Private reading of Scriptures hath been signally blessed of God as to the Bereans who daily searched the Scriptures that they might understand what they heard in publick and know whether it were the truth of God or not this their private diligence was so blessed of God that there is a remark put upon it by the Holy Ghost Acts 17. 11. therefore many of them believed Page 88. It is therefore a great temptation to the people to be negligent and a great want of care in a Church to leave so material a thing as the reading of the word of God to private diligence Ans It 's great want of care in a Church when people are not exhorted to read Scriptures in private and to tell them as the Author doth Page 180 of his Book that some parcels of the Book of Common Prayer is as full and proper a service as any Master of a Family can desire to offer to God and no exhortation to read any portion of the Scriptures as immediatly Dictated by him But 2ly This is no pretence of ours against publick reading the Author misseth his mark He addeth That many of the common people of our perswasion are ignorant of the very History of the Bible Ans The Lord in mercy grant the people both of your perswasion and ours more true knowledge but some times there is a beam in a mans own eye when he challengeth a mote in anothers For the 2d pretence Page 89. That copies of the Bible are now common and easie to be had and most Families have some in them that can read Ans We have great reason to give thanks to God that it is so and the greater fault it is to neglect reading of Scriptures in Families seing God hath dealt so bountifully with us Page 90. And to rely upon peoples procuring and reading copies of the Bible privatly is to leave Gods way and presumptuously depend on that which has no promise annexed to it Ans If privat reading of the Scriptures have no promise annexed to it then what profit is it for any man to read the Scripture if no blessing be promised his labour is lost if I had not read this expression in the Author's Book it would been hard believing any report that such dangerous unwarrantable words could have dropt from his Pen. 2ly God hath commanded privat reading of the Scriptures as expresly as he hath commanded publick reading whereby it becometh the Ordinance of God no less than publick reading let the Reader observe what God speaketh Deut. 6. from verse 6. and downward The Laws of God were to be written on the very posts of their houses that they might read them frequently 3ly Seing then this privat reading of the Word of God is his Ordinance no less than publick reading by what warrand can the Author say there is no promise annexed to it But besides this 4ly I will prove from the Word of God that promises are annexed to the People of God's privat Diligence in reading the Scriptures Let the Reader observe Deut 6. verse 3 where we have these words Hear therefore O Israel and observe to do it that it may be well with thee and that ye may increase mightily as the Lord God of thy fathers hath promised thee in the Land that floweth with milk and honey Here is a comprehensive promise containing many blessings That it may be well with thee and next the qualifications of the persons to whom this Promise belongeth followeth verse 5. Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine heart Verse 6. and these words which I command thee this day shall be in thine heart and verse 7. And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house And verse 9 Thou shalt write them upon the posts of thine house and one thy gates By which Scripture its evident that such as diligently make use of the Word of God in their Houses have the promise of God that it shall be well with them Let the Author find out a more express promise made to publick reading than is here to privat reading then it s no presumption to depend on this promise annexed to privat reading Ibid There are still many families even amongst Protestants that can neither compass a Bible or get any to read it Ans Blessed be God that even poor people among us will pinch themselves rather than want a Bible and such as are so very poor that they cannot procure one it were charity in the Author who is able to provide some Bibles for such indigent persons As for these who cannot read where God giveth a heart for it they take help of their Neighbours who can read 2. The Author injuriously supposeth them to be deprived of all publick reading of the Word of God which I have proved already to be an unjust imputation ibid and there are at this day too many of all parties that neither read themselves nor hear one Chapter read in a whole year except at Church Ans And no great wonder if they never be exhorted to privat reading in their Families and withal told that there is no promise annexed to privat reading which is not only comfortless and discouraging Doctrine if they have no promise of God to be bettered by their reading but pernitious to the souls of men Page 92. The Author saith That the word of God cannot be presumed to have the same efficacy when read privatly as it hath when read in the Assemblies of Christians since he has given us a peculiar promise to be present in such Assemblies Ans The promise of this peculiar presence is Matth. 18. 20. Where two or three are met together in my name c. The presence promised in this Scripture belongeth not only to publick Assemblies but even to two or three meeting in Christs Name for his Worship then a privat Family if they were but two if they meet together for his Worship agreeing together to ask of God according to the Command of God these few Christians thus met together have the promise of Christs presence no less secured unto them than if the Assembly were greater Christs own words prove this to be undenyable Page 92. The third pretence alledged is that reading takes up too much time and is a hinderance to the more profitable Duty of what you commonly call preaching Ans It s tedious to be always put to declare that not one of these pretences are ours The Author may debate against himself if he will yet Page 93. The Author giveth a new Concession which is in my opinion too ample and more than we desire or resolve to practise when he saith Suppose that upon some extraordinary occasion it may be lawful to omit reading of Gods Word in our Assemblies that we may have the more time to manage a Discourse for the instruction of the people Ans If there be time to manage a Discourse I do
