the Gospell and communion thereof CHAP. V. Of the Catholick Church visible Of the Nature thereof In what sense the Vniversality of Professors is called a Church Amiraldus his Judgement in this businesse The Vnion of the Church in this sense wherein it consists Not the same with the Vnion of the Church Catholick Nor that of a particular instituted Church Not in relation to any one officer or more in subordination to one another Such a subordination not proveable 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Nicene Synod Of generall Councells Vnion of the Church visible not in a generall Councell The true Vnity of the Vniversality of professors asserted Things necessary to this union Story of a Martyr at Bagdat The Apostacy of Churches from the unity of the Faith Testimony of Hegesippus Vindicated Papall Apostacy Protestants not guilty of the breach of this Vnity The Catholick Church in the sence insisted on granted by the Ancients Not a Politicall body THe Second generall notion of the Church as it is usually taken signifies the Vniversality of men professing the Doctrine of the Gospell and obedience to God in Christ according to it throughout the World This is that which is commonly called the visible Catholick Church which now together with the union which it hath in its selfe and how that Unity is broken falls under consideration That all Professors of the Gospell throughout the World called to the knowledge of Christ by the Word doe make up and constitute his visible Kingdome by their professed subjection to him and so may be called his Church I grant That they are precisely so called in Scripture is not unquestionable What relation it stands in to all particular Churches whether as a Genus to its Species or as a Totum to its parts hath lately by many been discussed I must crave leave to deny that it is capable of filling up or of being included in any of these denominations and Relations The Vniversall Church we are speaking of is not a thing that hath as such a specificative forme from which it should be called an Vniversall Church as a particular hath for its ground of being so called It s but a collection of all that are duely called Christians in respect of their profession nor are the severall particular Churches of Christ in the world so parts and members of any Catholick Church as that it should be constituted or made up by them and of them for the order and purpose of an instituted Church that is the cellebration of the worship of God and Institutions of Jesus Christ according to the Gospell which to assert were to overthow a remarkable difference between the oeconomy of the Old Testament the New Nor do I think that particular Congregations doe stand unto it in the Relation of Species unto a Genus in which the whole nature of it should be preserved and comprized which would deprive every one of membership in this Vniversall Church which is not joyned actually to some particular Church or Congregation then which nothing can be more devoid of truth To debate the thing in particular is not my present intention nor is needfull to the purpose in hand The summe is the Vniversall Church is not so called upon the same account that a particular Church is so called The formal Reason constituting a particular Church to be a particular Church is that those of whom it doth consist doe joyne together according to the minde of Christ in the excercise of the same numericall Ordinances for his worship And in this sence the Vniversal Church cannot be said to be a Church as though it had such a particular forme of its own which that it hath or should have is not only false but impossible But it is so called because all Christians throughout the world excepting some individuall persons providentially excluded do upon the enjoyment of the same preaching of the word the same Sacraments administred in specie profes one common faith and hope but to the joynt performance of any exercise of Religion that they should heaâ—e one Sermon together or partake of one Sacrament or have one Officer for their Rule and Government is ridiculous to imagine nor doe any professe to think so as to any of the particulars mentioned but those only who have profit by the fable As to the description of this Church I shall acquiesce in that lately given of it by a very learned Man Saith he Ecclesia Vniversalis est communio seu societas omnium coetuum I had rather he had said and he had done it more agreeable to principles by himselfe laid down omnium Fidem Christianam profitentium sive illi ad Ecclesias aliquas particulares pertineant sive non pertineant qui Religionem Christianam profitentur consistens in eo quod tametâ—â— neque exercitia pietatis uno numero frequentent neque Sacramenta eadem numero participent neque uno eodemque omnino ordine regantur gubernentur unum tamen corpus in eo constituunt quôd eundem Christum Servatorem habere se profitentur uno in Evangelio propositum iisdem promissionibus comprehensum quas obsignant confirmant Sacramenta ex eadem institutione pendentia Amyrald Thes de Eccles nom defin The. 29. There being then in the World a great multitude which no man can number of all Nations Kindreds people and languages professing the doctrine of the Gospell not tied to mountaines or hills Joh. 4. but worshipping 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Cor. 1. 2. 1 Tim. 2. 8. Let us consider what union there is amongst them as such wrapping them all in the bond thereof by the will and appointment of Jesus Christ and wherein the breach of that union doth consist and how any man is or may be guilty thereof I suppose this will be granted That only Elect believers belong to the Church in this sense considered is a Chimaera feigned in the braines of the Romanists and fastened on the Reformed Divines I wholly assent to Austins dispute on this head against the Donatists and the whole entanglement that hath been about this matter hath arisen from obstinacy in the Papists in not receiving the Catholick Church in the sense mentioned before which to doe they know would be injurious to their interest This Church being visible and professing and being now considered under that constituting difference that the union of it cannot be the same with that of the Catholick Church before mentioned it is cleare from hence that multitudes of men belong unto it who have not the Relation mentioned before to Christ and his body which is required in all comprehended in that union seeing many are called but few are chosen Nor can it consist in a joynt Assembly either ordinary or extraordinary for the celebration of the Ordinances of the Gospell or any one of them as was the case of the Church of the Jewes which met at set times in one place
