to be more evident and unquestionable than those which are alledged for the former rejected TEnthly It cannot but be granted That those passages of holy Scriptures wherein any forme of government different from the anciently received and established is pretended to be grounded had need to be very cleare and unquestionable and more evident and convictive than those whereon the former now rejected policy was raised For if only Scripture must decide this question and no other either evidence or judgment will be admitted besides it And if withall there be difference concerning the sense of the texts on either sides alledged it must needs follow that the clearer Scriptures must carry it and give light to the more obscure we are wont to say that possession is eleven points of the Law surely where that is had and hath long been held it is fit there should be a legall ejection and that ejection must bee upon better evidence of right If therefore the Church of God have beene quietly possessed of this government by Bishops for above these sixteene hundred yeares it is good reason the ejectors should show better proofe than the ancient possessours ere they be outed from their Tenures And what better proofe can there be than more cleare Scripture Shortly then if it shall bee made to appeare that the Scriptures brought for a lay-Presbytery are few doubtfull litigious full of diverse and uncertaine senses and such as many and much clearer places shall plainely show to be otherwise meant by the Holy Ghost than these new maisters apply them then it cannot be denied that the lay-Presbytery hath no true footing in the Word of God and that the old forme of Administration in an imparity of Ministers ought onely to be continued in the Church §. 18. The eleventh ground That if Christ had left this pretended order of government it would have ere this time been agreed upon what that forme is and how to be managed ELeventhly I may well take it for granted neither can it reasonably be denied that if the Order which they say Christ and his Apostles did set for the government of his Church which they call the Kingdome and Ordinance of Christ be but one and that certaine and undoubted then certainly it must and should and would have beene ere this agreed upon by the abettors of it what and which it is For it cannot without impiety be conceived or said without blasphemie that the Sonne of God should erect such a Kingdome upon earth as having lyen hid for no lesse than sixteene hundred yeares cannot yet be fully knowne and accorded upon so that the subjects may be convinced both that it is his and by what Officers and what rules it must be managed If then it shall be made to appeare that the pretenders to the desired Discipline cannot yet all this while agree upon their verdict for that kingdome of Christ which they challenge it will be manifest to every ingenuous Reader that their platformes of this their imagined kingdome are but the Chimericall devices and whimsies of mens braines and worthy to bee entertained accordingly §. 19. The twelfth ground That if this which is challenged be the kingdome of Christ then those Churches which want any essentiall part of it are mainly defective and scarce any at all entire TWelfthly It must be yeelded that if this which they call for be the Kingdome and Ordinance of Christ then it ought to be erected and maintained in all Congregations of Christians all the world over And that where any essentiall part thereof is wanting there the Kingdome of Christ is not entirely set up but is still mainly defective If therefore it shall appeare that even in most of those Churches which doe most eagerly contend for the Discipline there neither are nor ever were all those severall Offices which are upon the list of this spirituall Administration it will irrefragably follow that either those Churches doe not hold these offices necessary which having power in their hand they have not yet erected or els that there are but very few Churches if any upon earth rightly constituted and governed which to affirme since it were grossely uncharitable and highly derogatory from the just glory of Gods kingdome under the Gospell it will be consequent that the device is so lately hatched that it is not yet fledge and that there is great reason rather to distrust the plots of men than 〈◊〉 condemne the Churches of God §. 20. The thirteenth ground That true Christian policie requires not any thing absurd or impossible to be done THirteenthly I have reason to require it granted That true Christian policie requires not any thing which is either impossible or absurd to be done If therefore it shall be pretended that upon the generall grounds of Scripture this sacred Fabricke of Discipline raised by the wisedome of some holy and eminent reformers conforme to that of the first age of the Church it is meet it should be made manifest that there is some correspondence in the state of those first times with the present and of the Condition of their Churches with ours Otherwise if there be an apparent difference and disproportion betwixt them it cannot sound well that one patterne should fit both If then both the first planters and the late reformers of the Church did that which the necessity of the times would allow this is no president for the same persons if they were now living and at their full liberty and power neither can the Churches of those Cantons or Cities which challenge a kinde of freedome in a Democraticall State be meet examples for those which are already established under a setled Monarchy If therefore it shall appeare that many foule and unavoidable inconveniences and if not impossibilities yet unreasonable consequences will necessarily follow upon the obtrusion of a Presbyterian government upon a Nationall Church otherwise setled all wise Christians who are members of such Churches will apprehend great and just cause why they should refuse to submit and yeeld approbation to any such novell Ordinances §. 21. The fourteenth ground That new truths never before heard of especially in maine points carrie just cause of suspicion FOurteenthly It must be granted that Those truths in Divinity which are new and hitherto unheard of in the Church but especially in those points which are by the fautors of them held maine and essentiall carrie just causes of suspicion in their faces and are not easily to be yeelded unto And surely if according to Tertullians rule quod primum verum That the first is true then the latest is seldome so where it agrees not with the first After the teeming of so many ages it is rarely seene Liberum esse praeter contra sanctorum Patrum Doctorum sententiam in religionis doctrina innovare Alphons Var. Toletan de Stratagem Iesuit that a New and Posthumous verity is any other than spurious It was the position it seemes of
Poza the braine-sick Professour of Divinity set up by the Iesuites at Madrill That it is free for any man besides and against the judgement of the holy Fathers and Doctors to make innovations in the doctrine of religion And for his warrant of contemning all ancient Fathers and Councels in respect of his owne Opinions borrowes the words in Ecclesiasticus Concil Constantinop Act. 5. Ecclesiast 25. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cited by the Councell of Constantinople Beatus qui praedicat verbum inauditum Blessed is he that preaches the word never before heard of impiously and ignorantly marring the text mistaking the sense belying the Authour slandering the Councell the misprision being no lesse ridiculous than palpable For whereas the words are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in auditum he turnes them both into one adjective inauditum and makes the sentence as monstrous as his owne stupidity Pope Hormisda in his Epistle to the Priests and Deacons of Syria turnes it right Qui praedicat verbum in aurem obedientis He that preaches a word to the obedient farre bee it from any sober and Orthodoxe Christian to entertaine so wild and wicked a thought he hath learned that the old way is the good way Ier. 6.16 and wil walk therin accordingly and in so doing finds rest to his soule he that preacheth this word is no lesse happy than hee that obediently heares it neither shall a man finde true rest to his soule in a new and untrodden by-way If therefore it shall be made to appeare that this government by lay-Presbyters is that which the ancient and succeeding Church of God never acknowledged untill this present age I shall not need to perswade any wise and ingenuous Christian if otherwise he have not lost the free liberty of his choice that he hath just cause to suspect it for a misgrounded novelty For such it is §. 22. The fifteenth ground That to depart from the judgment and practice of the universall Church of Christ ever since the Apostles times and to betake our selves to a new invention cannot but be besides the danger vehemently scandalous c. LAstly it must upon all this necessarily follow that to depart from the judgement and practice of the universall Church of Christ ever since the Apostles times and abandon that ancient forme wherein we were and are legally and peaceably infeoffed to betake our selves to a new one never till this age heard of in the whole Christian world it cannot but be extremely scandalous and savour too much of Schisme How ill doth it become the mouth of a Christian Divine which Parker hath let fall to this purpose Quod duo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 posuerit Park Polit. Eccles l. 2. c. 5. Who dareth to challenge learned Casaubon for proposing two means of deciding the moderne controversies Scriptures and Antiquity what more easie triall can possibly be projected Who but a profest Novellist can dislike it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was the old and sure rule of that sacred Councell and it was Salomons charge Remove not the old land-marks Prov. ◠If therefore it shall be made to appeare that Episcopacie as it presupposeth an imparity of order and superiority of government hath been a sound stake pitched in the hedge of Gods Church ever since the Apostles times and that Parity and lay-Presbytery are but as new-sprung bryars and brambles lately woven into the new-plashed fence of the Church In a word thus if it be manifest that the government of Bishops in a meet and moderate imparity in which we assert it hath been peaceably continued in the Church ever since the Apostolicall Institution thereof and that the government of lay-Presbyters hath never beene so much as mentioned much lesse received in the Church untill this present age I shall need no farther argument to perswade all peaceable and well-minded Christians to adhere to that ancient forme of Administration which with so great authority is derived unto us from the first Founders of the Gospell and to leave the late supply of a lay-Presbyterie to those Churches who would and cannot have better The Second Part. §. 