habetis Aaron Hurvobiscum si quid natum fuerit quaestionis referetis ad eos Aaron and Hur Iudges for the deciding all differences which might arise in the congregation during his absence Exod. 24 wherefore Christ infallibly hath ordained and appointed spirituall Gouernors of necessary and perpetuall vse in his Church for the deciding all controuersies of faith and religion and for the preseruing of it in holiness to the world's end this doctrine is plainly euidenced by sundry most cleare prophesies vttered by Christ himselfe viz. Math. 16. the gates of hell shall neuer preuaile against it Math. 18. if he refuse to heare the Church let him be vnto thee as an heathen man and a publican and Ioa. 16. the holy Ghost shall teach you all truth Whereby clearly appear's that the very office of supream Iudge in order to deciding matters concerning faith and religion is proper to the Church and truly the Church and no other thing distinct from it can rightfully challenge the full essentiall proprietys or conditions here vnto required For example * In supremo iudice cōtrouersiarū requiri veritatem infallibilem in definiendo non tantum catholici sed illorū aduersarij fatentur v. g. vvhittakerus contro 10 de scrip quas 5. can 8. in 3. suo argumento alij quādo de hac re agunt Vnd. Ang. l. 1. de moribus Ecclesiae catholicae ait illam esse magistram totius sapientiae christianorum magistram castissimam not to be liable to errour at all in defining controuersies of faith and religion is one essentiall propertie in fallible verity being of necessitie ioyned to the authority of a supream Iudg that declareth sentence of iudgment in matters relating to faith which is inconsistent with errour and falshood God by a speciall and supernaturall prouidence hath constituted this Iudg in his place and appointed him as his immediate Ambassadour to propound to all christians the verity of faith least they be carryed about with euery wind of doctrine by the craftiness of Satan which office or employment he could not execute if he were fallible in the execution thereof neither should christians acquiess in his proposalls and definitiue sentences vnless they knew or supposed him infallible that is not liable to errour matters of faith depending of diuine reuelation which is not seen An other necessary propriety required in the supream Iudg is authority to exact obedience vnto his ordinances which essentiall propriety Christ declared when speaking of the scribes and Pharisies sitting in Moyses chaire Math. 23. he said all therfore whatsoeuer they bid you obserue that obserue and doe where the particles whatsoeuer they bid you obserue importe power and authority to propound vnto the Iews what they were to belieue and the particles that obserue and doe import an obligation to admit and receiue their ordinances and indeed euery common-wealth hath a supream Iudg or magistrate that propoundeth laws and ordinances vnto subiects and commandeth their compliance thereunto A third necessary propriety or condition required in this supream Iudg is to be visible and a cleare speaker Moyses visible and liuing said of himselfe as supream Iudg of the faithfull in those times Exod. 18. When they haue a matter of controuersy they come vnto mee and I iudg between one and another and declare the ordinances of God and the laws also this necessary condition appeareth by the command giuen to the people of Israel Deut. 17. thou shalt come vnto the Priests of the Leuites and to the Iudg that shall be in those daies and aske and they shall shew thee the sentence of iudgment besides Christs own words Math. 23. whatsoeuer they bid you obserue doe sufficiently manifest that the head Priests which sate in Moyses seate were visible liuing Iudges and indeed there is no ciuill nation that hath not a visible liuing and speaking law that is to say a supream Iudg or magistrate visible liuing and speaking for an vnliud and mute Iudg namely a meer written law cannot Iudg between one and another pronounce sentence of iudgment to the punishing of peruerse offenders or to declare ordinances to the suppressing of controuersies That the proprieties of this supream Iudg thus explaned be proper to the (b) By the Church is meant the high tribunall of faithfull Priests wherof the Chief visible head is the Bishop of Rome seated in the Chair of S. Peter and as he is the Chief and supream head so he is supream Iudge in consequence of which whosoeuer is affraid to be circumuented by the hardness of a question he ought to recur to him Church of Christ taken in the proper sense for a congregation of belieuing Christians including the supream visible Pastour it is plainly demonstrable for example that this Church is not liable at all to errour which is the first propriety appeares by Christs testimony alledged before Math. 16. the gates of hell shall not preuaile against it which importeth an absolute infallibility in defining propounding and teaching matters of faith for if the power of Satan that consisteth in crafty dealings to draw men into errour could ouercome the Church by making it teach any one false doctrine it would follow euidently that the gates of hell might preuaile against it in consequence of which Christ should not be faithfull in his promises Besids Christ saying Ioan. 19. the holy Ghost shall teach you all truth meant that the Church should teach nothing of errour to the worlds end and indeed that promise was made to the Apostles and their successours in the ministery and Gouernmēt of the Church because Christ before Ioa. 14. had said expresly that the spirit of truth should abide with them for euer wherfore * Aug. l. de mor. Ecclesia catholica ait si quis metuit falli difficult ate alicuius quaestionis ad Ecclesiā esse recurrendū Jtem ait Christū habere Ecclesiā loco Synagogae Et Tom. 6. con Epis Manichaeorū Non crederem inquit Euangelio nisi Ecclesiae catholicae authoritas me cōmoueret whosoeuer is affraid least he may be deceiued through the difficulty of a hard question he ought to recur to the Church established in the room of the Synagogue for as the Pharisies and Scribes teaching in the Chaire of Moyses could not deuiate from the truth so neither can the pastours of our Christian Church sitting in the Chaire of S. Peter Secondly that the Church is inuested with power and authority to exacte from the faithfull obedience to her ordinances which is the second propriety of this supream Iudg Christ Math. 18. plainly declareth saying if he refuse to heare the Church let him be vnto thee as a heathen man and a publican that is let him be excommunicated as appeareth by Christs words immediatly following * Verba illa Christi quaecunque alligaueritis super terram intelligenda sunt de censuris ecclesiasticis id etiam fatetur Cal. l. 4. insti Whatsoeuer
CHVRCH MILITANT THE CONTENTS God hath giuen to his Church on earth the keeping of all truth that we may not be as children wauering carryed about with euery wind of doctrine by diuine institution pastorall functiōs are of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church vnto teaching christian faith and deciding controuersies pertaining thereto without being liable to errour God hath inuested Church-Gouernours with autority to make laws and ordinances and exacte obediēce vnto them the Church cannot lie hid priuat spirits haue nothing of power to interprete scriptures or to judge matters in debate concerning faith and religion the outward testimony of the Church is the ordinary expedient necessary to the receiuing of christian faith answeres to sundry obiections vrged by sectaries in fauour of a priuat reuealing spirit holy scriptures were neither primarily intended nor primaryly deliuered as supream Judges of controuersies in order to christian faith and religion profoundnes ' of mysteries plenteousnes and shortnes of sentences render the scriptures obscure and intricate to infer the Churches infallibility from the autority of scriptures and scriptutes infallible autority from the infallible testimony of the Church implies no circle of errour faith as to the assent thereof is resolued into the Church and not into the scriptures the four principall marks of the true Church taken joyntly agree with the Roman Church onely which is the one holy catholick and Apostolick Church that neuer deuiated from truth THe Church militant is the grownd and piller of truth 1. Tim. 3. as the foundation of an house supporteth and hindereth it from falling So the Church of God sustaineth and preserueth truth that is the doctrine of christian faith from perishing wherefore whosoeuer desireth to find out truth vnto saluation must seek it in the Church which is the certaine keeper and faithfull Guardian thereof the supream prouidence hauing put therein Some Apostles and some Prophets and some Euangelists and some Pastours and Teachers for the consummation of the Saints for the worke of the ministery and for the edification of the body of Christ vntill we all meet together in the vnity of faith and the knowledg of the son of God vnto a perfect man and vnto the measure of the age of the fulness of Christ that we henceforth be no more children wauering and carryed about with euery wind of doctrine by the wickednesse of men and crastines of Satan whereby they lie in waite to bring vs into errour Ephes 4. where the Apostle plainly asserteth pastorall function together with the office of teaching christian faith to be of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church for the administring of Sacraments auoiding of errours and the confirming of such as shall wauer in religion and truly it cannot be conceiued as to reason probable that Christ coming into the world to be Gouernour of souls and to make vnto himselfe a glorious Church without spot or wrinckle Ephes 5. should not departing out of the world leaue necessary helps to preserue it in holynes (a) god instituted in the old law Deut. 17. à supream Tribunall consisting of Priests for the deciding of matters in debate in order to his people to the end that if inferiour Iudges should differ in iudgment or deuiate from the truth they might recur to the Council of Priests where one chief Iudge that is the high Priest was appointed to prouounce sentence and all others bound to giue obedience therto the law condemning those of pride which resisted or refused the high Priests decision in matters of controuersie again God so specially assisted the said Council with his spirit of truth that the high Priests sentence was infallible though himselfe might erre as a priuat person Wherefore Christ Mat. 23. commanded the people to doe what the Scribs and Pharisies said in regard they sate in the Chair of Moyses And S. Iohn cap. 11. ascribes not the truth of Caiphas prophesing that Christ ought to die for the safety of that nation vnto his speaking as of himselfe but to his speaking as high Priest of that same yeare which rendered him infallible in speaking in consequence of which seeing that God so directed the high Priest in the old law that he could not speake an vntruth from the Chair of Moyses it follows of necessity that Christ in his own new law of grace so specially assistes the high Priest his grand Vicar and supream head of the Church which he built on his beloued Apostle S. Peter that he cannot tell a lye from the Chair of the same S. Peter the first high Priest of the new law after Christ Wherefore the Churches supream Gouernour that succeds in that Chair cannot erre in his decrees that concerne matters of faith or generall manners notwithstanding that he were as wicked as Caiphas From hence plainly appear's the manifest weaknes of sundry sectaries which will haue the supream Priests sentence no longer to bind then hee pronounces sentence in conformity to the word of God for there is no warrantable authority saue that of the supream Pastours Tribunall which can assure vs of the diuine word for the scripture would not be belieued if it were not warranted from the infallible Chair of S. Peter Moreouer sundry sectaries say vnaduisedly that in the old law the sentence of the high Priests concerned only ciuill matters in debate and not controuersies pertaning to faith and religion for as to this point both the second book of paralipomenon and the 24. Chapter of Exodus giue clear euidence against them Besides God hath not vsed lese care in instituting the christrian Church established in a law of grace then in forming the Synagogue of the Iewes established in a law of bondage wherefore * Deus cum primum instituit Cathedrā Moysis in Deutro promisit omnes singulas eius definitiones fore veritatis infallibilis ideo Aug. l. 4. de doct chris ait Pharisaeos scribas id est Pōtisices Mosaicos iudicantes ex Cathedra Moysis non pot uisse malè definire quamuis mali essent quia ad bene definiendum cogebantur à Deo since this had diuine authority and assistance to interpret and teach the old law of Moyses as likewise to decide all controuersies concerning the Iewish religion Deut. 17. doubtless he hath not prouided in a lesser measure for the Church of Christ in order to teaching and interpreting the new law and determining all matters that might be in debate about christian religion Again Christ being about to leaue this Church in order to his visible presence for as many ages as the world shall endure was as prouident and carefull to preserue it pure from schism and heresy as was Moyses to preserue his when he was to absent himselfe from it for a shorter time but Moyses being to goe vp vnto Mount Sinai and there to abide forty dayes and forty nights onely constituted * Exod. 24. exspectate hic inquit Moyses donec reuertamur ad vos
inquit haereses obortae sunt aut nata sūt schismata quam quod Sacerdoti Dei non obtemperatur nec vnus in Ecclesia ad tē pus Sacerdos Iudex vice Christi cogitatur teaching peruerse things to draw disciples after them wherby is euidenced that no priuat man is an infallible interpreter of holy scriptures neither can know certainly that scriptures are the word of God laying aside the Churches authority For example credence is not giuen to the canon or caralogue of scriptures because of scripture testimony which no where attestes that catalogue in so much that Luther and Caluin down from the begining of their defection to the departure out of the world contended about the number of canonicall scriptures and their adherents of these dayes respectiuely continue in the pursuance of the same dispute Moreouer there is greater reason that the christian faith should rely rather on the Church which * S. Cypri in trac de vnitate Ecclesiae adulterari inquit nō potest sponsae Christi incorrupta est pudicae is an infallible ground and piller of truth then of sole scriptures which are liable to mutations corruptions and false interpretations howeuer scriptures cōsidered in themselues precisely do chaleng equall authority with the Church the same diuine spirit that directeth the tongues of the supream pastours in speaking (o) God by his absolute and extrrordinary power can himselfe alone or by an Angel instruct men and reueale matters of faith and christian religion without the ministery of the Church And doubtless the Apostles had noe other master but God himselfe as to sundry mysteries of christian faith and Christ himselfe confesseth that S. Peter came to the knowledge of his diuine nature by reuelation from God the Father Caro Sanguic non reuelauit tibi sed Pater meus guided the pennes of the Apostles and Euangelists in writing and as the Church beareth witnesse of the scriptures infallible doctrine so the scriptures do witness the Churches infalible authority yet so as that faith in order to its acte of assent is resolued into the Church and not into the scriptures for noe man can prudently belieue any scripture to be the word of God if the Church that is the ground and piller of truth should not declare it for such howeuer Catholicks who doe infer the Churches infallibility from the testimony of scripture and the authority of scripture from the testimony of the Church are noe more guilty of committing (p) According to Euclide a mathematicall circle taken in the proper sense is the passing of one and the same line from and the repassing vnto the same point and by the same way a circle of errour then are Philosophers that assert mutuall causalities or doe argue from a cause its proper effect and from an effect its proper cause for example from the rising of the sun is proued the existence of the day and againe the existence of the day proueth the risiing of the sun wherin there is noe circle of errour which properly consisteth in the coming again of the same thing vnto the same thing from whence it came and by the same way it came but the way of one cause is not the way of an other cause nor the way of an effect is the way of the cause wherof it is the effect in like manner the way of the Church which is a cleare speaking Iudge is not the way of the scriptures which consiste in mute elements of characters and although we belieue that the Church is an infallible proposer of all matters pertaining to faith because of the scripture testimony neuertheless if the scriptures had borne noe witness therof there is euidence of credibility enough to induce vs prudently to belieue the Churches infallibility which euen before the writing of scriptures was beliued neither do we recur to scriptures to proue it (q) In disputs or conferences with such as deny holy scriptures motiues of credibility haue weight with them and that one which S. Austin vseth l. con Epis Faus cap. 4. seems of greattest moment Many things saith he keepe me fast in the bosom of the Catholick Church for example the vnanimous accord of people and nations authority confirmed by miracles .... by antiquity strengthned and the succession of Bishops dovvn from S. Peter the Apostle to vvhom our lord committed the feeding of his sheepe vnto the present Episcopacy but when we haue to doe with such as admit them and euen then we doe not alledge scriptures as the formall cause the Churches infallibility is known by for that is diuine reuelation but as witness of it only for we doe not belieue precisely that the Church is infallible because the scripturs do say it but in regard of many other motiues which do moue vs to giue our assent thereto neither was the church intended for the vse of the scriptures but scriptures for the vse of the Church besides no man without manifesting extream weakness can except against the mutuall testimony that Christ and S. Iohn Baptist gaue of one another or against the disciples of both who belieued their masters to be such as their masters reciprocally had declared theselues to bee The principall marks or tokens of the true Church * Quatuor illa signa dilucide constant ex sacra scriptura ex symbolis Apostolorum Nicae S. Athanasij expressè habentur in sym Constātinop cuius Patres voce apostolicam diuinitus addiderunt are foure set douwn in that Article of christian faith viz I belieue one holy catholick and apostolick Church Albeit that the true Church consisteth of many members yet it is but one body 1. Cor. 12. of Christ in vnity of faith and baptism One lord one faith one baptism Ep. 4. nor can Christ be an author of diuision that is a God of vnion Likwise it is holy for as much as it is the body of Christ that is the fountain of all holyness and enioyes a sacrifice and Sacraments which confer sanctity neither matters it that sundry members of his body are guilty of mortall transgressions For as such as profess any art are counted artificers though they doe not act according to the principalls or rules there-of so the said members in regard they put on Christ (r) According to S. Austin in psal 85. if all christians and true belieuers are baptized in Christ they haue put on Christ as the Apostle reacheth Gal. 3. and if they be made members of his body and say they are not holy they do an iniury to the head whose members are holy by Baptism and become the chosen people of God by faith are called holy although they doe not obserue the ordinances and lawes of either For example 1. Cor. 1. the Corinthians are said to be sanctified in Christ IESVS and holy neuertheless there were among them both the naturall and carnall men The true Church militant is (ſ) According to the Euangelist
