excell most in Faith it selfe Nor doe the modern Papists differ herein from the Schoolmen Let the Fathers of Trent speake Sesâ—ion 3. The Apostles Creed is that Principle in which all that professe the Faith of Christ do necessarily agree and it is that firme and only foundation against which the gates of Hell shall never prevaile And in the very Catechism of the Council of Trent this Creed is called Pag. 14. The short forme of the Christian Faith and Hope the summe and foundation of Truth first and necessarily to be beleeved of all Canifius affirmes That the words in the Creed tend to this purpose that we may have the true Knowledge of God and Heavenly things which is necessary to every man towards the leading of a godly and happy life comprised in briefe abridgement James Baius cals it the rule of the Christian faith prescribed to all Beleevers because by this common Profession of the faith those of the same houshold and brethren are distinguished from their Enemies Out of which testimonies we gather that it was the generall opinion of Divines that all Fundamentall Doctrines of the Christian Faith necessary with the necessity of the meanes to the Salvation of men were comprehended in the Creed so that none shall perish for meer ignorance of God and Christ who give an explicite Faith to these things Yet we say not that besides these few Fundamentals Christians should make no account of all other Doctrines which are placed in the Holy Scriptures Yea all Pastors and Doctors are bound by the necessity of the Precept to further the perfecting of the Saints and edifying of the Body of Christ Eph. 4.11 12. till we all come into the unity of the Faith and of the Knowledge of the Son of God unto a perfect Man The people themselves also are bound where ability and opportunity is afforded them to grow unto the riches of the full assurance of Vnderstanding Col. 2.2 to the acknowledgement of the Mystery of God and of the Father and of Christ But neither Doctours of Particular Churches nor Christians living in them are bound to break off the band of Brotherly Communion with other Churches which embrace this Summe of the Christian Faith in that sense wherein the Catholique Church always received it and professe themselves enemies to all Heresies that overthrow the same Now as we have set downe the Apostles Creed for the briefe of Fundamentals pertaining to the saving Mysteries of Faith so wee acknowledge the Decalogue as the Symbole and Summe of all things to be done as touching duties due to the worship of God and offices of Charity which wee owe to our Neighbour For wee may fitly enough call Fundamentall Doctrines not only those Mysteries of Faith whose explained Knowledge is altogether necessary to the Salvation of Christians but also those Doctates of the Divine Law which if we know not at all we cannot worship God as we ought to the obtaining of Salvation In this sense we terme the Decalogue the Summe of things to bee done even as wee styled the other of which we have spoken before the Sum of things to be beleeved For the meere speculative Knowledge of the Divine Mysteries without the practicall knowledge of the Divine Mandats can bring none to blessednesse Therefore Luth. Tom. 1. in disp p. 406. Philip. pag. 436. the teaching of Gods Law in Churches is plainly necessary and altogether to be retained without which Christ cannot be retained For to this Law not only our corporall life but also our spirituall life ought to bee subjected Now those things which are propounded in this Law of God are so fundamentall that they cannot be broken without the guilt of death nor opposed and denyed without the staine of Heresie The Fundamentals of the Creed aime at this end that we may know God and Christ to eternall Life as either hath revealed himselfe The Fundamentals of the Decalogue drive at this That wee may worship both as they have commanded themselves to be worshipped If any overthrow the Fundamentals of Gods worship he is shut out from Salvation as much as if hee had overturned the Mysteries of Faith Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the Kingdom of God Be not deceived Aquin. quaest disp de superb art 4. neither fornicators nor Idolaters nor Adulterers c. As if the Apostle had said It is no lesse damnable to erre in these morall than in speculative principles For the corruption of ones opinion about those things which pertaine to manners may make an Heretique no lesse than about those things which pertaine to Faith if it be in any Universall Principle of Gods Law Hee that beleeves he may worship many Gods or adore the true God in an Image made with hands that is of the opinion that theft or fornication are things lawfull grates upon a Fundamentall Doctrine and runs into a deadly and dangerous Heresie For the practicall dictate which is included in every mandate of the Law is a Fundamentall truth and ought equally to bee beleeved as an Article of the Creed in speculative things If any man therefore should beleeve or teach that our Parents are not to be honoured or any thing else against a Commandement of God although he reverenceth his Parents with due honour or keepes that Commandement himselfe yet should hee bee an Hetetique and justly to bee accused for overturning a Foundation of Faith Let the Church of Rome therefore looke to it which boasteth that the Foundations of the Christian Faith hitherto have been preserved chiefly by her care whether or no she hath not grosly and damnably erred in the Fundamentals of the Decalogue to say nothing of her other errors Now if any will adde unto the Fundamentall Doctrines of the Creed and Commandements the Doctrine also of the Sacraments clearely revealed in the Gospell I am not against it provided on this condition that as they shall not all passe for fundamentals which Divines endeavour to build upon the fundamentall Articles of the Creed but that those only bee counted fundamentall which are necessary for all to know and beleeve to Salvation So also in the matter of the Sacraments every thing shall not presently bee a Fundamentall which may bee disputed about the Sacraments or gathered by the occasion of the Words which Christ spake but whatsoever Christ hath so set down and established that it is absolutely necessary to the receiving of Grace and Salvation in the use of the Sacraments As concerning the Sacrament of Baptisme it is a Fundamentall Doctrine that Christians must be Baptized in the Name of the most Holy Trinity that they may bee grafted into Christ Now they that beleeve and doe this retaine the Fundamentall doctrine of Baptisme although it may happen that the same men may in their minds conceive some false opinions of Baptisme or mingle some vaine and uselesse rites in the Administration thereof So in the Sacrament of
against them because the common consent of the whole Church doth not in the same appeare Those who would not have the Churches themselves Arg. 4 to bee rent and torn asunder because of the controversies bandied betwixt Protestants they seem to be of this opinion that every one may be saved in his own Religion and that a promiscuous multitude of erroneous people may bee received into the same Church Militant and Triumphant but this must not be granted If we will speak with the Scriptures Answ the name of one Religion is to be fitted and applyed not to difficult questions but to the points of Christian Faith preached to all and received of all Christian Churches throughout the whole world They therefore embrace the true and one only Religion which believe those things of God of Christ of the Church of all other matters and doe them which are necessary to be known done to the attaining to Salvation Wee conceive not therefore that every one may be saved in his own Religion which he feignes to himselfe but believe that they may be saved in the Christian Religion and be received into the same Church both Militant and Triumphant who so farre forth agree in the Doctrine of the Gospell as it is required that the Faith of Christians be saving to those that beleeve and that the worship which they yeeld unto God be gratefull and accepted of him in Christ But they who thinke that the perfect consenting of Churches is necessary to their meeting together in the Communion of one Church Militant and Triumphant can scarce free and disengage themselves from their error who conceived the Catholique Church to reside in one determinate party They therefore who in things either to be done or be beleeved defend such points with which the saving of Soules and Spirituall worship of God cannot consist they are truly said to have made a defection from that which is the alone saving Religion but they who retaining all fundamentals of faith and Gods worship differ from others and erre in some consequences or Doctrines of lesse moment professe no new or other Religion but are convicted not as yet to have attained in that one onely Religion to perfect knowledge For such imperfection of knowledge God excludes none from the Church Militant neither ought we to doe it We ought not to retaine brotherly Communion with