the Lord is His Word to obey the Magistrat in things lawful and also according to your refusal it is good Conscience to disobey the Magistrat therefore be pleased to consider that there is a twofold superstition First positive which is most ordinar to which the old Pharisees were much addicted There is also a negative superstition of which we have example Colos 2. 19. Touch not taste not handle not there is an other example of the same Rom. 14. 3. Where ye will find a superstidious eat not upon consideration of which two Texts see that your refusing to sing the Doxology come not in in that category sing not in which place ye may find a controversy betwixt two sorts of Christians the strong in knowledge and the weak the strong Christian believes that he may can any thing and not ask question or scruple for Conscience sake and him the Apostle approveth and alloweth for him the Apostle defends against the weak Christian in the end of the 3. verse God hath received him to wit the strong Christian and albeit the weak Christian who is stiff through his ignorance to eat not yet the Apostle condemns him because he proudly and ignorantly thought these things unclean whereas the Apostle sayes they were not unclean and therefore the strong made no scruple but eat and is approven of God So in the 14. verse of this 14. Chapter the weak thought that unclean which was not unclean and therefore refused to eat it then apply this to your own Consciences who sayes sing not because your Conscience thinks it unlawfull to sing when we have proven already that it is both lawfull and expedient See then that ye are not as wrong with your sing not as these weak Christian Romans were with their eat not The strong Christian thinks it clean to sing and dutifull and is approven of God ye think it unclean and unlawfull and are not approven of God because ye obey not the Magistrat in that which is lawfull and I pray you consider in the 14. verse of that Chapter the Apostles vehement and emphatick expression I know and am perswaded by the Lord Jesus Christ that there is nothing unclean of it self So I know and am perswaded with the universall Church that the Doxology is not unclean nor the singing of it an unclean Action and though ye judge him that singeth God hath saved him In these two ranks of Christians strong in knowledge and weak I perceive a fault in each of them mutually toward the other vers 3. The weak judged or condemned the strong for the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies both as if they had been sinning in their eating and as people that made no conscience of their doings So beware it be not your sin proudly and ignorantly to condemn them that sings as it were a sin There was a sin also on the other hand in the strong that despised the weak for their refusing to eat because of their scrupulous and ignorant conscience therefore it is my humble request to all that sing the Doxologie that none of them despise or set at nought him that singeth not upon meer ignorance his conscience being sincere for despising is a sin against Christian love therefore even these who in great weakness sing not yet bestow Christian love on them and still the more if ye see any sign of Christ in them and be willing to instruct them in the spirit of meekness for which cause I have written these lines for your information and am to exhort you to tenderness with them in the last Chapter And if any object that there is some diversity and difference betwixt particular Churches which viosits not Christian union as in some Churches they kneel at the receiving of the Lords Supper in another Church they sit in the third they stand I answer albeit diverse Churches in diverse Kingdoms have diverse wayes yet no Church in one and the same Kingdom allows such a latitude as this receive the Communion standing or not standing as you please but every Church have their settled way and uniformity otherwayes it would violat the Apostles rule let all things be done in order and decency 1 Cor. 14. vers last and make confusion of which God is not the Author as it is vers 33. of that same Chapter and according a Justinianum lib 4. cap. 10. § 27. Si Ecclesiae incolumitati bene prospectum volumus diligenter omnino curandum est ut decenter omnia secundum ordinem fiant at cum in hominum moribus tanta in sit diversitas tanta in animas varietas tanta in ingeniis judiciisque pugna neque politia ulla firma est nisi certis legibus constituta nec nisi stata quadam forma servari ritus quispiam potest Calvin writes judiciously that there cannot be order and decency unless there be one certain state form so that this difference in some Churches one from another will not allow in the same Church some to sing the Doxologie some not For as Calvin did sing it to the day of his death so neither at that time nor never before it was the singing of the Doxologie called in question 2 Answer Albeit the universal Church hath judged some things of less moment then that the universal Church should be tyed to an uniformity in them because Church Communion might be kept firm amongst diverse Churches notwithstanding that they differed in some smaller particulars of which Socrates in his Church History lib. 5. cap. 21. writes at length which the Learned know yet there are some things belonging to the Church of so weighty and important concernment that the universal Church judged it no wayes expedient that particular Churches should be left to their own choise but that the universal Church should agree upon one certain way wherein all particular Churches might keep uniformity according to the rule of Gods Word for order and decency and peace and therefore the learned know what contentions fell out in the second Century betwixt the Church in the West and the Churches in lesser Asia for these in lesser Asia kept their Feast of Easter the same day that the Jews kept their Passover but the Christians in the West kept their Feast of Easter upon the first Sabbath day thereafter And albeit in this mean time the foresaid West and East Churches their judgement and practice was diverse upon that matter yet on both sides they who were strong in knowledge still kept Church Communion one with the other as Socrates proves learnedly in the foresaid Book and Chapter so that Polycarpus Bishop of Smyrna afterwards a glorious Martyr of Jesus Christ albeit he did celebrat Easter in that same day with the Jews Passover as ordinarily did all his Neighbour Bishops in lesser Asia yet coming to Rome he Communicat with their Bishop upon their Christian Sabbath day which differed from his day of giving the Communion at home but because there