S. Mat. cap. 24. the Church of God bears the name of the kingdom of Heauen And S. Hierom stileth the Church the arke of Noe that contained Leopards kids wolfes and lambs that is to say both good and wicked men dwel in the Church of God and though she is faid Eph. 4. to haue no spot or wrinckle yet that is meant in relation to faith and doctrine which are holy and without blame Howeuer S. Austin l. de perfec iustorum expounds the sacred Text set down also in order to the Church triumphant which is without spot or wrinckle the great house of God wherin are not only vessells of gold and siluer but also of wood and of earth and some for honour and some for dishonour 2. Tim. 2. howeuer no man is so irreuocably a vessell vnto dishonour but that he may be translated into a vessell vnto honour sanctified and meet for our lord IESVS if he will cast from him all his transgressions committed after baptism wherby he was incorporated into this great house which made him a vessell vnto dishonour The Church is called catholick that is vniuersall in as much as it sendeth forth the marueilous light of christian faith from the rising of the sun vnto the goeing douwn therof For Christ that redeemed vs to God by his bloud out of euery kindred and tongue and people and nation Apoc. 5. hath not confined the knowledg of his faith * Aug. ser 13. Ecclesia inquit à solis ortu vsque ad occasum vnius fidei splendore enititur within the bounds of one kingdome Moreouer the Church is rightly named catholick or vniuersall in respect of time that is to say of perpetuall succession of pastours and Teachers for the prouidence of God towards man of necessity preserueth the Church from perishing himselfe hauing prouidently instituted it as the common ordinary way to lead man vnto his kingdom Again its vniuersall because of the obligation euery man hath to embrace it that will aspire to eternall life As out of the arke of Noe there was no deliuerance from the generall deluge (t) According to S. Cyprian trac de vnit Eccle. whosoeuer hath not the Church for his Mother shall not haue God for his Father And according to S. Fulgentius who was contemporary with S. Austin l. de fide Such as are not incorporated into the Church how charitable soeuer they be cannot be saued and this Catholick assertion S. Austin professes likwise li. 4. de baptismo besids according to the holy scriptures no man that is not within the Churches bosome can obtaine heauenly benediction in consequence of which to rebell against or fall from her is execrable and damnable so out of the true Church there is no saluation and indeed the Church is the sole Mother that conceiueth bringeth forth and nourisheth children vnto heauenly blessednes Lastly the true Church is called apostolicall because it hath doth and shall preach in all times to the end of the world christian religion planted by the Apostles vpon whom as the foundation it was built Eph. 2. By the forementioned marks or tokens ioyntly the Church of Christ is shewed and distinguished from euery false congregation The Synagogue of Iews and Mahometans cannot challeng Apostolicall foundation where of Christ himselfe is the Chief corner stone nor catholick propagation from the rising of the sun to the goeing down therof for their religion is neither christian nor spread in all parts of the world and the false Churches of sectaries though they carry the name of christian neuertheless they haue nothing of vnity as to the faith of Christ nor of perpetuall succession as to pastours and Teachers down from the Apostles to these present times for they set vp a new mysticall body of Christ composed of reformed members saying that Christ in regard of sundry great scandalls and errours hath elected the old mysticall body wherof he was head afore that is the Roman Church which seemeth a strang thing because that Church according to their own confession was once in possession of the true faith and true religion * Ad Rom. 5. gratias ago Domino Deo quod fides vestra Romana annunciata Est in vniuerso mundo and the Apostle witnesseth as much writing to the Romans I thank my God through Iesus-Christ for you all because your faith Roman is published through out the whole world and no one expresse scripture testimony can be alledged to shew that the Roman Church hath deuiated from that true faith in consequence of which sectaries that will belieue nothing without express scripture ought not to belieue that the Roman Church is deuested of the true faith which it was once in possession of and therby deserted and truly it is not to reason credible that Christ after being marryed to the Roman Church for sundry ages should repudiate her especially hauing promised by the mouth of his holy Prophet that * Sponsabo te mihi in aeternum he will neuer chang the spouse of the new law saying I will espouse thee for euer it is not as to reason credible that Christ that cast out the bill of deuorce practized in the old law should be the first to bring it again into practice nor is it as to reason credible that the spouse which Christ chose without sport or wrinckle and put vnder the conduct of the holy Ghost should cast away her spousall innocence integrity and fidelity and turne to vncleaness fornication and idolatry Wherfore it is plainly euident that the Roman Church is not repudiated or deserted wherefore she and no other is the true Church of Christ that since the first age for 1660. yeares hath not deuiated from one holy catholick and Apostolick faith neither is * Apostolus scribens ad Rom. dicit fidem vestram meam sed fides S. Pau. erat vniuersalis catholica Roman Church and catholick or vniuersall Church less consistent together then christian Church and catholick Church or apostolicall and catholick Church for Christ was a singular person whence the word Christian is deriued and the Apostles were particular men whence the word Apostolicall comes and as the catholick Church is named christian because of Christ that is the supream inuisible head therof and as the catholick Church is called apostolicall in respect of the Apostles which were the foundation of it so the Catholick Church is called Roman from the Bishop of Rome that is the visible head therof subordinate to Christ * Concil Alexand loquens de Roma Eccl. sacer inquit vertex inquo omnis Ecclesia vertitur and indeed the Roman Church taken properly doth not signifie precisely and only that Church which is at Rome but cōprehendeth euery Church through out the whole world that professeth the same faith with it and acknowledgeth obedience to the same (u) According to S. Anaclete S. Anaclete S. Peters disciple and his third successor in the Pontificate
A wit-sectary set forth the greatest praise of faith is first to belieue and then to know an inordinate loue to Philosophy is the mother of Heresies A Wit-belieuer is an inuader of Christian faith inordinately attending to naturall reason and scientificall demonstrations in the search of supernaturall truths which faith only is entrusted with (a) S. Austin l. de vtili cred c. 1. arguing against the Manicheans which taught that Christians ought not to assent vnto the mysteries of faith vnless they knew them afore by the light of reason saith expresly That vve doe not knovv vnto belieuing but vee belieue vnto knovving and ambitious to know before he belieues he robs faith of its greatest praise which is first to * Aug. tract 79. in Joan. haec est inquit laws fidei si quod creditur non videtur vnde illud Isa si non credideritis non intelligetis belieue and then to know or to belieue what is not known Also he is an inuader of the true belieuers * Aug. de vtilitate credendi con Manichae sidelis Christianus non rationalis appellatur name which is Christian changing it into an nouell Title of rationall and accordingly stileth himselfe the rationall belieuer Besides blown vp with a conceited actiuity of his own witt he chooseth to teach amiss rather then to teach with the current of other belieuers and inuent (b) S. Paul 1. Tim. Counsels Timothy to auoide profane nouelties and oppositions of knowledge falsely so called which men of corrupt minds and puft vp with pride promising haue erred about faith vnauthoriz'd and vnparal lel'd modells of new doctrin rather then to be counted in the ranck of * Luc. 18. dixit superbus Pharisaeus nō sum sicut caeteri homines ergo sicut caeteri daemonū infert S. Bernardus Caeteri homines In the pursuance of his ambition he rips his brain and forcibly cuts out abortiue notions which goe rather in a rownd circle of fancy by which he is biased then in a right line of reason tending to the law (c) Rom. 12. The Apostle condemnes knowledge that is not according to sobriety that is which is not conform to the generall practice of the holy Church and such saith S. Iraeneus l. 5. c 17. as forsake the preaching of the Church argue the holy Priests of vnskilfulnes not considering how far more worthly a religious Idiote is then a blasphemous and impudent sophister of sobriety and charity which is the only center of religious consistency His fancied thoughts he puts forth in bold assertions dressed vp with obscure words and dark sentences to take the ears of the ignorant or such as being desirous to be esteemed witty doe abandon their judgment to an implicit faith of his new exotick notions In sum he is a wit-sectary that fancy vnder a specious colour of reason hath deboiched making him eat too * Prouerb 25. mel multum comedendo nocet aboundantly the hony of Philosophy and thereby create her the Mistress which is but the hand maid of Theology her office being only to call vnto the Tower of wisdome and not to rule therin Philosophy is the captiue woman that S. Hierome wisely aduiseth Pammachius to diuest of her alluring and bewitching haires and make her bald assuring him that by so dressing her she shall bring forth much captiue fruit and of a Moabit become an Israelite (d) S. Hier. ad Ctesiph con Pelag. c. 1. and Tertullian de praescrip con Marcio l. 5. call Philosophers the Patriarcks of Hereticks affirming that the ancient Heresies haue sprung from such as were too much addicted to prophane Philosophy And S. Ambros l. 1. de fide cap. 5. con Aria ascribes to Philosophy the Origen of all impieties and moreouer excludes Philosophicall arguments in the resolution of faith as vnnecessary For vve giue credence saith this great Doctor to fishermen and not to Philosophers Philosophy so long only is profitable to the Church of God as she is kept in awe of diuine faith and in obedience to the schooles of Christian Catholick Doctors If it were granted that * S. Tho. do Villa-noua ser de Epiph. pag. 33. experimento saepè didicimus vt qu◠nimium cupit esse Philosophus facilè desinat esse Christianus sicut magi dum quaerunt in Hierusalem humanum consilium amisere caeleste signum sic Christiani nimium quaerentes humanas rationes in diuinis mysterijs perdunt fidei lucom fulgorem Philosophy might furnish clear demonstrations as requisits to Christian faith it would follow of necessity that faith were not faith being faith and naturall euidence are inconsistent together according to the Apostle who excludeth sight from the walk of faith 2. Cor. 5. CHAR. XIV OF A SINGVLAR DOCTOR THE CONTENTS Singular Teachers compared to Erostratus and Pausanias from the singularity of one Doctor proceed's the curiosity of many hearers one singular Master planteth a sect which the curiosity of many schollars spreads singular Teachers appeare outwardly in sheeps cloathing while they are inwardly rauenous wolfes A Singular Doctor is a wanton schollar of new notions that blown vp with vanity and arrogancy ambitiously endeauoureth to get a name aboue other Teachers contempory with him (a) S. Bernard ser 65. in Cant. writeth that the intent and aim of all hereticks is to in hance and spread their name through singularity of doctrine And S. Gregor l. 24. mor. saith that t is naturall vnto hereticks to be puft vp with vaine pride of science and to scorne and laugh at the simplicity of other belieuers Also Theodoret. in praet in Polymor obserues that some men which haue done no gallant laudable actions worthy renown endeauour by wicked entreprises to celebrate their name Aug. in psal 9 saith that those which cannot be known by well doing striue by ill doing to abide for euer in the mouth of posterity desirous of an euill name rather then to haue none at all which is the sole ground of his singularity and rather then to haue none he laboureth for an ill one turning from wholsom learning * Martianus Imperator in Concil Calcedo qui post veritatem repertam inquit Doctorum vnitate stabilitā aliquid vlterius discutit mēdacium quaerit established in the vnity of Doctors to exoctick and vnauthorised Tenents which though he craftily diuulgeth for primitiue verities and vaunteth (b) S. Chrysostome in com oper imperf super Mat. hom 45. writeth thus When thou shalt hear any man extolling and beatifying the ancient Doctours obserue his carriage tovvard those vvhich are contemporary vvith him for if he shall approue and honour those doubtles he vvould haue respected the others if be had liued in their dayes but if he contemne the moderne he vvould likevvise haue contemned the ancient Teachers if he had been contemporary vvith them to haue left modern as troubled waters for ancient doctrins as clear springs neuertheless he carries
wherby he is armed against his own lusts and wanton desires (b) Seneca compareth a wise man vnto the strongest army because a wise man indeed stands firm against pouerty slanders reproches ignominies and all manner of tribulations and made vndantedly valiant in all encounters with aduersity wherfore wisdome is an infinit treasure vnto such as lay hold on her for her counsell preserueth and her vnderstanding keepeth them as a pillar of a cloud led the Israëlits in their way by day and the pillar of fire gaue them light by night that they might goe both by day and night Exodus 13. soe wisdome is a guid vnto men which walk in prosperity as by day and a light vnto men that walke in aduersity as by night Wisdome is the schoolmistris of the knowledge of God the chooser out of his works the teacher of sobernes the giuer of holines and the doer of all things most profitable and acceptable in the sight of Heauen * Jacob 30. Sapientia desursum est whence she is descended Wherby is plainly evident that wisdome is not the same thing with science which taken precisely hath no bounds being common a like to each human knowledge besides many times * 1. Cor. 8. Scientia inflat science puffeth vp him that findeth it and deceiueth his judgment rendering him curious in superfluous things (c) Those which know profitable and not such as know many things are wise men indeed which haue nothing of profit Of this curiosity in order to science the Athenians were guilty who saith S. Luke Act. 17. gaue themselues to nothing else but to speak or to heare something of nouelty which is the mother of schism and heresy but in all times some wanton wits haue either begot or reuiued dangerous vnauthorised doctrins blown vp with their own science to the end they might be counted learned aboue the ordinary ranck of knowing men so that it is no strang thing that the present age should bring forth new Teachers and new hearers of prophane nouelties in consequence of the premisses noe man how knowing soeuer he seems is truly wise when (d) S. Austin in an Epistle to Dioscorus condemnes those schollars which rejoyce in knowing of Anoxagoras Anoxemenes Pithagoras Demosthenes to the end they may seem learned because there is nothing of solide doctrine and true erudition in them he seeketh out curiously things that haue nothing of profit or searcheth into hidden misteries which exceed his capacity for a wise man indeed thinketh with reuerence vppon what God hath commanded Eccles 32. in superfluous things search not and be not curious in many of his works for many things are shewed vnto thee aboue the capacity of men Furthermore true wisdom which is from aboue is pure Iacob 30. That is without vncleanes A wise man indeed (e) Ecclesiasticus cap. 3. saith that an heart which is wise and vnderstanding will abstaine from sin and shall prosper in the works of Iustice wherfore S. Bernard teacheth that those sind wisdome which are sorry for their sins purgeth out of his heart the leuen of sin casteth a way wickednes presseth down the lustes of curiosity of ambition of vain glory committeth not fornication with schism and heresy despiseth wordly pleasures (f) According to S. Austin l. de ciuit the intent and aime of true wisdome is to be where God is all in all things with an assured eternity and perfect peace and setteth his affection on things that are aboue and not on things which are on the earth true wisdome is peaceable Iacob 30. A wise man indeed hath nothing of strise in his heart is a louer of vnion established in the vnity of Christian schooles is gentle humble modest without leuity pride wantounes is full of obedience to the Churches lawes and ordinances and full of mercy and good fruits without hypocrisy Again a wise man indeed is wise in order to himselfe Prouerbs 90. if thou be wise thou shalt be wise for thy selfe The primitiue Christians were wise indeed to themselues which euery where bore in their bodies the mortifications of Christ IESUS for they suffered with great patience all manner of tribulations together with the spoiling of their goods for his sake that they might be glorified with him counting that the afflictions of this present time were not worthy of the glory to come through his merits and truly what shall it prosit a man though he did win the whole world and lose his own soul or What exchange shall a man giue for his soul Mat. 8. Wherfore such Christians as desert the Catholick Church to get worldly honours to heap vp earthly treasures preferring the world to the faith of Christ earth to Heauen flesh to the soul transitory pleasures to eternall blessednes * S. Bernard de consideratione Sic alloquitur Eugenium Papam quid prodest si vniuersum mundum lucreris te vnum perdens etsi sapiens alijs sis deest tibi sapientia si tibi non fueriâ— how wise soeuer they be to others are not wise to themselues for the wisdome of such men doth not descend from aboue but is earthly sensuall and deuilish Iacob 30. CHAR. XXV OF IVSTICE THE CONTENTS The things that are made equall are said to be adjusted from whence Iustice deriues its name the property of Justice is to render to euery one what is euery on 's own Iustice requireth of euery man worship and obediencein order to God exacteth loue kindnes respect honour and duty in order to man man in Iustice is bound to doe to his neighbour what he would his neighbour should doe vnto him Iustice exhorteth the faithfull aliue to shew pity vnto the faithfull departed apparitions of souls after their remouall out of their bodies asserted IVstice is a * Iustitia definitur virtus reddens vnicuique quod suâ—â— est Seu constaÌ„s perpetua voluntas in s suum vnicuique triâ— buens constant perpetuall inclination of the will to render vnto euery one what is euery on 's own That is to giue vnto God the things that are Gods and to giue vnto man the things which are mans as the immobility (a) According to Aristotle l. 2. de coelo the earth is equally poisd in the mids of the world in consequence whereof t is immoueable and indeed according to the holy Scripture terra in aeternum stat Eccles 1. that is the earth for euer stands firme without mouing at all of the earth is perceiued through an equall weighing of its parts in the center of the world so the firmnes and constancy of Iustice is establisht and perpetuated by an equall adjusting of debts vnto God and man which is the center thereof (b) Iustice is a morall vertue so named because of necessity it requires equallity and things are said to be adjusted which are of equall parts wherefore the great lawer Constantine defines us to be ars boni aqui and
bringes poor man into the pit of the deuil for they that will be rich saith the Apostle 1. Timot. 6. fall into temptation and snares and into many foolish and noisome lustes which drown them in perdition and destruction A ship that is fastened to the earth cannot sail to the hauen she tends to euen so a man whose affections are fixed on earthly riches cannot pass to Heauen which is his hauen in regard the ship of his soul stickes fast to the ground of worldly treasures howeuer riches in themselues are not euil as the poor labourer that spreads fatt dung abroad ouer all his feild renders it fruitfull vnto (d) According to the holy Scriptures Almes deeds deliuer from sin The holy Prophet Daniel counselled Nabuchodonosor to redeem his sinnes by giuing almes and to releiue the poore is a counsell Christ himselfe gaue saying Giue vnto the poore and thou â—halt haue a treasure in Heauen bringing forth much corne so the rich man that distribut's his riches to such as be in necessity prosits his soul vnto iustification of life but who is he that vses well his riches which he might abuse who is he that might doe euil with his gold and hath not don it might offend and hath not offended who is this blessed rich which is found without blemish and hath not gon after riches nor hoped in mony or treasures wherby so many are destroyed who is he for he is an example of glory and his goods be established in our lord and all the Church of Saints shall declare his almes Eccles 31. the blessed rich is he that maketh himselfe poore hauing great riches or he that of his little substance is not afraid to giue a little almes In the law of Moses the old Tobias was blessedly rich he gaue the first tenth part of all his goods to the Priests the sonns of Aron another tenth part he sold and euery yeare bestowed it in good vses at Ierusalem the third tenth part of his goods he destributed among them to whom it was meet he powred out great almes to his brethren and gaue his own bread to such as were hungry and his own clothes to those which were naked Tob. 10. likwise Zaccheus was blessed in riches that gaue halfe of his goods * Qui miseretur pauperi beatus erit beatus qui intelligiâ— super egenuÌ„ pauperem id est qni prouidet egenis pauperibus to the poor because saluation came therby to his house Luk. 19. and that almes laid vp a good store for him selfe in regard it deliuered him from death and suffered him not to come into darknes In the law of grace the primitiue Christians were the blessed rich for many which were possessors of lands or houses sold them and brought the price and laid it down at the Apostles feet and it was distaibuted according to the necessity of each one respectiuely Act. 4. and down from the Apostles to the present times the Church hath produced numberless numbers of blessed rich in euery age respectiuely and our country of England makes a larg claim to the blessed rich as euidence the many beautifull Churches sumptious Monasteries goodly Colleges and famous hospitalls which the almes of its primitiue Catholick Christians haue erected in the honour of God his glorious Virgin mother and other blessed Saints But truly the modern haue much surpassed euen the primitiue Catholick Christians of this Iland for as much as they haue gladly born the yoke of persecution patiently endured the spoiling of their goods and willingly suffered banishment taking vp their Cross of tribulation after the example of their heauenly Master the son of God that desceuded from Heauen to exalt and render pouerty estimable beyond worldly treasures for coming into the world he made choice * Elegi te in camino paupertatis ait Propheta of a poor Virgin in the furnace of pouerty of whom he was made man and in lieu of a glorious pallace sutable to the king of glory at his first entrance into the world was lodged in a stable in room of rich mantles was wrapped in poor swadling cloathes In stead of a bed of state he was laid in a crath or manger and while he was conuersant on earth he had not wheron to rest his head besides at his departure out of this world he was stripped of all cloathes Wherfore t is a great abuse saith S. Bernard and manifest madnes if we shall * S. Bernardus magna abusio vt quis diues esse velit pro quo Deus pauper fierâ— voluit couet to be rich for whose sake the son of God made himselfe poor CHAR. XXXI OF VSVRY THE CONTENTS To lend vnto vsury is forbidden by the law of nature the written law of Moyses and the Euangelicall law of Christ The ancient Iewes by diuine dispensation lent vpon vsury to the Cananites to lend for a spirituall gain precisely implies nothing of vsury nor to exacte or receiue temporall gain either in regard of gain that ceaseth by or dammage that comes of loan precisely Those which lend money or other commodities that consume in vsing transfer the dominion thereof vnto the borrowers in consequence of which Mutuum loan differs from letting or setting to hite The condition of vsurers is miserable USury whichcomes of couetousnes taken in the proper sense implies lucre that is gain gotten exacted or coueted of the loan of money principally and precisely aboue the Capitall sum or of some other thing which through vsing consumes away namely oyle corne c. aboue the capitall stock Here the particle lucre denotates reall money or a vantage that carries the price or valeu of true money for he who lend's to an other man with intent onely to make him his friend or to keepe him from being his Enimy or lends meerly to preuent an vniust vexation does not commit vsury since he reaps thereby nothing of lucre that bears the price or valeu of money because the motiues of such loane be spirituall in consequence of which the lucre that comes of them must of necessity be * S. Math. c. 15. centuplum accipietis c. hic saccrtextus intelligitur de lucre spirituali spirituall also The particle principally makes the primary or principall intent and aime of receiuing encrease aboue the Capitall to be a requisit necessary to the guilt of vsury and indeed a secundary or less principall intention of gain has nothing of wickednes for exaÌ„ple t' is lawfull to serue the Church or the chief Prelate of a Church with a secundary and less principall intent in order to the obtaining of a benefice for his seruice likewise t' is lawfull to celebrate or heare diuine seruice vnto receiuing daily distributions or to serue God in hope and in reguard secondarily of worldly rewards and enioyements * Psal 118. inclinaui cor meum ad faciendas iustificationes tuas propter vetributioneÌ„ which is the doctrine of
