we confesse we were filled with wonderment at that Divine hand that had thus led the judgements without the least mutuall interchange or intimation of thoughts or notions in these particulars of our Brethren there and our selves unworthy to be mentioned with them here Onely we crave leave of the reverend Author and those Brethren that had the view of it to declare that we assent not to all expressions scattered up and down or all every Assertion interwoven in it yea nor to all the grounds or allegations of Scriptures nor should wee in all things perhaps have used the same terms to expresse the same materials by For instance wee humbly conceive Prophecying as the Scripture tearmes it or speaking to the edification of the whole Church may sometimes be performed by Brethren gifted though not in Office as Elders of the Church onely 1 Occasionally not in an ordinary course 2. By men of such abilities as are fit for Office And 3. not assuming this of themselves but judged such by those that have the power and so allowed and designed to it And 4. so as their Doctrine be subjected for the judging of it in an especiall manner to the Teaching Elders of that Church And when it is thus cautioned wee see no more incongruity for such to speake to a point of Divinity in a Congregation then for men of like abilities to speake to and debate of matters of religion in an Assembly of Divines which this reverend Author allows and here with us is practised Againe in all humility we yet see not that Assembly of Apostles Elders and Brethren Acts 15. to have beene a formall Synod of Messengers sent out of a set and combined association from neighbour Churches but an Assembly of the Church of Jerusalem and of the Messengers from the Church of Antioch alone that were farre remote each from other and electively now met Nor are we for the present convinced that the Apostles to the end to make this a Precedent of such a formal Synod did act therein as Ordinary Elders and not out of Apostolicall guidance assistance But we rather conceive if we would simply consider the mutual aspects which these two Churches and their Elders stood in this conjunction abstracting from them that influence and impression which that superior Sphere the Apostles who were then present had in this transaction this to have been a Consultation as the learned Author doth also acknowledge it to have beene in its first originall onely rising up to be a Generall Councell by the Apostles presence they being Elders of all the Churches or if you will a reference by way of Arbitration for deciding of that great controversie risen amongst them at Antioch which they found to bee too difficult for themselves and so to be a warrant indeede for all such waies of communion between all or any especially neighbour Churches and upon like occasions to bee Ordinances furnished with ministeriall power for such ends and purposes Our reasons for this wee are now many waies bound up from giving the accompt of in this way and at this season But however if it should have beene so intended as the learned Author judgeth and the Apostles to have acted therein as ordinary Elders yet the lines of that proportion of power that could bee drawne from that patterne would extend no further then a Ministeriall Doctrinall power c. in such Assemblies which we willingly grant And it may bee observed with what a wary eye and exact ayme hee takes the latitude and elevation of that power there held forth not daring to attribute the least either for kind or degree then what that example warrants which was at utmost but a Doctrinall decernement both of the truth of that controversie they were consulted in as also the matter of fact in those that had taught the contrary as belyers of them and subverters of the faith without so much as brandishing the sword and power of Excommunication against those high and grosse delinquents or others that should not obey them by that Epistle Onely in the last place for the further clearing the difference of the peoples intrest which the reverend Author usually calleth Liberty sometimes Power the Elders rule and authority which makes that first distribution of Church power in particular Congregations as likewise for the illustration of that other allotment of Ministerial doctrinal power in an association or communion of Churches as severed from the power of Excommunication which is the second We take the boldnes to cast a weake beame of our dimne light upon either of these to present how these have layne stated in our thoughts to this end that wee may haply prevent some readers mistake especially about the former For the first we conceive the Elders and Brethren in each Congregation as they are usually in the New Testament thus mentioned distinctly apart and this when their meeting together is spoken of so they make in each congregation two distinct intrests though meeting in one Assembly as the intrest of the Common-Councell or body of the people in some Corporations is distinct from that of the company of Aldermen