Deut. 16. the feast of Tabernacles from the tents and boothes wherein the people lived in the Desart and which more punctually meets with this objection their weekly holiday had its name not from him to whom it is dedicated but from Rest the duty of the day enjoyned Secondly In the Christian Church his rule of denomination doth not hold for wee call one holiday dedicated to Christ by his Birth another by his Circumcision another by his Ascension which are the things done on the day not by his name onely to whom they were dedicated If it bee said when wee speake of the Nativitie we understand the Birth of the Lord and so also the Circumcision of the Lord and the Ascension of the Lord I grant wee doe so and so when wee say the Sabbath wee may meane as in the Commandement is expressed the Sabbath of the Lord or to the Lord. Thirdly That the names of dayes should not bee taken from the quality of the person onely to whom they are intended is plaine by the feast of Pentecost so called from the number of the dayes betwixt it and Easter and the name of the Lords day called from its order by the Evangelists and the Apostle Paul the first day of the weeke and by the Ancients the day of light from illumination at the Sacrament of Paptisme and the day of Bread from the Sacrament of the Lords Supper administred every Lords day as n Mr. Ironside quest 3. cap. 13. p. 124 125. Mr. Ironside himselfe hath observed Fourthly If the names of holidayes should be taken from the quality of the person to whom they are intended as because our weekly holiday is intended to the honour of the Lord it must be called the Lords day then all the holidayes which are named by the Saints should have their names from their Lord for though the portions of Scripture read on them concerne their lives and deaths the honour and service of the day is directed and intended not to them but to the Lord yea all holidayes of both Testaments are dayes dedicated to his honour by that reason then all must bee called the Lords dayes and so names that should bee given for distinction would turne to confusion Thus much for the first Reason for the name Sabbath as applyed to the Lords day or Sunday which were more then enough if there had not beene much more then there was need and cause objected against it but the rest we shall contract into a narrower compasse The second Reason why our weekly holiday may be called Sabbath day is this Reas 2 It is confessed by all that are not branded with the note of heresie that there are ten Commandements to us Christians as well as to the lewes and that the fourth Commandement is one of the ten and requireth at least the assigning or setting apart of some time to religious rest and that by vertue of these words Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy that time then which the Church keepeth as in obedience to that part of the Commandement expressed in the letter of the law by the name Sabbath may or rather must be called by that name By that word Sabbath in that Commandement as o B◠Andr. his Serm. de Natic pag. 37. Bishop Andrewes said of the words which shall bee wee hold and though wee say not as hee farther addeth it is our best tenure yet a tenure it is which wee must not let goe but wee must as hee said of the word p Idem In his second Serm. of the Nativ pag. 15. nobis make much of it for thereby our tenure and interest groweth up to a further degree of assurance and evidence Thirdly Reas 3 q B. Hall dec of Ep. 6. epist 2. p. 384. Bishop Hall saith The sonne of righteousnesse rising upon that day called the Lords day drew the strength of that mor all Precept unto it for all the vertue and vigour of it is vanish'd from the Jewes Sabbath so that it remaineth a meere working day and if so the title of Rest surely did not stay behinde it but with the strength was transferred to the day for which it was changed Fourthly Reas 4 It is enough to gaine a title from one thing to another to possesse the place as Successor upon the decease and in stead of another as the Christians Lords day by the ordinance of the Lord himselfe as r 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Athanasius de Semente Tom. 1. pag. 835. Edit Graeco-lat Commelian Ann. c 10.10 c. Athanasius saith succeeded the Jewish Sabbath whose name it may have in that respect if there were none other reason of more weight Here it will haply bee objected that so one might call Baptisme by the name of Circumcision and the Lords Supper by the name of the Passeover for these two Sacraments of the new Testament succeeded those two of the old which were to bring in a confusion of termes and times and so in part to incurre the scorne which the f Bish of Elie his examinat of the Dialogue pag. 85. Bishop of Elie putteth upon his Dialogist for his Argument drawn from the succession of the one day to the other I answer Howsoever the Argument of the Dialogist succeed which wee have nothing to doe withall at this time wee shall easily shake off this slight exception thus First Wee doe not ascribe the proper name of the old Sabbath to the Lords day for wee doe not say Saturday is Sunday or the Lords day but that name which is common to them both and wherein the one by a reall right and congruity of sense succeedeth the other and that is the name Sabbath signifying Rest which belongeth to them both and that is not as if one should call Baptisme Circumcision or the Lords Supper the Passeover but as if wee should call them Sacraments and Seales of the Covenant in which respect the later have both the authority and appellation of the former Or as if one should say Doctor White succeeded Doctor Buckeridge Bishop of Elie therefore hee hath the Title and Authoritie of the Bishop of Elie though hee bee not called by his Predecessors Christian or surname in particular hee saith indeede t Examinat of the Dialogue p. 63 69. marg That the fourth Commandement appointed a particular fixed day to wit Saturday but if that were true which I deny hee cannot say the word Saturday is named there and if it were wee would not take that but the name Sabbath for the true title of the Lords day against which no just exception hath yet beene taken nor in truth can bee And for a second Answer which in regard of the ground of it it will not become a Bishop to slight wee may say That upon a substitution of one thing in the roome of another it is not unusuall in our Church to assigne the name as well as the place to that which is substituted for a
parcell of Scripture is called by our Church the Epistle though it bee not taken out of those writings which are properly so called◠but out of some booke of * Prophes Isa ch 7. ver 10. On the Annunciation of the Virgin Mary 40. v. 1. On Saint John Baptists day 63. v. 1. On Munday in Passion week Jer. c. 23. ver 5. On the twenty fifth Sunday after Trinity Joel c. 2. v. 12. The first day in Lent Prophesie or ″ Hist Acts ch 1. ver 1. On Ascension day ver 15. On Saint Matthias day 2. v. 1. On whitsunday 5. v. 12. On Saint Bartholomewes day 7. v. 55. On Saint Stevens day 8. v. 14. On Tuesday in Whitsun week 9. ver 1. On the Convers of S. Paul 10. v. 34. On Munday in Easter week On Mund. in Whitsun week 11. ver 22. On Saint Barnabies day ver 27. On Saint James his day 12. ver 1. On Saint Peters day 13. v. 26. On Tuesday in Easter week Historie as in the Service of divers Sundayes and Holidayes in the yeer according to the Catalogue in the margine because it is read in the place and standeth in stead of the Epistle And thus u M. Brab Desence p. 600.601 Master Braburne will allow the Lords day not onely the name but the honour of a Sabbath viz. as in the roome of the old Sabbath for a time and for its sake Fifthly Reas 5 wee have already shewed out of Chrysostome of old and Jos Scaliger of late that the other holidays of the Jewes which were not weekely are called Sabbaths and * Doctor Hevl Hist Sab. part 1. c. 5. pag. 87 88. Doctor Heylin x M. Brab Discourse p. 81 82. Master Braburne and y Master Ironside queil 3. cap. 13. pag. 123. Master Ironside acknowledge no lesse and if they when the seventh dayes Sabbath was yet in force and use might be called by that name much more may the Lords day now which is a weekly day of rest as the old Sabbath was but now is not so that there is nothing in it much lesse in any other day of the week that may give it a better right to the title Sabbath then the Lords day hath Sixthly Reason 6 z There is a Sabbath or rest from sinne D. Heyl. Hist of the Sab. part 2. c. 5. pag. 157. Doctor Heylin alloweth the name Sabbath to bee given to cessation from sinne why then not rather to rest from labour Since this is literall and proper as the law of the Sabbath requireth that metaphoricall and sigurative and the right of appellation goeth rather by the letter then by the figure as a Bish Andr. 3. Serm. of the Nat. p. 64. Bishop Andrewes observing of the world day taken sometime figuratively for the whole time of mans life and sometimes properly and literally as in our ordinary speech for the seventh part of the weeke maketh his choice of the sense which consenteth with the letter and leaveth the figure Adde hereunto a further latitude of the word Sabbath allowed by b Mr. Broad in his 3d. quest p. 5. Master Broad and therewithall a greater liberty for the use of it to Christians which is That the Kingdome of heaven and the Sabbath have one common name and yet saith hee the difference betwixt them is as much as betwixt the sacrifices of beasts by the law and the sacrifice of Christ in the Gospel and if the difference bee lesse betwixt day and day rest and rest in observation of Jewish and Christians holidayes which cannot reasonably be denyed the same name may bee attributed to their holiday and to ours especially by turnes to theirs while it was in force to ours since that being put downe it hath obtained the honour of the day Seventhly Reas 7 Doctor Heylin againe notwithstanding his exceptions both against the name and thing it selfe noted by the name takes the name Sabbath to bee an honour where hee saith that the new Moones were not honoured with that title in the booke of God conceiving belike as c M. Brah. des of his disiourse pag. 53. Master Braburn said that the name was a crown on the head rather then as d D. Pockl. Visit Serm. p. 20. Doctor Pocklington held a deformed vizzard on the face And if the Lords day have gotten the honour of the Jewes Festivity as indeed it hath since that was put down and this set up in its stead that name as well agreeing with the precedent proofes may be the more fitly attributed to it Eightly e M. Dowe in his Discourse of the Sabbath and Lords day pag. 41. Master Dowe observeth though by way of complaint for which there is no great cause that the day we celebrate is vulgarly called and known by the name of the Sabbath the like hath f Mr. Brab def p. 626. Master Braburne Doe not they saith hee usually call Sunday or Lords day the Sabbath And if it bee vulgarly knowne and called by that name the rule is Wee must speake with the vulgar and think with the wise Master Ironside by way of exception to this vertually I meane not expressely for hee maketh no mention of the rule saith g Mr. Ironside quest 3. cap. 13. pag. 126. Who speaks most religiously the Apostles and the whole Church or some few private persons of late yeeres is easie to determine wherein hee implyeth that the first and best and most Christians forbeare the name Sabbath and use rather the word Lords day therefore the name Sabbath must cease as savouring both of novelty and schisme Whereto I answer for the present that all the foure Evangelists note the day wee celebrate by the name of the first day of the weeke and onely one of them viz. S. John and that but once viz. Rev. 1.10 calleth it the Lords day yet without any imputation of novelty or schisme which we shall more cleerly fully take off and avoid for the denomination of the L. day by the name of the Sab. in the ensuing Chapters CHAP. XIIII Ancient evidence for calling the Lords day by the name of Sabbath observed especially against a D. Pockl. Visitation Serm. called Sunday no Sabbath Dr. Pocklington his Assertion viz. That no ancient Father no learned man tooke the name Sabbath otherwise from the beginning of the world till the yeere 1554. then for Saturday observed by the Jewes USe of speech which for the name Sabbath as applyed to the Lords day hath for our age beene b See c. 12. and c. 13. propè sin confessed by the adversaries of it is as the c Si volet usus Quem penes arbitrium est vis norma loquēdi Hor. de art poet Poet saith the rule of speech and of such authority that wise men willingly submit unto it and that sometimes so farre as to speake amisse that they may bee understood aright so did d Ossum sic enim potius
of Elie in his Examinat of the title Dial. pag. 107. Bishop of Elie in his Examination of the Dialogue of the Sabbath taketh exceptions at it when it is brought in to this purpose and sheweth some reasons why it should be supposed to be none of his but of a later time and if it be none of Augustines when it is so cited it was none of his when himselfe cited it in his name and as his as he did in his r B. of Elie in his Treat of the Sab. pag. 110. former Treatise of the Sabbath After Augustine and as a neer follower of his both in tract of time and tractates of doctrine wee may note Prosper Aquitanie who in his sentences collected out of Å¿ Sententiae â—ine dubio sunt Augustini sed collectae à Sancto Prospero Bell. de Eccles script pag. 185. Saint Augustine saith t Malè celebrat Sabbatum qui ab operibus bonis vacat Prosper Aquitan sent 114. ex Aug. tom 3. part 2. p. 1402. that such celebrate the Sabbath in an ill sort who make it a vacation from doing good In which words hee vertually alloweth of the celebration of a Sabbath both for name and thing If the like exceptions be taken at these Testimonies out of Augustine and Prosper to those that have beene noted before concerning the saying of Ignatius the like answer may bee here returned which there was made By such authorities as these whereof I forbeare some being to bring them in upon another occasion I desire not to make shew that the Ancients did alwayes use to call the Lords day by the name of Sabbath as some u See B. White his treat of the Sab. pag. 201. have said or for the most part for no man can prove that And it is evident that in their Idiome it is more frequent and familiar to call the weekly holiday of the Jewes the Sabbath and the Christians weekly holiday Lords day but to observe that they did not condemne the name as in application to the Lords day nor forbeare it so constantly as some especially Doctor Pocklington have said nor upon such conceipts as hee and some others have imagined but upon some considerations which appertained to their times and not to ours as I shall seasonably shew in answer to another objection when it crosseth my way Now I will descend from the Primitive Church downeward where the Doctor may finde his Assertion gaine said by a Synod of Bishops and other Prelates collected by ″ Fox Mart. pag. 128. edit 2. Cuthbert Archbishop of Canterbury about the yeere 747. in which among other Ecclesiasticall matters it was decreed that the Sabbath day and by that was meant the day wee now keepe holy should bee reverently observed And in x M. Fox Ib. Dies Sabbati ab ipsa diei Saturni hora pomeridiana tertia usque in Lunaris diei diluculum festus agitator Sr. Hen. Spelman de concil c. cap. 5. an Christ 967. pag. 445. King Edgars dayes ann 959. the Christians weekly holiday was by a decree under the name of the Sabbath measured out from Saturday at three of the clock in the afternoone to Munday morning Against this Decree of King Edgar y D. Heyl. hist part 2. cap. 7. pag. 216. Dr. Heylin objecteth that though the Decree in Latine have the word Sabbath in the Saxon copie it is onely Heald which signifieth holiday which maketh nothing against our present observation unlesse he had shewed that the Latine edition of that constitution was much later then the Saxon and not a little for it Because First They that penned the Latine in likelihood were more learned and so the better able to judge of the fitnesse of the name then they that penned it in the Saxon language for it requireth lesse ability to speake a native tongue or to understand or translate a learned one then to pen or speake it Secondly As the Latine is a more learned language so it is more generall especially in the Christian world where the celebration of the day so named is received and so it implyeth either that the word was usually understood or that they would have it commonly taken in that sense And whereas the z D. Heyl. Hist Sab. part 2. c. 7. pag. 216. Doctor saith There is onely Heald or holiday in the Saxon Decree hee implyeth holiday to bee lesse then Sabbath whereas Sabbath in a meere Grammaticall sense signifieth lesse then holiday for so Sabbath signifieth rest and no more and so the a Levit. 25.2 chap. 26.34 earth hath its Sabbath when it is not tilled and the b Otium est Sabbatum Asinorum Bish Downam in his Analys of the ten Commandements Com. of the Sab. beasts their Sabbath when they are not toyled whereas the holinesse of the holiday belongeth to us as wee are c Sanctius his animal mentisque capacius altae Deerat adhuc quod dominari caetera posset Ovid. Met. l. 1. men and much more as wee are d Ephes 1.4 Christians yet I confesse where both names are in use so distinguished that the Sabbath standeth for the Lords day and holiday for other dayes ordained for religious exercises the name Sabbath is of more and better importance then holiday is but that maketh nothing for the Doctors purpose In the Lawes of e Fox Martyr tom 1. p. 1017 col 2. edit ult Canutus anno 1016. there was a constitution like that in King Edgars time concerning the Lords day by the name of the Sabbath making the measure of it from Saturday noon till Munday morning which might yet be all one for the measure with the Decree of Edgar for the ninth houre which is called nona or noon was at three of the clock which now with us is the third houre after noone Againe f Fox Martyr tom 1. p. 1017. col 1. King Edward the elder and Gythrum the Danish King forbidding buying and selling and all labour upon the holiday of the Christians make their prohibition of them in the name not of Sunday or Lords day but of the Sabbath And out of g Albert. Krantz Metrap lib. 4. cap. 8. Krantzius h D. Heyl. Hist Sab. part 2. c. 15. pag. 131. Doctor Heylin noteth of Olaus King of Norway anno 1028. that taken up one Sunday on the Lords day saith Krantzius in serious thoughts and having in his hand a small walking stick hee tooke his knife and whirled it as men do sometimes when they are troubled or intent on businesse and when it had beene told him how hee had trespassed therein against the Sabbath hee gathered the small chips up together put them upon his hand and sit fire unto them that hee might take a revenge upon himselfe for violation of the divine Precept The matter most remarkeable in this story is his scrupulous conscience and precise severity for which hee is k Gloriosissimus Rex Olaus
Secondly If any apply any place to our weekly holiday which is peculiar to the Jewes Sabbath he may as easily be answered by distinction of the Jewish and Christian Sabbath as if from the name Altar much in use with some in our dayes any should make inferences of Jewish Sacrifices to bee offered upon it hee may bee stopped which the Authour of this objection I thinke will not deny by the distinction of a Jewish and Christian Altar and application accordingly Thirdly To disavow the name Sabbath would become a more dangerous snare to Judaisme for that were to give up the fourth Commandement wholly unto the Jewes both for title and tenure for without the title how can our Christian Holiday be in any good sense set upon that ground and to establish their day by the best Authority that can bee viz. by a most holy and expresse law as the Jewes assume and some Christians too easily assent And to leave our Lords day floting upon the uncertaine conjectures of an Apostolicall tradition as some account it Who can tell saith d Mr. Ironside quest 5. of the Sabb. cap. 20. p. 200 201. Master Ironside whether the Lords day of which Saint John speakes were the Lords day which wee keepe or Easter day which Saint John and his Disciples observed as it fell out any day of the weeke according to the Jewish supputation This as I have e In my historicall part of the Sabbath shewed was a snare and scandall to M. Braburne which made him relapse from Sunday to Saturday And if his Books were as commonly read as they are cunningly penned to this purpose many more might bee taken in that snare at unawares unlesse they were more soundly answered then yet they have been Lastly There is a snare to profanenesse as well as to Judaisme to bee shunned by Christians but the taking of the name Sabbath from the Lords day as those that most dislike that title would have it may bee a snare to profanenesse and that in a higher degree then the Judaisme pretended for they that most mislike the name Sabbath as applyed to Sunday or Lords day disavow both the honour and holinesse of the day and would depose it from being a Queene to make it a drudge an ordinary workeday and therefore with the name they deny its right to the fourth Commandement as the uncommunicable charter of a weekely holiday in the Jewish Church whence will follow that many will be more bold familiarly to profane it Therefore in this respect also there is more danger in refusing or forbearing the name Sabbath when we speak of our day of religious rest then in receiving or approving thereof Object 7. Though Master Braburne accompt it too great an honour to the Lords day as before wee have noted to bee called Sabbath yet the Christian Church hath observed some matter of reproach in it and therefore hath shee called a sort of Heretickes by way of contempt and censure Sabbatarii and it is a ready reproach in the mouthes of many to call them as in disdaine Sabbatharians who put the name Sabbath upon Sunday Answ It is true but first the Church condemneth them not for calling and holding the Lords day to bee a Sabbath but Saturday as the Ebionites did of old and Master Brab of late and the Jewes doe to this day Secondly though Heretickes have been so entitled from the name Sabbath and some who are not Heretickes be too forward to cast that terme in contempt upon their Orthodox brethren yet the word is never the worse or lesse honourable for that for there were Heretickes called f Aug. de Haeres ad quod vul haer 39. p. 22. Angelici g Ibid. haer 40. Apostolici h Ibid. haer 34. pag. 21. Melchisedechians as well as Sabbatarii yet the names of Angels Apostles and of Melchisedech are for all that sacred and venerable CHAP. XXII The negative Argument drawne from the Apostles not using the name Sabbath for the Lords day answered ob 8 HOwsoever it bee lawfull to call the Lords day by the name Sabbath yet the name wherewith the Christians have anciently christned Sunday is the Lords day and not Sabbath day yea the Holy Ghost saith a M. Ironside quest ch 12. p. 120 121. Master Ironside doth every where in the New Testament call it the Lords day and no where Sabbath so did the Primitive Church in precedent times for the first three hundred yeares and so doe both Romane and Reformed Churches who stile it Lords day and not Sabbath day wherein to vary from them may bee justly noted of singularity affectation and if it be said that religious persons call it Sabbath day who speakes most religiously saith he the Apostles the whole Church or some private persons of late yeares is easie to determine In setting downe his Objection I have contracted three Arguments into one abating from the number not from the vigour of his reasons of exception because the answer I shall returne unto them will for the most part give satisfaction to them altogether The b Bish Whites Treatise of the Sab. and Lords day p. 127. See the like p. 135. Bishop of Ely maketh the like Objection We Christians saith he observe a weekly Holiday namely Sunday which with the Apostles we call not Sabbath but Lords day He saith further That the Lords day was not called Sabbath day by our Saviour nor by any of his Apostles or their immediate successors It is farre different saith c Ibid. p. 201. he againe and the like hath d M. Dow in his discourse pag. 4. Mr. Dowe from the language of the Fathers to stile the Lords day by the name of Sabbath The Sabbath and the seventh day saith e M. Primrose Treatise of the Sab. or Lords day part 2. ch 6. p. 132. M. Primrose and he meaneth the seventh from the Creation are indifferently taken for the same thing and the one is the explication of the other to which purpose hee quoteth many places of the Scripture but our Lords day saith f Idem Ibid. part 2. c. 20. pag. 138 184. he wherein wee apply our selves to Gods outward service is alwaies called in the New Testament the first day of the weeke or the Lords day and not Sabbath which name the Apostles and first Beleevers had not failed to give unto it if Jesus Christ had not so qualified and stiled it but they never termed it by such a name Hereof Master Broad in his Treatise of the Sabbath and Lords day which was sent me in a MS. by Mr. D. of B. hath these words g M. Broad in his MS. Treat of the Sab. and Lords day p. 41. The Scripture never calleth the Lords day by the name of the Sabbath neither any other I beleeve for the space of two hundred yeares and more since Christs time and whether it were so called by the Fathers saith he I
to bee kept holy and Markets may bee kept upon the other And in Sir Edward Coke his first part of the Institutes of Litleton resolving what day is not dies Juridicus he saith In e Sir Edward Coke in that first part of his Institutes lib. 12. c. 11. Sect. 2. of Villenage pag. 135. calleth it â—oure times the Sabbath day in this page all the foure termes the Sabbath day is not dies Juridicus for that ought to be consecrated to divine service and in his Reports in the case of the Citie of London it is said f Le jour de Sabaoth so it is written for Sabbath solemnit Except Cokes reports part 8. p. 127. a. That every day in the week is a Market day the Sabbath day by which is understood the Lords day onely excepted And in Machellies case who being arrested on the Sunday slew the Sergeant it was objected against the Sergeant g Le jour de soleile est le Sabbath Idem Ib. part 9. p. 66. that Sunday was the Sabbath day and answer made that no judiciall act may be done that day but ministeriall may In this instance is both the word Sunday and Sabbath for the same day And those two and a third are all of them by an eminent h Sir Jo. Finch in his first book of the Law cap. 3. p. 7. Lawyer it is Sir John Finch in one side of a lease indifferently used for the day wee Christians celebrate and another bird of the same golden feather Master Henry Finch in his Nomotechnia shewing besides the lawfull use of the name Sabbath for the Lords day the separation of it from secular affaires i Si le jour del returne vel si le primer ou darraine jour del terme hap sur le Sabaoth jour donque se jour procheine en suaul server en lin de ceo So Master Hen. Finch in fol. 52. in which edition the figures are mis-reckoned for on that lease is set num 58. which commeth twice but the former should be 52. as I have cited it saith If the day of returne or the first or last day of the terme happen upon the Sabbath day by which must needs bee understood the Lords day then the day next ensuing shall serve or bee kept in stead thereof for the beginning of the terme or day of returne Now to answer to the objection taken from the Acts of Parliament I say First That in the k M. Pultons Abridgement fol. 134. p. b. Parliament of the 19. of Queen Elisabeth cap. 13. which is of Hats and Caps the name Sabbath is used for the Lords day Secondly For the Act fore-cited concerning the observation of the day wee Christians keepe giving it the name of Lords day or Sunday not of Sabbath I answer That I have heard a ″ M. Ed. Whitby late Recorder of Chester Parliament man of eminent note in his time say that the bill was penned and passed in the Commons House in the name of the Sabbath day and I have read that when an Act was made for reformation of abuse by profanation of the Sabbath l In a MS. of Doct. Twisse concerning the Sabbath Doct. Lake Bishop of Bath and Wells was somewhat eager to have it called by the name of Sabbath and it had not been the worse if that reverend Father had been allowed as a Godfather to give the name and title in the Statute Thirdly though some prime persons of the upper House thought it fit in the Act to make use rather of the word Sunday and Lords day then of the word Sabbath it doth not follow they disallowed or condemned the use of that word for they were not ignorant of his Majesties Proclamation and Briefes calling our weekly Holiday by the name Sabbath nor how the name and day were incorporated into our Communion Booke with a prayer at the end of the fourth Commandement for pardon of profanation past and for grace to shun the like in time to come nor that that Commandement as well as the rest was a part of the common Catechisme prescribed for the instruction of children before their confirmation Fourthly they might haply mention the day wee observe for a Sabbath by the name of Sunday because that name was used in the Statute of the 5. and 6. Stat. 5. 6. Ed. 6. c. 3. p. 133 of Edward the sixth wherein it was enacted that all Sundaies in the yeare should be kept holy and by the name Lords day because that is the name which S. John giveth it Revel 1.10 and which the Latine Church most used to distinguish it from the Saturday Sabbath and for the name Sabbath they might at that time forbeare it First because these two names chosen for these reasons were sufficient to make it well enough known unto all Secondly because the name Sabbath in the Communion Booke was like to bee upheld with so much honour and reputation so long as the fourth Commandement is a part of the Liturgy and Catechisme and both of them are in force and use that there was no such need to grace it with a particular mention in the Act as the other two titles yet if all three had been brought to a serious consultation for the choice and use of one above the rest the name Sabbath of right might have had the preheminence and so much I hope to manifest in the next Chapter CHAP. XXVI A comparison of the names Sabbath Lords day and Sunday with a resolution of the Question for the name Sabbath as the best and fittest to be the most usuall title of our weekly Holiday THough all the three names be lawfull enough and may each of them as just occasion requireth bee used without either sinne or scandall if there be not more fault in the mind of the speaker or hearer then in the words themselves yet since they are not all at such an equipoize for sense or acceptation but that there may be observed a preheminence among them which may incline the custome of speech to one more then to another thereafter as it is apprehended when the name is uttered or heard It will bee a matter of some use to observe the importance and prelation of these names so farre as to resolve which of them in our Church and age is most sit to become most common among us Names are of chiefe accompt for these seven particulars First for Antiquity secondly for Authority thirdly for Significancy fourthly for Facility to the speaker fifthly for Acceptability with the hearer sixthly for Frequency seventhly for Efficacy First if we compare them for Antiquity the name Sunday in the language of the world is more ancient then Lords day the name Lords day in the language of the Church a more ancient name then Sunday for we find the Lords day in Revelat. 1.10 about the 94. yeare after Christ but the first mention of Sunday as a Christian Holiday is
