Selected quad for the lemma: christian_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
christian_n	body_n	church_n	union_n	1,510	5	9.6741	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A61548	A discourse in vindication of the doctrine of the Trinity with an answer to the late Socinian objections against it from Scripture, antiquity and reason, and a preface concerning the different explications of the Trinity, and the tendency of the present Socinian controversie / by the Right Reverend Father in God Edward, Lord Bishop of Worcester.	Stillingfleet, Edward, 1635-1699.	1697 (1697)	Wing S5585; ESTC R14244	164,643	376

to_o go_v about_o to_o prove_v they_o but_o to_o show_v what_o use_n we_o be_v to_o make_v of_o they_o we_o must_v consider_v that_o it_o can_v be_v deny_v that_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n do_v meet_v with_o opposition_n very_o early_o in_o the_o christian_a church_n especial_o among_o the_o jewish_a christian_n i_o mean_v those_o who_o strict_o adhere_v to_o the_o law_n of_o moses_n after_o the_o apostle_n have_v declare_v the_o freedom_n of_o christian_n from_o the_o obligation_n of_o it_o these_o as_o i_o shall_v show_v by_o and_o by_o soon_o after_o the_o dispersion_n of_o the_o church_n of_o jerusalem_n gather_v into_o a_o body_n by_o themselves_o distinct_a from_o that_o which_o consist_v of_o jew_n and_o gentile_n and_o be_v therefore_o call_v the_o catholic_n christian_n church_n and_o this_o separate_a body_n whether_o call_v ebionites_n nazarene_o or_o minean_n do_v not_o only_o differ_v from_o the_o catholic_n christian_n church_n as_o to_o the_o necessity_n of_o observe_v the_o law_n of_o moses_n but_o likewise_o as_o to_o the_o divinity_n of_o our_o saviour_n which_o they_o deny_v although_o they_o profess_v to_o believe_v he_o as_o the_o christ_n or_o promise_v messiah_n theodoret_n have_v with_o very_o good_a judgement_n place_v the_o heresy_n of_o the_o first_o age_n of_o the_o christian_a church_n 11._o under_o two_o distinct_a head_n which_o other_o reckon_v up_o confuse_o and_o those_o be_v such_o as_o relate_v to_o the_o humanity_n of_o christ_n as_o simon_n magus_n and_o all_o the_o set_v of_o those_o who_o be_v call_v gnostic_n which_o be_v recite_v in_o his_o first_o book_n in_o his_o second_o he_o begin_v with_o those_o which_o relate_v to_o the_o divinity_n of_o christ_n and_o these_o be_v of_o two_o kind_n 1._o the_o jewish_a christian_n who_o deny_v it_o of_o these_o he_o reckon_v up_o the_o ebionite_n cerinthian_o the_o nazarene_o and_o elcesaitae_fw-la who_o he_o distinguish_v from_o the_o other_o ebionite_n because_o of_o a_o book_n of_o revelation_n which_o one_o elxai_n bring_v among_o they_o 17._o but_o epiphanius_n say_v he_o join_v with_o the_o ebionite_n and_o nazarene_o 2._o those_o of_o the_o gentile_a christian_n who_o be_v look_v on_o as_o broach_v a_o new_a doctri●e_n among_o they_o of_o these_o he_o reckon_v artemon_n as_o the_o first_o than_o theodotus_n who_o other_o make_v the_o first_o publisher_n of_o it_o as_o tertullian_n 28._o and_o the_o old_a writer_n in_o eusebius_n suppose_v to_o be_v caius_n who_o live_v near_o the_o time_n and_o of_o who_o a_o considerable_a fragment_n be_v preserve_v in_o eusebius_n which_o give_v light_n to_o these_o matter_n the_o next_o be_v another_o theodotus_n who_o frame_v a_o new_a sect_n of_o such_o as_o set_v up_o mel●hisedeck_v above_o christ._n