THE CASE and CURE OF Persons Excommunicated According to The present Law of England In Two Parts I. The nature of Excommunication as founded in Holy Writ the Persons intrusted with that Power the Objects of that Censure and the Method prescribed by God for it The Corruptions of it in times of Popery with the Acts of the Popish Clergy to fortify it with under these Corruptions The several Writs of Common Law and the Statute Laws made in those times and still in force to restrain the abuse of this Censure and to deliver the Subjects from the Oppression of it II. The Mischievous Consequents of Excommunication as the Law now stands at present in England With some Friendly Advice to Persons pursued in Inferior Ecclesiastical Courts by Malicious Promoters both in order to their avoiding Excommunication or delivering themselves from Prisons if imprisoned because they have stood Excommunicated Fourty days LONDON Printed for J. R. Sold by Richard Janeway 1682. PART I. The Case and Cure of Persons Excommunicated according to the present Law of England CHAP. I. The Foundation of Excommunication both in Reason and from Scripture both of the Old and New Testament EXcommunication being the Separation of a Person from the Communion of the Church at least in some Ordinances seems to be founded in the Law of Reason as well as in Holy Writ for it is very irrational to imagine that any Political Body should be left without a Power to purge it self from such Members of it as are unfit for Communion with it And as the God of Order never left any Kingdom or Commonwealth without a Power to make and execute or at least to execute such Laws as were necessary for its Preservation So it is most of all unreasonable to imagine That that Body whereof Christ is the Head should not be cloathed with Authority sufficient to free it self from disorderly Members God who himself instituted all the Laws of the Jewish Church did not leave that Church without a Power to keep their Communion pure and holy Hence we shall find that Penalty He shall be cut off from his People so often annexed to those Laws which doubtless is not to be understood of Eternal Condemnation for it is unreasonable to imagine that the Child of eight days old should be eternally condemned for the Parents neglect to circumcise it Gen. 17.14 Nor of Corporal Punishments alone for tho God was about to have killed Moses for not circumcising his Child yet we read of no danger the Child was in but the Phrase is certainly to be understood of a penal judicial Separation of the Person from the visible Communion of the Church And that some such thing was in practice amongst the Jews appears in their most corrupt times both by their casting one out of the Synagogue in Christ's time whom he received and by his Prediction to his Disciples that the Jews would for their Confession of him turn them out of the Synagogues Upon the Reformation and the Settlement of the Christian Church Christ is supposed to have clothed his Church with such a Power Mat. 16.19 And I will give unto thee the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt loose on Earth shall be loosed in Heaven The same Power he committed to more of his Disciples John 20.23 Whosoever Sins ye remit they are remitted and whosoever Sins ye retain they are retained Our Saviour seemeth more particularly to direct in the Case Mat. 18.15 Moreover if thy Brother shall trespass against thee go and tell him his Fault betwixt thee and him alone if he shall hear thee thou hast gained thy Brother But if he will not hear thee then take with thee one or two more that in the mouth of two or three Witnesses every Word may be established And if he neglect to hear them tell it the Church if he neglect to hear the Church let him be unto thee as an Heathen and a Publican Verily I say unto you whatsoever you shall bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever you shall loose on Earth shall be loosed in Heaven More than this we find not in our Saviour's Directions given by himself But he ascending up on high gave Gifts unto Men Apostles Evangelists Prophets Pastors and Teachers Apostles to plant Churches and to put them in order revealing his Will unto them for their Order and Government Pastors and Teachers for the ordinary Government of them by putting the Laws in Execution which Christ personally gave or which the Apostles gave for the ordering and Government of them we find the Apostle Paul more fully instructing us as to this Ordinance of Excommunication we have an eminent Instance 1 Cor. 5. A Person that was a Member of the Church of Corinth had taken his Father's Wife the Apostles Judgment concerning him is declared ver 4. In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ when ye are gathered together and my Spirit with the Power of our Lord Jesus Christ to deliver such a â—â—e unto Satan for the Destruction of the Flesh that the Spirit may be saved in the day of our Lord Jesus That Phrase of delivering unto Satan is again mentioned 1 Tim. 1.20 of whom is Hymeneus and Alexander whom I have delivered unto Satan that they may learn not to blaspheme Most agree that the Apostle in these Texts by delivering to Satan and understands Excommunication why he expresseth it by the notion of delivering up to Satan is not so uniformly agreed Some think that Excommunicated Persons were in these Times corporally vexed by Satan I could never see it well proved at least that it was ordinarily done tho God might make some such remarkable Instances of his Vengeance There is a sense in the Canon Law which pleaseth me much better which is by the Apostle called The God of the World as the Church is God's House so Men out of the Church are in Satan's Territories and under his Government and this certainly is the meaning of that Phrase The Apostle delivered up Hymenâ—â—s and Philetus who had put away Faith and a good Conscience to the World that is Shut them out of the Communion of God's House which is the Church and left them to the World and this comporteth with our Saviour's Institution Let him be to them as an Heathen and as a Publican From which also appeareth that Persons under that Sentence might according to the Will of God be admitted to such Ordinances as Heathens might be admitted to who might be preached to and prayed for Yea the Excommunicated Person was in something a better Condition than a meer Pagan for the Church was under an Obligation to admonish him as one that had been a Brother 1 Thess 3.6 14. he had given command That if any Brother did walk disorderly they should withdraw themselves from him ver 14. they should note him and have no company with