Hebrew Greek and Latine tongue as to the publick seruice of the Church these being no strange languages inspired by miracle but the known tongues of the Christian world and the most proper and significant to expresse the diuine mysteries because of the elegancy emphasy of their words and sentences and also of their grammar rules wherby they are contained within certain bounds and limits to the clearing of vncertaintyes and intricacies vnto which other languages are subject in regard of the great similitude of cases numbers and tenses that occasion inextricable doubts for this respect all the Scriptures of the old and new Testament were written and set forth in Hebrew Greek and Latine And S. Paul himself composed his Epistles in Greek which he directed to the Romans whose vulgar toÌ„gue was latine Furthermore it is euident that the Corinthians had their publick seruice in Greek when the Apostle writ vnto them wherby manifestly appeareth that he meant not of the Church seruice which in no place of the world was celebrated but in Hebrew Greek or Latin And though S. Paul saies in the aforenamed Chapter If I pray in a strang tongue my spirit prayeth but my vnderstanding is without fruit Neuertheless he does not (n) The Apostle 1. Cor. 14. reprehendes certain Corinthians endued with the guift of tongues because they vttered prayers and Hymns in the priuat meetings of the faithfull of those dayes which neither themselues nor others there present vnderstood and puft vp with a vain opinion preferred the gift of tongues before all other miraculous gifts and this is what S. Paul condemneth in the Chapter set down meane of priuate prayers which the faithfull of all fexes euen in this age doe deuoutly vse vpon their latin Primers especially for the priuate prayers he speaketh of were psalmes hymnes sonnets reuelations inspired by miracle and vttered in a strang tongue giuen extraordinarily by miracle also howeuer without doubt the Apostles intention in the words aboue mentioned was not to forbid euen strang languages since he expresly sayes in the same Chapter Wherfore brethren couet to prophesie and forbid not languages but the true meaning of the aforesaid words is that if any one shall vse a strang tongue in praying and want the knowledg therof though his spirit heart and affection prayeth well neuertheless he is without fruit as to the vnderstanding for as much as the vnderstanding doth not penetrate the things or misteries that the words signify and this is incident euen in this age to such as pray in the latine tongue wherin they are not versed yea to such also as be knowing in the grammaticall signification of latin words especially if in praying they vse the Psalmes of Dauid because of the tropes and figures contained therin For example how many euen of the learned reciting the words of the Psalme 59 Moab the pot of my hope Into Edom I will stretch out my thooe or of the Psalm 67. If yee sleepe among the midst of the lotts the wings of a doue couered with siluer rebuke the wild heasts of the reede The congregation of bulls in the kine of the people doe comprehend the sense and meaning therof notwithstanding all this neither priuate prayers which are said and not vnderstood nor publick prayers which are heard and not vnderstood likewise ought to be contemned or counted as vnprofitable for whosoeuer sayeth or heareth prayers so if he prayeth and heareth deuoutly enjoyes the fruit and comfort of a minde * S. Damas ait oratio est mentis eleuatio in Deum Suppoint autem hac orationis definitio vel includit rerum deceÌ„tium petitionem eleuated to and fixed in God wherin lies the consistency of praying and hearing aright albeit that his vnderstanding wanteth it 's proper fruit which is to feed of the sense signified by the words and indeed it happeneâ—h often times that many good catholick men and women praying in a language vnknown to themselues doe merit and obtaine more spirituall advantages of God then others that haue the vnderstanding of what they vtter in praying especially if they pray with greater humility pietie feruour and reuerence towards the prayers for as much as they be set forth and approued as holy profitable and acceptable to the diuine Majesty by the generall practice and warrantable authority of the holy catholick Church (o) Aug. Epis 118. cap. 5. any thing that the whole Church practices and obserues through out the world to dispute thereof as though it were not to be done is most insolent madnes that cannot erre in it's ordinances Besid's there is more respect and deuotion had towards a thing that is not known by the vnderstanding nor perceiued by the senses if credence be giuen to the profitablenes therof then towards any other thing that is familiar to the vnderstanding and obuious to the senses for example all true Christians doe most religiously honour the Mistery of the Incarnation and most deuoutly reuerence the Sacraments for as much as they belieue the Incarnation to be the principall and the Sacraments the instrumentall cause of iustification vnto eternall life God does not so much looke after the * Aug. Epis 102. ad Euodium non enim quantum intelligas sed quaÌ„tum credas credendo ames quaerit Deus nam saepe fit vt qui intelligunt contemnant qui non intelligunt afficiantur accuratnes of knowledg as to the vnderstanding of the words of holy prayers Hymnes c. priuatly or publickly said as he does after the credence giuen therunto wherby a belieuer is excited to loue him for often times it happeneth that such as vnderstand doe contemne when such as are * Dixit quidam sanctus Pater Jlliterati rapiunt Coelum nos vbi cuÌ„ scientia nostra vnlearned and know litle or nothing are carryed on the wings of a feruent deuotion and zeale to the inward veile of the diuine Tabernacle that is to say to the Thron of God For this reason which is taken out of S. Augustine it may be probably coniectured that in the primitiue Church the holy Ghost did giue sundry Christians guifts to speake in strange tongues which they vnderstood not therby to shew to posterity that no man ought to condemne as vnprofitable the prayers of such as say them in an vnknown language especially they relying on the Church-authority for the profitablenes therof as also vseing attention * S. Tho. ponit tres intentiones orationis vnam ad verba qua oraÌ„s profert alteram ad sensum tertiam ad finam qui est Deus Et prima secuÌ„da aliquando nocent in quaÌ„tum impediunt deuotionem as to the end of prayer which is God only though they should not haue attention as to the words vttered in praying or as to the sense therof the two last attentions being neither the best nor necessarily required to the consistency of prayer and some times do obstruct and hinder
that is to say such as are not mēbers of Christs Church haue no right to the mysticall meate and drink which is the reall body and blood of Christ 11. The corporall and linnen clothes that couer the Altar doe signify the linnen cloath that wrapped the sacred Body of Christ when he was laid in the sepulcher Io. 19. Furthermore besides the many religious visible ceremonies God commanded to be employed in exhibition of diuine worship during the continuance of the old law Exod. 29. Christ Authour of the new law instituted sundry ceremonies and rites which be of necessity namely washing with water in Baptism imposition of hands and anoynting with consecrated oyle in the Sacrament of Order c. Yea Christ himself practised visible ceremonies for he fell on his face and prayed Io. 26. lift vp his eyes and prayed Io. 11. lift vp his hands and blessed Luc. 24. Besides when he found in the Temple which is a sensible ceremonie too deputed vnto diuine worship those that sold oxen sheep and doues c. Io. 20. he was offended to see his Fathers howse made an howse of marchandice Hereby is euidently plain that Christ when in his conference with the Samaritan Woman Io. 4. said the hower cometh and now is when the true adorers shall adore the Father in spirit and truth he did not meane that he was come to take away sacrifice Sacraments prayers Churches and all other sensible ceremonies practised in the seruice of the new law but for as much as the cited Text is often tymes alledged by ancient and moderne sectaries especially against all visible rites of christian religion it will conduce greatly to vndeceiuing the deceiued in the sense and meaning therof if they consider duely that the Samaritans were Schismaticks as Luther and Zuinglius religious men both and Priests illegally and sacrilegiously marryed against the holy Canons and vowed chastity went out from the catholick Church in the time of Henry the eight king of England and began a schism in Germany likewise as Ballev Peter Martyr Martin Bucher c. Apostat-wedded-priests also in the reign of Edward the Sixt a childe began the schism in England countenanced and supported by Bishop Cranmer specially to which Henry the eight king Edwards Father had opened a doore only so a certain Priest of the Iews called Mansses to retain and enjoy an vnlawfull wife fell from the society of the faithfull Iewes at Hierusalem and broached schism in Samaria Besides as Luther and those other afore mentioned to establish their schisms leaped * Ioseph l. 11. Antiquit cap. 8. est propriū inquit Haereticis Schismaticis transilire capita antiquarum Ecclesiarum vt suam reddant Religionem antiquissimam ouer the heads of all christian Churches then and for many ages before establish't pretending that these were not agreeing with Christ and his Apostles in the essentialls of doctrine worship and gouernment and in consequence thereof made reformation the disguised end of their leape in like manner Manasses to render his schism plausible and taking with that people he leaped ouer the Prophet Moyses to Iacob the Patriarch and ouer the Temple in Ierusalem to the Temple of the Samaritans in Mount Garizim tying thereto the sacrifice of the Iews religion vpon pretence that the said Patriarch Iacob had therin adored long before the Temple of Salomon was built or the law giuen to obtain superiority in his schism he gaue the preeminence in Church-seruice to the place wherin he began it This was the true cause that moued the faithfull Iews to abstain from the company and conuersation of the Samaritans who maintained their adoring in Garizim to be more ancient then the worship of the Iews in Ierusalem In regard of this contention about the Temple in Ierusalem and the Temple in Garizim the Samaritan woman conceiuing Christ to be some Prophet for as much as he had reuealed vnto her the secret passages of her whole life propounded vnto him a Theologicall question touching the afore said controuersy on design to be informed to which of the two publick (e) According to holy scriptures by publick solemn adoration is meant proper sacrifice namely Joan. 12. and There vvere certain Gentils amongst them that came vp to adore at the feast And Act. 8. the Euneuch came vp to adore in Jerusalem in both these scripture-places by adoration which was publick and solemn is vnderstood proper sacrifice that was offered onely in Ierusalem but all other adorations outward and inward might be vsed in any whatsoeuer place besid's Ierusalem adoration or sacrifice was tyed and confined saying Our Fathers adored in this mountaine and ye say that in Ierusalem is the place where men ought to adore that is to offer sacrifice to which Christ replying (f) The Iews and Samaritans contended about the place of sacrifice and for as much as both of them were in fault therefore Christ form'd his answere in order to both Although the Iews sacrifice was the true sacrifice neuertheless it was vnprofitable being not able to procure sanctifying grace but the Samaritans sacrifice was erroneous for they were schismaticks and adored that is offered sacrifice where God would not haue had them that is they offered sacrifice out of Gods Temple in Ierusalem and therefore Christ said to the Samaritan woman Yee adore vvhat yee knovv not said woman belieue me the houre cometh when ye shall neither in this mountaine nor at Ierusalem adore the Father c. Wherby he for'told her that the adoration or sacrifice as to both the Temples should shortly cease and be disannulled and that the true sacrifice suddenly to be instituted in room therof should not be tyed to one place or nation but should be offered in all the parts of the world according to the Prophecy of Malachias cap. 10. and instructed her with all concerning this new sacrifice signifying that is should not be a gross and carnall adoration exhibited in and by the flesh and blood of goates sheepe oxen c. as afore but that it should be a clean adoration or sacrifice containing in it selfe spirit grace and life which the others wanted yea that it should be the verity it self wherof all former sacrifices were shadowes and figures only wherefore Christ told her that the new adorers should adore the Father in spirit that is to lay should offer to God a sacrifice giuing grace and life Christ did not inculcate adoration of God in spirit to condemne adoration vnder whatsoeuer sensible rites and ceremonies but to exclude the carnall adoration or sacrifice of the Iews that wanted spirit to giue life to the soul In like manner Christ did intimate adoration of God in verity to condemne the erroneous worship of the Samaritās who albeit they did adore the true God of Israel neuertheless being Schismaticks they did not adore him in verity because they adored him out of the communion and vnity of the faithfull Iews and in the mountaine of Garizim
where God would not be adored by sacrifice this being confined to the Temple at Ierusalem Wherby followeth euidently that such as worship or adore God otherwise then he will himself be worshipped or adored doe not worship or adore him in verity or Truth Sithence God will be adored in one sole Church founded on the merits of Christ all Schismaticks and Hereticks that abandon the communion and vnity therof doe not adore God in verity vnto saluation howeuer they may flatter themselues with their mountaine of Garizim that is with their own fancied worship founded on the mountaine of pride wherfore to such worshippers may be said both according to reason and equity you adore what you know not for saluation is of one Church and such only doe pray worship and adore * Aug. in psal 130. ipse inquit in spiritu veritate orat qui in pace Ecclesiae orat in spirit and truth which pray worship and adore in peace and coÌ„munion of one catholick and apostolick Church wherunto is tyed and coÌ„fined the sacrifice worship and seruice of the new law vnto iustification of life Again though sundry Church-ceremonies be neither commanded nor mentioned (g) The Council of Trent sess 21. c. 2. declares that God hath left power vnto the Church to ordaine and institute what she shall think expedient and conducing to the reuerence of the Sacraments and the aduantages of such as receiue them wherfore Church-gouernours are called dispensers of the mysteries of God 1. Cor. 4. in the holy scriptures farther then vnto an implicite faith neuertheless they are not to be condemned for many things appertaining vnto diuine worship doe not of necessity require an express ordinance Noah built an Altar to God on which he offered a sacrifice of euery clean beast all eit he had no * Noe non iussus altare construxit vt notat S. Ambrosius warrantable authority by speciall precept Abel in like manner vnbidden offered sacrifice that was * Respexit Deus ad Abel munera eius acceptable to the diuine Majesty According to the dictates of nature God is to be worshipped Priesthood to be instituted Hosts to be immolated ministers to be deputed for exhibition of diuine scruice and speciall ornaments are to be ordained and appointed as holy signes to distinguish them from the rest of the people moreouer works of speciall commande euen executed aright are not so pleasing in the sight of God as works * Vulgare apud Theologos est dictum Deus imperat minora de maioribus dat consilium counselled only if they be done according to the rule of a discreet zeale A good work that is done in and for as much as God doth counsell the doing therof is more laudable and noble then a commanded worke because of a greater alacrity and promptitude that is required to the performance of a good work vnbidden Christ * Hierom. l. 1. con Iouia ait Christum plus amare Virgines quia sponte tribuunt quod jis non fuit imperatum bears a more speciall affection to Virgins that doe consecrate vnto him their virginity without a speciall command and indeed it is a more noble action in a man to giue an almes which he is not obliged vnto then to giue it vpon the score of an obligation Furthermore Church-ceremonies ought not to be counted * Augus Epis 40. quaes 3. dicit non esse câ—nsenduÌ„ superstitiosum omne quod christiani cum infidelibus quomodocunque habent communâ— superstitious though Pagans and other Infidells doe vse the same or the like vnto superstition for according to that argument christians should condemne vowed chastity because the Pagans had their vestall Virgins that did binde themselues by vow to a single chast life Christians should pull down Churches because Pagans built Churches christians should abolish sacrifice because Pagans offered sacrifice christians should despise all manner of prayers because Pagans vsed prayers christians should not reuerence honour and worship one true God because Pagans reuerenced honoured and worshipped many false Gods To conclude christians should not weare breeches because the Turks which be Infidells weare breeches howeuer truly according to Tertullian it is an * Pudeat inquit Tertullianus insulsos christianos quod ab Ethinicis IdoloruÌ„ suorum solemni pompa religioso gestu officio superentur exceeding great shame vnto Christians to vse less solemn pompe less ceremony and less reuerence in the seruice of the true God then is vsed by the Heathens in the worship of Idols CHAR. VI. OF BAPTISM THE CONTENTS Baptism is the sole door that openeth a passage into the Church of God The kingdom of Heauen is for euer shut against the vnbaptized that is no man can come to the clear sight of God that is not washt sacramentally afore with naturall water vnder an express invocation of the blessed Trinity de facto or in desire The sanctity of holy faithfull parents cannot render their children that dye without Baptism Heirs of Heauen coheirs and brothers of Christ Through diuine mercy those which dye without Baptism and haue nothing of any other guilt are not punisht with sensible pain after their death they are banisht the court of Heauen onely S. Austins opinion as to this point cleard Baptism ministred aright imprinteth an indelible character or marke in the soul of the baptised Anabaptism confuted Ceremonies pertaining to sacramentall baptism set down and explicated BAptism is a Sacrament of new birth or regeneration vnto iustification of life through the washing of (a) Sensible naturall water is the proper remote matter of necessity requisit to the Sacrament of baptism and accordingly the Council of Lateran haith defin'd it out of the third Chapter of S. Iohn Except that a man be born again of vvater c. and from thence is named a Sacrament of regeneration which is conform to the doctrine deliuered by the Apostle ad Tit c. 3. where he calleth baptism the vvashing of a nevv birth and indeed washing is the immediate and water the remote matter onely so that neither yee hail or snow vnless they be made fluid and thereby proper to wash are a sufficient matter of baptism naturall water vnder an expresse invocation of (b) The true form of sacramentall baptism is I baptise thee in the name of the Father son and holy Ghost which is cut out of Christs own words Mat. 28. Where is required a distinct inuocation of all the three diuine persons Wherefore Pelagius the Pope dis 4. can multi de consecra reiectes baptism administred in the name of Christ only And S. Cyprian Epis 73. ad Jubaia affirmes that the Apostles neuer baptised de facto in the sole name of Christ howeuer he grant's that S. Peter and the other Apostles named Iesus-Christ in the conferring of baptism together with the other diuine persons For example saying J baptise thee in the name of the Father and Jesus-Christ his son