then_o follow_v paulus_n samosatenus_fw-la and_o sabellius_n who_o make_v but_o one_o person_n as_o well_o as_o one_o god_n and_o so_o overthrow_v the_o trinity_n with_o who_o marcellus_n agree_v in_o substance_n and_o last_o of_o all_o photinus_n but_o theodoret_n conclude_v that_o book_n with_o this_o passage_n viz._n that_o all_o these_o heresy_n against_o our_o saviour_n divinity_n be_v then_o whole_o extinct_a so_o that_o there_o be_v not_o so_o much_o as_o any_o small_a remainder_n of_o they_o what_o will_v he_o have_v say_v if_o he_o have_v live_v in_o our_o age_n wherein_o they_o be_v not_o only_o revive_v but_o be_v pretend_v to_o have_v be_v the_o true_a doctrine_n of_o the_o apostolical_a church_n have_v all_o man_n lose_v their_o sense_n in_o theodoret_n time_n and_o yet_o there_o be_v as_o many_o learned_a and_o able_a man_n in_o the_o christian_a church_n then_o as_o ever_o be_v in_o any_o time_n chap._n iii_o the_o socinian_n plea_n for_o the_o antiquity_n of_o their_o doctrine_n examine_v but_o this_o be_v not_o the_o age_n our_o unitarian_n will_v stand_v or_o fall_v by_o they_o be_v for_o go_v backward_o and_o they_o speak_v with_o great_a comfort_n about_o the_o old_a ebionite_n and_o nazarene_o as_o entire_o they_o and_o that_o they_o have_v considerable_a man_n among_o they_o as_o theodotion_n and_o symmachus_n ii_o two_o translator_n of_o the_o hebrew_n bible_n and_o among_o the_o gentile_a christian_n they_o value_v themselves_o upon_o three_o man_n paulus_n samosatenus_fw-la lucianus_n the_o most_o learned_a person_n they_o say_v of_o his_o age_n and_o photinus_n bishop_n of_o sirmium_n as_o to_o the_o unitarian_n at_o rome_n who_o they_o improper_o call_v nazarene_o they_o pretend_v that_o their_o doctrine_n be_v apostolical_a and_o the_o general_a doctrine_n of_o the_o church_n till_o the_o time_n of_o victor_n and_o zepherin_n this_o be_v the_o substance_n of_o their_o plea_n which_o must_v now_o be_v examine_v i_o begin_v with_o those_o primitive_a unitarian_n the_o ebionite_n concern_v who_o i_o observe_v these_o thing_n 1._o that_o they_o be_v a_o distinct_a separate_a body_n of_o man_n from_o the_o christian_a church_n for_o all_o the_o ancient_a writer_n who_o speak_v of_o they_o do_v mention_n they_o as_o heretic_n and_o whole_o divide_v from_o it_o as_o appear_v by_o irenaeus_n tertullian_n epiphanius_n theodoret_n s._n augustin_n and_o other_o eusebius_n say_v of_o they_o 27._o that_o although_o the_o devil_n can_v not_o make_v they_o renounce_v christianity_n yet_o find_v their_o weakness_n 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d he_o make_v they_o his_o own_o he_o will_v never_o have_v say_v this_o of_o any_o who_o he_o look_v on_o as_o member_n of_o the_o christian_a church_n but_o wherein_o be_v it_o that_o eusebius_n blame_v they_o he_o tell_v it_o in_o the_o very_a next_o word_n that_o it_o be_v for_o the_o mean_a opinion_n they_o entertain_v of_o christ_n for_o they_o look_v on_o he_o as_o a_o mere_a man_n but_o very_o just_a and_o although_o there_o be_v two_o sort_n of_o they_o some_o own_n the_o miraculous_a conception_n and_o other_o not_o yet_o say_v he_o they_o at_o last_o agree_v in_o the_o same_o impiety_n which_o be_v that_o they_o will_v not_o own_o christ_n to_o have_v have_v any_o pre-existence_n before_o his_o birth_n nor_o that_o he_o be_v 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d god_n the_o word_n