Whit. Tract 3. c. 6. p. 181. in an external and visible way These visible Bodies are either greater and containing as Empires Kingdoms Provinces c. Or those that are less and contained as Cities Colledges Parishes Families and the like whether they be Civil or Ecclesiastical These lesser though they have the Compleatness of a Body or Corporation each in its kind and sufficient Power to govern it self yet not to govern one another A Church hath not Authority to govern a Church nor a Family or the chief in it to govern a Neighbour-Family The Light in the least Star is sufficient for it self but not to rule the Day or the Night as the Sun and Moon These lesser Bodies are therefore so composed in their several Regiments that many of them together may lie in the Bosom of a greater Corporation and it will be for their better and more comfortable subsisting and Government There is no external Coercive or ruling Power that falls in and fills up the space betwixt those great and Catholick Bodies the World and the Church and those lesser and lowest Regiments and Societies but what is or ought to be expected by or from the Civil Magistrate who is to be acknowledged of his Subjects whether Ecclesiastical or Civil under God to be over all Consid 3 3. These lesser Societies therefore ordinarily are found under a twofold Regiment or Discipline The one intrinsecal and peculiar which in Families is received from the Light of Nature and from the Light of Institution in Churches The other more General and Common And these lesser Bodies come under it by reason of their Situation being within the Confines of such a Republick they are under the Jurisdiction of the Princes thereof De Episc lib. 3. c. 5. Each Prince saith Mason hath Power in subditos suos ac proinde in Ecclesiam modo subditi sunt Ecclesiae If situated where there is no formed Common-wealth King or Supream Power over them they are as a Free-State each Family City and Church immediately under God and Christ and no other Power but what it hath in it self which being a Power not derived from the Magistrate but peculiar to a Family or Church remains in them though no Magistrate Such was the Family and Church-state in the time of the Patriarchs for two thousand Years Consid 4 As it is a Happiness to a People that live in Empires and Kingdoms that these are parcels of that World which hath the righteous God to govern it who is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords 2 Kings 19.15 So is it likewise to these lesser Bodies a Family or a Church that they are situated under the Wing of a Christian and well-governed Common-wealth Where their Governours may be under some Government and in Wrongs and Disorders they may have the Benefit of a Magistrate's Authority to appeal unto CHAP. V. 1. The first Objection answered 2. The Government of a particular Church hath Affinity with that of lesser Bodies more than with the Government of Empires and Kingdoms Object § 1. IT may be objected that Churches are spiritual Corporations and of a more peculiar Consideration in respect of their Government and therefore not to be reckoned with Civil at least not with Families or such mean and low Societies Answ Policy or Government in it self and all the sorts of it is from the Light of Nature and common Reason And this is generally supposed by all that tho the Subject Matter or Persons governed be of different kinds yet the Law and Forms of Government may be the same where so appointed by Christ And I rather insist on such a way of Discourse and Reasoning as most suitable to the Subject I am upon but especially because Subordination of Churches to Churches is argued from the Light of Nature and in this very Case termed by our Brethren a Divine Topick Now if we may argue and guide our selves in Church-Affairs by the Light that shineth forth from the natural Wisdom and Prudence of Man in the Government and managing of Kingdoms there is as much a Jus Divinum and ground of reasoning from the Light that appears in the prudent Constitution and Government of any other civil Society I have mentioned in the Considerations Cities Families and those lesser and contained as I term them Societies or Corporations with particulars Churches Because I humbly conceive the Policy and Government of each tho in other things different to be more proportionable and of greater Similitude in many things then between particular Churches and those greater and containing Bodies Kingdoms Empires or the like Churches thus humbly constituted and governed are most consistent with Civil Magistracy of what Form soever the Common-wealth shall be In Confirmation of this Agreement or Similitude I shall take for the most part the Concessions of the learned of each Perswasion The Instances or Particulars are these § 2. 