House and this being religious Worship let the Author consider how this practice can be reconciled to the second Command Page 116. Vncovering the Head is a common work of respect and then followeth a digression concerning covering the Head which is not material to the purpose in hand But Page 117. However being an honour payed to men there is no reason why it should not be payed to God Ans Custom having prevailed among us to make uncovering the Head a sign of Deference and conferring honour on others is therefore practiced by us in acts of religious Worship as Prayer Praises and hearing the immediat Words of God read as a part of his Worship but this is no argument to uncover the Head to any Creature when thereby religious reverence and worship is designed but at length other pillars failing as not able to bear up the honour conferred on Churches the Author hath recourse to his rich Magazine where there is no want And it is one of the Articles of our Church that the Church has power to order Rites and Ceremonies that is to determine what particular things comes under the Apostles general word of Decency Ans Here it s to be observed that the Author is defending religious bowing when they enter the Church which is worship and for proof of its lawfulness fairly maketh this his Argument Our Church has power to order Rites and Ceremonies it followeth then that by this power the church may appoint new worship the inference is native seing according to the author it s therfor lawfull to bow the head religiously because the church hath this power I desire he would review his first preliminarie position that it belongs to God only to give rites how he will be worshiped how can these two stand it belongeth to God only and yet the church hath the power to institute new worship If the Church hath such power it were a most necessary service and justice to the World to discover and make once that commission appear whereby the Church is invested with this power and if no man can make it appear why is such a power assumed That the Church hath power to order external circumstances necessarly belonging to the Worship of God and determinable by the prudent use of natures light and the general rules of Scripture is readily yielded but what is this to a power of prescribing worship which God hath not prescribed as to bow the head religiously unto or before any creature as sharer in the worship here the Author overstretcheth the article Page 118. We stand at our praisings thanksgivings c. at our confessions of sin and at our prayers we present our selves before God on our knees Ans That there ought to be signs of religious reverence in all acts of immediat commanded worship we are agreed but there appeareth no reason why the Author should make such a difference between confession of sin and prayers for confession of sin and thanksgivings are performed in prayer and for confessions of Faith I demand by what rule they are made any part of worship except as they may be comprehended under the heads of Prayer or Praises As for kneeling in the time of Prayer which I know is most noticed let the reader understand that we are far from offending at the kneeling of others in publick assemblies but standing is also a warrantable praying posture which is our practice and in numerous Congregations such as by the Lords Mercy we have conveniency for kneeling cannot be had without forcing many of the Congregation to such a distance as they could not hear the Prayers which in their hearts they should offer up to God Ibid The Author asserteth another sort of kneeling than kneeling in prayer viz. a kneeling before the Elements of Bread and Wine in the Lords Supper We celebrat the Holy Sacrament of the Body and Bloud of Christ in a worshiping posture I know that many except against this Ans Many do except against it and of all the Arguments you have mustered not one of them passeth muster and no wonder others make exception seing your self makes the first exception before ever you bring them to the field as by your appended marginal Not appeareth saying the Authors intention is not to assert that the Scriptures require kneeling at the Lords Supper I see a bad cause will sometimes make the courage of a Champion to faint If the Scripture require not kneelling at the Lords Supper with what confidence can any man require it why are we charged as deficient seing the Scripture doth not require To what purpose did the Author write these words in his Preliminaries That the holy Scriptures contain the revelations of Gods will concerning his worship and yet by the Author the Holy Scriptures contain not this kneeling as any Revelation of his will it followeth undenyably therefore kneeling at the Lords Table is no Revelation of Gods will if this conclusion be displeasing blame the Authors two propositions his marginal Note that can admit of no other conclusion and thus he yieldeth the Cause leaving kneeling before the Elements of Bread and Wine deprived of any Revelation of Gods will let him advise us now what name we shall give it the Authors own words constraineth me to place it among the meer unwarrantable Inventions of men But the Author will not yet let it pass therefore addeth in his marginal Note but to shew that it is not contrary to the institution of Christ or practice of the Apostles who compare our receiving it with the Jews partaking of their Altar to which they approached with adoration Ans We shall have the Author answering himself in this also by his first Position Page 3d That it belongeth only to God to give Rules how he will be worshipped For if it belong to God only then there is no place left for mans prescribing of Worship whether the worship prescribed be contrary or not contrary yet it s an encroachment on Gods peculiar Prerogative to prescribe his own worship 2ly We find the Lord charging guilt on this account because he did not command Jer. 7. 