portransibit gladius she endured grieuous afflictions and painefull sorrows S. Iohn Baptist who exceeded in sanctity all others of his sex by Christ's owne testimony did practice extream penance and the calamities that holy Iob suffered were greater then his sin 's required as himself witnesseth in the sixt Chapter of his book saying Oh that my sins were weighed wherby I haue desernad wrath and my miseries together in the ballance as the sand of the sea this would appeare heauier in like manner it may be turly said of the passions endured by other blessed Saint's wherfore since the supream prouidence doth reward euery good work beyond what it deserueth vndoubtedly he hath assigned reward 's suitable thereto that is both in order to merit and satisfaction according to that of S. Luke cap. 21. There shall not an hair of your heads perish Wherby Christ promiseth a recompence to each good work how litle soeuer it be But if the works of blessed Saint's as meritorious only and not as satisfactory should receiue reward many baires of their head 's would perish that is many of their good works as they are satisfactory should not be recompenced which is contrary to Christ's promise Sithence the coÌ„dition of satisfaction is such that it is applyable by him that satisfyes for others distinct from himselfe as appears by S. Paul that wished to be Anathema for his bretheren and by Moses that beseeched God to blot him out of the book of life for the conseruation of the Israëlites it is conformable to reason and diuine iustice which hath a reward for euery good work that the aboundant and exceeding satisfactions of blessed Saints that remaine vprecompenced be laid vp in the Treasury of the Church vnto the remission of temporall paine due to sin which is the reward that good works as satisfaction specially challenge and vndoubtedly * 2. Cor. 12. Ego autem libentissimè impendam super impendam ego ipse pro aniâ—â—bus vestris Et S. Timoth. 2. omnia sustineo propter electos the saints themselues now departed in as much as they were inuested with the grace of charity when they did exercise their voluntary satisfactions and endured their violent passions had at least a virtuall intention to assist and profit therby the rest of the faithfull the law of charity requiring that * Vnum inquit Paulus corpus in Christo sumus Et Gal. 6. alter alterius onera portate all members of the holy catholick Church concurre mutually to the perfecting of the whole body one bearing anothers burthen and one satisfying for an other applying a meer price for temporall paine due to sinne * In Bulla Pij 5. damnatur propositio Michaelis Baij diceÌ„tis per passiones sanctorum coÌ„municatas Jndulgentijs non propriè redimi debita which is the consistency of Communio Sanctorum that christians profess in the Nicene Creed and the Apostle practiced saying Now reioyce I in my suffering's for you and fulfill the rest of the afflictions of Christs in my flesh for his bodies sake which is the Church Neither hence ought any man to infer the saint's to be our Redeemers because their satisfactions for others in order to remission of temporall punishment's if Christ's satisfactions were to be laid aside would signifie nothing being founded therin (g) Though the blood of Christ be sufficient enough to olenst a soul from both the guilt and the pain of sin neuertheless it does not procure that deliuerance vnless it be applyed by the Churches Sacraments or by acts of faith and contrition and indeed euen sectaries assert a necessity of saith and contrition vnto remission of sinnes In consequence wherof wheras Christ is said Hebra 10. with one oblation to haue consummated foreuer them that are sanctifyed it is meant as to sufficiency being that one oblation without the application thereof doth not sanctify indeed and effectually and he alone is properly our Redeemer in and by whose proper merit 's through the effusion of his blood was purchased our redemption vnto forgiueness of sinnes Collos 1. And that was Christ only One mediator of God and man and as no man ought to be said his own Redeemer according to the form of proper speech for as much as through good works of painfull satisfaction he payeth a ransome for temporall punishment's corresponding to his sins or for as much as he exerciseth an act of perfect contrition whereby his sin 's are remitted so the blessed saint's ought not to be called the Redeemers of such as receiue remission of temporall paines due to sinn's through the application of their satisfactions Neither hereby are Christ's satisfaction 's preiudiced For as the prayer that one belieuer on earth maketh for another doth nothing at all diminish the dignity of Christ's dayly praying for vs at the right hand of his diuine Father * Rom. 8. quotidie interpellat pro nobis Rom. S. since the efficacy of it is founded in the merit 's of his death and passion so the satisfactions of the blessed saint's applyed for the remission of paine due to sin doe dot lessen the infinite valour of Christ's satisfactions being they receiue from them all their worthiness and efficacy And doubtless Christ's own will was to haue it so to the end that his faithfull on earth might exercise reciprocall works of charity towards one an other and exhibit honour to such as he had translated to his kingdom of eternall blessedness being the honour done to a seruant doth redound to his lord and Master Power to dispence this spirituall Treasure of Indulgences or pardons is committed to the Catholick Church as appeareth euidently by Christ's own word's Mat. 16. saying And I will giue vnto thee the key 's of the kingdome of Heauen and whatsoeuer thou shalt binde vpon earth shall be bound also in Heauen and whatsoeuer thou shalt * Quoad verba Christi quodcuÌ„que solueris nomine solutionis non intelligitur sola absolutio iudiciaria sed etiam omnis dispeÌ„satio imo omnis fauor gratia ex vi illius potestatis facta proinde Indulgentia concessa pro extensa ad defunctum à summo Pontifice eius enim solius est dare Indulgentias per defunctis infallibiliter prodest defuncto per modum suffragij id est pro modum auxilij adiutorij Ecclesiastici eidem defuncto applicata si caetera sint paria puta si Jndulgentia fiat ex rationabili causa sique defunctus existat in gratia c. his suppositis Indulgentia applicata defuncto alicui semper est valida rata apud Deum luxta tamen Caâ—etanum Henricum Indulgentia non babes infallibilem effectuâ— respectu animae defuncti sed liberum est Deo eam acceptare vel non acceptare loose an earth shall be loosed also in Heauen wherby Christ promiseth to S. Peter and his successors in Church-gouernment authority and power for the remouing of all
bringes poor man into the pit of the deuil for they that will be rich saith the Apostle 1. Timot. 6. fall into temptation and snares and into many foolish and noisome lustes which drown them in perdition and destruction A ship that is fastened to the earth cannot sail to the hauen she tends to euen so a man whose affections are fixed on earthly riches cannot pass to Heauen which is his hauen in regard the ship of his soul stickes fast to the ground of worldly treasures howeuer riches in themselues are not euil as the poor labourer that spreads fatt dung abroad ouer all his feild renders it fruitfull vnto (d) According to the holy Scriptures Almes deeds deliuer from sin The holy Prophet Daniel counselled Nabuchodonosor to redeem his sinnes by giuing almes and to releiue the poore is a counsell Christ himselfe gaue saying Giue vnto the poore and thou â—halt haue a treasure in Heauen bringing forth much corne so the rich man that distribut's his riches to such as be in necessity prosits his soul vnto iustification of life but who is he that vses well his riches which he might abuse who is he that might doe euil with his gold and hath not don it might offend and hath not offended who is this blessed rich which is found without blemish and hath not gon after riches nor hoped in mony or treasures wherby so many are destroyed who is he for he is an example of glory and his goods be established in our lord and all the Church of Saints shall declare his almes Eccles 31. the blessed rich is he that maketh himselfe poore hauing great riches or he that of his little substance is not afraid to giue a little almes In the law of Moses the old Tobias was blessedly rich he gaue the first tenth part of all his goods to the Priests the sonns of Aron another tenth part he sold and euery yeare bestowed it in good vses at Ierusalem the third tenth part of his goods he destributed among them to whom it was meet he powred out great almes to his brethren and gaue his own bread to such as were hungry and his own clothes to those which were naked Tob. 10. likwise Zaccheus was blessed in riches that gaue halfe of his goods * Qui miseretur pauperi beatus erit beatus qui intelligiâ— super egenuÌ„ pauperem id est qni prouidet egenis pauperibus to the poor because saluation came therby to his house Luk. 19. and that almes laid vp a good store for him selfe in regard it deliuered him from death and suffered him not to come into darknes In the law of grace the primitiue Christians were the blessed rich for many which were possessors of lands or houses sold them and brought the price and laid it down at the Apostles feet and it was distaibuted according to the necessity of each one respectiuely Act. 4. and down from the Apostles to the present times the Church hath produced numberless numbers of blessed rich in euery age respectiuely and our country of England makes a larg claim to the blessed rich as euidence the many beautifull Churches sumptious Monasteries goodly Colleges and famous hospitalls which the almes of its primitiue Catholick Christians haue erected in the honour of God his glorious Virgin mother and other blessed Saints But truly the modern haue much surpassed euen the primitiue Catholick Christians of this Iland for as much as they haue gladly born the yoke of persecution patiently endured the spoiling of their goods and willingly suffered banishment taking vp their Cross of tribulation after the example of their heauenly Master the son of God that desceuded from Heauen to exalt and render pouerty estimable beyond worldly treasures for coming into the world he made choice * Elegi te in camino paupertatis ait Propheta of a poor Virgin in the furnace of pouerty of whom he was made man and in lieu of a glorious pallace sutable to the king of glory at his first entrance into the world was lodged in a stable in room of rich mantles was wrapped in poor swadling cloathes In stead of a bed of state he was laid in a crath or manger and while he was conuersant on earth he had not wheron to rest his head besides at his departure out of this world he was stripped of all cloathes Wherfore t is a great abuse saith S. Bernard and manifest madnes if we shall * S. Bernardus magna abusio vt quis diues esse velit pro quo Deus pauper fierâ— voluit couet to be rich for whose sake the son of God made himselfe poor CHAR. XXXI OF VSVRY THE CONTENTS To lend vnto vsury is forbidden by the law of nature the written law of Moyses and the Euangelicall law of Christ The ancient Iewes by diuine dispensation lent vpon vsury to the Cananites to lend for a spirituall gain precisely implies nothing of vsury nor to exacte or receiue temporall gain either in regard of gain that ceaseth by or dammage that comes of loan precisely Those which lend money or other commodities that consume in vsing transfer the dominion thereof vnto the borrowers in consequence of which Mutuum loan differs from letting or setting to hite The condition of vsurers is miserable USury whichcomes of couetousnes taken in the proper sense implies lucre that is gain gotten exacted or coueted of the loan of money principally and precisely aboue the Capitall sum or of some other thing which through vsing consumes away namely oyle corne c. aboue the capitall stock Here the particle lucre denotates reall money or a vantage that carries the price or valeu of true money for he who lend's to an other man with intent onely to make him his friend or to keepe him from being his Enimy or lends meerly to preuent an vniust vexation does not commit vsury since he reaps thereby nothing of lucre that bears the price or valeu of money because the motiues of such loane be spirituall in consequence of which the lucre that comes of them must of necessity be * S. Math. c. 15. centuplum accipietis c. hic saccrtextus intelligitur de lucre spirituali spirituall also The particle principally makes the primary or principall intent and aime of receiuing encrease aboue the Capitall to be a requisit necessary to the guilt of vsury and indeed a secundary or less principall intention of gain has nothing of wickednes for exaÌ„ple t' is lawfull to serue the Church or the chief Prelate of a Church with a secundary and less principall intent in order to the obtaining of a benefice for his seruice likewise t' is lawfull to celebrate or heare diuine seruice vnto receiuing daily distributions or to serue God in hope and in reguard secondarily of worldly rewards and enioyements * Psal 118. inclinaui cor meum ad faciendas iustificationes tuas propter vetributioneÌ„ which is the doctrine of
impediment's inconsistent with the enioyment of heauenly blessedness wherfore since not sinn's alone but pain 's due thereunto obstruct the passage to the kingdome of Heauen according to Christ's own preaching Mat. 5. Verily 1 say vnto thee thou shalt not come out thence till thou hast paid the vtmost farthing it is euident that the power of the Church doth not only extend vnto the remitting of sinn's but likewise to the releasing of temporell punishment's due thereunto this catholick Truth is clearly euidenced by S. Paules proceeding with the incestuous Corinthian whom he had commanded afore to be deliuered vp to Satan as to destruction of the flesh that his spirit might be saued 1. Cor. 5. For when the Apostle heard that the incestuous adulterer had exercised great penance for his sin least he should be swallowed vp with ouer much sorow at the earnest request of the Corinthians he for gaue the rest or surplus of the pain he had inflicted on him writing to them thus Whom ye forgiue any thing I forgiue also for if I forgiue any thing to whom I forgiue it for your sakes forgiue I it in the person of Christ 2. Cor. 2. by these words plainly appeares that the Apostle forgaue something and since what he forgaue could not be sin in order to the guilt therof for by the Epistle it is clear that the adulterer had exercised great contrition in consequence of which he had receiued remission of his grieuous offence as to it's malice or guilt It followeth of necessity that the thing forgiuen was part of the temporall punishment which the greatness of the sin had deserued and indeed in order to that alone the Corinthians presented their request Hereby further appeares the authority wherwith Church-gouernours are inuested for the remission of temporall pain 's remaining after sin's are forgiuen which is the power of granting Indulgences proper to the Vicars of Christ in whose room they exercise it And the word 's sett down beare euidently this sense viêªt videlicet In the person of Christ As the Apostle did deliuer vnto Satan the adulterer in the name and by the power of our lord IESVS CHRIST 1. Cor. 5. so 2. Cor. 2. * In 1. Cor. 5. Patianus Epis contra NouatianuÌ„ Vide inquit Apostoli Jndulgentiam proprias etiam sententias temperantis he did moderate his sentence by remitting part of his temporall affliction * S. Ambros l. 1. de poeniten c. 6. agens con Nouatianos ait ex eo quod Apostolus dicit se condonare in persona Christi ipsuÌ„ vendicasse ius à Domino acceptum non indebitum vsurpasse challenging to that effect authority receiued of Christ whose person he represented in the dispensation of that pardon or Indulgence Neither is this doctrine infirmed at all because of the Apostles request directed to the rest of the Corinthians wherby he hearing of the said adulterers exceeding griefe for his sin exhorteth them to pardon and comfort him saying It is sufficient vnto the same man that he was rebuked of many so that now contrary wise ye ought rather to forgiue and comfort him lest exceeding heauiness should swallow him vp Cor. 2. For though it was not said to all the faithfull of the Church ioynt and seperate Whatsoeuer ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in Heauen But to the Apostles and their successours in Priestly function such only being Christ's ministers and Vicegerents to whom the power of loosing is coÌ„mitted properly as to the iuridicall exercise of it (b) A belieuiug Christian that hath nothing of iurisdiction can by way of request or prayer obtaine for an other remission of the pain due to his sin for example a