against them because the common consent of the whole Church doth not in the same appeare Those who would not have the Churches themselves Arg. 4 to bee rent and torn asunder because of the controversies bandied betwixt Protestants they seem to be of this opinion that every one may be saved in his own Religion and that a promiscuous multitude of erroneous people may bee received into the same Church Militant and Triumphant but this must not be granted If we will speak with the Scriptures Answ the name of one Religion is to be fitted and applyed not to difficult questions but to the points of Christian Faith preached to all and received of all Christian Churches throughout the whole world They therefore embrace the true and one only Religion which believe those things of God of Christ of the Church of all other matters and doe them which are necessary to be known done to the attaining to Salvation Wee conceive not therefore that every one may be saved in his own Religion which he feignes to himselfe but believe that they may be saved in the Christian Religion and be received into the same Church both Militant and Triumphant who so farre forth agree in the Doctrine of the Gospell as it is required that the Faith of Christians be saving to those that beleeve and that the worship which they yeeld unto God be gratefull and accepted of him in Christ But they who thinke that the perfect consenting of Churches is necessary to their meeting together in the Communion of one Church Militant and Triumphant can scarce free and disengage themselves from their error who conceived the Catholique Church to reside in one determinate party They therefore who in things either to be done or be beleeved defend such points with which the saving of Soules and Spirituall worship of God cannot consist they are truly said to have made a defection from that which is the alone saving Religion but they who retaining all fundamentals of faith and Gods worship differ from others and erre in some consequences or Doctrines of lesse moment professe no new or other Religion but are convicted not as yet to have attained in that one onely Religion to perfect knowledge For such imperfection of knowledge God excludes none from the Church Militant neither ought we to doe it We ought not to retaine brotherly Communion with those Arg. 5 whom it is an heinous sin to admit to the Lords Supper together with our selves But it seemed unlawfull for the Lutherans in taking the Lords Supper to communicate with the Helvetian or French Churches See the pres to the confer at Mompelg For the holy Supper of the Lord amongst other ends hath this use that it should bee the note and badge of the Religion which every one professeth For they who communicate with any Church in the receiving of this Sacrament by this deed doe publikely professe that they embrace the doctrine of the same Church and reject the contrary and separate themselves from others We must therefore in no case sport and play with the receiving of the Lords Supper nor therin dissemble any thing from which our heart doth abhorre and therefore wee cannot communicate with those Churches which embrace not our Confession For by such communicating we should seem to derogate from our Confession and syncere Religion and either to Patronize or surely closely to favour the errors of other Churches It is more safe therefore to Imitate the Christian Emperours who when the Arians did request to be received into Communion with the Orthodoxe they would not grant it unto them before they did approve the doctrine of the Orthodoxe We make no strife about that which is affirmed in the first place Answ But as for the Assumption namely That it is unlawfull to admit any to the Lords Table except them alone who are ready to subscribe to the Confession of one the same particular Church this seemes to me ought not to be defended For the Principall use of the Lords Supper is to recount the death and Passion of Christ which he suffered for the Salvation of men and to receive eternall Life by the Partaking of his Flesh and Blood It serveth also to witnesse and confirme the Union which Christians ought to have betwixt themselves 1 Cor. 10.17 and with Christ Jesus their head Lastly we confesse that this Sacrament as also that other of Baptisme is the note and badge of that Religion which wee professe Aug. cont â—austum 19.12 For men can be united together into no name of Religion whether true or false unlesse they be bound together in some fellowship of signer and visible Sacraments But as Baptisme is indeed the badge of the Christian Religion we professe and not of the particular opinions and confessions which we embrace before others so also must we conclude of the Lords Supper For to the mutuall Communion of all Christians in the Eucharist it is not required that all who Communicate together should agree in the same confession either the English or the French or the Dutch but that they agree in one Profession of the Christian and Catholik Faith Let us leave these rigid and Tyrannicall domineerings to the Papists who adjudge all to be separated from their Communion which would not sweare unto the Confession of Trent Cyprianus Cornelius The holy Fathers did not doe soe but they kept the Lords peace with those Churches which were of different opinions from themselves removing none from the right Communion because he refused to consent to the private Judgement of another particular Church for they acknowledged the Catholike Faith received with an unanimous consent of the Catholike Church to be the certaine Aug. Ser. 181. and sole Rule of Faith by which Beleevers retaine the Catholike Vnity But let him who can shew that Particular Churches ever usurped this to themselves that they did cut off others from the Brotherly Communion with themselues for diversitie of opinions in matters not as yet determined by the Judgement of the Catholike Church Socrat. l. 5. c. 21. on one side or other Victor indeed attempted to doe this and after him Stephen Lib. 5. cap. 23. lib. 7. cap. 4. both Bishops of Rome But it is plaine out of Eusebius that this Separation was founded on no right and therefore highly displeased the pious and Godly Fathers Therefore farre be it from us that in the very Communion of the Lords Supper we should as it were proclaime war against all other Churches which will not make our particular Confession their owne or will not forsake their own that they may embrace ours If we conceive our Churches to be of the righter and truer opinion than other Churches in certaine Questions not as yet determined wee have just cause not to Communicate with them in their errorss but thence have no cause at all to Communicate with them in the Sacraments Forasmuch as no errour in which
and establishing of cleere Articles of the Christian Faith against Hereticks than for the discussing and defining of hard and controversies which are not necessary at all Let us return therefore to that peaceable and Brotherly conference which we lately commended which if it be appointed with that minde and mannaged in that manner it ought we are in great hope very shortly to see an happy agreement of the German Churches This therefore ought first to be setled in the minde of all who are entertained in the Conference that they are not called together that as adversaries they should contend but that as Brethren they should seek and follow all lawfull wayes to establish Peace For if they themselves betwixt themselves saw one another and thinke they must revy contentions they will never perswade Union and Peace betwixt the Churches at variance Therefore let them not so much as offer to enter into the Labyrinths of the wonted disputations but let them aime and direct their meeting to this one marke that they may shew their Churches that there is no cause just enough why they should refuse mutuall Union and so long abhorre from joyning their right-hand of Brotherhood That this may be done let it be stated and determined in the first place concerning every controversie what of old was defined by the Suffrages of the Catholique Church and under the paine of a curse was to be believed of all For about things most Fundamentall there may arise some questions and Problems noâ— at all Fundamentall and which the ancient Fathers if they had been moved in their age would never have offered to have defined within the pâ—rill either of raysing or continuing a Schisme betwixt the Churches For instance That God is one in Essence three in Persons distinguished betwixt themâ—eâ—ves that the Sonne is begotten of the Father that the holy Spirit is the Spirit of the Father and the Sonne that these three Persons are Coeternall and Coequall All these are deservedly determined ranked amongst the Fundamentall Articles Now if any should contend that all those things which are disputed of the Schoolemen of the Manner of Proceeding and Begetting are also Fundamentall and necessary to be determined on one side verily he by this his rash Judgement would gaine no favour with Christ or Christs Churches So also That our Lord Jesus