to true Councels Can an ordinarie man then iudge of these things And if he cannot let him not be deceiued by pretence of them II. Touching the ancient Fathers this they must know that they are found to be of differing opinions and had contentions among themselues that they held not their owne iudgements infallible nor submitted to one another otherwise then men godly and learned doe now but onely as by good reason and authoritie they were ouercome that they haue erred and this is acknowledged by most learned men on both sides that our aduersaries of the greatest note do often shake off their authoritie when they are against them that of the Fathers writings some are doubted of some are corrupted and many counterfeites are put out vnder their names that the iudgement of all the Fathers cannot be had for all our controuersies These things being so how idle is it then for ordinarie men to be talking of Fathers of the opinion of all the Fathers or for any such men to be carried away with such a sound which is not possible for them to vnderstand seeing our aduersaries alleage them for their selues and we more truly for our selues III. Concerning the Churches custome and path in euerie age let them consider that this is very vncertaine Historians haue not alwaies in euery relation bin found faithfull that euerie Age hath not had in it such as haue truly written of the Church that a man may spend his whole life in seeking out the whole Churches course and yet not be able to find it out I suppose I erre not if I say that all men now liuing cannot do it exactly in euery Age. And therefore it s but a gulling flourish of our aduersaries to boast of the whole Church in euery Age and yet withall so boasting fraudulently to meane their owne particular Romane Church By alleaging then these arguments to wit Councels Fathers and the generall custome of the whole Church the conscience of an ordinarie Christian cannot bee throughly satisfied his knowledge cannot herein bee certaine to conuince his iudgement these are beyond his reach and capacitie Be aduised therefore not to be drawne with these reasons which are to thee so vncertaine but rest vpon the other which be plaine and easie within thy capacitie and certaine vnto thee by which thou mayst through Gods helpe maintaine that which thou professest and confute the aduersaries vntruths or at least gather thence such strength as they shall not easily draw thee to beleeue them as for instance in some particulars I wil shew thee They say that the Pope is the head of the Catholike Church There is no plaine Scripture for this We find Iesus Christ to be called the Head of the Church but no other It s no Article of our Creed therefore thou art not bound to beleeue it But I adde this that what we beleeue is inuisible Heb. 11.1 and not seene 2. Cor. 5.7 If therefore the Pope be the Head there must be a visible head of an inuisible body Againe the head immediately giues life motion and direction to its true body which the Pope cannot doe to Christs Church It s also vnreasonable to thinke two heads to bee for one body whether one besides another or one vnder another it is a monstrousity Common experience testifieth against the Popes inabilitie to performe the true office of the true Head to Gods Church They say that he cannot erre Let it be taken in the best sense they can conceiue it there is no plaine Scripture which giueth this to any one particular person It s no Article of our Creed to beleeue it experience hath found him to haue erred foully They say that after the words of consecration the bread is turned into the very body of Christ and the wine into his bloud so as Iesus Christ is there corporally as he was borne of the Virgin Marie vnder the accidents of bread and wine In holy Scripture there is no such thing taught there is a sacramentall phrase This is my Body and the like vsed in the Sacraments of the old Testament This is my Couenant Gen. 17.10 This is the Lords Passeouer Exo. 12.11 The Rocke was Christ 1. Cor. 10.4 but yet no turning one substance into another The Creed teacheth vs to belieue him to be in heauen and thence to expect his comming when hee shall appeare to iudge the quicke and the dead This transubstantiation therefore is no part of our Faith It s against reason for a true body and continued quantitie to be in two places yea in a thousand mouthes at once The Angels reason vnto Marie Mat. 28.6 confuteth this grosse opinion for he said to her when she with the other Marie came to seeke Christ He is not here for hee is risen that is He is not in this place because he is else-where in another If Christ could haue been in two places at once the Angels argument had been of no force remember that this is an Angell-reason which know wee how to reason truly This opinion is against our sences we see not feele not nor taste not flesh and blood Now God neuer deluded mans sences whensoeuer he turned one substance into another Moses staffe was made a Serpent dust was Lice the water