Imprimatur JO. BATTELY Oct. 14. 1686. A SERMON PREACHED UPON St. Peter's Day Printed at the Desire of Some that heard it WITH SOME ENLARGEMENTS By a Divine of the Church of ENGLAND LONDON Printed for Ric. Chiswell at the Rose and Crown in St. Pauls Church-Yard MDCLXXXVII A SERMON PREACHED UPON Saint PETER 's Day c. MATTH XVI 18. beginning And I say also unto thee that thou art Peter and upon this Rock I will build my Church THE Text as we call it is part of the Gospel for this Day and according to the Interpretation which some give of it it is the whole Gospel of Christ These two Words PETER and CHURCH being so comprehensive that if they be well learnt there needs no further pains to come acquainted with all the rest of the Christian Religion For in PETER who they say is the Rock here spoken of all the Bishops of Rome in all succeding Ages are included who inherit the very same Prerogative which St. Peter had of being the Foundation of the Church Which CHURCH say they is nothing else but that Body of Men and Women who are united unto the Roman Bishop as their Head From whom all Ecclesiastical Power is derived unto all other Pastors of the Church Over whom and consequently over all Christians he hath a Soveraign Authority to declare the Rule of Faith to determine the Canonical Books of Scripture and the Traditionary Word In brief To be as infallible a Guide in the way to Heaven as Saint Peter was So that if any Man would know infallibly what the Christian Religion is he need be at no more trouble but only to enquire of that Church which adheres to him as the Foundation and resign up himself to the belief of whatsoever it teaches him because it cannot possibly teach him amiss These are wonderful things and we are highly concerned to examine whether there be ground enough in this Speech of our Saviour for the Church of Rome to raise upon it so large so high so glorious a Structure to it self as this is Because if it appear that our Lord did give not only to Saint Peter but to all the Roman Bishops and to them alone this Universal Pastorship and Power to Teach to Rule and Govern all Christians of whatsoever sort they be we must without any Contradiction obediently submit unto it and have not so much as this liberty left us To enquire whether the Roman Bishops do not extend their Power too far in commanding us to do those things which are directly contrary to the Commands of Him from whom all Power comes Because tho we think we see clearly that they do yet we must not believe our own eyes but them who tell us they do not On the contrary if it can be demonstrated that our Saviour in these Words to St. Peter did not confer any such power upon him much less upon all that succeed in the Roman See we shall discern how little reason we have to commit our selves to the Guidance of that Church which builds upon such a sandy Foundation And that it is our certain duty to adhere to the Constitutions of this Church of England whereof we are Members which not only teaches That no manner of Obedience and Subjection is due to any such Forreign Power but commands us who are Ministers in it To use the utmost of our Wit Knowledg and Learning purely and sincerely without any Colour or Dissimulation to teach manifest open and declare four times every Year at least that all such Power is for just Causes taken away and abolished In obedience to which Injunction which is the An. 1603. very first Canon of our Church I shall in this Discourse endeavour according to the best of my Understanding and most diligent Enquiry to give you the Genuine and Sincere Meaning of those Words which are the prime Foundation of that high Claim now mentioned and that as they were expounded in the first and best Times of the Church when the Doctors of it were not engaged in those unhappy Controversies which now disturb or rather distract the Christian World. And if I prove That neither the Apostles after they heard these Words from Christ no not St. Peter himself who is said to be most nay only concerned in them nor the Ancient Bishops that succeeded them no not the Bishops of Rome themselves when they on purpose treat of these Words did think of any such Monarchy it may be truly called as is now built upon them you will conclude that this is a new Doctrine and that the Asserters and Maintainers of it not we who oppose it deserve the Name of Innovators in Religion And for the clearer Exposition of them I think it will be necessary First To observe the Occasion upon which they were spoken and from thence proceed Secondly To show in what sense they were anciently understood And Lastly What Inferences and Deductions are necessarily to be made from their Interpretations PART I. The Occasion of the Words THE meaning of these Words of Christ will be better understood when we have well weighed the occasion on which they were spoken which was this The Opinion and Discourse of the Country concerning our blessed Saviour which was thus reported to him by his Disciples when he askt them about it vers 14. Some say that thou art John the Baptist some Elias and others Jeremias or one of the Prophets That is there were very various and uncertain Opinions conceived of him for tho they all agreed in general he was a great Man nay a Man of God as they called the Prophets yet they were not resolved much less setled in any particular determinate notion of him To try therefore the Proficiency of those who were constantly bred in his School he asks what their Opinion was vers 15. But whom say ye that I am Unto which Simon Peter makes this reply vers 16. Thou art Christ the Son of the Living God. The Question ye may observe is propounded to them all not to Peter alone He doth not say Peter whom dost thou say that I am But he saith unto them that is to his Disciples before mentioned Whom say ye that I am Unto the same Persons of whom he enquired Whom do men say that I am v. 13. He now saith But whom say ye that I am And yet the Answer to this Question is not returned by them all or by several of them as before but by one only Simon Peter answered and said c. What should be the reason of this The plainest and most undoubted answer is That there was no difference of Opinion among them as there was among the common People but they were all of one mind in this matter and therefore no more offered to speak but one because they had all but one thing to say That he was Christ the Son of the Living God. To the first Question one of them alone would not return an Answer
