Selected quad for the lemma: child_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
child_n	sir_n	thomas_n	william_n	8,060	5	10.2909	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A53380	A display of tyranny, or, Remarks upon the illegal and arbitrary proceedings, in the courts of Westminster, and Guild-Hall London from the year, 1678, to the abdication of the late King James, in the year 1688, in which time, the rule was, quod principi placuit, lex esto : the first part.	Oates, Titus, 1649-1705.	1689 (1689)	Wing O35; ESTC R16065	100,209	272

charged against them touching the Proceedings against Sr Thomas Armstrong Then Mrs Mathews Sr Thomas Armstrong's Daughter was called in and examined what she knew of the Prosecution against her Father And Sr Robert Sawyer then Attorney General being named by her as one of the Prosesecutors After she was with-drawn he was heard in his place to what was objected against him and then he withdrew and upon debate of the matter it was Resolved That Sr Robert Sawyer 's name be put into the Bill as one of the Prosecutors of Sr Thomas Armstrong Resolved That Sr Robert Sawyer be expelled the House for the same Saturday the 25th of January 1689. The House being acquainted that according to their Order Sr Francis W●thens Sr Richard Holloway Mr Graham and Mr Burton attended at the Door th●y were severally called in and examined touching the Prosecution and Proceedings against Sr Thomas Armstrong And also the Executors of the late Lord Jeffryes that were attending at the Door were likewise called in and asked what hey had to say why Reparation should not be made out of the Lord Jeffryes Estate to the said Sr Thomas Armstrong's Family No Persons appearing as Executors to the late Justice Walcot the House was acquainted that he dyed Intestate and had not left an Estate sufficient to pay his Debts After the Persons before-mentioned were heard and with-drawn Mr Blaney was called in who gave the House an Account of the Proceedings in the Court of King's-Bench upon the Awarding Execution against Sr Thomas Armstrong And then the House proceeded upon the Amendments made by the Committee to the Bill for annulling the Attainder of Sr Thomas Armstrong And after having inserted the Name of Sr Robert Sawyer as a Prosecutor and resolved That the sum of five thousand Pounds should be paid by the Judges and Prosecutors to Sr Tho. Armstrong's Lady and Children as a Recompence of the Losses they had sustained by reason of his Attainder the Bill was recommitted upon the debate of the House to the same Committee Notes upon the Tryal between Sr William Pritchard Alderman of London and Thomas Papillon Esq. at Guildhall upon the 6th day of November 1684. before Sr George Jeffryes Lord Chief Justice of the Kings-Bench THat Mr Papillon was second to none in his zealous and undaunted opposition to the wicked attempts of introducing Popery and Arbitrary Government is very well known and deserves to be for ever remembred with honour None out did him in a diligent and faithful discharge of his Trust in several Parliaments In the Year 1681 there appeared a Race of Men fond of Vassalage and Slavery to that degree that they made Addresses of Thanks to the King for breaking two Parliaments in the compass of three Months meerly upon the score of their steady Resolution to extirpate the Popish Plot and Popery One of these fawning Addresses with promise of venturing their Lives and Fortunes to maintain this Violation of the Constitution of the Government having been presented to the King by Sr William Pritchard Sr George Jefferies and others Mr Papillon in abhorrence of it promoted and personally prosecuted a Petition to the Lord Mayor Aldermen and Common-Council praying that the Thanks of the City might be returned to Sr Robert Clayton Sr Thomas Player Alderman Pilkington and Alderman Love their worthy and well deserving Representatives in the Oxford Parliament and shewing That as matters then stood the Papists being animated in their Bloody designs by the hopes of a Popish Successor a Declaration to have frequent Parliaments could not attribute to the safety of the Kingdom and the composing the minds of Protestants but that it must be the sitting of a Parliament so as to search the Plot to the bottom to Prosecute the Conspirators and provide suitable Laws against the impending Evils and that nothing else could be effectual Further This Gentleman having in the same year 1681. greatly added to his guilt by baffling the Popish designs upon the Lives Liberties and Estates of all Protestants in the attempt upon the Earl of Shaftesbury He exerts himself in the year 1682. in the defence