man that is bound to suffer pain or punishment may notwithstanding transfer and apply the prize of that satisfaction to the aduantage of his freind for as the Apostle saith Charitas patiens est Charity is patient wherfore a charitable man is inclinable to suffer affliction vnto profiting his Neighbour whereof the Apostle Collos 1. giues euidence euough saying Novv rejoyce I in my sufferings for you and to fulfill those things that vvant of the passions of Christ in my flesh for his bodies sake vvhich is the Church though Christs Passions were wanting in nothing as to sufficiency for he was made vnto vs iustice sanctification and redemption 1. Cor. 1. that is according to the same Apostle 1. Cor. 6. he was made the Author giuer and meritorious cause of our iustice sanctity and redemption neuertheless as to efficacy there was something wanting viz. the application of Christs merits which is made by the Sacraments of the Church vnto remitting both the guilt and pain of sin and by our own afflictions charitable offered in order to our Neighbour vnto remitting of temporall punishment due to sin remitted afore But no man can satisfye for the sin of an other as to the guilt therof for he diuine Iustice will remit no man his sin that shall not be sorry for and dereste it himselfe according to the holy scripture Luc. 13. Except yee do penance that is except ye haue in ward sorrow and detestation of your sinnes yee shall all perish Besides neither the guilt of a mortall sin nor eternall pain due thereto is forgiuen and taken away without the infusion of sanctifying grace according to the Council of Trent sess 6. c. 7. nay veniall sin according to the common opinion of Catholick Doctours is not purged out of a soul vnless grace be infused into it howeuer neither of both is remitted to those which are come to full yeares of discretion without an act of detestation and sorrow Wherfore when the Popes Bull 's whereby Indulgences are granted mention remission of sinnes they mean remission of the temporall pains due vnto them And indeed the Popes declare in their Bull 's that they grant their Indulgences to such as are contrite and truly penitent Again accordiug to holy scriptures sin is taken sometymes for the paine due thereto namely Machabae 2. neuertheless all the faithfull together with their Pastours forgiue and loose by consent desire (i) The Apostle 2. Cor. 8. in saying Let your aboundance supply their vvant that also their aboundance may supply your vvant gaue hopes to the Corinthians whom he exhorted to furnish Titus and Luke with corporall necessary's that the spirituall aboundance of the same Titus and Luke might supply and enrich their spirituall want through their good work 's prayers and corporall satisfactions And truly this sacred Text shew's euidently that not only worldly goods as Almes may be rewarded through spirtuall riches namely prayers and other holy works but that the Saincts or godly persons may as well applye their aboundant satisfactions vnto supplying the spirtuall want's of others as those which abound with worldly riches may supply with their superfluities the corporall necessities of their Neighbours commiseration outward ward good works and holy prayers offered to God
the Apostles to loose the cordes wherwith he was tyed doe represent Christian penance and the power that Christ gaue the Church to loose and remit sins as doe euidence the testimonies of ancient Fathers who also doe expresly assert Christ by his actions to haue prefigured the mysteries of christian religion Howeuer no man can deny without running into manifest errour but that the seuen afore named ecclesiasticall order haue had their begining from Christ's own institution and it matters not that euery Church in the primitiue times was not serued with so many for then in regard of the scarcity of belieuers and want of members to promote to the ministery there could not be so many ordained in so much that for the most part one Church was gouerned by one Priest only or by one Bishop and a Deacon yet after a happy encrease of belieuers and persons proper to exercise ecclesiasticall functions euery Church was supplied with all the seuen orders of ministers and serued according to their distinct offices As touching * Catechismus Trid. cap. de ordine parag 13. ait Parochū debere docere primam Tōsuram esse praeparat ionem quandā ad sacros ordines suscipiendos sicut sunt Exorcismi ad Baptismum sponsalia ad matrimoniū docēt autem Beda l. 4. His. Aug. Baronius Tom. 1. Annal an Christi 58. antiquitatem vsum significationem clericalis Tōsurae clericall Tonsure it is no ecclesiasticall order taken in the proper sense being only a disposition or preparation vnto ordination as exorcisme is to Baptisme or spousalls vnto Matrimony that is to say it is the first step only to ecclesiasticall promotion howeuer the vsage thereof is ancient as is also the clipping of the haire in the crowne of his head that receiues it wherby literally is signifyed the crowne of royall Priesthood wherunto a Clergy-man is disposed and deputed by Clericall tonsure or the crowne of glory which he expecteth in vertue of Christs death and passion or mystically is represented therby worldly employments and superfluous cares and entertainement's which a Clergy-man ought to cast from him as he doth the haire of his head in the receiuing of Tonsure But Episcopacy as a function distinct from Priesthood hath a good title to ecclesiasticall order taken in the proper sense for the consecration of Bishops is called ordination and the Hierarchy of the Church which is a subordination of ecclesiasticall ministers in respect whereof some are more eminent then others in the administration of diuine things doth consist of Bishops Priests and other inferiour ministers wherefore Episcopacy is essentially required thereunto as the noblest Hierarchicall member and indeed that which the Apostle gaue to Timothy by laying on of his hands was Episcopall dignity or Episcopacy according to the interpretation of S. Chrysostome Hom. 13. in 1. Epis ad Timoth. Theophilactus S. Anselm and others Besides the ancientest Fathers doe call Episcopacy an holy Order Anacletus Ep. 3. cap. 1. Caius Pope in the numbring of orders acknowledgeth two orders of Priests the one of Maior Priests that is Bishops and the other of Minor Priest's that is meer Priests Likewise S. Epiphan Haeres 75. Yet the degrees and states of Primates and Patriarchs as distinct offices from Episcopacy lay no claim to the Churches Hierarchy being in respect of Episcopall function one and the same order and the maiority that these can challenge aboue meer Bishops proceedes from human constitution only As the ordination of Priests Deacons and Sub-Deacons c. is a Sacrament taken in the proper sense so is (g) According to the Current of catholick writers since the Council of Trent Episcopacy is a Sacrament taken in the proper sense and the contrary opinion counted erroneous And truly S Austin con Parmeni and other ancient Fathers while they call holy Order a Sacrament they instance in Episcopacy which has diuine institution Act. 20. the holy Ghost appointed Bishops to gouerne the Church and though according to the 2. Toletan Council meer Priest's laid their hands together with the Bishop in the heads of those which were ordain'd which was the custome of some Churches of those dayes neuertheless that imposition of hands as to meer Priest's had nothing of the proper matter and at the most was a condition only requir'd to the validity of the Sacrament of holy Order as now the personall presence of the Parish Priest or some other by him substituted is an essentiall requisit to the validity of Marriage ordination of bishops hauing all necessary requisits therunto viz. outward sensible Rites Grace conferred therby and Christs (b) The Sacrament of holy Order as to Episcopacy Christ instituted Io. 20. when he said to his Apostles As my Father sent me so send I you receiue the holy Ghost And indeed as to reason t' is not probable that Episcopall Order was instituted afore for then doubtless Christ had instituted it at his last supper by the word 's hoc facite do this But these particles according to the Council of Trent sess 21. can 2. were meant of power giuen vnto Priest's in order to the celebrating of the Euchariste own institution which do plainly appeare by the words of the Apostle 2. Tim. 1. stir vp the grace of God which is in thee by the putting on of mine hands that is by ordaining thee a Bishop according to the interpretation of the ancient Fathers Again diuine institution of Episcopacy is deducible sufficiently enough from the Hierarchy of the Church instituted by diuine ordination Episcopacy being the noblest member therof for the Hierarchy (i) According to S. Epiphanius haer 57. or 77. Orders of Church-ministers were perfected by litle and litle onely and he obserueth that the Apostle Epis ad Timot. ad Tit. mention's a Bishop and a Deacon onely because those primitiue Churches had onely those two orders of Ministers in regard there was then exceeding great scarcity of persons fit to be ordain'd and the Council of Trent doth not exact the whole number of Ministers but in such Churches as can conueniently be furnisht with all the Orders doth consist of Bishops Priests and (k) The principall Church Ministers after the Priest's are Deacons according to S. Denys l. de Eccles Hierar c. 23. and 5. the function proper to them is to serue in order to the holy Euchariste Also according to S. Ignat. Epis ad Trullo Deacons were not dispensers of meat and drink but of christian Sacraments Besides according to S. Justin in fine Apologet. Deacons were wont to minister the Enchariste to those which were present and to carry it to such as were absent Again this catholick doctrine appear's evidently by the History of S. Lawrence which S. Ambrose set's down l. 1. offic c. 41. and doubtless to haue care of the poore was the secundary and not the primary office of Deacons ministers Hereby it is cleare that Episcopacy doth imprint a spirituall character in
prinat spirit is condemned for example in the old law Numb 12. God was angry with Mary Moyses Sister and Aaron because they had detracted from Moyses she saying hath our lord spoken only by Moyses hath be not spoken also by vs and Ierem. 23. Heare not the words * S. Hieron ait falsos illos prophetas referre baereticos qui sequuntur spirituÌ„ suuÌ„ quia nequaquam inquit diuino instinctu sed proprio corde vaticinantur of the Prophets that prophesie vnto you and deceiue you they speak the visions of their own hearts and not out of the mouth of our lord and Ezech. 13. God saith thus woe vnto the foolish prophets that follow their own spirit yet say the lord saith it albeit I haue not spoken likewise in the new law this priuat spirit is condemned for in the primary age of the Church (f) Eusebius l. 3. hist Eccles cap. 12. attests that Cherintus besides his other prophane nouelties fained subtil delusions as reuealed vnto him by the ministery of Angels and according to the same Eusebius l. 5. cap. 15. Montanus and Maximilla were carried away with delusions of the like nature for among the reasons why they were cut of from the Church of God one was because they pretended vnto speciall reuelations and the Church declared that it was a thing contrary to the custom and practice down from the Apostles till those times that any particular person should presume to haue a priuat spirit reuealing vnto him matters pertaning to christian faith Cherintus was counted an Heretick for pretending vnto priuat reuelations in the spreading of sundry absurd doctrines and in as much as he asserted that Iesus-Christ was not come in the flesh Saint Ioan. Apostle Epis 1. cap. 4. writeth to the faithfull against him thus Dearly beloued belieue not euery spirit but trie the spirits whether they are of God for many false prophets are gon out into this world hereby you shall know the spirit of God euery spirit which confesseth that Iesus-Christ is come in the flesh is of God and euery spirit that confesseth not that Iesus-Christ is come in the flesh is not of God Yet althought the Apostle vsed that analogie in order to this true article of faith Iesus-Christ is come in the flesh as a certain signe to shew the falshood of Cherintus assertion neuertheless he did not mean to establish it for a generall rule to distinguish euery good from euery ill spirit or euery true from euery false doctrine for the Pelagians and sundry ancient sectaries are counted Hereticks both by Lutherans and Caluinists albeit they acknowleged the mistery of the Incarnation But the generall rule for the trying of spirits Saint Iohn clearly expresseth a very little after in his same Epistle saying Wee Apostles are of God he that knoweth God heareth vs he that is not of god heareth vs not hereby know we the spirit of truth and the spirit of errour In regard his first particular rule was not sufficient enough to discerne between euery true and false doctrine that is to say between all true and false Teachers therfore he addeth this generall rule viz. To heare or not to heare vs Apostles Gouernours of the Church alluding to Christs own words set down I uc 10. He that heareth you heareth me and he that despiseth you despiseth me Saint Iohn spoke in the person of all the Apostles and their successors in Church Gouerment with whom is deposited christian doctrine receiued from the mouth of Christ and truly it is very probable that no one of the other Apostles was aliue when Saint Iohn writ his Epistle yet what Christ promised Mat. 28. behold I am with you alwayes untill the end of the world remained then in him and euen now in the Prelats of the Church that succeed the Apostles in the administration therof wherby it is cleare that the office of supream Iudge of coÌ„trouersies in debate concerning faith and religion is proper to ecclesiasticall authoritie only howeuer in as much as no man can come vnto Christ except the Father which hath sent him draw him Ioa. 6. inward grace of the holy Ghost is necessarily required to belieue in and loue God aright vnto the obseruation of his ordinances and law of which is meant the prophesies Ierem. 31. I will put my law saith our lord in their inward parts and write it in their hearts and will be their God and they shall be my people Isa 50. and all thy children shall be taught of our lord to witt by inward grace which excludeth not outward Teachers for faith is by heareing and hearing importeth outward Teachers Moyses and the Prophets of those daies taught the people in as much as they declared vnto them outwardly the lawes of God affording nothing of inward help to the seeking of them but Christ truly God cloathed with human flesh taught by himselfe in our new law both outwardly preaching the doctrine of faith and inwardly instilling into the hearts of his people inward grace for the embracing of it and afterward before his ascention into heauen appointed outward visible Teachers and promised withall his own inward inuisible concurrence with them to the end of the world Wherfore doubtless the alledged scripturs will show only the maiority of Christ compared to Moyses and the Prophets in order to teaching matters of faith and religion together (g) According to holy scripture Io. 1. the law was giuen by Moyses but grace and truth came by Iesus-Christ The old law pointed at sin onely and made it known but the new law furnishes grace to fulfill it and purge out of our souls the leauen of sin with the plenteous measure of grace especially annexed to the new law in respect wherof it is stiled the law of grace neither is this necessity of outward Teachers excluded by the saying of Saint Paul 1. Cor. 2. he that is spirituall discerneth all things and he himselfe is iudged of noe man Ioa. 1. Eps cap. 2. ye need not that any man teach you but as his vnction teacheth you all things and it is true and is notlying and Saint Ioa. 1. Eps cap. 5. he that belieueth in the son of God hath the testimony of God in himselfe for as to the first text Saint Paul spoke of the spirituall man only that is to say of such beliuers as were perfect and knowing of christian doctrine and therby apt to discern false opinions and conceiue the high mysteries of faith declared by word of mouth or writing which is not to exclude outward Teachers and that this is the true meaning appeareth by the Apostle himselfe because he says in the very same Chapter set down We speak wisdom among them that are perfect and we speake wisdom in a mystery wherby he seâ—teth the spirituall maÌ„ against the naturall man that is versed only in the wisdom of the world or in the knowledge of naturall things and in the third Chapter of the same Epistle