31. They have built the high places of Tophet c. which I commanded them not neither came it into my heart Their wicked practices of burning their Sons and their Daughters in the fire was contrary to Gods Law yet the way that God taketh to express their guilt is because God had not commanded it So Jer. 14. 14 and 19. 5. and 23. 32. which the Reader may peruse and shall find in all these places the displeasure of God discovered because they acted without his command so that the Author's endeavours to make it appear that kneeling at the Lords Table is not contrary to the Institution of Christ will not deliver it from the reflection of being a meer invention of man However the Author essayeth what the Scriptures will do for him First The altar was of Old the Lords Table from whence his
meeting of Christians for worship in the whole New Testament without it Ans 1. Still the Author pursues Celebrating at every meeting for worship under the New Testament But how doth this agree with what the Author saith that by Act 20. 7. The celebration was fixt to the Lords day for Christians had meetings for publick worship after that time and by the Author at all these meetings they did celebrate now after the celebration was fixed to the Lords Day How could they celebrat at other times of meeting which were not on the Lords Day for then it followeth that either fixing it to every Lords Day faileth or else that their celebrating at every meeting faileth the reason is clear for if they did celebrat at every meeting some whereof were not on the Lords Day then the celebration was not fixed to the Lords day If the Author say by fixing it to the Lords Day they were obliged to celebrat no other day Then why doth our Author celebrat on other days than the Lords Day In few words I do seriously demand of the Author a solution to this question Whether by Act 20. vers 7. or any other Scripture or Scriptural example there be divine institution for celebrating the Lords Supper every Lords Day yea or not if he affirm then the divine institution must be by Christ that we should celebrat every Lords Day if the times when we should celebrat be appointed by Christ then why doth the Author say that our Saviour hath confined us to no time if he say the Apostles practice amount not to an institution by Christ then their practice in this is not a rule for us It s past all dispute that the Apostles and primitive Christians did frequently celebrate the Lords Supper and by the extraordinary Gifts and Graces poured out upon them great grace being upon them all they were ordinarly in a readiness and prepared for that holy Ordinance which we in after Generations know little of and therefore are not in case for such frequency as they were And whoever urge frequency of receiving on any terms should consider these two things first that the Scripture mentioning often yet doth not mention how often 2. That upon pain of Damnation if we Eat Drink unworthily Every Christian should have due time to prepare and examine himself and not to proceed to receiving otherwise command frequency who will lest he profane it And tho I have insisted longer on this Debate than I intended yet I will not omit the Authors general challenge That we do not find any solemn stated meeting of Christians for worship in the whole New Testament without it that is without celebration of the Lords Supper Ans By this challenge its evident that its the Authors assertion every such assembly had it and the proof is incumbent to him who alledgeth that at every time of the meetings of such assemblies they did celebrat the Lords Supper but he will find hard work to prove that all of them at every time of meeting for Worship had it and let the Reader remark his words under the whole New Testament I shall instance several meetings for Worship where nothing of this celebration appeareth First There were many most solemn Assemblies of Christs followers when Christ himself preached to them these were no Old Testament Assemblies and tho a mixt multitude attended yet there were many sincere Believers among them and while Christ publickly preached it was stated worship and to be sure these did not celebrat the Lords Supper for it was not as yet instituted yet there was solemn Worship Act 1. 13. The Apostles were together with the Women continuing in prayer and supplication which was publick Worship and yet no mention of this Ordinance So Act. 12. 12. Many are gathered together Praying which is worship and yet nothing appearing of this celebration So 1 Cor 5. 