1. The termes and state of the Question setled and agreed upon THese are the grounds which if they prove as they cannot but do firm and unmoveable we can make no fear of the superstructure Let us therefore now addresse our selves to the particular points here confidenly undertaken by us and made good all those severall issues of defence which our holy cause is most willingly cast upon But before we descend to the scanning of the matter reason and order require that according to the old and sure rules of Logicians the terms be cleared and agreed upon otherwise we shall perhaps fight with shadows and beat the ayr It hath pleased the providence of GOD so to order it that as the Word it self the Church so the names of the Offices belonging to it in their severall comprehensions should be full of Senses and variety of use and acception and that in such manner that each of them runs one into other and oftentimes interchanges their Appellations A Prophet we know is a foreteller of future things an Evangelist in the naturall sence of the word is he that preaches the glad tidings of the Gospel an Apostle one of Christs twelve great Messengers to the world a Bishop 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an Overseer of the Church a Presbyter some grave ancient Churchman a Deacon a servant or Minister in the Church yet all these in Scripture are so promiscuously used that a Preacher is more then once termed a Prophet 1 Cor. 14. Act 1.20 2 Ep. Iohn 1 Peter 5.1 1 Tim. 4.6 an Evangelist an Apostle an Apostle a Bishop an Apostle a Presbyter a Presbyter an Apostle as Romans 6.7 a Presbyter a Bishop and lastly an Evangelist and Bishop a Deacon or Minister for all these met in Timothy alone who being Bishop of Ephesus is with one breath charged to do the work of an Evangelist and to fulfill his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Ministery It could not be otherwise likely but from this community of names there would follow some confusion of apprehensions for since names were intended for distinction of things where names are the same how can the notions be distinguished But howsoever it pleased the Spirit of God in the first hatching of the Evangelicall Church to make use of these indistinct expressions yet all this while the Offices were severall known by their severall Characters and employments So as the function and work of an Apostle was one viz. To plant the Church and to ordain the Governours of it of a Bishop an other to wit To manage the Government of his designed Circuit and to ordain Presbyters and Deacons of a Presbyter another namely To assist the Bishop and to watch over his severall charge of a Deacon another besides his sacred services to order the stock of the Church and to take care of
other than to snatch the reines out of the hands of a skilfull Coachman and either to lay them loose on the horses necks or to deliver them to the hands of some ignorant and unskilfull lackeyes that run along by them But of this point more elsewhere My zeal and my respects to the Churches abroad and my care and pitie of many seduced soules at home have drawne me on farther in this discourse than I meant For who can indure to see simple and well meaning Christians abused with the false colour of Conformity with other Churches when there is apparently more distance in the ground of their differences than in the places of their situation Be wise my deare Brethren and suffer not your selves to be cheated of the Truth by the mis-zealous suggestions of partiall-teachers Reserve your hearts free for the clearer light of Scripture and right reason which shall in this discourse offer to shine into your soules For you Sir fu frere confesse unlesse you can in truth deny it that you goe alone and that you have reason absolutely to quit all the hope of the Patrocination of other Churches which you might seeme to challenge from their example and practice For now that I have got you alone I shall be bold to take you to task and doe in the name of Almighty God vehemently urge and challenge you to maintaine if by any skill or pretence you may your owne act of the condemnation of Episcopacie and your penitent submission to a Presbyteriall government Wherein I doubt not but I shall convince you of an high and irreparable injury done by you to God his Ordinance and his Church § 6. The project and substance of the Treatise following FOr the full and satisfactorie performance vvhereof I shall only need to make good these tvvo maine points First That Episcopacie such as you have renounced even that vvhich implies a fixed superioritie over the rest of the Clergie and jurisdiction is not only an holy and lavvfull but a divine Institution and therefore cannot be abdicated vvithout a manifest violation of Gods Ordinance Secondly That the Presbyterian Government so constituted as you have novv submitted to it hovvever venditated under the glorious names of Christs Kingdome and Ordinance by those specious and glozing termes to bevvitch the ignorant multitude and to insnare their consciences hath no true footing either in Scripture or the practice of the Church in all ages from Christs time to the present That I may clearly evince these two maine points wherin indeed consists the life and soul of the whole cause I shall take leave to lay down certain just and necessary Postulata as the ground-workes of my ensuing proofs all which are so cleare and evident that I would fain suppose neither your selfe nor any ingenuous Christian can grudge to yeeld them But if any man will be so stiffe and close-fisted as to stick at any of them they shall be easily wrung out of his fingers by the force of Reason and manifest demonstration of Truth §. 7. The first ground or postulate That government whose foundation is laid by Christ and whose Fabrick is raised by the Apostles is of Divine Institution THe first whereof shall be this That government whose ground being laid by our Saviour himselfe vvas aftervvards raised by the hands of his Apostles cannot be denied to be of Divine Institution A Proposition so cleare that it were an injurie to goe about to prove it He cannot be a Christian who will not grant that as in Christ the Sonne of God the Deity dwelt bodily so in his servants also and agents under him the Apostles the Spirit of the same God dwelt so as all their actions were Gods by them Like as it is the same spring-water that is derived to us by the Conduit-pipes and the same Sun-beames which passe to us through our windowes Some things they did as men actions naturall civill morall these things were their own yet they even in them no doubt were assisted with an excellent measure of grace But those things which they did as Messengers from God so their names signifie these were not theirs but his that sent them An Ambassador dispatcheth his Domesticall affaires as a private man but when he treats or concludes matters of State in his Princes name his tongue is not his owne but his Masters Much more is it so in this case wherein besides the interest the agents are freed from errour The carefullest Ambassador may perhaps swerve from his message these which was one of the priviledges of the Apostles were through the guidance of Gods Spirit in the acts of their Function inerrable So then if the foundation were laid by Christ and the wals built up by his Apostles the Fabrick can be no lesse than divine §. 8. The second ground That the practice and recommendation of the Apostles is sufficient warrant for an Apostolicall Institution SEcondly It must also be granted That not onely the government which vvas directly commanded and enacted but that vvhich vvas practised and recommended by the Apostles to the Church is justly to be held for an Apostolicall Institution In eminent and authorized persons even examples are rules much more in so sacred Neither did the Spirit of God confine it selfe to vvords but expressed it selfe also in the holy actions of his inspired servants as Chrysostome therefore truly said That our Saviour did not only speak but vvork Parables So may vve say here that the Apostles did not only enact but even act lavves for his holy Church Licèt autem nullum extat praeceptum de manuum impositione c. Calv. l. 4. Instit C. 3.8.16 And this is learned Calvins determination about imposition of hands Although saith he there is no certaine precept concerning Imposition of Hands yet because vve see it vvas in perpetuall use vvith the Apostles their so accurate observation of it ought to be unto us instead of a command and therfore soone after he affirmes plainly That this Ceremony proceeded from the Holy Ghost himself And in the fore-going Chapter speaking of the distribution of Pastors to their severall charges he saith Nec humanum est inventum c. It is no humane device but the Institution of God himselfe For vve read that Paul and Barnabas ordained Presbyters in all the Churches of Lystra Antioch Iconium And that direction vvhich the great Apostle of the Gentiles gave to Timothy vvas as Calvin truly Mandati nomine in the name and nature of a command And vvhat els I beseech you vvould the rigid exacters of the over-severe and Judaicall observation of the Lords day as an Evangelicall Sabbath seem to plead for their vvarrant vvere they able to make it good any vvay but the guise and practice of the Apostles Precept certainly there is none either given or pretended Thus the bitter Tileno-mastix can say There was a double Discipline of the Apostles Docens and Vtens in the first they gave precepts to