he saith thus And I would not speake vnto you Brethren as vnto spirituall mem but as vnto carnall men euen as to Babes in Christ I giue you milke to drinke and not meat for you were not yet able to beare it where he layeth the spirituall man against the carnall man that in regard of carnall affection perceiueth not the things of the spirit of God wherfore it seemeth a strang thing that Sectaries should infer from this text of scripture that euery belieuer hath a priuat (b) S. Irenaeus l. 3. cap. 2. con haer sharpely rebuks Valentinus for leauing tradition and following the priuat spirit thereby constituting himselfe sole iudge and rule of faith reuealing spirit of truth wherby he is enabled with authority to discern matters of faith and iudge all controuersies and to be iudged of no man himselfe vnto the excluding of all outward Teachers As to the second Text the true meaning of it is not that his vnction only doth teach but that the doctrines of christian religion which men teach outwardly by speaking * Aug. trac 3. in Epis Joan. magisteria inquit forensecus adiutoria quaedam sunt admonitiones cathedram autem in caelo habet qui corda dotet his vnction teacheth inwardly by inspiring grace wherby men are made apt to harken to what the Church ministers teach and indeed this docility or aptness to harken to the word of God is a speciall prerogatiue giuen by the spirit of grace vnto the children of the new law and prophesied of in the old law by Ieremy and Isaias As concerning the third Text set down the true sense is this that whosoeuer beliueth in the son of God aright hath in himselfe inward faith which is a diuine gift and therfore called the testimony of God in as much as it witnesseth that no man can * Mat. tues Christus Filius Dei viui caro sanguis non reuelauit tibi sed pater meus come vnto the son Iesus-Christ except it be giuen vnto him by the Father and albeit that the inward testimony of God hath been the Iole cause to draw some men vnto the maruelous light of faith for example Saint Peter beliued the mistery of the incarnation in vertue of an inward inspiration proceeding from God immediatly neuertheless the outward testimony of the Church is the ordinary necessary requisit to the conceiuing of christian faith according to the ordinance of Christ that hath constituted outward Teachers to be of necessary and perpetuall vse in his Church to the worlds end that we be not carryed about with euery wind of doctrine which hath been extreme needlesse if he had thought it expedient to supply euery particular belieuer with a priuat reuealing spirit Furthermore from the premises is clearly deducible that the holy scripture cannot lay clame to the dignitie of a supream Iudge because the office therof which is a primary end intended of necessity * Plato in libris quos de repub scripsit Aristoteles in policicis docent in constitutione formatione alicuius reipub vnum ex ijs quae debent 1. per se intentendi esse ipsum IudiceÌ„ pro dirimendis litibus ciuium ad pacem in rep seruandam in the forming of euery common wealth is to declare laws punish peruerse offenders and pronounce sentence of iudgment for the determining all matter in debate that therby vnity and peace may be preserued but the scripturs can chaleng nothing of iuridicall power in order to iudging defining and deciding controuersies of faith these actions importing life hearing and speaking which the scripturs cannot exercise being vnliud things that neither heare nor speak clearly and consequently vnfit to Iudg matters in debate between one and another besids these were not intended in â—he forming of the Church as requisits absolutly necessary to the Gouerment of it for Christ during the time he conuersed on earth writ nothing himselfe nor commaunded his Apostles or disciples to writ and indeed of themselues they were not much (i) According to Eusebius l. 3. hist Eccles cap. 18. the Apoles and disciples of Christ were not greatly solicitous to put down in writing the misteries of christian faith being the employment inioyned them was to preach the Gospel in so much that according to the same Eusebius it was a tradition of those days that they were after a manner necessitated to write and according to S. Hierom de viris illus S. Iohn writ his Gospel in regard of Cherintus and Ebion which denyed the diuinity of Christ And indeed t is euident that the Apostles did not write down the principles of christian religion hauing receiued command ad commission from Christ to preach without any commission to write set vpon writing because of their ingagement in an higher imployment namely preaching of the Gospell and it seems that those few which haue written were vrged or necessitated therunto as was Saint Iohn that writ his Gospell to confute the hereticks Cherintus and Ebion who denied the diuinity of Christ Again among the twelue Apostles Saint Matthew and Saint Iohn only and among the 62. Disciples Saint Luke only only writ the Gospell euen diuers years after Christs Ascention into Heauen insomuch that the christiaÌ„ Church had institutioÌ„ exercised iuridicall authority made lawes exacted obedience vnto them along while before the new scripturs were in being and contrary to the old scripture pronounced sentence of iudgment to the anulling of Circumcision which was a controuersy of faith Wherfore doubtless scripturs were neither primarly intended nor primarly giuen as suprem iudges of all matters in debate concerning faith and religion moreouer Saint Irenaeus who florished in the yeare of our lord 160. expresly (k) Irenaeus l. 3. con haer cap. 4. denyes expresly that christian faith had perished if the Apostles had not left vs the scriptures asserteth that the people of sundry countries without the help of paper or inck had preserued christian faith down from the Apostles to his time the vnwritten supplying the room of the written word for this ancient Father writeth and ascribeth that preseruation vnto apostolicall tradition obserued by the ancient Churches together with the help of inward grace proceeding from the holy Ghost Wherfore as those primatiue Churches did perseruer in the profession of the christian faith for the space of many years without scripturs so the present Church assisted with the like meanes might continue pure without spot or wrinckle although it had nothing of written doctrine and consequently the primary end for which scripturs were intended was not to doe the office of suprem Iudg howeuer all things which were written were written for our learning that wee through patience * L. 1. Machabae cap. 11 Ionathas summus Sacerdos scribens spartiatis dicit se suos in rebus aduersis pro solatio habere libros sacros quod ostendit vsum in quem datae sunt nobis
inquit haereses obortae sunt aut nata sūt schismata quam quod Sacerdoti Dei non obtemperatur nec vnus in Ecclesia ad tē pus Sacerdos Iudex vice Christi cogitatur teaching peruerse things to draw disciples after them wherby is euidenced that no priuat man is an infallible interpreter of holy scriptures neither can know certainly that scriptures are the word of God laying aside the Churches authority For example credence is not giuen to the canon or caralogue of scriptures because of scripture testimony which no where attestes that catalogue in so much that Luther and Caluin down from the begining of their defection to the departure out of the world contended about the number of canonicall scriptures and their adherents of these dayes respectiuely continue in the pursuance of the same dispute Moreouer there is greater reason that the christian faith should rely rather on the Church which * S. Cypri in trac de vnitate Ecclesiae adulterari inquit nō potest sponsae Christi incorrupta est pudicae is an infallible ground and piller of truth then of sole scriptures which are liable to mutations corruptions and false interpretations howeuer scriptures cōsidered in themselues precisely do chaleng equall authority with the Church the same diuine spirit that directeth the tongues of the supream pastours in speaking (o) God by his absolute and extrrordinary power can himselfe alone or by an Angel instruct men and reueale matters of faith and christian religion without the ministery of the Church And doubtless the Apostles had noe other master but God himselfe as to sundry mysteries of christian faith and Christ himselfe confesseth that S. Peter came to the knowledge of his diuine nature by reuelation from God the Father Caro Sanguic non reuelauit tibi sed Pater meus guided the pennes of the Apostles and Euangelists in writing and as the Church beareth witnesse of the scriptures infallible doctrine so the scriptures do witness the Churches infalible authority yet so as that faith in order to its acte of assent is resolued into the Church and not into the scriptures for noe man can prudently belieue any scripture to be the word of God if the Church that is the ground and piller of truth should not declare it for such howeuer Catholicks who doe infer the Churches infallibility from the testimony of scripture and the authority of scripture from the testimony of the Church are noe more guilty of committing (p) According to Euclide a mathematicall circle taken in the proper sense is the passing of one and the same line from and the repassing vnto the same point and by the same way a circle of errour then are Philosophers that assert mutuall causalities or doe argue from a cause its proper effect and from an effect its proper cause for example from the rising of the sun is proued the existence of the day and againe the existence of the day proueth the risiing of the sun wherin there is noe circle of errour which properly consisteth in the coming again of the same thing vnto the same thing from whence it came and by the same way it came but the way of one cause is not the way of an other cause nor the way of an effect is the way of the cause wherof it is the effect in like manner the way of the Church which is a cleare speaking Iudge is not the way of the scriptures which consiste in mute elements of characters and although we belieue that the Church is an infallible proposer of all matters pertaining to faith because of the scripture testimony neuertheless if the scriptures had borne noe witness therof there is euidence of credibility enough to induce vs prudently to belieue the Churches infallibility which euen before the writing of scriptures was beliued neither do we recur to scriptures to proue it (q) In disputs or conferences with such as deny holy scriptures motiues of credibility haue weight with them and that one which S. Austin vseth l. con Epis Faus cap. 4. seems of greattest moment Many things saith he keepe me fast in the bosom of the Catholick Church for example the vnanimous accord of people and nations authority confirmed by miracles .... by antiquity strengthned and the succession of Bishops dovvn from S. Peter the Apostle to vvhom our lord committed the feeding of his sheepe vnto the present Episcopacy but when we haue to doe with such as admit them and euen then we doe not alledge scriptures as the formall cause the Churches infallibility is known by for that is diuine reuelation but as witness of it only for we doe not belieue precisely that the Church is infallible because the scripturs do say it but in regard of many other motiues which do moue vs to giue our assent thereto neither was the church intended for the vse of the scriptures but scriptures for the vse of the Church besides no man without manifesting extream weakness can except against the mutuall testimony that Christ and S. Iohn Baptist gaue of one another or against the disciples of both who belieued their masters to be such as their masters reciprocally had declared theselues to bee The principall marks or tokens of the true Church * Quatuor illa signa dilucide constant ex sacra scriptura ex symbolis Apostolorum Nicae S. Athanasij expressè habentur in sym Constātinop cuius Patres voce apostolicam diuinitus addiderunt are foure set douwn in that Article of christian faith viz I belieue one holy catholick and apostolick Church Albeit that the true Church consisteth of many members yet it is but one body 1. Cor. 12. of Christ in vnity of faith and baptism One lord one faith one baptism Ep. 4. nor can Christ be an author of diuision that is a God of vnion Likwise it is holy for as much as it is the body of Christ that is the fountain of all holyness and enioyes a sacrifice and Sacraments which confer sanctity neither matters it that sundry members of his body are guilty of mortall transgressions For as such as profess any art are counted artificers though they doe not act according to the principalls or rules there-of so the said members in regard they put on Christ (r) According to S. Austin in psal 85. if all christians and true belieuers are baptized in Christ they haue put on Christ as the Apostle reacheth Gal. 3. and if they be made members of his body and say they are not holy they do an iniury to the head whose members are holy by Baptism and become the chosen people of God by faith are called holy although they doe not obserue the ordinances and lawes of either For example 1. Cor. 1. the Corinthians are said to be sanctified in Christ IESVS and holy neuertheless there were among them both the naturall and carnall men The true Church militant is (ſ) According to the Euangelist
S. Mat. cap. 24. the Church of God bears the name of the kingdom of Heauen And S. Hierom stileth the Church the arke of Noe that contained Leopards kids wolfes and lambs that is to say both good and wicked men dwel in the Church of God and though she is faid Eph. 4. to haue no spot or wrinckle yet that is meant in relation to faith and doctrine which are holy and without blame Howeuer S. Austin l. de perfec iustorum expounds the sacred Text set down also in order to the Church triumphant which is without spot or wrinckle the great house of God wherin are not only vessells of gold and siluer but also of wood and of earth and some for honour and some for dishonour 2. Tim. 2. howeuer no man is so irreuocably a vessell vnto dishonour but that he may be translated into a vessell vnto honour sanctified and meet for our lord IESVS if he will cast from him all his transgressions committed after baptism wherby he was incorporated into this great house which made him a vessell vnto dishonour The Church is called catholick that is vniuersall in as much as it sendeth forth the marueilous light of christian faith from the rising of the sun vnto the goeing douwn therof For Christ that redeemed vs to God by his bloud out of euery kindred and tongue and people and nation Apoc. 5. hath not confined the knowledg of his faith * Aug. ser 13. Ecclesia inquit à solis ortu vsque ad occasum vnius fidei splendore enititur within the bounds of one kingdome Moreouer the Church is rightly named catholick or vniuersall in respect of time that is to say of perpetuall succession of pastours and Teachers for the prouidence of God towards man of necessity preserueth the Church from perishing himselfe hauing prouidently instituted it as the common ordinary way to lead man vnto his kingdom Again its vniuersall because of the obligation euery man hath to embrace it that will aspire to eternall life As out of the arke of Noe there was no deliuerance from the generall deluge (t) According to S. Cyprian trac de vnit Eccle. whosoeuer hath not the Church for his Mother shall not haue God for his Father And according to S. Fulgentius who was contemporary with S. Austin l. de fide Such as are not incorporated into the Church how charitable soeuer they be cannot be saued and this Catholick assertion S. Austin professes likwise li. 4. de baptismo besids according to the holy scriptures no man that is not within the Churches bosome can obtaine heauenly benediction in consequence of which to rebell against or fall from her is execrable and damnable so out of the true Church there is no saluation and indeed the Church is the sole Mother that conceiueth bringeth forth and nourisheth children vnto heauenly blessednes Lastly the true Church is called apostolicall because it hath doth and shall preach in all times to the end of the world christian religion planted by the Apostles vpon whom as the foundation it was built Eph. 2. By the forementioned marks or tokens ioyntly the Church of Christ is shewed and distinguished from euery false congregation The Synagogue of Iews and Mahometans cannot challeng Apostolicall foundation where of Christ himselfe is the Chief corner stone nor catholick propagation from the rising of the sun to the goeing down therof for their religion is neither christian nor spread in all parts of the world and the false Churches of sectaries though they carry the name of christian neuertheless they haue nothing of vnity as to the faith of Christ nor of perpetuall succession as to pastours and Teachers down from the Apostles