1. Families tho contained under the National Government where they are sinuated yet are intrusted with a ruling and governing Power compleat and sufficient each in and for it self so are particular Churches 1. They are intrusted with a Government each for it self It is not sufficient saith Mr. Perkins for a Church to have the preaching of the Word Perk. on Rev. 2.20 but Church-Government This Church speaking of Thyatira is blamed because she did not use the Authority God had given her There is given to the Ministers of each particular Congregation according to Episcopal Ordination established by our Law not only a Power to preach c. Take Authority to preach the Word of God but they are made Rectors Governours in those particular Churches and it 's said to them Whose Sins thou dost remit they are remitted and whose Sins thou dost retain they are retained by which Words the Keys of Discipline are given them see Bilson Perpet Govern p. 213. By Order of the Church of England saith Bishop Vsher all Presbyters are charged to administer the Doctrine and Sacraments Reduct of Episc p. 2. and the Difcipline of Christ as the Lord hath commanded and as this Realm hath received the same And that they might the better understand what the Lord hath commanded therein the Exhortation of St. Paul to the Elders of the Church of Ephesus is appointed to be read unto them at the time of their Ordination Take heed to your selves and to all the Flock among whom the Holy Ghost hath made you Overseers to * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so taken in Mat. 2.6 and Rev. 12.5 and 19.15 Ho. Eccl. Pol. lib. 3. Sect. 1. rule the Congregation of God which he hath purchased with his Blood Mr. Hooker tells us that for Preservation of Christianity there is not any thing more needful than that such as are of the visible Church have mutual Fellowship and Society one with another In which Consideration the Catholick Church is divided into anumber of distinct Societies every of which is termed
the Punishment which as yet stands is greater The first Refusal of the Oath brings the Person within a Praemunire and if tendred a second time after the space of three Months and again refused by the same Person it is High-Treason This Severity in the Punishment is recompensed with a more gentle and indulgent Interpretation of the Oath as will appear in the following Section As we are not to swear rashly so our Laws do not give Oaths rashly but with great care and tenderness weighing and considering both the Matter Persons Penalties and the Season or Occasion being not willing their Laws or Punishments for breaking of them be a Snare or at any time more grievous to the Subject than the Necessity of State requires § 4. The true Scope and Sence of this Oath may be gathered from the Laws and Statutes since established and some Light also from other Writers of Note Queen Eliz. within a little time after this Oath was reduced to the Form wherein now it stands in an Admonition annexed to the Injunctions declareth the Sence and Interpretation of it as followeth The Admonition annexed to the Queen's Injunctions THe Queen's Majesty being informed that in certain Places of this Realm sundry of her Native Subjects being called to Ecclesiastical Ministry in the Church be by sinister Persuasion and perverse Construction induced to find some scruple in the Form of an Oath which by an Act of the last Parliament is prescribed to be required of divers Persons for the Recognition of their Allegiance to her Majesty which certainly neither was ever meant ne by any equity of Words or good Sence can be thereof gathered would that all her Loving Subjects should understand that nothing was is or shall be meant or intended by the same Oath to have any other Duty Allegiance or Bond required by the same Oath than was acknowledged to be due to the most noble Kings of famous memory King Henry the Eighth her Majesty's Father or King Edward the Sixth her Majesty's Brother And further her Majesty forbiddeth all manner her Subjects to give ear or credit to such perverse and malicious Persons which most sinisterly and maliciously labour to notify to her Loving Subjects how by the Words of the said Oath it may be collected the Kings or Queens of this Realm Possessors of the Crown may challenge Authority and Power of Ministry of Divine Offices in the Church wherein her said Subjects be much abused by such evil disposed Persons For certainly her Majesty neither doth ne ever will challenge any other Authority than that was challenged and lately used by the said noble Kings of famous memory King Henry the Eighth and King Edward the Sixth which is and was of ancient time due to the Imperial Crown of this Realm That is under God to have the Sovereignty and Rule over all manner of Persons born within these her Realms Dominions