the Church Paracles l. 1. c. 4 and her Governours in the second their practice prescribes her government although as he adds without booke not without the Churches owne consultation and consent which if it be granted makes the more for us who ever since we were a Church have consented to the Apostles practice and constantly used the same What do I stand upon this They are the words of Cartwright himselfe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the example of the Apostles and generall practice of the Churches under their government draweth a necessitie §. 9. The third ground That the formes ordained by the Apostles were for universall and perpetuall use THirdly it is no lesse evident that the form which the Apostles set and ordained for the governing of the Church was not intended by them for that present time or place onely but for continuance and succession for ever For no man I suppose can be so weak Praecepta ipsa disciplinae omnibus in futurum Ecclesiis dictante Sp. Sancto tradiderunt Sco. Wy Paracles l. 1. c. 4 as to thinke that the rules of the Apostles were personall locall temporary as some Dials or Almanacks that are made for some speciall Meridians but as their office and charge so their rules were universall to the whole world as farre and as long as the world lasteth For what reason is there that Crete or Ephesus should be otherwise provided for than all the world besides Or what possibility to think that those first planters of the Gospell should leave all the rest of Christs Church as the Ostrich doth her eggs in the dust without any farther care The extent and duration of any rule will best be measured as by the intention of the Authour so by the nature and use of it S. Paul's intention is clearely expressed for a continuance untill the appearing of our Lord Iesus Christ 1 Tim. 6.14 As for the nature of the severall directions they carry perpetuity and universality of use in the face of them there being the same reason of their observation by all persons concerned and in all times and places why should not every Bishop be as unreproveable as a Cretian or an Ephesian Why should an accusation be received against an Elder upon more slender evidence in one place than another Why should there not bee the same courses taken for Ordination and Censure in all ages and Churches since the same things must of necessity bee done every where in all ages and Churches But why should I strive for a granted Truth For it is plaine that the Isle of Crete and Ephesus were but the patternes of other Churches and Timothie and Titus of other faithfull Overseers If therefore it shall appeare that Episcopacie so stated as we have expressed was in these persons and Churches ordered and setled by Apostolicall direction it must necessarily be yeelded to be of Apostolike and therefore Divine Institution §. 10. The fourth ground That the universall practice of the Church immediately succeeding the Apostolike times is a sure Commentary upon the practice of the Apostles and our best direction FOurthly I must challenge it for a no lesse undoubted Truth That the universall practice of the Church immediately succeeding the Apostles is the best Commentary upon the practice of the Apostles and withall that the universall practice of Gods Church in all ages and places is next unto Gods Word the best guide and direction for our carriages and formes of Administration The Copartners and immediate Successors of those blessed men could best tell what they next before them did for who can better tell a mans way or pace than he that followes him close at the heeles And if particular men or Churches may mistake yet that the whole Church of Christian men should at once mistake that which was in their eye it is farre more than utterly improbable A truth which it is a wonder any sober Christian should bogle at yet such there are to our griefe and to the shame of this late giddy age even the great guides of their faction Polit. Eccles l. 2. cap. 7. Falsum est c. Our mis-learned countriman Parker the second Ignis fatuus of our poore mis-led brethren and some Seconds of his stand peremptorily and highly upon the Deniall It is false saith he that the universall practice of the Church is sufficient to prove any thing to be of Apostolike Originall And jeeringly soone after Vniversa Ecclesiae praxis consensus patrum unica Hierarchicorum Helena est The universall practice of the Church and consent of Fathers saith he is the onely dearling of the abettors of the Hierarchy But the practice of the Church immediatly after the Apostles is no evidence Heare now I beseech you my deare brethren all ye who would pretend to any Christian ingenuity and consider whether you have not reason to distrust such a leader as would perswade you to slight and reject the testimony and practice of the whole Church of God upon earth from the first plantation of it to this present age and to cast your selves upon the private opinions of himselfe and some few other men of yesterday surely in very matter of doctrine this could be no other than deeply suspicious than foulely odious If no man before Luther and Calvin had excepted against those points wherein we differ from Rome I should have hated to follow them how much more must this needs hold in matter of fact Iudge what a shame it is to heare a Christian Divine carelesly shaking off all arguments drawne from Antiquity Continuance Perpetuall Succession in and from Apostolike Churches unanimous consent universall practice of the Church immediate practice of all the Churches succeeding the Apostles as either Popish or nothing And all these are acknowledged for our Grounds and are not Popish For me I professe I could not without blushing and astonishment read such stuffe as confounded in my selfe to see that any sonne of the Church should be not onely so rebelliously unnaturall to his holy mother as to broach so putrid a Doctrine to her utter disparagement but so contumelious also to the Spirit of God in his providence for the deare Spouse of his Saviour here upon earth Holy Jrenaeus Iren. l. 4. contr haeres I am sure was of another minde Agnitio vera saith he The true acknowledgement is the doctrine of the Apostles antiquus Ecclesiae status and the ancient state of the Church in the whole world by the Succession of Bishops to whom the Apostles delivered the Church which is in every place And then whiles we have both these the doctrine of the Apostles seconded by the ancient state of the Church who can out-face us What meanes then this wilfull and peevish stupidity Nihil pro Apostolico habendum Ibid. l. 2. c. 7. Nothing saith Parker is to be held for Apostolike but that which is found recorded in the writings of the Apostles Nothing Was all
the poor yet all these agreed in one Common Service which was the propagation of the Gospel and the sounding of Gods Church and soon after the very terms were contra-distinguished both by the substance of their charge and by the property of their Titles insomuch as blessed Ignatius that holy Martyr who lived many yeers within the times of the Apostles in every of his Epistles as we shall see in the sequel makes expresse mention of three distinct orders of Government Bishops Presbyters Deacons Now we take Episcopacie as it is thus punctually differenced in an eminence from the two inferior orders of Presbyter and Deacon so as to define it Episcopacie is no other than an holy order of Church-Governours appointed for the Administration of the Church Or more fully thus Episcopacie is an eminent order of sacred function appointed by the Holy Ghost in the Evangelicall Church for the governing and overseeing thereof and for that purpose besides the Administration of the Word and Sacraments indued with power of imposition of hands and perpetuity of Iurisdiction Wherein we finde that we shall meet with two sorts of Adversaries The one are furiously and impetuously fierce crying down Episcopacy for an unlawfull and Antichristian state not to be suffered in a truely Evangelicall Church having no words in their mouthes but the same which the cruell Edomites used concerning Ierusalem Downe with it down with it even to the ground And such are the frantick Separatists and Semi-separatists of our time and Nation who are only swayed with meer passion and wilfully blinded with unjust prejudice These are Reformers of the new Cut which if Calvin or Beza were alive to see they would spit at and wonder whence such an off-spring should come Men that defend and teach there is no higher Ecclesiasticall government in the world than that of a Parish that a Parochiall Minister though but of the blindest village in a Country is utterly independant and absolute a perfect Bishop within himselfe and hath no superiour in the Church upon earth and doth no lesse inveigh even against the over-ruling power of Classes Synods c. than of Bishops you are not perhaps of this straine for we conceive that our Northern neighbors desire and affect to conforme unto the Genevian or French discipline Honoratiss Do. Glanico Cancellario Scotiae respon ad sex quaestiones for which we find Beza's directions although both your act of a brenunciation and some speeches let fall in the assembly of Glasco and of the plea of Covenanters fetching Episcopacy within the compasse of things abjured might seem to intimate some danger of inclination this way our charity bids us hope the best which is that you hate the frenzeys of these our wilde Countrey-men abroad for whom no answer is indeed fit but darke lodgings and Ellebore The other is more milde and gentle and lesse unreasonable not disallowing Episcopacy in it selfe but holding it to be lawfull usefull ancient yet such as was by meer humane device upon wise and politick Considerations brought into the Church and so continued and therefore upon the like grounds alterable with both these we must have to do But since it is wind ill lost to talke reason to a mad-man it shall be more than sufficient to confute the former of them in giving