Parents and are Members with them Dout 29. 14 15. 3. Children born before their Parents covenanting yet if in their minority when their Parents enter into covenant do covenant with them and are Church-members Gen. 17. 25. The whole houshold of Lydia the Jailor and others were baptized therefore some children in minority which were born before except we shall deny so much as one child in minority then alive in all those houses 4. There is no sufficient reason at least ordinarily to conclude a child of seven ten or twelve years old to be incorrigible because a child at the ages mentioned is infans in foro Ecclesie i. e. He hath no voice nor is capable of being heard in a Church way therefore not incorrigible as to the Church Their obstinacy at the years mentioned is not capital By Gods Law Deut. 21. 18. There is still place for hope Prov. 19. 18. 22. 15. 5. Their desiring or not desiring in their own persons during the ages forementioned is not to be attended as the ground of proceeding in this case because the ground thereof is the covenant founded upon Divine Institution and in-depending upon such childrens desires Quest 3. Till what age shall they enter into Covenant with their Parents whether sixteen twenty one or sixty Ans. As long as in respect of age or capacity they cannot according to ordinary account be supposed able to act in a matter of this nature for themselves so long they shall enter in by means of their Parents covenant because whilst they are children and in their minority they are not otherwise capable of covenanting When adult they are to covenant in their own persons If a precise and certain age may here be prescribed surely it is safe to go at least so far as may answer the example Gen. 17. 25. Where Ishmael is admitted to the Seal by his Fathers covenant at thirteen years of age Howbeit the bounding of adult and in-adult age depending upon the judgment of prudence much is to be left unto the discretion of Officers and Churches in this case Quest 4. What Discipline a child is subject to from seven to sixteen years old Ans 1. Church Discipline is taken either more largely for the act of a Church-member dispensed to a Church-member as such by way of Spiritual watch rebuke c. Luke 17. 3 4. Mat. 18. 15. Or more strictly for the act of the whole Church dispensed by a Member thereof as in case of publick rebuke admonition excommunication Mat. 18. 17. 2 Cor. 2. 3. 1 Tim. 1. 20. In the first sense children in their minority are subject to Church Discipline immediately but not in the second 2. It is the Duty of the Elders and Church to call upon Parents to bring up their children in the narture and admonition of the Lord and to see as much as in them lieth that it be effectually done Eph. 6. 4. Officers and Churches respectively succeed Apostles in matters of ordinary practise 3. Besides their subjection to Ecclesiastical Discipline they are also subject to civil Discipline respectively according to their capacity whether Domesticall Scholasticall or Magistraticall Quest 5. Whether a Father may twice Covenant for his Children in Minority in several Churches Ans. 1. When a Parent is called to remove from one Church to another he is also called to enter into covenant in that Church to which he removes Paul was first baptized and in communion at Damascus Act. 9. 29. Afterwards removed unto Ierusalem and joyned to the Church there v. 26. This the very nature of order calleth for because otherwise he can neither do all the duties nor enjoy all the priviledges of a Member in the one Church or in the other not in the former because now he dwelleth not with them nor in the other because though dwelling amongst them he joyneth not with them in covenant 2. When the Parent thus removing entreth into covenant his children then in minority covenant in him The child and the power of Government over the child must go together Prov. 29. 15. 3. Hence it is the duty of Churches when they give Letters dimissory unto Parents to insert the dismission of the children then in minority with them 4. Adult children yet under the power of the Parents and removing with them are to give their personal consent unto this translation of their Membership and so to be orderly dismissed and received with their Parents otherwise they remain Members of the Church of which they were before Quest 6. Whether the end of a Deputy Covenant be not to supply personall incapacity or whether Children ripe for personall Covenanting in regard of age should Covenant by a Deputy as others that are unable thereunto Ans. 1. Children in their minority whose immediate Parents are in Church-Covenant do covenant in their Parents see the proof hereof in answer to Question 1. 