and Countries of what Estate either Ecclesiastical or Temporal soever they be so as no other Foreign Power shall or ought to have any Superiority over them And if any Person that hath conceived any other Sence of the Form of the said Oath shall accept the same Oath with this Interpretation Sence or Meaning her Majesty is well pleased to accept every such in that behalf as her good and obedient Subjects and shall acquit them of all manner Penalties contained in the said Act against such as shall peremptorily or obstinately refuse to take the same Oath In the fifth Year of her Reign there is by Act of Parliament a Confirmation of this Sence by way of Proviso in these Words The Proviso in the Statute of 5 Eliz. cap. 1. Provided also That the Oath expressed in the said Act made in the said first Year shall be taken and expounded in such Form as is set forth in an Admonition annexed to the Queen's Majesty's Injunctions published in the first Year of her Majesties Reign That is to say to confess and acknowledg in her Majesty her Heirs and Successors none other Authority than that was challenged and lately used by the Noble King Henry the Eighth and King Edward the Sixth as in the said Admonition more plainly may appear There may be a Doubt made about this Interpretation as whether it be not inconsistent with the Words of the Oath it seems to be rather a material Change of them than an Interpretation In the Oath it is All Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Things or Causes in the Interpretation it is All manner of Persons of what Estate either Ecclesiastical or Temporal soever they be The Oath seems to speak of one thing and the Interpretation of another Ad leges per se requiritur potestas in persmam secunderio in res altas Suarez de Le◠lib. 1. cap. 8. the one of Causes and the other of Persons Answ There is no opposition or Inconsistency between these two Persons and Causes The principal Object of a Law is a Person and a Person with respect to his Actions a Person morally considered for a Person physical that is in his Being only and Nature as Man without moving or acting any thing good or evil is not the Object of a Law nor Actions of any kind or sort whatsoever as Actions and in that general Consideration do come under a Law but as they respect Persons and are some way or other the Actions of reasonable Creatures Tho a Law be made to punish the Ox which goreth a Man that he dieth Fxod 21.29 yet it is with respect to Man to let him know how much God is provoked by shedding Man's Blood as Gen. 9.5 1 Cor. 9.9 10. Doth God care for Oxen Doth God in his Law respect the Beast for it self is it not that Man may be instructed and restained Verse 10. He saith it altogether for our sakes The mentioning of Ecclesiastical Causes therefore doth imply Persons and Persons of the same Denomination to whom such Actions are peculiar that is Ecclesiastical Persons 2. And that this latter is an Interpretation of the former will thus appear The Oath in giving a Supremacy in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Causes might seem to imply Spiritual Things to be the immediate and proper Object of the Magistrates Power and spiritual Persons only for this because they had to do in spiritual Matters and to infer thence that the Christian Magistrate hath Power in spiritual Administrations as the Word and Sacraments after the same manner as hath the Ministers of Christ who have Power in these Things as the principal and immediate Object of their Function Which this Form af Expression in the Admonition doth clearly take away 1. In asserting that by the Words of the said Oath Kings or Queens of this Realm may not challenge Authority and Power of Ministry of Divine Offices in the Church 2. The mentioning Ecclesiastical Persons and not Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Causes at all implieth that the Persons of Bishops Presbyters and such like are primarily and
immediately the Object of this Supreme Power and the Laws made by it upon another Consideration than as Bishops c. namely as being born within these her Majesty's Realms and Dominions and such Persons of what Estate either Ecclesiastical or Temporal soever they be She hath the Sovereignty and Rule over them Spiritual and Ecclesiastical Things are mentioned in the Oath upon a twofold Account 1. Because the Civil Magistrate's Power and Jurisdiction really extends it self to the Duties of both Tables and hath to do with Matters and Causes as well as Persons that are spiritual as hereafter we shall shew but 2. Principally that a Calling or Employment in Church-Affairs whatsoever hath been formerly judged and practised doth no more exempt a Person and his Actings that is a Subject to the Queen upon any other account from her Secular Power than doth a Temporal Calling or