satisfaction to the latter for if wee shall make it appeare that Episcopacy is not onely lawfull and ancient but of no lesse than divine institution those raving and black mouthes are fully stopped and those more easie and moderate opposites at once convinced But before we offer to deal blows on either side it is fit we should know how far we are friends and upon what points this quarrell stands It is yielded by the wiser fautors of Discipline that there is a certain Polity necessary for the retention of the Churches peace That this Polity requires that there must be severall Congregations or flocks of Christians and that every flock should have his own Shepherd That since those guides of Gods people are subject to error in Doctrine and exorbitance in manners which may need correction and reformation and many doubtfull cases may fall out which will need decision it is requisite there should be some further aid given by the counsell and assistance of other Pastors That those Pastors met together in Classes and Synodes are fit arbiters in differences and censurers of errors and disorders That in Synodes thus assembled there must be due order kept That order cannot be kept where there is an absolute equality of all persons convened That it is therefore necessary that there should be an head President or Governour of the assembly who shall marshall all the affairs of those meetings propound the Cases gather the voyces pronounce the Sentences and judgements but in the mean while he having but lent his tongue for the time to the use of the Assembly when the businesse is ended returnes to his own place without any personall inequality A lively image whereof we have in our lower house of Convocation the Clerks whereof are chosen by the Clergy of the severall Diocesses They all having equall power of voyces assemble together choose their Prolocutor He cals the house receives petitions or complaints proposes the businesses asks and gathers the suffrages dismisses the Sessions and the action once ended takes his former station forgetting his late superiority This is the thing challenged by the Patrons of Discipline who do not willingly heare of an upper house consisting of the Peeres of the Church whose grave authority gives life to the motions of that lower body They can be content there should be a prime Presbyter and that this Presbyter shall be called Bishop and that Bishop shall moderate for the time the publike affairs of the Church but without all innate and fixed superiority without all though never so moderate Iurisdiction Calvin in this case shall speak for all who writing of the state of the Clergie in the Primitive times hath thus Calv. Instit l. 4. c. 4. Quibus ergo docendi munus c. Those therefore which had the charge of teaching injoined unto them they named Presbyters These Presbyters out of their number in every city chose one to whom they especially gave the title of Bishop lest from equality as it commonly fals out discords should arise Neither was the Bishop so superiour to the rest in honour and dignity as that he had any rule over his Colleagues but the same office and part which the Consul had in the Senate to report of businesse to be done to ask the votes advising admonishing exhorting to go before the rest to rule the whole action by his authority and to execute that which by the common Councell was decreed The same office did the Bishop sustain in the assembly of the Presbyters Thus he and to the same purpose Beza in his Treatise of the degrees of the ministery Moulin Chamier others So as we easily see how
judgement was given hath thus Non hoc putandum de ultimo judicio c. We may not think this spoken of the last judgement but the seats of the Prelats or presidents by whom the Church is governed and the governors themselves are to be understood the judgment that is given cannot be any better way taken than for that which is said Whatsoeuer ye binde on earth shal be bound in heauen §. 3. The execution of this Apostolicall power after our Saviours ascent into Heaven THe power is clear will you see the Execution of it Look upon St. Paul the Posthumous and Supernumerary but no lesse glorious Apostle see with what Majesty he becomes his new erected Throne one while deeply (a) 2 Thess 36. charging and commanding another while (b) 1 Cor. 5.4.5.6.7 controlling and censuring One while (c) 1 Cor. 11.2 1 Cor. 16 1. giving Laws and Ordinances another while urging for their observance One while (d) 1 Tim. 1.6 1 Tim. 2.9 1 Tim. 6 13. 2 Cor. 13.2 2 Cor. 4.21 1 Tim. 1.20 ordaining Church-governours another while adjuring them to do their duties one while threatning punishment another while inflicting it And if these be not acts of Iurisdiction what can be such which since they were done by the Apostle from the instinct of Gods Spirit wherewith he was inspired and out of the warrant of his high vocation most manifest it is that the Apostles of Christ had a supereminent power in Gods Church And if any person whosoever though an Evangelist or Prophet should have dared to make himselfe equall to an Apostle he had been hissed out yea rather thunder-struck by deep Censure for an Arrogant and saucy usurper Now if our blessed Saviour thought it fit to found his Church in an evident imparity what reason should we have to imagine he did not intend so to continue it It had been equally easie for him had he so thought meet to have made al his followers equally great none better than a disciple none meaner than an Apostle But now since it hath pleased him to raise up some to the honour of Apostles no lesse above the 70 than the seventy were above the multitude only injoyning them that the highest in place should be the lowest in minde and humility of service what doth he but herein teach us that he meant to set this course for the insuing government of his Church Neither is it possible for any man to be so absurd as to think that the Apostles who were by their heavenly Master infeoffed in this known preeminence should after the Ascent of their Saviour descend from their acknowledged superiority and make themselves but equall to the Presbyters they ordained No they still and ever as knowing they were qualified for that purpose by the more speciall graces of the holie Ghost kept their holie state maintained the honour of their places What was the fault of Diotrephes but that being a Church-governour he proudlie stood out against St. John not acknowledging the Transcendant power of his Apostolicall Iurisdiction whom the provok't Apostle threats to correct accordinglie so as those that lay Diotrephes in our dish do little consider that they buffet none but themselves who symbolize with him in opposing Episcopal that is as all antiquity was wont to construe it Apostolicall government But you are ready to say This was during their own time they were persons extraordinary and their calling and superioritie died with them Parâ—câ—â—l 1. c. 4. Thus our Tileno-mastix in terms The only question is Whether of the ordinary Presbyters which were singlie set over severall Churches they advanced one in degree above his brethren We shall erre then if we distinguish not These great Ambassadors of Christ sustained more persons than one they comprehended in themselves the whole Hierarcy they were Christians Presbyters Bishops Apostles So it was they were Apostles immediatlie called miraculouslie gifted infalliblie guided universallie charged Thus they had not they could not have any successors they were withall Church governours appointed by Christ to order and settle the affairs of his Spirituall Kingdome And therein besides the preaching of the Gospel and baptizing common to them with other Ministers to ordain a succession of the meet Administrators of his Church Thus they were would be must be succeeded Neither could the Church otherwise have subsisted No Christian can denie this all binding upon a necessitie of Apostolicall succession though differing in the qualitie and degree of their successors §. 4. The derivation of this power and majority from the Apostles to the succeeding Bishops NOw therefore that we have seene what ground our Saviour laid for a superioritie in them Let us see how they by his divine inspiration erected it in others who should follow them â—hat was Apostolicall this was Episcopall It is true as Calâ—in saith that at the first all to whom the Dispensation of the Gospell was committed were called Presbyters whether they were Apostles Evangelists Prophets Pastors and Doctors as before the Apostles were commonly called by the name of Disciples in every Chapter yet in degree still above the 70 and we do still say one while Bishops and Curats comprehending all Presbyters and Deacons under that name another while Bishops Pastors Curats not distinctly observing the difference of names So they all were called Presbyters yet not so but that there was a manifest and full distinction betwixt the Apostles and Presbyters as thrise Act. the 15. They therefore though out of humility they hold the common names with others yet maintained their places of Apostles and governed the Church at first as it were in common And thus as St. Ierome truly All maine matters were done in the beginning by the common Councell and consent of the Presbyters their consent but still the power was in the Apostles who in the nearer Churches since they in person ordered Ecclesiasticall affairs ordained only Presbyters in the remoter Bishops This for the Consummation of it was an act of time Neither was the same course held at once in every Church whiles it was in Fieri some which were nearer being supplied by the Apostles presence needed not so present an Episcopacy Others that were small needed not yet their full number of Offices neither were there perhaps fit men for those places of eminence to be found every where whence it is that we finde in some Scriptures mention only of Bishops and Deacons in others of Presbyters not of Bishops This then was the Apostles course for the plantation of the Church and the better propagation of the Gospel where ever they came they found it necessary to ordain meet assistants to them and they promiscuously imparted unto them all their owne stile but Apostolicall naming them Bishops and Presbyters and Deacons according to the familiarity and indifferency of their former usage therein But when they having divided themselves into severall parts of the world found that the number of