his Church to determine how the Euchariste should be ordered and indeed the Church-goucrnours are the proper ministers of Christ and the dispensers of the mysteries of God 1. Cor. 4. in consequence of which the Church has authority to constitute and appoint in order to dispensing the Sacraments what she shall judge expedient according to tyme place and persons but with that prouiso that she alter nothing pertaining to the nature or essence of them muesting his Church with authority and power to dispense and order therein so the integrity and substance of the Sacrament be not prejudiced as in prudence she might thinke fit in regard of places tymes persons and circumstances (b) Communion vnder the form of bread onely was practiced in the primitiue Church according to the best antiquity prouing the lawfullness thereof out of the 2. and 20. chapter of the Acts. For example S. Austin Epis 6. ad Casulanum S. Bede in 20. Act. and indeed many of the first Christians were Nazarits who were bound by their vow not to drink any licour of grapes pum 4. wherfore since the legall ceremonies of the old law were in force as appears by the fame chapter of the Act. doubtless those new Christians receiu'd the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder one kinde onely Besides S. Cyprian that liu'd in the first 300. yeares l. de lapsis set's down two examples of communion vnder one kinde Again S. Hierom in epitap Paul ad Eustach e. 23. S. Austin l. 3. de consensu Euang. c. 23. affirme that Christ gaue the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder the form of bread onely vnto the Disciples going to Emmaous Moreouer Tertull. l. 2. ad vxor l. de Orat. attest's that it was a practice or custome to take Christs body forthwith or to carrie it home and defer the taking to an other tyme. Lay-communion vnder one kind only was practised in the primitiue Ages as plainly doe euidence scripture and Father-Testimonies preseruing of the Eucharist vnder one sole kinde as spirituall prouision for sick persons which though they were Priests did nor communicate in sickness but vnder one kinde de onely namely bread (c) The custome of communicating Infants continued in Some Churches till the dayes of Hugo de S. Victor who liu'd about the yeare 1130. for l. 1. c. 2. de caeremon he affirmes that the Priest with his finger dipt afore in consecrated wine ministred the Sacramen of the Euchariste vnder the form of wine vnto Babes newly born they being able to suck Besides in the ancient Roman office cap. de Sabbato parents are admonished not to suffer their children to suck milk vntill they had communicated But now the Church for good and iust reasons hath wholy abolished that custome and a principall motiue there of was to resist the heresy which euen in those days the Bohemian Hussits had spread teaching that Infants could not be sau'd without receiuing the Euchariste and an other reason of taking away that practice was the eminent danger of prophaning so holy a Sacrament because of the great number of children and the distribution of the Sacrament vnto Infants in one sole kinde also Namely wine for albeit these could not eat the sacramentall bread yet they might suck the sacramentall wine from the Priest's finger which truly they did according to the custome of some Churches Again lay-communion * ConueniÅt omnes Doctores Caetbolici communionem sub vtraque specie fuisse in vsu in quibusdam Ecclesijs eiusque meminerunt S. Dionys cap. 3. de Eccles Hierarch S. Iustinus Martyr Apolog 2. S. Gregor l. 3. Dial. cap. 36 alijque Patres vnder both kindes was anciently practised at some tymes in seuerall precincts of particular christian Churches as doe plainly shew the writings of primitiue Fathers And S. Leo the first being supream Pastor in Church-gouernment vnder Christ by a speciall ordinance commanded publick lay-communion at Easter vnder both kindes the chiefe intent whereof was to discouer the manichean heriticks who to conceale their heresy these sectaries did foolishly belieue that there was a good and euill God and as foolishly held wine to be created by the euill God and therfore had an abhorrence of it were obserued to receiue the sacramentall bread at Easter which sole kinde was then in practice with Catholicks promiscuously Again lay-communion vnder both kind's was abrogated absolutely and vniuersally because of certain Bohemian sectaries named Hussit's that condemned lay-communion vnder one kinde only teaching both kind's as necessarily required to all Christians vnto saluation In detestation of this heresie as also for other good reasons the generall Councell of Constance obliged all lay-Catholick's to communicate in one kinde and indeed the Church of God ought to exercise her authority to the crushing of all heresies in the bud Yet the Greek-Church continued lay-communion in both kind's though it did not esteem both the species of the Sacrament necessary to saluation For in the generall Councill of Florence which was called with design chiefly to setle concord and vnion between that and the latine Church neither the greek or latine Fathers did except against lay-communion as to the practise thereof vnder one sole or both kinds whereby it is euidently manifest that Christ hat left it in the Churches liberty to determine and appoint the distribution of the communion vnto meer lay-people in one only or both kind's as it shall think fit according to the various condition of tymes places persons and circumstances so that though in this present age lay-communion be giuen in sacramentall bread alone through all the precincts of the easterne Church neuertheless it is in the power of the supreme Pastour to change that into another vsage of both kind's if he shall see as good reasons to moue him thereunto as he seeth cause to continue it vnder one sole kinde viêªt videlicet in opposition and detestation of moderne heresies First in regard of many Lutherans who beleiue that Christs body only is contained with the bread and his blood only with the wine and not all Christ entirely which is a manifest ignorance for wheresoeuer Christ's body is truly really and substantially from the day of his Resurrection there it is truly * Rom. non amplius moritur Christus aliue being impossible for Christ to die again and since the life of the flesh * Leuit. 17. anima omnis carnis in sanguine is in the blood Leuit. 17. it followeth euidently that wheresoeuer Christs body is there his blood is also and since Christ hath deuested himself of no reall thing that he once assumed and whatsoeuer he assumed was vnited hypostatically to his diuine person it is again plainly euident that wheresoeuer * S. Ambrosius vbi carpus Christi Christus est Christs body blood or soul is there is all Christ entire without separation of one part from another and albeit the words that consecrate Christs body according to their proper
debt liable to satisfaction Neither doth this preiudice Christ's satisfaction for though in order to it 's own value and efficacy it is more then abundantly sufficient to ransome all sins whatsoeuer ioynt and seperate neuertheless it causeth remission only according to the disposition of the subject to which it is applyed after the similitude of naturall causes which how potent and actiue soeuer they are themselues yet the subjects on which they worke put bound's to their actiuity and efficacy in working wherfore as it doth not argue insufficiency in naturall causes though they doe not produce effect's proportionable to their efficacy through the indisposition of the subjects so neither doth it argue imperfection in Christ's satisfaction to the preiudice therof although sin's are remitted thereby as to their malice and eternall paine the temporall paine remaining vnremitted through remissnes of a penitent's contrition By the premises euidently appeares the extream weakness of modern sectaries that acknowledg inward penance only which is a detestation of sin together with a purpose of amendment (b) S. Cyprian l. de lapsis treating of Confession in order to secret sinnes mentions expresly satisfaction as a part of true penance Et confiteantur ait singuli delictum suum dum adhuc qui delinquit in saeculo est dum admitti confessio eius potest dum satisfactio remissio per Sacerdotem grata est apud Dominum and a litle after exhort's sinners to turne to God with their whole heart and to appease his wrath through fasting praying weeping and wailing and according to S. Ambrose trac ad Virginem lapsam cap. 8 if a sinner shall not be indulgent to himselfe God will shew him indulgence that is if he shall punish himselfe God will not punish him and reiect outward penance which is called satisfaction belicuing that God * Concil Trid. sess 6. can 30. si quis post acceptam iustificationis gratiaÌ„ cuilibet peccatori poenitenti it a culpam remitti reatum aternae poenadeleri dixerit vt nullus remaneat reatus poenae temporalis exoluenda vel in hoc saeculo vel in futuro in purgatorio antequaÌ„ ad regna caeloruÌ„ aditus patere possit anathema sit doth neuer inflict temporall punishment's for sin's whose mortall malice and eternall paine due thereto is pardoned afore for the scripture-testimonies alledged doe plainly demonstrate the contrary Besides although the malice or deformity of sin be the sole cause of temporall paine neuertheless it is no formall or materiall cause it is but the efficient morall cause only which is not allwaies in being together with it's effect as clear experience teacheth in things physicall and morall and therfore no man ought to infer from the remission of the malice of sin the remission of all paine corresponding thereto Again albeit that remission of eternall paine be a greater thing and far more difficult then is the remission of temporall paine neuertheless that doth not of necessity infer this for an outward Court of Iustice often times doth spare a malefactours life that deserueth death enioyning him a penalty that is a lesser thing To forgiue a greater punishment is not to forgiue a lesser that hath noessentiall connection with the greater and indeed though eternall pain be inconsistent with the remission of the deformity and malice of mortall sin in as much as sanctifying grace wherby such remission is purchased doth constitute a sinner a child of God Heir of Heauen and coheir of Christ howeuer sanctity and temporall paine are not incompatible together God tooke to mercy again the children of Israel that had made them God's of gold which they adored being pacified by the prayer of Moyses for their Idolatry Exod. 32 (i) Exod. 32. Our lord therfore plagu'd the people for the fault in order to the calfe that Aaron had made Where the particles Therfore for the fault giue euidence that the sole reason which mou'd God to punish them again that is after the prayer of Moses had appeas'd him was the sin of Idolatry afore pardoned as to the guilt thereof neither does Caluin deny in his Comment on the same Chap. of Exod. but that the fault was remitted afore yet afterward he did visit that very sin vpon them with temporall punishment's as doth euidence the same Chapter To conclude all primitiue Fathers of the new lawe doe not exhorte Christians only to turne vnto God with inward contrition of heart * S. Cypria ser 5. de lapsiâ— Oportet inquit orare impensius rogare diemluctu transigere vigilâ—â—s fletibus noctes ducere tempus omne lacrymosis lamentationibus óccupare but also with praying fasting mourning weeping Almes-deed's and other painfull afflictions Wherfore it is meer foolishness to belieue that God is pacified by inward penance which is detestation of sin and not by outward penance which is satisfaction for temporall paine due thereto together with reparation of the injury which God suffereth by sin Neither doth the saying of S. Paul Ephes 5. viz. No man euer ye hateth his own flesh but nourisheth and cherisheth it infirme this christian doctrine for the same Apostle 1. Cor. 9. confesseth that himself punished his flesh saying I beat down my body and bring it into subiection Though no man can hate his flesh out of hatred to his flesh precisely yet he may punish his flesh out of hatred to the many miseries the rebellion therof brings to the soul and indeed God * Apo. 3. ego quos amo arguo castigo chasteneth the flesh of as many as he loueth CHAR. XIV OF INDVLGENCES THE CONTENTS The Church of God inheriteth the aboundant satisfactions of Christ and his Saincts vnto remitting of temporall paines due to sinnes pardoned afore as to the guilt thereof which is the consistency of the Churches Indulgences or pardons the dispensing whereof is proper to the Church-gouernours which vse less or more moderation in the releasing of temporall punishment's according to tymes places and persons greater-penances and fewer pardons agreed with primitiue christians that carryed about the dying mortifications of their crucified Lord there is nothing of substantiall difference between ancient and modern Indulgences as those so these import remission of temporall pains not onely in the Ecclesiasticall before men but likewise in the diuine Court of Iustice in the sight of God sundry kinds of Indulgences set down The state of grace necessarily required vnto the gaining of them INdulgences are remission of temporall pain due to sins pardoned afore through the application of the (a) Pope Clement the sixt Extra vnigenitus Tit. de poenit calleth the prize of Christ and the Saincts satisfaction 2 Treasure taken in spirituall signification after the similitude of a corporall Treasure laid vp and conseru'd for the common vses of a community or common wealth without being propriated to any particular person aboundant satisfactions of the blessed Saintes and Christ's specially the value and worth
for a sinfull Brother and truly this kinde of forgiuing and loosing is common alike to all such as deuoutly and charitably recite that petition of our Lord's prayer Forgiue us our trespasses as we forgiue the trespasses against vs as witnesseth S. Augus trac 58. vpon S. Iohn and doubtless by the mentioned word 's of the Apostle viêªt videlicet Ye ought rather to forgiue and comfort him and whome yee forgiue any thing c. is meant of this generall manner of forgiuing and loosing which is common alike to all the faithfull of the Church but to demonstrate that he himself laid claime to a higher and better kinde of forgiuing and loosing he professeth that he exercised his forgiueness and power of loosing in the person or room of Christ Wherby again appear's that the Apostle did not forgiue this adulterer the rest of the paine enioyned him in order to the rigour of Church-discipline only that is to the intent only that it should aduantage him in the ecclesiasticall Court but also in order to the diuine Court of Iustice that it might benefit him before God and this is so manifest a truth that no sectary can say the contrary without contradicting the Apostles own words viêªt videlicet I forgaue it in the person of Christ that is in the room of Christ and as his Minister to whom Christ had committed his power of loosing and binding vpon earth and indeed S. Paul should haue extreamly preiudiced the said miserable adulterer which were great impiety to think if his forgiuenesse should haue had no weight * S. Cypria Epis 14. agens de relaxatione poenarum impositarum peccatoribus ait illam fieri per intercessionem martyrum vel aliorum fidelium quorum satisfactionibus suffragijs adiuuantur in delictis apud Dominum id est in foro Dei with the diuine Court and been of no value before God for according to that supposall he should haue pardoned a pain of this life in respect wherof the adulterer should haue suffered a far greater in the next because the punishment a man endureth vpon earth is a thousand times lesser then the torment 's of Purgatory and therby S. Paul would haue brought his penitent Corinthian out of the frying pan into the fyer That is out of the prison of the ecclesiasticall Court into the prison of the diuine Court Conformably vnto this catholick doctrine Bishops in the primitiue Church enjoyned sinners penances to satisfye God and to compence the iniury done to him through their sin 's (k) According to Tertullian l. ad martyres and S. Cyprian Epis 10.11.12.13.14 sundry Christians that through frailty fell from the Church in tyme of grieuous persecution were wont to recur vnto the Martyrs and Confessours that their penances might be remitted vnto them and these ancient Fathers did not mean penances or pains enioynd and due only in the Churches Court but due also in the Court of God wherfore S. Cyprian Epis 14. faith expresly that they receiued help and deliuerance from their pains apud Dominum that is in the diuine Court in consequence whereof Indulgences remit penances or pains at the Tribunall of God as due there and not as due onely in order to the Churches Canons as wanton schollars of these dayes vnaduisedly teach for otherwise according to S. Thomas q. 25. a. 1. Indulgences would be more vnprofitable then profitable reseruing the penitent to more grieuous pains in Purgatory Besides according to the holy scriptures whatsoeuer priest 's shall binde on earth shall be bound in Heauen and whatsoeuer they shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heauen in consequence of which God has a Court in Heauen that remits the guilt and paine of sinne accordingly as they be remitted in the Churches Court and indeed if there were no remitting of pains in the Court of Heauen there would be no need at all of the Churches spirituall Treasure consisting of the aboundant satisfactions of Christ and the blessed Saincts and yet that there is this spirituall Treasure is an article of Christian faith for as such a Treasure could not be necessary vnto remission of pains in a ciuil Court so it could not be necessary vnto remission in an ecclesiasticall Court The ground on which the Digbean diuines build their opinion is a damned heresy namely that God does not forgiue us our sinnes as to the guilt thereof except her pardon the pain also as is plainely clear according to the definition of the Council of Trent sess 6. can 30. and this practice was both in order to such as had publickly sinned in reference to which canonicall pain 's were instituted only as also in order to such as had sinned in secret as doe demonstrate Burchard in the 13th book of decretalls and sundry others which haue made a full collection of the canonicall pains Furthermore no man can say without running into manifest errour that the Apostles forgiuenesse or indulgence in order to the penitent Corinthian was but an absolution of excommunication or of his sinne giuen in the Sacrament of penance for first a deliuerance from an ecclesiasticall censure of excommunication is neuer named by scriptures or Fathers a condonation forgiueness or indulgence Again by the Apostles words appeareth that he forgaue part only of the punishment enioyned which cannot be meant of an absolution either from excommunication or sin 's in the Sacrament of penance where there is no sharing out by partes Yet notwithstanding all this the vsage of indulgences was not neer so frequent in the primitiue times as in the subsequent ages because primary Christians carrying the fresh memory of their crucifyed Redeemer and thereby much enflamed with loue towards his sufferings allwayes bore about his dying mortification that his life also might be made manifest in their mortall flesh 2. Cor. 4. so that then there was strict discipline and great penances enioyned sinners For example rigorous fasting much praying and other painfull afflictions * In 1. Concil Nicae cui intersuerunt 318. Patres indicitur poena vndecim annorum Item in Concil Ancyrano iniungitur poena septenij ijs qui bis vel ter Idolis sacrificauerant Porro vulgatum est vnicuique peccato mort ali poenitentiam septem annorum iniungendam esse iuxta Canones pro quo tam en nullus Textus reperiri potest Et contrarium tenet S. Tho. in 4. l. sent dis 20. sanè Gratianus qui allegatur pro contraria sententia non dicit Ecclesiam septemnem poenitentiam in singula peccata statuisse sed tantum pro grauissimis iniungi solitam fuisse deinde dicit illam poenit entiam non taxatam fuisse pro foro interiori sed exteriori constat illos Canones ad forum exteriùs pertinere as by the ancientest Councils appeareth Neuerthelesse such was their feruour of spirit and extream zeale in complyance to Christ's sufferings that they fullfilled them willingly and chearfully few sought after pardons vnto