their different Tenets come with indifferency to be examined In the meane time I thought this speech after so many inducements as before I have touched though directed to him was pertinent to mee And besides other respects somewhat more to mee then to Master Bifield in that a great f Mast W. C. Admirer of Master Breerwood brought mee divers of his Dictats on this Argument which are not in print that I might peruse them and so might either take the impression of his opinions from them or if my judgement swayed mee otherwise that I might endeavour to take off the errour of his and other mens mis-conceipts by some better evidence of truth herein then yet had been offered to their view At this marke while I direct mine aime and addresse mine endeavours my resolution is and care shall be to deale with such diligence as not to neglect any meanes of due information in matters of doubt and with such fidelity as not to tell a lye for God nor to out-face a truth against the meanest man And if while I devote my thoughts pains to make some truths not of meere speculation but of ordinary practice to shine which have been obscured with manifold scruples and to fence them from the storme of some mens oppositions it bee mine hap to derive contradictions upon my selfe it shall not discourage mee from any duty I owe unto the truth for he that gain-sayeth me in that maketh himselfe Gods adversary more then mine for truth is not any mans so much as his who I hope will give mee eyes to see both what wrong is done unto it and by what meanes and in what manner it should be righted But if the exception he taketh against what I write be true and just I will take it for a matter not of disgrace but of gratification for I shall accompt it a favour if he shew mee an errour of mine owne and it shall be no longer mine then untill it be seen which yet I see not For which discovery I shall hold it my duty to give him thankes without taking offence at any good office hee performeth for the truth and shall alwaies be ready to debate any doubtfull difference so as with the g Et refellere sine pertinacia refelli sine iracundia parati sumus Cicer. Tus qu. l. 2. p. 137. 5. Oratour to give or receive a refutation without pertinacy or passion and as h Nobiscum nulla contentio cum uterque pari jugo non pro sese sed pro causa niteretur Plin. opist lib. 3. pag. 85. Lucius Albinus and his friend to joyne my necke with his in the yoak sociably to draw not the waine of our vaine conceipts or selfe-wills but the chariot of truth that shee may ride on in state and triumph which will I am sure be the last issue of these Sabbathary dissentions wherein falshood though for a time it may advance as Pageants doe by an unnaturall and violent force shall fall under her wheele and receive the reward of the wicked by Solomons doome Prov. 20.26 In hope whereof and heart by that hope I shall betake my selfe to my taske which will bee a double discourse The former Historicall wherein I shall shew how the controversie of the Sabbath hath proceeded from the Primitive to the present times The later Doctrinall and Practicall in which the differences of the Doctrine shall be discussed and the duties of practise accordingly delivered But because we can treat of none of them without the use of Termes and Names which are called in question and by some condemned of profanenesse or Judaisme especially the name i In the book called Sunday no Sabbath made by Doct. Pockl. Sabbath whereof we must needs make frequent mention it will bee very convenient and neere unto necessary first of all to discusse the exceptions taken at the titles of our weekly Holiday Yet so as that the discourse of them may be a preparative to reall resolutions afterwards In all which the God of Truth and Piety be mine aide and guide Amen The Copie of the Letter mentioned in the Preface To the Reverend and our worthy Friend and Brother in the Ministery Mr. John Ley these Reverend and worthy Sir SInce the due observation of the Lords Sabbath is of so much importance both for Gods glory and mans good that the whole Decalogue is usually with more or lesse conscience regarded as the Sabbath doth abound with or is abated of its due respect and observance and being conscious of the variety of opinions in these dayes of contention and controversie both touching the day and duties thereof Which it is When it begins By what force and how farre it obligeth with the distractions which these differences may produce in the mindes of all especially of weake though well-affected Christians wee are bold in assurance of your wisdome and abilility this way as well as otherwise to entreat you to add light to the truth in these points by a serious sifting of them and a seasonable divulging of your judicious Labours on them wherein you shall not onely gratifie us in particular that much desire to partake of your pious endeavours but promote the publick good and peace of Gods Church stop the mouthes and stay the pens of such as are carryed away with mis-conceit and errour settle and comfort their consciences that hover betweene doubt and resolution having neede of all learned and religious helpes to cleare this doctrine from such clouds as doe eclipse the brightnesse and beauty of it The Lord incline your heart to undertake this work and so direct and assist you every way to plead his cause that Truth may triumph over all subtleties and sophismes that with their faire appearances are apt to deceive the simple So wee commend you to the Grace of God and rest Your very respective Friends and Brethren in the Ministery William Moston Andrew Wood. John Conny Samuel Clerke Matthew Clayton William Shenton Richard Holker Robert Whittell Charles Herle Nathaniel Lancaster Richard Wilson Alexander Clerke John Glindale Thomas Holford The Contents of the Discourse following CHAP. I. IN what cases we may be indifferent for the for bearance or use of Names In what wee must bee chary concerning both Pag. 1. Chap. II. The divers names of the Christians weekely holiday pag. 4. Chap. III. Of three most usuall names of the Christians weekely holiday and first of the name Lords day Revel 1.10 The strange opinion of Dr. Gomarus and Mr. Braburne charging the title as applyed to the Christians Sabbath with impertinency and noveltie pag. 7 Chap. IIII. A comparison of the old Sabbath day the day of our Saviours Birth of his Passion Ascension and of his Apparition to S. John with the day of his Resurrection as touching right to the title Lords day and the pertinency and propriety of that title to our weekly holiday p. 13. Chap. V. The imputation of novelty in applying the title
eighth day to bee received and therein as e Octavus dies id est post Sabbatum primus quo Dominus Circumcisionem spiritualem daret hic dies octavus praecessit in imagine Cypr. lib. 3. Ep. 8. pag. 80. col 2. S. Cyprian thought and f August in Psalm 150. tom 8. part 2. pag. 1059. S. Augustine hath the like conceipt was the Christians weekly holiday prefigured With these Appellations of number order we may remember those Titles of honour ascribed unto it by g Chrysologus Serm. 77. Chrysologus who calleth it the primate of dayes and by h Ignat. Epist ad Magnens vocat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pag. 57. Edit Genev. 1623. Ignatius who advanced it to a denomination of an higher straine naming it the Queene and Princesse of dayes other feast-dayes being as i Mr. Godwin in his Moses and Aaron lib. 3. c. 3. p. 110 111. concubines and the worke-daies as hand-maids not as k Mr Brab in his Discourse upon the Sabbath in 8o. page 53. In his Defence in 4 to page 159. 488 490. Mr. Brab would have it as if hee left the Title of King and Prince for the Saturday Sabbath for if hee had meant such a titular prelation of that day above the Lords day hee would not surely where hee speaketh of them both have adorned the one with the title of a Queene and not the other with the title of a King which hee hath no where done nor any body else for ought that I have yet either read or heard but Mr. Brab it is his peculiar Courtship whereby he would restore the old Sabbath to the prerogative of a Crown after it hath been justly deposed from it for many hundred yeers together in the Christian Church Besides the Bishop of l Tho Bp. of Elie in his Treat of the Sab. pag. 75. Elie hath pertinently replyed to this imaginary preheminence of the Jewish Sabbath by giving instance of the Rabbins stiling it by the name not of a King but of a Queene and of the Philosopher and Oratour terming Justice Eloquence and Mony by the same title and hence hath hee rightly inferred that Ignatius named the Lords day the Queene of dayes not by way of derogation but to signifie the eminent and transcendent honour of the day But howsoever the words went in Ignatius his time to call the one a King the other a Queene in our daies would sound like an m The Ebionites keepe the Jewish Sabbath and celebrate the Sunday also Euseb Eccl. Hist l. 3. c. 24. pag. 50. Ebionitish combination or marriage of Saturday and Sunday together for the Ebionites honoured them both with a weekly observation but for that Mr. Brab while hee disavowed the Lords day on the one side and others of sounder judgement disclayming the Saturday Sabbath on the other would bee ready to forbid the banes of matrimony before-hand or afterwards to sue out a divorce There is another name of this day which hath a sound of dignity with a sense of diminution for some of late saith n Dr. Bound on the Sabbath part 1. p. 117. Dr. Bound have given it a new name unknowne to the world and not properly belonging to it calling it the Kings day the Queens day the Emperours day So have some Divines done saith he but he nameth them not and it is not worth the while to seek after the names of such ungodly godfathers ungodly doubtlesse if in giving it these names they meant as there is good cause to suspect thereby to degrade the day from all sacred to meere secular Authority But these Appellations already specified are either out of use or out of Question and so wee may quickly quit them and may betake our selves to the consideration of other Titles of more regardable observation in our dayes CHAP. III. Of three most usuall names of the Christians weekely Holiday Lords day Sunday and Sabbath And first of the name Lords day Rov 1.10 The strange opinion of Doctor Gomarus and Master Braburne charging the Title as applyed to the Christian Sabbath with impertinencie and novelty THe names of our weekly Holiday more frequent in use and yet not free from exception are three the Lords day Sunday and Sabbath day I put the Lords day first though it bee the youngest name of the three not as a Dr. Bound on the Sab. part 1. p. 110. 120. some who preferre it so farre as by it to put downe the use of the other two but because it hath so much in preheminence of dignity by its notation of neere reference to the Authour of Rests and Father of Lights as maketh amends for what it wanteth in age and feniority and the Sabbath I place last though it bee the eldest of all because I shall most insist upon it and best conclude with it in regard of the reall inquiries and observations which with reference to it must begin when this Logomachie or word-warre is at an end The title Lords day is not taken from Saint Paul 2 Cor. 10.26 wherein hee saith the earth is the Lords and so that day may be called the Lords day in a common sense because the Lord made it for a common use as b As the earth is the Lords 1 Cor. 10.26 because the Lord made it and all things therein to serve man in his ordinary and common use Gen. 1.26 9.3 So this day is called the Lords day because Christ ordained it for mans ordinary and common use that is for a working day Mr. Brab defence of his Discourse pag. 240. Master Brab not by any common but by his own singular conceit hath said but from Saint John Rev. 1.10 where he saith I was in the Spirit on the Lords day that is on the day on which Christ our Lord rose from the dead Upon this ground grew the observation of that day we celebrate under that name wherein both the most and the best Authours doe agree Against this exceptions have been taken by two late Divines who each of them have written two Treatises a piece upon the weekely Holiday of the Church and have in all foure sought by new surmises to shift off the title both as in and to this text of Saint John the one is Doctor Francis Gomarus the States Professour of Divinity in the Universitie of Groning the other Mr. Theophilus Braburn a Minister of the County of Norfolke a man as the Bishop of Elie of whose Diocesse hee was when hee was Bishop of Norwich c In his Epist Dedic pag. 22 23. before his Treat of the Sabbath noteth of him who laid a load of disgrace and contempt on his Puritan adversaries as hee termeth them Doctor Gomarus maketh the Lords day to bee the same with the day of the Lord and by the day of the Lord understandeth the day of the d De die apparitionis Domini aut in carne ut dies natalis aut quâ
restlesse turbulencie of sinne for that is a very troublesome evill the sinne of Simeon and Levi troubled Jacob Gen. 34.30 the sinne of Jonas troubled the aire and the sea and made it restlesse untill hee was offered up as a sacrifice to becalme it and The wicked saith Isaiah are like the troubled sea whose waves cast up mire and dirt Esa 57.20 and though the godly having lesse sinne have thereby the more rest yet to them it is a very troublesome and toylesome evill which will not suffer them to sleepe Davids teares are eye-witnesses hereof Psal 6.6 and for a more solide assurance of this truth hee bringeth in his bones to give testimony to it I finde no rest in my bones saith hee by reason of my sin Psal 38.3 The third acception of the name Sabbath but adding it to the former the sixth is that which the Apostle useth Heb. 4.9 the word in the originall is not Sabbatum but Sabbatismos but the termination troubles not the rest of the former part of the word and therefore our best Bibles render it as if it had beene the word Sabbatum by our English word Rest and this is the best Sabbath or Rest of all others wherein the Elect shall wholly cease from sinne and labour and it is that eternall Sabbath whereof the externall or temporall Sabbath was a Type in respect of the time of it as the Tabernacle or Temple was a Type for the place to the kingdome of Heaven where it shall bee enjoyned CHAP. XII Whether the day called Lords day or Sunday may not also be called Sabbath day or the Sabbath The exceptions which are taken up by divers against it THese acceptions premised it will bee the more easie to answer the exceptions which some have taken at the use of the name Sabbath as applyed to the Lords day who would have that name under so rigorous an arrest at the sute of Saturday that it may not stirre one step to the day next unto it and so wee may not by their leave call the Lords day the Sabbath day Of this minde are some of the greatest friends of the Lords day as well as they that as enemies oppose the divine authority of it for a D. bound l. 1. de Sab. p. 110. Doctor Bound a man sincerely devoted to the doctrine and duties of the fourth Commandement saith The name of the Sabbath was changed into the name of the Lords day which must bee retained and if the old name bee to bee changed and the new must be retained then the old name must bee taken to bee abolished at least to bee prohibited as to the day now solemnely observed and generally received And b M. Brerew repl p. 73. 74 Master Brerewood an opponent against divers points of Doctor Bound his Booke of the Sabbath in his Reply to Mr. Byfields Answer saith The name of the Sabbath remained appropriated to the old Sabbath and was never attributed to the Lords day for many hundreds of yeers after our Savious time none of the Apostles nor of the ancient Christians for many hundreds of yeers after them ever intituled it by the name of Sabbath and since him c Bish white treat of the Sab. pag. 134 135. Bishop White hath written Wee Christians keep a weekly holiday namely Sunday which with the holy Apostle Revel 1.10 wee stile the Lords day not the Sabbath day d D. Heyl. Hist Sab. part 2. c. 8. pag. 255. Doctor Heylin in his History of the Sabbath having objected against some an intent to cry downe holidayes as superstitious and Popish ordinances mentioneth as in scorne their new found Sabbath and Sabbath now saith he it must be called And the Translator of e The Transl of D ◠Prid. his Lect. on the Sab. Praef. pag. ult edit 2. Doctor Prideaux his Lecture of the Sabbath in his Preface before it bringeth in Barkley a Papist with a notable Dilemma as hee calleth it the better to encounter those who still retaine the name of the Sabbath What is the cause saith hee that many of our sectaries call this day meaning the Christians weekely holiday by the name Sabbath If they must observe it because God rested on that day then they ought to keepe that day whereon God rested and not the first as now they doe whereon the Lord began his labour If they observe it as the day of our Saviours Resurrection why doe they call it still the Sabbath seeing especially that Christ did not altogether rest but valiantly overcame the powers of death His question God willing shall bee answered anon as yet wee are to note onely his disallowing of the name as applyed to the Lords day which wee may observe also in f M. Dowe in his Discourse pag. 4. 19. Master Dowe his late Discourse of the Sabbath or Lords day and in g Mr. Ironside quest 3. cap. 12 13. Master Ironside his seven questions concerning the Sabbath h Mr. Broad his MS. of the Sab. part 2. cap. 2. p. 26. propè sin Master Broad forbiddeth Preachers in their Sermons to say Remember the Sabbath day to sanctifie it and would have them in stead thereof to say Remember to sanctifie the Lords day for the Lords day saith hee may bee called no more Sabbath then the Sabbath may bee called Lords day If as much it will bee enough as shall be shewed afterward But Master Braburne as hee misliketh that the Lords day should lord it over the Jewish Sabbath more then any so he cavilleth more at the calling of it by the name of the Sabbath lest under that name it should take up some authority from the fourth Commandement Hee beginneth his Discourse which is his former Book against it thus i Mr. Braburns Discourse of the Sab. p. 1. Bee pleased Christian Reader first of all to note that wee now adayes apply the name Sabbath to the Lords day promiscuously and without difference now thus to confound two proper names of dayes is as if wee should call Sunday Saturday and Saturday Sunday And to restraine the name Sabbath to the old day of the Jewes which hee pleads for hee would have the words of the Commandement rendred thus k Ibid. pag. 7. pag. 68. Remember the Saturdayes Rest to keepe it holy from which saith l Ibid. p. 200. hee the name Sabbath cannot bee separated And in his other Booke which hee wrote in defence of the former hee saith m M. Brab Defence p. 164. edit 2. That it is an errour of our Ministers to call the Lords day or the first day of the weeke by the name of Sabbath and a n Ibid p. 164. 626. meere fiction since none of the Apostles ever called it so nor is it any where so named in the Scripture hee addeth that o Ib. pag. 52. by calling the Lords day by the name of Sabbath they have robbed the Sabbath of its honourable ornaments that
Christians why should the word Sabbath signifying rest be allowed as applyed to it Is there any reason why names should not in sense bee surable to things to which they are applyed but rather contrary to them To call that day by a name of rest which is a day allowed for labour and to deny that name to the day wherein we are required to rest is not so little an absurdity as that which Master Braburne remembred of deafe men who when a man calleth for a knife doe bring him a sheath for there is that neernesse betwixt them that they may bee both together the one within the other but rest and labour are like light and darknesse in a contradictory distance which cannot be reconciled nor brought together It is no marvell that Master Braburne who denyeth the thing holding the Lords day for no day of rest but for a workeday should deny the name Sabbath as in application to it for hee taketh it to bee a proper name of the day of rest in the old Testament which if it were granted would doe him no good nor the Lords day any hurt for its right to this title for Adam was the proper name of the first man Gen. 3.8 9. and yet it is used in Scripture for man in generall Psal 9.1 ver 12 20. But saith c M. Ironside quest 3. cap. 12. pag. 122. Master Ironside the name Sabbath leads us onely to an outward cessation from bodily labour which of it selfe and precisely considered was indeed a dutie of the Jewish Sabbath but it is not so of the Christian Festivall d Ibid. cap. 13. pag. 123. The corporall rest was a chiefe thing aymed at in all the dayes of publick worship in the Jewish Synagogue being both memorative of some things past and figurative of things to come The name Sabbath is therefore no more morall and to bee retained in the Gospel then the names Priest Altar and Sacrifice To which wee may say First that the word Sabbath signifieth not a cessation with limitation to outward worke nor precisely a Jewish memorative or sigur ative rest proper to the weekely holiday of the Jewes but rest absolutely and therefore e Master Ironside quest 3. cap. 13. pag. 124. Si vocis primaevam signisicationem spectemus Sabbatum erit omnis dies sestus Estius 3d. Cent. d. 37. hee confesseth out of Estius That if wee looke to the first and originall signification of the word every holiday wherein men rest from their labours may be called a Sabbath and that f M. Irons ubi supra p. 123. God himselfe in Scripture imposed the name Sabbath upon all the dayes of publik worship in the Jewish Synagogues Secondly Hee acknowledgeth g Ibid. quest 6. cap. 24. p. 223. That there is a cessation from works required of Christian people under the Gospel upon all dayes of their publick worship and assemblies for Nature her selfe saith hee out of h Natura dictat aliquando vacuam diem quieti Gers de decem Precept Gerson teacheth all men sometimes to rest from their owne imployment and to spend that time in the prayses of God and prayers to him for as i Ibid. cap. 24. pag. 223. he very well saith to attend Gods publick worship and at the same time to follow our owne imployment are incompatible and imply contradiction And that 's enough to qualifie the Lords day or Sunday for the title Sabbath which hee implicitly yeeldeth when upon that ground hee saith k Ibid. The Turks nay the Indians have their Sabbaths Thirdly Whereas hee saith as by way of distinction of the old Sabbath of the Jewes from that day which Christians celebrate that it was memorative of things past and sigurative of things to come I answer That that cannot consine the name Sabbath to their day nor restraine it from ours for in the former of the two wee have as much interest as the Jewes for wee are to remember Gods finishing his workes in sixe dayes and his resting the seventh as well as they and to have a gratefull memory of the benefit of creation as they had and we need such a remembrance so much more as wee are at more distance from it and for the later wee build not the title upon a figure which is but a feeble and sandie foundation but upon the letter or sense already confessed which is firme and solide Fourthly For that hee saith That the name Sabbath is no more morall and to bee retained in the Church then the names Priest Altar and Sacrifice wee will him to remember what elsewhere hee hath said viz. l Mr. Ironside quest 6. cap. 25. pag. 231. That there is a rest which is eternall and morall to all dayes of publick and solemne worship if so the name Sabbath may bee eternall and reach as farre as the thing it selfe And whereas hee saith That rest to the Jewes was an essentiall dutie i. e. of it selfe and in its owne nature without reference or publick worship which hee denyeth to the Christians weekly holiday I answer That the question is not here whether the Jewes were more restrained from labour then the Christians but whether there be not so much rest required now both in respect of publick duties and of private which require also cessation from outward workes as that our Sunday or Lords day hath thereby a better title to the name Sabbath then Saturday hath which hath been long agoe deposed from the dignity of an holiday and made an ordinary workeday Lastly For the names Priest Altar and Sacrifice I perswade my selfe he will not deny the name Priest since hee tooke orders under that name and doth under that name officiate according to the Liturgie of the Church of England which hee will not say is rather Jewish then Christian Legall then Evangelicall and for the words Altar and Sacrifice I remit him if hee doubt of them to bee resolved by the late Treatises wherein both the Names and Things are busily discussed onely I will say by way of answer to his comparison that since wee have a literall Rest of a weekly recourse and not literall Altars and Sacrifices the name Sabbath thus may bee retained under the Gospel though the names Priest Altar and Sacrifice be abolished But saith m M. Ironside quest 3. cap. 13. pag. 125. Mr. Ironside the day is to be named not from the nature of things done but from the quality of the person to whom they are intended and therefore not Sabbath but Lords day I answer The Antecedent is subject to exception many wayes First The chiefe holidayes in the old Testament were nominated from the things done and not from the quality of the person to whom they were intended as the Passeover from the Angels passing over the houses of the Israelites in Egypt without hurt Exod. 12.25 the feast of Trumpets from the solemne sounding of Trumpets at it Levit. 23. Levit. 23.