Christ is God and Man and hath in one Person the Humane and D vine nature inseparably united together and that we owe our Salvation to God incarnated is a most solid Foundation of our Catholique and saving Faith Notwithstanding whatsoever may be asked and disputed of the unutterable manner of this Union whatsoever of the manner of the Corporall presence in the Holy Supper whatsoever of the properties communicated to the humane nature by the vertue of the Union or of the Operations of the humane nature depending on this Union it doth not presently belong to Fundamentall Faith but to skill in Divinity and perchance not to that neither but sometimes to the curiosity of Divines Let this therefore be the first and chiefe care of the Divines at the conference accurately to distinguish and sever Fundamentalls from those which are not Fundamentall neither to take it for granted that whatsoever seemes to touch and border on a Fundamentall Article is presently Fundamentall After they have agreed on these things care must be taken that these fundamentals be expressed in few cleer words and be propounded to be established with the common consent of the Churches De anima Certa semper sunt in paucis Those things that are certaine are ever comprised in few words saith Tertullian And whatsoever necessary is to be known to the Salvation of Christians whatsoever makes men better or more blessed is set in open veiw Here is no place for subtill distinctions which onely a quick sighted Eagle or some Epidaurian Serpent can perceive and discerne no place for the fringes of long explication or penthouses which we often see jetting out not so much to build up Christians in Fundamentall Faith as for the enlarging of the Doctors opinions Lastly no place for Metaphysicall formalities and abstracted notions which may trouble the heads of the learned and deterre the mindes of the unlearned from the Catholique Faith it selfe but neither bow the hearts of these or those to the embracing of the Faith of Fundamentall Articles But now when those things which belong to the Fundamentall and common Faith of the Churches are comprised in few words and plaine but sound formes of speeches and those set aside and left alone which are not as yet agreed on It follows in the next place that all peaceable Divines endeavour to make all throughly to be perswaded of this That we must no longer sight in hostile manner with the danger of the Churches losse of Peace and scandall of Schisme for those things whereof Christian people may be ignorant without fault or losse of Salvation How wholsome and necessary this Counsell is the rashnesse and contrary practice of the Roman Church doth easily prove For whilest they not at all content with the Articles of the Apostles or Nicene Creed endeavour to thrust upon the Christian world new Articles of the Conventicle of Trent Epist ad Stephan ad Jubajaâ— prefa ad Concil Carthag they have left the everlasting matter of an everlasting Schisme betwixt the Churches How more advisedly did Cyprian that most holy Martyr and most learned Father of his age who professes that he would offer violence to none for difference in opinions or violate the Lords Peace with his Colleagues or remove any man from the right of Communion because he was otherwise minded than himselfe With which Christian charity and gentlenesse erring Cyprian deserved better of Gods Church than Stephen Bishop of Rome being in the right opinion and rending the Churches as much as lay in his power with his Schismaticall spirit Relying on the Example of this most holy Martyr and on the judgement of Augustine in this matter I doubt not to affirm that those Doctors amongst the Dutch Churches which are deceived Vide Aug. de Bapt. l. 2. cap. 5. and yet are ready to retaine Brotherly Communion with others are held more excused from Schisme before God than they who maintaine the true opinions in those controversies and in the mean time disdaine to hold Brotherly Communion with other Churches desiring the same Consent therefore being had in Fundamentalls although the Doctors cannot fully and perfectly agree in other things yet in this let them all agree that with one mouth and heart they cry out together to God Nulla salus bello pacem te poscimus omnes In war no safty Peace we all desire thee But if any here should demand what must be done with those controversies which cannot be composed least by occasion of these the Peace and Union of the Church may either be hindered or troubled and broken againe after once it is made
no other Originall and obstinate persisting in a Schisme but brotherly hatred Most sure it is that the proper duties of Charity cannot appeare and shew themselves in these differences of the Protestant Churches I appeale to the Apostle himselfe for my witnesse Rom. 12.9 10 11 Ioh. 13.35 1 Ioh. 3.14 1 Cor. 13.1 2. c. 1 Cor. 13.5 6 7 c. If we grant those Churches which wee conceive somewhat to erre in the Faith yet to be sanctified and preserved in Christ the foundation of the Church our Faith though something the sounder Chap. 9 will little availe us August de Bapt. contr Denat lib. 1 cap. 8. if our Charity be wanting towards all the Saints For saving Faith cannot bee unlesse conjoyned with Charity or Brotherly love as the Scriptures every where doe witnesse For what shall a mans sound Faith profit him where the soundnesse of his Charity is baned with the deadly wound of Schisme CHAP. IX That Brotherly Communion betwixt the Protestant Churches is not to be broken off for their divers opinions about questions in Controversy is proved by Arguments drawn from the want of lawfull power in Ministers to cause such a breach or dissolution NONE can be ignorant but that at the first the very Doctors and Ministers of the Churches were the chiefe yea the sole Authours of this Separation which we so desire may be taken away For it is not to be doubted but they alone are the hinderance why the Reformed Churches though by wofull experience they have found the numberlesse discommodities of this long lasting dissention yet they will not amongst themselves renew the Charter of their Brotherly Communion For if it seemed good to their Doctors to give each to other the right hands of brotherly fellowship in this selfe same houre we should see the Churches mutually embracing one another Therefore let us see whether they have done or now doe rightly who either have perswaded that the bands of Brotherly Communion betwixt the Protestant Churches should be broken or earnestly maintaine that for the present they ought not to be renewed againe We are of the contrary opinion being induced thereunto by these Arguments It is not in the power of the Ministers of any particular Church Reas 1 to separate or cut off another particular Church from the brotherly Communion which it hath with the Catholique therefore neither from that which it hath with any part of the Catholique Church and by the same reason not from the brotherly Communion which it ought to have with it selfe unlesse she will confesse her selfe to be no part of the Catholique Church The truth of the Antecedent seems therefore plaine to me because all just and lawfull seperation of every member from its body Catholique ought to leane and rely on the authority of the Catholique Church for one member hath not this judiciary power over another It is a known Rule of Lawyers A sentence given by him that is not his Judge is voyd in Law But particular Churches are not the Judges of private persons living in forreign churches how much lesse then over the Churches themselves If therefore any Church should pronounce another to be disjoynted from the Communion with the Catholique Her sentence were to be sleighted and contemned as of a Judge that presumed to make laws out of the bounds of his owne Jurisdiction But perchance they who easily grant the Antecedent of our Argument will yet doubt of the Consequent and set downe that one part of the Catholique Church may cast off another part thereof that is one particular Church may separate another particular Church from Brotherly Communion with her selfe by the power of her own private sentence and authority I deny that any particular Church hath any lawfull power to dissolve Christian Brotherhood with any other except so farre forth as the separation rely on the Authority of the Catholique Church which one claspes and containes within her embraces the Churches of all Nations Now this separation relyes on this authority so often as it is made for those points which are so established by the judgement of the Catholique Church that they are to bee counted shut out from the cōmunion of faithfull Christians who are known to oppose or deny them Trusting on this authority we justly deny brotherly Communion to those Churches which falsely and equivocally are entitled with the name of Christ who with joy and jeering hisse out the Divinity of Christ Who carpe at the mystery of the Trinity which is to be adored or with sacrilegious boldnesse overthrow any foundation of the Christian Faith For all these things have been passed for things