blood and water was wine and all these sensible No Scripture nor any other approued testimony can be produced to shew vndoubtedly the contrarie Yea this is certaine that the true body of Christ is discernable by sense to be a true bodie wheresoeuer it is therefore when the Disciples doubted at his sudden appearing he said It is I my selfe And to proue this he willeth them to vse their senses saying Handle me and see that so they might discerne his true body flesh and bones and so might it be in the Sacrament if indeed and truth he were there corporally It hath been witnessed against by the blood or many Martyrs but where be so many in defence of our aduersaries grosse opinion Which of them haue euer hitherto or dare to suffer for this their opinion as ours haue done against it This opinion of our aduersaries is to be detested for first the falshood thereof secondly for the grosse idolatry committed through it euen a piece of bread adored for Almightie Iesus Christ himselfe Thirdly for the bloodie crueltie which for the vpholding of it hath been done with furious rage vpon the bodies of Gods Saints because they would not beleeue this false doctrine nor commit this abominable idolatrie Fourthly all such as thus beleeue sinne not only in the act damnably for Idolaters perish euerlastingly Reuel 21.8 but also irrepentantly because they be perswaded that in so beleeuing and worshipping they doe not onely not sin but doe a most excellent worke and meritorious seruice to God They teach that there is a Purgatorie a place of torment In holy Scriptures we find plainely Heauen Earth Hell Sea but no
plaine name of Purgatorie nor Limbus Patrum nor Limbus Infantium In the Decalogue we find Heauen Earth and Waters vnder the Earth and in the Lords Prayer Heauen and Earth in the Creed Heauen Earth and Hell but none of the other deuised and faigned places This Purgatory for satisfaction is against common equity for they say the sinne is pardoned by Christ and can then in equity the partie be punished A Creditor forgiues freely to a man all his debt can he then with equitie after lay him in Gaole to make any satisfaction for the same They say that Images may be set vp to be adored The Scriptures are plaine against them Deut. 4.15 19. Esay 40.18 Act. 17.20 Rom. 1.23 The second Commandement in the Decalogue forbids them which our aduersaries bid from the people in their vulgar Catechismes Our corrupt nature is apt to these things and therefore the lesse to be liked of They teach to pray vnto the Virgin Marie to Saints and Angels The Scriptures afford no precept for this nor any euident example prayers there are taught to be made vnto God Angels are not to be worshipped Col. 2.18 Reuel 19.10 22.9 The Lords Prayer the perfect rule of prayer teacheth vs to pray to God our Father in Heauen whensoeuer we pray now can wee say to the Virgin Marie to Saint or Angell Our Father which art in Heauen Can we pray to any of them and say Thy Name be hallowed thy Kingdome come thy will be done in Earth as it is in Heauen Can we pray any one of them to giue vs daily bread to forgiue vs our sinnes to deliuer vs from euill Can we ascribe to any one of them and say Thine is Kingdome power and glory for euer Yet this prayer warrants vs that to whom in Heauen we may pray to him may we say all this but if not to the Virgin Marie not to Saint nor Angell then may wee not pray to them by any warrant of this prayer Our Creed teacheth vs to beleeue in none but God the Father Sonne and holy Ghost Now the Scripture plainely telleth vs that wee cannot pray to any but in whom we beleeue Rom. 10.14 Therefore then not to the Virgin Marie nor to Saint nor Angell because we are not to beleeue in them They tell thee that thou must beleeue the Romane-Catholik Church and to be also a member thereof else thou canst not be saued The Scriptures tell vs plainely that God added to the Church such as should be saued Acts 2.47 but not a word there of the Romane Church In our Creed we are taught to beleeue the Catholike Church and that we be members of it but to bee of any Romane Catholike Church is no Article of our Creed Besides the speech is absurd and it is against reason to call a particular Church the generall or the generall a particular as the Church of Rome in the best estate of it neuer was other And can the obiect of faith be the obiect of sight as it is the obiect of faith Now we beleeue the Catholike Church but the Papists tell vs that their Church is euer visible to the eye This also which they say is against common charitie for must all out of the Church of Rome be without hope of saluation In the planting of the Gospell there was a Church at Ierusalem before any at Rome and many Churches planted by Saint Paul which neuer had dependance vpon the Church of Rome many Churches in the East and other parts of the World which are not within the Romane iurisdiction nor doe acknowledge it must needs all these be without saluation because the Romane Pope is not domineering ouer