loquamur meliùs est ut reprehendant nos Grammatici quam non intelligant populi August enarrat in Psal 138. tom 8. part 2. p. 871 872. S. Augustine when he said e Ib. in Psal 36. part 1. p. 358. ossum for os and foenerat for foeneratur as being desirous rather that Grammarians should reprehend him then that the people should not understand him and among us many learned men use to say with the vulgar f The words Chirurgus and Apostema are so englished by Cooper in his Dictionary Surgeon for Chirurgeon and Impostume for Aposteme and there bee many more words of this sort But for the name Sabbath there being such sufficient reasons to set it as a title upon the Lords day when the more judicious make use of it in that sense they may well bee conceived to doe it not as complying with the erroneous dialect of the common sort but as guided to it by reason as well as by use And for such as have so taken it or the conjugate to it which is the same in sense wee may mention divers of eminent place both of ancient and of later times as first Ignatius the Disciple of Saint John the Evangelist who having spoken against the manner of the Jewes spending their Sabbath in sensuall jollity excessive feasting dancing and other revelling g 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ignat ep ad Magnes pag. 57. adviseth Christians every one of them to sabbatize or keep the Sabbath spiritually that is rather to bestow the time in religious delights then in carnall contentments If any one except and say that hee meaneth this of the Jewish Sabbath day which in his dayes and a good while after was kept holy with the Lords day wee may thence inferre that if Ignatius could brook the observation of Saturdayes rest without any feare of Judaisme when that day was to give up to the Lords day the holinesse and honour of a weekely holiday which necessarily requireth both Rest and Religion hee would not have made scruple to call it the Sabbath h 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. as it is fore-cited cap. 13. lit ◠Athanasius hath a sentence from whence wee may derive the like inference for his opinion of the name Sabbath with reference to the Lords day The Lord hath changed the Sabbath day saith he into the Lords day Whereof saith i D◠Twisse in a MS. of the Sabbath a learned Doctor of our Church what can be the meaning but that the Lord himselfe hath now in these times of grace made the Lords day to become our Christian Sabbath So that upon the change the Saturday is not what before it was a day of rest but the Lords is so as before it was not And if the holy rest of Saturday bee translated to the Lords day shall not the name that is answerable to the nature of it passe along with it If more expresse and formall Testimonies be expected for these are but implyed and vertuall evidences wee finde k Origen in Numb cap. 28. Hom 23. tom 1. pag. 259. Origen in his three and twentieth Homily upon the book of Numbers expresly applying the name Sabbath to the day set apart for Evangelicall devotion Ob. l Dr. Pockling Sunday no Sab. pag. 16. But it will be said he addeth the word Christian to it calling it not simply Sabbath but the Christian Sabbath Ans Let them allow of the name Sabbath and wee will not stick with them for the title Christian if for distinction sake and to prevent misprision there bee any reason to make that addition but where the word will bee readily referred to the right day without another to explaine or restraine it it is needelesse to adde it Ob. Here Doctor Pocklington to extenuate this Testimonie saith m Dr. Pockl. Sunday no Sab. pag. 19. That Origen his Christian Sabbath is not kept on Sunday onely but every day in the weeke he meaneth I suppose according to the conceipt of divers of the Ancients a Sabbath consisting in cessation from sinne and sanctity of life Christ saith hee out of Origen is our Christian Sabbath and hee that lives in Christ rests from evill works and worketh uncessantly the works of Justice Answ This is no contradiction to that wee have said but a concession of much more then wee demand Christ himselfe saith Doctor Pocklington and every day in regard of the holy life of a Christian might be called a Sabbath If so the Lords day which was ordained and must bee observed with more generall and solemne holinesse and with more rest and cessation from worldly affaires for holinesse sake might much more bee called a Sabbath In the Latin Fathers the name Sabbath in this sense may also bee observed I will give some instances as in n Nos octava die quae ipsa prima est perfecti Sabbati festivitate laetamur Hilar. Prolog in Psal oper p. 335. Hilary Upon the eighth day which is also the first day saith he we rejoyce in the festivity of a perfect Sabbath Whereby we are to understand not an every dayes Sabbath in forbearance of sinne but an especiall sabbatizing above other dayes as in the celebration of the Lords day by cessation from works of the weeke dayes and exercise of religious duties belonging unto it which hee calleth the eighth day though it have a weekly returne in the number of seven because in the first observation counting on beyond the Jewish tale of dayes comming next after their seventh that maketh the eighth To this purpose wee may produce Saint Augustine o Observa diem Sabbati non carnaliter non Judaicls deliciis quae otio abutuntur ad nequitiam August enar in Psal 32. tom 8. part pag. 242. in his enarration upon the 32. Psalme where hee exhorteth to observe the Sabbath day not carnally with Judaicall delights for they abuse their Rest c. And in his p Observa diem Sabbati Magis nobis praecipitur quia spiritualiter observandum praecipitur Judaei enim serviliter observant diem Sabbati ad luxuriam ebrietatem August Tract 3. in Johan 1. tom 9. pag. 30. fourth Tract upon S. John Wee Christians saith he are more strictly commanded to keep the Sabbath then the Jewes for we are to keepe it spiritually they keepe it carnally in luxurie and drunkennesse which in the readiest construction of the words must runne thus Wee Christians are more strictly commanded to keepe not the Saturday Sabbath from which we are discharged Col. 2.16 but our Christian Sabbath then the Jewes keep their Jewish Sabbath If then wee bee commanded to keep a Sabbath wee must have the thing and the thing may have the name that belongeth to it and that name properly is Sabbath There is another allegation for the name Sabbath taken out of the 251. Sermon de tempore in Augustine his name which I forbeare to urge as his because the q B.
Christianae Religionis observantissimus inter alia virtutum suarum praeconia hoc reliquit exemplum sanctimoniae die Dominico c. Albert. Krant metr l. 4. c. 8. p. 106. highly commended by Krantzius but for i Cum die Dominico cogitationibus gravatum cum gereret animum baculumque manibus reneret cultello ut sit scindulas fâ—â—it admonitus ab astante per jocum de violatione Sabbati non leviter in se punivit admissum scindulas collegit diligentissimè manuique suae impositus jussit incendi ut in se ulcisceretur quòd contra divinum praeceptum incautus admisisset Albert. Krantz Metrap lib. 4. cap. 8. pag. 106. our present purpose we are especially to note that that day which Dr. Heylin calleth Sunday was then called the Sabbath Ob. He saith the King was told by way of jest that he had trespassed therein against the Sabbath Ans So it might have been in jest if the party had used another name whether Lords day or Sunday and in using the name Sabbath rather then either of them it is most like that was a name rather of common use then of speciall choice to breake a jest withall l D. Heyl. Hist Sab. part 2. c. 5. pag. 158 159. Hee addeth for the yeere 1120 the time of Rupertus an observation of one Petrus Alphonsus calling the Lords day the Sabbath of the Christians but saith hee he meant none otherwise then the feast of Easter is called the Christian Passeover for which hee bringeth nothing out of that Authour that may bee a just ground for such a glosse And on the contrary it may be said that there is a Sabbath or Rest according to the letter confessed in the observation of the Lords day but the word Passcover was figurative even to the Jewes after their comming out of the Land of Egypt much more is it so to Christians since the comming of Christ Besides hee bringeth in one John de Burie Chancellor of the University of Cambridge about the later end of the reigne of King Henry the eighth assirming That every day designed to divine service might be called Sabbath which seemeth also to be the judgement of Bernard who expounds the fourth Commandement thus m Observa diem Sabbati quod est in sacris feriis te exeâ—ce quatenus per requiem praesentem discas sperare aeternam Bern. super salv Regina Serm. 4. col 1744. Observe the Sabbath that is Exercise thy selfe upon the holidayes that by present rest thou mayest learne to hope for rest eternall If so much more may the Lords day be called Sabbath which hath the preheminence of other dayes as the old Sabbath had every weeke throughout the yeere and not onely once a yeere as Easter and other holidayes which have in an anniversary revolution one turne and no more We need say no more then this to confute the fond and new found conceipt of Doctor Pockl. concerning the novelty of the name Sabbath wherein also n D. Heyl Hist Sab. part 2. c. 8. pag. 269. Dr. Heylins negative observation That a Sabbath day was not heard of in the Church of Christ forty yeeres agoe is disproved for a day of cessation from worldly works for religious duties which indeed is a Sabbath hath been in use in the Christian Church in every age since our Saviour ascended and the name Sabbath hath been often and answerably applyed to the thing as hath been shewed And if the Doctor said right touching the late time of the Sabbath and made a true returne by his ″ Search we did with all care and dil gence to see if we could find a Sabbath in any evidence of Scripture or Writings of the holy Fathers or edicts of Emperours or decrees of Councels or finaliy in any one of the publick acts and monumeÌ„ts of the christiaÌ„ Churcl but after severall searches made upon the aâ—ias and the pluries wee still â—eturne non est inventus So in the second page of his Epist to the Reader before the second part of his Hist of the Sabbath non est inventus for the fore going ages hee gave a wrong Title to the second part of his History when he called it The History of the Sabbath from the first preaching of the Gospel to these present times for if there were no Sabbath day heard of from the beginning of the Gospel untill forty yeers since he should rather have called it for that time the History of no Sabbath And albeit it be as strange to write an History de non ente or of a meer nullity as it is untrue that there was no Sabbath all that while yet such a Title had beene though more contradictory to the truth more correspondent to his owne tenet which with greater desire and more diligent endeavour hee striveth to defend yet haply as the truth in his conceipt and so without any contestation against his owne conscience I will yet think so charitably of him and if hee had done so by others it had been better both for them and him CHAP. XV. Royall and reverend Authority for putting the name Sabbath upon Sunday whereby it is cleared from schisme as well as from novelty THat it is no novelty to call the Lords day or Sunday by the name Sabbath wee have proved in the precedent Chapter by sundry Testimonies all of them of much ancienter date then the yeer 1554. designed by Dr. Pockl. for the first use of the word in that sense And for the time since which is long enough to gain allowance to a word especially such a one as hath congruity of reason to the thing whereto it is applyed we can name Authority for it sufficient to over sway any thing that he hath said against it and to cleare the use of it from schisme which the same Doctor Pockl. hath objected against it 1. The Book of a Homil. of the time and place of prayer pag. 102.164 twice p. 166. twice The Author of the Dialog betwixt A. and B. reckoneth ten times edit 2. p. 25. Homilies ratified by the Royall Authority of three Princes and by subscription of all the conformable Clergy in their severall reignes calleth the Lords day the Sabbath divers times 2. King James in his b Apud D. bound on the Sab. l. 1. p. 268 269. And D. Heyl. Hist Sab. part 2. p. 257. Proclamation against profane sports dated at Theobalds May 7.1603 giveth to Sunday or the Lords day the name of Sabbath and in his second book of his c K. James Basilic Dor. lib. 2. pag. 164. Basilicon Doron having spoken of the lawfulnesse of recreations hee concludeth with a proviso that the Sabbath bee kept holy and no unlawfull thing done therein 3. 1639. 1. For the Towne of Weedenbeck 2. For John Cheny of Leftwich in Cheshire 3. For Walker in Yoâ—â—shire 1631. 4. For Riddlâ—hurâ—â— of Davâ—nhâ—m in Cheshire 5. For the Towne of Yaxall 6. For William Small of Cletham
the word and to the thing which is signified by it as if hee had observed the same throughout his booke of the History of the Sabbath it had neither been so bad nor so bigge as we see it is 3. Master e Mr. Primrose part 1. ch 13. paâ— 73. See also part 4. p. 302 304 305. to the same purpose Primrose though otherwise neither fondly nor friendly affected to the Christian Sabbath is sometimes so facile and liberall in his allowance of the use of the name Sabbath in the time and state of the Christian Church as to allow Christians liberty to keep every day holy and to say that all daies under the Gospel should be as so many Sabbaths all the dayes of the weeke and the whole yeare should bee as Sabbaths unto them If so the Sunday may be a Sabbath much more for the reasons and authority fore-alledged and if it have more of the thing it hath more right to the name Master f Mr. Ironside quest 3. c. 13. p. 123. Ironside also though he dispute against the title Sabbath as to our Christian Holiday ingenuously confesseth that the name Sabbath is lawfull and may be also used by such as have their wits well exercised in Scripture if without superstition fraud or scandall g Mr Ironside quaest 2. cap. 9. pag. 96 97. And that God must have his rest and appointed Sabbaths which is the essence life and spirit of that Commandement and for ever morall And if the thing Sabbath be morall and perpetuall and the effence life and spirit of the Law as hee saith can any one deny the title Sabbath Master Ironside cannot well doe it who affirmeth this and that by the expresse title of the Sabbath And of the Friday made a weekly Holiday by Constantine he faith h M. Ironside concius of his quest cap. 31. pag. 293. that he made it a Sabbath Object But when hee saith that the Lords day is Sabbath he meaneth not that it is properly so called but analogically and in its proportion To which I answer 1. That when men call the Lords day Sabbath there is no need to adde either properly or improperly or analogically therefore for ordinary speech it is no exception against the use of the word It is familiar with many to call the Lords Table Altar though it be not properly an Altar but analogically and yet he will not say they are bound to bring in this distinction when they mention it and to say it is an analogicall Altar and when Christ is called the Lambe of God the Lion of the Tribe of Juda hee is not properly but analogically a Lamb or a Lion yet he is commonly so called without adding either part of the distinction of properly or analogically 2. But the Lords day may bee called Sabbath properly because as it is an Holiday it is a day of Rest properly so taken a day of weekly Rest as the old Sabbath was And even in Doctor Pocklingtons Seâ—mon though we should not much accompt of his Testimony but where it is against himselfe there is something albeit hee meant it not which makes for the title Sabbath to belong to the Lords day viz. this i Doct. Pockl. Visitat Serm. p. 19. Cujus vis soluta nec nomen haerebit Ambr. so cited by Doct. Pockl. Ibid. When the Sabbath lost its force it forfeited its name saith hee out of Saint Ambrose and therefore ought not so to be called and so having lost both force and name is become nothing at all but a meere Idoll The Saturday then which was the day of Rest unto the Jewes is now no Sabbath nor must be so called which by the way is contradictory to that k With us the Sabbath is Saturday and no day else Doct. Pockl. Serm. pag. 21. which hee saith elsewhere for if it have forfeited its name forfeiture is not an annihilation but an alienation of a right from one to another and if that bee so let any body judge what day hath most right to that forfeiture Can any other day of the week put in for an interest in it before the Lords day or Sunday If the Lord of the Sabbath may be Judge he will give no sentence surely for any day against his owne CHAP. XVII Exceptions against some of the precedent Testimonies alledged for calling the Lords day Sabbath propounded and answered THe Bishop of Elie in his Treatise on the Sabbath day and in his Examination of the little Dialogue made in answer to it would avoid the allegations for the name Sabbath taken out of the Fathers the Book of Homilies Bishop Andrewes and Master Hooker and his brother Doctor John Whites Booke of the Way to the true Church by such exceptions as these The first Exception touching the Fathers First for the Fathers The Question is not saith a Bish Whites exam pag. 109. he whether the ancient Fathers have at any time stiled the Lords day a Sabbath in a mysticall or spirituall sense that is a day wherein Christian people ought to abstaine from sinne for in this sense they have stiled every day of the weeke wherein Christians rest from sin a b His former Treatise of the Sabb. p. 203. Sabbath yea every day throughout their whole lives I have diligently searched saith c Ibid. p. 202. hee into Antiquitie and observed in the Fathers their formes of speech when they treat of the Lords day and I find it farre different from the usuall language of the Fathers to stile the Lords day the Sabbath and that they by the name Sabbath either understand the old legall Sabbath taken away by Christ or the spirituall or mysticall Sabbath which was typed and represented by the Sabbath of the fourth Commandement Wherein hee speaketh more warily though not altogether truly then d No ancient Father no learned man Heathen nor Christian took the name Sabbath otherwise then for Saturday from the beginning of the world untill the beginning of Schisme An. 1554. Doct. Pockl. visit Serm. p. 21. Doctor Pocklington did And when the Fathers distinguish and give proper names to the particular dayes of the weeke saith the Bishop they alwaies stile the Saturday Sabbatum the Sabbath and the Sunday or the first day of the weeke Dominicum the Lords day This is his reply to the Testimonies taken out of the Fathers whereto I answer This distinction of mysticall and literall is familiar with the Bishop and may serve for a shift to elude other Testimonies for the name Sabbath as well as those particularly mentioned But it is but a shift and will serve but for a while for to answer First concerning the Fathers though they in their times distinguished two dayes by the names of Sabbath and Lords day to avoid confusion when they celebrated both with services of devotion as the e Bish White his Treat of the Sab. pag. 202. Bishop hath observed out of Ignatius Ambrose Socrates
and Clemens Romanus yet there is no reason we should give up the proper title of the religious Rest of the fourth Commandement to a day which wee use neither for Rest nor for Religion Secondly If they held a mysticall conformity betwixt the Jewes Sabbath and a Christians holy conversation sufficient ground for bestowing the name Sabbath upon a spirituall rest from sin it must needs bee so much more warrantable to call the Lords day Sabbath as there is the more agreement betwixt it and the Jewish Sabbath now betwixt them there is an agreement much more then mysticall for whereas that mysticall Sabbath as the Bishop taketh it may bee every day in the weeke and all the dayes of mans life our solemne Sabbath commeth onely once every weeke as the Jewes Sabbath did In ours wee forbid and forbeare secular imployments so was it with the Jewes there was a cessation from such works with them that they might the better attend upon religious exercises and those principally publick and so it is with us Christians The reason of the Commandement drawne from Gods example in his proportion of working six dayes and resting on the seventh is exemplary to us as well as to the Jewes it belongeth to Christians to deale as equally with God in letting him have one day in seven for his honour who alloweth us sixe for one for our owne occasions as to the Jewes And for their end and use of the Sabbath which is a gratefull remembrance of their creation and the blessing of God upon their carefull and holy observation of it wee Christians are as much bound to the one and may hope for as much benefit by the other as the Jewes All which literall conformities considered betwixt their Sabbath and ours with reference to the letter of the fourth Commandement our Church taketh that Commandement wholly into her Liturgy and prayeth as after the other nine Lord have mercy upon us c. and therefore the distinction of literall and mysticall to say the least of it is impertinently applyed to preclude the title Sabbath in a literall sense from the day wee celebrate Bishop Whites second Exception touching the name Sabbath in the Homilies answered Secondly Against that which is propounded for the name Sabbath out of the Homilies of our Church hee saith f Exam. p. 37. It may be questioned in what sense the Homilie stileth Sunday the Sabbath whether in a proper and a literall sense according to the stile of the old Law or in a mysticall and analogicall sense as Christ is called our Passeover 1 Cor. 5.7 But a little after hee putteth the matter out of question by a peremptory resolution which is this The Lords day is not the literall Sabbath of the fourth Commandement and therefore in propriety of speech it cannot be called the Sabbath day expresly and in particular commanded in the Decalogue but the same is stiled by the Homily our Christian Sabbath in a mysticall and analogicall sense even as mortification is called circumcision g Circumcision is that of the heart in the spirit not in the letter Rom. 2.29 Rom. 2.29 sincerity truth are called unleavened bread 1 Cor. 8.5 This exception of his touching the name Sabbath taken out of our Homilies is obnoxious to so many exceptions that I wish rather some weak and worthlesse Adversary to our cause had made it then a man of so great learning gravity and authority as he was for whose sake I will deale as respectively in the returne of mine answer as I well may without betraying the truth and so first I say 1. That in saying That the Lords day is not expresly and in particular commanded in the fourth Commandement hee implyeth which h Bish White in his treat of the Sab. day p. 112 126 269. and in his examinat of the Decalog p. 46 52 63. marg 69. marg elsewhere hee expresly delivereth that the Jewes Sabbath which was Saturday is expresly and in particular there commanded which is not true in it selfe as I shall prove in handling the materiall points of that Commandement and being yet acknowledged by learned Christians doth gratifie the Jewes and prejudice our Christian Holiday so much that upon that ground Master Braburne set up the Saturday for a Sabbath and did what hee could to demolish the doctrine and observation of the Lords day and others have and many more may if that be granted incurre the like scandall It is not i April 26. 1636. long since a woman one Margaret Former examined before Sir John Lambe Doct. Turner and Doctor Somes disclaimed our Saviours Doctrine by the name of Ceremonies Rites and Sabbaths and professed to keep the Sabbath of the Lord of Hosts which said she is Saturday If shee had been examined why shee did so could shee have given a better answer then such a one as the Bishops examination of the Dialogue ministreth to the Reader viz. k Bish Thites examinat pag. 63. marg p. 69. marg That the fourth Commandement appointed a particular fixed day to wit Saturday The time commanded in the fourth Commandement is Saturday Who can desire a better warrant for any thing hee will say or doe then that and what is there to bee alledged for the Lords day which may preponderate such a proofe which yet is no proofe but against such as are so inconsiderate as to confesse that which the adversary cannot prove viz. that Saturday is particularly prescribed in the fourth Commandement Secondly the Commandement appointeth the proportion of one day in seven for sacred and solemne services of Religion which is as the Characteristicon to the Jewes Sabbath and the Christians which are the variations into which it is divided while neither of them is expresly and in particular there commanded so that to say the Jewes Sabbath is literall and the Christians onely mysticall is as if one should say that Homo signifieth literally a man but hominis homini and hominem note not a man literally but mystically Thirdly whereas hee saith the Homily useth the word Sabbath for the Lords day but in a mysticall and analogicall sense even as Mortification is called Circumcision c. There bee two particulars very faulty The one is his assertion the other his similitude 1. For his assertion l The Homily of the time place of praier pag. 164. edit 1582. That the Homily useth the name Sabbath but in a mysticall and analogicall sense the contrary is evident to any intelligent Reader of the Homily for such a one may out of it deduce these literall observations 1. That by the fourth Commandement Christians must have one standing day in a week for the exercises of Religion 2. That they must rest upon it after Gods example 3. That on that day lawfull workes must bee forborne 4. That yet they must not be idle but wholly give themselves to exercises of Gods true Religion and Service There bee other deductions