so as without the consent and concurrence of both nothing is esteemed as a Church act But so as in this company of Elders this power is properly Authority but in the people is a priviledge or power An apparent difference betweene these two is evident to us by this That two or three or more select persons should be put into an Office and betrusted with an intire intrest of power for a multitude to which that multitude ought by a command from Christ to bee subject and obedient as to an ordinance to guide them in their consent and in whose sentence the ultimate formall Ministeriall act of binding or loosing should consist this power must needs bee esteemed and a knowledged in these few to have the proper notion and character of Authority in comparison of that power which must yet concurre with theirs that is in a whole body or multitude of men who have a greater and neerer interest and concernement in those affaires over which these few are set as Rulers This difference of power doth easily appeare in comparing the severall interest of Father and child in his disposement of her in marriage and her concurrence with him therein although we intend not the paralell between the things themselves A virgin daughter hath a power truly and properly so called yea and a power ultimately to dissent upon an unsatisfied dislike yea and it must be an act of her consent that maketh the marriage valid But yet for her Parents to have a power to guide her in her choyce which she ought in duty to obey and a power which must also concurre to bestowe her or the marriage is invalid this comparing her intrest wherein she is more neerly and intimately concerned with theirs doth arise to the notion of an extrinsecall authority whereas that power is in
Church discerns the same and hath no just exception against it but condescendeth thereto it is a further act of the Elders power to give sentence against the offender Both these acts of power in the Ministers of the Gospel are foretold by Ezekiel Chap. 44.23 24. They shall teach my people the difference between holy and prophane and cause them to discerne between the uncleane and the cleane And in controversie they shall stand in judgement and they shall judge it according to my judgement c. 8. The Elders have power to dismisse the Church with a blessing in the name of the Lord Num. 6.23 to 26. Heb. 7.7 9. The Elders have received power to charge any of the people in private that none of them live either inordinately without a calling or idlely in their calling or scandalously in any sort 2 Thes 3.6 ver 8 10 11 12. The Apostles command argueth a power in the Elders to charge these duties upon the people effectually 10. What power belongeth to the Elders in a Synod is more fitly to be spoken to in the Chapter of Synods 11. In case the Church should fall away to blasphemy against Christ and obstinate rejection and persecution of the way of grace and either no Synod to be hoped for or no helpe by a Synod the Elders have power to withdraw or separate the Disciples from them and to carry away the Ordinances with them and therewithall sadly to denounce the just judgement of God against them Act. 19.9 Exod. 33.7 Mark 6.11 Luk. 10 11. Act. 13.46 Obj. But if Elders have all this power to exercise all these acts of Rule partly over the private members partly over the whole Church how are they then called the servants of the Church 2 Cor. 4.5 Answ The Elders to be both servants and Rulers of the Church may both of them stand well together For their rule is not lordly as if they ruled of themselves or for themselves but stewardly and ministeriall as ruling the Church from Christ and also from their call and withall ruling the Church for Christ and for the Church even for their spirituall everlasting good A Queene may call her servants her mariners to pilot and conduct her over the Sea to such an Haven yet they being called by her to such an office shee must not rule them in steering their course but must submit her selfe to be ruled by them till they have brought her to her desired Haven So is the case between the Church and her Elders CHAP. VI. Of the Power and Authoritie given to Synods SYnods wee acknowledge being rightly ordered as an Ordinance of Christ Of their Assembly wee find three just causes in Scripture 1. When a Church wanting light or peace at home desireth the counsell and helpe of other Churches few or moe Thus the Church of Antioch being annoyed with corrupt teachers who darkned the light of the truth and bred no small dissension amongst them in the Church they sent Paul and Barnabas and other messengers unto the Apostles and Elders at Hierusalem for the establishment of Truth and Peace In joyning the Elders to the Apostles and that doubtlesse by the advise of Paul and Barnabas it argueth that they sent not to the Apostles as extraordinary and infallible and authenticall Oracles of God for then what need the advise and helpe of Elders but as wise and holy guides of the Church who might not onely relieve them by some wise