them Now God forbid They will tell thee that thou must be able to shew thy Church and the professors therof in euery age else thou art not of the true Church But the holy Scriptures neuer bound any to such a taske neither Christ nor his Apostles in all the new Testament euer charged any Christian Church much lesse any beleeuer with this It is an Article of thy Faith to beleeue that there is a Church of God here and there dispersed abroad in the world This is a man bound to beleeue but not that euery one or any other for him should be able to make a Catalogue of all that went before in the same profession in euery Age. One ignorant of this may yet be of the true Church neither shal the ignorance thereof damne him They will tell thee that there are some sinnes in Nature veniall in themselues not deseruing eternall death The Scripture teacheth otherwise Rom. 6.23 The wages of sinne is death no exception of any at all Yea the consent of sinne is worthy of death Rom. 1.23 In the Lords Prayer when we craue pardon of our trespasses without exception wee thereby acknowledge that euery kind of trespasse offendeth God standeth need of forgiuenesse and therefore what else would follow if he did not forgiue it but death This false distinction giueth libertie to our corrupt nature to sinne as experience tels euery of vs euen in our aduersaries wallowing licenciously in their supposed veniall sinnes It may seeme vnreasonable if there be sinnes veniall in their owne nature that such a horrible scorching fire as they make that in Purgatorie to bee should bee prepared to plague soules for the same The greatest torments in the world as they say are not comparable to the torments there How can it then be possibly imagined that veniall sinnes which as they say doe not breake friendship with God should be so terribly punished by way of satisfaction and yet God remaine to him who is so punished a sure friend They teach that a man hath power to doe Gods will and to auoide euill and not be ouercome thereof if he will The Scriptures tell vs that it is God that workes the will and the deed Phil. 2.13 and maketh all our sufficiencie to be of him 2. Cor. 3.5 In the Lords Prayer wee are taught to beg of God abilitie to doe his will and his grace to deliuer vs from euill vnder will is comprehended all good and vnder euill is contained whatsoeuer is sinfull so as it s not in vs to doe good nor to auoyde euill but both is Gods worke in vs. Euery man feeleth this inabilitie in himselfe by experience yea these also which doe maintaine this power in man if they would confesse it And why are they not all most holy if they haue this power Their damnation is more iust when they sinne in any measure then such as want this power though they fall by infirmitie into greater sinnes They teach that a man may fulfill the whole Law and so merit The Scripture teacheth otherwise Luke 17.10 Eccles 7.20 Prou. 20.9 Psal 130.3 Iob 9.20 1. Ioh. 1.8 Iam. 3.2 In the Lords Prayer we aske all of vs forgiuenesse In the Creed wee are taught not to dreame here of
yeeres after Christ in which space was there none that might be called a Papist or Roman Catholike after the definition of the Trentists And therefore were they not their Martyrs neither did any of them professe the now new Romane Trentisme And thus wee see how by these differences they cannot claime the Martyrs Now our differences from them are all grounded vpon Scriptures and principles of Christianity and warranted by such common truth of Christian Religion as they and we doe fully accord in not one of our differences being either heresie or any part of Iudaisme or Paganisme nor euer condemned by any generall Councell in the space of these first sixe hundreds of yeeres in which these three sorts of Martyrs did liue True it is that our aduersaries call vs Heretikes and lay heresies to our charge but falsely without iust proose as our learned Whitacres Bishop Morton and others shew in answering Bellarmine his calumnies herein to the full Seeing then our differences and truths of Christian Religion taught by the Apostles and by the succeeding Pastors and belieued by the Church are the parts of that Faith and Religion which these Martyrs suffered for I conclude that in regard both of the truthes wherein wee and our Aduersaries agree and also of our differences wherein we disagree from the now present Church of Rome they were our Martyrs and none of theirs IV. Sort of Martyrs are those who suffered by and amongst these our aduersaries as the Berengarians Waldenses Albigenses Wicklife and his followers in England Iohn Hus and Ierome of Prague at Constance and many moe in Bohemia and in other places euen to Luthers time and after an innumerable multitude slaine and massacred burnt and put to sundry deathes for our Religion and for gaine-saying our aduersaries in those differences which we now stand out in against the Church of Rome at this present These were therefore our Martyrs But our aduersaries will say that these