tria ista Symbola Nicenum Symbolū quod itidem ut Athanasii contra Arium conditum est quod singulis Dominicis diebus in missa canitur That is In the Apostles Creed was laid the Foundation of the Christian Faith We will adde at latter end to these three Creeds the Nicene Creed also which as that of Athanasius was framed against Arius and which uppon every Lords Day is sung at Masse that is The second or communion service for there of old it hath been placed The same Luther in his Colloquies gathered and set forth by Peter Rebenstocke Anno Dommini 1571. Tome 2. pag. 106. Ad suos frequenter aiebat Symboli verba ab Apostolis constituta esse credo qui in congregatione sua hoc Symbolum verbis tam brevissimis consolatoriis confecerunt est opus spiritus sanctirem tanta brevitate tam efficacissimis emphaticis verbis describere extra Spiritum sanctum Apostolos non potuisset ita componi etiamsi millia secula illud componere conarentur That is Luther was wont to say oft' unto those about him I Believe that the words of the Creed were agreed on by the Apostles who meeting together framed this Creed in so curt but comfortable expressions It is the worke of the holy Ghost to describe a thing with such a brevity and yet most efficatiously and emphatically it could not have been so composed unlesse by the holy Ghost and the Apostles allthough a thousand Ages had endeavoured it These full and cleare Testimonies of his I find cited by Fevardentius in his annotations on Irenaeus lib 1 cap 2. A fiery Adversary of his and so not likely to ly for Luthers credit and Advantage 2. Calvin Instit lib 2. cap. 16 § 18 saith thus of the Creed Apostolis certè magno veterum consensu ascribitur neque vero mihi dubium est quin a primâ statim Ecclesiae origine adeoque ab ipso Apostolorum seculo instar publicae omnium calculis receptae confessionis obtinuerit undecunque tandem initio fuerit profectum Nec ab uno aliquo privatim fuisse conscriptum verisimile est cum ab ultima usque memoriâ sacro sanctae inter Pios omnes authoritatis fuisse constet Concerning the fulnes of it thus Dum paucis verbis Capita Redemptionis perstringit vice tabulae nobis esse potest in quâ distincte ac sigillatim perspicimus quae in Christo attentione digna sunt Then Id extra Controversiam positum habemus totam in eo Fidei nostrae historiā succincte distincteque recenseri nihil autem contineri quod solidis Scripturae testimoniis non sit consignatum quo intellecto de authore vel anxie laborare velcum aliquo digladiari nihil attinet nisi cui forte non sufficiat certam habere Spiritus sancti veritatem ut non simul intelligat aut cujus ore enunciata aut cujus manu descripta fuerit In which words though according to his Judgment an anxious Dispute about the Author of the Creed be needles he affirmeth enough whereon to ground what I have said concerning the composure of it by the Apostles and none other viz. 1. That the Ancients generally ascribe it to the Apostles 2. That it was universally received as a publick Confession of the Faith presently upon the first Rise of the Christian Church and from the Age of the Apostles 3. That it is not probable to have been writen by any Private Man seeing it is most certaine to have been time out of mind of a most Sacred Authority amongst all Pious Christians 4. That it is an assured Truth or Dictate of the Holy Ghost withall telling us that some such Divine Truths are written others only delivered to us by an Orall Tradition such as the Creed is Now I would faine know to whom so Ancient so universally received a Creed one of so Sacred an Authority and so Divine an Author as the Holy Ghost can be justly attributed except to the Apostles who only were the First the Generall the Holy the Divinely-inspired and authorized founders of the Christian Church and Preachers of the common Faith 3. Beza subscribes in like manner to the Authority of the Creed in his annotations on the fore-cited place Rom. 12. 6. where he not only tels us that the Creed was extant when the Gospell began first to be Preached and therefore as we have reason to conceive framed by the first Preachers of the Gospell the Apostles but also that the Articles therein conteined are Axiomata 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 such as require our Beliefe without any farther Proofe that is without proofe from Scripture whereon our Beliefe is grounded therfore in the Judgment of Beza they must needs come from the divinely-inspired Apostles namely the same Authors from whose Mouthes or Pens the Scriptures of the New Testament were derived to us for none else under the Gospell have delivered Axiomata 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Principles of Religion which require no farther Evidence whence it is that Saint Luke tels us in his Preface that he had his Gospell from the mouthes of the Apostles and St Marke as Church-History hath constantly informed us had his particularly from St Peter 4. Joannes Pappus Comment in Confess August fol. 2. hath these wordes Semper in ecclesiâ scriptorum quorundam publicorum usus fuit quibus doctrinae divinitùs revelatae de certis Capitibus Summa comprehenderetur contra Haereticos aliosque adversarios defenderetur Talia scripta licet perbrevia sunt Symbola illa totius ecclesiae consensu recepta Apostolicum Nicenum Athanasianum Where he tels us that there have been certaine Creeds in the Church of Publick use wherein the summe of Christian Doctrine was conteined and thereby defended against Hereticks namely the Apostles Creed the Nicene and that of Athanasius all received by the consent of the whole Church Now we know that the two latter were composed since the third Century and therefore the Particle Alwayes must especially and absolutely relate only to the Apostles Creed which if as Pappus here affirmes it hath been of Publick and Perpetuall use in the Christian Church challengeth the Apostles for its Composers by those two Badges of Antiquity and Vniversality besides the acknowledgment of its Title 5. Peter Martyr loc Comm de missâ cap. 12. saith thus in Symbolis summa fidei comprehenditur quae sane comprehensio vel summa siquis veteres attente legat Ecclesiae Traditio vocata est quae cum ex divinis libris desumpta est tum ad salutem creditu est necessaria nonnunquam a Tertulliano contra haereticos qui sacros libros negabant producitur Symbolum plenum absolutum Nicena Synodus edidit non tamen primum quandoquidem prius aliqua extabant ut vel ex Tertulliano possumus cognoscere Where he affirmes 1. That the Creed is a summary of the Faith necessary to Salvation and called by the Ancients the Tradition of the
succeeding Creeds which the whole Church hath for many Ages imbraced they were Framed in generall Councels or confirmed by Generall Practise Now the Catholick Church which received the Creed from the Apostles and preserved â—t as an inviolable Depositum may justly be presumed best to know the meaning of it the Common Mother of Christians can best informe us which is the true sence of the Common Faith and hath sufficienâ— authority to impose it upon Her Children Reas 4. Those Fathers who wrote since the Nicene Councell set downe and explaine that Creed which beareth the Apostles name not that which was framed in the Councell of Nice as appeares by the fore-cited Testimonies Now this they would not nor could have done if the Nicene Creed had been the first The first Father whom we find to meddle with or handle the Nicene Creed is St Cyril Patriarch of Alexandria who flourished an whole Century after the making of it Doth not this plainly shew that the Church had still the prime if not the sole respect to that Symbole or Rule of Faith which the Apostles left her as the maine Basis on which the Faith of her Children was built the Root whereout other Creeds as so many Branches sprung the Fathers who since the celebration of that Councell have explained and commented on the Apostles Creed I have already mentioned viz. Chrysostome Augustine Chrysologus Venantius Eusebius c. Reason 5th It is a received Rule which S. Augustine laies downe lib. 4. De Baptismo cont Donat. cap. 24. Quod universa tenet Ecclesia nec Conciliis institutum sed semper retentum est non nisi authoritate Apostolicâ traditum rectissimè creditur That is That which the universall Church holdeth and hath alwaies retained not being ordained by a Councell is most justly believed to have been derived unto us by the Authority of the Apostles And this rule is grounded upon good Reason besides the Authority of the deliverer for a generall effect must have as generall a cause they must be both of the same latitude and extent now there is no Generall cause imagineable of a publiquely received Doctrine Goverment Ceremony or Discipline in the Catholicke Church such especially as is derived to it from hand to hand time out of mind but the Authority of a Generall Councell which is the Church Representative or the concordant preaching of the Apostles who first planted Christianity in the Churches of the whole world So then to apply this Rule unto our present purpose That the whole Church holds the Apostles Creed experience demonstrates that it hath been alwayes reteined in the Church the Testimonies of the fore-aleadged Fathers shew and that it was not Framed in any Genenerall Councell sufficienty appears both by the copies of those Creeds which were framed in them found varying from that of the Apostles as also by the writing of those Fathers who lived before the first General Councel held at Nice wherein they make mention of a Rule of Faith derived downe to them from the Apostles which some of them also set downe as Irenaeus Tertullian Origen Reason 6th Before the Nicene Creed was framed both the Easterne and Westerne Churches had an Ancient Symbole or Creede Socrat. lib. 5. cap. 6. Which could be no other than that of the Apostles since no other is assigned or mentioned by any good Author First That the Westerne or Romane Church had such an Ancient Symble appeares 1. By the words of Vigilius Byshop of Rome lib. 4. De Eutiche Roma antequam Nicena Synodus conveniret a temporibus Apostolorum usque all nunc ita fidelibus Symbolum tradidit viz. in Jesum Christum Filium ejus Dominum nostrum leaving out the Particle Vnicum That is The Church of Rome even before the Nicene Councell from the very Apostles times till this present in these termes delivered the Creed unto Believers And in Jesus Christ his Sonne our Lord leaving out the Particle Only 2. By Ruffinus in his Tract on the Creed who compares the Aquilean Creed with the Romane and withall tells us that the Creed was believed so ancient in his time that it was then held for an Apostolicall Tradition Now this Ruffinus was a man of note in the Church nine yeares before the first Councell of Constantinople viz. in the yeare 372. when he went with Melama from Rome to Alexandria about which time also S. Ierome wrote letters to him namely his Epist 5. 41. Secondly that the Easterne Churches had an ancient Creed too before the Nicene Councell appears by the same Ruffinus who compares the Aquilean Creed with that of the East as well as with the Romane The same appears by Cyril of Ierusalem who explaines it at large in his Catecheses and this Creed of his explaining we shall find much consonant to that which we now call the Apostolicall only cutting off some few exegeticall Particles which were added to fore-arme his Auditors and other orthodox Christians against succrescent Heresies to which Creed of his he adjoynes also some practicall Grounds for the more compleat instruction and Preparation of them against the time of Baptisme This Cyril was first Catechist then Patriarch of Ierusalem and sate afterwards in the first Councell held at Constantinople where the Easterne Bishops were only present and composed a Creed almost in the same termes with this of Cyril He composed these Catecheses in his youth about the yeare 350 and died in the yeare 386 five years after the celebration of that Councell as the learned Vossius demonstrates out of Leo and S. Jerome compared with a passage in his sixt Catechesis Now as the Fathers of the first Councell at Constantinople laboured not to frame a new Creed but were contented to enlarge the Article concerning the Holy Ghost against Macedonius who perverted it so we may justly suppose that the Nicene Fathers retained the words of that Creed which had been of old received in the East least they might otherwise seeme to have framed a new Faith amplifying only the Article concerning the Divinity of our Saviour which was then called in question by Arius that so it might appeare to the World quaedam tantummodo explicatius dici as the same Vossius rightly conceives Cut off therefore from the Nicene or Constantinopolitan Creed or from that of Cyril which much symbolizeth with it the Additionals unto those two Articles and you have the whole Creed of the Apostles for the Communion of Saints is not a distinct Article but a part or Paraphrase of what goes before Saints being implyed in in Holy and Communion in Church or Congregation Ecclesia which is an Assembly of selected People and Christs descent into Hell is presupposed to the Article of his Resurrection Therefore to think that Cyril in his old Age or Iohn the Patriarch his Successor added all that to the Jerosolymitan Creed which followes the Articles of the Holy Ghost is nothing probable because Cyril doth not barely