2. Children adult ought to covenant in their own Persons To covenant in our own persons according to the sense of this Question is nothing else but an orderly and Church profession of our Faith or a personall publick and solemn avouching of God in an Ecclesiasticall way to be our God according to the covenant of his Grace the great duty of the people of God throughout all generations both in the times of the Law and Gospel Pregnant and Illustrious examples whereof we have in the time of Moses Deut. 26. 17 18 19. 29. 10 11 c. And of Ioshua Iosh. 24. 18 27. Of Asa 2 Chron. 15. 12. Of Iosiah 2 Chron. 34. 31 32. So Ier. 50 5. A considerable part of which Prophesie for it extends it self also to the ages after Christ we have accomplished Nehem 9. ult. 10. 28 29. The Priests and Levites and many others there named and their wives and their sons and their daughters every one that had knowledge and that had understanding did cleave unto their Brethren their Nobles and entred into a covenant and an Oath to walk in Gods Law so of the times under the Law Concerning the times under the Gospel in Isa. 62. 5. 41. 3 4 5. We read of the seed and off-spring of Iacob and Israel that when they should be sprung and grown up h. e. become adults they should both by word and writing by saying and subscribing with their hands engage themselves unto the Lord It is a part of instituted Gospel Worship The same reason which called the Fathers to confession before calleth the son also when adult It went for good reason among the Iews He is of age he shall speak for himself Ioh. 9. 21. What more meet than that the confession of our Faith should be made with our own mouths when we are able God avoucheth them in the same day when they avouch him It is a special engagement of the adult person to perform his covenant Psal. 119. 106. I have sworn and will perform Lastly It is a duty compared with others especially commended in the
would have reduced under the yoke of circumcision they were some of those whom the Apostles accounted Disciples or whom the Apostles had Discipled But some children were some of those whom the false Teachers would have reduced under the yoke of circumcision for they would have had both Gentile Parents and children circumcised after the manner of Moses v. 1 5. with Exod. 12. 48 49. Acts 21. 21. And that the Apostles took in children with Parents when they were conversant in the work of Discipling further appears from Acts 2. 39. 16. 15 31 33. 1 Cor. 7. 14. 2. Some children are under the promised teaching of God Isa. 54. 13. And the Word there used is rendred Disciples Isa 8. 16. 3. Some children do visibly belong to Christ Mark 10. 14. Iosh. 22. 24 25. Therefore are Disciples Compare Mat. 10. 42. with Mark 9. 41. 4. When Christ saith Disciple all Nations he bids gather the Gentiles into like covenant and Church-estate for the substance thereof which had been the portion of the Iews Therefore he bids Disciple some children Arg. 6. They that are subjects of the Lords visible Spiritual Kingdom servants and children of the Lords Family they are Members of the Church which is called the Lords Kingdom and House and Family in the Scripture But so are some children Ezek. 37. 25 26 27. It is Davids i. e. Christs Spiritual-Gospel-Kingdom that he there speaks of and that in reference unto visible Sanctuary or Church-estate That some children are the Lords Servants see Lev. 25. 39 41 42. And that not by common right of Creation onely or designment unto some particular service but of special Redemption and conservation there spoken of And surely both childrens capacity so to be and the Lords Grace and Favour so to accept them was not greater then than now That they are children sons and daughters of God see Rom. 9. 4 26. Gen. 6. 2. Ezek. 16. 20 21. 23. 37. And how were these children the Lords children properly and meerly upon the account of internal and spiritual regeneration For that was not found in many of the children spoken of in the places mentioned nor yet only by Creation for so others were Gods children as well as the children of the Iews and so the daughters of men were his daughters as well as the other were his sons Gen. 6. 2. Therefore they are said to be Gods children because of their Covenant and Church relation unto him which was common to all the children of the Church and to none other and so Ezek. 16 8. shews being compared with verse 20 21. Arg. 7. If no children be members of the visible Church then we have no well-grounded hope according to ordinary course of dispensation of the salvation of any dying Infants And the reason is because salvation pertains to the Church Isa. 45. 17. Eph. 2. 12. 5. 23 26. Ioh. 4. 22. Act. 2. 27. Luke 19. 9. Those that are without the visible Kingdom of God are visibly in the Kingdom of Satan for he is the God of the world 2 Cor. 4. 