this is far from saying that meerly her owning of infallibility doth make infallibility her own It is a very different thing to say He that must be a Minister must needs be a man and not a woman and to say That such a one must needs be a minister because he is a man and not a woman So it is one thing to say the Church which is the infallible Judge must be a Church judging and holding and professing her self to be infallible and cannot be a Church which judgeth and professeth her self to be fallible And another quite different thing to say that such a Church is the infallible Judge because she teacheth and professeth her self to be so Not be not I pray so far mistaken as some are usually and wilfully if not maliciously to think that when I speak of the Roman Church I intend the Church of the Diocess of Rome and so pretend to make a perticular Church to be an Universal and the Universal or Catholick Church of Christ No I entend by the Roman Church all that vastly extended community of christians which liveth in communion with and in subjection and Obedience unto the Bishop of Rome as to their Supream Pastour and Governour on Eearth in things appertaining unto faith next under Christ This is the Flock of Christ adhering to the true Shepheard appointed them by God And now dearest Friends I have no more to say but only entreat you in the bowels of Charity to learn by heart that most pretious lesson of our sweet Saviour viz. Learn of me for I am meek and humble of heart And that you may be in a ready way to learn this remember in order to it that Lesson which I mentioned before of his beloved Apostle St. John 4. 6. We are of God he that knoweth God heareth us he that is not of God heareth us not hereby know we the spirit of truth and the spirit of error There was nothing then required to distinguish these two spirits but to hear or to refuse to hear the Apostles and seeing St. Paul saith Faith comes by hearing It will be as necessary now to hear in our times those who are lawfully sent to teach it as it was in the times of the Apostles If therefore ye hear no body or follow those who at first and in their beginning heard no body you refuse to hear those who are sent to teach you And then according to St. Iohn it is evident you are lead by the spirit of error Consider these things and be happy according to the Prayers of Your true Friend and well-wisher in the best things ROBERT EVERARD POSTSCRIPT I apprehend that it is not impossible but that some of you will be attempting to answer this Letter and endeavouring to shake these Principles which have by Gods Grace proved of strength to win me to the Holy Catholick Faith To such I shall only give these cautions First that they will be pleased in their Answer to set down my own words as they lye intirely and without maiming them If they shall please to answer by Paragraphs and to set down each of my Paragraphs wholly and sincerely before their Answer to the same Paragraph I shall own their Candor and Iustice But if they Answer by setting up a Puppit of their own pretended to be mine they will not make mine but their own Arguments ridiculous and will not deserve a Reply from me or to be regarded by any one Secondly that they will forbear all Reproaches and Slanders against the Catholick Church or Catholicks in general or in perticular this is a fault to which Protestants are too much addicted in general but most Perticularly those of the Presbiterian and Independent perswasions they have alwaies used to deal with Catholicks as they did with His late Majesty of glorious memory and with our most dread Soveraign that now is and their party viz. to impute crimes to them without end and errors innumerable without taking care to examine whether what they charged them with was true or false So if they can throw Dirt enough upon the Catholicks and impute Opinions unto them sufficiently monstrous all is well they know the major part of the Nation to be byassed with interest and ready enough to beleive what ever is suggested against those whom they call the Common Enemy and that thousands will admit a thing for truth if they find it in Print rather then take the pains to examine whether it be true or not and therefore have no difficulty to cast forth untruths with as much confidence as if themselves were satisfied that all they publish is dictated by the Holy Ghost As for those who are and shall be guilty of these crimes I only wish them the like Repentance which St. Augustine had for the like errors committed by himself whilst he was a Manichaean of which he makes this mention St. Aug. the 6. book of his Confes c. 3. towards the end I blush even full of Joy in regard that I found my self thereby not to have barked against the Catholick Faith but against the Fancies and Fictions of carnal thoughts But yet I have been rash and impious in that I had said those things accusingly which I ought to have learnt inquitingly Nor do not I beseech you take a liberty to upbraid me as if I had some private ends in my present Change but be pleased to consider that I am now united to a Communion whose portion in this Kingdome is to suffer to be poor and scorned to want preferments and suffer affronts from every hand who shall please to give them Whilst I was at the head of a Troop of Horse in the Rebellious Army a sin which I hope my dearest Saviour hath forgiven me I having heartily asked pardon of my God as I here do of my Soveraign for the same I was in a condition to rise and thrive and glut my sences with what this world called good and pleasing But I thank my Saviour I am now brought home to that Church