Roman Bishop but directly against the sense of the Ancient Fathers whom he was bound by solemn Oath to follow who as a learned Man h Iv. Launoy Epist ad Raimundum Formentinum pars 2. of the Roman Communion hath largely proved understand hereby every faithful Pastor in the Church of Christ Who according to the way and method of the Divine Counsels which is to give unto those that have to bestow more on those who make a good use of what they have already received immediately hereupon opens to the Apostles his purpose of gathering a Church and drawing more disciples to him besides themselves who should perpetually keep and preserve this Confession and withal declares that he would use Peter as an eminent instrument in this great undertaking 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and I also or moreover say unto thee beside what I have said already I tell thee further Thou art Peter and upon this Rock I will build my Church His Speech is directed to Peter but it is evident from what hath been said that in him he comprehends all the Apostles as they were all comprehended in his Confession Who knew already that he was Christ the Son of the Living God but did not understand his intention of gathering a Church by their means This Name of Peter we met withal before Matth. x. 2. being given him at his first coming to our Saviour John i. 42. Where he told him Thou shalt be called Cephas which is by interpretation a stone or Peter Concerning which Justin Martyr a Dialog cum Tryh p. 333 334. See also Tertullian L. iv adv Marcionem c. 13. hath this Excellent Observation That it was to show our Saviour was the very same God who in the beginning had given new Names to Abraham and Sarah to Jacob and Joshua And for the same reason he called other two Disciples by the name of Boanerges to signify that he had the same Authority by which names were anciently changed and that he was their Lord and Soveraign of which the imposing a name on any person was a mark So that the Words of our Saviour in this place are to be understood as if he had said Thou art he to whom when thou first camest to me I gave a new Name and called Peter a Stone and truly my Church shall be built on a bottom as firm as any stone or rock It was the custom of our Lord when he was about to declare any Divine Truth to lay hold on some sensible similitude then near at hand the better to represent it to the minds of those that heard him As discoursing with the Woman of Samaria at the Well-side he takes occasion to tell her of living water that he had to bestow upon her Such as should be in those that drank it a well of water springing up into everlasting life John IV. 10 14. And at another time feeding a Multitude miraculously with a few Barly Loaves and Fishes he thence lays hold of the opportunity to discourse of the bread of life which came down from heaven which he admonishes them to labour after because if any man eat of this bread he shall live for ever John VI. 26 27 50 51. In like manner here from the Name he had given Peter he takes the occasion of representing the stedfastness of that Foundation on which his Church should be built saying on this rock will I build my Church There was something in Peter no doubt which was the motive to the bestowing this Name upon him and that was the forwardness of his Faith which carried him to Christ meerly upon the report which his Brother Andrew gave of him Which was the reason S. Gregory Nyssen thinks that though Abraham's Name was not changed till after long acquaintance with God and many Divine Apparitions to him Peter's was changed at the very first sight of our Saviour he at the same time hearing his Brother and believing on the Lamb of God was consummated by Faith and being knit to the rock viz. Christ was made Peter * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hom. XV. in Cantic Canticorum p. 691. For our Lord intended to imploy him though not him alone as an eminent instrument to bring others to the Faith and build them on the same Rock that he himself was built till they became a Church The word CHURCH signifies the whole company of Believers united unto Christ as their Lord and Master who are here compared to a House The building of this Church is nothing else but the joyning these Persons with their Pastors into Company and Society one with another in such good order as the Stones which make an House are laid in upon their Foundation All the difficulty is about the Rock or the Foundation upon which this Society stands and by holding fast to which it remains a Church Which is the second thing I undertook to treat of unto which I now proceed PART II. What is here meant by the Rock COncerning this there are various expositions among the ancient Fathers as is manifest to every one that hath read their Writings though in truth as you shall see before I have done they differ rather in words than in sense and quite overthrow all the pretensions of the Church of Rome from this place of Holy Scripture I will name four I. It is confessed by all Protestants that some of the ancient Fathers by the Rock do understand Peter No Body that I know of disputes about this but only about their meaning when they say he was this Rock on which Christ said he would build his Church Which undoubtedly is not such as they of the Church of Rome would have it because other Persons far more in number and of as eminent rank in the Christian Church expound it of the Faith which S. Peter confessed So that he was the Rock and the Foundation only as he preached this Faith which is the second interpretation and shall be made appear to be the meaning of those who call Peter the Foundation of the Church II. If numbers are to be followed there are most I am sure for this sense of these words that by the Rock we are to understand that faith which S. Peter now confessed It is mentioned by Fortunatus an African Bishop in a Council at Carthage * De Baptizanâ—is Hareticis apud Cyprian p. 233. edit Oxon. where he saith the Lord hath built his Church Supra petram non super haeresin upon a Rock not upon Heresie In which words Rock being opposed to Heresie without all doubt he understood our Saviour to speak of a sound and solid Faith in him when he said he would build his Church upon this Rock Which is exactly the sense of Epiphanius also who by the Gates of Hell understanding all sorts of Heresies adds immediately †〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Haeres LXXIV n. 14. but they cannot prevail against the Rock that is against the Truth To whom I
neither in Paul 's nor in Peter 's but in the name of Christ that Peter might be built upon the Rock not the Rock upon Peter The like we meet withal in another place †Tract CXXIV in evang Johannis The Church is founded upon the Rock whence Peter received his Name For the Rock is not denominated from Peter but Peter from the Rock * Non enim à Petro Petra sed Petrus à Petra directly contrary to Card. Baronius who confidently says non Petrus à Petra sed ipse Petra not Peter from that Rock but he is the Rock Ad An. 31. n. 24. as Christ hath not his name from Christian but a Christian from Christ for therefore the Lord said Vpon this Rock I will build my Church because Peter had said Thou art Christ the Son of the living God. Vpon this Rock therefore saith he which thou hast confessed will I build my Church FOR THE ROCK WAS CHRIST upon which foundation even Peter himself is built For other foundation can no Man lay than that is laid which is Christ Jesus I will not trouble you with any more Authorities such as that of Venerable Bede †In Cap. XXI Johan who hath transcribed these last words of S. Austin into his own Book because I have a fourth exposition to add which will help to clear the rest especially the first IV. There are those who having what I have now said in their mind expound these words of all the Apostles and their Successors that is of all Christian Bishops who laid this foundation stone and continued to build upon it after it was laid Thus S. Cyprian * Ad Lapsos Epist XXXIII Edit Oxon. most expresly Our Lord whose precepts we ought to reverence and observe ordering the honour of the Bishop and the rule of his Church saith in the Gospel unto Peter I say unto thee thou art Peter and upon this Rock c. From hence through the course of times and successions runs down the Ordination of Bishops and the rule of the Church THAT THE CHVRCH MAY BE CONSTITVTED VPON BISHOPS and every affair of the Church be governed by those