the charge of Timothy and Titus set aside their own persons whereof we shall give account afterwards in whose instructions the Apostle is large in qualifying Bishops and Deacons such Bishops as we reade of Tit. i. 7. where having said that he left him in Crete to make Presbyters in every city the Apostle addeth For a Bishop must be blamelesse but of any other rank not a syllable None in the Church of Corinth The Commentaries under S. Ambrose his name yield this reason of the disorders the Apostle taxeth there 1 Cor. xi 21. Because there was no Bishop there The words are not of ordinary mark Hos notat qui sic in Ecclesiam conveniebant ut munera sua offerentes advenientibus Presbyteris quia adhuc Rectores Ecclesiis non omnibus locis fuerant constituti totum sibi qui obtulerat vindicaret schismatis causâ So whereas that whereof the Eucharist was consecrated should be spent by the assembly in the common feast of Love some made good chear others that had not offered went away without their share Therefore saith the Apostle ver 22. Have ye not houses to eat and drink in but despise ye the Church of God coming thither for dissensions sake and belly-chear not for the Sacrament and for peace and shame them that have not sending them away without enterteinment therefore verse 33. he exhorteth to stay for one another at their meetings Thus farre out of those Commentaries Which reason as it giveth a clear meaning to the whole passage of the Apostle so it groweth still more probable because we shall find afterwards that it continueth still in force at the time of writing Clemens his Epistle published not long since And men of learning have argued that this reason might better be yielded for their dissensions saying I am of Paul I am of Apollos I am of Cephas which the Apostle reproveth in the beginning of the Epistle to wit Because there was then no Bishop there and in the Apostles absence And indeed if we reckonnot amisse what reason have we to think that this Apostle should ordain in the Churches of his planting a higher rank of Bishops to govern the Churches above and with the Presbyters Do we not see that he chargeth himself with the oversight of these Churches wherein he had planted the Colledges of Presbyters aforesaid 2. Corinth xi 28. Besides those things which are without that which cometh upon me dayly the care of all the Churches To what purpose else is the journey he taketh Acts xv 36. to visit the Churches wherein he had ordained Presbyters afore Let us return saith he to Barnabas and visit our brethren in all cities where we preached the word of the Lord and see how they do We see he taketh care to exercise discipline upon the incestuous person at Corinth which it seemeth the Rulers of the Church there had neglected to do 1. Cor. v. 4. pronouncing sentence of excommunication and requiring the Church to see it ratified executed And for a thing remarkable observe in what terms he proceedeth 1. Cor. v. 4. When ye are gathered together and my spirit saith he his Spirit which ruled there in chief for the time So that it is not for nothing that Tertullian lib. De praescript cap. 36. reckoneth Corinth Philippi Thessalonica Ephesus and the rest of the same rank all Apostolicall Churches from this one Apostle because he planted and ruled them all for his time Apud quas saith he ipsae adhuc cathedrae Apostolorum suis locis praesident which is in good English neither more nor lesse then here is affirmed The Apostles chair rested in them all till Tertullians time therefore the Apostle for his time sate in it And to my apprehension all his Epistles are nothing else but so many acts of this government spirituall in chief which the Apostle reserved himself in the Churches of his own planting The like to be said of S. Peters Epistles and hath been observed in part by Eusebius Eccles hist lib. iii. cap. 5. That the title of his former Epistle addressed to the strangers dispersed through Pontus Asia Galatia Cappadocia and Bithynia that is to the Jews sojourning in those provinces argueth it to be a work of his care in preaching the Gospel to the charge he had undertaken according to the division alledged before Galat. ii 9. And therefore as hath been hitherto argued of the other Apostle so when we see S. Peter 1. Pet. v. 1. direct his exhortation to feed the flock to none but Presbyters we have cause to conceive that those Churches to whom he writeth and whom we shall heare Epiphanius say anon that he went sometimes from Rome to visit had as yet no Bishops over their Presbyters The same that S. Hierome hath argued long since out of Hebr. xiii 17. where the Apostle writeth in the plurall number Obey them that have the rule over you and submit your selves CHAP. IV. As the Apostles withdrew so Bishops came over the Presbyteries in their stead Timothy and Titus had not their charge