Selected quad for the lemma: christian_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
christian_n	believer_n	church_n	visible_a	1,349	5	9.2573	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A35959	Truths victory over error, or, An abridgement of the chief controversies in religion which since the apostles days to this time, have been, and are in agitation, between those of the Orthodox faith, and all adversaries whatsoever, a list of whose names are set down after the epistle to the reader : wherein, by going through all the chapters of The confession of faith, one by one, and propounding out of them, by way of question, all the controverted assertions, and answering by yes, or no, there is a clear confirmation of the truth, and an evident confutation of what tenets and opinions, are maintain'd by the adversaries : a treatise, most useful for all persons, who desire to be instructed in the true Protestant religion, who would shun in these last days, and perillous times, the infection of errors and heresies, and all dangerous tenets and opinions, contrary to the word of God.	Dickson, David, 1583?-1663.; Sinclair, George, d. 1696.	1684 (1684)	Wing D1412; ESTC R3405	145,943	378

there can be no midst Eph. 2. 12 13. And so there shall be no difference between the children of Believers and the children of Turks and Pagans 5 Because infants under the Old Testament had right unto the Covenant of Grace Gen. 17. 7 12. And children of Believers under the New Testament have lost no right to that covenant of Grace which children under the Old Testament had seeing the covenant of Grace now under the Gospel is not more strickly and sparingly administred than long since under the law Heb. 8. 6. Rom. 11. 12. 6 Because infants are commanded to joyn themselves to Gods ordinances Ioel 2. 16. 7 Because if Christ while an infant was head of the visible church then infants may be his members But the first is true from Isaiah 9. 6. Therefore the second must be true also 8 Because they whom the false Apostles would have to be circumcised after the manner of Moses and therefore infants were called Disciples Acts 15. 10. Quest. IV. IS there any ordinary possibility of Salvation out of the Visible Church No. Acts 2. 47. Well then do not the Enthusiasts Quakers and Libertines err who affirm that any man may be a true christian and be saved though he live within no Visible Church Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Lord IEHOVAH in his visible Church ordinarly commands the blessing even life for evermore Psalm 133. 3. 2 Because the visible church is the mother of all Believers Gal. 4. 26. By Ierusalem which is above I understand the true Christian Church which seeketh its salvation not by the first covenant of the law namely by the works of the law but by the second of the Gospel namely by the merits of Christ embraced by a true Faith which hath its orginal from heaven by the powerful calling of the Holy Ghost 3 Because they that are without the visible church are without Christ Eph. 2. 12. 4 Why are men and women joyned to the visible church but that they may be saved Acts 2. 47. 5 Because they that are without the visible church are destitute of the ordinary means of life and salvation Psalm 147. 19. 20. Quest. V. HATH Christ given to this Catholick-church-visible the Ministry Oracles and Ordinances of God for the gathering and perfecting of the Saints in this life to the end of the World Yes Shall there be alwayes a church on earth to worship God according to his will Yes 1 cor 12. 28. Eph. 4. 11 12 13. Mat. 28. 19 20. Matth. 16. 18. Psalm 72. 17. Psalm 102. 28. Isai. 59. 21. Well then do not the Socinians Anabaptists and Libertines err who affirm that the visible Church may fail and perish out of the world Yes Do not likewise the Scepticks commonly called Seekers err who affirm that the whole universal church which hath been upon the earth and all religious worship all external and outward preaching of the Word all administration of Sacraments and the use of all other religious things have perished a little after the Apostles times and are not to this day restored until Christ from Heaven shall send new Apostles with an extraordinary commission for restoring and raising up again the visible church And that in the mean time no man hath right or power to dispense the Word or administer the Sacraments or perform any Ecclesiastical duty and that they who are now called the preachers of the Gospel are not so Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Lord hath promised that his church shall endure so long as the ordinances of heaven shall continue Isaiah 66. 22. 2 Because Christ hath promised that the Gates of Hell shal not prevail against his church Matth. 16. 18. 