Selected quad for the lemma: christian_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
christian_n	baptize_v	child_n	infant_n	1,168	5	9.1746	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A25460	Fides Catholica, or, The doctrine of the Catholick Church in eighteen grand ordinances referring to the Word, sacraments and prayer, in purity, number and nature, catholically maintained, and publickly taught against hereticks of all sorts : with the solutions of many proper and profitable questions sutable to to [sic] the nature of each ordinance treated of / by Wil. Annand ...	Annand, William, 1633-1689.	1661 (1661)	Wing A3218; ESTC R36639	391,570	601

by some Hereticks of this generation who dips sometimes the adult by setting them upon their knees and dipping their heads in the baptist●ry pronounceth the words of the institution and infants after the same manner where without danger it may be done witness the reformed Churches of Helvet Art 21. of Sax. Art 13. The Assemblies direct Chap. 28 and the Church of England in her Rubrick or book of Common Prayer Quest. 2. Whether Infants ought not to be baptized By infants we understand such as are born of Christian parents unto whom the promise of salvation is only made and given Acts 2.39 The infants of others viz. of Heathens of Infidels being without God are also without Christ and so without hope of Eternal life Ephes. 2 12. That such infants as are born within the pale of the visible Church may be baptized that is dipped sprinkled or any other way decently washed in the name of the Lord appears from these following reasons 1. From the end of that Ordinance there are marks or distinctions that the Church of God ought to be known by and never was without one of which is baptisme as circumcision was to differ the Iew from all that were without God unto which baptisme succeeds as shall anon be proved Now to difference therefore the children of believing parents from the children of such as believe not baptisme may be Administred to them and ought 2. To them the Covenant of grace or promise of remission of sins belongs Act 2.39 the promise is unto you and to your children and to all that are af●r off that is the promise of the remission of sin of which baptisme is an outward sign and if our Adversaries were not wilfully blinde they would know what it were to be afar off Eph●s 2.13 Now the promise of the forgiveness of sins belonging to infants through the largeness of grace what should hinder but the sign of that ought to be given by the Churches charity And when shall the Adversaries of this truth finde out one place that the Covenant of grace made to believers under the Gospel is not so large as that to believers under the Law which included not themselves only but all their seed Gen. 17.10.11.12 Never Never Never 3. Unto them belongs the Kingdom of Christ Luke 18.15 All the graces that lead to Heaven and all the glory that is in Heaven belongs and is appointed for them and such as them This testimony of him who is Truth it self hath sufficient proof to discover the lawfulness even of Baptisme to such since that is a sign or earnest of their inheritance 4. Infants are Disciples of Christ He that receives one of them receiveth him and it is dangerous to offend one of those little ones that believe in him c. Matth. 18.4 5 6. Of whom doth our Saviour speak this Of that little child before him or of them that are little in the account of the world We say or then we say falsely that he speaks of both and whereas our adversaries then concludes it were dangerous to offend or anger children We conclude with them and truly it is dangerous to offend one of those little ones if it be purely upon the account that they belong to Christ as we know hath been done by Turks Jewes and Papists not otherwise for in some cases that may be a sin even against the Gospel not to offend them 5. Infants under the Law were circumcised therefore under the Gospel they are to be baptized Hence it is that Baptisme is called Circumcision 2 Col. 12. where the Apostle throws off circumcision of the flesh and placeth baptizing in the room of it And as all Iewish Proselytes were circumcised before they were owned as Gods people and therefore called upon to be circumcised so all converted to the Christian Faith were baptized before they were owned or declared Christians though both the one and the other belonged to God by faith before and were therefore called to be baptized In a word let the use and end of Circumcision be inquired after and Baptisme exactly answers it in all points It is true Circumcision was given onely to the Male because the Female was uncapable of it but both Sexes are capable sufficiently of this Sacrament and therefore to be denied to neither Acts 8.12 6. Christ gave commandment that all Disciples should be baptized Matth. 28.9 Disciple all Nations for so it is in the Greek reading Baptizing them teaching them so that all that are Disciples in all Nations are to be baptized And that even Children are Disciples appears Matth. 