those Arg. 5 whom it is an heinous sin to admit to the Lords Supper together with our selves But it seemed unlawfull for the Lutherans in taking the Lords Supper to communicate with the Helvetian or French Churches See the pres to the confer at Mompelg For the holy Supper of the Lord amongst other ends hath this use that it should bee the note and badge of the Religion which every one professeth For they who communicate with any Church in the receiving of this Sacrament by this deed doe publikely professe that they embrace the doctrine of the same Church and reject the contrary and separate themselves from others We must therefore in no case sport and play with the receiving of the Lords Supper nor therin dissemble any thing from which our heart doth abhorre and therefore wee cannot communicate with those Churches which embrace not our Confession For by such communicating we should seem to derogate from our Confession and syncere Religion and either to Patronize or surely closely to favour the errors of other Churches It is more safe therefore to Imitate the Christian Emperours who when the Arians did request to be received into Communion with the Orthodoxe they would not grant it unto them before they did approve the doctrine of the Orthodoxe We make no strife about that which is affirmed in the first place Answ But as for the Assumption namely That it is unlawfull to admit any to the Lords Table except them alone who are ready to subscribe to the Confession of one the same particular Church this seemes to me ought not to be defended For the Principall use of the Lords Supper is to recount the death and Passion of Christ which he suffered for the Salvation of men and to receive eternall Life by the Partaking of his Flesh and Blood It serveth also to witnesse and confirme the Union which Christians ought to have betwixt themselves 1 Cor. 10.17 and with Christ Jesus their head Lastly we confesse that this Sacrament as also that other of Baptisme is the note and badge of that Religion which wee professe Aug. cont â—austum 19.12 For men can be united together into no name of Religion whether true or false unlesse they be bound together in some fellowship of signer and visible Sacraments But as Baptisme is indeed the badge of the Christian Religion we professe and not of the particular opinions and confessions which we embrace before others so also must we conclude of the Lords Supper For to the mutuall Communion of all Christians in the Eucharist it is not required that all who Communicate together should agree in the same confession either the English or the French or the Dutch but that they agree in one Profession of the Christian and Catholik Faith Let us leave these rigid and Tyrannicall domineerings to the Papists who adjudge all to be separated from their Communion which would not sweare unto the Confession of Trent Cyprianus Cornelius The holy Fathers did not doe soe but they kept the Lords peace with those Churches which were of different opinions from themselves removing none from the right Communion because he refused to consent to the private Judgement of another particular Church for they acknowledged the Catholike Faith received with an unanimous consent of the Catholike Church to be the certaine Aug. Ser. 181. and sole Rule of Faith by which Beleevers retaine the Catholike Vnity But let him who can shew that Particular Churches ever usurped this to themselves that they did cut off others from the Brotherly Communion with themselues for diversitie of opinions in matters not as yet determined by the Judgement of the Catholike Church Socrat. l. 5. c. 21. on one side or other Victor indeed attempted to doe this and after him Stephen Lib. 5. cap. 23. lib. 7. cap. 4. both Bishops of Rome But it is plaine out of Eusebius that this Separation was founded on no right and therefore highly displeased the pious and Godly Fathers Therefore farre be it from us that in the very Communion of the Lords Supper we should as it were proclaime war against all other Churches which will not make our particular Confession their owne or will not forsake their own that they may embrace ours If we conceive our Churches to be of the righter and truer opinion than other Churches in certaine Questions not as yet determined wee have just cause not to Communicate with them in their errorss but thence have no cause at all to Communicate with them in the Sacraments Forasmuch as no errour in which
Protestant Churches desire all to meet in one brotherly Communion not so much as the least spot or staine of Idolatry were to be feared on either side Away therefore with all pretence of Impossibility drawn from this Reason neither let it make mens mindes or endeavours step aside from this so holy a purpose and designe The third and last obstacle whence the Communion of divers Churches betwixt themselves is held impossible is the asserting and defending of some Fundamentall Article necessary to be known and beleeved to the salvation of Christians on the one side which is sound and Catholique and the denying and opposing the same on the other side which is Hereticall For to grow together into one with Hereticks subverting the foundations of the Christian Faith is to start off from Christ the Foundation of the Christian Church Concerning this hinderance because it is a matter of greatest moment we must dispute somewhat more largely Therefore in the first place I conceive that is to be counted a Fundamentall Article which through the will of God revealing it to the attaining of Salvation and eternall happinesse is so necessary to be known and beleeved that from the Ignorance and much more from the opposing thereof men runne the manifest hazard of losing eternall Life This care and charge lyes not upon the Divines of our age that they should forge new and fundamentall Articles of the Catholique Faith for Christian people That which was not Fundamentall in the times of the Apostles and Primitive Church cannot with all our Affirmings wranglings and Cursings become Fundamentall These first Beleevables which we have gathered and brought together out of the whole body of the Scriptures into the Apostles Creed Epist 57. ad Dardan makes up that Rule of Fundamentall Faith which Auâ—ustine cals common to small and great and determines that it must be maintained of all with Perseverance whereof Hilary almost to the same purpose It is most safe for us to retaine that first and sole Evangelicall Faith confessed and understood in Baptisme Ad Constan August And I think the Apostle had an eye to these Fundamentall Articles when he calls Titus Titus 14. mine owne son after the common Faith This common faith comprised in the Apostles Creed proposeth to all Christians to beleeve the admirable workmanship of all Creatures made of nothing the unsearchable Mystery of the Trinity which is to be adored the benefit of Christ Incarnated Suffering Rising againe Glorified bestowed on miserable sinners and those things which flow from thence the Redemption of mankinde the Sanctification of Gods peculiar people the Communion of the Saints betwixt themselves the forgivenes of sinnes the Resurrection of the bodyes and the Glorification of the faithfull Who so believeth all things which we have contained in this short Creed and endeavours to lead his life conformable to the precepts of Christ is not to be dashed out of the lift of Christans nor to be driven from the Communion of other Christians members of what Church soever On the other side He that filcheth away or carpeth at any of these Articles though he challengeth to himself the name of Christian is to be driven and kept off from the Communion of those which rightly beleeve yet I acknowledge that besides these Articles many Doctrines are contained in the holy Scriptures out of the holy Scriptures may be deduced by firme consequence which are very profitable to be known and conduce much to proficiency in Divine knowledg but then at last are to be â—eld under the perill of losing Salvation or Communion when they are manifestly declared and understood to be contained in the Scriptures or necessarily to follow out of them In these things if any Church cannot so cleere the truth of her opinion to other Churches as to draw them to the same opinion shee ought to cast off their errors but ought not to cast off brotherly Communion with them because of these errours To these I adde that although some place of Scripture may seem to these Churches to establish a Fundamentall Article seems not unto others yet in this diversity of opinions there is not cause just enough to break off the Communion so be it both sides piously beleeve the same Article and acknowledge it to be cleerly and solidly sounded on other places of holy Scripture Lastly and this also must be added It is neither impossible nor swarving from the duty of good Christians to retain communion with those Churches who seem to us to follow some opinion which truly cannot hold together with a fundamentall Article so be it as in the meane time they professe the same Article and with both armes as we say embrace it For