not to breake the bond of conscience to the duties of the day and to make way for more living and lesse labour to heap up Benefices and shrinke in the services due to the Lord of the Sabbath and to the soules of the people on that day to give them leave to turne a Christian Holiday into a profane play-day that his paines may be lesse looked for at his Pastor all charge and his negligence the lesse blamed when hee is absent from it or idle at it And if a man reade his booke over and give way to the working of his imagination as hee hath done may hee not haply thinke that by his setting upon the name Sabbath his plot was to prostitute the dignity of that day to such profanation as might bee a preparation to Popish superstition for if ever Popery like the uncleane spirit return to the place whence it was expelled the common breach of the fourth Commandement by violation of the Sabbath will be if not a wide gate yet at least an open wicket or window to receive it againe For as Bellarmine observeth well though hee apply it ill l Nec fere solet accidere ut ante circa fidem aliquis naufraget quà m naufragare caeperit circa mores Bellar. orat in Schol. ant tom 4 fine orat The shipwracke of manners is the readiest way to the shipwracke of faith And for shipwracke of manners there is not a readier way then profanely to rush upon the breach of that Commandement which is as a pale or wall to all the rest CHAP. XIX An Answer to Barkley the Papist his Dilemma against the name Sabbath for Sunday or Lords day THe next Exception to bee answered against the word Sabbath is the Quaere and a Dilemma of Barkley the Papist in his Parenaesis ad Sectar translated thence by the Translator of Doctor Prideaux his Lecture and by him called a notable Dilemma a The Translator of Dr. Prid. Lectine in Epist to the Reader p. ult but in Barkley his Paraenes ad Sectar it is l. 1. pag. 161. What is the cause saith hee that many of our Sectaries call this day meaning the Christian weekely Holiday by the name of Sabbath If they observe it saith hee as a Sabbath they must observe it because God rested on that day and then they ought to keepe that day wherein God rested and not the first as now they doe wherein the Lord began his labours If they observe it as the day of our Saviours Resurrection why doe they call it still the Sabbath seeing that Christ did not altogether rest but valiantly overcame the power of death To which I answer Ans First That not onely Sectaries but prudent and potent Kings reverend and learned Bishops and other orthodox Divines have allowed of the word Sabbath for the Lords day as the Testimonies premised sufficiently shew Secondly for the Dilemma it is an absurd impertinency to the point in question for the Question is of the appellation and the Dilemma is made of the observation of the Sabbath yet as if it were not a squint-eyed and distorted Argument but looked directly to the title I answer 1. To the first part of it that to call a day Sabbath there is no necessity it should bee the same day on which God rested for the name is given to it not onely because of Gods example of rest but also because of his ordinance of rest for if he had not rested himselfe but onely instituted a day of rest such a day might significantly and sutably be called by such a name as wee have observed The Holidayes of the Jewes were so called besides the Sabbath of weekly recourse yet is not God said to have rested on them nor did hee for they were dayes of worke both to him and to us 2. The second part of it is If they observe it as the day of our Saviours Resurrection why doe they call it still the Sabbath seeing especially that Christ did not altogether rest but valiantly overcame the powers of death Which words are liable to the like exceptions as the former for the Resurrection containeth not the nature of the Christian Sabbath but the occasion of it nor is the day called Sabbath from Christs example and practice on that day but from Christians resting from their secular affaires for a religious gratefull and solemne memoriall thereof Secondly It is called Sabbath with reference to the Creation which was finished in sixe dayes and Gods rest on the seventh and to our duty to sinish our secular affaires in the like number of working dayes and after them to rest as God did after his workes but with reference to the Resurrection it is called not Sabbath day but Lords day because on that day the Lord of the Sabbath shewed his Lordship and Dominion over the Divell death and the grave in breaking their bonds and rising up in despigh◠of their power when they had him at their greatest advantage being under their Arrest And for that hee faith our Saviour did not rest on the day of his Resurrection wee may say with b See B. White his examinat of the Dialog pag. 110 111 113. Bishop White and his ″ Ibid. Adversary also for therein they are not adversaries but agree well together that though he were in action yet did he not labour for his glorifyed body had that ability and perfection in it that all motions and actions were as pleasing to it as any ease or rest could be and not onely that day but all the dayes betwixt the Resurrection and Ascension hee was conversant in Sabbatary or sanctified employment speaking of the things appertaining to the Kingdome of God for forty daies together Act. 1.3 and though hee did not rest nor needed it as wee doe yet wee must And if we may call the Sacrament of the body and bloud of Christ the Lords Supper though wee take it before dinner as Christ did not wee may call our day Sabbath since we rest though he did not So this notable Dilemma brought in with its two hornes against the two syllables of the word Sabbath hath not defaced one letter but left it entire for a title of the Lords day and Barkley hath but barked at it not bitten it to doe it any manner of hurt CHAP. XX. Master Braburne his objection of confusion in calling Sunday Sabbath answered ob 3 THe third objection may be that of M. Braburne who chargeth the Appellation with confusion a Mr. Braburns discourse pag. 1. 79. And in his def of the discourse p. 494. To call Sunday Sabbath day is saith he as if a man should call Sunday Saturday and what a confusion would this breed in time b M. Primrose Treat of the Sab. or Lords day part 2. c. 6. pag. 123. For this name Sabbath is the proper particular name of the seventh day i.e. from the Creation c M. Brab def p. 43 44 522
550. as John and Thomas are two proper names of two of Christs Apostles so the Sabbath is a proper name to Saturday Answ The comparison hath two parts The ground of it and the inconformity betwixt Sabbath and Sunday which hee maketh to bee as much as betwixt Sunday and Saturday and no more For the first Hee saith the name Sabbath is a proper name as Sunday and Saturday are which is not true for Sabbath is rather a name of office as King then a proper name as Edward or James or Charles and therefore any day of religious rest what day of the weeke soever it fell was called a Sabbath and so may the Lords day bee much more because it succeeds the Sabbath of the old Testament as a weekely day of rest as that was and other holidayes were not and exceeds it too in as much as the occasion of it and motive to observe it is doubled Secondly For his comparison saying That it is as great confusion to call Sunday Sabbath as to call Sunday Saturday hee will make it good when he can prove that the Sun and d Verstegan seemes to derive the word Saturday from Seater an Idol of the Saxons which hee saith is fondly supposed by some to be Saturne Versteg restuut of decayed Intelligence cap. 3 p. 77. but most learned men take the name of Saturday from the Planet Saturne Saturne are not two distinct Planets but that one may as well be called by the name of the other as the Sunne Saturne and Saturne the Sunne as either Saturday or Sunday when they be dayes of Rest may be called by a name of Rest Sabbath In the meane time it is but a Planetary or wandering comparison so farre from truth that it draweth neere to absurdity object 4 But saith hee againe e Mast Brab discours p. 200. The name Sabbath and the time of the seventh day cannot be separated I answer If that were true it maketh nothing against us for wee apply it to a seventh day now and to none else though not to that seventh day which was at first observed and if hee say that the name Sabbath and that seventh day which was Saturday cannot bee separated which is indeed his meaning I say First the name Sabbath may bee communicable to other dayes though it were not separable from the Saturday for if the day had never been changed yet other daies agreeing with it in cessation from worke might and did partake with it in the appellation of Rest At this day we may find it so in the Ethiopicke Church keeping both Saturday and Sunday holy and calling them both Sabbaths though with the distinction of Jewish and Christian as wee shall pertinently note afterward Secondly I say the name Sabbath and the seventh day from the Creation are separable for if Saturday may bee made a working day as the Christian world acknowledgeth both in position and practice and Master Brab himselfe in his dispensation whereof we shall speake in another place confesseth it may then the name of Rest viz. Sabbath may be separated from it unlesse the day shall be called by a name quite contrary to the nature and condition thereof CHAP. XXI The objection of Judaisme in using the name Sabbath answered and retorted as also the reproach of the name as from the Sabbatarian Heretickes removed object 5 BUt the a Bish of Ely his Treat pag. 207. Bishop of Ely misliketh the name Sabbath for the perill of Judaisme and the heresie of Judaizants The name Sabbath saith b Mast Dowe in his discourse of the Sab. and Lords day p. 4. Mr. Dowe is Jewish and which is more c Doct. Pockl. Visit Serm. p. 6. Doctor Pocklington saith That Sunday was anabaptized after the mind of some Jew hired to be Godfather thereof and so called the Sabbath And d M. wonside q. 3. of the Sab. ch 12. p. 121. Master Ironside also objecteth That in using the name Sabbath we gratifie the Jewes in their superstitious obstinacy against Christ and his Gospel for they abhorre the name of the Lords day as the greatest blasphemy e Ibid. p. 121. adding withall that the ancient Christians fasted on Saturday when the Jewes feasted that they might be so farre from gratifying of them as to be quite contrary to them To all which I answer That many points of Religion both Jewes and Christians hold in common and that onely is to be refused as I wish which is peculiar to them but so is not the keeping of a day of religious Rest nor the proper name of that Rest if the word Sabbath did properly import sacrifices or shadowes of things to come as f Doct. Heyl. hist Sab. part 1. c. 6. pag. 111. Doctor Heylin would have it it might have some Jewish favour in the mouth of a Christian but that it doth not The word Altar hath a neerer reference to Judaisme and Popery and yet they g Doct. Pockâ— Visit Serm. pag. 28 29. the title of another book of his is Altare Christianum p. 50.80 doth D. Heyl. in Antidot Lincol. familiarly use it and thinke there is no danger of Jewish or Popish errour by calling the Communion Table by the name of an Altar but rather the discovery of a h Bish Whites Treatise of the Sab. pag. 207. perverse disposition of novell Sabbatarians by the way I doe not approve of his words but onely repeat them to make scruple of that while they call the Lords day by the name of a Sabbath as Bishop White objecteth Secondly i Bish White in his Treatise of the Sab. pag. 5. Bishop White and k Doct. Heyl. part 2. p. 236 237. hist of the Sab. Doct. Heylin bring in the sayings of John Frith and William Tindall for the Churches liberty to have chosen any other day then the Lords day for religious Rest the Jewes day not excepted and the Apostles and many Churches since the Apostles for three hundred years and more kept Saturday holy every weeke as well as Sunday as l Bish Whites Treatise of the Sab. pag. 109. Bishop White alledgeth and m M. Primros Treat p. 1. c. 12 Master Primrose alloweth a liberty to Christians to observe that day and in it to give themselves to all exercises of our Christian Religion and if any Holiday light upon a Saturday no man is to make scruple to observe it as an Holiday Besides our Church commandeth with the rest of the Decalogue the reading of the fourth Commandement for sanctification and this weekly with a prayer for pardon of profanation past and for grace for better observation in time to come and if there bee no danger of Judaisme in all this there is none surely in retaining the name of the Sabbath with another day then that which the Jewes solemnized Thirdly to deny the name of the Sabbath to the day wee Christians celebrate is rather Jewish for those that are Jewes indeed or
Jewish in opinion as n Mast Brab in his discours pag. 44. Master Braburne was in this point affixe the name Sabbath to Saturday whence it is that hee in his plea against applying the name to the Lords day appealeth to the Jewes at Amsterdam and elsewhere who call Saturday the Sabbath day o Ibid. whereto saith hee I may adde the Jewes reckoning of the dayes of the weeke Saturday they call Sabbath day Sunday they call the first day of the Sabbath Munday the second of the Sabbath c. In which accompt saith he no day is called Sabbath but Saturday nor can the Jewes or those that are Jewish abide to have the Lords day to be called Sabbath because they would exclude it from all right and title to the fourth Commandement as is plaine enough by that wee have already noted out of Master Brab and therefore that of p Doct. Pockl. Visit Serm. pag. 6. Doctor Pocklington before remembred viz. That a Jew should bee the Godfather and give it the name Sabbath as hee saith is a fancie which both superstitious Jewes and religious Christians will deny and deride Fourthly let those that thinke to call the Christian weekly Holiday by the name of Sabbath is Jewish consider whether it bee not now either Jewish or foolish to call Saturday by that name rather then the Lords day since Sabbath signifieth Rest and to say that Saturday must now be a day of Rest is Jewish and if it bee a workeday as wee take it to entitle it with a name so contrary to work is little lesse then foolish especially since wee have a day of rest to which that name with more congruity may be applyed For now to give Saturday a workeday with us that name of rest and to deny it to the Lords day wherein wee rest indeede is as if wee should call the body of a deceased King by the name of a King and deny that Royall title to the living person of his surviving Sonne and heire the heire of his Crowne Lastly For that which Master Ironside saith of gratifying the Jewes by applying the name Sabbath to ours Lords day and of their abhorring of the title Lords day as the greatest blasphemy I answer That wee shall gratifie the Jewes and those that are Jewish much more by giving up the name and title Sabbath unto their day then by applying it to ours for q M. Brab des of the Sab p. 54. Master Braburne when hee was most Jewish in this point made his exhortations to Ministers and people to refraine putting the name Sabbath day on the Lords day and with forbearance of the name hee requireth them r Ib. pag. 55. 288. to forbeare the use of the fourth Commandement the name Sabbath day therefore and the fourth Commandement saith hee must goe unseparable together hold the one and hold the other Ibid. renounce the one and renounce the other also But for the name of Lords day he was well enough pleased that it should be applyed to the day wee celebrate for when hee had exhorted to a forbearance of the name Sabbath hee enforceth his exhortation by this reason Å¿ Ibid. pag. 54. Wee have names enough besides wee may call it Sunday Lords day or First day of the weeke And which is more hee was then when hee did so Judaize in that point as never Christian did before him so farre from being offended at the title Lords day that hee pleaded for a right in it to the Jewes Sabbath t M. Brab defensâ— pag. 238. and in his discourse pag. 8. The Sonne of man saith hee is Lord of the Sabbath wherefore the seventh day may bee truely called the Lords day And if hee had beene a compleat Jew and so would not have allowed Christ to be called Lord yet it would have offended him more to heare the Lords day called Sabbath then Lords day simply For the name Sabbath in his conceipt dignifieth the Lords day with too high and holy a title u M. Brab his defence p. 52. for saith hee it is as if one should rob the Mistresse of her Jewels and bestow them on her Maid or should take the Crowne off the head of a King and set it upon a common subject as before wee had occasion to observe For Saturday saith hee hee meaneth as the Sabbath * Ib. pag. 53. is as the King or Mistresse to the Lords day which is x Ib. p. 52. but a common working day in Gods accompt And for that y M. Ironside cap. 12. of his quest of the Sab. pag. 121. Master Ironside saith of the Christians crossing of the Jewes in fasting on Saturday when they feasted it was not generall nay the greater part of the Christian world in z Aug. Ep. 19. ad Hier. p. 81. Saint Augustine his time did not fast on Saturday as hee hath recorded in his Epistle to Saint Hierom. Ob. 6. Yet by keeping up the name Sabbath some pretenders of piety cite many places of Scripture under that title which may incline to Jewish rigour and so cometh in the perill of Judaisme which the Bishop of Elie seemeth to suspect in the former objection Doctor a D. Pockl. Visitation Serm. p. 19. Pocklington more plainely complaineth of it when hee saith thus they must make a Sabbath of Sunday and keep up that name otherwise their many citations of Scripture mentioning onely the Sabbath applyed to Sunday will appeare so ridiculously distorted and wry neck'd that they will be a scorne and derision to the simplest of their deluded Auditorie And so doth b M. Brab def p. 53. Master Braburne in his Discourse By translating the name Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday saith hee the common people when they reade in the Scripture any thing of note touching the Sabbath day they presently cast that in their mindes upon the Lords day thinking it to bee meant of that The like is objected by c M. Irons Sab. quest 3. cap. 12. pag. 121 122. Master Ironside The name Sabbath may be and is become a snare to many weake ones and especially in reading of the Scriptures for wheresoever they finde the name Sabbath they presently conceive it to bee spoken of the Lords day and many times by this meanes fall into flat Judaisme as appeares by their quoting of the old Testament in the question in hand Answ First This objection if it have any weight in it maketh more against the reading of the fourth Commandement in our Communion Book and the Prayer annexed to it for inclination of the heart to keep that Law then against the simple name or title Sabbath for there is much more conformity with the Jewes in that then in this especially as some expound the Commandement with particular limitation of it to the Saturday Sabbath and whether it reach not also in part to prohibite the publick reading of some parts of Canonicall Scripture I will not determine
know not But the h The Soveraigne Antidote against Sabbathary errours qu. 1. p. 5. Authour of the Soveraigne Antidote against Sabbathary errours speaketh for a further compasse and with a fuller confidence thus Concerning the name Sabbatum or Sabbath I thus conceive that in Scripture Antiquity and Ecclesiasticall writers it is constantly appropriated to the day of the Jewes Sabbath or Saturday and not at all till of late yeares used to signifie our Lords day or Sunday We may here recall to mind what wee have said before out of Doctor Pocklington though to another purpose touching this point i Doct. Pockl. Serm. Sunday no Sabb. p. 21. No learned man Heathen nor Christian tooke the name Sabbath otherwise then for Saturday from the beginning of the world till the beginning of Schisme which was 1554. Lastly Master Braburne when hee was a Jew in his dis-affection of the dignity of the Lords day pleadeth for continuing the word Sabbath to Saturday and against applying it unto the Lords day by the phrase of the k M. Brab def p. 44. 164. 626. Scriptures by the l M. Brab pag. 44. testimony of the Jewes at Amsterdam and else-where and of the m M. Brab pag. 44. Latines to this day n M. Brab pag. 44. by all Latine Dictionaries and so ends with an appeale to all o M. Brab pag. 44. Divines if the word Sabbath be not used in Ecclesiasticall histories for Saturday Now the Objection is at the full both for weight of exception and the condition of persons that except against the title Sabbath to the Lords day I will make a full and I hope a satisfactory answer And first I desire it may be remembred what reasons have been formerly rendred for the application of the name Sabbath to the Lords day Secondly for the title Lords day I have acknowledged it to be given by the holy Ghost to the day of our Saviours resurrection and that others might do so I have proved it also though I dare not say as p M. Ironside qu. 3. ch 12. pag. 120. Master Ironside doth that the holy Ghost doth every where in the New Testament call it the Lords day for it is more usually there called the first day of the weeke and but in one place and but once called the Lords day viz. Revel 1.10 and if hee can shew it mee but once more he shall gratifie me much Thirdly for the negative exception against the name Sabbath as the q Bish White in his Treat of the Sab. and Lords day pag. 127.135 Bishop of Ely maketh it where he saith With the Apostles we call our weekly Holiday not Sabbath but Lords day the Lords day was not called Sabbath by our Saviour nor by any of his Apostles saith r Bish White Ibid. he and thence inferreth a conformity in our Christian phrase If that be a good reason wee must not call it Sunday for the Apostles called it no more Sunday then they called it Sabbath and the Primitive Fathers very seldome so termed it and yet in our Churches Liturgie it is usually called Sunday and seldome or not at all Lords day as before hath been observed Fourthly it may bee pertinently noted to this purpose that for the same thing in one age one word may be more in use in another age another as wee see by 1 Sam. chap. 9. ver 9. Before time in Israel when a man went to enquire of God thus he spake Come and let us goe to the Seer for hee that now is called a Prophet was in old time called a Seer Where you see the same men that is men of the same profession were not alwaies of the same denomination not called by the same name for in the former age they were called Seers who in the later which was the present time when that booke was penned were called Prophets so that day which in precedent times was commonly called by one name in after ages may bee called by another Master Ironside telleth us that Antiquity ever used one of these foure names for the holiday of Christians Sunday not from the Sun in the Firmament but from the Sunne of righteousnesse with healing in his wings or the day of light for the Sacrament of Baptisme called the Sacrament of illumination or the day of bread not from holy bread as the Papists now use it but from the Sacrament of the Supper administred every Lords day or the Lords day which doth and will continue to the worlds end He might have added a fifth or rather have brought in as the first and most ancient the first day of the week which though it were the first and hath the best Authority for it as being mentioned by all the foure Evangelists was not used by any Profession whether of orthodox or hereticall Christians in any age since but by the Brownists of late and though nothing bee more usefull or usuall then light and bread yet those names of light and bread are quite out of use for the denomination of the weekly holiday of the Christians CHAP. XXIII Though neither the Apostles nor the ancient Fathers calbed Sunday Sabbath we may and the reasons why 6. TO answer more particularly touching the title which the Church anciently used to signifie this day I confesse that in the holy Scriptures and in the Writings of the ancient Fathers the word Sabbath is familiarly set upon the Saturday the old weekly holiday of the Jewes but that therefore the Christians weekly holiday should not now be called by that name is an inference which I may justly deny since there was an especiall reason of the distinction of those two dayes in those times by the titles Sabbath and Lords day which now is not of force For it is acknowledged by those that took exception at the word Sabbath as set upon the Lords day that both those dayes were celebrated with solemne Assemblies in many Churches in the primitive times The primitive Church saith a Bish of Elic his treat of the Sab. pag. 71. Bishop White which had Jewes and Proselites in their Christian Assemblies made the Saturday of every weeke an holiday upon the same reasons the Apostles had formerly done And the reasons which he noteth out of b Existimo veram Germanam causam fuisse quòd cum primum inter fratres Judaeos disseminani Evangelium coepisset nollent aut certè non auderent ceremonias omnes Judaicas rescindere Sic Alb. obser in Optat. Concil Carthag Albaspin his observation upon Optatus and the Councell of Carthage were because having Assemblies mixt of Jewes and Gentiles when they begun the promulgation of the Gospel either they would not or they durst not abolish or cancell all the ceremonies of the Jewes Hee might have made his reason more particular and withall more pertinent from the Sabbath it selfe as that on that day the Jewes being accustomed to assemble themselves together they
would then bee more willing to meet and the Gentiles being now converts would easily joyne with them having no holidayes of their own to pitch upon but such as were stained with odious idolatry and so the Apostles had the better opportunity to sow their sacred seed in larger fields with better hope of greater fruit And afterward the c B. of Elie Ib. p. 189. Bishop sheweth how long this double devotion of Christians was in use The Apostles saith he and likewise the successors of the Apostles for many ages at least three hundred yeers in some Churches kept holy the Saturday in every week as well as the Sunday Dr. Prid. who is brought in by the Translator of his Lecture as not well affected to the title Sabbath for the Christians holiday having said that Christ ascended up on high and left behind him his Apostles to preach the Gospel asketh d D. Prid. Lect. Sect. 6. p. 24. English And what did they not keep the Jewish Sabbath without noise or scruple and gladly teach the people congregated on the Sabbath dayes nay more then this did not the primitive Church designe as well the Sabbath day as the Lords day to sacred meetings Little doe you know saith e M. Breerwood his first treat against M. Byf. pag. 77. MS. pag. 48. Mr. Breerwood to Mr. Byfield if you know it not that the ancient Sabbath did remaine and was observed together with the Lords day by the Christians of the Easterne Church three hundred yeers and more after our Saviours Passion And f D. Heyl. Hist Sab. part 2. c. 2. pag. 56. c. 3. p. 57. Doct. Heylin hath an observation out of Basil That the Christians assembled foure times a week and Saturday and the Lords day were two of them and of these two the observation was more generall then of the other both for time and place both while the Apostles lived and after their decease which I note rather for the Jewes day for the present then for the Lords daies sake for that belongeth to another place To these Testimonies most what of the adverse party assenting to that which will inferre their conviction for application of the name Sabbath I will annexe other evidences both for the Apostles time and for some succeeding ages of the Church First for the time of the Apostles their practice for religious and solemne Assemblies on the Jewes Sabbath is plaine in the relation of their acts by St. Luke whereof they that doubt may reade their owne resolution and receive satisfaction in Act. 13. ver 14 42 44. Act. 16.23 and chap. 27. ver 2. besides other places Secondly from the Apostles time untill the counsell of Laodicea which was about the yeare 364. the holy observation of the Jewes Sabbath continued as may be proved out of many g Ignat. â—p ad Magnes p. 77. edit Vedel Athanas tract de semente Socrat Scholast hist lib. 6. ca. 8. ca. 29. Centuriat Cent. 406. col 410. Concil Laod. can 29. tom 1. concil pag. 300. edit Bin. 1636. Paris in lib. qui inscrib Canon Apost Sanctor Concil 4. per Jo. Tilium Hospin de orig Festor Christian cap. 9. Authors yea notwithstanding the Decree of that Councell against it about the yeare 380. h Quibus oculis diem Dominicum intueris qui Sabbathum dedecorâsti an nescis hos dies germanos fratres esse si in alterum injuriosus sis in alterum impingis Greg. Nyssen de castig in cos qui aegrè ferunt reprehens Greg. Nyssen passionately complained of the violation of the old Sabbath as an holy brother to the new Lords day questioning the profaners of it thus as the i Bish Whites Treat pag. 80. Bishop of Ely brings him in With what face saith he dost thou looke upon the Lords day who hast dishonoured the Sabbath Knowest thou not that they are Germane brethren and that thou canst doe wrong to neither but thou must be injurious to both But saith the k Bish of Ely his Treat of the Sab. p. 72. Bishop Saturday was not made a weekly Holiday universally in all Primitive Churches for l Cent. 4. ch 6. col 477. at Rome Alexandria and throughout Africa it was a work day To which I answer First that though Saturday were not universally kept as an Holiday in the Primitive Church yet it was observed as a sacred time and noted by its ancient name in so many places and I thinke I may say in most for the Easterne Church for divers hundred yeares after Christ as the places fore-cited in the margin shew So that then to have put the name Sabbath upon the Lords day had been to speak with confusion unlesse some other terme were added to it for distinction sake Secondly for the Churches specified by the Bishop viz. the Churches of Rome Alexandria and Africa I answer first for Rome First that there might bee some especiall reasons why they kept not holy the old Sabbath as the Eastern Church did and that either because they had a religious respect to Wednesdaies and Fridaies m Hieron com in â—p ad Galat. c. 4. as Saint Hierome sheweth more then the Easterne Church had Secondly or because the Jewes and the Romanes were by the warres betwixt them become most odious to each other as appeareth by the history of n Joseph de bello Jud. l. 6. 〈◊〉 26 l. 7. c. 18. Josephus and otherwise as I have observed in mine historicall part of the Sabbath though now which I point at but for a glance by the way toward the Popish Metropolis they bee better accepted at Rome then the best Christians who are not suffered there to live while the Jewes are o Sr. Ed. Sands his Relat. pag. 218. edit 1632. toler ated to trade in usury straining it up upon Christians after eighteene in the hundred whereas halfe that summe in a Christian is not allowed Thirdly Though the old Sabbath were sleighted at Rome it was not so farre out of request but that elsewhere even in Italie it was sociably observed with the Lords day and that in Millaine and there by p Crastino die Sabbati Dominico de orationis ordine dicemus Amb. de Sacr. l. 4. c. 6. Saint Ambrose and the people of his Church to whom it seemes by what hee saith in his discourse of the Sacraments hee preached as well on the one day as on the other Secondly For the Church of Alexandria we have cause to conceive that there the old Sabbath was observed for the Centurists observe out of Athanasius who was Bishop there a saying of his to that purpose q Cent. 4. col 410. q. Wee assemble on the Sabbath day saith hee not as if wee were infected with Judaisme but therefore wee meet together on the Sabbath that wee may worship the Lord of the Sabbath which in part is acknowledged by the r B. of Elie his Treat of the Sabb.