non in Arca sed in memoria portaretur The quintessence of the whole Body of Scripture is extracted into a few Sentences that so this precious Treasure of the Soule might be the more easily borne not in a Chest but in the Conscience After this he brings two similies to the same purpose comparing the Creed to a picture wherein are united all the severall Graces of the choisest Beauties and to a Rich Man journying who puts all his wealth into a few Jewells which are easily portable 8. S. Austin in his 181 Sermon De Tempore gives this Elogy of the Creed Symbolum breve est verbis sed magnum est Sacramentis quicquid enim praefiguratum est in Scripturis quiquid praedictum est in Prophetis vel de Deo ingenito vel ex Deo in Deum nato vel de spiritu Sancto vel de suscipiendo omni Sacramento vel de morte Domini resurrectonisque ejus mysterio totum breviter hoc Symbolum continet That is The Creed is litle for words but large in mysteries for what soever was prefigured in the Patriarchs proclaimed in Scripture foretould in the Prophets either concerning God the Father Sonne and holy Ghost or of undertaking the mysterious worke of our Salvation or concerning the Death resurrection of the Lord this Creed doth conteine in briefe 9. Leo the Great in his 13th Epistle written to the Empresse Pulcheria calls the Creed as is fore-alleadged The short and Perfect Confession of the Catholick Symbole distinctly marked forth by the twelve Apostles into so many sentences Tanquam instructa sit munitione Caelesti ut omnes haereticorum opiniones solo ipsius possint gladio detruncari cujus plenitudinem si Eutiches c. As compleatly furnisht with celestiall armour so that the the Heades of all hereticall opinions may be cut off by its sword alone the Fulnesse whereof if Eutiches c. 10. Cassianus in his sixt Booke of the Incarnation of our Lord speakes fully to this purpose Quicquid per universum c. whatsoever is largly diffused throughout the whole Body of the Scriptures is all summed up in the perfect breviary of the Creed The place we have cited more at large chap. 5. 11. Venantius Fortunatus in the preface to his explication of the Creed begins thus Fidei Catholicae totius summam recensentes in quâ integritas Credulitatis ostenditur unius Dei omnipotentis id est Sanctae Trinitatis aequalitas declaratur mysterium Incarnationis Filii Dei c. That is Whilst we declare the summe of the whole Catholicke Faith wherein the entire beliefe of a Christian is set forth with the equality of one Almighty God that is of the Holy Trinity and the mystery of the incarnation of the Sonne of God c. where he useth the very words of Clemens Rom. Which we forecited Then he concludes Cunctis credentibus quae continentur in Symbolo salus animarum vitae perpetua bonis actibus praepareiur Let all those who believe the Things contained in the Creed provide by good workes for the salvation of their Soules and life everlasting that Creed being sufficient for matter of beliefe as good workes are for matter of practise 12. I shall conclude these Testimonies of the Ancients with these words of Erasmus lib. de Rat. verae Theolog. Vtinam nostra credulitas Symbolo esset contenta ubi caepit esse minus Fidei inter Christianos mox increvit Symbolorum modus numerus Would to God saith he our Beliefe had been contented with the Creed when there began to be lesse Faith amongst Christians the Creeds straitwaies increased both in bulk number For the farther clearing of this Truth I shall adde to the Authority of the Ancients the Testimonies of some noted Doctors in the Roman Church who make the Apostles Creed the Breviary of the Faith and the note or signe to distinguish the Orthodox Professors from Hereticks as well as Infidells and so by a necessary consequence free the Reformed Churches from the injurious imputation of Heresy seeing they all unanimously receive the Creed in the old Primitive sense as it was expounded and enlarged by the foure first generall Councells 1. Aquinas 2a 2ae qu. 1. Art 9. speaking of the Apostles Creed useth these words Necessarium fuit fidei veritatem in unum colligi ut facilius posset omnibus proponi ne aliquis per ignorantiam fidei a veritate deficeret Et ab hujusmodi sententiarum fidei collectione nomen Symboli est acceptum It was necessary saith he for the Poynts of the true Faith to be drawn into one from which Collection of Sentences it took the name of Symbolum that so they might the more easily be presented to all and for this end least any one should depart from it through ignorance Whence it will follow that all necessary poynts of Faith are therein contained for if any were wanting there were roome left for ignorance 2. Canisius in his Catechisme maketh this Question Estné brevis aliqua fidei complexio ac summa omnium nobis credendorum Is there any short summary of the faith and collection of all Poynts to be believed He answers Est illa quam 12 Apostoli suo Symbolo tradiderunt quod quidem Symbolum velut illustris not a est qua Christiani ab Impiis qui vel nullam vel non rectam Christi fidem profitentur discernendi ac internoscendi sunt There is namely That which the Twelve Apostles have delivered in their Creed which Creed is a famous marke or signe whereby Christians are to be discerned from those ungodly persons who either professe no faith or not the Right 3. Augerius in his Catechisme proposeth the like question Estné brevis aliqua methodus fidei quae necessario nobis tenenda est Is there any short method or rule of Faith which is necessary to be held by us He answers Est quidem ab ipsis Apostolis tradita quae Symbolum ideo vocari solet quod sit quaedam Illustris notae quâ Christianos distinguimus ab iis qui Idololatrarum superstitionem haereticorum impiotatem comitantur There is such an one and that delivered by the Apostles themselves which is therefore commonly called a Symbole because it is a certain marke of note whereby we distinguish Christians from those who follow the superstition of Idolaters and the impiety of Hereticks 4. The Romane Catechisme set forth by the Decree of the Councell of Trent and of Pius 5. hath these words touching the Creed Hanc fidei formulam Symbolum Apostoli appellârunt quia eâ veluti notâ tessera quadam uterentur quâ desertos subintroductos falsos fratres qui evangelium adulterabant ab iis qui verè Christi militiae sacramento se obligarent facilè possent internoscere That is This forme of Beliefe the Apostles called a Symbole because they made use of it as a certain Token or watch word whereby they might easily discerne
the Diuids of Pythagoras Socrates c but what we find written I Answer The Creed is best preserved by Tradition for the sense and substance of the Articles because daily in publike use in the Catechumen's mouthes and the Liturgies of the Church yet subject to variation in point of expression by reason of severall Tongues and Dialects in the Christian World as also because of some exegeticall Additions interserted upom occasion of some particular Heresies which arose in this or that Church So Lawes are best preserved by continued Practise though somewhat varying if received in diverse Nations as the Romane Lawes are in some specialty of expression or by way of application to the exigence of the Times and Genius of the People in diverse Countries As for the dependance of Tradition it relies not only upon Memory but upon continuall use and Practise a better means of Preservation then Writing which is daily subject to the fraud negligence and ignorance of Transcribers many differences arising from whence have raised no small trouble unto Learned Criticks how to reconcile them or if irreconcileable to descerne the true Copie The Hebrew Bible was preserved entire in the true reading thereof as being constantly used in the Jewish Synagogues without any Points or Vowels written as now we have it and that for many hundred yeares according to the most received Opinion a Thinge infinitely more difficult then the Preservation of the Creed Wherefore we may not without Reason say that a short Summary of the Faith such as the Creed is is best kept by Tradition especially such an one as is in continuall use and Practise whereof the Fathers here cited give us good reason in summe that Non sunt evulganda fidei mysteria nisi Initiatis Magistro Duce seu Interprete ne sc derisui Profanis habeantur aut malignantium Calumniis paâ—eant ne erroneis Ignorantium aut male feriantium glossematis obiiciantur The whole Word of God was committed to writing because large and full of Variety yet occasionally and by Degrees The like may be said of the many long various Discourses of Pythagoras and Socrates committed to Paper by their Schollers Our Saviours Sermons and Discourses were oft very large his Miracles and memorable passages of his Life almost infinite and so could not otherwise be well preserved then by Writing yet Irenaeus tels us that many Christian Nations had no Scripture amongst them in his Time who notwithstanding kept Christianity diligently amongst them by an old Tradition And on the other side the Fathers tell us that where the Scriptures were to be had the Hereticks oft set forth unsound Books under the Apostles names and corrupted the true Copies of Scripture which they got into their Hands by this means seducing many troubling more to neither of which inconveniences a knowne practised breife Tradition is obnoxious As for the doctrine of the Druids it was carefully preserved as long as the Religion stood by an unwritten Tradition now Christianity hath a promise of continuance unto the end of the world Mat. 28. 20. so needs no more to feare a failing of its doctrine then its Disciples If it be farther objected that all in generall are commanded to confesse Christ and to give an account of the hope that is in them 1 Pet. 3. 