3 Because there is no end to be put to the kingdom of Christ Luke 1. 33. And therefore no end to his church Isaiah 9. 7. 4 Because glory will be to him in the church by Christ Jesus throughout all Ages world without end Amen Eph. 3. 21. 5 Because Christ who hath given power to his Ministers to teach his church and to administer the Sacraments hath promised to be with them to the end of the World Matth. 28. 19 20. 6 Because the Lord hath promised to preserve a people to himself to the end of the world which he shall rule and govern by his Word and Spirit Isaiah 59. 20 21. Isaiah 9. 6 7. 7 Because the Lord hath chosen Zion he hath desired it for his habitation where he will rest and dwell for ever Psalm 132. 13. 14. 8 Because Christ hath given some to be Pastors and Teachers for the perfecting of the Saints till we all come into the unity of the Faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God Eph. 4. 11. And he hath appointed a Ministry to continue even after the Apostles dayes as is evident from 1 Tim. 3 chapter From Titus first chapter where the Apostle sets down the ordinary qualifications of Ministers and the Rules for calling them to the Ministry 9 Because there is a general Rule set down for the government and discipline of Christs church which discipline and order is to continue in it to the end of the world Matth. 1 18. 10 Because the Lord commands that we forsake not the assembling of our selves together and hath promised to bless after a special manner any that are gathered together in his name any where but our assembling for hearing the word of God is done in the name of Christ Heb. 10. 25. Matth. 18. 20. Matth. 28. 20. 11 Because the death of Christ in the last supper is to be shewed till he come 1 Cor. 11. 26. 12 Because by the Word even preached Rom. 10. 17. we are born again 1 Peter 1. 23. Iames 1. 18. By Baptism we are ingrafted into Christ Rom. 6. 3 4. Gal. 3. 27. In the Lords Supper we have communion with Christ 1 Cor. 10. 16. See more to this purpose chap. 21. Question eight Quest. VI. HAth the Catholick church been sometimes more sometimes less Visible Yes Rom. 11. 3 4. Rev. 12. 6 14. Well then do not the Papists err who affirm that the church hath been is and shall be most gloriously Visible to all the whole world far and nigh Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the church of GOD in the Prophet Elijahs time was brought to that pass that he thought none remained but himself 1 Kings 19. 10. Rom. 11. 2 3 4. 2 Because for a long time Israel was without the true GOD and without a teaching Priest and without the Law 2 Chron. 15. 3. 3 Because the Lord often complains that his church and people have forsaken him have not known him that the faithful city hath become a harlot that scarce a man could be found to do justice and follow truth all which is inconsistent with that glorious condition of the visible church which the Papists dream of Isaiah 1. 3 4. Ierm 2. 29. Ierm 5. 1. 4 Because

institution of Marriage for the Lord gave to Adam one wife only Gen. 2. 24. 2 Because the Law of God forbidds expresly Bigamie or two wives Lev. 18. 18. 3 Because the Lord doth find fault sharply with Polygamie many wives Mal. 2. 14 15. 4 Because Christ says he that puts away his wife except in the case of Adultery and marries another committeth adultery Matth. 19. 9. But if it were lawful to have at one time more wives than one he should not be guilty of adultery in marrying another whether he put away the former wife or not 5 Because Bigamie and Polygamie take away the true peace of a wedded life as is evident from the examples of Iacob Gen. 30. And of Elkana 1 Sam. 1. 6. 6 Because the invention of Bigamie was the device of a wicked man Lamech Gen. 4. 19. Quest. II. IS it lawful for all sorts of people to marry who are able with judgement to give their consent Yes Heb. 13. 4. 1 Tim. 4. 3. 1 Cor. 7. 36 37 38. Gen. 24. 57 58. Well then doth not the Popish-Church err that forbids and discharges marriage to their Church men Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because marriage is honourable among all men and the bed undefiled Heb. 13. 4. 2 Because the Apostle commands for avoiding fornication every man to have his own wife and every woman to have her own husband 1 Cor. 7. 2. 3 Because the Apostle reckons up the forbidding of marriage among the doctrines of devils 1 Tim. 4. 3. 4 Because a Bishop must be the husband of one wife 1 Tim. 3. 2. 4. Titus 1. 6. 5 Because the Apostle reckons over the qualifications which are requisite for Bishops wives 1 Tim. 3. 11. 6 Because it can be gathered from Scripture that some of the Apostles and other Ministers of the Gospel have been married persons Concerning Peter the matter is evident Matth. 8. 14. Mark 1. 