of His which teacheth me to suffer and be humble to give Obedience to Authorities for Conscience sake to become a servant and a learner not a master or a Teacher to hear those that are lawfully sent to take care of my Soul and not to usurps the Office of the Priests or proudly to intrude my self into that Sacred Function I must for ever hereafter cease to be contentious and let my Prince or those who are in Authority under him determine what they please in relation to my body or Estate I hope I shall at all times hereafter follow the blessed Precepts of God which I receive from the mouth of his Church and from the Holy Scriptures namely To make Supplications and Prayers and Intercessions and giving of thanks for all men for Kings and all that are in Authority that I may lead a quiet life in all godliness and honesty 1 Tim. 2. v. 1. 2. And to those who shall be otherwise minded I shall only say We have no such custome amongst us in the Church of God FINIS This is taken out of Mr. Johnsons reply to Mr. Baxter called Novelty Repressed Fo. 142. 143 c. The Books which I here intend are The Question of Questions the before mentioned Novelty repressed with Fiat Lux and that Elaborate Treatise called Infidelity Unmasked or a Confutation of a Book Published by Mr. Wil. Chil. Fagworth See Jus Divinum upon Presbytery P. 69. 70 See Answorths Advertisement to the Reader in the end of his Anotations upon Deute touching objections made against the Heb. Text. †As touching the English Translations and the Hebrew and Greek Copies which are now extant amongst us See John Goodwin his Treatise upon Divine Authority of Scripture asserted from Page 4. unto pag. 19 c.
of the Canon being lost And what will the consequence be if it stand proved also that supposing the Canon were compleat yet it is not sufficient to decide the controversies now a foot amonst Christians in matters of Faith Will it not follow that then it is necessary to have such a Rule and Judge as is before mentioned The late Learned Dr. Ferne a great Champion for sole Scripture confesseth Sext. 27. That Indeed such a Iudge or Umpire in Christendome would if to be had be a ready means to compose all differences and to restore truth and peace But shall we think that our blessed Redeemer when he first founded his Holy Church did not see this as clearly as Dr. Ferne certainly he did and for this reason he appointed the Holy Apostles and their Successors to be this Judge and Umpire and if you desire or expect to see an end of those differences wherein ye are now involved by relying on your own private Interpretations of the Scriptures you must address your selves to this Judge and be content to stand the determination of their Umpire which is infallible I say infallible for as the Apostles though as men were subject to error in their own private affairs and actings and as such might one withstand the other and reprove the other yet were they by the assistance of Gods Holy spirit in defining and delivering matters of Faith so the Prelates of the Holy Catholick Church though as men they were fallible in their own private actings and affairs yet when assembled in a General Council with their Supream Pastor they are still made infallible in defining matters of Faith by the assistance of the same Holy Ghost who was as well promysed to them as to the Apostles The last reason is that none of the difficulties that were proposed to prove the Scriptures not to be the Rule and Judge before mentioned are capable of being objected against the Church For first this Judge and Rule is capable of answering the end for which it is appointed and proposed all who submit unto the Church agreeing in matters of Faith Secondly it is not capable of being misunderstood or misinterpreted by the various Reasons Judgements and Interests of men but is alwaies in being and capable upon demand to explain and declare its own sence and intention upon any difference arising Thirdly it is capable of being understood by All. Fourthly it is capable of being certainly known by all Fifthly it is capable of determining what plainess and clearness in every Article of Faith and hath alwaies appeared to do so to the condemation and confusion of all opposers Sixthly this was the said Rule and Judge in Christs time and in the times of the Apostles Lastly this doth not set up every individual man and woman to be a Judge and Rule unto themselves but preserves the unity of the spirit in the Bond of Peace by teaching all understandings to become Captives to this Rule and Judge appointed by God for their guidance and direction But I know there will be yet an Objection made by you of the seperation whether these Texts which speak so amply of the Church are to be understood of the Church Militant and visible in this World or of the Church Triumphant For certainly did you apprehend that God had a Church in this world that is a visible body politique distinct from that invisible Church which is Christs Mistical body Triumphant you would not as I in Charity beleive divide your selves into so many Congregations independent of each other or any other body or Government whatsoever in relation to Religion Now to satisfy you in this I shall desire you to consider Acts the 20. 28. Where the Text speaks of a Church governed by High Pastors which can only be meant of the Visible Church and that of the whole Flock or Church which Christ redeemed with his blood which cannot be meant of any perticular Congregational Church 1 Cor. 10. 32. Give none offence neither to the Iews nor to the Gentiles nor to the Church of God even as I please all men in all things where he speaks clearly of the sole and entire visible Church 1 Cor. 12. 