speaketh of sauing after death it is clear that he meaneth eternall saluation therby Thirdly that by the words The day of the lord shall declare it is vnderstood the day of each souls particular judgment is manifest likewise according to that saying Math. 24. Watch therfore for ye know not what howre the son of man will come that is to say what hower ye shall die and be iudged Again the same Apostle 2. Timoth 4. sayth that there was laid vp for him a crown of Iustice which At that day our lord would giue him a iust Iudg. Yet doubtless he obtained that reward instantly after his death as to essentiall blessedness Lastly that by the word (f) According to S Austin l. de fide operibus the fire of hell is euerlasting against the errour of Origin and the Latin Father 's in the Council's of Florence assert true fire in Purgatory and speake after the same manner of it as of Hell fire and the Current of catholick Doctours teach that the fire of Hell is true corporall fire fire true and reall fire is meant appear's by the Apostles saying That if any mans work burneth for to burne is proper to true fire and as concerning the particles * Jo. 1. vidimus gloriam eius quast gloriam vnigeniti à Patre vbi quasi non est particula diminuens aut faciens comparationem inter veram metaphoricam gloriam sed potius explicat veritatem vt notant S. Patres sic loquendo de Rege dicimus incedit quasi Rex id est vt Regem decet de vâ—ro iusto venit vt vir iustus id est vt decet virum iustum as it were they doe rather affirme then infirme the reality of fire for when S. Iohn sayeth of Christ cap. 1. we saw the glory of him as it were of the only begotten of the Father the particles as it were doe not deny Christ to be the true and naturall son of God the Father but rather affirme that vndoubted truth as all catholick writers doe obserue in their Commentaries vpon that scripture Hereby it is cleare (g) S. Cyprian Epis 52. ad Antonia writes thus T' is not the same thing to be sent to prison and there to remain till the last farthing be pay'd t' is not the same thing to receiue suddenly the reward of faith and vertue and to be clens'd and purg'd by fire after long suffering of grieuous sorrovves for sinnes committed afore that the Apostle held purgation of some soules after they were deuested of their bodies and before their translation vnto eternall life and this the catholick Church calleth Purgatory which name though it be no vsed in holy scripture no more then the words Trinity person and sundry others which are receiued and allowed of by all writers in order to a clearer explicating some misteries of christian Religion howeuer the name Purgatory taken in the sense afore mentioned layeth claime to a large series of Antiquity But seeing that scriptures and * S. Cyprian Epis tota 52. ad Anton Orig. hom 6. in Exod. cum inquit venitur si quis multa opera bona parum aliquid iniquitatis attulerit illud parum tanquaÌ„ pluÌ„bum resoluitur purgatur totum remanet aurum purum .... Hilar. in illud Psal 118. concupiuit anima mea purgatorium vocat indefessum ignem in quo grania sustinentur supplicia per quae animae à peccatis expiantur Aug. l. 2. 1. de ciuit c. 24. ait constare quod spiritus aliquorum fidelium poenas aliquas temporales post mortem patiantur primitiue Fathers doe assert the thing signifyed by the name of Purgatory vêªt videlicet purgation of some souls by suffering of temporall paines in the next life * Aug. quando de re constat de nomine non est conteÌ„ndendum no man can contend about that name without incurring a censure of manifest weakness yet in regard of two states only to which God promiseth eternall life or eternall death that is beatitude or damnation for Purgatory shall cease after the day of generall Iudgment is past both the scripture and the Fathers sometimes doe mention only after death the Paradise of the blessed and the Hell of the damned * De locis seu statibus perpetuis intelliguntur hae scripturae Eccles 11. si ceciderit lignum ad Austrum aut Aquilonem in quocunque loco inciderit sbi erit Item Mat. 25 Jte maledicti in ignem aternuÌ„ venite benedicti possidere RegnuÌ„ which be the two euerlasting states of soules but hence no man can argue an absolute negation of a third place or state in reference to temporall afflictions after death without preiudicing both scriptur's and Fathers as is sufficiently enough proued and though S. Austin Ser. 14. de verbis Domini lib. 10. de peccatorum meritis remissione cap. 20. doth expresly affirme that the catholick faith acknowledgeth two places only vat an eternall kingdome of Heauen or Hell eternall neuertheless by his other writings appeareth plainly that he held the Purgatory of some faithfull soul 's after death and in the cited writing's he denyeth only that the Catholick Church does acknowledge such a third place as Pelagius contended for who taught that children dying without baptism should be saued though they were not admitted into the kingdome of Heauen which errour S. Austin confuteth By the premises is euident that such souls only goe to Purgatory as are liable either to veniall sins or temporall satisfactions corresponding to their sins pardoned in this life as to the guilt thereof both of them importing defects that are inconsistent with the perfection of heauenly blessdeness yet these suffering souls while they endure their painfull afflictions haue something of comfort and refreshment (b) Pope Leo the tenth in his condemnation of Luther's 26. article hath defined that soul 's in Purgatory are assured of their saluation for they know that there is fauour laid vp for them they are certaine of their saluation they loue God with all their power conforming themselues in the bitterness of their afflictions to his diuine will of Iustice they haue confidence in the suffrages and sacrifices of the faithfull vpon earth in order to their deliuerance and are visited by their good Angells that cheare them vp Neither doth it hence follow that their paines are less grieuous for the intensest sorrow is not incompatible with the said refreshments as appeareth by Christ whose grief abounded and exceeded others in intensness notwithstanding the assurance of glory the comfort flowing from his God-head the conformity to the will of his diuine Father and the extream willingness to suffer his death and passion for the Redemption of the world and indeed it is a certaine truth that the anguish and tribulation which a soul endureth in Purgatory * Docent S. Aug. l de euva pro mortuis agenda c. 16. S.
Ansel in cap. 3. 1. Cor. poenam quam patiuntur animae Purgatorij esse grauiorem omni poena huius vita is more grieuous then all the sufferings of this life for therein is the place and time of executing the diuine Iustice the instrument wherof is true and reall fire that is applyed * Aug l. 2. de ciuit c. 10. docet spirituÌ„ posse pati ab igne corporeo per omnipotentiam Dei for the tormenting of such souls truly and really according to the proportion of the guilt of petty-treasons and debt's they stand charged with yet in as much as they being departed in faith hope and charity which be the spirituall chaines of vnion in order to all the good members of Christ's mysticall body and in as much as it is proper and naturall to the (i) According to the Apostle 1. Cor. 12. members of one and the same body can mutuall helpe one another and it is an Article of Catholick faith that the soul 's in Purgatory are members of one and the same Church and can be help'd through her prayers and suffrages And as to this poynt of doctrine there was ful agreement between the Latin and Greek Fathers in the Council of Florence as clearly appear's by the letters ' of vnion Besides Aerius was counted an Hereâ—ick by S. Epipha haer 75. and S. Austin haer because he denyed that the dead might receiue reliefe through the suffrages of the liuing Moreouer this Catholick truth is asserted by the ancientest Fathers namely S Deny's l. de caeles Hierar c. 7. S. Cyprian Epis 66. and S. Austin l de curae pro mortuis agenda ser 22. de verbis Apos expresly teacheth that the doctrine which assert's that the faithfull departed receiue help by prayers sacrifices and Almes-deeds c. is approu'd by the vniuersall Church members of one and the same body to comfort and help one an other doubtless the souls of Purgatory can be comforted and helped by the prayers and suffrages of the liuing as plainly appeares by the testimonies and Liturgies of primitiue Fathers authorities of Councils and the vniuersall practice of the catholick church that offereth dayly and howerly prayers and suffrages for the faithfull souls of such as die in grace that they may be comforted and deliuered out of the grieuous paines which they endure in Purgatory Besides for as much as they are not (k) According to S. Austin l. 20. de Ciuit. c. 9. the souls of the faithfull departed are not seperated from the Church which euen now is the kingdom of God and indeed the good soul 's of Purgatory are vnited vnto us in charity in regard at their departure out of this world they were in the state of grace again they are vnited vnto vs in faith and hope because these two vertues are not euacuated before the soul's admittance into Heauen seperated from the Church they be in a capacity to receiue benefit euen by Indulgences it being in the Churches power to apply those spirituall treasures for the aduantage of all such children as abide in vnion with her through faith Hope and charity And though prayers Church-suffrages Indulgences c. doe not remit sinnes in the next life these requiring necessarily * Trid sess 6. cap. 7. docet peccatuÌ„ mortale non remit ti sine infusione gratiae at sola Sacramenta in re vel in voto suscepta in funduÌ„t gratiam ex eodeÌ„ Concil sess 6. cap. 4. sed Indulgentia noÌ„ est Sacramentum culpa venialis nunquam tollitur sine aliqua displicentia de tali peccato veniali infusion of grace if mortall or a detestation therof if veniall no man can say but that souls be deliuered thereby out of their pames and translated to the kingdome of heauen without contradicting the authority of ancient Fathers the definition of a generall Councill the Ordinances of sundry Popes and the vniuersall practice of the catholick Church For example S. Austin placeth souls after their purgation in the next life in heauen to expect their bodies lib. 15. de Trinitate cap. 25. Again S. Austin puts no longer bounds to tyme in Purgatory then the matter as to satisfaction for each sinne requireth The Council of Florence defineth the transplanting of suffering soul's out of Purgatory into Heauen before the generall Resurrection Pope Benedict the 12. decreto Benedictus Deus in donis suis rancketh such as hold with pertinacy the contrary doctrine in the number of Hereticks Pope Gregory the first and Pope Siluester afore granted (l) Although an Indulgence be an act of iurisdiction and although the Church militant hath nothing of iurisdiction ouer the souls suffering in Purgatory neuertheless she hath power ouer her spirituall Treasure In consequence of which Indulgences are not granted in order to the dead after the manner of a Iudges absolution but in nature of a suffrage vnto helping of such onely as remoue out of their bodyes in communion with Christ's body and blood wherfore when the Church-gouernours grant Indulgences for the dead they insert the particles per modum suffragij after the manner of suffrages wherby is signifyed that they doe not giue Indulgences in order to the dead as if the dead were continued vnder their iurisdiction but they grant them only as competent recompences or conuenient satisfactions for as much as the faithfull aliue offer them as satisfactory works vnto satisfying the pains due to the sinnes which the dead had committed before they were remou'd out of their bodyes Aud doubtless euery particular belieuer that is in the slate of grace may offer to God their fasting praying and giuing of almes as worthy satisfactions vnto compensing of the torment 's which good soul 's endure in Purgatory Indulgences to such Priests as offered the sacrifice of Christ's body and blood in a Chappel dedicated to the blessed Virgin Mary called by the name of Mariae Liberatricis that they might free one soul out of Purgatory as doth appeare by the ancient Records of the said Chappell and Pope Pascall the first gaue deliuerance of one soul out of Purgatory to Priests celebrating fiue Masses in a Church consecrated to S. Praxes which Indulgence eleuen succeeding Popes confirmed whereunto may be added the Indulgence of Pope Iohn the eight that administred supream Church-gouernment in the yeare 878. granted to souldiers that should loose their life 's in the holy warr for the defeÌ„ce of the Church and this practice was neuer yet reproued by any Council Pope or catholick writer wherfore it seen eth a strange thing that Mr. Thomas White a priuate man and in outward profession a catholick christian should assume so vnauthorized a liberty and vnparalelled boldnesse as to publish a writing in the yeare 1653. entitled An Account of his husbanding the midle state of soul's in contradiction of the (m) According to S. Austin Tom. Epis 118. ad Ianua it is a manifest madnes to call in question
the Apostles to loose the cordes wherwith he was tyed doe represent Christian penance and the power that Christ gaue the Church to loose and remit sins as doe euidence the testimonies of ancient Fathers who also doe expresly assert Christ by his actions to haue prefigured the mysteries of christian religion Howeuer no man can deny without running into manifest errour but that the seuen afore named ecclesiasticall order haue had their begining from Christ's own institution and it matters not that euery Church in the primitiue times was not serued with so many for then in regard of the scarcity of belieuers and want of members to promote to the ministery there could not be so many ordained in so much that for the most part one Church was gouerned by one Priest only or by one Bishop and a Deacon yet after a happy encrease of belieuers and persons proper to exercise ecclesiasticall functions euery Church was supplied with all the seuen orders of ministers and serued according to their distinct offices As touching * Catechismus Trid. cap. de ordine parag 13. ait Parochū debere docere primam Tōsuram esse praeparat ionem quandā ad sacros ordines suscipiendos sicut sunt Exorcismi ad Baptismum sponsalia ad matrimoniū docēt autem Beda l. 4. His. Aug. Baronius Tom. 1. Annal an Christi 58. antiquitatem vsum significationem clericalis Tōsurae clericall Tonsure it is no ecclesiasticall order taken in the proper sense being only a disposition or preparation vnto ordination as exorcisme is to Baptisme or spousalls vnto Matrimony that is to say it is the first step only to ecclesiasticall promotion howeuer the vsage thereof is ancient as is also the clipping of the haire in the crowne of his head that receiues it wherby literally is signifyed the crowne of royall Priesthood wherunto a Clergy-man is disposed and deputed by Clericall tonsure or the crowne of glory which he expecteth in vertue of Christs death and passion or mystically is represented therby worldly employments and superfluous cares and entertainement's which a Clergy-man ought to cast from him as he doth the haire of his head in the receiuing of Tonsure But Episcopacy as a function distinct from Priesthood hath a good title to ecclesiasticall order taken in the proper sense for the consecration of Bishops is called ordination and the Hierarchy of the Church which is a subordination of ecclesiasticall ministers in respect whereof some are more eminent then others in the administration of diuine things doth consist of Bishops Priests and other inferiour ministers wherefore Episcopacy is essentially required thereunto as the noblest Hierarchicall member and indeed that which the Apostle gaue to Timothy by laying on of his hands was Episcopall dignity or Episcopacy according to the interpretation of S. Chrysostome Hom. 13. in 1. Epis ad Timoth. Theophilactus S. Anselm and others Besides the ancientest Fathers doe call Episcopacy an holy Order Anacletus Ep. 3. cap. 1. Caius Pope in the numbring of orders acknowledgeth two orders of Priests the one of Maior Priests that is Bishops and the other of Minor Priest's that is meer Priests Likewise S. Epiphan Haeres 75. Yet the degrees and states of Primates and Patriarchs as distinct offices from Episcopacy lay no claim to the Churches Hierarchy being in respect of Episcopall function one and the same order and the maiority that these can challenge aboue meer Bishops proceedes from human constitution only As the ordination of Priests Deacons and Sub-Deacons c. is a Sacrament taken in the proper sense so is (g) According to the Current of catholick writers since the Council of Trent Episcopacy is a Sacrament taken in the proper sense and the contrary opinion counted erroneous And truly S Austin con Parmeni and other ancient Fathers while they call holy Order a Sacrament they instance in Episcopacy which has diuine institution Act. 20. the holy Ghost appointed Bishops to gouerne the Church and though according to the 2. Toletan Council meer Priest's laid their hands together with the Bishop in the heads of those which were ordain'd which was the custome of some Churches of those dayes neuertheless that imposition of hands as to meer Priest's had nothing of the proper matter and at the most was a condition only requir'd to the validity of the Sacrament of holy Order as now the personall presence of the Parish Priest or some other by him substituted is an essentiall requisit to the validity of Marriage ordination of bishops hauing all necessary requisits therunto viz. outward sensible Rites Grace conferred therby and Christs (b) The Sacrament of holy Order as to Episcopacy Christ instituted Io. 20. when he said to his Apostles As my Father sent me so send I you receiue the holy Ghost And indeed as to reason t' is not probable that Episcopall Order was instituted afore for then doubtless Christ had instituted it at his last supper by the word 's hoc facite do this But these particles according to the Council of Trent sess 21. can 2. were meant of power giuen vnto Priest's in order to the celebrating of the Euchariste own institution which do plainly appeare by the words of the Apostle 2. Tim. 1. stir vp the grace of God which is in thee by the putting on of mine hands that is by ordaining thee a Bishop according to the interpretation of the ancient Fathers Again diuine institution of Episcopacy is deducible sufficiently enough from the Hierarchy of the Church instituted by diuine ordination Episcopacy being the noblest member therof for the Hierarchy (i) According to S. Epiphanius haer 57. or 77. Orders of Church-ministers were perfected by litle and litle onely and he obserueth that the Apostle Epis ad Timot. ad Tit. mention's a Bishop and a Deacon onely because those primitiue Churches had onely those two orders of Ministers in regard there was then exceeding great scarcity of persons fit to be ordain'd and the Council of Trent doth not exact the whole number of Ministers but in such Churches as can conueniently be furnisht with all the Orders doth consist of Bishops Priests and (k) The principall Church Ministers after the Priest's are Deacons according to S. Denys l. de Eccles Hierar c. 23. and 5. the function proper to them is to serue in order to the holy Euchariste Also according to S. Ignat. Epis ad Trullo Deacons were not dispensers of meat and drink but of christian Sacraments Besides according to S. Justin in fine Apologet. Deacons were wont to minister the Enchariste to those which were present and to carry it to such as were absent Again this catholick doctrine appear's evidently by the History of S. Lawrence which S. Ambrose set's down l. 1. offic c. 41. and doubtless to haue care of the poore was the secundary and not the primary office of Deacons ministers Hereby it is cleare that Episcopacy doth imprint a spirituall character in
