Selected quad for the lemma: church_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
church_n apostle_n bishop_n timothy_n 4,167 5 10.7647 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A27001 The Quakers catechism, or, The Quakers questioned, their questions answered, and both published for the sake of those of them that have not yet sinned unto death and of those ungrounded novices that are most in danger of their seduction / by R[i]chard Baxter. Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691. 1655 (1655) Wing B1363; ESTC R28362 39,590 58

There are 5 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

who knows not that one English word hath many significations There is a Beast called a Wolf and a Fish called a Wolf and an eating disease called a Wolf Are these therefore all one because they have one Name So a Sect-master is called a Master One that would be the Lord of mens faith is called a Master and a Teacher of the Church of Christ is called a Master Doth it follow that all these are forbidden because one is Your Prater also made a stirre with me for calling the sacred Languages the Originall because forsooth the Spirit of God is the Original And is not that a wise man to go cry down the Ministry that cannot discern the difference between the Original cause and the Original Language He charged me also to be empty of the Spirit because I studied and told me he did not study no not in speaking what to say I the lesse marvell at his non-sence But I pray God forgive me that I Study no more Do you think we cannot talk without study as well as you and I hope a little better and when the lazy fit overtaketh Ministers they are ready to preach without study as well as you do I can bring you a woman fit for the gumblestool that shall without any study talk it out with the best of you We do not so despise God his Word or our hearers as to speak before we consider what to say Reade 2 Tim. 2. 15. Psa. 1. 2. 1 Tim. 4. 15. Psal. 119. 15 23 48 78 97 99 148. and see whether it be not our duty to study and meditate continually day and night And whereas you call us to thresh and dig I professe if God would give me leave I should take it for a great recreation and refreshment to my body and should think it incomparably a more easie life then that which I endure Solomon knew and I know to my sorrow that much study is a wearinesse to the flesh and might I but plough and dig I should yet hope to live in some competent health who now spend my daies in continuall pain and languishing But then how shall I fulfill Gods command 1 Tim. 4. 15. Meditate on these things Give thy self wholly to them mark wholly that thy profiting may appear to all How should I watch over the Church day and night Act. 20. 31. yet whereas your Prater feared not before God to affirm that if I had no pay I would not preach I do here professe before the same God that he is a Liar and I prove it because I have long preached already without pay and been glad of Liberty and I would labour with my hands as far as my languishing body would bear to supply my necessities as Paul did to stop the mouths of your Predecessors rather then I would give over preaching the Gospel Judge therefore whether your Lying Spirit be the Spirit of God or the meet authour of Reformation or whether indeed you are perfect without sin Your 20. Qu. is Did ever the Lord of Heaven and Earth or Jesus Christ bid thee or any of you Go and Preach to a people or was any of the Apostles or Ministers of Christ made Minister by the will of man Ans. 1. I offered your Prater here to shew him my Comission from God if he would shew me his and he told me that it was invisible and why may not you take the answer that you give 2. The Lord called his first Apostles by his own voice and appointed them to call others and to establish an Order for the succeeding of others in that Office of the Ministry to the end of the world Matth. 28. 21. and till the Saints be one perfect man Eph. 4. 11 14. that they that should ever after be called might not expect a voice from Heaven to their ears but might be called in Christs appointed way And in this way I have been called by Christ The Signs of his Call are 1. My comperent qualifications 2. My thirst after the good of souls and the building of that house of God 3. The Ordination of authorized Church-Officers 4. The Call and consent of the people of Christ over whom he hath set me 5. And afterwards the successe of my labours 6. And some daily assistance of the Spirit in those labours 7. And some Testimony of the Spirit to my conscience of Gods Acceptance These seven set together are my evidence of mission shew you the like if you can 2. Neither Paul not any true Minister is called by the meer will of man nor are we the Servants of men Nor were the Apostles called by men at all but immediatly by Christ But all afterwards were to be called by Christ through the Ordnation of men Tit. 1. 5. For this end left I thee in Crete that thou shouldest ordain Elders in every City Act 14. 23. When they had ordained them Elders in every Church c. The gift was given Timothy by prophecy with the laying on of the hands of the Presbytery 1 Tim. 4. 14. Paul directeth him whom to make Bishops 1 Tim. 3. Will not all this suffice you Your 21. Qu. is Whether had any Ministers of Christan hour-glasse to preach by or took a Text and raised Doctrines Reasons Uses Motives or a carnall Bell to call people together by prove these things by Scripture or else be silent and never professe your selves to be Ministers of Christ more Ans. By your patience I must tell you that the Conclusion is but your Lordly ignorant command such as is joyned to many of the other Queries Scripture is Gods Laws and fa sufficient Rule for Doctrines and worship it self But was never intended to name to you every circumstance that is lawull about that worship Hath Scripture told you at what place you shall meet or at what hour I tell you again you speak with no more wisedom then if you should say thus Prove that ever man read the Bible with a pair of Spectacles or that ever Christ or his Apostles used a printed Bible when printing was invented but a while ago or that ever they used an English Bible when they wrote in Greek or that ever they preached in doublet breeches or stockings or else call your selves Ministers of Christ no more And why so Because you command us and yet tell us your Commission is invisible These Circumstances are purposely left by Christ to the determination of humane prudence as occasions shall require and therefore he bids us do all things to edification and decently and in order 1 Cor. 14. 26. 4. And therefore sure we must discern what is edifying decent and orderly This is plain to them that will see What came the Word of God out from you or came it unto you only If any man think himself to be a Prophet or spiritual let him acknowledge that the things that I write are the Commandments of the Lord But if any be ignorant let him be ignorant 1 Cor. 14.
