must passe as undenyed truth And thus false History is made the chief foundation of the Roman Kingdom Thus they will face you down that you are ignorant or impudent 1. If you question whether Peter was a true Bishop at Rome yea or ever there which Nilus hath shewed to be somewhat uncertain 2. Or that he setled the Roman Bishop as his successour in a supremacy over all the Christian world 3. Or that the Popes Primacie was over all the Churches on earth which indeed was but as Canterburie is in England in one Roman Empire only 4. They will perswade you that this Primacie was setled by Christ or his Apostles which was done only by Councils and Emperours of Rome 5. They would make you believe that this was from the Apostles daies which began long after 6. They would perswade you that all the Christian world submitted to it even Abassia and all the extra-imperial Churches which is no such matter 7. Yea that before Luther none contradicted the Papal power and claime but all the Christian world were Papists By many such lies they deceive thousands of the ignorant And when they challenge men to dispute by word or writing their last refuge is to bring them into a wood of History that there they may either win the game or end the chase And if a Minister of Christ be not armed here to confute their historical forgeries they will take it for a victory and triumph which made me write my last book against Johnson or Terret to shew Historically the Antiquity of our Church and the novelty of theirs which I could wish young Ministers unacquainted with Church-History would peruse But if our people were truely acquainted how things have gone in the Church from the beginning it would be one of the most effectual preservatives against Popery when now the falsifications are become its strength I have oft thought that it had been greater policy in the Papists if they could to have burnt all Church-History but specially of the Councils that the credit might have depended on their bare word For verily once reading of Crab Binnius Surius or Nicolinus would turn against them any stomack that is not confirmed in their own disease But they have overdone Baronius and now made so great and costly a load of the Councils as that the deficiency of money time wit and patient industry shall save the most even of the Priesthood from the understanding of the truth And such Epitomes as Caranza's leave out most of the culpable part and yet even such they can hardly tolerate II. The more moderate French Papists who magnifie Councils aboue Popes would make us believe that though Popes are fallible and may miscarry yet General Councils have been the universal Church-representative which have a Legislative and Iudicial Vniversal power and that our concord must be by centring in their decrees and all are Schismaticks at least that take not their Faith and Religion upon their trust But if men knew that there never was a General Council of all the Christian Churches but only of the Empire and how wofully they have miscarried it would do much to save them from all such temptations III. The overvaluers of Church grandure and wealth and maintainers of the corrupt sort of Diocesane Prelacy Patriarks c. write books and tell the ignorant confident stories how such a Prelacy hath been in the Church ever since the dayes of the Apostles and that all the Churches on earth consented to it But if the people were acquainted with Church History they would know that the primitive fixed Episcopacy was Parochial or every Church associated for personal present Communion had a Bishop Presbytery and Deacons of their own unfixed Itinerant General Pastors indefinitely taking care of many Churches And that it was the Bishops striving who should be greatest and turning single Churches into an Association of many Churches and to be but Chappels or parts of the Diocesan Church that their power and wealth might be enlarged with their Territories and the turning of Arbitrating Bishops into the Common Indicatures which must govern all Christians and such like which poysoned the Church and turned the species of particular Churches Episcopacy Presbytery and Discipline quite into another thing And to speak freely it was the many blind volumes and confident clamours of some men that rail at us as denying an Episcopacy which the universal Church hath always agreed in which drew me to write this abridgement of the Church History of Bishops Councils and Popes IV. And those that make the Ignorant believe that seditious disobedient Presbyters have in all Ages been the dividers of the Church and the Bishops the means of Vnity concord and suppression of such Schismaticks and Hereticks could never thus deceive the people were but so much Church-History commonly known as I have here collected Read Church-History and believe that if you can V. And many that take up any new opinion or dotage which is but newly broached among them would have been saved from it if they â—aâ— but known how that same opinion or the like was long ago taken up by Hereticks and exploded by the faitbful Pastors and people of the Church VI. And the sectaries who rashly seperate from some Churches because of some forms opinions or ceremonies which almost all Christians on earth have used in the former purer ages and still use would be more cautelous and fearful in examining their grounds and would hardly venture to seperate from any Church for that which on the same reason would move them to separate from almost all Christians in the whole world if not Vnchurch the Church of Christ And ancient errours and crimes would affright us from imitating them VII And those that make new ambiguous words or unnecessary practices to become necessary to Church Communion and hereticate all that differ from them or persecute them at least would be more frightened from such pernicious courses if they well knew what have been the effects of them heretofore VIII And it is not unuseful to Princes and Magistrates to see what hath corrupted and disturbed the Churches in fâ—rmer times and what cause they have to keep the secular power from the Clergies hands and to value those that for knowledge and piety are meet for their proper guiding office and use of the Church Keys but not to corrupt them by excess of worldly wealth and power nor to permit them by striving who shall seem GREATEST WISEST and BEST to become the incendiaries of the Church and world and the persecutors of the best that cannot serve their worldliness and pride The Reader must Note 1. That though much of the History be taken from others the Councils are named and numbred according to Binnius and Crabbe 2. And that because so much evil is necessarily recited I thought it needful in the beginning and end to annex a defence of the Pastors and their office and work lest any should be tempted
the Parliaments complaints of Popery Arminianism and Arbitrary Illegalities and after saith Hist. Presb. p. 465. 470. The truth is that as the English generally were not willing to receive that yoak so neither did the Houses really intend to impose it on them though for a while to hold fair quarter with the Scots they seemed forward in it This appears by their Declaration of April 1646 Nor have they lived to see their dear Presbytery setled or their Lay-Elders entertained in any one Parish of the Kingdome that 's false on the other side and yet all must be done by this Parliament as Presbyterians four years before when they were Episcopal distasting only the persons and actions of Bishop Laud Wren and some other present Bishops If I find a man like Schlusselburgiâ—s fall Pell-mell with reproach on all that differ from him or Dr. Heylin speak of blood with pleasure and as thirsty after more as of Thacker Vdall c. or as designing to make Dissenters odious as he and most of the Papists Historians do as the Image of both Churches Philanax Anglicus the Historical Collections out of Heylin I will believe none of these revilers further than they give me Cogent proof I hear of a Scots Narrative of the Treasons Fornications Witchcrafts and other wickedness of some of the Scottish Presbyterians and as for me the Author knoweth not what to call me unless it be a Baxterian as intending to be a Haeresiarcha being neither Papist nor of the Church of England nor Presbyterian nor Independent c. To this I say I have no acquaintance with any Scots Minister nor ever had in my life except with Bishop Sharp that was murdered and two other Bishops and two or three that live here in London therefore what they are I know not save by Fame But though I have heard that Country asperst as too much inclin'd to Fornication I never before heard the Religious part and Ministers so accused Either it is true or false if false shame be to the reporters if true what doth it concern us here or any that are innocent any further than to abhor it and lament it and to be thankful to God that it is another sort of men that are called Puritans in England and that in all my acquaintance with them these 56 years which hath been with very many in many Countries I remember not that ever I heard of one Puritan man or woman save one accused or suspected of fornication and that one yet living though openly penitent hath lived disowned and shamed to this day but I have heard of multitudes that revile them that make a jest and common practice of it Try whether you can make the Inhabitants of this City believe that the Nonconformists or Puritans are fornicators drunkards or perjured and that their accusers and haters are innocent men that hate them for such Crimes But it s possible that you may make men of other Countries or Ages believe it and believe that we wear Horns and have Cloven Feet and what you will but I fear not all your art or advantages on those that are acquainted with both sides But the misery is that faction ingageth men to associate only with their party where they hear reproaches of the unknown dissenters from whom they so estrange themselves that the Neighbours near them are as much unknown to them save by lying same as if they lived an hundred miles from them I remember Mr. Cressey once wrote to me that he turned from the Protestant Religion to the Roman because there was among us no spiritual Books of Devotion for Soul Elevations and affectionate Contemplation And I told him it was Gods just Judgment on him that lived so strange to his Neighbours because they are called Puritans and to their Writings which Shops and Libraries abound with had he read Bishop Halls Mr. Greenhams Mr. Ri. Rogers Mr. Io. Rogers Mr. Hildershams Mr. Boltons Mr. Perkins Mr. Downhams Mr. Reyners Dr. Sibbes c. yea or no better than my own the Saints Rest the Life of Faith the Divine Life the Christian Directory c. or had he read the Lives of Divines called Puritans or but such as two young men published partly by my self Ioseph Allen and Iohn Ianeway he would never have gone from the Protestants to the Papists because of our formality and want of an affectionate spiritual sort of devotion especially knowing what excess of formality is among the Papists and how much it is of the Clergies accusation of the Puritans that they are for too little form and too much pretence of spiritual devotion But if any called Religious or Puritans or Presbyterians be vicious I know no men that so heartily desire their punishment and ejection as those that are called by the same names I thank God that these twenty years while neither Wit Will nor Power hath been wanting against them I have scarce heard of two men if one that have been judged and proved guilty of any such immorality of all the ejected silenced Ministers in this Land I would I could say so of their Adversaries II. And now I must speak to the Accusers speeches of my self I thank you Sir that you feigned no worse against me if I am an Haeresiarcha why would not you vouchsafe to name that Heresie which I have owned I have given you large Field-room in near 80 Books and few men can so write as that a willing man may not find some words which he is able to call Heresie A little learning wit or honesty will serve for such an hereticating presumption 2. I never heard that Arminius was called an Arminian nor â—â—ther a Lutheran nor Bishop Laud a Laudian but if you be upon the knack of making Names you best know your ends and best know how to fit them to it 3. But seriously do you not know my Judgment will not about 80 Books inform you how then can I help it 4. No but you know not what Party I am of nor what to call me I am sorrier for you in this than for my self if you know not I will tell you I am a CHRISTIAN a MEER CHRISTIAN of no other Religion and the Church that I am of is the Christian Church and hath been visible where ever the Christian Religion and Church hath been visible But must you know what Sect or Paâ—â—y I am of I am against all Sects and dividing Parties But if any will call Meer Christians by the name of a Party because they take up with meer Christianity Creed and Scripture and will not be of any dividing or contentious Sect I am of that Party which is so against Parties If the Name CHRISTIAN be not enough call me a CATHOLICK CHRISTIAN not as that word signifieth an hereticating majority of Bishops but as it signifieth one that hath no Religion but that which by Christ and the Apostles was left to the Catholick Church or the Body of Jesus Christ on Earth
such Orders as were to continue to the end and none that came after them might change they being the Ordinances of the Holy Ghost in them 2. Temporarily pro re natâ to make convenient mutable Constitutions in matters left by the great Legislator to humane prudence to be determined according to his general regulating Laws In this last the Apostles have Successors but not in the former No other have their Gift and therefore not their Authority No men can be said to have an Office that giveth them Right to exercise abilities which they never had nor shall have § 4. Christ summed up all the Law in LOVE to God and Man and the works of Love and all the Gospel in Faith and Hope and Love by them kindled and exercised by the Spirit which he giveth them even by the Belief and Trust of his Merits Sacrifice Intercession and Promises and the prospect of the future Glory promised fortifying us to all holy duties of obedience and diligent seeking what he hath promised and to patient bearing of the Cross conquering the inordinate love of the world and flesh and present life and improving all our present sufferings and preparing for his coming again and for our change and entrance into our Masters joy § 5. Christ summed up the Essentials of Christianity in the Baptismal Covenant in which we give up our selves in Faith Hope and consenting Love to God the Father Son and Holy Ghost our Creator Redeemer and Sanctifier and in which God receiveth us in the Correlations as his own And all that are truly thus baptized are Christened and are to be esteemed and loved as Christians and to be received into Christian Communion in all Christian Churches where they come until by apostasie or impenitency in certain disobedience to the Laws of Christ in points necessary to Christian Communion they forfeit that priviledge Nor are men to deprive them of the great benefit thus given them by Christ on pretence of any wit or holiness or power to amend Christs terms and make the Church Doors narrower or tie men to themselves for worldly ends Yet must the Pastors still difference the weaker Christians from the stronger and labour to edifie the weak but not to cast them out of the Church § 6. The sacred Ministry is subordinate to Christ in his Teaching Governing and Priestly Office and thus essentiated by Christs own institution which man hath no power to change Therefore under Christ they must teach the Church by sacred Doctrine guide them by that and sacred Discipline called The power of the Keys that is of judging who is fit to enter by Baptism to continue to partake of the Communion to be suspended or cast out and to lead them in the publick Worship of God interceding in Prayer and speaking for them and administring to them the Sacraments or holy Seals of the Covenant of God § 7. The first part of the Ministers Oâ—â—ice is about the unbelieving world to convert them to the Faith of Christ and the second perfective part about the Churches Nor must it be thought that the first is done by them as meer private men § 8. As Satan fell by pride and overthrew man by tempting him to pride to become as Gods in Knowledge so Christ himself was to conquer the Prince of pride by humility and by the Cross by a life of suffering contemned by the blind and obstinate world making himself of no reputation despising the shame of suffering as a Malefactor a Traitor and Blasphemer And the bearing of the Cross was a principal part of his Precepts and Covenant to his Disciples without which they could not be his Followers And by Humility they were to follow the Captain of their Salvation in conquering the Prince of pride and in treading down the Enemie-world even the lust of the flesh the lust of the eyes and pride of life which are not of the Father but of the world § 9. Accordingly Christ taught his chief Disciples that if they were not so converted as to become as little children they could not enter into the Kingdom of Heaven Matth. 18. 3. His School receiveth not masterly Disciples but humble teachable Learners that become fools that they may be wise And when they were disputing and seeking which of them should be greatest he earnestly rebuked all such thoughts setting a little child before them telling them that the Princes of the Earth exercise authority and are called Benefactors or by big Names but with them it should not be so but he that would be the greatest must be servant ofâ— all Luk. 22. shewing them that it was not a worldly grandeur nor forcing power by the Sword which belongeth to Civil Magistrates which was to be exercised by the Pastors of the Church But that he that would be the Chiefest must be most excellent in Merit and most serviceable to all and get his honour and do his work by meriting the respect and love of Volunteers The Sword is the Magistrates who are also Christs Ministers for all Power is given him and he is Head over all things to the Church But they are eminently the Ministers of his Power but the Pastors and Teachers are most eminently Ministers of his Paternal and saving love and wisdom And by wisdom and love to do their work The Word preached and applied generally and particularly by the Keys is their Weapon or Arms and not the Sword The Bohemians therefore knew what they said when they seemed damnable Hereticks to the worldly Clergie that destroyed them when they placed their Cause in these four Articles 1. To have the whole Sacrament Bread and Wine 2. To have free leave for true Ministers to preach the word of God without unjust silencing of proud worldly men that cannot stand before the truth 3. To have Temporal Dominion or Government by the Sword and power over mens Bodies and Estates taken from the Clergie 4. To have gross sin suppressed by the lawful Magistrate by the Sword § 10. Had it been necessary to the Churches Union against Schism or Heresie for Christians to know that Peter or some one of his Apostles must be his Vicar-General and Head of his Church to whom all must obey who can believe that Christ would not only have silenced so necessary a point but also at a time when he was desired or called to decide it have only spoken so much against it to take down all such Expectations Yea we never read that Peter exercised any Authority or Jurisdictions over any other of the Apostles nor more than other Apostles did much less that ever he chose a Bishop to be Lord of the Church as his Successor Nay he himself seemeth to fore-see this mischief and therefore saith 1. Pet. 5. 1 2 3. The Elders which are among you I exhort who am also an Elder and a Witness of the Sufferings of Christ and also a Partaker of the Glory that shall be revealed These are his Dignities
Feed the Flock of God which is among you not out of your reach and hearing in a vast Diocess taking the oversight not by constraint but willingly and on willing men not for filthy lucre but of a ready wind neither as being Lords over Gods Heritage but being Examples to the Flock and when the chief Shepherd shall appear ye shall receive a Crown of Glory that fadeth not away § 11. Nothing is more certain than that the Church for above 300 years had no power of the Sword that is forcibly to meddle with and hurt mens Bodies or Estates except what the Apostles had by miracle And to this day no Protestants and not most Papists claim any such Power as of Divine Institution but only plead that the Secular Powers are bound by the Sword to destroy such as are judged Hereticks by the Bishops and to punish such as contemn the censures of the Church § 12. He that would see more for the Power of Princes vindicated from the Clergies Claim and Usurpation may find much in many old Treatises written for the Emperours against the Pope collected by Goldastus de Monarch and in Will. Barclay but much better in Bishop Bilson of Obedience and in Bishop Andrew's Tortura Torti and in Bishop Buckridge Roffensis of the Power of Kings and much in Spalatensis de Repub. § 13. The Vniversality of Christians is the Catholick Church of which Christ is the only Head or Soveraign but it is the duty of these to worship God in solemn Assemblies and to live in a holy Conversation together and to join in striving against sin and to help each other in the way to life therefore Societies united for these ends are called Particular Churches § 14. When the Apostles had converted a competent number of Christians they gather'd them into such Assemblies and as a Politick Society set over them such Ministers of Christ as are afore described to be their Guides § 15. These Officers are in Scripture called sometime Elders and sometimes Bishops to whom Deacons were added to serve them and the Church subordinately Dr. Hammond hath well described their Office in in his Annotat. which was to preach constantly in publick and private to administer both Sacraments to pray and praise God with the People to Catechize to visit and pray with the sick to comfort troubled Souls to admonish the unruly to reject the impenitent to restore the penitent to take care of the poor and in a word of all the Flock § 16. The Apostles set usually more than one of these Elders or Bishops in every Church not as if one might not rule the Flook where no more was necessary but according to their needs that the work might not be undone for want of Ministers § 17. They planted their Churches usually in Cities because Christians comparatively to the rest were few as Sects are among us and no where else usually enough for a Society and because the Neighbour-scattered Villages might best come to the Cities near them not but that it was lawful to plant Churches in the Country where there were enough to constitute them and sometimes they did so as by Clemens Roman ad Corinth by History appeareth § 18. Grotius thinketh that one City at first had divers Churches and Bishops and that they were gathered after the manner of the Synagogues and Dr. Hammond thinketh that for some time there were two Churches and Bishops in many Cities one of Jews and one of Gentiles and that in Rome Paul and Peter had two Churches whom Linus and Cletus did succeed till they were united in Clemens § 19. There is great evidence of History that a particular Church of the Apostles setling was essentially only a Company of Christians Pastors and People associated for personal holy communion and mutual help in holy Doctrine Worship Conversation and Order Therefore it never consisted of so few or so many or so distant as to be uncapable of such personal help and Communion But was ever distinguished as from accidental Meetings so from the Communion of many Churches or distant Christians which was held but by Delegates Synods of Pastors or Letters and not by personal help in presence Not that all these must needs always meet in the same place but that usually they did so or at due times at least and were no more nor more distant than could so meet Sometimes Persecution hindred them somtimes the Room might be too small Even Independent Churches among us sometimes meet in divers places and one Parish hath divers Chappels for the aged and weak that are unfit for travel § 20. Scotus began the opinion as Davenport Fr. a Santa Clara intimateth and Dion Petavius improved it and Dr. Hammond hath largely asserted it that the Apostles at first planted a single Bishop in each Church with one or more Deacons and that he had power in time to ordain Elders of a different Order Species or Office and that the word Elder and Bishop and Pastor in Scripture never signifie these subject Elders but the Bishops only and saith he there is no evidence that there were any of the subject sort of Presbyters in Scripture-times Which concession is very kindly accepted by the Presbyterians but they call for proof that ever these Bishops were authorised to make a new Species of Presbyters which were never made in Scripture-times and indeed they vehemently deny it and may well despair of such a proof § 21. But for my part I believe the foundation unproved that then there was but one Elder in a Church and think many Texts of Scripture fully prove the contrary But I join with Dr. Hammond in believing that in Scripture-times there was no particular Church that had more stated meetings for publick Communion than one For if there was so long but one Elder there could be but one such Assembly at once for they had no such Assemblies which were not guided by a Presbyter or Bishop in Doctrine Worship Sacraments and Discipline And they used to have the Eucharist every Lords day at least and often much more And one man can be at once but in one place § 22. I have elsewhere fully proved that the ancient Churches that had Bishops were no bigger than our Parishes and few a quarter so big as the greatest of them and consisted of no more than might have such present personal Communion as is before described the proofs are too large to be here recited Ignatius is the plainest who saith that this was the note of a Churches Unity that To every Church there was one Altar and one Bishop with his Fellow Presbyters and Deacons And elsewhere chargeth the Bishop to take account of his Flock whether they all come to Church even Servant-men and Maids Clemens Romanus before him intimateth the like mentioning even Country Bishops Martyr's Description of the Christian Assemblies plainly proveth it Tertullian's Description of them and many other passages in him prove it more fully He professeth that
Governours besides Magistrates but such as Philosophers in their Schools who were appointed to set up Holy Societies for Divine Doctrine Worship and Holy Living and to Guide them accordingly by Teaching Worship and Government by the Word forbidding them the Sword or Force they are said to have the Keys of the Church and the Kingdom of Heaven because as Grace is Glory in the seed the Church is Heaven in the seed and the Pastors were the Administrators of Sacraments and Church-priviledges and therefore the Judges who were fit for them who should be Baptized who should Communicate and in what rank and who should be denied these admonished or excluded and who should as far as belongeth to others be judged meet or unmeet for Heaven And so the Christian Societies were to be kept clean and not to be like the polluted World of Infidels And the Pastors had no other power to use but were to judge only those within and leave them without to Gods own judgment and to the Magistrate who was not to punish any one for not being in or of the Church or for departing from it which is a grievous punishment it self But Magistrates being then Heathens the Christians were hard put to it for the decision of their quarrels For the love of the world and selfishness were but imperfectly cured in them They went to Law before Heathen Judges with each other and this became a snare and a scandal to them S. Paul therefore childeth them for not ending differences by Christian Arbitrators among themselves as if there were none among them wise enough to Arbitrate Hereupon the Churches taking none to be wiser or trustier than their Pastors made them their Arbitrators and it became a censurable scandal for any to accuse a Church-member to a Magistrate and to have Suits at Law By this means the Bishop becoming a Stated Arbitrator thereby became the Governour of the Christians but with his Presbyters and not alone But because Bishops had no power of the sword to touch mens bodies or estates but only to suspend them from Church-Communion and Excommunicate them or impose penitential Confessions on them therefore they fitted their Canons which were the Bishops Agreements to this Governing use to keep Christians under their Government from the Magistrates And so they made Canons that a Fornicator or Adulterer should be so long or so long suspended and a Murderer so long and so of the rest § 36. And when Constantine turned Christian he had many reasons to confirm this Arbitrating Canonical power to the Christian Bishops by the Civil Sanction 1. Because he found them in possession of it as contracters by mutual consent and what could a Christian Prince do less than grant that to the Christians which they chose and had 2. Because the advancement and honour of the Teachers and Pastors he thought tended to the honour of their Religion and the success of their Doctrine upon the Heathens with whom they dwelled Grandure and Power much prevail with carnal minds 3. Because he had but few Magistrates at first that were Christians and none that so well knew the affairs of Christians as their own chosen Bishops And he feared lest the power of Heathen Magistrates over the Christians might injure and oppress them 4. He designed to draw the Heathens to Christianity by the honouring of Christians above them 5. And withal his interest lay most in their strength For they were the fastest part of his Souldiers and Subjects that for Conscience and their own Interrest rejoyced to advance and defend him to the utmost when he lost many of the Pagans and they were not of the spirit of the old Pretorian Souldiers that set up and pulled down Emperours at their pleasure Had Constantine faln the Christians had much faln with him and had the Christians been weakned he had been weakened They were become his strength And he fore saw not the evils that afterwards would follow Some must govern and there were then no wiser nor better men than the Bishops and Pastors of the Churches And their interest in the Christian people that chose them was greatest As now all differing parties of Christians among us Papists Presbyterians Independents Anabaptists would desire nothing as more conducing to their ends than that the King would put the greatest Power especially of Religion into the hands of those Teachers whom they esteem and follow even so was it with the Christians in the days of Constantine And hereupon Laws were made that none should compel Christians to answer in any Court of Justice saving before their own Bishops and so Bishops were made almost the sole Governours of the Christians § 37. By this means it is no wonder if multitudes of wicked men flock'd into the Church and defiled and dishonoured it For the Murderer that was to be hanged if he were no Christian was but to be kept from the Sacrament if he were a Christian and do some confessing penance which was little to hanging or other death And so proportionably of other Crimes Bad Christians by this device were multiplyed The Emperour also being a Christian worldly men are mostly of the Religion of the Prince or highest powers § 38. And no man that can gather an effect from an effectual cause could doubt if neither Nazianzen or any Historian had told it him but that proud and worldly men would strive then to be Bishops and use all possible diligence to obtain so great preferment Who of them is it that would not have Command and Honour and Wealth if he can get it While the great invitation to the sacred Ministry was the winning and edifying of Souls those that most valued Souls desired it yet desired it to be kept from such Poverty and Persecution as exposed them to hinderance and contempt But when Riches Reputation and Dominion were the Baits who knoweth not what sort of Appetites would be the keenest Christ telleth us how hardly Rich men are good and come to Heaven Therefore when Bishops must be all Great and Rich either Christ must be deceived or it must be as hard for them to be honest Christians as for a◠Camel to go through the Needles eye And thus Venenum funditur in Ecclesiam § 39. The World being thus brought into the Church without the cure of the worldly mind and the Guides being so strongly tempted to be the very worst no wonder if the Worldly Spirit now too much rule the Church and if those that are yet of the same Spirit approve plead and strive for what they love and despise the business of the Cross and Christian Humility and Simplicity to this day And if Bishops have done much of their work accordingly ever since Constantine and much before it hath been the Devils Work to carry on his War against Christ and Piety under Christ's own name and the pretence of Piety as an Angel of Light and Righteousness and Unity and to set up Pastors over the Church
