Selected quad for the lemma: christian_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
christian_n body_n church_n mystical_a 1,148 5 10.4023 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A89779 The temple measured: or, A brief survey of the temple mystical, which is the instituted church of Christ. Wherein are solidly and modestly discussed, most of the material questions touching the constitution and government of the visible church militant here on earth. Together with the solution of all sorts of objections which are usually framed against the model and platform of ecclesiastical polity, which is here asserted and maintained. In particular here are debated, the points of so much controversie, touching the unity of the church, the members of the church, the form of the church, and church covenant, the power of the church, the officers of the church, and their power in church-government, the power of magistrates about the church, and some church acts, as admission of members, and other things set down in the table before the book. / By James Noyes teacher of the church at Newbery in New England. Noyes, James, 1608-1656. 1646 (1646) Wing N1460; Thomason E359_12; ESTC R201171 85,622 104

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

in every Citie and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth not exclude villages as it appeareth by Matth. 10.10 Cenchrea was but answerable to a village and yet it is said to have a Church Rom. 16. One Province contained many Churches 1 Cor. 16.1 19. Gal. 1.2 21. Rev. 1.2 The Churches of Galatia were Churches of one Province not one Provincial Church 4. There was no ordinary Officers instituted by Christ for any other then congregational Churches The Elders of every congregation have the same power both intensive and extensive there are no Archbishops or Archdeacons instituted by the Lord. 5. All congregations have the same Titles the same Power the same Ordinances compleatly Nature giveth the same name to similar parts every drop of water is water it hath the same name and the same nature Paris in parem non est pocestus The lamb of the Passeover was to be eaten onely by so many together as might enjoy a festival communion together at one Table Exod. 2. Ancient Canons did prohibite the ordaining of a Presbyter to more then one Title but as the Church did degenerate there came in Non-residence Pluralities Commendaes universal and perpetual Commendaes for term of life or for term of life a distinction of Benefices compatible an incompatible and Canons all these were added to Diocesan Episcopacie and Prelacie The Church in respect of its integrality Pro. 3. may consist but of two or three Noah and his wife and children were a Church Abrahem and Sarah were fundamentally the whole Church of the Jews Adam and Eve were actually the whole Church upon earth The Churches indeed in the Apostles time seem to be somewhat grown before they erected Presbyters yet they were Churches when they were not so numerous and there was the lesse need of ordinary Presbyters because there were extraordintry Two or three cannot be a compleat Church organically Those two or three in Matth. 18. do refer to the Presbytery as may be proved hereafter The family or domestick Churches preceding the Levitical Priesthood do correspond to the congregational Churches constituted by the coming of Jesus Christ and the state of the Church then in point of unity and universality doth confirm the unity and universality of the Church at present The Masters of families with their fathers were Priests in their childrens family as well as in their own houses Melchizedek by vertue of a natural precedency in age as may be supposed was a Priest to Abrahams family as well as in his own Adam if sin had not degraded him had been naturally a Priest for ever unto the whole world If Officers and Discipline strictly taken are not necessary to the being of a Church then a number of Seven or such a number as may afford Officers and exercise Discipline according to the rule Matth. 18 is not necessary And suppose such qualifications in members as are necessary to Officers unnecessary in members to the being of a Church it will follow that such a number as is necessary to the constituting of Officers is unnecessary to the being of a Church Concerning the Form of the Church EXplicite and particular covenants are not necessary to the constitution of Churches Pro. 1. Heb. 10. Acts 19.9 1. Christians fell into fellowship without any such form in Primitive days The Ordinances brotherly relation cohabitation were natural motives the directions and exhortations of the Apostles and Elders did concur Acts 19.9 Paul is said to separate the brethren in Ephesus 2. Elders were ordained without any explicite covenants both before and since the time of the Gospel we read of a charge but not one syllable of a covenant Now if Officers were ordained without any covenant May not members by proportion be admitted without any explicite covenant 3. One ground may be the unity of the Church in general we must not so close with a particular Church which is but a part of the Church as to break relations with the whole Church universal in confining members strictly to one particular Church 4. Another ground may be this Fellowship in a particular Church is conditional and transient and a duty of no greater moment then many other which are not to be instanced in unto admission 5. In the Acts there is no appearance of explicite covenanting with the Church in particular or general There was an explicite profession of faith and repentance and a cleaving unto the Lord Acts 2.8 No shew of covenanting to cleave to each other in Church-fellowship no shew I say of any such explicite covenanting Christians counted themselves next brethren one and the same houshold and were exhorted to maintain the unity of the Spirit as one body at one table as much as might be for edification The mystical Church in the Temple was represented by twelve cakes on the table called The bread of faces because all Saints sit there together face to face feeding on the Lord Jesus in way of communion The visible Church or Church of the outward court is also called to one and the same table mystical as far as all may sit together 6. We finde no explicite covenanting in Israel but with God and Israels covenanting with God was solemnized and attended as occasion did urge in collapsed times There is not any evidence of their covenanting conjoyntly with God at their first constitution there may be granted an explicite covenant of reformation but not of constitution of confirmation or reformation not of admission Object It is recorded in Neh. 10.29 that they clave to their brethren Answ It is explicated in the same verse how they clave to their brethren namely to covenant with God They did not covenant to cleave to their brethren but they clave to their brethren to covenant with God Besides some duties that concerned the House of God and the Officers of the House of God are there particularized but Church-fellowship is made no part of the covenant For an explicite covenant of reformation we have Nehemiah Hezekiah Jehoiada c. authentick examples but for an explicite covenant of constitution we have authentick examples to the contrary the Apostles themselves such as it must needs be presumption in us to oppose In the Old Testament it is usual to speak of a covenant of conversion and reformation but neither in the Old or New can we finde an explicite covenant of constitution of Churches and admission of members A people professing faith a resolution to embrace the Ordinances of the Lord Jesus Christ together is a Church before there be any explicite covenanting together there is an implicite covenant in such a profession Pro. 2. When a company of Christians are called to dwell together where there is no foundation of a Church there is need of some explicite conjunction or consent Such are to make known their desire and faith to one another either by testimony or by their profession And where Elders of some neighbouring Church may be procured it is