is infirmity and weakness in many Christians therefore after that diverse day of keeping of Easter raised such broils and contentions betwixt the East and West Church that there was no visible nor seasible way for preventing a fearful rent and schism in the universal Church until the general Council of Nice did appoint all to keep one day which the universal Church hath kept ever since therefore Beza in his 24. Epist and 14. § thereof distinguisheth well betwixt Ecclesiastick constitutions some are universal some particular and without all controversie the singing of the Doxologie is of universal constitution for as we have proven from antiquity of Fathers and Councils the singing of the Doxologie was the practice and judgement of the universal Church therefore as the universal Church resolved to keep Easter upon a differing day from the Jew who crucified the Lord of glory and still blasphemes him as Constantine the Great insinuats in his pious Letters after that Council of Nice so that same universal Church resolved to keep the Doxologie as a testimony against the Arians and all such blasphemous Antitrinitarian Hereticks Then to apply the singing of the Doxologie is like the keeping of Easter on the Christian Sabbath day and not with the Jew on their day to which both the Civil Magistrat by their Authority and the Church by their Spiritual Authority did agree at the Council of Nice as for that Text which we cited Rom. 14. of Christians in two contrary opinions about meat and dayes the Civil Magistrat nor Church had not as yet interponed their Authority but it was still Arbitrary for the Magistrats external power they being then all Pagans to them both the Jewish and Christian Religion were accounted superstition about words and names as said the Pagan Magistrat Acts 25. 19. and they thought it below them to take notice of these things as for the Church Authority which was then Apostolick the Learned know the reason why they did not determine these questions of meats and dayes because there was a time allotred of interim betwixt the death and honourable burial of the Jews Ceremonies which time of their honourable burial was not yet expired and the Epistle to the Romans was written in this interim during which time the Jewish Ceremonies of meats and dayes c. were mortui to the strong Christian Jew and they were freed of their yoak by taking on Christs easie yoak and to the weak Christian Jew who was not clear to quite these Ceremonies as yet during this interim they were indifferent and not mortiferi So that place foresaid Rom. 14. I fear be misapplyed by these that refuse to sing the Doxologie for the case alters in this the Doxologie is determined to be used both by the universal Church and all civil Christian Powers but these meats and dayes when St. Paul wrote to the Romans were yet left arbitrary therefore St. Paul reproved these weak Christians for their ignorance in not eating but how much more bitterly had he reproved and condemned them if their not eating had been a breach of the command of the Church and State as now it is in refusing to sing the Doxologie Yet as the singing of the Doxologie agreed upon by the universal Church differs from the keeping of Easter on the Christian Sabbath and not on the Jewish Sabbath in two particulars 1. The universal Church did more then 200. years differ in keeping the Christian Easter but all that time not one iota of objection or scruple against the singing of the Doxologie 2. The Scandalizing Act of difference of keeping Easter was but once in the year but the refusing to sing the Doxologie is a scandal every weekly Sabbath This your refusing to sing the Doxologie which the universal Church judgeth to be lawful and expedient is offensive and evil both to these within and these without the Church for these within the Church I make this Hypothesis that there being many thousand Protestants beyond Seas who hear that some in Scotland have made a separation from their Mother Church and yet these same beyond Seas do not study the particular grounds or pretended causes of that separation yet these same persons being certainly informed that these of the Scots separation among other differences refuse to sing the Doxologie which refusal of theirs is so notorious in their Publick Worship that it is like the Oyntment upon the right hand which cannot be hid Then what will Protestant Strangers over Seas conclude Even this that seing there is in Scotland some who without just cause have abandoned the Doxologie contrary to the judgement and practice of the universal Church then it is very like that their other pretences for their separation are as unwarrantable this refusing to sing the Doxologie is also evil to these without the Church which I thus illustrat a Turk Jew or Pagan being in the way of conversion to Christianity and having learned that there is one God and three Persons Father Son and Holy Ghost for in this Name he is to be baptized and being thereafter informed that these same men who are to Baptize him refuse to sing Glory to the Father Son and Holy Ghost in their Publick Worship in what a demurr and doubtful perplexity would that Turk be Or would he receive Baptism from these who were to Baptize him in the Name of Father Son and Holy Ghost and yet would not themselves sing Glory to Father Son and Holy Ghost and also forbid him to sing it would not that doubt debarr him from Christian Baptism and Salvations or else upon better information that these who refused to sing the Doxologie were but a hanâ—ful who did separate themselves from the many thousand thousands of Christians who did gladly sing the Doxologie Would not that Turk joyn himself gladly to that Church whose Word and Works Sacraments of God and his other Worship was harmonious where they did Baptize in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost did also in their Publick Worship sing Glory to Father Son and Holy Ghost This bygone information as I directed is only to the weak and gracious Lambs of Christ yet because I know there are other sort of Christians to whom though I owe not so great respect as to the Lambs yet I will tender them this word ye who refuse to sing the Doxologie pretending Conscience for your refusing ye are either painted Tombs and cunning Hypocrites or openly prophane ones who proclaim your sin like Sodom First I speak to the Hypocrite thou gravely assevers that you dare not sing the Doxologie leâ—â— you should wrong or grieve your Conscience but how comes it to pass that against thy knowledge and Conscience thou lives in secret hainous sins wilt thou in that day when thou gives account of thy self to the all-seeing God the searcher of hearts and the eye-witness of thy secret sins pretend Conscience as thy defence for thy schism now in refusing to sin the