Church-History OF THE GOVERNMENT OF BISHOPS AND THEIR COUNCILS ABBREVIATED Including the chief part of the Government of Christian Princes and POPES and a true account of the most troubling Controversies and Heresies till the REFORMATION Written for the use especially of them I. Who are ignorant or misinformed of the state of the Antient Churches II. Who cannot read many and great Volumes III. Who think that the Universal Church must have one Visible Soveraign Personal or Collective Pope or General Councils IV Who would know whether Patriarchs Diocesans and their Councils have been or must be the cure of Heresies and Schismes V. Who would know the truth about the great Heresies which have divided the Christian World especially the Donatists Novatians Arrians Macedonians Nestorians Eutychians Monothelites c. By RICHARD BAXTER a Hater of false History LONDON Printed by B. Griffin for Thomas Simmons at the Princes Arms in Ludgate-Street MDCLXXX THE PREFACE THE great usefulness of History needs not many words to prove it seeing natural inclination it self is so much for it and reason and experience tell men that they cannot spare it as to Natural Civil or Religious use God himself hath highly commended it to us by writing the Sacred Scriptures so much Historically yea and making some of it part of the necessary Articles of our Creed Children that yet understand not the Doctrinal part of the Bible do quickly take delight in the Historical part which prepareth them for the rest Ignorant and ungodly persons that have no true sense of Sacred Doctrine can yet understand and with lesse aversness and weariness read the history Melancholy and sad persons who can hardly bear long Doctrinal studies are often eased and recreated with useful History Man is a part of the Vniverse and every man is a part of the world of mankind and therefore thinketh the case of the whole to be much of his concerne And were not narrow selfishnes much of our Pravity we should take the universal and publick good and Gods Love to it and Pleasedness and Glory in it to be much more our end and the object of our desire and delight than any personal felicity of our own It is a Monster of inhumanity in the Doctrine of the Sadducees Spinosa Hobbes and their bruitish followers that they set up Individual self interest as a mans chiefest end and object of rational Love and desire and own no Good but that which Relatively is Good to me that is either my personal life and pleasure as the end or other things as a means thereto Though Grace only savingly cure this base inhumane maladie yet common reason beareth witness against it and only sense and reason captivated by sense do patronize it Put not the question to a reasonable man though wicked what he can do or doth But what in reason he should do and he cannot deny but that he should think of a more excellent person at the Indies that never will do anything for him as more amiable than himself much more many thousands such And as Goodness and Amiableness are all one so that which is best should be loved best And he that would not die to save his Country is worse than sober Heathens were And he that would not rather be annihilated than all or halfe the world should be annihilated is so basely selfish that I should sooner believe that analogical Reason ruleth some bruites than that true Reason determineth this mans choice Spinosa taketh the Knowledge of our Union with Universal nature which he calleth God to be mans perfection and his chief good in comparison of which sensual Pleasure Riches and Honour are but troubles further then they are a meanes hereto And if he had better known God as the Creator and Governour and end of the material Vniverse which he took to be God and had joyned holy Uniteing Joyful Love to the Universe and specially to the Heavenly Society and above them all to God himself unto this Knowledge and extended it to the perpetuity of an Immortal state he had been happily in the right which missing he became a pernicious seducer of himself and others But thus nature and Grace do loudly tell us that each part should be greatly concerned for the whole and therefore every one should desire to know as much of the whole as he is capable and as tendeth to his duty and delight And how small a parcel of Time or Men or Actions are present or in our daies How little knoweth he that knoweth no more than he hath lived to see What Religion can he have who knoweth not the History of Creation Redemption or the giving of the Holy Ghost or the planting and propagating the Church and also what will be when this life is ended But it is not all History that is needful or useful to us There are many things done which we are not concerned to be acquainted with But the History of the Church of the propagation of the Christian faith and what the Doctrine was that was then received and how it was practised promoted and defended and how it was corrupted invaded and persecuted is of so great use to posterity that next to the Scripture and the illumination of Gods Spirit I remember nothing more needful to be known When Philip Nerius set up his Oratorian exercises at Rome as to win the people they found it necessary to use large affectionate extemporate prayers and expositions and Sermâ—â—s so the next thing found necessary was to bestow constantly one exercise in opening Church-History to the people And this did both entice their attentions by delight and also by fitting reports more to the Papal interest than to the truth did greatly bewitch them into a confident beliefe that the Papal sect was all the true Church and all other Christians were but sectaries and branches broken off and withered and therefore to be burned here and hereafter abusing Joh. 15. 5. c. And I have oft thought that the right use of such an Historical exercise in an ordinary congregation would be of great use to the ignorant vulgar and unlearned zealous sort of Christians For I find that for want of the knowledge of Church-History and how things have gone before us in all former times many errours and sins are kept up that else would more easily be forsaken To instance in some few I. As it was the craft of Baronius who performed that exercise in Nerius his Conventicles at Rome to write afterward his Church-History in Latin so voluminously that few but the Clergie byassed by interest would read it and so the Clergy might be the credited reporters of all to the vulgar so to this day the Papist-Priests contrive to be the Masters and reporters of Church-History as well as of unwritten Tradition and to keep the Laity so far ignorant of it that when they tell men confident stories for their advantage few or none may be able to contradict them and so their report
they took not the Lord's Supper save only from the hand of the Bishop Antistitis manu who could give it but to one Assembly at once Many Canons also fully shew it elsewhere cited some appoint all the people to joyn with the Bishop on the great Festivals of the year even above 300 years after Christ. The Custom also of choosing Bishops sheweth it where all the people met and chose him Yea in Cyprian's time the Exercise of Discipline proveth it when even in such great Churches as Carthage it was done in the presence of the people and with their consent § 23. The only Churches in the World that for about 200 years after Christ if not more had more than one ordinary Assembly for Church-Communion though but like our Parish Chappels were Rome and Alexandria as far as I can learn in any History For that at Ierusalem for all the numbers had no more stated Members than oft met in one place excepting occasional absents And I find no reason to believe that ever these two the chief Cities of the Empire had so long more than some London Parishes which have above sixty thousand souls as is supposed no nor near if half so many And because elsewhere I have only excepted these two Cities I will yet add somewhat to shew that even there the case was not as many now imagine § 24. Cornelius in an Epistle to Fabius of Antioch in Euseb. Hist. l. c. 43. alias 42. saith that in the Church of Rome were 46 Presbyters 7 Deacons and of other Officers 94. that is 42 Acolites 52 Exorcists and Readers with Porters Widows and impotent persons above 1050 souls who are all relieved by the grace and goodness of Almighty God c. This is the chief testimony in the third Age to prove that this one Church had more than could either meet in one place or hold personal Communion § 25. But let it be considered 1. That partly for the honour of qualified persons and partly that all the Church might in season have the help of all mens gifts they were so far in the ancient Churches from having so few as Dr. Hammond and Petavius imagine that they multiplied Officers and dignified and so employed a great part of the Church that had useful gifts Insomuch that a most credible Witness shortly after even Gregory Nazianzen saith Orat. 1. Pag. 45. that by the intrusion of men for dignity and maintenance The Church-Rulers were almost more than the Subjects The words are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Of others I am ashamed who when they are no better than others and I wish they were not much worse thrust themselves upon the most holy Mystories as we say with unwashen hands and prophane minds and before they are worthy to approach to holy things ambitiously enter the Vestry it self or Chancell and press and thrust themselves about the holy Table as if they judged this Order not to be an example of Virtue but an occasion and help of getting maintenance and not to be an Office lyable to give Account but a Command in which they may be free from Censure Who being miserable or pitiful persons as to Piety and unhappy as to Splendour that is low in the World and Parts do now in number almost exceed those whom they are over or are to govern This would make one suspect that there were then many Ruling Elders that preach'd not but it 's plain they had an Office about the Sacraments Therefore this Evil increasing and getting strength with time it seems to me that they will have none under them to rule or guide but that all will turn Teachers and will Prophesie instead as was promised by God of being all taught of God So that of old the History and Parable said Saul also is among the Prophets For there neither now is nor ever was so great plenty of any other thing as there is now of these frequent Shames and Criminals for other things as they have their flourishing time have also their decay And though to repress their impetuousness be a work above my strength yet certainly to hate it and be ashamed is not the least part of Piety Judge by this what numbers of Officers of Clergy-men then the Church had § 26. Next for the Poor consider their proportions in and by other Churches Chrysost. in Matth. Edit Savil. p. 421. supposeth the Poor of the Church of Antioch whence he came to have been about the tenth part and dividing the City into three Ranks he accounts a tenth part rich and a tenth part poor and the rest of a middle Estate between both Now in Chrysostom's time the Church was so high being owned by the greatest Emperours as we may well suppose almost all or most of the rich came in Whereas at Rome in the time of Cornelius it being under reproach and cruel persecution we may well conclude that most of the rich stood out and they might say with Paul not many Great not many Noble are called few rich men comparatively receiving the Gospel it 's most likely that the poor were then far more than a tenth part if not the greater part of the Church But suppose them a tenth part which is not probable the whole Church of Rome then would be but 10500 Souls which is about the fifth part or sixth as big as Martins Parish and about a quarter as big as Stepney Parish and about a third or fourth part as big as Giles Cripplegate Parish and not half so big as Giles in the Fields and other Parishes Moreover Chrysostome Hom. 11. in Act. p. 674. computes the poor at Constantinople to be about half as many as all the other Christians and this in the most flourishing City and Age And by this measure they would yet fall further short It may be you will say that these were not the poorest of all that were kept by the Church But it 's known that ever since the times of extraordinary Community the Churches relieved all the needy according to the several degrees of their wants and these were such as were in want though not equally and they are such poor as were distinguished not only from the Rich but also from the middle sort and such as the Church took care to relieve § 27. And as for Alexandria the greatest City of the Empire next Rome as Iosephus saith de bello Iud. l. 5. c. ult it is certain that in the third Century the Christians had more Meeting Places for Divine Worship than one and in the fourth Century had many Epiphanius nameth divers Haeres 69. p. 728. Arius having one wherein he preached had that advantage to propogate his Heresie But all know that the building of Temples began after Emperours were Christians and the fair Churches which Eusebius saith they had in Dioclesians time till he destroyed them were but like our Tabernacles or private Churches and grew to Number and Ornament but a little before as
Eusebius intimateth It was a good while before there were two Churches even in Constantinople Indeed it is noted as a singularity that they had two Churches But they mistake that apply that to two Meeting Places which is spoken of two Societies because in Meletius time they had two Bishops § 28. But yet let us see how big the Christian Church was in this great City even when it had many Chapels even in Athanasius time in the fourth Century Tom. 1. Ed. Commel p. 531. in his Apology to Constant. you may find in words too large to be all transcribed that he being accused for assembling the People in the Great Church maketh this part of his Defence The confluence of the People at the Easter Solemnity was so great that if they had met in several Assemblies or by parties the other Churches were so narrow or small that they would have been in danger of suffering by the Crowd nor would the universal Harmony and Concord of the People have been so visible and efficacious if they had met in Parcels Therefore he concludeth it better for the whole Multitude to meet in that great Church being a place large enough to receive them altogether and to have a concurrence of the People all with one Voice in Symphony For if according to Christ's promise where two shall agree of any thing it shall be done for them how prevalent will be the One-voice of so numerous a People assembled together and saying Amen to God Who therefore would not admire Who would not count it a happiness to see so great a People met together in one place And how did the People rejoyce to see one another whereas formerly they assembled in several places Thus plainly Athanasius I do not hence gather that every Man Woman and Child was present In our Parish Churches that hold the Assembly some are there and usually some stay at home and come by turns But it seemeth hence plain that even in Alexandria the Christians were no more than that the main Body of them at great Solemnities could meet and hear in one Assembly Which in many of our Parishes they cannot do § 29. Add to this that Athanasius tells them that his Predecessor Alexander did as much as he had done on such occasions assembling their whole Multitude in one Church before it was dedicated pag. 532. § 30. I add a further Argument from the City it self as offered me also while I was writing this by a learned Friend in his own Words This City was by Strabo's description of it like a Souldiers Coat whose length at either side was almost thirty furlongs its breadth at either end seven or eight Furlongs Geogr. li. 17. p. 546. So the whole compass will be less than ten Miles A third or fourth part of this was taken up with publick Buildings Temples and Royal Palaces ibid. Thus is two miles and a half or three and a quarter taken up I take this to be that Region of the City which Epiphanius calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where he tells us was the famous Library of Ptolomy Philadelphus and speaks of it in his time as destitute of Inhabitants de ponder mensiâ—r n. 9. p. 166. A great part of the City was assigned to the Jews So Strabo indefinitely as Josephus quotes him Antiqu. Jud. l. 14. c. 12. Others tell us more puncutally that their share was two of the five Divisions Vshers Annals Lat. p. 859. Though many of them had their habitations in the other Divisions yet they had two fifth parts intire to themselves And this is I suppose the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which Josephus saith the Successours of Alexander set apart for them Bell. Jud. l. 2. c. 21. Thus we see how six or seven miles of the ten are disposed of The greatest part of the Citizens as at Rome and other Cities is the beginning of the fourth Age were Heathens Else Antonius had wronged their City who in Athanasius time is brought in thus exclaiming by Jerome Vit. Paul p. 243. Civitas meretrix in quam totius orbis Daemonia confluxere c. A charge thus formed supposeth the prevailing Party to be guilty But let us suppose them equal and their proportion half of the five or four miles remaining Let the rest be divided between the Orthodox and the Arians and Novatians and other sorts And if we be just a large part will fall to the share of Hereticks and Sectaries For not to mention others the Novations had several Churches and a Bishop there till Cyrils time Vid. Socrat. Hist. l. 7. c. 7. The Arians were a great part of those that professed Christianity Sozom. Hist. li. 1. c. 14. And if we may judg of the Followers by the Leaders no less than half For whereas there were nineteen Presbyters and Deacons in that Church Theodor. Hist. li. 4. c. 20. Twelve was the number of their Presbyters by their ancient Constitution and seven of their Deacons as appears by Eutychius here and at Rome and elsewhere six Presbyters with Arius and five Deacons fell off from the Catholicks Sozom. Hist. li. 1. c. 14. But let the Arians be much fewer yet will not the proportion of the Catholick Bishops part in this City be more than that of a small Town one of eight or twelve Furlongs in compass And so the number of Christians on this account will be no more than might well meet for Worship in one place If the Reader will peruse Epiphanius History of the Fraction between Alexander and the Followers of Meletius in Alexandria how Alexander was impatient with their separate Meetings when Meletius was dead though till then two Bishops and Churches lived quietly in one City because they came not to his Church with the rest of the story he will easily see what a Church was then even in Alexandria Thus you see the difference of a just computation and the hasty accounts of men that judg of Places and Persons as they are in their misled imaginations and not as they were indeed and truth Mr. Dodwell in a Letter to me layeth so much on the number of the Officers and Poor before mentioned as if it proved undoubtedly a Diocesane Church when the conclusion ariseth from an erroneous comparing their Cities and times with ours and their Presbyters with our Parish-Priests and Curats And when all 's done a grand Patriarchal Church is not the measure of a Diocesane or of every Bishops Church their Presbyters had other work than our Curates have They met in the same Assembly with the Bishop and sate in a Semicircle on each side him and were as a Colledge of Governours to rule one Church and that only by the Word applyed by the Keys and not by the Sword till Cyril first usurped it for which by Historians he is noted If our times tempt you to marvel how so many Officers or Clerks were maintained by so few People Church-History affordeth you matter enough to resolve your doubt
§ 31. But if these two great Cities had indeed had yet more Altars and Churches Orbis major est Vrbe saith Hierome Two singular Cities may not over-weigh the contrary case of all the Churches If any other had been like them it would have been Antioch the third Patriarchate when as in Ignatius time as is aforesaid the Churches unity there and elsewhere was notified by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 One Altar or Altar-place and One Bishop with his Presbyters and Deacons And hence came it to be the note of a Schism to set up Altare contra Altare because one Bishop and Church had but one Altar Mr. Mede no injudicious nor Factions man saw this and asserteth it from the plain words of Ignatius § 32. How the case came to be altered it is easie to know But whether it was well or ill done is all the controversie or the chief I confess there want not some that think that the Apostles had their several assigned Provinces and that they left them to twelve Successours and this is the foundation of Patriarchal or Provincial Churches with such unproved Dreams 1. We doubt not but that the Apostles wisely distributed their Labours But we believe not that they divided the Countreys into their several Dioceses or Provinces nor that two of them e. g Iohn and Paul Peter and Paul Iames and other Apostles might not and did not do the work of an Apostle in the same Country and City Much less do we believe that one of them e. g. Iames at Ierusalem whether an Apostle or not I contend not was a Bishop over the Apostles when they resided there 2. Nor do we believe that they left any such divided Provinces to their Successors If they had it 's strange that we had not twelve or thirteen Patriarchal or Provincial Churches hence noted Which were they and how came they so soon to be forgotten and unknown And why had we first but three Patriarchs and one of those Alexandria accounting from no Apostle but from S. Mark and the other two reckoning from one and the same Apostle save that Rome reckoned from two at once Peter and Paul when as one City must say they have but one Bishop § 33. The case is known that 1. When Christians so multiplyed that one Assembly would not serve but they became enough for many the Bishops greatness and wealth increasing with the People they continued them all under their own Government and so took them all to be their Chapels setling divers Altars but not divers Bishops in one Church 2. And herewith their work also by degrees was much changed and they that at first were most employed in Guiding the whole Church in Gods publick worship and exercised present discipline before them and were the sole usual Preachers to them all the rest of the Elders Preaching but when the Bishop could not or bid them did after become distant Judges and their Government by degrees degenerated to a similitude of Civil Magistracy 3. And then they set up the old exploded question which of them should be the chief or greatest And then they that had the greatest Cities being the richest and greatest Bishops in interest because of the greatness and riches of their Flocks they got the Church Government to be distributed much like the Roman Civil Government within that Empire And where the Civil Magistrate had most and largest command they gave the Ecclesiastical Bishop the like And so they set up the Bishops of the three chief Cities as Patriarchs Rome being the first because it was the great Imperial Seat as the Chalcedon Council giveth the true reason Afterwards Constantinople and Ierusalem being added they turned them into five And Carthage and other places not called Patriarchal Seats had exempt peculiar Jurisdictions with a power near to Patriarchs And the rest of the Bishops strove much for precedency and got as large Territories as they could and as numerous Flocks and many Parishes though still the name Paroeciae was used for the whole Episcopal Church when it was turned into a Diocess § 34. I conceive that this Change of One Altar into a Diocesane Church of many Altars and Parishes was not well done but is the thing that hath confounded the Christian World and that they ought to have increased the number of Churches as the number of Christians did increase as the Bees swarm into another Hive My Reasons are 1. Christ and the Holy Ghost in the Apostles having setled a Church Species and Order like that of the Synagogues and not like that of the Temple no man ought to have changed that Form Because they can prove no power to do it and because it accuseth the Institution of Christ and the Holy Ghost of insufficiency or errour which must so soon be altered by them Perfective addition as an Infant groweth up to Manhood we deny not But who gave them power to abrogate the very Specices of the first Instituted Churches That the Species is altered is certainly proved by the different uses and Termini of the Relation For a Church of the first Institution was a Society joyned for personal Communion in Doctrine Worship and holy living But a Diocess consisting of many score or hundred Parishes that never see or know or come near one another are uncapable of any such present personal Communion and have none but Mental and by Officers or Delegates 2. By this means all the Parish-Churches being turned into Chapels and un-Churched are all robbed of their Right seeing each one ought to have a Bishop and Presbyters and the benefit of that Office and Order which is now denied them and many hundred such Parishes turned into Chapels have no Bishop to themselves but one among them all to the Diocess 3. Because by this means true Discipline is become impossible and unpracticable by the distance and multitude of the people and the distance and paucity of Bishops What Christ commandeth Mat. 18. being as impossible to be done in many hundred Parishes by one Bishop and his Consistory as the Discipline of so many hundred Schools by one School-master though each School have an Usher or the care of many hundred Hospitals by one Physician perhaps at twenty or forty or eighty or an hundred miles distance 4. Because it altereth the antient Office of a Bishop and of a Presbyter and setteth new ones in the stead As a Bishop was the Bishop of one Church so a Presbyter was his Assistant Ejusdem Ordinis in the Government of the Church who now is turned into a meer Usher or Worshipping-Teacher or Chaplain 5. Because it certainly divideth the Churches For Christians would unite in a Divine Institution and the exercise of true Discipline that will never unite in a humane Policy which abrogateth the Divine and certainly destroyeth commanded necessary Discipline § 35. The very work also of the Bishop and so the Office came thus to be changed Christ having appointed no other Church
of Christ that hate the Doctrine and Life and Cross of Christ that by pleading for Godliness and Concord may be the effectual Enemies of both and may fight against Christ in his own Livery under his Colours and with his own Arms. Whose God is their Belly who glory in their shame who mind earthly things being Enemies to the Cross of Christ The History of whom you will find in the following part of this Treatise § 40. But here I must above all remember the Reader that he is not for this Corruption of the Clergy and Government of the Church to think that the Church here ceased to be a true Church or that the Ministry was lost or that it became unlawful to hold Communion with any such Churches much less to think hardly of Christianity it self as if it were no better than false Religions because so many of its Pastors were so bad None of God's Counsels were frustrate by mans sin None of his Promises to his Church have failed For all this Christ is the Saviour of the World the Prince of Righteousness and Peace that came to destroy the Works of the Devil and to save his people from their Sins and all that are given him of the Father shall come to him and he will cast none of them out nor shall any take them out of his hands § 41. I. Let it be still remembred that as the Chronicles of Kingdoms mention only the publick Actions of Princes and great Men but name not the poor and private sort so also our Church-History of Councils and publick things say little of godly private Christians but of Patriarchs and great Prelates who yet are themselves but a very small part of the Christian World II. Note also that every Bishop had many Presbyters whose work was not to strive for superiority nor trouble the world in Councils where usually they came not and so had not a quarter of the temptations that the Bishops had And though we find mention sometimes of the Presbyters also that were naught yet the number so reproved and proved bad is not proportionable to the number of Prelates compared among themselves that miscarried in Councils The Presbyters that staid at home and followed their work in private with the Flock and came not on the Stage in publick affairs kept up the substance and practice of Religion III. And the private Christians had yet less temptation and were not so overwhelmed with worldly things nor carryed away by pride and ambition and covetousness as the ruling party were IV. And the Monks and other retired Christians that saw the Prelates sin and sâ—ares though many of them had their failings too yet no doubt kept up much serious piety and a holy life V. And no doubt but very many of the Bishops themselves were humble holy faithful men that grieved for the miscarriages of the rest Though such excellent persons as Gregory Neocesareae Gregory Nazianzen Gregory Nyssen Basil Chrysostome Augustine Hillary Prosper Fulgentius c. were not very common no doubt but there were many that wrote not Books nor came so much into the notice of the world but avoided contentious and factious Stirs that quietly and honestly conducted the Flocks in the ways of piety love and justice And some of them as S. Martin separated from the Councils and Communion of the prevailing turbulent sort of the Prelates to signifie their disowning of their sins VI. And oft times when the Prelates were at the worst God raised up some very Godly Princes that maintained Religion more than the Clergy and were an honour to it when the Bishops dishonoured it VII And it is not to be contemned that much piety was kept up among great numbers of Christians whom for some mistake the rest reviled and condemned as Schismaticks or Hereticks Little know we how many holy souls were among those that are in Epiphanius Catalogue Of the Audians and some others he seemeth to confess as much himself The Novatians were tolerated in almost all the Empire and had their Churches and Bishops having the testimony of the Orthodox that they were usually of sound faith and upright lives and stricter than other Christians were And God pardoneth the infirmity of a small mistake in judgment when men are sincerely addicted to his service Now and then a cruel Prelate did prosecute them but so did not the gentler sort as Atticus Proclus c. at Constantinople c. nor the Emperours themselves save when so instigated VIII And though the Churches in the Roman Empire kept up this grandure of Patriarchs Metropolitans and rich Prelates that after over-topped Kings it was not so in other parts of the Christian world but the Clergy lived more humbly and quietly The Scots under Columbanâ—s and their other Presbyters long lived in great piety without any Bishops And when the Scots Presbyters Finan Aidan c. ordained Bishops in Northumberland they were commonly humble holy men like themselves And both Scots and Britains so much misliked the Romane-grandure and way that when Augustine the Monk came in they would not subject themselves to the Pope or any Foreign Prelates nor so much as eat and drink with the Missionaries And the like we may say of some other Extra-imperial Churches The Spaniards themselves not only while Arian Goths of whom see the testimony of Salvian to the shame of the Orthodox but after Recaredus days for many ages lived in great quietness while Italy France and Germany were employed in Hereticating Cursing Excommunicating or bloudy Wars The great Empire of Aâ—assia as the crediblest History saith never had Bishops to this day but only one called the Aâ—uâ—â— while the whole Clergy are exercised though in too much ignorance in their Priestly Office Brocardus that lived at Ierusalem testifieth that those Eastern Christians called by the Papists Nestorians Iacobites Eutychians were commonly plain honest Religious people free from Heresie and of better lives than even the Religious of the Church of Rome and that there were not worse men at Ierusalem than the Romaâ— Catholicks The Armenians have many Bishops and one chief but live though too ignorantly and superstitiously yet in great austerity of life IX In all ages since Prelacy swelled to the corruption of the Churches and annoyance of the Peace of Kings and Kingdoms there have been still a great number of pious lamenters of the Corruptions of the Church that have groaned and prayed for reformation Insomuch that Dr. Field maintaineth that even in the Church of Rome there have been still considerable numbers of Doctors that owned truth and piety and misliked the Papal usurpations and errours The Waldenses and Albigenses exceeding numerous said they had continued from the Apostles and so from the days of Sylvester or Constantine had dissented from the Roman pride and corruptions And God hath made the Protestant Churches since the Reformation as his Vineyard where truth and piety have prospered though Satan hath been still at work