judged on and that by the well known and famous authority of the Apostolike and Catholike Church But this separation is not made rightly nor according to the custome of the Catholike Church as often as one particular Church shall deny Brotherly Communion to another for dissenting from them in questions newly risen and never determined on one side or other by the authority of the Catholike Church as points of the Catholike Faith For no Church can at its own pleasure breake off the Band of Brotherly Communion by which all the members of the Catholike Church are coupled together with any particular Church but that with the selfe same Deed shee divides her selfe from the body of the Catholike Church in which those members can have no being which have lost their due joynting and Union with their fellow members We will conclude this argument with the Testimony of Augustine who every where teacheth Tom. 3. de side ad Petr. Diac. cap. 43. that this Separation of the good from the evill being within the Catholike Church is unlawfull and they which endeavour to pluck other members from the joynting of the body doe rather separate themselves from the Vnity of Christ Tom. 4. de side oper cap. 4 5. Lastly it nothing hurteth or hindereth those that are good that they abide still in Vnity and participation of the Sacraments with those whose Deeds they disallow Neither with those whose opinions they cannot approve For if we will beleeve the same Augustine they cannot be excused of unlawfull presumption who too much loving their own judgement arrive at such an height of boldnesse as to cut off Communion with others Tom. 7. de Bant. contra Don. For they neither ought nor can be cut off from communion with particular Churches which remaine conjoyned with the Catholike Church Particular Churches ought not in our age Reas 2 to challenge that to themselves which none ever durst to do in the time of the Apostles The Ministers of the Churches ought not to urge that which the Apostles themselves durst never perswade to be done But that one particular Church should renounce all Brotherly communion with another is a thing altogether unheard off wholy swerving from the prudence and practice of the Apostles Amongst the seven Churches to which S. John wrote
Revel 2.3 It is plaine there were some infected with errours from which others were free Yet those Churches which were the purer did entertain Christian brotherly Communion with those which were more impure the Apostle perswaded each of them to amend their own faults and errours but gave counsell to none on the pretence of vices errors to start a sunder from other For as in the naturall body the parts which are well in health and strength endeavour to cure not to cut off those that are sick and weake so in the Mysticall body of the Catholike Church if any be more pure and sound than others they are bound as much as lyes in their power to heale the vices and errors of others ' and not to deny Brotherly Communion to whole Churches Hither it may be added that this denying of Brotherly Communion may seem to have the kind force of an Excommunication which censure is not to be drawn and used of the Ministers of the Church for every fault or for every Error no not upon a single person subject to their Ministery Decret 6. de sent Exc. but much lesse on the whole body of a Church which in no wise is subordinate unto them For as the Lawes forbid to Excommunicate a Society or Corporation because it may happen that then those that are inocent may be entangled in that censure so right and religion forbids to exclude whol Churches from the Communion of the faithfull because this cannot be done without an injury contempt to many that be innocent If any should determine that communion should have been denied to the whole Church of Israel because of their worshipping of Baal besides that be should exercise an act going beyond the bounds of his Ministeriall power he should have offered an high wrong and injury to those seven thousand men who never bowed knee to Baal If any should say that this denying of Brotherly Communion which we disswade from is not the Excommunication of an whole commonalty such as the Laws respect and take notice of I confesse there is some difference betwixt these two yet I deny it to be of so great moment that it should make that lawfull in the one case which is not lawfull in the other Indeed Excommunication properly so called is the act of a lawfull Judge which passeth and layeth hold on those which are subject unto him and bindeth them though against their own wils But this renouncing of brotherly communion whereof we speake is an act of one judging only of persons not at all subject unto him and declaring them unworthy of all brotherly Communion and therefore driving and repelling them from the same although they desire it By what name so ever any please to call this repulse of other Churches from brotherly communion it doth them a great wrong and disgrace for it adjudges them unworthy of the honour of Brotherhood which Christ our elder Brother disdaines not to bestow upon them Ministers therefore of Churches ought not so much as to thinke of shutting out whole Churches from the communion with them and theirs It would be enough to cast off single persons desiring fellowship with them then at last when it shall appeare that they are stained with so hainous sinnes or wrapped in so mischievous errours as that by good right they may and ought to be driven and banished from the communion with all the Faithfull The Ministers of particular Churches Reas 3 put case of Saxony or Switzerland ought not to deale harder with ther Christian Brethren of other Churches in granting or refusing communion with them than they deale with their owne For the Christian Brotherhood which is betwixt the members of Christ is not altered according to the variety of Places or Nations But we call not our owne to a strick account what they conceive of the Articles in controversie and to what Doctors they stick therein but esteem it sufficient to the right of communion if together with us they hold and professe the Fundamentall Doctines of Christianity comprised in the Catechisme and adhere unto Christ Wee should use the same moderation and equall dealing towards forraigne Churches especially to the very body of Churches which for the most part is made up of simple and unskilfull Christians for whom it is not needfull that they should have any intercourse with controversall Dâ—vinity Therefore those Protestant Churches seem not to doe well which detest any fellowship with others and professe an open division and Separation for some difference in opinions about hard questions of which they cannot know certainly or inquire what the people in forraigne Churches therein doe hold and maintaine But this we may know surely out of their Doctors writings that those grosse errours wherewith those which are called Lutherans charge the Calvinists and those which are called Calvinists charge the Lutherans are at this day defended neither by learned or unlearned but rejected and damned of both Therefore the cause of this Separation which some esteem necessary hitherto appeares neither necessary nor just enough The Doctors of any Church cannot bring in such a Separation Reas 4 which shall restraine the Unity of the Church of Christ and Christian brotherhood to the side of Luther or Calvin as at this day the Papists straiten the same to the part of the Pope of Rome For Christs inheritance is limited with the same boundes wherewith the Brotherhood of Christians is limitted and is crowded into the same straits whereinto we thrust this brotherly fellowship If therefore we acknowledge no Ecclesiasticall communion and Christian brotherhood with those Churches which think otherwise than our selves it is manifest that we call home and confine the Church of Christs which consisteth of numberlesse Churches only to our own side For if any Protestant Church professe it selfe that it neither can nor will have brotherly Communion with the Church of Saxony or Switzerland by reason of some diversity of opinion I demand of them with what Churches then can or will it hold communion Not with the Roman not with the Greeke Church for it dissenteth from them in more controversies and of greater moment not with any other in any place for none can be instanced in from which she hath not some matter of dissenting for difference in Doctrine Therefore at last the matter will come to this passe that they which thinke themselves to have no brotherly communion save onely with their partners in opinions must say Christs that Church hath perished out of the whole world besides and only remains in those Churches which are of their own party But this is the very self same thing which the Catholike Church ever disalowed in the Donatists and which Augustine and Optatus Milevitanus doe demonstrate to bee repugnant to most manifest places of Scripture For the foresaid Augustine thus urgeth it That Christ hath lost his Inheritance if the Christian Communion be tied to one place or Countrey Aug.