it_o be_v true_a he_o find_v fault_n with_o they_o afterward_o for_o keep_v to_o the_o law_n of_o moses_n but_o the_o first_o impiety_n he_o charge_v they_o with_o be_v the_o other_o that_o which_o i_o infer_v from_o hence_o be_v that_o eusebius_n himself_o to_o who_o they_o profess_v to_o show_v great_a respect_n than_o to_o most_o of_o the_o ancient_a writer_n 37._o for_o his_o exactness_n and_o diligence_n in_o church-history_n do_v affirm_v the_o doctrine_n which_o overthrow_v the_o pre-existence_n and_o divinity_n of_o christ_n to_o be_v a_o impiety_n 20._o and_o therefore_o when_o he_o affirm_v the_o first_o fifteen_o bishop_n of_o the_o church_n of_o jerusalem_n who_o be_v of_o the_o circumcision_n viz._n to_o the_o siege_n of_o it_o by_o hadrian_n 5._o do_v hold_v the_o genuine_a doctrine_n of_o christ_n it_o must_v be_v understand_v of_o his_o pre-existence_n and_o divinity_n for_o the_o other_o we_o see_v he_o account_v a_o impiety_n and_o he_o tell_v we_o the_o church_n of_o jerusalem_n then_o consist_v of_o believe_a jew_n and_o so_o it_o have_v do_v from_o the_o apostle_n time_n to_o that_o of_o hadrian_n be_v banishment_n of_o the_o jew_n which_o be_v a_o considerable_a testimony_n to_o two_o purpose_n 1._o to_o show_v that_o the_o primitive_a church_n of_o jerusalem_n do_v hold_v the_o doctrine_n of_o christ_n pre-existence_n and_o divinity_n but_o say_v our_o unitarian_n this_o do_v not_o follow_v for_o what_o reason_n when_o it_o be_v plain_a that_o eusebius_n account_v that_o the_o only_a genuine_a doctrine_n no_o say_v they_o 176._o he_o mean_v only_o the_o miraculous_a conception_n and_o that_o they_o hold_v that_o in_o opposition_n to_o those_o ebionite_n who_o say_v that_o he_o be_v bear_v as_o other_o man_n be_v this_o be_v very_o strange_a when_o eusebius_n have_v distinguish_v the_o two_o sort_n of_o ebionite_n about_o this_o matter_n and_o have_v blame_v both_o of_o they_o even_o those_o that_o hold_v he_o bear_v of_o a_o virgin_n for_o fall_v into_o the_o same_o impiety_n what_o can_v satisfy_v such_o man_n who_o be_v content_a with_o such_o a_o answer_n but_o say_v they_o eusebius_n only_o speak_v his_o own_o sense_n not_o so_o neither_o for_o he_o say_v in_o that_o place_n that_o he_o have_v search_v the_o most_o ancient_a record_n of_o the_o church_n of_o jerusalem_n yes_o say_v they_o for_o the_o succession_n of_o the_o first_o bishop_n but_o as_o to_o their_o doctrine_n he_o have_v it_o from_o hegesippus_n and_o he_o be_v a_o ebionite_n himself_o then_o eusebius_n must_v not_o be_v the_o man_n they_o take_v he_o for_o for_o if_o hegesippus_n be_v himself_o a_o ebionite_n and_o tell_v eusebius_n in_o his_o commentary_n that_o the_o primitive_a

church_n of_o jerusalem_n consist_v of_o all_o such_o then_o eusebius_n must_v suppose_v that_o church_n guilty_a of_o the_o same_o impiety_n with_o which_o he_o charge_v the_o ebionite_n and_o will_v he_o then_o have_v say_v that_o they_o have_v the_o true_a knowledge_n of_o christ_n among_o they_o no_o say_v they_o eusebius_n speak_v his_o own_o opinion_n but_o hegesippus_n be_v a_o ebionite_n himself_o mean_v otherwise_o but_o eusebius_n do_v not_o use_n hegesippus_n his_o word_n but_o his_o own_o in_o that_o place_n and_o withal_o how_o do_v it_o appear_v that_o hegesippus_n himself_o be_v a_o ebionite_n this_o one_o of_o their_o late_a writer_n have_v undertake_v but_o in_o such_o a_o manner_n as_o