Shepherd and the Bishop of our Souls 5. That he hath used them to enlarge confirm preserve and edefie his Church to this day 6. That he maketh the best of them to be the best of men 7. That he putteth into the hearts of all good Christians a special love and honour of them 8. That he useth even the worser sort to do good while they do hurt especially some of them 9. That Satan striveth so hard to corrupt them and get them on his side 10. That Religion ordinarily dyeth away or decayeth when they fail and prove unable and unfaithful 11. That Christ commandeth men so much to hear receive and obey them and hath committed his Word and Keys to them as his Stewards 12. And hath promised them a special reward for their faithfulness and commanded all to pray for them and their preservation and success And the nature of the things tells us that as knowledge in lower things is not propagated to mankind but by Teachers man being not born wise so much less is heavenly wisdom And therefore it is that God is so regardful of the due qualification of Ministers that they be not blind guides nor novices nor proud nor careless sluggards nor self-seeking worldlings but skilful in the word of truth and lovers of God and the souls of men and zealous and diligent unwearied and patient in their holy work And when they prove bad he maketh them most contemptible and punisheth them more than other men the corruption of the best making them the worst § 48. Therefore let us make a right use of the pride and corruption of the Clergy to desire and pray for better and to avoid our selves the Sin which is so bad in them and to labour after that rooted Wisdome and Holiness in our selves that we may stand though our Teachers fall before us Let every man prove his own Work and so he shall have rejoicing in himself and not in others only Gal. 6. But let us not hence question the Gospel or dishonour the Church and Ministry no not any further separate from the Faulty than they separate from Christ or than God alloweth us and necessity requireth As we must not despise the needful helps of our Salvation nor equal dumb or wicked men with the able faithful Ministers of Christ on pretence of honouring the Office so neither must we deny the good that is in any nor despise the Office for the Persons Faults § 49. Especially let us take heed that we fall not into that pernicious Snare that hath entangled the Quakers and other Schismaticks of these times who on pretence of the faults of the Ministers set against the best with greatest fury because the best do most resist them and that revile them with false and railing language the same that Drunkards and Malignants use yea worse than the prophanest of the Vulgar even because they take Tythes and necessary Maintenance charging them with odious covetousness calling them Hirelings deceivers and what not Undoubtedly this Spirit is not of God that is so contrary to his Word his Grace and his Interest in the World What would become of the Church and Gospel if this malignant Spirit should prevail to extirpate even the best of all the Ministry Would the Devil and the Churches Enemies desire any more The very same Men that the Prelates have silenced near 2000 in England these fifteen or sixteen years together are they that the Quakers most virulently before reviled and most furiously opposed § 50. Nor will the Clergies corruption allow either unqualified or uncalled Men to thrust themselves into the Sacred Office as if they were the Men that can do better and must mend all that is amiss Such have been tryed in Licentious Times and proved some of them to do more hurt than the very Drunkards or the ignorant sort of Ministers that did but read the holy Scriptures Pride is too often the reprehender of other Mens Faults and Imperfections and would make other Mens Names but a stepping-stone to their own aspiring Folly As many that have cryed out against bad Popes and Prelates that they might get into the places have been as bad themselves when they have their Will No wonder if it be so with the proud revilers of the Ministry § 51. There is need therefore of much Wisdome and holy care that we here avoid the two extreams that we grow not indifferent who are our Pastors nor contract the Guilt of Church-corruption but mourn for the reproach of the solemn Assemblies and do our best for true and needful Reformation that the Gospel fail not and Souls be not quietly left to Satan nor the Church grow like the Infidel World and yet that we neither invade nor dishonour the sacred Office nor needlesly open the nakedness of the Persons nor do any thing that may hinder their just endeavours and success we must speak evil of no man either falsly or unnecessarily § 52. I thought all this premonition necessary that you make not an ill use of the following History and become not guilty of diabolism or false accusing of the Brethren or dishonouring the Church And that as God hath in Scripture recorded the Sins of the ungodly and the effects of Pride and of malignity and Christ hath foretold us that Wolves shall enter and devour the Flock and by their Fruits of devouring and pricking as Thorns and Thistles we shall know them and the Apostles prophecied of them I take it to be my duty to give you an Abstract of the History of Papal and aspiring Prelacy usurping and schismatical and tyrannical Councils as knowing of how great use it is to all to know the true History of the Church both as to good and evil § 53. Yea Bishops and Councils must not be worse thought of than they deserve no more than Presbyters because of such abuses as I recite The best things are abused even Preaching Writing Scripture and Reason it self and yet are not to be rejected or dishonoured There is an Episcopacy whose very Constitution is a Crime and there is another sort which seemeth to me a thing convenient lawful and indifferent and there is a sort which I cannot deny to be of Divine Right § 54. That which I take to be it self a Crime is such as is aforementioned which in its very constitution over-throweth the Office Church and Discipline which Christ by himself and his Spirit in his Apostles instituted such I take to be that Diocesane kind which hath only one Bishop over many score or hundred fixed Parochial Assemblies by which 1. Parishes are made by them no Churches as having no Ruling Pastors that have the Power of Judging whom to Baptize or admit to Communion or refuse but only are Chapels having preaching Gurates 2. All the first Order of Bishops in single Churches are deposed as if the Bishop of Antioch should have put down a 1000 Bishops about him and made himself the sole Bishop of their
Churches 3. The Office of Presbyters is changed into semi-Presbyters 4. Discipline is made impossible as it is for one General without inferiour Captains to Rule an Army But of this before § 55. Much more doth this become unlawful 1. when deposing all the Presbyters from Government by the Keyes of Discipline they put the same Keyes even the Power of decâ—etive Excommunication and Absolution into the hands of Laymen called Chancellours and set up Courts liker to the Civil than Ecclesiastical 2. And when they oblige the Magistrate to execute their Decrees by the Sword be they just or unjust and to lay Men in Goals and ruine them meerly because they are Excommunicated by Bishops or Chancellours or Officials or such others and are not reconciled And when they threaten Princes and Magistrates with Excommunication if not Deposition if they do but Communicate with those that the Bishop hath Excommunicated 3. Or when they arrogate the power of the Sword themselves as Socrates saith Cyril did Or without necessity joyn in one person the Office of Priesthood and Magistracy when one is more than they can perform aright § 56. And it becometh much worse by the tyrannical abuse when being unable and unwilling to exercise true Discipline on so many hundred Parishes they have multitudes of Atheists Infidels gross ignorants and wicked livers in Church-Communion yea compel all in the Parishes to Communicate on pain of Imprisonment and ruine and turn their censures cruelly against godly persons that dare not obey them in all their Formalities Ceremonies and Impositions for fear of siâ—â—ing against God And when conniving at ignorant ungodly Priests that do but obey them they silence and ruine the most faithful able Teachers that obey not all their imposing Canons and swear not and subscribe not what they bid them § 57. Undoubtedly Satan hath found it his most successful way to fight against Christ in Christs own name and to set up Ministers as the Ministers of Christ to speak indirectly against the Doctrine Servants and interest of Christ and as Ministers of Light and righteousness and to fight against Church-Government Order Discipline and Unity by the pretences of Church Government Order Discipline and Unity and to cry down Schism to promote Schism and to depress Believers by crying up Faith and Orthodoxness and crying down Heresie and Errour Yea to plead God's Name and Word against himself and to set up Sin by accusing Truth and Duty as Sin § 58. II. That which I take for Lawful Indifferent Episcopacy is such as Hierome saith was introduced for the avoiding of divisions though it was not from the beginning When among many Elders in every single Church one of most wisdom and gravity is made their President yea without whom no Ordinations or great matters shall be done The Churches began this so early and received it so universally and without any considerable dissent or opposition even before Emperours became Christians that I dare not be one that shall set against it or dishonour such Episcopacy § 59. Yea if where â—â—t men are wanting to make Magistrates the King shall make Bishops Magistrates and joyn two Offices together laying no more work on them than will consist with their Ecclesiastick work though this will have inconveniencies I shall not be one that shall dishonour such or disobey them § 60. III. The Episcopacy which I dare not say is not of Gods institution besides that each Pastor is Episcopus Grâ—gis is that which succeedeth the Apostles in the Ordinary part of Church-Government while some Senior Pastors have a supervising care of many Churches as the Visiters had in Scotland and are so far Episcopi Episcoporum and Arch-bishops having no constraining power of the Sword but a power to admonish and instruct the Pastors and to regulate Ordinations Synods and all great and common circumstances that belong to Churches For if Christ set up one Form of Government in which some Pastors had so extensive work and power as Timothy Titus and Evangelists as well as Apostles had we must not change it without proof that Christ himself would have it changed § 61. But if men on this pretence will do as Rome hath done pretend one Apostle to be the Governour of all the rest and that they have now that Authority of that Apostle and will make an Universal Monarch to rule at the Antipodes and over all the World or will set up Patriarchs Primates Metrâ—politans and Arch-bishops with power to tyrannize over their Brethren and cast them out and on pretence of Order and imitating the Civil Government to master Princes or captivate the Churches to their pride and worldly interests this will be the worst and most pernicious tyranny § 62. And as it is not all Episcopacy so it is not all Councils that I design this History to dishonour No doubt but Christ would have his Church to be as far One as their natural political and gracious capacities will allow And to do all his work in as much love peace and concord as they can And to that end both seasonable Councils and Letters and Delegates for Concord and Communication are means which nature it self directeth them to as it doth direct Princes to hold Parliaments and Dyets In the multitude of Councellours there is safety Even frequent converse keepeth up amity In absence slanderers are heard and too oft believed A little familiarity in presence confuteth many false reports of one another which no distant defences would so satisfyingly confute And among many we may hear that which of few we should not hear How good and pleasant is it for Brethren to dwel together in Unity And the Concord of Christians greatly honoureth their holy profession as discord becometh a scandal to the world But all this and the measures and sort of Unity and Concord which we may expect and the true way to attain it I have fuller opened in a Treatise entitled The true and only tâ—rms of the Concord of all Christian Churches § 63. When Christians had no Princes or Magistrates on their side they had no sufficient means of keeping up Unity and Concord for mutual help and strength without meetings of Pastors to carry on their common work by consent But their meetings were only with those that had nearness or neighbourhood And they did not put men to travel to Synods out of other Princes Dominions or from Foreign Lands much less did they call any General Councils out of all the Christian Churches in the world But those that were capable of Communion by proximity and of helping one another were thought enough to meet for such ends § 64. And indeed neither nature nor Scripture obligeth us to turn such occasional helps into the forms of a State-policy and to make a Government of friendly consultations And therefore though where it may be done without fear of degenerating into tyranny known times of stated Synods or meetings of Pastors for Concord are best as once a
creaturam sed non tanquam rerum creatarum aliquam foetum itidem sed non tanquam unum è caeteris They thought that before God made the rest of the creatures he made one super-angelical perfect Spirit by which he made all the rest and that this is Christ and that he received no other soul but a body only at his Incarnation and this super-angelical spirit was his soul. This was the dangerous heresie of Arius § 5. Dion Petavius truly telleth us that his great advantage was that many of the Fathers of that Church had spoken in such kind of words before him the Controversie being not then well considered p. 285. ad Haeres 69. having spoken of Lucian the Martyr's giving advantage to Aâ—ius he addeth Quod idem plerisque veterum Patrum cùm in hoc negatio tùm in aliis fidei Christianae capitibus usu venit ut ante errorum atque haereseon quibus ea singillatim oppugnabantur originem nondum satis illustratà ac patefactâ rei veritate quaedam suis scriptis asperserint quae cum orthodoxae sidei regulâ minimè consentiant And yet the Papists swear not to expound Scripture but according to the unanimous consent of the Fathers Nè ab hoc Trinitatis mysterio ac quaestione discedam observavimus jamdudum Justinum Mart. Dialogo cum Tryph. de filio Dei idem propemodum cum Arians sentire And in his Books De Trinit he at large citeth the very words of him and many other Fathers But he here giveth them this gentle excuse Sed ab omni culpâ tam hic quam Lucianus aliique liberandi sunt qui nondum agitatâ controversiâ panem de eâ commodè pronunciâsse videntur Simile quiddam de Dionys. Alex. tradit Basilius Ep. 41 c. But it is enough to think charitably that they were saved without going so far as to say they were without all fault For Christianity is the same thing before such Controversies and after And it 's hard to think how he can be a Christian that denyeth Christs Essence But God is merciful and requireth not knowledge alike in all that have not equal means of knowledge Which charity must be extended to others as well as to these Fathers Yet the same Petavius cannot endure Camerarius for saying that Athanasius though a valiant Champion of the truth did sometime indulge his own desires and mix some ill with sacred things But if he were not at all to be blamed Constantine was much the more to be blamed for banishing him And why should not his honour be of some regard The truth is the Alexandrian Bishops and People were long more violent and troublesome than others as not only Socrates but many other Historians note And as it was noted with dishonour in Theophilus and Cyril and Dioscorus c. so it can hardly be believed by them that read the History throughout that Alexander and Athanasius wanted not something of the humble patience meekness and healing tenderness and skill that their Case required For who is perfect And how apt are great Bishops to be too violent against Dissenters instead of healing them with Love and clear convincing Evidence § 5. Happy had it been if Prudence had silenced this Heresie betimes for never any one did so great mischief to the Church The badness of it was the honour of the Niccne Council that suppressed it as far as in them lay But alas the Remedy seemed quickly conquered by the Disease As Constantine had work enough to keep Peace among the Bishops in the Council by his presence and reproofs so when the Arians profess'd repentance his peaceableness caused him too far to indulge them by which some of them got such interest in his Court as proved the following Calamity of the Church And it is the sadder to think on that the two great Emperours Constantius and Valens that were deceived by them and drawn into violent Persecution are noted to be otherwise none of the worst men Epiphanius saith p. 737. Accessit Impâ—ratorum favor cujus initium à Constantio Imperatore profectum est Qui cùm caeteris in rebus perhumanus ac bonus esset alioquinpius â—c multis probitatis ornamentis praeditus hâc unâre aâ—eâ—ravit quod non impressa à parente fidei vestigia seqâ—utus est Quod ipsum tamen non illius culpâ factum sed nonnullorum fraude qui in die Iudicii rationem reddituri sunt qui specie nomine tenùs Episcopi sinceram Dei fidem labefactarunt Et beati Constantii in errorem ab illis inducti qui rectae fidei regulam ignoravit eâdemque ignorantiâ ad illorum se utpote sacerdotum Authoritatem accommodavit quod ipsum error illorum ac caecitas dep 〈◊〉 ataque fides ex diaboli profect a consilio lateret Accessit alia causa quae huic serpentum officinae plurimum adjecit virium Eusebius scilicet qui callidè se insinuans Valentis aures pii ac religiosi Imperatoris ac Divini numinis amantissimi corrupit Qui quòd ab illo baptismo sit initiatus ea causa fuit cur haec factio stabilis ac firma consisteret If Epiphanius say true we see what men these Persecuting Emperours were § 6. As to the other part of the Councils work the fixing of Easter-day had not the Bishops been sinfully fierce about it against each other it had never been taken for a Heresie to mistake the time nor had it been a work so necessary and great to determine it seeing as Socrates Sozomen c. tell us many Churches differed in this and matters as great as this without condemning or separating from each other And the Asians erred by the Motive of Tradition and Irenaeus had long before censured the Roman Bishop for his violence in condemning them And many good Christians even after the Councils determination durst not forsake their old Tradition nor obey them Among whom how long our Britains and the Scots stood out Beda telleth us And though the Audians that also disobeyed were called Hereticks I would all Adversaries to Hereticks were no worse men § 7. And because these Audians rose about that time I think it worth the labour to add the sum of their History out of Epiphanius that the World may better perceive what spirit the Hereticating Prelates were then of and how some called Hereticks were made such or defamed as such and who they were that did divide the Churches and break their peace Epiph. l. 3. Tom. 1. p. 811. Of the Schism of the Audians which is the 50th or 70th Heresie The Audians live in Monasteries in Solitudes c. Audius their Founder arose in Mesopotamia famous for his integrity of life and ardent zeal of Divine Faith Who oft seeing things ill carried in the Churches feared not to their faces to reprove and admonish the Bishops and Priests and say These things should not be so done You should not thus Administer As a
was not as the Papists say because Christ prayed for Peter that his Faith might not fail but because the Emperours of the West were Orthodox while those in the East were Arians And the Bishops much followed the Emperours Will. That this last was the Cause is notorious in the History That Christs foresaid promise was not the Cause is certain Because whatever promise Christ maketh he fulfilleth But he hath not kept all the Bishops of Rome from failing in their Faith Therefore he never promised so to do The minor is certain by History To pass by Marcellinus and Liberius and Honorius falls which were but like Peters all those wicked men whom Councils deposed as Infidels or Hereticks Simoniacks Murderers Adulterers one as a Devil Incarnate and all those that Baronius and Genebrard stigmatize as Apostatical and not Apostolical 50 together had not this promise fulfilled Nor Sixtus Quintus if Bellarmine judged truly that he was damned For it was not a dead faith but a saving faith which Christ promised Peter should not fail such a saith as had the promise of life He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved Whoever believeth in him shall not perish but have everlasting life a faith that worketh by love Else Peter might have been a wicked man and damned notwithstanding this Prayer of Christ and Promise If the faith of Constantine senior junior Constans Valentinian Theodosius Honorius Gratian c. had failed the General Councils at Milan and Ariminum tell us how failing the Bishops faith was like to be when Ierome said that the whole world groaned to find it self turned Arian § 2. The blind zeal of Valens made him restless in Persecuting the Orthodox in the East At Antioch he vexed those that would not Communicate with Euzoius the allowed Arian Bishop At Cyzicum Eunomius was put in Eleusius place but his followers built them a separate Church without the Walls Socrat. lib. 4. c. 6 7. He Persecuted the Novatians and exiled Agelius their Bishop at Const. He banished Eustathius Antioch and Evagrius chosen by the Orthodox Bishop of Const. against Demophilus the Arian Fourscore Bishops â—ent to crave Justice of him were put to Sea in a Ship there set on fire and were both burnt and drowned together Socr. l. 4. c. 13. In all the East he deposed abused murdered many that would not for sake the Nicene Creed He set his Officers to suppress their Conventicles At Alexandria he imprisoned Peter that succeeded Athanasius and banished his Presbyters and set up Lucius an Arian Bishop He persecuted the Monks of the Wilderness of Egypt Nitria and Scitis and destroyed their Houses Banished Macarius of Egypt and Macarius of Alexandria their Leaders He persecuted Basil at Caesarea He went in person at Antioch to disturb and scatter the Conventicles of the Orthodox And when he had banished one of their Bishops Meletius enduring Paulinus the Presbyters kept the Meeting when he drove them away a Deacon kept it up At last Themistius a Philosopher made an Oration before him bidding him not marvel that the Christians had such differences for they were nothing to those of the Philosophers who were of three hundred different Opinions and that God would be honoured even under diversity of Opinions This somewhat asswaged him and shortly after in the 50th year of his age he was slain § 3. Gratian and Valentinian junior coming to the Empire Liberty of Conscience and Restoration was given to all Sects except the Eunomians Photinians and Manichees Socrat. l. 5. c. 2. He took Theodosius into the Empire with him And so the Orthodox Party got up again and the Arians after this went every where down save among the Goths § 4. LXXI Theodosius called a General Council at Constantinople where the chief things done were 1. the setting up of Gregory Nazianzene as Bishop 2. The condemning of the Macedonians 3. The giving of the second Patriarchate to Constantinople because it was the Imperial Seat putting under him the Diocesses of Pontuâ— Heraclea and Asia 4. The putting down of Nazianzene again and putting Nectarius in his stead 5. The setling Flavianus at Antioch § 5. Some would perswade us that it was two Councils and not one that did these things But the question is but de nomine In the beginning they dispatch'd part of their work and before they departed Meletius the Bishop of Antioch dying the Bishops returned to Council and more Egyptian Bishops came and did the rest § 6. The Case of Gregory Naz. was thus A Council at Antioch in the reign of Arianisme sent him with three more able speakers to go visit the Churches and draw them from Arianisme He came to Constantinople and an Arian being in possession he got into a little empty Church and there so long Preached till he had recovered much of the City from Arianisme Hereupon Peter Bishop of Alexandria signified by Letters that he would have him be Bishop of Constantinople against the Arian Bishop The Orthodox Party chose him One Maximus that of a Philosopher turned Christian and insinuated into Gregories familiarity by money first and threats after gets Peter of Alexander and the Egyptian Bishops to make him Bishop of Constant supposing Gregory not yet lawfully settled Meletius Antioch being at Const. Ordaineth Gregory Bishop The Council when Convened Confirm him and cast out Maximus that never had possession Theodosius owneth Gregory and putteth out the Arian Bishop and possesseth him of the Great Church The Antiochian Controversie falling in at the death of Meletius Gregory was against Flavian The Egyptian Bishops being for him set against Gregory and resolved to cast him out and choose another He seeing their resolution and offended at their furious carriage in the Council resigneth to the Emperour and departeth some make it as if his resignation was unconstrained but his own words shew that he did it but to prevent the deposition which they resolved on Else he durst not have deserted his Flock that lamented his departure In his place they chose Nectarius a Pretor that was no Christian in foro Ecclesiae as being not yet baptized and so was indeed uncapable and the choice null But the man was honest And Nicephorus saith that they put down his name in a Paper with others leaving it to the Emperour to chuse one of them and that he chose Nectarius § 7. The description of this Council and the good Bishops of his time by Gregory Naz. in his Poems and his Orations is very doleful How implacably factious and contentious they were how fierce and violent leaping and carrying themselves in the Council like mad-men He describeth the People as contentious but yet endued with the love of God though their zeal wanted knowledg Page 528. Orat. 32. The Courtiers he saith whether true to the Emperour he knew not but for the most part perfidious to God And the Bishops as sitting on adverse thrones and feeding adverse opposite Flocks drawn by them into factions like