15. which seems to make against the second Reason assigned by Cyril of Ierusalem That the Creed was of old committed to writing by Irenaeus Tertullian that when these Reasons and exhortations were made by Ruffin Cyril and Chrysologus the Creed was committed to writing both by themselves and others I answer first that those Precepts belong properly to Christians that is to Persons entered into the Church by Baptisme who had the whole Creed explained unto them but if they extend to the Catechumeni the Confession and Account must be understood more indefinitely and at large to wit of those more easie and generall Principles whereof they were informed by their Teachers Secondly the Creed is therefore call'd a Tradition because not committed to writing by the Apostles as the Gospell and Epistles were though in after Ages it were put in writing by the Fathers and Councills for the more publike Conviction of Hereticks Yet it clearly appeares by the fore-cited Fathers who cannot well be thought ignorant of the Churches custome in their own Times that the Creed was not delivered in writing to the Catechumeni but taught them by word of mouth to learne and professe this teaching or delivery not without an explication of the Catechist or Bishop least otherwise they might chance to erre in the meaning withall it was not delivered all together but line after line as they were able to receive it CAP. III. Testimonies of Scripture touching the Composure of the Apostles Creed especially out of S. Pauls Epistles as the places are accordingly interpreted by Divines of good note both Auncient and Moderne Some doubts against these Testimonies solved THUS much for the History of the Creeds Composure and its manner of Conveyance to after Ages But that the Apostles did first Compile and then deliver this Creed by an orall Tradition to the Christian Church will need farther Confirmation I shall endeavour to prove it by Scripture Antiquity and Reason all which I hope will be found to attest this Truth as joynt-witnesses of what hath bin already produced out of Ruffinus And first by Scripture for though the Creed be not expresly set down in any place of the New Testament because the Apostles for the foremention'd reasons thought not good to commit it unto writing yet S. Paul in diverse places of his Epistles not obscurely alludes unto it under severall phrases of speech apt metaphours which we find afteward applied to the Creed by the auncient Fathers as they may be most probably interpreted are so understood de facto by the judgment of good Authors both of the Primitive and latter Times 1. First Rom. 6. 17. The Apostle tels us of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That Forme of Doctrine and expressly cals it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Tradition as the Ancients constantly stile the Creed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ye have obeyed from the Heart that Forme of Doctrine which was delivered you that is whereas before Baptisme ye were the Servants of Sinne now now yee have professed your obedience to the Faith by the publike rehearsall of the Creed delivered to the Church in a set Forme by the Apostles to be openly recited before the Congregation at the time of Baptisme a Custome used from the Beginning and still retained in the Church Thus is the place expounded by Anselme our Learned and Renowned Archbishop of Canterbury Quae doctrina est Forma quia imaginem Dei deformatam restituit which Doctrine saith he is stiled a Forme because it restores the defaced Image of God to wit by Baptisme which the Apostle elsewhere calls The Laver of
VI. Testimonies of the Authors and Authority of the Creed taken out of the Protestant Divines who have unanimously received and acknowledged this Creed of the Apostles together with the Nicene Creed and that of Athanasius ALthough the Testimonies of the Fathers might well suffice in this Busines the Ancient Doctours of the Church being the most apt and able Witnesses of so ancient a Tradition yet because the Church at this day especially this Western Part of it is so unhappily broken into severall divisions whereto diverse too pertinaciously addicting themselves think nothing right or true but what their owne side allowes and their heades maintaine thus measuring all Religion by the private judgment of some late masters of the Reformation whom though choise Instruments in that worke we ought not sure to looke on as infallible dictatours least in a crosse ridiculous vanity we be found to imitate what we so much blame in our Adversaries by giving that unto them which we have taken from the Pope and so setting up many for one I thought it not amisse by declaring their Judgment also in this Point to comply a little with these prejudices and so give satisfaction even to the most partiall who look upon the Fame of the Author rather than the Force of the argument and value the proofe according to the esteeme they have of the Person as if the Truth were commended by the Teacher not the Teacher by the Truth contrary to that short and sharpe expostulation of Tertullian num ex Personis aestimamus Fidem an ex Fide Personas In compliance I say with these I have thought good to subjoyne unto the consent of Antiquity the suffrages of our latter Protestant Divines many of them the prime Instruments of the Reformation who fully agree with the Fathers in this Point whereby also I shall shew the convincing evidence of this Truth which hath obteined a free confession from the Mouthes Pens of those who have rejected so many other doctrines received in the Church of Rome Especially matters of Tradition such as the Creed is which hath been so universally received by them who have repudiated or Reformed all that they could find any fault with after a most severe examination who in other Points not a few have shewed themselves not only of a contrary judgment unto the Church of Rome but even of a Different among themselves These Testimonies then may justly much prevaile with those who professe themselves of the Reformed Churches not only because of the Dignity of their Name and the uncorruptnesse of their writings as being composed of late not at all suspected of coruption by any Romish fraud but also that when they speake of the Apostles Creed they questionlesse meane that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the same in expresse Termes which is now extant and so are not liable to that Exception which some though without just Ground have made against those Creeds set downe in the writings of the Fathers that they vary from the Forme we now have at least in some words and in the manner of expression Hereby also two sorts of men may likewise see their errour First the Romane-Catholik who with alike loudnes and lying proclaimes to the world that the Protestant or Reformed Churches have brought in a new Religion whereas their endeavour hath been to restore the old unto its Primitive Simplicity by paring off from it as well eroneous superstructures in matter of Doctrine as Superstitious or Burdenous Appendixes in matter of Ceremonies Discipline Government and Manners Secondly the Novellist who though he seemes outwardly much to honour the Prime Reformers yet adheres not to their Principles but runs wildly after his owne Inventions foolishly measuring the Truth of Religion by its opposition to the Church of Rome as if shee had wholy apostatized from the Faith Now betweene these two extreames the old Catholick Truth keeps a mean though for this cause much suffering on both sides Mat. 11. 19. But Wisdome is justifyed of her Children Among these Protestant Divines I have already produced the Testimonies of Calvin Beza Grynaeus and Paraeus in their Comments on the fore-alleaged Places of Scripture viz. Beza and Grynaeus on Rom. 12. 6. Calvin and Paraeus on Heb. 1. 6. To these I shall now adde the Testinnies of others and withall cite Calvin and Grinaeus in their other writings 1. Martin Luther in his Tract of the three Creeds which we find extant in the seventh Tome of his workes hath these words Because some after Confession of my Faith Questioned my Religion I have thought good to Publish these three Symboles as they are cald or confessions of the Christian Faith packt up as it were in one bundle which Creeds the universall Church hitherto hath with generall Approbation taught read sung quas quidem hactenus universa ecclesia magno consensu docuit legit cantavit Quare iterum testatum volo sentire me unice cum vera Christianâ ecclesiâ quae ista Symbola magno consensu hactenùs tum docuit tum retinuit e contra toto Pectore abhorrere ac dissentire a falsâ illâ hypocriticâ ecclestâ quae est saevissimus hostis verae ecclesiae Christi quaeque neglectis obscuratis istis pulcherrimis Symbolis multiplicem interea Idololatriam in ecclesiam invexit Whereby saith he I againe desire to testify that I wholy cōforme my judgment to that true Christian Church which hath hitherto concordantly retained and delivered those Creeds and on the contrary doe cordially dissent from and abhorre that false and hypocriticall Church which is the most cruell enemy of the true Church of Christ which neglecting and debasing those most excellent Creeds hath in the meane time introduced manifest Idolatry into the Church Thus he in his preface to the Reader He proceedes thus Est autem primum illud Apostolorum Symbolum ex reliquis pulcherrimum maximeque concinnum utpote quod brevissime quodam ceu compendio omnes fidei christianae Articulos complectitur quo nomine facilius à Pueris Simplicioribus percipi ac disci potest Alterum Athanasii sc Symbolum est paulo prolixius estque hoc velut propugnaculum primi illius Apostolici Symboli ab eo contra Arianos haereticos conditum est That is The first of these is the Apostles Creed the most excellent best composed of the rest as which most briefely compendiously comprehends all the Articles of the Cristian Beliefe in which regard it may be more easily learned and understood of Children and the more simple sort The Second is the Creed of Athanasius which is somewhat larger and is in the nature of a Bulwarke to that first Creed of the Apostles It was framed by him against the Arrians The Third which he there sets downe is Te Deum being as well a Creed as an Hymne Then after In Symbolo Apostolorum jactum est fundamentum Christianae Fidei Subjiciemus sub finem ad
Church 2. That this Creed is produced by Tertullian against those Hereticks who denyed the Scriptures 3. That the Nicene Creed although a full and compleate Forme yet was not the first which the Christian Church had for which he refers us to Tertullian Now that Creed which was older than the Councell of Nice can be no other than the Apostles Creed seeing no other Creed was ever mentioned before the time of that Councell nor other Authors assigned And for Tertullians Testimony to whom we are referd he clearely assignes the Apostles for the Authors 6. Bullinger in the Begining of his Decads whereto he prefixeth the Ancient Creeds hath these words Sufficiebat hactenus Symbolum Apostolorum sufficisset Ecclesiae Christi etiam Constantini Seculo confitentur enim omnes omnes Ecclesias non alio Symbolo quam Apostolico usas eodemque fuisse per totam terrarum orbem contentas quoniam verò Constantini magni aetate emerfit impius blasphemus Arius qui Christianae fidei puritatem corrupit simplicitatem doctrinae Apostolicae pervertit coacti sunt ipsa necessitate Ecclesiarum ministri sese impostori opponere ac Symbolo editio verum id est veterem fidei confessionem damnatâ Arii novitate declarando ex Scripturis canonicis illustrare neque enim in aliis mox sequentibus tribus conciliis Generalibus editis Symbolis quicquam mutatum est in Doctrinâ Apostolorum neque quicquam novi adiectum quod prius ex Scriptura sancta Ecclesiae Christi habuerunt crediderunt sed corruptionibus novitatibus Haereticorum antiqua veritas illustrata per Symbola prudenter utiliter religiose est opposita That is Hitherto the Creed of the Apostles sufficed and had sufficed the Church of Christ even in the Time of Constantine for it is confest by all that all Churches used no other Creed than that of the Apostles and were contented therewith all the world over but because in the Time of Constantine the Great there sprang up that impious and blasphemous Arius who corrupted the Purity of the Christian Faith and perverted the Simplicity of the Apostolick Doctrine the Pastors of the Churches were compeld out of necessity to oppose themselves