4. And to him are men delivered when they are cast out of the Church 1 Cor. 5. 5. 1 Tim. 1. 20. So if children live and die out of the visible Church they live and die out of Gods visible Kingdom and visibly in the Kingdom of Satan And then what visible ground of hope according to ordinary course of their salvation But to account the estate of all that die children so hopelesse and forlorn is contrary to the tender and rich mercy of the Lord and to the Doctrine of the Scriptures and to Godly Parents most uncomfortable Arg. 8. If some children were Members of the Church of God in the old Testament then some children are Members of the Church of God in the daies of the new Testament But some children were Members of the Church in the time of the old Testament which though a Truth that we know not how any can deny yet we may briefly evince and confirm thus That children then were in Covenant is expresly witnessed Gen. 17. 7. Deut. 29. 11 12 15. And that they were in such a Covenant or so in Covenant as to be Members of the Church that then was appears because 1. They were in the same Covenant that their Parents or elder persons were in and whereby they were constituted Members of the Church Gen. 17. 7. Deut. 29. 10 11 12 14 15. 27. 9. 26. 18. Ier. 23. 11. Acts 7. 38. 2. They were subjects of a Church-Ordinance never regularly applied to any out of the Church viz. Circumcision Rom. 3. 1 2. They were Israelites i. e. In other words Members of the Church of Israel to whom pertained Church priviledges Rom 9. 4. They were children of the Kingdom and such as were capable of being cast out of Church estate therefore in it Mat. 8. 12. Rom. 11. 20. Ier. 7. 15. 2 King 17. 20. 5. They were visibly the Lords people by Covenant even as the rest of the people were the Lords people Ezek. 16. 8 20 21. 6. They were children of the House of Israel as opposed to dogs i. e. Persons out of the Church Mat. 15. 24 26. In a word as oft as they are said or implied to be a part of the holy seed of the holy people of the Lords people of Israel of the Circumcision of those whom God redeemed out of the Land of Egypt to make them his peculiar treasure of the inheritance and congregati of the Lord c. So often are they shewed to be Members of the Church But all the Question will be about the consequence of the Proposition and that may be cleared thus 1. If the Church of the old Testament and the Church of the Gentiles under the new Testament be for kind essentially the same then if children were Members of that Church they are also Members of these For if they be the same essentially and the same for kind then they have the same Covenant or general From Therefore that Covenant which takes in the seed or children Gen. 17. 7. Therefore the seed or children are in and of the one Church as well as the other But that the Church State then and now was and is essentially the same is evident because it is the same Kingdom of God and not another which is taken from them and given to us Mat. 21. 43. 8. 11 12. One and the same sheepfold for kind under one and the same shepheard in which were the Iews first and the Gentiles afterwards Iohn 10. 16. The Gentiles are fellow heirs with the Iews of the same body and partakers of the same promise Eph. 3 6. We are in the same root and Olive from which some of them were broken off in which the Godly Iews not broken off did still continue and into which the rest shall be grafted in again in time Rom. 11. 17 18 24. The conversion of the Gentiles is expressed in such
a manner as to be by coming in to the Iews and joyning with them as Iaphet must dwell in the Tents of Shem Gen. 9. 27. And not that Shems Tents must be destroyed and other kind of Tents built for Iaphet to inhabit All which do shew that the Church then and now is not essentially though sundry waies accidentally differing but the same 2. Again If the consequence be not good then it will follow that such Iews as were brought in by the Gospel into Church-estate were great losers by embracing the Gospel and the children losers by their Parents Faith inasmuch as though in the former state the children were Members with the Parents yet now in the Gospel-estate the children by this assertion are all left out Yea then the children of those Iews Acts 2. Which before the Sermon when their Parents wanted Faith were in the covenant and Church-state with their Parents are now after the Sermon when their Parents are become believers cast out or fallen out of the Church A strange and harsh Doctrine that the Faith of the Parents should set the children further off from God and from his Church and covenant than they were before 3. Then also when the Iews shall be converted in the latter daies of the new Testament the Parents must be Members of the Church but not the children and so they shall be in a worse condition than formerly as not having their children in the Church with them as formerly it was But besides the harshnesse of such a conclusion see the contrary in Ier. 30. 