that down so many Ministers for being called Masters But alas do you not know that Pride of inward qualifications commonly called spiritual Pride is the most killing and abominable the better the thing is that you are proud of the worse is your Pride O what a brave thing doth it seem in these mens eyes that they should seem to be possessed with such an excellent spirit as can trample upon worldly glory and can boisterously contemn all that are not of their sect and that can despise Dignities and be equall with the greatest yea that only they should have this admirable spirit and all o-others are the Children of the Devil and under their feet Though other men should never so much sl●eght them yet do they wonderfully please themselves with these high thoughts of themselves For Pride is first an overvaluing of a mans self and thinking of himself above what is meet and then a desire that others should do so by him too If yet you see not the pride of these men I will shew it you in these four particular Evidences and that so plainly that if you know the difference between the language of heaven and of hell you may easily perceive the devil speaking by their mouths 1. They affirm themselves to be perfect without sin yea some of them say they are Christ and God And is it possible that any man in this life that is not mad with spiritual pride can indeed believe that he hath no sin what that he transgresseth no Law That he doth love God in the highest degree that he is bound to do That he never hath a thought or word that is sinful nor sinfully loseth one minute of his time Yea and this when in the eyes and ears of the wisest they foam out their own shame as the raging Sea doth cast out the dirt The devil himself hath either lesse pride or lesse ignorance then to think himself to be perfect without sin If they have no sin what need they pray Forgive us our sins or what further need have they of the bloud of Christ or his Intercession to procure them any further forgiveness If you can see no pride in this I fear you are blinded with them to destruction 2. And is it not apparent pride in them to set up themselves so far above all the people of God on earth yea to vilifie the most holy and eminent Servants of God and condemn all the Churches in the world as if heaven were made for them alone if it were so well that all of them did beleeve a heaven besides that within them which I suppose is but a sorry heaven 3. And yet more unmatchable pride and impious Infidelity is it to damn all the Church and people of God for this 1600 years at least Indeed God had never a people on earth of these mens way But to let passe the Scripture ages which condemn them tell me Had Christ any Church since the Apostles daies till now or not If he had not then he was no head of the Church and so no Christ For there is no head without a body If he had a Church tell us where it was and when Do you not know if you know any thing of the state of the Church for 1600 Years that Christ had no Church on earth of the Quakers minde and that all his Ministers have been such as they condemn and have been called by as honourable Titles as they are now And is not that man either an Infidel and enemy to Christ or stark mad with pride that can believe that Christ had no Church till now and that all the Ministers of the Gospel for 1600 years were the Ministers of the devil as they say of us that tread in their steps and that all the Christians of that 1600 Years are damned at now they dare denounce against those that succeed them and that God made the world and Christ died for it with a purpose to save none but a few Quakers that the world never knew till a few Years agoe or at least a few Hereticks that were their Predecessors of old 4. And I should suppose that their proud scornful railing language should put it out of doubt what spirit they are of to any that are acquainted with the language of Christs Spirit and of Satan and are able to judge of spirits by the most palpable effects and to know darknesse from light But you say It is Scripture-Language which they speak I answer the greater is their presumptuous sin in making so ill a use of Scripture-Language as to serve Satan by it and use it to reviling What if Christ call Judas a devil Is it therefore lawfull to call Perer so or any faithfull Servants of Christ But I perceive you think they justly condemn us because we are called Masters of men contrary to Matth. 23. Alas that a Christian should be so ignorant as not to know that even calling Master and Lord too is commonly allowed of in Scripture and that it is not the Title but 1. The proud affecting of the Title 2. And the Lording it over mens faith as Masters of that as if others must be of their minde right or wrong which Christ there condemneth Even as in the same place he forbiddeth being called Fathers in the very same sense when yet it is frequently allowed in a better sense But for the fuller answering of these scruples of yours and the rest about Tithes and such like I send you herewith an Answer to the Questions of some Quakers near us in the Parish of Bromsgrove and refer you to my Defence of the Worcester shire Petition Printed some Years agoe To your Question What I think of these men I will tell you what I think and am past all doubt of There