of the great and undoubted Right of the Citizens to chuse their own Sheriffs but now arbitrary Power being by the aid of ill Men become rampant and uncontroulable he must be sacrificed to their Revenge Mr Papillon having been duly elected one of the Sheriffs of London and Middlesex he brought a Writ of Mandamus out of the Court of King's-Bench to command the Mayor Aldermen to swear him into the Office that being disobeyed he is advised by his Counsel that he is entitled to an Action at Law for the wrong done him he sends in a respectful way to the Mayor and Aldermen requesting them to give voluntary appearances to his Action that being refused he proceeds by a legal process to bring them to answer him at Law whereupon Sr William Pritchard being arrested by the Coroner of London to whom the King's Writ was directed and detained some hours upon his refusal to give an appearance to Mr Papillon's Action Sr William brings an Action against him for thus arresting him and demands 10000 l. damages wherein he committed a great over-sight for had he ask'd 100000 l. the usual damages given in that day he had not failed of it with the following Jury which tryed the Cause Bartholomew Ferryman an old Informer one of the Jury of the Guildhall Riot Thomas Blackmore One of Dr Otes's Jury and also of the Riot Jury Thomas Symonds William Whatton One of the Riot Jury John Greene Thomas Amy One of Sr S. Barnardiston's Jury Joseph Baggs Daniel Chandler John Reynolds John Allen. Joseph Caine and Will. Wythers junior Fathers own Son. Mr Mundy opened the Declaration to this effect That the Plantiff being Lord Mayor and to attend that Office in the diligent Government of the City The Defendant envying the happy Estate of the Plantiff and contriving unjustly to disturb him in the Execution of his Office did to vex him not having any probable Cause of Action against him maliciously prosecute the King 's Writ out of the Court of King's-Bench against him directed to the Coroner of London commanding him to take Sr William Pritchard at Mr Papillon 's suite in an Action of Trespass and did procure Mr John Brome The Coroner to arrest him and that he was detained in custody six hours To the disgrace and scandal of the Plantiff and of his Office Whereas in fact he had not any just Cause of Action against him to his damage 10000 l. Then the Attorney General told the Jury that the action was brought to vindicate the honour of the Chair from such Affronts as these which in no Age till our times of faction and confusion it ever met with and he said We shall shew you that there lay a further Malice in this case and that there was a design in it against the Government This design was laid to carry on the great

inhumane manner concluded thus That you shall have by the Grace of God see that execution be done on Friday next according to Law. You shall have the full benefit of the Law. It may seem proper in this place to note to the Reader the reason why the Grace and Favour as termed by the Chief Justice and Attorney General of being admitted to Tryal was offered to Holloway upon the one and twentieth of April before and now denyed to Sr Thomas Armstrong which cannot be better done then by casting an Eye to the proceedings upon Holloway whereby it manifestly appears that that unhappy person had been wrought upon by the fear of Death and hope of Pardon to be very prodigal in his Confessions it being most evident that what he had declared was more then a thousand Witnesses against himself and that he had put down a multitude of Hear-says and Reports of others the truth whereof never did nor will appear Hereupon they who had before wheedled deluded him do now caress him Mr Attorney told him that at Law he was gone but if he had any thing to say to defend himself the King would not exclude him but extend his Mercy so far as to admit him to Tryal Upon which the Chief Justice said Mr Attorney it is exceeding well and told the Prisoner that the King was pleased to signifie his gratious Intention towards him in that he was contented to wave the Out-lawry and allow him to try the matter if he thought he could defend himself The Prisoner finding himself snared and that this Grace would serve him as it did all others that fell into their power at that time did only answer that he could not undertake to defend himself he having before thrown himself upon the King's mercy and confessed himself guilty of many things in the Indictment So he was sentenced and dyed without Mercy At the place of Execution Sr Thomas Armstrong deported himself with Courage becoming a great man and with the Seriousness and Piety suitable to a very good Christian