I intend not to survey all the particulars of the present Schism but only this viz. the refusing to sing the Doxology in the publick Worship of God which makes a sad and unchristian-like Rent for in one Paroch-Church you may hear the Doxology Christianly sung but in the next Paroch-Church no mention of it non in the wandring Conventicle at the Hill side or in the Den they have gone from Mountain to Hill they have forgotten their resting place Jer. 50. 6. and have forgotten the Doxology as if they were all Antitrinitarians Jews Turks or Pagans yea and too often in the same Church-Assembly both in City and Country when it comes to the closing of the Psalm some sing the Doxology decently others sitting by who did sing the Psalm instantly turn silent at the Doxology yea some are worse deriding and scoffing the Singers of it this among Christians is a lamentation and shall be for a lamentation Ezek. 19. 14. tell it not in Gath but no doubt it is proclaimed at Rome long ago who rejoice in our halting and say aha aha our eye hath seen 2 Aquinas in locum 1 Job 2. 19. Erant de Ecclesia sacramentorum perceptione non charitatis communione non erant ex nobis predestinatione aut electione ideo ex recessu eorum Ecclesia non est damnificata sicut nec corpus damnificatur cum humores pravi exeunt de corpore nam si suissent ex nobis praedestinatione aut electione mansissent utique nobiscum i. e. finaliter mansissent in consolatione fidei idem summae parte 1. quaest 23. art 4. in concl omnes à deo praedestinati sunt electi dilecti art 3. post concl praedestinatio includit voluntatem conferendi gratiam gloriam resp ad 2. Praedestinatio est causa gratiae in hac vita gloriae in vita sutura imo Tridentini Sess 6. can 15 16. Collatis fatentur praedestinatos ad vitam infallibiliter perseveratures itaque Tridentini cum Aquinate sunt in hoc puncto Remonstrantibus multo Orthodoxiores Lomb. itidem Sent. lib. 1. dist 40. capitulo 1. Nullus praedestinatus potest damnari at labi postmodum converti salvari nam Schisma Haeresis qua tales non sunt peccatum istud irremissibile at Ecclesia universalis penitenti absolutionem nequaquam negavit quum Deus misericors hanc tabulam penitenti post naufragium concessit cui Doctrinae S◠Claro adstipulatur Problem 30. pag. 255. But lest the Roman Church insult against us because some have separate from our Church and thence infer that we are not of the true Church I answer that albeit a Church be Orthodox some may depart from them and no fault be in the Church but in them that separate from her dare any man impute a blot to the Christian Church in St. John's days when there went some out from the Apostolick Church when they were not of us says the Apostle 1 Joh 2. 19. for if they had been of us they had no doubt continued with us 2. I answer These who are separate from their Mother Church and died in that time I judge they have repented before the searcher of Hearts and obtained Mercy but the secret things belong to God Deut. 29. 29. as for these of the Separation as yet alive albeit they have fallen they may arise they have left their Fathers House with the Prodigal but they may repent and return for albeit they were bent on their Separation as St. Paul on Persecution before his Conversion so as he did it ignorantly and therefore obtained Mercy upon his repentance 1 Tim. 1. 13 so I judge in Charity their Seperation flowed from their ignorance also and therefore is a large door of Hope opened for Mercy to them upon their repentance This answer will satisfie the most rational of the Roman Church 3. I answer Blessed be the God of order who stilleth the noise of the Seas the noise of their Waves and the tumult of the People Psal 65. 7. who hath reduced the proud and swelling Waters of that deludge of Disorder which threatned the overtopping of the Mountains to abide within their wonted Channels I wish these Waters may abate more and as with their Bodies they give external obedience to Order so all this Church may be of one Heart and Soul keeping the unity of the Spirit in the bond of Peace it being observed that the refusing to sing the Doxology is the most known Sibboleth Judg. 12. 6. whereby these of the Seperation are known from these that are orderly and the refusing to sing it proves a demonstration of too strong inclination to Separation Therefore we resolve to take pains for its refutation and if this opinion of the unlawfulness to sing the Doxology were meerly a speculative question in Divinity and did not tend to practice the knowledge thereof might safely and prudently be kept up from the Vulgar for many such questions are wisely kept close within the walls of the Divinity School which the Vulgar although they did hear them dispute in their Mother Tongue could not understand them Not the less in these same questions the learned can dispute pro and contra and be of contrary Judgements and yet keep Love and Charity but this Question anent the Doxology tends to Practice and that in the publick Worship of God and that not only on the Christian Sabbath but also on the Week day and therefore the refusing to sing the Doxology is a daily stumbling to the Weak If any particular man or particular metting of Church-men although they were a Body Representative of many Particular Churches yet it were Presumption in them to press any Duty upon their Christian Brethren who were not within their Line of Jurisdiction but surely the Singing of the Doxologie is far otherwayes for it hath the Authority Approbation and Practise of the Universal Church more then 1300. Years by past which with the Lords assistance we shall clear from Antiquity for in the 2. Greek Liturgies of St. Basil and St. Chrisostome who both lived in the 4. Cent. after our Lords Incarnation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrisost Litur Pag. 20. grlat Eandem Doxologiam habet Basilius in sua Lyturgia The Doxologie is to be Seen and Read unto this day For these 2. Greek Liturgies are used in the Publick Worship of God dayly or weekly sometime the one sometime the other in all the Churches of the Greek Communion which contains thousand thousand Christians In which Greek Liturgies this Prayer is to be found in Greek their Mother Tongue give unto us That with one Mouth and with one Heart we may Glorifie and Sing Praise together to the most Honourable and Magnificent Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost now and ever and to all Ages Amen The beginning and foundation of which Prayer is indyted by the Holy Ghost Rom. 15. 6. That we may with one mind and with one