are in England a Company of young raw Professors that have more zeal then knowledge And there are a companie of carnal hypocrites that place all their Religion in holding certain Opinions and using certain externall worship and siding with a Religious partie It is no hard matter to misleade all these if they be not better guided by others then by themselves While they have due regard to the Judgements of their Teachers that know more then themselves and so live in a learning way till they have attained to better understanding they may escape Deceivers But if they are once brought to be wise enough in their own eyes and to despise their Teachers then they are like a man that hath lost his way in a dark night or that hath lost his Guide in an unknown Wildernesse or like a Dog that hath lost his Master and therefore will be ready to follow any body that first whistleth to him The Papists and the devil know this well enough and therefore their first endeavour is to unsettle these people by taking them off all dependance on their guides and that must be by bringing the Ministers into contempt with them For if they could
But I 'll tell you what do When you come home go to some of your Gossips the Friers or other Papists and ask them this Question Whether it be a true Church which set up the Spanish Irquisition and Caused the French Massacre and hath by flames and sword drawn out the bloud of so many hundred thousand true Christians Ask them Whether the Butcheries of the Waldenses and the Irish murders were done by a true Church It may be they will give you a most satisfactory Answer then I can because you will sooner hear them Your third Question is about Infant-Baptism Of that I have already written a whole Book which in modesty you should peruse before you call to me for more Have you soberly read what I have there wrote already If not to what purpose should I write more to you of the same subject Only to your Query I will adde this Query to your Founders the Anabaptists Whether by this time they do not feel Gods plagues upon their party And whether God do not visibly testifie against them from Heaven in giving up their disciples to all kinde of abominations And whether the Plague of Pharaoh be not on those hearts and of the blinded Sodomites on their eyes that in all this can see no reason at least to be very suspicious of their way and whether they are yet resolved to wink on to destruction or to stay till all turn Quakers Ranters or infidels And how much England yet feels it self beholden to Separation and Anabaptistry And whether it be not the Seperated and Anapaptists Churches that are emptied by the Quakers Your fourth fifth sixth seventh eight and ninth Queries are all about Tythes The substance of which I had answered long ago to some of your leading Bretheren in a Book called The Worcestershier Petition Defended to which Book I referre you to spare the labour of speaking one thing twice and modestly should have taught you to take notice of that which I have done already before you call for the same things again Only let me now adde these Queries also to you Qu. 1. Whether have you read any of those Books that are written long ago to prove that Tythes are still of Divine Right If you have not were it not well beseeming a tender Conscience to hear all that can be said before men adventure to rail against that which they do not understand Qu. 2. Whether there be not sufficient Scripture to warrant a man to Dedicate part of his Lands to God for the service of his Church and promoting of his Worship Yea Whether they did not in the Primitive times so Dedicate all selling it and laying down the Price at the Apostles feet Qu 3. Is it not lawfull to take and use that which is so Dedicated And if the Apostles and first Church Officers might take all May not we take the Tenths when they are thus Devoted Qu. 4. If our Ancestours many an Age ago have given the Tenths to the Church for the Ministry are not those sacrilegious Church-robbers that should now take them away having nothing to do with them And do not you counsel men to the sin of Iudas or of Ananias and Sephira Qu. 5. If one that bears the bag prove a Iudas and Thief or one Nicolas a Deacon should lead a Sect of Nicolaitans your Predecessours Whether are all the Apostles therefore Thieves or all the Churches and Pastors greedy dogs for taking much more then the Tenths even mens whole Estates that gave them to that use Qu. 6. Whether I or other Ministers do ask the people so much for preaching as the Quakers receive themselves Do not you receive meat and drink to sustain your lives But we ask not meat and drink of any nor any thing else that is theirs The Tythes is none of theirs nor ever was nor their fathers before them but they bought or took Leases of their Lands with the Condition of paying the Tenths as none of their own We ask them not for a peny but only to divide between theirs and ours and give us our own Qu. 7. If it be not a wrong to the people more then to the Ministers to have the standing Church-maintenance taken away Why then do people petition so hard for Augmentations where Means is wanting Or else do worse Qu. 8. If the Supream Rulers of the Commonwealth may lay an Excise or Tax on the Nation and pay Souldiers with one part of it what