4. The Church is gathered together but nothing of this found with them Besides those blessed meetings of Christ with his Apostles after his Resurrection where the Disciples did meet but not celebrat Page 153. When first some who had been present at the prayers and preaching of the Church began to go away without receiving the Church decreed whosoever was guilty of it should be excommunicated Ans Many errors and heresies sprung up even in the Apostles times and did increase afterwards and if some such persons did despise the Sacrament of the Lords Supper and thereupon deserted it s no wonder some severity was used towards them but to excommunicat for simple not receiving without consideration and examining the Reasons why they did not partake was never in any age the duty of wise faithful and compassionat Pastors All that is in this Section is now answered only Popish Massers every Lords Day are alledged to be most agreeable to the rule that the Priest hath them solitary is the fault of the people which I leave to the Reader the Author having never hitherto instructed the rule of frequency SECT 2. PAge 155. Let us in the second place compare the rules and practices of our Church with this Pattern I will not pretend that they come fully up to it Ans Why then did the Author say That no copy can come nearer the Original and now he will not pretend they are come fully up to iâ— he cannot rationally expect he can come more fully up to it seing no Copy can come nearer the Original Page 157 It s ordered that in Cathedral and Collegiat Churches and Colledges where there are many priests and Deacons they shall all receive the Communion every Sunday at the least and that every Parishoner shall Communicat three times in the year whereof Easter to be one and surely such as cannot fit themselves so often must in their own opinion be out of a state of Grace and deserve to be excommunicated by the Church Ans If Cathedral Churches c. communicat every Lords Day this frequency is either by Christs direction or without his direction if by his direction then why should poor Countrey Souls be deprived of the benefit of receiving every Lords Day more than the Cathedral Church Christ himself is no respecter of persons in such cases surely the mean and poor in the world have as good a Title to Christs benefits as the rich and great if Christ hath not directed this frequency as the Author confesseth he hath confined us to no time Then whose invention is it that in Cathedrals c. it must needs be every Lords Day though all the Countrey Parishes want it 2ly If Cathedrals c. obtain this priviledge because many Ministers are ready to attend the service then it appears that convenience should be considered for the celebration and where all these conveniencies offer the celebration may be more frequent than where they are wanting But the Author said not long ago Page 148. that there was no other reason imaginable for non-frequency but the deadness of mens
and decently ex tempore and there are some occasions that require it even in publick Ans Here is suficient ground to confute all the arguments the Author hath hitherto brought against Extemporary prayers which I leave to the discerning of the judicious Reader But he addeth And on these occasions when a man has not time allowed him to reduce his desires into Form before he offers them he may depend on the assistance of God's spirit Ans And needeth he not depend on the assistance of God's Spirit after he has reduced his desires into a Form if the form be once attained It will do for it self but hath not a man as much need of the Spirit of God to help him by a Form as without it shall we say that the words of a Form will do the whole work From this Page to the end of this Chap. I find little argumentative and therefore shall soon dispatch what remains Page 55. and 56. He hath two conjectures concerning other mens prayers the one concerning Ministers praying in publick that some of them compose forms of prayer then pray according to these forms Ans I know no way he hath this if it be not by some personal experience The next is Page 56. Where the Author saith that good men who make conscience of secret prayer to God do by degrees fall into a Form Ans I give this the same answer I gave the other conjecture and perswade my self that as the Author wordeth it it is the very way of a decayed Soul for if men shall observe their daily recent mercies and how badly improved and if even the remarkable sins of every day be noticed as they ought if men be desiring to grow in Grace if men observe the temptations whereby their Souls are hurt the binding up of such by the words of a Form would be a very bondage I must also say that the Scope of this discourse I will not say of the Author but that the intentio operis is against the very power of Godliness And to reduce us all to bare Form of words not only in publick and in our Families but in secret also and so to be praeterea nihil nothing but Forms as Papists are at this day And therefore it concerneth us all to take notice of the warning given us 2 Tim. 3. 5. That in the last days perilous times shall come wherein amongst other evils it is said some shall have a Form of Godliness but denying the power thereof from such turn away For all the Author hath said that extemporary prayers are not unlawfull and that they are acceptable to God if there be Grace in the heart Yet no stone is unturn'd against them but all assaults hitherto want success therefore once more Page 56. Let me observe that the use of extemporary conceived prayers even in cases of necessity is founded on a general rule of Scripture only which commands us to ask of God what we lack And a little after general commands ought only to take place in such cases where God has not laid down a particular rule Ans 1. This position doth again cut off all liberty for conceived prayer in publick or privat for tho' there be a general command to ask what we need yet now there being a particular rule for a Form the general command is thereby Exhausted and so by the Author there is no room left for any manner of prayer but the Form 2 If a particular subsequent command evacuate the general then it followeth that when God requireth