Overseers The very same is affirmed by S. Austin who in several places looks upon the whole order of Bishops as comprehended in S. Peter particularly in an Epistle to three †Epist CLXV vide Launoii Epist Par. V. ad Carolum Magisirum p. 47. c. ad Gulielâ—â— Voellum p. 12. c. great persons where he saith Christ spake these words to him sustaining the figure of the whole Church It will not be fit to mention all the rest of the antient Writers who thus extend the sense of this place I shall only note that Paschasius Radbertus the founder of Transubstantiation was of this mind For thus he writes * L. IV. in Matt. v. 26. p. 18. The Church of God is not built upon Peter alone but upon all the Apostles and the Successors of the Apostles Unto these four Expositions I might add a fifth there being those who have understood every Christian Man and Woman by this Rock they being the stones and materials as I may call them of which the Church consists But I will pass this by though it have more great names to support it besides Origen because I have said enough already to expose the foul dealing and unworthy reasonings and conclusions of greatest Doctors of the Church of Rome which I shall represent in these following Considerations PART III. Reflections upon what hath been said concerning these Interpretations I. IF these things be certainly true as I assure you they are and themselves cannot deny that there are these several interpretations of this Scripture among the ancient Doctors then there can be no excuse made for their partiality who receive and adhere only to one of these interpretations as the Catholick Exposition and lay aside all the rest even those which are far more Catholick Thus doth Bellarmine * L. 1. de Pontif. Rom. C. X. who finding fault with Erasmus for contradicting their Exposition of the Church being founded upon Peter saith that all the Fathers teach it And thus doth Cardinal Baronius †Ad An. 33. n. XXVII to name no more who is not ashamed to say that it is an interpretation received and approved by the consent of the whole Catholick Church What truth can you expect from such Men or who can think it safe to give up himself to the conduct of such Guides who thus notoriously falsifie in a matter so evident that for one antient Father or Ecclesiastical Writer that by the Rock understands Peter himself there are two nay very near three that interpret it of the Faith which S. Peter confessed For to all those which a very learned and ingenuous Doctor of the Roman Church hath collected which are XLIV in number * V. Jo. Launoii Epist P. V. ad Guil. Voellum p. 18. c. others may be added besides Fortunatus and Epiphanius before mentioned For example Euagrius seems to have had this in his thoughts who speaking of Anastasius Bishop of Antioch where S. Peter sat before he was at Rome to whom such fierce assaults were given as if they thought in his overthrow to subvert the Church it self saith he manfully withstood them all †〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 L. IV. C. 40. for he stood firm upon the impregnable Rock of Faith. If the sense of the Antients be to be reverenced at all why not one sense as well as another And why not that most of all which hath the most to assert it With what conscience do they fix upon one and throw away nay detest all the other which are of more credit Is it not highly unjust to make Peter this Rock here spoken of rather than Christ our Lord when there are so many reasons as well as great Authority for the last more than for the other And yet they not only do this but most immodestly say all the Fathers are of their mind And which is worse they make this an Article of the Faith That the Church is founded upon S. Peter nay the prime Article of all unto which it is evident the Church hath never agreed but manifestly contradicted it Upon this Bellarmine grounds the Infallibility of the Bishop of Rome because Peter is the Rock and the Foundation of the Church as the Supreme Governor of it and therefore every Successor of his is in like manner the Rock and Foundation of the Church And thus he saith all the Fathers have expounded it * L. IV. de Pontif. Rom. C. III. And hence proceeds so far as to say this is the summ of Christian affairs †Praefat. in illos Libros the whole frame of the visible Church depending so much upon the Roman Bishop that if he be taken away the Church falleth Upon this Foundation also they have raised to him such an Authority they make him by Christs
Christ as S. Paul speaks that is the Christian Religion though from less Circumstances than these some endeavour to prove the Monarchy of St. Peter Our Saviour say they speaks to him after such a particular manner as argues he intended to Object 2. bestow on him some particular Grace not common to him with others For he calls him by the Name he had before he came to him and mentions his Father's Name and the Name he himself had given him and then alludes to that Name of Peter in the word Rock and gave him a particular Blessing upon occasion of a particular Act of his confessing Christ's Divinity which God in particular revealed to him All these show that the Promise made to him after such a way and introduced with such peculiar Circumstances was not common to others but peculiar to himself But after this labourious heaping up of meer circumstantial things the Consequence they Answ would infer from hence falls to the ground Because we are informed by him who cannot deceive us that he did not design the great Power here promised particularly to him alone but to them all for what he promises here to him ver 19. he promises to them all in the next Chapter xviii 18. And besides this as the substantial part of this Discourse belongs to them all so most of the Circumstances which I have enumerated are common to others and not peculiar to him For others confessed his Divinity and were taught it by God and were blessed and designed also for Stones in the Fabrick of the Church as hath been already proved So that there is nothing left but Simon Bar-jona that is his own Name and his Fathers Name and the Name of Peter to support this weighty Foundation of St. Peter's Supremacy And they are very slender things For the mention of Barjona Son of Jona was necessary to distinguish this Simon from the other Simon Zelotes and Simon was necessary to be mentioned that this Son of Jona might be distinguished from Andrew who was his Son also And as for the Name of Peter tho we should grant it to be the very same with the Rock after mentioned it is very far from proving that he alone had the thing because he alone had the Name for they were all Rocks I have shown in the same sense that he was a Rock And the most we can gather from it or from the rest of these peculiar Circumstances is this that he had the Honour promised him of being the first that should lay the Foundation of Faith among the Gentiles Which St. Ambrose y Serm. xlvii de fide Petri Apostoli or some other old Homilist that assumed his Name makes the reason of his being called a Rock Petra dicitur eo quod primus in Nationibus fidei fundamenta posuerit He is said to be the Rock because he first laid the Foundations of Faith among the Nations Which notwithstanding did not give him a Supremacy over them but St. Paul was the Apostle of the Gentiles Rom. xi 13. and as God wrought so mightily with him that he made great Conversions among them so being brought to Christ he had upon him the Care of all the Churches 2 Cor. xi 28. Which