counsell and holy order but also set a Precedent to succeeding ages how errours and dissensions in Churches might be removed and healed And the course which the Apostles and Elders tooke for clearing the matter was not by publishing the counsell of God with Apostolick authoritie from immediate revelation but by searching out the truth in an ordinary way of free disputation Act. 15. v. 7. which is as fit a course for imitation in after ages as it was seasonable for practice then 2. Just consequence from Scripture giveth us another ground for the assembly of many churches or of their messengers into a Synod when any church lyeth under scandall through corruption in doctrine and practice and will not be healed by more private advertisements of their own members or of their neighbour Ministers or Brethren For there is a brotherly communion as between the members of the same church so between the churches We have a little sister saith one church to another Cant. 8.8 therefore churches have a brotherly communion amongst themselves Look then as one brother being offended with another and not able to heal him by the mouth of two or three brethren privately it behooveth him to carry it to the whole church so by proportion if one church see matter of offence in another and be not able to heal it in a more private way it will hehove them to procure the Assembly of many churches that the offence may be orderly heard and judged and removed 3. It may so fall out that the state of all the churches in the countrey may be corrupted and beginning to discern their corruption may desire the concurse and counsell of one another for a speedy and safe and generall reformation And then so meeting and conferring together may renew their covenant with God and conclude and determine upon a course that may tend to the publike healing and salvation of them all This was a frequent practice in the old Testament in the time of Asa 2 Cron. 15.10 to 15. in the time of Hezekiah 2 Chron. 29.4 to 19. In the time of Josiah 2 Chron. 34.29 to 33. and in the time of Ezra Ezra 10.1 to 5. These and the like examples were not peculiar to the Israelites as one intire nationall church For in that respect they appealed from every Synagogue and Court in Israel to the nationall high Priest and Court at Jerusalem as being all of them subordinate thereunto and therefore that precedent is usually waved by our best Divines as not appliable to Christian churches but these examples hold forth no superiority in one church or court over another but all of them in an equall manner give advice in common and take one common course for redresse of all And therefore such examples are fit precedents for churches of equall power within themselves to assemble togegether and take order with one accord for the reformation of them all Now a Synod being assembled three questions arise about their power 1. What is that power they have received 2. How far the fraternity concurreth with the Presbyterie in it the brotherhood with the Eldership 3. Whether the power they have recieved reacheth to the injoyning of things both in their nature and in their use indifferent For the first we dare not say that their power reacheth no farther then giving counsell for such as their ends be for which according to God they do assemble such is the power given them of God as may attain those ends As they meet to minister light
5. From this soveraigne power it is that all the spirituall power and efficacie and blessing in the administration of these gifts in these offices and places for the gathering and edifying and perfecting of all the Churches and of all the Saints in them is from him Mat. 28.20 Lo I am with you alwayes c. Col. 1.29 1 Cor. 15.9 The g od pleasure of the Father the personall union of the humane nature with the eternall Son of God His purchase of his Church with his own blood and His deep humiliation of himself unto the death of the Crosse have all of them obtained to him this his highest exaltation to be head over all things unto the Church and to injoy as king thereof this soveraign power Col. 1.19 Col. 2.2 9 10. Act. 20.28 Phil. 2.8 to 11. But of this soveraigne power of Christ there is no question amongst Protestants especially studious of Reformation Now as concerning the Ministeriall power we give these following Propositions I. Propos A particular Church or Congregation of Saints professing the faith TAKEN INDEFINITELY FOR ANY CHVRCH one as well as another is the first subject of all the Church-offices with all their spirituall gifts and power which Christ hath given to be executed amongst them whether it be Paul or Apollos or Cephas all are yours speaking to the Church of Gorinth 1 Cor. 3.22 not as a peculiar priviledge unto them but common to them with any other particular church And theirs was such a Church of whom it is said That they came all together into one place for the communication of their spirituall gifts 1 Cor. 14 23. And Paul telleth the same church that God hath set the officers and their gifts and all variety of members and their functions in his Church 1 Cor. 14.28 where it is not so well translated Some God hath set some in his church for hee hath set all but speaking of the members of the church v. 27. he proceedeth to exemplifie those members in v. 28. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and which God hath set in his Church that is which members Apostles Prophets c. For though the Relative be not of the same gender with the Antecedent before yet it is an usuall thing with the pen-men of the new Testament to respect the sense of the words and so the person intended rather then the gender of their name and to render the Relative of the same gender and case with the Substantive following so here 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. In the new Testament it is not a new observation that we never read of any nationall church nor of any nationall officers given to them by Christ In the old Testament indeed we reade of a Nationall church All the tribes of Israel were three times in a yeer to appeare before the Lord in Jerusalem Deut. 16.16 And he appointed them there an high Priest of the whole nation and certain solemne sacrifices by him to be administred Lev. 16.1 to 29. and together with him other Priests and Elders and Judges to whom all appeals should be brought and who should judge all difficult and transcendent cases Deut. 17.8 to 11. but wee reade of no such nationall church or high Priest or court in the new Testament And yet we willingly grant that particular churches of equall power may in some cases appointed by Christ meet together by themselves or by their messengers in a Synod and may perform sundry acts of power there as hath been shewed above But the officers themselves and all the Brethren members of the Synod yea and the Synods themselves and all the power they put forth they are all of them primarily given to the severall churches of particular Congregations either as the first subject in whom they are resident or as the first object about whom they are conversant and for whose sake they are gathered and imployed II. Propos The Apostles of Christ were the first subject of Apostolicall power Apostolicall power stood chiefly in two things First in that each Apostle had in him all ministeriall power of all the officers of the Church They by vertue of their office might exhort as Pastors 1 Tim. 2.1 teach as Teachers 1 Tim. 2.7 rule as Rulers 2 Tim. 4.1 receive and distribute the oblations of the Church as Deacons Act. 4.35 yea any one Apostle or Euangelist carried about with him the liberty and power of the whole Church and therefore might Baptize yea and censure an offender too as if he had the presence and concurrence of the whole Church with him For we reade that Philip baptized the Eunuch without the presence of any Church Act. 8.38 And that Paul himself excommunicated Alexander 1 Tim. 1.20 and it is not mentioned that hee took the consent of any Church or Presbyterie in it It is true indeed where he could have the consent and concurse of the Church and Presbyterie in exercise of any act of church-power he willingly took it and joyned with it as in the ordination of Timothy 2 Tim. 1.6 with 1 Tim. 4.14 and in the excommunication of the incestuous Corinthian 1 Cor. 5.4 5. But when both himself and the person to be baptized or ordained or excommunicated were absent and distant from all churches the Apostles might proceed to put forth their power in the administration of any church act without them The amplitude and plenitude of power which they received immediately from Christ would beare them out in it As my Father sent me saith Christ to wit with amplitude and plenitude of soveraigne power so send I you with like amplitude and plenitude of ministeriall power Joh. 20.21 2. Apostolicall power extended it self to all churches as much as to any one Their line went out into all the world Psal 19.4 compared with Rom. 10. And as they received commission to preach and baptize in all the world Mat. 28.19 So they received charge to feed the flock of Christs Sheep and Lambs which implyeth all acts of Pastorall government over all the Sheep and Lambs of Christ Joh. 21.15 16 17. Now this Apostolicall power centring all church-power into one man and extending it self forth to the circumference of all churches as the Apostles were the first subject of it so were they also the last Neverthelesse that ample and universall latitude of power which was conjoyned in them is now divided even by themselves amongst all the churches and all the officers of the churches respectively the officers of each church attending the charge of the particular church cōmitted to them by vertue of their office and yet none of them neglecting the good of other churches so far as they may be mutually helpfull to one another in the Lord. III. Propos When the church of a particular congregation walketh together in the truth and peace the Brethren of the church are the first subject of church-liberty and the Elders thereof of church-authority and both of them together are the first subject of all