whilst he pursued the exercise of his Apostolicall Ministery of which sort many followed Christ and sustained him and his of their substances Luc. 8. and the Apostle calleth that woman a sister after the imitation of the Iewes that named the men among them Brethren and the women sisters Hereby it is euident that the Apostle by the words faithfull or sincere companion could not vnderstand a wife and indeed the chiefest sectaries do reject the Commentaries of such as do argue from that scripture against the single life of S. Paul since his own word 's afore alleaged 1. Cor. 7. doe speake him vnmarried (q) The Euangelist's S. Luke cap. 8. and S. Mathew cap. 7 signify that certain women accompanied Christ and ministred vnto him of their substance in imitation whereof the Apostles carried about women that furnish'd them with necessary sustenance to the intent that themselues might enioy greater liberty and better conueniency to preach the Gospell and doubtless women are more proper then men as to prouiding of necessary sustenance wherfore it must be some other that was his coadiutor and fellow-labourer in propagating the Ghospell of Christ which is the interpretation of the ancientest Fathers and truly it had not been hand some for the Apostle to haue made such an Apostrophe to his own wife in an Epistle written to the Philippians and to haue left her with them to help those women which laboured with him in promoting of the Gospell together with clement and other his fellow-labourers as is set down in the same Chapter CHAR. XVIJ. OF MATRIMONY THE CONTENTS The first instituting and celebrating of Marriage was in paradise carnall copulation is not a requisit essentiall thereto The B. Virgin Mary and S. Ioseph were marryed marriage taken in the proper sense Polygamy in the law of nature by diuine dispensation was lawfull Christ in his new law annulled Polygamy and confirm'd Monogamy as agreeing with the first institution of Marriage Though Marriages amongst Persons vnbaptized haue nothing of a Sacrament neuertheless they be lawfull Marriages contracted by christians euen of contrary professions challenge the essence of the Sacrament It lyeth not in the Churches power to vntye the knot of christian Marriage after consurnmation hath tyed it a Parish Priest must assiste at Marriages though he be no efficient cause thereof MAtrimony taken in the precise formall sense is * Definitio contractus à IuriscoÌ„sultis tradita est vltro citreque obligatio a ciuill contract expressed in words or signs wherby a man and a woman by mutuall consent giue and receiue power of each others body reciprocally (a) According to the Council of Trent God inspir'd Adam to speake the words set down Gen. 2. This novv is bone of my bones c. and therby to take Eue for his wedded wife The first Marriage was celebrated in the terrestiall Paradise when Adam said of the woman that God had made out of one of his ribs and brought vnto him This now is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh and doubtlesse euen then Adam tooke Eue to his wife for so he named her immediatly after adding to what he had vttered afore Therfore shall man leaue his Father and Mother and shall cleaue to his wife hereby it is conuincingly euident that Eue likewise tooke Adam to her husband since she could not haue been his wife without her own voluntary consent therunto Marriage essentially requiring mutuall acceptance And as Marriage was first celebrated in paradise so was it there (b) Gen. 1. God created them male and female that is according to S. Cyprian l. de bono pudicit God instituted that diuersity of sex that they might marry together in consequence of which the creation of Adam and Eue is rightly cal'd the institution of marriage instituted for God then made the first man and first woman Gen. 2. in consequence wherof he designed and determinated them to contract matrimony that is instituted matrimony by creating them a man and a woman * Constat ex 2. Gen. AdaÌ„ non babuisse copulä carnalem cum Eua in Paradiso Yet Adam and Eue did not perform the act of generation in compliance with the duty of nature till they were eâ—ected thence through their own voluntary act of disobedienceâ— which clearly manifest's that the * Julianus asserebat copulam carnalem esse de essentia matrimonij coÌ„tra quem Aug. hanc infert absurditatem scilicet fore vt matrimoniuÌ„ inter senes coniuges statim at quo nequenut copulam carnalem exercere deficeret item fore vt adulterium esset propriè matrimonium carnall exercise of the lust of concupiscence is no essentiall requisit to Marriage and it matter 's not that carnall copulation is one end of it for an end laying claime only to extrinsecall causality as do teach all Philosophers can be no essentiall part of the thing in respect wherof it is the end besides if the essentiall consistency of Marriage should depend of carnall copulation of necessity it would cease as to each married couple which is respect of old age were disenabled to company together in the act of generation nay it would plainly follow that fornications and adulteries ought to be counted Marriages taken in the proper sense wherfore the (c) S. Austin l. 3. con Faustum Manichae c. 8. l. de nup. concup treating of the Marriage between the B. Virgin and S. Ioseph denyes that comming together of both sexes in the act of generation mak's a Marriage which other ancient Fathers deny likewise and call S. Ioseph the Husband of the Virgin Mary Virgin Mary and S. Ioseph might truly and really contract marriage though they did not come together and doubtless they were married marriage taken in the proper sense For the Virgin Mary was betrothed and affianced to Ioseph Mat. 1. and consequently both of them were engaged in a mutuall promise of marriage so that if they were not truly married they must haue violated their faith or by consent released each other of the reciprocall engagement neither wherof is agreable to the exceeding sanctity of Persons confirmed in grace and godliness as were the Virgin Mary and Ioseph for to violate faith once pawned by promise is a manifest argument of leuity and inconstancy Besides both scripture and Fathers do call Ioseph the husband of the Virgin Mary neither did her * B VirgineÌ„ virginitate Deo dicasse id est voto firmasse testantur omnes Patres Graecae Ecclesiae hanc doctrinam Augustinus in Africa Ambrosius in Jtalia defenderunt vow of Virginity expressed in her answer to the Angell Gabriel viz How shall this be I know not man Luc. Ye put an impediment therunto for a vow of chastity together with a full purpose neuer to performe the act of generation doth not preiudice the essentiall requisit's to marriage wherfore (d) According to the Council of Trent sess 24. cap. 1. marriage
According to S. Austin l. de bono coniug c. 24. euery marriage is in order to generation but christian marriage onely is inuested with the dignity of a Sacrament haue nothing of a Sacrament taken in the proper sense viz for an outward practicall sign of sanctifying grace that is for a sensible ceremony that in vertue of it's institution can effectually sanctify which is an effect proper only to the Sacrament's of the new law wherof Baptism is the doore howeuer they be ciuill contracts conformable to the law of nature and by no diuine law forbidden and therfore lawfull * 2. Cor. 6. Nolite ducere iugum cū infidelibus yet the marriage of a christian belieuer with an infidell of what kinde soeuer when there appeareth danger of subuersion therby is against the dictates of nature which oblige euery one to auoide whatsoeuer tendes to his ruine in consequence whereof such marriages be vnlawfull in respect wherof the Apostle 2. Cor. 6. forbiddeth the Corinthians conuerted to the faith of Christ to beare the yoake with Infidells which is meant in regard of the danger as to subuersion and indeed no diuine ordinance making such marriages vnlawfull appeares either by the old or new Testament for Salomon euen at that time when the old scripture reported him to be loued of God and to walk in all the commandements of his Father Dauid married the daughter of Pharao and though God Exod. 34. prohibited Moses to make any compact with the Amorites and the Cananites which adored false Gods or to take wiues of their daughters for his sons (i) S. Austin l. de fide operibus c. 19. treating of marriages between Catholick's and Hereticks affirm's that in his dayes they were not counted as sinnes because in the new Testament nothing is commanded in Order to such marriages neuerthelesse that diuine prohibition according to the precise form of speech was in reference only to the danger of subuersion which by the law of nature euery man is obliged to auoide for God maketh the eminent danger of their ruine to be the ground of his prohibition adding these words Lest their daughters goe a fornicating after their Gods and make thy sons goe a fornicating after their Gods neither doth the new Testament expresse any speciall law that prohibiteth christians to marry with Infidells Besides in the primitiue times (k) Clodoueus king of France was conuerted to the faith of Christ by the means of his Queen that was a christian Again S. Monica S. Austins Mother preuail'd with her husband and S. Cicily with her spouse Valerianus to embrace the christian Religion which verifies what the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 7. The vnbelieuing husband is sanctifyed by a belieuing wife sundry gallant women for vertue and sanctity were yoked with vnbelieuing husbands and the supream prouidence blessed their marriages with happy success vsing them as a means to bring their said husbands to the marueilous light of christian faith Notwithstanding the catholick Church wisely considering that many spirituall subuersions and other great inconueniences arose from such marriages hath euen anciently prohibited and annulled them that is hath disenabled christians to beare the yoke with Infidells wherby is euident that the marriage of a Catholick with an Heretick is vnlawfull in respect of an ecclesiasticall constitution only * Ex cap. ex literis extra de consuetudine talis cōsuetudo quae est in Polonia aequipollet legi sed lex posterior potest abrogare priorē which in Poland and germany seemeth to be abrogated by a contrary custome introduced with the tacite consent at least of the Churches chief Pastor the Churches consent express or tacite being a necessary requisite to the introducing of a Custome vnto the abrogating of an ecclesiasticall law in regard of Catholicks and hereticks promiscuous liuing together and the toleration of them both (l) As to the marriages of Catholicks with Hereticks that matter of controuersy was at sundry tymes disputed before Pope Clement the 8. by many learned Cardinalls and other famous diuin's which with one accord declar'd that his Holines might lawfully grant leaue vnto a Catholick to marry with an Heretick or Infidel and in Poland and Germany where there is toleration of one and the other profession and where Catholicks and Hereticks liue promiscuously together such marriages are vsuall and common either in regard in those countryes it is a Custome introduced through a tacite consent of the sea Apostolick which hath abrogated the ecclesiasticall law that forbiddeth such marriages and they be forbidden in the Councils Laodis sub Syluestro Carthag 3. and others or because in those Countries which giue freedom in the exercise of euery Christian profession there is no morall apparent danger of subuersion as to to Catholicks And it matters not that when a catholick man or woman marrying with an Heretick knowes that the party he or she that marryes will minister and receiue the Sacrament vnworthily for the marriage thereby no more ceases to be a Sacrament then Baptism ceaseth to be a Sacrament vnworthily receiu'd neither doth the Catholick sinne therby because Vtitur iure suo duntaxat For example a man that through necessity borrow's money of an vsurer whom he knows morally will exact vnlawfull lucre doth not offend because he vseth but his own right and the vsurer if he would might cōmit no sin being in his power to pleasure his neighbour in an vrgent necessity without exacting or expecting gain for the loan of his money which probably taketh away eminent dāgerof subuersion in order to a Catholick man or woman so marrying and his or her children howeuer it doth not lie in the Churches power to loose the knot of christian marriage after consummation hath tied it vpon any occasion whatsoeuer either for adultery or any other enormous crime so as to giue leaue to the innocent party to marry again whiles the other liueth for no humane authority can put a sunder that which God coupled together wherfore the Apostle saies 1. Cor. 7. And to the married I command not I but our lord let not the wife depart from her husband where he expresseth a double departure the one vniust forbidden by the words set downe the other iust in respect of a lawfull cause namely fornication which he alloweth vpon condition only adding But if she depart let her remain vnmarried or he reconciled vnto her husband signifying therby the bond of marriage to be vndissoluble Again Christ Math. 5 reuoking the bill of diuorcement that God had granted to the Iews during the old law because of the hardness of their hearts and reducing marriage to the institution it had in the begining of creation said to the Pharisies Whosoeuer shall put away his wife except for * Nomine adulterij siue formeationis intelligitur omnis copula illicita violans sidem matrimonij per diuisionē carnis cōtra illud erūt duo in carne vna fornication
causeth her to commit adultery and whosoeuer shall mary her that is diuorced doth commit adultery and it matters not that Christ insertes that exception except for fornication for it hath reference only to the first part of the sentence viz. Whosoeuer shall put away his wife Christ signifying therby that it is lawfull for an husband (m) S. Austin con Adamant cap. 3. and Theophilac expounding that Chapter of S. Matthew teach that whosoeuer putteth his wife away otherwise if afterwards she comit adultery he is the cause of it and doubtless Christ in the Chapter set down speak's of a Husband that shall put his wife away as to dwelling and bedding with him which kinde of diuorce according to the Council of Trent sess 24. can 8 may be done lawfully when a iust cause interuem's for example fornication eminent danger of some great euill whether spirituall or temporall or enormious crime c. and indeed Christ in that Chapter speaks not at all of dissoluing the bond of marriage for that kind of putting away is a deuorce giuing power toeach of both to marry again without waiting till the one or the other chance to dye to depart from an adulteres wife or for a wife to depart from an husband that is an adulterer which is it is lawfull for an innocent husband not to bed or liue together with a wife that committes adultery and doubtless Christ intent was not to inuolue the said exception in the latter part of the sentence for so Christ's meaning should be this viz whosoeuer shall marry her that is diuorced except for fornication committed adultery and consequently should signify thereby fornication to be a sufficient lawfull ground to dissolue the very bond of marriage vnto giuing leaue to a wife put away for adultery to marry again which sense carryeth an extream absurdity for so the condition of an adulteress wife were better then that of an innocent wife the adulteress being made free in regard of her adultery to take a new husband in consequence of which if that were the true sense of Christ's words euery married woman that is weary of her husband might easily commit adultery to get liberty to marry an other if adultery could dissolue the bond of marriage Besides S. Mark cap. 1. and S. Luke cap. 16. relating this forementioned passage and the sentence Christ pronounced Math. 5. dâ—e clearly and absolutly assert putting no exception at all that whosoeuer shall marry her that is diuorced committeth adultery wherfore though after consummation of marriage a wife may lawfully depart from her husband that committeth adultery and a husband may lawfully depart from his wife that committeth dultery as to bedding and liuing together neuerthelesse neither of them is at liberty to mary again as long as both doe liue As to administring the Sacrament of christian marriage albeit that the Councill of Trent requireth the presence of the parish Priest vnto the celebration therof in all places and Countries wherin their ordinance is promulgated yet he is no Minister of the Sacrament that is (n) According to the Council of Florence the efficient cause of marriage is the mutuall consent of the parties that marry expres'd in words of the present Tense For example the man faith I Thomas take thee Anna for my vvedded vvife and again I Anne take thee Thomas for my vvedded Husband no efficient cause of it since in order to such as marry together he applyeth neither matter nor form in the administration thereof these consisting in a reciprocall deliuering vp and a reciprocall accepting of bodies by mutuall codescention expressed in words of the present sense which is the true efficient cause of marriage in consequence of which those that contract are the proper ministers of the Sacrament they yeelding their bodyes to each other with an vnanimous consent reciprocally in so much that it is not absolutly (o) According to the holy congregations of Cardinals that expounded that first Chapter of the 24. session in the Councill of Trent which requires to the validity of marriage the presence of the parish Priest it is not necessary that the parish Priest assisting at a marriage vtter any words his presence and his knowledge of the transaction is sufficient though he should forbid and dissent from it necessary that a Parish Priest assisting at a marriage vtter any words at all his presence together with his notice of what is done there being sufficient enough and though he should dissent from the doing of it the validity of the Sacrament would receiue no preiudice therby for Christ instituting marriage a Sacrament changed nothing of the ciuill contract which necessarily it includeth but only eleuated the said contract in as much as it is performed by persons baptised vnto the dignity of a Sacrament Wherfore seeing that in all other ciuill contracts the parties that doe contract are the efficient causes therof it plainly follows that a Christian man and a christian woman marrying together are efficient causes or ministers of the Sacrament of marriage Neither is the validity of the Sacrament preiudiced though both parties while they administer stand liable to mortall sin for the vnworthiness of the minister doth not destroy the essence of a Sacrament Baptism administred by a Pagan that applyeth the true matter and form with an intention conform to Christ's intention is a Sacrament taken in the proper sense howeuer no man can participate the fruits of any Sacrament that ieceiues it vnworthily CHAR. XVIIJ OF EXTREM-VNCTION THE CONTENTS Holy vnction which Christ instituted after his resurrection and S. James the Apostle promulgated ought to be ministred to the faithfull in extremity of sicknes onely and thence is called Extrom-vnction The Sacrament of holy vnction is made and perfected in as much as a Priest anointeth the sick in the room of Christ with oyle of Oliue blessed and consecrated by a Bishop and prayeth ouer him The guirt of healing by anoynting or laying on of hands practiced in the primitiue Church was not the holy vnction that S. Iames prescribeth in his catholick Epistle saying If any be sick among you let him bring in the Priest's of the church and let them pray ouer him anointing him vvith oyle in the name of our lord Priest's in the administring of sacramentall vnction anointe the Organs of the siue senses vsing the form of words prescribed by the Roman Church which doubtless is the best EXtrem-vnction is a (a) According to the Councils of Floren in the Decree of Eugenius and of Trent sess 14. Extrem-vnction is a Sacrament of the new law and the greek Church euen after their fall into deadly shism fell not from the definition of the Councils set down as to Extrem-vnction for their Patriarch Ieremy reckoneth it amongst the Sacraments of the new law proper Sacrament of the new law wherby a christian belieuer constituted in eminent * Habetur in Concilio Floren quod SacrameutuÌ„ sacrae vnctionis