be_v not_o like_a to_o convince_v i_o it_o be_v thus_o 41._o hegesippus_n be_v himself_o a_o jewish_a christian_a and_o make_v use_v of_o the_o hebrew_n gospel_n and_o among_o the_o heretic_n which_o creep_v into_o the_o church_n of_o jerusalem_n he_o never_o number_v the_o ebionite_n or_o cerinthian_o but_o only_o the_o gnostic_n i_o will_v not_o dispute_v whether_o hegesippus_n be_v a_o jewish_a christian_n or_o not_o grant_v he_o be_v so_o yet_o how_o do_v it_o appear_v that_o all_o the_o jewish_a christian_n be_v at_o that_o time_n ebionites_n or_o cerinthian_o it_o seem_v they_o be_v neither_o of_o they_o heretic_n although_o they_o be_v opposite_a to_o each_o other_o the_o one_o hold_v the_o world_n create_v by_o inferior_a power_n the_o other_o by_o god_n himself_o the_o one_o we_o see_v make_v christ_n a_o mere_a man_n but_o the_o cerinthian_o hold_v a_o illapse_n of_o the_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d upon_o he_o and_o so_o make_v he_o a_o kind_n of_o a_o god_n by_o his_o presence_n as_o nestorius_n do_v afterward_o but_o honest_a hegesippus_n take_v neither_o one_o nor_o the_o other_o for_o heretic_n if_o our_o unitarian_n say_v true_a but_o yet_o it_o do_v not_o appear_v that_o hegesippus_n be_v either_o one_o or_o the_o other_o for_o he_o speak_v of_o the_o church_n of_o jerusalem_n as_o be_v plain_a by_o eusebius_n 22._o and_o the_o cerinthian_o and_o ebionite_n be_v in_o other_o part_n the_o former_a in_o egypt_n and_o the_o lesser_a or_o proconsular_a asia_n and_o the_o latter_a about_o decapolis_n and_o coelesyria_n from_o whence_o they_o spread_v into_o arabia_n and_o armenia_n as_o appear_v by_o epiphanius_n but_o origen_n say_v that_o all_o the_o jewish_a christian_n be_v ebionite_n what!_o no_o cerinthian_n among_o they_o be_v not_o those_o jewish_a christian_n or_o be_v they_o all_o turn_v ebionites_n then_o no_o such_o thing_n appear_v by_o origen_n say_n but_o we_o be_v not_o inquire_v now_o what_o they_o be_v in_o his_o time_n but_o in_o the_o church_n of_o jerusalem_n do_v origen_n say_v all_o the_o jewish_a christian_n there_o be_v such_o and_o as_o to_o his_o own_o time_n it_o be_v not_o improbable_a that_o those_o who_o then_o make_v up_o the_o separate_a body_n of_o jewish_a christian_n be_v ebionite_n but_o what_o be_v this_o to_o the_o first_o christian_n of_o the_o church_n of_o jerusalem_n very_o much_o say_v they_o because_o the_o first_o christian_n be_v call_v nazarene_o and_o the_o nazarene_o hold_v the_o same_o doctrine_n with_o the_o ebionite_n but_o the_o title_n of_o nazarene_o do_v not_o always_o signify_v the_o same_o thing_n it_o be_v at_o first_o use_v for_o all_o christian_n 24.5_o as_o appear_v by_o the_o sect_n of_o the_o nazarene_o in_o tertullus_n his_o accusation_n of_o s._n paul_n than_o it_o be_v take_v for_o the_o christian_n who_o stay_v at_o pella_n and_o settle_v at_o decapolis_n and_o thereabouts_o as_o epiphanius_n affirm_v 7._o for_o although_o all_o the_o christian_n withdraw_v thither_o before_o the_o destruction_n of_o jerusalem_n as_o eusebius_n say_v yet_o they_o do_v not_o all_o continue_v there_o but_o a_o great_a number_n return_v to_o jerusalem_n and_o be_v there_o settle_v under_o their_o bishop_n but_o those_o who_o remain_v about_o pella_n keep_v the_o name_n of_o nazarene_o and_o never_o be_v unite_v with_o the_o gentile_a christian_n but_o keep_v up_o their_o old_a jewish_a custom_n