misconstructions which not the obscurity of the words but the eminency of the gifts and worth of Expositors hath made difficult Let us adde an argument or two more to the same purpose to prove that the Church of a particular Congregation fully furnished with officers and rightly walking in judgement and peace is the first subject of all Church-authority needfull to be exercised within their own body 3. A third argument to prove this is usually and justly taken from the practice and example of the Church of Corinth in the excommunication of the incestuous Corinthian 1 Cor. 5.1 to 5. Obj. 1. The excommunication of the incestuous Corinthian was not an act of judiciall authority in the church of Corinth whether Elders or Brethren but rather an act of subjection to the Apostle publishing the sentence which the Apostle had before decreed and judged for saith the Apostle I though absent in body yet present in spirit have judged already concerning him that hath done this deed c. Answ 1. Though Paul as a chiefe Officer of every church judged before-hand the excommunication of the incestuous Corinthian yet his judgement was not a judiciall sentence delivering him to Satan but a judicious doctrine and instruction teaching the Church what they ought to do in that case 2. The act of the church in Corinth in censuring the incestuous person was indeed an act of subjection to the Apostles divine doctrine and direction as all church-censures by whomsoever administred ought to be acts of subjection to the word of Christ but yet their act was a compleat act of just power even an act of all that liberty and authority which is to be put forth in any censure For first they delivered him to Satan in the name of the Lord Jesus and with the power of the Lord Jesus v. 4. and that is the highest power in the Church Secondly the spirit of Paul that is his Apostolike spirit was gathered together with them in delivering and publishing the sentence which argueth both his power and theirs was co-incident and concurrent in this sentence Thirdly the holy end and use of this sentence argueth the heavenly power from whence it proceeded They delivered him to Satan for the destruction of the flesh that is for the mortifying of his corruption that his soul might be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus Fourthly when his soul came to be humble and penitent by the means of this sentence Paul intreateth the church to release and forgive him 2 Cor. 2.6 to 10. Now ejusdem potestatis est ligare solvere claudere aperire Object 2. All this argueth no more but that some in the church of Corinth had this power to wit the Presbytery of the church but not the whole body of the people to excommunicate the offender Answ 1. If the Presbyterie alone had put forth this power yet that sufficeth to make good the Proposition that every church furnished with a presbyterie and proceeding righteously and peaceably they have within themselves so much power as is requisite to be exercised within their own body Answ 2. It is apparent by the Text that the Brethren concurred also in this sentence and that with some act of power to wit such power as the want of putting it forth retarded the sentence and the putting of it forth was requisite to the administration of the sentence For first the reproofe for not proceeding to sentence sooner is directed to the whole church as well as to the Presbyterie They are all blamed for not mourning for not putting him away for being puffed up rather 1 Cor. 5.2 2. The commandment is directed to them all when they are gathered together and what is that but to a Church meeting to proceed against him 1 Cor. 5.4 In like sort in the end of the Chapter he commandeth them all Put away therefore from among you that wieked person v. 13. 3. He declareth this act of theirs in putting him out to be a judiciall act v. 12. Do you not judge them that are within Say that the judgement of authoritie be proper onely to the Presbytery yet the judgement of discretion which as concurring in this act with the Presbytery hath a power in it as was said may not be denyed to the Brethren for here is an act of judgement ascribed to them all which judgement in the Brethren he esteemeth of it so highly that from thence he taketh occasion to advise the members of the Church to refer their differences even in civill matters to the judgement of the Saints or Brethren Know ye not saith he that the Saints shall judge the world yea the Angels 1 Cor. 6.1 2 3. how much more the things of this life Yea rather then they should go to Law and that before Infidels in any case depending betweene Brethren he adviseth them rather to set up the meanest in the Church to hear and judge between them 1 Cor. 6.4 4. When the Apostle directeth them upon the repentance of an offender to forgive him 2 Cor. 2.4 to 10. he speaketh to the Brethren as well as to their elders to forgive him As they were all the Brethren as well as the Elders offended