were no Martyrs but condemned Heretikes That they were Martyrs no Heretikes its cleare S. Iohn in the Reuelation calleth those Saints and Martyrs of Iesus Reuel 17.6 which should suffer for the Word of God for refusing to worship the Beast and his Image and for not receiuing his marke in their fore-heads or in their hands Reuel 20.4 and for keeping the Commandements of God and the faith of Iesus and so dying in the Lord should rest from their labours and be accounted blessed Reuel 14.12 13. But such were these our Martyrs for they suffered for Gods Word for keeping the Commandements and Faith of Iesus and for refusing to worship the Beast and Whore of Rome drunke with the blood of the Saints And therefore were blessed Martyrs and no Heretikes But they will say These held diuers errours and were not in all things wholly with vs They suffered and were Martyrs for those selfe-same things which with vs they witnessed against the Church of Rome II. Many errours are ascribed vnto them which they neuer held as Doctor Vsher Bishop of Meeth learnedly shewes III. Though in some things they should haue differed from vs yet doth not that make them not to be of our Religion For if for lighter differences in opinions men should be held not to be of the same Religion if so our aduersaries will conclude then are the now Romanists not of one and the same Religion which is now professed at Rome for one of them differs much from another in many things Neither haue they any right to the ancient Fathers betweene whom and these our aduersaries is also great difference and that in many things These Martyrs therefore though they might differ from vs in some things the Light then not shining so clearely as now it doth were our Martyrs Thus wee see all the Martyrs from the beginning to be ours and so haue our Aduersaries none at all which may be properly called theirs for the first 600. yeeres For if they claime the first three sorts it s but as they doe agree with vs for in their differences from vs the Martyrs are none of theirs The fourth sort are clearely our owne and are Martyrs in defence of our differences from them But for their differences they haue no Mrrtyrs of Iesus for such Martyrs as be his Martyrs suffer for his sake for Gods Word for his Faith and Commandements but their differences are not Gods Word nor the Faith nor Commandements of Iesus neither suffered Papists here for Religion but for treason rebellion disloyall acts for denying due obedience to lawfull authority and for standing in defence of forraine power and the authority of the Whore of Babylon the murtherer of Saints and of that Antichrist the Pope as hee is prooued sufficiently so to bee And therefore I conclude our Religion to be before Luthers time III. Argument From the Writings of the ancient Fathers THat Religion which is to be found in the writings of the ancient Fathers as professed and taught by them in the first 600. yeeres after Christ that was before Luthers time But this our present Religion in the poynts of doctrine wherin we differ from our Aduersaries is to be found in the writings of the ancient Fathers as professed and taught by them in the first 600. yeeres after Christ Therefore was this our present Religion in the poynts of doctrine wherein wee differ from our Aduersaries before Luthers time The Minor I thus prooue All the differing Religions of greatest note which were euer since Christs ascension are one of these Iudaisme Gentilisme or Paganisme Arianisme vnder which I comprehend all heresies Mahometisme or Turcisme the present Religion of the Church of Rome which may be called Trentisme or Iesuitisme commonly called Papistrie and this our Religion termed The reformed Religion or Protestancy which wee professe and teach with an vnanime consent in the Harmonie of Confessions otherwise then the Church of Rome now doth But those ancient Fathers taught not Iudaisme nor Paganisme nor Arianisme or other heresies which in those dayes rose vp nor Mahometisme Ergo either the Religion of the now Church of Rome or ours with either of our differences one from another But not so this of theirs For those differences on their part whereby a man becommeth a Romane Catholike or Papist the ancient Fathers with one consent neuer taught The differences are mentioned before for all which if they can produce the vnanime Consent of those Fathers in 600. yeeres space we yeeld them the Fathers but if not then are they ours as they that taught and professed our Religion For they not onely taught all the maine poynts of faith which we and our aduersaries doe agree in but also all the principall differences with vs wherein we and our aduersaries doe differ as Polanus hath largely prooued to whose learned paines I referre the Reader Therefore this our present Religion was before Luthers time IV. Argument From the witnesse of our very