p. 72. Bishop of Elie where hee observeth out of Athanasius his Tractate de semente That the Saturday Sabbath was so observed that it was not prohibited Thirdly For Africa Saint Augustine since hee was an African Bishop may informe us by that hee hath in the 91. Psalme where treating upon it as the text of his Sermon Å¿ Hodiernus dies Sabb. est Aug. in Psal 91. tom 8. part 1. pag. 158. hee saith this day is the Sabbath if it were the Jewes day on that day he preached to the people and they had an holy Assembly on that day with conformity it is like to other Churches for hee calleth it the Sabbath as a day designed to holy duties and as it is like with conformity to other Churches if it were the Lords day hee called that the Sabbath and so the title is authorised by his Testimony But whatsoever become of these Allegations or however they prove for force or feeblenesse certain it is that the Decree of the Councell of t Concil Laodicen can 29. Caranz sum concil p. 190. Bin. tom 1. p. 300. Laodicea about the yeare 368. prevailed not so far as quite to put downe the observation of the Saturday Sabbath though to u Si inventi fuerint Judaizare i. e. non operando in Sabbato non praeponendo diem Dominicam eidem diei Anathema sint Ibid. Sabbatize with a Jewish cessation were forbidden upon pain of an Anathema for in time of Pope Gregory the Great there were some who had it in too great honour and religious reverence but by this time the Lords day had so farre advanced in estimation above it and in operation against it that ″ Greg. â—p 3.11 hee is almost as sharpe with them who were precise observers of the Sabbath with the Lords day as Ignatius was with such as combined them both in superstitious abstinence or fasting Gregory held those who observed the old Sabbath to bee x Perversi spiritus homines die Sabbati operari prohibent quos quid aliud nisi Antichristi Praedicatores dixerim Greg. â—p ex Regist l. 11. c 3. fol. 452 p. 1. col 2. Antichristian and y 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ignat. ep ad Philip pag. 45. Ignatius termed those who fasted on the Lords day or Sabbath one day excepted the killers of Christ So in his Epistle to the Philippians But for all that of the Laodicean Councell and this of Gregory the Sabbath was in some places upheld with the sacred services not onely as that z Sabbat is evangelia cum alâ—is Scripturis legenda esse censemus Concil Laod. can 16 pag. 180. Councell decreed for the reading of Scripture for that day but as with an equall respect to the Lords day which the a Ibid. can 29. Councell forbad and so it is to this day in the Ethiopicke Churches as b Quod autem Sabbatâ—n aequè ac diem Dominicum ab opere immune habent id non est argumentum Judaisini sed veteris Christianismi quot enim Canones sunt qui vetant Sabbato opus facere Joseph Scal. de emend temp l. 7. p. 683. Joseph Scaliger sheweth which hee will have to bee no argument of Judaisme but of ancient Christianity for how many Canons saith hee are there to forbid men to worke on the Sabbath day meaning the Saturday I wish hee had set downe how many some I have met with but not many and of those that which is pretended to be of the greatest Authority is in true judgement of least accompt viz. that of c Clement const Apost l. 7. c. 24. Clement published in the name of the Apostles which commands to keep holy the Sabbath day in memory of the Creation and the Lords day in memory of the Resurrection which if Clement had received from the Apostles the Romans it is like would which they did not have received it from him for they reckon him for one of the prime successors of S. Peter in the Bishoprick of Rome The summe of these observations concerning sacred Assemblies twice a weeke viz. upon Saturday the old Sabbath and the Lords day the new begun by the Apostles for the quicker progresse of the Gospel and better advantage of devotion and continued by Christians in after ages after their examples is this In the primitive times the Lords day was seldome called the Sabbath because then the old Sabbath of the Jewes was religiously observed with solemne Assemblies and while and where two dayes were so solemnized i. e. Saturday and Sunday it was sit to call them for distinction sake and to avoid confusion by severall names and good reason that the Saturday having for some thousand of yeers had possession of the title Sabbath when yet the Lords day or Christian Sunday had never shined in the world should be called the Sabbath rather then any other day and that the Lords day should rather be called by another name then by that But now at least among us who use the day which was the Jewes holiday not as a Sabbath or a day of rest but as a workeday now that some Jewishly some prophanely affected doe deny the name of Sabbath to the day wee celebrate to supplant the support of it by the fourth Commandement not as it is the Lords day but as one of the seven there is no danger of confusion by calling the Lords day the Sabbath but due caution thereby given against such conceits as tend to impeach the preheminence thereof CHAP. XXIIII The objection taken from the use of the name Sabbath in Histories Dictionaries and the Roman and Reformed Churches answered NOr is it any thing to prejudice the preheminence of the title Sabbath among us that Latin Authours whether of Histories or Dictionaries take the word Sabbatum usually for Saturday as a M. Brab his defence p. 44. Master Braburn hath objected since so long a custome of the Sabbaths observation upon Saturday both in the Jewish the Christian Church might easily prevail with many Writers to take the terme as they found it in familiar use before their time wherein they might be more facile while they suspected none advantage would be made of it against the truth But if from that facility of phrase exception be taken against the right of the Christians weekely holiday though a day of rest to the name Sabbath a name of rest then we must have recourse to the proper sense of the word and correspondence of the thing and rather speake according to both then to the improper and abusive application of it though customarie or usuall And as for the word Catholick though many Protestants have familiarly called the Papists by that name yet since they have insolently gloryed in it and perversely inferred from our use of it agreeing with their usurpation that wee that call them Catholicks doe by consequence confesse that our selves are Hereticks who are opposite to them as Coqueus concluded from
Perth an 1618. our Church of England hath a Canon for the Crosse after Baptisme and bowing at the name of Jesus many Reformed Churches have none for either of them and in England Cathedrall Churches differ from most others in the use of Copes Organs prick-song tunes and many other waies besides Of these with the rest of the differences we may say they are such as no necessity doth inforce yet will not Master Ironside I suppose be forward to charge the later Church in departing from the former nor the Reformed in dissenting from the Romish nor the English in differing from the Scottish Church nor Cathedralls in varying from other Churches for such particulars with schisme singularity or affectation Which I doe not mention with any mind to maintain any thing that is amisse in the different manner of Cathedralls from other Churches for I wish rather a reformation then a ratification of them as now they are but to give fit instance against Master Ironside his position Secondly I say and shall where it is requisite prove it that neither the Romish nor many of the Reformed Churches out of England are so Orthodox in the Doctrine of the Sabbath in particular for the explication of the fourth Commandement as they should be and as the Churches of England and Scotland are and it is no marvell if their dialect be like unto their Doctrine Thirdly it is too late to impute schisme singularity or affectation to the word Sabbath when the use of it is justified by such both reasons and authorities as have been produced and when not onely persons of chiefe preheminence so call it but that it is as well received into use by most as approved by the best as hath been observed Fourthly for the Reformed Churches the Waldenses who first separated themselves from the Church of Rome as the Whore of Babylon called the Lords day Sabbath and that so familiarly that nothing was more usuall among them as a learned h Doct. Twisse in a MS. of the Sabbath Doctor hath observed of them Fifthly wee must not accompt it schisme singularity and affectation to conforme rather to our brethren about us then to either brethren or adversaries that are separated from us Sixthly nor are wee more liable to exception of schisme singularity or affectation by using the word Sabbath for Lords day then by putting Sunday for it the most usuall name in our Service Booke which is as unwonted a word in the reformed Churches as the word Sabbath is and hath been i Pope Silvest See Polyd. Virg de invent rer lib. 5. c. 6. forbidden by the most Cathedrall Doctor of the Popish Church with more probability of reason then hath been urged by way of exception against the name Sabbath CHAP. XXV The objection taken from the Statute and language of Lawyers answered THere remaine yet two objections more and but two that I have read or can call to minde which are brought in by Master Broad a Mr. Broad his 3d. quest p. 22. marg in his printed book of three questions the one is That a Processe to appeare die Sabbati is meant and understood upon Saturday The other in b Mr. Brad his 2d. MS. p. 18. marg another book of his which is yet a MS. wherein saith hee the last Parliament may well bee thought to dislike the name Sabbath as to the Lords day for neither in the title of the Act which is for the keeping of the Lords day nor yet throughout the body thereof is this name used though the heathenish name Sunday be in both yea and though the Commandement read in the Church speaketh of sanctifying of the Sabbath Hee might have alledged two Acts of two Parliaments the one anno 1. of King Charles chap. 1. The other anno 3. ch 1. In the former whereof there is the name of Sunday in the title of the Act though not in the body of it as in the Statute anno 5. 6. of King Edward the sixth chap. 3. pag. 133. of the Stat. at large and the name Lords day once in the title and thrice in the body of the Act and in the later Act they are each of them named once in the title and once in the body of the Act but the name Sabbath not at all Whereto I answer first for the Processe concerning which I say First That such a Processe might be taken up when there were many Jewes and much Judaisme in the Land as in the reignes of many of our Popish Kings which gave occasion of warrant in contracts and bargaines against Jewes by especiall mention who kept a foot the name and observation of the old Sabbath and so it might bee then as in the dayes of ancient Fathers a word of distinction betwixt the Jewish and Christians holiday Or Secondly If not for that reason yet the use of the name in that sense having obtained such generall passage in the times precedent might bee a motive to the Lawyers to continue it though the reason which began it descended not so low as to their age as wee call an houre-glasse in Greek and Latin Clepsydra which signifieth the stealing away of water drop by drop from one bottle to another for at first it was made to measure time by water though now it bee made to run with sand only Thirdly Their Processe being Latine haply they made choice rather of that word which had in it some relish of Religion both among Jewes and ancient Christians and so hath the word Sabbath then of that which was for that language in a manner meerly heathenish to wit Saturday and though the word Sunday which is originally heathenish as wel as Saturday be used in our Church Liturgie yet we call the Lords day Sunday not from the Sunne in the Firmament but from the Sun of Righteousnesse Mal. 4.2 as hath been formerly observed the word Saturday is not capable of a signification so sacred and sutable to the person of our Saviour the Lord of the Sabbath Fourthly Though the Lawyers did in their Latin writs use the word Sabbath for Saturday yet they did neither forbid nor forbeare to use it of the Lords day in French and in English as in Fitzherberts natura Brevium it is said Pleas cannot be held upon Quindena Paschae c Que est le Sabot jour Fitzherb natur Brev. fol. 17. because it is the Sabbath day whereby not Saturday but Sunday or the Lords day must be meant for on the Saturday it was lawfull not onely to hold Pleas but to keepe Markets as Judge Fairfax in the Prior of Lantonies case resolveth viz. d Devant le Incarnation le Sabbadi suit le Sabat jour solenize mes ore est change per les eglise at jour demain c. the yeer book 12. of Ed. 4. b. That before the incarnation Saturday was the Sabbath day but since it is changed by the Church into the Lords day that day is
in Justin Martyrs 2d. Apol. ad Antoninum pium about the yeare 150. but the name Sabbath for a weekly Holiday is ancienter then them both Secondly if we compare them for Authority we may consider it in a double sense as divine and humane First by divine Authority the Sabbath and Lords day have the best warrant for they are both Scripture names and the name Sunday is not so I confesse in the translation of the Bible published in King Henry the eight his daies anno 1540. before which Archbishop Cranmer prefixed a Preface the words of Saint John Revel 1.10 are rendred thus I was in the spret on a Sunday as I noted before but in the originall there is not that word which signifieth either Sun or Son and in all other translations that I have seen it is rendred according to the originall Lords day and not Sunday Secondly the name Sabbath for a weekly Holiday is in the fourth Commandement of the Decalogue the greatest warrant of Authority that can be thrice mentioned neither the name Lords day nor Sunday are so And for humane Authority in the Liturgy of our Church the name Sabbath and Sunday are both mentioned and the name Lords day to my remembrance not at all In the Canons of the Church though the name Sabbath for the English edition as I have already observed be not omitted the names Sunday or Lords day are more often mentioned and in the Latine Canons the title Lords day onely Thirdly if we compare them for significancy that swayeth the preheminence by three respects First by Dignity secondly Propriety thirdly Perspicuity First for Dignity the name Lords day hath prelation over the other two and carrieth a signification of his dignity who is Lord of all both Angels Men and Divels and imports with his person his absolute Lordship over the world especially over his Church and the name Sunday sheweth his illustrious excellency if wee understand the terme according to the Prophet Malachy for the Sunne of Righteousnesse but the name Sabbath in its Grammaticall sense signifieth onely Rest which is in dignity inferiour to them both Secondly for Propriety that is to be considered as opposed either to figurativenesse or to community taking proper for that which is not figurative the name Sabbath signifying in the Grammaticall sense a literall rest which is required on an holiday is a more proper word then either of the other which are not well understood without a figure for wee call the Sabbath Lords day by an a For all dayes are the Lords but this by an especiall eminency Antinomasie and Sunday by a b In the sense of the Heathens who dedicated the day to the Sun and thence gave it that name Metonymie or c In the religious sense in the Prophet Malach. c. 4. v. 2. Metaphor But taking propriety as opposed to generality or community the names Lords day and Sunday as in application to dayes are more proper and particular noting a set and certaine day in the weeke viz. that which wee Christians celebrate and none other as the d Soveraigne Antidote against Sabbatary errors pag. 7. Authour of the soveraigne Antidote well observeth Whereas Sabbath hath been a name for any holiday which may fall out any day of the weeke In which respect if there had not been other considerable reasons to the contrary hee had well resolved that when wee speake of a time of rest undeterminately and in generall the name Sabbath is the fittest the other two Lords day and Sunday when we speake determinately of that day which is observed in the Christian Church Thirdly For Perspicuitie that is most perspicuous which is least ambiguous so is the name Sunday which presently points all to the day wee observe but the names Sabbath and Lords day are not at all times and in all places so cleare since the name Sabbath hath beene for a long time taken for Saturday and the name Lords day hath beene taken not onely for the weekly Sabbath of the Resurrection but also for the day of Christs Nativity Passion Ascension and last Judgement as hath beene shewed in the second Chapter Besides the Apostle saith there bee Lords many 1 Cor. 8.5 and the more they bee the more ambiguous is the name whereof that word maketh up the one halfe Yet to say the truth in our Church and age they are all perspicuous and cleere enough so that there is scarce any one so silly but hee presently knoweth if hee heare the name Sabbath Lords day or Sunday what day of the week is understood by them Fourthly If wee compare them for facilitie or readinesse of speech the names Sabbath day or Sunday are more apt to be taken up as when wee speake of the weekly holiday past or to come it is readier to say and withall more distinctly understood the last Sabbath or the last Sunday next Sabbath or next Sunday some Sabbath or some Sunday as in his Majesties Briefes fore-noted then the last Lords day or the next Lords day or some Lords day Fifthly If for acceptation with speaker or hearer they are every one of them single for the most part of better relish then the other two with some or other some like best of the name Sabbath some of the name Lords day some of Sunday and by that wee have observed of each of them before it appeareth that there are many of the better sort of men who stand divided in their inclinations and prelations according to the diversity of the titles fore-mentioned and yet when two holidaies were observed in a week the name Lords day for the day wee celebrate was most acceptable to most men and since they have all of them beene taken to indifferent use by the wiser sort it hath been lesse obvious to exception then either the name Sabbath or Sunday have beene while some though without just cause have charged the one with Judaisme the other with Paganisme which is worse since our Religion hath more affinity with Jewish then with Heathenish principles Sixthly For frequencie or community of use all in our Church are bound to assent unto the name Sabbath and to use it also by the obligation that tyeth them to the Liturgy and Catechisme of the Church and as Religion hath advanced so hath that name prevailed and bin most frequently used by the religious of our Church untill that a very few yeers agoe some tooke up such exceptions against it as have beene seene in the precedent Discourse which either reason may work out or time wear out of mens opinions as in the title Lords day hath come to passe for that at at the first did not passe without cavill and contempt for in the memory of some yet alive many were as much offended suspecting a tang of excessive precisenesse that some said Lords day for Sunday as any now are at those who say rather Sabbath then either Seventhly and lastly If wee compare the three names for
Lords day to the Christians weekly holiday answered p. 26. Chap. VI. Of the name Sunday Whether we may call our weekly holiday by that name objections against the use of the name Sunday for our weekly holiday p. 34. Chap. VII How farre it may be lawfull to use Idolatrous names an Answer to the Objection against the name Sunday pag. 41. Chap. VIII Of the name Sabbath and first of the writing Sabboth Sabaoth and Sabbath which of them is the right and by occasion thereof some observations of skill and ignorance of the originall tongues pag. 50. Chap. IX The Etymologie of the name Sabbath and first of the abusive derivations of it by Justin and Plutarch by way of contempt of the Jewes their Religion and Manners pag. 60. Chap. X. The derivation of the name Sabbath from two Hebrew words the one signifying seven the other Rest the former being the errour of Lactantius the later the true and most received Etymologie pag. 67. Chap. XI The sever all acceptions of the name Sabbath pag. 69. Chap. XII Whether the day called Lords day or Sunday may not also be called Sabbath day or the Sabbath the exceptions which are taken up by divers against it pag. 73. Chap. XIII Reasons why Sunday or the Lords day may be called Sabbath day delivered and defended pag. 79. Chap. XIV Ancient evidence for calling the Lords day by the name of Sabbath observed especially against Doctor Pocklington his assertion viz. That no ancient Father nor learned man tooke the name Sabbath otherwise from the beginning of the world till the yeare 1554. then for Saturday observed by the Jewes pag. 91. Chap. XV. Royall and reverend Authority for putting the name Sabbath upon Sunday whereby it is cleared from schism as well as from novelty pag. 101. Chap. XVI Of such as are Adversaries to the name Sabbath as put for Sunday sometimes assenting thereto and using the name in that sense or yeelding that which doth inferre it pag. 116. Chap. XVII Exceptions against some of the precedent Testimonies alledged for calling the Lords day Sabbath propounded and answered pag. 119. Chap. XVIII A particular answer to the particular exceptions made against the name Sabbath as applyed to Sunday or Lords day and first of the dangerous plot pretended by Doctor Pocklington in the use of the name Sabbath for Sunday and of his prodigious comparison of the name Sabbath on the Lords day to the crowne of Thornes on the Lords head pag. 133. Chap. XIX An answer to Barkley the Papist his dilemma against the name Sabbath for Sunday or Lords day pag. 143. Chap. XX. Master Braburne his objection of confusion in calling Sunday Sabbath answered pag. 146. Chap. XXI The objection of Judaisme in using the name Sabbath answered and retorted as also the reproach of the name as from the Sabbatarian Heretickes removed pag. 148. Chap. XXII The Negative argument drawne from the Apostles not using the name Sabbath for the Lords day answered pag. 156. Chap. XXIII Though neither the Apostles nor the ancient Fathers called Sunday Sabbath we may and the reasons why pag. 161. Chap. XXIV The Objection taken from the use of the name Sabbath in Dictionaries Histories and the Romane and Reformed Churches answered pag. 168. Chap. XXV The Objection taken from the statute and language of Lawyers answered pag. 175. Chap. XXVI A comparison of the names Sabbath Lords day and Sunday with a resolution of the Question for the name Sabbath as the best and fittest to be the most usuall title of our weekly Holiday pag. 180. Chap. XXVII A briefe accommodation of this Nomenclature or nominall discourse to some purposes of importance concerning the Sabbath pag. 197. A Premonition concerning my Sonnes Verses after written THough a learned and worthy a Doct. Primrose in his Preface to the Reader before his Sons Treatise on the Sabbath Doctor of the French Church honoured his Sonne so much as to write to him to deliver his mind concerning the Sabbath I am not so fond a Father as to conceive my Sonne being yet by his yeares in his minority and among Graduates of the University but a meere fresh-man having but newly stepp'd up to the first and lowest degree of the Schooles fit with that hand which was but lately taken from the ferula to take the Censors rod and to passe his judgement or if that be too grave a terme for one so young his opinion or conceipt either upon the Doctrine or any Dictates of the Sabbath yet his filiall affection and poeticall fancy prompting him to put pen to paper in these ensuing Verses and to send them to mee with his desire that I would allow them some vacant page in my Book as some what of kinne to mine own conceptions because they be his I have assented to him but with these two advertisements to the Reader 1. The one That hee thinke not the better of mee or my Booke for any praise they bestow upon either for Poetry is an Art of deceit which measureth expressions not by the truth of the subject but by the strength of imagination working upon it nor is it more disposed to deceive then naturall affection to be deceived especially in relations of neerest degree as betwixt us two though it be usually as more forcible so more fallible in a descending then in an ascending operation 2. The other is That my meaning in this admittance of his Muse before my Sabbatary discourse is to engage him openly to this holy cause as * Hamilcar Hannibalem filium non amplius novem annis natum ad aram adduxit eamque caeteris remotis tenentem jurare jussit nunquam in amicitiam cum Romanis fore Aemil. Probus in vita Hannib fol. 115. Hamilcar did his young sonne Hannibal privately in the cause of the Carthaginians against the Romans that when time and studie with Gods blessing have ripened him for any religious undertaking hee may hold himselfe solemnely bound to bee zealous for Gods right in this behalfe and faithfull and resolute to plead for it against all opposers With these premisses I have left him roome and given him leave under my name to write to the Reader in his owne stile as followeth On the learned Treatise of my much honoured Father intituled Sunday a Sabbath Deare Sir PArdon my fault if 't be presumption here Before your sacred labours to appeare But if you will not I shall make my pen To keepe a Sabbath and not write agen In former times you meant to put to presse Your English Sabbath in a ″ ″ I purposed to publish it in Latin because it would not passe in English Romane dresse But'twould have griev'd you sure your work should be Abus'd by what you hate flat Popery For your own name would make most think it good And some to read what they not understood I still lamented that your deske should bee The Sabbath's prison and still kept from mee As well as others and 't
was my delight Pardon the pious theft to steale a sight And then to wish O that this might not be Imprison'd in a Latin liberty God heard my vote and now hath made it true You would not stoop to times * * My confidence for this the Reader may see in the end of my Preface written about five yeers agoe times should to you WILLIAM LEY Student of Christ-Church SUNDAY A SABBATH CHAP. I. In what cases wee may bee indifferent for the for bearance or use of Names In what wee must bee chary concerning both IF under the diversity of words there were no dissention touching the things that are treated of as a De verbo ut mea fert opinio controversia est de re quidem convanit Senec. de clement l. 2. e. 7. pag. 102. Seneca observeth of the words clemencie and pardon it were a waywardnesse or wantonnesse well worthy of sharpe reproofe to wrangle or spend many words about them which b Ne verbi controversiam vel superfluam faciam vâ—l meritò patiar quoniam cùm de re constat non est opus certare de nomine Aug. Ep. Hieronymo Ep. 28 tom 2. p. 108. Saint Augustine professeth hee would neither willingly doe nor deservedly suffer for where the sense is sound and consonant to truth on both sides embraced there is little appearance of perill in the difference of termes and as little cause to bee curiously nice either in the allowance or forbearance of their use So in effect hath c Dum resâ—ognoscitur non est de vocabulis laborandum Aug. de Gen. ad lit lib. 4. cap. 5. tom 3. pag. 730. S. Augustine after d Non obstant verba cùm sententia congruit veritati Lactant. Instit lib. 4. cap. 9. Lactantius resolved as directed thereto not onely by the rule of Religion which requireth among men Christians especially as much union as may bee 1 Cor. 1.10 but by the dictate of Reason For Logick which is artificiall and refined reason e Docuit me seil Dialectica cùm de re constat propter quam verba diâ—untur non de verbis debere contendi Aug. contra Academ lib. 3. cap. 13. tom 1. pag. 618. saith he hath taught me in consent of things not to contend about the acception of words But since wee cannot hold discourse of the one without helpe of the other for verball notions are to reall in the service of the mind as ″ Verba quasi vasa August Confes l. 1. c. 26. vessels are to meats for the sustenance of the body to serve them in to that both place and use for which they were before prepared Secondly Since not onely the things but words also which concerne the Christians weekly holiday are brought into vehement dispute and sometimes censoriously resolved on the wrong way Thirdly Since likewise men seldome except against a Word or Name but when they wish not altogether well to the thing it selfe as the f Nomen ferè non vellicat nifi qui rei non omnino benè vult Bp. Andrews Ep. 1. Pet. Du-Moulin opusc pag. 166. Bishop of winchester writeth in his first Epistle to Doctor Du-Moulin Fourthly Since sometimes by giving up words in a matter of weight to gratifie the desire of the Adversary there is advantage given therewith to the left hand and more courage taken to contend against the right of the cause in question which was the issue of that facility g De ousia vero nomine abjiciendo placuit auferri non erat curae Episcopis de vocabulo cum sensus esset in tuto Hieron adver Luciferian tom 2. pag. 144. The Arrians required the like for the word Consubstantialis as Theodoret writeth Hist Eccles lib. 2. cap. 18. pag. 533. which the Fathers at Ariminum shewed in condescending to the request of the Arrians for the abatement of the word ousia in the doctrine of the Trinity Lastly Since as h Mr. Ironside quest 3. cap. 13. pag. 123. Mr. Ironside hath out of S. Augustine observed of the Academicks They are not such simple men as not to know how to give things their proper names who purposely make choyce I may say as well purposely make refusall of words which may serve to hide from the simple and to intimate to the wiser sort of their Disciples their opinions whether Sabbatharie or Antisabbatharie if erroneous and dangerous it is equally materiall It is as I conceive upon all these considerations of weight and moment very requisite to make search and to seeke for satisfaction of scruples in this controversie of the Sabbath both for words and things And to conclude with our former comparison as vessels must be scoured before meat be served to the Table in them so words must first bee cleared which is requisite in the tryall of the title of the day of rest as well as in other Questions before the matters in difference which they import can well be brought in to be discussed CHAP. II. Of the divers Names of the Christians weekly holiday THe Names of that day which wee Christians keep for our weekly holiday are divers the first name was the first day of the week a name for Antiquity as old as the beginning of the first weeke of the world Gen. 1.5 And that title is given it by all the foure Evangelists by Saint Matthew chap. 28. ver 1. Saint Mark chap. 16. ver 2. by Saint Luke in Acts 20. ver 7. and by Saint John chap. 20. ver 1. as also by S. Paul 1 Cor. 16.2 eight times as a Mr. Braburn Defence p. 162 Master Braburne numbers them it is called the first day of the weeke by the holy writers of the new Testament all of them using in the Greek a cardinall number for the ordinall as Moses doth in the Hebrew in the forecited Text Gen. 1.5 b Ethnicis semel annuus dies quisque festus est tibi octavo queque die Tert. de Idol cap. 14. tom 2. p. 457. Tertullian c Hic dies octavus id est post Sabbatum primus dominicus Cypr. lib. 3. Epist 8. p. 80. col 2. Cyprian and d Dominicus verò post septimum quid nisi octavus Aug. praefat in Psal 150. tom 8. part 2. p. 1058.1059 Augustine and if wee may beleeve Master Braburne but wee finde no proofe for it all Churches call it the eighth day not that they would have a Christian weeke longer then after the old computation which took up with the number of seven but for that as it is cleare by the words of Saint Augustine it being after the Saturday which was the seventh if a man count on the next day following maketh the eighth and without any intention to make the circle of the weeke one day wider then it was before they made the account in this sort and named it the eighth day the rather with reference to Circumcision which was on the