whereof Saint Peter acknowledges himself a Compresbyter for if it be alleaged as it is That this is against our owne Principles who allow but one Bâ—shop in one City and these were many let me put the Objector in minde that though these Bishops were called together by Saint Paul from Miletum to Ephesus yet they were not all said to be Elders of Ephesus but from thence monition went speediliest out to all places to call them and so we hear saint Paul say Ye all amongst whom I have gone preaching the Kingdome of God which plainly argues they were not confined to the compasse of one City or Territory but Over seers of severall and far-dispersed charges As Saint Paul therfore to his Timothy so Saint Luke here uses the terms promiscuouslâ— one being as yet in common use for both though the offices were sensibly distinguished And now what shall we say to this Tell me ye that look upon these Papers with censorious eyes tell me is all this think you no other than a formall presidence of an assembly without any power or command Is this to do but as a Consull in a Senate to propound Cases to gather Votes to declare the judgement of the Presbytery or Synod or as Zanchy resembles it ut Rector in Academia as a Rector in one of their Academies or rather as Saint Ierome whom you challenge for your Patron in this point hath it tanquam imperator in exercitu â—â—â—â—on Epist 〈◊〉 Evangâ—â—â— as a Generall in an Army who hath power both to Marshall all the troops and to command the Captains and Colonels and to execute Marshall law upon Officers If you have a mind to suffer your eies to be willingly blinded with such improbable suggestions falling from those whom you think you have otherwise reason to honour hugg still your own palpable errour not without our pity though without the power of redresse but if you care for truth and desire in the presence of God to imbrace it for truthes own sake without respect of persons aske your own hearts whether these charges and services laid by the elect Vessell upon his Timothy and Titus be any other than really Episcopall and such as manifestly carry in them both Superiority and Iurisdiction §. 7. The testimony of St. Iohn in his Revelation pressed NEither can all the shifts in the world elude that pregnant Vision and charge of the blessed Apostle St. Iohn in whose longer lasting time the government of the Church was fully setled in this threefold imparity of the Orders and degrees who having had the speciall supervision of the whole Asian Church was by the Spirit of God commanded to direct his 7 Epistles to the Bishops of those seven famous Churches by the name of so many Angels To the Angel of the Church of Ephesus To the Angel of the Church in Smyrna c. For what can be more plain than that in every of these Chur hes as for instance that of Ephesus there were many Presbyters yet but one Angel If that one were not in place above the rest and higher by the head than they how comes he to be noted in the throng Why was not the direction to al the Angels of the Church of Ephesus Divina voce laudatur sub Angeli nomine pâ—aepositus Ecclesiae Aug. Epi. 162. All were Angels in respect of their Ministery one was the Angel in respect of his fixed superioritâ— There were thousands of Starres in this firmament of the Asian Churches there were but seaven of the first magnitude who can indure such an invasion that one is mentioned many are meant as if they had said Non populum aggrâ—dit sed principem claâ—â— utique Episcopum Mâ—rlâ—rat To one that is to more To one Angel that is to more Angels than one To what purpose is it to insist upon any proprâ—ety of speech if we may take such liberty of Construction As if when the Prophet came to Iehu with a message and expresly said To thee O Captain he should have turn'd it off to the rest and have said To me that is Not to me alone but to all my felllows with me But to put this matter out of doubt it is particularly known who some of those Angels were Holy Polycarpus was knowne to be the Angel of the Church of Smyrna whom Ignatius the blessed Martyr mentions as by his Episcopacy greater than his Clergie Timothy had been not long before Bishop of Ephesus yea of the Asians now Onesimus was whose Metropolis Ephesus was Wherein Ignatius acknowledges 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a very great multitude of Christians so large that in the Emperour Leo's time Iura Graec. p. 88. 90. it had 36. Bishopricks under it And so was Sardis having under it 24. And shall we think that these great Dioceses were as some obscure Parishes wherein were no variety of eminent persons so as the Angel that is noted here must needs be of a large Iurisdiction and great Authority But if any man shall imagine these things spoken to the Angel as to him under that title in the name of all the rest let him know that this cannot be for that the charges and challenges there made are personall and such as could not be communicated to all for who can say that all those of the Church of Ephesus were patient and laborious Revel 2.2 that none of them fainted that they all lost their first love that all hated the work of the Nicholaitans who can say that all those of the Church of Smyrna were either poore or rich That none in the Church of Pergamus denyed the fath Besides here is a manifest distinction betwixt the Pastor or Bishop and those of his charge and they are described by the severalties of their estates As when he had acknowledged the Graces of Polycarpus the Angel of Smyrna Revel 2.10 and incouraged that blessed Martyr by way of premonition to some of his Church Behold some of you the devill shall cast into prison and ye shall be tryed and endure Tribulation ten dayes and then addressing to him Be thou faithfull to the death c. And in his fourth Epistle Revel 2.24 distinguishing the Angel or Bishop of Thyatyra from the rest of his charge But unto you saith saith he and the rest of Thyatyra as many as have not this doctrine and the depth of Satan as they speake I will put none other burden upon them but that which ye have hold fast till I come So that this conceit is no lesse wild than that other which followes it of my old acquaintance Brightman who makes not only these Angels the types of those Churches but those Churches of Asia the Types and Histories of all the Christian Churches which should be to the end of the world Thus the Bells say what some Hearers thinke So cleer is this truth that the Opposites have been forced to yield Priority here intimated but a Priority of Order onely not
the Apostles themselves If it were constituted in their time and proceeded from them and were in this name received of all Churches then certainly it must be yielded to be of Apostolicall that is divine Institution More if it needed might be added and that out of Chamier's owne allegations Thus much truth is not grudged us by these ingenuous Divines All the question is of the nature and extent of this Superiority This difference there was but as that great Pancratiast others with him contend though many prerogatives were yielded to the Bishop in his place especially in the nobler Cities yet this place Cham. ubi supra was but Primatus ordinis a Primacy of order onely nulla erat hic dominatio aut jurisdictio sed sancta charitas Here was no rule no jurisdiction but all was swayed by an holy Charity Here 's the knot wher 's the wedge Why 't is here If charity did it then it doth it still for I hope Jurisdiction and charity may well stand together and Chamier had no reason to oppose things which agree so well as well in a Bishop as in a civill Magistrate for as for rule if we affect any but fatherly and moderate and such as must necessarily be required for the Conservation of peace and good order in the Church of God we doe not deprecate a Censure We know how to bear humble minds in eminence of places how to command without imperiousnesse and to comply wth out exposing our places to contempt so as those are but spightfull Frumps and malicious suggestions which are cast upon us of a tyrannicall pride and Lordly domineering over our brethren We are their Superiours in place but we hate to think they should be lowlier in mind But hereof we shall have fitter occasion in the sequel §. 10. The superiority and Iurisdiction of Bishops proved by the testimony of the first Fathers and Apostolicall men and first of Clemens AS for that Jurisdiction which we claime and those reverend and obedient respects which we expect from our Clergy if they be other than those which were both required and given in the very first times of the Gospell under the Apostles themselves and of those whom they immediatly intrusted with the government of the Church let us be hissed out from among Christians For proof of this right then whom should I rather begin with after the Apostles than an Apostolicall man a copartner and a deare familiar of the two prime Apostles St. Peter and St. Paul I mean Clemens whom St. Paul mentions honourably in his Epistle to the Philippians Philip. 