20. Isa. 61. 9. 59. 21. 65. 23. Ezek. 37. 25 26. 4. Although it be true that the Lord hath made difference between the Administration of his covenant and Grace to his people in these daies from that which was in former times yet as these differences are not in the essence of the Church-estate but in accidentals and in degree so where any alteration is made it is still for our advantage and greater benefit and therefore our covenant is called a better covenant and established upon better promises Heb. 7. 22. 8. 6. And from this it is that the burden of ceremonies which lay on them is now taken off the darknesse of Types and Shadows is now removed and liberty is now given to worship the Father every where whereas they were for many things tied only to Ierusalem and every congregation of Saints is now a Church entire within it self whereas then no single congregation had such Church-power and entirenesse of Jurisdiction but all their congregations had dependance on Ierusalem and all made up but one National Church In these things and some others that might be named there is alteration made but still it is an alteration for the better and for our advantage But now for the Particular in Question If children were then Members of the Church and now be not here is an alteration made for the worser and not for the better not for our advantage but for our losse for so it is to have all our children put out of covenant and Church and from all the priviledges thereof Iosh. 22. 24 25. Eph. 2. 12. Psal. 87. 3. Mat. 15. 26. And therefore such a change may not be admitted For Christ by his coming did not worsen the condition not of the whole Church but not of any one person upon Earth nor yet of any age or condition or sort of persons Luke 2. 10. And surely the child in minority as the Church of old was Gal. 4. 1 2. hath not a greater or larger place in the house nor is in better condition in respect of priviledges than the heir that is full of age And who can think that a place in Gods House which is promised as so great a Benefit in Isa. 56. 5 7. And accounted such a Glory Advantage c. Rom. 3. 1 2. 9. 4. Should be no more but a part of that bondage and tutorage which belongs to children under age Hence also add a fifth Argument to prove the consequence above mentioned 5. If children were once Church-members and do not continue to be Church-members still then their Membership must have been repealed by the Lord who alone could make such an alteration And if any should affirm that the Lord hath done it it lieth upon them to prove it and to shew when or where such an alteration was made or such a repeal may be found But in the mean time though it be lesse needful to prove the negative when-as the affirmative in such a case as this cannot be shewed yet let these considerations amongst others that might be named for that purpose be duly weighed 1. If the Lord had made such an alteration that now under the new Testament no children should be Members of the Church then in all likelihood Christ or his Apostles would have made mention of it Witnesse their Faithfulnesse And how else should we know that the Lord had appointed any such alteration but now Christ and his Apostles in stead of mentioning any such thing do confirm the contrary Mark 10. 13 14 16. Acts 2. 39. 1 Cor. 7. 14. And hence the Apostles writing Epistles to Churches do sometimes expresly and directly apply their speeches unto children Eph. 6. 1. Col. 3. 20. Which seems to imply that they accounted children to be parts and members of the Churches unto whom they sent those Epistles 2. If the Apostles had taught any such alteration surely the Iews who raised Objections and controversies about matters of far lesser moment and who did so stumble at taking away the particular Rite of circumcision for though they had Member-ship and Baptism allowed to their children yet that would not satisfie them without the Rite of circumcision also Acts 16. 3. 15. 1. 21. 21. And considering also how they had been from age to age wonted to this covenant and Church-estate of their children Sure'y we say they would have made a remarkable stand at this if the Apostles had taught or practised this discovenanting or unmembring of all their children and the Apostles would have needed both by preaching and writing to have bestowed much pains to have quieted them in this point But of any such thing there is a deep and total silence in all the new Testament Quest 2. Whether all children of whatever years or conditions be so as 1. Absent children never brought to the Church 2. Born before their Parents Covenanting 3. Incorrigible of seven ten or twelve years old 4. Such as desire not to be admitted with their Parents of such an age Ans. Onely such children as are in their minority covenant with their Parents therefore not all children of whatsoever years and conditions We do not hereby exclude such as being defective in their intellectuals are as children in respect of their incapacity That adult children are to covenant in their own persons see Ans to Quest 6th 2. Children in their minority though absent covenant in their