18.4.5 6. For whosoever receiveth even one of them in his Name receiveth him and he who offends one of them offendeth him of whom can this be said but of Disciples 7. Infants are holy and have the promise of the holy Ghost 1 Cor. 7.14 If the Parent be holy and within the Covenant then the child is holy also to say that by Holyness here is meant not bastards is to say nothing to the sence and scope of the place and to say fondly to preserve their own Diana except Holy in the Language of the Holy Ghost in another place be taken in that sence which they shall never be able to find It is also promised the Beleiver that his child shall have clean water poured upon him which is the Sign and the Spirit powred upon his seed the thing signified by that water Isa. 44.3 Can any man therefore forbid water that these children should not be baptized which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we Acts 10.47 8. From that Opposition made against Christian liberty by some Jewish Zelots may we draw an Argument of weight There were some that were alwayes pressing the point of Circumcision according to the law to have the Christians not altogether to eye Baptisme but with it Circumcision Acts 15.1 Now that Circumcision was administred upon Infants is clear and as clear it is again that the Iewes seeing that liberty that Christians assumed under the Gospel would have had them lay a great part of it aside particularly baptisme which they might have seen believers to administer upon all their seed and this makes them press Circumcision the more eagerly an Argument more then probable that the Christians baptized their Infants in those dayes when that opposition was made 9. There is nothing in the Scripture that makes against it God had but two Churches that of the Iewes in which children and Infants were marked with that Initiatory ordinance of Circumcision and by that were within the Covenant and Members of his house whereby the Parent had this comfort that God was not onely his God but the God of his seed the other Church was that of the Gentiles every member of which is a son of faithful Abraham Now when God made Lawes for the Gospel would he not have in some place or other shew● that he intended not the seal of the Covenant which is the

or her pleasure openly expound and preach the Gospel that it was no lawfull for a Minister to have humane learning or that it was unl●wf●ll to hear such that it was and would be unlawful for Ministers to prepare themselves to preach by study that it was unlawful for a Gospel-Minister not to have some handy Trade and work in a Mechanick way for his living Ought they not since it was known to have been long used by Gods people before the Law and by his people after the Law to have told that to receive Tythes now was to deny that Christ was come in the flesh why was it not told us that the whole ●●sterity of man whether of Heathens or Christians during their Infancy are pure and holy there being no Originall sin why did not that wise Master builder lay his foundation aright and show us that to enter any into th● Church by Baptism without declaration of Faith and Repentance though born of holy parents was a sin and also if any such thing were done in the name of the holy Trinity wherein consists the essence of Baptisme with the application of the spirit which is not hindred by Infancy yet that they ought to be baptized again Why did they not inform the Church that though God was pleased to receive the Children of the Jews so far into his favour as to give them the outward sign of his Covenant with the Fathers viz. by circumcision yet would not have the Children of Christians to receive the outward sign of his Covenant with their Fathers viz. by Baptism Why did they not inform us that there were none baptized nor none should account themselves baptized except they were plunged or dipped in a River And that any member of the Church might do that why did he not tell us that it was and would be a sin for one to teach his child to say the Lords Prayer or call God father since they had no faith in Christ Why do they not shew us that to be in a place hearing his word with those that were not all holy was a great sin before God and that there should be a parity in the Church of God That no civill Magistrate hath any power at all to be command any thing to be done in the Church of God and that no Christian ought to pray in a set form and therefore that the Lords prayer was not to be used yea was as abominable unto God as Swines flesh unto a Jew as I have read some of them do however we know it is disused by them all Why was it not told us that to receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper was either a vain thing or an indifferent thing or to eat it with unholy persons a sinful thing and also that any one that had gifts might administer the same or that the profit of the Sacraments depended upon the goodness or holynesse of him that gave it or did administer them These with a thousand more are the Principles that our Hereticks walke and teach by and if they be true doctrine how long hath the Church been without truth and in matters of greatest concernment as Preaching the word and Sacraments Why did not the Apostles once at least encourage Christians to persevere in Holiness upon the account of Christs comming personally to Reign upon Earth and why would they not tell that it was a decent holy seemly thing to hear a woman Preach It seems strange that neither by word nor by Epistle this was made known that any man might assume the office of the Ministry unto himself though he were not outwardly called as was Aaron why would they not tell us that Ordination was but a toy and was not to continue longer then themselves But what am I doing If these be true Churches and this Doctrine true Gospel the Apostles have been faithlesse and unjust I speak it trembling for no such thing did they ever teach but the contrary we finde them often times in the Scripture handling those very points and laies down contrary conclusions particularly Heb. 5.4 speaking of Priest-hood in generall and of Christs in particular who is the high Priest of the Gospel saies no man taketh this honour to himself but he that is called as was Aaron And that Aaron had an outward call for that Office and was deputed and set apart for that function in a publick way is clear from Ex. 29. and Levit. 