4.3 by the title of one of his fellow-labourers whose names are in the booke of life One who laid St. Peter in his grave as Theodoret tells us and followed that blessed Apostle both in his See and in his Martyrdome yea one whom Clemens Alexandrinus enstyles no lesse than an Apostle of so great reputation in the Church that as Ierome tells us he was by some reputed the pen-man of the holy Epistle to the Hebrews and that learned Father findes the face of his style alike if not the same you looke now that I should produce some blowne ware out of the pack of his Recognitions or Apostolicall Constitutions but I shall deceive you And urge a Testimony from that worthy and Apostolike Author which was never yet soyled so much as with any pen either in Citation or much lesse in Contradiction of venerable and unquestionable authority It is of that noble and holy Epistle of his which he wrote to the Corinthians upon the occasion of those quarrels which were it seemes on foot in St. Paul's time and still continued Emulation and side-takings amongst and against their teachers which belike proceeded so farre as to the ejecting of their Bishop and Presbyters out of their places He gravely taxes them with this kinde of Spirituall conspiracy and advises them to keepe their own stations For which purpose having laid before them the history of Aarons rod budding and thereby the miraculous confirmation of his election he addes And our Apostles knowing by our Lord Jesus Christ the contention that would arise 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 about the name of Episcopacy and they Clem. Epist ad Corinthios 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. for this very same cause having received perfect knowledge appointed the foresaid degrees and gave thereupon a designed order or list of Offices that when they should sleepe in their graves others that were well approved men might succeed in their charge or service Those therefore which were constituted by them or of other renowned men after them with the consent and good liking of the whole Church and have accordingly served unblameably in the Sheepfold of Christ with all meeknesse quietly and without all taynt of corruption and those who of a long time have carryed a good testimony from all men these we hold cannot justly or without much injury be put from their Office and service For it were no small sinne in us if we shall refuse and reject them who have holily and without reproofe undergone these Offices of Episcopacy And withall blessed are those Presbyters who having dispatched their journey by death have obtained a perfect and fruitfull dissolution For now they need not fear least any man shall out them from the place wherein they now are For we see that some ye have removed and displaced from their unblameably-managed office ye are contentious my brethren and are quarrelsome about those things which do not concerne salvation search diligently the Scriptures c. Thus Clement Did he write this trow we to the Church of Corinth or of Scotland Judge you how well it agrees but in the mean time you see these distinctions of degrees you see the quarrels arising about the very title You see that the Bishops ordained by the Apostles succeeded in their service you see they continued or ought to continue in their places during their life you see it a sin to out them except there be just cause in their misdemeanour The testimony is so clear that I well foresee you will be not a little pinched with it and desirous to give your selfe ease And which way can you doe it perhaps you will be quarrelling with the authority and antiquity of the Epistle But this yron is too hot for you to take up It hath too much warrant in the innate simplicity of it and too much testimony from the ancient Fathers of the Church for any adversary to contradict Though it could come but lately to our hands yet we know long since that it had the attestation of Iustin Martyr of Irenaeus who calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Clemens Alexandrinus of Origen of Cyrill of Ierusalem of Photius who tearms it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a very worthy Epistle of Ierome who tearms it valde utilem a very profitable Epistle and tells us that it was of old publikely read as authenticall in Churches
it is plainely attributed to Bishops as in that to the men of Smyrna as we shall see in the sequel And why might not hee digest this Phrase which he so commonly met with in antiquity 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrysost in Act. c. 1. Citat in Append Notarum Criticarum Nic. Vedel Amonst the rest it is remarkable that the very same sentence that hee cites for his defence out of Chrysostome cuts his throat then their praefecture speaking of the Apostle's Bishop was not an honour but a provident care for those whom they ruled over Lo here was a praefecture first and then here are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which implyes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a rule not alluding to the abuses of his owne time as Vedelius poorely but to the Apostles in whom honour did well agree with care was there ever man that denyed Apostle-ship to be an honour much lesse holy Chrysostome The Fathers meaning plainly is that the Apostles did not stand so much upon their own honour as the care of their charge as what good Bishop doth otherwise In the meane time here is an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a rule implyed in that Testimony which is brought to impugne it for Ignatius his passage is as undoubted as his Epistle and the Bishops power is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 onely which Vedelius could yeeld but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And what need Vedelius to stand upon this terme when Chamier himselfe so fully yeelds it Cham. de Occumen Pontif. l. 13. c. 19. ex Nazianzen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Revera Episcopatus est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and singuli Episcopi in suis Ecclesiis sunt principes The Martyr for a close shuts up with a Fare-well in the Lord Jesus and be subject to your Bishop c. In the second Epistle to the Magnesians for I love to follow the trace of that blessed Saint I exhort you Ignat. ad Magnes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. pag. 54. saith he that your care and study be to do all things in a godly Concord your Bishop being president in the place of God your Priests in the place of the Senate of the Apostles c. And not long after As the Lord saith he did nothing without his Father who said I can do nothing of my selfe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so neither may any of you do ought without your Bishop Whether it be Priest or Deacon or Laick Neither let any thing seeme meet for you to doe without his judgement for whatsoever is so done is wicked and an act of meere enmity to God What will our refractaries say to this who affect to make head against their Bishops yea not onely suffer him to do nothing without them but suffer him to do nothing at all yea suffer him not to be Oh God! if thy blessed Martyr Ignatius now lived and saw these insolencies how would he thinke himselfe falne amongst more fierce beasts than those which were prepared for him Ignat ad Philadelph p. 91. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. In his third Epistle to the Phyladelphians So many saith he as are Christs are for the Bishop and those that decline from him and take part with the accurst they shall be cut off together And not long after in the same Epistle in Christ saith he there is neither bond nor free Let the Princes or chiefe governours obey Caesar Let the souldiers obey their chiefe governours Let the Deacons and the rest of the Clergie with all the people souldiers governours and Caesar himselfe obey their Bishop Let the Bishop obey Christ as Christ obeyed his Father and thus shall Vnity be conserved in all things Thus he Now comes in Nic Videlius and seconding Scultetus cries out of manifest interpolation I wish I had leisure in this place to follow him home he is out of my way yet I must step aside to him a little And what and where then is this so open fraud in foysting in this clause of Ignatius Caesar was then no Christian In vaine should the true Ignatius have charged Caesar to obey the Bishop weakly objected for as Maestraeus answers him well The Martyr tels us what should be done not what was It is true that the greatest Monarchs of the world even those whose vassals we confesse our selves in temporall respects yet in Spirituall reguards ought to submit their soules to our government or rather to Gods in us But Ignatius admonisheth Christians not heathen of their duty Weake still His amonition is universall though directed to Philadelphians and those men which were now Ethnicks might prove Christians The rules must not vary with the persons But it would have been scandalous especially in those times to exhort an Heathen Emperour to submit himself to a Christian still alike what scandall more in this than in the rest of the doctrine of the Gospell which in the mouthes of all faithfull Preachers requires Princes to yield their necks to the yoke of Christ Why more then Go tell that Foxe And the Non licet of the Baptist to Herod why more than the bold speeches of the Martyred Saints to their heathen persecutors Why more than of that Christian Bishop to Julian of Chrysostomus to Eudoxia why more than the high language of Valentinian and Trajan to Valens and hundreds other of this kinde Socrat. lib. ◠cap. 16. Theod. lib. 5. cap. 31. 3◠But which is grossest of all he makes the end of all the Conservation of unity in the Church And what saith he are heathens within the Church Or is there any Union betwixt Christ and Infidels As if Ignatius had written only for a day as if these men must needs live and die Heathens The Cavills must be more probable that must cast a Martyr or rob us of his holy instruction Yet again therefore hear what our St. Ignatius sayes in the same Epistle Pag. 102. Edit Vede 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. It is hard saith he to reject the preaching of the Apostles The Priests are good and so are the Deacons or Ministers of the word but the chief Priest is better 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who is trusted with the Holy of Holies who only is intrusted with the secrets of God Here Vedelius startles and not he only but Chamier too contends the Chief Priest not to be meant of the Bishop but of Christ but the place easily quits it self Ignatius plainly compares these holy Offices with themselves not with Christ How absurd had it been to make a comparison betwixt the goodnesse of Priests and Deacons and the goodnesse of Christ as if there had been any possibility of proportion as if any doubt could have risen this way This meliority therefore or betternesse above the Priests and Deacons is ascribed to the Bishop by the name of the high Priest in allusion to the Jewish Priviledges of the great Pontife who only might enter the holy of