where Satan had his Throne and Antichrist kept the Chair They wrote nine several Creeds not all confirming or explaining the former Creed but some of them containing Contradictions of which themselves were ashamed d Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 25. for a Liar should have a good Memory yea in the last of these Councils they ratifie their Council at Seleucia and its Creed and cursed the Creed at Ariminum because it was not Heterodox enough e Socrat. lib. 4. cap. 4. As we have seen the Activity Perfidity and Falshood of the Arian in spreading their Heresie so in the fourth place we shall take a view of their Hellish Cruelty practised against the Orthodox and true Church of God For they poysoned with their Arianism the Emperour Constantius who began his Reign Anno Dom. 336. and Valence who began his Reign Anno Dom. 366. thâ—se two Emperours they instigate to raise cruel and bloody Persecution against the Orthodox during the time of their Empire of which we shall only mention a few notable Instances First The Arians at Constantinople raised a great Tumult of Sedition that many Christians were troden under Foot to Death a Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 9. Secondly The Arian Emperour Constantius having banished the Orthodox Bishop of Constantinople the Arians strangled him in his Exile and the Orthodox Bishop of Adrianople died in Prison with Torments b Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 21. Thirdly Great Persecution was raised by the Arians in the Cities of the East against the Orthodox Christians by Banishment spoiling of their Goods and sundry kinds of Torments c Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 22. Fourthly The Arians at Alexandria upon the Lords Day invaded with Arms the Orthodox and having kindled a great Fire apprehended Orthodox Virgins who as they thought would soonest yield to them these they threatned with Burning unless they turned Arian but percelving these holy Virgins invincible Courage resolute to die Martyrs for the Glory of the Sacred Trinity they violently in the open Streets pulled off all their Clothes to put them to shame and mocked them in their nakedness but these Virgins being of undaunted Courage to suffer for the Name of Christ them the Arians so wounded on the Face that their nearest Relations did hardly know them and fourty Men they scourged with Rods that some of them died yet they refused to give their dead bodies to their Friends to bury and these who outlived their Scourging part of them they Banished of others not banished the Chirurgians had great difficulty to pull out the Thorn Pricks out of their Flesh At that same time the Arians killed moe then thirty Orthodox Bishops in Egypt and Lybia and banished sixteen moe whereof some died in their cruel usage by the way others died in the place of their Banishment of which Martyrs the World was not worthy d Socrat lib. 2. cap. 23. Fifthly In Constantinople and the Country about many Orthodox Bishops were banished by the Arians and other of the Orthodox that refused to communicate with the Arians they cruelly tormented their Bodies and then scobbing their Mouths violently thrust in the sacramental Elements of the Lords Supper and that not only of Men and Women but also of Children and these who were most reluctant they detained in Prison and Torments that so the Arian intended by this his work to get the honour that the Orthodox did communicate with them but prophane forcing proved the Arian Communion to be the Table of Devils yea they thrust the Papes of some holy Women into a Chest and closing its lid cut off their Papes with a Saw and others they burnt off their Papes with a red hot Iron a Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 30. Theodoret. lib. 2. cap. 14. Sixthly The Arians in Alexandria conspired with the Jews and Pagans and all three raised great Persecution against the true Christians there they apprehended the holy Virgins stripped them naked as they were born and led them through the Streets obscenely mocking them and if any Beholder in Christian compassion did speak but one word in their favours they were driven away with Wounds thereafter many of the Virgins they ravished some they killed and refused to give their Bodies to their Parents to be buried yea in this Tumult the Arian and Pagan committed so great abomination that I am ashamed to render them in English b Theodoret. lib. 4. cap. 20. a most profane Pagan being a chief Acter of these Abominations acted both in the Pulpit and on the Altar of the chief Church of Alexandria it was too like a Stage-Play of Satans divising against God's Word and Worship the most profane the Devil could devise and all this acted in the presence of the Arian Bishop whom the Pagan Spokesman thus saluted O Bishop who denies the Son of God thy coming is welcome to us c Theodoret. lib. 5. cap. 22. our god Serapis embraceth thee and brought thee hither observe how well the Devil and the Arian does aggree like Heart and Joy This Pagan god Serapis had a Church in Alexandria where he was worshipped and in it a monstruous great Image at that time much worshipped by the Pagans there What true Christian can read the Perjury Falshood and hellish Cruelty of the Arian and their atheistical profaning of the Lord's Supper and not look upon them as incarnate devils against these antichristian and profane bloody Arians who blasphemed both the Son and Holy Ghost The Orthodox Church were most zealous to defend the Truth and for that cause to sing the Doxology in their publick Worship exactly according to the words of the Holy Scriptures For then the Arian also keeped the singing of their own Doxology but it was different from the Orthodox and Holy Scriptures Now considering the true Churches hard condition when the Arians persecute them and yet these holy Christians were most willing to suffer Martyrdom for the Name of Jesus and also to sing the Doxology therein professing their Faith in one God in three Persons Father Son and Holy Ghost equal in Power and Glory Now I would ask the Christian now a days If the Lord in His Providence did put them now in such a condition to be persecuted to the death by the prevailing Arian whether or not they would be content to suffer Martyrdom in defence of the honour of Christ and also with the Orthodox Christian to sing the Doxology would they both sing and suffer as these did who are now singing triumphant Songs to Father Son and Holy Ghost having trode Satan and Arians under-foot I willingly judge in Charity to these weak Lambs they would then with the Orthodox Christians both joyn in singing the Doxology and also in suffering with them for the Name of Jesus Then I ask them again if they would have sung the Doxology if they had been going to the Stake to die in desence of the honour of Christ against the cursed Arian then have they not as good