to these present times for they set vp a new mysticall body of Christ composed of reformed members saying that Christ in regard of sundry great scandalls and errours hath elected the old mysticall body wherof he was head afore that is the Roman Church which seemeth a strang thing because that Church according to their own confession was once in possession of the true faith and true religion * Ad Rom. 5. gratias ago Domino Deo quod fides vestra Romana annunciata Est in vniuerso mundo and the Apostle witnesseth as much writing to the Romans I thank my God through Iesus-Christ for you all because your faith Roman is published through out the whole world and no one expresse scripture testimony can be alledged to shew that the Roman Church hath deuiated from that true faith in consequence of which sectaries that will belieue nothing without express scripture ought not to belieue that the Roman Church is deuested of the true faith which it was once in possession of and therby deserted and truly it is not to reason credible that Christ after being marryed to the Roman Church for sundry ages should repudiate her especially hauing promised by the mouth of his holy Prophet that * Sponsabo te mihi in aeternum he will neuer chang the spouse of the new law saying I will espouse thee for euer it is not as to reason credible that Christ that cast out the bill of deuorce practized in the old law should be the first to bring it again into practice nor is it as to reason credible that the spouse which Christ chose without sport or wrinckle and put vnder the conduct of the holy Ghost should cast away her spousall innocence integrity and fidelity and turne to vncleaness fornication and idolatry Wherfore it is plainly euident that the Roman Church is not repudiated or deserted wherefore she and no other is the true Church of Christ that since the first age for 1660. yeares hath not deuiated from one holy catholick and Apostolick faith neither is * Apostolus scribens ad Rom. dicit fidem vestram meam sed fides S. Pau. erat vniuersalis catholica Roman Church and catholick or vniuersall Church less consistent together then christian Church and catholick Church or apostolicall and catholick Church for Christ was a singular person whence the word Christian is deriued and the Apostles were particular men whence the word Apostolicall comes and as the catholick Church is named christian because of Christ that is the supream inuisible head therof and as the catholick Church is called apostolicall in respect of the Apostles which were the foundation of it so the Catholick Church is called Roman from the Bishop of Rome that is the visible head therof subordinate to Christ * Concil Alexand loquens de Roma Eccl. sacer inquit vertex inquo omnis Ecclesia vertitur and indeed the Roman Church taken properly doth not signifie precisely and only that Church which is at Rome but cōprehendeth euery Church through out the whole world that professeth the same faith with it and acknowledgeth obedience to the same (u) According to S. Anaclete S. Anaclete S. Peters disciple and his third successor in the Pontificate
can sacro-sancta the Apostolicall sea did not receiue supremacy and preeminence from the Apostles but from our Sauiour himselfe and indeed Christ founded and built his Church vpon S. Peter Mat. 16. Thou art Peter and on this rock I vvill build my Church .... and J vvill giue vnto the the keys of the kingdome of heauen Again Christ praid especially for S. Peter and after his resurrection appointed him to feed all his sheepe and lambs Moreouer S. Peter as head and Prince of the other Apostles called the first Councill which was celebrated between the Ascention and Pentecost And in the second Council mentioned act 15. spoke first and decided the matter in debate Bishop of Rome as lawfull successour of S. Peter in suprem authority and there is not any except the Roman Church that hath published and planted the one holy apostolicall faith from the rising of the sun to the goeing down therof which denoteth its vniuersality an order to place there is not any except the Roman Church that can rockon pastours and Teachers in a continuall line of succession down from S. Peter to the present times which sheweth its vniuersality in order to time there is not any Church-Gouernour saue the Bishop of Rome to whose definitiue sentence of iudgment (x) S. Anaclete Epis 1. commanded that euery hard question should be referd to the sea Apostolick because saith he the Apostles so appointed by speciall command from Christ Wherefore Tertullian calleth the Pope king of the world and stiles Rome the Chief and Apostolicall seat whether saith he wee ought to recur in all doubtfull matters relating to faith Besids S. Austin that was a member of the African Church Epis 9. addressing himselfe to Pope Innocent in order to the Pelagians whom he impugned writeth thus ... that errour and impiety of the Pelagians the authority of the sea apostolick must anathematize Again the Council of Alexandria cals Pope Felix prophanarum haresium depositor the deposer of prophan heresies hard controuersies of faith haue been referred in all ages Furthermore it is essentiall to the true Church to begett children in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell 1. Cor. 4 that is to say to bring whole countries out of darkness of infidelity into the maruelous light of Christian faith which not any except the Roman Church hath performed Sectaries like partriges haue gathered children * Ieremiae cap. 17. perdix fouet seu congregat quae non peperit Vnde S. Aug. assimilat haereticos perdici which they haue not brought forth but the Roman Church hath begotten vnto Christ a world of children both in the primatiue times for the first 500. yeares and since For Germans Bauarians Vandals Polans Sweds Danes Noruegians Hungarians Normans English and sundry other Countryes since the yeare 600. were begotten in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell by Priests and Bishops of the Roman Church as plainly appears by the ancient and modern histories written of each people respectiuely And as touching our country of Englād that embraced the catholick faith through the preaching of S. Austin a Priest and Bishop of the Roman Church after its conuersion which happened in the reign of S. Ethelbert for near a thousand yeares continued obedient to the Bishop of Rome and constant in the profession of the catholick religion as do euidence our ancient Cronicles laws common laws ordinances Records foundations of Bishopricks Cathedrall Churches vniuersities colleges and hospitalls which remain monuments of these dayes to beare clear witnes of catholick religion wherfore it is a wonder how English Magistrats come to look with so enuious an eye vpon their catholick subiects as to persecute them for conforming their conscience to the full and constant profession of all their christian progenitours CHAR. XX. OF TRADITIONS THE CONTENTS Down from the Apostles to these times the true Church of God hath been directed and gouernd by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Christ or from the holy Ghost by inspiration were deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnritten traditions if the Churches authority and vnwritten traditions were laid a side scriptures would haue nothing of waight with them vnto euincing christian religion Answeres vnto seuerall obiections propounded against the Churches traditions TRaditions are vnwrtten doctrines deliuered by the mouth of Christ or his Apostles and committed vnto the keeping of the Church (a) 1. Cor. 11. as I haue deliuered vnto you saith S. Paul keep my precepts From this sacred Text Theophilact infers that both S. Paul and the other Apostles deliuered many things which they did not set down in writing called traditions not because they are not at all written but in regard there is no express mention thereof in the holy scriptures for t is certaine that the traditions receiued from the Apostles and deliuered as it were from hand to hand for sundry ages are now written as precepts of faith and generall manners necessary vnto saluation Though the whole scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to conuince to correct and to instruct in iustice 2. Tim. 3. Yet it is not the same thing to be a profitable guide in the way of iustce and saluation and to be the sole expedient necessary therunto for a head is both profitable and necessary to preserue a man aliue neuertheless it alone without the society and ministery of the body is not sufficient enough to continue him aliue likewise the Sacrament of Eucharist conduceth to the purchase of eternall blessedness yet cannot effect it without the help of baptism and faith and the Chapter set down expresly asserteth that euen the old scriptures instruct to saluation and notwithstanding the Apostle requireth of Timothy perseuerance in the doctrines which he had heard of him besides what he had learned from them wherin he had been versed from (b) By the particles from his infancy euidently appeares that the Apostle spoke of these scriptures which Timothy had learned in his youth that is he meant the old testament being the new scriptures were not written when Timothy was a youth Wherefore when the Apostle writ vnto him that all scripture is profitable c. he could not vnderstand the whole body thereof as some sectaries vnaduisedly interprete him translating whole for all And indeed when the Apostle writ that Epistle to Timothy the whole body of scripture was not composed S. Iohn had not then put forth his Gosple and his Apocallps he writ after the death of S. Paul him infancy again albeit the scriptures be a great light neuertheless they doe not giue light to all a en within the house of God whose written doctrines they are vnless they be put vpon the candlestick of the Churches definitions and vnwritten traditions for setting these aside scriptures are but a light shining in a dark place 2.
Pet. 10. in order to many diuine ordinances in regard they doe not shew plainly clearly and euidently all the mysterious precepts of Christian faith that require necessary obseruance wherefore it is an extream weakness to infer from the light of the written a negation of light in the vnwritten word of God as to instruction in iustice and saluation and indeed down from the begining of the Church christian religion hath in all times * Trid sess 4. cap. 1. declarat veritatem disciplinä Ecclesiae contineri in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus qua ex ipsius Christi ore ab Apostolic acceptae aut ab ipsis Apostolis Spiritu sancto dictāte quasi per manus traditae ad nos vsque peruenerūt huiusmodi traditionū contemptoros anathemati subiecit Sectarij vero communiter reijciuns eruditiones apostolicas affirmantes omnia qua sine dispendio sulutis possunt ignorari apertè contineri in scripturis been directed and gouerned by both of the said lights that is by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs which kind of gouerment is common alike to euery common wealth instituted aright That this double light (c) According to S. Irenaens p. 3. con haer c. 3. 4. Tertull. l. de coro militum cap. 3. S. Basil l. ad Amphilochium de Spiritu sancto cap. 29. S. Austin Epis ad Janua there is full parity between traditions ad scriptures warrantable authority being common alike to the one and the other Wherefore S. Chrys hom 4. in 2. ad Thess saith Est traditio nihil quaras amplius T' is tradition seeke no further of written and vnwritten Traditions is of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church appeareth by the second Epistie to the Thesalonians where S. Paul enioyneth the keeping of both saying stand fast keepe the Traditions which you haue been taught either by word or our Epistle All the doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Iesus-Christ or by inspiration of the holy Ghost they deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnwritten traditions which down from the primatiue Church to the present times haue passed as from hand to hand in a continuall line of priestly succession Moreouer it appeareth clearly by the second Chapter of S. Iohns canonicall Epistle that the Apostles thought it not expedient to set forth in writing all matters of christian religion necessary to saluation for he expresly saith although I had many things to write vnto you yet would I not write with paper and inck for I trust to come vnto you and speak mouth to mouth that your ioy may bee full which he repeateth in the end of his third canonicall Epistle saying I haue many things to write but I will not with ynck and pen write vnto thee and doubtless as Christ when he said to his Disciples Io. 16. I haue yet many things to say vnto you but ye cannot beare them now meant of many mysteries of faith distinct from those he had already taught them so S. Iohns meaning was that he had other doctrines of christian faith or manners to deliuer by word of mouth then those he had written with ynck and pen and truly the particles That your ioy may be full doe import as much being meant of spirituall ioy such as faithfull christians commonly receiue when they are instructed in things pertaining to iustice and saluation and it is not in reason probable that S. Iohn should vnderstand temperall ioy in order to wordly aduantages the intent of his Epistle being to stir vp a Mother and her son vnto a vertuous life in Iesus-Christ neither is it as to reason credible that so many things which S. Iohn purposely omitted to write were set down in writing either by himself afterward or by the other Apostles afore there being no scripture testimony wheron to ground those coniectures inuented meerly by the aduersaries of vnwritten traditions Besids it is plainly euident that sundry vnwritten doctrines of christian religion which are not contained expresly in any part of the new or old Testament are of necessary credence For example we must belieue with diuine faith the receiued catalogue or canon of both Testaments to be the true and vncorrupted word of God For otherwise those holy writings would haue nothing of weight with vs as theron to relie our saluation notwithstanding not any part of either Testament expresseth the receiued catalogue or canon for example we must belieue that the true sense of the written letter is a necessary and essentiall requisit to faith because in the sense that giueth life and not in the letter that bringeth death the true word of God consists but the true sense of the written letter that is to say how (d) The Caluinists in a publick disputation with the Antytrinitarians in the presence of Iohn the second elected king of Hungary engag'd to proue by scripture the mystery of the B. Trinity but failing in their engagement the king of a Caluinist became an Anti-trinitarian the written letter ought to be taken whether in a proper or figuratiue signification is not known but by the interpretation and tradition of the Church Again we must belieue that in one God there is a Trinity of diuine persons which be really distinct one from an other and no more yet not any writing of the Apostles or Euangelists (e) According to S. Chrys hom 4. operum imperf as in Heauen so in scripture God lies hid vnseen Wherefore as all men behold this corporall Heauen and not God that dwels within it so though many read the holy scriptures neuertheless they perceiue not the God of truth that lies hid in the inward seuse thereof expresly assertes a reall distinction or excludeth expresly a quaternity of persons and truly though S. Iohn saith in his canonicall Epistle cap. 4. that there be three which beare testimony in Heauen the Father the word and the holy Ghost neuertheless he doth not say expresly * Simplex affirmatio ternarij in aliquo non excludit vel negat ibi esse aliquod quartum cū in quaternario includatur ternarium qui asserit esse tres vbi sun◠quatuor non falsum dicit three only or that these three are really distinct one from an other for he addeth these three are one in so much that the great Sabellian heretick Praxeas taught that God was but one sole person that carried three distinct names in order to three seuerall effects naming him Father in as much as he createth all things son because be was borne of the Virgin Mary inuested with human nature and holy Ghost in regard he sanctifieth all creatures Wherfore if the Apostles had not deliuer'd to the faithfull of those days by word of mouth a reall distinction in God as to personality and a reall identity as to nature and substance and the Church