Foundation of Religion Catholike Faith But if we should let the matter run on so long till all the controverted Problemes betwixt Protestants bee counted Fundamentall long since they have grown to too numerous hereafter they may grow to an almost numberlesse multitude For this solemne course and practice is observed of many that what they themselves have added to any Fundamentall Axiom as over weight and what they beleeve to be a consequence of the same this they presently require of all to be counted in the number of Fundamentalls If we grant to any particular Churches or to their Doctors this power of creating and multiplying Fundamentalls all hope is past of the certainty of the Catholike Faith all hope is gone of the Brotherly communion of the Catholike Church The mad error of the Church of Rome may confirme the Truth of our opinion who by stuffing a medley of uncertain opinions into the Creed of Trent by the same deed did both shake the immoveable certainty of the Catholike Faith and the Union of the Catholike Chuch so much desired of all we ought not therefore to mingle controversies lately born betwixt us with the foundations of Catholike Faith which are few and published by the preaching of the Apostles through the Christian world and received by the joynt consent of Christians In the last place that these things whereabout we contend Reas 6 were never counted in the number of Fundamentalls plainly appeares out of the very Augustane confession penned by Ph. Melancthon and approved and commended by Luther It is not likely that the Authors of so solemne a confession would have omitted any Fundamentall Doctrine of the Christian Faith without the knowledge and beleife whereof Salvation could not be attained by Christ Jesus But in this confession none of those points doe appeare about which so fierce a strife hath been been maintained betwixt the Helvetian and Saxon Churches In the third Articles of the Union of the two Natures in Christ in the tenth Article of the presence of the Body and Bloud of Christ in the Lords Supper they have established nothing which is not approved by the consent of all the Protestants And if we should run over the rest of the Articles we shall finde very few things after the last correction of which there is any dissenting betwixt the Protestant Churches nothing of so great moment that it should bring in a Schisme into the Church But grant some things to be in this confession to which other Churches cannot afford their consent it sufficeth to the retaining of Peace that they consent in all things necessary to be known for the Salvation of Christians For the confessions of particular Churches are not streitned to fundamentals alone but sometimes are extended to the declaring of their judgement of all heads of Divinity as they conceive it expedient for the Aedification of their people in Truth and Piety Therefore their errour is not to be born with who what ever they finde in their confessions will have it counted so fundamentall that they feare not to ranke those forreign Churches which in all and every thing will not admit the same to be the Rule of saving Faith among damned Hereticks overthrowers of the Foundation in a word amongst wicked men estranged from the holy brotherhood of good Christians Nothing could be done or thought of more injurious For if we weigh the confessions or disputes of all Reformed Churches and place on one side those things wherein they exactly agree and set on the other side those things which are in controversie wee shall perceive that the former out of the very Nature and Quality of the points themselves belong to the foundations of Faith and Piety the later either to the no wise necessary speculations of subtile braines or if they have any soliditie in them to the true inferences of the more skilfull Divines out of well grounded Propositions But those things which in this manner are built upon the foundation are not to be made equall with the fundamentalls themselves nor are they to bee accounted to erre in fundamentalls which swarve somewhat herein from the right line of Truth CHAP. XI Chap. 11 That there is no Controversie betwixt Protestants about Fundamentalls is shewn by instancing in three particular questions which are conceived before all other of greatest moment to the disjoynting of Churches BEFORE wee enter into this dispute wee must premise this firme and unmoveable rule That Christian Churches are not to be disjoynted which agree in all things necessary to be known or done to the Salvation of Christian men For no Authority lyes in one particular Church to make enquiry into others or office to compell other particular Churches to the rule of their owne confessions or power to dissolve the bands of brotherly Unity betwixt their owne and other Churches whatsoever which consent in the same common Faith that is in fundamentalls and the saving Articles of the Christian Religion Let us see therefore whether the Protestants agree so farre forth and let us take example only from those three controversies Of the Presence of the Body and bloud of Christ in the Eucharist Of the Communication of Properties in the person of Christ God and man Of Divine election and preterition according to the good pleasure of the Divine will For if in these questions by occasion whereof mighty surges and billows of contention have been blown up betwixt the Saxon and Helvetian Churches so much bee confessed on both sides as is necessary to know to Salvation All the rest may be left indifferent in the middle or to be disputed of betwixt learned men with peaceable mindes the brotherly Communion betweene Churches being no whit broken or torne a pieces Wee will begin from that which gave beginning to all the rest namely from the Presence of the Body of Christ in the Lords Supper and the eating of the same First of all nothing can be conceived fundamentall which is not by joint consent admitted by or received on both sides This is Fundamentall That the Body and Bloud of Christ are so truly present in the Administration of the Sacrament that Communicants may partake of them so as to draw life from thence and they may justly be condemned who so receive Bread and Wine as that withall they receive not the Flesh and Bloud of Christ to the Salvation of their Soules Hospin ad annum 1544. p. 191 Of this there is no dissention For Bucer grants That the Body of the Lord in the Eucharist is truly present and partaken off An annum 1540. p. 178 Calvin saith Wee all confesse with one mouth that we when we receive the Sacrament by Faith according to the Lords institution In Cons Mompelg p. 66. are made truly partakers of the Substance of the Body of Christ Beza saith we deny not the Body of Christ to be truly present to bee truly given and received I passe by the rest because no
men may erre preserving still the Faith whereby wee are Christians gives us power to depart from other Churches or to abhorre from holy and brotherly Communion with them Vid. Aug. contra Jul. Pelag. lib. 1. cap. 2. de peccat Orig. lib. 2. c. 23. Neither doe those Christians play with the Sacraments and incurre the guilt of dissembling when they celebrate one Lords Supper with them whom they know to differ from themselves in some heads of Doctrine in divinity For the Sacrament of the Eucharists is not instituted of Christ to this end that it should be a note or token of perfect Knowledge in all which are fellow-partakers of the same Therefore neither of perfect Agreement which perfect Agreement it is altogether impossible to finde in the imperfect Knowledge of Christians They therefore who use this moderation towards other Churches that they reject them not from Communion with them under pretence of difference in particular confessions even themselves also enjoy the same benefit amongst others Neither in the mean time doe they derogate any thing from their owne confession or favor and Patronize a strange one but they doe not at all challenge to themselves the power of dividing of Churches or dissolving of Brotherly Union betwixt Christians from that cause which neither Christ nor the Apostles nor the Primitive Church would ever have approved Lastly the Example fetch'd from the Arians is altogether divers and farre off from the matter in hand for we willingly grant that Brotherly Communion is to be denyed to them not onely of some one particular Church but even of all who durst denie the Eternall divinity of Christ For this is to overturne the most solid foundation of Christian Faith and mans Salvation But far different is the Reason and nature of those Controversies which are disputed of in the Protestant Churches and in which they differ and disagree amongst themselves For in none of these can any truly say That either the Foundation of mans salvation is overthrown or the Authoritie of the Catholike Church contemned or lastly that any particular Church ever was for errors in such points separated or to be separated from the Brotherly Communion of all Christians by the Judgement and power of the Catholike Church But this seems to have no doubt at all in it that one particular Church doth unjustly cut off any other from her Communion when for the same opinions according to the ancient discipline of the Catholike Church and rules Catholikely established she was not to be cut and cast off from all other Churches But through the love of Peace and desire of renewing concord betwixt most famous Churches I am carried much farther than at first I propounded to my selfe I will now turne my Speech to God himself whom I humbly beseech that at last he would be pleased to binde up the differences of all the Protestant Churches and to make them up into one and that he would shew unto all That it agrees with the nature of this One God to be worshipped in Unity Now I take my farewell of my most deare Brethren of the forrain Churches with the Exhortation of most holy Augustine If you will live of the Holy Spirit hold Charity love Verity desire Vnity that you may come to Eternity To the God of heaven who is the God of Peace to Jesus Christ our Lord who is the Prince of Peace to the Holy Spirit who is the Bond of Peace be Glory Honor and Thankesgiving for ever and ever Amen FINIS Imprimatur THO. WYKES April 8. 1641.
