whereof Saint Peter acknowledges himself a Compresbyter for if it be alleaged as it is That this is against our owne Principles who allow but one Bâ—shop in one City and these were many let me put the Objector in minde that though these Bishops were called together by Saint Paul from Miletum to Ephesus yet they were not all said to be Elders of Ephesus but from thence monition went speediliest out to all places to call them and so we hear saint Paul say Ye all amongst whom I have gone preaching the Kingdome of God which plainly argues they were not confined to the compasse of one City or Territory but Over seers of severall and far-dispersed charges As Saint Paul therfore to his Timothy so Saint Luke here uses the terms promiscuouslâ— one being as yet in common use for both though the offices were sensibly distinguished And now what shall we say to this Tell me ye that look upon these Papers with censorious eyes tell me is all this think you no other than a formall presidence of an assembly without any power or command Is this to do but as a Consull in a Senate to propound Cases to gather Votes to declare the judgement of the Presbytery or Synod or as Zanchy resembles it ut Rector in Academia as a Rector in one of their Academies or rather as Saint Ierome whom you challenge for your Patron in this point hath it tanquam imperator in exercitu â—â—â—â—on Epist 〈◊〉 Evangâ—â—â— as a Generall in an Army who hath power both to Marshall all the troops and to command the Captains and Colonels and to execute Marshall law upon Officers If you have a mind to suffer your eies to be willingly blinded with such improbable suggestions falling from those whom you think you have otherwise reason to honour hugg still your own palpable errour not without our pity though without the power of redresse but if you care for truth and desire in the presence of God to imbrace it for truthes own sake without respect of persons aske your own hearts whether these charges and services laid by the elect Vessell upon his Timothy and Titus be any other than really Episcopall and such as manifestly carry in them both Superiority and Iurisdiction §. 7. The testimony of St. Iohn in his Revelation pressed NEither can all the shifts in the world elude that pregnant Vision and charge of the blessed Apostle St. Iohn in whose longer lasting time the government of the Church was fully setled in this threefold imparity of the Orders and degrees who having had the speciall supervision of the whole Asian Church was by the Spirit of God commanded to direct his 7 Epistles to the Bishops of those seven famous Churches by the name of so many Angels To the Angel of the Church of Ephesus To the Angel of the Church in Smyrna c. For what can be more plain than that in every of these Chur hes as for instance that of Ephesus there were many Presbyters yet but one Angel If that one were not in place above the rest and higher by the head than they how comes he to be noted in the throng Why was not the direction to al the Angels of the Church of Ephesus Divina voce laudatur sub Angeli nomine pâ—aepositus Ecclesiae Aug. Epi. 162. All were Angels in respect of their Ministery one was the Angel in respect of his fixed superioritâ— There were thousands of Starres in this firmament of the Asian Churches there were but seaven of the first magnitude who can indure such an invasion that one is mentioned many are meant as if they had said Non populum aggrâ—dit sed principem claâ—â— utique Episcopum Mâ—rlâ—rat To one that is to more To one Angel that is to more Angels than one To what purpose is it to insist upon any proprâ—ety of speech if we may take such liberty of Construction As if when the Prophet came to Iehu with a message and expresly said To thee O Captain he should have turn'd it off to the rest and have said To me that is Not to me alone but to all my felllows with me But to put this matter out of doubt it is particularly known who some of those Angels were Holy Polycarpus was knowne to be the Angel of the Church of Smyrna whom Ignatius the blessed Martyr mentions as by his Episcopacy greater than his Clergie Timothy had been not long before Bishop of Ephesus yea of the Asians now Onesimus was whose Metropolis Ephesus was Wherein Ignatius acknowledges 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a very great multitude of Christians so large that in the Emperour Leo's time Iura Graec. p. 88. 90. it had 36. Bishopricks under it And so was Sardis having under it 24. And shall we think that these great Dioceses were as some obscure Parishes wherein were no variety of eminent persons so as the Angel that is noted here must needs be of a large Iurisdiction and great Authority But if any man shall imagine these things spoken to the Angel as to him under that title in the name of all the rest let him know that this cannot be for that the charges and challenges there made are personall and such as could not be communicated to all for who can say that all those of the Church of Ephesus were patient and laborious Revel 2.2 that none of them fainted that they all lost their first love that all hated the work of the Nicholaitans who can say that all those of the Church of Smyrna were either poore or rich That none in the Church of Pergamus denyed the fath Besides here is a manifest distinction betwixt the Pastor or Bishop and those of his charge and they are described by the severalties of their estates As when he had acknowledged the Graces of Polycarpus the Angel of Smyrna Revel 2.10 and incouraged that blessed