To hold seuen Sacraments that Baptisme is to bee administred with hallowed Water with Chrysme Salt Spittle Coniuring and other deuices IV. To beleeue that the Priest may receiue the Sacrament alone and yet many other Christians to be there present looking on that the Bread without the Cup is to bee giuen to the people that after the words of consecration the Bread is turned into the very naturall body of Christ the accidents of Bread and Wine onely remaining but not the substance that it is to be adored and prayed vnto and to be carried about in Procession that it is to bee administred with such varietie of garments alterations of gestures and change of voyce that it is a propitiatorie sacrifice for the quicke and the dead V. To make prayer to administer the Sacraments and to say all diuine Seruice in an vnknowne Tongue to say the Creed amongst Prayers the Aue Marie as a prayer with the Pater noster vpon Beades with Crosses and that to a certaine number repeating the Aue Marie fortie times and the Pater noster foure times with a Creed at the end that many thus praying though they vnderstand not the words which they vtter yet hauing a good intent they do a work pleasing to God VI. To hold the Church of Rome to bee the Mother Church the onely One Holy Catholike and Apostolike Church that it could not erre and that all which should not beleeue euer as it beleeueth should not bee held for sound Christians and such as should not submit to her authoritie to be held Heretikes VII To hold the Pope of Rome to bee Christs Vicar and Peters successor that all should depend vpon him as vpon their Head that he as Pope cannot erre è Cathedrâ that to him as of right belongeth the spirituall and temporall iurisdiction and so hath authoritie to make Lawes to bind conscience to depose Kings and to dispose of their Kingdomes that he and his Clergy are exempt from the authoritie of Secular power VIII To hold seuen degrees of Priesthood that there are sacrifizing Priests in the time of the Gospell that all the Clergie are to liue a single life IX To set vp high and worldly dignities in the Church as Kingly Cardinals Prince-like vnpreaching Prelates and Pastors ouer Congregations not able to teach them to allow infinite Orders of Monkes Friers and Nunnes X. To beleeue that there is a Limbus Patrum a Limbus Infantium and a place called Purgatorie In their Catalogue they are to bring Christ his Apostles and all the rest therein named for teachers and professours of these things and the like else are they not to be reputed of this their present Religion Vrge them friendly Reader vnto the proofe of these particular differences till then keepe thy right standing and be not mooued with a shew of names In the meane space that thou mayest be well assured that thou art a true member of the Catholike Church of Christ though no Romane Catholike haue recourse vnto thy baptisme and the Couenant which God made with thee and thou with him therein Aske them when any of them goeth about to seduce thee whether they thinke that thou hast receiued true baptisme If they say Yea as they cannot answere truly otherwise though wee were baptized of very condemned Heretikes as the Trent Councel decreeth then demand of them againe Whether true baptisme doth admit the baptized into the true Church of God or no If it doe know of them that then being thereby receiued into the true Church why thou and wee so baptized should not still be of it in their account Will them to shew what we teach and beleeue differing from them that hath disannulled our Couenant with God and how we come to bee out of the Church The Romane Catechisme which with them is of great authority telleth vs that men are out of the Church as Infidels which neuer were in it as Heretikes Schismatiks and Excommunicated persons once of it whereto may be added such as be Apostates wholly renouncing Christ Taking this for granted that these be all and then that we be none of these it must needs follow that we are through Baptisme yet in the true Church I hope our aduersaries will not say that wee be either of the first or last sort let them cleare vs of that and wee will well enough acquit our selues of the rest I. We are not though they so call vs commonly Heretikes If they please let the Catholike Moderator pleade for vs or let them beleeue their owne moderate Answerer to whom my L. of Couentry and Lichfield maketh reply who saith that he supposeth that no one particular learned Catholike in this Kingdome doth or will defend this opinion That Protestants are Heretikes and excommunicate If these on their side will not be sufficient to cleare vs let vs learne from them what an Heretike is and so cleare our selues thereby An Heretike saith the Romane Catechisme is he which neglecting the Churches authority doth maintaine impious opinions obstinately By this wee cannot be proued to bee Heretikes this cannot agree to vs. For first we may demand What impious opinions either affirmatiue or negatiue doe we hold which they can iustly task vs of Let them instance what pleaseth them and then prooue the same to be heresie first by plaine and pregnant places