forsook the Party called the Catholick Church and gathered separated Churches and became the Head of a Schism called since Luciferian Hereticks meerly because the Churches received the confessing returning Arians to Communion and he owned Elavianus And thus even good Bishops could not agree nor scape the imputation of Heresie § 10. Baronius and Binnius after him say Nazianzenus hunc discordiam suâ abdicatione compositum iri arbitratus sedi Constantinopolitanae cum consensu Imperatoris non sine magno Bonorum ac populi fletu renunâ—iat atque statim post habitas in Synodo aliquot actiones comitantibus optimis quibuscunque Orientalibus in Cappadociam discedit Tum qui supererant ibi Episcopi ac Sacerdotes Nundinarii in locum Christiani perfectissimi Theologi absolutissimi Monachi castissimi Nectarium hominem nondum Christianum sed adhuc Catechumenum rerum Ecclesiasticarum penitùs imperitum in voluptatibus saeculi carnis hactenùs versatum suffecerunt § 11. This Council added to the Nicene Creed some words about the Holy Ghost The advancement of the Constantinopolitane Bishop by this Synod with the reasons of it bred such a jealousie in the Bishops of Rome as hath broken the Churches of the East and West which are unhealed to this day § 12. LXXII Two Bishops Palladius and Secundianus complained to Gratian that they were unjustly judged Arians and desired a Council to try them Ambrose perswaded him not to trouble all the World for two Men. A Council of 32 Bishops is called for them at Aquileia They refuse to be accountable to so few and are condemned § 13. LXXIII An. 381. Twelve Bishops met at Caesaraugusta against the Priscillianists These Men had divers other Councils in those times Ithacius and Idacius were the Leaders The whole Story you may find in Sulpitius Severus in the Life of Martin c. The sum is this Priscillianus a rich Man of much Wit and learning was infected with the Heresie of the Gnosticks and Manichees Many followed him his party was much in Fasting and Reading The Bishops in Council excommunicated them Yet they kept up The Bishops in Council sought to the Emperour Gratian to suppress them by the Sword A while they prevailed But the Priscillianists quickly learned that way and got a great Courtier to be their Friend and Gratian restored them Gratian being killed when Maximus was chosen Emperour by his Army the Bishops go to Maximus for help The Arians having got Head against Ambrose at Milan and these Sectaries troubling the Churches in France Spain and Italy Maximus a Man highly commended for Piety by most Writers saw that being forced by his Army to accept the Empire he was a Usurper being once engaged thought the defence of the Orthodox would strengthen him So he forced Valentinian by Threats to forbear wronging Ambrose And to please the Bishops he put Priscillian to death and banished some of his Followers Martin Bishop of Tome being a Man of small learning but of great Holiness and austerity of Life living like a Hermite in the poorest Garb and Cabbin lying on the Ground faring hard praying much and working more Miracles if Sulpitius his Schollar and Acquaintance may be believed than we read of any since the Apostles even than Gregory Thaumaturgus did abhor drawing the Sword against Hereticks and disswaded the Bishops and Emperour but in vain The prosecution was so managed by the Bishops that in the Countreys those that did but Fast and Read much were brought under the suspicion of Priscillianism and reproached This common injury to Piety from the Bishops grieved Martin yet more so that he renounced the Communion of the Bishops and their Synods whereupon they defamed him to the Emperour and People as an unlearned Man a Schismatick suspected of favouring Priscillianism But Martins holiness and Miracles magnified him with the Religious sort At last a great Priscillianist being sentenced to death Martin travelled to the Emperour Maximus to beg his Life Maximus told him he would grant his desire if he would but once communicate with the Bishops Martin preferring Mercy before sacrifice yielded and did once communicate with them But professed that in his way home an Angel corrected him and threatned him if he did so any more and that from that time his gift of Miracles was diminished and so he never communicated with them more to the Death Sulpitius his Narrative puts the Reader to a great difficulty either to believe so many and great Miracles as he reports or not to believe so learned pious and credible an Historian who professeth to say nothing but what he either saw himself or had from the Mouth of Martin or those that saw them and who speaketh his own knowledg of his eximious Piety He speaketh hardly of the Bishops not only as complying with an Usurper but that Ithacius in particular of his knowledge was one that much cared not what he said or did The Bishops would have denied that the death of Priscillian was by their means Is it not strange that the Church of Rome should Canonize Martin for a Saint believing his great Miracles and yet themselves go an hundred times further against the blood of Dissenters than the Bishops did whom Saint Martin therefore opposed and separated from to the death The Churches in Spain and elsewhere were disturbed and scattered or endangered by Souldiers to please these Bishops not as some forge that Maximus did persecute the Christians for the Prey For most Writers magnifie his Piety and Defence of Ambrose and the Orthodox that condemn his Usurpation though he said the Souldiers in Britain forced him to it § 14. LXXIV A General Council was called to Rome by the Emperour and Damasus but the Oriental Bishops would not come so far but met at Constantinople Here Damasus owned Paulinus at Antioch as the Council of Const. had owned Meletius And so neither would be obedient to the other the General Council nor the Pope But Damasus durst not excommunicate Flavianus but permitted two Bishops to continue at Antioch accounted a Schism which continued long § 15. LXXV The Oriental Bishops that would not come to Rome meeting at Constantinople wrote to Rome to tell them their Case and Faith minded them that it was according to the Canons that Neighbour Bishops and not Strangers should Ordain Bishops to vacant Seats to justifie their setting up Flavianus when Rome set up Paulinus And they give account of the advancement of Const. and Ierusalem and call Ierusalem The Mother of all other Churches § 16. A Synod held at Syda against the Massalians little is known of § 17. LXXVI A Council at Bourdeaux condemned Instantius Priscillian who thereupon was slain at Trevers § 18. LXXVII An. 386. A Council at Rome under Syricius repeated some of the old Canons § 19. LXXVIII Theognostus having excommunicated Ithacius and reprehended the Bishops as irregular and bloody for procuring the Death of Priscillian a Council called at Trevers did justifie and acquit
him Unjustly say even Binnius and Baronius who here repeat out of Sulpitius Martins once communicating with the Bishops there to save two Mens Lives and the Words of the Angel to him Meritò Martine compungeris Sed aliter exire nequîsti Repara virtutem resume Constantiam ne jam non periculum gloriae sed salutis incurras Itaque ab illo tempore satis cavit cum illâ Ithacianae partis communione misceri Caeterùm cum tardius quosdam ex ergumenis quam solebat gratiâ minore curaret subinde nobis cum lachrymis fatebatur se propter communionis illius malum cui se vel puncto temporis necessitate non spiritu miscuisset detrimentum virtutis sentire sexdecim pòst vixit annos nullam Synodum adiit c. Is it not strange that Papists blush not to recite such a History with approbation which expresseth a testimony from Heaven against far less than their Inquisition Flames Murders Canons de heraeticis comburendis exterminandis and Deposing Princes that will not execute them And which sheweth such a Divine justification for separation from the Bishops and Synods of such a way yea though of the same Religion with us and not so Corrupt as the Reformation found the Roman Papacy and Clergy § 20. LXXIX The two Bishops continuing at Antioch Evagrius succeeding Paulinus and Rome owning him and the East Flavianus a Council is called at Capua Flavian refuseth to come The Council had more wit than many others and Ordered that both Congregations Flavian's and Evagrius's being all good Christians should live in loving Communion O that others had been as wise in not believing those Prelates that perswaded the World that it is so pernicious a thing for two Churches and Bishops to be in one City as Peter and Paul are said to be at Rome And they referred the Case to Theophilus Alex. § 21. But this Council condemned a new Heresie Hereticating was in fashion viz. of one Bishop Bonosus denying Mary to have continued a Virgin to the death And they condemned Re-baptizing and Re-ordaining and the Translation of Bishops § 22. LXXX Next comes a Provincial Council or two at Arles which doth but repeat some former Canons § 23. LXXXI Next we have a strange thing a Heresie raised by one that was no Bishop But the best is it was but a very little Heresie Hierome is the describer of it who writing against the Author Iovinian a Milan Monk no doubt according to his sharpness makes the worst of it At the worst it containeth all these 1. That Virgins Widows and Marryed Women being all baptized or washed in Christ and not differing in any other works are of equal merits 2. That those that plenâ â—â—de with a full faith are born again in baptisme cannot be subverted by the Devil 3. There is no difference of merit between abstaining from meat and receiving it with thanksgiving 4. That there 's one Reward in Heaven for all that keep their baptismal vow Siricius catching Iovinian hid at Rome sends him to Milan where a Council Hereticateth him § 24. LXXXII It 's strange that Binnius vouchsafeth next to add out of Socrates l. 5. c. 20. when he Hereticateth him also a Council of the Novatians Socrates and Sozomen are called Novatians by the Papists because they rail not at them so valiantly as the Hereticators do And it may be they will call me one if I say that I better like this Councils Canon than burning men for such a Heresie They decree that as from the Apostles the different time of keeping Easter was not taken for sufficient cause for Christians to renounce Communion with each other so it should be esteemed still and it should be so far left indifferent that they live in love and Communion that are herein of different minds And I would say as lowd as I can speak If all the proud contentious ambitious hereticating part of the Bishops had been of this Christian mind O what sin what scandal and shame what cruelties confusions and miseries had the Christian world escaped But yet men will scorn to be so far Novatians in despight of Scripture reason humanity and experience whatever sin or misery follow As I said before in England the Convocation and Parliaments oversight hath determined of a false rule to know Easter-day and silenceth Ministers for not Assenting Consenting to it and approving the Use of it even the Use which consisteth in keeping Easter at a wrong time which makes us Hereticks § 25. LXXXIII An. 393. A great Council was called at Hippo where Austin yet a Presbyter was there Good men will do well Here was nothing but pious and honest for reformation of Discipline and Manners And most of the African Councils were the best in all the world Their Bishopricks were but like our Parishes and they strove not who should be greatest or domineer § 26. LXXXIV Next a Council at Constant. decideth a Crontroversie between two men striving for a Bishoprick Bin. p. 539. § 27. LXXXV Concilium Adrumetinum did we know not what § 28. LXXXVI An. 394. A Council of Donatists was held at Cavernae about a schism between two men set up for Bishops against each other § 29. LXXXVII At Bagai another Council was called by the Donatists for the same Cause where Primianus Carthag having 310. Bishops condemned Maximianus his Competitor absent Note here 1. How great a number the Donatists were and on what pretence as over-voting them they called others Hereticks and Schismaticks 2. How small Bishopricks then were the number tells us § 30. LXXXVIII A Synod was held at Taurinum in Savoy where a difference was decided between the Bishops of Arles and Vienne striving which should be greatest And he was judged to be the greatest whose seat was proved to be the Metropolitan And a case of Communicating with one Foelix a Partner of Ithacius and the bloody Bishops was debated § 31. LXXXIX Another Carthage Council called the second which Binnius saith was the last is placed next which decreed several Church Orders some of which shew that a Bishops Diocess had then but unum altare As when reconciliation of Penitents as well as Chrisme and Consecrating Virgins was to be done by the Bishop only except in great necessity And when Christians were multiplyed they that desired a Bishop in a place that had none before might have one And the prohibition erigendi aliud altare c. was repeated § 32. XC Another Carthage Council called the third hath many good Orders One is Can. 26. That the Bishop of the first Seat shall not be called the Chief Priest or Bishop or any such thing but only the Bishop of the first Seat To avoid all ambitious designs of superiority Whence Binnius elsewhere noteth that Carthage had not an Archbishop No doubt they had a sense of the sin and misery that came by the Patriarchall and other ambitious strifes § 33. XCI Another Carthage
Cyril Alex. called a Council at Rome and condemned Nestorius unless he recanted in ten days § 66. CXII Cyril calleth his Council at Alexandria and passeth the same sentence having got Caelestine to back him and sends it with many Anathematismes to Nestorius calling for his abjuration The whole cause is opened at the next Council at Ephesus CHAP. V. The First General Council at Ephesus with the Second and some other following § 1. THe Church at Constantinople growing to be the greatest by the presence of the Court which was the spring or poise of most of the Bishops courses and indeed did rule it became the envy and jealousie especially or the two great Patriarchs Rome and Alexandria Alexandria being under the same Emperour had more to do with Const. and made the greater Stirs For when the Empire was divided Rome being under an Orthodox Emperour had little trouble at home and little opportunity for domination in the East Yet keeping up the pretence of the prime Patriarchate and the Caput Mundi Romani the Pope watch'd his opportunity to lay in his claim aud to keep under the stronger side and while they did the work in the East against one another he sent now and then a Letter or a Legate to tell them that he was somebody still And indeed the hope of help from the Western Emperour by the countenance of the Pope made the Eastern Churches still vexed with Heresie and Persecutions and Divisions to seek oft to Rome and be glad of their approbation to strengthen them against their adversaries § 2. When Arsacius was dead Atticus succeeded him at Constantinople a wise and pious healing man who greatly thereby advanced that Church and all the Eastern Churches He dealt gently with the Novatians and lived in peace with them He encouraged Hereticks by kindness to return to the Communion of the Church At Synada in Phygia Pac. was a Church of Macedonians Theodosius Bishop of the Orthodox Persecuted them with great severity And when he found that the Magistrates of the place had not power to do as much as he expected he got him to Constantinople for greater power while he was there Agapetus the Macedonian Bishop turned Orthodox and all the Church adhered to him and set him in the Bishops chair When Theodosius came home with power to persecute him he found him in his place and the people shut the doors against Theodosius Whereupon he went back to Const. and made his complaint to Atticus how he was used Atticus knew that it fell out for the best for the concord of the Church and he gave Theodosius good words and perswaded him only to be patient § 3. Cyril at that time succeeded his Unkle Theophilus at Alexandria in place and in unquiet domination taking more upon him than Theophilus had done even the Government of temporal affairs He presently shut up the Novatian Churches in Alex. rifled them of all their Treasure and bereaved Theopemptus their Bishop of his substance The Jews at that time falling out with the Christians murdered many of them Cyril executed some and banished them all Orestes the Governour took this ill Fifty Monks of Mount Nitria come to take Cyril's part and assault the Governour and wound him in the head with a stone The people rise and put the Monks to flight but take him that did the Fact and he is tormented and put to death Cyril pronounced the Monk a Martyr but the people would not believe him one At that time there was a Woman Hypatia so famous for learning that she excelled in all Philosophy and taught in the Schools which Plotinus continued so that she had Scholars out of many Countries and was oft with Princes and Rulers and for her modesty and gravity was much esteemed Orestes the Governour oft talking with her the people said It was long of her that he was not reconciled to Cyril They laid hold of her drew her into a Church stript her stark naked rase the skin and tare the flesh off her body with sharp shells till she dyed they quarter her body and burn them to ashes which turned to the great dishonour of Cyril § 4. All this while the followers of Chrysostome remained Nonconformists and Separatists at Constantinople and were called Ioannites and kept in Conventicles of their own Atticus knew that love was the way to win them and he purposing to take that way writeth to Cyril Alex. that the restoring of Chrysostome's name in the Church-Office would tend to heal their sad division and give the Churches peace He told Cyril that Populus majori ex parte per factionem scissus extra muros conventus egerit plerique sacerdotes collegâ—â— nostri Episcopi à mutuâ communione discedentes bonam plantationem Domini parùm abest quin avulserint c. Most of the people were gone and had separate meetings without the Walls Priests and Bishops separating from one another were like to destroy the Church and that if he consented not to restore the name of dead Chrysostome the people would do it without him and he was loath that Church administration should so fall into the hands of the Multitude and therefore he would take in Chrysostom's name Alexander a good Bishop of Antioch put him upon this way But Cyril did vehemently oppose it How did he obey Rome then when the Pope had Excommunicated Chrysotom's persecutors And first he pleaded that the Schismaticks were but few as if their own Bishop knew not better than he and that Chrysostome being ejected dyed a Lay-man and was not to be numbered with the Clergy that Atticus had the Magistrates on his side that would bring them in by force Reader there is nothing new under the sun the things that have been are And a little time would reduce most of them to the Church though they increased That by favouring the Schismaticks he would lose the obedient Conformists and would get nothing by pleasing such disobedient men but strengthen them That the Conformists or obedient were the far more considerable part even the Bishops and Churches of Egypt Libia c. and threatned that he would seek a remedy himself And reproaching Chrysostome he telleth Aâ—ticus That Conformity to the Canons was more to be observed than the pleasing of such Schismaticks and that violating the Canons would do far more hurt than pleasing such men would do good And that such men will never be satisfied by reasons nor judge truly of themselves And he likened the restoring of Chrysostome's Name to the putting in the name of the Traytor Iudas with Matthias He added That if ignorant wilful fellows will forsake the Church what loss is it And therefore that a few mens talk must not draw Atticas to pluck up the Church Sanctions And as for Alexander Antioch who perswaded him to it He was a bold-faced man that had deceived many but this disease must not thus prevail but be cured Thus
made him Emperour and whose power then was great was the same that before had been against Nestorius in her Brothers reign Never was it truer than in the Case of General Councils that the Multitude of Physicians exasperateth the Disease and killeth the Patient The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the one nature after union the words one will and one opperation had never done half so much mischief in the Church if the erroneous had been confuted by neglect and Councils had not exasperated enraged and engaged them and set all the World on taking one side or another One skilfull healing man that could have explicated ambiguous terms and perswaded men to Love and Peace till they had understood themselves and one another had more befriended Truth Piety and the Church than all the Hereticating Councils did § 15. If what Socrates writeth of Theodosius junior be true as we know no reason to doubt God owned his Moderation by Miracles notwithstanding his favouring the Eutychians more than he did any ways of violence Socrates saith l. 7. c. 41 42. that Theodosius was the mildest man in the World for which cause God subdued his enemies to him without slaughter and bloodshed as his Victory over Iohn and the Barbarians shew Of which he saith First Their Captain Rugas was kill'd with a thunder-bolt Secondly A Plague killed the greatest part of his Soldiers Thirdly Fire from Heaven consumed many that remained And Proclus the Bishop being a man of great Peace and Moderation hurting and persecuting none was confirmed by these providences in his lenity being of the Emperours mind and perswading the Emperour to fetch home the bones of Chrysostome with honour wholly ended the Nonconformity and Separation of the Ioanites § 16. Before Theodosius dyed Leo Bishop of Rome set Placidia and Eudoxia to write to him against Dioscorus and for the cause of Flavianus Yea and Valentinian himself Theodosius wrote to Valentinian and the like to the Women That they departed not from the Faith and Tradition of their Fathers that at the Council of Ephesus second things were carried with much liberty and truth and the unworthy were removed and the worthy put into their places and it was the troublers of the Church that were deposed and Flavianus was the Prince of the Contentions and that now they lived in Concord and Peace § 17. The Council at Calcedon was called an 451. Dioscorus is accused for his Ephesine General Council and for his violence and defence of Eutiches and the death of Flavianus He alledgeth the Emperours Order to him Authoritatem Primatum tuae praebemus beatitudini If the Popes Universal Rule be essential to the Church then the pious and excellent Emperour Theodosius and the General Council that consented were none of them Christians that knew it but went against it Eos qui per additamentum aliquod aut imminutionem conati sunt dicere praeter quae sunt exposita de fide Catholica à sanctis Patribus qui in Nicaea post modum qui in Epheso congregati sunt nullam omnino fiduciam in sancto Synodo habere patimur sed sub vestro judicio esse volunus Here Binnius accuseth the good Emperour as giving that which he had not but by usurpation and this through ignorance of the Ecclesiastical Canons But were all the Bishops ignorant of it also Or was so good an Emperour bred up and cherished in ignorance of such a point pretended by the Papists to be necessary to the Being of a Church and to salvation The Bishops of Ierusalem and Seleucia also partook of the same power by the Emperour's Grant Dioscorus answered that All the Synod consented and subscibed as well as he and Juvenal Hieros and Thalassius Seleuc. The Bishops answered that they did it against their wills being under fear Condemnation and Banishment was threatned Souldiers were there with Clubs and Swords Therefore the Oriental Bishops cryed out to cast out Dioscorus Stephen Bishop of Ephesus who had been Dioscorus chief Agent there cryed out that fear constrained them The Lay-Judges and Senate asked who forced them Stephen said Elpidius and Eulogius and many Souldiers threatned him They asked Did Dioscorus use violence with you He said that he was not suffered to go out till he had subscribed Theodorus Bishop of Claudiopolis said that Dioscorus Iuvenal and the leading men led on them as simple ignorant men that knew not the Cause and frightned them with defaming them as Nestorian Hereticks Thus they cryed out that they were frightned The Egyptian Bishops answered that A Christian feareth no man and yet they were afraid before they ended A Catholick feareth no man we are instructed by flames If men were feared there would be no Martyrs Dioscorus noted what Bishops those were that said they subscribed to a blank Paper when it was about a matter of Faith But asked who made them by their several interlocutions to speak their consent Hereupon the Acts of the Ephes. Council were read among which were the words of Dioscorus Anathematizing any that should contradict or retract any thing held in the Nicene or the Ephesine Synods Adding how terrible and formidable it was If a man sin against God who shall intercede for him If the Holy Ghost sit in Council with the Fathers he that retracteth cashiereth the Grace of the Spirit The Synods answered We all say the same Let him be Anathema that retracteth these Bishops that curse themselves will easily curse others Let him be cast out that retracteth Dioscorus said No man ordereth things already ordered The holy Synod said These are the words of the Holy Ghost c. Theodorus denyed these words recorded Dioscorus said they may as well say they were not there § 18. Here also Eutyche's Confession at Ephesus was read in which he professeth to cleave to the former Ephesine Council and to the blessed Father Cyril that presided disclaiming all additions and alterations professing that he had himself Copies in a Book which Cyril himself sent him and is yet in his hands and that he standeth to the definition of that Council with that of Nice Eusebius Bishop of Doril. said He lyeth that Council hath no such Definition Dioscorus said There are four Books of it that all contain this Definition Do you accuse all the Synodical Books I have one and he hath one and he hath one Let them be brought forth Diogenes Bishop of Cyrilum said They deceitfully cleave to the Council of Nice The Question is of additions made against Heresies The Bishops of Egypt said None of us receive additions or diminutions Hold what is done at Nice This is the Emperour's Command The Eastern Bishops clamoured Iust so said Eutyches The Egyptian Bishops still cryed up the Nicene Faith alone without addition Dioscorus accused the Bishops for going from their words and said If Eutyches hold not the Doctrine of the Church he is worthy of punishment and fire ex ore tuo My regard is
the Pretor stand at the Tribunal of the Bishop and to morrow the Bishop may be called to the Pretors Bar That an Earthly judge may take and punish the servants of the highest judge and consecrated men who will not say that this is most absurd Answ. This sheweth what Church-grandure and power these men expect If they have not the Civil power and be not Magistrates or Lords of all the Church is wronged This Clergy-pride is it that hath set the World on fire and will not consent that it be quenched 1. By this rule all Christians should be from under all Power of Kings and Civil Rulers For are they not all the servants of the highest Iudges Hath God no Servants but the Clergy 2. By this rule both Princes and People should be free from the Bishops judgment For are not these Bishops Men as well as Princes and are not Christian Princes and People the servanâ—â—s of the highest Iudge and therefore should not be judged by Bishops 3. But what a wicked rebellious doctrine is intimated in the distinction that Princes are Earthly Iudges and Prelates are the servants of the highest Iudge Are not Prelates Earthly Iudges as well as Princes in that they are men that judge on Earth And are not Princes Judges of Divine appointment and authority as well as Prelates Yea and their power more past all dispute 4. And what absurdity is it that every soul be subject to the higher power And that he that 's one of your Sheep in one respect may be your Ruler in another Why may not the King be the Ruler of him that is his Physician or his Tutor And why not of him that is his Priest Was not Solomon Ruler of Abiathar when he displaced him May not one man judge who is fit or unfit for Church Communion and another judge who is punishable by the sword Did Christ come to set up a Ministry instead of a Magistracy He that saith Man who made me a Judge came not to put down Judges He that saith By me Kings reign came not to put down all Kings Obj. Christ sets up a Kingdome of Priests or a Royal Priesthood Answ. But his Kingdom is not of this World or Worldly It is a spiritual Kingdome conquering sin and Satan putting down the World out of our hearts and making us hope for the everlasting Kingdom which we shall shortly enjoy The Disease of the Disciples that strove who should be greatest and sit at the right and left hand and said Lord wilt thou at this time restore the Kingdom to Israel hath prevailed after all this warning on a Worldly Clergy to the great calamity of the Church And what wonder when even then St. Paul saith All seek their own too much and none the things of Iesus Christ so naturally as Timothy did and so zealously as they ought Too many Popes haue been Peters Successours in the Character given him Mat. 16. Get thee behind me Satan Thou art an offence unto me For thou savourest not the things that be of God but those that be of men I understood not who were the spring of our late Fifth-Monarchy mens diseases till I read Campanella de Regno Dei and some such Papists where I see that Christs reign by his Vicar the Pope over all the Princes and People of the World is the true Fifth-Monarchy Heresie For which they bring the same Prophecies as the Millenaries do for their Expectations Obj. But the Pope Prelates and Clergy called the Church are not to reign by deposing Kings but by Ruling them and being above them As Love is above the Law which yet is made for the ungodly that want Love and must be ruled by fear so Princes are for the World of unbelievers but not for the Church and Spiritual persons who live above them in the life of Love Answ. 1. This was one of the first Heresies which the Apostles wrote against Many tempted Christians then to think that Christianity freed them from service and subjection and made all equal But how plainly frequently and earnestly do Paul and Peter condemn it Is it not a shame to hear such Papists as cry up such a Heresie as this cry down and damn a Nestorian or an Eutychian or a Monothelite for an unskilful use of a word Paul saith He that teacheth otherwise against subjection is proud knowing nothing but doting 2. Love doth indeed set us above Fear and Legal threats so far as it prevaileth But it is imperfect in all and Fear still necessary 3. And this taketh not down either the Law or Magistracy to us but only maketh us less need such means It 's one thing to love and live so holily and justly as never to need or fall under the sword of Magistrates and another thing to be freed from subjection and obligation This increaseth in many the opinion that the Papal Kingdom is Antichristian in that they set up themselves above Rulers that are called Gods 3. But why must this priviledge extend to the Clergy only Have not other Christians as much holy love and spirituality as most of them And must Princes rule only Infidels Some suspect none as inclining to Popery but those that take up some of their Doctrines of Transubstantiation Purgatory Images c. But they that on pretence of the raising of the Church and defending its power do first call the Clergy only the Church and then seek to make themselves the Lords of Princes by the pretences of an Excommunicating Power and plead themselves from under them and take it for their priviledges to be free from subjection to them and their penal Laws are doubtless levened with that Popish Heresie which hath done much of all the mischiefs which the forecited History describeth § 50. CXXXI Besides some little contention at Alexandria under Proterius before he was murdered the next in Binnius is said to be at Angices Andegavensâ— which saith over again some of their old Canons against Priests living with Women and removing from place to place and such like And the Papists say that this Council was to contradict the Emperour Valentinians Law and to vindicate the rights of the Church as not being lyable to Civil Judicatures or under Kings § 51. CXXXII Anno 45. 3. A French Venetick Council was called about Ordinations which repealed some former Canons and was so strict that the first Canon kept Murderers and False Witnesses from the Sacrament till they repented instead of hanging them And the second Canon denyed the Communion to Adulterers that unlawfully put away their Wives and took others O strict Laws § 52. CXXXIII Ann. 459. A Council at Constantinople forbâ—d Simony § 53. CXXXIV Ann. 467. A Council at Rome of 48 Bishops decreed that men that had two Wives or the Husbands of Whores should not be ordained That they that could not â—ead and they that were maiâ—ed or dismembred or the Penitent should not be made Ministers c. § 54. CXXXV Ann.