for the performance of that worship which was then required nor could otherwise be accomplished For as it is not at all possible that any such thing should ever be done considering what is and shall be the estate of Christs visible Kingdome to the end of the World so it is not that I know of pleaded that Christ hath made any such appointment yea it is on all hands confessed at least cannot reasonably be denyed that there is a supersedeas granted to all supposalls of any such duty incumbent on the whole visible Church by the Institution of particular Churches wherein all the Ordinances of Christ are duely to be administred I shall only adde that if there be not an institution for the joyning in the same numericall Ordinances the Vnion of this Church is not really a Church Vnion I mean of an Instituted Church which consists therein but something of another nature Neither can that have the formall Reason of an instituted Church as such which as such can joyne in no one act of the worship of God instituted to be performed in such societies So that he that shall take into his thoughts the condition of all the Christians in the world their present state what it hath been for 1500 years and what it is like to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 will easily understand what Church state they stand in and relate unto 3. It cannot possibly have its union by a Relation to any one Officer given to the whole such an one as the Papists pretend the Pope to be For though it be possible that one Officer may have Relation to all the Churches in the World as the Apostles severally had when Paul said the care of all the Churches lay on him who by vertue of their Apostolicall commission were to be received and submitted to in all the Churches in the World being antecedent in office to them yet this neither did nor could make all the Churches one Church no more then in one man were an Officer or Magistrate in every Corporation in England this would make all those Corporations to be one Corporation I doe not suppose the Pope to be an Officer to the whole Church visible as such which I deny to have an union or order capable of any such thing but suppose him an Officer to every particular Church no union of the whole would thence ensue That which is one Church must joyne at least in some one Church act numerically one So that though it should be granted that the Pope were a generall Officer unto all and every Church in the World yet this would not prove that they all made one Church and had their Church-union in subjection to him who was so an Officer to them all because to the constitution of such an Vnion as hath been shewed there is that required which in reference to the universall society of Christians is utterly and absolutely impossible But the non-institution of any such Officer ordinarily to beare rule in and over all the Churches of God hath been so abundantly proved by the Divines of the Reformed Churches and he who alone puts in his claime to that prerogative so clearly manifested to be quite another thing that I will not needlessely goe over that work again something however shall afterwards be remarked as to his pretensions from the principles whereon I proceed in the whole businesse There is indeed by some pleaded a subordination of Officers in this Church tending towards an union on that account as that ordinary Ministers should be subject to Diâ—cesan Bishops they to Arch-Bishops or Metropolitans they again to Patriarchs where some would bound the processe though a parity of Reason would call for a Pope Nor will the Arguments pleaded for such a subordination rest untill they come to be centred in some such thing But 1 before this plea be admitted it must be proved that all these Officers are appointed by Jesus Christ or it will not concerne us who are enquiring solely after his will and the setling of conscience therein To doe this with such an evidence that the Consciences of all those who are bound to yeild obedience to Jesus Christ may appeare to be therein concerned will be a difficult task as I suppose And to settle this once for all I am not dealing with the men of that lazy perswasion that Church affairs are to be ordered by the prudence of our Civill Superiors and Governors and so seeking to justify a non submission to any of their constitutions in the things of this nature or to evidence that the so doing is not Schisme nor do I concerne my selfe in the order and appointment of Ancient times by men assembled in Synods and Councells wherein whatever was the force of their determinations in their own Seasons we are not at all concerned knowing of nothing that is obligatory to us not pleading from Soveraigne Authority or our own consent but it is after things of pure Institution that I am enquiring With them who say there is no such thing in these matters we must proceed on other principles then any yet laid downe Also it must be proved that all these Officers are given and do belong to the Catholick Church as such and not to the particular Churches of severall measures and dimensions to which they relate which is not as yet that I know of so much as pretended by them that plead for this order They tell us indeed of various arbitrary distributions of the World or rather of the Roman Empire into Patriarchats with the dependent Jurisdictions mentioned and that all within the precincts of those Patriarchats must fall within the lines of the subordination subjection and communication before described but as there is no subordination between the Officers of one denomination in the inferior parts no more is there any between the Superior themselves but they are independent of each other Now it is easily discernable that these Patriarchats how many or how few soever they are are particular Churches not any one of them the Catholick nor altogether comprising all that are comprehended in the precincts of it which none will say that ever they did and therefore this may speak something as to a combination of those Churches nothing as to the union of the Catholick as such which they are not Supposing this Assertion to the purpose in hand which it is not at all it would prove only a combination of all the Officers of severall Churches consisting in the subordination and dependance mentioned not of the whole Church it selfe though all the members of it should be at once imagined or fancied as what shall hinder men from fancying what they please to be comprised within the limits of those distributions unles it be also proved that Christ hath instituted severall sorts of particular Churches Parochiall Diocesan Metropoliticall Patriarchall I use the words in the present vulgar acceptation their signification having bin somewhat