28. where mention is made of the Governours and Priests which are extended throughout the whole visible Church only God hath set some in the Church first Apostles secondly Prophets c. and Ephes 4. 11. before cited Col. 1. 24. 25. Where Church is taken for the Militant only for St. Paul was not made a Minister of the Church Triumphant 1 Tim. 2. 15. before cited must signifie the sole and whole visible Church for no perticular Church can be stiled The pillar and ground of truth since they may fall and often have fallen from truth Iam. 5. 14. Where he speaks in general to all beleiving Christians and of a Church using visible Ceremonies and Priests or Elders which is not the Church Triumphant Mat. 16. 18. where the Church of Christ is to be built upon Peter and therefore must be meant of the visible Church Militant for it is built whilst Militant and transferred when it is Triumphant Nor can this be any other then a visible Church founded upon a visible Rock or Foundation for that Rock there spoken of is not Christ but St. Peter as the words clearly signifie for our Saviour saies upon this Rock I will build my Church immediatly after he had named St. Peter where as if he had meant himself or St Peters confession of his being the Son of the ever living God this being the remote or mediate antecedent he should have said according to Grammer and true construction and upon that Rock Besides he saies I will build my Church whereas if by Rock he had intended himself or St. Peters aforesaid confession he would have said upon this Rock I have built or I do build my Church not I will build For when our Lord spoke these words his Church was then actually built upon him and upon his being the Son of the Living God He spoke then therefore of what he intended to do and of what was to be after his Resurrection and Ascension into Heaven and promiseth here that for those future times his visible Church should be built upon St. Peter Lastly that I may speak not as to the word only but also as to the thing it self viz. The Divine constitution of the Catholick visible Church by the Ordinance of our dearest Saviour Consider 1 Cor. 12. where it is at large described by the Holy Apostle to be One body with different parts fitly disposed ordered and connected together in one and the same body Whereof One he saith is the Head and that must be as visible as the rest of the body for a visible body without a visible head would be a Monster and such a visible Head as stands in need of the foot which Christ cannot do being God and so wanting nothing And this the Apostle applies to the Apostolical
do and that I beleived the Scriptures to be Gods word from the infallible testimony of Gods spirit bearing witness with my spirit that they were Gods Words and that I was fully convinced that this proceeded from the infallible testimony of Gods spirit from a certain knowledge and feeling which I had of the same within my self and in my own Conscience To all which it was mildly replyed that upon the Grounds which I had laid and whereon I founded my self it was impossible for me to be infallibly assured that this testimony which I mentioned was infallibly the testimony of the spirit of God For having granted the Protestant Principle that I was not infallible that no man or number of men was or were infallible this spirit which I talked of might for ought I knew be the spirit of error And for farther evincing thereof I was desired to reflect on these Scriptures Jer. 17. 9. The heart of Man is deceitful above all things who can know it Eccles 9. 1. No man knoweth Love or Hatred by all that is before them And to consider the strange delusion which bewitched the Angel or Bishop of Laodicea Revel 3. 17. Because thou sayest I am Rich and encreased with goods and have need of nothing and knowest not that thou art wretched and miserable and poor and blind and naked How much was he deceived in his own jupgement of his own Estate In fine what would you said he answer to an Arrian or Jew or Turk should they urge the like knowledge and feeling with the like confidence to prove they were in the truth and Christianity a delusion What you would reply to them suppose as said unto your self and see if it will not satisfie In the mean time said he you seem to imply and so to grant that we ought to have an infallible certainty of what we beleive with Divine Faith this the Apostles had in the time of our blessed Saviours conversing with them upon earth they had sufficient to prevail with their wills to command their understandings into the beleif of his being God consequently infallible and consequently that whatsoever he taught was to be assented unto as infallibly true without being questioned by our little feeble limited Reasons And this was necessary for the Church then otherwise they could not have been sufficiently assured that what Christ taught them was true consequently it would not have been a sin in them to have doubted This infallible assurance also the Christians who lived in the Apostles times and after the Ascension of our Lord enjoyed they had sufficient to enduce them to a beleif that the Holy Apostles were infallible guides and reachers and that whatsoever they taught and commanded them was as infallible true as if God had immediately spoken to them the same things and no more to be doubted contradicted or disputed against by their reasons which doubtless were as good and strong as ours then the immediate words commands or dictates of Almighty God otherwise those who refused to hear