beck of the Emperor and at the will of a Monothelite Patriarch the holy sixth Synod is condemned and what they decreed of two Wills in Christ and two Operations and all retracted by the Decree and Subscription of very many Oriental Bishops that were in one moment turned from being Catholiques to be Monothelites Is this the constancy of Bishops and the certainty of their Tradition But why have we not the Acts of this great Council as well as of the rest CHAP. IX Councils called about Images and some others § 1. POpe Gregory the 2d is the Man that must set up Image-worship against all opposition rebel against his lawful Sovereign and confederate with other Princes to alienate the Western Empire when the East was almost ruined before and so to weaken the Christian Power that the Turk might shortly win the Empire § 2. To have recited all along as we went on what new Ceremonies Formalities and Orders were invented and brought in by the Popes and how Doctrine and Practice grew corrupted being a thing done already by many others would have been tedious here and besides the design of this writing which is but to shew how Prelates have used the Church by their contentions about JURISDICTION and HARD or AMBIGUOUS WORDS and what hath been the work especially of General Councils But we cannot tell you well the work of the following Councils without telling somewhat of the occasion of the matter The Primitive Christians used not Images in the Worship of God read Dalaeus de Imaginibus But the contempt of Christianity by the Heathens occasioned many to oppose their contempt by glorying in the Cross of Christ and by making the transient sign of it with their fingers and thence they grew to use the fixed sign of it and thence to speak of and believe many Miracles wrought by it and thence to make the Image of Christ crucified which yet Epiphanius condemned and thence by degrees to make the Images of the Apostles and Martyrs and thence to make in their Churches the Images of their deceased Bishops till an Excommunicater arâ—se of another Opinion that pull'd any of them down And abundance of Dreams Visions Apparitions and Revelations were the pretended Proofs that prevailed for many such Superstitions but especially for Images and Purgatory and Prayers for the dead Among others an English Monk Egwin of Evesholme chosen Bishop of Worcester must lead the way by pretence of a Vision a Dream no doubt see Spelman's Concil p. 209. in his own Chart Egwin saith That the Virgin Mary first appeared to a certain Shepherd called Eoves and afterward to himself with two Virgins holding a Book in her hands and told him in what place she would have him build her a Monastery The crafty Dreamer divulged the Vision and some good Men opposing it the Pope must have the hearing of it The Pope put it to the Oath of Egwin whether ever he saw such a Vision or not Egwin sware it and the matter was past doubt just as honest Commenius took Daubritius's Prophesies to be of God because the melancholy Man sware that they were true Hereupon Egwin is sent home and a Council called to take Egwin's words again that he had such a Vision and in the end was added That the Virgin Mary ' s Image must be set up in the place The Pope sent to King Kenred and King Offa by Bishop Brithwald to grant what the Vision intended who obediently make over a great part of the Countrey to that Monastery as you may see described in Spelman Conc. p. 209 210. in Charta Kenredi Offae Regum And p. 211. in Charta Egwini who saith himself that God being propitious to him he had in a little time got for the said Church an hundred and twenty Farms given as is written and confirmed in the Charter of that Church Many Villages are there named and some great ones in the fattest and richest part of the County of Worcester Was not this a profitable Dream or Vision And should we not have many Dreamers and Swearers if they could get as much by it as Egwin did And herewith Images are set up § 3. But Baronius and Binnius question whether Naucler and Bale say true that this Council first brought Image-worship into England because it came in before with Austin the Monk To which Spelman well answereth That the use of the Cross in banners and otherwise was here before and some Images for Instruction and Commemoration as Beda's own words intimate but not any worship of Images or worshiping before and towards them And Sir H. Spelman saith proving that Image-worship was not then in use among the Saxons that even praying to the Saints themselves was not then in use mentioning an old Psalter of his written about the time of the 2d Nicene Council in which there were an hundred seventy and one Prayers inserted between the Sections of the 119th Psalm and in them all not one name of any Saint or the Virgin Mary much less any Prayer directed to them § 4. If one talk now with our English Papists they are so loth to own their own Doctrine and Practice that they will tell you they hold not the worshiping of the Image but of the Person signified by it But to tell them how commonly their Writers defend worshipping Images if Colere and Cultus signifie Worship and what Aquinas saith of giving the worship of Latria to the Image of Christ and to the Cross though undeniable yet will not be taken for sufficient proof I shall therefore give you here thâ— sense of the Papal Church in England in the form of Abjuration which they prescribed to those that they then called Lollards as it is found in the Tower Records and you must take it in the old English in which it is written because I do but transcribe it and must not alter it the sense of it being plain and obvious Ex Rotulo Clausax de Anno Regni Regis Ricardi secundi 19 membr 18 dors MEmorand quod primo die Septembris Anno Regni Regis Ricardi secundi post Conquestum decimo nâ—no Willielmus Dynel Nicholaus Taillour Michaelus Poucher Willielmus Steynour de Nottingham in Cancellar ipsius Regis personaliter constituti Sacramenta divisim prestiterunt sub eo qui sequitur tenore I William Dynel befor yhow worchipefull Fader and Lorde Archbyshop of Yhorke and yhowr Clergie with my free will and full avyside swere to Gode and to all his seyntes uppon this holy Gospelle that fro this day forthwarde I shall Worship Ymages with preying and offering unto hem in the worschip of the seintes thae they be made after and also I shall never more despyse pygremage ne states of holy Chyrche in no degree And also I shall be buxum to the lawes of holy Chirche and to yhow as myn Archbyshop and to myn other ordinares and Curates and kepe yo lawes uppon my power and meynten
of the Apostolick Seat that the Kingdom was translated from Chilperic to Pepin the foresaid Historians do so expresly say that it 's a wonder with what front the innovating Hereticks dare call it in question Lastly It is here to be noted that it was by this same Pope Zachary that the nomination or postulation of Bishops for the vacant Churches in his Kingdom was granted to King Pepin Therefore if elsewhere you read that the Kings of France give Bishops to the Churches remember that it is not done by their own Right but by the Grant of the Apostolick Seat In vain therefore do the innovating Hereticks glory in this Argument who endeavor to subject the Church to Kings So far Binnius after Baronius § 12. From this Story and these words let the Reader think how to answer these Questions Quest. 1. Had not Kings need to take heed of making any one man too great if greatness and exercise of Government give him so much right to the Kingdom Qu. 2. Had not Kings need to look to their manners for their Crowns sake as well as their Souls if Lust Sensuality and Dulness forfeit their Kingdoms Qu. 3. Did not Wars and weakning of the Empire make a great change with Popes when they that were set up and banished at the Emperor's pleasure can now first depose the Emperor in the West for being against Images and Persecuting and then can translate the Crown of France Qu. 4. Was not an ambitious Pope a fit Tool for Pepin and his Confederates to work by to put a pious gloss on their Conspiracy Qu. 5. Did not the Pope rise thus by serving the turns of Conspirators and of Princes in their quarrels with one another Qu. 6. Are Subjects Judges when a King's Sins make him unworthy of the Crown Qu. 7. Yea is the Pope Judge and hath he power to depose Kings if he judge them such Sinners and unfit for Government Qu. 8. Is it a good Reason that a King is justly deposed because Good Men and Holy Bishops are the Desirers and Promoters of it Qu. 9. Would not this Reason have served Maximus against Gratian Was it not Cromwel's Plea If he had but had the Pope and People on his side you see how it would have gone Qu. 10. Is it the mark of an Innovating Heretick to say that the Church should be subject to Kings when Paul and Peter said it of all Christians so long ago Qu. 11. Is it a Note that Protestants love Rebellion because they are against Popes deposing Kings Or is there any heed to be taken of the words of impudent Revilers that dare speak before God and Man at this rate Is deposing Kings the Papists freedom from Rebellion and is our opposing it a character of Rebels Qu. 12. Is it any wonder that Bishop Burchardus desired it and that Bishop Boniface executed the Pope's command who had been translated from England by him to such dignity and had sworn Obedience and Service to him Qu. 13. Is it any wonder that the Pope made these Bishops Saints Qu. 14. I hope they were really godly Men But is it any wonder that some good Men at such a time as that did think it had been for the interest of Religion to have all Power in the Clergies hands especially being themselves Bishops that were to have so great a share How few Bishops are afraid of too much power or ever do refuse it Qu. 15. If the King of France had his Kingdom by the Pope's gift what wonder if he had the power of nominating Bishops also by his gift Qu. 16. Whether he that hath power to give hath not power to take away and be not Judge when the Cause is just Qu. 17. With what face do Papists at once make these claims and yet profess Loyalty to Kings Qu. 18. Whether it concern not Kings to understand on what terms they stand with the Pope and his Clergy that must not be subject to them but have power to depose them Qu. 19. If there be any Party among them that hath more Loyal Principles is it a sign of the concord of their Church that agreeth not in matter of so great moment Or a proof that the Pope is the infallible Judge of Controversies that will not determine so great a Point on which the Peace of Kingdoms doth depend § 13. About the same time they persuaded Rachis King of the Longobards Successor to Luitprand for the love of Religion to lay down his Crown and go into a Monastery so that Monasteries are places for the worst and the best some too bad to reign and some too good lest they should over-master the Clergy § 14. It may be you will think that this Pope Zachary and his sworn Vassal St. Boniface were some very profound Divines that could by their wisdom and piety thus master Kingdoms Doubtless they were zealous Adversaries to Heresies except their own and Successors of the Hereticating and Damning Fathers For Epist. 10. Bin. p. 206 207 208. Zachary writeth to Boniface to expel Virgilius from the Church and Priesthood for holding Antipodes viz. that Sun-shine and Moon-light and Men are under the Earth as well as here which we call over it The words are De perversa autem iniqua doctrina quae contra Dominum Animamsuam locutus est si clarificatum fuerit ita eum confiteri quod alius mundus alii homines sub terra sint seu Sol Luna hunc habito Concilio ab Ecclesia pelle Sacerdotii honore privatum That is But as to the perverse and unjust Doctrine which he hath spoken against the Lord and his own Soul if it be made clear that he so confesseth that under the Earth there is another world and other Men and Sun and Moon call a Council and depriving him of the honour of Priesthood drive him out of the Church That by another world is meant Antipodes or the other side of the Earth inhabited is doubtless § 15. Qu. 1. Did God make Popes to be the Governors of the Antipodes for so many hundred years before they knew that there was any Antipodes And when they excommunicated and silenced those that affirmed it Qu. 2. Were these Popes and Bishops Men of such wisdom as were fit to hereticate Dissenters as they did Qu. 3. Do we not see here what some Councils were and did in those times Qu. 4. Do we not see what Heresie signified at Rome and how little heed there was to be taken of their outcry against some Heresies Qu. 5. Whether was all the World or all the West bound to avoid Communion after with Virgilius Qu. 6. Do we not see here of what Infallibility the Pope is in judging of matters of Faith and how happy the World is to have such a Judge and of what credit his Heretications and Excommunications are Qu. 7. Do we not see how Religion hath been depraved and dishonoured by the Pope and his Clergy calling
and his Son Sergius were the Captains that had wrought this great deliverance to the Church And now they plead with King Desiderius for St. Peter's Rights as still zealous for the Pope The King is angry with them and jealous of their power and seeketh to destroy them and particularly to set their own Pope against them They get the Citizens to stand by them and the King cometh with an Army The Pope seeing which was like to be the stronger side in great wisdom went out to the King and after some days conference with him sendeth to Christopher to render himself to the King The Citizens hearing this forsook Christopher and Sergius Gratiosus seeing they were deserted by the People through the Pope went out first to the King and Pope and Sergius next and Christopher last The Pope was so kind to them that made him Pope that he made them Monks and put them in Sanctuary in St. Peter's Church to save their lives But they had Adonibezek's justice and were soon drag'd out thence and Christopher's eyes put out of which he dyed But Sergius was awhile a Monk and then thrust in the Laterane Cellar Thus went the matters of the Universal Monarch at Rome § 36. A little before the Pope's death Sergius was fetcht blind out of the Cellar and kill'd the next Pope searcht out the Authors and found them to be Paulus Cubicularius and the last Pope's Brother and other great Men and he prosecuted some of them to Banishment but the Archbishop of Ravenna caused Paul to be killed § 37. It was Adrian a Deacon that was then chosen Pope Son to the chief Man in Rome ablest to effect it Upon these stirs Desiderius desired friendship with the Pope but he demanding the Cities which Pepin had given the Church some of which Desiderius still kept and doing the foresaid justice on the Friends of Desiderius he came with an Army and killed many and took many Cities The Pope urgeth the restitution of all his Cities indeed the Emperor's given him by Pepin he still denieth the Pope gets Charles of France to come with an Army for fear of whom the Longobards flie The Dutchy of Spoletum and other Cities yield themselves to the Pope and as a token of subjection receive tonsure Charles besiegeth Desiderius in Papia and forceth his Brother Carloman's Wife and Children that fled to the Longobards to yield themselves to him while the Siege continued Charles went to Rome and was gloriously entertained by the Pope and renewed to him Pepin's gift of all the Exarchate of Ravenna and many Dukedoms and Cities which were none of his own to give and now the Pope is a Prince indeed And Charles returning to the Siege conquereth Papia taketh King Desiderius and winneth all the Longobards Kingdom And thus Strength gave Right according to the Atheists Opinion now stirring that Right is nothing but a power to get and keep Pepin and Charles make themselves Kings and the Pope a Prince that while they share the Emperor's Dominions between them they might be a strength to one another And Desiderius being himself but an Usurper helped by the Pope into the Throne no wonder if when interest changed the same hand take him down How Charles his Brother Caroloman dyed and why his Wife and Sons fled from Charles to the Longobards and what became of them is not well known § 38. Pope Adrian the 1st thus made a greater Prince than any before him did greater works than they had done and ob nimium amorem Sancti Petri ex inspiratione Divina built many great and stately Buildings made all places about his Palace Baths c. fit for splendid pomp and pleasure and all this from meer self-denial and holiness Many Churches also he repalred and adorned and did many other such good works § 39. This great Adrian was before but a Deacon I have oft marvelled to read that Deacons were so ordinarily then made Popes and sometimes Lay-men when yet the old Canons required an orderly rising through the several degrees It was no wonder that then a Deacon at Rome was a far higher preferment than a Bishop For a Deacon and a Priest might be chosen Pope but a Bishop could not For of old when Diocesses and Parishes were all one the Canons decreed that no Bishop should remove to another Church except being Consecrated by others he never consented nor had possession so that every Bishop must live and dye in the place where he was first Ordained so that Rome Const. Alex. Antioch c. and all the great Seats chose either Deacons Priests or Monks to be their Patriarchs and Bishops No wonder then if as Nazianzen saith Orat. 5. it was the custom to have almost as many Clergy-men in every Church as People in regard of the present Honour and the future hopes of Preferment Indeed he carried it that had the greatest Friends which was as commonly the Deacon as the Priest or Archdeacon By which we may conjecture whether the worthiest Men were made Popes For if they were the worthiest why were they by former Popes never made higher before than Deacons Did not the Popes know the worthiest men And if a breach of the Canons in Elections nullifie the regular Succession by this it is evident that the Roman Seat hath no such Succession § 40. By the way the Reader must note that in all the Writings of the Popish Clergy concerning these matters there are certain terms of Art or Interest which must be understood as followeth viz. 1. Sanctissimus Papa the most Holy Pope signifieth any prosperous Bishop of Rome how wicked soever in his life 2. Rex Pientissimus the most Pious King signifieth a King that took part with the Pope and advanced his Opinions and Interest 3. Imperator Sceleratissimus Haereticus Nefandus c. a most wicked Emperor or Patriarch or any other and abominable Heretick signifieth one that was against the Pope his Interest or Opinion Homo mendaeissimus a Lyar is one that saith what the Papists would not have to be true If you understand them otherwise you are deceived ordinarily § 41. About the death of Paulus Cubicularius and others note that it had long been the way of the Church-Canons to contradict God's great Law for humane safety He that sheddeth Man's blood by Man shall his blood be shed and on pretence of being more merciful than God to entice Murderers Adulterers and all wicked Thieves and Criminals to make up the Church of Christ by decreeing that instead of being Hanged or Beheaded if they would but be Baptized they should but be kept for a time from the Sacrament or do Pennance and what Villain would not then be a Christian § 42. Here ariseth a great Controversie with Sigibert a Monk-Historian and Gratian himself which Baronius and Binnius take up viz. the first say That Charles being at Rome a Council there with Pope Adrian gave him the power of chusing the
Irene will do as the Pope would have her She is as much for Pictures as the Pope himself She calling this Council at Constantinople the old Soldiers bred up under the former Emperors being against Images haeresin medullitus imbiberant saith Binnius p. 396. Would not endure them in Constantinople but routed them At which the Empress being troubled dismissed the Bishops till they had purged the Army of those old Soldiers and then she called the Bishops to Nice and there they knowing their errand before-hand damned themselves and their Brethren that had held the former universal Synod and set up Images again § 55. By the way I appeal from Pride and Ignorance to Christian Sobriety and Reason how the taking down of Images can in the Roman sense be called an Heresie unless it be an Article of Faith that Images must or may be used And can any Man that ever read and believed the Scriptures and the Writings of the first four hundred years believe that having or worshiping of Images or Saints by Images is an Article of Faith or necessary to Salvation The best of them that any Man can plead with Modesty is that they are indifferent or lawful and useful to some Persons The Papists tell us now that they would not compel us to bow toward Images but leave it to our liberty Must it be Heresie and the Christian world cast into distractions about it when yet this Image-worship is Idolatry in the sense of one part of Christians and but indifferent and convenient to the ignorant that have other helps enow in the sense of others O what a Plague hath it been to the world to have a worldly Clergy invade the Churches § 56. At the meeting of this Council we have first the Call and Title in which 1. The Emperor and his Mother are called the Governors of the whole world Orbis Terrarum And yet our Papists as W. Iohnson in his Novelty represt c. would make Men believe that if they find but such a saying of a Council or of the Church it must needs signifie more than the Empire even all the Earth indeed 2. It 's expresly said over and over that this Council was called by the Emperor and by their Decree and Command Tharasius beginneth with telling them the need of Reformation for Images and reporting how they were assaulted at Constantinople when they met there and so removed to Nice c. § 57. Next the Letters of the Empress and her Son are read in which they are before made know what they must do They are told what Paul Const. on his Death-bed said for Images and that Tarasius would not take the Patriarchate till he had promise of a Council to restore them and some hopes of it The Emperor here saith that he called and Congregated the Synod and that ex universo terrarum orbe out of the whole earthly world and yet it was only out of the Roman Empire § 58. When the Bishops business was so well made known by the Woman that called them first three Bishops that had been lately forward speakers against Images in the former General Council under Constantine did humbly confess their sin to the Council and asked forgiveness that is Basil. Ancyrae Theodorus Myron and Theodosius Amorii And first Basil Bishop of Ancyra gave them his Creed in which he professed to believe in the Trinity and to embrace the intercession of the Mother of God and of the heavenly Powers and of all the Saints and with all honour to receive and embrace their holy Reliques firmly believing that he may be made Partaker of their holiness Also that he embraceth the venerable Images which the Oeconomy of our Lord Iesus Christ c. and of the inviolate Virgin our Lady the Mother of God and of the holy Apostles Prophets Martyrs and all Saints and giveth them due honour Rejecting and cursing with all his mind that called the 7th Synod that was gathered by a depraved mind and madness a false Council as alien to all Piety and Religion impiously barking against Ecclesiastical Legislation reproaching venerable Images and commanding them to be taken out of the Churches c. And to shew his zeal and lead others the way he delivereth in nine Curses or Anathemas One against those that demolish Images Another against those that expound the Scripture words against Idols and Gentile Images as against Christians Images Next he execrateth all that embrace not Images so it is now become necessary unto salvation Another Curse is against those that favour them that are against Images c. Was not the Church ill used by her Bishops when they are sure to be cursed by them one year cursing all that be for Images and another cursing all that be not for them Was it such a cursing Clergy to make a cursed Church that Christ ordained And that the Council might not suspect that this Bishop was a Temporizer and changed his Opinion with the Times first he professeth to declare all this With his whole Soul Heart and Mind and next he wisheth That if ever by any means he revolt again from Images he may be alienated from God the Father Son and Holy Ghost and the Catholick Church And thus he renounceth Repentance cursing himself if ever he repent § 59. Tharasius and his Synod glorifie God for this excellent Confession And next cometh Theodore Bishop of Myros and he doth the like and is joyfully received And next cometh Theodosius Bishop of Amorium and he more dolefully lamenteth that being a sinner and seduced he had blattered out many evils untruly against venerable Images and therefore confessing his fault he condemneth and curseth or detesteth himself resolving hereafter to do the same thing which he had cursed or spoken ill of and to teach it to the world and begging to be received among Christians though unworthy Next he offereth his Libel viz. First I approve receive salute and venerate before all things the intemerate Image of our Lord Iesus Christ our true God and the blessed Mother Virgins who brought him forth without seed whose help protection and intercession I pray for night and day that she may help me a sinner as having that power from him whom she brought into the world Christ our God And I receive and venerate the Images of Saints Apostles Prophets Martyrs Fathers Eremites not as Gods c. And with all my mind I beseech them to intercede with God for me that I may find mercy in the day of judgment On the same account I venerate the Reliques of Saints c. So he proceedeth also to his Curses and first he anathematizeth all that venerate not Images Then he curseth those that reproach them And next that speak evil of them And next he curseth those that do not from their hearts teach Christian People the veneration of holy and honourable Images of all Saints which from the beginning pleased God Qu. 1. Where shall we