if St. Peter had any where said of himself I am sure it would have been urg'd as an evident proof of his Universal Pastorship but we make no such Inference from it for St. Paul because we know Christ made no one Head of all Churches nor gave to any of the Apostles a Supremacy of Power and Universality of Jurisdiction V. But beyond all this there is still a higher Presumption that they are guilty of who extend the Prerogative supposed to be granted here to St. Peter unto all the succeeding Bishops of Rome whom they make the Heirs of his Authority In which there are a vast number of Suppositions that can never be proved as many Writers of our Church have shown and therefore I will not here repeat them It is sufficient to tell them that they themselves are forced to grant That some Speeches of our Saviour were so personally directed to St. Peter that he himself only was concerned in them and not his Successors z See Bellarm Q. 2. de Pont. Rom. c. xii Resp ad 5. Object Calvini Now if any there is great reason to look upon this as one of those Speeches which were limited to Peter's Person and cannot be thought to be intended to any body after him For 1. First the description of his Person by the personal adjuncts both of his Name and of his Parentage may most properly be urged to prove that this Speech is personal limited to him alone by express terms of individual difference And it is observable that both here when he saith he will build his Church upon him and when he bids him Feed his Sheep Joh. xxi 15 16 17. he uses the very same terms of individual difference calling him Simon Son of Jona So that of all the places upon which they of the Church of Rome chiefly ground the claim of their Bishops as his Successors there are none more personal than these two which most evidently restrain the words to Peter alone 2. And this appears farther from the impossibility that this Honour of founding the Church upon him should reach beyond his Person Because there can be no more Foundations of a Building than are laid at first All that comes after is built upon that and is as we call it Superstructure If St. Peter therefore were the Foundation of the Church his Successors cannot be intended in this Name because the Church is not still to be founded but all that come after him do themselves rely upon that Foundation 3. But the chief thing of all is That Christ did not lay such a Foundation of his Church as might fail and have need of the Succession of another which was also to fail it self and required another continued Succession of Foundations For as the Author to the Hebrews proves from hence the Infirmity of the Aaronical Priesthood that their High-Priests being mortal could not administer an Eternal Priesthood which belongs to Christ alone who remains for ever in like manner may we certainly argue in this matter If the Foundation of the Church must be constant and permanent they cannot be the Foundation of it who dying frequently make it necessary another should be substituted in their stead But it was absolutely necessary the Foundation should be perpetual immoveable and unalterable always remaining the same and never changing and therefore we may be sure they are not the Rock on which the Church is built who are in a perpetual change and cannot continue but must give way to others If we should allow such a Foundation of the Church we must allow as many several Foundations as there are Popes and so the Rock on which the Church is built cannot be said to be one and the same for
ever All which shows how true it is that Peter himself was not that Rock on which Christ promised to build his Church unless we understand thereby only his Ministerial Function which he did not exercise solely but had all the rest Co-workers with him VI. But let us in the last place suppose once more that he was the Rock more than the rest yet it is a strange Conclusion from hence that Christ made him the Lord and sole Governour of his Church For what relation hath a Rock to Power Government and Dominion We may as soon draw Water out of a Pumice as any such Doctrine out of this word Rock which hath relation only to Solidity Firmness Stedfastness or something of that kind as appears from the very nature of the word and the use of it in all Authors where it never imports any thing of that which is now so much pleaded for and made the Subject of the greatest Contests And therefore those Writers who expound these words of Peter say nothing of his Dominion much less of the Dominion of the Popes of Rome for which there is now so much stickling but they give us quite another reason why he is called the Rock Because of the solidity of his Devotion saith one because he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as hard as a Rock or stone in the Faith saith another because of the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the firmness of his Faith saith a third because of his Faith in the true Rock saith a fourth because also he laid the first Foundation of Faith among the Gentiles and because that this Faith which he professed viz. That Jesus Christ is the Son of God is the first Principle of our Religion the beginning of Christianity the Foundation and Bottom of all that we believe In which Faith he was so stedfast that he did not fluctuate in uncertainty like the rest of the Jews some of which said he was Elias others Jeremias others John the Baptist but was setled in this constant Perswasion that Jesus was the Son of God which he as constantly preached unto others and converted unto this Faith. I have not thought it necessary to quote the Authors where all these things may be found I will only name Epiphanius a Haeres lix num 7 8. who speaking of St. Peter whom he calls the most principal of the Apostles he adds Who truly was to us a firm Rock founding the Faith of the Lord upon which the Church is altogether built First when he confessed Christ to be the Son of the Living God and heard our Saviour say Vpon this Rock of an unshaken Faith will I build my Church And again he was a firm Rock the Foundation of the House of God when denying Christ he returned and had those words said unto him Feed my Sheep For Christ saying this draws us to Repentance that on him may be built again a well-grounded Faith which doth not deny Life to those that truly repent Who doth not see that this Father thought he was the Rock because he laid the Foundation of Faith in us And there are those who think he had the Name of Peter given him to show also the Difficulties and Dangers he was to go through in that Imployment unto which he was called of preaching the Faith. But more than such things as these is not to be drawn out of these words No such thing as the Infallibility of the Bishop of Rome which is another Presumption built upon this word Rock For supposing Peter to be the Rock that is saith Bellarmine the Foundation of the Church thence it follows he could not err because then the Foundation would prove ruinous and the Church which is the Building would fall to the ground And consequently his Successors cannot err for the same reason because they are what he was the Foundation upon which the Church relies and if they should fail the Christian Religion might come to nothing Which is so wretched a sort of reasoning that it shows the greatest Wits were not able to say any thing considerable in this cause For it supposes that which hath no proof at all that Peter was the sole Foundation of the Church If he were not