at large insisted on In briefe put the whole Church of God into that condition of libertie and soundnesse of Doctrine which it was in when the great uproare was made by the Donatists and we shall be concerned to give in our judgements concerning them To presse an example of former dayes as binding unto duty or convincing of evill in respect of any now without stating the whole substratum of the businesse and compleat cause as it was in the dayes and seasons wherein the example was given we judge it not equall Yet although none can with ingenuity presse me with the crime they were guilty of unlesse they can prove themselves to be instated in the very same condition as they were against whom that crime was committed which I am fully assured none in the world can the communion of the Catholick Church then pleaded for being in the judgement of all an effect of mens free liberty and choice now pressed as an issue of the Tyranny of some few yet I shall freely deliver my thoughts concerning the Donatists which will be comprehensive also of those other that suffer with them in former and after ages under the same imputation 1. Then I am perswaded that in the matter of fact the Donatists were some of them deceived and others of them did deceive in charging Caecilianus to be ordained by Traditores which they made the maine ground of their separation however they took in other things as is usuall into their defence afterward Whether any of themselves were ordained by such persons as they are recharged I know not 2. On supposition that he was so and they that ordained him were known to him to have been so yet he being not guilty of the crime renouncing Communion with them therein and themselves repenting of their sinne as did Peter whose sinne exceeded theirs this was no just cause of casting him out of Communion he walking acting in all other things suitable to principles by themselves acknowledged 3. That on supposition they had just cause hereupon to renounce the Communion of Caecilianus which according to the principles of those days retained by themselves was most false yet they had no ground of separating from the Church of Carthage where were many Elders not obnoxious to that charge Indeed to raise a jealousy of a fault in any man which is denyed by him which we are not able to prove which if it were proved were of little or no importance and on pretence thereof to separate from all who will not believe what we surmise is a wild and unchristian course of proceeding 4. Yet grant farther that men of tender consciences regulated by the principle then generally received might be startled at the cōmunion of that Church wherein Caecilianus did preside yet nothing but the height of madnesse pride and corrupt fleshly interest could make men declare hostility against all the Churches of Christ in the world who would communicate with or did not condemne that Church which was to regulate all the Churches in the world by their own fancy and imagination 5. Though men out of such pride and folly might judge all the residue of Christians to be faulty and guilty in this particular of not condemning and separating from the Church of Carthage yet to proceed to cast them out from the very name of Christians and so disanull their priviledges and ordinances that they had been made partakers of as manifestly they did by rebaptizing all that entered into their communion was such unparalleld Pharisaisme and Tyranny as was wholy to be condemned and untollerable 6. The Divisions Outrages and Enthusiasticall furies and Riots that befell them or they fell into in their way werein my judgement tokens of the hand of God against them so that upon the whole matter their undertaking and enterprise was utterly undue and unlawfull I shall farther adde as to the mannagement of the cause by their Adversaries that there is in these writings especially those of Austin for the most part as sweet and gratious spirit breathing full of zeale for the glory of God Peace Love Union among Christians and as to the issue of the cause under debate it is evident that they did sufficiently foyle their Adversaries on principles then generally confessed and acknowledged on all hands though some of them seem to have been considering Learned and dexterous men How little we are at this day in any contests that are mannaged amongst us about the things of God concerned in those differences of theirs these few Considerations will evince yet notwithstanding all this I must take liberty to professe that although the Fathers justly charged the Donatists with disclaiming of all the Churches of Christ as a thing wicked and unjust yet many of the principles whereon they did it were such as I cannot assent unto Yea I shall say that though Austin was sufficiently cleare in the nature of the invisible Church Catholick yet his frequent confounding it with a mistaken notion of the visible generall Church hath given no small occasion of stumbling and sundry unhappy intanglements to diverse in after Ages His own book De unitats Ecclesiae which contains the summe and Substance of what he had written elsewhere or disputed against the Donatists would afford me instances enough to make good my assertion were it now under consideration or proofe Being then thus come off from this part of our Charge and accusation of Schisme for the relinquishment of the Catholick visible Church which as we have not done so to doe is not Schisme but a sin of another nature and importance according to the method proposed a recharge on the Romanists in reference to their present Condition and its unsuitablenesse to the Vnity of the Church evinced must briefly ensue Their claime is known to be no lesse then that they are this Catholick Church out of whose Communion there is no salvation as the Donatists was of old that also the union of this Church consists in its subjection to its head the Pope and worshipping of God according to his appointment in and with his severall qualifications and attendencies Now this claime of theirs to our apprehension and Consciences is 1. Cruell and sanguinary condemning Millions to hell that invocate and call on the name of the Lord Jesus Christ believing all things that are written in the Old and New Testaments for no other cause in the World but because they are not convinced that it is their duty to give up Reason Faith Soule and all to him and his disposall whom they have not only unconquerable presumptions against as an evill and wicked Person but are also resolved and fully perswaded in their Consciences that he is an enemy to their deare Lord Jesus Christ out of Love to whom they cannot beare him Especially will this appeare to be so if we consider their farther improvement of this principle to the killing hanging torturing to death