30. And we read that Philip the Evangelist had four daughters all of them Prophetesses Acts 21. 9. And sayes not the Apostle have we not power to lead about a sister a wife as well as other Apostles and all the brethren of the Lord and Cephas 1 Cor. 9. 5. Quest. III. OUght marriage to be within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity forbidden in the Word No. Can incestuous marriages ever be made lawful by any law of man or consent of parties so as these Persons may live together as man and wife No. 1 Cor 5. 1. Amos 2. 7. Mark 6. 18. Lev. 18. 24 25 26 27 28. Well then doth not the Popish-Church err that speaks in the decrees of the Council of Trent after this manner If any man affirm that these degrees only of Consanguinity or Affinity which are set down in Leviticus may hinder a contract of Marriage to be made or may dissolve a marriage contract already made and that the Church hath not power to dispense with some of these degrees that is to say to permit incest or may not make new Laws and constitute far more forbidden degrees than are exprest in Leviticus let him be an Anathema and accursed Yes By what reasons are they confuted Before this be done take notice that there are here two heads to be considered First Whether or not we must stand to the forbidden degrees of Consanguinity and Affinity exprest in Leviticus Secondly Whether to these degrees set down as forbidden in Leviticus new degrees may be added by the Church of Rome which will render a marriage incestuous To which we answer that it is not in the power of any creature to dispense that is to say to suffer that to be used which is forbidden by the Law of God with any of these Laws in Leviticus which forbid incestuous marriages And next we affirm neither is it in the power of any creature to add to these degrees forbidden in Leviticus any other which are not forbidden 1 Because such a power of dispensing is not to be found in all the Scripture 2 Because the Lord sayes expresly what thing soever I command you observe to do it thou shalt not add thereto nor diminish from it Deut. 12. 32. But the Lord himself hath made these Laws and established these Marches so sure that no Council no Pope no Creature can either dispense with any of them or add new ones to them See Leviticus 18. 3 Because these Laws are of common and perpetual right and therefore cannot be dispensed with For the breach of them is reckoned up amongst the abominations wherewith the Nations about polluted and defiled the land Lev. 18. 24. 25 27. Quest. IV. IS it lawful to marry a second wife after the first is dead Yes Is it lawful after divorce to marry another as if the offending party were dead Yes Matth. 5. 31 32. Rom. 7. 2. 3. Matth. 19. 9. Well then do not the Novatians the Puritans of old truely so called and the Tertullianists err who absolutely condemned second marriages Yes This absurd tenet is confuted from Rom. 7. 2 3. and from 1 Cor. 7. 39. Do not likewise the Papists err who deny that after divorce second marriages are permitted to Christians Yes But here by two distinctions they explain their mind First They distinguish between Cohabitation the Bed and the Ty. The first is the dwelling together of man and woman in one family The second is the right of giving and requiring due benevolence The third is that whereby both are made one whereby the one cannot but be the others while they are both living They distinguish next between persons that are believers and that are unbelievers If then both parties or one of them be unbelievers they grant that the marriage is valide both as to Cohabitation to the marriage bed and to the Ty or Bond. But if both parties be Christians they think that the marriage may be dissolved as to bedding together and Cohabitation yet the Bond standeth sure and abideth unloosable especially if the marriage be contracted after Baptism and therefore a second marriage after divorce is unlawful to any of them But this is easily confuted 1 Because Christ permitted marriage after divorce Matth. 5. 31 32. Matth. 19. 9. Here Christ forbidding a man to put away his wife and to marry another in express words excepts the case of Fornication Therefore he suffers a man to put away his wife in the case of Fornication and to marry another 2 Because the Apostle says but if the unbelieving depart let him depart for a brother or sister is not under bondage in such cases 1 Cor. 7. 15. Therefore if a brother or sister when there is such a wilful and obstinate desertion be not under bondage then surely the Bond is dissolved and all remedies being tryed in vain for bringing back the obstinate party I doubt not but the innocent party may marry another without blame If this be then much more may the innocent party marry another when a Divorce is obtained Quest.