pag. 58. Thus he writs all men may see that many in England are Arians and Antitrinitarians he writs also pag. 136. a Letter from Holland to London dated 1646. Here we burn the Books of the Socinian Errors and they dare not be sold in these parts but at London is taught Blasphemy against God and his Christ and a Minister in Holland wrot a Letter dated October 18. 1646. to some Ministers in London that diverse English Merchants were seeking to buy Socinus Works and Crellius c. from a Stationer in Holland and when the Stationer answered that these Books were prohibit by the States General the Merchant replyed nevertheless you may transport them from other Nations and we shall give you for them what you will and the Generall Assembly in Scotland Anno Dom. 1648. Sess 43. Writs thus Socinianisme is now spread in England As for our sentiment upon the Socinian there was in the ancient Church two Heresies that were most dangerous and prevalent First the Arian then the Pelagian both which the Orthodox Church zealously opposed and justly condemned but the late Socinian hath drunk in all the poyson both of the Arian and Pelagian and much more Secondly That as the Ancient Church did condemne Arius and Pelagius in their Councils and being obstinat Excommunicat them So the Ancient Fathers b Athanasius oratione prima contra Arianos multis probat Arianos non debere dici christianos Idem scribit Theodoretus lib. 2. cap. 16. Fulgentius Hilarius ad Imperatorem Constantium denyed the Arian to deserve the name of Christian yea the moderns both Papists and Lutherians that wrot against the Socinians deny them also to be Christians the same doth Gomarus and Doctor Forbes in his Theological Instructions lib. 10. cap. 13 Sect. 14. denyes the Socinian Baptism to be valid The Professors of Leyden Anno Dom. 1598. gave their judgment of Osterodius the Socinian his Writs that they led Men very near to Turcism and Grotius writing of the Piety of the States of Holland saith Seing Heresie is the Venom of the Church and that suddenly working yet there are degrees in Heresies whereof some are more hurtful then others but a worse Heresie then Socinianism is not to be found at the very mentioning of which all the godly should shrink Against this Heresie not only the Civil Magistrate and Church but also the God of Heaven by His immediate Hand of Providence hath given Testimony the Magistrate hath put them to death not only in the reformed Church but also the Roman Church Thus the Parliament of Pole being informed Anno Dom. 1638. that the Socinians in Racovia had begun to print a Book of Blasphemies against the Sacred Trinity a Libri titulus Tormentum Throno Tritnitatem deturbans they did take from them their Bibliotheck Printinhouse and Press and being many banished them the Town As for the immediate Hand of God upon the Socinian it is remarkable both in Temporal and Spiritual Judgments that some of them were their own Murderers and others of them died in Despair others renunced Christ and turned Mahumetan Thus having spoken of the Socinian remains a word of the Anabaptist and Quaker who also are Blasphemers of the Trinity That the Anabaptists are such the Professors of Leyden are sufficient Witnesses b Profess Leidens disp 23. in antithesi Sabellius Praxias hodie libertini Anabaptistae quidam trinominem Deum statuentes personarum realem distinctionem tollentes modumque tantum patesactionis varium inducentes Patrem incarnatum passumque revera statuunt As for the Quakers who not only are in England and Jreland but even some of them scattered in Scotland It 's well known by many of their own printed Pamphlets and by the Books of others their mad Pranks and Blasphemies and Disputes against the Sacred Trinity for instance The Phanatick History printed at London Anno Dom. 1660. pag. 54. In a publick Dispute at Cambridge they denied the Sacred Trinity with Blasphemies that I abhor to write And Anno Dom. 1657. a Book printed at London by John Stalham called the Reviler rebuked wherein he refutes Quaker Richard Fairnworth who printed and spread a Pamphlet about that time wherein he denied the Holy Ghost to be a Person in the Trinity Therefore as the Universal Church of old did piously and wisely appoint and practise the singing of the Doxology to confirm the Flock of Christ against the dangerous Blasphemies of Arius and other Antitrinitarian Hereticks so to this day the Universal Church do still continue that practice to guard their Flocks against the Blasphemies of Anabaptists and Quakers but especially Socinians who in horrid and hellish Blasphemies out do the old Arian CHAP. VI. The lawfulness of Singing the Doxology proven by these Arguments 1. Because all Christians are baptized in the Name of Father Son and Holy Ghost 2. They believe or profess their Faith in Father Son and Holy Ghost 3. They believe Father Son and Holy Ghost to be their Creator Redeemer and Sanctifier 4. Their Faith and Hope of Eternal Glory is from Father Son and Holy Ghost 5. God Father Son and Holy Ghost made all things and especially for His Glory 6. This Lord of Glory often calls Man's Tongue His Glory 7. From the practice of the Saints and Angels 8. From God's Command 9. The Appointment and Practice of the Universal Church 10. The indivisibility of the Worship we give to God one in Essence and three Persont illustrate by Fathers and Councils IN the former Chapters I having described the occasion upon which the Universal Church did appoint the singing of the Doxology to wit The abounding of Blasphemers against the Trinity proven in the first three Chapters Secondly The unanimous Agreement of the Church for singing the Doxology in the fourth Chapter and the reason of its continuance in the Church to this day even because the Church ever since hath never altogether wanted some blasphemous Hereticks within the Church besides the Turk and Jew both deniers of the Trinity without the Church Follows the second part of this Treatise which is subdivided thus First I prove by many Arguments the lawfulness of the singing of the Doxology in the sixth seventh eighth ninth and tenth Chapters Secondly I answer some Objections in the eleventh and twelfth Chapters Thirdly I show the many Evils from the refusing to sing the Doxology Lastly I close with an Exhortation to receive with all tenderness all that shall return from their Errors In this and some following Chapters I have accumulate Arguments because I supponed I did write to some Christians weak in Knowledge I say weak in Knowledge because I am loath to judge that any Christian strong in Knowledge will deny its lawfulness unless their Judgement be strangely overclouded by prevalent Prejudice and if any such there be we have also brought Arguments for their perusing We begin with Arguments for the Weak All who are baptized in