gravity and holy Moderation as I verily suppoie our Island yeildeth none such let his person ruler let his calling be innocent and honourable It is not wealth or power that is justly taxable in a Bishop but the abuse of both and that man is weakly grounded which would be other than faithfull to his God whether in an higher or meaner Condition Forasmuch therefore as these imaginary dissimilitudes betwixt the Primitive Episcopacy and ours are vanished and ours for substance is proved to be the same with the first that ever were ordained and those first were ordained by Apostolike hands by direction and inspiration of the holy Ghost we may confidently and irrefragably conclude our Episcopacie to be of no lesse than Divine Institution §. 18. The practice of the whole Christian Church in all times and places is for this government of Bishops HOwever it pleaseth our Anti-praesulists to sleight the practice and judgement of all Churches save the Primitive Church which they also without all ground and against all reason shut up within the strait bonds of 250 yeers out of a just guiltinesse of their known opposition yet it shall be no small confirmation to us nor no lesse conviction to them that the voice as of the Primitive so of the whole subsequent Church of God upon earth to this very age is with us and for us Quod semper et ubique Alwaies and every where was the old and sure rule of Vincentius Lirinensis and who thinks this can fail him as well worthy to erre It were a long task to instance in all times and to particularize in all Churches Let this be the triall Turn over all histories search the records of all times and places if ever it can be shown that any Orthodox Church in the whole Christian world since the times of Christ and his Apostles was governed otherwise than by a Bishop superiour to his Clergy unlesse perhaps during the time of some persecution or short inter-regnum let me forfeit my part of the cause Our opposites dare not stand upon this issue and therefore when we presse and follow them upon this point they runne back fifteen hundred years and shelter themselves under the Primitive times which are most remote And why will they be thus cowardly They know all the rest are with us and against them yea they yeild it and yet would fain think themselves never the worse Antichrist Antichrist hath seized upon all the following times and corrupted their government what a meer gullery is this Do not they themselves confine Antichrist to Rome And hath not Bishop Downham diligently noted his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Boniface his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Hildebrand his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the latter times Surâ—ly had these men bestowed that time in perusing Bishop Downhams discourse concerning Antichrist Diatrib de Antichrist 〈◊〉 â—â—on Lessâ—â—â— which they have spent in confuting his worthie Sermon they had needed no other either reformation or disproof For can any indifferent man be so extreamly mad as to think all the Christian world these men only by good luck excepted is or ever was turn'd Antichrist or that that Antichrist hath set his foot every where in all assemblies of Christians and that he still keeps his footing in all Gods Church upon earth To say nothing else concerning the notorious falsity hereof what a derogation were this to the infinite wisedome providence and goodnesse of the Almighty that he should so slacken his care of his Church as that he should from the very beginning give it up wholly up to the managing of Antichrist for the space of more than fifteen hundred years without any check or contradiction to his government no not within the first Century Yea but his Mystery began to work betime True but that was the mystery or iniquity not the mystery of good order and holy government And if the latter times should be thus depraved yet can any man be so absurd as to think that those holy Bishops of the Primitive times which were all made of meeknesse and humility and patience being ever persecuted and cheerfully pouring out their blood for Christ Loco supra citato would in their very offices bolster up the pride of Anti-christ Or if they would yet can we think that the Apostles themselves who saw and erected this superiority as Chamier himself confesseth would be accessary to this advancement of Anti-christ Certainly he had need of a strong and as wicked a Credulity of a weak and as wilde a wit that can believe all this So the Semper is plainly ours and so is the ubique too All times are not more for us than all places Take a view of the whole Christian world The state of Europe is so well known that it needs no report Look abroad ye shall finde that for the Greek Church Christianography of the Greek Ch. the Patriarchate of Constantinople which in the Emperour Leo's time had 81 Metropolitans and about 38 Arch-bishopricks under his Jurisdiction hath under him still 74 Metropolitans who have divers Bishops under them As Thessalonica ten Bishops under him Corinth four Athens six c. For the Russian Church which since the Mahumetan tyranny hath subjected it self a Patriarch of their own neer home of Mosco he hath under him two Metropolitans four Arch-bishops six Bishops For the Patriarchate of Jerusalem to which have belonged the three Palestines and two other Provinces Tirius reckons also five Metropolitans and ten Bishops For the Patriarchate of Antioch which hath been accounted one of the most numerous for Christians it had as the same author reckons fifteen Provinces allotted to it and in them Metropolitans Arch-bishops and Bishops no fewer than 142. For the Armenian Christians they acknowledge obedience to the government of two Patriarks of their own the one of Armenia the greater who kept his residence of old at Sebastia the other of Armenia the lesse whose residence was formerly at Mytilene the Mother City of that Province now neer Tarsus in Cilicia Mr. Sands reports their Bishops to be 300 but Baronius 1000. For the Jacobite Christians they have a Patriarch of their own whose Patriarchall Church is neer to the City of Merdin in Mesopotamia and he hath under his government many Churches dispersed in the Cities of Mesopotamia Babylonia Syria For the Maronites whose main habitation is in Mount Lebanus containing in circuit 700 miles they have a Patriarch of their own who hath eight or nine Bishops under his Jurisdiction For the mis-named Nestorian Christians they are subject to their Patriarch of Musal or Seleucia besides others which they have had Under one whereof is said to have been 22 Bishopricks and more than six hundred Territories For the Indian Christians named from St. Thomas they have their Archbishop lately subjected to the Patriarch of Musall For the African Christians we finde that in one Province alone under one Metropolitane they have had 164 Bishops
yet such as in other places he doth either salve or contradict The passages are scanned throughly by many authors It is true then that he saith Bishops are greater than Presbyters rather consuetudine ecclesiae Hier. ad Evagrum than Dominicae dispositionis veritate but even in that withall he grants Episcopacy to be an Apostolicall Institution Eadem Epistola ad finem for he interprets himself that this Custome was derived and continued from the Apostles and that the Dominica dispositio of which he spake was to be taken of a personall appointment from Christ our Saviour Hier in 1 ad Tâ—tum Wherefore what can be more plain than that his toto orbe decretum relates to Apostolick Constitution The very pedegree of it is by himself fetcht from the time of the quarrels which St. Paul mentions in his Epistle to the Corinths One sayes I am of Paul another I am of Apollo I am of Cephas which was in the heart of the Apostolique times And relating those words of the Bishop of Jerusalems letters There is no difference betwixt a Bishop and a Presbyter he passeth a satis imperite upon it professing to his Marcella against the Novelty of Montanus With us our Bishops hold the place of the Apostles and that the drepression of their Bishops below their place was utterly perfidious And commenting upon that passage of the Psalme Hier. in Ps 44. In stead of Fathers thou shalt have children The Apostles saith he O Church were thy Fathers c. Thou hast instead of them children which are the Bishops created by thy self And which is for all where he is most vehement for the dignity of a Presbyter yet he addes Quid facit Episcopus exceptâ ordinatione quod Presbiter non facit What doth a Bishop besides Ordination which a Presbyter doth not That very exception exempts him from Aerianisme and those other clear testimonies besides more which might be cited show him though but a Presbyter no friend to the equality of our Presbyterians As for St. Ambrose they could not have pitch'd upon a better man a renowned Archbishop and Metropolitan and of so holily-high a grain as that he would not abate one inch of Archiepiscopall port and power no not to an Emperour Yet this is the man that shall plead against the superiority of Bishops And what will he say Of a Bishop and a Presbyter saith he there is one order or Ordination for either of them is a Priest but the Bishop is the first so that every Bishop is a Presbyter but not every Presbyter a Bishop for among the Presbyters the Bishop is the first But first of all by Parkers own confession it is not St. Ambrose that saith so but a changling in his clothes So not only Whitakers spalato Cocus Rivetus and others but even some of the great Pontifician authors as we shall see upon another occasion more fully Secondly Ambrose himselstells another tale Ambros de dignitate sacerd c. 3. c. 5. in his genuine writings There is one thing saith he that God requires of a Bishop another of a Presbyter another of a Deacon And again As Bishops do ordain Presbyters and consecrate Deacons so the Arch-bishop ordaineth the Bishop Do you not think this man likely to speak for the new government Thirdly if he had said as they make him they must give him leave to interpret himself The Bishop is Primus sacerdos that is saith he Princeps Sacerdotum §. 