it abhors from the rule of Charity yea from sound reason that any for those Consequences by himselfe neither understood nor granted should be conceived to have denied or rejected a fundamentall Article which he firmly beleeves explicitly affirmes and if need were would Seale and Signe the truth thereof with his own blood More true and favourable is the judgement of a great and peaceable Divine Bucere It is not our part to have respect to that which of it selfe followeth of any opinion but to that which followeth in their consciences who hold that Point which we conceive opposite to a fundamentall Article For even as he that believeth any true Principle doth not presently believe and understand all those things which learned Men by consequences may deduce from the same so he that holds any false opinion doth not instantly hold all those things which those of better sight do perceive to be conjoyned with or â—oâ—lowing after that false opinion It is lawfull therefore to urge such consequences to snatch our brethren from their Errors but odiously to charge them therewith as if they were their own proper Doctrines it is unlawfull How farr this spreads it selfe and how forcible it is to establish brotherly union betwixt Reformed Churches Wise men and lovers of the Peace of the Church may easily observe For if it be granted that Communion onely is impossible that is unlawfull with those Congregations which explicity reject any fundamentall Article or defend an Heresie which stabs the Heart and cuts asunder Communion with Christ himselfe that also will follow that this brotherly Communion which we so much desire betwixt the German Churches may be establishes between Churches which are found and those which are not so well in health between Churches of a more and of a lesse refined Standard Therefore lâ—t those Churches which stick to the foundation depart from those which by Apostacy slide back from it but in the meane time from those which erre in matters of lighter moment neither disjoyn from Christ the fountain of life let them not depart Rom. 14.1 Rom. 15.1 The Apostle commands us to receive the weake in faith not to cast them off Wee that are stronger ought to beare the infirmities of the weake
Catholique Church under Christ the head The Illustrious Princes themselves Osiander Antist p. 75 in their Preface to the forme of concord cleerely professe That it is in no wise their purpose or intent to damnt those men who erre out of a kinde of simplicity of heart nor are they blasphemous against the truth of heavenly doctrine much lesse to condemne whole Churches which are under the Roman Empire nor that they did doubt that even in those Churches many godly were found which hitherto consented not with them in all things And also Lucas Osiander when it was objected against him that he called the Calvinists the Devils Martyrs diligently purged himselfe in this manner They that have heard my Sermons will say that they never heard any raylings against the Martyrs of Christ In Antist pag. 91. and my publike writings doe witnesse that I called them holy Martyrs that on Bartholomew day were murdered in France It is therefore seriously to be weighed whether it be safe whether it be pious whether it agree with the duty of Christian Churches for every errour of lighter moment not to reach forth the riâ—ht hand of fellowship to those Churches which notwithstanding this errour may remaine Christ's Martyrs yea his holy brethren Will they â—ill they whosoever acknowledge Christ their elder Brother they must of necessity have all the Brethren of the same Christ joyned unto them in a most neere and Brotherly Communion Moreover I doubt not at all but that the Saxon and Helvetian Churches and others which either consent with these or those acknowledge themselves to have and to desire to retaine Brotherly Communion with the English Scotish Irish and other forreign Reformed Churches Surely as concerning us although we consent not with them in all points and titles of controversall Divinity yet we acknowledge them Brethren in Christ and protest our selves to have a Brotherly and holy Communion with them But if they themselves be like minded towards us with what equiâ—â— dâ—e the German Churches amongst themâ—elves deprive each other of that Brotherly Communion which with forreign Churches they feare not to retaine What therefore Mâ—ses said of old â—o the Israelites that fought together that may truly be said to the Dutch Churches striving amongst themselves Acts 7.26 but cannot truly be confuted by them Yee are brethren why doe yee wrong one to another Lastly what all the godly are bound to begge of the most great and good God and request it in their fervent Prayers that this may come to passe out of doubt they are bound to employ all their study and endeavours But who doth not daily solicite God for the peaceable and flourishing State of the Church Who prayes not that those things may be taken away which trouble vex disturbe or any way hinder the Spirituall edification of the Church This was the wish of the Royall Psalmist and the same ought also to be of Princes Psal 122. v. 9. Doctors and all Christians Neither did he only wish all good things to the church of God but sought for them and procured them as much as lay in his power This was his duty 't is surely ours also And here I should not be so well employed if in a long set Oration I should lay open to the German Churches either the commodities of Peace and Union or the discommodities of long lasting dissention That of Prudentius is instead of an Oracle Scissura domestica turbat Rem populi titubátque foris quod dissidet intus Home-bred rents trouble the State and that shakes abroad which is divided at home Let them therefore looke to that which is for the benâ—fit of their owne Churches and let them resolve with themselves that all that is not only to be requested of God in daily Prayers but also it must be laboured after with the greatest and unwearied endeavours of all men that it may be effected and obtained Neither let men unexperienced in matters hope that they shall ingratiate themselves the more with the Papists and suffer lesse dammage from them if they refuse to joyn with those whom they call Calvinists What is to be hoped of them Osiander long since hath told The Papists saith he burne the Lutherans no lesse than the Zwinglians in those places In Antist pag. 74. where the Pope of Rome that fierce and cruell beast hath and doth exercise full dominion They therefore who are highest in their favour can hope for no more kindnesse from them than Polyphemas in Homer bestowed on Vlysses 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will eate Vlysses last after his Companions They will devoure the Câ—lvinists sooner the Lutherans later and at last if they can they will devoure all Hitherto wee have employed our paines to this purpose that this communion betwixt the Dutch Churches may bee understood not onely to be possible but by vertue of Gods commandement altogâ—ther due and necessary It remaines now that we shew in what manner and by what meanes these Churches miserably rent and torne a sunder may with best conveniency and speed be reduced and made up together into one Body which I will endeavour to doe rather that I may manifest the willingnesse of my minde to so worthy a worke than that I conceive those noble Churches and evermore stored with plenty of learned pious and peaceable Divines to stand in need of the counsell of forreginers in this matter Forasmuch therefore as the foreâ—â—â—d controversies may be agitated either betwixt Churches belonging to divers dominions whereof one is not subject to another or betwixt Christians of the same Church who acknowledge one or the selfe same Prince or supreme Magistrate wee will speake first of divers Churches standing on terms of equall right â—hen of the members of â—ne and the selfe same Church how they re all to be joyned together amongst themselves For the reducing of divers Churche into one communion I conceive no more fit and convenient way can be thought upon than that familiar one of appointing a faire and peaceable Conference betwixt Divines chosen by the authority of their Princes For if any man think that by calling a Councel out of all the Reformed Churches these questions which have employed the wits of most learned men these many years may within a few moneths or years or within one century of years be so defined that the consent of all men may be obtained in all these heads of controversall Divinity be it spoken with the good leave of all good men to me it seems scarce likely Seeing the weake eye of Mens mindes hardly pierceth into the nicity of subtile controversies even when it surveys them being in quietnesse But if it be as if it were full of black dust raysed with the motion of Disputants for most part it cannot so much as see them or with a fixed and steddy looke behold them And to speak the truth Councels especially those that are Generall ought rather to be used for the defending