and obey them had been in no fault and it would have been an unsufferable Pride and presumption in St. Paul to have required such an absolute submission to what he taught as to oblige the Christians of his time not to have beleived an Angel from Heaven teaching contrary to what he taught them Hence it is that the remaining writings for so much as we have of them of the Blessed Apostles are by all Christians esteemed as the Words of God And this was necessary in the Age after Christ for the Church of God namely in the Apostles times to have a living infallible way of direction in so much as had we then lived and had encountred with any doubts or difficulties relating to Religion and to the true meaning of what was either spoken or written by any Apostle or by all the Apostles we should without all doubt have made our immediate recourse to them some or one of them for the solving of such doubts and the explayning of such difficulties and should have received and submitted unto such solutions as made by God himself without ever interposing our own reasons or senses in opposition This we see was the course taken in the fifteenth of the Acts when certain doubts were arisen amongst Christians the Apostles met in a Council they considered the things they determined with an It seemeth good unto the Holy Ghost and to us Their Decrees and Canons were obeyed and submitted unto by the whole and the Disputes were at an end But suppose some dispute had arisen touching the sence and meaning even of some of those Decrees must not it have been interprited by some judicial Authority Doubtless yes And questionless the then Christians would have appealed or applyed to the same Authority that made those Canons and Decrees for the interpretation of them and would have submitted to such interpretations otherwise it would have been with the Primative Christians then as it is with you now every one would have framed his own interpretation those who had been Masters of the greatest Wit power or interest would have framed Parties or Churches to themselves and in fine the Sword of the Flesh and not the Spirit of God must have given the Rule and Law to Christianity they would have been so far from any possibility of maintaining The Unity of the spirit in the bond of Peace from being One body that they would have divided into as many parts to speak without grateing as you now are and have gone to Cuffs and raised Wars for the decideing of Controversies as we have seen you do since you divided your selves from the Holy Catholick Church of Christ It is not hard for you to imagine into what confusion these Discourses put my poor soul to hear such things so great evidences of Reason produced by a private Gentleman of that party whom I had beleived so ignorant I had oftentimes in Disputations both publickly and privately encountred and I thought worsted several of the English Clergy in those points wherein I differed from them But I found nothing now to say against these Principles which I had yet hitherto supposed the most ridiculous that any people could imagine to set up Well I could no longer contest but resolved to have recourse unto Almighty God by Prayer for his Divine Assistance and to make it my business according to the utmost of my poor skill and understanding to take a full view of the Grand Principles of the Catholick Faith and of Christianity and laying aside all Prejudices Pride and Humour I resolved by the assistance of God to embrace and submit unto whatsoever I should understand to be most agreeable with his most holy will and pleasure without taking any regard to worldly interest or the censures of men which I had reason to beleive would run high against me And the better to enable me in this search and examination I borrowed from this Gentleman several books
and treatises from whence I made several Collections the Heads of which I recommend to your considerations they being such as had by the Gracious assistance of Almighty God such a prevailing power upon my understanding as to convince me of the errors of the way wherein I then was and to bring me to the Knowledge of the Divine truths of the Catholick and Christian Faith I gathered from the true interpretation of that Text of Scripture Heb. 11. 6. Without Faith it is impossible to please God And of that Mar. 16. 16. He that beleiveth not shall be damned And of that other Ephes 4. 5. There is but one Faith and one Baptisme one Lord Iesus That the faith which was to save me and by the which I was to please God must certainly be the true Faith which cannot be found in contrary Opinions it being but One and of contraries One only can be true I also collected from that Text 2. Cor. 10. 5. Bringing into Captivity every thought to the Obedience of Christ That this Faith or beleiving was to be seated in the understanding that the understanding was to submit not dispute And that this Act To beleive was a Command or Precept of Almighty God who will have his Will obeyed by all his Subjects and the not obeying of which is punished with eternal Damnation Lastly I found from that Text Heb. 10. 