then if this reasoning be good it proves all Bishops who are the Successors of the Apostles and frequently so called by ancient Writers to be infallible But I shall say no more of this for there are so many flaws in such Discourses as derive to the Successors all that was in Peter or the rest of the Apostles that they are not easily numbred and I have said enough I hope to show that all the pretensions of the present Church of Rome grounded upon this place are weak and without any bottom They fall to the ground when we come to touch them with one rational thought and prove like a Building that hath no Foundation Or they are not like a Structure built on a Rock but like a House that Men build on the Sand. There is nothing of solidity nothing of strength in their Arguments upon this Subject but after much pains to connect a great many things together they fall asunder like a Rope of Sand. There is no solid reason to make us think that our Lord spake here of Peter and not of Himself Or if he spake of Peter that he meant his Person and not that Doctrine which he preached And no reason in the Earth that he spake concerning himself or his Doctrine only to Peter and not to them all Or if we should make this large grant that he spake only of Peter there is not the least shadow of reason to make us think he spake of his Dominion and supream Power but only of his stedfastness in the Faith and his being the first Instrument in gathering a Church among the Gentiles tho he was not the prime Instrument if we thereby understand the chiefest and greatest for that was St. Paul. Some Vses of what hath been said I. And therefore we are a true Church though we have nothing to do with the Bishop of Rome This is no part of the definition of a Church that it is united to him as its Head but it is intire without it The Bishop of Rome makes all his claim from St. Peter who it is plain had no Universal Jurisdiction granted or promised in these words and therefore the Pope can get nothing by them Faith in Christ Jesus Communion with our Christian Brethren and Subjection to those Pastors who are over us in the Lord are sufficient to make us a Church whether the Pope will or no. Though there were no such Bishop in the World though the Chair of St. Peter were overturned and no where to be found the Church of Christ would be where it was built upon the Foundations of the Apostles and Prophets There is not one of the Apostles that say a word in their Writings of the Prerogative of St. Peter Among all their Admonitions
to the Churches they never bid them be subject unto him much less to his Successors but only to those that rule over them to those that admonish them and watch for their Souls that is to their own Pastors and Governors in those places where they lived II. Since therefore we are undoubtedly a true Church of Christ though we have no dependance on him and should have been so though we had never heard there was such a Bishop in the World let us be mindful of the Exhortation of the Apostle St. Jude ver 20 21. which contains the properest Use of what hath been said 20. But ye Beloved building up your selves on your most holy Faith praying in the Holy Ghost 21. Keep your selves in the Love of God looking for the Mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto Eternal Life First Build up your selves on your most holy Faith. Do not think of building upon the Successor of St. Peter as the Priests of the Church of Rome would perswade you but upon that Christ and that most holy Faith on which St. Peter himself was built There are three things which the Apostles of our Lord speak concerning Faith. First They speak of laying the Foundation of it which I hope is done already so that there is no need to exhort you to it but I may say as the Apostle doth to the Hebrews Ch. vi 1. Let us go on unto perfection not laying again the Foundation of Repentance from dead Works and of Faith towards God. Secondly They speak of continuing in the Faith for by that we continue in the Church the Body of Christ Rom. xi 20. Thou standest by Faith 2 Cor. i. ult by Faith ye stand Thirdly Of continuing stedfast in it Col. ii 5. I rejoyce beholding your order and the stedfastness of your Faith in Christ 1 Cor. xvi 13. Stand fast in the Faith. And here St. Jude adds an Exhortation to building up our selves on it to endeavour that is to increase and grow strong in Faith by understanding all the Grounds and Reasons on which it relies by observing all the Testimonies which God hath given to his Son Jesus Christ for this is the very Foundation of Religion to use the words of St. Chrysostom the original of Righteousness the head and fountain of Sanctity the beginning of all true Devotion the light of the Soul and the gate of Eternal Life But we need not go to Rome for any of these and particularly we may know this great thing St. Chrysostom speaks of and be sure without consulting them that the Son of God is come as it is in the last Verse but one of the first Epistle of St. John and hath given us an understanding that we may know him that is true i. e. the true God whose Nature and Will is declared by him and we are in him that is true even in his Son Jesus Christ that is Children of the true God or his chosen People in or by his Son Jesus Christ that is by hearty Faith in him who is his only Begotten of one substance with the Father full of Grace and Truth Of all this I say we may be sure and this as it there follows is the true God and Eternal Life though we never know whether there be such a place as Rome and such a Bishop as the Pope of whom many Christians no doubt in several parts of the World never heard so much as one word And therefore let us not be so weak as to think we must needs use any of his Tools and Instruments for the laying the Foundation or for the building up our selves in the Christian Faith. Which relies upon the Testimony of all the Apostles whose words we have recorded in the holy Books and no where else and which all the Ministers of Christ have as much Authority to expound as they and can give as good reason for what they say as appears by what hath been said upon this place which is the Principle from whence they would wring for derive they cannot so great a Power as they challenge To which if you submit it is to undo all that you have done to lay again the Foundation of Faith or rather to overturn it and build upon Human Authority instead of Divine Which is one thing that would prevail with you if it were considered not to give up your selves to their Directions whose great labour it is to unsettle your Faith not to strengthen it to make you doubtful of every thing in the Christian Religion not to build you up on the Faith of Christ Secondly But besides this he would have us pray in the Holy Ghost That is ardently and with such devout Affections as the Holy Ghost sometimes inspires and for such things as the Holy Ghost teaches us to ask in the holy Gospel which is the Mind of the Spirit of God and especially to pray thus in the Christian Assemblies For the Apostle here opposes these things to the practice of those that separated themselves being sensual having not the Spirit ver 19. Our Lord would have us pray always and in our Closet especially in the Assemblies of our Christian Brethren where we must take heed of being frigid or luke-warm of praying to gratify any of our Carnal Desires especially that of Revenge as St. James teaches us ch iv 1 2 3. and of praying in the Name of St. Peter or St. Paul