unto such an Imposture and setting forth a Creed to illustrate the True that is the Ancient Confession of Faith by manifesting it out of Scriptures thereby condemning the novelty of Arius for neither in the three other generall Councels which followed that of Nice was there any thing changed by setting forth their Creeds in the doctrine of the Apostles nor any new thing added unto what the Churches of Christ formerly had and believed out of the Holy Scripture but the Ancient Faith being illustrated by the Creeds was prudently profitably and piously opposed unto the Corruptions and Novelties of the Hereticks 7. Christopher Barbarossa in the Preface to his Catecheticall Analysis wherein he hath drawne into Method the Catechisticall Meditations of seventeene Protestant Divines set forth by the Deane and Colledge of Divines in the Academy of Rostock hath these words Apostoli Synodi brevibus Symbolis doctrinae Christianae Summam complexi sunt quilibet Apostolorum suum contulit ad hoc Symbolum Ratio quare Apostoli composuerunt hoc Symbolum duplex est 1. Suiipsius causâ ut certam haberent Regulam Amussim doctrinae postquam exire vellent in totum Mundum 2. Propter nos ipsos ut haberemus Regulam Amussim Fidei contra Haereticos Nomen Articuli requirit integram omnium Fidei Articulorum cognitionem confessionem si modò Fides perfecta integra esse debet That is The Apostles and Synods comprehended the summe of Christian doctrine in certaine breife Creeds Every one of the Apostles contributed his part to the Creed There is a double Reason why the Apostles composed the Creed 1. For their owne sake that they might have a certaine Rule or measure of Doctrine after they had resolved to goe forth into the whole world 2. For our sakes that we might have a Square or Rule of Faith against the Hereticks The word Article requires an entire knowledg and Confession of all the Points of Faith if so be it ought to be whole and perfect 8. Grinaeus de Eccles contin Primitiva Ecclesia habuit Symbolum Apostolorum cujus plena in Scripturis explicatio non abit ab hoc quod in Irenaeo extat Symbolum lib. 1. cap. 2. That is The Primitive Church had the Creed of the Apostles which is fully explained in the Scriptures This Creed is not diverse from that which is extant in Irenaeus 9. Nicol. Selneccerus in his Paedagogia Christiana Tria Symbola usitate nominantur Apostolicum Nicenum Athanasianum Apostolicum majus in quarta Apostolorū Synodo conscriptum fuisse arbitrantur 1. De electione Matthiae 2. De Ordinatione Diaconorum 3. De Abdicatione legalium 4. Vt existimatur de conscribendis his Fidei Articulis ut certa norma 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 praecipuorum Capitum doctrinae Christianae cum Apostolis jam esset in totum terrarum orbem abeundum extaret confessio quae unanimem ipsorum consensum exhiberet ut autem hoc se habeat certum tamen est in hoc Symbolo quod internae nostrae Fidei Professio concordia est contineri omnia Capita totius Religionis Christianae recte perspicue ordine That is There be three famous Creeds the Apostles the Nicene and that of Athanasius the Apostles Creed is of the greatest account and is supposed to have been compiled in the fourth Synod of the Apostles whereof the first was concerning the election of Mathias the Second concerning the Ordination of Deacons the Third concerning the disanulling of Ceremonies Act. 15. the Fourth as is conceived concerning these Articles of Faith which should serve as a certaine Rule or Modell of the cheife Heades of Christian Doctrine and seeing that the Apostles were now to goe forth into the whole world there might be extant a Confession which should exhibite their unanimous consent unto all But however this businesse was ordered 't is certaine that in this Creed which is the concordant profession of our inward Faith are conteined all the Heads of the whole Christian Religion Rightly Clearely and Orderly 10. Alex. Nowell in his Catechisme giveth two Reasons why the Creed is entituled to the Apostles whereof the First and Cheife and to which he principally enclines is this that it was ab Ore Apostolorum exceptum Received from the mouthes of the Apostles and his following words confirme this reason of the Name wherein he declares that it hath been Ab initio usque Ecclesiae receptum received from the very begining of the Christian Church and from that Time hath perpetually abode in it firme Authentick immoved amongst all Pious Christians ut certa atque constituta Christianae Fidei Regula as a sure setled Rule of the Christian Beliefe As for his latter conjecture of the name Apostolick that
extitissent diversisque nominibus columbam Dei atque Reginam lacerare per partes scindere niterentur nonne cognomen suum Plebs Apostolica postulabat quo incorrupti Populi distingueret unitatem ne intemeratam Dei Virginem Error aliquorum per membra laceraret Where we may observe First That he mentions not at all the applying of the word Catholick to the Church or whole Company of Believers as it is placed in the Creed for this was not cal'd in question by Sympronianus but the aplying of it to particular persons which in the Apostles times were called Disciples or Christians not Catholicks as Sympronianus objected Secondly That Pacianus absolutely granteth not that the word Catholick was not so used in the Apostles Times but only indulgeth so much unto his adversary because notwithstanding this supposall he was otherwise able to convince him upon his own concessions which kind of supposall or indulgence is most usuall amongst Polemick writers there by to winne over and worke upon the Adversary Thirdly That the Reason of the name brought by Pacianus and urged upon Sympronian namely the distinguishing of the true Church from the severall Sects led by denominated from their severall factions and Hereticall heads is very agreeable to the Apostles dayes and so required the like distinctive Epethete for S. Paul blames the Church of Corinth for Schismes and addicting themselves factiously to severall Idolised Teachers which they had chosen to themselves for though he names only Peter Apollos and himselfe yet his Discourse cheifly aimes at some other Popular Preachers and false Apostles as appeares by comparing 1 Cor. 4. 6. 2 Cor. 11. 13 20. And S. John expresly names the Nicolaitans denominated from one Nicolas in his Revel ch 2. v. 15. As for S. Austins involving the word Catholick in the Epithet Holy it proves not that it was not then in the Text of the Creed for it was usual with the Fathers in their Paraphrasticall explications to omit the expression of severall Particles sometimes one sometimes another which yet were cōfessedly in the Creed are expresly mentioned by them in their other Homilies or Tractates as wee may see in Chrysollegus Eusebius Gallicanus and others Thirdly Hereticks arose not only after but even in the very Apostles Times the Tares were scattered presently upon the sowing of the Wheat in the lateplowed field of the Church S. Luke mentions Simon Magus that First-borne of the Devill and Father of Hereticks as the Auncients Style him Act. 8. 9. 24. S. Paul tels us of Hymenaeus and Phyletus 2 Tim. 2. 17. And of Alexander Phygellus and Hermogenes 1 Tim. 1. 20. 2 Tim. 1. 15. Yea S. John informes us in more generall Termes That there were many Antichrists in the world even whilst he lived who denyed the Father and the Sonne 1 Io. 2. 18. 22. These Antichrists then were Hereticks who taught contrary to the Faith of Christ wherefore it is most probable that the word Catholick was placed in the Creed even by the Apostles themselves for the reason before assigned Fourthly The Christian Church might justly be styled Catholick or universall to distinguish it from the Church of the Jewes which was a particular Church confined if not within the Bounds of one Country yet unto one Nation whereas the Christian Church comprehended all Nations and had no other Bounds than those of the world although not actually at the time of making the Creed yet in vertue and power according to that generall Commission of our Saviour to his Apostles Goe teach all Nations Mat. 28. 29. And gaine Ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem and all Judea and in Samaria and to the uttermost part of the Earth Act. 1. 8. The Jewes were so envious and proud as not to receive the Gentiles into their communion or acknowledge them partakers in the promises of the Messiah they would have had them all circumcised and submit to the Ceremonial Law but God broke downe this Partition wall Eph. 2. 14. As he made appeare by the Vision of the Sheet which he sent to S. Peter Act 10. 11. 15. And by the Decree of the Councel at Jerusalem Act. 15. And so gathered all into one Body or Church Catholick so called in respect of Time Place Persons Faith which is therefore called the Common Faith Tit. 1. 4. For this Reason at least the Apostles might justly frame the Article at the very first Composure in these words I believe the holy Catholick Church Ob. 4th The different relation of the Story bewrayes the uncerteinty of it for they give not all the same Article to the same Apostle and some marshall them one way some another Answ First Diversity of opinions in Circumstances not materiall cannot justly call the maine Point in doubt So all Christians believe the Gospell of St Mathew and the Epistle to the Hebrwes to be the Word of God though Divines differ about the language in which and the time when they were writen and they all agree there is an Hell though they doe not about the place where Therefore notwithstanding some slight groundlesse differences some of them of latter inconsiderable Authors wee have no just reason to disbelieve the Apostles Composing of the Creed Secondly As to the various marshalling and order of the Articles it cannot justly argue the uncerteinty of the Tradition because the Bookes of the holy Scripture are also placed in a various method according unto severall Editions and Translations some following the order of the Hebrew Text as the Protestant Churches others that of the Septuagint and the old Latine Translation as the Churches of Greece and Rome Thirdly Neither can the diverse ascribing of them to severall Apostles raise any just doubt of the Composers of the whole for we find not a few Controversies agitated amongst Divines concerning the Authors of severall Bookes of Scipture in the Old Testament of the Bookes of the Judges Kings and Chronicles of the Booke of Job in the New Testament of the Second and Third Epistle of St Iohn and of the Revelation whether Iohn the Elder were the Author of these Epistles and Iohn the Divine of the Revelation as distinct Persons from Iohn the Evangelist Or whether Iohn the Ap. were the Author of all three under 3 several Titles But more especially the Author of the Epistle to the Hebrwes is questioned whether it were Paul or Barnabas Luke or Clemens And yet not withstanding all these Controversies the Christian Church now doubts not of the Authority of these Bookes why should we more doubt of the Authority of the Creed although we know not how certainly to assigne the Distinct Articles to their severall Apostles whenas in truth the more probable opinion is that they joyntly concurd to the framing of them all Ob. 5. If the Creed for matter and forme were from the Apostles and they delivered it precisely in those words wherein we now have it why is it not placed in the