forbids but that they may pay Ministers of the Gospel with the other part And if they may lay a Tax for them Why may they not fix a setled Maintenance in Tenths for them much more why may they not let them possesse that which is theirs already by their fore-fathers gift Qu. 9. Where doth any Scripture forbid paying or taking Tythes I have shewed you in my other Book where it commandeth allowing sufficient Maintenance Shew where it condemneth the Tenth part any more then the ninth or the eleventh or twelfth Qu. 10. When God hath commanded a sufficient maintenance in general and left it to humane prudence to judge what is sufficient before they give it If then a man shall say Where doth the Scripture require the Tenths and you are no true Ministers who take the Tenths Is not this as wise as to say Though Christ and his Apostles did wear clothes yet shew where any of them preacht in doublet or breeches or stockings or else you are false Prophets for wearing these Is not this as wise arguing as the other and to the same purpose And where you ask us so oft whether the Apostles took the Tenths I tell you again they took more that is men sold all and laid down the money at their feet It 's true that then the poor also were maintained out of it And if you will shew a Commission to examine us we will give you an account how far we maintain the poor out of our meer tenth part In the mean time it 's unreasonable that you demand that we should so maintain them as to suffer no beggars For if all that a Minister hath will not maintain twenty poor people if he give it them all how should he then maintain a hundred with it Your 10th Qu. is Whether Christ enlighteneth every one that cometh into the world To which I answer Yea he doth so All that come into the world of nature he enlighteneth with the light of Nature so called because that it is a knowledge gotten by the Book of the Creatures and natural means without supernatural Revelation though it be of grace also as it is freely given after a forfeiture And all that come into the world of grace he enlighteneth with the light of supernatural Revelation Having said as much to this Query as you require I will gratis adde something that I may please you by supererrogation I lately saw another Paper of your Queries which you have disperst in other places which speaks
almost only of This Inward Light In which I perceived 1. That you falsly intimate that we deny the necessity of an inward light when as we maintain that the external light of the Word alone is not sufficient without the inward light of the Spirit 2. You there intimate to us a supposed sufficiency of the inward light that every man in the world hath Concerning which I shall say more anon and now only demand of you 1. Whether you mean it is sufficient to leave men without excuse That we maintain as well as you or is every mans light sufficient to his salvation If so Q. 2. Was it sufficient before Christ preached the Gospel and sent his Apostles Or is it now sufficient to all that never heard the Gospel If so Is not the Gospel a vain and needlesse thing or are you Christians that dare so affirm Q. 3. If the world have sufficient light what need they your teaching or discourse or conviction Q. 4. If all have sufficient light within them what need there any converting grace Q. 5. Then why did Christ send Paul to open mens eyes and to turn them from darknesse to light if they had sufficient light before Act. 26. 18. Q 6. I pray you do not disdain to tell me when you have rub'd your eyes if all men have sufficient light within them Why you got up into the Judgement seat and pronounced me so oft to be in darknesse and to be void of the light and to have none of the Spirit If all have it why may not I have it But let me tell you further in your ear that we that you so frantickly bawl against have read Bellarmine and other Papists so oft that we cannot be ignorant who are your Teachers though your selves are ignorant We know how earnestly the Jesuites would perswade us that there is a light in every mans conscience which if he improve and husband well God is bound to give such additions as shall make it become saving and that by the good use of natural light men may certainly get supernatural and that it is in mens own power what light soever they have to improve it to salvation Your 11th Query is Whether we have seen Gods face Ans. Whether these be Learning or Teaching or quarrelling or doting Questions I leave to your consideration but what Call you had to propound them to such Serpents Dogs and Children of the devil as you call us I know not But however I 'le answer you truly 1. By the eye of reason I have seen that there is a God and that he is infinite incomprehensible most great and most good c. 2. The same I have seen more cleerly by the eyes of faith 3. But I never saw God by the eye of flesh for none can so see God and live Nor hath any man seen God at any time saving the only begotten Son who is in the bosome of his Father he hath declared him 4. Nor have I seen him in glory intuitively or as the glorified in heaven do If you say you have seen more I shall not be very forward to beleeve you till I see better fruits of it I also therefore demand of you Whether he that hath seen God do not abhor himself as Iob did in dust