us to call upon him in the day of trouble that we should not call upon God at any other time but in the day of trouble this being a particular command under the general command of calling upon God which particular command doth evacuate the general for it taketh no more place as the Author saith So is a man call upon God in the time of health and prosperity he hath no command for it and so is but will-worship the inference is genuine and let the Author see to its Solution Page 57. The Author speaketh to a second supposed exception of dissenters against Forms I come now to speak to the second that all Forms of prayer are unlawful to Christians and that it is a sin to joyn in a worship where they are used or so much as to be present at it Ans Who they are that maketh this objection I know not but for us we utterly disown it and so dismiss it Page 59. There neither is nor has been any established Church these 1500. Years but has maintained their lawfulness and used them in the service of God that is Forms of prayer Ans 1 The Author wrongeth his Reader in confounding but never distinguisheth Divine Forms from Humane Composures 2 We use Divine Forms in publick Administrations and therefore are not divided from other reformed Churches on that Head as was instanced in all our publick Administrations 3. No other reformed Churches make Humane Forms and Composures Terms of Communion that if men do not assent and consent and subscribe they shall be forced into a separation 4. If by Forms of prayer the Author understandeth Humane Composures and publick Liturgies I deny they took place in the Church of God for many Centuries after Christ Justin Martyr Apolog. 2d Saith that their ministers prayed according to their ability this could not be to read prayers for reading is no great Tryal of a Minister's abilities So Tertullian apolog 39. Saith their prayers were sine monitore without a monitor because they prayed from their heart Dr. Burnet in his History asserteth that publick Liturgies came not under publick consideration for 400. Years after Christ and several Centuries after before Gregories composure was established I find no further in the following Pages of any new Argument requiring notice till we come to Page 63. And I dare appeal to your selves whether some very Immoral persons guilty of gross and Scandalous Crimes have not been eminent for this gift of prayer and whether such persons are not apt to flatter themselves that they are the Children of God and endued wih his Spirit notwithstanding all their wickedness and it is Impossible either to convince these persons of their mistake or to comfort poor Ignorant people dejected only for want of this gift whilst they are possessed with this opinion of the unlawfulness of Forms Ans 1. Some by Nature and its improvement by multiplied Acts acquire an habit of speaking more orderly and decently than others 2. Such persons being Educated Christians by profession and having occasion often to hear speak read and converse in religious things may speak of the matters of God whether to God or men much more pertinently and fluently than others and have no more but a natural gift themselves remaining immoral and wicked 3. And being pinched by affliction may pour out prayers with great natural fervour or in expectation of the applause of men may speak in
no where prescribed to us such a rule Therefore mens reading much cannot be the reason why they are nearest the rule if there be any such rule make it appear and if there be no rule prescribing how much with what colour can it be said you come nearest the rule for it 's yet under debate but that less reading and expounding what is read to edification will be found nearer the rule than much reading where no help is given for peoples understanding the Scriptures 6ly These come not nearest the rule who read too much and more than God hath given direction to read as any part of his Service or Worship but you know who read Apocrypha in God's publick Service which he hath given no rule for therefore such come not nearest the rule 7ly These cannot be said to come nearest the rule who read too little or may be never that which God hath prescribed to be read but you know who lay aside a considerable part of the Scriptures from their publick Service Worship and then those who do so are not nearest the rule If it be said that no Scriptures are left out but such as are less proper and profitable for ordinary Assemblies yet the word of God saith all Scripture is given by inspiration and is profitable for Doctrine reproof c. Again if it be said that Ministers are allowed to read all the Scriptures in publick and yet if men be tasked every Lords day and Holy day they must hold by their Task Page 78 For the more Solemnity of these readings our Church joyns with each of them Praises Thanksgivings or Confessiones according to what we find practiced in the Holy Scriptures Ans If what they joyn to these readings be not Instituted of God then let the Author conscientiously mind his second position Page 3. That the Holy Scriptures contain the Revelations of God's Will concerning his Worship and beware of adding or joyning what is not prescribed by these Scriptures Page 79 It 's ordered in our Church that the Ministers shall explain some part of the Holy Scriptures every Lords day and exhort their Congregations in a Sermon Ans If there be no more Scripture explained but the Text before a Sermon your hearers are at a great loss tho' you should read twenty Chapters every Lords day and explain nothing but a Text. SECT 3. Page 82. The Author chargeth dissenters with the neglect of teaching the principles of Religion saying That tho' a man frequent your meetings all his life yet he has no security or hardly possibility of Learning from