whom the objectour cites I shall returne a more particular Answer First Cyril indeed in that place tels us that the mysteries of the Faith ought not to be delivered unto the Catechumeni simply nakedly but as clothed with scripture and that they should not simply believe him unlesse he brought proofes from thence for what he delivered because the safety of our Faith saith he depends not on the pleasingnes of Rhetorick but on the demonstration of Gods Word written The reason whereof he assignes in the begining of the same Homily 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. The Disciples of the Hereticks by their elegancy of speech and fair soothing tongues under the name of Christians deceive the hearts of the simple they hide the poysoōusdartes of their ungodly Doctrines with sugred expressions of all whom joyntly our Lord saith beware least any man deceive you then he goes on 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for this cause the doctrine of Faith is delivered with expositions thereon So that he would not have the Creed or himselfe believed without Scripture not that the Creed but the Times required such proofe for the Heretickes of those Dayes partly framed new Creeds of their own partly added to altered and perverted the old withall indeavouring to make their doctrine good by seeming probabillities of Reason and flourishes of Rhetorick It was necessary therefore in this case to discover these false Creeds and Interpretations by bringing all unto the Text of Scripture Secondly The other Father Paschasius in the begining of his Booke De Spiritu Sancto written against Macedonius taxeth a false reading of the Creed crept into it through the ignorance of some Transcribers who wrote I believe in the holy Church for I believe the holy Church by this error enervated an Argument usually alleadged by the Fathers for the Deity of the holy Ghost against Macedonius and his Followers Paschasius therefore proves by certeine Places of Scripture that they are commanded to believe in God alone but never in man wherefore seeing the Church consists of a company of men that reading of the Creed must consequently be false which enjoynes us to believe in the Church But what of all this He appealed not in this from the Creed unto Scripture but by Scripture corrects a false reading of the Creed as the Fathers in their polemicall writings against Hereticks frequently correct their corrupt quotations of some places of Scripture by other undoubted places Ob. 8th The Reason assigned why the Apostles composed this Creed discovers the vanity of the Tradition what was that That it might be forsooth to the Apostles a Canon or Rule according to which they should square and conforme their Preaching what to the Apostles to whom Christ promised his Blessed Spirit that should lead them into all Truth Certeinly they needed it not for their owne sakes amongst whom there was no ground of difference nor doubt of the Principles of Christianity And whereas others more probably say it was framed for the Churches sake that shee might have a short plaine yet full confession of Faith as a Formula of Beliefe to be publickly recited at the Time of Baptisme neither will this hold for in the Apostles Age the Confession of Faith was plaine and simple when they came to be Baptized namely in Jesus Christ or in the Father Son and holy Ghost as appeares by the History of the Acts so that the Church had then no need of such a Formula It began not to be required till diverse Heresies brake into the Church Answ First It is readily confest that the Apostles needed no Rule of Faith whereby to square their Preaching as if otherwise they should have erred yet they might well agree one a Canon or Rule of Fundamentals wherewith they thought fit to acquaint all Christians as with Points necessary to Salvation whereas otherwise they might have Preached more at large and intermixt matters of lesser Consequence As for the Authors who bring the Reason alleaged in the objection they lay it downe not in these Termes least the Apostles being seperated each from other ipsi inter se in varias scinderentur partes much lesse thus ne subinde alii abaliis in doctrinâ abirent as is odiously alleaged but Ruffinus renders the reasō thus Ne diversum aliquid his qui ad fidem Christi invitabantur exponerent S. Austin in like words Ne diversum vel dissonum praedicarent his qui ad fidē Christi invitabantur Now diversum and abversum dissonum and absonum are two things there was no feare that the Apostles by being severed each from other should Preach ought contrary to the Truth or to one Another if they had not before agreed uppon a Forme yet they might have Preached somewhat diverse from the Fundamentalls of Christianity namely other Points of inferiour concernment or at least the same in other wordes if they had not agreed on this Rule at their setting forth whence their Auditours might have taken occasion to suspect and argue them of falsehood not believing they were all guided by the same Spirit or to part themselves into factions as it fell out in the Church of Corinth about Paul and Apollos although they taught the same Gospell And what stirres arose in the Church about a Ceremony viz. the time of observing Easter derived frō a different tradition of S. Iohn to the Churches of Asia frō the rest of the Christian world though they all agreed in the main the keeping of the Feast Eusebius others will sufficienly informe us But to come closer to our Subject A notable instance in the very same kind namely in matter of of Doctrin such as the Creed is we find in the Greek and Latine Church about the middle of the fourth Century touching the Grand mystery of the Trinity which yet upon due examination proved only a difference of the tongue language The Controversie is thus set down by Greg. Naz Orat. 21. written in praise of the Great Athanasius Num. 46. 47. The Orientals saith he held one 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Essence and three Hypostases or or subsistences The Latines by Reason of the barrennesse of their Tongue and the narrownesse of expression could not distinguish Hypostasis from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Subsistence from Essence therefore insteed of Hypostasis brought in the new-coind word Persona Gr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to signify the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the proper distinctive Relations of the Three as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signified the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Nature what was the effect of this saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The effect deserved laughter or rather Lamentation this small difference of wordes seemed a diversity of Beliefe for the Orientals suspected the Westrne Church of Sabilianisme because they would not acknowledge three Hypostases but caled them by the name of three Persons And the Western Church suspected the Orientals of Arianisme for holding three Hypostases
question'd or denied by the Hereticks of those times have taken nothing from the Apostles Creed as in it selfe superfluous but have in a larger Declaration insisted on some Articles which were controverted by the said Hereticks omitting others about which there was no doubt or question raised and therefore not necessary in that case to be repeated The truth of this will more clearely appeare by the Paraphrases of some Fathers on the Apostles Creed who frequently omit some Articles or parcells of Articles in their explications even in that Age when 't is confest on all Hands that the Creed which is now called the Apostles was fully and compleatly extant And if they omitted some considerable Parts of the Creed when they undertook professedly to explain it because either so plain that they needed no explication or because handled before in some other Homily or Paraphrase we may suppose with greater Reason that the Councels and Fathers omitted some one or few Articles in the composing of their new Symboles which were framed upon some especiall occasion directed against a particular Heresy though the Apostles Creed were then fully extant For proofe of this consult the following Fathers 1. S. Chrysostome who flourisht about the yeare 400. in his first Hom. on the Creed omits these particles maker of Heaven Earth suffered died descended into Hell ascended into Heaven and ends the Text of his Creed thus I believe in the Holy Ghost 2. Petrus surnamed Chrysologus who flourisht about the year 440. in his 57 Hom. on the Creed omits Almighty maker of Heaven Earth suffered under Pontius Pilate died descended into Hell In his 58 Hom. he omits suffered and died rose from the dead descended into hell Catholick which Epithete is also omitted in the other following Homilies though exprest in the 57. After siting at the right hand of the Father he leaves out Almighty as also in the 57 Homily In Hom. 59. he omits maker of Heaven and Earth In Hom. 61. he leaves out the last Article life everlasting as included in the precedent of the Resurrection for Death being conquered by our Rising againe it must needs be a Resurrection unto a life immortall 3. Eusebius Gallicanus usually called Emesenus a Father of uncertain Age but placed by Bellarmine in the yeare 430. in his first Homily on the Creed omits maker of Heaven and Earth as implied in Omnipotent all the Articles between Christs Birth and Ascension although he mention them in his explication He omits also the Article of the Holy Ghost The remission of sins by Baptisme as inclosed in the beliefe of the Holy Catholique Church and the two last Articles viz. of the Resurrection and life Everlasting In his second Homily he omits Almighty maker of Heaven and Earth only Son in the second Article Suffered under Pontius Pilate died 4. Venantius Fortunatus who flourished about the yeare 570. in his Exposition of the Apostles Creed omits Maker of Heaven and Earth our Lord in the second Article rose againe from the Dead sitteth on the right hand of the Father though it be in the explication I believe the Holy Catholique Church the Communion of Saints and Life everlasting which is included as by Chrysologus in the Article of the Resurrection Object 12. If the Creed were framed by the Apostles and by them delivered to all Churches of the World it could never have come into the Fathers mindes to have composed so many Symboles and Confessions which for Perfection must needs give place to that of the Apostles no such therefore was then extant which he must needs grant who knowes that this simple formula was required of those that came to Baptisme whether they believed in God the Father Son and Holy Ghost Math. 28. 19. Answ The Fathers made no new Creeds or Confessions of Faith as hath been already shewen but only explained the old the occasion of which explicatory Creeds is well rendred by the Learned Vossius Non licuit per haereticos in ea simplicitate permanere Haeresibus igitur obortis quarum Architecti vel Patroni sese pro Christianis venditarent ac misere seducerent imperitos coacti sunt addere alia quibus Ecclesiae Doctrina ab Haereticâ item Ecclesiae filii ab haereticis eorum Sectatoribus secernerentur That is The Hereticks would not suffer the Church to continue in the Primitive simplicity of the Faith for Heresies arising whose Authors and abettors carried themselves for Christians and under that name miserably seduced the ignorant the Fathers were compelled to adde other Creeds whereby the Doctrine of the Church might be distinguished from Heresy and the Children of the Church from Hereticks and their followers Thus he De trib Symb. Dissert 1. num 29. Sceondly as to that Forme of Beliefe in the Trinity which the Apostles are said by direction from their Master to have required of those who came to Baptisme Mat. 28. 19. There is no such matter there set downe only they are charged there to Baptize in the Name of the Trinity not in the name of any strange God or of any one Person of the sacred Trinity but of all Three together Yet I willingly grant that faith in the Holy Trinity was required of the Persons which came to Baptisme but not by vertue of that command which was given to the Baptizers not to the Persons who came to be Baptized but this Faith was not the only thing required of them for we read other points numbred amongst the principles or beginings of Christian Doctrine which the Catechumeni were taught as Repentance from dead workes resurrection of the Dead and Eternall Judgment Heb. 6. 1 2. Ob. 13th If the Creed had been Composed by the Apostles with the same sentences words order which we now have and had been so delivered to the Catholick Church there had not been divers Creeds about the yeere 400 according to diverse Churches diverse in the manner of expression and diverse in the number of sentences which diversity will appeare to him that shall compare severall Creeds together especially the Nicene which hath not a few sentences added others alterd with which additions and alterations it was afterwards received and used in the Eastern Churches the Apostles Creed being in a maner excluded Answ First The diversity of severall Creeds in some few words or in the manner of expression is a Circumstance not materiall so the same sense be kept inviolate and all the Heads or Articles of the Faith preserved entire Secondly As to the number of Sentences more in some Creeds and fewer in others we have before assigned some Reasons why one or more articles have beene omitted in some Creeds and so the number made fewer but for the adding of any new Sentences unto the Apostles Creed I constantly deny that the Primitive Church ever did it but on the other side constantly disclaimed it her office being this to preserve the old Faith which was once delivered to