Church when it is compared to a Building when it is likened to a Man is termed the Head when resembled to a Tree stiled the Root It is called an Head because it maintaineth the members united unto it ceasing not to convey spirituall strength and life into them In the same sense it is named a Root because it spouteth a vitall Sap into all the Boughs and Sprigs ingrafted in it As therefore those are counted Fundamental Doctrines which are sufficiently effectuall and absolutely necessary to joyne Christians to their Foundation so may they also be called Capitâ—â—â— or Radicall Articles which being known and beleeved by any Members of the Mysticall Body they may be united to their Quickning Head and any of the Branches may rely upon that Roote of theirs which conveyeth Life unto them and stick fast to the same Moreover as every thing is not sitly called the Foundation which is usefully imployed about the building but only that which is so underlaid beneath the building that without it it cannot be supported but may stand strongly if coupled and conjoyned with it So all Doctrines profitable for the furthering of edification are not properly termed Fundamentall but only those which are so necessary to be known that without them there is no coupling of the building to the Foundation with them a saving conjunction may be had though somethings be wanting which are requisite to the perfecting of the Knowledge of a Christian Lastly 2 Tim. 3.16 let us acknowledge with the Apostle all Scripture to be profitable for Doctrine for Reproofe for Correction for Instruction of all Christians in Righteousnesse Godlinesse and Truth but we do not call all propositions founded in Scripture Fundamentall Doctrins because the nature of the thing and the propriety of the Metaphor doth forbid it The folly of Tanner in a like case was laughed at by all when in Conference at Ratisbone he feircely maintainedt hat whatsoever is affirmed in the Scripture is an Article of the Christian Faith as for example that Tobiah had a Dog But least we should stay longer than it is meet in handling the bare signification of words be this setled and resolved on that the names of Foundation and Fundamentall agree only to those things which in reference to what is founded on them are of absolute necessity and power to bring unto Salvation I find amongst Divines in this Sense a threefold acception of Foundation 1. Personall Foundation of the Church and this only one properly so called 2. Ministeriall Foundations of Churches so termed but not in the same Propriety of Language 3. Doctrinall Foundations justly so called as deserving that honorable stile not by the Opinion of a few Divines but the constant Judgment of the Catholique Church All the difference betwixt the Reformed Churches is about the two later yet can it not easily be composed Chap. 3 except we discourse of all three So much of thenotion and use of the words we come now to handle them severally in order CHAP. III. Of the only Personall Foundation of the Church Christ Jesus God and Man Mediator betwixt God and Men and of the true conjunction with him THE most wise God and most loving towards mankind was pleased to found a Church which should endure for ever and prevaile against the Gates of Hell Now such a Church could not be except it stood on a solid and eternall Foundation which might not be forced by any strength or foundred by Engines God therefore thought fit to lay no other Foundation than Jesus Christ the eternall Son of an eternal Father whom he sent into the World that every one which beleeveth on him might not dye but have everlasting life The prophets and Apostles witnesse with a joynt consent Him alone to be the Personall Foundation of the Church Psal 118.22 Esay 28.16 Act. 4.11 12. 1 Cor. 3.11 Hence David calleth Him the corner Stone Esaiah termeth Him a tryed Stone Precious and placed in the foundation of Zion This is the Stone set at nought by the Builders which is become the Head of the Corner neither is there Salvation in any other Other foundation can no man lay than that is laid which is Jesus Christ. Now what hath been said of this one only Foundation ought also to be understood of the one only Head Husband Root of the Church and also of all other Metaphorical Titles which import the same dignity of Christ the Churches same dependancy on him For Christ God and man is the only quickning and saving Head of the Church from whom the whole Body is fitly joyned together and compacted Eph. 4.15 16. Ioh. 3.29 Hos 2.20 Fph. 5.26 He is the only Bridegrom of the Church who hath the Bride and hath espoused her to himself that he might Eternally preserve that is that he may sanctifie her in this World and present her glorious in that which is to come Lastly he is the heavenly root of the Church Col. 2.7 in whom whosoever are rooted spring up towards Heaven and shall continually flourish in Heaven This Personall prerogative is so properly invested in Christ God and man that it can agree to no other Heb. 2.11 Not to Angels because they want that conformity of Nature which ought to be betwixt the Foundation and things founded in it the Head and the Members joyned unto it the Husband and Wife coupled to him in lawfull marriage Not to a bare man because no mortall by reason of the corruption and weaknesse of humane Nature can possibly performe the office of a Foundation Head Spouse in upholding quickening and preserving of the Church Not to God himselfe considered alone in the dreadfull nature of his Divine Majestie For though we acknowledge God the founder of the Church we still want a Foundation to which we need not feare to approach draw neare to come and as it were to glue our selves But the Majesty of God considered in it selfe is not only a light not to be approached unto but also is a consuming fire and what mortall man can dwell with a devouring fire Heb. 12.29 Isa 33.14 We cannot therefore have in or under Heaven any other personall Foundation by the Mediation whereof we may be reconciled and united to God save only the Word Ioh. 1.14 Made Man full of Grace and Truth But to what purpose is this dispute about a matter so plaine and granted of all Protestants Namely that it may hence appeare that other Churches neither may nor ought to renounce brotherly Communion with those particular Churches which retaine a saving conjunction with this Foundation We wonder not that the Papists who besides Christ himself make another personall Foundation another Head another Husband of the Church cut and cast off all Churches though firmely and fastly sticking to Christ which cleave not to the Pope of Rome as to their Foundation Head Husband Nor care we for their false clamours whereby they think to affright the
as they repent of their errors they are to be received againe into the Bosome of their Mother Thus may they deale with their own But when they are to meddle with Churches not at all subordinate unto them they may hold Divine concord and keepe Gods Peace with those which think and teach otherwise than themselves as we may see it in Cyprian Epist. 72. ad Stephanum 73 ad Julianum It will not be from the matter after this our discourse of Particular Churches to adde something concerning some famous and eminent Doctors in the same For private Doctors are also in their distance to be accounted Ministeriall foundations who in the maintaining expounding defending preaching or writing the Truth of the Gospell have imployed their commendable paines And here amongst the principall Doctours of the Reformed Churches wee reckon those Worthyes Luther and Philip Melancthon not fearing to joyne unto them Bucer Calvine Martyr and others whom we need not to name But of all these though exellent Divines of our Age we ought so to esteeme as accounting them Stars but not Deities in our Churches nor do we reverence them as the Prophets and Apostles inspired by God but value them as godly Men worthily learned and raised up by God for the generall good of the Church withall confessing them to bee but ordinary Ministers and subject to their mistakes Besides we must beware that we do not suffer the Churches themselves to be sirnamed by Epithets from these famous Men. Lactan. Instit lib. 4. cap. 30. For to put off the Name of Christ and to put on and weare humane and outward names is far from Christians and most times is the fuell of endlesse dissention That therefore of Nazianzens