with his sin so it was meet they should all a like be satisfied and being satisfied should forgive him the Brethren in a way of brotherly love and Church-consent as well as the Elders by sentencing his absolution and restitution to the Church 3. Obj. But was not this Church of Corinth who had all this power a metropolis a mother Church of Achaia in which many Presbyteries from many Churches in the villages were assembled to administer this censure Ans No such thing appeareth from the story of the Church of Corinth neither in the Acts Act. 18. nor from either of the Epistles 〈…〉 Corinthians True it is Corinth was a mother-city but not a Mother-Church to all Achaia and yet it is not unlikely that other Churches in that region might borrow much light from their gifts for they abounded and were enriched with variety of all gifts 1 Cor. ◠〈◊〉 But yet that which the Apostle calleth the Church of Corinth 〈◊〉 the whole Church was no larger then was wont to meet together in one place one congregation 1 Conrinth 14.23 A fourth and last Argument to prove the Proposition that every Church so furnished with officers as hath been said and so carried on in truth and peace hath all Church power needfull to be exercised within themselves is taken from the guilt of offence which lieth upon every Church when any offence committed by their members lyeth uncensured and unremoved Christ hath something against the Church of Pergamus for suffering Balaam and the Nicolaitans Revel 2.14 15. and something against the Church of Thyatira for suffering Jezabel Now if these Churches had not either of them sufficient power to purge out their own offenders why are they blamed for toleration of them yea why are not the neighbour Churches blamed for
power of the sword in matters which concern the civill peace The matters which concern the civill peace wherein Church-subjection is chiefly attended are of foure sorts 1. The first sort be civill matters 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the things of this life as is the disposing of mens goods or lands lives or liberties tributes customes worldly honours and inheritances In these the Church submitteth and referreth it self to the civill State Christ as minister of the circumcision refused to take upon him the dividing of Inheritances amongst Brethren as impertinent to his calling Luk. 12.13 14. His kingdome he acknowledgeth is not of this world Joh. 18.36 Himself payed tribute to Cesar Matth. 17.27 for himself and his disciples 2. The second sort of things which concern civill peace is the establishment of pure Religion in doctrine worship and government according to the word of God as also the reformation of all corruptions in any of these On this ground the good Kings of Iudah commanded Iudah to seek the Lord God of their fathers and to worship him according to his own statutes and commandments and the contrary corruptions of strange gods high places Images and Groves they removed and are commended of God and obeyed by the Priests and people in so doing 2 Chron. 14.3 4 5. 2 Chron. 15.8 to 16. 2 Chron. 17.6 to 9. 2 Chron. 19.3 4. 2 Chron. 24.4 5 6. 8 9 10. 2 Chron. 29.3 to 35. 2 Chron. 30.1 to 12. 2 Chron. 34.3 to 33. The establishment of pure Religion and the reformation of corruptions in Religion do much concerne the civill peace If Religion be corrupted there will be warre in the gates Iudg. 5.8 and no peace to him that cometh in or goeth out 2 Chron. 15.3 5 6. But where Religion rejoyceth the civill State flourisheth Hagg. 2.15 to 19. It is true the establishment of pure Religion and reformation of corruptions pertain also to the Churches and Synodicall Assemblies But they go about it onely with spirituall weapons ministery of the Word and Church-censures upon such as are under Church-power But Magistrates addresse themselves thereto partly by commanding and stirring up the Churches and Ministers thereof to go about it in their spirituall way partly also by civill punishments upon the wilfull opposers and disturbers of the same As Iehosaphat sent Priests and Levites and them accompanied and countenanced with Princes and Nobles to preach and teach in the Cities of Iudah 2 Chron. 17.7 8 9. So Iosiah put to death the idolatrous Priests of the high places 2 King 22.20 Nor was that a peculiar duty or priviledge of the Kings of Iudah but attended to also by heathen Princes and that to prevent the wrath of God against the Realme of the King and his sons Ezra 7.23 yea and of the times of the New Testament it is prophesied that in some cases capitall punishment shall proceed against false Prophets and that by the procurement of their neerest kindred Zach. 13.3 And the execution thereof is described Revel 16.4 to 7. where the rivers and fountains of waters that is the Priests and Iesuites that conveigh the Religion of the Sea of Rome throughout the countreys are turned to blood that is have blood given them to drink by the civill Magistrate Neverthelesse though we willingly acknowledge a power in the Civill Magistrate to