V. IS nothing but Adultery or such wilful desertion as can no way be remedied by the Church or Civil Magistrate a sufficient cause of dissolving the bond of Marriage Nothing Matth. 19. 8 9. 1 Cor. 7. 15. Matth. 19. 6. Well then do not the Enthusiasts and Familists err who maintain that it is free to a man to put away his wife when he pleaseth Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the God of Israel hatteth putting away Mal. 2. 16. 2 Because whosoever putteth away his wife except in case of Fornication he causeth her to commit Adultery Matth. 5 32. 3 Because the Apostle says art thou bound to a wife seek not to be loosed 1 Cor. 7. 27. Do not likewise the Papists err who maintain that there are other causes of divorce than Adultery and wilful desertion Yes They first tell us that marriage contracted but not consummated may be dissolved to wit by a Monastick Vow of a perpetual single life They tell us secondly that infidelity and heresie are just causes of divorce So say the Anabaptists And thirdly they tell us that murder committed upon the hope of getting such a Match is a sufficient cause of divorce That coldness perpetual impotency and such like fancies are causes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Christ says what God hath joyned together let no man put asunder Matth. 19. 6. But marriage contracted and ratified though not consummated is made by God therefore it cannot be dissolved by man Neither ought any man once married to turn a Monck for a single life is only fit for those that have the gift of Continency for God commands them that have it not to marry 1 Cor. 7. 9. 2 Neither can infidelity or heresie be a ground of divorce as is clear from 1 Cor. 7. 12 13. If any brother hath a wife that believeth not and she be pleased to dwell with him let him not put her away And the woman that hath an husband that believeth not if he be pleased to dwell with her let her not leave him CHAP. XXV Of the CHURCH Question I. DOTH the Catholick or Universal Church which is invisible consist of the whole number of Elect that have been are or shall be gathered into one under Christ the head thereof Yes Eph. 1. 10 22 23. Eph. 5. 23 27. Col. 1. 18. Well then doth not the Popish-Church err who deny any Catholick invisible Church consisting of the Elect only effectually called who maintain the Catholick Church to be absolutely visible and as visible a Society as the Republick of Venice or the kingdom of France and that it consists no less of reprobates unbelievers great and manifest sinners void of all inward and true grace than of the Elect effectually called Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because we profess to believe according to the Creed that there is a Church Universal namely such a one as we have now described but what we believe must be invisible Heb. 11. 1. 2 Because the internal form of the Church namely her effectual calling by the Word and Spirit 1 Peter 2. 9. is invisible 2 Tim. 2. 19. 1 Cor. 2. 11. 3 Because the glory of the Kings daughter that is of the Universal Church as the Adversaries themselves confess is internal and therefore hidden and invisible Psalm 45. 13. 4 Because the Word tells us that there is a Church even the number of those whom Christ hath loved for whom he gave himself to the death whom he hath sanctified and washen and cleansed and redeemed with his own blood and whom at last he will glorifie Eph. 5. 25 26 27. 5 Because the Scripture tells that there is a Church which is the mystical body of Christ and therefore invisible to the eyes which by a most mystical and most marvelous union is conjoyned and united straitly with him Eph. 1. 10 22 23. 6 Because the Church Universal as to its internal forme is a spiritual house built of lively stones in Christ 1 Peter 2. 5. 7 Because the members of the Church Universal considered as to their internal state and condition are united and conjoyned together in one body by one Spirit and by one Faith 1 Cor. 12. 13. Eph. 4. 4 5. 8 Because the members of the Church Universal considered the former way are the lively members of Christ which he himself doth cherish with a lively and quickning nurishment Eph. 5. 29 30. Quest. II. IS the Visible Church under the New Testament Catholick and Universal Yes 1 Cor. 1. 2. and 1 Cor. 12. 12 13. Psal. 2. 8. Rev. 7. 9. Rom. 15. 