ought wonderfully to please all prudent and pious Christians Orat. 30. I reverence Peter yet will I not be called a Petrian I honour Paul yet will I not be called a Paulian If private Christians can not take this in good part how much lesse is it fitting to nick-name a whole Church from a single man Last of all I may adde this concerning private Doctors It is a most in jurious thing that a whole Church should be indited guilty of the errors of that Doctor whatsoever hee bee which hath or doth use his Ministery therein unlesse it doth appeare that that Church by their publique assent doth approve and maintain his errors But where is there one of an hundred amongst common Christians who so searches the books of their Doctors that he giveth his consent to all their Opinions Yea where is there one amongst those Doctours themselves which doth not from his whole heart abhorre such errors when his adversaries charge him with them Lastly where is there one to be found amongst the Learned in any Church who hath so sworne to defend the words of Luther or Calvin or any other writer but that he thinks it lawfull to depart from them where they depart from the Truth Now seeing it is manifest these things are so if these which wee call Ministeriall Fundamentals sometime in some things do shake or stagger we must not pin their Personall errors upon the whole Church Apud Luth. Tom. 1. disp de Author Eccles pag. 439. B. For the Church properly so called doth not allow whatsoever ill Doctours mingled in the Church do allow as rightly Melancthon to which we adde neither every thing which good Doctors have taught ill CHAP. CHAP. 5. V. Of the Doctrinall Foundations of the Christian Faith in Generall and how farre they are to bee beleeved under the necessity of Salvation THE Doctrine of the Holy Scripture contained in the Books of the Prophets Evangelists and Apostles is that Foundation on which alone the Faith of Christians may safely rely because of the most certaine authority of God revealing it Nor must we give eare to the Papists when they object Augustin Confes lib. 6. cap. 5. Irenaeus li. 3 cap. 1. Whence know you those Books to have been given to mankind by the Spirit of the most true God If God as yet hath not perswaded me in this point he hath not as yet perswaded me that I am a Christian For the will of God hath commended the Scriptures unto us to be the Foundation and Pillar of our Faith If the Romanists will give no credence neither to Augustine nor Irenaeus they ought notwithstanding undoubtedly to beleeve Peter 2 Pet. 1.19 20 21. who calleth the voyce of the Scriptures a voyee more sure than that which came down from Heaven and not brought by the will of man but holy men of God spake it as they were moved by the holy Ghost Therefore the holy Scripture so propoundeth the foundations of our Faith and fastens the Rule of our Doctrine that the Faith of Christians only trusteth and reposeth it selfe on those Revelations which are contained in the canonicall Books I will say nothing against that fantastick imaginary Doctrinall foundation which the Papists trislingly defēd to be in a word not written and couched in the privy cabinet of the Popes breast because I conceive so profane and grosse an error in a matter of so great moment amongst wel instructed Christians is not worthy of a confutation He that seeks for the Doctrine of Salvation and Eternall Life out of the Scriptures shall find it no sooner than if hee looked for the Tree of Knowledge and Life out of Paradise But although wee straitly maintain that no fundamentall Doctrine of Faith is to bee sought for out of the Bookes of the Old and New Testament yet wee do not defend that all things contained in these books are fundamentall points so necessary to be known and beleeved that if any of these be unknown or denyed of any we should presently adjudge them to have falne off from the foundation of Salvation Many things in the Books of both Testaments are Historicall some things are dogmaticall which are truly affirmed and profitably placed there and yet are accounted not to come into the Number of Fundamentall points Numberlesse things there are which by true firme consequence may be deduced out of the Scriptures and yet mount not up to this high pitch of honour Therefore those things only are to be set apart and owned for Fundamentals without the plaine and explicite Knowledge whereof none can be saved in which as well Negative infidelity not at all to know them as positive infidelity to refuse to beleeve them doth condemn Now such are all those things without which we can neither savingly beleeve in Christ nor rightly call upon God in Christ and worship him to the obtaining of eternall Life In a word without which Christians can neither have pious affections towards God nor exercise the Religious Acts of Faith Hope and Charity being absolutly necessary to Salvation These two things beene yeelded and granted that our Faith is to trust on the Scriptures alone and that all every one of those things
excell most in Faith it selfe Nor doe the modern Papists differ herein from the Schoolmen Let the Fathers of Trent speake Sesâ—ion 3. The Apostles Creed is that Principle in which all that professe the Faith of Christ do necessarily agree and it is that firme and only foundation against which the gates of Hell shall never prevaile And in the very Catechism of the Council of Trent this Creed is called Pag. 14. The short forme of the Christian Faith and Hope the summe and foundation of Truth first and necessarily to be beleeved of all Canifius affirmes That the words in the Creed tend to this purpose that we may have the true Knowledge of God and Heavenly things which is necessary to every man towards the leading of a godly and happy life comprised in briefe abridgement James Baius cals it the rule of the Christian faith prescribed to all Beleevers because by this common Profession of the faith those of the same houshold and brethren are distinguished from their Enemies Out of which testimonies we gather that it was the generall opinion of Divines that all Fundamentall Doctrines of the Christian Faith necessary with the necessity of the meanes to the Salvation of men were comprehended in the Creed so that none shall perish for meer ignorance of God and Christ who give an explicite Faith to these things Yet we say not that besides these few Fundamentals Christians should make no account of all other Doctrines which are placed in the Holy Scriptures Yea all Pastors and Doctors are bound by the necessity of the Precept to further the perfecting of the Saints and edifying of the Body of Christ Eph. 4.11 12. till we all come into the unity of the Faith and of the Knowledge of the Son of God unto a perfect Man The people themselves also are bound where ability and opportunity is afforded them to grow unto the riches of the full assurance of Vnderstanding Col. 2.2 to the acknowledgement of the Mystery of God and of the Father and of Christ But neither Doctours of Particular Churches nor Christians living in them are bound to break off the band of Brotherly Communion with other Churches which embrace this Summe of the Christian Faith in that sense wherein the Catholique Church always received it and professe themselves enemies to all Heresies that overthrow the same Now as we have set downe the Apostles Creed for the briefe of Fundamentals pertaining to the saving Mysteries of Faith so wee acknowledge the Decalogue as the Symbole and Summe of all things to be done as touching duties due to the worship of God and offices of Charity which wee owe to our Neighbour For wee may fitly enough call Fundamentall Doctrines not only those Mysteries of Faith whose explained Knowledge is altogether necessary to the Salvation of Christians but also those Doctates of the Divine Law which if we know not at all we cannot worship God as we ought to the obtaining of Salvation In this sense we terme the Decalogue the Summe of things to bee done even as wee styled the other of which we have spoken before the Sum of things to be beleeved For the meere speculative Knowledge of the Divine Mysteries without the practicall knowledge of the Divine Mandats can bring none to blessednesse Therefore Luth. Tom. 1. in disp p. 406. Philip. pag. 436. the teaching of Gods Law in Churches is plainly necessary and altogether to be retained without which Christ cannot be retained For