great while they studied by their Canon Laws to uphold its Authority denying the Excommunicated Persons Burial in Church-yards a Power to make a Will and such other things as were within their Power which things by the Popes long Usurpations became a kind of Common Law in Nations subjugated to that Religion yet they found all this too little to uphold the Authority of an Ordinance of God whose Virtue themselves had extinguished by their horrible Profanation of it And at the last were forced to fly to the Secular Magistrate from whom in times of Popery when almost all Civil Magistrates were made their Slaves to execute their Lusts they obtained several other things which were civil Punishments of the Person that durst adventure to stand their Sentence of Excommunication He might not be either Judg or Witness in any Court. If he had occasion to sue any for his just Right in any Court his Excommunication might be pleaded in bar to his Proceedings If he stood excommunicated forty days the Bishop might signify it to the Civil Magistrate and have from him a Writ to imprison the Person to be kept without Bail or Mainprize until he had given Satisfaction to the Church and obtained its leave to come out The Writ with us here in England made in Popish Times ran thus The King to the Sheriff of L. greeting The Venerable Father H. Bishop of London hath signified to us by his Letters Patents that B. a Member of his Diocese hath been Excommunicated by his ordinary Authority for his manifest Contumacy and will not be reformed by the Ecclesiastical Censures whereas the Royal Power ought not to be wanting to Holy Church in its Complaints we command you to imprison the Body of the said B. according to the Custom of England until he shall have satisfied Holy Church as well for his Contempt as the Injury which he hath done unto it They not satisfied with this obtained also another writ from the Civil Magistrate commanding the burning of the Person whom they had once determined to be an Heretick by virtue of which many good Christians were burned as in former times so in the time of King Hen. 8th and Queen Mary of which our Martyrology speaks sufficiently but this is by a late Act destroyed Being furnished with this Power they were busy enough in the Execution of it and themselves found Inconveniences arising from the extravagant use of it so as even the Canon Law it self regulated divers things Among others it ordained a threefold Caution for such as were Excommunicated upon the giving of any of which they were to be discharged even by the Canon Law A Caution by Pledg a Caution by Sureties and a Caution by Oath that is the Party was either to lay in some Cledg to the Bishop or enter into a Bond with Sureties or take an Oath that he would afterwards be obedient to the Commands of the Church in form of Law and upon this he was to be absolved The Caution by Oath was only admitted in case the Party was able to give no other as appears from the Canon Law Sexti decretat l. 5. tit 9. But the Civil Power even in the times of Popery quickly found the unreasonable Inconveniences accruing to the Nation by this extravagant Power formerly either indulged to or usurped by Church-men which it took care to restrain by several Statutes and Writs To this purpose was the Writ of Prohibition invented I cannot tell the just Original of it but it appears by the Statute of Circumspecte agatis made 13 Edw. 1. that was 1285 that is now near 400 Years since that it was before that time in use for that Statute restraineth the issuing of it in Cases of Fornication and Adultery leaving the Church-yard unclosed or the Church uncovered in case of Oblations and accustomed Tithes and in case of Mortuaries and Pensions Defamation and laying violent Hands on Clerks By which it is plain it was in use before that time and that before that time Prohabitions were wont to issue when any was questioned for these things in the Courts Ecclesiastical It is the Error of some that Writs of Prohibition do not lye where the matter is not cognoscible in the Spiritual Court but properly belongs to the Court Ecclesiastical But Dr. Cozens in his Apology for Ecclesiastical Proceedings pag. 1. c. 17. gives us a much truer Notion of that Writ telling us The Prohibition is a Charge by the King 's Writ to forbear to hold Plea either in some matter or manner which it is supposed a Man dealeth in beyond his Jurisdiction or otherwise than the Law will warrant A Writ of Prohibition commanding the Ecclesiastical Court to proceed no further may be had not only where the thing doth properly belong to the Ecclesiastical Court but also where they proceed in a manner which the Laws of England do forbid As 1. If an Ecclesiastical Court will proceed before they have given the Party accused a true Copy of Articles a Prohibition lies upon the Statute 2 Hen. 5. 