Linguistic DNA - Concept Modelling Demonstrator

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
child_n	father_n	israel_n	tribe_n	4,559	5	10.6477	5	true

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A07822	Salomon or A treatise declaring the state of the kingdome of Israel, as it was in the daies of Salomon Whereunto is annexed another treatise, of the Church: or more particularly, of the right constitution of a Church.	Morton, Thomas, of Berwick.	1596 (1596)	STC 18197.7; ESTC S112936	159,289	238

is called the visible Church by relation had to the catholik Church the which by reason of the dispersed members of it is inuisible as hath bene declared whenas euery particular Church yea euen priuate Churches and so consequently the visible Church consisting thereof doth make a publick profession of the fayth This visible Church doth continually existe in the world forsomuch as GOD hath appointed that his name shoulde continually as longe as the worlde endureth be called vpon and worshipped in one place or other as the story of the Ch. doth witnes We confesse that it hath often lurcked in secret places and often been so ouer-shadowed with errours superstition and idolatrie that it could hardly be discerned and so hath been euen as the sunne is in the eclipse yet neuer wholly taken away for whenas there was but one particular Ch. in the world yea this particular church was not publick but priuate within one mans family and secret lurking in a corner so that they who liued at that time or in the ages following could not define where the Church was at such a time yet that Church made the visible Church For their profession was visible and open among themselues and also to others although it were not seen at that instant for a thing which is not actually seen may be visible Secondly this is to be noted that in the first ages of the world before the time of the Gospell the visible Ch. did often consist of one only particular church there being no moe in the world but since the publishing of the gospel it hath hitherto shall alwaies consist of many Lastly as touching the place of this visible Ch. although it be not tyed to any certaine place yet it hath alwaies bene cheifly in some one parte of the world So we knowe that first it was wholly in the east partes in the countries of Mesopotania Syria Iurie and others adioyning vnto these Afterwards in the first time of the gospell it was cheifly in Asia And in these last ages we see that it hath been almost wholly in Europe and whether God will change the dwelling place of it again or no euen transporte it to the fourth parte of the world lately found out or to any other place it is knowne to himselfe onely Diuers â—ther points should be added for the full declaration of â—he nature and state of the visible Church But many of them aâ—â— common with the catholick Church and therefore are handled in the first Chapter where they may be considered The rest we cut off for breuities sake because this treatise is already growen beyond our purpose and expectation So then to conclude if to this visible Church we do adde the dispersed members of the catholick Church we haue the catholick Church And so the end of this treatise is brought to the beginning FINIS Why the people desired an alteration of the state The occasion of this alteration Magistracie Gods ordinance The church hath neuer beene without magistracie How God erecteth magistracie among infidels Why God appointed magistracie In what respect the magistrate beareth the image of God The kingdome of Israel a type of Christes kingdome How God was the king of Israel The iudicial law in part abrogated by the erecting of this kingdome God put from his kingdome What authoritie the people had before the time of the Kinges No authoritie in Israel but in the hands of the king The king to his subiects as a father to his children The prophets neuer reproue the people for not resisting the idolatrous kings Vnlawfull to vse violeeÌ„e against the kiâ—g in the maintenance of religion The people could not resume their liberty giuen into the handes of the kings It belonged not to the people but to God to nominate the king Saul remained the lawfull king of Israell after that Dauid was annointed and appointed to the kingdome The rebellion of Ieroboam of the tenne tribes vnlawfull Hazaels rebellion foretold by God but not permitted God would not take the kingdome from Dauids posterity The kingdome so annexed to the house of Dauid that it could not be taken from it God neuer approued any conspiracy made against any of the kings With what weapons this people might fight against their kinges Why absolute monarchies were more in vse in the first ages of the world The gouernment of the kings compared with the former Ecclesiasticall persons subiect to the authoritie and iurisdiction of the king God deferred the building of the Temple till that the kingdome were erected The Church with the common welth make but one bodie Resisting of wicked kings weakeneth the authority of good kings Ecclesiastical constitutions made by the authority of the kinges The kings exempted from the Iudiciall lawes Great power bringeth with it great maiesty The diuine original of this kingdome made it maiesticall The annointing of these kinges signified the holinesse of their persons and functions Long continuance of hereditarie succession made this kingdome strong and maiesticall What made the gouernment of the Iudges to be contemned The statelinesse of this kingdome in the daies of Salomon The maiesty of this kingdome increase and decrease as did the sinceritie of religion The kinge might lawfully exact of the people not only for necessarie vses but for pompe pleasure An absolute Monarchie is a chargeable and costly gouernment The people had this gouernment in great reuerence and estimation This kingdome standeth yet in Christ. The people account the kinges better then ten thousand of themselues This gouernment doth more resemble the authority of God then any other kind doth Why God was offended with the people asking a king God did alwaies like this gouernment and purpose to establish it God the author of kingdomes and the setter vp of kinges The kinge held his kingdome as from God and was subiect to his will and worde This example of Samuel teaching the people the state of the kingdome is to be followed by the ministers of Gods word Nothing better beseeming Christians then due subiection to magistates A compendious abstract of the state of the kingdome of Israel Care to be had of posterity Alteration of gouernment in any common wealth troublesome and dangerous The worde Catholicke not vsed in the scripture The catholicke Church was twise contained in one familie The profession of the true religion maketh one a member of the catholicke Church Infantes are members of the catholike Church Hypocritical professours are members of the catholicke Church Excommunication doth not separate from the catholicke but only froÌ„ the visible Church Heretikes as Arians and papistes are to be counted members of the catholicke Church The papist holdeth the foundation of Christian religion Whole Churches haue held grieuous errours The state of the Church before the comming of Christ. Faith and fundamentall errours together The same errour more pernitious at one time theÌ„ at another Greater hope of the saluation of an ignorant then of a learned