to this Law not only our corporall life but also our spirituall life ought to bee subjected Now those things which are propounded in this Law of God are so fundamentall that they cannot be broken without the guilt of death nor opposed and denyed without the staine of Heresie The Fundamentals of the Creed aime at this end that we may know God and Christ to eternall Life as either hath revealed himselfe The Fundamentals of the Decalogue drive at this That wee may worship both as they have commanded themselves to be worshipped If any overthrow the Fundamentals of Gods worship he is shut out from Salvation as much as if hee had overturned the Mysteries of Faith Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the Kingdom of God Be not deceived Aquin. quaest disp de superb art 4. neither fornicators nor Idolaters nor Adulterers c. As if the Apostle had said It is no lesse damnable to erre in these morall than in speculative principles For the corruption of ones opinion about those things which pertaine to manners may make an Heretique no lesse than about those things which pertaine to Faith if it be in any Universall Principle of Gods Law Hee that beleeves he may worship many Gods or adore the true God in an Image made with hands that is of the opinion that theft or fornication are things lawfull grates upon a Fundamentall Doctrine and runs into a deadly and dangerous Heresie For the practicall dictate which is included in every mandate of the Law is a Fundamentall truth and ought equally to bee beleeved as an Article of the Creed in speculative things If any man therefore should beleeve or teach that our Parents are not to be honoured or any thing else against a Commandement of God although he reverenceth his Parents with due honour or keepes that Commandement himselfe yet should hee bee an Hetetique and justly to bee accused for overturning a Foundation of Faith Let the Church of Rome therefore looke to it which boasteth that the Foundations of the Christian Faith hitherto have been preserved chiefly by her care whether or no she hath not grosly and damnably erred in the Fundamentals of the Decalogue to say nothing of her other errors Now if any will adde unto the Fundamentall Doctrines of the Creed and Commandements the Doctrine also of the Sacraments clearely revealed in the Gospell I am not against it provided on this condition that as they shall not all passe for fundamentals which Divines endeavour to build upon the fundamentall Articles of the Creed but that those only bee counted fundamentall which are necessary for all to know and beleeve to Salvation So also in the matter of the Sacraments every thing shall not presently bee a Fundamentall which may bee disputed about the Sacraments or gathered by the occasion of the Words which Christ spake but whatsoever Christ hath so set down and established that it is absolutely necessary to the receiving of Grace and Salvation in the use of the Sacraments As concerning the Sacrament of Baptisme it is a Fundamentall Doctrine that Christians must be Baptized in the Name of the most Holy Trinity that they may bee grafted into Christ Now they that beleeve and doe this retaine the Fundamentall doctrine of Baptisme although it may happen that the same men may in their minds conceive some false opinions of Baptisme or mingle some vaine and uselesse rites in the Administration thereof So in the Sacrament of
Epist 150 161. and Epist 162 163 164. Tom. 7. de unitate Ec. cap. 13. 16. and he saith it is an unwise part to goe about to condemne the Communion of the whole world He sheweth moreover That for the good of Vnitie we must beare with some things wee approve not at all and that the knowne bad prejudice not the Good in the Church if either they want power to forbid and drive them from the Communion or if some reason hinder for the preserving of Peace In a word he avoucheth That the Donatists who would acknowledge no Brethren besides those on their owne part did erect an altar of sacrilegious dissension against the whole world Thus farre Augustine Also Optatus fights fiercely against this manner of restraining Brotherly Communion He saith a Lib. 1. in mitio That the Donatists were owned of the Orthodox for Brethren He saith that b Lib. 2. prope ab initio They by this their restrained Brotherhood suffer not the Son of God to possesse the Inheritance promised unto him by his Father but doe place the Church where they please and where they please not there again do banish it out He saith c Lib. 3. init That the very name of Brotherhood however odious to the Donatists is notwithstanding necessary for the Orthodox to use towards the Donatists themselves He saith d Lib. 6. That those follow Gods Will and Commandements who loving Peace hold Communion with the Church in the whole world Lastly he saith e Lib. 7. That this Separation of some Brethren from others which the Donatists defend was displeasing to God To finish our fourth Reason although I perswade my selfe that there is none of the Protestant Churches which abhor from Brotherly Communion with others with as high a straine of Pride and malignitie of minde wherewith the Donatists detested communion with others yet I ingenuously professe that I understand not how they can cleere and winde themselves off who retaine not Brotherly Communion with other Churches but endeavor to confine the Priviledges of Christian Brotherhood onely within the bounds of their owne Churches No particular Church Reas 5 holds it self bound to break off and renounce brotherhood with another Church for the vices of men living therein though known dispersed and reigning Seeing we all know Gluttony reignes in one place Drunkennesse in another Lust in a third and these nationall vices are no lesse known to us than their Opinions If therefore for these haynous offences in life which reigne in many we take not occasion to dissolve our tye of brotherhood with whole Churches neither ought we to doe it for the errors of the Understanding which are of lesse guilt in the sight of God and often stretch not to the whole Body of Christian people 1 Cor. 5.11 2 Thes 3.6 If wee will make use of the Apostle for our Counsellour wee should depart from the company of other Christians rather for their wickednesse than for their ignorance yet for neither injoyneth he Churches to separate from Churches but only private persons to withdraw from the company of private persons Yea it is unlawfull for the Heresie of few or many Doctors ruling in particular Churches to cast off any whole Christian Church and separate it from Brotherly Communion with us A man that is an Heretick after the first and second admonition reject Titus 3.10 knowing that he that is such is subverted and sinneth being condemned of himself saith the Apostle It is lawfull to exclude a single man from the communion of other Christians for a damnable Heresie See Aug. Epist 162 tom 6. de util cred cap. 1. wherein he is condemned by his owne judgement or convicted of obstinacie but it is not lawfull for an errour into which he is trained in by the deceit and subtiltie of others and which he defendeth not with any wilfull stomack but only being deceived with an imagination and conceit of Truth and Pietie But no Protestant Church can seperate or banish any other whole Protestant Church for example the English or French from Brotherly Communion with it either for faults in life or errrors in Doctrine The reason is at hand Because it cannot be proved that that whole Church hath fallen into a damnable heresie because the obstinacy of a whole Church in an error whatsoever can neither be demonstrated to forraign churches nor ought to be presumed of them Lastly because wee have no command from God nor Admonition from the Apostles to breake the bond of Brotherhood betwixt whole Churches If any here should aske why the Doctors of the Churches who never perswaded their People to disjoynt themselves from the Brotherly Communion with other Churches for the grosse and enormous vices every where reigning amongst Christians should so vehemently perswade that this must be done because of the Errors they conceive them to be fallen into Let him receive this answere That this commeth thence to passe because we more affect the praise of knowledge than of holinesse and take it in worse part from them who oppose our Dictates which are doubtfull than from them that break and violate the plaine