they saw not This sole motiue carrieth evident credibility and weight enough to perswade a rationall prudent man to embrace Christian faith Wherfore Picus Mirandula Epis 5. writeth thus T is an extream madnes not to belieue the gospell the truth vvherof blood of Martyrs proclames Apostolicall voices eccho forth vvonders and miracles proue reason confirmes mute elements speak deuills confess but t is a greater madnes adheth he if a Christian that doubts not of the truth of the gospell neuertheless shall liue as if he did question the truth thereof of infidelity Examples of this captiuity were the learned Pagan Philosophers namely S. Denys of Areopagus Aristides Iustin Magistrat's Princes Kings and Emperours of all nations who illuminated with the admirable splendour of faith through the preaching of poor fishermen forsooke their sacrilegious worship of many Gods to imbrace the religion of one crucifyed Christ that seemed to most Gentiles foolishnes and to most Iews the stumbling stone of offence and rock of scandall hauing respect only to a reward of an enduring happines vnseen Obedience an effect of the afore said captiuity and a necessary requisite to faith is an humble submission of the will to diuine truth which distinguisheth it from all human perswasion for an assent to naturall verities apprehended either by sense demonstration or experience requires nothing of obedience in consequence of which though deuills (c) S. lames cap. 2. saith that deuils belieue and tremble that is they beleiue vnwillingly forc'd there to by clear evidence of the miracles of Christ in consequence of which their faith is not diuine supernaturally infused The deuils were affraid in regard they were conuinc'd that Christ was the son of God who must come to judge both men and Angels wherefore deuils stand in awe of Christ and his office of judge is an vnexpressable terrour vnto them belieue neuertheless they haue not the vertue of diuine faith because they want the vertue of (d) Aug. do verbis Domini c. 9. saith that the faith of wicked men that want the vertue of obedience comes near to the faith of deuils and truly the saith of our witsectaries in these daies is extream like vnto the faith of deuils because they will not belieue the mysteries of Christian Religion in obedience to authority but in clear evidence of naturall reason obedience Examples of this obedience were millions of Christians Primitiue and modern who in obedience to Christ endured mockings scoffings imprisonments wheeles kniues swords and all manner of torments stedfast and valiant in maintaining the faith of Christ and what they * Rom. 10. corde creditur ad iustitiam ore fit confessio ad salutem beleiued with their hearts they confessed with their mouths with their hearts they beleiued to justice and with their tongues made confession to saluation in which consists the cheif praise of Christian faith It is not enough that a Christian Catholick hath faith within himselfe * Mat. 10. qui confitebitur me coram hominibus confitebor ego eū corā Patrè meo qui in coelis est vnless he express it outwardly if he will haue Christ to confess him before his heauenly Father he ought to confess Christ be fore men Nothing is more gratfull to Christ then an open confession of ones faith Saint Peters confession of Christs diuinity * S. Hilar. fides Petri de diuinitate Christi habet claues Regni caelorum got the keys of Heauen and that joyn'd to a full expression of loue to Christ merited the cheif place among the twelue Apostles But faith wanting charity is a lamp without oyle a candle without flame and a body without life faith in the absence of charity is * Jacob. 2. fides sine operibus mortua est dead hauing neither nourishment to burn or flame to enlighten or life to liue and as the body doth act by the influence of life so faith doth work by the support of charity (e) S. Bernard ser 38. teacheth that the want of merits is a pernicious pouerty and biddeth us take care to haue merits and know when we haue them that they are giuen us and indeed the Council of Trent sess 6. can 32. has defined that the good works of a just man be the gifts of God and the merits of the same just man for as much as they proceede from him by diuine grace and the merits of Iesus-Christ and other good works proceeding from diuine grace grounded in the merits of Christ which are not only signs or testimonies of faith's presence but they doe increase * Iacob 2. en operibus fides cōsummata est and perfect it in the work of iustification of which faith is the foundation only Wherby is plainly euidenced that the sole essentiall requisit to sanctifying justice is not faith * 1. Cor. 13. nunc autem manet Fides Spes Charitas tria haec maior autem horum est charitas Igitur cum charitas sit maior fide non debet dici quod sola fides iustificet saluet alone called by the name of speciall faith and counted a certain evident cognition infallibly assuring the beleiuer that his sins are forgiuen him in particular and that he is made an adopted child of God through Christ Neither is such a faith the substance of things hoped for which is the definition or description of Christian faith deliuered by the Apostle for hope that is seen is not hope nor a thing (f) Hieron l. 2. con Iouin writeth thus T vvere great injustice in God if the should punish sins that is vvicked vvorks and haue no regard to or revvard for good vvorks peculiarly assured is a thing hopd for Besides when S. Peter bid Simon Magus who after his baptism had retained wickednes in his heart to repent he did not assure him that his sins should be forgiuen him saying only vnto him Repent of this thy wickednes and pray God if perhaps the thought of thine heart may be forgiuen thee And S. Paul while he preached to others although he did not apprehend in himselfe any guilt of mortall wickednes yet he durst not pronounce himselfe justifyed being afraid of damnation he feared lest while he preached to others himselfe should become a reprobate * Aug. ser 19. de verbis Apostoliait Paulus suo timore nos terruit quid enim faciet agnus vbi aries tremuit But what shall the lamb doe when the Ram is afraid (g) Chrysostome in Comment super 10. Epis 1. ad Cor. writeth thus Let him that thinks he standeth take heed lest he fall for if Paul the Apostle saith he the strongest of all men vvas affraid vve haue greater reason to fear if S. Paul the most sted fast and valiant in the faith of Christ did tremble and fear in the working of his saluation what shall other Christians doe which be far inferior to him CHAR. XIIJ. OF A VVIT-BELIEVER THE CONTENTS
coÌ„plexans LESVS eos paruulos imponens manus super illos benedicebat Huius caeremoniae meminit Aug. l. 2. de pec merit c. 16. Imposition of hands and the Priests benediction with all after the imitation of Christ Mar. â— Ninthly * Unctionis ex oleo benedicto in pectore scapùlis meminit Aug. ser 206 de Tempore anoiming breast and shoulders with holy oile wherby is signifyed that who euer is haptized is prepared to fight the deuill the world and the flesh Ceremonies employed in administring of baptism that is to say which accompany the doing of the SacrameÌ„t are first the * Nomina Gentilium imponere prohibitum est can 33. Concil Nicaeni naming of the person that is to be baptized a ceremony not at all times practised Secondly (o) God-Fathers and God mothers Tertull l. de baptis c. 18. nameth sure ties because of their engagement in order to such as they chrisen and indeed thereby they are bound to instruct their God-sons and God-daughters in all requisits necessary to christian Religion Trident. sess 24. cap. de reform But their obligation is far less when the children they chrisen abide vnder the conduct of catholick Parents From the Sacrament of Baptism ariseth a spirituall kindred between the God-father or God-mother and the party baptised and again between the God-father or God-mother and the Parents of the party baptised In regard of this spirituall kindred t' is vnlawfull without speciall dispensation for either God-father or God-mother to marry with the party they chrisen and the marriage is invalide Howeuer now since the publication of the Councill of Trent no such spirituall kindred ariseth to the anulling of marriage between the God-father and God-mother And from hence it comes that Fathers and Mothers ought not to baptise their own children if their baptism can be supplyed otherwise neither ought they to be God-fathers or God-mothers of their own children according to the Churches canons can 30. q. 1. ad simina God-Fathers and God-mothers so called in regard of their concurrence vnto the spirituall regeneration by baptism wherby they contract spirituall kindred with the baptised and parents therof only in as much as they vndertake the spirituall conduct of the baptised as to instruction in the rudiments of christian doctrine and therby contract an obligation according to iustice to the performance therof they be named suerties Thirdly blessing of water fourthly immersion or washing of water considered as it is a ceremony only and not as it is the immediate matter of this Sacrament for taken in that sense it is more then an accidentall ceremony being an essentiall part of baptism Ceremonyes employed after baptism is ministred that is to say which be subsequent therunto are first anoynting of the crown of the head in the person baptised with chrism consecrated by a Bishop which ceremony doth signify that the baptised in Christ hath put on Christ and incorporated himselfe into him as to his head Fourthly the putting of a wax candle lighted into the hand of the baptised which is a mysticall representation of the marueilous light of faith the baptised is called vnto Fiftly a white garment which expresseth the innocency and spirituall candor of him that is baptised whose sins though they be as crimson or scarlet by baptism be made white as snow and wool CHAR. VII OF CONFIRMATION THE CONTENTS To lay hand 's on the heads of such as are baptized anointing their foreheads with Chrism and signing them with the sign of the cross wherein consisteth the true matter and form of sacramentall Confirmation is a function proper to Bishops onely Although the Sacrament of Confirmation is not of so exceeding great necessity as baptism neuerthelesse it produceth an additionall sanctity vnto perfecting the grace that baptism brought forth afore baptism begetteth christian souldiers and sacramentall confirmation improu's and strengthens them in professing Christ As to confirme sacramentally so to consecrate Chrism is an office proper to Bishops onely Episcopall ceremonies practiced in the consecration of Chrism COnfirmation is a (a) The Councils of Florence in the Decree of Pope Eugenius and of Trent sess 7. can 7. define Confirmation to be a Sacrament of the new law Neither matters it that it is not set down expresly in the holy Euangile for according to S. Iohn cap. vlt. IESVS did many things which the Euangelists neuer committed to writing and indeed t' is meer accidentall to a Sacrament that either the iustitution or any essentiall part thereof be expressed plainly in the holy scriptures for before the new Testament was written both batpism and the Eucharist were Sacraments taken in the proper sense Sacrament of the new law taken in the proper sense the ordinary Minister wherof is a Bishop S. Philip Deacon and disciple of Christ though he did confer the Sacrament of baptism Act. 8. neuertheless he did not lay his hand 's on the heads of those whom he dad baptised anointing their forehead 's with Chrism and signing them with the sign of the cross in the name of the Father son and holy Ghost wherein is this Sacraments consistency that being an act proper (b) Though a meer Priest has power to baptise and anoint the baptised with the oyle of Chrism consecrated by a Bishop neuertheless he wantes authoritie to signe with the same oyle the forehead of the baptized that function being proper to Bishops when they giue the holy Ghost to the baptized howeuer by speciall priuiledge of the sea Apostolick Abbates that are no Bishops and meer Briests also may minister the Sacrament of Confirmation where there is no Bishop to perform that office and de facto Pope Gregory dispensed as appear's by his own writings l. 5. Epis 26. to the Episcopall function Wherefore when the Apostles that wâ—re at Ierusalem heard that the Samaritans through S. Philips preaching had embraced christian religion and were baptised with all they sent * S. Chrysos in 8. Act. hom 18. Epiphan haer 21. expressè negant S. Philippum cum esset Diaconus dumtaxat fuisse sufficientem muneri imponeÌ„di manus vt Samaritani reciperent SpirituÌ„ sanctum proinde intentio ob quaÌ„ missi fuerunt Petrus Ioannes ad id officium praestandum fuit quod essent Episcopi vnde constat Episcopum esse ministrum ordinarium sacramentalis confirmationis Vnde S. Dionys Eccl. Hierar cap. a. Sacerdotes inquit offerebant baptisatum Episcopo vt eum posset signare diuino Deifico vnguento S. Peter and S. Iohn which were Apostles and Bishops too to lay their hands on the heads of those which were baptised that they might receiue the holy Ghost that is they sent vnto them Bishops to minister the Sacrament of confirmation vnto giuing of sanctifying grace so the * Theodor. in cantica ad illa verba vnguentum effusum nomen tuum dicit baptizatos sub visibili vnguenti specie huius Sacramenti invisibilem
what the vniuersall Church practiseth constant and vniuersall practice that agreeth with so warrantable and euident testimonies as are set down Howeuer he produces but weake and incoÌ„sequent proof's for the establishing of his nouell doctrine for example from these words Maccab. For if he had not hoped that they which were slaine would rise again it had been superfluous and vain to pray for the dead he doth infer that the soul 's in Purgatory are not freed of their sufferings till the generall Resurrection and this inference he proueth only saying For if soul 's were released out of their pains through the prayers of the liuing before the Resurrection it would be extreame profit able to pray for the dead though no Resurrection should follow But where is the connection between the Scripture-Text and Mr. Whites inference shall it follow that good soul's must be imprisoned till the generall Resurrection because the noble and godly Iudas according to the profession of his Religion did belieue in the immortality of soul's and the Resurrection of their bodyes and indeed the true meaning of this scripture afore alledged according to all Orthodox writers is this viêªt videlicet if Iudas Maccabaeus had belieued soul 's to be mortall and to die with their bodyes which consequently should neuer rise again it had been superfluous and vain to pray for them and therfore religiously thinking of the Resurrection and fearing that the souls of his souldiers that were slaine in battell might be punished in the next life in respect of some sinnes they had committed vpon earth he commanded that prayers and sacrifice should be offered for their deliuerance from sin that is to say from temporall punishment due to their sinnes whence doubtlesse no wise and indicious man can infer the imprisonment of soul 's in Purgatory till the generall Resurrection which would neuer haue happened if souls had been mortall and died together with their bodies After the same manner he abuseth the new Testament Let the new iustrument saith he keepe time and harmony with the old let S. Paul be heard preaching to the same effect 1. Cor. 15. what shall they doe which are (n) by baptism for he dead the Apostle may mean water of tribulation and persecution wherewith primitiue Christians seem'd as it were baptised again may vnderstand voluntary afflictions for example praying fasting giuing of Almes c. which the liuing offer to God for the comfort and benefit of the dead moreouer the Apostle may mean the baptising of such as defer'd their baptism till the hower of death which Custome was vsuall in the primitiue Church and the Apostles sense is then if souls be mortall and in consequence therof no resurrection of the dead those which are baptised dying that is at the hower of their death reapo nothing of aduantage by their baptism baptised for the dead if the dead doe not rise at all From this holy text he inferreth that no benefit is obtained by baptism for the dead before the Resurrection not by so doing can soul 's till then be released But in earnest this is a pitifull deduction like vnto this God is in Heauen therfore Mr. Thomas White is at Roterdam for indeed there is nothing of connection between the antecedent and consequence and Mr. Whit's inference for it does not follow that soul's obtain nothing of profit before the Resurrection because S. Paul saith What shall they doe which are baptised for the dead meaning thereby to what purpose shall Christians pray fast giue Almes or suffer tribulation for Christ's sake if the dead rise not again Besides if Mr. Whit's inference were warrantable and vnquestionable the Apostle himself is not as yet in a capacity to obtaine