2. Also whether in case of a Prosecution by Informers if the Court will proceed before the Informer hath done what is required by the Statute 18 Eliz. 15. and other Statutes made to regulate Informers a Prohibition will not lye in those Cases 3. According to the Canon Law also every Prostor ought to have a Letter Procuratory under the Hand and Seal of him who imployeth him And an Act of Court ought to be made to admit him as a Proctor for such Persons and if this be not the Party prosecuted can recover no Charge because there is no Legal Adversary to recover it from By that Law also voluntary Promoters which may be Vagrants ought first to give Security to pay Charges if over thrown If the Ecclesiastical Judg refuseth these things Query Whether a Prohibition will not lye 4. By the Canon Law also Vox unius est nox millius No one Witness makes a Proof If a Judg in those Courts will give Sentence upon the Proof of a single Witness a Prohibition will lye 5. If the Judg of an Ecclesiastical Court will allow a Person to be charged generally or incertainly it is against the Common Law of England the Judg in that case will prohibit the Ecclesiastical Judg. So in many other Cases where the manner of the Proceedings in the Court Ecclesiastical is either plainly against the Civil and Canon Law Rules or against the known Rules of Common Law so that I conceive a Prohibition is A Common law-writ forbidding the Ecclesiastical Judg to proceed either in a Case which doth belong to his Jurisdiction or in such a manner as is manifestly against the Rules of the Civil and Canon Law according to which he ought to judg or against the Common or Statute Laws of this Realm of which and the true sense of which his Majesties Judges in the Courts at Westminster are the Judges and the Benefit of which is the Liberty
Man out of the Kingdom of God and are equally heinous and scandalous as these such as are reckoned up by the Apostle 1 Cor. 6.9 10. Idolaters Adulterers Effeminate Persons such as abuse themselves with Mankind Theeves Murderers Sorcerers profane Swearers and Cursers these are all scandalous Offenders and so within the Precept Matth. 18. 3. Yet neither are all these the Objects of this Censure unless they be Stubborn Contumacious and Incorrigible An Heretick is not to be avoided till after the first and second Admonition Tit. 3.10 Nor an Offender till after that he hath refused to hear the Church Mat. 18. Conformable to this was the general Judgment of the Churches of God for more than a thousand Years after Christ as might be made appear from infinite Quotations out of the Ancients and out of the Canon Law which steadily determineth That none but Hereticks and such as are guilty of Mortal Sins and Contumacious in them are to be Excommunicated It is a most unreasonable thing to think that it is the Will of God that any should be Excommunicated for what is no Sin Christ never willed the cutting off true Members from his Body And it is altogether as unreasonable to imagine that it is the will of Christ who hath Compassion on the Ignorant and those who are out of the Way and who hath declared his readiness to receive repenting Sinners should have willed the cutting off of those from the Communion of his Church who are not Contumacious But this is granted on all hands that none be they never so great Transgressors unless Contumacious should be the Objects of this Censure at least what they call the greater Excommunication for the Separation of some open notorious Transgressors from Communion in some Ordinances being under the Church's Admonition it cannot indeed properly be called Excommunication But when a Person is to be judged Contumacious is the great Question The Papists making the Laws and Decrees of their Church equal if not superiour to the Laws of God make all Disobedience to their Canons persisted in to be Contumacy And in abuse of that Text Matth. 18. If he will not hear the Church let him be unto thee as an Heathen and a Publican determine all Persons contumacious who will not hear those whom they call the Church 1. Either commanding them to appear at their Consistories 2. Or tho appearing if they will not within such a time as they set do what in those Courts they think fit to enjoyn them But indeed that Contumacy which renders any according to the Will of God the Objects of this Censure must be a Contumacy against the Commands of Christ If indeed any Person hath done any thing for which according to the Will of God he is censurable by the Church and they send for him and he will not appear to answer and justify himself Or if they command him to do what Christ hath in his Gosppel commanded them to do and he refuseth after several Admonitions to do it he may be judged Contumacious but other Contumacy the Scripture knoweth not nor can any Person by the Law of the Gospel be judged a Person fit to be Excommunicated but one who hath been a scandalous Sinner who being sent for by the Church of which he is a Member refuseth to come at them or coming to them being required to do what is the will of Christ peremptorily refuseth to yield Obedience but will still go on in his sinful Courses CHAP. IV. The Divine Order Method and Manner to be proceeded in with Reference to Excommunication There is yet one thing more to be considered and that is the Order and Manner of the Execution of this Sentence according to the Will of God Whoso considereth it as an Ordinance of God an Action done in the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ and with the Power of our Lord Jesus Christ as the Apostle expresseth it in 1 Corinth 5.4 will easily conclude it ought to be done with all the Seriousness and Gravity imaginable and as is usually said in our Officials Sentences how truly God knoweth Christi nomine prius invocato after a first calling upon the Name of Christ The Name and Power of Christ cannot be trifled with without Profanation and Blasphemy and an high degree of taking the Name of God in vain