Martyr by way of premonition to some of his Church Behold some of you the devill shall cast into prison and ye shall be tryed and endure Tribulation ten dayes and then addressing to him Be thou faithfull to the death c. And in his fourth Epistle Revel 2.24 distinguishing the Angel or Bishop of Thyatyra from the rest of his charge But unto you saith saith he and the rest of Thyatyra as many as have not this doctrine and the depth of Satan as they speake I will put none other burden upon them but that which ye have hold fast till I come So that this conceit is no lesse wild than that other which followes it of my old acquaintance Brightman who makes not only these Angels the types of those Churches but those Churches of Asia the Types and Histories of all the Christian Churches which should be to the end of the world Thus the Bells say what some Hearers thinke So cleer is this truth that the Opposites have been forced to yield Priority here intimated but a Priority of Order onely not
of power a Priority of Presidencie for the time not personall Beza yields him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as he acknowledges Justine Martyr to call him President of the Presbytery imo ne perpetuum q. istud 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 munus esse necessario opportuisse but perhaps not perpetuall wherein I blesse my self to see how prejudice can blinde the eyes of the wise and learned for what Author in the whole world ever mentioned such a fashion of ambulatory Government in the Church And do not our Histories testifie that Polycarpus the Angel of Smyrna dyed Bishop there that Onesimus by Ignatius his testimony so continued Bishop of Ephesus James at Ierusalem and of these errors taxed by the holy Ghost were but for the time of a shifting Presidencie why should any one of the momentany guides of the Churches be charged so home with all the abuses of their Iurisdiction How easie had it been for him to shift the fault as hee did the chair for how could it concerne him more then the next men surely this conceit is more worthy of pity than Confutation No indifferent Reader can looke upon that Scripture and not confesse it a strained Construction Here then were certainly both Continuance and Iurisdiction Wherein Parker braves our learned Docter Field as relying meerely upon the proofs of humane authority but that worthy Divine had he insisted upon the point which hee but touched in the way could easily out of the very Text it self have evicted the Angels power and Iurisdiction for how plain is it that the Angell of Ephesus had taken the Examination of the counterfeit Apostles and found them lyers which if a meer Presbyter had undertaken to do to bee sure hee had been shaken off with scorn enough It is imputed to the Angell of the Church of Pergamus that however himself in his own person held constant to the Faith yet that there were those under his charge who held the doctrine of Balaam the beastly errours of the Nicolaitans lhey were of his Clergie that taught these wicked Doctrines And for this the Bishop is texed and menaced how should this be if he had not had a coe cive power to restraine and punish them And more plainly the Angell of the Church of Thyatyra notwithstanding all his good parts graces services is sharply taxed What is his fault Revel 2.26 That thou sufferest the woman Iezabel who calleth herself a prophetesse to teach and seduce my servants c. Were he but an Ordinary Presbiter unarmed with power how could he helpe it Or why should he be charged with what he could not redresse Let an ingenuous reader now judge whether these bee not more than probabilities of a Supereminent and Iurisdictive power in these speciall Angels of the Asian Churches Shortly then upon these clear passages of Saint Paul and Saint Iohn meeting with the grounds laid by our blessed Saviour I am for my part so confident of the Divine Institution of the Majority of Bishops above Presbiters that I dare boldly say there are weighty points of faith which have not so strong evidence in holy Scriptures Let me instance in that power which we that are Evangelicall Ministers have by the vertue of our sacred Ordes given to us alone for the Consecration and distribution of the holy Eucharist a point not more highly than justly stood upon by all Orthodox Divines yea Christians What warrant can we challenge for this right but our Saviours practise And with all that speech of his to his Disciples Luke 22.20 Do this in remembrance of me Now if this Hoc facite shall be taken as it is by some as not spoken of the Consecration or benediction but of the receit what warrant had the Apostles and all their holy successors in the Church of God ever since to enjoyne and appropriate this sacred worke to none but those that are Presbyters by Ordination The receiving of Infants to holy Baptisme is a matter of so high consequence that we justly Brand our Catabaptists with heresie for denying it yet Let me with good assurance say that the evidences for this truth come farre short of that which the Scriptures have afforded us for the superiority of some Church-governors over those who otherwise indeed in a sole respect of their ministeriall function are equall He therefore that would upon pretence of want of Scriptures quarrell at the divine Institution of Bishops having so evident and unavoydable Testimonies might with much better colour cavill at those blessed Ordinances of God which the whole Church hath thought her self bound upon sufficient reason to receive and reverence §. 