Employment in any worldly Affairs There is something of Explication further in the Articles of Religion concluded in the Year 1562. The 37th Article is this The 37th Article professed in the Church of England The Queen's Majesty hath the chief Power in her Realm of England and other her Dominions unto whom the chief Government of all Estates of this Realm whether they be Ecclesiastical or Civil in all Causes doth appertain and is not nor ought to be subject to any Foreign Jurisdiction Where we attribute to the Queen's Majesty the chief Government by which Titles we understand the Minds of some slanderous Folks to be offended we give not to our Prince the ministring either of God's Word or of the Sacraments The which thing the Injunctions also lately set forth by Elizabeth our Queen do most plainly testify But that only Prerogative which we see to have been given always to all Godly Princes in Holy Scriptures by God himself that is that they should rule all Estates and Degrees committed to their Charge by God whether they be Ecclesiastical or Temporal and restrain with the Civil Sword the Stubborn and Evil-doers The Bishop of Rome hath no Jurisdiction in this Realm of England It is mentioned in the Admonition that the Queen 's Ecclesiastical Power is the same that was challenged and used by Henry the Eighth c. Which is supposed by some to be the same that was in the Pope the Person only and not the Power changed so that our Princes are but Secular Popes This Objection was strengthned by the Subtilty of Gardiner abroad Whom Calvin terms Impostor ille in Am. 7.13 and at home by a Sermon preached at Paul's-Cross in the Year 1588 by Dr. Bancroft who calls Queen Elizabeth a petty Pope and tells us her Ecclesiastical Authority is the same which the Pope had formerly This 37th Article removes the Scruple sufficiently 1. In asserting the Authority given to her Majesty to be no other but what we see to have been given to all Godly Princes in holy Scriptures c. And for what Power Henry the Eighth challenged it was no new Jurisdiction wrested from the Pope but a Power or Prerogative justly and rightfully belonging to him 26 Henry 8. cap. 1. claimed and exercised by his Predecessors some hundreds of Years before his Time being anciently annexed to the Crown 2. In the latter part of the Article it is also evident For tho a Power in spiritual Causes be given to a Secular Prince yet it is not a spiritual Power and such a Jurisdiction as the Pope claims but such a Power only and in such a way as is put forth and exercised in ordinary Civil Affairs and the same in respect both to Ecclesiastical and Temporal Persons namely a restraining with the Civil Sword the Stubborn and Evil-doers So to restrain or coerce is an Authority or Jurisdiction peculiar to Civil Magistrates and by Christ himself denied to the highest Ecclesiastical Powers Mat. 20 25 26. Ye know saith Christ the Princes of the Gentiles exercise Dominion over them and they that are great exercise Authority upon them but it shall not be so among you you apostles and threatens the Use of the Sword in such Persons Mat. 26.52 King James speaking of the Oath of Supremacy In that Oath saith he is contained only the King 's absolute Power over all Persons as well Civil as Ecclesiastical excluding all Foreign Powers and Potentates to be Judges within his Dominions In his Apol. pag. 76. And more fully afterwards pag. 164. It implies saith he a Power to command Obedience to be given to the Word of God by reforming Religion according to his prescribed Will by assisting the spiritual Power by his temporal Sword by Reformation of Corruption by procuring due Obedience to the Church by judging and cutting off all frivolous Questions and Schisms as Constantine did and finally by making a Decorum to be observed in all indifferent Things for that purpose which is the only Intent of our Oath of Supremacy My Lord Coke out of 1º Eliz. and in the Words of the Statute gives this Interpretation There is saith he no Jurisdiction by this Act affixed to the Crown but was of Right or ought to be by the ancient Laws of this Realm parcel of his Jurisdiction and which lawfully had been or might be exercised within the Realm The End of which Jurisdiction and of all the Proceedings thereupon is that all Things might be in Causes Ecclesiastical to the pleasure of Almighty God Increase of Vertue and the Conservation of the Peace and Unity of the Realm as by divers places of the Act appears And therefore by that Act no pretended Jurisdiction exercised within this Realm being ungodly or repugnant to the ancient Law of the Crown was or could be restored to the Crown according to the ancient Right and Law of the same Coke de Jure Ecclesiastico fol. 8. Bishop Bilson a great Searcher into the Doctrine of the Supremacy of Kings