till S. Paul left those parts His journey from Ephesus through Macedonia into Greece By the way he left Titus in Crete Why he wintered at Nicopolis At spring he returned by land into Macedonia There and then Timothy undertaketh the Church of Ephesus Timothy an Evangelist The prophecies that went before of him and the grace he received Titus and he over many Presbyteries Bishops over each afterwards The Angels of the seven Churches BUt as the Apostles began to wear out or otherwise as their occasions gave them not leave to attend in person upon the Churches of their care reason required if but in correspondence to the state of government that had hitherto rested in some Apostle and the Presbyteries of particular Churches there should be instituted some heads of these companies of Presbyters to whom the name of Bishops hath been appropriated ever since and certain it is that during the time of the Apostles instituted they were This agreeth extreme well with the charge and instructions of the Apostle to his Disciples Timothy and Titus over the Churches of Asia and Crete whom as all Ecclesiasticall writers after Eusebius acknowledge to be made Bishops of Ephesus and Crete so must we not fail to observe here that this was not done till it was revealed to the Apostle that from thenceforth the Lord would imploy him in the Western parts of the world The businesse is most an end agreed upon on all hands yet because the observation is so effectuall to this purpose let me take leave to inlarge it by clearing the whole passage of the Apostles last voyage from Ephesus through Greece and back again Acts xix 21. we reade at that time Paul resolved by the Spirit having passed through Macedonia and Achaia to go to Jerusalem saying When I have been there I must also see Rome In 2. Cor. i. 15. he writeth to them that he had formerly purposed to go
not yet made therefore he did not intend there should be any such in the Church Rather let me argue that because S. Paul left two of his principall Disciples in two principall places with charge to plant Presbyteries as there was means to propagate Churches therefore he gave a pattern of that which these Disciples and all the Church was to do afterwards in settling the government of those Churches in the Presbyteries of them and in their heads which themselves were for the time And this we shall find was done in good time in the Churches of Timothies charge if we take but a short consideration of the beloved Disciple John the Apostle and Evangelist what we find concerning him in Scriptures or otherwise received and credible in this nature He lived longest of all the Disciples as is said and he will easily shew us Bishops over the Churches of Timothies charge for such without doubt were the seven Churches of Asia unto whom the Apostle sending from our Lord seven Epistles ii and iii. chapt of his Revelation directeth them to the Angels of those Churches a style not competible to a person of common rank and the act of directing Epistles to one in the name and behalf of the whole Church arguing the eminence of the head fit to answer for the body he representeth Herewith agree the words of Clemens Alexandrinus in Eusebius iii. 23. concerning this Apostle that being returned from Patmus to Ephesus he used upon request to go among the neighbour-nations 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is in some places to constitute Bishops to wit where there were Presbyteries afore that yet had none in some to found whole Churches in others to ordain a Clergie out of such as were signified by the Spirit as we reade of S. Paul and Timotheus For will you have these to be Bishops according to the use of the word in S. Paul where it is all one with Presbyters Sure we must needs think of such as his own writings make Angels of Churches Ignatius that was his Disciple according to some in all his Epistles specifieth and sometimes by name the Bishops of some the same Churches and some of others together with their Presbyteries and in particular Onesimus Timothie's successour at Ephesus Tertullian and Ireneus the most ancient we can alledge have named Polycarpus in particular made Bishop of Smyrna by this Apostle It is not possible to say more in this case So often as we find mention of government in particular Churches in Scripture so often we meet with Presbyteries or the heads of Presbyteries Apostles themselves or deriving their charge from the Apostles Nay it is very much not pretending that Bishops came on otherwise then to be in stead of the Apostles over particular Churches that there is so much to be said for their office out of Scriptures all written during their time CHAP. V. The Presbyterie at Antiochia S. Peter and S. Paul heads of the Church there Likewise of that at Rome The difference about their next Successours Epiphanius his