and ashes and whether the true knowledge of God do not ever abase the soul and make a man very mean in his own eyes And then is it likely that ever those men had the true knowledge of God who make it their businesse to exalt themselves as having the Spirit and beign perfect without sin and to revile and bedung other men with their reproaches as being all the Children of the devil and of darknesse that be not of their strain and rave not as they do The Pharisee that thanked God he was not as other men nor as the Publicane spoke humbly and modestly in comparison of you and yet was he counted a proud self-justifier If ever you come to the least saving sight of God it will mightily change the proud strain of your spirits and make you abhor the thoughts of your present evil waies Your 12. Query is Whether we have the same infallible Spirit as the holy men of God had that spoke forth the Scriptures Ans. Why must you know this Are all Dogs and Serpents with you that have not that Infallible Spirit But we hear the croakings of your Papist guides in that word Infallible that's the pillar of their Kingdom and the master-point of their New Religion That their Church is infallible For denying which Knot the Jesuite against Chillingworth and a late ●otable gawdy Orator S. W. against Dr Hammond and others of them would fain perswade us that we subvert Christianity and are little better then Infidels because we are not Infallible But I will answer you and your Masters together in a word 1. The Prophets and Apostles had infallible Inspirations of new matters of divine verity not before revealed because they were to be Gods penmen and Messengers of such New Revelations I have none such that I know of 2. The Prophets and Apostles were guided infallibly in the manner as well as the matter so that every word that they wrote to the Churches was infallibly true I have no such Infallibility nor your Grandfather the Pope neither He may erre while he pretendeth to the greatest Infallibility in deciding Controversies 3. What man soever he be in the world that beleeves any Truth he doth infallibly believe it For he that is in the right is not deceived so far and he that is not mistaken is so farre infallible which is no more then non fallitur 4. But if by Infallibility you should mean the clearnesse and subjective Certainty as distinct from the objective and the bare truth of our conceptions then I say that 's another thing then Infallibility and not to be so called and of that Certainty men have different degrees All true Christians are certain of their Fundamentals yet sometime with some doubting so that they may finde cause to say with the Apostles Lord Increase our Faith or We beleeve help thou our unbelief But in lesser controverted Points which Salvation dependeth not on the best man on earth may erre much more be uncertain So that in a word Every Church in sensu composite while a Church is infallible in the essentials of Christianity and so is every true Christian And also they know infallibly every other truth that indeed they know because Truth is Truth whether they know it or not and when they do know it they are not deceived But in many things we all erre because we know but in part and so farre are deceived Well I say still Fair fall the honest humble Christian that will confesse with Paul that we know but in part For I shall never like pretenders to un-erring Infallibility more I know but two such pretenders and they are both the most abominable deceivers and deceived
Whether ever the earth bore men that did more proudly despise others in comparison of themselves and whether their language savour of the Spirit of the Lamb of God Or can he have any taste of that Spirit of Christ in himself that doth not even feel that their proud and railing language is of the devil Qu. 7. Was there ever a generation known on the earth that did more arrogantly step up into the Throne of God and censure his Servants whose faces they never saw and whom they can charge with nothing but being Preachers of the Gospel and that in a Pulpit having an hourglasse taking Tythes c. to be Ministers of the devil sons of perdition with much of the like Though Christ hath said Iudge not that ye be not judged and who art thou that judgest another mans Servant To his own Master he stands or fals Qu. 8. Was there ever a Generation of men on whom the Image of the devil was more visible then on these He is the Prince of darknesse pride and malice And the depth of Ignorance and height of pride and malice breaks out so abundantly in their carriage and discourse that all not utterly blinded may see it It is the work of the devil to be the Accuser of the Brethren and so it is the very Religion and businesse of these wretches to accuse Ministers and godly people to be hypocrites Liars children of the devil Serpents Vipers with much the like Qu. 9 Is it no kin to the blaspheming of the holy Ghost for such wretches when they have powred out the most horrid lies slanders Railings and false doctrines to professe solemnly that all this is from the Spirit of Christ within them and make God and his holy Spirit the Author and Patron of all Qu. 10. Can that man that hath one spark of grace believe that he hath no sin Can he have so little knowledge of himself And consequently of the need he hath of the Physician Dare you say to Christ we will not be beholden to thee for thy bloud to wash us any more or to thy Intercession to pard on us any more Do you not believe that In many things we offend all Jam. 3. 