that eminent benefit of being deliuered before the Resurrection For in the same Chapter he addeth to the word 's set down Why are we Apostles in icopardy euery hower if the dead rise not at all what aduantageth it me to haue prayed fasted endnred great persecution if the dead be not raised vp let us eat and drink for to morrow wee shall die that is if there be no Resurrection after death why doe wee giue our selues to any thing el's saue to eating and drinking Wherfore S. Paul himself according to Mr. White is but in the way to his blessed crowne for if his soul were already translated into Heauen his sufferings would haue aduantaged euen though no Resurrection should follow But it seemeth a strange thing that Mr. White should presume to gather from the words set downe that good souls shall not be released of the paines which they sufferin Purgatory before the generall Resurrection the said words not carrying the least sound that way for they neither speake of pain 's in order to the next life nor of releasing souls out of Purgatory and indeed the Apostles sole intent in the Chapter alledged is to proue the Resurrection of the dead and to that purpose brings sundry argument's The first whereof is that Christ our head is raised vp and therfore we his members shall rise again in regard of the fast connection that is between the head and the members thereof And what Mr. White alledgeth for the imprisonment of souls to the day of Iudgment is a secondary argument which S. Paul vseth only as a confirmation of his first argument to demonstrate the Resurrection of bodyes signifying therby that he himselfe together with the rest of the Apostles and primitiue Christians of those day 's had suffered in vain afflictions and tribulations if sou'ls had been mortall and consequently neuer to rise again for t' is clear by the very forme of the Apostles speech that he supposed the false opinion that teacheth souls to be mortall whence of necessity would follow that there should be no Resurrection at all and truly if the Apostle had not made that supposall he would haue concluded nothing for supposing souls to be immortall good works of this life would haue much aduantaged him for the obtaining of Heauenly blessedness though no Resurrection at all had followed And the same supposall is made by the holy writer of the Macchabies signisying therby if the dead were not to rise again it would follow that soul 's were mortall in consequence of which all prayers offered for them would be in vain where is obseruable that the Iewish sectaryes to wit Sadducies held that the soul 's were mortall and consequently denied the Resurrection of Bodies other Iewes which belieued aright professed immortality together with the Resurrection there being in each soul an innate desire to resume the body wherof it was the true form once and as to reason it is most consonant that God who createth nothing in vain will not frustrate that desire hence it was that the ancient Iew 's spoak of the immortality of souls and the Resurrection of bodyes alike and our Sauiour Christ Math. 22. to proue to the Sadducies the Resurrection of bodies infer's it from the
Angell is not a Cherubin or Seraphin that being a peculiar Order of Angells distinct from the rest And albeit that S. Hierom and but he alone among all the ancient ecclesiasticall writers doth assert in his Epistle 85. to Euagrius that in the primitiue times a Bishop and a Priest were one and the same thing also that Bishops got superiority ouer meer Priests rather in respect of ecclesiasticall constitution then diuine institution yet no man must argue thence that S. Hierom did deny a Bishop taken in the ordinary ecclesiasticall sense to be distinct from a meer Priest without hauing him contradict what himselfe hath written in sundry other places which were to play the part of an vniust Iudg. Besides it is not consonant at all as to reason that so great a learned Prelate as S. Hierom should be ignorant of bishops superiority ouer meer Priests in regard of iurisdiction and order as to diuine right since Timothy whom all interpreters and Fathers call Bishop was inuested with iudicatory authority ouer meer Priests as doth plainly appeare by the Apostles own words 1. Timoth. 3. Against Priests receiue none accusation but vnder two or three witnesses Moreouer S. Hierom doth not deny in the epistle afore alleadged the superiority of Bishops ouer meer Priest's to be grounded in the truth of our lord's disposall for he doth assert only that maiority to proceede rather or more from ecclesiasticall custome then from a true ordinance of Christ for as much as ecclesiasticall constitutions haue rendred the dignity of Bishop's more eminent then it was in primary times adding thereunto preeminence of places in the Church peculiar ornaments and priuiledges to consecrate diuerse thing 's which meer Priest's cannot doe Howeuer S. Hierom doth assert expresly ordination that is power to ordain Priests proper to Episcopall function only in his said Epistle to Euagrius and likewise power to confer the Sacrament of Confirmation in a Dialogue writen against Luciferus But it is conceiued by coniecturall deductions from the writings of S. Hierom that in his Epistle 85. to Euagrius * Credibile etiam est S. Hieron prae oculis habuisse Ioannem Ierosolymae Episcopum qui iniustè afflixerat eum fratrem ipsius voluit deprimere fastum eius Legatur Epis 61. ipsius Hieron he playd the Oratour vsing the figure hyperbole being heartily angry with certain Deacons that ambitiously preferred themselues before Priests or at least suffered themselues to be preferred wherfore to suppress their inordinate ambition and extream insolence he made a parity between Bishops and meer Priest's which doubtless he meant only in respect of the great and maine function in order to the celebration of the holy Eucharist that is equall and common alike to both of them * Est propositio de fide quod sint 7. ordines communiter dicti presbyte ratus Diaconatus c. vt patet ex Concilijs Roma sub Syluestro can 7. Carthag 4. cui interfuit S. Aug. Trid. sess 32. catechismus Trid. cap. de ordine recenset omnes 7. ordines sigillatim As touching the number of ecclesiasticall Orders it is a constant Tenet of catholick faith that there be seuen orders taken in the proper sense viz of Priests Deacons sub-Deacons Acolists Lectours Exorcists and doorekeepers corresponding to as many sundry functions which are exercised in reference to the celebrating of the Eucharist The first is the consecration therof proper to Priest's alone the second administration of the Sacrament which belongeth to Deacons The third is the preparing of the sacramentall matter wherunto Sub-Deacons are ordained the fourth is the presenting of the matter at the Altar and vnto this function doth relate the order of Acolits But the other three orders regarde the disposition of such as be attendants only at the time of celebrating the Eucharist among which some are vnbelieuers and doore-Keepers are ordained to debarre and keeper of such Persons others haue a desire to belieue aright but are not sufficiently enough instructed for the perfecting of these Lectours are ordained Others though they are true belieuers and want no instructions yet in as much as they be possessed with deuills or otherwise vexed by them Exorcists are ordained for their meet help (f) According to Pope Innocent the third and other Orthodox writers before him namely Steph. Eduensis In opus de Sacra Altaris pr. 6. all the functions proper to the seuen orders were represented in the outward actions of Christ And S. Austin and other ancient Fathers affirme that Christ represented the Sacrament of penance in the raising of Lazarus for as much as he commanded the Apostles to vntye the cords that bound him Again S. Austin Comment In Ioan. c. 9. says that the washing of the mans eyes that was blind from his birth in the water of Siloe was a figure of christian baptism And all these seuen ecclesiasticall orders are figured and represented by sundry actions which Christ exercised on earth For example Christ Io. 3. made a scourge of small cordes and droue out of the Temple of Ierusalem those that sold oxen sheep Doues and changer's of money wherby are figured Door-keepers whose office is after Christ's example to shut the Church doores againsT the vnworthy and open them to the worthy Christ Luc. 4. read the Prophesie of Isaias wherin the Order of Lectours is signified their office being to read the holy Prophesies Christ Mark 8. cast out Deuills wherby Exorcists are represented Christ Io. 8. sayes I am the light of the world Wherunto doe relate Acolites the carrying of burning candles to enlighten being their function Christ Io. 13. preparing to celebrate the Eucharist tooke a Towell girded himselfe and powered water into a bason to wash his disciples feet in which action Sub-Deacons be expressed for one office of these Ecclesiasticall Ministers is to prepare water for celebrating of the Eucharist and to wash the Corporalls as is prescribed in the Roman Pontificall Christ Mat. 26. at his last supper distributed to his Apostles the Sacrament of the Euchariste and afterward Io. 13. preached vnto them in these two actions are shadowed deacons whose office is to preach and sometimes to distribute the Sacrament of the Euchariste as doth appeare plainly by the hystory of S. Steuen and S. Lawrence which as Deacons exercised the said actions Again Christ at his last supper did offer the sacrifice of the Euchariste that is of his body and blood which is proper to Priestly function * S PP Aug. Gregor alâ—â— testaÌ„tur Christum actione illa qua suscitauit LazaruÌ„ iussitque eum vinculis quibus erat ligatus ab Apostolis dissolui adumbrasse nostraÌ„ poeniteÌ„tiam potestateÌ„ traditaÌ„ Ecclesiae pro remitteÌ„dis peccatis Et Aug. comment in Euang Ioan. dicit ablutionem oculorum caeci naii ad natatoria Siloe tepraesontasse ablutionem nostri Baptismi In like manner Christs actions expressed in raysing vp of Lazarus and in commanding
by Priests of the Church lay Elders because they are not Church-ministers taken in the proper sense neither is it their office to pray ouer the sick and to administer holy vnction vnto remission of sins and it matters not that the Apostle sayes let them bring in Priests wheras the practice of the catholick Church is to employ one sole Priest in the administration of Extrem-vnction for the true meaning therof is let him bring in some one of the Priests the Apostle vseth the signre which Gramarians call Enallogy putting the plurall for the singular number After the same manner Mat. 1. the Angell of our lord appearing to Ioseph says Take the Babe and his Mother and goe into the land of Israel for they are dead that sought the Babes life notwithstanding he mentioneth only Herod saying when Herod was dead c. Lastly in as much as the Apostle asserteth absolutly putting no limitation of time If any be sick among you he plainly sheweth Extrem-vnction (e) Since all the other precepts S. Iames inioyn's in his catholick Epistle concerne christians in all ages t' is not as to reason probable that the sole precept of anointing the sick should be giuen for a short tyme onely and according to Caluin scarcely for the space of one age but this his interpretation the Council of Trent has condemn'd sess 14. doct de Sacram. Extr. vnct and can 2. to be of perpetuall vse in the catholick Church to the worlds end which is essentiall to a Sacrament of the new law wherfore sundry ancient Fathers that liued in the subsequent ages when they speake of christian belieuers reduced through sicknesse to eminent danger of death recommend to them holy vnction as a Sacrament of the new law and alledge for it the authority of S. Iames set down * Hieron Epis 65. ad Pamach oceanum de erroribus Originis in simili re ad fidem spectūte de qua tamen prima concilia nihil definierant sic scribit Confessi sunt quod negabatur tacuerunt de quo nemo quarebat and though the first generall Councill's make no mention of Extrem-vnction neuertheless no man ought to infer from that negatiue authority an argument to the preiudice of so warrantable a doctrine for they declared and defined such point's of christian faith as were questioned and impugned by the Hereticks of those times respectiuely but then no controuersy arose concerning Extrem-vnction By the premises is plainly euidenced that the guift of healing through vnction or laying on of hands (f) S. Marke mentioneth sick persons whom the anoynting with oyle cured And in the last Chapter of S. Marke t' is promised that the imposition of hands shall heale the sick mentioned by S. Mark and practiced in the primitiue times was not this holy vnction that s. Iames prescribeth in the forenamed catholick Epistle for that was a miraculous end owment and no gifts of doing miracles did confer sanctifying grace vnto remission of sins which is proper to a Sacrament of the new law and truly that particular guift (g) Often tymes such as were not Priests heald the sick by anoynting them namely according to S. Hierom S. Hilarion that had not receiu'd the Sacrament of holy Order and according to Tertull. ad scap c. 4. A certain lay-christian named Proculus anoynted with oyle Seuerus the Emperour and recouered him thereby called the gift of healing was extended only to corporall infirmities it could cure the body but not the soul Besides one and the same spirit distributed that and all other guifts of doing miracles seuerally according to his own free will 1. Cor. 12 wherfore neither such only as by ordination were promoted to Priestly ordination nor all those had the guift of healing but to the administring of Extrem-vnction is necessary Priestly ordination for the Apostle sayth expresly If any be sick among you let him bring in Priests of the Church Also our Extrem-vnction requireth oyle of Oliues blessed (h) The Councils of Flor. in the Decree of Eugenius and of Trent sess 14. cap. 1. declare that the oyle that is applyed in and is proper to the Sacrament of Extream-vnction ought to be blessed and consecrated by a Bishop which vsage is conform to the generall practice of the catholick Church and consecrated by a Bishop neither is it applyed to euery sick person but to such only as be incorporated into Christ by faith hope and charity nor to euery part of the sick body but to the Organs of the fiue senses which be the windows that let in sin into the howse of the soul and although our Extrem-vnction be endowed with vertue euen as to the healing corporall infirmities when the supreme prouidence thinketh it expedient for the sick yet the cure of these is the secundary effect thereof only being instituted specially to heale the soul Furthermore to the forementioned healing vnction no determinat form of prayer was annexed as is to our Extrem-vnction for example the Roman Church vseth this form * Concil Trid. expressè docet ritum vsū Extremaevnctionis quem obseruat Romana Ecclesia esse optimum idque patet ex decreto Eugenij ad calcem Concilij Florentini which doubtlesse is the best our Lord in vertue of that holy vnction and his most benigne mercy grant vnto thee Indulgence of all thy offences committed by seeing hearing smelling tasting and touching and indeed the Priest that ministreth Extrem-vnction (i) The necessity of the precept requires that the form of sacramentall vnction which consistes of these word's Per istam sanctam vnctionem pijssimam suam misericordiam indulgeat tibi Dominus quicquid deliquisti per visum auditum c. ought to be repeated fiue seuerall tymes in fiue seuerall anoyntings of the fiue senses I say the precept of necessity requires this ceremony though perhaps neither a fiue fold repeating of the formall words nor a siue fold anoynting of the sick can lay claim to the essence of the Sacrament is bound to anointe the Organs of euery sense and express the name of each one particularly together with a repetition of the said form vnless he shall obserue that the sick person is seiz'd with pangs of present death for then one sole vnction and the naming of all the outward senses respectiuely is sufficient enough as to the essence of the Sacrament and vnto obtaining the fruites therof for example it sufficeth if anointing one Organ only the Priest say our Lord through that holy vnction and his most benigne mercy grant vnto thee Indulgence of all thy offences committed by seeing hearing smelling tasting and touching As to the anointing reins breasts and feet though these vnctions haue nothing of the essentiall matter yet as to them a Priest ought to obserue the custome of that particular Church wherunto he is subiect howeuer decency requireth that he omit to anointe the reins and breasts of sick women CHAR. XIX OF THE