establish and reform Religion according to the Word of God yet we would not be so understood as if we judged it to belong to the civill power to compell all men to come and sit down at the Lords table or to enter into the communion of the Church before they be in some measure prepared of God for such fellowship For this is not a Reformation but a Deformation of the Church and is not according to the Word of God but against it as we shall show God willing in the sequell when we come to speak of the disposition or qualification of Church-members 3. There is a third sort of things which concern the civill peace wherein the Church is not to refuse subjection to the Civill Magistrate in the exercise of some publick spirituall administrations which may advance and help forward the publick good of Civill State according to God In time of warre or pestilence or any publick calamitie or danger lying upon a Common-wealth the Magistrate may lawfully proclaime a Fast as Iehosaphat did 2 Chron. 20.3 and the Churches ought not to neglect such an administration upon such a just occasion Neither doth it impeach the power of the Church to call a Fast when themselves see God calling them to publick humiliation For as Iehosaphat called a Fast so the Prophet Joel stirreth up the Priests to call a Fast in time of a famine threatning the want of holy Sacrifices Ioel 1.13 14. It may fall out also that in undertaking a warre or in making a league with a forraine State there may arise such cases of conscience as may require the consultation of a Synod In which case or the like if the Magistrate call for a Synod the Churches are to yeeld him ready subjection herein in the Lord. Jehosaphat though he was out of his place when he was in Samaria visiting an idolatrous King yet he was not out of his way when in case of undertaking the war against Syria he called for counsell from the mouth of the Lord by a Councell or Synod of Priests and Prophets 1 King 22.5 6 7. 4. A fourth sort of thinge wherein the church is not to refuse subjection to the Civill Magistrate is in patient suffering their unjust persecutions without hostile or rebellious resistance For though persecution of the churches and servants of Christ will not advance the civill peace but overthrow it yet for the church to take up the sword in her own defence is not a lawfull means of preserving the church peace but a disturbance of it rather In this case when Peter drew his sword in defence of his Master the Lord Iesus against an attachment served upon him by the Officers of the high Priests and Elders of the people our Saviour bade him put up his sword into his sheath again for saith he all they that take the sword shall perish by the sword Mat. 27.50 51 52. where he speaketh of Peter either as a private Disciple or a church-officer to whom though the power of the keys was committed yet the power of the sword was not committed And for such to take up the sword though in the cause of Christ it is forbidden by Christ and such is the case of any particular church or of a Synod of churches As they have received the power of the keys not of the sword to the power of the keys they may and ought to administer but not of the sword Wherein neverthelesse we speak of churches and Synods as such that is as church-members or church-assemblies acting in a church-way by the power of the keys received from Christ But if some of the same persons
be also betrusted by the civill State with the preservation and protection of the Lawes and Liberties peace and safety of the same state and shall meet together in a publike civill assembly whether in Councell or Camp they may there provide by civill power according to the wholsome lawes and liberties of the countrey Ne quid Ecclesia ne quid Respublica detrimenti capiat If King Saul swear to put Ionathan to death the Leaders of the people may by strong hands rescue him from his fathers unjust and illegall fury 1 Sam. 14.44 45. But if Saul persecute David though as unjustly as Ionathan yet if the Princes and Leaders of the people will not rescue him from the wrath of the King David a private man will not draw out his sword in his own defence so much as to touch the Lords anoynted 1 Sam. 24.4 to 7. To conclude this Corollary touching the subjection of churches to the civill State in matters which concern the civill peace this may not be omitted that as the Church is subject to the sword of the Magistrate in things which concern the civill peace so the Magistrate if Christian is subject to the keys of the Church in matters which concern the peace of his conscience and the kingdome of heaven Hence it is prophesied by Isaiah that Kings and Queens who are nursing fathers and mothers to the church shall bow down to the Church with their faces to the earth Isai 49.23 that is they shall walk in professed subjection to the Ordinances of Christ in his Church Hence also it is that David prophesieth of a two-edged sword that is the sword of the Spirit the word of Christ put into the hands of the Saints who are by calling the Members of the Church as to subdue the nations by the ministery of the Word to the obedience of the Gospel Psal 149.6 7. so to binde their Kings with chains and their Nobles with fetters of iron to execute upon them the judgement written that is written in the Word Psal 149. v. 8 9. 