8. The estate and order of Episcopacy deduced from the Apostles to the Primitive Bishops DId not the holy Scriptures yield unto these firme grounds whereon to build our Episcopacy in vain should we plead the Tradition and practise of the Church ever since for as much as we have to deal with those who are equally disaffected to the name of a Bishop and to Tradition and are so fore-stalled with their own prejudice that they are carried where Scripture is silent to an unjust jealousie against the universall practise of the whole Church of God upon earth But now when Christ and his Apostles give us the text well may the Apostolicall and universall Church yield us the Commentary And that let me boldly say is so clear for us that if our Opposites dare stand to this triall the day is ours their gultinesse therfore would fain decline this barre Tertull. de prescrip c. 24 25. Parker taking advantage from a word of Tertullian Nihil interest quando quid sit quod ab Apostolis non fuit It matters not when any thing is which was not under the Apostles that is Adulterine what ever it be that is not named by the Apostles inferres What then It matters not when the Episcopall Hierarchy began whether sooner or later Qi d igitur Nihil interest c. l. 2. c. 8. it is enough that it is Adulterine for that it is not named by the Apostles And contrarily it matters no whit at what time the reformed dis ipline was impayred whether in the very first Church or no or whether in the time immediatly succeeding Thus he And shall we take him at his word Where then did the Apostles name this mans Consistory Where his Lay-changable Presbytery Where his Discipline It is therefore Adulterine As also Where name they the peoples voyce in their Ministers Election where Classes or Synods Are all these adulterine For us we are not concerned in this Censure Our Episcopacy is both named and recommended and prescribed by the Apostles As for his discipline seeing it never came within the mention either of an Apostle or of any Christian for above fifteen hundred yeers since our Saviour left the world what can that be but grosly adulterine But to make up all Parker should have done well to have taken notice of the following words of
the Church Paracles l. 1. c. 4 and her Governours in the second their practice prescribes her government although as he adds without booke not without the Churches owne consultation and consent which if it be granted makes the more for us who ever since we were a Church have consented to the Apostles practice and constantly used the same What do I stand upon this They are the words of Cartwright himselfe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the example of the Apostles and generall practice of the Churches under their government draweth a necessitie §. 9. The third ground That the formes ordained by the Apostles were for universall and perpetuall use THirdly it is no lesse evident that the form which the Apostles set and ordained for the governing of the Church was not intended by them for that present time or place onely but for continuance and succession for ever For no man I suppose can be so weak Praecepta ipsa disciplinae omnibus in futurum Ecclesiis dictante Sp. Sancto tradiderunt Sco. Wy Paracles l. 1. c. 4 as to thinke that the rules of the Apostles were personall locall temporary as some Dials or Almanacks that are made for some speciall Meridians but as their office and charge so their rules were universall to the whole world as farre and as long as the world lasteth For what reason is there that Crete or Ephesus should be otherwise provided for than all the world besides Or what possibility to think that those first planters of the Gospell should leave all the rest of Christs Church as the Ostrich doth her eggs in the dust without any farther care The extent and duration of any rule will best be measured as by the intention of the Authour so by the nature and use of it S. Paul's intention is clearely expressed for a continuance untill the appearing of our Lord Iesus Christ 1 Tim. 6.14 As for the nature of the severall directions they carry perpetuity and universality of use in the face of them there being the same reason of their observation by all persons concerned and in all times and places why should not every Bishop be as unreproveable as a Cretian or an Ephesian Why should an accusation be received against an Elder upon more slender evidence in one place than another Why should there not bee the same courses taken for Ordination and Censure in all ages and Churches since the same things must of necessity bee done every where in all ages and Churches But why should I strive for a granted Truth For it is plaine that the Isle of Crete and Ephesus were but the patternes of other Churches and Timothie and Titus of other faithfull Overseers If therefore it shall appeare that Episcopacie so stated as we have expressed was in these persons and Churches ordered and setled by Apostolicall direction it must necessarily be yeelded to be of Apostolike and therefore Divine Institution §. 