the Doxologie ye detain the truth in unrighteousness Rom. 1. 18. and rebel against the light and hate the light John 3. 20. And they who wilfully harden themselves would not embrace the truth albeit Christ the wisdom of the Father were Preaching it unto them unlesse he did apply his Almighty gracious power as he did to Saul in his conversion Acts 9. ver 5 6. Which he does not ordinarily on those that harden themselves and close their eyes against the light darting in upon their understanding for he resists the proud but giveth grace to the humble and lowly The Apostle speaks of unreasonable men by which are meant the unbeliever and unregenerat For the true believer his saving Faith clears up and fortifies his reason Therefore if thou be a furnished and true believer and grant the truth of the first two sentences of any one or all the reasons then thou will assent to the third sentence which is to sing Glory to the Father Son and Holy Ghost and if thou find thy heart inclining to consent then blow at that spunk that is kindled in thy soul by the Holy Ghost and go to thy knees in all humility sincerity and self-denial and beg of him to lead thee in all truth and to shew thee the good and the right way and whether it will tend more to the glory of God to sing Glory to the Father Son and Holy Ghost or to be dumb and silent and say in your heart I will not sing glory to God even when my fellow-Christians are singing it Do you believe with all your soul that God sent his Son from Heaven to earth to bring you from earth to Heaven that Christ suffered the sorrows of death and hell to save thee from endless torments and will ye refuse to sing glory to him for so doing and suffering for you If a poor brother of Jesus were asking an alms from you and you would not give him one mite and yet would say at that same time to standers by if that poor man were going to Prison I would give him a great sum of money to relieve him would they believe you or rather laugh you to scorn So when you are desired to sing glory to the blessed Trinity and ye refuse to do it who would believe you that you would suffer tormenting flames for the glory of that blessed Trinity I know you will say you have some reasons why you refuse to sing the Doxologie but ye would have no reason to refuse martyrdome I answer your corruption that prompts you with excuses to refuse to sing the Doxologie which is the easier duty would furnish you with more excuses to shun burning so that ye who will not give God his due honour to sing glory to him it is too like would never suffer martyrdome for him and so the true ground of your refusing is want of true Faith Phil. 1. 29. To you it is given in the behalf of Christ not only to believe in him but also to suffer for his sake As for your pretences and excuses you bring for not singing the Doxologie lay it to heart that your excuses which your prejudged Conscience it may be accepts of so as to give you a seeming and deceitful peace for a time yet trust not that he who is greater then your Conscience will accept of these excuses which in this life men who are blind and partial Judges in their own cause thinks to be good and relevant Our Saviour in the Gospel gives a list of excusers of themselves but the Judge of quick and dead tells the true reason which the excusers would not have told Mat. 22. 5. they made light of it But I intreat you make it not a light thing to refuse to sing Glory to Father Son and Holy Ghost for these reasons I have set before you are founded on the Word of God by which we shall be judged and your pretences and excuses in that day will be burnt with the hay and stubble 1 Cor. 3. 12. CHAP. IX 15. Reason from the necessary Difference of the Christians Worship as in Reading of the Word Prayer and Sacraments they exceedingly differ from Christians shall not then also be a difference betwixt the Christian singing of Psalms and the Jews by singing the Doxology 16. As the Jews in their Psalms of David close many of them with a Doxology answering to the measure of their Light dispensed to them in the Old Testament so it becomes the Christian to have a Doxology answerable to their greater measure of Light of the Trinity in the New Testament 17. Reason founded upon the signification of Jehovah Elohim which is often in the Doxology of the Old Testament TAke three Reasons more to be pondered by the judicious and unbyassed Christian The first is thus grounded the Worship of God consists in two parts either God speaks to us or we speak to God God speaks to us in the Word read or exponed by Preaching We speak to God by Prayer suiting things needful to Soul and Body or by Praises of His infinite Excellencies and for His Benefites These two last to wit Petitions or Praises are either done without Song or in a Song but so it is that God in His infinite Wisdom and Goodness hath made the Christian Worship in the New Testament to differ from the Jews Worship in the Old Testament in fulness clearness and comfortableness they had only the Old Testament we have the New Testament added to it they had the Old Testament read and exponed by the Church-men and Prophets we have Old and New Testament both read exponed and preached more plainly and fully to our greater saving Knowledge and Comfort for the least in the kingdom of Heaven is greater then John Baptist Matth. 11. 11. Secondly Our Prayers and Praises of God in the New Testament are proportional to the Word read and preached even more full clear and comfortable then the Jew had in the Old Testament but so it is that the obstinate and impenitent Jew refused to joyn with us Christians in any of these three parts of the Worship of God they will not hear the Gospel read because it is the Gospel of Christ whom they reject and blaspheme they will not hear the Word preached because we preach Christ crucified which is to the Jews a stumbling-block 1 Cor. 1. 23. Thirdly They will not joyn with us in Prayer for they refuse to pray to Father Son and Holy Ghost and they will seek nothing from God in the Name of Christ Fourthly They reject our Sacraments for they refuse to be baptized in the Name of Father Son and Holy Ghost nor yet will they communicate with us because it is the Communion of the Body and Blood of Christ Seing then the all-wise Lord hath made the Christian to differ from and excell the Jew in the Word and Sacraments in Preaching and Praying is it not convenient and suitable to the other parts of our Christian