or any other Saint or Angel for which the Holy Ghost hath given no direction but quite contrary told us by the Mouth of his holy Apostles that to us there is but one God and one Lord 1 Cor. viii 6. One God and one Mediator between God and Man 1 Tim. ii 5. So that to use any other is to fall into a Schism to spoil the Unity and break the Communion of the Church of Christ as they of the Church of Rome have done both by this and by changing the ancient Government Discipline and Faith of the Christian Church which believed nothing heretofore concerning St. Peter and his Successor's Supream Power over all the Bishops in the World who took themselves to be the Vicars of Christ as much as the Bishop of Rome Take a Review of what I have said and you will see that it is they who have separated themselves from the rest of the Christian World by usurping this Universal Jurisdiction as well as by many other things and so broken that Charity and quenched that loving and kind Spirit which gives the greatest efficacy to our Prayers and makes them most fervent and most prevalent Joyn not therefore your selves to them but as the Apostle adds in the third place Thirdly Keep your selves in the Love of God. Our Lord Christ tells you how Joh. xv 10. If ye keep my Commandments ye shall abide in my Love c. adding ver 12. This is my Commandment that ye love one another as I have loved you which he repeats again Verse 17. These things I command
you that ye love one another Have a sincere and hearty Affection for all Christian People and imitate not the Romanists who are out of Charity with the far greatest part of the Christian World. This Love of God and of our Brethren which are inseparable is the fruit of Faith and of Prayer without which they are nothing worth We must not only lift up our Hands to God which is a description of Prayer but lift up our Hands also unto his Commandments which we have loved Psal cxix 48. which is to do God's Will with a sincere Affection to it Without such fruits of Faith we shall not be able to stand fast in time of Temptation as Men built upon a Rock No our Lord hath told us that they who hear his Word and do it not are like to a Man that built his House upon the Sand which is soon overturned If we profess then this Faith which St. Peter confessed that Jesus is the Christ the Son of the Living God which is the Foundation of Christianity let us be faithful and obedient unto him in all things For what he hath bidden us do as well as what he hath bidden us believe comes with the very same Authority and ought to be look'd upon as the words of the ever living God by his only begotten Son whom he hath sent to reclaim the World both from their Infidelity and from their Impiety This is part of the Foundation of our Religion that we renounce all Wickedness as well as that we believe our Lord Jesus to be the eternal Son of God. So St. Paul teaches us as we translate his words 2 Tim. ii 19. The Foundation of God standeth sure having this Seal The Lord knoweth them that are his And let every one that nameth the Name of Christ depart from Iniquity As much as to say this a setled Truth in the Christian Religion that they are Christ's they alone are known or approved by him who so profess Belief in him as to depart from Iniquity A profession of his Faith we ought to make but not content our selves with that alone We must add something to it and St. Peter tell us what 2 Pet. i. 5 6 7. Add to your Faith Vertue and to Vertue Knowledg and to Knowledg Temperance and to Temperance Patience and to Patience Godliness and to Godliness brotherly Kindness and to brotherly Kindness Charity For if these things be in you and abound they make you that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the Knowledg of our Lord Jesus Christ And so as St. Jude teaches you in the last place Fourthly You may look for the Mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto Eternal Life That is have a good hope to be saved in the day of the Lord by the great Grace and Mercy of God in Christ Jesus Stedfastly expect this and wait for it with a patient hope whatsoever any Man can say to discourage you Let it not shake you nor make you doubt of the Mercy of God in this way unto which the Holy Ghost directs us all the Power to which the Pope pretends from St. Peter shall never be able to shut you out of Heaven He may shut out himself by his unjust Usurpations and by his Uncharitableness and by his unwarrantable Additions to the Christian Doctrine and Religion but none of those who trust in God after this manner which I have declared shall ever be confounded Let him thunder and lighten as much as he pleases it shall never hurt and therefore should not fright any of those pious Souls nor shall their hope ever make them ashamed The sound of Damnation perpetually in their Ears they ought to hear as an empty noise and vain words which should not so much as startle much less terrify them or turn them out of the way wherein they are All the Conceit which others may have of their own Merits and of the Merits of the Saints and of the Treasures of their Church and the Indulgences of the Pope shall never avail them so much as the Mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ towards those who look for his appearing unto Eternal Life by an holy Faith and by ardent Devotion and by unfeigned Love to God and to all Christian People Which cannot fail to commend us sufficiently unto him who is able as it follows in St. Jude to keep you from falling and to present you faultless before the presence of his Glory with exceeding Joy. You ought not to question it nor suffer others to raise doubts in your Minds about it but in assured hope of it continually bless and praise the Father of Mercies who hath called you into his Church chosen you to be his People wrought Faith and Love and hope of Eternal Life in you saying as he concludes his Epistle To the only Wise God our Saviour be Glory and Majesty Dominion and Power both now and ever Amen FINIS ERRATA PAge 6. line 14. for would not read could not P. 24. l. 14. Marg. r. Faelix iii. P. 30. l. antepen r. the greatest P. 33. l. 19. r. that they make P. 41. l. 21. f. prevent r. pervert P. 45. l. 18. r. next Chapter but one P. 51. l. 17. r. next Chapter but one P. 56. l. 23. r. next Chapter but one An Advertisment Of Books printed for Richard Chiswell THE History of the Reformation of the Church of England By GILBERT BVRNET D. D. in two Volumes Folio The Moderation of the Church of England in her Reformation in avoiding all undue Compliances with Popery and other sorts of Phanaticisms c. By TIMOTHY PVLLER D. D. Octavo A Dissertation concerning the Government of the Ancient Church more particularly of the Encroachments of the Bishops of Rome upon other Sees By WILLIAM CAVE D. D. Octavo An Answer to Mr. Serjeants Sure Footing in Christianity concerning the Rule of Faith With some other Discouses By WILLIAM FALKNER D. D. Quarto A Vindication of the Ordinations of the Church of England in Answer to a Paper written by one of the Church of Rome to prove the Nullity of our Orders By GILBERT BVRNET D. D. Octavo The History of the Gunpowder Treason collected from Approved Authors as well Popish as Protestant With a Vindication of the said History and of the Proceedings and Matters relating thereunto from the Exceptions which have been made against it and more especially of late Years by the Author of the Catholick Apology and others Quarto A Relation of the barbarous and bloody