9. Rom. 5.12 where the Apostle handling the infectious nature of sin maintains That by one man sin entered into the World and death by sin and so death passed upon all men for that all had sinned viz. by the sin of that one man I can find here no exception of Infants which if true doctrine the wisedome of God would have discovered in such an apt and proper place And truly that Infants should dye having no sin since death is the wages of sin Rom. 6 23. is a Doctrine that either charges God with unjustice or St. Paul with a falshood or at least a grosse mistake Of Baptizing of Infants we shall speak in it's own place and touching receiving the Sacrament of the Lords Supper with a mixed Congregation in its propper season and of Dipping when we come to the Font. Touching the peoples Ordination let the Scripture be produced that gives the people power for to set apart a Lay or Mechanick or any person and to constitute him a Church-Officer in the least Let the Scripture be produced that gives a power to a multitude so to do or that approves of a mans assuming to himself the power ministerially to teach Baptize give the Sacrament of the Lords Supper show or produce me that Scripture that gives authority to a Lay-man such a one we count him that is not Ordained by an Ecclesiastick person according to Apostolicall Tradition to bind or lose to cast out of the Church by judicial Excommunication or ●o receive in by authoritative absolution I say again let any of our ●ereticks produce me that Scripture show that text and I here promise them to renounce my Ordination forsake my calling and deny my Baptisme For I am not ignorant that the whole stream of the Scripture goes smoothly in another Channel If these or any of these be Churches then the candle hath never been upon a candlestick the City hath never been upon a hil Kings have never been her Nursing Fathers nor Queens her nursing Mothers except Iohn Buckhold alias Iohn of Layden with his fifteen Wives which Iohn being a Botcherly Taylour was by a mad crew of Anabaptists despisers and otherwise opposers of all government appointed King at Munster in Germany An 1534. where wearing Royall Robes of Embroidered work Spurs of gold Scabbards of gold and two Crowns of gold he had his Chancellours Cup-beares Carvers one holding up the holy Bible and another a naked Sword the handle whereof glistered with gold and pretious stones went before his Botcherly Majesty

is free to all and tyed to none be that comes weary with the burthen of his sins shall finde ease and rest with as much haste as he that shall come groaning under the same with a present of gold in his hand Matth. 11.28 SECT III. THe ends why God appointed this Ordinance to be continued in his Church are best known to himself we are to submit to the practice of it contenting our selves with his precept without urgeing his reason yet a Posteriore we may know be designed it 1. For the distinguishing our profession baptisme is Character Regius We know a foot-boy by his habit a Souldier by his colours and by baptis●e we know by whom the baptized expects to be saved by it we are distinguished from Turk Iew Pagan and from all that looks not for salvation through the Son of God as a Kings servant is known by his badge so a Christian by this sign He that is baptized hath put on Christ. 2. For assureing us of our regeneration baptisme is an outward visible sign of our being washed or sprinkled with the Holy Ghost Mat 3.11 which is called a baptisme with fire following after that of water so that even from the baptismal water may a believer draw an argument of his salvation and the assurance of his sanctifiation Acts 22.16 hence it is that baptisme is said to save us 1 Pet. 3.21 that is seals unto us or is a sign of that redemption purchased sed by Christ whence also it is that baptisme and remission of sins usually go together in the Gospel Acts 2.38 Mat. 3.6 Eph. 5.26 3. For the quickening of us unto mortification Gospel repentance is the fruit and consequent of Gospel baptisme It is the end of that Sacramental water to bring the sinner to a spiritual acknowledgement of his sin and engages him against the time to come to be more watchful against it if he be adult And also causes sorrow of heart for his not closing up to the terms of that Covenant which by baptisme he is tyed unto if he received it being an infant Matth. 3.11 4. To assure us of a comfortable resurrection by baptisme we Sacramentally are buried with Christ and therefore certainly shall rise with him leaving nothing behind us but our grave clothes our sins and our lusts Not that here is defended that doctrine of the Church of Rome that baptisme wholly takes away Original sin but where God is pleased to cause the thing signified to accompany the sign there corruption begins to lose ground especially if the party dye in infancy for then God will sanctifie it by water through the word Rom. 6.4 5. 