of holy Scripture which may conuince the conscience of indifferēt men Secondly by general Councels or by any one generall Councell within 600. yeres after Christ in which space were most famous renowned Councels that hath condemned any maine doctrine of our Faith for heresie Thirdly by the vnanimous consent and generall voyce of the Greeke and Latine Fathers for that space condemning the same for heresie and for an impious opinion Let them if they be able shew first in our faith that wee hold any thing against any Article of our Creed which is the summe of our beliefe Secondly in our prayers any thing against the patterne of all true prayers commonly called The Lords Prayer Thirdly in our deeds which we teach to be done or bid to be left vndone any thing against any of the Commandements in the Decalogue the rule of our obedience If they can thus fairely and euidently proceede they should doe well so to conuince vs. Secondly if any impious opinions could be found among vs it must be considered whether they be broched by priuate persons or tenents held of the Church in her publike Records If the former then are they not the Churches if the Church should hold any such how can they proue that she maintaineth them obstinately For obstinacy is not to be imputed vnto vs till all lawfull good and sufficient meanes haue been vsed to conuince our iudgement and the same also by such as haue lawfull and full authority to iudge and determine thereof But hitherto this hath not been done neither can it be but by a
lawfull and free generall Councell which the Conuenticle of Trent was not till then we are not to be condemned of obstinacy and so as yet no Heretikes Thirdly we neither haue neglected nor yet doe neglect the true Catholike Churches authority into which wee are receiued by Baptisme For we very willingly desire to heare her sentence but where can that bee except in a generall Councels determination therein to heare the Catholike Church speaking to vs from the Scriptures we greatly long for we readily submit vnto Let her thus speak that we may know her Iudgement and we will hearken thereunto As for the Church of Romes authoritie we doe not acknowledge it ouer vs because it is not nor euer was in her best estate the Catholike Church but onely a particular Church which now also is a party questioned And therfore her authoritie for her selfe against vs is no more of vs to be regarded then by them our Churches authority for her selfe against them Seeing then that by their definition wee are not conuinced of heresie wee are not out of the Church as Heretikes II. Not as Schismatikes For albeit we haue no departed from this Romish Church yet are we no Schismatikes First for that we keepe communion with the Catholike Church into which we by Baptisme were admitted which is the body of Christ and wee truly members thereof in faith and loue through the worke of Gods Spirit being built vpon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets Iesus Christ himselfe being the Corner-stone Secondly because this Church of Rome hath falne from the faith and obedience commended by S. Paul to be in the Church at Rome in his time as appeareth in many particulars before named which the Church first planted at Rome neuer taught neuer beleeued nor practised Therefore are we no Schismatikes for leauing her in those things wherein she hath left the true and Apostolike Church at the beginning Thirdly for that wee doe not breake off from her simply but in some respect that is as farre foorth as she hath forsaken her former selfe so that if shee would returne to the Catholike Faith and Religion and forsake her Trentisme Iesuitisme and Popery the inuentions of her owne added to that which first she did professe wee want not charitie towards her to vnite our selues vnto her againe For otherwise neither our true loue to God nor true loue to his Church will suffer vs to liue with her so defiled as she is in the spirituall bond of sacred loue which knits the true members of Christ one to another Heauenly charity which maketh this vnitie admitteth not of such things into the vnitie of faith as bee taught and practised in that Church both sinfull against God and pernicious to mens soules yea vtter destruction to them without hearty repentance Fourthly wee haue a warrant yea a commandement from God to separate our selues from her for that she is become the great Whore and spirituall Babylon Reuel 18.4 This charge of God freeth vs from Schisme for there is no sin no Schisme in that which God commandeth to be done Fifthly we by leauing this Romish Church doe not deuide our selues from the true Catholike and Apostolike Church but by this separation doe we indeed returne to the vnitie of it and to our first blessed estate therein when first the Gospell was here planted in this Iland by Apostles or Apostolicall men which came hither not from Rome but from Ierusalem our Mother Church where the Lord and his blessed Apostles first began to teach and erect a Church