which is a Crime that whosoever presumeth to incur shall not be held guiltless as we are assured in the third Commandment Again whoso considereth it as an Action by which Mens Sins are retained and by which a Person is cast out of God's special Providence and put into the condition of an Heathen and a Publican and debarred of the greatest Priviledges of the Gospel viz. the Vse of the Sacrament and the Communion of Saints if he be a Person who hath any thing of the Fear of God before his Eyes or any thing of brotherly Love and Compassion toward Souls in his Heart will easily conclude it is a thing ought not to be done passionately rashly or suddenly but upon mature Deliberation after grave Admonitions and patient waiting for the due effect of them And as the very Nature of the thing thus far instructeth any Men of Common Sense and Moralities so that no other manner of performing this can be expected from any but such as in their ordinary Discourse are so used to throw out The Divel take you that they cannot forbear it in their most solemne Actions so God hath sufficiently instructed us in his Will as to this thing The secret Sinner must have a private and Fraternal Correption before the Church hear of his Crime Mat. 18. The Heretick must not be rejected till after a first and second Admonition Tit. 3.10 and certainly he that hath commanded us In meekness to instruct those that oppose themselves if God peradventure will give them Repentance to the acknowledging of the Truth And that they may recover themselves out of the Snare of the Divel who are taken captive by him at his will 2 Tim 2.26 And again If a Man be overtaken with a Fault restore such a one in the Spirit of Meekness considering our selves lest we also be tempted Gal. 6.1 never intended that Men should be delivered up to the Devil cast out of the Communion of the Saints in haste And indeed this is so evident a piece of the Will of God so consonant to Humane Reason that not only all Divines as well Ancient as Modern have agreed it but the very Canon Law it self in several places determines it and maketh it a grievous Sin for any Bishop or Priest to proceed to this Sentence without a leisurable and full hearing of the Cause And I remember the Instance of God himself is brought in resolving to go down and see if the Merits of the Men of Sodom were according to the cry come up and as to the deliberate proceeding of the Judge as in the hearing and proof of the Cause so in the denouncing the
much latter Date In the fourth Century we read of many Excommunicated yet none but by Bishops or Pastors The Bishop of Laodicea Excommunicated Apollinarius The Bishop of Alexandria Excommunicated Aris c. Still it was the Work of Bishops or Pastors and none other Thus it was in the 5th and 6th Centuries Nay in the 7th Century the Centuriators tell us That the Power was only in Bishops and Priests but Pope Boniface had invested Monks with it Anno 1518. When the Power of Excommunication came into the hands of Laicks under the Notion of Officials I know of no History will inform us but it is easie to be concluded that it must do so from the time that Bishops claimed to themselves the sole Power in it and charged themselves with so many Churches as a thousand Eyes tho very watchful could not possibly oversee there was a necessity they should delegate their Power in this Cause to others because it was not possible they should execute it themselves nor could they delegate it to the Curates because then a short time would have discovered to whom it did of right belong nor could the Grandeur of Prelates have been upheld without a Court nor the Officers of that Court have lived with out having something to do We still maintain that Bishops alone can Excommunicate Ordination Confirmation and Jurisdiction are all pretended Differences betwixt them and other Minsters of the Gospel The Execution of this Sentence by Officials is pretended to be but by Delegation only why they may not also delegate to such Officials their Authority also to preach and baptize and ordain Ministers and administer the Eucharist as to hear the Causes of Persons complained of for Error and Heresy or Leudness of Life will deserve their own Thoughts and every serious and thinking Man's Enquiry These things considered I cannot but be amazed when I read what I find in Dr. Burnet's Collection of Records pag. 239. added to his first Part of the History of our Reformation how some of our great Bishops and Doctors in the time of King Hen. 8th in the beginning of our Reformation delivered themselves upon this Question The Bishops of Canterbury Hereford St. Davids and Westminster Dr. Day Coren Leighton Cox Simmons declared their Judgments contrary to Scripture and all Antiquity That Lay Persons might Excommunicate if they were appointed thereto by the Magistrate So as they held it seems that Christ gave the Power of Excommunication to Magistrates or that whether he did or no they might take and delegate it The Bishops of York and Durham and Dr. Edgworth denied it Three more held it was given to the Church and such as they should depute unto it But something must be allowed to that time when we were beginning to reform and our greatest Men had too great a Tincture of Popery both as to Doctrine Worship and Discipline In Edward the Sixth's time What the Opinion of Archbishop Cranmer and many others were appears by that Systeme of Ecclesiastical Canons which they composed by Commission from that excellent Prince and are to be found in the Book called Reformatio Legum Ecclesiasticarum where they determine That no one Person should execute this Power but that the Archbishop or Bishop or some other lawful Judge with a Justice of the Peace and the Proper Minister of the Place where the Party accused dwelleth or some other appointed by him