gives this as the Sence of the Oath The Oath saith he expresseth not Kings Duty to God but ours to them As they must be obeyed when they join with Truth so must they be endured when they fall into Error Which Side soever they take either Obedience to their Wills or Submission to their Swords is their due by God's Law and that is all which our Oath exacteth And in a few Lines following he interprets what is meant by Supremacy We do not saith he give Princes Power to do what they list in the Matters appertaining to God and his Service Indeed we say the Pope may not depose them nor pull the Crown off their Heads In this only Sence we defend them to be Supreme that is not at liberty to do what they list without regard of Truth or Right but without Superior on Earth Dr. Morton against the Pope's Supremacy out of an Epistle of Leo to the Emperor speaking thus You must not be ignorant that your Princely Power is given unto you not only in worldly Regiment but also spiritual for the Preservation of
Synod of the 32. appointed by Hen. 8. and afterwards by Edw. 6. to do the work of a Synod and present a Body of Ecclesiastical Canons for Confirmation by the Magistrate 3. These Laws saith * De Ju. Ec. pag. 9. Dr. Ridley's view pag. 110. 25 Hen. 8. c. 19. 25 Hen. 8. c. 21. Cook are termed Regiae Leges Ecclesisiasticae and another such Ecclesiastical Laws as now are in force are called the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws for that now all Jurisdiction whether it be Temporal or Ecclesiastical is the Kings And if there be any thing difficult or doubtful in these Laws the Interpretation is ultimately to be given in the Civil Judicatures So Cook 's Instit pag. 4. cap. 74. To the King also is the last Appeal to be made and Delegates appointed by Him give final Determination in Controversies after adjudged by those Laws and Canons in any yea the highest of those Ecclesiastical Courts Vltima Appellatio sit ad Principem non extra Regnum saith Dr. Cosen and tells us it is a Jurisdiction Coronae Regiae de Jure debita 4. The King's Majesty may dispense with any of those Canons or Ecclesiastical Laws indulge the Omission of what is enjoined by them make void the Crime and remove the Penalty incurred by breach of them yea and give Faculty to do or practise otherwise any Synodical Establishment or long usage to the contrary notwithstanding in what offends not the Holy Scripture and Laws of God 5. The King may exempt Persons and Societies from the Jurisdiction of the Ordinary or Bishop or any else who are to execute these Canons De Jure Eccles This my Lord Coke asserts and as a Prerogative annexed to the Crown He gives many Instances of such Dispensations in several Kings Reigns both ancient and of later times For doubtless what Power He grants and is exercised under Him may be re-assumed by Him And Priviledge even whole Parishes if he please from Episcopal or Synodical Jurisdiction and such Parishes are said to be Regiae Majestati immediate subditae Mocket de Ecclesiastica Ang. Pol. pag. 294. And many Parishes to this day stand thus exempted by the favour and grant of Princes formerly The Dutch and French Churches in several Parts of this Kingdom by Patent from Edw. 6. were exempted from the then Establishment and exercised a Discipline and Forms of Worship according to their own Perswasion our Synod and Ecclesiastical Courts having by vertue of this Exemption nothing to do with their Ministers or Churches which Priviledge hath been confirmed to them by our Kings that Reigned since and are enjoined to this day His Majesty that now is by His Prerogative in Ecclesiastical Matters notwithstanding the present Form of Worship and Ceremonies Graciously indulged Tender Consciences a Forbearance in what they were not satisfied and to practise otherwise Declaration of October 1660. 6. There is no matter or thing appertaining to Religion or first Table-Duties or so intimate and properly spiritual which a Synod or Convocation hath Cognisance of and may make Laws and Canons about But the like things have been established by the Civil Powers more than sometimes for Advice without it as will abundantly appear in the many Statutes and Laws of former and later Times as against Swearing Perjury Sabbath-breaking c. That one instance the Liturgy and ordering Bishops Priests and Deacons the many Rubricks in each of those Books are so many Canons and Ecclesiastical Constitutions insomuch as some have termed the Parliaments of England Synods or Representatives of the Church of England observing also that in the King 's Writ by which a Parliament is called there is expresly committed unto them the Considerations of what concerneth the Church as the Kingdom of England There hath been also Injunctions Declarations Advertisements Proclamations and the like Edicts published in Ecclesiastical Matters from time to time by our Princes without calling or advising with a Synod And Obedience hath been required unto those Precepts by the Ordinary in each Diocess as well as to the Canons and Ecclesiastical Laws made by Synods The Dependency therefore of Synods and Convocations upon the Civil Magistrate according to the Constitution and Practice here in England is very great and apparent For I. They can make no Canon or Ecclesiastical Law without the Civil Magistrate but he can and may without them II. His Majesties Licence to the Convocation May 12. 