things they professe the same Communion who are admitted to the same holy Supper But in very deed as by this mutuall Communion we doe not professe that we all have attained a perfect or the same degree of knowledge in Diviniry so neither doe we by this deed protest that we have a perfect consent amongst our selves in all heads of Doctrine in Divinity or altogether the same opinion of every question If the Communion of Christians amongst themselves should stand on these hard termes scarce could Peter and Paul have held Communion amongst themselves Sure the Church of the Corinthians had been broken into shivers but in these our times it had not been easie to finde many divines of great credit who could with a safe conscience be partakers together of the Lords Supper All Rulers therefore of Churches ought being guilty of their own and the common infirmity to beware least whilst they exact require from their own people a too harsh and not at all necessary confession they seem to shake and weaken the most sweet and most necessary Communion of Christians amongst themselves So much concerning the Governors of the Churches Wee come now to the Ministers or any other Christians which desire Communion with the Chruches wherein they live and yet cannot worke upon their consciences with any entreaties to approve and professe all the received opinions of the same Church It shall be their duty to afford and expresse themselves teachable and humble not obstinate and proud in the maintaining of those opinion wherein they step aside from the common opinion of the Church but he is to be counted teachable and humble who willingly and submissively lendeth his cares and heart to the Church teaching him who rejects not the doctrine propounded unto him out of a vitious disposition of his Rebellious will but is hindred by the weaknesse of his understanding that he sees not the Truth in these hard controversies which those who are more learned and accurate perchance with no difficulty can discern Now because 't is the priviledge of God alone to search hearts it is our part ever to encline to the most favorable side and to presume of every one where the contrary appeares not by manifest evidence that rather out of conscience than stubbornnesse he is detained and hindred from affording his consent They who shall behave themselves in this manner are not for every stubble of erroneous opinion to be parted and kept off from the Churches Communion wherein they live Yet on those terms and conditions they are not to be driven off if they presume not at all to oppose the common Judgment of the Church or to extoll and spread their private opinions amongst the people Nor ought they to take this in ill part who are desirous to entertaine Peace and Ecclesiasticall Communion for suppose the opinion of any private Doctor or Christian to be true and that to be erroneous which useth to bee defended by the Church yet if the error be in a matter or opinion which hinders not the Salvation of Christians farre better is it that the true opinion of any private Doctor whatsoever lye hid in the dark than that the publike authority of the Church bee in the broad light openly trampled upon or the Peace of the Church be shaken by this altogether unnecessary bickering of contrary opinions as with the struggling of windes crossing each other But if any one perswadeth himselfe that that opinion which he defends against the judgement of the Church be of so great moment that the Salvation of men doth depend from the knowledge thereof if he cannot perswade the same to the Rulers of his own Church he must either depart unto another Church or else for the good of the Soules in that Church to which he is subject patiently to undergoe the censure imposed upon him These are the things most learned Duraeus which I though fit at your request to write and send unto you If they may be usefull to you or any other towards the furthering of the Union of the Churches I have abundantly satisfied mine own desire and purpose They without doubt may suggest more and better things to whom the present estate of the German Churches is better known and looked into This thing alone remaines for me to doe humbly to pray to the God of Heaven that he would bow the hearts of Princes from their Soules to desire this Union of the Churches that he would enlighten the mindes of Divines to finde out and apply those meanes whereby it may foonest be established that he would kindle the hearts of all Christians to embrace and propagate this Peace to all Posterity The God of peace grant this for his Sounes sake our only Mediatour and Procurer of Peace with the Father to whom with the Holy Spirit be all Honour Glory and Thankesgiving for ever and ever Amen FINIS AN EXHORTATION to the restoring of Brotherly COMMUNION betwixt the PROTESTANT CHURCHES FOUNDED IN THIS That they do not differ in any Fundamentall Article of the Catholique Faith IN DOMINO CONFIDO LONDON Printed by R. B. for Richard Badger and John Williams 1641. An Exhortation to the restoring of Brotherly Communion Chap. 1 betwixt the Protestant CHURCHES CHAP. I. Of the discommodities and occasions of these Discords together with the Remedies briefly declared WHAT Cicero the Oratour said once of the Discords betwixt famous men Orat. de harusp respons that may we now truely say of the Dissentions betwixt severall Churches that they usually end either in the destruction of them all or in the injurious domineering of the Conquerours over the party subdued Now though it is to be hoped that there is none amongst the Reformed Churches which affecteth a sole and absolute Command over the rest Yet is it much to be feared least all by these dayly and deadly contentions which God forbid hasten their own overthrow Whose present condition the godly bemoane and by the miseries fallen on some guesse the dangers hanging over all unlesse they schooled with their calamities at last begin to be wise and heartily study the advancing of Peace For whilst this strife groweth hot amongst Brethren they afford their enemies constant matter of rejoycing and insulting over all Churches and not only of rejoycing and insulting but also arme them with infinite opportunities to hurt and oppresse them Nor do they order the matter well for their own people which will have even the unlearned to be distracted about such endlesse Controversies which perchance the Learned are never able to determine If Schollers only were to enter the Lists and to combat with Schollers the danger were lesse but it is too plaine that Christians of all sorts and sides are summoned to the fight whose minds are no sooner entangled in these needlesse controversies but they are cal'd away from the most necessary duties of charity and fruits of new obedience Moreover these dissentions betwixt the Reformed Churches hinder the more
the Lords Supper this is a Fundamentall Doctrine That it must bee celebrated in bread and wine that therein the memory of Christs Passion is ever to be renewed that Christians in that Sacrament have not only an empty 1 Cor. 10.6 or shadowy representation of Christ crucified but do truly really and savingly partake of the body of Christ Hee that beleeves all things soundly and sufficiently embraceth the Fundamentall Doctrine of this Sacrament to the sucking of Grace out of it Although those difficult questions tossed and tumbled betwixt Divines about the manner of the Presence and eating of Christ never came into his head much lesse did he give his consent to one side or other To this threefold kind of Fundamentals Whereof the first is seen in the Creed The second in the Commandements The third in the Sacraments of Baptisme and the Lords Supper We may adde a fourth contained in the Lords Prayer For seeing invocation or Prayer is a duty belonging to the worship of God absolutely necessary for the obtaining of Grace and Salvation it must needs have certaine fundamentals which being unknowne or slighted it becomes of no moment but is effectuall if they be retained and observed This is a fundamentall point God alone is to be invoked by Religious Prayer he is to be called upon through his Son our Mediator trusting on whom we call him Our Father He is to bee Prayed unto for all good things wee want but chiefly for Grace Pardon and Glory which we most stand in need of Lastly he is to bee prayed unto in Faith Charity and a good Conscience He that contradicts these things is a slat Heretique and perverts the fundamentals in the duty of Prayer That these foure things which wee have touched are alone to be accounted Fundamentals of the Christian Religion seemes to me plainly to appeare out of the practice of the Apostles themselvs and Primitive Church well known unto all For they have judged no particular Church to have cast away the Fundamentall points of saving Faith or to have fallen off from the Communion of the Catholique Church who holily professe the faith in the Creed and obedience to the Commandements who administred the Sacraments according to Christs Institution and called upon God in the Name of Christ For they conceived them to deserve an admonition for their errors of lighter moment but