9 10 11 12. Well then do not the Independents err who maintain there is no Visible Church under the New Testament except what may meet in one place and may perform all their holy services in a private Church Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because in very many places of the New Testament the word Church to wit Visible is so largely taken that it cannot be restricted to any particular Congregational Church Acts 8. 3. Gal. 1. 13. Acts 2. 47. 1 Cor. 10. 32. Eph. 3. 10. 1 Cor. 12. 28. 1 Tim. 3. 15. 2 Because it hath been foretold in many places of the Old Testament that the Catholick Church shall be Visible Psalm 22. 22 23 25 27 28. Psalm 72. 8 9 10 11. Psalm 86. 9. Isaiah 2. 2 3 4. Zech. 14. 9. 3 Because the Donation or the gift of the kingdom that is of the Church Universal made by the Father to the Son is Universal and of all the World Psalm 2. 8. Psalm 72. 8. Isaiah 49. 6. Dan. 7. 14. 4 Because the Gospel of the Kingdom is Universal and according to the stile of the Scripture worketh the visible conversion of the whole world and therefore the Church visibly converted and gathered together is Catholick and Universal Matth. 26. 13. Mark 14. 9. Col. 1. 16. 5 Because the Visible Charter which constitutes the Church is Universal and therefore since one Charter constitutes one Politie or Government all the Visible particular Churches which are constitute by that one Catholick Charter are one Church Universal Matth. 28. 19. Eph. 3. 6. 6 Because if there be Officers of a Church Visible Universal there must be a Church Visible Universal it self but the first is true since the Donation of the Ministry and the giving of it in a gift is made to the Catholick Church 1 Cor. 12 28. Matth. 28. 19. 7 Because there is a general outward call and a general outward covenant into which all Christians enter outwardly by vertue whereof all of them are knit and tyed together Acts 2. 39. 8 Because that same individual System and Body of external Laws proceeding from that same Authority in which all particular Churches are equally concerned and by which they are ruled is Universal 1 Tim. chap. 3. and Titus 3 chap. 9 Because that external union of brotherhood which is amongst all the Visible Christians

in the world is Catholick and Universal Acts 15. 23. Acts 24. 14. Gal. 5. 14. 10 Because the initial Visible seal admittance and enrowlment are things Catholick and Oecumenical For he that takes up his freedom in a whole Corporation or Kingdom is free of the whole and in every part thereof and hath right to all the general priviledges and immunities thereof There is a Patent for Baptism Go and baptize all Nations And by vertue of the Priviledges thereof they that are baptized in any one Church are accounted visible subjects of Christs Kingdom in all places of the Christian world Matth. 28. 19. 11 Because all Churches are one Body Rom. 12. 5. 12 Because Peter writting to the strangers scattered abroad throughout Pontus Galatia Cappadocia Asia and Bithynia calleth them all one Flock 1 Peter 5. 2. 13 Because all the Churches of the World are one sheepfold Iohn 10. 16. 14 Because the Visible Church is one great house 2 Tim. 2. 20. Quest. III. DOTH the Visible Church consist of all those thorowout the world that profess the Christian Religion together with their Children Yes 1 Cor. 1. 2. Psalm 2. 8. 1 Cor. 7. 14. Well then do not the Donatists Anabaptists and Puritans of old so truely named err who affirm the visible Church to consist of those only that are pious and holy Yes Do not likewise the Independents err who think none ought to be members of the Visible Church save those who in the judgement of men very spiritual and discerning are esteemed true believers and saints who have given sufficient proof of their knowledge in the fundamentals of Religion who have reported in order and given a good account of the experimental work of their conversion and effectual calling who have shewed their conversation in the world to have been without the omission of any known duty or commission of any known fault and that for a considerable length of time Yes Do not lastly the Quakers err who think the only visible Church of GOD on earth to be themselves and all others not of their profession and practise to be unregenerate and wanting the Spirit Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the visible Church is compared to a Garner in which there is not only Wheat but Chaff mixed with it To a Field in which Tares and Darnel are mixed among the good Corn. To a Net in which both good Fishes and bad are taken Matth. 