haereses defendatur Comp. 2 Tim. 2. 2. 3. 14. 7. Seventhly the Apostle renews the same charge to him 2 Tim 1. 13. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hold fast the forme of sound words which thou hast heard of me not which thou hadest of me in writing for the Creed as I have shewed is a Tradition in faith and love that is concerntng Christian Faith and Charity namely concerning Faith in the Creed concerning love or charity in the Commandements thus he conjoynes our Credenda and Agenda that is the Rules of our Beleefe and Practise And it follows in the next v. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Keep that good Depositum the good Thing which was committed unto thee Vpon which words consult the following Interpreters S. Chrysost T◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 What is this Depositum the Faith S Jerome Secundùm meam formam vide doce quam à me breviter accepisti quomodo integrè credere alterutrum deligere debeamus What is this breife and entire Forme of Beleefe but the Creed Theophilact likewise by this Depositum understands the Rule of Faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Articles which we are cōmanded to believe But how saith he wilt thou keepe these Rules not by humane strength but by the holy Ghost 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which dwelleth in us through Baptisme take care therefore to keepe that Spirit and that Spirit will keepe this Depositum Cajetan Habeto in usu formam Sermonum quos a me non per Scripturas didicisti sed audisti Ipsa forma sanorum verborum quae audierat a Paulo appelatur Bonum Depositum Now this set forme of wordes delivered by word of mouth to what agrees it but to the Creed Estius in like manner Depositum id est Doctrina ab Apostolis continuata serie tradita in sola Ecclesiâ Catholicâ asservatur Scriptura enim ei cum Haereticis communis est Now this Doctrine delivered down from the Apostles to us in an uninterrupted Succession which is here contradistinguish'd to the Scriptures and said to be kept in the Catholick Church what is it else but the Creed 8. Eightly The Authour of the Epistle to the Hebrews whom I little or not at all doubt to have been the same Apostle tells the Jewes That they had need to be taught again 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which be the first principles of the Oracles of God and that they were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Babes having need of milke Now these Principles are contained in the Creed and Cyril of Jerusalem in his Catech. 4. wherein he Paraphraseth on the Heads of the Creed alluding plainly to this Place as to the other two Parallell ones 1 Cor. 3. 2. 1 Pet. 2. 2. cals it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as I observed before To this sense accord the following Fxpositions Beda Quod in lactis commemoratione posuit Doctrinam ipsa est quae per Symbolum traditur Orationem Dominicam Anselmus Elementa vocantur illae Partes de quibus Sermo Dei priùs contexitur sc Incarnatio Passio Resurrectio Commune Judicium Damnatio malorum Corona justorum caetera quae primum annunciantur eis qui convertunt tur Exordium enim Sermonum est Symbolum Christianae Fidei Aquinas Exordia Sermonum Dei prima Principia et Elementa sunt Articuli Fidei et praecepta Decalogi Cajetan Elementa sermonum Dei sunt ea Principia quae docemus Catechumenos Dicitur in Symbolo Apostolica Ecclesia quia fundatur in Apostolis Their words are so plain that they need no Logick to apply them to the Creed Then in the Beginning of the next Chapter viz Heb 6. 1. the same Authour mentions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Principles of the Doctrine of Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Foundation Amongst which Fundamentall Principles he reckons up Faith towards God and the Resurrection of the dead which two be the first last Articles of the Creed the last I say reading the Creed as some of the Ancients did with this close The Resurrection of the dead unto life everlasting thus coupling two Articles in one Let us now see what Expositors beare witnesse to this sense applying these words to the Apostles Creed S. Chrys 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Where he interprets the words of the grounds of Christianity wherein we are Catechized and whereinto Baptized those fundamentall Doctrines of faith to which all the rest are in the nature of superstructures and what are these but the Creed S. Ambrose Quis fit sermo inchoationis Christi nisi Fidei initium Sicut enim cum qui in doctrinam literarum inducitur elementa oportet primum audire sic Christianus primum omnium de fide Catholicâ erudiri debet quod est fundamentum nostrae salutis quia enim fides fundamentum est caetera verò superaedificationes sunt D. Paulus sequentibus verbis ostendit This fidei initium the groundworke of Faith and Salvation and this fides Catholica wherein a Christian ought first to be instructed as being that foundation whereon the whole after-frame is built what else can it be but the Creed S. Aug. De fide operibus cap. 11. Epistolâ quae ad Hebraeos inscribitur cum eorum qui baptizantur commemorarentur Initia posita est ibi paenitentia a mortuis operibus Haec igitur omnia pertinere ad initia Neophytorum satis apertéque Scriptura testatur Venerable Bede hath the same words borrowing them as much else of his Comments from S. Austin Both referre them to those Principles of Christianity which the Novices or Catechumeni were instructed in and profest at Baptisme among which the principall was the Creed Oecumenius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Where he shewes the method of the Christian Catechisme some poynts whereof were explained to the Novices in Religion before Baptisme as Repentance from dead works Beliefe in God the nature and use of Baptisme as also of Imposition of Hands in Confirmation after Baptisme whereby to be made Partakes of the Spirit and some after Baptisme as the Mysteries of our Saviours Passion and High-priesthood his taking our sinnes on himselfe and working our Salvation the mysteries of our Resurrection of the last judgement and everlasting Reward or life the most of which Principles are comprehended in the Creed Theophyl also on the same place 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Where he interprets this repentance from dead works of renouncing the works of the Devill in Baptisme and referres the resurrection of the Dead in expresse termes to our Confession of Faith or Creed which at the time of Baptisme we publiquely attest Anselmus Necrursum jacientes fundamentum Doctrinae inquit quae in exordio tradita est vobis per Symbolum orationem Dominicam ut hac iterum incipiatis imbui Estius fidei in Deum Respicit ad professionem Symboli quam faciebant Baptizandi Calvinus Erant certa capita de quibus Pastor Catechumenum
interrogabat quemadmodum ex variis Patrum Testimoniis constat praesertim de Symbolo quod Apostolicum vocant examen habehatur Ille primus quasi ingressus erat in Ecclesiam iis qui jam adulti Christo nomen dabant cum priùs alieni fuissent ab ejus fide Paraeus Fidem pro Symbolo fidei intelligere possumus ubi haud dubiè quaerebatur credisné in Deum Patrem Credisné in Jesum Christum filium ejus unigenitum Credisné in Spiritum Sanctum In his quaestionibus Jeronimi temporibus Catechumeni baptizandi quadraginta diebus erudiebantur ut ipse scribit ad Pammachium These foure Testimonies so cleerely understand this place of the Creed and so plainly speake of the profession thereof at the time of Baptisme that it were lost labour to insist farther on them 9. Ninthly and lastly S. Jude in his generall Epistle ver 3. exhorteth all good Christians That they would earnestly contend for the Faith which was once delivered to the Saints Where by Faith is plainly meant the object of Faith or the Principles of Beliefe which are contained as we know in the Creed for he renders this as the reason of his exhortation in the words immediatly following That certain men viz. Hereticks had crept in unawares who denied the only Lord God and our Saviour Jesus Christ which be the two first Articles of the Creed This Faith saith the Apostle was delivered 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So it is a Tradition And but once delivered to shew the perfection and stability of it the Perfection for nothing must be added to it since it was once delivered entire and the stability of it for nothing must be taken from it it must for ever remain firme and untoucht in both like a Depositum no second Delivery thereof either to increase or correct it To conclude This Faith the Apostle would have contended for and that not slightly but earnestly because it concernes the maine Grounds or foundation of Christianity not some By-poynts or slight superstructures Thus at length have I proved the Antiquity and Orinall Authors of the Creed from severall Texs of Scripture accordingly expounded by Divines of the best note both in the Primitive Times and this latter Age. But before I proceed to any farther proofes it will be requisite to remove such objections as may be raised against what I have here produced Ob. 1. How can it be proved out of Scripture that the Apostles made the Creed that is this forme of faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the same words wherein we now have it Seeing it is no where in Scripture and as for those Metaphors 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. They agree to every Epistle or Sermon of the Apostles as well as to the Creed and therefore it will no more follow they speake of the Creed under those formes then that I speake of Homo therefore I meane Socrates And indeed most of the Fathers cited on those places seeme to relate to the Doctrine of faith in generall not to any Epitome of it such as the Creed Besides Anselme and Cajetan extend the Rule as well to the Agenda as the Credenda whereas the Creed comprehends no Agenda at all Answ Every Epistle or Sermon of the Apostles cannot properly be stiled a forme of Doctrine a Rule a Depositum c. First not every Epistle for the Apostles mention this forme whatsoever it were in diverse of their Epistles as somewhat severall from them and contradistinct unto them nor secondly every Sermon for the Apostles Sermons which we find recorded in the Acts were commonly made unto the Jewes circumcised Proselites or to the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the