Scriptures from the subject thereof viz. A Believer Rom. 10. 10. Every believer is a confessor From the matter the greatest Truth i. e. The Doctrine of Christ Jesus Heb. 3. 1. The Apostle of our confession From the manner others not being excluded as we are called thereunto 1 Pet. 3. 15. In a Church way Mat. 16. 16 19. Paul 2 Cor. 9. 13. in a special manner commends the subjection of the obedience of the Church astipulation of the Corinthians From its excellency a good Profession 1 Tim. 6. 12. A good confession v. 13. It s giving glory unto God 2 Cor. 9. 13. It s victorious exemplarinesse in respect of men Rev. 12. 11. The blessing upon the sincere performance thereof Heb. 11. 13 16. Mat. 10. 32. With the heart man believeth unto righteousnesse and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation Quest 7. Whether as large Qualifications be not required of a Members child to the participation of the Lords Supper and the priviledges of votes and censures as were requirable of his Parents at their first entrance Ans. The holding forth of Faith and Repentance with an ability to examine themselves by way of confession to the judgment of Charity were all requirable in the Parent for admission into the Church to full communion and the same is requisite for the regular admission of the Parents child being grown adult unto his full communion with the Church For the clearing of this Proposition two things are to be proved 1. That they are to have Faith and Repentance 2. That this Faith and Repentance must appear to others First They are to have Faith Repentance 1. Because Examination is the duty and Faith and Repentance are the matter of their Examination without both the being and exercise of which they cannot come worthily to the Lords Supper which is the end of their examination 2. From the end of the Lords Supper which is instituted not for regeneration but for nourishment and confirmation 'T is a Supper and a Seal That their Faith and Repentance ought to appear to others is manifest thus The Officers ought to be wise and faithful stewards now to such it belongs not only to dispense a portion in reason but to see also that those to whom it is dispensed are meet to receive their portion Luke 12. 42. 1 Cor. 4. 2. The Lords Supper cannot regularly be administred to any receiver concerning whom personally according to Truth in the judgment of charity the Minister cannot say Take and eat this is the body of the Lord Jesus which was given for you But this the Minister cannot say with good Conscience to any one upon his meer having of Faith and Repentance without a visible holding forth of the same to others in their own persons because both the exercise of reason and the exercise of Grace are requisite to the taking and eating here required As this proves the assertion concerning the Officers so 1 Cor. 10. 15 16 17. proveth the same concerning the whole body because in a regular celebration of the Lords Supper the whole Church doth judge all the partakers thereof to have spiritual communion with Christ crucified and one with another as one body in him It is the duty of the Church and Officers respectively as the keepers of the holy things so to discern between the holy and prophane the clean and the unclean as that the Sacrament may onely be administred unto worthy receivers Ezek. 44. 7 8 23. But this cannot be except the premised essentiall requisites be made appear to them in judgment of Charity Concerning the power of voting it is not rational that they should exercise a Church-power as to the administration of Church-Ordinances which voting implies who themselves are unfit for all Ordinances They who are thus unfit will abuse the Ordinances themselves and admit and retain unworthy Officers and Members and discourage the worthy and therefore power in the hands of such is not for edification but for destruction contrary to the mind of Christ 2 Cor. 10. 8. Quest 8. Whether by Covenant seed is meant the seed of immediate Parents onely or of remote also Ans. The Gospel by Covenant seed intends only the seed of immediate Parents in Church Covenant as appears from 1 Cor. 7. 