conjecture upon it Another Clemens succeeded S. Peter and Linus S. Paul The succession of the Apostles there is unquestionable THe Church of Antiochia is remembred next to that of Jerusalem in the Acts of the Apostles but of the government thereof we have nothing so distinct or expresse in Scripture Yet this we reade Acts xiii 2. Now there were in the Church at Antiochia certain prophets and teachers And as they ministred unto the Lord and fasted the holy Ghost said Seperate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them And when they had fasted and prayed and laid their hands on them they sent them away That these Prophets and Teachers were all of them Presbyters of that Church is more then can be affirmed because it is nowhere set down But when we reade that they ministred unto the Lord which must be understood of the service of God in their assemblies especially in celebrating the Eucharist and gave imposition of hands we find among the number of them the works of ordinary Ministers when there was no higher rank then that of Presbyters able to do the like For as concerning the Heads of this Church we must have recourse to Ignatius his Epistle ad Magn. where he useth these words For at Antiochia the Disciples were first called Christians Paul and Peter founding the Church And in the Epistle ad Antioch if it be his as the other unquestionably is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is Ye are Pauls and Peters Disciples Remember Euodius that first had the rule of you put into his hands by the Apostles Be he what he will be that writ this let me be bold to say it agreeth marvellous well with what hath been said and with the Scripture In which it is plain there were at the beginning two congregations of Christians at Antiochia one of the Circumcision the other converted from the Gentiles because S. Peter Gal. ii 12. fearing those of the Circumcision withdrew himself and ate no more with the Gentiles In regard of the care of which two congregations performed by S. Peter and S. Paul according to the division agreed upon Gal. ii 9. the words of Ignatius are to be verified where he maketh both Apostles founders of the Church at Antiochia Who finding themselves imployed in other parts of the world took the same course with this Church which S. Paul did with those he commended to Timothy and Titus and put both congregations by that time united and concorporate in one under the charge of Euodius predecessour to Ignatius These two Apostles are usually counted founders of the Church at Rome as well as of that of Antiochia Ireneus iii. 3. Fundantes itaque instituentes beati Apostoli Ecclesiam Lino Episcopatum Ecclesiae administrandae tradiderunt Hujus Lini Paulus in iis quae sunt ad Timotheum Epistolis meminit Succedit autem ei Anacletus Post eum tertio loco ab Apostolis Episcopatum sortitur Clemens Where you see he referreth the foundation of that Church to both the Apostles as doth Dionysius also of Corinth some hundred and twentie years after their death in Eusebius Eccles hist. iii. 26. and others of later stamp sans number Whereupon Epiphanius Haer. 27. reckoning the succession of the Bishops of Rome putteth Peter and Paul in the first place But yet observe further the difference between the words of Ireneus which put Linus after the Apostles and the Latine Church which according to S. Hierome Catal. Script in CLEM. reckoneth Clemens in that place which Tertullian the most ancient of that language lib. De Praescript averreth To which difference we may ascribe the confusion that Baronius hath observed in the Pontificall book under the name of Pope Damasus an ancient piece but pieced indeed out of severall writings and crosse to one another divers times As for the purpose when it
of Cleophas sister of the blessed Virgin the wife of Alpheus and mother of James the lesse Wherewith agreeth Clemens Alexandrinus in Eusebius Eccles hist ii 1. where he acknowledgeth but two Jameses the son of Zebedee and this James of Jerusalem mentioned by the Apostle And herewith agreeth S. Chrysostome upon that text of the Apostle where he observeth that for S. James his honour S. Paul calleth him brother of our Lord whereas he might as well have called him sonne of Cleophas as the Evangelist had done Here it is plain that James the brother of our Lord and sonne of Cleophas is the Apostle sonne of Alpheus according to S. Chrysostome As for that which followeth that neverthelesse he was not of kin to our Lord according to the flesh but according to the opinion of the world it seemeth to depend upon Hegesippus in Eusebius iii. 11 26. where he maketh Cleophas brother to Joseph supposed father of our Lord. Which is possible to be true that Joseph and Cleophas brothers should take to wife the two Maries sisters or cousins But otherwise there is so much appearance in the