23. Let us hold fast the profession of our Faith without wavering for he is faithful that hath promised That Faith if truly Divine must be an infallible assent of our understanding submitting it self obediently to beleive the Revelations of God For otherwise Faith and consequently all Religion may be no more then fancy or Opinion and then no waies certain and if so then no Obligation From whence I thought it did very naturally follow first that there must be some means appointed by God by which we may know this one true Faith from all false Opinions for to require us to beleive upon pain of Damnation and not to give us any means whereby we may know what to beleive were to require us to make Bricks without Straw Secondly that these means must be infallible for we cannot be brought to an infallible ascent by fallible and uncertain means and God would not require us to assent to an Authority which may deceive us Thirdly that the understanding must submit to these means under pain of Damnation for if the understanding were at liberty to submit or not to submit to the means by which Faith is conveyed unto us it would be no fault not to beleive consequently God could not justly damne us for not beleiving Besides whosoever shall refuse to be governed by their means and that Authority which God hath appointed to govern him is a Rebel against God Fourthly that two men of two differing Faiths or beliefs cannot be saved for they both of them knowing that they are bound to be guided and governed by those means which God hath appointed to convey faith unto them and one of them flatly refusing to submit this person who refuseth must be guilty of disobedience to Gods command and consequently cannot be saved Fifthly that ignorant people by such reasonable diligence as is very tollerable to humane frailty and very possible for them may come to the knowledge of these means For otherwise God would have appointed means which would be unprofitable to the end and the far greater number of Souls for whom Christ dyed would not be sufficiently provided for by the sweet Providence of God By which that Prophesy would be ineffectual Esay 35. Say to them that are of a fearful heart be strong fear not behold your God will come and save you then the eyes of the blind shall be opened and the Ears of the deaf unstopped c. And one high way shall be there and a way and it shall be called the Holy way the way faring men though Fooles shall not err therein And thus far I met with nothing but what I esteemed very agreeable with all sorts of people professing themselves Christians All that I ever met with seemed to grant that there must be a way and a Rule there must be means appointed there must be a governing power to judge and decide all doubts and teach us the true way to Heaven with certainty But who this Rule or Iudge is that is the difficulty for when once we have found it I think all persons will agree that they are obliged to submit unto it as to the Apostles if they were actually living or to Christ himself This therefore I thought to be the only question that I was to gain satisfaction unto I therefore ceased to enquire after this doctrine or the other Article as beleiving that if I could once find out this Rule this Judge which God had appointed as the means to direct me and to which I was to submit as to that Authority which God had appointed to Rule and Govern me to teach me what I was and what I was not to beleive I should no more scruple to beleive what that Authority should teach me to be revealed by God then if I heard God himself speaking And I was no way discouraged in my resolution to search when I considered that as God spoke in Antient times by the mouthes of his Prophets before and after the Scriptures were written and by the mouthes of his Apostles before and after the New Testament was written and that the writing of what God directed to be written did not lessen the power of God but that he might still direct by the mouthes of his Prophets and Apostles so possibly I might find God still speaking by an Authority which hitherto I had not been acquainted with I found all the Rules and meanes proposed by every party to amount to four in the whole One party would set up a claim to the Spirit directing them and speaking to their spirits Another will have Reason to be this Rule and Judge A third will set up sole Scripture And the fourth assigneth the Holy Catholick Church of Christ Visible here on Earth to be that Judge and Director And finally that medium appoynted by God himself for the ends before mentioned and to which all Christians were to submit Other then these I never heard of any for I alwaies esteemed the Quakers Light to be either the Spirit or natural Reason and I resolved to rank it under one of those considerations by a name more known to the world then that which they have given it And therefore these I resolved most carefully to examine As to the first touching the Spirit bearing witness in secret with our spirits or in plainer terms the Private Spirit I considered that there is no man in the world Jew or Turk Pagan or Christian but may if he will put on confidence enough affirme that he is taught inwardly by God many of all sorts do this and yet teach contradictions some therefore must be
informs us 6. It is necessary to know that the very Copies and Translations of the Scriptures which we have upon which we ground our selves are certainly true for if they are not we build upon uncertainties and consequently have no sure foundation for our Faith yet we cannot be assured nor have so much as any information as to this perticular from the Scriptures 7. It is necessary that the many manifest controversies about the true sence of Scripture should be decided because where two contrary sences are imposed or urged and both affirmed to be the meaning of God and his Revelation one only can be true and he who refuseth to beleive that which is true shall be damned yet these controversies cannot be decyded by Scripture 8. It is necessary to know what is purely and absolutely necessary to salvation to be beleived and what not that is as you