latter sence also The plea about Metropoliticall Churches I suppose will be thought very impertinent to what I have now in hand so it shall not at present be insisted on That the state of Churches in after Ages was moulded and framed after the patterne of the civill Goverment of the Roman Empire is granted And that conformity without offence to any be it spoken we take to be a fruit of the working of the mystery of Iniquity But that there was any such order instituted in the Churches of Christ by the Apostles or any instituted by the Authority from the Lord and Ruler is utterly denyed nor is any thing but very uncertaine conjectures from the sayings of men of after Ages produced to attest any such order or constitution When the order spirituality beauty and glory of the Church of Christ shall returne and men obteine a light whereby they are able to discerne a beauty and excellency in the inward more noble spirituall part indeed life and soul of the worship of God these disputes will have an issue Chrysostome sayes indeed that Corinth was the Metropolis of Achaia but in what sence he sayes not the Politicall is granted the Ecclesiasticall not proved nor are we enquiring what was the state of the Churches of Christ in the dayes of Chrysostome but of Paul But to returne If any one now shall say will you conclude because this evill mentioned by the Apostle is Schisme therefore nothing else is so I Answer that having before asserted this to be the chiefe and only seat of the Doctrine of Schisme I am inclinable so to do and this I am resolved of that unlesse any man can prove that something else is termed schisme by some divine writer or blamed on that head of account by the Holy Ghost elsewhere and is expressly reproved aâ— another crime I will be at Liberty from admitting it so to be But yet for what may hence by a parity of Reason be deduced I shall close with and debate at large as I have professed The Schisme then here described by the Apostle and blamed by him consists in causelesse differences and contentions amongst the members of a particular Church contrary to that of love prudence and forbearance which are required of them to be exercised amongst themselves and towards one another which is also termed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 15. 21. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 16. 13. And he is a Schismatick that is guilty of this sinne of Schisme that is who raiseth or entertained or persisteth in such differences nor are these termes used by the Divine writers in any other sence That any men may fall under this guilt it is required 1. That they be members of or belong to some one Church which is soe by the institution and appointment of Jesus Christ And we shall see that there is more required hereunto then the bare being a Believer or a Christian 2. That they either raise or entertaine and persist in causelesse differences with others of that Church more or lesse to the interruption of that Exercise of love in all the fruits of it which ought to be amongst them and the disturbance of the due performance of the duties required of the Church in the worship of God As Clement in the forementioned Epistle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 3. That these differences be occasioned by and do belong to some things in a remoter or nearer distance appertaining to the worship of God their differences on a Civill account are elsewhere mentioned and reproved 1 Ep. cap. 6. for therein also there was from the then state of things an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 v. 7. This is that Crime which the Apostle rebukes blames condemnes under the name of Schisme and tells them that were guilty of it that they shewed themselves to be carnall or to have indulged to the flesh and the corrupt principle of selfe and their own wills which should have been subdued to the obedience of the Gospell Mens definitions of things are for the most part Arbitrary and loose fitted and suited to their severall apprehensions of Principles and conclusions so that nothing cleare or fixed is generally to be expected from them from the Romanists description of Schisme who violently without the least colour or pretence thrust in the Pope and his Head ship into all that they affirme in Church matters least of all I can allow men that they may extend their definitions of things unto what they apprehend of an alike nature to that which gives rise to the whole disquisition and is the first thing defin'd But at this I must professe my selfe to be somewhat entangled that I could never yet meet with a definition of Schisme that did comprize that was not exclusive of that which alone in the Scripture is affirmed so to be Austins Definition contains the summe of what hath since been insisted on saith He Schisma ni fallor est eadem opinantem eodem ritu utentem solo Congregationis delectari dissidio Gâ—n Faust lib. 20. cap. 3. by dissidium congregationis he intends separation from the Church into a peculiar Congregation a definition directly suited to the cause he had in hand and was pleading against the Donatists Basil in Epist ad Amphiloch Con. 44. distiguisheth between 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and as he makes Schisme to be a division arising from some Church controversies suitable to what those dayes experienced and in the substance true so he tells us that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is when either Presbyters or Bishops or Laicks hold unlawfull meetings Assemblyes or Conventicles which was not long since with us the only Schisme Since those days Schisme in generall hath passed for a causelesse separation from the communion and worship of any true Church of Christ the Catholick Church saith the Papist with a relinquishment of its society as to a joynt celebration of the ordinances of the Gospell how farre this may passe for Schisme and what may be granted in this description of it the processe of our discourse will declare In the mean time I am most certain that a Separation from some Churches true or pretended so to be is commanded in the Scriptures so that the withdrawing from or relinquishment of any Church or society whatever upon the plea of its corruption be it true or false with a mind and resolution to serve God in the due observation of Church institutions according to that light which men have received is no where called Schisme or condemned as a thing of that nature but is a matter that must be tryed out whether it be good or evill by vertue of such generall rules and directions as are given us in the Scriptures for our orderly and blamelesse walking with God in all his wayes As for them who suppose all Church power to be invested in some certain Church Officers originally I meane that