would therefore cut off no particular Churches Chap. 8 called by the Name of Christ from the body of the Catholique Church CHAP. VIII That Brotherly Communion is to be kept betwixt the Protestant Churches is proved by Reasons drawne from the Communion which they have in Jesus Christ the only Personall Foundation FORASMUCH as this one thing is the greatest hinderance of setling agreement betwixt Protestant Churches that some learned and godly men conceive that such a Brotherly agreement and Communion is altogether unlawfull we to our ability shall endeavour to shew that this Communion of particular Churches amongst themselves is not only lawfull but acceptable to God and necessary to themselves For the proving whereof long since wee have laid our foundations in those things which were largely discussed concerning the personall Foundation and the foundations Ministeriall and Doctrinall This one thing remaines that we call our Reasons which are scattered and dispersed thorough this whole discourse to come in to their colours that they may present themselves at one view We will begin as it is fit from those Reasons which flow from the consideration of that one foundation Jesus Christ our Saviour to whom all dostick and from whome all Good Temporall Spirituall and Eternall is derived to all Reformed Churches With those Churches it is fitting to retaine Brotherly Communion Reason 1 which we will not deny but that they retaine Conjunction and Communion with Christ the Head and Foundation of the holy Catholique Church Yea except we will yeeld and confesse our selves to bee estranged from the body of Christ we cannot but be their Brethren who are esteemed to hold brotherly Communion with Christ our elder Brother For the band of holy Brotherhood betwixt the Churches themselves cannot be broken at mens pleasures except they be also broken betwixt them and Christ who is the head of all Churches If the Saxon count the Helvetian or Helvetian the Saxon Churches so alienated and torne asunder from Christ by their errors that they are neither founded in Christ nor by Christ the Elder Brother taken into the brotherly society of fellow-members then they may pretend some reason why they renounce communion with them But if in no wise they dare affirme this wee cannot have just cause to disclaime Brotherly Communion with those whom Christ himselfe blusheth not to owne and call his Brethren August Epist 162. It was the peevish frowardnesse of the Donatists neither to receive from other Churches any letters importing a Communion nor to acknowledge any right of Brotherhood with them But in the meane time what did the Orthodox Churches Out of Augustine wee may learne it in whome wee read That the Donatists angry for this thing Contra Donat post Coll. cap. 35 were notwithstanding by the Orthodox acknowledged for Brethren The same also appeares out of Optatus Milevitanus who thought That the name of Brotherhood was not to be denied unto them Yea De schism Donat. lib. 1. in initio lib 4. in initio thought it an impious act to suppresse or conceale the name of Brethren Either therefore it must be justified that some Protestant Churches have lost their conjunction with Christ the Foundation of the Church and forfeited their Brotherly Communion with Christ their Elder Brother or else we must not depart from Brotherly Society with them In the second place wee argue from most certain Signes and Markes 2. Reason whence we may and ought to be perswaded that this or that Church is conjoyned to Christ the corner stone for from the same notes we may conclude that other Churches are bound and obliged not to separate themselves from the same They therefore which want not the knowledge of God and Christ necessary to eternall life who have true Faith true Repentance and true Endeavour after a New life and holy obedience to such we ought to grant that they enjoy a saving conjunction with Christ their foundation But none for ought I know as yet is found which hath given this bloody Sentence That in this or that Protestant Church there is not so much knowledge of God and Christ as sufficeth to Salvation That there is not in it the ordinary Justification of Christians by Faith That there is not the earnest exercise of Repentance and endeavour after New Life But if all these things agree to all Protestant Churches it is manifest that they remaine conjoyned with their Head and Foundation not lesse manifest that they have inward Brotherly Communion and ought to have outward with all the members of Christ Rom. 12.5 For we being
no other Originall and obstinate persisting in a Schisme but brotherly hatred Most sure it is that the proper duties of Charity cannot appeare and shew themselves in these differences of the Protestant Churches I appeale to the Apostle himselfe for my witnesse Rom. 12.9 10 11 Ioh. 13.35 1 Ioh. 3.14 1 Cor. 13.1 2. c. 1 Cor. 13.5 6 7 c. If we grant those Churches which wee conceive somewhat to erre in the Faith yet to be sanctified and preserved in Christ the foundation of the Church our Faith though something the sounder Chap. 9 will little availe us August de Bapt. contr Denat lib. 1 cap. 8. if our Charity be wanting towards all the Saints For saving Faith cannot bee unlesse conjoyned with Charity or Brotherly love as the Scriptures every where doe witnesse For what shall a mans sound Faith profit him where the soundnesse of his Charity is baned with the deadly wound of Schisme CHAP. IX That Brotherly Communion betwixt the Protestant Churches is not to be broken off for their divers opinions about questions in Controversy is proved by Arguments drawn from the want of lawfull power in Ministers to cause such a breach or dissolution NONE can be ignorant but that at the first the very Doctors and Ministers of the Churches were the chiefe yea the sole Authours of this Separation which we so desire may be taken away For it is not to be doubted but they alone are the hinderance why the Reformed Churches though by wofull experience they have found the numberlesse discommodities of this long lasting dissention yet they will not amongst themselves renew the Charter of their Brotherly Communion For if it seemed good to their Doctors to give each to other the right hands of brotherly fellowship in this selfe same houre we should see the Churches mutually embracing one another Therefore let us see whether they have done or now doe rightly who either have perswaded that the bands of Brotherly Communion betwixt the Protestant Churches should be broken or earnestly maintaine that for the present they ought not to be renewed againe We are of the contrary opinion being induced thereunto by these Arguments It is not in the power of the Ministers of any particular Church Reas 1 to separate or cut off another particular Church from the brotherly Communion which it hath with the Catholique therefore neither from that which it hath with any part of the Catholique Church and by the same reason not from the brotherly Communion which it ought to have with it selfe unlesse she will confesse her selfe to be no part of the Catholique Church The truth of the Antecedent seems therefore plaine to me because all just and lawfull seperation of every member from its body Catholique ought to leane and rely on the authority of the Catholique Church for one member hath not this judiciary power over another It is a known Rule of Lawyers A sentence given by him that is not his Judge is voyd in Law But particular Churches are not the Judges of private persons living in forreign churches how much lesse then over the Churches themselves If therefore any Church should pronounce another to be disjoynted from the Communion with the Catholique Her sentence were to be sleighted and contemned as of a Judge that presumed to make laws out of the bounds of his owne Jurisdiction But perchance they who easily grant the Antecedent of our Argument will yet doubt of the Consequent and set downe that one part of the Catholique Church may cast off another part thereof that is one particular Church may separate another particular Church from Brotherly Communion with her selfe by the power of her own private sentence and authority I deny that any particular Church hath any lawfull power to dissolve Christian Brotherhood with any other except so farre forth as the separation rely on the Authority of the Catholique Church which one claspes and containes within her embraces the Churches of all Nations Now this separation relyes on this authority so often as it is made for those points which are so established by the judgement of the Catholique Church that they are to bee counted shut out from the cōmunion of faithfull Christians who are known to oppose or deny them Trusting on this authority we justly deny brotherly Communion to those Churches which falsely and equivocally are entitled with the name of Christ who with joy and jeering hisse out the Divinity of Christ Who carpe at the mystery of the Trinity which is to be adored or with sacrilegious boldnesse overthrow any foundation of the Christian Faith For all these things have been passed