Massacre of about an hundred thousand Protestants begun at Paris and carried on over all France in the Year 1572. Collected out of Mezeray Thuanus and other Approved Authors Quarto The Apology of the Church of England and an Epistle to one Signior Scipio a Venetian Gentleman concerning the Council of Trent Written both in Latin by the Right Reverend Father in God JOHN JEWEL Lord Bishop of Sarisbury Made English by a Person of Quality To which is added The Life of the said Bishop Collected and written by the same Hand Octavo A Letter writ by the last Assembly General of the Clergy of France to the Protestants inviting them to return to their Communion Together with the Methods proposed by them for their Conviction Translated into English and examined By GILB BVRNET D. D. Octavo The Life of WILLIAM BEDLE D. D. Bishop of Kilmore in Ireland Together with certain Letters which passed betwixt him and James Waddesworth a late Pensioner of the Holy Inquisition in Sevil in matter of Religion concerning the General Motives to the Roman Obedience Quarto The Decree made at Rome the second of March 1679. condemning some Opinions of the Jesuits and other Casuists Quarto A Discourse concerning the Necessity of Reformation with respect to the Errors and Corruptions of the Church of Rome Quarto First and Second Parts A Discourse concerning the Celebration of Divine Service in an unknown Tongue Quarto A Papist not misrepresented by Protestants Being a Reply to the Reflections upon the Answer to A Papist Misrepresented and Represented Quarto An Exposition of the Doctrine of the Church of England in the several Articles proposed by the late Bishop of Condom in his Exposition of the Doctrine of the Catholick Church Quarto A Defence of the Exposition of the Doctrine of the Church of England against the Exceptions of Monsieur de Meaux late Bishop of Condom and his Vindicator 4º A CATECHISM explaining the Doctrine and Practices of the Church of Rome With an Answer thereunto By a Protestant of the Church of England Octavo The Second Edition corrected with a Vindication of a Passage in the said Catechism from the Exceptions made against it in A Reply to the Answer of the Amicable Accommodation
could add Sixteen other ancient Writers and not put S. Austin into the number who often follows this Exposition four of which were Popes of Rome * Leo I. Foelix M. Gregorius I. Adrian I. and I do not reckon neither Isidorus Hispalensis venerable Bede and a great many other excellent Writers later than they down to Alphonsus Tostatus and lower among whom are five or six Bishops of Rome †Nicholas I. John VIII Steph. VI. Innocent II. Hadrian IV. Urban III. who expresly say The Rock that Christ here speaks of is the Faith which Peter confessed For the Church saith the last named Writer is built upon faith which faith is called a rock because it always remains firm and solid III. But there are others of no less name and credit that understand Christ himself by this Rock Who then may be conceived to have pointed to his own person when he spake these words shewing by his voice and gesture whom he meant by this Rock Which as it is an elegant so it is no unusual form of Speech but made use of by our Lord himself on another occasion Joh. II. 19. when he saith destroy this Temple intending the Temple of his Body and in three days I will raise it up And there are no small number of the antient Doctors who thus expound these words particularly S. Austin in divers places of his Works as he himself takes notice in his Review of them Where he saith †Retract L. 1◠Cap. 21. that in a certain place of his Book against the Epistle of Donatus he made Peter the Rock on which the Church was founded but since that time had very often said it was Christ the Son of the living God. He leaves the Reader indeed to chuse which he pleases but any one may see he inclined to the last which he followed in those Books which he wrote after this of his Retractions For which I must needs say there are no small reasons that are worthy to be mentioned First this very Apostle whose name is Peter or Stone calls Christ a living stone unto whom ye coming saith he to his flock as lively stones are built up a spiritual house c. 1 Pet. II. 4 5. Who can read these words without prejudice and not think that S. Peter lookt upon Christ as that Rock on whom every one must be built who will be a part of the spiritual House that is of the Church And therefore he adds that Christ is that chief Corner Stone elect and pretious whom the Prophet Isaiah foretold God would lay in Sion v. 6. And Christ alone for if he had had any conceit that he was a joynt secondary foundation of this building it would have been very seasonable or rather necessary to have bidden his flock come to him as that chief Corner Stone which God of old predicted he would lay in Sion as the foundation of his Church together with Christ For so Bellarmin †is bold to expound that Praefat. ad Libros de summo Pontif. Prophecy of Isaiah indeavouring at large to prove that every particular there mentioned belongs to Peter and his Successors in the See of Rome who he saith are that tried Stone that pretious nay that corner Stone that sure foundation in fundamento fundatus as they translate it that stone laid in the foundation which we read of Isaiah XXVIII 16. Directly against the words of S. Peter himself who applys all this to Christ alone and indeavours to fasten his flock unto him as the only sure Rock of their Redemption and Salvation This is a Doctrine frequent in the mouth of this very Apostle whom against his own mind they will needs make the Foundation of the Church and which he had read in other places of the antient Prophets For long before the writing of this Epistle he tells the Council of Jerusalem that Jesus was the stone which was set at nought by such Builders as they but become the head of the Corner Act. IV. 11. The great Men that is of the Jewish Church would not build on this Foundation by joyning themselves unto him as the rest of the Stones in a House are to that of the Corner and so they excluded themselves from his Body and from Salvation for there is no Salvation saith he in any other Secondly Another great Apostle also tells us that Christ is the Rock 1 Corinth X. 4. Who poured out his Spirit after his Death upon the Church as the Rock in the Wilderness after it was smitten did Water for the Israelites Thirdly And more than that he tells us in that Epistle III. 11. Other foundation can no Man lay than that is laid which is Jesus Christ How is it possible to have a better interpreter of Christs words to Peter than this which is here given us by the great Apostle of us Gentiles There are sundry Elogiums indeed which the antient Fathers have bestowed on S. Peter in their writings of which they of the Church of Rome are wont to boast and we grant them all nay have often told them that if it will do them any service we will furnish them with as many more titles of Honour out of the Fathers as they have collected But when we have done we will present them with as many and great and transcendent yea the very same titles bestowed upon S. Paul Who here tells us in plain words whom we are to understand by the Foundation of the Church and consequently by the Rock on which it is built And indeed our Saviour doth not here say to Peter Thou art Peter and upon thee will I build my Church but upon this Rock as if he spoke of something else either himself or that Faith concerning him which Peter had confessed Tu Petrus Ego Petra thou art Peter and I am the Rock on whom thou art built thy self and must help to build others If Peter himself was the Rock then how is he built upon the Rock He would be a Rock and a Foundation to himself For there is no mention of more Rocks than one which if it be Christ then Peter and all must be built on him Hear how handsomely S. Austin * Serm. 13. De verbis Domini Cap. 1 2. expounds these words Thou therefore art Peter and upon this Rock which thou hast confessed upon this Rock which thou hast known saying Thou art Christ the Son of the living God I will build my Church Super me aedificabo te non me super te I will build thee upon me not me upon thee For they that would build upon men said I am of Paul I am of Apollo I am of Cephas that is Peter and others who would not be built upon Peter but upon the Rock said I am of Christ Now S. Paul seeing them make choice of him and contemn Christ asks them Is Christ divided Was Paul Crucified for you Or were you baptized in the name of Paul No