illustri visione patefecit futurum Ecclesiae statum pag. 78. Thes 36. Advent comming or appearing of the Lord Amos 5.8 Malach. 3.1 2. and this appearing hee taketh to bee either the day of Christs birth or that peculiar day wherein in an especiall vision hee appeared to Saint John and revealed unto him the state of the Church for future times or the day of judgement e Sic 1 Cor. 5.5 ut spiritus salvus sit in die Domini quo scil apparebit ad judicium Dr. Gamar Invest Sav. c. 6. Ibid. Thes 34. 1 Cor. 5.5 but he f Si verò diem natalem intelligamus aliquanto expressior erit circumstantia temporis Dr. Gomar Ibid. pitcheth upon our Saviours birth day applying unto it that which hee said of Abraham viz. That hee rejoyced to see his day Joh. 8.56 Upon that Text that rarely learned g Bp. Andrews in his Serm. Joh. 8. ver 56. Bishop of Winchester observeth That Christ had two eminent dayes his Genesis or his comming into the world and his Exodus or his going out of the world the first of his Nativity the last of his Passion But for one Genesis hee might have noted a threefold Exodus one out of the world of men into the grave another out of the grave into the world among men againe and a third out of the neather world into the upper by his ascension from earth into heaven Master Braburn in his first discourse of the Sabbath having brought in the Jewish h The Sabbaths were called the Lords holidayes Es 58.13 now if the Sabbath be the Lords holiday it is the Lords day M. Brab in his discourse pag. 8. Sabbath and all the fore-named dayes except that of his apparition to Saint John which is Dr. Gomarus his peculiar conceipt so far as yet I have observed as rivals with the day of Christs Resurrection for reputation and right to the title Lords day of that title saith thus And which of them John had respect unto scil when hee mentioned the Lords day the Scripture is altogether silent and if hee and Doctor Gomarus had beene silent too it had beene much better but to make the matter worse against the Antiquity of it they both take such exceptions as these Master i Mr. Brab Defence of the Sabbath p. 243. Braburne in generall saith The name of the Lords day was but new and put upon Sunday since Christ and that not many yeeres too since Christ hee might haply have read in Symeon Metaphrastes that Silvester the first first gave that title unto it which k Baron Annal. tom 3. ad an 315. num 16. col 163. See also Pol. â—nrg de Invent rerum lâ—b 6. â— 5. p. 366. who relates the comeipt and refutes it aâ— Baroniuâ— doth Baronius confuteth Doctor l Si ista appâ—lâ—atio ab Apostolis promanasset in Ecclesia suâ—ssâ—t recepta an crediâ—ile est potuisse fieri ut Justinus Martyr antiquis simus atque incorruptus Scriptâ—r ea in accurata rituum descriptiâ—ne omissa solis diem aut unum Sabbatorum aut primam hebdomadis tantummodo nominaret quemadmodum in Apologia pro Christianis Dialogo cum Triphone Gom. Investig Sab. cap. 6. pag. 76. The like is in his defence of his Investig c. 10. pag. 135 137 141 142. Gomarus more particularly telleth us That in Justine Martyr ' s time the Christians weekley holiday was not noted by that name since hee useth other titles as Sunday and the First day of the weeke but maketh no mention of it at all by the name of the Lords day albeit if it had beene in use from the Apostles time to his hee had good occasion both to note it in his Dialogue with Tryphon the Jew and in his Apologie to Antoninus where hee maketh an accurate description of the rites of the Christian Religion From his silence then in so commodious places for remembrance Doctor Gomarus inferreth that it was not derived from the Apostles nor received into the Church till after Justine Martyr his dayes so that in summe their objections against this title are reduced into two heads Impertinency and Novelty First for Impertinency they would make the title Lords day no more pertinent or proper to the Christians weekely holiday then to divers dayes called in the Scripture the day of the Lord nay more pertinent to others then to it Whereto I answer for the present reserving further satisfaction to the next Chapter First That wee may conceive as a late m Rejicimus Haebraïsmum illum multum enim interest inter diem Domini Dominicum illa enim est appellatio generalior haec strictior specialior mâ—ltae enim dicuntur Domini tamen non sunt Dominica ut arbores Domini Psal 104 16. quas puto arbores Dominicas Gomarus non vocabit multa Dei dicebantur quae tamen divina non erant ut montes Dei Inquisit de Sabbaâ— pag. 84 85. Writer distinguisheth a difference betwixt the day of the Lord and the Lords day or Dominicall day as the Rhemists in English turne the text Rev. 1.10 not so much for congruity to the Originall as to make obscurity in the Translation for many things in the generall may be said to be the things of the Lord which yet are not to bee named Dominicall things as the trees of the Lord Psal 104.16 which Doctor Gomarus himselfe would not think sit to bee called Dominicall trees and many things are said to be Gods which are not godly nor divine for in use of speech the former importeth a common right which is a right in God to the creatures in common the later a right of peculiar appropriation to himselfe Secondly Howsoever that distinction prove and though it be true and pertinent it is I confesse somewhat nice and curious so that few upon their owne reading of the Scripture will take notice of it yet the distinction of n Gomar Invest Sab. cap. 6. p. 74. Thes 33. Doctor Gomarus is manifestly faulty both in it selfe and in respect of the purpose for which hee frameth it For hee distinguisheth betwixt the day of the Lords Advent comming or appearing and his Resurrection as his words partly expresse and partly imply and this to the end that hee may transferre the title Lords day from the day of the Resurrection to some other whereas indeed that day on which hee arose was as well an Advent or day of appearance unto men as that which hee so nameth by way of opposition unto it for hee came that day and as by a new and admirable birth appeared to many Mark 16.9 Thirdly To prevent mistaking of the Tenet which I hold in the triall of right betwixt the day of our Saviours Resurrection and other dayes set up with it in competition for the title Lords day I professe with o Mr. Primrose his treat of the Sab. or Lords day part 3. c. 1. p. 198. Mr
Primrose though in many other points I must dissent from him that I doe not conceive there is any morall necessity that that day of the weeke on which Christ rose from the grave should bee kept holy in the Christian Church rather then the day wherein hee was borne or the day wherein he suffered on the Crosse or the day wherein he ascended into heaven Fourthly While therefore I plead for preheminence of right for the day of the Resurrection to the title in question I take not upon me to render reasons for it demonstratively necessary yet I doubt not but upon serious consideration they will bee found such as together with the consent of all or at least of the most and best approved Authours in all ages who have unanimously met in the explication of that title of Saint John and the application of it to the day of Christs Resurrection will appeare evidence sufficient in a point of no greater moment then this is and such as will not bee counterpoyzed by any proofe for the contrary Tenet CHAP. IIII. A comparison of the old Sabbath day the day of our Saviours Birth of the day of his Passion Ascension and of his Apparition to Saint John with the day of his Resurrection touching right to the Title Lords day and the preheminence and propriety of that Title to our weekly holiday THere bee many dayes that are set up with the day of our Saviours Resurrection in contestation for this title Lords day as in the precedent Chapter hath partly been observed viz. The old Sabbath our Saviours Birth day the day of his Passion Ascension the day of his Apparition to Saint John and the day of Judgement And first for the old Sabbath for here it may have the first place I The old Sabbath though I have given reasons why elsewhere I ranke it otherwise concerning which I say though in the fourth Commandement Exod. 20. it be called the Sabbath of the Lord thy God and so in that respect albeit it bee there rather declaratively then preceptively brought in it may bee named the Lords day as a Mr. Brab Discourse on the Sab. pag. 8. And in his Defence saith he The Son of man is Lord of the Sabbath Wherefore the seventh dayes Sabbath may be truly called the Lords day Mr. Brab Defence pag. 238. Master Braburne pleadeth yet that is but by vertuall intimation not by formall denomination as S. John hath it Rev. 1.10 Secondly Though it had been called expressely by the name of the Lords day in the old Testament and so long as it was in force it was indeed the Lords day in especiall maner as is the day we celebrate now yet it is not probable that day being generally noted by the name of the Sabbath from its first originall both in the old Testament and in the new that Saint John would entitle it by a new name having an old one already of pertinent importance and permanent continuance especially there being a new day of especiall note and capable of that new title as b Mr. Braburn Discourse of the Sab. p. 8. Master Braburne confesseth viz. the day of the Resurrection to which for its dignity in it selfe and for distinction from other dayes it might more properly bee applyed Secondly II The day of Christs Birth for the day of Christs Birth or his first comming albeit it bee a day of high account yet the time of it was so farre from being so illustrious in the primitive times as that day which wee call the Lords day that neither the day of the weeke is certainely knowne nor the day of the moneth nor the moneth of the yeere no nor the yeere of our Lord so cleared but that there is and hath beene much controversie about them Hence is that c Vide variantes de eare sententias à Bellarmino collectas Bell. l. 2. de Ro. Po. cap. 5. p. 336. col 2. diversity in computation of his age while some reckon his life at 30. some at 33. some 34. and some at 50. yeeres of age There was difference also I confesse about the Feasts of the Resurrection commonly called the Feast of Easter as d Euseb Eccles Hist l. 5. c. 21. pag 91. Eusebius and other Ecclesiasticall Writers have observed To which I answer that the dissention was about the time of solemnitie whether it should be ordered by the course of the Moon which would cast it upon any day of the weeke as it fell out among the Jewes or were to bee confined to the day wee celebrate but there was no difference for the day of the Resurrection which it was in the order of the weeke a matter of chiefe moment in a weekely holiday for that there was good agreement on all hands there being cleare texts of Scripture to take off all doubt in that respect Which doth plainly evince that our Saviour arose the first day of the weeke viz. on the day the heathens câ—lled Sunday and wee Christians Lords day But there neither is nor can bee just plaine and apparent proofe for the day of Christs birth which it was either for order among the dayes of the week or moneth of the yeere or for number in the yeeres of the world Ob. The learned e Bp. Anâ—rewes his Sermon on Job c. 8. v. 56. part 1. pag. 62. Bishop of Winchester saith There is no day so properly Christs as his Birth day which may appeare saith hee if wee set it in comparison with other dayes of most memorable note as the day of his Passion Resurrection and Ascension for the day of his Passion that was not so properly his because two theeves suffered with him at the same time in the same place after the same manner Nor the day of his Resurrection for as hee rose from the dead so did others the same day and went into the holy Citie Nor the day of his Ascension for Enoch and Elias had their ascension too and that long before his But his Birth day was his without a fellow none ever so borne none ever born such a one and therefore as no Festivitie is besides it it is attended as Christ himselfe with an Apostolicall retinue of Holidayes which reckoning every day in Christmas being usually freed from secular labours for a moneth make up the fulnesse of time and so it is the recapitulation of the whole yeere as the f Bp. Andrewes Serm. on Gal. 3.4 p. 23. Bishop maketh the allusion and accompt Whereto wee shall returne a reasonable Reply which shall want neither light of truth nor weight of authority for wee shall bring in that great and reverend Prelate to drive back that Objection and this it is Repl. Though that day of Christs Birth have much in it which is peculiar to Christ because as he saith none was ever so borne none ever borne such a one yet that is no more then wee may say for the day of his Resurrection
Rev. 1.10 may bee conceived the day of the Lords comming to his last Judgement for which the one citeth Luk. 17.30 the other 1 Cor. 5.5 I answer first to the opinion it selfe and then to the proofe For the first I say That Saint John speaketh as wee noted before in the readiest construction of the words as of a day that was in being before that Vision and so knowne that the Reader might take notice when the Vision came unto him but the day of Judgment is not yet come and so unknowne to man that our Saviour saith of it but of that day and houre knoweth no man no not the Angels of heaven but my Father onely Mat. 24.36 Secondly For their proofes though both places produced be meant of the day of Judgement yet that they appertaine not to the title now in question wee may observe that neither of them nameth the day as Saint John doth the Lords day for in the one viz. 1 Cor. 5.5 it is called the day of the Lord Jesus in the other viz. Luk. 17.30 the day of the Sonne of man So that this device of the day of judgement as to the day pointed out by Saint John in his appellation is void of all judgement and withall so full of presumption that if any man should goe on in commenting on the Revelation throughout to the last Chapter as hee begun with the first hee might thereby derive upon himselfe a wretched right to those plagues with commination whereof Saint John shuts up and seales up his mysticall Prophesie Revel 22.18 19. Ob. But if wee take the Lords day for the Resurrection for that as r M. Brab in his discourse pag. 8. Master Braburne notwithstanding his crosse conceits confesseth is properly the Lords day it will not follow that it should be a weekly Holiday it may suffice for that title being given it but once in Scripture f M. Brab in his Defence p. 163. and 175. if it be celebrated some one first day though but once a yeere as the Nativitie Passion and Ascension are and as the Feast of Easter is with us in reference unto it Ans To which I answer First That the question yet is not whether the Lords day should be a weekly Holiday or not But being such a one in fact for yet wee are not come to discusse in point of right whether it may not in its weekly recourse be intituled by that name Secondly That the day of the Resurrection being still noted in Scripture to bee the first day of the weeke and not such a day of the moneth as returnes but once a yeere or once in halfe a yeere or once a quarter or once a moneth onely it may bee called the Lords day once a weeke for its weekly recourse as well as once a yeere if as the Feast of Easter it came no oftner If it be said that no Friday is called good Friday nor any Thursday holy Thursday or Ascension day but one in the yeere it may bee replied to that if they were weekly observed as for a time good Friday was and the first day of the weeke hath beene since the Apostles time they might all be partners in the same appellation all holy Thursdaies all good Fridaies as well once a weeke as once a yeere though the first might have some preheminence above the rest and after the first that which answereth to the first in the season of the yeere as well as in the day of the week and by reason thereof as being no common guest it might have an Alablaster box of oyntment bestowed upon it more then upon those which were more ordinary guests as Easter Sunday was by a t A die Resurrectionis per integram hebdomadem sideles feriuntur Concil 6. gener Const Can. 66. pag. 646. Decree of the Councell of Constantinople to be kept holy and for its sake all the six dayes that followed next after it yet it might in its weekly recourse bee very well called the Lords day as though all the Jewish festivities were called Sabbaths and some in solemnity exceeded others yet the weekly holiday of the Jewes was best knowne by that name which was sometimes by especial priviledge u Shabbath Shabbathon given only to the Sabbath i.e. of the 4th Commandement or to such dayes as for cessation from worke were equivalent unto it Dr. Willet in Levit. 23. q. 31. p. 586. doubled upon it so the name of the Lords day howsoever it be sometimes attributed to other dayes all being his yet doth it most appertaine unto the weekly holiday of the Christians and the rather because it hath a more constant and continuall Lordship or dominion over the dayes of the weeke then any other by its comming in a weekely returne above fiftie times in the yeere for the other Festivities they have their turne but once a yeer And so we have answered the objection of Impertinency of that title Lords day to our weekly holiday which hath beene urged as if it did not more properly appertaine unto it then to some other daies before rehearsed CHAP. V. The imputation of Novelty in applying the title Lords day to the Christians weekly holiday answered WEE are now to answer the objection of Novelty which Doctor Gomarus and Master Braburne bring in against the setting of the title Lords day upon our weekly holiday and therewith wee shall further strengthen the truth against the last objection for which the best proofe alledged is a negative Argument or an Argument drawne from the negative testimony of one man which is of little authority in it selfe and the lesse in this case because it takes up with one Writer onely whereas if more could bee produced to that purpose the antiquity of that Name as now the Church applyeth it might yet be upheld by the advantage of a greater number of grave and ancient Authours positively which is better then negatively giving their votes and voyces to the contrary Tenet That singular Author who is brought in as a dumb shew speaking nothing of our weekly holiday by the name of the Lords day is Justin Martyr from whose silence Doctor Gomarus argueth thus a Si diei Dominici pro die Resurrectionis Domini seu primo hebdomadis appellatio ab Apostolis promanasset c. ut supra citatur cap. 3. lit m. If the title Lords day as applyed to the day of the Resurrection or the first day of the weeke had beene derived from the Apostles and received in the Primitive Church is it credible that Justin Martyr a most ancient and incorrupt Writer in his accurate description of the rites of the Christian Religion would have called the day by the name of Sunday or the first day of the week and not Lords day at all To which I dare not answer as b Dr. Bound on the Sabbath part 1. p. 114. Dr. Bound doth that Justin Martyr in his second Apologie hath the name of Lords
day for I finde it otherwise But c Dr. Rivet disscriat de orig Sab. cap. 10. pag. 180. Dr. Rivet replyeth very well whose answer I shall a little transpose and alter to make it more serviceable to the truth First That it is no marvell that Justin Martyr writing to an Heathen and discoursing with a Jew used such termes as they were best acquainted with and best liked of as did the Translater of the Bible out of which the Epistles and Gospels of our Liturgie were taken as we shall observe in the seventh Chapter and such was the name Sunday to the Heathens and the first day of the week to the Jewes and therefore which hee might further have observed out of d Justin Apol. ad Anson 2d. propè sin pag. 419. Justin speaking to the Gentiles hee calleth the day before it not the Sabbath though among the Religious it were both of most ancient and common use but Saturday or the day of Saturne Secondly Whereas Doctor Gomarus grounds the weight of his Argument upon Justin Martyrs accurate description of the rites of the Christian Religion as that if the name Lords day for the Christians weekly holiday had beene in use before that time in the Church it must either there bee mentioned or from the omission of it there it might well bee denyed to have beene the title of it in his time Doctor Rivet answereth by retortion of his reason out of Tertullian That when the Gentiles conceived from the Christians weekly Assemblies upon Sundaies c Tert. Apol. cap. 16. tom 2. pag. 632. that the Sun was the god they worshipped hee stands to the name with denyall of their sinister conceit of the Christians practice and takes not that occasion to tell them though it bee a better inducement then Justin had any in the place fore-alledged to mention the Lords day that they had another name for that day viz. the Lords day and another reason of their religious observation of it then they imagined viz. the memoriall of the Lords Resurrection their Lord and Saviour f An non hic erat opportunissimus declarandi locus Dr. Rivet ubi ante pag. 182. Here surely was a most meete place to have made some declaration of the day as under that title the Lords day and because hee did it not there will it follow that it was not in use in his time among the Christians the contrary will appeare by his Booke g Die Dominico jejunare nâ—sas ducimus vel de geniculis adorare Tertul. de corona milit cap. 3. com 1. pag. 747. de corona militis and h O melior sides nationum quae nullam solennitatem Christianorum sibi vendicar non Dominicum diem non Pentecosten Tert. de Idol cap. 14. tom 2. pag. 457. de Idololatria wherein having to do with Christians hee useth the name or title Lords day for the Christians weekly holiday And to answer both Doctor Gomarus and Master Braburne together the observation of i Bish Andrewes in his Speech in the Star-chamber against Master Trask pag. 73. 74. Bishop Andrewes is of some weight as himselfe setteth downe in these words This day this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 came to have the name of dies Dominicus in the Apostles time and is so expressely called by Saint John in the Revelation ch 1. ver 10. and that name from that day to this hath holden still with continuance of it from the Apostles age and may bee deduced downe from Fathers to Fathers even to the Councell of Nice and lower I trust saith hee we need not follow it no doubt is made since then by any one that hath read any thing Yet some raise a doubt upon the Constitution of Constantine by whose authority they say Sunday was made a generall and a publick holiday and with it Friday and both of them were to be observed weekly as k Euseb de vita Constantin l. 4. c. 18. p. 254. Eusebius sheweth why then may not Friday bee the day to which that title Lords day might belong especially since as in English wee commonly call it it hath an addition of especiall weight and worth good Friday good 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by way of eminence and excellencie above all other dayes But notwithstanding this the day of the Resurrection hath the preheminence as in dignitie as before hath beene proved so in antiquitie perpetuitie and generalitie of solemne observation above all other dayes for it was a l Originem hujus denominationis ab ipso Apostolorum tempore accersendam omnibus ferè Scriptoribus placet D. Walaeus dissertat de quart praecept cap. 7. pag. 150. weekly holiday from the Apostles time as wee shall manifest elsewhere and though it were to gaine ground of the Jewish Sabbath but by degrees in Ignatius his time who lived in the first Centurie or hundred yeeres of Christianitie it was growne to that credit as not onely to bee well knowne by the name Lords day but to bee dignified with that royall title the Queene of daies as hath been observed and it is to bee noted that this Ignatius was his disciple who first used that title Lords day viz. the disciple of the Evangelist S. John and so was most like to know what day he meant by that appellation Secondly For that Decree of Constantine it was not made untill the fourth Century was begun above two hundred yeers after this of Ignatius Thirdly As Friday was made a weekely holiday much later then Sunday was not to stand upon comparisons betwixt Apostolicall and Imperiall powers for the making of holidaies in which respect Sunday hath the advantage above good Friday so hath Sunday continued much longer by many hundred yeers and hath been both for time more perpetuall and for place in the Christian Church more generall then Friday ever was And as the observation of that day hath been almost universall so hath the application of this title Lords day been unto it likewise for as Doctor m Omnes ferè sacrae Scripturae interpretes tam veteres quam recentiores de primo dic Septimanae intelligunt ac proinde nova planè interpretatio est corum qui Apocalypscos diem c. Wallaeus dissertat de quart praecept cap. 6. pag. 150. Walaeus noteth the deriving of the originall of that name from the Apostles time out of Apoc. 1.10 is approved almost by all Writers and Doctor ″ D. Heyl. Hist Sab. part 2. c. 1. ad sinem cap. p. 37. Heylin though otherwise farre from doting on the dignity of our weekly holiday not onely for the tenure of it but for the title too having referred the originall of it to the yeere of our Lord 94. wherein he followeth n M. Broad his MS. part 2. c. 10. p. 62. M. Broad his note upon it which sheweth but little good will unto it saith thus o D. Heyl. Hist Sab. part 2. a. 1. pag. 30. So long it