for things judged on and that by the well known and famous authority of the Apostolike and Catholike Church But this separation is not made rightly nor according to the custome of the Catholike Church as often as one particular Church shall deny Brotherly Communion to another for dissenting from them in questions newly risen and never determined on one side or other by the authority of the Catholike Church as points of the Catholike Faith For no Church can at its own pleasure breake off the Band of Brotherly Communion by which all the members of the Catholike Church are coupled together with any particular Church but that with the selfe same Deed shee divides her selfe from the body of the Catholike Church in which those members can have no being which have lost their due joynting and Union with their fellow members We will conclude this argument with the Testimony of Augustine who every where teacheth Tom. 3. de side ad Petr. Diac. cap. 43. that this Separation of the good from the evill being within the Catholike Church is unlawfull and they which endeavour to pluck other members from the joynting of the body doe rather separate themselves from the Vnity of Christ Tom. 4. de side oper cap. 4 5. Lastly it nothing hurteth or hindereth those that are good that they abide still in Vnity and participation of the Sacraments with those whose Deeds they disallow Neither with those whose opinions they cannot approve For if we will beleeve the same Augustine they cannot be excused of unlawfull presumption who too much loving their own judgement arrive at such an height of boldnesse as to cut off Communion with others Tom. 7. de Bant. contra Don. For they neither ought nor can be cut off from communion with particular Churches which remaine conjoyned with the Catholike Church Particular Churches ought not in our age Reas 2 to challenge that to themselves which none ever durst to do in the time of the Apostles The Ministers of the Churches ought not to urge that which the Apostles themselves durst never perswade to be done But that one particular Church should renounce all Brotherly communion with another is a thing altogether unheard off wholy swerving from the prudence and practice of the Apostles Amongst the seven Churches to which S. John wrote
Revel 2.3 It is plaine there were some infected with errours from which others were free Yet those Churches which were the purer did entertain Christian brotherly Communion with those which were more impure the Apostle perswaded each of them to amend their own faults and errours but gave counsell to none on the pretence of vices errors to start a sunder from other For as in the naturall body the parts which are well in health and strength endeavour to cure not to cut off those that are sick and weake so in the Mysticall body of the Catholike Church if any be more pure and sound than others they are bound as much as lyes in their power to heale the vices and errors of others ' and not to deny Brotherly Communion to whole Churches Hither it may be added that this denying of Brotherly Communion may seem to have the kind force of an Excommunication which censure is not to be drawn and used of the Ministers of the Church for every fault or for every Error no not upon a single person subject to their Ministery Decret 6. de sent Exc. but much lesse on the whole body of a Church which in no wise is subordinate unto them For as the Lawes forbid to Excommunicate a Society or Corporation because it may happen that then those that are inocent may be entangled in that censure so right and religion forbids to exclude whol Churches from the Communion of the faithfull because this cannot be done without an injury contempt to many that be innocent If any should determine that communion should have been denied to the whole Church of Israel because of their worshipping of Baal besides that be should exercise an act going beyond the bounds of his Ministeriall power he should have offered an high wrong and injury to those seven thousand men who never bowed knee to Baal If any should say that this denying of Brotherly Communion which we disswade from is not the Excommunication of an whole commonalty such as the Laws respect and take notice of I confesse there is some difference betwixt these two yet I deny it to be of so great moment that it should make that lawfull in the one case which is not lawfull in the other Indeed Excommunication properly so called is the act of a lawfull Judge which passeth and layeth hold on those which are subject unto him and bindeth them though against their own wils But this renouncing of brotherly communion whereof we speake is an act of one judging only of persons not at all subject unto him and declaring them unworthy of all brotherly Communion and therefore driving and repelling them from the same although they desire it By what name so ever any please to call this repulse of other Churches from brotherly communion it doth them a great wrong and disgrace for it adjudges them unworthy of the honour of Brotherhood which Christ our elder Brother disdaines not to bestow upon them Ministers therefore of Churches ought not so much as to thinke of shutting out whole Churches from the communion with them and theirs It would be enough to cast off single persons desiring fellowship with them then at last when it shall appeare that they are stained with so hainous sinnes or wrapped in so mischievous errours as that by good right they may and ought to be driven and banished from the communion with all the Faithfull The Ministers of particular Churches Reas 3 put case of Saxony or Switzerland ought not to deale harder with ther Christian Brethren of other Churches in granting or refusing communion with them than they deale with their owne For the Christian Brotherhood which is betwixt the members of Christ is not altered according to the variety of Places or Nations But we call not our owne to a strick account what they conceive of the Articles in controversie and to what Doctors they stick therein but esteem it sufficient to the right of communion if together with us they hold and professe the Fundamentall Doctines of Christianity comprised in the Catechisme and adhere unto Christ Wee should use the same moderation and equall dealing towards forraigne Churches especially to the very body of Churches which for the most part is made up of simple and unskilfull Christians for whom it is not needfull that they should have any intercourse with controversall Dâ—vinity Therefore those Protestant Churches seem not to doe well which detest any fellowship with others and professe an open division and Separation for some difference in opinions about hard questions of which they cannot know certainly or inquire what the people in forraigne Churches therein doe hold and maintaine But this we may know surely out of their Doctors writings that those grosse errours wherewith those which are called Lutherans charge the Calvinists and those which are called Calvinists charge the Lutherans are at this day defended neither by learned or unlearned but rejected and damned of both Therefore the cause of this Separation which some esteem necessary hitherto appeares neither necessary nor just enough The Doctors of any Church cannot bring in such a Separation Reas 4 which shall restraine the Unity of the Church of Christ and Christian brotherhood to the side of Luther or Calvin as at this day the Papists straiten the same to the part of the Pope of Rome For Christs inheritance is limited with the same boundes wherewith the Brotherhood of Christians is limitted and is crowded into the same straits whereinto we thrust this brotherly fellowship If therefore we acknowledge no Ecclesiasticall communion and Christian brotherhood with those Churches which think otherwise than our selves it is manifest that we call home and confine the Church of Christs which consisteth of numberlesse Churches only to our own side For if any Protestant Church professe it selfe that it neither can nor will have brotherly Communion with the Church of Saxony or Switzerland by reason of some diversity of opinion I demand of them with what Churches then can or will it hold communion Not with the Roman not with the Greeke Church for it dissenteth from them in more controversies and of greater moment not with any other in any place for none can be instanced in from which she hath not some matter of dissenting for difference in Doctrine Therefore at last the matter will come to this passe that they which thinke themselves to have no brotherly communion save onely with their partners in opinions must say Christs that Church hath perished out of the whole world besides and only remains in those Churches which are of their own party But this is the very self same thing which the Catholike Church ever disalowed in the Donatists and which Augustine and Optatus Milevitanus doe demonstrate to bee repugnant to most manifest places of Scripture For the foresaid Augustine thus urgeth it That Christ hath lost his Inheritance if the Christian Communion be tied to one place or Countrey Aug.
