Selected quad for the lemma: christian_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
christian_n	catholic_n	church_n	communion_n	6,888	5	9.4764	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A61842	The indecency and unlawfulness of baptizing children in private, without necessity, and with the publick form seriously recommended to the consideration of both the clergy and laity of the Church of England : to which is added, a brief exhortation to the constant receiving of the Lords Supper.	Strong, Martin, b. 1663 or 4.	1692 (1692)	Wing S5995; ESTC R15237	25,798	32

the force of the strongest Arguments and of the most convincing Reasons in the World Nothing but This could possibly have prevailed with so many members even of our own Communion to persevere so obstinately in Baptizing their Children in Private houses without any just Necessity and with the Publick Form a Custom confessedly Indecent and undeniably Vnlawful That it is so is the design of this following Treatise to evince and I hope to do it Vnanswerably by insisting on these several Arguments 1. That the Baptizing Children in Private houses is contrary to the nature and design of Christian Baptism 2. 'T is contrary to the constant and universal Practice of the Catholick Christian Church in all ages 3. 'T is contrary to the express Laws and Rubrick of our own established National Church of England 4. 'T is contrary to every Ministers solemn Promises and Subscriptions And 5. 'T is Absurd and Irrational If I can prove beyond denial these several Assertions I hope it will be granted that I have sufficiently performed my promised Undertaking and that I had good reason for refusing to comply with this Illegal Custom But to prevent all mistakes it must be remembred that Exception and Allowance is still to be made for the Case of invincible Necessity of extreme Sickness and danger of Death at which time the Church admits of Private Baptism and has composed a particular Form for that purpose of which I shall say more in its proper place This being premised I assert First That the Administration of Baptism in Private houses is contrary to the Nature and Designs of Baptism for Baptism is a great and most solemn part of Gods Publick Worship 'T is that Divine Sacrament by which we are entred and admitted into the Christian Church and Covenant by which we are made members of that Holy Catholick Church and united to that Communion of Saints and common Society of Christians which makes one fundamental Article of our Creed Baptism is also an open and solemn profession of our belief in the Sacred Trinity Father Son and Holy Ghost in whose names we are Baptized but especially 't is a Publick declaration of our Faith in Jesus the Mediator an open acknowledgment to all the Woald that we heartily embrace that Gospel and Religion which Christ reveal'd from his Father to mankind and which distinguishes us from Jews and Mahometans and all other Religions in the World For this reason 't was that the Font was always placed near the door or entrance into the Church Vid. Dr. Patricks Aqua Genitalis to signifie to us that 't is by Baptism we are first entred into the Christian Faith into the Religion and Church of Christ Now all this evidently proves that Baptism is not of a Private but of a Publick Nature and that its ends and designs are Publick And from hence it as evidently follows that it ought to be administred according to its Nature See Dr. Sherlocks Rel. Assemb p. 291. that is not Privately but in the Publick Assembly and Congregation of Christians The force and reason of this Argument is plainly founded upon that Apostolical precept 1 Cor. 14.40 Let all things be done decently 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and in order If this be Scripture and the word of God it certainly obliges us to perform all the Sacred and Publick offices of our Religion with all that Decency and Solemnity that the Nature of the things and the Majesty of God requires In this sense the most learned Commentators understand the words Nor can any other interpretation be put upon them without offering a manifest violence to the design of the Apostle throughout that whole Chapter which was to correct abuses and indecencies in the service of God and to give such standing rules and general directions as he thought necessary to be observed in Gods Publick worship by all Christian Congregations This being granted I now appeal to the sense and reason of all the world whether it be not more for the Decency and Solemnity of Christian Baptism to be administred in the Church and House of God than in a Private room of common and ordinary use The Sacraments of our Religion are certainly the most solemn parts of it We admit but two of these and Baptism is one And does it not best agree with the solemn Nature of this Sacrament that it should be Administred in the solemn place of Gods worship Since Baptism is an open profession of our Faith in Christ how can this be duly performed in Private or any where out of the Publick Assemblies of Christians And since Baptism is designed to enter and admit us into the Church what place can be so decent for its Administration as the Church To this purpose we have Dr. Burnet telling us Hist Reform Abridged Lib. 2. p. 63. That Baptism being the Admission of a New Member to the Church 't is most suitable to the design of Baptism to do it before the whole Congregation and withal adds that the Liberty of baptizing in Private which was at first indulged by the Church only as a provision for Weakness is since become a Mark of Vanity and a piece of affected State If Baptism be designed to make us members of the Christian Church I would willingly be satisfied how this can be decently performed out of the Church and out of the presence of the Church or can any other place be so fit and convenient for so sacred a thing as the Place that is dedicated and devoted to the service of God These are plain Questions I know but I believe they are unanswerable and I leave them to the Conscience of all Unprejudiced Readers with this serious and earnest Exhortation viz. That they would not look on Baptism to be a trifling or inconsiderable thing as if it were only the giving a Name to the Child and no more but that they would consider it as a most solemn part of Gods Worship as that Divine Sacrament by which their Children are dedicated to God and to the Religon of Christ The want of which Consideration I am convinced is the cause why so many otherwise good and well meaning Persons are so regardless provided it be done at all how or where in what place or after what manner this sacred duty is performed I do not say that there is any Positive Holiness in one place above another or that the place alone can sanctify the worship performed in it without other due Qualifications but this I do affirm and all the sober part of Mankind did ever yet grant that as there is a Relative Holiness in the Lords day above other days of the Week so there is at least a Relative Holiness in the Church above other places both as 't is set apart and consecrated to the service and worship of God and as Almighty God is more especially and immediately present in it Upon this account it was that the pious and Primitive Christians