memorie and other common giftes Then followeth a corrupt worship consisting in outward rites and ceremonies in vaine babling in suffering hunger or in other bodily exercises Further if in steede of true doctrine errours be publickely taught and generally receaued or if in steede of a christian life sinne doe abounde by these meanes and many other which it is not needefull to rehearse commeth a corrupt state of a Church But heere we are briefely to touch a question which hath beene in part handled alone Chap. 1. Sect. 4. to wit howe farre a Church may be corrupt before it cease to be a true Church that is a Church truely and indeede For answere whereof it seemeth that wheresoeuer a company of men doe ioyntlie and publickely by worshipping the true God in Christ professe the substance of Christian religion which is faith in Iesus Christ the sonne of God and Sauiour of the world that there is a true Church notwithstanding any corruption whatsoeuer yea although it be of that nature that it might be made by consequent of argument to fight with the very foundation of christian religion and so hainous as that in respect thereof the people stained with this corruption are worthy to be abhorred of all men and vnworthy to be called the Church of God We will take an instance of a people which together with the profession of the faith doe mâ—intaine and vse idolatrie not worshipping a false God for then they were without all question to be counted infidels but the true God after a false and deuised manner These seeme to be a Church although they doe prophane the worship of God after a most horrible grieuous mâ—nner thus as it may seem some christans did in the first time of the gospel who did both beleeue in some sort yet could not of a sudden shake off that idolatrie wherein they had liued so many yeares For so Paul writeth 1. Cor. 5.11 If any that is called a brother that is a christian be a fornicatour or couetous or a worshipper of Images This kind of wâ—rship is in vse in the Church of Rome the which seemeth to be a Church althogh in the lowest degree that can be imagined vnlesse as it semeth that we may do we wil admit into the church the people of the ten tribs who were idolaters yet by circumcisioÌ„ some otherwaies did professe the name of Iehoua as we may note out of many testimonies of scripture And first out of those places where they are called the people of god as we read Ro. 10.25.26 wher the people of God the beloued of God and the children of the liuing God doe all signifie a true Church In the 1. King 16.2 they are twise so called wher God saith that he made Bahasa the captaine of his people Israell Secondly God is called the God of the ten tribes and said to be among them 1. King 20.28 because the Syrians speaking of the God of the ten tribes of whome they were ouercome said that Iehoua was God of the hils onely and 1. King 18.35 thou art the God of Israel Thirdly for that they alwaies had the true prophets of God and by them did aske and receiue counsell of God in their waightie affaires Thus 1. King 22.5.6.7.11 Achab asked counsel of God 2. King 2.16 Ahazia is reproued by God for that He sent to aske counsell at Baalsebub as though there were not a GOD in Isâ—ael whose worde he might haue sought after Likewise 1. King 5.8 Eliseus saith this is a most certaine thing that Israell is not at any time without a prophet The trueth hereof may be gathered also 1. King 18.21 where Elias saith that the people did halt betwixt God and Baal that is did serue them both together And lastly by that which is often said that the kinges of Israel did euil in the eyes of God that is in that place wherupon God did as yet looke with the eyes of his mercy as vpon his Church So that although they did wante almost the whole publicke worship and therefore are said 2. Chro. 15.3 to be without God without priestes and the law yet because the name of God was generally by circumcision professed of them they seeme to retaine the name of a Church and oâ— the people of God Euen as the Church of Rome serueth God and Christ by baptisme and by professing his name otherwaies although they haue no part of the worship of God vncorruptâ—d And so the ten tribes some christians in the primitiue church the papists and as we may thinke king Salomon with many others ioyned idolatry the worship of the true God together as it is said of the Samaritanes that they feared the Lord and worshipped idols 2. Kinges 17.41 yet these Samaritanes were not a Church for they did only in their mindes slauishly feare God but all their outward worship was done vnto idols Sect. 11. Of a Church corrupt in doctrine NOwe we are to enquire howe farre a people may be corrupt in doctrine and yet remain a Church Whereunto we answere as before that all they who hold the foundation of religion are to be counted a Church although together they be infected with many grieuous errours By the foundation of religion we doe not meane any one particular point no not the waightiest points or those which come nearest to the foundation it selfe but the generall and maine doctrine of Christianitie the which was before the comming of Châ—ist this I beleeue in the Messias who is to come of the seed of Dauid and since his comming it is this I beleeue that Iesus is Christ as the foundation of religion is defined by the Apostle 1. Cor. 3.11 The truth hereof may euidently appeare by considering the state of the visible Church before the comming of Christ especially as it was at the time of his comming in the which although God did reueale his will more clearely to some of his prophets people yet the church generally was altogether ignorant of the waightiest points of the Gospell as of Christ the trinitie two distinct natures the vnion of them of his offices death and resurrection Now although simple ignoraunce be not so grieuous a sinne as wilfull heresie neither an heresie before the comming of Christ as one since his comming yet in this respect they are all one for a man doth erre in that point which he doth not knowe holding the errour contrary to the said trueth Euen as the Iewes not knowing the heades of doctrine before named did alwaies in all ages and doe to this day so many as continue in vnbâ—leife deny the doctrine of the trinitie for they make but one person to wit God the father and the doctrine of the deitie of Christ thinking that the Messias should be a mere man they deny his offices thinking that he should be a temporall king onely and therefore they knewe not the doctrine of regeneration as we see in