the deserved reproof of Ignorance â—ride and Perversness therefore Mr. Baxter in his Method of Peace of Conscience paâ— 411. writes thus In my weak judgment if Hymns and Psalms of Praise were new invented as fit for the state oâ— thâ— Gospel Church and Worship to laud the Redeemer come in the Flesh as expressly as the work of Grace is now express As Davids Psalms were fitted to the former state and infancy of the Churchâ— and more obscure Revelations of the Mediator and His Grace it would be no sinful humane invention or addition nor any more want warrand then ouâ— inventing the form and words of every Sermon we preach or every Prayer that we make or any Catechism or Confession of Faith nay it seems oâ— so great usefulness as is next to a necessity and if there be any convenient parcels of the ancient Church that are fitted to this use they should deservedly Petrus Martyr Comment in quintum caput Judicum v. ◠§ 4. curandum ne in templis quaevis promiscue canantur sâ—d illa tantummodo quae divinis literis continentur aut quae inde justis conclusionâ—bus eliciuntur cum verbo Dei ad amiusium consentiunt nam si senestra inventis hominum aperiaâ—ur verendum est ne musica ecclesiastica tandem ad nugas fabulas reâ—idat at approbat Hymnos Ambrosii cani in Templis Symbolum Athanasii Psalmos Augustini contra Donatistas be preferred for doubtless if Gods usual solemn Worship on the Lords days were fitted and directed to a pleasant delightful praising way it would do very much to frame the spirits of Christians to joyfulness thankfulness and delight in God than which there is no greater care for the doubtful pensive and self-tormenting frame of some Christians O try this Christians at the request of one who is moved by God to importune you to it Isa 58. 14. Thou shall delight thy self in the Lord compare this with Zeph. 3. 17. The Lord will rejoice over thee with joy he will rest in his love he will rejoyce over thee with singing If it be objected that the Doxology is defective because it expresseth not the unity of the Essence in the Godhead with the Trinity of the Persons to wit that we do not express glory to God Father Son and Holy Ghost to which I answer first That it is beyond all question that these three Persons Father Son and Holy Ghost are one glorious God and so all true ChrisTians from the rising of the Sun to its going down do firmly believe and unanimously profess therefore to sing it after that manner no doubt were Orthodox then ye will urge why was it not so appointed at first to be sung in Churches for answer to which question I perceive that the Westminster Synod in their Directory Anno Dom. 1645. for Baptism have appointed the Sacrament of Baptism to be administrate in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost without adding one word more albeit they did well know and believe that these three are one God which no doubt they have done following closs to the example of that great cloud of Witnesses to wit the Universal and particularly the reformed Churches lest otherwise they had presumed to teach our Saviour who is the wisdom of the Father to speak better and more full Divinity And this leads us to the chief Answer to wit Why the Doxology Ecclesia antiqua fidem suam in tres personas divinas aequales ejusdemque trinitatis Doxologiam super Christi verbis baptisma instituentis accuratius fundarunt patres concilij Constantiâ—op secundi oecumen ab Ecclesia universali in hunc diem approbati mittunt libellum synodicum Roman ad Damasim aliosque Epis copos ibidem convocatos in quo exhibent fidei suae de Trinitate confessionem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 consentaneam baptismati 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theodoret Hist Eccles lib. 5. cap. 9. Nazianzen his contemporandus oratione 32. Anno Dom. 381. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 idem Nazianzâ— Oratione 6. de Spiritu Sancto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Quod ad Arianorum perversam ac haereticam Doxologiae corruptionem ab Ecclesia Orthodoxa damnatam consule Theodoretum Hist Eccl. lib. 2. cap. 24. ex Athanasio does not express the unity of the divine Essence with the Trinity of Persons even because these ancient Doctors of the Church and Apostolick Men in their holy and due reverence given to our Saviours words when he appointed Christian Baptism baptizing them in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost to the Doxology would neither add nor alter from that divine Pattern and accordingly Basil the great writes Epist. 78. We must as we have received even so Baptize and as we Baptize even so Believe and as we Believe even so give Glory As for the Arian about the Year of Christ 360. in the Cathedral Church of Antioch the Arians singing the Doxology were observed to change the words appointed by our Saviour in Christian Baptism and instead of singing Glory to the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost did sing Glory to the Father by the Son in the Holy Ghost which presumptuous change the Orthodox Church did condemn as flowing from an Antichristian heart inspired from Hell yet pretending somewhat of an Angel of Light for their heretical Spirit was seen through their Mask in that they did not keep fast the form of sound words 2 Tim. 1. 13 Others object To oblige Christians to sing the Doxology is to take away their Christian liberty who should have it still in their option to sing it or not sing it when they please I answer God never appointed Christian Liberty to warrand disorderly Confusion which God disowneth for according to this Objection in a Church Meeting there is one half at such a Diet that will not sing the Doxology because of their Christian Liberty and the other half will sing it at that same Si Ecclesiae incolumitati bene prospectum volumus diligenter omnino curandum est ut diligenter omnia secundum ordinem siant ut cum in hominum moribus tanta insit diversit as tanta in animis varietas tanta in ingeniis judiciisque pugna neque politia ulla firma est nisi certis legibus constituta nec nisi stata quaedam forma servari ritus quispiam potest Institut lib. 4. cap. 10. §. 27. time because of Christian Liberty and then who will deny this to be horrid and scandalous Confusion very dishonourable to the God of all Glory who is not the Author of Confusion 1 Cor. 4. 33. and hath commanded all things to be done decently and in order and therefore hath given power to His Church to appoint such and such things to be done decently and in order as is clear in Calvin's words If it be objected to the Christians to sing the Doxology so often