14. The Parents there spoken of are immediate Parents their Progenitors were Heathens The Gospel extends not the external Covenant beyond the immediate Parents If neither of the immediate Parents be in Covenant their children are unclean see the Text The next Parent may bring in his seed though his Progenitors be unbelievers and the next Parents may cut off their seed though the progenitors be believers witnesse the instances of Ishmael and Esau Ier. 9. 25 26. Ezek. 32. 29. Psal. 83. 6. Mal. 1. 4. Gen. 21. 10. Otherwise there can no generation be given where the Covenant Interest of posterity can expediently be bounded Depinge ubi sistam Shew us where we shall make our stand The contrary exposeth the Churches to inevitable and intollerable impurities Quest 9. Whether adopted Children and bond servants be Covenant-seed Ans. Adopted children and Infant-servants regularly and absolutely subjected to the Government and dispose of such heads of Families as are in Church-covenant though they cannot be said to be their natural seed yet in regard the Scriptures according to the judgment of many Godly Learned extend to them the same Covenant priviledges with their natural seed we judge not any Churches who are like-minded with them for their practise herein All which notwithstanding yet we desire at present to leave this Question without all prejudice on our parts to after free disquisition Quest 10. Whether the child admitted by his Fathers Covenant be also a Deputy for his seed without or before personal Covenanting or without before like personal qualifications in kind as his Father was to enjoy when he became a Deputy Ans. The meaning of this Question in other terms we conceive to be this whether the child of a person joyned in Church-Covenant by means of his or her immediate Parents Covenant though such a Parent be not admitted to nor qualified for full communion nor have covenanted in their own person whether we say the child of such a person is to be baptized Whereunto we answer in these following propositions Propos. 1. Infants either of whose immediate Parents are in Church-Covenant do confaederate with their Parents and are therefore Church-members with them See Ans. to Quest 1. Propos. 2. It is the duty of those Infants when grown up to years of discretion though not yet fit for the Lords Supper to own the Covenant they made with their Parents by entring thereinto in their own persons and it is the duty of the Church to call upon them for the performance thereof as appeareth by Scripture examples of persons both called to and entring into Covenant many of whom could not be looked upon as personally Gracious and therefore not fit for
all Ordinances and full communion Deut. 29. 12 14. 2 Chron. 15. 12. 2 Chron. 34. 31 32. Where it is mentioned as the performance of a duty whereto they stand obliged by the Covenant made in their Infancy Propos. 3. Being accordingly called thereunto if after Church-admonition and other due means with patience used they shall refuse the performance of this great duty or in case they shall notwithstanding like means applied any otherwise continue scandalous it is the part of the Church to proceed with them to the censure of excommunication because the Facts mentioned deserve excommunication 2 Chron. 15. 13. Mat. 18. 17. 2 Cor. 5. 11. 2 Thes. 3. 6 14. And the persons are Church-members being confederate with their Parents and the Church as the matter requireth administreth Discipline to the Members thereof without respect of persons according to their capacity 1 Cor. 5. 12. 1 Tim. 5. 21. Add hereunto the instance of those who are separated from the Congregation for their non-observance of that Covenant Ezr. 10. 3 7 8. Together with the examples of Cain Ishmael and Esau not a little contributing to the truth of this assertion by way of proportion Propos. 4. In case they understand the grounds of Religion are not scandalous and solemnly own the Covenant in their own persons wherein they give up both themselves and their children unto the Lord and desire Baptism for them we with due reverence to any Godly Learned that may dissent see not sufficient cause to deny Baptism unto their children these reasons for the affirmative being proposed to consideration 1. Church-Members without offence and not baptized are to be baptized The children in Question are Church-Members without offence and not baptized Therefore the children in Question are to be baptized 2. Children in the covenant of Abraham as to the substance thereof i. e. To whom the promise made to Abraham as to the substance thereof doth belong are to be baptized The children in Question are children in the covenant of Abraham as to the substance thereof Therefore the children in Question are to be baptized 3. Children in the