Gentile-worshippers of the true God and observers of the seaven Lawes of the sonnes of Noah now such as these needed nothing to be proved to them but that Jesus was the Messiah that is to have the foregoing Promises and predictions of the Old Testament applied to a particular person namely to Iesus the sonne of Mary as for the rest the most of the Creed they believed it before and therefore had no need to have it preached unto them Yea in that Sermon of S. Paul at Athens Acts 17. to the Heathen Philosophers who were pure idolatrous Gentiles we find nought preached unto them but the knowledge and worship of one true God Christs Resurrection and coming to judgement so not the whole Canon or forme of Doctrine which if it were not explained to the Chatechumeni before they came to Baptisme as we have already learned from Cyril of Ierusalem when he was Catechist much lesse was it propounded in grosse to the raw Pagan who in likelihood at first sight might either deride the faith or stumble at the threshold upon the hearing of so many strange mysteries Besides many of the places alleadged out of S. Pauls Epistles not obscurely allude unto Baptisme wherein the Catechumene made his confession of Faith by a publique rehearsall of the Creed as will more fully appeare hereafter but had not that Creed Preached unto him at his first invitation to Christianity only in the precedent dayes of Lent the Creed was explained to him by the Catechist on Palme-sunday by the Bishop The Rule involves the Agenda or practicall grounds of Christianity as Anselme and Cajetan rightly tell us but it includes the Credenda too that is our Articles of Beliefe and primarily poynts at them which is sufficient for our purpose for we make not the Creed the whole but the Principall part of the Christian Catechisme S. Paul therefore Heb. 6. 1 2. and Cyril of Ierusalem in his Catechises joyne them both together as necessary for the Catechumeni who were to be taught what to doe observe as well as what to believe As for the Fathers in their Expositiōs on the forecited places of Scripture some of thē expressely mention the Creed others referre what they say to Bapt. when the custome was to make open professiō of the Creed these therefore may well speak for the rest and explaine their meaning touching the doctrine of Faith that though exprest it be in more generall Termes yet is to be understood in the same sense for the Breviary of this Doctrine couched in the Creed and confest at the time of Initiation into the Church by Baptisme Ob. 2. Suppose it be granted that the forecited places of Scripture import there was some Forme of Doctrine delivered before the new Testament was written or after and that it contained the cheif heads of Christian Religion yet that this Forme or Rule was the same with that which we call the Apostles Creed is not necessarily inferr'd nor doe most of the Expositours alleaged affirme any such Thing Nay those Principles Heb. 6. 1 2. are such as some of them are not mentioned in the Creed as Baptisme Imposition of Hands Repentance from dead works It is not enough to prove there were Summaries of Faith containing the same in
substance with the Creed for so all Creeds and Confessions of Faith if true might be called the Apostles Creed nay the Scripture of the New Testament contains nothing else in Substance the Apostles Creed is that only which is delivered in this Forme and in these wordes which distinguish it from all other Creeds If any now among us who receive it as framed by the Apostles should even for explication or under any other pretence offer to alter the least word or tittle we should count it and that justly high Presumption and Sacriledge and should not esteem it so altered though containing nothing but Truth to be the Apostles Creed Answ The fore-cited places of Scripture evince thus much that a Forme containing the Heads of Religion was delivered not after but before the New Testament was written for else the New Testament could not have born witnesse of it Now the Church saith the Apostles Creed is that Forme for she hath delivered us none other nor entitled any other to the Apostles name in any age past therefore let the Objectours either produce another or subscribe to the Churches Testimony The like Argument may be urged touching any Book of Scripture As for Instance Antiquity tels us that S. Paul wrote an Epistle to the Romans the Church tels us that the Epistle we now have so entitleed is that Epistle and none other therefore if any man will doubt of or deny it let him ether shew another Epistle which S. Paul wrote to the Romans or accept this upon the Church's word As for what the Expositours say on the fore-alleaged Places of Scripture hath been already shewen Those Principles mentioned Heb. 6. 1 2. are some of them Practicall Heads of Christianity which were taught the Catechumeni together with the Creed and because Practicall Points not included in it the Creed being composed for a Summary of pure Doctrinals yet they all refer to the Tenth Article of the Creed namely to Remission of sinnes Repentance as the Antecedent or preparative Baptisme as the outward means and Imposition of Hands in Confirmation as the Complement or Perfection thereof As for other Summaries of Faith they cannot be either so truely or so properly called the Apostles Creed because they want the Attestation of the Church which never acknowledged them for such though otherwise perhaps in substance they agree with it as Paraphrases or parts thereof The New Testament containes many things besides the fundamentall Articles of Beleefe as smaller Doctrinall Points Evangelicall Rules of Practice matters of History Disputes Prophecies c. All extra Fidem besides the Creed the Forme and wordes whereof were delivered by the Apostles as well as the Heads and Substance of the Faith though some now doubt which they were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in expresse wordes As for explicating or altering the Creed we may safely paraphrase or comment on it now though not alter the Text thereof in wordes or sense because it hath been delivered to us totidem verbis by a confest evident Tradition of above 1200 years as the Oppugners of its Authors are forced to yeeld Before it was thus setled there was more liberty of expression because diverse Churches somewhat varied the Forme by reason of succresent Heresis but now it hath triumphed over all and is long agoe setled in full possession of the Christian Faith Besides in all those former variations though the Forme was changed in some few Particulars yet the heads or Articles of Beleefe continued the same It was not therefore sufficient for any confession of Faith to gaine the Title of the Apostles Creed in that it contained nothing but Truth CAP. IV. Testimonies concerning the Creed and the composure thereof by the Apostles taken out of the Greeke Fathers who beare witnesse for the Easterne Churches Some objections against these Authorities partly answered partly prevented YOU have seene what light the Holy Scripture gives us concerning this Creed of the Apostles but this Truth will be farther cleered and confirmed by the concordant Testimonies of the Fathers and most of those the most ancient for Time as living neerest the age of the Apostles and the most venerable for Authority who therefore may best be credited in this matter and well speake for the rest Now in reciting their Testimonies when I produce some of them who in their writings set downe the Creed or Rule of Faith not agreeing totidem verbis expressely in every word and tittle with that which the Church now receives for the Apostles I shall desire my Reader to take notice of these three things 1. First that diverse of the Fathers writing against the Heretickes of their Times mentiond only or chiefly those Articles which were then cald in question by those against whom they wrote whence it is that they doe not alwaies set the Creed downe whole and entire which by the way may well be one Reason why the Article of Christs descent into Hell was omitted in many latter Creeds because never question'd by any of the Hereticks of those dayes The same reason induced the Nicene Fathers to proceed no farther in their Creed than this Article in Spiritum Sanctum And I believe in the Holy Ghost although the old Creed was larger as will appeare more fully in what I shall produce hereafter namely because the Arian controversy required no more 2. Secondly That the Fathers maine care in setting down this Rule of faith was to keep themselves to the same Heads or Articles of the Creed giving themselves somtimes liberty to vary words phrases whence it is that though they alwayes set downe the Creed wheresoever they mention it as the only necessary unchangeable Rule of faith the immoveable Basis of Christianity the distinctive 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or assured marke of a true orthodoxe Christian contradistinguishing him to Pagans Jewes and Hereticks yet somtimes as learned Discoursers they enlarge the parts of the Creed by way of Paraphrase otherwhiles as short Comprisers thereof they contract the sum of it into fewer words according as they saw cause or had occasion offered So Tertullian though he lay downe this for a ground that Regula fidei una omninò est sola immobilis irreformabilis The Rule of faith is only one soley immoveable and umchangeable De Virg. vel chap. 1. Yet whereas he thrise rehearseth it in three severall Tracts he never useth the same words exactly but varyeth his expression now extending now contracting it at pleasure Besides there is an other reason why some of the Creeds end with the Article of the Holy Ghost viz because the four following Articles are virtually included in it which appeares by S. Chrysostomes first Homily on the Creed as shall be shewen by and by As for us of this Age we are not unjustly abridged the like liberty in varying of words or phrases First because these are suspected times wherein the very Grounds of Faith are by many very doubtfully held and by
ad divinam doctrinam certa humilitatis atque Charitatis firmitate surgentibus quod multis verbis exponendo esset perficiendum Secondly For the due bounding of our Faith and Charity There are many lesser circumstantiall Points in divinity which Christians may differ about Salva Fide Charitate without prejudice to either but others there be of farre higher Concernment requisite to the very beeing of a true and rightly grounded Christian these we call Fundamentall Points the Nescience of most whereof but the denyall of any is destructive of Salvation whithout ensuing repentance Now it was necessary that these should be knowen and severed from the rest that so the Church might know whome to admit to Baptisme and acknowledg for her Children and on the other side Whom to reject or cut off as Heretickes misbelievers Yea besides that every private Christian might know by this Rule whom to communicate with and whom to fly from and avoid as Heathens and Publicans in our Saviours Language To demonstrate this Father namely that the Creed conteines all Points which a good Christian is bound of necessity to believe I shall produce a Reason or two and thereto subjoine the testimonies of the Ancients which among other Corollaries hence deducible will serve to free the true reformed Churches from that just imputation of Heresy which the Church of Rome hath been pleased to lay upon Them for al of thē generally unanimously imbrace the Creed as appeares by their severall confessions and therfore cannot justly be charged with heresy in the ancient which is the true and genuine acception of the word The reasons are these two which follow First the End for which the Apostles Framed the Creed cannot be imagined to be any other than this viz. To give us a Breviary of the fundamentall Doctrines of Faith Dare we say that the Apostles came short of this their end It must be then either for want of Power or want of will Now to affirme they could not compasse it is little better then Blasphemy and to affirme they would not when they might must needs argue them of grosse negligence in their function and uncharitablnesse to the Christian church faults wholy uncompatible with the Apostolick office and Zeale Secondly The name of Symbole 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Greeke and Regula Fidei The Rule of Faith in the Latine whereby the Ancients style the Creed argue the compleatnesse of it for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies Nota or Indicium the Creed being the note of difference between the true Children of the Church and those who were either unbelievers or misbelievers And the Rule of Faith as Tertullian calls it or The Rule of Truth as Irenaeus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That unerring Rule of Truth which we received in Baptisme from whom Chrysostome and Austin borrowed the terme who opposed the Creed to the Placita of Hereticks and will have them examined ad hujus amussim by the line or Rule of the Creed must be adequate to the Faith or necessary Truth whereof it is a Rule niether larger nor narrower for else it looseth the very nature of a Rule To this Truth the Fathers give in their Suffrages I shall set downe the Testimonies of some who were the most Ancient and the most famous in their Times 1. The Creed is called Breve Evangelium the Epitome or breviary of the Gospell like Homers Workes inclosed in a nutshell according to the saying of S. Bartholomew recorded by Dionys Arear lib de myst Theo. cap. 1. 