Selected quad for the lemma: christian_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
christian_n	baptism_n	baptize_v	infant_n	1,991	5	9.3594	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A04286	An apologie for the oath of allegiance first set foorth without a name, and now acknowledged by the authour, the Right High and Mightie Prince, Iames, by the grace of God, King of Great Britaine, France and Ireland, defender of the faith, &c. ; together with a premonition of His Maiesties, to all most mightie monarches, kings, free princes and states of Christendome.	James I, King of England, 1566-1625.; Paul V, Pope, 1552-1621.; Bellarmino, Roberto Francesco Romolo, Saint, 1542-1621.	1609 (1609)	STC 14401.5; ESTC S1249	109,056	264

the losse of his kingdome and life as the recordes of antiquitie doe euidently testifie See Lambertus Schafnaburg at the yeere 1077. Abbas Vispergen at the yeere 1075. The authour of the life of Henry 4. Bruno in his Historie of the Saxon warre Laziard in epitom vniuersal Histor c. 193. Cuspian in Henric. 4. Sigonius de Regno Italiae lib. 9. Tortus p. 83. 3 The trueth of the History of Alexander 3. treading vpon the necke of Fredericke Barbarossa with his foote may bee iustly doubted of Confutation But no Historian doubteth of it and many doe auouch it as Hieronym Bard. in victor Naual ex Bessarion Chronico apud Baro. ad ann 1177. num 5. Gerson de potestate Ecclésiae consid 11. Iacob Bergom in supplem Chron. ad an 1160. Nauclerus Gener 40. Petrus Iustinian li. 2. Rerum Venetar Papirius Masson lib. 5. de Episcop vrbis who also alledgeth for this Gennadius Patriarch of Constantinople Besides Alphonsus Ciacconius de vit Pontif. in Alexand. 3. and Azorius the Iesuite Instit Moral part 2. lib. 5. c. 43. Tortus p. 83. 4 What other thing feared Frederick Barbarossa but Excommuniticaon Confutation That Frederick feared onely Pope Alexander his Excommunication no ancient Historian doeth testifie But many doe write that this submission of his was principally for feare of loosing his Empire and Dominions See for this Martin Polon ad an 1166. Platina in vita Alexand. 3. Laziard in epitom Historiae vniuersal c. 212. Naucler generat 40. Iacobus Wimphelingus in epitom Rerum Germanic c. 32. Tortus p. 88. 5 Adde heereunto that Cuspinian in relating the history of the Turks brother who was poysoned by Alexander 6. hath not the consent of other Writers to witnesse the trueth of this History Confutation The same History which is reported by Cuspinian is recorded also by sundry other famous Historians See Francis Guicciardin lib. 2. Histor Ital. Paulus Iouius lib. 2. Hist sui temporis Sabellic Ennead 10. lib. 9. Continuator Palmerij at the yeere 1494. ¶ The nouell Doctrines with a briefe declaration of their Noueltie Nouell doctrine p. 9. 1 IT is agreed vpon amongst all that the Pope may lawfully depose Hereticall Princes and free their Subiects from yeelding obedience vnto them Confutation Nay all are so farre from consenting in this poynt that it may much more truely be auouched that none entertained that conceit before Hildebrand since he was the first broacher of this new doctrine neuer before heard of as many learned men of that age and the age next following to omit others of succeeding ages haue expresly testified See for this poynt the Epistle of the whole Clergie of Liege to Pope Paschal the 2. See the iudgement of many Bishops of those times recorded by Auentine in his history lib. 5. fol. 579. Also the speech vttered by Conrade Bishop of Vtrecht in the sayd 5. booke of Auentine fol. 582. And another by Eberhardus Arch-Bishop of Saltzburge Ibid. lib. 7. p. 684. Also the iudgement of the Arch-Bishop of Triers in constitut Imperialib à M. Haimensfeldio editis pag. 47. The Epistle of Walthram Bishop of Megburgh which is extant in Dodechine his Appendix to the Chronicle of Marianus Scotus at the yere 1090. Benno in the life of Hildebrand The author of the booke De vnitate Ecclesiae or the Apologie for Henry the 4. Sigebert in his Chronicle at the yeare 1088. Godfrey of Viterbio in his History intituled Pantheon part 17. Otho Frisingensis lib. 6. c. 35. praefat in lib. 7. Frederick Barbarossa lib. 6. Gunther Ligurin de gestis Frederici and lib. 1. c. 10. of Raduicus de gestis eiusdem Frederici Vincentius in speculo historiali lib. 15. c. 84. with sundry others Nouell Doctrine p. 51. 2 In our supernaturall birth in Baptisme wee are to conceiue of a secret and implied oath which wee take at our new birth to yeelde obedience to the spirituall Prince which is Christs Vicar Confutation It is to be wondered at whence this fellow had this strange new diuinity which surely was first framed in his owne fantastical brain Else let him make vs a Catalogue of his Authours that holde and teach that all Christians whether infants or of age are by vertue of an othe taken in their Baptisme bound to yeeld absolute obedience to Christs Vicar the Pope or baptized in any but in Christ Nouell Doctrine p. 94. 2 But since that Catholike doctrine doth not permit for the auoidance of any mischiefe whatsoeuer to discouer the secret of Sacramental confession he Garnet rather chose to suffer most bitter death then to violate the seale of so great a Sacramēt Confutation That the secret of Sacramentall confession is by no meanes to bee disclosed no not indirectly or in generall so the person confessing be concealed for auoydance and preuention of no mischiefe how great soeuer Besides that it is a position most daungerous to all Princes and Common wealths as I shew in my Premonition pag. 122 123. it is also a Nouell Assertion not heard of till of late dayes in the Christian worlde Since the common opinion euen of the Schoolemen and Canonistes both olde and newe is vnto the contrary Witnesse these Authours following Alexand. Hales part 4. qu. 78. mem 2. art 2. Thom. 4. dist 21. q. 3. art 1. ad 1. Scotus in 4. dist 21. q. 2. Hadrian 6. in 4. dist vbi de Sacram. Confess edit Paris 1530. pag. 289. Dominic Sot in 4. dist 18. q. 4. art 5. Francis de victor sum de Sacram. n. 189. Nauar. in Enchirid. c. 8. Ioseph Angles in Florib part 1. pag. 247. edit Antuerp Petrus Soto lect 11. de confess The Iesuites also accorde hereunto Suarez Tom. 4. disp in 3. part Thom. disp 33. § 3. Gregor de Valentia Tom. 4. disp 7. q. 13. punct 3. who saith the common opinion of the Schoolemen is so Nouell Doctrine p. 102. 4 I dare boldly auow that the Catholikes haue better reason to refuse the Oath of Alleageance then Eleazar had to refuse the eating of swines flesh Confutation This assertion implieth a strange doctrine in deede that the Popes Breues are to bee preferred before Moses Law And that Papistes are more bound to obey the Popes decree then the Iewes were to obey the Law of God pronounced by Moyses Nouell Doctrine p. 135. 5 Churchmen are exempted from the Iurisdiction of secular Princes therfore are no subiects to Kings yet ought they to obserue their Lawes concerning matters temporall not by vertue of any Lawe but by enforcement of reason that is to say not for that they are their Subiects but because reason will giue it that such Lawes are to bee kept for the publike good and quiet of the Common-wealth Confutation How true friends the Cardinall and his Chaplen are to Kings that would haue so many Subiects exempted from their power See my Premonition p. 20 21. Also p. 114 115. c. But as for this and the like new Aphorismes I would haue these