See Dr. Caves Primitive Chr. Chap. 6. Part 1. and Cap. 9. always paid such an extraordinary Respect and Veneration to the public places of Gods Worship both at their first Entrance into and all the while they continued in them And for this reason 't is that the Public place of Gods Worship is in Scripture set forth by so many honourable Names and Titles such as are the Temple the Tabernacle and the Sanctuary of the Lord the Habitation of his Holiness and the place where his Honor dwelleth the House of Prayer and the Church of God All which things put together do strongly prove that there is at least a Relative holiness in the Church above other places and that God is more immediately present there to hear the Petitions and to answer the Prayers of his humble Supplicants and to give a due vertue and efficacy to his blessed Sacraments But lest I should be thought to be singular in this opinion I shall beg leave for the satisfaction of every unbyass'd Reader to transcribe the words of a pious and learned Bishop of this Church Dr. Sparrow Bp. of Norwich in his Rationalé on the Com. Prayer p. 371. who speaking of the Dedication of Churches and Chappels to Service of God tells us That our Prayers and public Services are most readily accepted in such holy separate places and he proves it from 2 Chron. 7 15. Now mine Eyes shall be open and mine Ears attent to the Prayer in this place which promise of acceptance belongs to any other place so dedicated and consecrated to Gods holy Worship and Service as was this house which Solomon built for the reason which God gives of his gracious readiness to hear the Prayer of that holy place is in general this v. 16. For now have I chosen and sanctified this House that my Name might be there for ever Now that this house is dedicated and solemnly set apart by religious Rites and Prayers to my Service A quatenus ad omne valet consequentia now I have chosen it for mine And a little farther he adds By the like reason whatsoever other place shall be dedicated to him shall have the Eyes of God open and his Ear attentive to the Prayer of it And God Almighty promises as much Exod. 20.24 In all places where I record my Name I will come unto thee and bless thee that is in all places dedicated to me and my Service and so made mine And a little farther p. 385. are these very remarkable words The Church is the most convenient place for the service of God and adds much to the beauty of holiness And he that should neglect that decency and despising the Church should offer up the Publick Worship of which we have already proved Baptism to be a most solemn part in Private He would by so doing sin against that law of God that says Cursed be he that having a better Lamb in his flock offers up to God a worse Mal. 1.14 For God Almighty must be served with the best we have otherwise we despise him He that can have a Church and will offer up the holy Service in a worse place Let him fear that Curse This I think is home to the purpose and an evident proof of my former assertion from the plainest Texts of Scripture and if it seem severely spoken let it be remembred that 't is substantially proved and that they are not mine but a Reverend Prelates words of this Church whose name and authority ought to be had in veneration by all its members And would to God those persons who contend so earnestly for Baptizing their Children at home without any just necessity would consider seriously whether This be not very like that sin of despising the Church of God which St. Paul so severely condemned in the Corinthians 1 Ep. 11.22 and not only making their own houses equal to the Church but in this respect preferring them before it Upon the whole of this first Argument I think it is undeniably proved that Baptism is not of a Private but of a Publick Nature and that the Church is the fittest and most decent place for the Administration of it And therefore that to administer it in Private houses is both contrary to the Nature and Designs of Baptism and a plain transgression of this precept of St. Paul Let all things be done decently and in order Secondly To Administer Baptism in Private houses is contrary to the constant practice of the Catholick Christian Church in all ages For the proof of this I cannot take a better Method than to give you the words of the judicious and learned Dr. Cave Prim. Christ c. 10. p. 311. pars pr. who speaking of the place where Baptism was anciently administred tells us That 't was always as near as might be to the place of their Public Assemblies and that 't was seldom performed without the presence of the Congregation and that for very good reasons both as 't is a principal act of Religious Worship and as 't is the initiating of Persons into the Church which therefore ought to be as Public as possible that so the whole Congregation might be Spectators and Witnesses of that Profession and Engagement which the baptized Person then took upon him And this the Primitive Christians so zealously kept to that the Trullan Council Can. 59. allows not Baptism to be administred in a Private Chappel or Oratory but only in the Public Churches punishing the Persons offending in this particular with Deposition from their Office if they were Clergy-men and if Laity with Excommunication For this reason they had their Baptisteria or Fonts built at first in some place near the Church then in the Church * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Naz. Porch till afterward they were placed in the Church itself This I think is very plain and I have chose to transcribe the very words of this reverend and learned Person because of his great Name and Eminency in the Church especially as a faithful and diligent Inquirer into the Customs and Practice of Antiquity of which this Book called Primitive Christianity is amongst the rest One illustrious proof I was once thinking to add some other Observations of my own relating to this affair But I since find this particular so largely and unanswerably proved by an ingenious Author who has lately writ on this very subject Mr. Arwaker's Dissuasive from Baptizing Children in Private printed 1687. that because I can add nothing new I think it better to refer the inquisitive Reader thither The Book is licensed by the Arch-Bishop and dedicated to the Bishop of London Of both whose pious Endeavours to reform this Vnlawful Custom the Author gives us an account in his Epistle Dedicatory which I observe for this reason that the Reader may know that what I here write against has been condemned by the Metropolitan and the whole Church of England in general Whoever reads this little book