13. chapter To a great House wherein are not only vessels of Gold and Silver but of Wood and of Earth 2 Tim. 2. 20. 2 Because Christ will answer some at the last day who will say to him Lord have not we Prophesied in thy name and in thy name casten out Devils and have we not eaten and drunken at thy table I know you not This evidently shews that many have been members of the Visible Church whom Christ will not own at the last day Matth. 7. 22 23. 3 From the Parable of the ten Virgins five whereof were foolish five wise Matth. 25. 1. 4 From the Parable of the Banquet where one was found at the Table without a Wedding Garment Matth. 22. 11. 5 Because many are of the Visible Church who are not of the invisible Church 1 Iohn 2. 19. 6 Because the Apostle calls the Church of Corinth the Church of Christ notwithstanding of their gross enormities 1 Cor. 1. 11. 1 Cor. 3. 3. 1 Cor. 5. 1. 1 Cor. 6. 7. 7 Because Moses did acknowledge even those then to be members of the Visible Church to whom yet he knew the Lord had not given ears to hear nor eyes to see nor a heart to understand the great and wonderful miracles which he wrought in their sight Deut. 29. 10 11 12 13. compared with the verses 2 3 4. 8 Because Iohn the Baptist did admit many thousands into the communion of the Visible Church without making a narrow search of their true grace and conversion Matth. 3. 9 Because the Apostles did instantly and without the delay of one day baptise all those that professed the Christian Religion Acts 2. 38 41. Acts 8. 12. Iohn 3. 26. 10 Because the preaching of the Gospel is appointed by God as an ordinary mean no less for the Conversion of men and women than for the advancement of those in grace that are converted Prov. 9 3 4. 2 Cor. 5. 18 19. 20 2 Tim. 2. 24 25 11 Because we are forbidden by the Apostle to judge the spiritual state and condition of our neighbour Rom. 14. 4. 12 Because Christ did acknowledge Iudas the Theif and Traitor as a member of his Visible Church whom yet he foresaw to be the son of perdition Matth. 26. 23. 13 Because Christ had a visible church on earth many hundered of years before ever there were such cattle as Quakers in the World Unless they will alledge that the primitive Christians and all the Saints since the Apostles dayes have been their Predecessors and claime kin to them as the Samaritans did to Iacob who were truely descended of the heathen who were brought thither out of Assyria as the Quakers are descended from the Enthusiasts in Germany about 160 years since as Nicolas Strokins Iohn Matthias and Iohn of Leyden notorious Hereticks blasphemers and bloody Murderers But how quite different the Quakers are to the primitive christians and holy men of God then and since will evidently appear hence that they did not contemn these two great ordinances of the Gospel instituted by Christ to wit Baptism and the Lords Supper They had Bishops and Deacons to govern and instruct them who were ordained to their functions by prayer and imposition of hands whom they did not revile with the ugly names of dumb dogs and hirelings These primitive christians had not in their assemblies Women-preachers as the Quakers have which is down right contrary to Pauls injunctions 1 Cor. 14. 35. Neither were silent meetings ever heard of among the primitive christians Nor did they ever out of contempt call churches places appointed for the publick worship of God Steeple-houses but resorted to them for performing their devotions and service to God as did our blessed Saviour and his Apostles Iohn 18. 20. Luke 4. 16. Acts 3. 1. Acts 13. 5. Do not likewise the Papists and Lutherians err who will have none members of the visible Church that are unbaptized Yes Do not lastly the Anabaptists err who will have no infants members of the visible church Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because that God commanded infants and little ones should stand before him should enter into covenant with him Deut. 29. 10 11. 2 Because infants are called the people of God no less than men and women come to age Deut. 29. 11 12 13. 3 Because the promise of Grace belongs to children as well as to the parents Acts 2. 39. 4 If children be not members of the visible church they must be members of the visible kingdom of the devil for