Gospel that Mary mother of James and Joses is Mary of Cleophas sister to the blessed Virgin that it must needs be an inconvenience to deny this James to be kin to our Lord by her side As for other relations and conjectures of Church-writers the varietie whereof is endlesse and unreconcilable it is not reason to draw them into consequence to the prejudice of a conjecture which maketh so clear an agreement of this whole difference It was my desire to shew the true meaning of the Apostles words but it is not my purpose to build upon uncertainties Whosoever this James of Jerusalem was we find the Church of Jerusalem under his charge almost assoon as there was a Church there at least if we believe Ignatius Epist ad Trall where he saith S. Stephen was Deacon to this James of Jerusalem which must be betimes after our Lords death And therefore thus we see whom the Bishops of Jerusalem succeed CHAP. III. The Apostles planted mother-churches in mother-cities The Government of them estated upon Presbyteries Saint Paul at the beginning made no Bishops over those Presbyteries The reason Himself had the oversight of the Churches of his planting for the time The like in the Churches of S. Peters charge LEt us now go abroad with the Apostles and see how they followed this pattern in the Churches which they converted to the faith Tertullian l. De praescript c. 20. speaketh thus of them ac providè Ecclesias apud unāquamque civitatem condiderunt This slight circumstance which he but pointeth at that the Apostles founded Churches in Cities is very considerable in our businesse For it is plain they could not bestow their pains on all places reason required they should labour most to plant the faith in the most populous And common sense and the least knowledge of times will serve to shew that from thence it was propagated through the Countreys that lay to those Cities which therefore in time became and were called the Territories Parishes or Dioceses of such or such Churches Now the form of government estated by S. Paul over these Churches is pointed out to us Acts xiv 23. where we reade in the end of their first journey that Paul and Barnabas having ordained them Presbyters in every Church returned to Antiochia But unto Titus the Apostle writeth thus Tit. i. 5. For this cause left I thee in Crete that thou mightest set in order the things that are wanting and constitute Elders in every city as I had appointed thee Elders in every Church in the one place and Elders in every city in the other both to the same effect not meaning one in a place but Presbyteries that is Colledges bodies companies of Presbyters with common advice to order the Churches planted in these Cities Such a Colledge of Presbyters it was that we spoke of in the last chapter instituted by the Apostles in the Church of Jerusalem the pattern whereof S. Paul followeth in the Churches which he converted out of the Gentiles And thus in the Church of Ephesus you shall see S. Paul Acts xx 17. sending for the bench of Elders there to Miletus Thus in the Church of Philippi you shall find that the Apostle directeth his Epistle to the Bishops and Deacons there which must be to the Colledge of Presbyters next above the order of Deacons Thus when the Apostle writeth to the Thessalonians 1. Thess v. 12. And we beseech you brethren to know them which labour among you and are over you in the Lord the multitude whereof he speaketh is to be understood of the like company of Presbyters Thus in Ignatius his epistles you shall find him up and down reckoning next after the Bishops the Presbyteries of all the Churches to which he writeth The like in S. Cyprians epistles for the Presbyteries of Rome and Carthage To spare more words in all Church-writers you shall find continuall remembrance of these Presbyteries whensoever there is speech of Mother-churches in Mother-cities And therefore those we are to understand when we reade that Paul and Barnabas ordained Presbyters in every Church and Titus in every City And such Bodies or Colledges of Presbyters they were to whom the Apostle committed the Churches which he had planted But this being granted the question will be in the next place Where are the Bishops the chief and heads of these Presbyteries For had the Apostle from the beginning of his planting these Churches placed that rank over these Presbyters it is like we should have found some remembrance of it Now these Presbyters are styled by the name of Bishops as hath been observed ever since S. Hierome and which is more to averre the observation for this purpose neither in the relation of his planting and ordering the Churches nor in the style of his Epistles nor in his instructions concerning ministers of these Churches is there any remembrance or respect to be found but of Presbyters and Deacons which in so much eminence of place so