Levites in their passage over Jordan Joshua 3.4 Object The Church is the Spouse or the Bride Answ She is not yet married onely espoused or betrothed and therefore may not have the keyes in possession 2. She is yet under age unfit for government 3. She is but figuratively a Spouse and being constituted of so many persons unmeet to govern in point of ordinary execution 4. The Church of Israel was a spouse socia domus as well as the Christian Church and yet subjected to the Priests 5. The Spouse is kept under Magistracy and why not under the ministry Why not under both together Edicunt reges indicit festa sacerdos Object All the Saints are kings Answ In some common respects but not in respect of special office They are kings in respect of Church power or Church government fundamentally and essentially yet I do not find that the Scripture in the attribution of this title unto Christians hath respect to the power which visible Christians have over one another in special whereby they judge those that are within but in respect of that power whereby they reigne over themselves and over the world Rev. 11. All Saints are called Kings in respect of Christian power as mystical members not in respect of Ecclesiastick power 2. They were kings under the Law and yet subject to the Priests and Levites 3. They are priests as well as kings yet they are not Priests in respect of Ecclesiastick power according to the Scripture phrase They may not ordinarily preach and administer the seals by turn or every man in his course 4. They may be kings in respect of a Christian power mystically and yet be no more exempted from ministerial authority then from Magistratical authority They are not kings litterally and properly but figuratively or mystically Object Elders are ministers stewards servants of the Church Answ Respectively finaliter objective not absolutely or properly 2. They are fathers as well as stewards the stewards of Christ in propriety 3. If they are servants in propriety then they must not govern over the Church or with the Church but obey the Church 4. The Apostles were servants as well as ordinary elders yet they governed without the concurrence of the Church in way of consent The Church is the object of the elders ministry in p●r● but in this respect Angela and Magistrates are also servants to the Church Elders are not servants of the Church in propriety in way of subjection they are actually over the Church the governors of the Church the servants of Christ the whole Church is subject Object Elders must not have Lordlike power to excommunicate the whole Church Answ Lordlike power is not denominated from its extent in respect of the object of their administrations the Apostle had an extensive power over all Churches and yet not Lordlike power Lordlike power consisteth in Magistratical commands laws and mediums of punishment and in an imperious execution of power If the authoritas be in magistrates in respect of ordinary execution he may punish the whole Common-wealth one by one nay altogether de jure in point of ordinary execution in case justice requireth it If the Church may excommunicate Elders and yet have no Lordlike power then Elders may excommunicate the Church without a Lordlike power Object The whole Church cannot be excommunicated because excommunication is a casting out of the Church Answ Excommunication is essentially casting out of Church estate 2. A particular Church may be cast out of the universal Church Junius and all seem to deny an unity integral or visible in the universal Church yet they generally allow of a judicial power in Synods and Councells and how is that possible unlesse there be an universal visible Church But I am not to urge this point at present Object Elders are hereby made inexcommunicable Answ It is more sutable that Elders that Governors should be exempted from excommunication in point of ordinary execution then those which are governed 2. The major part of a particular Church is made inexcommunicable wholy if particular Churches are neither subordinate to their Elders nor to Synods and Councells 3. We suppose that Elders of particular Churches are subordinate to Synods and Councels and that the majesty resideth principally in the Church universal We suppose that Elders are subordinate to their particular Churches in respect of a defensive power in the way of excommunicating or withdrawing As Elders are ordained by Elders so it is meet that particular Churches should make use of Elders in the deposing and excommunicating of an Elder 5. We may put a difference between an ordinary and an extraordinary power A magistrate may be subordinate to his people in whom the majesty doth reside in point of extraordinary execution notwithstanding he hath power in point of ordinary execution to inflict capital punishment upon the people Potestas est in Magistratu principe co modo sub quo translata est Suar. de lege humana The practise of the Churches from the beginning of the World doth shew that they have not thought the consent of the body of the Church absolutely necessary Some godly writers have seemed to be in amaze when they have spoken of the consent of the members but what hath been their own practice Those of Reformed Churches for the general which have spoken most fully for the consent of the people have excluded it from being co-ordinate with the sentence of the Elders See the opinion of the Leyden Professors and Peter Martyr upon 1 Cor. 5. Beza in his Commentary upon the same chapter Res in Presbyteri● praejudicata sertur ad populum Cal. Com. 1 Cor. 5 4. requires no more then that excommunication be carryed conscia plebe Yet we must all protest against the magistratical and imperial Soveraignty of Antichrist and all Prelatical Spirits Christ and his Ministers do govern like the sweet fig tree the sat olive and the true vine not like the bramble that hath neither shadow nor good fruit It is observable how the Church is delineated Cant. 7. where the body of members is elegantly distinguished from the Elders as the body from the head 1. Her shoes and feet do denote her heavenly conversation and patience especially in the ambulatory course of the primitive Church for the conversion of the world Ephes 16.15 2. Her thighes navel and belly do represent her as the fountain of procreation and conversion The Church is the mother of all living The graces of the Spirit are the jewel-like joynts of her thighes The Church is the font of the world filled with the liquor of grace and out of her belly flow rivers of living water unto the regeneration or conversion of the world Her belly is compared to heaps of wheat beset with pleasant lillies to signifie that Christ conveigheth himself to the world as the bread of life by the Church in her womb all the infant converts of the world are nourished unto eternal life