and two or three other Religious Ministers should meet in whose Presence after a full Handling and weighing the Cause the Party should be Excommunicated They had said before p. 161. c. 6. That the consent of the whole Church was to be wished but because that is hard to be procured they orainded as aforesaid Now what difficulty was there in obtaining the consent of the whole Church but the extending the Notion of a Political Governing Church beyond the number of so many as in one place could be gathered together or could be under the Government of the same Officers out of the Cause of Appeals in which Causes it might possibly be so extended But I observe in the Determination of those Great and Reverend Persons if the consent of the Congregation be not necessary which yet I incline much to believe they had put in all who can pretend to any such just Power viz. The Bishop and the Minister of the place and if the other be only allowed as Witnesses to whom the Judicial Power belongs not possibly that Determination was not evil But I conclude with the Evidence of Holy Writ the consent of all valuable Antiquity and from the Evidence of Reason That Christ hath not betrusted this Church-Key with any but the Pastor and Officers and Members of the particular Church to which the Offender doth belong and any Excommunication decreed or executed by any other is no more than a Civil Punishment and the effect of an Humane Law and can pretend to no Institution of Christ nor Authority from Apostolical Writings and it were well the Name of Christ were left out of those Sentences which can pretend to no Authority from him CHAP. III. An Inquiry into those Crimes for which alone according to the Divine Rule Excommunication ought to proceed and be issued by the Church THe next thing we have to consider is the Objects of this Punishment admitting it a meer Civil Punishment The Objects of it must be determined by the Laws of Men and the Justice or Injustice of the Execution of it upon them must be determined by the Law of God another Day But by a Parity of Reason if it be an Institution of Christ's the Objects of this Censure must be determined by the Law of God and it is not in the Power of Man to make an Alteration in the Case nor hath the Scripture left us without a Determination in the Case Three things according to Scripture must concur to make an Object of this heavy Censure 1. The Party must be a Sinner whose Sins you retain are retained 2. Nor is every Sinner the object of it but he must be 1. Either an Heretick Titus 3.10 One that hath made Shipwrack of the Faith 1 Tim. 19. Or a scandalous flagitious Sinner such as hath made Shipwrack of a good Conscience an Incestuous Person one that is Proud Covetous a Boaster a Blasphemer one disobedient to Parents Vnthankful Vnholy without Natural Affection a Covenant-Breaker a false Accuser one that is fierce Incontinent a Despiser of such as are Good Traitors Heady High-minded one who is a Lover of Pleasures more than a Lover of God One that tho he may have a Form of Godliness yet denieth the Power of it 2 Tim. 3. One that obeyeth not the Word of God that walketh disorderly 2 Thess 3.6 14. One that is a Fornicator an Idolater a Drunkard a Railer an Extortioner 1 Cor. 5. One that causeth Divisions contrary to the Doctrine of Christ Rom. 16.17 And not only these but in reason such as shut a
Sentence it speaketh so much as one would think more were needless to be said So as the hasty thundering out of Excommunications which we see in our Days is so far from deriving any Repute or Authority from Holy Writ that it cannot so much as derive from the Popish Canon Law CHAP. V. The Original of those Corruptions which have been or are found in the Church as to Excommunications SInce the Pope claimed to himself the Title of the Head of the Visible Church all Ecclesiastical Power hath been pretended to derive from him who grants it or such part of it as he pleaseth to Archbishops Bishops Arch-deacons c. with a Power also to them to delegate it unto others Those who are broken off from the Church of Rome and yet will have National and Diocesan Churches must make Bishops the Spiritual Heads of them clothed with immediate Power from Christ to influence their several Churches and to deal out God's Ordinances unto them To keep my self to that particular Ordinance which is the Subject of my Discourse The Canon Law of old determined That Laymen being licensed from the Pope the Vicar of Christ might excommunicate and even Bishops might not in some particular Causes reserved to his Holiness Since Bishops extended their Dioceses beyond the reach of their own Eye and the possibility of their own Personal Care there was a necessity also of their delegating their Power as to Jurisdiction Whether this necessity did not arise from their own Error in taking Charges which according to the Divine Rule they could not discharge I leave to others to inquire as also by what Authority any Ecclesiastical Officer can depute another to use the key of Discipline committed to him more than the Key of Knowledg or the Administration of Sacraments Supposing them to have a Power to delegate they must either delegate it to Ministers or Lay-men To have deputed only Ministers of particular Congregations had been both very unreasonable and dangerous unreasonable that a Minister of a particular Congregation should have a Power to excommunicate the Members of another for the Bishop could not make him Pastor of the whole Diocese And dangerous too to the Episcopal Function lest People should have been nursed up in an Opinion that the Minister did it by his own Power immediately derived from Christ and so there had been no need of a Bishop for Jurisdiction Thus when one absurdity is granted an hundred follow Upon this point I will only add the Testimony of