much difference of Bishops office if any then had been could scarce have come to passe and maketh me conclude that the Apostle ordained none such from the beginning over the Presbyteries No Bishop the Apostle had yet settled at Ephesus when he used these words to the Presbyters there Acts xx 17. Take heed to your selves and to the whole flock over whom the holy Ghost hath made you EPISCOPOS Bishops or Overseers For as he giveth the name to the Presbyters so he addresseth his instructions to none besides None at Philippi when he directed his Epistle to the Bishops and Deacons there neither the custome of the Church bearing more then one Bishop in one Church at once nor being a thing reasonable to think if any such had been that the Apostle would not have found a room for him in the style of his Epistle None in the Churches within
assigned his proper services Which further appeareth when he urgeth the example of their sacrifices that were offered before the Temple being first visited 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 54. But the Presbyters of that Christian Church he exhorteth with these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Brethren saith he let every one of you give thanks to God that is Celebrate the Eucharist in his language in his own order being in a good conscience not stepping out of the set rule of his Ministery Perhaps his meaning is that they should celebrate by turns Howsoever here is my reason that there was then no Bishop there because then there could not have been so much debate about the order in celebrating the assemblies of Christians which as shall be shewed afterwards were not to be held but upon appointment of the Bishop with advice of the Presbyters being a mark of schisme to assemble otherwise And if this be not enough there is another to second it Whatsoever may be argued from the dissensions at Corinth one saying I am of Paul another I am of Cephas to shew that there was no Bishop there when the Apostle writ this and in his absence still continueth in force at the time of writing Clemens his Epistle The whole subject whereof is to quell such another dissension as this but onely that it was not under such colourable names of Paul and Cephas and Apollos as he complaineth but which is remarkable to prove my intent was as he saith p. 62. a mere faction for the love of one or two persons against the Presbyters no Bishop bearing any part either at one end or other of it Neither is it marvel that this Church should be still without a Bishop for some ten or twentie years perhaps after the death of the Apostle so many companions of the Apostles being then alive Clemens at Rome Titus in Crete Timothy at Ephesus Dionysius at Athens others elsewhere to furnish whatsoever assistance they had received from the Apostle during his time no otherwise then did Timothy and Titus to those Churches wherein they had planted Presbyteries before they had Bishops And this must be the answer if any man ask the question how Bishops came to be propagated through all Churches the answer must be They were made in due time by the heads of neighbouring Churches which we shall discern anon when we come to speak of the course held from the beginning in the choice and constitution of Bishops And by the practice of the Church it should seem the aim was afarre off to propagate Bishops according to the first practice of the Apostles For as they planted Presbyteries to govern Mother-Churches in Mother-Cities so when it became questionable which Churches should have Bishops and which not the matter was regulated according to the greatnesse of Cities or the multitude of Presbyters which the service of the Churches in them required whereof the Bishops were to be heads And therefore in the Councel of Sardica Can. vi it is provided that there should be no Bishop in towns or small cities where one Presbyter might serve but in those places where Bishops were of old time or if a place became so populous that it might deserve to have a Bishop that is either in Cities that had been so populous of old time as to have Bishops or which should afterwards become so populous But the xvii Can on of the Chalcedon Councel providing against innovation in Dioceses taketh order neverthelesse that when a place is promoted by the Emperour to be a Citie the form of the Church shall go along with the form of the Common-wealth that is it shall have a Bishop and his Diocese the territory of that Citie There is here a difference in the particular and yet the same generall ground of both Canons the practice of the Apostles ordaining Presbyteries to govern the Churches which they had planted in Cities the heads whereof were Bishops after their departure And this seemeth to be the reason why the seats of Cathedrall Churches are wont to be Cities And by this means Italy is so