presume not to claim to this word for it is none of yours but the Childrens Bread 5thly Why do ye pretend your disguist of the Bishops to be the cause of your refusing to sing the Doxology did you not refuse to sing it before they were Re-established and that because the General Assembly laid it aside whom ye obeyed then ye refused to sing it before they returned and if they had not returned would you have resumed it I think you will not say it Then if the Bishops had not returned stil to this day you would have refused to sing it 6thly I will give you better Information ye with the rest of all this Kirk are desired to reassume the Doxology by Authority of the King's Majesty for ye know it is the will of God in His Word to invest the King with a power to restore the decayes of Religion when they happen and so did the good Kings of Judah Asah Jehosaphat and Josiah and accordingly our Kings Majesty being by the King of kings wonderfully and mercifully restored to his Crowns and Scepters according to his duty of thankfulnesse and Authority from the Lord given to Him He perceiving that the Doxology was laid aside in a time of confusion when there was no King in Israel even that part of the Kirk's publick Worship wherein we not only agree with the universall but more especially with the Reformed Kirks Therefore seing all the Reformed Churches with the Universall retained the Doxology and the General Assembly of Scotland laid it aside when they were not in power to do it therefore the Kings Majesty by His Authority wisely and piously recommended the reassuming of the Doxology therefore in refusing to sing the Doxology ye disobey the King in that which is lawfull and right therefore my request is to you to fear God and Honour the King by singing the Doxology and thereby you shall first honour God Father Son and Holy Ghost and then your King for albeit at the casting off the Yoke of the Popes usurped Power some of the Reformed Kirks did quite the Government of the Kirk by Episcopacy yet none of these Kirks did ever affirm that Monarchy or Kingly Government was unlawfull no nor yet Episcopacy for albeit some of them quite Episcopal Government because they had not Rents to sustain them yet they granted the Government to be lawfull I have more to writ upon this Point but it is not for the Babes who have need of Milk and not of strong Meat There remains one doubt to be answered because the Apostle Paul 1 Cor. 6. 12. a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Beza reddit conducens Pastor spiritualiter utile hoc verbum invenitur John 16. 7. 1 Cor. 10. 33. 1 Cor. 12. 7. Heb. 12. 10. Anis medul Theolog. lib. 2. 6. 16. res media dicitur expedire cum omnibus circumstantiis consideratis ad gloriam Dei aedificationem proximi facit Hath a distinction All things are lawfull for me but all things are not expedient therefore some may say according to this distinction albeit the singing of the Doxology be lawfull for a Christian yet it will not follow that it is expedient to sing it for answer as we have proven by many Arguments the lawfulnesse to sing it so we shall clear the expediency which can be best cleared from the Holy Scriptures therefore 1 Cor. 10. 28. The Apostle sayes All things are lawfull for me but all things edifie not The Greek word which is rendered expedient may be rendered profitable or conducing that is for the Christians spiritual good and edification but so it is that the singing of the Doxology to the blessed Trinity is most conducing First To the glory of God 2dly To the edification of the Christian in the most fundamentall point of all Divinity and this was the true cause why the universall Church hath agreed so unanimously these many hundred years to retain the Doxology in the publick worship and for guarding of the Lords Flock against Aâ—itrinitarian Blasphemous Hereticks so that it cannot be objected it might be expedient then but not now for to the old Arians are now added Socinians Anabaptists and Quakers which Errors are come to our doors 2dly If any will yet be contentious to deny the expediency of it we Answer that the most competent Judge on earth to prove it's expediency is not this or that privat Man nor yet this or that privat Church but the universal Church which to this day retain it and use it and therefore by their practice they declare to all particular Christians that they judge it not only lawful but also expedient which is a satisfactory answer to all rational Christians CHAP. XIII The many evils that flow from the refusing to sing the Doxology HAving proven the Lawfulnesse and Expediency of singing the Doxology and answered the Doubts and Scruples to the contrare we shall hasten to a close having mentioned the evils that flow from the refusing to sing the Doxology the Apostle Paul 2 Cor. 12. 20. Mentions the evils that flowed from their divisions at the Kirk of Corinth to wit debates envyings wraths strifs back-bitings whisperings swellings tumults and all these are the sad effects of their divisions 1 Cor. 3. 3. That same Apostle writting to the Galatians hath yet sadder evils Galat. 5. 15. If you bit and devour one another take heed that ye be not consumeed one of another which judgement I pray God in his mercy to avert from this Land what bodily evils of Bloodshed Spoiling of Goods Desolation of Families many Widows and Fatherless Children these are the sad and sore evils that they are very dull and sensles who takes not this to heart but the spiritual evils of Sin and Scandal is far more provocking in the eyes of the Lord and First The sin of Sedition against the lawfull Magistrat which not only brings down the wrath of God upon a Land but if not repented of ends in damnation to Soul and body as appears Rom. 13. From the beginning another evil the great Scandal given to the grieving of the Strong and stumbling of the Weak when they see the Commands of the lawfull Magistrat commanding a thing so lawfull as to sing the Doxology yet to be contemned and slighted The Apostle Paul in that same place Rom. 13. Says we should obey the Magistrat not only for fear of Gods Wrath and the Magistrats Wrath but also for conscience sake is it not then strange Religion when the Lord bids oney the Magistrat in all things lawfull and that for Conscience sake that in the mean time they who call themselves Christians and conscientious will answer for Conscience sake we will refuse to obey the Magistrat can it here be supponed that their Conscience that will not obey is a good Conscience when the Conscience in the Word named Rom. 13. Is certainly meaned good conscience except ye will make it such Divinity as this It is good Conscience sayes