by Priests of the Church lay Elders because they are not Church-ministers taken in the proper sense neither is it their office to pray ouer the sick and to administer holy vnction vnto remission of sins and it matters not that the Apostle sayes let them bring in Priests wheras the practice of the catholick Church is to employ one sole Priest in the administration of Extrem-vnction for the true meaning therof is let him bring in some one of the Priests the Apostle vseth the signre which Gramarians call Enallogy putting the plurall for the singular number After the same manner Mat. 1. the Angell of our lord appearing to Ioseph says Take the Babe and his Mother and goe into the land of Israel for they are dead that sought the Babes life notwithstanding he mentioneth only Herod saying when Herod was dead c. Lastly in as much as the Apostle asserteth absolutly putting no limitation of time If any be sick among you he plainly sheweth Extrem-vnction (e) Since all the other precepts S. Iames inioyn's in his catholick Epistle concerne christians in all ages t' is not as to reason probable that the sole precept of anointing the sick should be giuen for a short tyme onely and according to Caluin scarcely for the space of one age but this his interpretation the Council of Trent has condemn'd sess 14. doct de Sacram. Extr. vnct and can 2. to be of perpetuall vse in the catholick Church to the worlds end which is essentiall to a Sacrament of the new law wherfore sundry ancient Fathers that liued in the subsequent ages when they speake of christian belieuers reduced through sicknesse to eminent danger of death recommend to them holy vnction as a Sacrament of the new law and alledge for it the authority of S. Iames set down * Hieron Epis 65. ad Pamach oceanum de erroribus Originis in simili re ad fidem spectūte de qua tamen prima concilia nihil definierant sic scribit Confessi sunt quod negabatur tacuerunt de quo nemo quarebat and though the first generall Councill's make no mention of Extrem-vnction neuertheless no man ought to infer from that negatiue authority an argument to the preiudice of so warrantable a doctrine for they declared and defined such point's of christian faith as were questioned and impugned by the Hereticks of those times respectiuely but then no controuersy arose concerning Extrem-vnction By the premises is plainly euidenced that the guift of healing through vnction or laying on of hands (f) S. Marke mentioneth sick persons whom the anoynting with oyle cured And in the last Chapter of S. Marke t' is promised that the imposition of hands shall heale the sick mentioned by S. Mark and practiced in the primitiue times was not this holy vnction that s. Iames prescribeth in the forenamed catholick Epistle for that was a miraculous end owment and no gifts of doing miracles did confer sanctifying grace vnto remission of sins which is proper to a Sacrament of the new law and truly that particular guift (g) Often tymes such as were not Priests heald the sick by anoynting them namely according to S. Hierom S. Hilarion that had not receiu'd the Sacrament of holy Order and according to Tertull. ad scap c. 4. A certain lay-christian named Proculus anoynted with oyle Seuerus the Emperour and recouered him thereby called the gift of healing was extended only to corporall infirmities it could cure the body but not the soul Besides one and the same spirit distributed that and all other guifts of doing miracles seuerally according to his own free will 1. Cor. 12 wherfore neither such only as by ordination were promoted to Priestly ordination nor all those had the guift of healing but to the administring of Extrem-vnction is necessary Priestly ordination for the Apostle sayth expresly If any be sick among you let him bring in Priests of the Church Also our Extrem-vnction requireth oyle of Oliues blessed (h) The Councils of Flor. in the Decree of Eugenius and of Trent sess 14. cap. 1. declare that the oyle that is applyed in and is proper to the Sacrament of Extream-vnction ought to be blessed and consecrated by a Bishop which vsage is conform to the generall practice of the catholick Church and consecrated by a Bishop neither is it applyed to euery sick person but to such only as be incorporated into Christ by faith hope and charity nor to euery part of the sick body but to the Organs of the fiue senses which be the windows that let in sin into the howse of the soul and although our Extrem-vnction be endowed with vertue euen as to the healing corporall infirmities when the supreme prouidence thinketh it expedient for the sick yet the cure of these is the secundary effect thereof only being instituted specially to heale the soul Furthermore to the forementioned healing vnction no determinat form of prayer was annexed as is to our Extrem-vnction for example the Roman Church vseth this form * Concil Trid. expressè docet ritum vsū Extremaevnctionis quem obseruat Romana Ecclesia esse optimum idque patet ex decreto Eugenij ad calcem Concilij Florentini which doubtlesse is the best our Lord in vertue of that holy vnction and his most benigne mercy grant vnto thee Indulgence of all thy offences committed by seeing hearing smelling tasting and touching and indeed the Priest that ministreth Extrem-vnction (i) The necessity of the precept requires that the form of sacramentall vnction which consistes of these word's Per istam sanctam vnctionem pijssimam suam misericordiam indulgeat tibi Dominus quicquid deliquisti per visum auditum c. ought to be repeated fiue seuerall tymes in fiue seuerall anoyntings of the fiue senses I say the precept of necessity requires this ceremony though perhaps neither a fiue fold repeating of the formall words nor a siue fold anoynting of the sick can lay claim to the essence of the Sacrament is bound to anointe the Organs of euery sense and express the name of each one particularly together with a repetition of the said form vnless he shall obserue that the sick person is seiz'd with pangs of present death for then one sole vnction and the naming of all the outward senses respectiuely is sufficient enough as to the essence of the Sacrament and vnto obtaining the fruites therof for example it sufficeth if anointing one Organ only the Priest say our Lord through that holy vnction and his most benigne mercy grant vnto thee Indulgence of all thy offences committed by seeing hearing smelling tasting and touching As to the anointing reins breasts and feet though these vnctions haue nothing of the essentiall matter yet as to them a Priest ought to obserue the custome of that particular Church wherunto he is subiect howeuer decency requireth that he omit to anointe the reins and breasts of sick women CHAR. XIX OF THE
prinat spirit is condemned for example in the old law Numb 12. God was angry with Mary Moyses Sister and Aaron because they had detracted from Moyses she saying hath our lord spoken only by Moyses hath be not spoken also by vs and Ierem. 23. Heare not the words * S. Hieron ait falsos illos prophetas referre baereticos qui sequuntur spirituÌ„ suuÌ„ quia nequaquam inquit diuino instinctu sed proprio corde vaticinantur of the Prophets that prophesie vnto you and deceiue you they speak the visions of their own hearts and not out of the mouth of our lord and Ezech. 13. God saith thus woe vnto the foolish prophets that follow their own spirit yet say the lord saith it albeit I haue not spoken likewise in the new law this priuat spirit is condemned for in the primary age of the Church (f) Eusebius l. 3. hist Eccles cap. 12. attests that Cherintus besides his other prophane nouelties fained subtil delusions as reuealed vnto him by the ministery of Angels and according to the same Eusebius l. 5. cap. 15. Montanus and Maximilla were carried away with delusions of the like nature for among the reasons why they were cut of from the Church of God one was because they pretended vnto speciall reuelations and the Church declared that it was a thing contrary to the custom and practice down from the Apostles till those times that any particular person should presume to haue a priuat spirit reuealing vnto him matters pertaning to christian faith Cherintus was counted an Heretick for pretending vnto priuat reuelations in the spreading of sundry absurd doctrines and in as much as he asserted that Iesus-Christ was not come in the flesh Saint Ioan. Apostle Epis 1. cap. 4. writeth to the faithfull against him thus Dearly beloued belieue not euery spirit but trie the spirits whether they are of God for many false prophets are gon out into this world hereby you shall know the spirit of God euery spirit which confesseth that Iesus-Christ is come in the flesh is of God and euery spirit that confesseth not that Iesus-Christ is come in the flesh is not of God Yet althought the Apostle vsed that analogie in order to this true article of faith Iesus-Christ is come in the flesh as a certain signe to shew the falshood of Cherintus assertion neuertheless he did not mean to establish it for a generall rule to distinguish euery good from euery ill spirit or euery true from euery false doctrine for the Pelagians and sundry ancient sectaries are counted Hereticks both by Lutherans and Caluinists albeit they acknowleged the mistery of the Incarnation But the generall rule for the trying of spirits Saint Iohn clearly expresseth a very little after in his same Epistle saying Wee Apostles are of God he that knoweth God heareth vs he that is not of god heareth vs not hereby know we the spirit of truth and the spirit of errour In regard his first particular rule was not sufficient enough to discerne between euery true and false doctrine that is to say between all true and false Teachers therfore he addeth this generall rule viz. To heare or not to heare vs Apostles Gouernours of the Church alluding to Christs own words set down I uc 10. He that heareth you heareth me and he that despiseth you despiseth me Saint Iohn spoke in the person of all the Apostles and their successors in Church Gouerment with whom is deposited christian doctrine receiued from the mouth of Christ and truly it is very probable that no one of the other Apostles was aliue when Saint Iohn writ his Epistle yet what Christ promised Mat. 28. behold I am with you alwayes untill the end of the world remained then in him and euen now in the Prelats of the Church that succeed the Apostles in the administration therof wherby it is cleare that the office of supream Iudge of coÌ„trouersies in debate concerning faith and religion is proper to ecclesiasticall authoritie only howeuer in as much as no man can come vnto Christ except the Father which hath sent him draw him Ioa. 6. inward grace of the holy Ghost is necessarily required to belieue in and loue God aright vnto the obseruation of his ordinances and law of which is meant the prophesies Ierem. 31. I will put my law saith our lord in their inward parts and write it in their hearts and will be their God and they shall be my people Isa 50. and all thy children shall be taught of our lord to witt by inward grace which excludeth not outward Teachers for faith is by heareing and hearing importeth outward Teachers Moyses and the Prophets of those daies taught the people in as much as they declared vnto them outwardly the lawes of God affording nothing of inward help to the seeking of them but Christ truly God cloathed with human flesh taught by himselfe in our new law both outwardly preaching the doctrine of faith and inwardly instilling into the hearts of his people inward grace for the embracing of it and afterward before his ascention into heauen appointed outward visible Teachers and promised withall his own inward inuisible concurrence with them to the end of the world Wherfore doubtless the alledged scripturs will show only the maiority of Christ compared to Moyses and the Prophets in order to teaching matters of faith and religion together (g) According to holy scripture Io. 1. the law was giuen by Moyses but grace and truth came by Iesus-Christ The old law pointed at sin onely and made it known but the new law furnishes grace to fulfill it and purge out of our souls the leauen of sin with the plenteous measure of grace especially annexed to the new law in respect wherof it is stiled the law of grace neither is this necessity of outward Teachers excluded by the saying of Saint Paul 1. Cor. 2. he that is spirituall discerneth all things and he himselfe is iudged of noe man Ioa. 1. Eps cap. 2. ye need not that any man teach you but as his vnction teacheth you all things and it is true and is notlying and Saint Ioa. 1. Eps cap. 5. he that belieueth in the son of God hath the testimony of God in himselfe for as to the first text Saint Paul spoke of the spirituall man only that is to say of such beliuers as were perfect and knowing of christian doctrine and therby apt to discern false opinions and conceiue the high mysteries of faith declared by word of mouth or writing which is not to exclude outward Teachers and that this is the true meaning appeareth by the Apostle himselfe because he says in the very same Chapter set down We speak wisdom among them that are perfect and we speake wisdom in a mystery wherby he seâ—teth the spirituall maÌ„ against the naturall man that is versed only in the wisdom of the world or in the knowledge of naturall things and in the third Chapter of the same Epistle
he saith thus And I would not speake vnto you Brethren as vnto spirituall mem but as vnto carnall men euen as to Babes in Christ I giue you milke to drinke and not meat for you were not yet able to beare it where he layeth the spirituall man against the carnall man that in regard of carnall affection perceiueth not the things of the spirit of God wherfore it seemeth a strang thing that Sectaries should infer from this text of scripture that euery belieuer hath a priuat (b) S. Irenaeus l. 3. cap. 2. con haer sharpely rebuks Valentinus for leauing tradition and following the priuat spirit thereby constituting himselfe sole iudge and rule of faith reuealing spirit of truth wherby he is enabled with authority to discern matters of faith and iudge all controuersies and to be iudged of no man himselfe vnto the excluding of all outward Teachers As to the second Text the true meaning of it is not that his vnction only doth teach but that the doctrines of christian religion which men teach outwardly by speaking * Aug. trac 3. in Epis Joan. magisteria inquit forensecus adiutoria quaedam sunt admonitiones cathedram autem in caelo habet qui corda dotet his vnction teacheth inwardly by inspiring grace wherby men are made apt to harken to what the Church ministers teach and indeed this docility or aptness to harken to the word of God is a speciall prerogatiue giuen by the spirit of grace vnto the children of the new law and prophesied of in the old law by Ieremy and Isaias As concerning the third Text set down the true sense is this that whosoeuer beliueth in the son of God aright hath in himselfe inward faith which is a diuine gift and therfore called the testimony of God in as much as it witnesseth that no man can * Mat. tues Christus Filius Dei viui caro sanguis non reuelauit tibi sed pater meus come vnto the son Iesus-Christ except it be giuen vnto him by the Father and albeit that the inward testimony of God hath been the Iole cause to draw some men vnto the maruelous light of faith for example Saint Peter beliued the mistery of the incarnation in vertue of an inward inspiration proceeding from God immediatly neuertheless the outward testimony of the Church is the ordinary necessary requisit to the conceiuing of christian faith according to the ordinance of Christ that hath constituted outward Teachers to be of necessary and perpetuall vse in his Church to the worlds end that we be not carryed about with euery wind of doctrine which hath been extreme needlesse if he had thought it expedient to supply euery particular belieuer with a priuat reuealing spirit Furthermore from the premises is clearly deducible that the holy scripture cannot lay clame to the dignitie of a supream Iudge because the office therof which is a primary end intended of necessity * Plato in libris quos de repub scripsit Aristoteles in policicis docent in constitutione formatione alicuius reipub vnum ex ijs quae debent 1. per se intentendi esse ipsum IudiceÌ„ pro dirimendis litibus ciuium ad pacem in rep seruandam in the forming of euery common wealth is to declare laws punish peruerse offenders and pronounce sentence of iudgment for the determining all matter in debate that therby vnity and peace may be preserued but the scripturs can chaleng nothing of iuridicall power in order to iudging defining and deciding controuersies of faith these actions importing life hearing and speaking which the scripturs cannot exercise being vnliud things that neither heare nor speak clearly and consequently vnfit to Iudg matters in debate between one and another besids these were not intended in â—he forming of the Church as requisits absolutly necessary to the Gouerment of it for Christ during the time he conuersed on earth writ nothing himselfe nor commaunded his Apostles or disciples to writ and indeed of themselues they were not much (i) According to Eusebius l. 3. hist Eccles cap. 18. the Apoles and disciples of Christ were not greatly solicitous to put down in writing the misteries of christian faith being the employment inioyned them was to preach the Gospel in so much that according to the same Eusebius it was a tradition of those days that they were after a manner necessitated to write and according to S. Hierom de viris illus S. Iohn writ his Gospel in regard of Cherintus and Ebion which denyed the diuinity of Christ And indeed t is euident that the Apostles did not write down the principles of christian religion hauing receiued command ad commission from Christ to preach without any commission to write set vpon writing because of their ingagement in an higher imployment namely preaching of the Gospell and it seems that those few which haue written were vrged or necessitated therunto as was Saint Iohn that writ his Gospell to confute the hereticks Cherintus and Ebion who denied the diuinity of Christ Again among the twelue Apostles Saint Matthew and Saint Iohn only and among the 62. Disciples Saint Luke only only writ the Gospell euen diuers years after Christs Ascention into Heauen insomuch that the christiaÌ„ Church had institutioÌ„ exercised iuridicall authority made lawes exacted obedience vnto them along while before the new scripturs were in being and contrary to the old scripture pronounced sentence of iudgment to the anulling of Circumcision which was a controuersy of faith Wherfore doubtless scripturs were neither primarly intended nor primarly giuen as suprem iudges of all matters in debate concerning faith and religion moreouer Saint Irenaeus who florished in the yeare of our lord 160. expresly (k) Irenaeus l. 3. con haer cap. 4. denyes expresly that christian faith had perished if the Apostles had not left vs the scriptures asserteth that the people of sundry countries without the help of paper or inck had preserued christian faith down from the Apostles to his time the vnwritten supplying the room of the written word for this ancient Father writeth and ascribeth that preseruation vnto apostolicall tradition obserued by the ancient Churches together with the help of inward grace proceeding from the holy Ghost Wherfore as those primatiue Churches did perseruer in the profession of the christian faith for the space of many years without scripturs so the present Church assisted with the like meanes might continue pure without spot or wrinckle although it had nothing of written doctrine and consequently the primary end for which scripturs were intended was not to doe the office of suprem Iudg howeuer all things which were written were written for our learning that wee through patience * L. 1. Machabae cap. 11 Ionathas summus Sacerdos scribens spartiatis dicit se suos in rebus aduersis pro solatio habere libros sacros quod ostendit vsum in quem datae sunt nobis
scripturae and comfort of the scripturs may haue hope Rom. 15. although they doe not define and iudge all matters of faith and religion yet they (l) The Apostle 2. Timot. 3. Saith that all scripture is giuen by inspiration from God and is profitable to teach argue correct and instruct in iustice That is according to the ancient Fathers to resiste conuince and condemne false doctrines Wherfore according to the same Apostle ad Tit. l. a Bishop must be vnreproueable embracing the faithfull word and sound doctrine that he may be able to exhort and conuince those which say against it conduce mainly therunto tending specially to christian instruction and erudition besides they stir vs vp to ioyne vertue with faith and with vertue knowledg and with knowledg temperance and with temperance patience and with patience godliness and with godliness loue 2. Epis 2. Pet. which is the consistency and plenitude of the law Scripturs are liud * S. Ambros Epis 19. vocat sacras scripturas fontes viuos qui saliunt in vitam aeternam fountains springing vp vnto euerlasting life but the keeping and dressing of them is cōmitted only to the Church of Christ that was the rock whence they sprāg it is the christian catholick Church taught of the holy Ghost that cōprehēdeth the bredth lenght depth and hight of these heauenly fountaines which is to say it is a speciall prerogatiue giuen to the Church of Christ to interpret infallibly and iuridically the holy scripturs (m) According to S. Hierom Epis ad Paulum S Chrys hom 40. in Ioa. S. Austin l. 4. de doct christ cap. 3. the hardness of holy scrpitures proceeds from the profoundnes copiousnes compendiousnes therof in consequence of which a right vnderstanding of sundry passages of necessary depends of tradition as well obserues S. Austiu l. de fide oper and S. Hierom in his scripture prologue ingeniously confesseth that he could not vnderstandand the holy Prophets Isaias Ieremy and Daniel again S. Irenaeus l. 3. cap. 7. Orig. in explic Epis ad Rom. and S. Austin l. de fide oper cap. 14. confess with one accorde that S. Paul is hard to be vnderstood and especially in regard he vseth frequent hyperboles which proceeded from the vehemency of the spirit that guided his pen. which profoundness of misteries plenteousness of senses shortness of sentences haue rendred obscure hard and intricate as plainly appeareth by the holy writers of the old law namely Isay Ieremy Ezechiel Daniel and of the new law Saint Paul especially according to the testimony of Saint Peter 2. Pet. 3. wherein he speaketh of his writings thus * S. Irenaue l. 3. cap. 7. scribens de Haereticis testatur Paulū hyperbolis vti frequenter propter impetu spiritus qui in ipso fuit Idē sentiūt Origines explicat Epistolae ad Rō Aug. de fide operibus cap. 14. 15. our Brother Paul in all his Epis mentioneth things in which Epistles some things are hard to be vnderstood which they that are vnlearned and vnstable wrest as they doe also others scripturs vnto their own perdition for further proofe of this catholick assertion may be alledged the perpetuall contention between one sectary and an other concerning the interpretation of scripture Texts in reference to controuersies of faith for example from the words This is my body Luc. 22. Lutherans doe argue the true and real presence of Christs body in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread contrariwise Caluinists infer a meer figure of Christs body Anabaptists deduce out of the commission Christ gaue vnto his Apostles Math. 18. goe and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father c. That baptism ought not to be administrated but to such as are de facto apt to receiue instruction And the Arians misinterpreting that saying of Christ Io. * Apud S. Joan. dicit Christus Pater maior me est alibi ego Pater vnum sumus Posterior textus explicatur ab Arianis de vnitate consensus conformitate voluntatū My Father is greater then I denied his Godhead the holy scriptures are a great light of christian doctrine for they are the dictates of the holy Ghost yet not sufficient enough to let vs see the way to euerlasting life vnless they be set on the cādlestick of the * Vt luceat omnibus qui in domo sūt Mat. 5. Church it is not the same thing to be a light and to enlighten a light vnder a bushell is a light and shineth there howeuer it doth not giue light to all that are in the house but when it is put on the candlestick Math. 5. euen so the scripturs light put vnder a bushell that is vnder the interpretation of priuate wits continueth a shining light in it selfe neuertheless doth not enlighten vnto euerlasting life but when it is put on the candlestick of infallible authority proper to the Church of Christ Again the scripture is a booke written within and on the backside Apoc. 5. the outward writing is the letter that killeth the inward the spirit that giueth life 2. Cor. 3. as the soul quickneth the body (n) S. Austin ser 70. de tempore expounding the sacred Text Epis ad Cor. the letter killeth the spirit quikneth If saith he thou follow the true sense of scripture which is the spirit that giues life to the soule it will bring thee vnto saluation but if thou shalt neglect the true sense adhering to the outward letter presuming the true sense to be therein it will often tymes lead thee into errour And according to Tertul. l. de resur carnis Heresies spring vp in regard the scriptures are misinterpreted And he speaking of S. Pauls Epistles affirms that it ought not to seem a hard thing or any way strang that from thence errours should arise since heresies must be 1. Cor. 11. which notwithstanding would not be if the scriptures were interpreted aright Heresies must be not becaus God hath appointed that they should be but because he permitted that they might be and mans free will together with pride and malice makes them to be against Gods positiue will howeuer the supream prouidence from euil heresies draws good things soe the spirit or sense of the scriptures quickneth the letter but to come vnto the spirit of necessity there is required the opening of the booke which the Church onely can doe trusted with the key of authority that openeth it wherfore in as much as many men down from the begining of christianity to these times haue adhered rather to the letter then to the sense of scripture and thence cut out vnauthorized interpretations of their own many heresies haue sprung vp to the distruction of infinit souls wherof Christ prophesying said heresies must be He fore saw that euen of such as were incorporated into his Church would men rise * S. Cypri Epis 55. ad Cornelium Nec aliunde