employ their Armes and use their strength that they pluck not asunder the Churches themselves with a dangerous Schisme The Authors of our English Confession in the XVII Article where Predestination is handled would not so much as in a word touch upon the other Question of Reprobation both because of the uselesse speculations which mens curiositie would extract thence as also because out of the Doctrine of Predestination well grounded so much may easily be gathered as is necessary or profitable to know or hold of Reprobation But neither for this thing is there cause to dissolve the Brotherly Union betwixt Protestants All grant and agree that these Propositions are most true That the Act of Reprobation in God as that of Election is from Eternity That none is Reprobated from Eternity which might not be Reprobated without all Cruelty or Injustice That no one was fore-damned of God from Eternitie whom he from Eternitie did not foresee wrapt up in the guilt of damnation That no one shall in time be damned but through the most just merit of his owne corruption and impiety That the Originall and cause of all Evills which drownes Reprobates in perdition is not found in God Reprobating but in the Reprobates themselves That this Eternall Reprobation cannot appeare to any particular Person unlesse out of the fruits most worthy of damnation which he brings forth and loves to bring forth to the end of his life That there is no single Person which may not attaine Eternall Life by Repenting Beleeving and Persevering according to the Tenor of the Covenant of the Gospell That there is no such Decree of God by which Reprobates should be forced and necessitated to sinne and perish But alwayes they perish by their own voluntary unbeliefe and impiety free and not constrained It appeared lately in the Conference of Lipsigh that there is an agreement in all these Points If there be any other things remaining they are rather Controversies about words than about matter rather discords about subtile Speculations than fundamentall Articles Such are those which are disputed betwixt Schoolmen of the Signification of the very words namely Predestination and Reprobation of the Imaginary order of Priority and Posteriority betwixt the Eternall Acts of Predestinating and Fore-knowing of the unsearchable manner of Divine working about all humane Actions whether good or bad of the necessitie or Contingency of all things which from Eternity were predestinated or fore-knowne of God In such perplexed Controversies it cannot bee but contradictions must arise oftentimes betwixt Disputants Yet brotherly Concord may be made up and maintained betwixt the Churches themselves as anciently it was preserved betwixt the African and Latine Churches Their Doctors in the mean time being of different opinions in the weighty Question of Baptizing of Hereticks Vid. Cypr. Epist ad Jubaiannum Et in sent Episc de de Heret Bapt. To close up all in a word Those Churches falsly so called may be forsaken which possesse not the Foundation of the Apostles preaching But true Churches ought not to be deserted and pluckt asunder from others for the Errors of particular Doctors because the Faith of Churches leanes not upon the names or writings of single Persons CHAP. XII Some Objections wherewith some Learned Divines have been moved to breake off the Communion betwixt Protestant Churches are answered TRuly it is to be bemoaned That some so far abhorre from the Brotherly Communion of Protestants betwixt themselves that they charge this very thing as a fault upon peaceable Divines that they will not suffer that these Controversies which are handled betwixt Learned men ought to break off the Bands of holy Brotherhood betwixt the Churches themselves But let us weigh what Reasons they chiefly rely on who contend that this disjoynting of Churches is absolutely necessary No Communion is to be retained with those Churches which embrace Arg. 1 and with obstinacy defend corruptions of Doctrine intrenching on the Glory and repugnant to the Word of God but the Lutherans thinke that this is done in many points by the Calvinists and on the other side the Calvinists complaine that the same is done by the Lutherans Therefore it is not lawfull for these Churches which are ill distinguished by the names of Luther and Calvin to retaine Brotherly Communion amongst themselves The major Proposition they conceive well founded in that most true Maxime That all things which we doe are to be referred to the Glory of God 1 Cor. 10.31 The minor they account themselves to have proved by running over all these heads of Doctrine whereabout they contend for the Divines on both sides doe presume that their Opinions doe ever make to the illustration of Gods Glory and that the contrary alwayes obscures it None denie Answ but that in all our actions we must level at the Glory of GOd and it must also be confessed that this is the nature of sin and false Doctrine that alwaies of it selfe it is of force to impaire the Glory of God in some part But that to me seems weak and unfound which both sides presume upon as on a thing to be granted and not at all to be denyed Namely that it tendeth to the Glory of God for us to renounce Brotherly cōmunion with those Churches wherein Doctrines are defended in some manner and degree crossing the glory of God Those things which so shake the Glory of God that they suffer not at all those which are erroneous in them to have saving Communion with God and Christ neither doe they suffer Orthodox Christians to retaine Brotherly Communion with them But those things which in some measure are repugnant to the truth of the Scriptures and glory of God but yet doe not destroy the said Communion can in no wise afford to any particular Church just cause of departing and dividing it selfe from another for this is the very selfe same fault which the Ancients endeavored to render odious to all under the infamous name of Schisme But that also may be added that the Churches which are in the right doe well enough discharge their dutyes when they provide and take care that their owne People be not intangled in the errors of others when they endeavor with all gentlenesse to reduce the wandring Churches into the way of Truth But when they depart from the Communion and Brotherly Unity of the Church from which Christ hitherto hath not departed they defend not but grievously wound the glory of God and Christ by this their separation Lastly when the far greater part of particular Churches consists not of learned Doctors but of simple people it cannot truly be affirmed that they understand the Errours propagated by the learned much lesse that they stick to them least of all that they stick to them with obstinacy and wilfulnesse Therefore under pretence of these the bands of Christian Brotherhood are not to be broken betwixt whole Churches For Jerusalem is built as a city which is at unity in
men may erre preserving still the Faith whereby wee are Christians gives us power to depart from other Churches or to abhorre from holy and brotherly Communion with them Vid. Aug. contra Jul. Pelag. lib. 1. cap. 2. de peccat Orig. lib. 2. c. 23. Neither doe those Christians play with the Sacraments and incurre the guilt of dissembling when they celebrate one Lords Supper with them whom they know to differ from themselves in some heads of Doctrine in divinity For the Sacrament of the Eucharists is not instituted of Christ to this end that it should be a note or token of perfect Knowledge in all which are fellow-partakers of the same Therefore neither of perfect Agreement which perfect Agreement it is altogether impossible to finde in the imperfect Knowledge of Christians They therefore who use this moderation towards other Churches that they reject them not from Communion with them under pretence of difference in particular confessions even themselves also enjoy the same benefit amongst others Neither in the mean time doe they derogate any thing from their owne confession or favor and Patronize a strange one but they doe not at all challenge to themselves the power of dividing of Churches or dissolving of Brotherly Union betwixt Christians from that cause which neither Christ nor the Apostles nor the Primitive Church would ever have approved Lastly the Example fetch'd from the Arians is altogether divers and farre off from the matter in hand for we willingly grant that Brotherly Communion is to be denyed to them not onely of some one particular Church but even of all who durst denie the Eternall divinity of Christ For this is to overturne the most solid foundation of Christian Faith and mans Salvation But far different is the Reason and nature of those Controversies which are disputed of in the Protestant Churches and in which they differ and disagree amongst themselves For in none of these can any truly say That either the Foundation of mans salvation is overthrown or the Authoritie of the Catholike Church contemned or lastly that any particular Church ever was for errors in such points separated or to be separated from the Brotherly Communion of all Christians by the Judgement and power of the Catholike Church But this seems to have no doubt at all in it that one particular Church doth unjustly cut off any other from her Communion when for the same opinions according to the ancient discipline of the Catholike Church and rules Catholikely established she was not to be cut and cast off from all other Churches But through the love of Peace and desire of renewing concord betwixt most famous Churches I am carried much farther than at first I propounded to my selfe I will now turne my Speech to God himself whom I humbly beseech that at last he would be pleased to binde up the differences of all the Protestant Churches and to make them up into one and that he would shew unto all That it agrees with the nature of this One God to be worshipped in Unity Now I take my farewell of my most deare Brethren of the forrain Churches with the Exhortation of most holy Augustine If you will live of the Holy Spirit hold Charity love Verity desire Vnity that you may come to Eternity To the God of heaven who is the God of Peace to Jesus Christ our Lord who is the Prince of Peace to the Holy Spirit who is the Bond of Peace be Glory Honor and Thankesgiving for ever and ever Amen FINIS Imprimatur THO. WYKES April 8. 1641.