the nature of such things will beare though you are not at all concerned in it yet we will give you leave to â—riumph over us And if our own Congregations be not Churches whatsoever we are we are not Schismaticks for Schisme is an evill amongst the members of a Church if S. Paul may be believed But we have forsaken the Church of Rome But Gentlemen shew first how we were ever of it No man hath lost that which he never had nor hath left the place or station wherein he never was Tell me when or how we were members of your Church We know not your language you are Barbarians to us It is impossible we should assemble with you But your Forefathers left that Church and you persist in their evill Prove that your Forefathers were ever of your Church in any communion instituted by Christ and you say somewhat To desert a mans station and relation which he had on any other account good or bad is not Schisme as shall farther be manifested Upon the same principle a plea for freedome from the charge of any Church reall or pretended as Nationall may be founded and confirmed either we are of the Nationall Church of England to give that instance or we are not if we are not and are exempted by our Protestation as before whatever we are we are not Schismaticks if we are fatally bound unto it and must be members of it whether we will or no being made so we know not how and continuing so we know not why shew us then what duty or office of Love is incumbent on us that we doe not performe Doe we not joyne in externall acts of worship in Peace with the whole Church Call the whole Church together and try what we will doe Doe we not joyne in every Congregation in the Nation This is not charged on us nor will any say that we have right so to doe without a Relation to some particular Church in the Nation I know where the sore lyes A Nationall Officer or Officers with others acting under them in severall subordinations with various distributions of power are the Church intended A non-submission to their rules and constitutions is the Schisme we are guilty of Quem das finem Rex magne laborum But this pretence shall afterwards be sifted to the utmost In the meane time let any one informe me what duty I ought to performe towards a Nationall Church on supposition there is any such thing by vertue of an Institution of Jesus Christ that is possible for me to performe and I shall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 addresse my selfe unto it To close these considerations with things of more immediate concernment Of the divisions that have fallen out amongst us in things of Religion since the last Revolutions of this Nation there is no one thing hath been so effectuall a promotion such is the power of Tradition and prejudice which even beare all before them in humane affaires as the mutuall charging one another with the guilt of Schisme That the notion of Schisme whereon this charge is built by the most if not all was invented by some of the Ancients to promote their plea and advantage them with them with whom they had to doe without due regard to the simplicity of the Gospell at least in a suitablenesse to the present state of the Church in those daies is too evident For on very small foundations have mighty fabricks and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Religion been raised As an Ability to judge of the present posture and Condition of affaires with counsell to give direction for their order and mannagement towards any end proposed not an Ability to contriâ—e for events and to knit on one thing upon another according to a probability of successe for continuance which is almost constantly disturbed by unexpected providentiall interveniences leaving the Contrivers at a perplexing losse will be found to be the summe of humane wisdome so it will be our wisdome in the things of God not to judge according to what by any meanes is made present to us and its principles on that account rendred ready to exert themselves but ever to recoile to the originall and first institution When a man first falls into some current he finds it strong and almost impassable trace it to its fountaine and it is but a dribling gutter Paul tells the members of the Church of Corinth that there were divisions amongst them breaches of that Love Order that ought to be observed in Religious Assemblies Hence there is a sinne of Schisme raised which when considered as now stated doth no more relate to that treated on by the Apostle then Simon Sonne of Jonas lovest thou me doth to the Popes Supremacy or Christs saying to Peter of John If I will that he tarry till I come what is that to thee did to the report that went afterwards abroad that that Disciple should not die When God shall have reduced his Churches to their Primitive Purity and institution when they are risen and have shaken themselves out of the dust and things of Religion returne to their native simplicity it is scarce possible to imagine what Vizards will fall off and what a contrary appearance many things will have to what they now walke up and downe in I wish that those who are indeed really concerned in this businesse namely the members of particular Churches who have voluntarily given up themselves to walke in them according to the appointment of Christ would seriously consider what evill lyes at the door if they give place to causelesse differences and divisions amongst themselves Had this sinne of Schisme been rightly stated as it ought and the guilt of it charged in its proper place perhaps some would have been more carefull in their deportment in their Relations At present the dispute in the World relating hereunto is about Subjection to the Pope and the Church of Rome as it is called And this mannaged on the Principles of Edicts of Councells with the practices of Princes and Nations in the dayes long agoe past with the like considerations wherein the concernment of Christians is doubtlesse very small Or of Obedience and conformity to Metropolitan and Diocesan Bishops in their constitutions and wayes of worship joyntly or severally prescribed by them In more Ancient times that which was agitated under the same name was about persons or Churches renouncing the Communion and Society of Saints with all other Churches in the World consenting with them in the same Confession of Faith for the substance of it And these differences respectively are handled in reference to what the state of things was and is grown unto in the dayes wherein they are mannaged When Paul wrote his Epistle there was no occasion given to any such Controversies nor foundation laid making them possible That the Disciples of Christ ought every where to abound in love and forbearance towards one another especially to carry all things
