Selected quad for the lemma: church_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
church_n	authority_n	bishop_n	episcopal_a	2,779	5	10.6212	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A67914	The decisions of the Lords of council & session in the most important cases debate before them with the acts of sederunt as also, an alphabetical compend of the decisions : with an index of the acts of sederunt, and the pursuers and defenders names, from June 1661 to July 1681 / Sir James Dalrymple ...	Scotland. Court of Session.; Stair, James Dalrymple, Viscount of, 1619-1695.	1683 (1683)	Wing S5175; ESTC R1208	952,036	833

the_o say_v judith_n leave_v in_o legacy_n 1200._o dollar_n due_a by_o the_o estate_n of_o bremen_n which_o be_v a_o part_n of_o she_o inventar_n to_o her_o husband_n and_o her_o three_o child_n of_o the_o first_o marriage_n there_o be_v no_o child_n of_o the_o second_o marriage_n whereupon_o john_n charles_n and_o judith_n greigs_n pursue_v the_o husband_n for_o the_o legacy_n as_o have_v uplift_v this_o sum_n from_o the_o estate_n of_o bremen_n the_o defender_n allege_v first_o that_o the_o clause_n in_o the_o contract_n of_o marriage_n take_v away_o the_o communion_n of_o good_n and_o make_v even_o the_o movable_a estate_n of_o either_o party_n to_o return_v be_v against_o the_o law_n of_o scotland_n inconsistent_a and_o ineffectual_a for_o any_o reservation_n or_o provision_n in_o favour_n of_o the_o wife_n do_v ipso_fw-la facto_fw-la return_n to_o the_o husband_n jure_fw-la mariti_fw-la which_o jus_o mariti_fw-la neither_o be_v nor_o can_v be_v discharge_v two_o albeit_o the_o first_o contract_n of_o marriage_n be_v consistent_a yet_o the_o sum_n in_o question_n be_v provide_v to_o one_o of_o the_o daughter_n of_o the_o first_o marriage_n by_o her_o contract_n upon_o condition_n to_o return_v to_o the_o wife_n if_o the_o marriage_n dissolve_v the_o marriage_n dissolve_v it_o come_v back_o to_o the_o wife_n tanquam_fw-la novum_fw-la jus_o ex_fw-la pacto_fw-la acquisitum_fw-la and_o so_o it_o fall_v under_o the_o husband_n jus_o mariti_fw-la as_o well_o as_o any_o sum_n acquire_v will_v three_o the_o husband_n uplift_v this_o sum_n by_o commission_n from_o his_o wife_n and_o so_o it_o must_v be_v presume_v to_o have_v be_v spend_v in_o oneribus_fw-la matrimonij_fw-la at_o least_o the_o husband_n must_v have_v retention_n of_o his_o expense_n in_o recovery_n thereof_o the_o pursuer_n answer_v that_o albeit_o provision_n in_o contract_n of_o marriage_n state_v right_n in_o the_o wife_n person_n to_o be_v enjoy_v by_o she_o during_o the_o marriage_n have_v not_o be_v sustain_v in_o some_o case_n yet_o this_o be_v a_o provision_n of_o a_o return_n after_o the_o dissolution_n of_o the_o marriage_n it_o be_v most_o consistent_a especial_o in_o this_o case_n where_o the_o estate_n contract_v be_v abroad_o and_o the_o contract_n itself_o make_v abroad_o where_o by_o the_o civil_a law_n current_n there_o the_o mean_n of_o either_o party_n do_v return_v hinc_fw-la inde_fw-la and_o the_o profit_n thereof_o be_v only_a common●_n stante_fw-la matrimonio_fw-la neither_o be_v the_o case_n alter_v by_o the_o daughter_n contract_n for_o both_o by_o the_o law_n and_o that_o paction_n the_o tocher_n return_v to_o the_o mother_n who_o give_v it_o in_o the_o same_o case_n it_o be_v it_o be_v she_o by_o her_o first_o right_o the_o second_o right_o by_o the_o marriage_n become_v void_a both_o by_o law_n and_o provision_n neither_o do_v it_o import_v that_o the_o husband_n lift_v the_o sum_n for_o by_o the_o contract_n he_o be_v oblige_v to_o repay_v it_o and_o can_v only_o employ_v the_o profit_n of_o it_o in_o oneribus_fw-la matrimonij_fw-la the_o lord_n repel_v all_o these_o defence_n but_o allow_v expense_n to_o the_o husband_n lay_v out_o by_o he_o in_o recovery_n of_o the_o sum._n lindsay_n and_o swintoun_n her_o spouse_n contra_fw-la inglish_n supplicant_n july_n 5._o 1670._o 〈…〉_z pursue_v his_o debtor_n and_o crave_v he_o to_o be_v hold_v as_o confess_v who_o not_o compear_v the_o clerk_n be_v not_o clear_a to_o give_v out_o a_o decreet_a because_o the_o messenger_n execution_n do_v not_o bear_v that_o the_o defender_n be_v personal_o apprehend_v but_o that_o the_o messeger_n come_v to_o his_o house_n and_o know_v he_o be_v within_o and_o be_v forcible_o keep_v out_o by_o his_o wife_n and_o thereupon_o protest_v that_o the_o defender_n may_v be_v hold_v as_o personal_o apprehend_v upon_o the_o clerk_n stop_v the_o pursuer_fw-mi give_v in_o a_o supplication_n desire_v that_o he_o may_v either_o have_v out_o his_o decreet_a hold_v the_o defender_n as_o confess_v upon_o this_o execution_n or_o that_o he_o may_v have_v a_o warrant_n to_o cite_v the_o defender_n at_o the_o mercat_n cross_n of_o the_o shire_n or_o