your publick teachings all the great mysteries of his Religion or the necessary principles of his Faith And hence it happens that hardly any one man in his life ever goes through the necessary articles of Faith or of practice in his publick Sermons and for the truth of this I appeal to your selves Ans The Reader who is a stranger to us may readily think how can this be false being asserted by a person of such Note and with such confidence appealing also to our selves for it's truth and seing he hath appealed to our selves I declare upon certain knowledge that what he hath asserted is a most unjust imputation for which he hath cause to ask forgiveness of God and I do appeal to many thousand now living who are ordinarly witnessess to the contrary and many of the Authors own perswasion know the contrair with what peace of conscience can any man thus impose upon strangers And impress future generations with that which is so far from truth it being publickly known that we ordinarly and orderly go through all the Heads of our Christian Faith in our publick Sermons Page 82. You have no Summary of principles injoyned either to be read or taught in your publick Assemblies tâ— aâ— Catechism you have but neither your directory nor practice make it any part of your Lords-days-Service and besides your Catechism is such that it no wayes answers the design of a Form of sound words I have already shewed that such a Form should contain only the first and necessary principles of the Oracles of God in such words and methods as may make it easily apprehended and retained by the weak and unlearned which make up the bulk of the people but your Catechism is full of hard words School Terms and abstruse notions no wise necessary to be known by the generality of Christians c. Ans Our Catechism is above the Authors censure and men of as great Authority and abilities as he of his own perswasion have still spoken of that Book with regard and recommended it to others as sound and profitable he doth but lessen himself by his Reflections against that Composure let the Reader judge what mean arguments he hath against it only he sheweth what Spirit he is of 2ly Whereas it 's not injoyned as any part of our Lords-days-Service Ans Tho' our Catechism be a sound and full Summary of Christian principles yet we know it to be but a humane Composure and therefore make it no part of our worship if by Service he understandeth worship as he frequently useth these words Service and worship Promiscuously we must have Institution for what we offer to God in his Service yet these principles are frequently explained on the Lords day and that not only occasionally but in order according to the method of our Catechism 3ly But the Author hath shewed that such a Catechism should contain only c. Ans The Author hath said but not shewed to his Reader that it should be as he saith except all he saith must be taken for demonstration 4. But our Catechism is full of hard words Ans It s good the Author hath no worse to say otherways we should hear of it 2. But why doth he not give instances of these hard words Some who have read our Catechism say They find not such a hard word in it all as god father and god-mother nor such words as God the Son hath redeemed me and all mankind 3. It was necessary our Catechism should have words significant and expressive of the matter and if any of these words be less obvious to the capacity of young or ignorant people we are at pains to explain such words 5ly But our Catechism is too long Ans And what if the Catechism of some others be too short give instances of what is redundant or superfluous we would think our Catechism very defective if it wanted the Doctrine of the Creation and of Mans Fall from God the Attributes of God the Natures of Christ and his Offices the nature of Justifying Faith and Sanctification c. Page 83. Besides all this it is so long and intricat even the shorter that not one Child in ten ever gets it by heart nor one in five hundred retains it as I have found by experience Ans I would gladly be acted by the Spirit of meekness but the Author's words are so provocking even in
hearts now he findeth other reasons are imaginable and why should he not be charitable to such as find not conveniency for so frequent receiving as others For his calling Ministers under the Gospel Priests is unsavory and unwarrantable seing the antient Priest-hood is taken down by the coming of Christ and the Sacrifices we have now to offer are only Spiritual so that Church-Officers under the New Testament are no otherwise Priests than all true Believers who are made Kings and Priests to God I think less of Papists retaining that name because they profanely make a sacrifice of Christ in the Mass Page 157. That every Parishoner shall communicat at least three times in the year whereof Easter to be one and surely such as cannot fit themselves so often must in their own opinion be out of a state of Grace and deserve to be excommunicated by the Church Ans If these words last recited were asserted and maintained by any of our Dissenting Ministers I must freely speak my thoughts that he deserved Deposition from the Ministry as unfit to have the charge of Souls who would rule them with such rigor as to excommunicate them purely for their weakness Let the Reader take notice of Ezek. 34. 