full of Bishopricks because it is so full of Cities CHAP. VII Presbyters govern with the Apostles in Scriptures Nothing done in the Church without their advise Why both ranks are called Sacerdotes Presbyteri Antistites and the like HAving hitherto justified the ground whereupon we go and shewed that Bishops came after the Apostles to be heads of Presbyteries in consequence hereunto it must now be averred that the government of Churches passed in common by Bishops and Presbyters as from the beginning the Presbyters governed with the Apostles themselves If in that great action of the Councel at Jerusalem the Elders of that Church bore their part with the Apostles what cause have we to think they did lesse when they were dispersed S. James alone remaining there If they concurred with S. James in his advise to S. Paul about a matter of greatest weight how to deal with those of the Circumcision that believed shall we imagine they did not do the like with his successours If S. Peter call the Presbyters of the Churches to which he writeth his fellow-Elders it is to the purpose to put them in mind of their share in that office which he chargeth himself with If the Apostle of the Gentiles charge the Elders of the Church of Ephesus Acts xx 18. with their part of that care of Christs flock after his departure which he for his time had performed over them shall we think them eased of it because Timothy came to be Bishop there Rather let me conceive this to be the cause why Timothie's instructions are addressed in the singular number to him alone without mention of his Presbyters because they were to receive their charge by themselves about the same time So farre is it from me to think that his Presbyters were not to concurre in assisting that course of government wherein he alone is directed by the Apostle to proceed And if we can go no further in proving this point out of Scripture the reason must be because as appeareth by that which hath been said the Scriptures for the most part speak of that time when Bishops yet were not but the Apostles themselves To which purpose neverthelesse there will be still something to be said out of the Scriptures in the particulars which we shall survey In the mean time let us take notice of a few passages among many more out of Ecclesiasticall writers to argue the generall whereof we speak Ignatius Epist ad Trall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 We cannot understand righter what the Presbytery meaneth then out of these words a Colledge or bench of Assessours to the Bishop in sacred matters The Commentaries under S. Ambrose his name upon 1. Tim. v. 1. speak home to this purpose Nam apud omnes utique gentes honorabilis est senectus unde Synagoga postea Ecclesia Seniores
question the true reading for it followeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And where he saith afterwards 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is agreeable to the charitablenesse of those times to think that neighbour Churches sent some their Bishops some their Presbyters or Deacons to comfort to advise to congratulate with his Church of Antiochia in their Bishops absence and reasonable it is that he should desire those of Smyrna and Philadelphia should ordain a Deacon for that purpose but that they should make a Bishop for it as now we reade it is without the compasse of common sense to imagine Be it then resolved that it is no other then a Deacon which Ignatius desires these of Smyrna as well as those of Philadelphia to Ordain to carry this message And let me have leave to conjecture that those whom the Apostle in the place alledged 2. Cor. viii 23. calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 messengers of the Churches were by their rank in the Church no other then Deacons Which is by like reason to be said of Epaphroditus whom S. Paul Phil. ii 25. calleth the Apostle of the Philippians and Minister of his necessities and perhaps of Andronicus Junias reading it for the name of a man and not of a woman Rom. xvi 7. where they are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 noted among the Apostles For the name Apostle is relative to him by whom he is sent the Apostles of Christ are Christs messengers the Apostles of Churches are the messengers which they send on common businesse Now ye shall often find in the practice of the ancient Church that Deacons were sent to forrein Churches about the businesse of their own And this practice beareth correspondence with the Synagogue for those that are called among them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of whom Epiphanius speaketh in these terms describing their office 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that they are by interpretation Deacons or Ministers are by another name called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is