21. The practice of the Waldenses and Albigenses in allowance of Episcopall government SHortly then all times all histories all Authors all places are for us yea which is most remarkable even those factions which divided themselves from the Church as the Arrians Novatians Donatists yet still held themselves to the government of their Bishops It was their question whether this or that man should be their Bishop it was never questioned whether they should have any Bishops at all Yea in these latter times the very Waldenses and Albigenses when in some things they justly flew off from the Romish superstition yet still would have a Bishop of their own It was one of the Articles that was objected against them the Supremacy of the Pope Artic Vvald Annâ— 1170 and 1216 usurping above all Churches is by them denied Neither that any degree is to be received in the Church but only Priests Deacons and Bishops And Aeneas Silvius in his Bohemian history reporting the Tenets of the Waldenses hath thus Foxe p. 209. de dogmat Waldens Romanum pontificem c. That the Bishop of Rome is but equall to other Bishops that among Priests there is no difference that not dignity but merit of life makes one Presbyter better then another Those of Merindol and Cabrieres a people which about two hundred yeers ago came out of the Country of Piemont to inhabite in the waste parts of Provence being there planted and hearing of the Gospell pâ—eached in Germany and Switzerland sent in the yeer 1530. George Maurellus and Petrus Latomus to conferre with the learned men of those parts they met with Oecolampadius Bucer Capito Maurellus escaping home alone told his Compatriots how much they had erred and how their old Ministers whom they called their Barbes that is their Uncles had misled them But before this their complices the good Christians who were termed Albigenses did set up to themselves a Bishop of their own one Bartolomaeus remaining about the coasts of Croatia and Dalmatia Epist Legati Papae Card. Portinens vide Fox Acts c. of whom the Cardinall Portinensis the Popes Legat writes thus to the Archbishop of Roan about the yeere 1146. Etenim de Carcasona orâ—undus c. For one Bartolomaeus the Bishop of the Hereticks borne in Carcasona taking upon him the Deputation of that Anti-pope yeelded unto him a wicked and abhominable reverence and gave him a place of residence in the Town of Porlos and removed himselfe to the parts of Tholose This Bartolomaeus in the tenour of his letters which run every where in the first stile of his salutation entitles himselfe on this manner Bartolomaeus the servant of the servants of God to N. the salutations of the holy faith This man amongst all his other enormities makes Bishops and takes upon him perfidiously to govern and order the Churches Thus that Cardinall And those Angragnians who are commonly said for some hundred of yeers to have cast off all relation to the Church of Rome yet in their Confession of faith and answers exhibited to the President appointed Commissioner for their examination confessed and acknowledged upon mention made of ancient Councells That the Councels had made divers notable Decrees concerning the Election of Bishops and Ministers of the Church concerning Ecclesiasticall Discipline as well of the Clergy as the people These Chrisians were far from that peevish humour wherewith divers miszealots are now-a-dayes transported What speak I of these The very late
Christians who within the Ken of memory Hâ—drian Sarav Praelat ad tractat de gradibus minister came into this Kingdome for Protection had the noble Johannes a Lasco for their Bishop Thus it was with all Christian men and assemblies all the world over till within the age of some who might be yet living the waters of the Cantons and the Lake of Lemanus began to be troubled And now when the grosse errors of Doctrine came to be both discovered by one side and impetuously defended by the other and the impugners cruelly persecuted to bonds and death those who could not enjoy the freedome of the true Religion under their Popish Bishops thought themselves driven to set up Church-governors and Pastors of their own And these once estblished now must belike be defended They might not be under those they had they could not have those they should they rested under those they could get And hence is all this Distraction §. 22. The government by Bishops both universall and unalterable WE have seen the grounds of Church-government laid by our Saviour himself in imparity We have seen it so built up by Apostolike hands we have seen the practise of the ancient and subsequent Church laying on the roof to make a perfect Fabrick Yet what is all this if the charge be not universall and perpetuall yeild it to be so ancient as the Apostles themselves yet if it be arbitrary whether for time or place what have we gained Surely as God is but one and ever himself so would he have his Church There may be threescore Queens and fourscore Concubins and Virgins without number but his Dove his undefiled is but one and though she may go in severall dresses and trimmings yet still and ever the stuffe is the same Plainly though there may be varieties of circumstantiall fashons in particular Churches yet the substance of the government is and must be ever the same That ordinary power which the Apostles had they traduced to their successors as bequeathed by our Saviour in his last fare well to them unto the end of the world For we may not think as one said well that the Apostles carried their Commission with them up to heaven They knew it was given them for a perpetuity of succession He that said Go teach all Nations and baptize added Behold I am with you to the end of the world He could not mean it of their persons which staid not long upon earth after him he meant it of their Evangelical successors So was he with them as he was with his domesticks their Predecessors not in the immediatnesse and extraordinary way of calling not in the admirable measure and kinds of their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or gifts not in the infalliblenesse of their judgement nor in the universality of their charge but in the effectuall execution of those offices which should be perpetuated to his Church for the salvation of mankinde Such were the preaching of the Gospell and the administration of the Sacraments the ordaining Church-officers the ordering of Church affairs the infliction of censures and in short the power of the Keys which we justly say were not tyed to St. Peters girdle but were communicated to all his fellows and to all his and their successors for ever By vertue whereof all true Pastors can open and shut heaven gates above much more the Church doors hereupon earth And all these as are of such necessity that without them the Church could not at all subsist at least not long and in any tolerable Condition The power of these acts as it was by our Saviours Commission originally in the Apostles being by them conveyed to the Church and not by the Church conveyed to them So it succeeded accordingly in and to their successors and was incorporated into their office we that are Priests receive the Keys in Peter saith St. Ambrose Veniat ad Antistites saith St. Augustine Let them come to the Bishops by whom the keys are ministred in the Church As Beza said truly of the promise of the holy Ghost Beza de Graeci minist c. 5. that it was given for the good of the whole Church yet not unto the whole Church but peculiarly unto the Apostles to give to others at least so must it be said of this power And so indeed by Calvins own determination Calv. Instit 1. 4. c. 3. none but Pastors might lay hands on the ordayned Hoc postremo hâ—bendum est non universam multitudinem manus iâ—posuisse suâ—s ministris sed folos pastores and none but they were capable to weild the great censures of the Church Shortly then was this power left by the Apostles or was it not left If it were left as we could else have no Church was it left with all or with some with all it cannot the multitude cannot be thought fit for these affaires If with some then whether with one in a City or territory or with more If with more why is the charge then imposed upon one One Timothy in Ephesus One Titus in Creet One Angel in Thyatira One other in Philadelphia Laodicea and the rest And why are those single persons challengeable for the neglect And if this power and this charge were by the very hands of the Apostles entayled upon these eminent persons which should by due ordination therein succeed them and from them lineally descend upon us I wonder what humane power dare presume to cut it off Neither do I lesse marvell at the opinions of those Divines which holding Episcopacy thus to stand Jure Apostolico in the first institution yet hold it may be changed in the sequel For me I have learned to yeild this honour to these inspired men that I dare not but think these their ordinances which they intended to succession immutable Some kinds of Ceremonious prescriptions fell from them which were meant to be only locall and temporary those we have no reason to think our selves oblieged to but those which they left for the administration of Gods Church it shall be high presumption in any to alter because the Apostles did but meet together divers times on the first day of the week and St. Paul ordered that day for the laying aside their Collections And that is only called the Lords day by the Apostle How strongly are the vehement opposites of Episcopacy wont to maintain that day in succession to the Jewish Sabbath and that in all points unalterable by any humane authority Surely had they but the tenth part of that plea from the Apostles for this their Judaicall-Evangelicall Sabbath which we have for our Episcopacy they would make us feel the Dint of this argument and would in the rigorous observation of it out-do the Jews But you are now ready to choak me with some Apostolicall ordinances which were even of tâ— emselves reversed Be it so Then you tell me of the first form of their goverment of the Church which say you was by an