which is the Church we returne vnto in doctrine and worship of God from which Holy Catholike and Apostolike Church wee were drawne by the vsurping and tyrannical power and iurisdiction of the Pope and his faction and the generall backsliding of this his Church So as this which they call Schisme is no Schisme in vs but a forsaking of schisme in them and is only a returning vnto and a recouerie of our selues againe to our former vnion with Christs true Church beginning at Ierusalem and planted here many hundred yeeres before the Monke Austin euer came into England Sixthly They are properly called Schismatikes saith Aquinas which of their owne accord and will separate themselues from the vnitie of the Church If this be true in the iudgement of this their owne so greatly honoured Doctor then certainely wee are no Schismatikes First of our owne accord and will we make not a separation but are inforced therto by the power of Gods commandement to come out of this Babylon to auoyde her sinnes to escape thereby her punishments She her selfe hath caused deuision and offences contrary to the doctrine which shee once receiued as the Epistles of S. Paul and S. Peter do in many particulars witnesse against her The Apostle S. Paul therefore wils vs to auoyde her and such as cause deuision and offences contrary to the Apostles doctrine Rom. 16.17 It may seeme from hence that a faction begun euen then among you Secondly we doe not separate from the Church that is from the vniuersall Catholike Church but from a Church that is the particular Church of Rome for Thomas doth not say He is a Schismatike which separateth from a Church but from the vnitie of the Church to wit the Church vniuersall which is but one For indeed no reason can bee giuen why any should deuide themselues from the true Catholike Church but good reasons may be giuen why a particular Church may be and ought to bee forsaken as wee doe giue for our departing from the Church of Rome for we are commanded to forsake Idolaters 1. Cor. 5.11 Heretikes Tit. 3.10 such as bring not the doctrine of Christ and doe not abide therein 2. Ioh. 10. and her that is called Babylon Reuel 18.4 Thirdly before we can be Schismatikes we must forsake the vnitie of the Church Now wherein stands this vnitie Standeth it only in affection of loue or also in the faith of the truth For both these graces the Apostle commendeth the Churches Ephes 1.15 2. Thes 1.3 and faith is preferred to the first place in both Scriptures We haue not forsaken the vnitie of the Faith of which S. Paul speakes Eph 4.13 For we teach the doctrine of the Apostles and no other in any thing when we differ from this present Church of Rome which hath lost her first faith of truth in many things Now can true diuine loue be there kept where faith is lost or can there be charitie to vnite where doctrine doth deuide Can light and darkenesse truth and falsehood cohabite in loue Truth and loue onely dwell together and for truths sake loue separateth from falshood wheresoeuer she finds it And therefore except they can proue that we haue lost the vnitie of faith wee haue not forsaken the vnitie of the Church in loue as the former reasons shew To conclude were the Priests and Leuites Schismatikes which left
the people of Israel once the people of God in Dauids and Salomons dayes and many hundred yeeres before when Idolatrie vnder pretence to worship no false but the true God was set vp and they not suffered then to do their office vnto the Lord as their office required If they were not no more are we For why doe we forsake the Romish Church Is it not because she hath set vp a new manner of seruice vnto God new kinds of Priests new Holy-dayes new Sacraments new Orders and will not permit the Lords Seruants and Ministers to do their Offices vnto the Lord as he hath by his written Word prescribed Therefore seeing we are not guiltie of Schisme we are not as Schismatikes out of the Church into which by Baptisme wee are receiued III. Not as excommunicate persons For if we be neither Heretikes nor Schismatikes vpon what other ground will they iudge vs to be proceeded against There are other causes for which men are excommunicate but in this question our aduersaries cannot pleade any such Againe I aske if wee bee excommunicate who hath pronounced the sentence Is it the Romish Church By what authoritie Their Church is not the Catholike Church but only a particular as ours is and it is by vs questioned and therefore in reason it cannot bee both a Partie accused and also a Iudge against vs in her owne cause Thirdly we doe appeale from her vnrighteous iudgement to a lawfull generall Councell where vpon earth our cause is onely to bee heard and decided lawfully Till which time wee for any censure of this Church of Rome doe remaine in the true Church into which by Baptisme wee are admitted out of which as yet we are not lawfully iudged to bee by any lawfull and supreme authoritie as either Heretikes Schismatikes or as excommunicate persons Therefore