can sacro-sancta the Apostolicall sea did not receiue supremacy and preeminence from the Apostles but from our Sauiour himselfe and indeed Christ founded and built his Church vpon S. Peter Mat. 16. Thou art Peter and on this rock I vvill build my Church .... and J vvill giue vnto the the keys of the kingdome of heauen Again Christ praid especially for S. Peter and after his resurrection appointed him to feed all his sheepe and lambs Moreouer S. Peter as head and Prince of the other Apostles called the first Councill which was celebrated between the Ascention and Pentecost And in the second Council mentioned act 15. spoke first and decided the matter in debate Bishop of Rome as lawfull successour of S. Peter in suprem authority and there is not any except the Roman Church that hath published and planted the one holy apostolicall faith from the rising of the sun to the goeing down therof which denoteth its vniuersality an order to place there is not any except the Roman Church that can rockon pastours and Teachers in a continuall line of succession down from S. Peter to the present times which sheweth its vniuersality in order to time there is not any Church-Gouernour saue the Bishop of Rome to whose definitiue sentence of iudgment (x) S. Anaclete Epis 1. commanded that euery hard question should be referd to the sea Apostolick because saith he the Apostles so appointed by speciall command from Christ Wherefore Tertullian calleth the Pope king of the world and stiles Rome the Chief and Apostolicall seat whether saith he wee ought to recur in all doubtfull matters relating to faith Besids S. Austin that was a member of the African Church Epis 9. addressing himselfe to Pope Innocent in order to the Pelagians whom he impugned writeth thus ... that errour and impiety of the Pelagians the authority of the sea apostolick must anathematize Again the Council of Alexandria cals Pope Felix prophanarum haresium depositor the deposer of prophan heresies hard controuersies of faith haue been referred in all ages Furthermore it is essentiall to the true Church to begett children in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell 1. Cor. 4 that is to say to bring whole countries out of darkness of infidelity into the maruelous light of Christian faith which not any except the Roman Church hath performed Sectaries like partriges haue gathered children * Ieremiae cap. 17. perdix fouet seu congregat quae non peperit Vnde S. Aug. assimilat haereticos perdici which they haue not brought forth but the Roman Church hath begotten vnto Christ a world of children both in the primatiue times for the first 500. yeares and since For Germans Bauarians Vandals Polans Sweds Danes Noruegians Hungarians Normans English and sundry other Countryes since the yeare 600. were begotten in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell by Priests and Bishops of the Roman Church as plainly appears by the ancient and modern histories written of each people respectiuely And as touching our country of Englād that embraced the catholick faith through the preaching of S. Austin a Priest and Bishop of the Roman Church after its conuersion which happened in the reign of S. Ethelbert for near a thousand yeares continued obedient to the Bishop of Rome and constant in the profession of the catholick religion as do euidence our ancient Cronicles laws common laws ordinances Records foundations of Bishopricks Cathedrall Churches vniuersities colleges and hospitalls which remain monuments of these dayes to beare clear witnes of catholick religion wherfore it is a wonder how English Magistrats come to look with so enuious an eye vpon their catholick subiects as to persecute them for conforming their conscience to the full and constant profession of all their christian progenitours CHAR. XX. OF TRADITIONS THE CONTENTS Down from the Apostles to these times the true Church of God hath been directed and gouernd by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Christ or from the holy Ghost by inspiration were deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnritten traditions if the Churches authority and vnwritten traditions were laid a side scriptures would haue nothing of waight with them vnto euincing christian religion Answeres vnto seuerall obiections propounded against the Churches traditions TRaditions are vnwrtten doctrines deliuered by the mouth of Christ or his Apostles and committed vnto the keeping of the Church (a) 1. Cor. 11. as I haue deliuered vnto you saith S. Paul keep my precepts From this sacred Text Theophilact infers that both S. Paul and the other Apostles deliuered many things which they did not set down in writing called traditions not because they are not at all written but in regard there is no express mention thereof in the holy scriptures for t is certaine that the traditions receiued from the Apostles and deliuered as it were from hand to hand for sundry ages are now written as precepts of faith and generall manners necessary vnto saluation Though the whole scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to conuince to correct and to instruct in iustice 2. Tim. 3. Yet it is not the same thing to be a profitable guide in the way of iustce and saluation and to be the sole expedient necessary therunto for a head is both profitable and necessary to preserue a man aliue neuertheless it alone without the society and ministery of the body is not sufficient enough to continue him aliue likewise the Sacrament of Eucharist conduceth to the purchase of eternall blessedness yet cannot effect it without the help of baptism and faith and the Chapter set down expresly asserteth that euen the old scriptures instruct to saluation and notwithstanding the Apostle requireth of Timothy perseuerance in the doctrines which he had heard of him besides what he had learned from them wherin he had been versed from (b) By the particles from his infancy euidently appeares that the Apostle spoke of these scriptures which Timothy had learned in his youth that is he meant the old testament being the new scriptures were not written when Timothy was a youth Wherefore when the Apostle writ vnto him that all scripture is profitable c. he could not vnderstand the whole body thereof as some sectaries vnaduisedly interprete him translating whole for all And indeed when the Apostle writ that Epistle to Timothy the whole body of scripture was not composed S. Iohn had not then put forth his Gosple and his Apocallps he writ after the death of S. Paul him infancy again albeit the scriptures be a great light neuertheless they doe not giue light to all a en within the house of God whose written doctrines they are vnless they be put vpon the candlestick of the Churches definitions and vnwritten traditions for setting these aside scriptures are but a light shining in a dark place 2.
Pet. 10. in order to many diuine ordinances in regard they doe not shew plainly clearly and euidently all the mysterious precepts of Christian faith that require necessary obseruance wherefore it is an extream weakness to infer from the light of the written a negation of light in the vnwritten word of God as to instruction in iustice and saluation and indeed down from the begining of the Church christian religion hath in all times * Trid sess 4. cap. 1. declarat veritatem disciplinä Ecclesiae contineri in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus qua ex ipsius Christi ore ab Apostolic acceptae aut ab ipsis Apostolis Spiritu sancto dictāte quasi per manus traditae ad nos vsque peruenerūt huiusmodi traditionū contemptoros anathemati subiecit Sectarij vero communiter reijciuns eruditiones apostolicas affirmantes omnia qua sine dispendio sulutis possunt ignorari apertè contineri in scripturis been directed and gouerned by both of the said lights that is by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs which kind of gouerment is common alike to euery common wealth instituted aright That this double light (c) According to S. Irenaens p. 3. con haer c. 3. 4. Tertull. l. de coro militum cap. 3. S. Basil l. ad Amphilochium de Spiritu sancto cap. 29. S. Austin Epis ad Janua there is full parity between traditions ad scriptures warrantable authority being common alike to the one and the other Wherefore S. Chrys hom 4. in 2. ad Thess saith Est traditio nihil quaras amplius T' is tradition seeke no further of written and vnwritten Traditions is of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church appeareth by the second Epistie to the Thesalonians where S. Paul enioyneth the keeping of both saying stand fast keepe the Traditions which you haue been taught either by word or our Epistle All the doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Iesus-Christ or by inspiration of the holy Ghost they deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnwritten traditions which down from the primatiue Church to the present times haue passed as from hand to hand in a continuall line of priestly succession Moreouer it appeareth clearly by the second Chapter of S. Iohns canonicall Epistle that the Apostles thought it not expedient to set forth in writing all matters of christian religion necessary to saluation for he expresly saith although I had many things to write vnto you yet would I not write with paper and inck for I trust to come vnto you and speak mouth to mouth that your ioy may bee full which he repeateth in the end of his third canonicall Epistle saying I haue many things to write but I will not with ynck and pen write vnto thee and doubtless as Christ when he said to his Disciples Io. 16. I haue yet many things to say vnto you but ye cannot beare them now meant of many mysteries of faith distinct from those he had already taught them so S. Iohns meaning was that he had other doctrines of christian faith or manners to deliuer by word of mouth then those he had written with ynck and pen and truly the particles That your ioy may be full doe import as much being meant of spirituall ioy such as faithfull christians commonly receiue when they are instructed in things pertaining to iustice and saluation and it is not in reason probable that S. Iohn should vnderstand temperall ioy in order to wordly aduantages the intent of his Epistle being to stir vp a Mother and her son vnto a vertuous life in Iesus-Christ neither is it as to reason credible that so many things which S. Iohn purposely omitted to write were set down in writing either by himself afterward or by the other Apostles afore there being no scripture testimony wheron to ground those coniectures inuented meerly by the aduersaries of vnwritten traditions Besids it is plainly euident that sundry vnwritten doctrines of christian religion which are not contained expresly in any part of the new or old Testament are of necessary credence For example we must belieue with diuine faith the receiued catalogue or canon of both Testaments to be the true and vncorrupted word of God For otherwise those holy writings would haue nothing of weight with vs as theron to relie our saluation notwithstanding not any part of either Testament expresseth the receiued catalogue or canon for example we must belieue that the true sense of the written letter is a necessary and essentiall requisit to faith because in the sense that giueth life and not in the letter that bringeth death the true word of God consists but the true sense of the written letter that is to say how (d) The Caluinists in a publick disputation with the Antytrinitarians in the presence of Iohn the second elected king of Hungary engag'd to proue by scripture the mystery of the B. Trinity but failing in their engagement the king of a Caluinist became an Anti-trinitarian the written letter ought to be taken whether in a proper or figuratiue signification is not known but by the interpretation and tradition of the Church Again we must belieue that in one God there is a Trinity of diuine persons which be really distinct one from an other and no more yet not any writing of the Apostles or Euangelists (e) According to S. Chrys hom 4. operum imperf as in Heauen so in scripture God lies hid vnseen Wherefore as all men behold this corporall Heauen and not God that dwels within it so though many read the holy scriptures neuertheless they perceiue not the God of truth that lies hid in the inward seuse thereof expresly assertes a reall distinction or excludeth expresly a quaternity of persons and truly though S. Iohn saith in his canonicall Epistle cap. 4. that there be three which beare testimony in Heauen the Father the word and the holy Ghost neuertheless he doth not say expresly * Simplex affirmatio ternarij in aliquo non excludit vel negat ibi esse aliquod quartum cū in quaternario includatur ternarium qui asserit esse tres vbi sun◠quatuor non falsum dicit three only or that these three are really distinct one from an other for he addeth these three are one in so much that the great Sabellian heretick Praxeas taught that God was but one sole person that carried three distinct names in order to three seuerall effects naming him Father in as much as he createth all things son because be was borne of the Virgin Mary inuested with human nature and holy Ghost in regard he sanctifieth all creatures Wherfore if the Apostles had not deliuer'd to the faithfull of those days by word of mouth a reall distinction in God as to personality and a reall identity as to nature and substance and the Church
carefully heauenly Angels endeauour to bring mortalls vnto eternall blessedness being they reioyce in the repentance of a sinner Wherefore Orig. hom 1. in Ezech. prayeth his Angel to receiue him conuerted from his former errour reioyce at the conuersion of a sinner Luc. 15. Besids according to the common vsage of the primatiue Church one beleeuing christian bargained with an other that he who went first to Heauen should pray for him that abided on earth Let vs saith S. Cyprian Epis 57. pray mutually one for an other and whether of vs two shall through the diuine mercy be first called for let his loue continue and his prayers not cease for his brethren and sisters in the world In like manner S. Hierome spoke to Heliodorus Epis 1. cap. 2. saying that when he is once in Heauen he will pray for him that exhorted and encouraged him to embrace a monasticall state of life Moreouer in the law of nature Abraham made intercession to an Angel for his sons Ioseph Ephraim and Manasse Gen. 48. the Angel which hath deliuered me from all euill bless these children And albeit it cannot be proued that in any time during the old Testament the people of God prayed directly to the holy Patriarkes and Prophets after their decease in regard then the Saints departed were not translated into Heauen and inuested with whiâ—e cloathes of glory their habitation being vnder the earth as in a prison 1. Petri 2. neuertheless they made intercession to God humbly asking of him mercy and grace through the merits of the said Patriarches and Prophets * Psal 131. memeÌ„to Domini Dauid omnis mansuetudinis eius propter Dauid seruum tuuÌ„ non auertas faciem Christi tui Salomon asked of God meet helpe in regard of his Father Dauids great merits * Exod. recordare Domine Abraham Isaac Jacob scruoruÌ„ tuum and Moyses in respect of the good workes of Abraham Isack and Israel the faithfull seruants of God Likewise the ancient Iews made intercession to God through the prayers of their progenitors departed And the holy Prophet Ieremy (k) Baruch cap. 3. prayeth thus O lord omnipotent God of Jsra Heare the prayer of the dead of Israel and though some sectaries count Baruch as apocryphall neuertheless the ancient Fathers and Councills haue ranked that book with diuine scripture both vnder the name of Ieremy Baruchs vncle and vnder the inscription of Baruch which is more proper Again the Councill of Laodicea in the last canon mentioneth Baruchs lamentations and Ieremyes Epistles Moreouer the Councils of Florence and Trent haue defined this catholick truth after his death praid much for the people of Israel 2. Mach. 75. Neither doth the Prophet Isaias preiudice this catholike truth saying cap. 63. Abraham knew vs not and Israel was ignorant of vs for he meant only that Abraham and Iacob did not acknowledge the Iews of those days for their children because of their greiuous sinns and iniquities as the ancient Fathers interpret that scripture Nor Ecclesiastes when hee saith the dead know noe more and haue reward noe more For his meaning is not to take all vnderstanding and knowledge from soules remoued out of their bodyes but to inculcate vnto vs that it is impossible after our departure out of this world to merit a reward the time of this life being a necessarie requisite there to according to Christs own testimony Io. 9. the night cometh when noe man can worke But now the ingagement mentioned in the character of Purgatory calleth for an answere vnto the Digbean White that hath studied diuinity 40. yeares who as to the contents of this character mainly resisteth the constant (l) Mr. White in the third account of the midle state of souls boldly asserts that though to pray for the blessed be against the common practice of the Church neuertheless he is not of so vveake a stomack as not to digest that morsell so that he maks not only the Church liable to errour as to manners and doctrines vniuersally receiued approued and practiced which is a manifest heresy but himselfe the Churches Reformer and vniuersall practice of the Catholick Church agreeing with so large and euident testimony of scriptures Councills and Fathers as are set down for example in the third accompt of his midle state of souls to proue that the ancient practice of the Church was to pray for the dead euen after their souls were beatified He alledged the 2. Epis and 1. cap. to Timothie where the Apostle thus prays for Onesiphorus Our lord grant him Onesiphorus to find mercy from our lord in that day by which words this knowing Master that hath studyed 40. years to build a Theology on Digbean peripateticks will of necessity proue that S. Paul prayed that Onefiphorus might find mercy after he was beatified Shall I deny saith he the Apostle prayed that Onesiphorus might find mercy euen after his soule was beatified the Text on all sides confessed for bids me what then will our aduersaries say this was not to pray for the blessed common sense permit's them not S. Paul did it But doubtless no knowing man in Theology or ecclesiasticall historie that is vnpartiall dare say for his credits sake that Mr. White doth clearly proue against the whole practice of the Church that the faithfull on earth must pray for the blessed because the Apostle prayed for Onesiphorus saying Our lord grant vnto him that he may find mercy of our lord in illo die in that day for Onesiphorus was not dead when S. Paul prayed that he might find mercy of our lord in illo die In consequence of which Mr. Whites inference from the words alledged carries no weight with it at all being grounded vpon a very false supposall Howeuer the good prayer of the Apostle was not in vain for according to the martyrologes both Latine and Greek Onesiphorus was honored afterward with a crown of martyrdom in Hellespont in consequence wherof doubtless he found mercy of our lord in that day that is in the day of particular iudgment after his death for it is the constant Tenet of the Catholick Church * Apoc. 14. Beati mortui qui in Domino moriuntur à modo iam dicit spiritus vt requiescant à laboribus suis Hic sacer textus osteÌ„dit beatos morientes id est martyres aliosque fideles decedentes perfectè iustos sine omni macula reatu poenae id est obligatione ad poenam noÌ„ expectaturos vniuersale iudicium vt accipiaÌ„t beatitudinem ita explicat S. Aug. l. 20. de ciuit cap. 9. that martyrs by their death suffered for the confessing of Christs faith be perfectly purged of sin both in order to the guilt and paines therof and immediatly possess their glorious crowns which is the beatificall vision as S. Austin lib. de peccatorum meritis expresly teacheth saying he that prayeth for a martyr doth an iniury to a martyr The same doctrine the Councill of Trent ses