CHVRCH MILITANT THE CONTENTS God hath giuen to his Church on earth the keeping of all truth that we may not be as children wauering carryed about with euery wind of doctrine by diuine institution pastorall functiōs are of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church vnto teaching christian faith and deciding controuersies pertaining thereto without being liable to errour God hath inuested Church-Gouernours with autority to make laws and ordinances and exacte obediēce vnto them the Church cannot lie hid priuat spirits haue nothing of power to interprete scriptures or to judge matters in debate concerning faith and religion the outward testimony of the Church is the ordinary expedient necessary to the receiuing of christian faith answeres to sundry obiections vrged by sectaries in fauour of a priuat reuealing spirit holy scriptures were neither primarily intended nor primaryly deliuered as supream Judges of controuersies in order to christian faith and religion profoundnes ' of mysteries plenteousnes and shortnes of sentences render the scriptures obscure and intricate to infer the Churches infallibility from the autority of scriptures and scriptutes infallible autority from the infallible testimony of the Church implies no circle of errour faith as to the assent thereof is resolued into the Church and not into the scriptures the four principall marks of the true Church taken joyntly agree with the Roman Church onely which is the one holy catholick and Apostolick Church that neuer deuiated from truth THe Church militant is the grownd and piller of truth 1. Tim. 3. as the foundation of an house supporteth and hindereth it from falling So the Church of God sustaineth and preserueth truth that is the doctrine of christian faith from perishing wherefore whosoeuer desireth to find out truth vnto saluation must seek it in the Church which is the certaine keeper and faithfull Guardian thereof the supream prouidence hauing put therein Some Apostles and some Prophets and some Euangelists and some Pastours and Teachers for the consummation of the Saints for the worke of the ministery and for the edification of the body of Christ vntill we all meet together in the vnity of faith and the knowledg of the son of God vnto a perfect man and vnto the measure of the age of the fulness of Christ that we henceforth be no more children wauering and carryed about with euery wind of doctrine by the wickednesse of men and crastines of Satan whereby they lie in waite to bring vs into errour Ephes 4. where the Apostle plainly asserteth pastorall function together with the office of teaching christian faith to be of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church for the administring of Sacraments auoiding of errours and the confirming of such as shall wauer in religion and truly it cannot be conceiued as to reason probable that Christ coming into the world to be Gouernour of souls and to make vnto himselfe a glorious Church without spot or wrinckle Ephes 5. should not departing out of the world leaue necessary helps to preserue it in holynes (a) god instituted in the old law Deut. 17. à supream Tribunall consisting of Priests for the deciding of matters in debate in order to his people to the end that if inferiour Iudges should differ in iudgment or deuiate from the truth they might recur to the Council of Priests where one chief Iudge that is the high Priest was appointed to prouounce sentence and all others bound to giue obedience therto the law condemning those of pride which resisted or refused the high Priests decision in matters of controuersie again God so specially assisted the said Council with his spirit of truth that the high Priests sentence was infallible though himselfe might erre as a priuat person Wherefore Christ Mat. 23. commanded the people to doe what the Scribs and Pharisies said in regard they sate in the Chair of Moyses And S. Iohn cap. 11. ascribes not the truth of Caiphas prophesing that Christ ought to die for the safety of that nation vnto his speaking as of himselfe but to his speaking as high Priest of that same yeare which rendered him infallible in speaking in consequence of which seeing that God so directed the high Priest in the old law that he could not speake an vntruth from the Chair of Moyses it follows of necessity that Christ in his own new law of grace so specially assistes the high Priest his grand Vicar and supream head of the Church which he built on his beloued Apostle S. Peter that he cannot tell a lye from the Chair of the same S. Peter the first high Priest of the new law after Christ Wherefore the Churches supream Gouernour that succeds in that Chair cannot erre in his decrees that concerne matters of faith or generall manners notwithstanding that he were as wicked as Caiphas From hence plainly appear's the manifest weaknes of sundry sectaries which will haue the supream Priests sentence no longer to bind then hee pronounces sentence in conformity to the word of God for there is no warrantable authority saue that of the supream Pastours Tribunall which can assure vs of the diuine word for the scripture would not be belieued if it were not warranted from the infallible Chair of S. Peter Moreouer sundry sectaries say vnaduisedly that in the old law the sentence of the high Priests concerned only ciuill matters in debate and not controuersies pertaning to faith and religion for as to this point both the second book of paralipomenon and the 24. Chapter of Exodus giue clear euidence against them Besides God hath not vsed lese care in instituting the christrian Church established in a law of grace then in forming the Synagogue of the Iewes established in a law of bondage wherefore * Deus cum primum instituit Cathedrā Moysis in Deutro promisit omnes singulas eius definitiones fore veritatis infallibilis ideo Aug. l. 4. de doct chris ait Pharisaeos scribas id est Pōtisices Mosaicos iudicantes ex Cathedra Moysis non pot uisse malè definire quamuis mali essent quia ad bene definiendum cogebantur à Deo since this had diuine authority and assistance to interpret and teach the old law of Moyses as likewise to decide all controuersies concerning the Iewish religion Deut. 17. doubtless he hath not prouided in a lesser measure for the Church of Christ in order to teaching and interpreting the new law and determining all matters that might be in debate about christian religion Again Christ being about to leaue this Church in order to his visible presence for as many ages as the world shall endure was as prouident and carefull to preserue it pure from schism and heresy as was Moyses to preserue his when he was to absent himselfe from it for a shorter time but Moyses being to goe vp vnto Mount Sinai and there to abide forty dayes and forty nights onely constituted * Exod. 24. exspectate hic inquit Moyses donec reuertamur ad vos
re shall hind vppon earth shall be bound in Heauen which is meant of ecclesiasticall Censures the greatest of which is excommunication Again Act. 15. when the new christians referred their controuersie concerning circumcision and other ceremonies of the law of Moyses to the Apostles at Ierusalem sentence of iudgment was declared by one accord thus It seemed good to the holy Ghost and to vs to lay no more burthen vpon you then these necessary things c. Wherby it is cleare that the Apostles then the representatiue Church were inuested with authority to make ordinances (c) It appeares plainly by the sacred text Act. Jt seems good to the holy Ghost and to vs to lay no more burden vpon you then these that the Apostles had authority to commande and exact obedience to their ordinances For the particles it seems good to vs to lay no more burden Shew euidently that they were superiours inuested with authority to commande and exact obedience from the people who were bound to obey them But here is obseruable that as to the matter in debate mentioned in the Chapter set down viz. whether the conuerted Gentils were obliged to obserue the law of Moyses S. Peter in that Council cald to determine it was supream Iudge for t' is written that after much dispute Peter rose vp and as head of all spoke first and decided the controuersy in fauour of the said conuerted Gentils deliuering them from the bondage of the old law and all the multitude saith S. Hierom Tom. 2. Epis 89. Augus cap. 2. kept silence and into Peters sentence or definition the Apostles S. Iames and all the Priests past with one accorde and euer since the Popes of Rome as S. Peters lawfull successors haue had precedence and the deciding suffrage in all Councils which are of credit and authoritie in the Church of God and to oblige the faithfull in the obseruation of them for the words It seemed good to vs to lay no more burden vpon you doe signify the authority of superiours to commande inferiours and the obligation of inferiours to obey their superiours Thirdly that the Church is liuing visible and speaking which is the third propriety of this Iudg is clearly expressed Act. 20. take heed to your selues and the flock wherof the holy Ghost hath made you Bishops to rule the Church of god which he hath purchased with his own blood and Again Math. 5. (d) According to S. Aug. trac in 1. epis Ioan. those are blind which cannot fee so great a mountaine and shut their eyes against the clear light put on a candlestick which is the Church of God the Church is stiled a Citty that is set on a mountaine which cannot be bid but no man can conceiue how Bishops can gouerne a Church which they see not or how a Citty set on a high mountaine can lie hid Besids all the Church offices ioynt and seperate do declare it visible liuing ad speaking neither matters it that the Church is known by faith which is of things not seen for the Apostles when they conuersed with Christ vpon earth they both saw and belieued him to be Christ As the Apostles saw Christ to be aman and belieued him to be God soe wee doe see the Church to be a congregation of men outwardly professing the faith of Christ and doe belieue that it is directed by the infallible assistance of the holy Ghost and as it cannot be euinced that a man is inuisible because an inuisible soul gouerneth him soe neither can it be euinced that the Church is inuisible because the supernaturall gifts of the holy Ghost namly faith hope and charitie wherby the Church is gouerned and men made children therof be inuisible From the premises is euidently deducible (e) S. Austin li. 10. de doct christ disputing against such as pretended to the knowledge of holy scriptures by speciall reuelations dissuades euery man from so proud and dangerous a tentation as to presume that he is taught of God and not of men and this caueat he vrgeth by many examples that the priuate spirit which is to say the particular reuealing spirit wherby as many sectaries conceiue euery priuate belieuer is enabled to interpret scriptures and iudge all matters concerning faith and religion hath no good claime to the office of this suprem Iudge beeing neither seen nor heard to speak clearly nor known certainly to be infallible in what it reuealeth to each particular belieuer in priuat for it may prudently be doubted whether it be a good spirit or not since false ministers can transforme themselues into Apostles of Christ and Satan himselfe into an Angel of light 2. Cor. 11. in consequence of which no wise and iudicious man can rely his eternity on such a priuat reuealing spirit Again God according to his ordinary way doth not immediatly himselfe reueale verities of faith to euery one in particular or iudge himselfe between party and party from the begining of the creation down to these times his prouidence hath ordained men to declare his ordinances vnto men appointed men to teach men and constituted men suprem Iudges of men for the determining of all hard matters in debate concerning faith and religion In the law of nature Abraham was made Teacher of men I know speaking of Abraham that he will command his son and family after him that they keepe the way of our lord Gen. 18. In the written law Moyses was constituted to teach the people of God the diuine ordinances and to shew vnto them the way wherein they were to walke and the worke they were to doe Exod. 18. and Deut. 17. the Priests of the Leuits were deputed supreme Iudges of controuersies which might rise about religion also Malac. 2. it is written the Priests lips shall preserue knowledg and they shall seek the law from his mouth In our new law of grace the Apostles were sent into diuers parts of the world to preach christian religion Mar. vltime Act. 8. God appointed Saint Philip to teach the Eunuch of Ethiopia Act. 9. Christ sent Saul to be instructed of Ananias and Act. 10. Cornelius the Centurion was admonished by an Angel to repaire vnto Saint Peter that he might learn of him matters of câ—ristian faith wherfore Saint Paul says Rom. 10. Faith is by heating and hearing by the word of God and how shall they heare without a preacher because ordinarily God teacheth men by men the verities of faith and Gal. 1. the same Apostle doubted not to prefer the doctrine he preached before the doctrine of an Angel from Heauen that should preach otherwise and truly if it were lawfull for euery man to follow and adhere to his own priuate spirit there would rise almost as many contrary religions as there are men liuing vpon the earth and consequently in room of that peace that Christ hath promised to the Church nothing but disorder and confusion would happen wherfore both in the old and new law this
scripturae and comfort of the scripturs may haue hope Rom. 15. although they doe not define and iudge all matters of faith and religion yet they (l) The Apostle 2. Timot. 3. Saith that all scripture is giuen by inspiration from God and is profitable to teach argue correct and instruct in iustice That is according to the ancient Fathers to resiste conuince and condemne false doctrines Wherfore according to the same Apostle ad Tit. l. a Bishop must be vnreproueable embracing the faithfull word and sound doctrine that he may be able to exhort and conuince those which say against it conduce mainly therunto tending specially to christian instruction and erudition besides they stir vs vp to ioyne vertue with faith and with vertue knowledg and with knowledg temperance and with temperance patience and with patience godliness and with godliness loue 2. Epis 2. Pet. which is the consistency and plenitude of the law Scripturs are liud * S. Ambros Epis 19. vocat sacras scripturas fontes viuos qui saliunt in vitam aeternam fountains springing vp vnto euerlasting life but the keeping and dressing of them is cōmitted only to the Church of Christ that was the rock whence they sprāg it is the christian catholick Church taught of the holy Ghost that cōprehēdeth the bredth lenght depth and hight of these heauenly fountaines which is to say it is a speciall prerogatiue giuen to the Church of Christ to interpret infallibly and iuridically the holy scripturs (m) According to S. Hierom Epis ad Paulum S Chrys hom 40. in Ioa. S. Austin l. 4. de doct christ cap. 3. the hardness of holy scrpitures proceeds from the profoundnes copiousnes compendiousnes therof in consequence of which a right vnderstanding of sundry passages of necessary depends of tradition as well obserues S. Austiu l. de fide oper and S. Hierom in his scripture prologue ingeniously confesseth that he could not vnderstandand the holy Prophets Isaias Ieremy and Daniel again S. Irenaeus l. 3. cap. 7. Orig. in explic Epis ad Rom. and S. Austin l. de fide oper cap. 14. confess with one accorde that S. Paul is hard to be vnderstood and especially in regard he vseth frequent hyperboles which proceeded from the vehemency of the spirit that guided his pen. which profoundness of misteries plenteousness of senses shortness of sentences haue rendred obscure hard and intricate as plainly appeareth by the holy writers of the old law namely Isay Ieremy Ezechiel Daniel and of the new law Saint Paul especially according to the testimony of Saint Peter 2. Pet. 3. wherein he speaketh of his writings thus * S. Irenaue l. 3. cap. 7. scribens de Haereticis testatur Paulū hyperbolis vti frequenter propter impetu spiritus qui in ipso fuit Idē sentiūt Origines explicat Epistolae ad Rō Aug. de fide operibus cap. 14. 