1640. None of their Laws though ever so Ancient but may be revoked by a Parliament but the Rubricks or Ecclesiastical Laws established by it may not be medled with by the Convocation I shall conclude with B. Bilson who seems to state the Nature and Occasion of Synods as they are in this Kingdom very fully and indeed much as they ought to be wheresoever they are called his words are these With us no Synods may assemble without the Prince's Warrant D. Bils Per. Gov. cap. 16. p. 383. as well to meet as to consult of any matter touching the state of this Realm And why They be no Court separate from the Prince nor superior to the Prince but subjected in all things to the Prince and appointed by the Laws of God and man in Truth and Godliness to assist and direct the Prince when and where they shall be called to assemble otherwise they have no power of themselves to make Decrees when there is a Christian Magistrate neither may they challenge the judicial hearing or ending of Ecclesiastical Controversies without or against the Prince's liking It appears evidently hereby that in the Judgment of the Learned Author Synods in their Nature and Use are not for Rule and Government where there is a Christian Magistrate or otherwise than as Assistants only to counsel and advise Him THe Synods in other Reformed Churches claim a coercive Jurisdiction Discip of Scot. lib. 2. c. 11. also Act. of G. Assemb before the Confes of Faith Jus divinum regiminis cap. 3. from an intrinsick right received immediatly from Jesus Christ as Ministers of the Gospel There being no express Scriptures to uphold this Assertion and the light of Nature and common reason being supposed sufficient to create a jus divinum The Authors of this perswasion argue thus In all Kingdoms and Republicks if wrong be done by inferior Courts we may have right by appealing to a Court superior in Authority there ought therefore to be such an order in Churches that is a Classis Synod c. That there may be regular Appeals in like Cases And further they argue Jus D. regim cap. 1. if it be not so when whole Churches or their Consistories transgress there is no ordinary Remedy Assembly Dispute p. 114. The Provision Christ hath made for Government in his Church will be found defective For though there be a Remedy for particular persons Ruthers peaceable Plea cap. 15. Assertion of the Gover. of Scot. by G. Gillespie part 2. cap. 4 yet for a
otherwise that are spiritual yield Appeals but it 's upon this Supposition that the Cause at last will be brought to a Tribunal that is Infallible Licitumest saith P. de Aragon in re grave cuique causam suam defferre ad sedem Apostolicam Aragon in 2.2 q. 69. a. 3. D. Th. quando vel ex imperitia vel ex Passione inferiorum judicum qui homines sunt ac decipi possunt injuriam patitur The Pope cannot be deceived he is more than a Man 2. Matters of Fact by reason of Appeals come to be sentenced at a great distance from the place where the Crime and Offence lieth which in Worldly Concernments may with more Righteousness be done than in what is Spiritual and of Church Cognizance 1. Transgressions come under a Civil Judgment as materially considered and according to the gross Act but brought to the Church not as Sins simple but as Scandals and Offences which is a Consideration not so obvious but requires good judgment in the Witnesses as well as in the Judges The Obstinacy also or Penitency of the Person offending accordingly as Testimony shall be given of either is a more difficult matter to make out than either the Sin it self or the Scandal Repentance Godly Sorrow or the contrary is the principal thing to be regarded in Church-process Repentance I say in truth and sincerity so far as we can judge in a seeing and not blind charity It is not only the Passion Sorrow or Shame but Godly Sorrow which is more spiritual and deeper in the heart and requireth much and particular knowledge of the Person and his temper and such as cannot be attained at a distance but by frequent and familiar Converse To sit in the Stool of Repentance stand in a White Sheet or do Penance as it 's termed these are as the fruits of the flesh manifest and judged of at the greatest distance it 's not so deep Prov. 20.5 as we need