Sheriff Daniel told him that he had leave to say what he pleased and should not be interrupted unless he upbraided the Government Sr Thomas thereupon told him that he should not say any thing by way of Speech but delivered him a Paper which he said contained his mind he then called for Dr Tennison who prayed with him and then he prayed himself In his Paper he thus expressed himself That he thanked Almighty God he found himself prepared for Death his thoughts set upon another World and weaned from this yet he could not but give so much of his little time as to answer some Calumnies and particularly what Mr Attorney accused him of at the Bar That he prayed to be allowed a Tryal for his Life according to the Laws of the Land and urged the Statute of Edw. 6. which was expresly for it but it signified nothing and he was with an extraordinary Roughness condemned and made a precedent tho' Holloway had it offered him and he could not but think all the world would conclude his case very different else why refused to him That Mr Attorney charged him for being one of those that was to kill the King He took God to witness that he never had a thought to take away the King's Life and that no man ever had the Impudence to propose so barbarous and base a thing to him and that he never was in any design to alter the Government That if he had been tryed he could have proved the Lord Howard's base Reflections upon him to be notoriously false He concluded that he had lived and now dyed of the Reformed Religion a Protestant in the Communion of the Church of England and he heartily wished he had lived more strictly up to the Religion he believed That he had found the great comfort of the Love and Mercy of God in and through his blessed Redeemer in whom he only trusted and verily hoped that he was going to partake of that fulness of Joy which is in his presence the hopes whereof infinitly pleased him He thanked God he had no repining but chearfully submitted to the punishment of his Sins He freely forgave all the World even those concerned in taking away his Life tho' he could not but think his Sentence very hard he being denyed the Laws of the Land. I shall here for the Readers more full Information in this matter subjoyn the Sence of our Present House of Commons of this Proceeding against Sr Thomas Armstrong and the Censure they have most justly passed upon it Martis 12. November 1689. A Petition of the Lady Armstrong and her Daughters was Read Whereupon a Committe was appointed to examine the matter and make their Report to the House Resolved That it be an Instruction to the Committee That they examine who were the Judges that gave the Sentence against Sr Thomas Armstrong and who were the Prosecutors of him and who had his Estate and how the Petitioner may have Reparation And also to examine what Proceedings were in order to a Writ of Error by him desired and how it came to be denyed and by whom And they are to make their Report with all convenient speed Martis 19. November 1689. Mr Chrisly reported from the Committee to whom the Petition of the Lady Armstrong and the Daughters of Sr Thomas Armstrong was referred An account of the whole Proceedings against him And that thereupon they had come to these Resolves 1. That Sr Thomas Armstrong's Plea ought to have been admitted according to the Statute of Edward 6. and that the Execution of him upon the Attainder by Outlawry was illegal and a Murder by pretence of Justice 2. That the Executors and Heirs of Sr Thomas Armstrong ought to have a Reparation of their Losses out of the Estates of those that were his Judges and Prosecutors 3. That a Writ of Error for the Reversal of a Judgment in Felony or Treason in the right of the Subject and ought to be granted at his desire and is not an Act of Grace or Favour which may be denyed or granted at Pleasure To all which Resolves the House agreed Resolved That leave be given to bring in a Bill to Reverse the Attainder of Sr Thomas Armstrong and to make Reparation to his Widow and Children out of the Estates of the Judges and Prosecutors And the same to be without Fees. Munday the 20th of June 1689. Mr Chrisly reported from the Committee to whom the Bill for the annulling the Attainder of Sr Thomas Armstrong was recommitted some Amendments to the Bill as also who were his Prosecutors also what Losses Sr Thomas Armstrong's Family had sustained by reason of the Attainder and thereupon it was Resolved That Sr Richard Holloway Sr Francis Wythens the Executors of the late Lord Jefferies and of the late Justice Walcot Mr Graham and Mr Burton do attend the House on Saturday morning next to answer to such matters as are