verbatim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 messengers of the Synagogue because it is like theywere wont to be imployed about businesse of the Synagogue And therefore if the person of whom S. Paul speaketh be no other then S. Luke the Evangelist as many think and the subscription of that Epistle beareth when he sets him forth thus 2. Cor. viii 8 18 19. Now we have sent with him our brother whose praise is in the Gospel or in preaching the Gospel through all the Churches and not that alone but was ordained by the Churches to travel with us with this grace which is ministred by us I shall not stick to think of him as of Philip the Deacon and Evangelist that for his rank he was ordained a Deacon by consent of many Churches in some of them to dispense the almes they sent with S. Paul to Hierusalem though for his personall grace he was an Evangelist Nay if the question be asked to what rank Timothy was ordained by that imposition of hands of the Presbytery mentioned by the Apostle my answer must be seeing Presbyters are for the oversight of their Churches and Bishop he was none till he undertook his charge at Ephesus that he was ordained Deacon by that Church to give attendance on S. Paul in his travels for which purpose his personall grace of Evangelist was very opportune for thus much Ignatius hath said writing to the Deacons at Trallis That the Deacons were such as ministred a pure and blamelesse ministery as holy Stephen to blessed James and Timothy and Linus to Paul and Anacletus Clemens to Peter Now as for Zonaras that had a mind to shew his reading in Demosthenes or the like Greek Authours and improve it by expounding the Canons according to it it is but sending him to Balsamon for his answer who writing upon the same Canon hath met with this impertinence of his with an unavoydable reason to convince his mistake which is that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Canons cannot mean Election by most voyces because the choyce of a Bishop is done by all the Bishops of the Province according to the Canons of Nice and Antiochia alledged afore whereas the Ordination which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is performed by two or three by the tenour of that Canon of the Apostles And therefore Justellus by the way did not right to alledge Balsamon for one that seconds Zonaras in this conceit wherein it is plain he hath laid him upon his back To which let me adde this The v. Canon of Laodicea provideth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Elections saith Zonaras for this Canon he alledgeth for his purpose because at Elections scandals were ript up and mens faults examined And so say all those that allow the people interesse of approving or excepting against those that stood to be ordained but he that looketh as farre as the xiii Canon of that Councel will never allow the people right of Electing by most voyces according to that Councel which provideth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That the choice of such as are to be placed in the rank of Presbyters must not be yielded to the people Now it is well enough known that many times at these assemblies for making of Ministers the votes of the people desiring such or such persons for Bishops or Presbyters or others prevented the order in practice nominating such before hand as they desired to have made as it is to be seen in the eminent examples of S. Augustine among Presbyters and S. Ambrose among Bishops Neither was it an inconvenience that those which ordained should balk the accustomed course to give satisfaction to the peoples desire when there was appearāce that it was bred upon a due opinion of merit in the person recommended And the case is in a manner the same when the best Christian Emperours did oftentimes of themselves nominate to the Bishopricks of the chief seats of the Empire where the State was most interessed in the condition of the person to be ordained For in this they proceeded as those in whom rested all the right of the people in that Common-wealth The Bishops proceeding to do their office upon due knowledge and approbation of the person without examining the course and proceeding as not so near concerning their charge And thus it is plain that the Apostles did not leave the choice of Matthias or the seven Deacons at large to the people but qualifying the persons by their directions in whom those qualities were found resting indifferent themselves they referred to the knowledge of the people For so we reade of Matthias Acts i. 21. Of these men that have companied with us ever since the Lord Jesus went in and out among us must one be chosen to be a witnesse of his resurrection with us And of the seven Deacons Acts vi 3. Wherefore Brethren look you out among you seven men of honest report full of the holy Ghost