burgh_n where_o he_o dwell_v as_o be_v difficilis_fw-la conventionis_fw-la some_o be_v of_o opinion_n that_o he_o shall_v be_v hold_v as_o confess_v the_o messenger_n prove_v that_o he_o be_v within_o or_o if_o the_o execution_n have_v bear_v that_o he_o and_o the_o witness_n also_o have_v give_v a_o particular_a evidence_n of_o their_o knowledge_n of_o his_o be_v within_o other_o think_v that_o he_o shall_v be_v hold_v as_o confess_v unless_o the_o defender_n can_v instruct_v he_o be_v alibi_fw-la in_o regard_n of_o the_o contumacy_n but_o the_o most_o resolve_v that_o hold_v as_o confess_v be_v a_o solemn_a and_o important_a certification_n peculiar_a to_o scotland_n that_o this_o assertion_n of_o the_o messenger_n and_o his_o execution_n shall_v not_o be_v sufficient_a nor_o shall_v put_v the_o defender_n to_o allege_v alibi_fw-la but_o that_o he_o shall_v have_v a_o warrant_n to_o cite_v at_o the_o mercat_n cross_n with_o certification_n to_o be_v hold_v as_o confess_v archbishop_n and_o presbitry_n of_o st._n andrews_n contra_fw-la george_n pittillo_n july_n 6._o 1670._o george_n pittillo_n be_v call_v before_o the_o prisbitry_n of_o st._n andrews_n for_o scandalous_a conversation_n with_o agnes_n mitchel_n two_o minister_n of_o the_o presbitry_n be_v appoint_v to_o speak_v with_o he_o to_o who_o he_o propon_v he_o be_v marry_v to_o the_o say_v agnes_n mitchel_n and_o produce_v a_o testificat_fw-la of_o some_o person_n bear_v that_o they_o be_v witness_n to_o the_o marriage_n but_o neither_o design_v themselves_o nor_o the_o minister_n which_o be_v report_v to_o the_o presbitry_n they_o reject_v the_o testimonial_a unless_o the_o minister_n and_o witness_n be_v design_v and_o if_o they_o be_v design_v ordain_v the_o party_n to_o make_v satisfaction_n for_o private_a marry_v without_o warrant_n and_o the_o say_v george_n not_o compear_v before_o the_o presbitry_n so_o to_o do_v they_o for_o his_o contumacy_n appoint_v the_o process_n to_o be_v see_v by_o the_o archbishop_n who_o ordain_v the_o party_n to_o be_v excommunicate_a and_o according_o he_o be_v excommunicate_a and_o now_o the_o archbishop_n and_o presbitry_n cause_v present_v a_o common_a bill_n for_o horning_n against_o the_o excommunicate_a person_n for_o charge_v he_o to_o answer_v submit_v and_o obey_v the_o censure_n of_o the_o kirk_n this_o be_v bring_v by_o the_o ordinar_n to_o the_o lord_n to_o know_v whether_o they_o will_v pass_v the_o horning_n in_o course_n or_o if_o they_o will_v consider_v whether_o the_o sentence_n of_o excommunication_n be_v orderly_o proceed_v the_o lord_n ordain_v two_o of_o their_o number_n to_o consider_v the_o process_n of_o excommunication_n and_o to_o hear_v any_o that_o do_v compear_v for_o the_o party_n excommunicate_a to_o debate_n whether_o horning_n shall_v be_v direct_a thereon_o before_o who_o compearance_n be_v make_v for_o the_o say_v george_n pittillo_n who_o allege_v that_o horning_n ought_v not_o to_o be_v direct_a because_o the_o sentence_n be_v disorderly_a and_o unjust_a and_o because_o there_o be_v a_o appeal_n to_o the_o council_n yet_o undiscu_v and_o found_v upon_o the_o late_a act_n of_o supremacy_n allege_v that_o the_o king_n and_o his_o council_n be_v supreme_a in_o all_o cause_n ecclesiastic_a so_o that_o appeal_n may_v be_v lawful_o make_v from_o any_o churchman_n or_o church_n judicature_n to_o the_o king_n and_o his_o council_n and_o further_o allege_v that_o he_o be_v unclear_a to_o acknowledge_v the_o bishop_n or_o his_o presbitry_n and_o the_o king_n have_v now_o grant_v a_o indulgence_n to_o many_o that_o do_v not_o acknowledge_v episcopal_a authority_n it_o can_v not_o be_v contumacy_n in_o he_o not_o to_o appear_v but_o he_o be_v content_a that_o it_o shall_v be_v now_o cognosce_v whether_o he_o be_v in_o the_o fault_n and_o if_o he_o be_v find_v guilty_a he_o shall_v submit_v and_o make_v satisfaction_n which_o be_v report_a to_o the_o lord_n and_o there_o be_v several_a other_o nullity_n in_o the_o process_n of_o excommunication_n which_o behove_v to_o be_v clear_v by_o the_o warrant_n of_o the_o process_n and_o have_v hear_v these_o of_o their_o number_n that_o be_v upon_o the_o council_n declare_v that_o upon_o the_o appeal_n the_o council_n remit_v the_o matter_n to_o the_o archbishop_n the_o lord_n ordain_v letter_n of_o horning_n unless_o pittillo_n will_v present_o offer_v satisfaction_n in_o which_o case_n they_o will_v give_v he_o a_o time_n and_o supercee_v the_o out-giving_a of_o the_o letter_n lady_n lucy_n hamiltoun_n contra_fw-la boid_n of_o pitcon_n and_o other_o july_n 8._o 1670._o the_o earl_n of_o abercorn_n have_v sell_v the_o land_n of_o mountcastle_n to_o george_n hay_n he_o give_v the_o earl_n a_o bond_n of_o 4000_o mark_n bear_v borrow_a money_n but_o be_v a_o part_n