10. The fourth ground That the universall practice of the Church immediately succeeding the Apostolike times is a sure Commentary upon the practice of the Apostles and our best direction FOurthly I must challenge it for a no lesse undoubted Truth That the universall practice of the Church immediately succeeding the Apostles is the best Commentary upon the practice of the Apostles and withall that the universall practice of Gods Church in all ages and places is next unto Gods Word the best guide and direction for our carriages and formes of Administration The Copartners and immediate Successors of those blessed men could best tell what they next before them did for who can better tell a mans way or pace than he that followes him close at the heeles And if particular men or Churches may mistake yet that the whole Church of Christian men should at once mistake that which was in their eye it is farre more than utterly improbable A truth which it is a wonder any sober Christian should bogle at yet such there are to our griefe and to the shame of this late giddy age even the great guides of their faction Polit. Eccles l. 2. cap. 7. Falsum est c. Our mis-learned countriman Parker the second Ignis fatuus of our poore mis-led brethren and some Seconds of his stand peremptorily and highly upon the Deniall It is false saith he that the universall practice of the Church is sufficient to prove any thing to be of Apostolike Originall And jeeringly soone after Vniversa Ecclesiae praxis consensus patrum unica Hierarchicorum Helena est The universall practice of the Church and consent of Fathers saith he is the onely dearling of the abettors of the Hierarchy But the practice of the Church immediatly after the Apostles is no evidence Heare now I beseech you my deare brethren all ye who would pretend to any Christian ingenuity and consider whether you have not reason to distrust such a leader as would perswade you to slight and reject the testimony and practice of the whole Church of God upon earth from the first plantation of it to this present age and to cast your selves upon the private opinions of himselfe and some few other men of yesterday surely in very matter of doctrine this could be no other than deeply suspicious than foulely odious If no man before Luther and Calvin had excepted against those points wherein we differ from Rome I should have hated to follow them how much more must this needs hold in matter of fact Iudge what a shame it is to heare a Christian Divine carelesly shaking off all arguments drawne from Antiquity Continuance Perpetuall Succession in and from Apostolike Churches unanimous consent universall practice of the Church immediate practice of all the Churches succeeding the Apostles as either Popish or nothing And all these are acknowledged for our Grounds and are not Popish For me I professe I could not without blushing and astonishment read such stuffe as confounded in my selfe to see that any sonne of the Church should be not onely so rebelliously unnaturall to his holy mother as to broach so putrid a Doctrine to her utter disparagement but so contumelious also to the Spirit of God in his providence for the deare Spouse of his Saviour here upon earth Holy Jrenaeus Iren. l. 4. contr haeres I am sure was of another minde Agnitio vera saith he The true acknowledgement is the doctrine of the Apostles antiquus Ecclesiae status and the ancient state of the Church in the whole world by the Succession of Bishops to whom the Apostles delivered the Church which is in every place And then whiles we have both these the doctrine of the Apostles seconded by the ancient state of the Church who can out-face us What meanes then this wilfull and peevish stupidity Nihil pro Apostolico habendum Ibid. l. 2. c. 7. Nothing saith Parker is to be held for Apostolike but that which is found recorded in the writings of the Apostles Nothing Was all
Episcopall power as those Bishops which they have abdicated 1 Tim. 3.8.9.10 Thirdly Timothy must prove and examine the Deacons whether they be blamelesse or not Whether they be so qualifyed as is by him prescribed and if they be found such must allow them to use the office of a Deacon and upon the good and holy use of it promote them to an higher degree How should this be done without a fixed Superiority of power Or what other than this doth an English Bishop 1 Tim. 3.15 Fourthly Timothy is encharged with these things in the absence of St. Paul that if he should tarry long he might know how to behave himself in the house of God which is the Church of the living God That is how to carry himself not in the Pulpit only but in Church government in admitting the Officers of the Ephesian Church This could not be meant of the duties of a meer Presbyter for what hath such an one to doe with the charges and Offices of his Equals par in parem c. Besides that house of God which is the Church wherin his behaving is so required is not some one private Congregation such an one were not fit for that style of the Pillar and ground of Truth but that famous Diocesan Church of Ephesus yea of Asia rather wherin there was the use of the variety of all those offices prescribed Neither may we think that Timothy was before after so much attendance of the blessed Apostle in his journeys ignorant of what might concerne him as an ordinary Minister it was therefore a more publique and generall charge which was now imposed upon him he therefore that knew how to behave himself in a particular Congregation must now know what carriage is fit for him as a Diocesan Fifthly Timothy must put the brethren that is 1 Tim. 4 6. the Presbyters in remembrance of the foreâ—old dangers of the last times and must oppose the false doctrine there specified with this charge Command and teach He must teach then himself he must command others to teach them Had he been only a simple Presbyter he might command and go without Now hee must command If our Lords Bishops do so much what do they more Sixthly 1 Tim. 5.1 Timothy is encharged with