4. The diseased have ye not strengthned neither have ye healed that which was sick neither have ye bound up that which was broken neither have ye brought again that which was driven away neither have â—e sought that which was lost but with force and with cruelty have ye ruled them And verse 10. Thus saith the Lord God behold I am against the shepherds and I will require my flock at their hands and cause them to cease from feeding the flock c. The Authors designation of a person deserving excommunication cannot but surprise any thinking Reader who hath any sensâ— of Religion for First He saith such as cannot fit themselves 2. They must in their own opinion be out of a state of Grace and therefore deserve excommunication For the first such as cannot if he had said such as will not fit themselves deserve censure would have been suitable to the care of a faithful and compassionat Pastor but to punish because they cannot is merciless for albeit they cannot fit themselves for receiving yet they may be diligent in the use of means and longing for fitness and for a time remain under fears and doubts so that they dare not receive least they eat and drink damnation to themselves they are not able as yet to eat in Faith and they find by the Word of God that whatsoever is not of Faith is sin and that every man should be perswaded in his own mind Should such persons be excommunicated who are so far from contempt of that holy Sacrament that all their fear is lest they profane it by receiving unprepared God requireth the man to take time to examine himself before he eat of that Bread which he must attend waiting for some competent preparation it grieveth him that he is not in due readiness to obey Christs gracious command Do this in remembrance of me laboureth for it resolveth that so soon as ever he can eat in Faith he will embrace the first opportunity of receiving only at present he cannot shall he be therefore rigorously driven to partake right or wrong whether he can do it in faith or not The Reader may yet further consider that the preparation of the heart in man is of the Lord and therefore not in mens power to prepare themselves when they will therefore Gods assistance for preparation must be waited for if the Minister urge on peril of excommunication he must and shall receive the man feareth a worse excommunication to be cast out into utter darkness wanting a wedding garment and dare not eat and drink damnation to pleasure his Minister or to avoid temporary excommunication specially clave errante as certainly in this circumstantiat case the excommunication were invalid and a minister so abusing the Ordinance of Excommunication would merit it more himself than the man guilty of no contempt and only laboureth to partake acceptably For the 2d That such must needs think themselves out of a state of Grace Ans And what if they did think so this their present opinion of themselves doth not deprive them of a state of grace they may be deprived of assurance and yet not deprived of grace after a man is by the mercy of God stated in grace and in Christ Jesus for whom there is no condemnation yet it is a distinct act of the spirit of God to make known the things that are freely given of God a man may be in a state of salvation and yet constrained some times to cry to God for restoring the joy of his salvation a godly Job was sometimes of opinion that God was holding himself his enemy yet he was no enemy but this he spoke when God hid his face from him Job 1324. should such a man as Job been excommunicated because he had so bad opinion of himself no sure for though God cause grief yet he will have compassion according to the multitude of his mercies and make his people praise him that though he was angry yet his anger is turned away and he comforteth them But suppose a man were not in a state of grace should he be therefore excommunicated seing to be in a state of grace is to be reconciled to God by the Bloud of Christ and sanctified by his Spirit and all such are members of the invisible Church now shall men be cast out of the visible Church because they are not of the invisible What Laws of God can be found to warrand this practice This is a dangerous invention indeed to throw people out of the means of Grace because they are not yet in a state of grace for the Gospel Kingdom of Christ on Earth comprehendeth the good and bad the Tares amongst the Wheat in one Field till the Harvest and then they shall be severed I can observe no more in this Section that giveth occasion for any further answer SECT 3. PAge 159. And here first I must observe to you that you have no fixt or set times for the administration of this Sacrament on the contrary your Directory orders that the time how often this is to be celebrated may be considered and determined by the Ministers and other Church governours of each Congregation as they shall find most convenient for the comfort and edification of the people committed to their charge Ans 1. The Author hath said that Christ hath prefixed no time 2. He telleth us that the Apostles varyed the time sometimes dayly and afterwards on the Lords Day 3. He saith they vary the times themselves for some of their Churches have it more seldom and some more frequently Why then is it so great a crime in us to want fixed times why did himself say Page 148. That there can be no better way of determining when than by observing