same estate with those children under the Law unto whom the seal of the righteousnesse of Faith because in that estate was by Institution Divine to be applied the Precept for so doing not repealed and the reason for so doing still remaining are to be baptized But the children in Question are children in the same estate viz. regularly in Church-covenant with those children under the Law unto whom the seal of the righteousnesse of Faith because in that estate was by Institution Divine to be applied the Precept for so doing not repealed and the reason for so doing still remaining Therefore the children in Question are to be baptized 4. Either the children in question are to be baptized or the Gospel dispensation forbids the application of the seal unto children regularly in Church-covenant unto whom the Mosaical dispensation commanded it to be applied But the Gospel despensation forbids not the application of the seal unto children regularly in Church-covenant unto whom the Mosaical dispensation commanded it to be applied Therefore the children in question are to be baptized The contrary opinion infers that the Gospel bereaveth the children mentioned at least in a considerable degree of their glory advantage mercy blessing and that in this respect it casts reproach yea brings disadvantage a judgment a curse upon them Iosh. 5. 9. Rom. 3. 1 2. 9. 4 5. This seems to be a lesse Evangelicall Tenent the nature of the Gospel being to enlarge and better not to contract and diminish the external dispensation of Grace 5. Children unto whom the Gospel testifieth both the promise and baptisme by vertue of that promise to belong ought to be baptized The children in question are children unto whom the Gospel testifieth both the promise and baptism by vertue of that to promise to belong Acts 2. 39. Therefore the children in Question ought to be baptized Obj. The Parent though a Church-member owning the Covenant in his own person and qualified according to the premises is not admitted to full communion therefore the child ought not to be baptized Ans. The Church-act onely and not any other act much lesse defect of the Parent is by Divine Institution accounted to the child The membership of the child is a distinct membership from the membership of the Parent In case the Parents membership ceaseth by death or censure the membership of the child remaineth still The membership of the child is the same in kind with and not inferiour to the membership of the Parent Membership is a Relation and therefore admits not of magìs and minùs more or lesse Members are better or worse and communion is more or lesse but membership admits not of degrees Benjamin an Infant but of an hour old is as truly a son as Reuben a man of twenty two years of age The child is baptized by vertue of his own membership and not by vertue of his Parents membership The Parents death is not with us an obstacle of the Childs Baptism Propos. 5. The same may be said concerning the children of such persons in question who being dead or necessarily absent either did or do give the Churches cause in judgment of charity to look at them as thus qualified and such as had they been called thereunto would so acted For in Charity that is here done interpretatively which is mentioned in the fourth Proposition expresly Propos. 6. Though the persons forementioned own the Covenant according to the premises yet before they are admitted to full communion i. e. To the Lords Supper and voting they must so hold forth their Faith and Repentance unto the judgment of Charity by way of confession in the congregation as it may appear unto the Church that they are able to examine themselves and to discern the Lords body See the proof hereof in Ans. to Quest 7th Quest 11. Whether children begotten by an excommunicate person are to be baptized he so remaining Ans. We cannot for the present answer the following Arguments for the Negative 1. Persons excommunicate are not members and the promise made to the seed belongs under the Gospel onely to the seed of immediate Parents in Covenant 2. Excommunicate Parents are to be looked at in Church account as Heathens and Publicans now the Church ought not to baptize the children of those which she is to account as Heathens Publicans because their children are unclean 1 Cor. 7. 14. 3. To baptize the children of the excommunicate is to have Church-communion with the excommunicate But those that we are forbidden to have civil communion with 1 Cor. 5. 11. We are much more forbidden to have Church Communion with Quest 12. Whether a Child born of a justly censurable person yet not actually excommunicate be to be baptized Ans. We answer affirmatively 1. Because the child is a Church-member by vertue of his covenanting with his Parents 2.