Christian-harted Reader thou that art a member of the Church of England though thou beest no Romanist assure thy soule that thou art of that Church which is vndoubtedly a member of the True Ancient Catholike and Apostolike Church in which abiding thou maist through the merits of thy blessed Sauiour obtaine eternall life if thou so beleeuing doest demeane thy selfe as it becommeth a good Christian and a Protestant in earnest And for thine owne more certaine assurance and stable abiding let me aduise thee to a few things Haue a care to keepe thy Couenant in thy Baptisme that thou mayst be better perswaded that God keepes his with thee and so to be one of his in the true Church Labour to feare God for it is the beginning of wisdome and the secrets of the Lord are with such as feare him and he will shew them his couenant Psal 25.14 Haue euer a loue of the truth and God will not giue thee ouer to beleeue lyes for this is a iudgement befalling such as loue not the truth beleeue it not but take pleasure in vnrighteousnesse Be a doer of the Word and thou shalt know the doctrine whether it bee of God or no. Beware of affected ignorance and carelesse neglect of knowledge but vse the meanes appointed to attaine vnto it Exercise thy selfe much in prayer beg of God wisdome and hee will giue it thee his Spirit and he will vouchsafe it thee pray against sedition and God will keepe thee frequent the company of such as haue knowledge the feare of God before them the loue of the truth in them and make conscience of their wayes Aske aduice of faithfull Teachers listen not to false Teachers feare to be seduced And further that thou mayst both defend the truth and also be able according to thy measure receiued to resist the aduersaries I. Learne carefully the truthes of God necessarie to saluation set downe in holy Scriptures Such truths are very manifestly and plainely deliuered either in expresse termes or by an vndoubted consequent drawne from thence and all such necessarie points as concerne all are written in the Scriptures as their Bellarmine confesseth With these Scriptures acquaint thy selfe and being an ordinarie Christian doe not trouble thy selfe about obscure places for plaine and easie places will bee sufficient to confirme thy faith in any thing necessarie for thee to beleeue and practize in the way of saluation II. Be well grounded in the Catechisme the parts whereof are the Creed the Lords Prayer the Decalogue and the doctrine of the Sacraments for these are the compendium or short summe of all Christianitie These well vnderstood will furnish thee with reasons to withstand seducers There is not any thing of which they shall speake but the same may be brought to some head in Catechisme as either concerning Faith and so referred to the Creed or concerning Prayer and so referred to the Lords Prayer or concerning obedience and so referred to the Decalogue or ten Commandements or else touching the Sacraments the Seales of our Faith III. Adde to these certaine considerations by which thou mayest defend the truth and ouerthrow falshood as the common law of Nature common reason right vse of senses common experience common equitie common charitie common honestie the witnesse of knowne Martyrs whereto adde the corruption of our nature allowing or disliking of any thing By the plaine euidence of Scripture by the Catechisme and by these considerations mayst thou trie all things which be necessarie for thee to stand vpon If a seducer come to thee and that he will needs deale with thee obserue two things first not to regard what he saith if it be not about necessarie points Secondly see that his confirmation or confutation bee onely by either some or all these three aforenamed to wit plaine Scriptures the parts of the Catechisme and those considerations from whence if hee cannot proue his assertions beleeue him not If he begin to tell thee of Councels ancient Fathers and the Churches custome in all Ages answere him first that the three former are knowne to thee the Bible common at hand the Catechisme in thy remembrance and the consideration of such as are without difficultie but as for these three last great reading and learning and knowledge in Historie are required to vnderstand them well and to cite them truly They are for the best learned of the world and not for any of the common sort ordinarie men cannot iudge aright by them neither will any such presume to thinke such abilitie to be in them if they would take notice of diuers things concerning Councels Fathers and the Churches custome I. Touching Councels they must know that they are not only subiect to errour but also haue erred that they haue contradicted one another that some of them haue been carried by a strong faction that ancient Fathers would not rest euer vpon the sole authoritie of Councels that Papists themselues though they pretend them yet doe not wholly resigne their iudgement vnto them that there are some counterfeite and forged Councels and counterfeite Canons added