in union and Peace in those Societies wherein they were joyned for the Worship of God were his Endeavours and Exhortations Of these things he is utterly silent Let them who aime to recover themselves into the like state and condition consider his commands exhortations and reproofes Things are now generally otherwise stated which furnisheth men with objections against what hath been spoken to whose removall and farther clearing of the whole matter I shall now addresse my selfe CHAP. III. Objections against the former discourse proposed to consideration Separation from any Church in the Scripture not called Schisme Grounds of such separation Apostacy irregular walking sensuality Of separation on the account of Reformation Of commands for separation No Example of Churches departing from the communion of one another Of the common notion of Schisme and the use made of it Schisme a breach of Vnion That Vnion instituted by Christ THat which lyes obvious to every man against what hath been delivered and which is comprehensive of all the particular objections to which it seemes lyable and obnoxious is that according to this description of Schisme separation of any man or men from a true Church or of one Church from others is not Schisme Seeing that is an evill only amongst the members of one Church whilest they continue so to be which is so contrary to the judgement of the generality of Christians in this businesse that it ought to be rejected as fond and absurd Of what hath been the judgement of most men in former Ages what it is in this what strength there is in an Argument deduced from the consent pretended I am not as yet arrived to the consideration of Nor have I yet manifested what I grant of the Generall notion of Schisme as it may be drawn by way of Analogie or proportion of Reason from what is delivered in the Scripture concerning it I am upon the precise signification of the word and description of the thing as used and given by the Holy Ghost In this sence I deny that there is any relinquishment departure or separation from any Church or Churches mentioned or intimated in the Scripture which is or is called Schisme or agreeth with the description by them given us of that terme Let them that are contrary minded attempt the proof of what they affirme As farre as a negative Proposition is capable of evidence from any thing but the weakenesse of the opposition made unto it that layed down will receive it by the ensuing considerations All blameable departure from any Church or Churches or relinquishment of them mentioned in the Gospell may be reduced to one of these three Heads or Causes 1. Apostacy 2. Irregularity of walking 3. Professed sensuality 1. Apostacy or falling away from the faith of the Gospell and thereupon forsaking the Congregations or Assemblyes for the worship of God in Jesus Christ is mentioned Heb. 10. 25. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not wholy deserting the assembling our selves as is the manner of some A separation from and relinquishment of the Communion of that Church or those Churches with whom men have assembled for the worship of God is the guilt here charged on some by the Apostle Upon what account they so separated themselves is declared v. 26. they sinned willfully after they had received the knowledge of the truth thereby shipping out their necks from the yoke of Christ v. 28. and drawing back to perdition v. 29. that is they departed off to Judaisme I much question whether any one would think fit to call these men Schismaticks or whether we should so judge or so speake of any that in these dayes should forsake our Churches and turne Mahumetans Such a departure makes men Apostates not Schismaticks Of this sort many are mentioned in the Scriptures Nor are they accounted Schismaticks because the lesser crime is swallowed up and drowned in the greater but because their sin is wholly of another nature Of some who withdraw themselves from Church communion at least for a season by their disorderly and irregular walking we have also mention The Apostle calls them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Thes 5. 14. unruly or disorderly persons not abiding in obedience to the order prescribed by Christ in and unto his Churches and sayes they walked 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Thess 3 6. out of all Church order whom he would have warned and avoided so also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Th. 3 2. persons that abide quietly in no place or station but wandred up down whom whatever their profession be he denies to have faith That there were many of this sort in the Primitive times who through a vaine and slight spirit neglected and fell off from Church Assemblyes when yet they would not openly renounce the faith of Christ is known Of such disorderly persons we have many in our dayes wherein we live whom we charge not with Schisme but vanity folly disobedience to the Precepts of Christ in generall Men also separated themselves from the Churches of Christ upon the account of sensuality that they might freely indulge to their lusts and live in all manner of pleasure all their dayes Jude 19. these are they that separate themselves sensuall having not the spirit Who are these they that turne the grace of God into lasciviousnesse and that deny the Lord God and our Saviour Jesus Christ v. 4. that defile the flesh after the manner of Sodom and Gomorrah v. 7 8. that spoke evill of things they knew not and in things they knew naturally as bruit beasts they corrupted themselves v. 10. Sinning openly like beasts against the light of nature so v. 12 13 16. these saith the Apostle are they that separate themselves men given over to worke all uncleannesse with delight and greedinesse in the face of the Son abusing themselves and justifying their Abominations with a pretence of the grace of God That there is any blameable separation from or relinquishment of any Church or Churches of Christ mentioned in the Scripture but what may be referred to one of those heads I am yet to learne Now whether the men of these Abominations are to be accounted Schismaticks or their crime in separating themselves to be esteemed Schisme it is not hard to judge If on any of these accounts any persons have withdrawn themselves from the Communion of any Church of Christ if they have on any motives of feare or love apostatized from the faith of the Gospell if they doe it by walking disorderly and loosely in their conversations if they give themselves up to sensuality and uncleannesse and so be no more able to beare the society of them whom God hath called to holinesse and purity of life and worship they shall assuredly beare their own burthen But none of these instances are comprehensive of the case inquired after so that for a close of them I say for a man to withdraw or withhold himselfe from the communion externall