as_o to_o their_o synagogue_n even_o in_o s._n jerom_n and_o s._n augustine_n time_n now_o these_o nazarene_o may_v be_v all_o ebionite_n and_o yet_o those_o of_o the_o church_n of_o jerusalem_n not_o so_o at_o all_o 2._o the_o next_o thing_n observable_a from_o this_o place_n of_o eusebius_n be_v that_o while_o the_o nazarene_o and_o ebionites_n be_v settle_v in_o coelesyria_n and_o the_o part_n thereabouts_o there_o be_v a_o regular_a christian_a church_n at_o jerusalem_n under_o the_o bishop_n of_o the_o circumcision_n to_o the_o siege_n of_o hadrian_n eusebius_n observe_v that_o before_o the_o destruction_n of_o jerusalem_n all_o the_o christian_n forsake_v not_o only_a jerusalem_n 5._o but_o the_o coast_n of_o judea_n but_o that_o they_o do_v not_o all_o continue_v there_o be_v most_o evident_a from_o what_o eusebius_n here_o say_v of_o the_o church_n and_o bishop_n of_o jerusalem_n between_o the_o two_o sieges_n of_o titus_n vespasian_n and_o hadrian_n 8._o which_o be_v in_o the_o 18_o year_n of_o his_o empire_n say_v eusebius_n who_o produce_v another_o testimony_n out_o of_o justin_n martyr_n which_o show_v that_o the_o christian_n be_v return_v to_o jerusalem_n for_o therein_o he_o say_v that_o barchochebas_n in_o that_o war_n use_v the_o christian_n with_o very_a great_a severity_n to_o make_v they_o renounce_v christianity_n how_o can_v this_o be_v if_o all_o the_o christian_n be_v out_o of_o his_o reach_n then_o be_v settle_v about_o pella_n and_o although_o eusebius_n say_v 6._o that_o when_o the_o jew_n be_v banish_v their_o country_n by_o hadrian_n be_v edict_n that_o then_o the_o church_n of_o jerusalem_n be_v make_v up_o of_o gentile_n yet_o we_o be_v not_o so_o strict_o to_o understand_v he_o as_o though_o the_o christian_n who_o suffer_v under_o barchochebas_n be_v whole_o exclude_v orosius_n say_v 13._o that_o they_o be_v permit_v by_o the_o emperor_n edict_n it_o be_v sufficient_a for_o i_o if_o they_o be_v connive_v at_o which_o be_v very_o probable_a although_o they_o do_v not_o think_v fit_a to_o have_v any_o such_o public_a person_n as_o their_o bishop_n to_o be_v any_o other_o than_o gentile_n and_o hegesippus_n be_v allow_v after_o this_o time_n to_o have_v be_v a_o jewish_a christian_n of_o the_o church_n of_o jerusalem_n so_o that_o the_o church_n there_o must_v consist_v both_o of_o jew_n and_o gentile_n but_o they_o can_v never_o show_v that_o any_o of_o the_o ebionite_n do_v admit_v any_o gentile_a christian_n among_o they_o which_o show_v that_o they_o be_v then_o distinct_a body_n 2._o they_o be_v not_o only_o distinct_a in_o communion_n but_o have_v a_o different_a rule_n of_o faith_n this_o be_v a_o point_n of_o great_a consequence_n and_o aught_o to_o be_v well_o consider_v for_o since_o our_o unitarian_n own_o the_o ebionite_n as_o their_o predecessor_n we_o ought_v to_o have_v a_o particular_a eye_n to_o the_o rule_n of_o faith_n receive_v by_o they_o which_o must_v be_v very_o different_a from_o we_o if_o they_o follow_v the_o ebionite_n as_o i_o doubt_v not_o to_o make_v it_o appear_v they_o say_v the_o ebionite_n use_v only_o s._n matthew_n be_v gospel_n but_o the_o christian_a church_n then_o 42._o and_o ever_o since_o have_v receive_v the_o four_o gospel_n as_o of_o divine_a authority_n eusebius_n one_o of_o the_o most_o approve_a author_n in_o antiquity_n by_o our_o unitarian_n reckon_v up_o the_o four_o evangelist_n and_o s._n paul_n