the Divine Ministeries shewing his madness even on that which hath no sense such an one is truly sensless and shall be obnoxious to the Lex Talionis and his work shall fall upon his own head as being a transgressor of God's Law For the chief Apostle Peter commanded Feed the Flock of God overseeing it not by force but freely and voluntarily according to God not for filthy lucre sake but readily and chearfully not as having a dominion â—ver the Clergy but as being examples to the Flock The 15th Canon forbids one Man to have two Churches The 22d Canon forbids Canting and Minstrels and Ribald Songs at meat But the 7th savors of their Superstition forbidding any Temple to be Consecrated without Reliques and ordering Temples that have no Reliques to be put down § 78. In the Letter to Adrian Tharasius tells him that he had a year before attempted the like at Const. but was hindered a whole year by violent Men which further sheweth how far the opposition to Images had obtained when Irene began to set them up § 79. So much of the 2d Nicene Council in which by the power of one Woman and Stauratius a Senator that ruled her the judgment of the Universal Church if the Council or most of the Bishops in the Empire signifie it was suddenly changed from what it had been during the Reign of the three last Emperors and made that Church-use of Images which some thought sinful and no judicious Christian could judge necessary but indifferent and of use to some to be henceforth so necessary that the Denyers are sentenced for cursed Hereticks yea the Doubters cut off from Christ. § 80. CCXXXIII Binnius next addeth a Council at Forojulium An. 791. held by Paulinus Bishop of Aquileia in which is a Speech of his to the Bishops and an excellent Creed and 14 Canons written as by himself all in a far more understanding sober pious manner than is usual among the Patriarchs at General Councils The 13th Canon is an excellent Precept for the holy observation of the Lord's-day wholly in Holiness and in Hymns of Praise to the Holy Ghost that blessed it by his admirable Advent calling it God's Sabbath of delight beginning the 7th day evening not for the honour of the 7th day but of this Sabbath c. § 81. Yet rash and unskilful words set the Bishops into more divisions Faelix Urgelitanus and from him Elipandus Bishop of Toletum taught that Christ as the eternal Word was God's Natural Son but that as Man he was his Adopted Son Hence his Adversaries gathered that he was a Nestorian and held two Sons A Council An. 792. at Ratisbonne was called to condemn this Heresie Yea Ionas Bishop of Orleance saith That it infected Spain for a great part and he knew their Followers to be certain Antichrists by their faces and habits But wise Men think that the Controversie was not de re but de nomine And that if one Christ be said to be one Son of God in two natures by a twofold fundamentum of the Relation of a Son and that the foundation of the eternal Relation was the eternal Generation and the foundation of the temporal Relation in the Humanity was the temporal Generation and Union with the Deity yet this proveth not two Sons yea or if it had been said that two Generations being the fundamenta two Relations of Sonship result from them If this be unskilfully and illogically spoken it will not follow that the Speakers held two Persons or made any more division of Christs natures than their Adversaries did but only might think that a double filiation from a double fundamentum might be found in one Person Let this Opinion be wrong I see not how the Hereticators could make it a damnable Heresie But it 's pity that Faelix had not taken warning by the Churches long and sad experience to avoid such wordy occasions of Contention and not to set again on work either the Heretical or the Hereticating Evil Spirit § 82. Claudius Taurinensis a great and worthy Bishop at this time did set in against the Worship and Church-use of Images against whom Ionas Aurelianensis wrote whose Writings are in the Biblioth Patrum by Marg. de la Bigne Read them and judge as you see cause § 83. About the time of the Frankford Council came out a Book-against Images which is published as written by Carolus Magnus himself A great Controversie it is Who is the Author No small number say it was Charles his own indeed Others that it was written at his Will and Command But Binnius and some others deny it and say it was written by Serenus Massiliensis an Iconoclast and his Disciples How we shall know the Truth in such Cases I cannot tell But it is confessed that Spain and France were then much infected with the Doctrine which is against Church-Images It is certain that Pope Adrian saith that Carolus Mag. sent him such a Book by Engilbert an Abbot and his Epistle against it is extant § 84. CCXXXIV We come now to a great Council at Frankford called by Charles Mag. present and by Adrian And as late as it is all the Historians cannot tell us whether it was Universal or what they did Some say it was a General Council because Charles summon'd it as such and 300 Bishops were there Others say No it was but Provincial because none of the Bishops of the East were there a sufficient reason and the like may be brought to prove that there never was a General Council in the World so called from the whole World but only from the whole Empire That they dealt with the Case of Elipandus Bishop of Toletum and Faelix Urgel is agreed on but what they did about Images is not agreed on Ado Rhegino Aimonius Urspurg and many Historians say They condemned the Nicene Council that was for Images Even Baronius is of the same mind thinking the Liber Carolinus deceived them He proveth this to be the common judgment of Historians and ancient Writers Bellarmine his Brother is of the same judgment And is not their Concession more than twenty later Mens denial Yea Genebrard concurreth yet Binnius leaveth his Master Baronius and giveth his Reasons against them And he doth well prove that it could not be by ignorance and surprize that the Frankford Council should condemn the Nicene and he is loth to think that they were wilful Hereticks especially when they profess to follow Tradition But he knew that the 7th Constantin Council against Images profest to follow Tradition And if French Men will make us Hereticks for speaking English it is no wonder if we make them Hereticks for speaking French If Men will Hereticate others for Images or Ceremonies or Words others will measure the like to them This kind of Hereticating is circular and hath no end Suarez will have either the Historians to have erred or their Books to be corrupted with what
Party that were against Images prevailed ever since Irene the Woman that set them up was deposed and dyed her Son Constantine whom she murdered being not for them before nor Nicephorus that deposed her after But Leo 5 Armenus that succeeded Michael Curop earnest against them and as they called it persecuted the Worshippers of Images A Prince confessed to be very profitable to the Empire Michael Balbus that is supposed the chief of them that murdered him reigneth in his stead he set himself earnestly to have healed the Church-divisions of the East about Images To that end he sent Ambassadors to Ludovicus Pius into France for his counsel in the professing his great desire of Peace Ludovicus called together some that he most esteemed for Learning at Paris which some call a Council but were like to be more learned than the Majority in Councils to debate and consider the business The Paris Divines in this Debate drew up a Writing in which they greatly sinned saith Bellarmine in that they took on them to reprehend the Pope and a General Council But do not they themselves condemn many General Councils In which saith Bellarmine they far exceeded the Author who in the name of Carolus Mag. put forth a Book against the worshiping of Images For he which also the Fathers of the Frankford Council did disallowed or rejected the 2d Nicene Synod because they thought it had been celebrated without the Pope's consent But these Counsellors of the Emperor Lewis confess the Council of Nice 2d for the worshiping of Images to be called and approved by Pope Adrian and yet they did not fear to examine judge and reprehend both the Synod itself and the Epistle of Adrian to Constantine for the worship of Images yea and the defence of that Synod sent by Adrian to Charles M. saying Indiscretè noscitur fecisse in eo quod superstitiosè eas adorari jussit So saith Bellarmine they were not ashamed to judge the Iudge of themselves and of the whole world to feed the Pastor of all Christ's Sheep and to teach the Teacher of all men than which temerity no greater can be imagined Thus far Bellarmine § 125. Here I desire the Reader to take notice 1. That even then when the Pope was advanced to his Kingly greatness yet as the Eastern Empire was far from obeying him so even that one Prince that set him up and defended him with his Doctors and Counsellors were far from thinking him Infallible but reproved him and judged him as superstitious for Image-worship and were not herein ruled by him 2. And judge whether most Bishops would not have judged accordingly if they had had but the same countenance from Princes as the Bishops in the East and these now had 3. And judge with what Face the Militant Doctors of Rome do pretend that all the world was then subject to the judgment of the Pope and bid us name any Churches that rejected it when East and West so far rejected it as is here confessed even when they were grown so high yea and Councils as well as Popes § 126. Hereupon a Book was printed An. 1596. called The Council of Paris about Images containing 1. The Emperor Michael ' s Epistle by which saith Bellarmine one would judge him one of the best Princes that ever was 2. The Paris Doctors Collection of Testimonies proving in the middle way that Images should not be broken contemptuously as some would have them nor be worshipped as the General Nicene Council and the Pope would have them 3. An Epistle in the Pope's name written saith Bellarmine by the French Doctors to Michael the Emperor shewing that Images are neither to be wronged disgracefully nor adored 4. An Epistle of the Emperor Ludovicus to the Pope desiring him to write to Michael to further this Peace of the Churches 5. An Epistle of Ludovicus to the two Bishops whom he sent to Rome t direct them how to carry themselves wisely to get the Pope's consent Whether this at Paris was a Council or only a select Convention of Men chosen by the Emperor is a Controversie of no great moment I take the latter to be the more honourable sort of Assembly as the world then went and should reverence more the judgment of 20 or 12 Men selected by such an extraordinary Prince than of the majority of the Bishops of all Europe As I prefer the judgment of those Men that by King Iames were appointed to Translate the Bible before the judgment of the major part of the whole English Clergy of whom perhaps one in ten had a smattering in the Hebrew Tongue and one of an hundred understood it at the most § 127. Our modern cheated English Papists that are taught here in England to say that they worship not Images might here see the Fraud of their Clergy that fit them a Faith to their interests and occasions We confess that it is but three sorts of Images that Aquinas saith we should worship with Latria Divine Worship But yet the rest are to be worshipped say their Doctor◠Why else do they so commonly condemn this Book and Council of Ludovicus Pius that forbiddeth both the breaking and the worshiping of them Why doth Bellarmine purposely revile and particularly confute this Book Why doth Binnius recite all Bellarmine's Answer in his Concil Tom. 3. p. 529 c § 128. Bellarmine is very loth that the Epistle here said to be written by Pope Eugenius the 2d should be taken to be his and supposeth that it was but sent to him to be subscribed By whom If by the Emperor Ludovicus Pius and his Council of Divines you may see of what reputation the Pope was then in the Church One great Argument against it is That the Pope would not so impudently flatter the Emperor as to say O venerable Princes of the world seeing by God's disposal you govern all the Church c. And for uniting the Church which by God's Ordination you govern What filthier Flattery saith Bellarmine could there be Michael Balbus a Murderer c. is said by the Pope to govern the Church by God's disposing What then are Bishops for Ans. And 1. Did not even Gregory Mag. as much flatter a worse Man and Murderer Phocas and his Successors him and many more 2. Did not many if not most of the Emperors Heathen and Christian come in by Murder or Invasion and Usurpation And were Men therefore disobliged from obeying them when they were setled by submissive implicite consent 3. But the venom of the Cardinal Jesuite's answer is that he taketh it to be base Flattery to say that Princes are by God's dispose the Governors of the Church For then what are the Bishops for And must the world be ridden and abused by such Men that would turn Princes out of all Government of the Church and understand not that the Government of the same Church may belong to the Magistrate and the Pastors respectively as the Government
of an Hospital to the King and to the Physician May not one rule and punish by the Sword and another by the Word by Teaching and the Church Keys Is it not one thing to Fine and Beat and Banish and Kill a Man and another to sentence him unmeet for Church-Communion Marvellous that God permitteth the world to be deluded by such a blinded or blinding Clergy though as learned as Bellarmine that would make these things seem inconsistent and separate what God hath conjoined See here to what the Roman Clergy would reduce Kings they must be no Governors of the Church And if all the Kingdom be Christians are they not all the Church And so the Christening of the Subjects deposeth the King and maketh the chief Priest King that Christeneth them If he had said that Kings govern Churches but not as Churches but as parts of the Kingdom he had said falsly For they govern them as Churches though not by the same sort of Government as the Pastors do as they govern not Hospitals by the same sort of Government as the Physicians § 129. In Eugenius's Epistle it is honestly and truly said that If there had never been a painted or a forged Image neither Faith Hope nor Love by which Men come to the Eternal Kingdom would have perished I am of Bellarmine's mind now that this was none of the Pope's Epistle but the honest Emperor's and his Clergy Councils He thought it too bad for a Pope and I think it too good for a Pope He thinks that the Pope must be mad if he would have so condemned his Predecessor Adrian's Acts as this Epistle doth and I doubt he was not so honest as to do it But did not Bellarmine know how much more sharp and virulent Accusations Popes have laid on one another § 130. CCXLVI So powerful was Pius's Attempts to reform the Clergy that it drove Pope Eugenius the 2d for shame to call a Council at Rome not from the Antipodes but of 63 Bishops An. 826. who repeated some old Canons and among other things forbad such Feasts and Plays as our Wakes arâ— on any Holy-days to be used § 131. Valentine was next chosen Pope Collectis in unum Venerab Episcopis Gloriosis Romanorum Proceribus omnique amplae urbis Populo in Pal. Later saith Anastasius but he lived but 30 or 40 days Historians agree not of it § 132. Gregory the 4th succeeded who saith Platina would not undertake the Papal Office till Ludovicus the Emperor had considered of the choice and confirmed it Which saith Platina Ludovicus did not out of Pride but lest he should lose the Rights of the Empire being by nature gentle and most humane and had ever upheld the Rights of the Church He setled Benefices on every Priest that Poverty might not hinder them You see here that the great Friend of the Church yet took that for the right of the Empire that none should be Pope against his consent § 133. Platina adding how he reformed the Clergy forbidding them gay Attire Ornaments Sumptuousness and Vanities saith thereupon Would thou hadst lived in our times O Ludovicus For the Church wanteth thy holy Institutions and Censure so much hath the Ecclesiastical Order poured out itself to all Luxury and Lust. So describing their abominable Pride and Vanity § 134. Pope Gregory added so much to the good works of his Predecessors by mending building adorning so many Temples Pillars and Posts with Stones Vestments Silver c. and removing the Bones of Saints if he mistook not that it is no wonder if Rome grew into greater pomp and splendor than ever before § 135. This godly Emperor having three Sons by his first Wife and marrying a second having two Sons by her the Sons of the first Wife hated the second Wife thinking her Son Charles had too much favor One Son Pepin apprehended his Father and the eldest Lotharius came in and approved it and the 3d joined with them and wickedly deposed him from his Kingdom of which anon § 136. Ludovicus called Councils at Paris Mentz Lyons and Tholouse for Reformation some say upon the warning of a Maid that being possessed of the Devil and speaking Latine said that this Devil executed Judgments on the Land for their Sins Injustice c. CCXLVII. The Council at Paris wrote a large Book for Reformation An. 829. with the rest of this Emperor's Constitutions worthy to be Translated for the common good that all â—ight see the difference between Reformers and turbulent Hereticks and Hereticators and proud aspiring Prelates The Book is a Treatise of pious Directions The 50th Chapter reproving the breach of the Lord's day saith that By sight and by certain relation they have notice that many working on that day have been killed with Thundeâ—bolts some punished by sudden Convulsions some by visible Fire their Flesh and Bones being in a moment consumed and turned into ashes and many other such terrible judgments Therefore they require that as the Iews keep their Sabbath all Men much more do spiritually observe this day of the Lord. The second Book doth notably shew the duty of Kings and Magistrates The last Chapter requireth those that are far from the Church to meet for Prayer in other places as being acceptable to God In the 8th Capitul Bin. p. 569. the Bishops say Beati Petri vicem indigni gerimus So that the Pope is not Peter's onely Successor others represent him if this Council did not mistake § 137. CCXLVIII We come now to a Council which sheweth you that the good Canons made by the Emperor for Church-Reformation were far from reforming the generality of the Bishops It is the Council at Compendium which too compendiously deposed the godly Emperor of whom the world was not worthy Calumniators pretended that one Bernhard a Courtier lay with Iudith the Emperor's second Wife The Sons of his first Wife hating her Pepin whom his Father had made King of Italy on this pretence Trayterously raiseth Arms against his Father Lotharius the eldest Son too much consenting persuaded his Father to let a meeting without Arms at Neomagus prevent a War At that meeting the Nobles Parentis Imperium legitimè prorogabant saith Binnius p. 575 and Pepin took up Arms again The Father conquereth his Son and taketh him Prisoner and might justly have taken away his life but he was stol'n out of Prison in the night Ludovicus depriveth him of his Kingdom of Italy and divideth it between his two Sons by the second Wife Charles and Rodolphus Hereupon Lotharius the eldest rebelling knew not how to conquer his godly and prosperous Father but by the Bishops Them he draweth into his Conspiracy that as Binnius himself saith Ut quem filii armis imperio deponere non possent horum saltem nundinariorum Antistitum suffragio judicio honore ac potestate imperiali privaretur successit impiis conatus impiissimus The last means of Treason was a Council of the base mercenary
in all things to acquiesce in their wholsom counsel and to undergo their remedying judgment And being glad of so wholsom an Admonition strait we intreated his beloved Son Lotharius Augustus to be speedily present that without delay with his Nobles he might come that there might be a mutual reconciliation between them according to Christian Doctrine that if there were any blemishes or discords in their hearts a pure and humble begging of Pardon might expiate them and thereupon before all the multitude he might receive the judgment of the Priesthood as Penitents do which soon after was done Therefore the Lord Ludovicus coming into the Church of Holy Mary God's Mother where rest the Bodies of Saints that is of Medard a Confessor of Christ and Bishop and of Sebastian a most excellent Martyr the Priests Deacons and no small multitude of the Clerks standing by and his Son the foresaid Lotharius being present with his Nobles and the generality of all the People even as many as the Church could hold and being prostrate on the earth upon Hair-cloth before the Holy Altar be confessed before all that he too unworthily used the Ministry committed to him and in it many wayes offended God and scandalized the Church of Christ and many ways troubled the People by his negligence And therefore for the Publick and Ecclesiastick Expiation of so great Guilts he said he would desire Penance that God being merciful by their Ministry and Help he might prosperously deserve or obtain Absolution of so great Crimes God having given them the power of Binding and Loosing whom also the Bishops as spiritual Physicians did wholsomly admonish telling him that true remission of Sin followeth pure and simple Confession that he should openly confess his Errors in which he professed that he most offended God lest he should hide any thing within or do any thing deceitfully before God as it is known to all that he did heretofore in the Palace at Compeigne when he was by another Holy Assembly reproved before all the Church And that he come not to God now as he did then by dissembling and craft with a double heart and provoke him to anger rather than to forgive his sin for it is written The dissemblers and crafty provoke the wrath of God And after this Admonition he professed that he had chiefly sinned in all those things whereupon he had been familiarly reproved by the foresaid Priests by word or writings that being by due rebuke reproved of the things they gave him a writing of containing the sum of his Guilts of which they had specially reproved him which he had in his hands viz. I. As in the same Paper is fullier contained incurring the guilt of Sacriledge and Murder in that he kept not according to his promise the fatherly Admonition and terrible Contestation made to him with Divine Invocation before the Holy-Altar in presence of the Priests and the greatest multitude of the People in that he had done violence to his Brethren and Kindred and had permitted his Nephew to be killed whom he might have delivered and that being unmindful of his Vow he after commanded the Sign of Holy Religion to be made for the revenge of his own indignation II. That being the Author of Scandal and Troubler of the Peace and Violater of the Sacraments by unlawful Power he corrupted the Covenant which was made between his Sons for the peace and unanimity of the Empire and tranquility of the Church by common Council and consent of all the faithful People and confirmed by the Sacrament and in that he compelled his faithful People in contrariety to the said first Covenant and Oath to swear another Sacrament and so fell into the guilt of Perjury by the violation of the former Oaths And how much this displeased God is plain in that the People subject to him had afterward no peace but were all led into perturbation bearing the punishment of their sins and by God's just judgment III. That against Christian Religion against his Vow without any publick profit or certain necessity deluded by evil counsel he commanded a general Expedition to be made in Lent and in the extreme parts of his Empire appointed a general Meeting or Council at the time of the Lord's Supper when the Paschal Sacraments were to be celebrated of all Christians In which Expedition as much as in him lay he drew the People into great murmuring and against right put the Priests of the Lord from their Offices and brought great oppression on the Poor IV. That he brought violence on some of his faithful People that for his and his Sons fidelity and safety and the recovery of the shaking Kingdom humbly went to him and made known to him the snares prepared for him by his Enemies And that against all Law Divine and Humane he deprived them of their Estates and commanded them to be banished and made them when absent judged to Death and doubtless induced the Iudges to false judgment And against Divine and Canonical Authority raised prejudice against the Lord's Priests or Bishops and Monks and condemned them absent And in this incurring the guilt of Murder he was a violater of the Laws of God and Man V. Of divers Sacraments Oaths contrary to each other oft made unreasonably by his Sons or People he commanding and compelling them whereby he brought no small blot of sin on the People committed to him He hereby incurred the guilt of Perjury because these are rightly charged on him as Author by whom they were compelled But in the purging of Women in unjust Iudgments in false Witnesses and Perjuries which have been committed in his presence by his permission how much he hath offended God he himself knoweth VI. Of divers Expeditions which he hath made in the Kingdom committed to him not only unprofitably but also hurtfully without counsel and profit in which many and innumerable heinous Crimes were committed in the Christian People in Murders and Perjuries in Sacriledge and Adulteries in Rapines in Burnings either in the Churches of God or divers other places in Plunderings and oppressing of the Poor by miserable usage and almost unheard of among Christians which all as is aforesaid reflect on the Author VII In the divisions of the Empire rashly made by him against the common peace and the safety of the whole Empire for his own will and the Oath which compelled all the people to swear that they would act against his Sons as Enemies when he might have pacified them by Fatherly Authority and the counsel of his faithful People VIII That so many Mischiefs and Crimes committed in the Kingdom committed to him by his negligence and improvidence were not enough which yet cannot be numbred by which the Kingdom was evidently disgraced and endangered but moreover to add to the heap of miseries he lastly drew all the People of his power to their common destruction when he ought to