say what is fundamental and what not fundamental and to be informed of this plainly lest we err and thereby be damned but in this the Scripture is silent 9. It is necessary to beleive that God the Father is not begotten ' that God the Son is not made but begotten by his Father only That God the Holy Ghost is neither made nor begotten but doth proceed and that from the Father and the Son That Christ is of one substance with the Father and that these three are One and that One Three I refer to consideration whether all these points be plainly and clearely to be found in Scripture if they were it had been almost impossible for so many divisions to have hapned about them as have done amongst persons on all sides admitting the Scriptures to be the word of God 10. It is necessary the Church of England saith that Infants should be Baptised that women should receive the Holy Sacrament of the Eucharist that Christians should observe the Lords day yet none of these points are clearly or perticularly proved by Scripture 11. It is a Sin and as the Generality of Christians agree an Heresy to Re-baptise any one who hath been Baptised by an Heretick where doth the Scripture say so That there are in the Scriptures several places which seem Contradictions and consequently some part of the Scriptures seem untrue is easily proved and I shall here give you some few plain Instances for example to which many more might be added 1. In the 2. Kings C. 8. v. 26. You read thus Two and twenty years old was Ahazia when he began to reigne and he reigned one year in Ierusalem and his mothers name was Athaliah the daughter of Omri But in 2 Chron. c. 22. v. 2. You will read thus Forty and two years old was Ahazia when he began to reign and he reigned one year in Ierusalem his mothers name was Athaliah the daughter of Oâ—…ri Now against the infallibility of Scripture Reason convinceth her self to have this infallible demonstration viz. No one who speaketh two things the one contrary to the other can be said to be infallible in speaking but to affirm of the same person that he began to reign when he was two and twenty years old and that he was two and forty years old when he began to reigne is to speak two things the one contrary to the other therefore saith Reason the Scripture is not infallible in speaking 2. In St. Matthews Gospel Chap. 1. v. 17. you read thus All the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations and from David till the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations Now if you please to consider that three fourteens must make forty and two and then please to reckon up all the persons named you shall find them demonstrably to be but one and forty and no more which is but two fourteens and one thirteen Now Reason asketh whether this can be infallibly true 3. In St. Lukes Gospel Ch. 3. v. 35. 36. you shall read thus Salah which was the son of Cainan which Cainan was the son of Arphaxad if you read Ge. c. 11. 12. you shall not find that Cainan was the Son of Arphaxad as St. Luke saith but that Arphaxad lived five and thirty years begat Salah Now according to St. Luke this Salah was the son of Cainan not of Arphaxad ' If it be answered that Salah was Arphaxads son because Arphaxad was his Grandfather I pray observe that Arphaxad is said to have begotten him and that when he was five and thirty years old And if you remark that Chapter in Genesis no one is said to have had a son before he was thirty years old But the greatest difficulty will be here It is said Arphaxad lived five and thirty years and begat Cainan If then Arphaxad was Granfather to Salah because he begat Cainan when he was five thirty years old in which year of his age he begat Salah then Salah his Grandchild and Cainan his son must be both born in the same year which saith Reason is impossible Now if Scripture can determine all controversies I hope you will shew me how to solve these difficulties by the Scripture which how to do I profess most seriously I do not understand The seventh Reason which I found against this Opinion of sole Scripture was that if the Scriptures had been appointed by God for this end of being our sole Rule Guide and Judge in all our doubts and the sole means to bring faith unto our souls they would have been so in the Apostles times at least after all the books of the New Testament were written but that they were so we do not find for then the Authority of the Apostles must have ceased so soon as they had made an end of Writing which I beleive no one will say much less prove And then even in the times of the Apostles if a controversie had arisen touching the true sence of any Text no address should have been to the Apostles to decide the doubt but to the book which every one must have judged though in opposition to the then present interpretation of the Apostles if they had then taken upon them to explain their own writings which to say I think will appear sufficiently absurd to all men Nay if the Scriptures had been intended for this it must have followed in all probability that our Lord Christ would have left his own law and doctrines in writing under his own hand which he hath not done at least he would have obleiged all his Apostles to write which he did not that we know of It should also follow that to write had been the chief part of the Apostles Ministry consequently that most part of the Apostles neglected to perform the chiefest part of their Ministry were negligent to do that which above all things was their duty will any of you presume to affirm this yet if you speak consequently it will be hard to avoid it The last