Idolatrous names are not to bee used But the name Sunday is an idolatrous name Therefore the name Sunday is not to bee used To the major Proposition there is some consonant sound both in the Scripture and in the sayings of Ancient and late Writers both Protestants and Papists which wee must first alledge that wee may the better judge of the liberty of our lips for the use of that name First For Scripture the proofe produced by b Dr. Bound on the Sab. part 1. p. 116. Dr. Bound as most pertinent to oppose Idolatrous names in particular the name Sunday and to depose it from the dignity it hath in being taken into titular association with the Lords day is Exod. 23.13 In all things that I have said bee circumspect and make no mention of the names of other gods neither let it be heard out of thy mouth To which may be added the like prohibition Jos 23.7 Neither make mention of the name of their gods nor cause to sweare by them and that which goeth farther Deut. 12.3 where God commandeth not onely abstinence from them but an abolition of them as was done by the children of Reuben Num. 32.38 The children of Reuben built with other Cities Nebo and Baal and their names being changed they gave other names unto the Cities which they builded for Nebo and Baal were the names of Idols of Nebo wee read Isa 46.1 upon which the note of Doway Bibles is that It was otherwise called Dagon the Idol of the Philistines mentioned 1 Sam. 5.2 and of Baal wee read Judg. 6.30 31. and in divers other places and because it lay not altogether in the power of men as to leave out their names so to put out their memory God promiseth to put to his helping hand for their suppression I will take away the names of Baalim out of her mouth and they shall no more remember their names Hos 2.17 and I will destroy the names of Idols out of the earth saith he Zech. 13.2 Answerably hereunto we should not only forbear the names of Idols as David professeth he will doe Psal 16.5 but so farre as lyeth in our power utterly abandon and abolish them All this as well as that in Exod. 23.13 may be urged against the name Sunday though all this and more may be well answered but yet the objection is not at the strongest it must be further fortified by adding the Testimony of the Ancients to the Authority of the Scripture Secondly then for the ancient Fathers The most learned and religious of them have expressed their dislike of Idolatrous names c Absit ab ore Christiano sonet Jupiter omnipotens Mebercule Mecaster caetera magis portenta quam nomina Hier. Epist de filio prodigo frugi ad Damas tom 3. p. 231. Farre bee it from any Christians mouth saith Saint Hierome to take up the titles of Jupiter omnipotent or to say Mehercule or Mecaster or other such words which are rather prodigies then appellations And d Displicit mihi quòd Musas quasi Deas quamvis jocando commemorarim August retract lib. 1. cap. 3. S. Augustine censured himselfe for having named the Muses Goddesses though but in jest And which cometh home to the point wee have in hand having mentioned the Pagan names of divers dayes in the week as of Munday Tuesday Wednesday c. used by some Christians as well as by Pagans e Secunda Sab. secunda feria quam seculares diem Lunae vocant tertia Sabbat tertia feria quam diem illi Martis vocant quarta Sabbatorum quarta seria qui Mercurii dies dicitur à Paganis à muitis Christianis sed noluimus ut dicant atque utinam corrigantur ut non dicant August enarrat in Psal 93. tom 8. part 2. pag. 181. he saith as to the Christians I would not have them so to doe and I would to God that errour were corrected in them f Melius eâ—gò de ore Christiano ritus loqueÌ„di Ecclesiasticus procedit Aug. Ibid. It were better saith hee that Christians should speake in the phrase and stile of the Church which noteth them by other names And that this may seeme no uncanonicall nicetie of theirs there may be quoted for it a Canon of the first Councell of Nice g Ne fideles imponant nomina Gentilium suis filiis sed iis inter baptizandum nomina Christianorum indant Concil Nicen. Can. 30. Alph. Pisan Edit Can. Concil Nicen. lib. 3. Can. 30. tom 1. Concil p. 355. Edit Bin. 1606. apud Caranz Summa Concil fol. 632. where for feare of giving countenance to Idolatry by names the faithfull are forbidden to impose heathen names upon their children in Baptisme and prescribed to put upon them onely Christian names Thirdly For Protestants h Bish Pilking in Hag. c. 1. v. 1. Bishop Pilkington misliketh the heathenish names of the moneths and dayes suspecting great danger in the use of them though there seeme matter of small moment in them whose censure is cited as also that of i Beroald Chro. lib. 1. c. 4. Beroaldus touching the subtilty of Satan in putting Pagan names in stead of Christian names upon the dayes of the week and approved by k D. bound of the Sab. part 1. pag. 112 113. Doctor Bound in his first part of his Book of the Sabbath Fourthly For Papists though they detest not Idolatry so much as they should doe yet against the Idolatrous names of dayes they are very zealous as wee may well perceive by their sayings which wee shall have occasion presently to cite in the proofe of the minor Proposition which is this But the name Sunday is an Idolatrous name Of the dayes of the weeke wee have shewed the conceit of S. Augustine already which may be applyed to Sunday as well as to the rest For the Sunne was made an Idol by the Gentiles as is notorious to all the world and which cometh neerer unto us the Saxons our Predecessors in this Kingdome did adore it in this figure It was made as l Verstegan Restitut of decayed Intellig. cap. 3. p. 68 69. Verstegan giveth the description of it both by scheme and glosse like an halfe naked man set upon a pillar his face as it were brightned with gleames and holding with both his armes stretched out a burning wheele before his breast the wheele being to signifie the course which hee runneth round about the world and the fiery gleames and brightnesse the light and heat wherewith hee warmeth and comforteth the things that grow This Idol thus figured was placed in the Temple and there adored and sacrificed unto for that they beleeved that the Sun in the firmament did with or in this Idol correspond and co-operate And as the Christians for keeping holy that day which the Pagans dedicated to the Sunne and for directing their worship toward the East were suspected by them in that respest to bee of the
same Religion with them which gave m Si diem Solis laetitiae indulgemus aliâ longè ratione quà m religione Solis c. Tertull. Apol. cap. 16. tom 2. pag. 632. Tertullian occasion to cleer himselfe and his fellow Christians from it by observing the difference betwixt themselves and those sun-burnt Idolaters who did indeed adore it as their god which they did not so by the retaining of idolatrous names of dayes it is conceived by divers as in part wee have shewed that some spice of that superstition is like to bee retained with no little prejudice to true Religion by keeping better names out of ordinarie use The Divell saith n D. bound on the Sab. part 1. pag. 13. Doctor bound caused the Mathematicians to call the first day of the weeke Sunday lest that any ignorant man hearing the name of the Lords day should inquire what that Lord was of whom the day was so called The o Rhem. Test cap. 1. ver 10. Rhemists dislike it in part for the same reason The name Sunday say they is an heathenish calling as well as all other of the week dayes bee in our language some imposed after the names of certaine Idols which the Saxons worshipped and to which they dedicated the dayes before they were Christians which have so long continued that p Profectò pudendum est simulque dolendum quòd non antehac data sint istis diebus Christiana nomina ne dii gentium inter nos tam memorabile monumentum haberent Polydor. Virg. de Invent. rer lib. 6. cap. 5. pag. 367. Polydore Virgil complaineth of it as matter of sorrow and shame to the Christian world that the dayes of the weeke have not hitherto been called by Christian but by heathen names whereby the Gentile gods have had too honourable a memoriall among us To which opinion q Doctor Fulkes answer to the Rhem. Test Rev. 1. vers 10. propè sinem Sect. 6. The like dislike is shewed by that other industrious Writer of our Church Doctor Willet Synops controvers quest 8. part 2. err 72. p. Dr. Fulke inclineth where he saith That the name of Sunday and the rest of the dayes were of heathenish beginning and therefore were better to be left off Here are then against those names severall sorts of Testimonies divine and humane and these both ancient and of later time Protestants and Papists and in these Testimonies are included sundry reasons against the name Sunday especially these First That it is of heathenish beginning Secondly That it hardneth men in Idolatry and hindreth the progresse of true Christianity Thirdly That it may bring those that use it into suspicion of heathenish superstition The Conclusion or Inference from these Premises will bee the forbearance of these names as r D. Fulke his answer to the Rhem. Test in Rev. 1.10 S. 6. Dr. Fulke would have it and the observation of some such Decree as is said to bee made by the Pope Silvester the first at the request of the Emperour Constantine which in f Durand rational l. 7. f. 426. pag. 1. Durandus t Polid. Virg. de Invent. rer l. 6. c. 5. p. 366. Polidore and u Rhem. in Luk. 24.1 ex Brev. Rom. Decem. 31. and in Rev. 1.10 Sect. 6. others wee finde to bee brought in thus Pope Silvester abhorring the Idolatrous appellation of daies and having a minde to reforme it was yet loath to imitate the nomenclature of the Jewes who reckoned the weeke thus the first of the Sabbath the second of the Sabbath c. I say the first of the Sabbath not the first after the Sabbath as the x Rhem. in Luk. 24. ver 1. Rhemists expound it for in the Jewish computation the Sabbath day was the last day of the seven and so the accomplishment of the whole weeke wherefore the word Sabbath is sometimes taken not for a day but for a weeke as Luk. 18.12 chap. 24.1 as our best English Translators render it and the accompt being made with such particular mention of the Sabbath every day it might bee a meanes daily to keepe in minde the memento of the fourth Commandement that all profanation of the day by provident forecast of secular affaires might be prevented and that other dayes of the week wearing as it were the Sabbaths livery they might bee so regulated with reference unto it that there might bee none occasion to make inchroachments upon it Notwithstanding this that Pope having no liking of the Jewish reckoning though with this intimation it did not deserve to be disliked nor yet of the Gentiles who count Sunday Munday c. gave them this numerall denomination calling the first day of the weeke prima feria or the Dominicall day the second secunda feria and so to the sixth naming the last of the seven by the old name Sabbath This is the most and worst that can be said against the usuall appellation of the dayes especially against the name Sunday which is the chiefe in acceptation with some and in exception with others Notwithstanding I conceive that in our times and in our Church the name Sunday is not so to be censured or shunned as by some it hath been and this will appeare chiefely by clearing it from such objections as are made against it which now wee shall offer to the judgement of the indifferent Reader CHAP. VII How farre it may bee lawfull to use Idolatrous names An Answer to the Objection against the name Sunday ANd first for the places of Scripture before alledged they doe not imply in their proprer sense so precise a prohibition of all names of idolatrous or otherwise of sinfull intimation or acception in all respects that it should be utterly unlawfull to mention them the name of evill is forbidden sometimes to make us more estranged from that which is evill yet not wholly and altogether For First An evill as it is evill may bee reproved and that under that name by which it is knowne so though the Apostle forbid the naming of fornication in his Epistle to the Ephes chap. 5. ver 3. yet himselfe nameth fornication and fornicator by way of reproofe well toward twenty times in his Epistles and in that very place hee could not so well have forbidden the thing it selfe if he had not at all made use of the name Secondly It may bee lawfull to mention an idolatrous name without reproofe as a M. Ainsworth in Mr. Pagets arrow against the Brownists p. 142 143. Master Ainsworth though a Brownist and so a vehement adversary to all appearance of idolatry acknowledgeth and giveth instance in the names Nebuchadnezzar and Belshazzer and others to which may be added the idolatrous name of the Ship wherein Paul was carried which hee called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. Castor Pollux Act. 28.11 and this in an idolatrous sense though without either approbation or reproofe of Idolatry Thirdly An idolatrous name may bee
most moment in the present subject concerning the use of it whether the Christians weekly holiday or Lords day may bee fitly called by that name For the first Some write Sabbath which is the right some Sabboth and some Sabaoth a M. Minsh Guide of the Tongues p. 638. Master Minshaw in his Guide of the Tongues hath them all In Master Brerewood his first Treatise the title of the first edition was A learned Treatise of the Sabaoth and that word so written runneth on throughout the whole Book Whereupon b M. R. Byf. pag. 1. Master R. Byfield in the Preface of his Answer to it saith What the Treatise affords shall bee seene anon God willing that title savours of little learning wherein for Sabbath is written Sabaoth which signifieth hoasts as in Isa 1.9 And a little after saith hee I would have imputed this to the Printers oversight if either the Errata had mentioned it or the whole Booke in any one place had given the true Orthography Wherein though in many differences about the Sabbath I shall and I hope upon just grounds dissent from Master Brerewood yet I shall bee ready to doe him all right and to quit him from all such causelesse exceptions as come in my way as this doth and so I answer First That if the title of the Booke did bewray some ignorance of the Hebrew in the Authour yet might hee bee a very learned man and his Booke like himselfe a very learned Book for all that for a man may bee very learned and yet bee unacquainted with the originall tongues so were many of those Divines who have had and still have the honour to bee stiled the Fathers of the Church and yet have beene noted for c We have over and above the benefit of all their works i.e. of the Fathers much skilfulnesse in the originall of the old Testament which most of them wanted and of the new also wherewith some were but little acquainted Mr. Downe 2d. part of his works p. 220. the most part of them to be unskilfull in the originall text of the old Testament and divers of them also of the new And to instance in particulars for the Latines S. Augustine with his one tongue is set in comparison and preferred by d Non ideo quisquam verè sapiens quia Graecus sit vel Hebraeus quare beatus Hieron quinque linguis monoglossam Augustinum non adaequavit Luther To. 1. Ep. fol. 54. Epist ad Joâ— Lang. Luther before Hierome with his five tongues and though Erasmus somewhat netled with the censure of Eckius who noted him for his e Nihil est quod tibi deesse Erasmici omnes conquerantur nisi quod Aurel. Aug. non legeris Eckius Epist Erasm lib. 2. pag. 95. not reading of S. Augustine his works in his Epistle to him weigh and sway the comparison the contrary f Erasm Epist Eckio lib. 2. pag. 97 98. way giving the preheminence to S. Hierome yet elsewhere bringing in the particular praises not only of him but of Athanasius Basil Cyprian Hilary Ambrose Gregory g At non arbitror alium esse Doctorem in quem opulentus ille juxta ac benignus spiritus dotes suas omnes largius effuderit quam in Augustinum quasi voluerit in una tabula vividum quoddam exemplum Episâ—opi representare Erasm Epist Archiep. Toled praesix tom 1. operum Aug. pag. 2. hee saith Hee doth not thinke there is another Doctor into whom the Spirit hath powred out all his gifts in a more ample measure then in Saint Augustine as if hee meant in him as in a Table to represent the lively patterne of a Bishop and having stiled him an incomparable h Incomparabilis Ecclesiae Dâ—ctor invictus propugnator quem tu non sine causa sic adamare prae caeteris sic in deliciis semper habere consuevisti Quid enim habet or bis Christianus hoc Scriptore vel magis aureum vel augustum ut ipsa vocabula nequaquam fortuitò sed numinis Providentià videantur indita viro Iâ— pag. 1. Doctor of the Church and an unconquered Champion for the truth and confessed that the Cardinall of Toledo not without good cause tooke delight in him before all others alluding to his name Aurelius Augustinus importing golden goodnesse and Imperiall greatnesse he asketh as with admiration of him What hath the whole Christian world more golden and more majesticall then this Writer these names surely saith he seem not by chance but by especiall Providence imposed upon him Yet is this so great a Clerke so accomplish'd and admirable a Doctor noted sometimes by way of excuse sometimes by way of exception for ignorance in the Hebrew and very little skill in the Greeke by i Nee Hebraicè sciebat Augustinus Graecè minus quam mediocriter Ludov. Viv. in Aug. de C. D. lib. 15. cap. 13. part 2. pag. 133. Ludovicus Vives k Augustinus vitiosam versionem secutus quia Hebraeae linguae ignarus minus culpandus quam hodierni Papistae Polan Syntag. Theol. lib. 1. cap. 42. col 561. Polanus l Augustinus dubitat Adam an Eva id dixerit sed gnarus linguae sacrae videt foeminae verba acquisivi verum à Domino Paâ—aeus in Gen. 4. col 655. fine Paraeus and m Adeo Augustinum ex sola ignorantia linguae Hebraeae esse deceptum in voce Cephas Bel. de Ro. Po. li. 1. cap. 10. p. 208. col 2. So was S. Ambrose deceived when he derived the Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifying to suffer Ambr. de myst Pasch ch 1. tom 2. pag. 190. Bellarmine and of Saint Hilary though n De Hilario nunc agimus qui tum ob vitae sanctimoniam â—â—m ob insignem eruditionem tum ob eloquentiam admirabilem aevi sic lumen suit Erasm Ep. Johan Carondeleto Arch. ep l. 28. pag. 1165. Erasmus sets him out as a most illustrious light of his age for holinesse of life learning and eloquence and brings in for an improvement of his praise That o Hieronymus qui pene contempsit Augustinum nec ita multum tribuit Ambrosio toties tanta cum veneratione citat Hilarium alibi vocans eum orbis Deucalionem c. Ibid. pag. 1168. Hierome who almost contemned Saint Augustine and did not attribute much to Saint Ambrose did admire him calling him sometimes the ″ I doubt Erasmus is mistaken in this title Deucalion of the world for Hierom giveth this title to one Hilary a Deacon of Rome in contempt for hee brings it in thus Est praeterea aliud quod inferemus adversum quod ne muciâ—e quidem audeat Helarius Deucalion orbis Hieron advers Lucifer propè finem and hee calleth him so because he separated from others as if all the world but hee and his sect were drowned in hereticall Baptisme Deucalion of the world
also further strength to this that Saint John in his Revel calleth this our Sabbath day the Sunday Dominicumdiem and afterward having set downe some generall duties of the day saith he m Ibid. p. 74. These things are not to bee done onely on the Sabbath day but every day even all our life long So doth that renowned and so admired n Sacratissimus antistes Lancelotus Andrewes linguarum artium scientiarum humanorum divinorum omnium infinitus Thesaurus stupendium oraâ—ulum c. So in the Title page the second edition of his Sermons Bishop of Winchester Bishop Andrewes who used to make a curious choice of his words as well as of his matter in his third Sermon of the Resurrection where speaking of the women that would have embalmed our blessed Saviour hee saith o B. Andrewes his 3d Sermâ—n on the Resurrection p. 406 407. Though they faine would have been embalming him yet not with breach of the Sabbath their diligence leap'd over none of Gods Commandements for haste no not this Commandement which of all other the world is most bold with and if they have haste somewhat else may but sure the Sabbath shall never stay them And beginning his Sermon at the Court on Whitsunday 1606. hee saith thus p B. Andr. his Serm. Acts 2. vers 2 3 4. pag. 595. Wee are this day besides our weekly due of the Sabbath to renew and to celebrate the yeerely memory of the sending down of the holy Ghost And even there where he set himselfe most seriously against Judaicall opinions viz. in his Speech against Mr. Traske in the Star-chamber hee saith thus q Ibid. In his Speech to the Starre-Chamber against Master Tracke pag. 72 73. and this name new Sabbath hee hath if the Authour of the Dialogue betwixt A. and B. reckon right twenty times in his Book called Catec Doctr. So the Dialogue betwixt two Divines A. B. edit 2. pag. 20. the Sabbath had reference to the old creation but in Christ wee are a new creature a new creation by him and so to have a new Sabbath if a new Sabbath then not no Sabbath as Doctor Pocklington would have it And the Bishop meaneth by that the Lords day which hee maintaineth against Master Traske who stood for Saturday the Sabbath of the Jewes Bishop Alley Bishop of Exceter in his Book called The poore mans Library printed Anno 1560. speaking of the due observation of the day wee celebrate saith r Bish Alleys Poore mans Library miscelan praelect 5. fol. 143. p. 2. All Governours and Housholders offend against this precept if they doe not their diligence to retaine the sanctifying of the Sabbath in their houses whosoever despise the Religion of the Sabbath give evident testimony in themselves of impiety and contempt of God c. Bishop King not long since Bishop of London Bishop King who in his time was accompted a very venerable Prelate and alwaies well affected to the Government of the Church before himselfe was made a Governour of it in his Lectures upon Jonah of severall impressions useth the name Sabbath divers times for Sunday or the Lords day as in his sixth Lecture where he reproveth carelesse dissolute and ill disposed persons he saith f Bishop King lect 6. p. 90. They love the thresholds of their private doores upon the Sabbaths of the Lord and their benches and ale-houses better then the Courts of the Lords house And a little after he taxeth them by the name of Profaners of our sanctified Sabbaths And in his seventh Lecture he hath these words t Ibid. lect 7. pag. 96. The Sabbath is reserved as the unprofitablest day of the seven for idlenesse sleeping walking rioting tipling bowling dancing and what not I speake what I know saith he upon a principall Sabbath For if the resurrection of Christ deserve to alter the Sabbath from day to day I see no cause but the comming downe of the Holy Ghost should adde honour and ornament to it I say upon a principall Sabbath c. Doctor Howson late Bishop of Durham though a reall opposite to the Sabbath in some particulars was not an enemy to that name when hee made mention of the thing for in his Sermon u Bish Howsons Sermon of Festiv pag. 6. edit 2. in defence of Festivities he hath these words Beloved Christians were any of those excellent Fathers in our times what thinke you he would say if he should see Oratoria turned into Auditoria Churches into Schooles our Sabbaths and Festivities not spent in cultu latriae but in hearing of Exercises as some call it c. though hee were no friend to the Sabbath either for the dignity of the day or the duties belonging unto it for both in opinion and practice he was opposite to preaching yet was hee not so ill affected to the name as Doctor Pocklington and others have been That very learned Bishop of Bath and Wells whose Sermons were so approved by Doctor Reynolds Bishop Lake that what he heard him preach hee still desired to reade and therefore used to crave a copy of his Sermon was not onely a friend to the name Sabbath for Sunday but a zealous pleader for it as we shall observe in another place And the Bishop of Exceter that now is who hath so decently dressed Devotion and Piety with delicacie of conceipt and elegancy of expression as to make it amiable in all eyes in his art of divine meditation saith in approbation of it thus * Bish Hall in the art of divine meditation cap. 10. p. 111. No Manna fell to the Israelites on their Sabbath on ours it doth Where the word Sabbath must bee necessarily understood in the word Ours And if so it be not plaine enough see further in his second booke of Characters where part of his description of a distrustfull man is this x Lib. 2. Charact p. 196. Hee dares not come to the Church for feare of the croud nor spare the Sabbaths labour for feare of want nor come neere the Parliament house for feare it should be blowne up I make no doubt but the Articles of Episcopall Visitations give allowance for the like use of the name Sabbath for Sunday or Lords day for so it is in the 15. Article of Archbishop Parker his Visitation Nor is it to be doubted but in Archbishop Whitgifts Articles the word was in the same sense for as we have noted before hee turned the word Sunday into Sabbath in translating a testimony out of Justin Martyr And sure wee are that Archbishop Bancroft used the word Sabbath for the Lords day foure times in his Articles of Visitation twice in two Articles viz. 75 76. whence it is probable that other Bishops were in phrase and forme of speech for that name conformable to them for in the Province of Yorke much more in that of Canterbury it was so as in our Diocesse of Chester Bishop Lloyd in his Visitation
Anno 1605. Bishop Lloyd in the 2.4.8.44 45. Artic. calls that day Sabbath day So did Bishop Morton in his Visitation of the same Diocesse Anno 1617. Artic. 11.30.33.39 Bishop Morton And Bishop Bridgman in his trienniall Visitation Anno 1631. Bish Bridgman Artic. 11.41.43 used the word Sabbath for the weekly Holiday of our Church who were yet all of them both in judgement language and practice far enough from siding with Schismaticall Novelties To these Bishops of England I will adde two out of Ireland and so conclude my Episcopall Testimonies for the name Sabbath The one is Bishop Usher the most reverend Archbishop and Primate of Armagh who I know by conference with him approveth of the application of the name Sabbath to our Sunday or Lords day The other is Bishop Downham the Bishop of Derty who hath done and suffered much in the defence of the Prelacie he in his abstract of the duties commanded and sinnes forbidden in the Decalogue treating of the fourth Commandement taxeth with reference to our times those that are mindfull of the Sabbath to profane it who having extraordinary businesse will not bestow any part of the weeke upon it but will reserve it for the Sabbath and make bold with God to borrow part of his day and those who observe the Sabbath for fashion sake keeping the outward rest onely putting on gay clothes and doing nothing c. After these reverend Prelates in number sixteene whereof foure are Archbishops wee will give in the names of some Cathedrall Deanes and Doctours of venerable estimation in our Church noting the Lords day by the name Sabbath as y Doct. Boys expos of the Liturgy p. 92. Doctor Boys Archbish Whitgifts Chaplaine and Deane of Canterbury and Doctor Donne Deane of Pauls The Deane of Canterbury saith The Sabbath is as one calls it Gods Schoole-day the Preachers are his ushers and the Church is his open Schoole house which he doth not onely repeat but approve of and when Sabbath breakers are rebuked saith z Doct. Boys ubi sup pag. 93. he all their answer is that most doe so If they will follow fashion and example let them follow the best scil Gods example And againe a Ibid. pag. 95. The duties required on the Lords day are principally two Rest and Sanctification of this rest a double Sabbath rest from labour and rest from sinne and if there bee a double Sabbath in it it hath a double right to the title Sabbath Doctor Donne the Deane of Pauls Dr. Donne preaching at the dedication of a new Chappell in Lincolnes Inne where hee was Lecturer speaketh thus b Doctor Donne of Pauls in his Sermon Joâ—n 10. vers 22. which hee calls the Feast of Dedication at the dedication of a new Chappell in Lincolnes Inne consecrated by the Bishop of London anno 1623. pag. 7. Though God take a seventh part of our time in the Sabbath yet hee takes more too for hee appoints other Sabbaths other Festivals and in all the Sabbaths there is still a cessation Hee saith not God tooke but takes in the present tense a seventh part of our time not of the Jewes onely though hee tooke it first of theirs and though hee call other Festivals Sabbaths also the seventh day may have an especiall right to the name Sabbath above the Rest for so it had under the old Testament though then there were other holidaies which for their congruity with it in rest or cessation for in all Sabbaths saith hee there is still a cessation might be partakers of the same title and prosecuting the same point afterwards he reproveth some who think we are bound to no festivals at all but to the Sabbath but God requires as much service from us as from the Jewes saith c Ib. pag. 10 of his dedication Sermon he and to them hee enlarged his Sabbaths and made them divers And to the same purpose hee speaketh in his Sermon on the 10. of John As God taketh the tenth part of our goods in Tythes but yet more in Sacrifices so though hee take a seventh part of our time in the Sabbath yet hee takes more too for hee appoints other Sabbaths or Festivals There bee some to take in a doubt by the way which his coupling of Sabbaths and Festivals as Synonymaes induceth us to consider who so precisely distinguish betwixt Sabbaths and Festivals as to deny that the Sabbath may be called by the name of a Festivall The Sabbath saith the d Re-examiner of Perth Assemb p. 187. printed in anno 1636. Re-examiner of Perth Assembly under the Law was never called Jom tob a good that is a merry day as were the solemn Feasts which seemeth to bee a portion of Sacrifice taken from the e Altare Damasc pag. 666 667. Altar of Damascus where the same observation is made and concerning Festivals in particular the Authour saith It was not lawfull to fast on a Festivall But it may bee answered that though there bee difference betwixt the Sabbath and other dayes properly called dies festi in regard of particular occasion of the institution and of more liberty in meats and delights then on the Sabbath yet might the Sabbaths yea all publick solemnities even the Fast of Expiation not excepted bee sometimes called Feasts or Festivals and so much the Authour of the f Ib. pag. 666. Altar of Damascus not without some apparant contradiction to himselfe hath acknowledged And as the old Sabbath was unto the Jewes a day of spirituall delight for which purpose some cite Isa 58. how fitly wee shall note in another place so is the new Sabbath to the Christians on which in g Die dominico jâ—junium nesas ducimus vel de geniculis adorare Tert. de coronmilit c. 3. tom 2. pag. 747. Tertullians time it was held a great offence to fast and in all times when the Sacrament of the Lords Supper is administred which in the Primitive times was as oft as that day returned it exhibiteth a Feast of the body and bloud of Christ the best and most delicious cheer that can be desired to him who is rightly prepared to receive it But this onely by the way or rather as an occasionall digression out of the way takâ—n from the doubt in the words of the Deane concerning the Sabbath from whom wee have one observation more to remember and that is in his Sermon on Mat. 21. h Idem Serm. on Mat. 21.44 pag. 16. printed 1634. at Cambridge We will admit of Christ saith hee but wee will not admit him to reigne over us If hee will bee content with a Consulship with a Colleagueship that hee and the world may joyne in Governement that wee may give the weeke to the world and the Sabbath unto him that of the day wee may give the forenoone to him the afternoone to our pleasures If this will serve Christ wee can bee content to admit him but nolumus