2. Clem. Romanus in his forecited Epistle Ad Fratrem Domini calls the Creed Summun totius Fidei Catholicae the Summary of the Catholick Faith and farther saith that in it Integritas credulitatis ostenditur The entire or whole Faith of a Christian is declared 3. Ignatius in his Epistle to the Magnesians after he had reckoned up those Heads of the Creed which touched our Saviour concludes thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He who fully knowes and believes these things is Blessed that is as fare as concernes these Articles or this part of the Faith which relates to our Saviour the same holdes in proportion of the rest otherwise not only a right beliefe although full and entire but a good life also are requisite to happinesse 4. Irenaeus tels us that many barbarous Nations who had not the Bookes of Scripture among them yet Sine Charactere vel atramento Scriptam habuerunt per Spiritum sanctum in Cordibus suis salutem Had Salvation wrote in their Hartes by the Finger of the holy Ghost without the helpe of Pen and Inke Where by Salvation he understands the Tradition of the Creed as appeares by the following words so called by a Metonymie because it is a meanes in its kind sufficient to Salvation Thus he lib. 3. cap. 4. The same Father elswhere gives this testimony of the fulnesse of the Creed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is Neither the most able Orator amongst the Pastors of the Church can say more than this for no man is above his Teacher or Master neither he who is weake in speech can distinguish or speake lesse than this Tradition for there beeing one and the same Faith neither he who is able to speake much of it hath augmented it nor he who is able to say litle hath lessened it at all 5. Origen in the preface of his Bookes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith that the Holy Apostles Preaching the Faith of Christ De quibusdam quidem c. Concerning some Points most plainly delivered unto all Believers even the most dull and slow whatsoever they judged necessary where by Necessaries he understandes the Articles of the Creed which he there reckons up 6. Cyril of Jerusalem in his fift Catechesis speaking of the Creed useth these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we comprehend saith he the whole Doctrine of Faith in a few versicles And afterwardes comparing it unto a small graine of mustard-seed which virtually containes many Branches 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so also doth this Creed in a few words comprehend the whole doctrine of Religion which is delivered in the old new Testament 7. Eusebius Galicanus commonly called Emesenus in the begining of his second Homily on the Greed hath these words Hanc nobis fidem velut magnam lampadem Christus adveniens errantibus viam monstraturus exhibuit per quem possit Deus ignotus requiri quaesitus credi creditus inveniri This Faith or Creed saith he like some great Lampe Christ exhibited for his comming thus shewing the way to those in errour By help wherof God who was before unknowne might be sought being sought might be believed on being believed on might be found The same Father in his first Homily derives the name Symbolum from Caena collatitia and then tels us that De utroque Testamento totius Corporis virtus in paucas est diffusa sententias ut facilius animae Thesaurus
before he was begotten and that he was made of nothing or had any other Essence or Substance than that of his Father or that he is obnoxious to change or Alteration such as these the Catholick and Apostolick Church of God doth Anathematize Socr. lib 4. cap. 11. THE FIRST APPENDIX Concerning the CREED of Athanasius CAP. I. Two Reasons why this Creed hath been more oppugned than the Rest It s Authority and Author are vindicated in generall more especially touching the severity of the Preface AMongst all the Creeds this of Athanasius hath met with most opposition First because it hath most resolutely and strictly oppugned the Ancient and Moderne Heresies about those great Poynts of the Trinity and Incarnation for whereas other Creeds proceed by way of simple Confession Narration or Exposition of the Faith I Believe c. This runnes in an higher style more directly repugnant to the corrupters of the Christian Faith Whosoever will be saved must believe c. Both in the Beginning and the close requiring an absolute Assent upon paine of Damnation and tacitely anathematizing all the Adversaries of the Faith So that we may compare the Apostles Creed to a Foundation the Nicene and other Exegeticall Creeds that followed unto a Superstructure but this of Athanasius to a Bulwarke or Defensive worke which guards the House and excludes the enemy from approaching no marvaile then it hath been so much oppugned Secondly because it was the worke and composure of a Private man whereas the other Creeds either challenge the Colledge of the Apostles for the Authors or the Catholick Church assembled in a Synod or at least the Tradition of some Patriarchall or other Ancient and famous Church time out of mind whereas this of Athanasius though relying but upon a single Fathers Authority yet speakes much bigger than the Rest and expressely requires a more exact obedience than any of the other Now this double reason hath raised both it and its Author many Adversaries whereof some have styled the Preface of it Proud and Insolent others have denied Athanasius for the Author so to leave it destitute of a Patron and deprive it of the Authority of so eminent a Champion of the Christian Faith a Third sort have more impudently defamed both Worke and Author and styled it Sathanasius his Creed as one Geo Niger and Valentinus Gentilis as Genebrard tells us in his Epistle to Charles Cardinall of Lorraine prefixed to his Book De Trinitate Among all which Adversaries 't is observable that none have either denied the Author or defamed the Creed but such whom the Church hath noted of Heresy and commonly have been the Ring-leaders to the Rest In this heat and fury of opposition it will concerne us calmely to examine the Truth whereby we shall at once vindicate the Credit both of the Creed and its Composer First for the Truth and Esteeme of the Creed it relies not on the Authority of one single Father who composed it though never so famous in his time and all Ages since among the Orthodox Professors but on the Testimony of the Catholick Church which hath received it and commended it to all her Children as the Buckler of the true Christian Faith neither only so but hath received it of old into her Liturgies and still retaines it an Honour not vouchsafed to any other Creed of a Private mans composing Constantinople Rome and the Reformed Churches have joyntly received it and exposed it to publique use although they very much differ in other Poynts a strong argument of its Verity and Authority Secondly For the credit of the Author whosoever consults Ecclesiasticall History and Nazianzens Encomiastick Oration must needs acknowledge his great fame throughout the Christian World for his Learning Vertue and unwearied Constancy in maintaining the true Faith against the Arian Faction under four Emperors Reignes especially under Constantius Valens when they swayed all which Undaunted constancy of his when the other Bishops generally either complyed with the Enemy or kept silence for feare deservedly purchased this peculiar honor to his Creed as the due reward of his unconquered Faith and delivered his Fame unto succeeding Ages with so loud a Trumpe that we heare Cosmas Laurens proclaime Cum ex S. Athanasii Opusculis aliquid inveneris nec ad scribendum Chartas habueris in vestimentis tuis scribe illud So Sophronii Prat. Spirit Thirdly As to the supposed Pride and Insolency of the Preface with which Termes some have been pleased to dignify it as being too stately for a private Mans worke and too peremptorily excommunicating all Christians who out of Ignorance or mysperswasion imbrace not all the following deepe misteryes contained in it they may please also to take notice that the Creed which followes though for the composure it Have Athanasius only for the Author yet the Faith therin set downe and explained is the common received Faith of the Church derived downe from the Apostles to his Times and since commended by our Catholick Mother to succeeding Ages as the Groundworke of Christian Religion most necessary to be first laid and relyed on and therefore may well beare such a Proeme which refers not so much to the Authority of the writer as to the Creed written the composure was a private Mans but the Creed was Publick the Frame of one but the Faith of All. Then for the strict exacting the beliefe of his Creed from all Christians they may please to observe that it was wrote in opposition to the Arians so that it doth not so directly exclude from Salvation the pure Ignorant as the stuborne Heretick nor somuch condemne the bare nescience as the negation of the Faith which was once delivered to the Saints Jud. 3. though I conceive it to be very hard if not utterly impossible for any Christian to be saved who doth not expresly believe the Substance of the Faith therein explayned especialy in those two Points which he so much insists upon viz. The Trinity and Incarnation the Vision or Fruition of the Blessed Trinity being the last End or Happinesse of mankind and the Incarnation of our Saviour with the consequents thereof being the meanes appointed by God for to compasse it So that the great Athanasius shewed not his Pride in prefixing such a Proeme but rather his mercy and Paternall care towardes the Church by a more expresse Declaration of the necessity of the Catholick Faith which some otherwise might have more oscitantly hearkned to and been lesse carefull to entertaine if not awakned by the Terror of this Preface CAP. II. Severall Testimonies Concerning the Author and Authority of the Athanasian Creed Hving premised thus much in way of a generall Vindication I shall now set downe some speciall Testimonies concerning the Author and Authority of this Creed begining with this latter Age wherein it hath begun to be questioned and so by degrees ascending to the Time of Athanasius himselfe thus at length arriving at the Fountaine Head by the