and open Commandements of God If the matter were otherwise we might easily perceive that it was no more lawfull to breake off Brotherhood which is betwixt particular Churches for their errours in Doctrine than for the sinnes of Life which we behold generally and openly to reigne amongst them Chap. 10 Therefore wee must beware of the errours of others but in no case must separate from those Christian Churches wherein they are predominant whether they belong to life or to doctrine because for the doing of such an Act there is no lawfull power in the Ministers of any particular Church CHAP. X. That Brotherly Communion is not to he broken betwixt the Protestants is showne by the nature and quality of those points whereunto they contend THis as it seems to me must be premised in the first place That the Bands of Brotherly Cōmunion ought not to bee dissolved betwixt Christian Churches for all discords of Opinions but only for the opposing or denying of Fundamentall doctrines For it seems to be confessed amongst all Protestants that this separation is not to be made for every straw of Erroneous opinions For hence it is that when they desire to maintain that this Joynting of Churches was concluded on good ground together herewith they alwayes commenc'd this suite That they have made a discession or departed from some Foundation of the Catholique Faith For unlesse this appeare to be done not of this or that Doctor in the Church but of the Church it self as it is considered under the respect of a Body compacted or conjoyned together it ought not to availe to the parting of one Protestant Church from another But in this place it will not be unseasonable to advise in a few words that the actuall exercise of outward Communion with some particular
not only truly said of the Man Christ that he is Omnipotent Omniscient c. but also that of the humane nature of Christ that the same is Omnipotent Omniscient c. yet doe so temper and explaine this their opinion that they deny these divine properties to bee powered into the humane nature or ever become properties fixed and setled in the humane nature and determine them only by the personall Union and exaltation that followed upon it to be attributed to him in his Person and not severally If there be any difference betwixt these Opinion it is so subtle so farre removed from the capacity and cōmon understanding of Christian people that it cannot be in the number of fundamentall Doctrines except we will faine a new kinde of fundamentalls hitherto unknown and unheard of to the Catholike Church and people of God As concerning other questions which those foure words have bred unto us Verbally Really in the Concrete in the Abstract we may freely say such termes of Art ought not to enter into the articles of the Christian Faith from the knowledge wherof depends the life and Salvation not only of learned men and Logicians but of the unlearned and of all common Christians Moreover it is little suteable that we should seek fundamentall Doctrines in Propositions as long as it is not agreed on of the sense and signification of the termes which are used in the framing of them But what comes to be understood Colloq Mompel pag. 222. c. 22◠under the name of Concrete what under the name of Abstract could not be consented on betwixt James Andrewes and Theodore Beza neither as yet doe the Divines of both sides well agree in the signification of these words when they are referred to Christ Therefore it is enough for the retaining of Unity betwixt Churches that all acknowledge the Communication of Properties not to be verball but reall so farre forth as that the same and one only Person to whom it is attributed is truly and really God is also truly and really man and therefore things may really be predicated of God which belong to Man and of the Man Christ which belong to God But if we should change the name of God into Godhead or Man into Manhood all also will acknowledge that the Propositions are not to be received with the same certainty None will doubt of this Proposition God was Crucified for our sins But if it be thus altered The Godhead or Divine Nature was Crucified for our sins It will afford occasion not only of doubting but of being deceived So this Proposition is placed without the reach of all question The Man Christ is omnipotent omnipresent c. But if the word Man be changed into the word Manhood as to say The Manhood or humane nature of Christ is omnipotent omnipresent c. it will not appeare so plainly to the Orthodox in their Judgement Tom. 2. vide Epist 102. Tom. 6. contra Ser. Arian tom 7. De Pecc mer. lib. 1. c. 31 tom 10. S.N. 14. de verbis Dom. Hist Sacra vart 2. pag. 15 16 17. 18. Augustine sheweth us the light to frame and understand such Propositions made of Christ God and Man almost in every book Let the places noted on the margin be consulted with Also Luther himselfe in Hospinian hath many things most worthy to bee considered of the Person of Christ and communication of his Attributes and most to the purpose for the true understanding of this question I will adde this one thing that those two Propositions The Man Christ is God The God Christ is Man Which are the foundation of all the rest in which this communication of Attributes whereof the strife is is made are above and against all rules of Logicians and Philosophers In vaine therefore doe we leane to the consequencies of Logick when we endeavor to annex other new fundamentalls unto them we doe it in tearing and rending the unity of the Churches when they cannot see alike the force of such consequencies For those which acknowledge and embrace the truth of all fundamentals in this question about the Person of Christ are not to be cast off from other Churches for every error in the manner of speech or ignorance in the manner of inferring or deducing of consequencies Now in the last place let us briefely see what is to be determined in that controversie which is about divine Predestination Of Divine Predestination AS concerning this controversie many things in the very heat of disputation have fallen from some private Doctors of great account which seem not to agree square to the exact rule of Truth But these things ought not to be urged to the breaking asunder of the Unity and Communion of the Churches if once it appeare to all Protestant Churches that that is confessed whatsoever in this matter is necessary to be believed unto Salvation and that all errors are rejected of all which crosse and oppose Mans Salvation to be obtained by Christ Look into all the Confessions of the Reformed Churches you shall finde nothing left out of them which may be called fundamentall nothing put into them which overthroweth any fundamentall Article All doe consent that none is elected or Predestinated from Eternity to Salvation except out of the meer and most free mercy and grace of God that none in time is brought to Salvation or Eternall Life except by the way of Faith Repentance and new Obedience Also all grant that God from Eternity did as well decree to give to the Elect as he did foresee all those saving goods should bee given them by helpe whereof they are brought to Eternall Life That he did also decree so to give to them and did foresee that this saving grace should so bee given that they cannot boast of any cause or occasion found or foreseen in themselves of this Gods bounty unto them Lastly they grant that all the certainty which single persons have or ought to have to eternall Life ought not to be sought a Priori beginning at the Top in the Decree or Prescience of God but a posteriori beginning at the bottome in the fruits of Faith and Holinesse And moreover they conclude this That the Elect themselves cannot be sustained or refreshed with the comfort of their electiō or salvation when and as long as they wander out of the way of Salvation because the holy Spirit will not beare witnesse to their hearts Rom. 8.14 15 16. that they are the sonnes and heires of God but when they are led by the Spirit of God But men cannot have a sure and firme comfort of their Election and Adoption except the Spirit witnesse this unto their spirits Now as touching that Passing men by or not Electing them which is commonly called Reprobation I see nothing Fundamentall whereof there is any dissention betwixt the Reformed Churches If as yet all things be not well agreed on betwixt particular Doctors Let them so