be_v epistle_n as_o write_n universal_o receive_v by_o the_o christian_a church_n then_o he_o mention_n some_o general_o reject_v as_o spurious_a and_o after_o those_o which_o be_v doubt_v among_o which_o he_o mention_n the_o gospel_n according_a to_o the_o hebrew_n which_o the_o jewish_a christian_n follow_v now_o here_o be_v a_o apparent_a difference_n put_v between_o the_o gospel_n according_a to_o the_o hebrew_n and_o s._n matthew_n be_v gospel_n as_o much_o as_o between_o a_o book_n receive_v without_o controversy_n and_o one_o that_o be_v not_o but_o if_o the_o gospel_n according_a to_o the_o hebrew_n be_v then_o acknowledge_v to_o be_v the_o true_a gospel_n of_o s._n matthew_n it_o be_v impossible_a a_o man_n of_o so_o much_o sense_n as_o eusebius_n shall_v make_v this_o difference_n between_o they_o but_o it_o be_v worth_a our_o observe_n what_o our_o unitarian_n say_v about_o this_o matter_n and_o by_o that_o we_o may_v judge_v very_o much_o of_o their_o opinion_n about_o the_o gospel_n i_o shall_v set_v down_o their_o word_n for_o fear_v i_o shall_v be_v think_v to_o do_v they_o wrong_n symmachus_n and_o the_o ebionite_n 39_o say_v they_o as_o they_o hold_v our_o saviour_n to_o be_v the_o son_n of_o joseph_n and_o mary_n so_o they_o contend_v that_o the_o first_o chapter_n of_o s._n matthew_n

think_v he_o can_v not_o honest_o conceal_v so_o fundamental_a a_o point_n of_o the_o christian_a faith_n and_o which_o relate_v to_o their_o be_v enter_v into_o the_o christian_a church_n for_o if_o the_o profession_n of_o this_o faith_n have_v not_o be_v look_v on_o as_o a_o necessary_a condition_n of_o be_v a_o member_n of_o the_o church_n of_o christ_n it_o be_v hard_o to_o imagine_v that_o justin_n martyr_n shall_v so_o much_o insist_v upon_o it_o not_o only_o here_o but_o in_o his_o other_o treatise_n of_o which_o a_o account_n have_v be_v give_v by_o other_o athenagoras_n have_v be_v a_o philosopher_n as_o well_o as_o justin_n martyr_n before_o he_o profess_v himself_o a_o christian_n and_o therefore_o must_v be_v suppose_v to_o understand_v his_o religion_n before_o he_o embrace_v it_o and_o in_o his_o defence_n he_o assert_n 11._o that_o the_o christian_n do_v believe_v in_o father_n son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n in_o god_n the_o father_n god_n the_o son_n and_o the_o holy_a ghost_n and_o he_o mention_n both_o the_o unity_n and_o order_n which_o be_v among_o they_o which_o can_v signify_v nothing_o unless_o they_o be_v own_v to_o be_v distinct_a person_n in_o the_o same_o divine_a nature_n and_o in_o the_o next_o page_n he_o look_v on_o it_o as_o thing_n which_o all_o christian_n aspire_v after_o in_o another_o life_n that_o they_o shall_v then_o know_v the_o union_n of_o the_o father_n and_o the_o communication_n of_o the_o father_n to_o the_o son_n what_o the_o holy_a ghost_n be_v and_o what_o the_o union_n and_o distinction_n there_o be_v between_o the_o holy_a ghost_n the_o son_n and_o the_o father_n no_o man_n who_o have_v ever_o have_v the_o name_n of_o a_o philosopher_n will_v have_v say_v such_o thing_n unless_o he_o have_v believe_v the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n a●_n we_o do_v i._n e._n that_o there_o be_v three_o distinct_a person_n in_o the_o same_o divine_a nature_n but_o that_o the_o manner_n of_o the_o union_n and_o distinction_n between_o they_o be_v above_o our_o reach_n and_o comprehension_n but_o