Emperor Michael to assume the Government and not leave the Empire any longer to his Mother and Sisters One Gebo then pretending to be the Son of Queen Theodora and claiming the Crown and many following him Ignatius is accused as being then on Gebo's side The Emperor commandeth Ignatius to shear his Mother and Sisters and put them into a Monastery He refuseth The Emperor is angry and suspecting him causeth it to be done by others and sendeth Ignatius to the Island Terebinth and killeth Gebo Within three dayes some of the Bishops who had subscribed and sworn to Ignatius even that they would sooner deny the supream Majesty of the Trinity than without a publick damnation they would suffer their Pastor to be deposed became agents to draw him to renounce his Place c. He refusing Photius is made one day a Monk the next day a Lector the next a Subdeacon the next a Deacon the next a Presbyter and on Christs birth-day is made Patriarch a great and noble Courtier the Emperors Secretary or privy Councellor famous for skill in things politick and civil so flourishing in the skill of Grammar Poetry Oratory Philosophy Physick and the study of almost all Liberal Arts and Sciences as that he was absolutely in them the Prince of his age yea and might contend with the ancients For he had a confluence of natural aptitude and force of felicity riches by which he got a library of all sorts of books and being desirous of Glory and Praise spent whole nights in sleepless Studies and after studied divinity and Ecclestical Volumes Gregorius Bishop of Syracuse a censured Bishop ordained him Ignatius is cruelly used and it s laid on Photius He sendeth some Bishops to Rome and by them saith that Ignatius gave up his Place It 's said that some held Ignatius's hand and by force wrote his mark and others wrote the rest but what 's the truth is hard to know A General Council is called The Emperor and all his Princes great ones and almost all the City met at Photiuâ—'s possession Baanes and some of the baser of the Romans are sent to summon Ignatius to the Council Bin. p. 867. He asketh them in what Garbs he shall come They take time and the next day say Rhodoaldus and Zacharias Legates of Old Rome by us summon thee without delay to appear at the holy Oecumenical Council in what habit thou wilt according to thy own Conscience He goeth in Patriarchs habit The Emperor commands him in the habit of a Monk No less than seventy two witnesses are brought into the Synod against him Nobles and Vulgar Nicâ—tas saith perjured of whom Leo and Theodotacius two Noble men were chief and some Anabaptists that is such as baptized men again though not against Infant Baptism These swore that Ignatius not justly ordained had twelve years ago usurped the place And alas there wanted not a Canon which would depose a great part of the Bishops of the world viz. that called the 30th Apost and oft renewed If any Bishop using the secular power do by them obtain a Church let him be deposed They left out And those that Communicate with him For which Nicetas accuseth the Bishops as falsly saving themselves And alas must all the ministers in England be deposed that communicate with any Bishop that gets a Church by the secular power What a separation than must here be made And would not this Canon depose Photius also The Popes Legates Bishops Rhodoceldus and Zacharias aliique nefarii homines saith Nicetas cryed down Ignatius as Vnworthy then they beat and odiously abuse the good old man And then cometh the foresaid forced subscribed confession or forged After this it s said that they sent men to kill him but by old base cloaths and two baskets on his back he past away unknown begging his bread by the way Nicetas saith that an Earthquake shook the City fourty dayes together and frightned them to send abroad and proclaim security to Ignatius who thereupon surrendered himself Bardas convinced sendeth him safe to his own Monastery and the Earthquake ceased and the Bulgarians moved by famine and the Emperor's gifts laid down armes and were baptized Christians Pope Nicholas excommunicateth Photius and the Emperor and all the Court. Bin. p. 868. A fire befals the Church of Sophia The young Emperor groweth so drunken and prophane that he gets a pack of wicked ungodly men and maketh them in mockery or play his Bishops and consecrateth a Church for them and maketh one Theophilus a jester their Patriarch to turn Religion into a scorn and then saith Theophilus is my Patriarch Photius is Caesars and Ignatius is the Christians And thus they by prophane witt derided the Bishops and Religion itself to which alas the Bishops ambition and odious strife did tend Photius was silent at all this Another Earthquake frightned them again the terriblest for a day and a night that had been there known Upon this one Basilius a Bishop of Thesalonica went boldly to the Emperor and opened the sin of his prophaneness disswading him from that wickedness that provoked God The Emperor enraged struk out his Teeth and caused him to be so scourged that he was like to dye Photius cared for none of this set his mind on the securing his seat and oppressing Ignatius magnifying all that tooke his part and encouraging false Stories and Calumnies against the best that were against him One of the betrayers and accusers of Ignatius was one of his Disciples and of his own name made Arch-Bishop of Hierapolis and then lost his Conscience and Fidelity Bin. p. 869. It was but for presuming to Consecrate an Altar cast down by the Russians and new built which was taken after his deposition for a breach of the Law and Canons and two Arch-Bishops ready at all times were sent to pull down the Altar as Nonconformable and to carry the stones to the Sea and wash them and then to set them up again O that they would have washt their hearts from Pride and Worldly Ambition Oh saith Nicetas What stupidity what pravity of a perverse mind was this What excess of Envy What study of ambitious Dishonesty Did thy daily meditation and night-watches and innumerable Books teach thee this Did thy frequent reading and disputation and striving for the praise of learning teach it thee Did the knowledge of the Old Testament and the New the sayings of the Wise the Decrees of the Holy Fathers teach thee to persecute a poor man and to vex and kill one of a broken heart and spirit Did not thy tyranical ejection of him satiate the implacable fury of thy mind c Thus Nicetas As much as to say Much learning and great power and places are too often separated from Honesty Charity and Conscience Here he mentioneth a terrible Dream of Bardas and the murder of him by Basilius's order and the Emperor's consent and how basely Photius cryed him down when he was dead
other mens Preaching might not win Souls as well as his these Popes could not endure the crossing of their ambition when Kingdoms took not them for their Lords Epist. 188. Is to justifie a man that baptized his own Child in danger of death for which Anselm Bishop of Lemovic judged him to be separated from his Wife Were not these two Bishops judicious Casuists Was either of them in the right After many other Epistles striving with and for the Bulgarians as belonging to his Diocess he Epist. 195. chideth Methodius Archbishop of Pannonia for turning from his Laws and in special for celebrating Divine Service in the Sclavonian Tongue which is barbarous commanding him to do it only in Latine or Greek You see how the Pope would edifie the Barbarians if he be their pastor This is the first Papal decree that I remember against publick prayers in a known tongue But alas his neighbour Italian Bishops had not yet fully learnt the extent of his authority sending for many Bishops on pain of excommunication to wait on him and to obey him old Auspertus Archbishop of Milan was one that disobeyed him and being forbidden to officiate by him conformed not to his silencing and suspending decree but went on in his office as a Nonconformist The Pope sent two Bishops as Legates to admonish him He kept them at the dore and set light by their message for which the Pope chideth him Epist. 196. Epist. 197. He flattereth King Ludovicus to come to Rome and own him in hope that he may be Emperor and all Kingdoms subject to him Epist. 199 200 201 202 203. He consenteth to the restoring of Photius but chargeth him to give up the Bulgarians to his jurisdiction Many persons in many Epistles he exhorteth to break their Covenants with the Pagans and chideth and threatneth them that did it not Epist. 247. The inclination of Stentopulcher a Pannonian Lord to the Church of Rome brought down the Popes heart to dispense with Methodius and changed his judgment to give very fair reason why Mass and Gospel and all might be used in the Sclavonian and all tongues only to keep up the honour of the Latine tongue and his authority he commandeth that though the rest be done in the Sclavonian yet the Gospel be first read in Latine and then translated and read over again in the Sclavonian Epist. 250. 251. He approveth of Photius's restitution Epist. 256. He is fain to chide Auspert Bishop of Milan that Instead of fearing his sentence he laid in prison two Monks sent by the Pope and taken on the high way But his heart came down at last and he speaks Auspertus fair and alloweth of his ordination of Ioseph Episc. Astensis though irregular Epist. 260 and commandeth his Arch-Deacon to obey him Epist. 261. After this he excommunicateth the Archbishop of Ravenna and a great stir there was about that also Epist. 292. He had made one Optandus Bishop of Geneva But Opteramus Archbishop of Vienna took it to be an usurpation on his right and laid the Popes Bishop in a miserable prison so far was he yet from being where he would be Epist. 294. Having excommunicated Athanasius Bishop of Naples for not breaking his Covenant with the Saracens he absolveth him on condition that yet he will break it The matter was that the Italians not able to resist the Saracens those that lay next them under their power sought to save themselves by truce and tribute by which means the Saracens had leisure to come further near to Rome and so the Pope to keep them from himself compelled by excommunications the Lords and Bishops of other parts to break their league and stand up in arms to their own destruction That you may know what Bishops now ruled the Churches Epist. 295. The foresaid Bishop of Vienna giveth one reason why he rejected Optandus ordained Bishop of Geneva by the Pope viz. Because he never was either baptized made Clerk acclamed or learned To which saith the Pope This should be covered in silence because let us speak it with your charity your holiness having nothing of these was yet consecrated in the Church of Vienna was not here good succession and a holy Church Bishops unbaptized that were no Scholars and no Christians Epist. 296. One Bishop by an armed band of men carrieth away another out of the Church and the Pope interposeth Epist. 297. He again soliciteth Michael King of the Bulgarians to become his subject The poor men that had chosen Christ were so perplexed between the Priests that strove who should be their Vice-Christ and King of Kings that it seemed as hard to them to resolve the doubt as it before was to be Christians Yet Epist. 307. sheweth the Bishop of Ravenna being dead that yet the Roman usurpation was not grown so high as to take the choice of the Bishop out of the People and Presbyters hands except in long neglected vacancies as Geneva aforesaid Had not this Pope been kept under by Gods judgments suffering the Saracens so to ruine Italy as that he still needed the help of Princes he had been like to have overthrown Rome by his usurpations setting both Princes and Prelates against him But necessity made him a flatterer of the two Emperors of the West the Emperor of the East the King of France the King of Bulgaria the Princes of Pannonia and all that he needed as ambition made him still striving by Tibi dabo claves and Anathematizing to affright the world to his obedience I say not worse of him than Baronius Binnius c. who have no other way to deny the Histories of Pope Ioan than by saying that this mans baser compliance made him called Pope Joan. Baronius ad an 879 n. 55. reciteth an Epistle of this Popes so greatly complying with Photius even against the Filioquen that Binnius would haveus believe that Photius forged it And epistolam ipsam aeterna oblivione dignam nolui saith he hisce adjungi § 81. CCXC. An. 876. a Concilium Ticinense maketh Charles Emperor when the Pope that had crowned Ludovicus before calleth Charles praescitum praeelectum et praedestinatum hereto with all honourable Elogies And here cometh in a great controversie between the Papists and the Protestants viz. Whether Kings succeed by inheritance or by the election and making of the Pope The Pope thought the craft of putting in a big usurping word was as good as a Law to prove their own power to make Kings and unmake them Accordingly this Pope when he durst stay from Rome in France no longer lest he lost all being imprisoned for refusing the right Heir Charles returneth and speaketh some big words and turneth forced consent into super-Kingly commands and saith Bin. p. 1010 eligimus merito et approbavimus solemnitèr ad Romani Imperii sceptra proveximus et Augustali nomine decoravimus c. And to disable the Kingly claim of inheritance he saith Neque enim sibi honorem
Romane Clergy were that would have such a Pope 2. But they give no proof of any such Consent but say It is verisimile 3. And where was the Church till that Consent or at least its Holiness 4. Can such Mens Consent make a Pope of an uncapable person Will no Wickedness incapacitate § 30. Say the foresaid Authors in this Popes time Sisevandus Bishop of Compostella finding the great diversity of the Roman and Moâ—â—rabick Liturgy altered his by the Popes consent After Herveus one Seulphus was Arch-Bishop of Rhemes Heribert Earl of Aquitane considering that the Bishop of Rhemes Anointeth the King of France bargained to have his Son made next Bishop that thereby he might get the Crown In hast Seulphus is Poysoned because they could not stay till he dyed Heribert ' s Son not yet Five Years old is made Arch-Bishop O scelus in auditum say Baronius and Binius This monstrous Election say they never before seen or heard of in the Christian World nor perhaps thought of Pope John did not only not disallow but ratifyed And by this Fact the Infamous Pope gave an Example to many Princes not only in that but the following Ages Alas for Grief to procure Lads that were their Kindred to be thrust into the Chief Seats or Bishopricks to the great Mischief of the Church A Work say they indeed worthy such a Pope whom an Infamous Woman by an Infamous Work had thrust into St. Peter's Chair Qu. Were such Villaines as Infallible as others Did their Love Honesty and Chastity fail and yet Were they secured against the Failing of their Faith Or Had they a Sincere Faith that had no other Grace And Could these forgive Sins and deliver Souls out of Purgatory When he had sate Fourteen Years or Sixteen saith Baronius and Binius Marquess Wido by the Perswasion of his Wife Marozia Pope Sergius Whore for the sake of his Brother Peter whom they hated cast him out of his Seat into a Prison where shortly after he was Choked with a Pillow And so the Invader and unjust Detainer of the Apostolick-Seat had an End worthy of his Wickedness And he that by the Impudent Mother Theodora had violently seized on the Holy Seat by her as Impudent Daughter was by God's just Iudgment Ejected Imprisoned and Deprived both of it and of his Life Ex Luitpr Frodoaldo Baron § 31. CCCIX Anno 912. A Synod at Confluence decreed as against Incest That none Marry within the seventh Degree of Kindred Was that Divine Law § 32. Two or Three other Synods at Trosâ—etum are mentioned about small Matters and One at Duisburge to Excommunicate some that put out the Bishops Eyes § 33. The next Pope is Leo the Sixth and Dyed after Seven or Six Months and Fifteen Dayes § 34. Next Anno 929. succeeded Stephen the Eighth or Seventh and sate but two Years one Month and fifteen Dayes How they were so fast dispatched I omit § 35. Next comes the Son of Marozia Pope Sergius his Bastard call'd Iohn the Eleventh His Mother and Father-in-Law Wido got him in Anno 931. even when he was a Lad under Age. His Brother Albericus saith Baronius did keep this Pope in Prison to his Death But the Case was this vid. Bin. p. 1055. Wido being Dead Marozia offereth the Dominion of Rome to his own Brother Hugo on condition he would Marry her He accepteth the Condition and secretly entering the Castle of St. Angelo after he had committed Incest with her his Brother's Widow he despised the Romans When his Son-in-Law Albericus by his Mother Marozia's Command poured out Water to wash his Hands he stroke him on the Face for pouring too much To Revenge this Wrong Albericus stir'd up the Romans to a Defection and having by Assault of the Castle put to Flight bis Father-in-Law Hugo he commanded his Mother Marozia and his Bastard-Brother the Counterfeit Pope John to be kept in Prison in which the violent Invader dyed being violently cast out after for five Years and some Months he had rather filthily Defiled tban Ruled the Apostolick-Seat Saith Binius out of Luitpraudus and Baronius Calling him a Monster and yet Magnifying Rome because such were Obeyed § 36. CCCX Anno 932. A small Council at Erford in Germany under King Henry decreed 1. That Holy-Dayes be kept for an Honourable Commemoration of the Twelve Apostles and Fasting on the Evens 2. That no State-Meetings be kept on the Lord's Dayes or other Holy-Dayes nor Christians then cited to the Courts of Justice 3. Nor when he is going to Church 4. That scandalous Ministers be tryed 5. That no private Christian make or impose any Fast on himself without the Bishop or his Missionaries Consent An unreasonable Usurpation Must the Bishop needs know all the Reasons that every Man hath for Fasting and be Judge of them But sure the Bishop's Diocess had not then so many hundred Parishes and so many Counties as they have now Else by that time the Bishop and his Commissary had heard a Hundred Thousand or Fifty Thousand Persons tell him what Reasons they had to Fast besides the common Fasts at any time or on any special Occasions much of his time would be taken up § 37. Anno 935. A Council at Rhemes against Church-Robbers c. § 38. Anno 936. Leo the Seventh was made Pope after Iohn the Eleventh In that time Hugo that was got away from Albericâ—s had got an Army and Besieged Rome A Match was made for Albericus to Marry Hugo's Daughter And so Marozia's Husband and Son were agreed by the means of Odo Abbot of Cluniac § 39. Henry King of Germany the Glory saith Baronius and Binius of Christian Religion dyed at this time who after many other Nations Couverted also the King of Denmark to the Christian Faith and left his Son Otho the Heir of his Piety and Valour Yet are not other Papists ashamed to say That all these Nations were Converted by the Pope who was the great Scandal that hindred the Conversion of the World § 40. But say the same Authors Manassâ—s Bishop of Arles now troubled the Churcb Being an Ambitious Man not contented with his Seat by the means of Hugo King of Italy he also invaded the Bishopricks of Verona and of Trent and of Mantua and of Milaâ— it self O now the Church prosper'd Saying That he did it by the Example of the Prince of the Apostles who at once possessed Rome Antioch and Alexandria Ex Luitpraud And could the Pope blame him that would be Bishop at the Antipodes and have all the World But it s strange that Men should talk of Bishops Ambition as of a strange thing in the Year 937. § 41. Anno 939. Pope Stephen the Nineth was chosen by Otho of Germany without the Cardinal-Clergy who had neither Power nor Virtue enough to choose And the City was under the Power of Albericus who Tyrannized over them And because he had not the Choice
so much as his Beard in his own power in which nature hath given him a propriety How much more might the Pope then command all mens purses 4. May way we not see here on what weighty reasons these men condemn God's word of insufficiency and plead for traditions and a necessity of their additional Laws When Scripture hath left out the shaving of mens Beards and we had never had such a Law if such power as the Papal had not made it O what discord and disorder would there be in the Church if we had not so necessary a government and what confusion would toleration introduce if mens Beards were left at liberty But if Paul called the heathen Phylosophy Vain and Science falsly so named 1 Tim. 6. 20. as befooling the world with pedantick trifling and calling them off from their great concernes may we not say then that this is vain Government and Order falsly so named which thus calleth the Church from its primitive purity simplicity and unity when Christians were known by loving one another to these childish games that the Prelates and Priests of the Catholick Church must be known by their being without Beards One would suspect this had its original from Pope Ioane if there were indeed such a person and that it is a Symbol of the Churches sex as it is called Our Mother or at least that Marozia or Theodora instituted it 5. And do you know which were the more inexcusable for silencing and persecuting the preachers of the Gospel The Iews that did it because they thought it took down Gods Law and would bring the Roman Power on them Or the Roman heathens that thought the Gospel destroyed the worship of their forefathers Gods or the Roman Papists that silenced and persecuted men for wearing Beards 1 Thes. 2. 16. § 56. Epist. 11. When some French Preachers had revived Religion in Sweden the Pope desirous to reap where they had sowed sends to the King of Sweden to tell him his joy and that what the French taught them they recieved from Rome and to desire him to send one of his Bishops to Rome to acquaint him with their customs and to receive his Laws and Mandates You see by what means Rome was raised Epist. 15. A Bishop gave up his Bishoprick The Pope chides him and commands him to a Monastery Rather than do so he returneth to his seat again The Pope chargeth him with the Idololatriae scelus the Crime of Idolatry for not obeying him and writes to them not to recieve him or be ruled by him as ever they loved the Grace of God and St. Peter The like he doth Epist. 16. by the disobedient Bishop of Narbon and Epist. 17. by the disobedient Arch Bishop of Rhemes and Epist. 18. 19 20. of the same and all this in St. Peter's name Yea Epist. 20. he requireth the King of France Philip to joyn against the Arch-bishop of Rhemes as excommunicate as ever he would have St. Peter's Grace because his Kingdom and his Soul were in St. Peter's power And it is no wonder that they that believe that the Pope is St. Peter's Vicar and Secretary and that their souls are in his power will give him all their Lands or Kingdoms to save their souls § 57. When the Pope sentenced the Emperor Henry to be excommunicate and deposed and was charged to have done this without authority he wrote his 21 Epist. l. 8. to the Bishop of Metz to prove that he had power to do it and to absolve his Subjects from their Oaths of fidelity saying that the Scriptures were full of certain documents to prove it And his certain documents are Tibi dabo Claves c. and Feed my Sheep And Kings are not excepted They are St. Peter ' s Sheep Bin. p. 1262. he saith that the Head of Priests is at the right hand of God but who knoweth not that Kings and Dukes had their beginning from them that knew not God and affected by blind lust and intolerable presumption to domineer over others the Devil the Prince of the world acting them in Pride Rapines Perfidiousness Murders and all wickedness who while they would have the Priests of the LORD to stoop to their footsteps are rightlyest compared to him who is head of all the Sons of pride who said even to Christ All this will I give thee if thou wilt fall down and worship me Who doubteth but that the Priests of Christ are the Fathers and Masters of Kings and Princes and of all the faithful And is it not notorious miserable madness for a Scholar to endeavour to subjugate his Master and a Son his Father and by wrongful obligations to subject him to his power by whom he believeth that he may be bound or loosed both in Earth and Heaven Did not Pope Innocent excommunicate Arcadius the Emperor and Pope Zachary depose from his Kingdom the King of France not so much for his iniquities as because he was not meet for so great power placed Pepin in his stead and absolved all the French from the Oath of fidelity Ambrose sheweth that Gold is not so much more pretious than Lead as the Priestly Dignity is higher than the Kingly Power Pag. 1263. Yea even the exorcists have power over Devils How much more over those that are Subject to the Devils and are his members And if the exorcist excel so much how much more the Priests And every King when he cometh to his end doth humbly and pitifully beg the Priests help that he may scape the prison of Hell and Darkness and at the judgment of God be found absolved But is there either Priest or Lay-man that when he is dying begs help of the King for the saving of his soul What King or Emperor can by his Office take a soul by baptism from the power of the Devil and number him with the Sons of God and fortifie him with holy Chrism And which is the greatest thing in the Christian Religion can with his own mouth make Christs body and blood Or which of them can bind and loose in Heaven and earth By all which it may be plainly gathered by how great power the sacerdot al dignity excelleth Which of them can ordain one Clerk in the holy Church How much less can they depose him for any fault For in orders exclesiastical to depose is an act of greater power than to ordain For Bishops may ordain Bishops but in no wise depose them without the authority of the Apostolick seat Who then that hath any knowledg can doubt but that Priests are preferred before Kings In a word we must know that all good Christians are more fitly Kings than evil Princes For these by seeking the Glory of God do strenuously rule themselves But the other seeking their own and being enemies to themselves do tyrannically oppress others These good Christians are the body of Christ. The other bad Princes are the body of the Devil These so rule themselves as that they shall
and the Pope dieth Onuphrius further openeth the Reasons and Rules of the Cardinals being shut up viz. Clem. the 4th being dead the Cardinals as is aforesaid were all so desirous to be Popes themselves that they were two years and nine months contending and could not possibly agree Philip King of France and Charles King of Sicily came themselves to Rome to intreat them but departed without success Yet they invoked the Holy Ghost every day to help them At last the Cardinal Bishop Ioh. Portuensis deridingly prayed them to uncover the houses for the Holy Ghost could not come in through so many covered roofs At last by Bonaventures intreaty they chose Theoâ—ald a Viseount and Archdeacon that was with our Prince Edward going to fight in Palestine And the â—aid Cardinal Portuens made these Verses on their choice anno 1271. Papatus munus tulit Archidiaconus Vnus Quem Patrem patrum fecit discordia fratrum § 221. Innocent the 5th cometh next the first after the shutting up of the Conclave He sought to end the Italian Wars but died before six moneths reign § 222. CCCCXLVII A Council at Salâ—zburge is published by Conisius as in Greg. the 10ths days but it seemeth liker to be after which condemned Pluralities nonresidence of Priests and their being in Taverns or Alehouses and playing at Dice and their wearing long Hair and sine Cloaths and restrained supernumerary begging Schollars and ordered that the Bishop should imprison such as prophaned holy things after they were excommunicated or suspended It seemeth that Bishops had by this time got coercive power but they used it not to bring the unworthy to the Sacrament but to keep the unworthy from it and from other profanations § 223. Next Ottobonus that was Pope Innocent the 4ths Nephew and Legate of England at the Barons Wars is chosen Pope but died before his Consecration within forty dayes but got the name of Hadrian the 5th § 224. Next cometh Pope Iohn the 22th as Platina the 19th as Binius and the 21st as most the 20th by Onuphrius 1276. He was a Physitian made Bishop inverecundi socordis ingenii saith Platina so foolish that he boasted how long he should live when presently the house fell on his head and he died by it in seven days after Suffridus saith Binius saith that he was writing an heretical perverse book when the room fell and cryed out after O what is become of my book Who will finish it which saith Binius if true sheweth the wonderful Providence of God for his Church But had this Pope been infallible had he been in a Council purposed to revoke the decree for shutting up the Cardinals in Conclave and this man finished the revocation and till the dayes of Celestine 5th that renewed it it stood revoked saith Onuphrius § 225. Next came Nicholas 3d. after six months contention and vacancy King Charles as Senator presiding and pleading for a French Pope He is commended much save that he set up all his own Kindred too much § 226. After three years reign eight months and fifteen dayes of Nicholas came Mâ—rtin 2d vulgo 4th saith Binius and Onuphrius a Frenchman In his time the Greek Emperour Paleologus not keeping his promise to the Pope joyned with Peter King of Arragon who claimed Sicily as his Wives inheritance and though the former Pope had set him on this was against him restoring King Charles to be Senator at Rome and siding with him because he was a Frenchman But the fatal Sicilian Vespers killed all the French and Peter overcame Charles and took his Son and Charles and the Pope shortly died of Fevers But before he died the Pope played the old Game excommunicating and cursing King Peter and gave his Kingdom for a prey to any one that would get it and absolved all his Subject from their Oath of Allegiance and signed Croisado's Soldiers under the sign of the Cross to fight against him § 227. Honorius the 4th cometh next his Brother being Senator at Rome He confirmed the same Anathema against Peter King of Arragon who shortly after died of a wound received in fight by the French The Pope dieth and the seat is void ten moneths 1287. after two years Reign § 228. Anno 1287. CCCCXLVIII A Council was held at Herbipolis by the Popes Legate endeavouring to have got the tenth penny of the Estates of the Clergy for the Pope and of the Laity for the Emperour by their joynt consent But Siphridus Arch-Bishop of Colen and Henry Arch-Bishop of Trevers stoutly opposing frustrated both their Conciliary designs § 229. Anno 1288 came P. Nicolas 4th a Religious Man General of the Minors when he had four years together laboured in vain to stay the blood in Italy between the Guelphes and Giâ—ellins and to reconcile the French and English and to relieve the Christians in Palestine he died And the Cardinals though for liberty they went to Perusium kept the Church headless two years and three months by contention though Princes in vain endeavoured to perswade them to agreement Are these no intercessions of the Succession In this time died Mich. Paleologus Emperour of Constantinople and the Clergy and Monks would not suffer him to be buried in holy ground because in the Council at Lyons he had consented to the Church of Rome Platina Was this a true Reconciliation of the â—reek Church § 230. Anno 1286. CCCCXLIX A Council at Râ—vâ—nna in Honorius time made some Canons for Reformation § 231. Anno 1291. CCCCL A Council at Sâ—ltsâ—urg for reconciling some Christians § 232. Anno 1292. CCCCLI The Arch-bishop of Mentz held a Council at Aschaffenburge which they say did many good things It is not known what § 233. Anno 1294. After two years and four months vacancy Caelestine the 5th a Religious man of solitary life is chosen Pope If ever there was a good Pope it is likely this was one But he was no sooner setled by common applause but the Cardinals especially Bened. Cajetaenus a subtile man perswaded him that his simplicity and unskilfulness would undo the Church and urged him to resign King Charles and the people disswade him and are only for him But the Cardinals prevailed and he resigned And going to his solicitude again the Cardinal Ben. Cajetaue that got him to resign sent him Prisoner to the Castle of Fumo where at best he died of grief Some write that Cardinal Cajetane got a way to speak through a Pipe put into the Wall as if it were some Angel to charge him to resign He was too good to be a Pope § 234. The deceiver that got him out succeeded him called Boniface the 8th by Bin. 7th 1294. This is he of whom it is said Intravit ut vulpes regnavit ut Leo exivit ut Canis He raised Wars to prosecute some Cardinals and the Gibelines While he lived wickedly he set up a Jubilee proclaiming Pardon of all sins to them that would visit