of Faith Rom 12. 6. an Vnity of Faith and of knowledge of the Sonne of God Eph 4. 13. a measure of saving Truths the explicite knowledge whereof in man enjoying the use of Reason within and the means of grace without is of indispensible necessary to Salvation without which it is impossible that any soule in an ordinary way should have communion with God in Christ having not light sufficient for converse with him according to the tenour of the Covenant of Grace These are commonly called Fundamentalls or first Principles which are justly argued by many to be clear perspicuous few lying in an evident tendency to obedience Now look what truths are savingly to be believed to render a man a member of the Church Catholick invisible that is whatever is required in any one unto such a receiving of Jesus Christ as that thereby he may have power given to him to become the Son of God the profession of those Truths is required to enstate a man in the unity of the Church visible 2. That no other internall principle of the mind that hath an utter inconsistency with the reall beliefe of the Truths necessary to be professed be manifested by the Professors Paul tells us of some who though they would be called Christians yet they so walked as that they manifested themselves to be Enemies of the crosse of Christ Phil 3. 18. certainly those who on one account are open and manifest enemies of the Crosse of Christ are not on any members of his Church there is one Lord and one Faith required as well as one Baptisme And a protestation contrary to evidence of fact is in all Law Null Let a man professe 10000 times that he believes all the saving truths of the Gospell and by the course of a wicked and prophane conversation evidence to all that he believes no one of them shall his protestation be admitted shall he be accounted a servant in and of my family who will call me Master and come into my house only to doe me and mine a mischiefe not doing any thing I require of him but openly and professedly the contrary Paul saies of such Tit. 5. 15 16. They professe that they know God yet in works they deny him being abominable disobedient and unto every good work reprobate which though peculiarly spoken of the Jewes yet contains a generall Rule that mens profession of the knowledge of God contradicted by a course of wickednesse is not to be admitted as a thing giving any priviledge whatever 3. That no thing opinion error or false doctrine everting or overthrowing any of the necessary saving Truths professed as above be added in with that profession or deliberately be professed also This principle the Apostle layes downe and proves Gal. 5. 3 4. notwithstanding the profession of the Gospell he tells the Galatians that if they were bewitched to professe also the necessity of Circumcision and keeping of the Law for Justification that Christ or the profession of him would not profit them On this account the Ancients excluded many Hereticks from the name of Christians so Justin of the Marcionites and others 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 We are at length then arrived to this issue the belief profession of all the necessary saving truths of the Gospell without the manifestation of an internall principle of the mind inconsistent with the beliefe of them or adding of other things in profession that are destructive to the truths so professed is the bond of the unity of the visible professing Church of Christ Where this is found in any man or number of men though otherwise accompanied with many failings sinns and errors the unity of the faith is by him or them so farre preserved as that they are thereby rendred members of the visible Church of Christ and are by him so esteemed Let us suppose a man by bare Reading of the Scriptures brought to him by some providence of God as finding the Bible in the high way and evidenâ—ing their Authority by their own light instructed in the knowledge of the Truths of the Gospell who shall thereupon make profession of them amongst them with whoÌ„ he lives although he be thousands of miles distant from any particular Church wherein the Ordinances of Christ are administred nor perhaps knows there is any such Church in the world much lesse hath ever heard of the Pope of Rome which is utterly impossible he should supposing him instructed only by reading of the Scriptures I aske whether this man making open profession of Christ according to the Gospell shall be esteemed a member of the visible Church in the sence insisted on or no That this may not seem to be such a fiction of a case as may involve in it any impossible supposition which being granted will hold a doore open for other absurdities I shall exemplifie it in its most materiall postulata by a story of unquestionable truth Elmacinus who wrote the story of the Saracens being Secretary to one of the Caliphs at Bagdat informes us that in the yeare 309 of their Hegira about the year 921 of our account Muctadinus the Caliph of Bagdat by the Counsell of his wise men commanded one Huseinus the son of Mansor to be crucified for certaine Poems whereof some verses are recited by the Historian and are thus rendred by Erpenius Laus â—i qui manifestavit humilitatem suam celavit inter nos divinitatem suam permeantem donec coepit in creatura sua apparere sub specie edentis bibentis Jamque aspexit cum Creatura ejus sicuti supercilium obliquum respiciat supercilium From which remnant of his worke it is easily to perceive that the crime whereof he was accused and for which he was condemned and crucifyed was the confession of Jesus Christ the Son of God As he went to the crosse he added says the same Author these that follow Compoâ—ur mens nihil plane habet in se iniquitatis bibendum mihi dediâ— simile ejus quod bibit secit hospitem in hospite And so dyed constantly as it appears in the profession of the Lord Jesus Bagdat was a City built not long before by the Saracens wherein it is probable there were not at that time any Christians abiding Adde now to this story what our Saviour speakes Luck 12. 8. I say unto you whosoever shall confesse me before men him shall the Sonne of man confesse before the Angells of God and considering the unlimitednesse of the expression as to any outward consideration and tell me whether this man or any other in the like condition be not to be reckoned as a subject of Christs visible Kingdome a member of this Church in the world Let us now recall to minde what we have in designe granting for our processe sake that Schisme is the breach of any unity instituted and appointed by Christ in what sence soever it is spoken of our inquiry is whether we are