Sir Francis Bacon sometimes Lord Chancellour of England not so much for the Authority as for the Reason of it Two things there are saith he in our Episcopal Government in which I was never satisfied 1. The single Exercise of their Authority 2. Their Deputation of it After he had spoken fully to the first he comes to the latter Our Bishops saith he exercise their Jurisdiction by Chancellours Commissaries Officials c. We see that according to the Laws of all Nations throughout the World Offices which require Skill and Trust are not executed by Deputation unless it be so expressed in the Original Commission and in that case it is lawful No Judg in any Court ever substituted a Deputy The Bishop is a Judg and that in Matters of an higher Nature how cometh he to substitute another when as all Trust is personal and inherent in the Person trusted and cannot be transferred to another Certainly as to this from the beginning it was not so It is saith he probable that when Bishops gave themselves too much to the Pomp of this World and in Kingdoms became Peers and Councellours to Princes they delegated their Jurisdiction which was proper to them as a thing beneath their Greatness and like Kings and Count-Palatines would have Councellours and Judges under them That learned Author speaks a great deal more in this Cause Nor hath any consciencious learned Man that I know defended this Power of hearing and judging Causes in order to Excommunication in the hands of any save only such as have been Ministers of the Gospel or the whole Church or the Lawfulness of Deputations in the Case It was first practised in the Church of Rome and that in latest and most corrupt Ages From the same Authors are derived Excommunications for light and trivial things a thing condemned by all Ancient Councils and up and down in the Canon-Law which forbiddeth all Excommunications unless for Heresy or for some Mortal Sin But we must know to what an heighth of Power the Advocates for the Church of Rome had cryed up that Church That it was impossible any could be guilty of a more Mortal Sin than not coming when any Officers of that Church said Come or not going when they said Go or not doing this or that when they said Do it Hence it came to pass that when as originally the Church had nothing to do to send for any as a Criminal but he that was accused as such for some Crime for which according to the Law of God he was if found guilty to be excommunicated in which Case indeed his non-appearance might be interpreted a Confession of the Guilt and a Contumacy in it The Church of Rome having from the Favour of Princes got for their Bishops the Cognisance of a Multitude of temporal Causes and consequently Authority to summon People to answer and to decree in the Cause their not appearing to such Summons or not obeying such Decrees was also judged a Contumacy to the Church and the Crime deserving Excommunication than which a greater Abuse cannot easily be imagined And it is no wonder that after that Excommunication came to be the Work of those who had no place in the Church of Christ as to matters of Judgment and also came to be thundred out upon every light occasion and so had lost all the repute of a Divine Institution thence it came as slightly to be managed or denounced all the Gravity and Seriousness of the Administration was lost The leisurable Admonitions given with the Interposition of many Days and Months were turned to the slighty saying thrice in a breath I admonish you the first time I admonish you the second time I admonish you the third time CHAP. VI. The Reason of the contempt of Excommunications frome hence The Arts of the Papists to strengthen it with other Penalties from Canon and Common and Statute Laws The Magistrates discerning their Errors even in Popish Times restraining them again by several Writs of Prohibition and Supersedeas and Attachments and the Writ de Cautione admittenda BY this time Excommunication which rightly administred was the most formidable Sentence that could be pronounced in any Court under Heaven at once depriving the Person of that special Providence of God peculiar to his Church and of the Communion of Saints and of the hope of the Pardon of Sins without a Repentance testified became a contemptible thing in the Eyes of the People and tho a
of every Subject of England These Prohibitions are sometimes granted absolutely in some Causes with a Quâ—â—sque till the Ecclesiastical Judg amendeth his illegal Proceedings nor was this the only Writ in these Causes If Ecclesiastical Judges should adventure to disobey these Writs the Law in that Case provided a Writ of Attachment That in case the Ecclesiastical Judg would adventure to proceed notwithstanding such a Writ of Prohibition he might be forced to yield Obedience to it Of this are many Instances in the Register of Writs And in regard the Ecclesiastical Judges might have so far proceeded notwithstanding such Prohibition as the Party might be laid up in Prison upon the Writ de Excommanicato capiendo the Law in that case provided a Writ of Supersedeas to deliver the Person out of Prison to follow his Attachment of the Judg for his Contempt of the King 's Writ of Prohibition There is a notable Precedent of this Writ in the Registry of Writs which because it is not known to all I shall take the pains to translate for the benefit of such Persons as may fall under these illegal extravagant Oppressions and not know what to do The King to the Sheriff greeting c. A. B. hath shewed us that whereas C. D. hath sued him in the Court Christian before R. concerning Debts and Chattels which belong not to Testaments or Marriages and altho the same A. B. hath delivered R. our Letter of Prohibition forbidding him to proceed in the Cause aforesaid yet the said R. nevertheless hath proceeded in the said Court