Selected quad for the lemma: child_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
child_n	sir_n	thomas_n	william_n	8,060	5	10.2909	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A94942	A true and perfect narrative of the several proceedings in the case concerning the Lord Craven, before the Commissioners for Sequestrations and Compositions sitting at Haberdashers-Hall, the Council of State, the Parliament and upon the indictment of perjury, preferred and found against Major Richard Faulconer, the single and material witness against the Lord Craven, concerning the petition to the King of Scots, vvhich as the said Faulconer pretended, was promoted at Breda by the Lord Craven, and wherein, as the said Faulconer deposed, the Parliament of England was stiled by the name of barbarous and inhumane rebels. Shortly after which oath the Lord Cravens estate was voted by Parliament to be confiscate.	Falconer, Richard, Major.; Craven, William Craven, Earl of, 1606-1697.; England and Wales. Parliament.	1653 (1653)	Wing T2536; Thomason E1071_1; ESTC R208200	44,802	51

and a great bustle of of business This Informant with Colonel Drury applied themselves to the Lord Craven intreating him to present the Petition to the Queen of Bohemia to present it to the King of Scots the said Lord Craven taking the Petition and reading the same Chearfully said to Colonel Drury and this Informant There is the Queen of Bohemia deliver it to her and I will speak for you Upon which they applied themselves to the said Queen and she presented the Petition After which the King of Scots the Lord Craven the Marquess of Newcastle the Queen of Bohemia with some other Lords went into a withdrawing room where this Informant and company could not enter But the Lord Craven came forth of the withdrawing Chamber and told this Informant and company That they should receive an answer from the Queen of Bohemia to their Petition and that he had spoken to the Queen of Bohemia in their behalf who afterwards came and told this Informant and company that she had delivered their Petition and that the King had taken order for it The next morning at three of the Clock the King departed but this Informant and company had their Quarters satisfied by the Princess of Orange according to the said Kings order upon their Petition and thereby to inable them to follow the said King in the prosecution of these Wars against the Parliament of England which was the effect of their aforesaid Petition That this Informant saw the Lord Craven very often and familiar with the said King and enter with the said King into the withdrawing Chamber and staid there the last night the said King was at Breda very late Richard Faulconer Jur. 10. Feb. 1650. Coram nobis Samuel Moyer James Russel Edward Winslow Josias Barners Arthur Squib Colonel Hugh Reyly was likewise sworn before the said Commissioners at the same time whose Information was in these words viz. Febr. 10. 1650. The Information of Colonel Hugh Reyly taken before Samuel Moyer James Russel Edward Winslow Josias Barners and Arthur Squib Esquires Commissioners for compounding c. Who saith THat during the late Treaty at Breda this Informant did oftentimes Colonel Hugh Reyly his Information against the Lord Craven see the Lord Craven with the now King of Scots in his Bed-chamber and also walked abroad with him there being no man more conversant with the King then he That the said Lord Craven during the said Treaty did twice go to Rotterdam and Dunhagh and back again being imployed as was commonly reported at Court there by the said King That the said Lord Craven had a charge from the King to look to one Mrs. Barlow who as is reported and he believes to be true had a child by the King of Scots born at Rotterdam which he did and after the King was gone for Scotland the said Lord Craven took the child from her for which she went to Law with him and recovered the child back again as is reported Hugh Reyly Jur. 10. Feb. 1650. Samuel Moyer James Russel Josias Barners Edward Winslow Arthur Squib Captain Thomas Kitchingman was ten dayes after sworn before the said Commissioners whose Information was as followeth viz. Feb. 20. 1650. The Information of Captain Thomas Kitchingman taken upon Oath before the Commissioners for compositions c. Who saith THat the said Captain Thomas Kitchingman in April and May Captain Kitchingmans Information against the Lord Craven 1650. Saw the Lord Craven several times with the King of Scots at Breda and waiting upon the said King several times at his Table at Breda This Informant also saw the Earl of Oxford at the same time with the King of Scots at Breda waiting upon the said King at his Table and saw the Lord Craven and the Earl of Oxford many times go into the withdrawing rooms after the said King This Informant also saw the Lord Craven and the Earl of Oxford in the Bowling-ally in Breda Castle with the said King Thomas Kitchingman Jur. coram Commissionar Febr. 20. 1650. Sir William Craven having notice that the Lord Cravens estate was in danger of Sequestration and considering that himself and his children by Elizabeth daughter to Fardinando Lord Fairfax upon whom a great part of the said estate was setled were like to be concerned therein desired Mr. Rushworth to go with him to the Commissioners at Haberdashers-Hall and to desire a Copy of the Charge against the Lord Craven and accordingly a Copy of the depositions taken against the Lord Craven was demanded by Sir William Craven and Mr. Rushworth To whom Mr. Moyer in the name of the rest of the Commissioners answered That they had not fully considered of the Informations against the Lord Craven But said that very speedily a Copy of the Charge should be delivered and power should be given to the Lord Craven to examine and cross examine witnesses whereupon at that time they departed being confident that they should never be deprived by those Commissioners of that common justice of being heard before condemnation March 4. 1650. The Commissioners at Haberdashers-Hall having taken into The Commissioners scruple to Sequester the Lord Craven consideration the said Informations of Faulconers Reylys and Kitchingmans were not satisfied in their judgements that they could Sequester the Lord Craven thereupon Wherefore they presented their doubt in that case to the Council of State which doubt or quere of theirs as it is recorded and recited in an order of the Council of State was as followeth Tuesday 4. Martij 1650. At the Council of State at White-Hall Upon perusall of the depositions touching the Lord Craven presented to this Council from the Commissioners for Sequestrations c. sitting at Haberdashers-hall And of their certificate wherein they mention that they have given orders for the seizing and securing the said Lords estate but offer it as a doubt whether the Parliament hath made it matter of Sequestration for any person living beyond the Seas to hold correspondency with or repair to the person of the now King of Scots when he was beyond the Seas And desire it may be offered to the Parliament for a Rule which may inable them to proceed to Sequestration in that and other cases of like nature It is ordered by the Council that Mr. Atturny Generall do report this matter to the Parliament and in respect the retarding of Sequestrations where persons may be esteemed justly sequestrable tends much to the prejudice and disadvantage of the State to desire that the Parliament will be pleased to give some directions therein for the expediting of Justice in this and the like cases Ex. Gualter Frost Secr. March 6. 1650. Mr. Prideaux Atturney Generall makes his report to the Parliament Mr. Atturny Generals Report according to the directions of the said order which report of his is entered in the journal book agreeing verbatim with the order of the Council of State of the 4. March and he also made a report of the three