transubstantiation to be made neither conceive there is made any Locall inclusion in the Bread or any durable conjunction out of the use of the Sacrament yet they grant the Bread to be the Body of Christ in a Sacramentall Vnion and that when the Bread is reached forth thâ— Body of Christ is together present and exhibited No one thing can be more like to another than is the judgement of the Helvetians to the judgement of the Lutherans Yet if any suspect that under this concord of words some Repugnancy of meaning and opinion may lye hid neverthelesse this is to be urged and enquired into whether this Repugnancy be such and of so great moment that it renders the Peace and Unity between Churches impossible and makes the Schisme and disjoynting betwixt them necessary and everlasting I know it seemeth farre otherwise to most learned and solid Divines when they side not to take part and are without the Lists of this discord Now as concerning those controversies of the Omnipresence of the Body of Christ the communication of his properties and others that first may seem to have bred whosoever shall weigh with Judgement what is granted what denyed on both sides shall presently perceive that neither of these nor of those any Fundamentall Article is called into question much lesse opposed or overthrowne For whatsoever was determined of these matters by the Catholique Church in the Creeds and Generall Councells that both sides receive and professe whatsoever was rejected and condemned that both alike reject and abhorre but that sometimes one Party should endeavour to draw the other by the small cords of consequences into the dirt of filthy Heresies is not a thing so much to be admired as to be bemoaned We all know the custome of angry disputants especially after they have begun to be throughly hot with long contending Also we have briefly touched before what is to be conceived of Heresies which are charged on others by consequences not at all granted or understood For the present this one thing may suffice to demonstrate the possibility of brotherly communion That on neither side any doctrine which is point blanck contrary to a Foundation of Faith Devoratoâ—rium Salutis or to use Tertullians word such as swallows up and devours Salvation is explicitly defended yea those whiâ—h are such are all cleerely and explicitly condemned on both sides If there be any other new controversies bred betwixt the Churches a-about Predestination Freewill and the like They can with no colour be pretended for the hindering of the Churches communion For in all these this one thing alone belongs to the Catholick and Fundamentall Faith That the free Grace of God in predestinating miserable men in conversion of sinners in setting free of mens wils Lastly in perseverance and Salvation of the Elect be so fully acknowledged that whatsoever he doth to the attaining of the state of Grace or Glory or whatsoever is done by men in reference hitherto that wholly be given to God and granted to Gods speciall grace and mercy On the other side whatsoever pertaines to the corruption of mans nature whatsoever to his obstinacy in sin whatsoever to the viciousnesse and servitude of Frâ—ewill Lastly whatsoever draws miserable mortals to damnation and tumbles them headlong into Hell that we impute all this to our selves and our owne demerits and command it distance to be farre off from God himselfe Whilest these things remaine fixed and immoveable as indeed they doe remaine although in the doctrines built upon the Foundation they have divers manners of conceiving and formes of speaking yea although they follow different opinions such errours are not so deadly that for their sakes a deadly hatred should be hatched or that a perpetuall Schism ought to be norished betwixt the churches If therfore this once be agreed on betwixt Divines that their strifes neither were nor are about any fundamentall Articles and things altogether necessary to be known to Salvation with all it will appeare That it is not impossible that Union and Communion betwixt the Churches be renewed that this pernicious Schisme be forthwith taken away and a blessed Peace for the time to come be holily preserved betwixt the German Churches Now it follows in the next place since we perceive this union is possible that we consider Whether Princes Doctors and even all Christian people be not tyed by vertue of Gods command and their own bounden duty every one for his own part to endeavour that this Brotherly Communion as soone as conveniently it may be be established between the Churches In the first place that of Paul mentioned by us in the beginning seems to intimate that we are all bound to this If it be possible and as much as in you lyeth have Peace with all men If a Civill and outward Peace is to be kept with so great desire betwixt all men without doubt the Spirituall and Ecclesiasticall Communion betwixt Christians is to be procured and cherished with farre greater Enâ—eavours Where therefore no unconquerable impossibility hinders on the part of the thing to be done mans Will cannot be excused which herein neglects or refuses is either lazy or perverse to obey the commandement of God nor is there cause why any should pretend that the differences of repugnant opinions cannot as yet be reconciled If in the meane time the Schisms of the Churches may bee taken away as out of doubt they may I had rather a Milstone were tyed about my neck and I cast into the depth of the Sea than that I would hinder a work so acceptable to God so necessary to the avoyding of scandals or not with all my mind and might further and advance the same Hither it may be added that all have need to confesse that true and genuine charity is no lesse necessary to Salvation for all Churches and members of Christian Churches than the true and entire profession of sound and saving Faith For by this badge our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ would have his true Disciples distinguished and discerned Joh. 13.35 from those that are false and counterfeit By this all shall know that you are my Disciples if yee love one another Now I leave it to be decided of every mans conscience what charity at last that is which permits Christian Churches on no just cause of refusall mutually to deny the right hands of fellowship and eternally to detest the making of an Union betwixt them Is it not enough for us to depart from the Hay and Stubble that is the errours of other Churches except also by making a voluntary rent we depart from the Churches themselves which never as yet departed from Christ Besides I seeme to my selfe to have observed both those that embrace the Zwinglian and Lutheran doctrine as they use to call it on both sides to acknowledge that the Churches whether they maintaine that or this doctrine remaine the true Churches of Christ or the true members of the