2. If we say that we have no sinne we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us If we confesse our sinnes he is faithfull and just to forgive us our sinnes and to clense us from all unrighteousnesse If we say that we have not sinned we make hem a lyar and his Word is not in us 1 Joh. 1. 8 9. 10. Are not all Christs Disciples taught daily to pray Forgive us our trespasses For my part I am one that is sick and have need of the Physician and dare not tell God that I will ask him pardon for no more sins nor be beholden to him for any more But O what a power hath the deceiver with these wretches that in the midst of their horrid railing flandring and other wickednesse will stand to it that they have no sin Just like the Swearer that will swear he never swore an Oath Or the Drunkard that will swear he was never drunk when he lieth drunk in the Channell Solomon saith There is not a just man upon earth that doth good and sinneth not Eccles. 7. 20. and these Quakers that Pharisaically and Papistically justifie themselves do give him the Lie Qu. 11. Whether those that deny Scripture to be Gods Word as these Quakers do and deny that there is any such Person as Jesus Christ who suffered at Ierusalem now glorified in heaven in the humane nature and only call somewhat within themselves by the Name of Christ I say whether these are not abominable Infidels having nothing to do with the name of Christians Q. 12. Is it not damnable Hypocrisie in these wretches to prate so much of Scripture and call for Scripture while they thus deny it to be Gods Word Qu. 13. Is it not damnable hypocrisie in them to call themselves Christians when they are Infidels and deny the person of Jesus Christ crucified to be in heaven Qu. 14. Is not he a Pagan and no Christian that thinks that the light which is in all the Indians Americans and other Pagans on earth is sufficient without Scripture Qu. 15. Was that light in Paul which perswaded him that he ought to do many things against the name of Jesus sufficient to convert him to the Faith of Jesus Or did Christ give him needlesly a light from heaven and by Ananias his doctrine O● had Con●lius sufficient light within him before Peter preached to him Or had all the world sufficient light within them before Christ sent abroad his Apostles to preach the Gospel to them Or did Christ send them a needlesse light by his Apostles Have those Persecutors sufficient light within them to cause them to believe in Christ who think they do God service in killing or reproaching his Ministers and people Qu. 16. If all have sufficient light within them what need you go up and down to teach or perswade them Is it needless light that you bring then or is i● hellish darknesse Qu. 17. Is it not a most sottish trick of you to go up and down prating and commanding and yet refuse to shew your Commission from God And to call Ministers to shew theirs and refuse to shew your own but say it is invisible within you are you so mad as to expect any should belive an invisible and indemonstrable Commssion And might not we as well tell you ours is invisible but that indeeed it is not Or should we beleeve every one that prates of a Commission within him or no If not why should we belive you more then others that say the like Qu. 18. Seeing you cry down our Ministry and Churches tell us which is the true Ministry and Church and when yours begun and where it hath been since Christs abode on earth till now Speak plainly and let us know whether you are indeed Papists or Pagans Qu. 19. Is not that man an Infidell and a Scorner of Christ that date say he came into the world and shed his bloud to gather onely a few raging Quakers in England 1652 years after his Incarnation If Christ have no Subjects but these he is a poor King If Christ have been till now without Subjects he was no King If without a Body he was no Head If without a spouse he was no Husband Therefore shew us what Church Christ hath had or confesse your selves Infidels Qu. 20. Did not the Spirit of the Quakers speak in Num. 16. 3. just as you do now against Magistrates and Ministers And is not God very patient that causeth not the earth to open and swallow you up quick as it did them Do you understand that the Simonians or Disciples of Simon Magus and the Nicolaitans whose doctrine and deeds Christ hateth Rev. 2. and other Gnostick Hereticks in the Apostles daies did deal by them and the Church then as you do by us now and that the second Epistle of Peter the Epistle of Iude much of 1 Iohn and 2 Iohn were written purposly against them besides many other Scriptures And have you well considered those Scriptures and applied them to your selves When you have answered these Questions I require you to have no more to do with me nor any of this Church For we renounce you as Hereticks after a first and second Admonition a●d will have no fellowship with such self-condemned persons nor receive you into our houses or bid you God speed lest we partake of your wicked deeds Tit. 3. 10. 2 Ioh. 10 11. Kederminster March 28. 1655. Richard Baxter FINIS