before in the next Chapter so when he actually gives this Power which he saith here he will give he bestows it upon every one of them which was after his Resurrection John 20. 21. As my Father hath sent me even so I send you Here he speaks in the present Time and gives them in this Commission the Power which they had not before making them to be what they were ever after In token of which he breathed on them and said unto them Receive ye the Holy Ghost Whose soever Sins ye remit they are remitted c. Vers 22 23. Can any one who reads these words think that Peter was only sent and made the only Foundation and the only Gate to let Men into the Church when he hears such an Authority as this granted and sealed to them all He hath lost then the ancient sense of the Church which Theophylact * Mat. 16. 19. represents in these words Though it was said to Peter only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will give thee yet it was given to all the Apostles When Then when he said Whose soever Sins ye remit they are remitted to them For I will give denotes the future Time that is after the Resurrection Hear also how St. Austin t Enarratio in Psal 87. discourses upon these words of the Psalmist before-mentioned Why are they called the Foundations of the Apostles and Prophets Because their Authority supports our weakness And why are they Gates Because by them we enter into the Kingdom of Heaven For they preach to us and when we enter by them we enter by Christ Is it not plain by this that they did not think St. Peter to be the only Man that stands at the Gate as it were and with his Keys le ts Men into Heaven To say this is as much as to say he only preached Did not St. John preach also and St. James As for St. Paul he laboured more than them all Therefore I may truly say according to St. Austin's meaning by John and by James as well as Peter but especially by Paul we have an entrance into the Kingdom of Heaven They all had equal Power they were all equally Gates whereby Men entred into the New Jerusalem they were all equally Foundations of the Church of Christ St. Peter laid the first Stone as he let in the first of the Gentiles but St. Paul let in more than he afterwards as appears by the whole Story of his preaching the Gospel of Christ To conclude this St. Peter himself it is manifest did not know of any such Authority as is now claimed residing in him For writing two Catholick Epistles he gives not the least intimation of any such Universal Pastorship as is now pretended to be derived from him but quite contrary calls himself Fellow Elder with the Pastors of the Church to whom he gives the same Exhortation that Christ did to him Feed the Flock of God 1 Pet. v. 1 2. which doth not differ in sense from Feed my Sheep or Feed my Lambs Joh. xxi 15 16. Nay more than this in the Gospel which the ancient Fathers say St. Mark wrote by St. Peter's direction he doth not so much as mention this Speech of Christ to him but only his own Confession Mark viii 29. which we may look upon as an Argument that he did not think it contained any Power peculiar to him which we may be sure he would not have forgotten Against so many weighty Reasons some think Object 1. it sufficient to argue for his Supremacy meerly from his being constantly named first when there is occasion to speak of him Five places are alledged for this purpose Matth. x. 2. Mark iii. 17. Luke vi 14. Acts i. 13. John xxi 2. Unto which I think fit to make a short Reply First That this is not such exact Truth as Answ to admit of no Exception For there are no less than four places where he is named with other Apostles and not set the first 1 Cor. iii. 22. ix 9. Gal. ii 9. Joh. i. 45. Secondly Supposing it was done designedly in those places where there is a Catalogue given of the Apostles the meer placing of a Name first will prove no Superiority of Power over those who are named after him as might be shown from a great many instances For any little advantage of Age Service Affection or the like may well be a Reason for such Precedence Thirdly The exact truth is when they were together as a Colledge it was necessary some one should be first in order but afterward when they were scattered abroad all over the World there was no such Precedence thought of For others I have shown are named before him and sometimes took place of him as St. James did at Jerusalem where he presided in the Council held there Peter indeed spake and delivered his Opinion first but the Decree is made by James who saith after he had taken notice of what Simeon had spoken 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I determine or judg my Sentence is as we translate it That we trouble not them which from among the Gentiles are turned unto God but write to them that they abstain from Pollutions if Idols c. Acts xv 19 20. And accordingly it was drawn up in his very words in that Letter which was written in the name of them all to the Gentile Christians Vers 28 29. This is no novel Criticism of Protestants but acknowledged heretofore by eminent Writers in the Roman Communion Alphonsus Tostatus r In Mat. 17. for instance observes that in this Council Peter did not produce the definition of the Church but James alone spake definitively as the Organ of the whole Church and greater than any of the Assessors And later than this Lorinus * Comment in Acta C. xv fol. 645. the Jesuite here notes that James seems to speak authentically and as a Judge when Peter is said simply to have spoken his mind How easie were it here if I durst take the liberty to strain several Observations beyond their true intention to bid you mark and observe how St. James declares himself in this Council the Head of the Church set over all his Brethren For first he being Bishop of Jerusalem the Mother-Church of the whole World thus begins his Speech Men and Brethren hearken unto me ver 13. as if he were the Successor of Christ of whom it was said Hear ye Him. Next ver 14. he calls him who had spoken before him bare Simeon not Peter now as if that Name signified Nothing to him who sate above him For he adds as I have said his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I judge or give this sentence And lastly when Peter had pleaded for an absolute and indefinite liberty from the burden of all Legal Rites ver 10. James thinks fit not to grant them an entire freedom but to tie them still to some necessary Observances ver 19 28. But we have not thus learned