5. For the Christian Parents consolation if Rachel among the Heathen have her Children taken from her she may make great lamentation and there is none to comfort her in regard that she being out of the Church her Children are without God but the Christian Parent unto whose seed salvation is entailed having the promise made sure both to him and them may comfort himself knowing that his baptized infant had all things requisite and necessary for salvation had the visible sign of the invisible birth was baptized with water after which follows the baptizing with fire not that we tye this last unto the first for unto such as belong to the Election of grace the want of baptisme is not imputed as their sin but a sin it is and shall be to their Parents who neglect this Ordinance appointed by God as a sign of their childes sanctification and a declarative mark of their New birth and a visible token of their being cleansed from Original sin Acts 2.39 which made believers call for it with speed Act. 8.36 Acts 16.33 Acts 22.16 SECT IV. THat this Sacrament must be Administred by water on all hands is granted but the manner of the application of that water is by some controverted whether by sprinkling or by dipping or any other way that is decent and comelys the word baptize signifying either of the two former and is put for any kind of washing as of cups pots tables Mark 7.4 the Greek reading is when they come from the market except they baptize they eat not And many other things they do as the baptizing of cups pots tables some other sence therefore must be given to the word then dipped And from those places wherein mention is made of baptizeing at a river as Mat. 3.16 it cannot be proved that the party was stripped of his garments and was wholly dipped in the water besides we read of diverss baptized and no river mentioned Acts 16.47 Acts 16.33 for any thing that can be produced the parties might go down to the river and come up out of the water yet not be plunged in but sprinkled with the same in regard that whereever I finde the word baptize I may truely understand either or any other kind of washing the word being of a large signification and will not naturally nay cannot be limited to any one sence Yet to grant what for the most can be granted the Primitive Christians did dip and other Churches yea the Church of England allows no other way save in cases of necessity by appointing dipping So it be discreatly and w●vily done and usually performs it so to any whom she baptizes adult but approves also of sprinkling if the parties be weak and ordinarily that way is performed in regard of infants So that dipping is put aside not as unlawful but as inconvenient and sprinkling used not as necessary but as most proper for however in the Eastern and hot countries they might dip their infants in water without harm yet in our Northern and cold climate as it is the first Sacrament given so it might be the last act done so a living 〈◊〉 the next might be to bury it We conclude therefore ●●at since the particular manner of the application of the outward ●gn is not expresly set down in Scripture but in a word that generally signifies dipping sprinkling or any other kinde of washing this left to the practice of the Church to do which way she thinks to be best keeping that golden rule 1 Cor. 14.40 Let all things be done desen●ly and in order for since God hath not tyed her she is not to be bound either to dipping or sprinkling but may indifferently use either the application of the outward Element of water to the party baptized is all God requires but to what place is ought to be applied and how much water must be used the Scripture is silent in SECT V. THe Sacrament of baptisme hath suffered a double injury first in being limitted only to dipping which is absolutely denies as hath been in part proved and in the next Section God willing shall be further demonstrated 2ly this dipping to be performed by any gifted brother at all times or by women in case of necessity as is maintained by two of different yet both he erodox perswasions for the present

part of the substance of that Sacrament for when the Minister dipping the infant in water or laying of water upon the face of it hath pronounced these words I baptize thee in the name of the Father c. the infant is fully and perfectly baptized so as the sign of the Cross being afterwards used doth neither adde any thing to the vertue or perfection of baptisme nor being omitted doth detract any thing from the effect and substance of it 2. It is apparent in the Common Prayer book that the infant babtized is by vertue of baptisme before it be signed with the sign of the Cross received into the Congregation of Christs stock as a perfect member thereof and not by any power ascribed unto the sign of the Cross. So that for the very remembrance of the Cross which is very precious to all them that rightly believe in Jesus Christ and in the other respects mentioned the Church of England hath retained still the sign of it in baptisme following herein the primitive and Apostolical Churches and accounting it a lawful outward Ceremony and honourable badge whereby the infant is dedicated to the service of him who dyed upon the Cross as by words used in the book of Common Prayer it may appear Lastly The use of the sign of the Cross in baptisme being thus purged from all Popish superstition and errour