censures and prescribed how he must manage them towards old and yong Rebuke not an Elder roughly c. He is also to give charge conâ—erning the choyce carriage and maintenance of these widowes which must be provided for by the Church he hath power to admit some and to refuse others and to take order the Church be not charged unduely which a single Presbyter alone is not allowed to do even where their own Presbytery is on foot Seventhly Timothy must care and see that the Elders 1 Tim. 5.17 or Presbyters who are painfull in their callings be respectfully used and liberally maintained what is this to an ordinary Presbyter that hath no power of disposing any maintenance If every Presbyter had and no body over them to moderate it at what a passe would the quiet of the Church be Who would not repute himselfe to be most painfull if himselfe might be judge No it was the Bishops work that A thing that the Bishops once might well do when all the Presbyters were and so were all at first as of the Bishops family all the tiths and means of the Church comming in to him and he dispencing among the Priests and other Church-officers to every one his portion Now indeed as by the distinction of Parishes and since that by other events things are falne it is that which our Bishops indeed may endeavour and pray for but sure I am it is more than they can hope to do till God himselfe be pleased to amend it Eighthly 1 Tim. 5.19 Timothy was charged not to receive an accusation against an Elder or Presbyter but before two or three witnesses So then Timothy by his place might receive accusations against Presbyters How could he do so if he were but their equall Our Northerne paraclesis can tell us parium neutrum alteri subordinatur and paria non sunt 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Scot. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 1. c. 4. that fellowes cannot be subordinate witnesses must bee called before him in cases of such accusation How can this be without a Iurisdiction And when he findes a Presbyter manifestly faulty he may he must rebuke him before all that others also may fear Epiphan haere 75. That of Epiphanius is upon good ground therefore The Divine speech of the Apostle teacheth who is a Bishop and who a Presbyter in saying to Timothy Rebuke not an Elder c. How could a Bishop rebuke a Presbyter if he had no power over a Presbyter Thus he The evidence is so clear Camer in 1 Tim. 4. that Cameron himselfe cannot but confesse Nullus est dubitandi locus c. There can be no doubt saith he but that Timothy was elected by the Colledge of Elders to governe the Colledge of the Elders and that not w thout some authority but such as had meet limits Thus must thus might Timothy do even to Presbyters what could a Bishop of England do more And thus Cameron Though I cannot approve of his election by the Colledge that conceit is his own but the authoritie is yielded 1 Tim. 5.21 Ninthly Timothy is charged before God and the Lord Iesus Christ and the elect Angels to observe all these things without preferring one Presbyter before an other and doing nothing by partiality plainly therefore Timothy was in such place and authority as was capable of giving favour or using rigor to Presbyters what more can be said of ours 1 Tim. 5.22 Tenthly Timothy is charged to lay hands suddenly on no man he had therfore power of the imposition of hands On whom should he lay his hands for Ordination but on Presbyters and Deacons therefore he above Presbyters The lesse saith the Apostle to the Hebrews is blessed of the better Hâ—br 7.7 He laid hands then Yes but not alone say our Opposites My demand then is But why then should this charge be particularly directed to Timothy and not to more The Presbytery some construe to have laid hands on the ordained but the Presbytery so constituted as we shall hereafter declare but a meer Presbyter or many Presbyters as of his or their owne power never An Apostle did so to Timothy himselfe and Timothy as being a Bishop might do it but who or where ever any lesse than he Neither doth the Apostle say lend not thine hand to be laid on with others but appropriates it as his own act whereas then our Antitilenus tells us the question is not whether this charge were given to Timothy but whether to Timothy alone me thinks he might easily have answered himselfe Doth St Paul in this act joyne any with him were there not Elders good store at Ephesus before Could they have
Christians who within the Ken of memory Hâ—drian Sarav Praelat ad tractat de gradibus minister came into this Kingdome for Protection had the noble Johannes a Lasco for their Bishop Thus it was with all Christian men and assemblies all the world over till within the age of some who might be yet living the waters of the Cantons and the Lake of Lemanus began to be troubled And now when the grosse errors of Doctrine came to be both discovered by one side and impetuously defended by the other and the impugners cruelly persecuted to bonds and death those who could not enjoy the freedome of the true Religion under their Popish Bishops thought themselves driven to set up Church-governors and Pastors of their own And these once estblished now must belike be defended They might not be under those they had they could not have those they should they rested under those they could get And hence is all this Distraction §. 