when God giveth opportunity 2ly This opportune season for publick edification we are willing to attend but then prefixed times especially long before celebration may prove no opportunity many things may and often do emerge making it not convenient for the publick good to observe these prefixed times and that Ministers and other Church Governours should determine the time as the edification of each Congregation requireth is convenient and necessary But Ibid. saith the Author By which rule the Lords Supper is excluded from being any ordinary constant part of Gods service Ans The Author cannot prove that this celebration ought to be a constant part of Gods service the many Scriptures I have already quoted testifie the contrary I perceive the Author preferreth the Popish way of constant consecration every Lords Day to his own way and ours for he saith Page 160. And truly in this point you seem more unexcusable than the Papists themselves for the Papists order the Elements to be consecrated every Lords Day and distributed to those that desire it but your Teachers neither offer it to the people nor invite them to it nay so far are they from it that they do not so much as afford an opportunity to those that desire to be constant receivers And he hath said already Page 159. That they themselves are too far short of the primitive practice and institution but the Popish Priests follow it in consecrating every Lords Day Ans As for the Authors preferring the manner of Popish Priests to our way is no surprisal to us seing he was pleased to yield them ample room in the Communion of the Catholick Church when he thrust us out at one blow 2ly He saith the popish Priests distribute the Elements in the plural number to those that desire it If it be so it s a new thing we heard not of that they distribute the Cup to those that desire it for they say plainly tho Christ distributed the Cup yet they see it not fit However we must be worse than Papists do what they will yea worse than the most degenerated or barbarous people that ever called themselves Christians This is the Authors spirit of meekness that he said would give no just offence Page 161. They rarely press their people to communicat Ans We do press them to communicat but much more to examine themselves that they may be prepared for it Ibid They have few Sermons or Discourses to that purpose Ans This is a matter of Fact also and hard to answer without irritation I love not to be using words of evil manners only I cannot but say it 's not a truth as many hundreds of witnesses can Testifie Ibid No body can certainly tell what frequently many often or convenient signifie And therefore where only these words are used in a Rule it 's little better than to have no Rule at all as appears in this very case Ans The Scripture useth these words as often and is this little betten then no Rule at all This must be dangerous treating of the word of God 2. These same words as often tho' they be few yet are much better than no Rule at all and have been very useful to the whole Church of God and encouraged many Souls to endeavour frequency of receiving because the word of God mentioneth often tho' no not how often Ibid. I appeal to you whether it is not yet reckoned a great thing among many of you if once in a year or two a Communion be celebrated in one of your meetings nay among some of you it 's often ommited for several years together and in some places for ten or more Ans This is also matter of Fact and a great mistake for we account it no great thing to have it every year and some of us have it oftner and some of our Communion have it much oftner than once or twice a year as God giveth them opportunity and all of us would be glad of conveniency for having it more frequently But let the Reader understand that we judge it not warrantable to admit persons to the Lords Table because they have in their memory and can say over the belief the Lords prayer and Ten Commandments which a Child or an Athiest may have in readiness to repeat But Stewards of the Mysteries of God who must not cast Pearls before Swine tho' they judge not of mens hearts leaving that to God whose Prerogative it is yet must have some satisfying account of a competent measure of knowledge in partakers and must take care to know they are able to discern the Lords Body as likewise that they have some knowledge of the Covenant of Grace the Sacrament being a Seal thereof and besides their knowledge which this is but a taste of lest Ministers be partakers of other mens sins by profaning the Holy Sacrament they must also take care that such be not admitted whose practice doth contradict their profession of Christianity As also sometimes Ministers must take time to support the weak dejected by their own fears and doubts and to encourage them as occasion serveth to approach the Lords Table so also to have any Animosities or contentions composed and healed that may be found amongst the people before they receive And if at any time so extraordinary a thing fall out that some Congregations be deprived of that Sacrament many years as this is altogether extaordinary so there will be found some extraordinary reason for it but I know not of one instance in the North of Ireland where any Congregation of our Communion wanted that Ordinance for Ten years I love not confident unwarrantable assertions but I say if any such thing be it will be found that these Congregations have either wanted Ministers of our Communion or somewhat altogether extraordinary is the cause and no Church or Society should be judged by extraordinaries Page 162. A man may live comfortably amongst you to the Age of 30. or 40. Years and never receive and I could not compute that one in ten going to your meetings ever receive through the whole course of their lives Ans Blessed be God we can make it appear that not one of ten come to Age of our Communion but have received already with us which our Examination Rules can instruct and hundreds of witnesses testifie 2ly No man of our Communion come to the Age of 30. or 40. Years but is particularly noticed if he do not receive but where Scandalous Immoralities are found if he were 50. or 60. Years of Age such will not be admitted with us heartily wishing our Neighbours to take the like care To the Dissenting Ministers of Derry PAge 170 But as to you my brethren that disown my Communion and authority I have reason to fear that what I shall offer to you may receive some prejudices from my station and Character yet reason is reason from whomsoever it proceeds and I only desire that you would weigh seriously what I have