as Sabbathary errours And though the Bishop pretend the errour of the old Sabbath and rigour of the new to have been so new that Bishop Andrewes and Master Hooker could not take notice of it being before their time and that therefore they tooke the lesse heed to their termes when they spake of our Christian and Weekly Holiday yet it is not like that either was unknowne unto them as he saith the heresie of Pelagius was to Chrysostome and Augustine when they wrote somewhat uncircumspectly concerning some points which he perverted For the conceipt of the necessity and perpetuity of the Saturday Sabbath hath bin the heresie of all Jewes and of some Christians ever since the Christian Sabbath was ordained and the most rigorous excesses touching the observation of the Lords day were published in a n M Rogers Prefat to the Art of Relig. printed anno 1607. Booke of generall note and common use before the passages cited out of Bishop Andrewes writings were published by himselfe or any one else at least before his Starre-chamber speech against Mr. Traske was made and in that speech though Traske were Jewishly conceipted of the Saturday Sabbath he gives the name Sabbath to the Lords day as hath been noted and even Doctor Howson Bishop of Durham though in his Sermon of Festivities hee mention the same straines of ever-strained severity in observation of the Christian Sabbath calleth Sunday or the Lords day for all that by the name Sabbath Besides the wiser sort well knew that to prejudice the piety and authority of the Lords day as from the fourth Commandement from whence the name Sabbath is derived upon it would bee to give too much countenance to Libertines and Antinomists whose heresie being plausible to the flesh by the craft of the Divell was like to find more welcome entertainment with the world then that opinion of the Saturday Sabbath or then those extreme severities in observation of the Lords day So that all doubts and dangers duely considered on both sides I make no doubt if most of those Worthies whose testimonies wee have produced for the name Sabbath were now alive to see the carriage of the cause in our daies but they would thinke it most convenient to continue the title Sabbath to the Lords day to make good their precedent by subsequent attestations to this truth and to adde their further care to oppose profanenesse which hath mightily advanced since the Legall and Evangelicall authority and piety of this day hath been so opposed I may say in the Bishops owne words and with reference to him opposed with an high hand for no hand so high as his did ever strive so to weaken the one and darken the other since the darknesse of Popery was by the light of the Gospel driven out of our English Horizon as his hath done Fourthly yet for all that as he desires I will judge charitably of him for my charity inclines mee to conceive that he wrote what he thought but withall my discretion telleth me that his pen marched in this quarrell after Jehu's pace in some pangs of passion which are no helps to true information in any difference whether of Religion or otherwise else hee would not have stained his stile with such infected phrases as o Bish Whites answer to the Dialogue p. 72. the mangy objections of the Dialogue-dropper and the scabby similitudes of old Thomas Cartwright termes more meet for the Frocke then for the Rochet If his Adversary dealt uncivilly with him I excuse him not if I might be so bold as to speak my mind of them both I should freely blame them for mingling so much of the drosse of their owne corruptions with the pure Gold of the Sanctuary in this cause of the Sabbath The fourth exception of the Bishop touching the testimony of his Brother Doctor John White answered Fourthly for that which is brought in in the name of his brother Doctor John White calling the Lords day by the name of Sabbath he replyeth thus There is not any contradiction between the two brethren in this Doctrine for the one brother calleth the Lords day Sabbath in a mysticall sense and the other brother saith that it is not the Sabbath of the fourth Commandement in a literall and proper sense Where he bringeth in againe the distinction of literall and mysticall taking literall in a negative sense for his owne part for he denieth the name in that sense and giving mysticall in a positive acception but with an implicite negation of the letter to his brother to which I answer First that had Doctor John White been alive when the Bishop wrote thus he could not I beleeve have made him such a yonger brother though hee were the elder brother and a Bishop both as to put upon him his opinions of the Sabbath either for the title or tenure Secondly the mist of that mis-application of mysticall and literall is already dispelled by the exposition of the Homily which containeth the Tenet of the Church of England so that we may say supposing his brother an Orthodox Doctor of this Church hee did not howsoever he should not so take the name Sabbath in a mysticall sense as to deny the literall in application to the Lords day Thirdly by that I have heard of that learned and godly Doctor both for his Doctrine where he preached and for his conversation where he lived I have cause to suspect his brother imposeth an opinion on him which he did not hold as he did on our Churches Homily before rehearsed Fourthly whosoever shall please to peruse the p Chap. 16. quotation out of Doctor John Whites Booke shall evidently see that he tooke the word Sabbath not in a mysticall but in a literall sense and without absurd and perverse wrestling of his words they cannot otherwise be expounded CHAP. XVIII A particular Answer to the particular exceptions made against the name Sabbath as applyed to Sunday or Lords day and first of the dangerous plot pretended by Doctor Pocklington in the use of the name Sabbath for Sunday and of his prodigious comparison of the name Sabbath on the Lords day and the crowne of Thornes on the Lords head WHat before wee have observed by way of exception against the word Sabbath was onely to note how farre by some it was disliked now wee must particularly examine the grounds and reasons of their dislike and give answer to them though some of them be rather passionate reproaches then probable objections Here the clamours of Doctor Pocklington are so loud that hee must needs first be heard with his accusations against the word Sabbath which if they be as true as they are hainous just cause there is to decree downe and cry down the name Sabbath as the name of him who to bee famous burned the Temple of Diana at Ephesus and thereupon became so infamous that all mention of his name was forbidden by a solemne Decree His charge on the use of
the name Sabbath is That there is in it a double plot the a Doct. Pockl. Visit Serm. pag. 20. one is to stalke behind that name and to shoot at the service appointed for the Lords day the b Ibid. other is to impose upon the day damnable superstition which hee aggravates by this opprobrious comparison hee c Ibid. resembleth the putting of the name Sabbath upon the Lords day to the putting of a crowne of Thornes upon the head of the Lord himselfe making them both unsutable alike and saith This was platted to impose on him damnable derision that was plotted to impose on it damnable superstition Now because he was aware that his comparison might touch some to the quicke who were better then himselfe hee putteth on their heads as a linnen cap for an head-piece this poor Apology to save them from pricking d Ibid. p. 20. If we find the word Sabbath for Sunday saith he used in some writings that of late come unto our hands blame not the Clerks good men for it Nor entitle the misprision any higher or otherwise then to these pretenders of piety who for their own ends have for a long time deceived the world with their zealous and most ignorant or cunning clamours and rung the name Sabbath so commonly into all mens eares that not Clerkes onely but men of judgement learning and vertue not heeding peradventure so much as is requisite what crafty and wicked device may be managed under the vaile of a faire word used in Gods Law doe likewise suffer the name often to escape the doore of their lips that detest the drift of the deviser in the closet of their hearts In which speech to spare many other passages of his booke which lye open to just exception of reason and religion there are divers particulars worthy of examination and censure which we may referre First to the fault objected an impious plot Secondly to the persons for whom he putteth in a perplexed and impotent plea to acquit or excuse them from participation therein For the former viz. the plot it is twofold as hee takes it the one to stalke behind the name Sabbath and to shoot at the service appointed for the Lords day the other to impose upon the day damnable superstition For the first Let him remember what hee hath said page 7. viz. e Dr. Pockling Sunday no Sab. pag. â— Allow them their Sabbath and you must allow them the service that belongs to their Sabbath then must you have no Letany for that 's no service for their Sabbaths but for Sundayes To which I say First Hee seemeth to except against a Sabbatary service as faulty or offensive in some positive points but noteth nothing in particular but what is negative the leaving out of the Letany Secondly That those whom wee have produced for the use of the word Sabbath require no Jewish services on that day nor any other then such as the Church hath established under the name Sunday Thirdly That if the word Sabbath will serve for a stalking horse against the Letany and other service of the Church because that is enjoyned not under the name Sabbath but Sunday then the word Lords day which hee alloweth will serve as well for a stalking horse to the same purpose for the Service is entituled not with the name Lords day but with the name Sunday which as wee have observed before is the word that beareth the greatest sound and sway throughout all the Communion Books since the Reformation of Religion within this Realme yea the title Lords day will serve better to that purpose for the name Sabbath is incorporated into the service of the Church in the fourth Commandement where that title Sabbath is repeated thrice over and that Commandement with the other nine is appointed by the order of our Church to bee rehearsed in her publick Liturgie every Sunday and holiday and besides them on the fifth of November and on the dayes of solemne fasting prescribed upon especiall occasion of the Church and State and to bee learned by heart by the younger sort as a part of the Christian Catechisme but the name Lords day is not to my remembrance once mentioned in our Communion Book now in use Now for the other plot It is as hee saith to impose upon the day damnable superstition I answer That the day may lawfully be called by that name as before wee have proved the abuse of it in some if it were such as hee pretended but cannot prove cannot take away the Christian liberty of others for the lawfull use of it nor hinder but that good Christians may have their intentions when they use it truely pious though the mindes of others bee superstitious Secondly That this condemning censure of an harmelesse word in f Peccar qui damnat quasi peccata quae nulla sunt Aug. de lib. arb lib. 3. cap. 15. Saint Augustine his judgement is a sinne and that sinne may bee a severe and sowre superstition for there is a superstition negative as well as positive as in those who say Touch not taste not handle not Col. 2.21 The forbearance of a thing as unlawfull when it is lawfull is a superstition and the damning of such a thing may bee a damnable superstition but howsoever saith the Doctor it is a great indecorum to call the Lords day by the name Sabbath g D. Pockl. p. 20. The vizzard of the Sabbath on the face of the Lords day saith he doth as well become it as the crowne of thornes did the Lord himselfe A speech not sit to be delivered for shame without a vizzard on the face of him that speaketh it to hide his blushing at the guilt of such an excessive absurdity if hee have any modesty at all or to cover his impudency if hee have none Here by the way let him not thinke it much if we returne him a taste of rue or herbe grace for his full dos of vinegar and gall for what indecorum can bee conceived comparable to that of setting of a crowne of thornes upon his head who was so innocent and excellent that roses and the powder of gold were not good enough to bee strewed in his way nor worthy to be trodden on by the sandals of his feet Surely if there had beene an appearance of such uncomelinesse in calling the Lords day by the name of the Sabbath King James so pregnant in apprehension so sound in judgement and the learned Bishops with other Ecclesiasticks of especiall choice who were at the conference of Hampton Court would not have shewed an unanimous assent to the thing Doctor Reynolds proposed which was the Reformation of abuse of the Lords day by the name of the Sabbath day without any exception at the word used by him But indeed there was no cause of offence in it at all for want of comelinesse as Doctor Pocklington objecteth for the comelinesse of words chiefly consisteth in their congruity with
King James his courteous charientismes in the use of that title it is requisite that wee take it according to the right sense and signification which it properly importeth and so to deny them and affirme our selves to be Catholicks as the learned and judicious Chamier hath done who in his controversies continually calleth the Protestant tenets and arguments by the name of Catholick and the contrary Popish or the doctrine arguments or objections of the Papists So since the name Sabbath is impertinently applyed to the wrong day and wrongfully with-held from the right with purpose to impeach the tenure of our Christian Sabbath by the fourth Commandement wee must not so much regard how it hath been rightly used in former times while Saturday was allowed and observed for a Sabbath or day of rest or how the tyranny of custome hath carryed the name along where there is no realty to answer it as what it properly signifieth and how that propriety of signification now belongeth rather to our day which we celebrate with religious rest then to the Jewes day which we hold not for an holiday but for a workday as the other dayes of the week allowed and imployed in secular labours and wee must inure our tongues with correspondent titles to make mention of them And for the proper signification of the word wee may appeale more pertinently and truely then Master Braburn could to all Dictionaries in all languages which render the word Sabbath according to the ″ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sabbatum à radice 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cessavit quievit destitit is dies quietis Hebraeis est septimus vel dies Saturni Christianis verò est primus vel Solis So Schindler Pentaglot pag. 1801. col 1. Hebrew originall by rest repose or cessation from bodily labours And though it bee usuall with them to take the terme rather according to custome then to truth and to apply it to Saturday the day of rest which anciently was but now is not many of the b So Thomasius word for word followeth Morelius in exposition and application of the name Sabbath later transcribing what they find in the former yet c Sabbath a day of rest among the Jewes celebrated on Saturday among the Christians on Sunday or the Lords day Minshei Dictionarium 10437. some more wisely and warily distinguish the name and render it according to the difference of time first to Saturday and then to Sunday for that day first and for a long time had and this now hath and shall have the honour of a sacred Sabbath untill the worlds end and therefore if it bee fit to speake rather according to the tenour of things as for the present they are and in perpetuity they shall bee then as formerly they were but now are not and must be no more when wee render the word Sabbath without distinction and difference of times wee should rather say according to d Cotgraves French Dictionary verb. Sab. printed 1632. the French Dictionarie that the Sabbath is Sunday then as Master Braburn would have it Saturday Ob. But then it will bee said though wee may differ in phrase and forme of speech from the primitive times because wee differ in practice from them wee should not so dissent from the Churches of later ages who have left off the observation of the Jewish Sabbath and with it the word Sabbath also Wee of the reformed Churches saith e Mr. Ironside quest 3. cap. 17. pag. 121. Master Ironside should not forsake the Roman Church but where necessity doth inforce us for then wee are guilty of the schisme made in the Christian world f Ibid. neither should we vary from our selves so much as were it possible in a sound or syllable for then wee may justly bee noted of singularity and affectation but both the Roman Churches and all the Reformed use to stile it the Lords day not Sabbath day Ergo c. This Argument is made up of three particulars whereof there is not one but it is liable to reasonable exception The first is That there should bee a strict union betwixt the Church of Rome and the Reformed and betwixt other reformed Churches among themselves except where necessity doth enforce a difference Secondly That to differ except in such a case from the Romane Church is to become guilty of Schisme and from the Reformed is to bee guilty of singularity and affectation Thirdly that to stile the Lords day Sabbath is to make our selves obnoxious to the charge of both Whereto I answer First that not to allow one Church to differ from another but where necessity doth inforce is to take away the Christian liberty which God hath granted to his Church contrary to the 34. Article of subscription which runneth thus It is not necessary that traditions and ceremonies be in all places one or utterly alike for at all times they have been diverse and may be changed according to diversity of countries times and manners so that nothing be ordained against Gods Word and a little afterward every particular or nationall Church hath authority to ordaine change or abolish Ceremonies or Rites of the Church ordained onely by mens authority And accordingly we find them exercising their power in varieties of Rites and Ceremonies for the ancient g Die Dominico jejunare nefas ducimus vel de geniculis adorare Tert. de Coron milit c 3. tom 1 pag. 747. quoniam sunt in Dominico die quidam adoratione genua flectentes propterea utique statutum est à sancto Synodo quoniam consona conveniens per omnes Ecclesias custodienda consuetudo est ut stantes ad orationem vota Domino reddamus Concil Nicen. 1. can 20. apud Caranz sum Concil pag. 109 edit 1633. in 8no. Bin. tom 1. pag. 345. edit Paris 1636. Die Dominico per omnem Pentecosten nec de geniculis adorare jejunium solvere Hieron advers Lucifer tom 2. epist p. 140. So also in a Councell of Towers an 813. can 57. Patr. Symps hist of the Church lib. 4. pag. 557. Church for many hundred yeares partly forbad and partly forbore kneeling at prayer all the Lords daies in the yeare and all the daies betwixt Easter and Whitsuntide the later Churches neither forbad nor forbore it The Popish Church keeps the celebration of our Lords Nativity and other Holidaies according to the Gregorian Calendar ten daies sooner then the Reformed especially in England Scotland and Ireland And in many other points they differ besides these which are not of necessity as if necessity required might bee abundantly manifested out of William Durandus his Rationale and John Steph. Durantus his three bookes de Ritibus Eccles Cathol The Reformed Churches differ among themselves in many particulars For instance we in England observe more Holidaies then the Transmarine Churches more then his Majesty that last was required to be kept of the Church of Scotland by the Articles enacted at
the divine Authority of the day or to diminish ought of the duties of devotion belonging to it so that all three names if there bee not more fault in their minds that make use of them then in the words themselves may and will with peaceable men be passable without any cavill at all Secondly hereby may bee precluded their intents that they take not effect who by cavilling at the name bewray a mind to undermine and overthrow the thing it selfe which I will not say nor do I think of all that take exception at that name yet I have shewed it of some that they plead against the word Sabbath to supplant its fundamentall right by the fourth Commandement and there is no little power in the use or refusall of words to advance or undervalue the things themselves to which they are applyed as hath been proved in that wee have before produced yea sometimes as b Nescio quid veneni in syllabis latet Hier. ad Damasc tom 2. pag. 132. Saint Hierome observeth there lurketh a kind of poyson under syllables as in every page of Doctor Pocklington his booke which weares this title Sunday no Sabbath whereof I have said enough before and hee too much though very little to the purpose for proofe of his distructive determination against the name Sabbath Thirdly In clearing the doubts that are made of those names and titles of our Christian Sabbath divers personages of highest place with many more of the better sort though of inferiour rank in the Church or Common-weale are cleared from such reproachfull imputations as by taunting at or traducing of the lawfull use of those names especially that of the Sabbath some with Ismaelitish malignity expressely or by consequence have cast upon them to which purpose the fore noted judicious Divine hath said somewhat in his Antidote against Sabbatary errours though me thinks a little too faintly viz. c A soveraign Antidote against Sabbatary errors qu. 1. pag. 5. That men otherwise sober and moderate ought not to bee censured with too much severity not with any severity at all hee might have said nor charged with Judaisme if sometime they call Sunday by the name of Sabbath if hee had said if commonly they call Sunday by the name of Sabbath hee had spoken no more then the truth will beare d Ibid. p. 8. for there is none of the three names saith hee to bee condemned as unlawfull but every one is to bee left to his Christian liberty herein so long as superiour Authority restraineth it not and so that hee doe it without vanity or affectation in himselfe and without judging or despising of his brother that doth otherwise which is a pious and prudent proviso though so farre defective as it importeth a meere paritie without any preheminence on the Sabbaths behalfe Fourthly By explication of these titles in this sort wee may answer many passages of the ancient Fathers produced against our weekly holiday in the name of the Sabbath whereby they meane not as many misconceive them and so misapply them any prejudice to the holy observation of the Lords day as in weekely recourse in the Christian Church but precisely and punctually the Saturday Sabbath which we hold as much as they to be abolished and much more then some of them did Fifthly If all the names bee lawfull and that of the Sabbath most usefull as hath beene shewed let us bee sure to make use of it upon all faire and fit occasions though wee neither wholly forbeare the other two titles nor quarrell with any for their more familiar use of them that wee may uphold the tenure of the day together with the title of it by the fourth Commandement whereto I desire to exhort the Reader with the more earnest intreaty First Because some with such supercilious disdaine have indeavoured to disgrace that title that others as much too modest as they too bold have beene affraid or ashamed to use it and I remember one who was of eminent parts and place and who formerly had divers times used it in a printed booke having upon occasion named the Sabbath presently recalled the word as if it had beene a fault and tooke up the title Sunday in stead thereof Secondly Because if wee let goe the name of the time wee may bee like to lose the thing in time to come or at least to loosen and weaken its claime to the best authority on which it depends for as it is a weekly holiday wee cannot plead better for it then by the proportion of the fourth Commandement and that being made good upon that ground the difference about the particular day within the circle of seven will bee the more easily composed since it is no more then other proofe and evidence inferiour to an expresse precept of the Decalogue may well support I would now put a sinall period to this comparative discourse but that opportunity prompts mee and it may bee a twofold duty which I owe both to my superiours and to this sacred cause wherein they are interessed as supreme Judges over it and I as a faithfull Advocate for it bindes mee to bend my conclusion towards the Barre of the most awfull Court in the Kingdome and with prostrate humility to beseech you most Noble Lords and you most worthy Knights Citizens and Burgesses of the high Court of Parliament now assembled to take into your prudent and pious consideration the weighing of the precedent titles and the poyse of Religious reason swaying the resolution on the Sabbath side and that as you have occasion to mention the day by divine ordinance designed to the solemne service of God and the salvation of man in your Discussions or Decrees you will bee pleased to give it that authentick and edifying appellation which best serveth to uphold the surest tenure by which it holdeth and most mindeth us of that holy observation to which by many and weighty reasons we are obliged whereby as it haâ—h been most highly honoured from heaven by Gods owne hand writing in the fourth Commandement so it may bee ratified by the highest authority on earth the highest to us viz. an Act of Parliament to secure it from contempt and to restore it to the right whereof many either in simple ignorance or inconsiderate rashnesse or audacious profanenesse or partiall prejudice or in politicke impiety for all these are Antisabbatary symptomes in some or other have endeavoured to deprive it You have already to the great joy of the godly throughout the Land raised your devout indignation against the indignity done to Religion by the most irreligious Pamphlet of Doctor Pocklington though composed and published under the sacred title of a Sermon and if now as by an act of your Justice SUNDAY NO SABBATH must burn so by some act of your Grace SUNDAY A SABBATH may shine and the same holy zeale will dispose you to this double devotion you will further advance his honour who hath promised to returne you like for like in that kinde 1 Sam. 2.30 and hee will doe it not onely in kinde but in degree and give us of the Clergie the better meanes to perswade the people with better mindes to compose themselves to all due obedience for what your Honours shall decree concerning their dutie both to God and man And so I conclude the titles of our weekly Holiday which will both conduce to the contracting of our taske and to the clearing of the truth to our understandings when wee come to deliver more materiall observations which from henceforward are to follow and which we shall begin in another Booke and goe on withall as God giveth ability to performe and opportunity to publish what this great and weighty cause of his and his Church requireth at our hands FINIS Errata PAge 1. line 2. after the word times adde with many pag. 4. line 3. aâ— the end of the quotation c leave out Selden pag. 5. lin 8. for the word for read and. pag. 8. lin 5. for desire reade more pag. 8. lin 24. for Videlius reade Vedelius pag. 9. lin 3. after but adde the. pag. 10. lin 6. after the words crosse and blot the words crosse to pag. 12. in the margent over against the third line reade Mr. Duraeus and lin 11. for distraction reade division pag. penult lin 3. for grace reade honour In the subscript of the Letter to the Authour for Samuel reade Sabbath and for Glindale Glendole p. 15. l. 21. or reade of p. 16. initio lâ— 30. adde be pag. 38. l. 18. respest reade respect p. 63. in the mar for in locico reade in lexico pag. 64. lin 16. after the word is adde but. pag. 82. lin 22. for or reade to pag. 89. lin 21. for Christians reade Christian pag. 124. lin 25. for hominum reade hominem pag. 143. lin 7. for Parenaesis reade Paranesis pag. 179. lin 1. for Sabbath reade Lords day pag. 195. lin 2. after the word if adde the.