contrary to our said Prohibition for which we have according to the Custom commanded R. to be attatched by our Letters directed to him to appear before our Justices to shew cause why he proceeded in the Ecclesiastical Court contrary to our Prohibition and for as much as the aforesaid R. whiles the Plea of Attachment hath been depending before our said Justices aforesaid as is afore said hath maliciously procured the said A. B. to be taken that so he might hinder him from prosecuting the said Attachment before our Justices according to the Laws and Customs of our Kingdom We command you that if it be so that you by no means execute our Writ for the 〈◊〉 of him the said A. upon the Occasion aforesaid until the Plea of the said Attachment be determined in our Court before our said Justices according to the Laws and Customs of our Kingdom and if you have taken him upon the account aforesaid we command you to deliver him from the Prison in which upon that account he is detained in the mean time This Writ saith the Register issueth out of the Chancery if the Party be taken and imprisoned before the return of the Attachment if it be in the time of the Vacation otherwise it issueth out of the other Courts after the Attachment The like Writ issueth if the Ecclesiastical Judg proceeded after an Appeal provided the Appeal be made appear to the Court by some publick Instrument and the Party obtaining it proveth by Witnesses or by Oath that he is diligent in the Prosecution of his Appeal and it must be within the compass of a Year after his Appeal By which two Writs appear the illegal and extravagant Proceedings in those times by Judges in the Ecclesiastical Courts proceeding to excommunicate Persons and then to certify against them and imprison them both contrary to the Canon Law and in contempt of the King's Writs from thence and also contrary to the Rules of their own Law according to which after an Appeal the inferiour Court ought to proceed no further till the Cause was by the Judg ad quem remitted to them Nor was the Writ of Prohibition and the Writs of Attachment and Supersedcas relating to that Writ the only Writs that were invented in those most corrupt and Popish Times to relieve the Subjects oppressed in and by the Ecclesiastical Courts for there are many Causes in which Prohibitions will not lye where those Courts may proceed and excommunicate and after forty days signify and have a Writ out against the Person to imprison him now that they might not at their Pleasure keep Men in Prison to their Ruine the common Law hath provided of ancient Times a Writ de Cautione admittenda Because it is but little understood I will give my Reader some account of it The old Popish Canon Law had ordained that if a Person were excommunicated right or wrong he should not be absolved unless he gave a fitting Caution to obey the Commands of the Church in form of Law This appeareth from that part of the Canon Law which is called the sixth of the Decretals Pope Boniface in the Year 1294 set two Bishops to gather up the Decretals of some former Popes and to be added to five of Gregory the ninth and to some of his own and the Book to be called Sextus upon which Johannes Andreas a Bononian glossed Now in this part of the Canon Law we read it again and again enjoined that Persons excommunicated should 〈◊〉 be absolved unless they gave Caution see Sexti Decretal l. 5. Tit. 5. de usuris Sol. 2. Tit. 6. cap. 1. l. 5. c. 24. Tit. 11. The Glossator upon that part of the Law every where expoundeth that term of a fitting Caution That a fitting Caution may be fide-jussoria or Pignoratitia or Juratoria that is by Sureties by Pledg or by an Oath He also determineth the Caution by Oath only to be taken where the Party should not be able to give Security by Bond and Sureties nor by Pledg The Caution by Sureties was looked upon as the greatest Caution and therefore in our Law in a Writ to the Sheriff commanding him to take Caution of a Party thus imprisoned which we find in our Regist Brevium p. 67. commands him to take Cautionem saltem Pignoratitiam at least a Caution by Pledge But notwithstanding this that Men may see how natural a desire it is in some kind of Men to torment their Brethren the Church here in England having got a Priviledge of a Writ to imprison the Person that had stood Forty days Excommanicated they would keep Men in Prison as long as they pleased till they compelled them to do and pay what they listed tho they offered them Caution according to the Canon Law Let us hear what Doctor Cozens in his Apology for certain proceedings in Causes Ecclesiastical p. 1. c. 2. says of this Writ of Excommunicato capiendo It is saith he a Liberty peculiar to this Church of England above all the Realms in Christendom that I read of that if a Man stand wilfully forty days together Excommunicated and be accordingly certified by the Bishop into the Chancery that then he is to be committed to Prison by Virtue of a Writ directed to the Sheriff nothwithstanding that in one Precedent in the Register of this Writ it is said Quod hujusmodi Breve nostrum ex gratiâ nostrâ pracedat By