our_o unitarian_n have_v a_o answer_v ready_a for_o these_o man_n 5._o viz._n that_o they_o come_v out_o of_o plato_n be_v school_n with_o the_o tincture_n of_o his_o three_o principle_n and_o they_o sad_o complain_v that_o platonism_n have_v very_o early_o corrupt_v the_o christian_a faith_n as_o to_o these_o matter_n in_o answer_n to_o which_o exception_n 174.178_o i_o have_v only_o one_o postulatum_fw-la to_o make_v which_o be_v that_o these_o be_v honest_a man_n and_o know_v their_o own_o mind_n be●t_o and_o i_o shall_v make_v it_o appear_v that_o none_o can_v more_o positive_o declare_v than_o they_o do_v that_o they_o do_v not_o take_v up_o these_o notion_n from_o plato_n but_o from_o the_o holy_a scripture_n justin_n martyr_n say_v he_o take_v the_o foundation_n of_o his_o faith_n from_o thence_o 24._o and_o that_o he_o can_v find_v no_o certainty_n as_o to_o god_n and_o religion_n any_o where_o else_o that_o he_o think_v plato_n take_v his_o three_o principle_n from_o moses_n and_o in_o his_o dialogue_n with_o trypho_n etc._n he_o at_o large_a prove_v the_o eternity_n of_o the_o son_n of_o god_n from_o the_o scripture_n and_o say_v he_o will_v use_v no_o other_o argument_n for_o he_o pretend_v to_o no_o skill_n but_o in_o the_o scripture_n which_o god_n have_v enable_v he_o to_o understand_v athenagoras_n declare_v 9_o that_o where_o the_o philosopher_n agree_v with_o they_o their_o faith_n do_v not_o depend_v on_o they_o but_o on_o the_o testimony_n of_o the_o prophet_n who_o be_v inspire_v by_o the_o holy_a ghost_n to_o the_o same_o purpose_n speak_v theophilus_n bishop_n of_o antioch_n 100_o who_o assert_n the_o coeternity_n of_o the_o son_n with_o the_o father_n from_o the_o begin_n of_o s._n john_n gospel_n and_o say_v their_o faith_n be_v build_v on_o the_o scripture_n clemens_n alexandrinus_n own_v not_o only_o 7._o the_o essential_a attribute_n of_o god_n to_o belong_v to_o the_o son_n but_o that_o there_o be_v one_o father_n of_o all_o and_o one_o word_n over_o all_o and_o one_o holy_a ghost_n who_o be_v every_o where_o 68_o and_o he_o think_v plato_n borrow_v his_o three_o principle_n from_o moses_n that_o his_o second_o be_v the_o son_n and_o his_o three_o the_o holy_a spirit_n even_o origen_n himself_o high_o commend_v moses_n above_o plato_n 371._o in_o his_o most_o undoubted_a write_n and_o say_v that_o numen●us_o go_v beyond_o plato_n and_o that_o he_o borrow_v out_o of_o the_o scripture_n and_o so_o he_o say_v plato_n do_v in_o other_o place_n but_o he_o add_v that_o the_o doctrine_n be_v better_o deliver_v in_o scripture_n than_o in_o his_o artificial_a dialogue_n can_v any_o one_o that_o have_v the_o least_o reverence_n for_o writer_n of_o such_o authority_n and_o zeal_n for_o the_o christian_a doctrine_n imagine_v that_o they_o wilful_o corrupt_v it_o in_o one_o of_o the_o chief_a article_n of_o it_o and_o bring_v in_o new_a speculation_n against_o the_o sense_n of_o those_o book_n which_o at_o the_o same_o time_n they_o profess_v to_o be_v the_o only_a rule_n of_o their_o faith_n even_o where_o they_o speak_v most_o favourable_o of_o the_o platonic_a trinity_n they_o suppose_v it_o to_o be_v borrow_v from_o moses_n and_o therefore_o numenius_n say_v 1_o that_o moses_n and_o plato_n do_v not_o differ_v about_o the_o first_o principle_n and_o theodoret_n mention_n numenius_n as_o one_o of_o those_o who_o say_v plato_n understand_v the_o hebrew_n doctrine_n