been so as it is most certaine we have not then we have not as yet broken any bond or violated any Vnity or disturbed any peace or order of the appointment of Jesus Christ so that whatever of trouble or division hath followed on our way and walking is to be charged on them who have turned every stone to hinder us our Liberty And I humbly begge of them who acting on principles of Reformation according to the commonly called Presbyterian platforme doe accuse us for separation from the Church of England that they would seriously consider what they intend thereby Is it that we are departed from the Faith of the people of God in England they will not sustaine any such crimination Is it that we have forsaken the Church of England as under its Episcopall constitution have they not done the same have they not rejected their Nationall Officers with all the bonds tyes and ligaments of the Union of that pretended Church have they not renounced the way of worship established by the Law of the Land doe they not disavow all obedience to them who were their legall Superiours in that constitution doe they retaine either matter or forme or any thing but that naked name of that Church And will they condemne others in what they practise themselves As for a Church of England in their new sence which yet in some respects is not new but old for what is beyond a voluntary consociation of particular Churches we have not as yet had experience of it That we shall be accused of Schisme for not esteeming our selves made members of a particular Church against our wills by buying or hireing an habitation within such a precinct of ground we expect not especicially considering what is delivered by the chiefe Leaders of them with whom now we are treating whose words are as followeth We grant that living in parishes is not sufficient to make a man a member of a Particular Church A Turk or Pagan or Idâ—later may live within the precincts of a Parish and yet be no member of a Church A man must therefore in order of nature be a member of the Church visible and then living in a Parish and making profession of Christianity may claime admission into the society of Christians within those bounds and enjoy the priviledges and ordinances which are there dispensed Ans of Cammil p. 105. This is also pursued by the Authors of Jus Divinum Ministerii Anglicani p 9 10. whereafter the repetition of the words first mentioned they adde that all that dwell in a Parish and constantly heare the Word are not yet to be admitted to the Sacraments which excludes them from being fideles or Church Members and makes them at best as the Catechumeni of old who were never esteemed members of the Church If we have been so members by our own voluntary consent and doe not continue so to be then this Congregation whereof we were so members was reformed according to the mind of Christ for I speak now to them that own Reformation as to their light or it was not If it were reformed and that a man were a member of it so reformed by his own voluntary consent I confesse it may be difficult how a man can leave such a congregation without their consent in whose power it is to give it to him without giving offence to the Church of God Only I say let all by-respects be layd aside on the one hand and the other all regard to repute and advantage let Love have its perfect worke and no Church knowing the end of its being and constitution to be the Edification of Believers will be difficult and tenacious as to the granting a dismission to any member whatever that shall humbly desire it on the account of applying himselfe to some other Congregation wherein he supposes and is perswaded that he may be more effectually built up in his most holy Faith I confesse this to be a case of the greatest difficulty that presents it selfe to my thoughts in this businesse Suppose a man to be a member of a particular Church and that Church to be a true Church of Christ and granted so by this person and yet upon the account of some defect which is in or at least he is convinced and perswaded to be in that Church whose Reformation he cannot obtaine he cannot abide in that Church to his spirituall advantage and edification suppose the Church on the other side cannot be induced to consent to his secession and relinquishment of its ordinary externall communion and that person is hereby intangled what course is to be taken I professe for my part I never knew this case fall out wherein both parties were not blamable The person seeking to depart in making that to be an indispensable cause of departure from a Church which is farre short of it and the Church in not condescending to the mans desire though proceeding from infirmity or temptation In generall the rule of forbearance and condescension in Love which should salve the difference is to give place to the Rule of obeying God in all things according to our light And the determining in this case depending on circumstances in great variety both with reference to the Church offending and the person offended He that can give one certaine Rule in and upon the whole shall have much praise for his invention However I am sure this cannot be rationally objected by them who esteeming all Parishes as such to be Churches doe yet allow men on such occasions to change their habitations and consequently their Church Relations Men may be relieved by change of dwelling Subcom of Div. p. 52. And when a mans leaving the ordinary externall communion of any particular Church for his own edification to joyne with another whose Administrations he is perswaded in some things more or fewer are carryed on more according to the minde of Christ is as such proved to be Schisme I shall acknowledge it As then the not giving a mans selfe up unto any way and submitting to any establishment pretended or pleaded to be of Christ which he hath not light for and which he was not by any act of his own formerly engaged in cannot with any colour or pretence of reason be reckoned unto him for Schisme though he may if he persist in his refuseall prejudice his own Edification So no more can a mans peaceable relinquishment of the ordinary communion of one Church in all its relations to joyne with another be so esteemed For instance of the first case suppose by the Law of this Nation the severall parâ—chiall Churches of the Land according to arbitrary distributions made of them should be joyned in Classicall Associations and those againe in the like arbitrary disposall into Provinciall and so onward which cannot be done without such interveniences as will exonerate conscience from the weight of pure institution or suppose this not to be done by the Law of the