of Punishment and not think it enough that a Judge of any Ecclesiastical Court tells them so let them take them and judge them according to their Law as Pilate told the Jews Doth the excellent Law of England unless that Part of it which rose up or was made not only in Popish times but from Popish Principles only relating to the Church condemn any to the loss of Life Limb Liberty or Estate before those who are to execute that Part of it have had the least Liberty to hear the Subject speak for himself Are Protestant Magistrates to believe Ecclesiastical Officers now by a strange Catachresis called the Church in high Acts of Righteousness or Vnrighteousness Will any say that their Law gives them no Power to imprison any except perhaps Clergy-men for Adultery or Fornication I remember the Jews told Pilate much the same thing concerning Christ but how easy is the Answer that neither doth the Law of God from whence they pretend to derive Excommunication appoint any such Punishment as Imprisonment to the ruine of Families upon Persons Excommunicated But be this as it will the Law of England at present is so and must be tho not approved yet submitted to until it pleaseth God to give our Parliaments Hearts and Leisure to enquire into the Reasonableness and Righteousness of it PART II. THE CASE and CURE OR The mischievous Consequents of Excommunication c. EXcommunications being so commonly thundered out to use the Law-Term for them by Persons who have no immediate Authority from Christ to trade in them and for such crivial Crimes as no Law of God hath ordered them against and in such a light and precipitant manner as no part of God's Word warranteths The wiser sort of Men look upon them rather as Excomonings much a kin to the Romanis Interdico tibi aquâ igni Civil Punishments than the Solemn Institutions of God and thereupon have no dread of any Spiritual Influence or Effect of them and therefore overmuch slight them not being well aware that as they are a piece of our Common Law so they have Legal Punishments heavy enough annexed to them which if duly considered were enough to make Men more wary how they incur them if they can by any means avoid them Nor if they be once catch'd in this Knot Innodati saith the Common Law Writ doth every one well understand how to slip or unty it That therefore every one may pay that just respect which he oweth unto the Law in this case or at least take heed to himself and avoid his own Danger I shall briefly shew the danger that Man runs who suffers himself to be Excommunicated and the proper way which the Law hath provided to avoid it together with the Remedy which the Law hath provided for them who are fallen under the misfortune of it 1. In the first place He that is Excommunicated is forthwith disabled to sue in his Majesties Civil Courts Not that the Excommunication takes away his Right to sue for his just Rights but that it may in time be pleaded in Abatement of his Action But concerning this note whosoever is instrumental in procuring solliciting decreeing or pronouncing the Excommunication shall never plead it nor shall it be pleaded unless the Excommunication be signified by the Bishop himself for the Court will receive no Certificate from any Person in this Case to whom if they see cause they cannot write to absolve the Person Nor shall it be pleaded after that Issue is joined and query whether it shall be pleaded unless the Cause be expresly mentioned in the Significavit for which and the time when the Person was Excommunicated nor if it be at length admitted by the Court shall it destroy the Action it shall only abate it until the Excommunication be taken off 2. Albeit an excommunicate Person may be appointed an Executor and is capable of a Legacy yet so long as he standeth Excommunicated he is not to be admitted by the Ordinary nor can commence any Suit for his Legacy in the Court Ecclesiastical See Swinborn of Wills p. 5. § 6. p. 228. 3. If a Person be excommunicated for Heresy or manifest Vsury or with an Anathema he cannot make a Will but in other cases he may saith the same Author Part 2. § 22. p. 62. 4. A Person Excommunicated cannot say some give his Suffrage in any Elections no not of Parliament-Men but this is an idle Dream so long as he hath a Freehold of 40 s. a Year Some will have it too that he cannot marry but Marriage being de Jure Naturali no learned Canonist would ever affirm it But I have known a Minister questioned in our Ecclesiastical Courts and if not suspended yet smartly threatned with Suspension for marrying a Person that was Excommunicated but this is but the Extravagancy of that Court's Proceedings 5. The great danger of all is If a Person be excommunicated whether it be legally or injuriously and stand so forty days upon the Certificate of it into the High Court of Chancery a Writ is to issue out of the High Court of Chancery to the Sheriff of the County in which the Person lives to imprison him till he hath given Satisfaction to the Bishop Being thus imprisoned he is not to be delivered by any of the ordinary Writs for the Liberty of the Subject's Person nor unless he submits to the Bishop and offers Caution for the time to come to stand to and obey the Commands of the Church in form of Law this Caution may be by a Bond of 10 or 20 l. to the Bishop or by a Pledg or if the Party can do none of these by his Oath This Writ to imprison the Person excommunicated is in no Nation of the World but only in this But here it is Common-Law while it pleaseth our Parliament by a Statute to amend the Common Law in that point the Subject therefore had need understand both 1. How by Law to avoid Excommunication 2. How to get himself out of Prison in case he be imprisoned upon this Writ As to the first He must know that no Person can be excommunicated but upon Contempt or Contumacy which may be 1. If the Person being duly cited demeth or omitteth to appear If he be not personally â—â—â—â—oned he needs not appear the first time but then their way is to cite him by a Writ called Vâ—s Mods set up at the Door 's of his House or at the Church-doors citing him at a certain day to appear to answer c. If being personally cited he doth not appear the first time or whether he be or no if he doth not appear the second time he is excommunicated for Contempt If he be cited personally the Law is Clerk Praxis Cur. Eccles Tis. 11. Tit. 16. That he shall appear the third day after the service of the Citation The Law also is that If he will give the Apparitor 6 d. he must bring him the full