and reduced in the Church of England to the primary institution of it upon those true rules of doctrine concerning things indifferent which are consonant to the word of God and the judgements of all the Ancient Fathers we hold it the part of every private man both Minister and others reverently to retain the true use of it prescribed by publick authority considering that things of themselves indifferent do in some sort alter their nature when they are either commanded or forbidden by a lawfull Magistrate and may not be omitted at every mans pleasure contrary to the Law when they be commanded nor used when they are prohibited The usual Objection against this harmless Ceremony is this Viz. what need is there of it but if Magistrates should not establish Lawes until every one of their Subjects were rationally convinced of their necessity when should there be Lawes made and many that makes this a sufficient Argument against the Crosse in Baptisme may remember that when they had power and fate at the Helm there were many things commanded of which we might have said What need they To conclude what ever is established by lawful Magistrates we are not to inquire the Reason of it Reason and Religion commanding us to obey without all Dispute for the Lords sake There being many things in the Church of Christ of themselves low and poor yet in regard of others so necessarie that she may say of them as our Saviour said of the Asse The Lord hath need of them Courteous Reader THis following Chapter was not so fully Preached as here handled in regard that the Iniquitie of the Times wherein these things were taught would from this chiefly have concluded the Preachers Malignancy whereby he should have been Crucified by an Ordinance By vertue of that Rule estote prudentes Matthew 10.16 it was passed over in a few words and they so clouded that it might have appeared the Preacher was not willing to be throughly understood CHAP. III. Of Confirmation THis is not here handled as a Sacrament but is placed as the space between the Font and the Table it being a most solemn Ordinance that the Baptized as in the ancient Churches was to be partaker of before he might be admitted to the Sacracrament of the Lords Supper Before we go any further it is necessary to speak something touching the rise of this word Confirmation in the Church which was briefly this In the Primitive Church when there were any persons wiling to imbrace the Christian Faith whether Iewes or Infidels they were not by and by admitted into the Priviledges of the Church but by certain ●teps or degrees set their foot therein 1. By hearing they were admitted to the hearing of the Word taught Catechized or Expounded which was common to them with men of all kinds whether Christians or not yet these were more particularly regarded by the Church and were called Audientes 2. By Catechizing having heard in common with others some grounds of the true faith and liked it they were after admitted in ● peculiar way and performing some Ceremony were admitted both to hear and see more in the Church then the Audientes were had the Principles of Religion taught them by eminent men purposely thereunto appointed who were called Catechista and their Disciples Catechum●ni Hence it is said that Theophilus is said to be instructed or as the word Originally is Catechized in the things of Christ 1 Luke 4. 3. By requesting that is having been Catechized and making good progress in the Christian principles and desireing to be owned as professors of the same they desired and required the Sacrament of baptisme which they did by giving in their names to the officers of the Church forty dayes before Easter that and Whitsunday being the publick dayes appointed by the Church for baptizing the Catechumeni and in regard of their number these two dayes being insufficient they set the two days following each of the former for that service apart from this giveing in their names they were called competentes quia nomina dederunt ad baptismum eum simul petebant 4. By baptizing after this upon the aforesaid dayes they were brought to the font or Baptistery and publickly and severally asked Credis in D●um Patrem Believest thou in God the Father c. the party said Credo c. So was baptized and called hence baptizati and looked upon as Members of the body of Christ yet incompleate and imperfect that is weak Christians being newly born 5. By confirming that is having been baptized and so owned as visible Members of the Church they were brought before the Bishop or chief Officer of the place and before him openly making a declaration of his faith and resolution to walk in the same was confirmed by a solemn calling upon God in prayer unto which was annexed the outward sign of imposition of hands by the Bishop that God would strengthen and confirm the baptized in that faith wherein he was baptized and whereof he had made profession after which prayer and imposition of hands he was declared a perfect Church Member that is fitted for the receiving of all Church priviledges particularly the Sacrament of the supper unto which the Church in this had a peculiar respect which is a great confirmer of the faith of the Saints Hence they were called Fideles and were of full age men in Christ Iesus and received Imposition of hands signifying that the Lord blessed them ut pleni Christiani inveniantur This is confirmation and laid down by the Apostle as a Christian Principle