22. The government by Bishops both universall and unalterable WE have seen the grounds of Church-government laid by our Saviour himself in imparity We have seen it so built up by Apostolike hands we have seen the practise of the ancient and subsequent Church laying on the roof to make a perfect Fabrick Yet what is all this if the charge be not universall and perpetuall yeild it to be so ancient as the Apostles themselves yet if it be arbitrary whether for time or place what have we gained Surely as God is but one and ever himself so would he have his Church There may be threescore Queens and fourscore Concubins and Virgins without number but his Dove his undefiled is but one and though she may go in severall dresses and trimmings yet still and ever the stuffe is the same Plainly though there may be varieties of circumstantiall fashons in particular Churches yet the substance of the government is and must be ever the same That ordinary power which the Apostles had they traduced to their successors as bequeathed by our Saviour in his last fare well to them unto the end of the world For we may not think as one said well that the Apostles carried their Commission with them up to heaven They knew it was given them for a perpetuity of succession He that said Go teach all Nations and baptize added Behold I am with you to the end of the world He could not mean it of their persons which staid not long upon earth after him he meant it of their Evangelical successors So was he with them as he was with his domesticks their Predecessors not in the immediatnesse and extraordinary way of calling not in the admirable measure and kinds of their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or gifts not in the infalliblenesse of their judgement nor in the universality of their charge but in the effectuall execution of those offices which should be perpetuated to his Church for the salvation of mankinde Such were the preaching of the Gospell and the administration of the Sacraments the ordaining Church-officers the ordering of Church affairs the infliction of censures and in short the power of the Keys which we justly say were not tyed to St. Peters girdle but were communicated to all his fellows and to all his and their successors for ever By vertue whereof all true Pastors can open and shut heaven gates above much more the Church doors hereupon earth And all these as are of such necessity that without them the Church could not at all subsist at least not long and in any tolerable Condition The power of these acts as it was by our Saviours Commission originally in the Apostles being by them conveyed to the Church and not by the Church conveyed to them So it succeeded accordingly in and to their successors and was incorporated into their office we that are Priests receive the Keys in Peter saith St. Ambrose Veniat ad Antistites saith St. Augustine Let them come to the Bishops by whom the keys are ministred in the Church As Beza said truly of the promise of the holy Ghost Beza de Graeci minist c. 5. that it was given for the good of the whole Church yet not unto the whole Church but peculiarly unto the Apostles to give to others at least so must it be said of this power And so indeed by Calvins own determination Calv. Instit 1. 4. c. 3. none but Pastors might lay hands on the ordayned Hoc postremo hâ—bendum est non universam multitudinem manus iâ—posuisse suâ—s ministris sed folos pastores and none but they were capable to weild the great censures of the Church Shortly then was this power left by the Apostles or was it not left If it were left as we could else have no Church was it left with all or with some with all it cannot the multitude cannot be thought fit for these affaires If with some then whether with one in a City or territory or with more If with more why is the charge then imposed upon one One Timothy in Ephesus One Titus in Creet One Angel in Thyatira One other in Philadelphia Laodicea and the rest And why are those single persons challengeable for the neglect And if this power and this charge were by the very hands of the Apostles entayled upon these eminent persons which should by due ordination therein succeed them and from them lineally descend upon us I wonder what humane power dare presume to cut it off Neither do I lesse marvell at the opinions of those Divines which holding Episcopacy thus to stand Jure Apostolico in the first institution yet hold it may be changed in the sequel For me I have learned to yeild this honour to these inspired men that I dare not but think these their ordinances which they intended to succession immutable Some kinds of Ceremonious prescriptions fell from them which were meant to be only locall and temporary those we have no reason to think our selves oblieged to but those which they left for the administration of Gods Church it shall be high presumption in any to alter because the Apostles did but meet together divers times on the first day of the week and St. Paul ordered that day for the laying aside their Collections And that is only called the Lords day by the Apostle How strongly are the vehement opposites of Episcopacy wont to maintain that day in succession to the Jewish Sabbath and that in all points unalterable by any humane authority Surely had they but the tenth part of that plea from the Apostles for this their Judaicall-Evangelicall Sabbath which we have for our Episcopacy they would make us feel the Dint of this argument and would in the rigorous observation of it out-do the Jews But you are now ready to choak me with some Apostolicall ordinances which were even of tâ— emselves reversed Be it so Then you tell me of the first form of their goverment of the Church which say you was by an