15. our Brother Paul in all his Epis mentioneth things in which Epistles some things are hard to be vnderstood which they that are vnlearned and vnstable wrest as they doe also others scripturs vnto their own perdition for further proofe of this catholick assertion may be alledged the perpetuall contention between one sectary and an other concerning the interpretation of scripture Texts in reference to controuersies of faith for example from the words This is my body Luc. 22. Lutherans doe argue the true and real presence of Christs body in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread contrariwise Caluinists infer a meer figure of Christs body Anabaptists deduce out of the commission Christ gaue vnto his Apostles Math. 18. goe and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father c. That baptism ought not to be administrated but to such as are de facto apt to receiue instruction And the Arians misinterpreting that saying of Christ Io. * Apud S. Joan. dicit Christus Pater maior me est alibi ego Pater vnum sumus Posterior textus explicatur ab Arianis de vnitate consensus conformitate voluntatū My Father is greater then I denied his Godhead the holy scriptures are a great light of christian doctrine for they are the dictates of the holy Ghost yet not sufficient enough to let vs see the way to euerlasting life vnless they be set on the cādlestick of the * Vt luceat omnibus qui in domo sūt Mat. 5. Church it is not the same thing to be a light and to enlighten a light vnder a bushell is a light and shineth there howeuer it doth not giue light to all that are in the house but when it is put on the candlestick Math. 5. euen so the scripturs light put vnder a bushell that is vnder the interpretation of priuate wits continueth a shining light in it selfe neuertheless doth not enlighten vnto euerlasting life but when it is put on the candlestick of infallible authority proper to the Church of Christ Again the scripture is a booke written within and on the backside Apoc. 5. the outward writing is the letter that killeth the inward the spirit that giueth life 2. Cor. 3. as the soul quickneth the body (n) S. Austin ser 70. de tempore expounding the sacred Text Epis ad Cor. the letter killeth the spirit quikneth If saith he thou follow the true sense of scripture which is the spirit that giues life to the soule it will bring thee vnto saluation but if thou shalt neglect the true sense adhering to the outward letter presuming the true sense to be therein it will often tymes lead thee into errour And according to Tertul. l. de resur carnis Heresies spring vp in regard the scriptures are misinterpreted And he speaking of S. Pauls Epistles affirms that it ought not to seem a hard thing or any way strang that from thence errours should arise since heresies must be 1. Cor. 11. which notwithstanding would not be if the scriptures were interpreted aright Heresies must be not becaus God hath appointed that they should be but because he permitted that they might be and mans free will together with pride and malice makes them to be against Gods positiue will howeuer the supream prouidence from euil heresies draws good things soe the spirit or sense of the scriptures quickneth the letter but to come vnto the spirit of necessity there is required the opening of the booke which the Church onely can doe trusted with the key of authority that openeth it wherfore in as much as many men down from the begining of christianity to these times haue adhered rather to the letter then to the sense of scripture and thence cut out vnauthorized interpretations of their own many heresies haue sprung vp to the distruction of infinit souls wherof Christ prophesying said heresies must be He fore saw that euen of such as were incorporated into his Church would men rise * S. Cypri Epis 55. ad Cornelium Nec aliunde
an other place or receptacle besids the Heauen of the blessed and the Hell of the damned Caluin that he might the rather deny Purgatory he deny'd Limbus and that he might the better deny Limbus he denyed that Christ descended into hell otherwise then by suffering on his Cross the torments of a damned soul which saith Caluin in cap. 26. mat vvere so grieuous that euen vvords of dispaire came from him So impudently this great reformer of religion blasphem'd against Christ but the Catholick Church teacheth that Christ truly and properly descended into hell that is the soul of Christ remoued out of his body with its proper presence penetrated the lower receptacles of the earth where good souls were detained as prâ—sonners and brough with him from thence such as were ripe and fit for the kingdom of Heauen Lege S. Jgnat Epis ad Trallia Clem. Alex. l. 2. 6. stromatum Basil in Psal 48. visited the lower parts of the earth comforting such as were departed in perfect grace afore his coming thither From his sepulcher he leapt again into the world from whence after that he had setled a Priestly ministery that should be of perpetuall vse in his vineyard that is the Church like a hunter that gladly rejoyces in his obtained prey went with joy home leading captiuity captiue that is rendering happy the captiuity of just souls detained as it were in a prison vnder ground and carrying them with him in glorious triumph for he opened the gates of his Fathers Pallace which were euer afore shut against them As clamorous hunting so couetous playing * Aleae lusus Clericis interdictus à Concilijs Patribus Canonibus Aristoteles Aleatores latronum praedonumque societati inserit at cardes or dice for mony is an exercise vnworthy Priests which ought to seek no other lucre then the gaining of souls vnto Iesus-Christ who is their proper treasure and * Sacerdos dicit Christo tu es qui restituis haereditatem meam mihi heritage and mony betrayed him sould Ioseph and damned Iudas * Augustinus vocat Theatra cauâ—as turpitudinis publicaâ— professiones flagitiorum laudantur Massilienses quod sic abhorrebant à spectaculis vt mimis locum in scaena non concederâ—nt Again stage-playes as they be commonly exhibited in our country are incoÌ„sistent with Priestly function for as much as the outward words and counterfeited Gestures of the players representing reciprocall passages of wicked louers tend to carnall wantonnes and vncleanes and such a a Theater Saith S. Chrysostom is the chair of pestilence schole of incontinency and shop of luxury that sets out to sale the lusts of the flesh howeuer stage-playes are laudable recreations in order to lay-people while they represent but heroicall actions of gallant persons vnto imitation and vn godly enterprises of wicked men vnto detestation therof or while they exhibite delightfull fictions without obscenes Furthermore Missionary Priests must not affect to be counted * 2. Timoth. 2. homo militans Deo non se implicet negotijs saecularibus statesmen they being priuat persons professing a spirituall vocation which hath not any relation to the temporall affaires of state The supream prouidence hath set bounds to euery vocation * Tractent fabrilia fabri nec sutor vltra crepidam vt fert vetus pronerbium nor ought any man to put his sickle on strang ground Let Priests mannage what is theirs and Christs business and the affaires which pertaine to Caesar let them leaue to Caesar and the ministers of his Council yet there are some wanton witts which like the raging sea transcend their prefixed limits lifted vp aboue the hight of the clouds with an opinion of their own science fancying to themselues knowledg of all things though indeed the greatest part of what they know * Sapiens ille Mercurius Trismigistus maxima â—orum inquit quae scimus est minima pars eorum quae nescimus is the least part of what they know not and thus wantonly carried away entangle themselues with publick affaires of ciuill Magistrats before they be called thereto Howeuer Priests ought to know nothing * Apostolus Paulus profitetur se nihil scire praeter Iesum Christum hunc Crucifixum but Iesus-Christ and him crucified and if the supream prouidence hath bestowed on one alone a better memory and witt then on others contemporary with him he is to vse his aboundant abilities according to charity temperance and sobriety for otherwise he shall by his high attempts vnhappily verifie the old Prouerb much witt little iudgment Besids great wanton wits are not without a mixture of madnes And truly experience shewes that common wealths are vnfortunat when the things named witts manage the affaires therof t is iudgment not flashes of witt that makes gouernements happie FINIS I. BOOK The faultes escaped in printing a curteous Reader will easily correct and pardon THE SECOND BOOK OF HOLY CHARACTERS containing a Miscelany of Theologicall discourses THAT IS THEOLOGY Positiue Scholasticall Polemicall and Morall Built vpon the foundation of Scriptures Traditions Councils Fathers CHAR. I. OF SACRIFICE THE CONTENTS Proper sacrifice defined no Preists Priesthood taken in the proper sense if proper sacrifice be laid aside asserting of improper metaphoricall sacrifice onely bringeth confusion and rendereth priestly function common to all alike SAcrifice taken in a spirituall generall sense is euery * Aug l 10. de ciuit Dei c. 6. ait sacrificium generaliter sumptum esse omne opus quod agitur vt sancta sociâ—tate inbaereamus Deoâ— work that a belieuer imployeth to the end that he may continue in holy society and freindship with God There are (a) According to S. Thomas two kinds of sacrifice taken in the generall sense are offered vpon the altar of Christ whereof one is called deuotion in order to God the other pity or compassion in order to our neighbour two kinds thereof the one is deuotion towards God comprehending all such actioÌ„s inward and outward of the minde and body as tend to the honouring and praysing of God the (b) The Apostle Hebrae 13. exhorteth vs to do works of Almes and charity saying that such sacrifices promerite God that is procure his grace and fauour and according to Ecclesiastes cap. 5. Those offer sacrifice which shew mercy other is pity or compassion towards our neighbour including the works of mercy and iustice to both kinds of spirituall sacrifice the Royall Prophet Dauid exhorteth all God's people of whatsoeuer condition or sex saying * Psal 15. tibi sacrificabo hostiam laudis Et psal 4. sacrificate sacrificium iustitiâ— Offer to God hosts of prayses and sacrifice sacrifices of Iustice and according to the Apostle spiri uall sacrificers of these kinds are * 1. Pet. 4. vos autem genus electum vegale SacerdotiuÌ„ Idem habetur Apoc. 5. kings and Preists investedwith the honour of royall Preisthood and indeed deuout
Christians in as much as they dayly serue God and haue dominion ouer their concupiscenâ—es declining whatsoeuer inclineth to sin are kings in a spirituall metaphoricall signification and in as much as they daily offer themselues a liuing sacrifice holy and acceptable vnto the diuine Majesty are Preists in a spirituall metaphoricall signification their works so offered being sacrifices in a spirituall metaphoricall signification Sacrifice taken in a speciall and proper sense is (c) Catholick definition of a sacrifice taken in the proper sense an outward oblation of a sensible visible thing by lawfull authority exhibited to God only no other object interuening vnto destruction or reall change of the thing offered in recognition of his supream excellency and dominion ouer all creatures In this Catholike definition of sacrifice are obseruable seuen sundry requisits's necessarily concurring vnto the compleating of a true proper sacrifice 1. Oblation for in euery sacrifice taken in the proper sense some sensible visible thing is offered to God and consequently euery true proper sacrifice is an oblation though * Secundum S. Thomam omne sacrificium est oblatio sed non è contra euery oblation is not a sacrifice in the proper sense for many things were offered in the old law namely brass siluer gold oile which were only sacrifices improperly and metaphorically 2. Outward oblation of a sensible thing for proper sacrifice is an act of heighest worship called by (d) This vsage and practise hath continued warrantable down from the begining of Christian Religion till these tymes Quem penes arbitrium est vis sorma loquendi vse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 wherby God is honoured aÌ„d worshipped in respect of his supream excellency in consequence whereof proper sacrifice is the chiefest kind of adoration which consisteth of some externall thing signifying the internall esteem that such as adore haue of the thing adored 3. The sensible thing must be permanent because a proper sacrifice is an exhibition of tribute due to God as king of Heauen and earth but tribute is a permanent during thing as experience teacheth in the payment of tribute vnto temporall Princes which is not a meer locution or other action enduring only for a litle while but brass siluer gold or some other permanent thing that is not flitting as are naked words 4. Oblation instituted by lawfull authority For proper sacrifice if the will of God and his institution were excluded is not an act euen of morall vertue hauing of and in it's self no goodness worthy praise nor worthiness deseruing esteem For example in the old law the slaughter or death of Lambes sheep and calfes was not more laudable then the killing of dogs wolues and hogs nay it had been far less laudable to kill those then these if God had not instituted in the old law sacrifices of Lambs sheep and calues excluding the others Furthermore the death and passion of Christ that was the most excellent and proper sacrifice considered in it self only abstracting from the (e) According to S. John the Euangelist cap. 10. Christ after he had declared to the Pharisies his power to lay down his life immediately added This commandement haue I receiued from my Father command he had from his diuine Father to giue his life for the redemption of the world is not an action of vertue because the death of Christ participated it's goodness and worthiness from the diuine command and his own will and indeed Abraham's willingnes to kill his son Isack who was a type of Christ had been a detestable wickedness if he had not had God's warrantable authority for it who is Author of life and death 5. Exhibited by a lawfull Minister for euery man is not a proper Minister of proper sacrifice but he onely who is by lawfull authority designed ordained and consecrated for that speciall charge and * Hebrae 5. nec quisquaÌ„ sumit sibi honorem sed qui vocatur à Deo tanquam Aaron sic Christ is noÌ„ semetipsum clarificauit vt Pontisex fieret sed qui locutus est ad eum tu es Sacerdos in aeternum secuÌ„dum ordinem Melchisedech no man should take this honour vnto himself but he that is called of God as was Aaron neither did Christ take vnto himselfe the office of High-Priest For he gaue it him that said vnto him thou art a Priest for euer after the order of Melchisedech And though God declared vnto the children of Israel that if they would heare his voice and keepe his Couenant he would make them * Exod. 19. si audieritis voceÌ„ meam eritis mihi in Regnum Sacerdotale gens sancta a priestly kingdom and a holy nation neuertheless they were not all royall Priest's taken in the proper sense but (f) According to S. Hierom. in quaes Hebraicis it was a tradition amongst the ancient Iew 's that down from Noe vnto Abraham the eldest son of each family was a Priest by diuine dispensation but the family of Aaron was invested with priestly dignity long after the institution of the pascall Lamb Exod. 12. and 28. so that in order to that sacrifice the ancient priuiledge granted to the eldest son of the family continued in force only such as descended from Aaron and both Saul and * 2. Paralip 26. 4. Reg. 14. Osias lepra punitus Osias were seuerely reprehended and punishad for attempting to offer sacrifice to which they were not specially deputed If euery priuate man should turn Priest and minister of proper sacrifice such vnnaturall proceeding against the law of God and nature would cause as dangerous and execrable confusion in the spirituall Church-gouerment as in ciuill State-gouerment if euery priuate man should turne king affecting to rule as king howeuer euen such Priest's as assume to themselue speciall and proper priesthood and deny speciall and proper sacrifice acknowledging spirituall and metaphoricall only open a door to the said confusion giuing occasion to euery priuate man to count himselfe as lawfull a Priest as such are being by baptism designed and consecrated to offer spirituall sacrifice and consequently as to the proper function of a Priest which is to * Hebrae 5. omnis Sacerdos Pontifex institutus vt offerat dona sacrificia offer sacrifice there is no distinction between a priuate man so baptised and such Priest's afore mentioned 6. Exhibited to God only because the end and motiue of proper sacrifice which is omnipotency or supream dominion in recognition wherof sacrifice is offered is found in God only although the catholick Church (g) According to S. Austin c. 20. con Faustum c. 21. Though Altars were erected in memory and honour of Martyrs neuertheless it was not the custom to offer sacrifice to Martyrs but to the God of Martyrs erecteth Altars in memory and honour of Martyrs and other blessed Saint's neuertheless she doth not offer sacrifice but to the sole God of both Martyrs and