3. A third Corollary touching the independency of churches is this That a church of a particular Congregation consisting of Elders and Brethren and walking in the truth and peace of the Gospel as it is the First subject of all Church-power needfull to be exercised within it selfe so it is independent upon any other Church or Synod for the exercise of the same That such a Church is the first subject of all church-power hath been cleered above in the opening the third Proposition of the first subject of the power of the keys And such a church being the first subject of church-power is unavoidably independent upon any other church or body for the exercise therof for as hath been said afore the first subject of any Accident or Adjunct is independent upon any other either for the injoying or for the imploying the having or the using of the same 4. A fourth Corollary touching the independency of churches is That a Church fallen into any offence whether it be the whole church or a strong party in it is not independent in the exercise of church-power but is subject both to the admonition of any other church and to the determination and judiciall sentence of a Synod for direction into a way of truth and peace And this also ariseth from the former discourse For if clavis errans non ligat Ecclesia litigans non ligat that is if Christ hath not given to a particular church a promise to binde and loose in heaven what they binde and loose on earth unlesse they agree together and agree in his name then such a church is not independent in their proceedings as do fail in either For all the independency that can be claimed is founded upon that promise What yee binde on earth shall be bound in heaven what yee loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven Matth. 18.18 On that promise is founded both the independency and security and parity also of all churches But if that promise be cut off from them they are like Samson when his haire was cut off weak and subject to fall under other men and yet they fall softer then hee did hee fell into the hands of his enemies but they fall under the censure of their friends As the false Prophet recanting his error did acknowledge so may they Thus was I wounded in the house of my friends Zach. 13.6 In the house of a neighbour-church or two I was friendly smitten with a brotherly admonition which like a precious oyle did not break mine head and in the house of a Synod of churches I was friendly yea brotherly censured and healed 5. A fifth and last Corollary arising from the former discourse touching the independency of churches may be this Though the church of a particular Congregation consisting of Elders and Brethren and walking with a right foot in the truth and peace of the Gospel be the first subject of all church-power needfull to be exercised within it selfe and consequently be independent from any other church or Synod in the use of it yet it is a safe and whole some and holy Ordinance of Christ for such particular churches to joyn together in holy Covenant or Communion and consolation amongst themselves to administer all their church affairs which are of weighty and difficult and common concernment not without common consultation and consent of other churches about them Now church-affaires of weighty and difficult and common concernment wee account to be the election and ordination of Elders excommunication of an Elder or any person of publick note and employment the translation of an Elder from one Church to another or the like In which case we conceive it safe and wholsome and an holy ordinance to proceed with common consultation and consent Safe for in multitude of counsellers there is safetie as in civill so in Church affairs Prov. 11.14 And though this or that Church may be of a good and strong constitution and walk with a right foot in the truth and peace of the Gospel yet all Churches are not in a like athletick plight and they will be Ioath to call in or look out for help as much or more then others though they have more need then others yea and the best Churches may soon degenerate and stand in as much need of help as others and for want of it may sink and fall into deep Apostasie which other Churches might have prevented had they discerned it at first It is also wholsome as tending to maintain brotherly love and soundnesse of doctrine in Churches and to prevent many offences which may grow up in this or that particular Church when it transacteth all such things within it self without consent It is likewise an holy ordinance of Christ as having just warrant from a like precedent The Apostles were as much independent from one another and stood in as little need of one anothers help as Churches do one of