in_o egypt_n and_o during_o his_o thirteen_o year_n ●ay_n there_o it_o be_v hardly_o possible_a to_o suppose_v he_o shall_v be_v ignorant_a of_o the_o hebrew_n doctrine_n about_o the_o first_o principle_n which_o he_o be_v so_o inquisitive_a after_o especial_o among_o nation_n who_o pretend_v to_o antiquity_n and_o the_o platonic_a notion_n of_o the_o divine_a essence_n enlarge_n itself_o to_o three_o hypostasis_n be_v considerable_a on_o these_o account_n 1._o that_o it_o be_v deliver_v with_o so_o much_o assurance_n by_o the_o opposer_n of_o christianity_n such_o as_o plotinus_n porphyrius_n proclus_n and_o other_o be_v know_v to_o be_v and_o they_o speak_v with_o no_o manner_n of_o doubt_n concern_v it_o as_o may_v be_v see_v in_o the_o passage_n of_o porphyry_n preserve_v by_o s._n cyril_n and_o other_o 8._o 2._o that_o they_o take_v it_o up_o from_o no_o revelation_n but_o as_o a_o notion_n in_o itself_o agreeable_a enough_o as_o appear_v by_o the_o passage_n in_o plato_n and_o other_o concern_v it_o they_o never_o suspect_v it_o to_o be_v liable_a to_o the_o charge_n of_o nonsense_n and_o contradiction_n as_o our_o modern_a unitarian_n charge_v the_o trinity_n with_o although_o their_o notion_n as_o represent_v by_o porphyry_n be_v as_o liable_a to_o it_o how_o come_v these_o man_n of_o wit_n and_o sense_n to_o hit_v upon_o and_o be_v so_o fond_a of_o such_o absurd_a principle_n which_o lead_v to_o the_o belief_n of_o mysterious_a nonsense_n and_o impossibility_n if_o these_o man_n may_v be_v trust_v 3._o that_o the_o nation_n most_o renown_v for_o antiquity_n and_o deep_a speculation_n do_v light_n upon_o the_o same_o doctrine_n about_o a_o trinity_n of_o hypostasis_n in_o the_o divine_a essence_n to_o prove_v this_o i_o shall_v not_o refer_v to_o the_o trismegistick_a book_n or_o the_o chaldee_n oracle_n or_o any_o doubtful_a authority_n 14._o but_o plutarch_n assert_v the_o three_o hypostasis_n to_o have_v be_v receiu●d_v among_o the_o persian_n and_o porphyry_n and_o jamblicus_n say_v the_o same_o of_o the_o egyptian_n 4._o that_o this_o hypostasis_fw-la do_v maintain_v its_o reputation_n so_o long_o in_o the_o world_n for_o we_o find_v it_o continue_v to_o the_o time_n of_o macrobius_n who_o ment●ons_n it_o as_o a_o reasonable_a notion_n viz._n of_o one_o supreme_a be_v father_n of_o all_o and_o a_o mind_n proceed_v from_o it_o and_o soul_n from_o mind_n some_o have_v think_v that_o the_o platonist_n make_v two_o create_v being_n to_o be_v two_o of_o the_o divine_a hypostasis_n but_o this_o be_v contrary_n to_o what_o plotinus_n and_o porphyry_n affirm_v concern_v it_o and_o it_o be_v hard_o to_o give_v a_o account_n how_o they_o shall_v then_o be_v essential_o different_a from_o creature_n and_o be_v hypostasis_n in_o the_o divine_a essence_n but_o this_o be_v no_o part_n of_o my_o business_n be_v concern_v no_o far_o than_o to_o clear_v the_o sense_n of_o the_o christian_a church_n as_o to_o the_o form_n of_o baptism_n in_o the_o name_n of_o the_o father_n son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n which_o according_a to_o the_o sense_n of_o the_o ante-nicene_n father_n i_o have_v prove_v do_v manifest_v the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n to_o have_v be_v general_o receive_v in_o the_o christian_a church_n 2._o let_v we_o now_o see_v what_o our_o unitarian_n object_n against_o the_o proof_n of_o the_o trinity_n from_o these_o