much understanding to draw it out 2. The Censure whether binding or loosing is to be executed always by the particular Church where the Offender is a Member those persons above all others are to have a particular knowledge of his Crime and true Repentance they are to forgive and confirm their love 2 Cor. 2.7 Mat. 18.15 17 or otherwise to withdraw from him If THY Brother offend thee let him be unto THEE an Heathen c. The Execution of the Censure being by each Brother of that Church it is necessary the Examination of the matter be before them Spiritual Duties are not to be performed upon an implicit Faith What knowledge but by remote heresay can a Church in the Orchades have of a mans repentance or obstinacy the ultimate tryal and cognizance whereof is taken by a Synod at Edenhurgh Civil censures are for Satisfaction of the whole Nation and not the Parish or Borough only where the crime was committed but in a Church-censure the particular Assembly being only and no other Congregation or person morally leavened and charged with the offence are principally and in the first place concerned to have satisfaction of the repentance and submission of the person offending For by this means only their Lump or Church becomes again unleavened Disparity 4 4. The other End before mentioned and Vse of Appeals is that our Judges and their Sentence be censured and judged by superior Tribunals To which proceeding Vnaequaque res per quascunque res nascitur per easdem dissolvitur the Judges in Civil Judicatures are liable but there is not the like Subordination in Churches for these Reasons 1. All the Power and Authority placed in their Inferior Courts is no other but the influx of the supream Civil Powers to whom we always make our last Appeal and therefore proper to them to suspend Actings nay utterly to destroy in part or in whole what Jurisdiction is derived from them as appears in the Constitution of all Kingdoms But it is not so here a particular Church The Court we are to Appeal from hath not its Being or Jurisdiction from a Classis or Synod * Ecclesia Parochialis est Ecclesia vera essentialiter integraliter absque ulla correspondentia vel Synodo Voet. de Syn. pag. 13. Parker de Polit Eccles lib. 3. cap. 13. It is an authoritative unchurching of an obstinate Church we plead for Ruth peaceable Plea cap. 15. p. 223 and p. 222. Excommunication is an authoritative unchurching these rather derive their Power from it being Representatives only as our Brethren have formerly written Particular Churches they term Ecclesiae primae and Synods Ecclesiae ortae Again if Synods as they grant exercise over Churches a Power only cumulative not destructive How can they Excommunicate a Church seeing Excommunication renders a Society as Heathens and Publicans which is to unchurch them as Mr. Rutherford rightly affirms 2. Although whole Churches may be punished for male Administration by the Civil Magistrate yet may not an Ecclesiastical Power meerly such do the like for to destroy or save whole Societies for the Evil of a major part or a few persons is the prerogative of the Lord himself which he communicates also in some cases to Civil Magistrates his Deputies but in no case to Churches it being an Authority high and Princely and not at all sutable to such as have only a Ministry and not a Dominion Bishop Davenant tells us That a Censure is not to be drawn on the whole Body of the Church Brotherly Communion c. 9. p. 102. for as the Laws forbid to Excommunicate a Society or Corporation because it may happen that those that are innocent may be intangled in the censure So Right and Religion forbids to exclude whole Churches from the Communion of the Faithful because this cannot be done without an injury and contempt to many that be innocent What ever formerly of this same unchurching power in Synods hath been asserted yet since upon further debate we are told this same Excommunieating of whole Churches is a thing not known in the Presbyterian Government and not the Churches but particular persons in the Churches are censured Assemb disputes pag. 180. But how can we say single persons only are to be censured and not the whole Church Whenas we know the contending parties of what condition soever are both equally liable to the Censure of the Judge Now when matters are brought by Appeal to a superior Court the Court Appealed from is a Party and in this respect upon no higher terms than the pars appellans though a single person But grant it be so and that the object of a Censure from a Synod be only particular members Excommunicatio ejusque denunciatio post appellationem legitimam latam est nulla Nardus p. 53. col 2. Then 1. Churches cannot have such a remedy as in Civil States for Appeals of this Nature are not to be made to any but persons invested with such a power as may