6. none is to be taken for Pope but we must live as the Greeks under our own Laws 10. It is against Scripture that Church-men have possession that is they should not labour to be rich 11. No Prelate should excommunicate any one unless he know that God hath first excommunicated him And he that so excommunicateth is thereby a Heretick or Excommunicate 12. A Prelate that excommunicateth a Clerk who appealed to the King or to the Council of the Kingdome is thereby a Traytor to the King and Kingdome 13. They that give over Preaching or hearing Gods Word for mens Excommunication are Excommunicate and in the Day of Judgment shall be judged Traytors to Christ. 14. It is lawful for a Deacon or Presbyter to preach the Word of God without the Authority of the Apostolick Seal or a Catholick Bishop 15. No one is a Civil Lord or a Prelate or a Bishop while he liveth in mortal sin The meaning of this is no open wicked man is a Subject capable of such Authority given by Christ as shall warrant him to use the place but his acts may be valued to others in many cases Dispositio materiae est necessaria ad formam recipiendam As an Infidel can be no Bishop or Pastor 16. Temporal Lords may take away temporal goods from the Church from a Possessor habitually criminal and not only in act Not from the sacred use in general but from that man that forfeiteth them 17. The people may correct their Delinquent Lords This is not to be believed to be Wickliff's sense till they cite his own words which no doubt limit it to the cases 18. Tythes are meer Alms and the Parishioners may take them away for their Prelates sins 19. The special prayers applied by Prelates and Religious men to one person profit him no more than the general ones caeteris paribus 20. He that giveth Alms to Fryars is thereby Excommunicate that is he sins by cherishing wilful idleness 21. He that enters the private Religion either of the Possessing or the Mendicant Fryars becomes less fit and able to keep the Commandments of God 22. Holy men that made private Religions thereby sinned 23. The Religious living in private Religion are not therein of the Christian Religion 24. Fryars are bound to get their living by the labour of their hands and not by begging 25. They are Simoniacal that bind themselves to pray for others for a temporal reward or price 26. The prayers of Reprobates wicked men availeth not to any 27. All things come to pass by necessity 28. The Confirmation of Youth the Ordination of Clerks the Consecration of Places are reserved to the Pope and Bishops for covetousness of temporal gain and honour 29. Universities Studies Colledges Degrees and Masterships in them are introduced by vain Gentility and profit the Church as much as the Devil doth 30. The Excommunication of a Pope or any Prelate is not to be feared because it is the Censure of Antichrist 31. They that found Cloysters sin and they are Diabolical that enter them 32. To enrich the Clergy is against Christs Rule 33. Pope Sylvester and the Emperour Constantine erred in inriching the Church 34. All the Order of Begging Fryars are Hereticks and those that give to them are Excommunicate 35. They that enter Religion as Fryars or any Order of them are thereby disabled from keeping Gods Commands and so of coming to Heaven unless they forsake them 36. The Pope and all his Clergy that have Possessions are therefore Hereticks and the Secular Lords and Laicks that consent to them to their great riches 37. The Church of Rome is the Synagogue of Satan and the Pope is not the immediate and nearest Vicar of Christ and the Apostles 38. The Decretal Epistles are Apocryphal and seduce from the Faith of Christ and the Clerks that study them are fools 39. The Emperour and Secular Lords were seduced by the Devil to inrich the Church excessively he meaneth with temporal goods 40. The Election of the Pope by Cardinals was introduced by the Devil 41. It is not necessary to Salvation to believe the Church of Rome to be the Supreme among other Churches 42. It is foolish to trust to the Indulgences of the Pope and Bishops 43. Oaths made to strengthen humane Contracts and Civil Commerce are unlawful 44. Augustine Benedict Bernard are damned unless they repented of having possessions and instituting and entering private Religions and so from the Pope to the lowest Religious Fryar they are all Hereticks 45. All Religions that is Orders of Fryars were introduced by the Devil This Article about Necessity of Events I see in Wickliff's Books is his own and many here cited are true but no doubt but many of them are perverted by their wording them and leaving out the Explicatory Context The Council forbad his Books and condemned them to be burnt and reprobated every one of all these foresaid Articles with all the 260. The Duke of Austria most humbly begged the Emperours pardon for receiving the Pope § 7. Sess. 9. The Citation of the Pope is read and Commissaries and Judges appointed and a Letter read from the University of Paris instigating the Council to their duty for their honest Chancellour Gerson was here § 8. Sess. 10. The Popes Suspension was read The Sess. 11. the Articles against the Pope are read which were proved which were in sum as followeth Art 1. That the Pope Iohn from his Youth was of a naughty disposition impudent a lyar rebellious against his Parents given to most Vices and so was and still is accounted of all that know him Cardinals Arch-Bishops Bishops c. witness it 2. He gathered riches by Symony and wicked means 3. By these Symoniacal riches he purchased a Cardinals place at great rates 4. Possessing Bononia as Legate by tyranny and cruel exactions inhumanely and impiously he ruined the people without all Justice or Piety c. 5. Getting thus to be Pope like a Pagan he contemned all Divine Offices 6. That he is the oppressor of the poor the persecutor of Justice the Pillar of the unjust the Statue of Simoniacks the servant of the Flesh the dregs of Vices a stranger to Virtue flying publick Consistories wholly given to sleep and other fleshly desires wholly contrary to Christ in life and manners the Glass of Infamy and the profound Inventer of all wickednesses or malice so scandalous to the Church that among faithful Christians that knew him he was commonly called THE DEVIL INCARNATE 7. That as a Vessel of all sins he repulsed the worthy and gave all Offices Benefices and Church-promotions to the bad that would give most Money for them 8. Hereby the whole Church Clergy and People fell under infamy and scandal 9. That of all these he was oft admonished and humbly intreated 10. That he was worse after than before laying all pretence of Justice and openly selling all to the worst that would give him money 11. That growing
excellency of the Truths that I am to preach and for the will of God and the good of Souls I would be a Plow-man or the meanest Trade if not a Sweep Chimney rather than a Minister Must we break our health and lay by all our worldly interest for you even for you and think not our lives and labours too good or too dear to further your Salvation and must we by you even by you be reproached after all God will be Judge between you and us whether this be not inhumane ingratitude and whether we deserve it at your hands 13. Yea it is Injustice also that you are guilty of The labourer saith Christ is worthy of his hire Luke 10. 7. Mark that you that call them Hirelings The Elders that rule well are worthy of double honour 1 Tim. 5. 17. Especially they that labour in the Word and Doctrine And will you throw stones at their heads for endeavouring to save your souls Will you spit in their faces for seeking with all their might to keep you from Hell Is that their wages that you owe them But blessed be the Lord with whom is our reward though you be not gathered Isa. 49. 5. But as you love your selves take heed of that Curse Ier. 18. 20. Shall evil be recompenced for good for they have digged a pit for my soul Remember that I stood before thee to speak good for them and to turn away thy wrath from them c. O how many a time have we besought the Lord for you that he would convert you and forgive you and turn away the evil that was over you And when all these our prayers and groans and tears shall be remembred against you O miserable souls how dear will you pay for all 14. And is it not a wonder that these Malignants do not see what evident light of Scripture they contradict and how many great express Commands they violate They break the fifth Commandment which requireth honour as well to spiritual Ecclesiastical Parents as to Civil and Natural And he that curseth Father and Mother his Lamp shall be put out in darkness Prov. 20. 20. The eye that mocketh at his Father and despiseth to obey his Mother the Ravens of the Valley shall pick it out and the young Eagles shall eat it Prov. 30. 17. Did these wretches never read 1 Thes. 5. 12. We beseech you brethren to know them which labour among you and are over you in the Lord and admonish you and to esteem them very highly in love for their work sake and to be at peace among your selves And Heb. 13 17. Obey them that have the rule over you and submit your selves for they watch for your souls as they that must give account that they may do it with joy and not with grief for that is unprofitable for you And Heb. 13. 7. Remember them which have the rule over you who have spoken to you the Word of God And so ver 24. And 1 Tim. 5. 17. The Elders that rule well are worthy of double honour c. with abundance more such passages as these Do not you feel these fly in your faces when you oppose the Ministers of Christ Doth a Thief or Murderer sin against plainer light than you 15. These Malignants sin against the consent and experience of the Universal Church of Christ till this day The whole Church hath been for the Ministry and instructed by them and as the Child doth seek the Breast so did new-born Christians in all Ages seek the Word from the Ministers that they might live and grow thereby And all the Nations of the Christian World are for the Ministry to this day Or else they could not be for Christ and for the Church and Gospel Is it not plain therefore that these Malignants are dead branches cut off from the Church that are so set against the Spiriâ— and interest of the Church 16. Moreover they sin against the experience of all or almost all the true Christians in the world For they have all experience that Ministers are either their Fathers or Nurses in the Lord And that by their means they have had their life and strength and comforts their sins killed their graces quickned their doubts resolved the taste of the good Word of God and of the powers of the world to come May we not challenge you as Paul oft doth his Flock Whether you did not receive the illuminating sanctifying Spirit by the Ministry if ever you received it I tell you it is as much against the new and holy nature of the Saints to despise the Ministers of Christ as it is unnatural for a Child to spit in the face of his Father or Mother And the experience of sound Christians will keep them closer and help them much against this inhumanity what ever Hypocrites may do 17. And if these Malignants had not Pharaohs heart they would sure have considered that the experience of all Ages tells them that still the most wicked have been the Enemies of the Ministry and the most godly have most obeyed and honoured them in the Lord and that this Enmity hath been the common Brand of the rebellious and the fore-runner of the heavy wrath of God and that it hath gone worst with the Enemies and best with the Friends of a godly Ministry Do I need to prove this which is so much of the substance of the Old Testament and the New Was it the Friends or Enemies of all the Prophets Apostles and Ministers of Christ that Scripture and all good Writers do commend Do not the names of all Malignants against the godly Ministry stink above ground as the shame of mankind except those that are buried out of hearing or those that were converted 18. Nay such as are noted for the highest sort of the wicked upon Earth worse than Drunkards Whoremâ—ngers and such filthy Beasts The Persecutors of Gods Ministers have been ever taken as walking Devils And the hottest of Gods wrath hath faln upon them Take two instances 1. When the Iews went into Captivity this was the very cause 2 Chron. 36. 15 16. But they mocked the Messengers of God and despised his words and misused his Prophets till the wrath of the Lord arose against his people till there was no remedy 2. And when the Iews were cut quite off from the Church and made Vagabonds on the Earth this was the very cause Acts 28. 28. Be it known therefore to you that the salvation of God is sent to the Gentiles and that they will hear it 1 Thes. 2. 15 16. These Jews both killed the Lord Iesus and their own Prophets and have persecuted us and they please not God and are contrary to all men forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved to fill up their sin alway for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost 19. It is the Devils own part that these Malignants act For it is he that is the great Enemy of
shew for it than they If others stick on this let me tell them that Magistracy is as truly from God as the Ministry And let ever a King on Earth shew me an uninterrupted succession giving him Title to his Crown and I will shew him a more undoubted succession or Title to my Ministry But here 's no room to discuss this Question 9. Object But you are Parish Priests and no true Ministers because you have not true Churches Answ. All the Christians in our Parishes that consent are our Flock And we undertake to prove the truth of such Churches not only against scorn but against all the Arguments that can be brought 10. Object But you have not the Spirit and therefore are no true Ministers Answ And how prove you that we have not the Spirit The approvers admit none but such as they think have the Spirit He that is sanctified hath the Spirit Prove us unsanctified and we will resign our Office Object You read your Sermons out of a Paper therefore you have not the Spirit Answ. A strong Argument I pray you take seven years time to prove the consequence As wisely do the Quakers argue that because we use Spectacles or Hour-glasses and Pulpits we have not the Spirit It is not want of your abilities that makes Ministers use Notes but it 's a regard to the work and the good of the Hearers I use Notes as much as any man when I take pains and as little as any man when I am lazy or busie and have not leisure to prepare It 's easier to us to preach three Sermons without Notes than one with them He is a simple Preacher that is not able to preach all day without preparation if his strength would serve especially if he preach at your â—ates 11. Object But the true Ministry is persecuted but so are not you but are Persecutors of others Answ. 1. For our persecuting others be so merciful as to prove it to us that we may lament it If punishing wicked men and Seducers be persecuting not only Paul was such that wished they were cut off that troubled the Galatians but God himself would be the greatest of all persecutors that will lay you in Hell without repentance and then you will wish your old persecution again And if we be not persecuted what means the reproaches of you and all the Drunkards and Malignants about us But I pray you envy us not our lives and liberties and a little breathing time Do you not read that The Churches had rest throughout all Judea and Galilee and Samaria and were edified and walking in the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the Holy Ghost were multiplied Acts 9. 31. Envy not a little prosperity to the Church Doth not Paul pray that the Gospel may run and be glorified and that we may be delivered from unreasonable wicked men 2 Thes. 3. 1. Sometimes you can say that more glorious days are promised and that the Saints shall rule the world Unmerciful men It is but a while ago since we had our share of sufferings Since that the Sword hath hunted after us Many of our Brethren are yet in America that were driven thither at this time in Spain and Italy and Germany and Savoy Alas what do our Brethren suffer in the same Cause and Calling that we are in And do you reproach us with our mercies if we be out of the Furnace but a little while in one corner of the world Object 12. You work no Miracles to confirm your Doctrine Answ. It is true nor do we need It is confirmed by Miracles long ago If we brought a new Gospel or as the Papists gave you not our Doctrine on the credit of Scripture but Scripture and all on our own credit then you might justly call for Miracles to prove it But not when we have nothing to do but expound and apply a Doctrine sealed by Miracles already Again I say Let any Prince on Earth that questions our Calling shew his Title to his Crown or any Iudge or Magistrate to his Office and if I shew not as good a Title to mine lâ—t me be taken for a Deceiver and not a Minister Christian Reader as ever thou wouldest be sanctified confirmed and saved hold fast to Christ Scripture Ministry and Spirit and that in the Church and Communion of Saints and abhor the thoughts of separating them from each other A second Sheet for the MINISTRY Iustifying our Calling against Quakers Seekers and Papists and all that deny us to be the Ministers of Christ. THe corruption of the Romish Church being most in the Errours and Vices of the Priests which made men abhor the offering of the Lord 1 Sam. 2. 17. the reproach which they brought upon themselves did much prepare men to hearken to the Reformers The observing of this and of the necessary dependance of the people on their Pastors hath caused the Papists to bend their force against the Ministers of the Reformed Churches and to use all their wit to defame their Persons and Callings and make them seem ignorant unworthy or no Ministers to the people On this Errand they send abroad their Agents this is the saving Gospel that the Seekers Quakers and their Brethren preach that the Scripture is not the Gospel or Word of God and that we are no true Ministers Whatever Doctrine we are preaching the Opposers work is to call us Deceivers and ask How we prove our selves true Ministers My work therefore at this time for the sake of the ignorant in our Assemblies shall be to acquaint them with our answer to this demand And I shall give it you in order in certain Propositions Prop. 1. Both in the Old and New Testament there is mention of two distinct sort of Ministers of Gods appointment First such as received some new Revelationâ— either a Law or a particular Message immediately from God so that the people could not be sure that their Doctrine was true till they were sure that the men were sent of God These were called Prophets in the Old Testament and Apostles Prophets c. in the New So Moses received the Law from God and the following Prophets their particular Messages So the Apostles received the Gospel from Christ and so did the Seventy and other Disciples that conversed with him and other Prophets and Evangelists had it by immediate inspiration All these were necessarily by Miracles or some Infallible Evidence to prove their own Call before the Hearers could receive their Doctrine for this was their Message The Lord hath commanded me to say thus or thus to you or The word which the Lord spake to me is thus or thus This sort of Ministers the Papists and Seekers do confess But besides these there is a second sort of true Ministers whose Office is not to receive from God any new Doctrine Law or Message but to proclaim the Laws already delivered and teach men the Doctrine already revealed and to oversee
this Commandment without spot unrebukable unto the appearing of our Lord Iesus Christ which must needs extend to his Successors The faithful and wise Stewards that give the children their meat in due season will be found so doing by the Lord at his coming Luke 12. 42 43. And it is not till the last day that Christ will give up the Kingdome to the Father 1 Cor. 15. 25. 2. The Apostles actually setled an ordinary Ministry in their time as is proved 3. There are Commands for setling Successors of these as 2 Tim. 2. 2. Tit. 1. 5. as is proved 4. These Ministers are described and the way of their Ordination setled by Canons 1 Tim. 3. Tit. 1. 5. We had the several Angels of the Churches in their places Revel 2. 3. and promises to some of them for the future with a Command Hold fast till I come 2. 23. and 3. 10. I will keep thee from the hour of temptation which shall come on all the world Behold I come quickly 6. Christ hath commanded the Ministerial work to continue to the end As the Preaching of the Word must be to all Nations and every Creature Matth. 28. 19. Mark 16. 15. And these most cruel men would have all the Preachers give over their work and leave the world to perish in Infidelity So for the assembling of our selves together and exhorting one another we are commanded not to forsake it as is the manner of some and so much the more as we see the day approaching Heb. 10. 23 24 25. So that the nearer we are to Christs coming the closer must we stick to Church-Communion and holy Assemblies considering that it s but a little while and he that comes will come and shall not tarry ver 37. God doth on purpose forbear his coming because he is long-suffering and will continue the means to call men to repentance and then the day of the Lord will come suddenly 2 Pet. 3. 9 10. The Word of the Lord endureth for ever and this is the word which by the Gospel is preached to you 1 Pet. 1. 25. The Lords Supper is Instituted to be used to shew the Lords death till he come 1 Cor. 11. 26. Church-government or Discipline is a fixed Ordinance Mat. 18. 15 16 17. And if the work continue the workmen must continue 7. The mercy of God and the Efficacy of Christs Blood and the necessities of the Church continue we still need a Teaching Ministry Heb. 5. 11. and for our need it is Instituted till the Church be perfect that we be not as children toss'd up and down Eph. 4. 13 14. What enemies to us and to the love and mercy of God are they that would perswade men that he so quickly withdrew so great a mercy when the gifts and calling of God are without repentance 8. The Law and its Priesthood was not removed but by the glory of a better Law and Ministry And Christ is the Mediator of a better Covenant and Promises Heb. 7. 22. 8. 7 8. Therefore he will not deal so much worse 9. Christ telleth us that a wise man will consider whether he can go through with it before he build or make War Therefore he would not himself begin to build his Church and enter himself the Captain of our Salvation and presently let his Enterprize fall 10. If the Ministry continue not then the Church continueth not for as the Head Liver and Stomack or Lungs are to the Body so is the Ministry to the Church 1 Cor. 12. 13 19 20 28 29. They plant and water it 1 Cor. 3. 6. and build it ver 10. For how shall we believe on him of whom we have not heard and how shall we hear without a Preacher and hew shall they preach unless they be sent Rom. 10. 14. But the Church doth continue for first else Christ were no longer the Head of it the King Prophet or Priest and so not Christ But he is a Priest for ever abiding continually he continueth ever and hath an unchangeable Priesthood he ever liveth to make intercession for those that come to God by him Heb. 7. 3. 22 24 25. 2. Those that deny the Church must needs deny themselves Christians and Members of that Church 3. There is no Salvation promised but to the Church Eph. 5. 23 25 26 27. Mark 16. 16. 4. Blindness is on the Jews but till the fulness of the Gentiles be come in and so all Israel shall be saved Therefore it is most evident that the Gentile Church shall not cease till the fulness have prepared for the re-ingraffing of the Iews Rom. 11. 25 26. 5. It is an everlasting Kingdome which cannot be moved and the City of the living God the heavenly Jerusalem whereof even the Angels and perfected Spirits of the Iust are a part to which we come by Faith therefore it ceaseth not Heb. 12. 22 23 28. 6. When that which is perfect is come then that which is in part shall be done away 1 Cor. 13. 10. but not before 7. If nothing can separate us from the love of God no not any distress or tribulation then are not all the Ministers and Church cut off Rom. 8. 34. to 39. Yea those that in all Ages suffer for his sake are not cut off from him but so many faithful Ministers do 8. But what should I say any more against that Assertion which carrieth stark Heathenism or Infidelity in its Forehead reproaching Christ as no Christ and teaching men that they are not bound to be Christians and believe the Gospel and perswading the world to despise Christs Messengers and Ordinances and Ministers to cast off their Masters work which in two words is to turn Infidels or Apostates I must refer you for my fuller answer to such men to my Book against Infidelity Prop. 4. God hath in his Law appointed a standing way for the calling of these ordinary Teaching Ruling worshipping Ministers in all Ages and doth himself call them in this way 1. He instituteth the Office 2. He commandeth that fit persons be ordained to this Office 3. He describeth them by their necessary Qualifications All this is at large 1 Tim. 3. Tit. 1. Act. 20. 1 Pet. 5. c. This is his work by his standing Law By which also he commandeth the people to chuse consent to or accept the fit and to hear and obey them Act. 14. 23. 2 Thes. 5. 12. Act. 6. 3 5. Heb. 13. 7 17. And then by Providence 1. He giveth them those gifts of the Spirit that may competently qualifie them for their Office 2. He assisteth the Chusers and Ordainers to discern those Qualifications and do their duties 3. He causeth some special fitness of a Minister to the special Province or Charge which he is to undertake and special inviting occasions and opportunities and oft-times causeth Necessity to make the choice 4. He boweth the heart of the person called to consent and usually to desire the work for the