from the safety of the people of states and commonwealthes the ground square and end of all good pollicie carieth with it such a faire shew of equitie and necessitie that like vnto a violent streame it hath caried many headlong in heate to condemne and reiect vtterly these absolute Monarchies as tyrannicall and barbarous kindes of gouernment pernitious to men yea altogether vnlawful and vnmeete for the Church of God But we ought not to suffer our selues to be deceiued by any appearance or pretence whatsoeuer or in respect of any inconueniences although neuer so great to iudge that to be vnlawfull and prophane which God by establishing it in his Church hath shewed to be holy and lawfull But for the further resoluing of this question it is requisite that we againe put you in minde that we doe not heere speake eyther what ought to be the state of al kingdomes in this behalfe or that this is the best kinde of gouernment but only doe shew what was the state of this kingdome of Israell In the which it seemeth that the whole power of ruling the lande was giuen by God and by the people into the handes of the king without any exception whatsoeuer insomuch that the people did not reserue to themselues any power whereby they might lawfully resist his authoritie or oppose themselues to his proceedings although vnlawfull and vniust much lesse take from him the kingdome or to offer any manner of violence vnto his person For the authoritie of this king ouer his people was no lesse then is the authoritie of a father in his familie in respect of his children who if he doe iniuriously intreat any of them or not carefully keep his own goods or liue any way disorderly it is the duety of his children if not with silence to suffer it yet with great modesty to admonish him of it But if they should ioyne themselues together and offer any violence vnto him especially if they should throw him out of his house all men woulde count them rebellious and vngratious children But if they shoulde take his life from him they were to be esteemed notoriously wicked ye rather as monsters worthy to be abhorred of all men So it seemeth that the state of this kingdome was such as that no subiect of what place soeuer no not the whol people iointly could lawfully vse any violence against the kings person or proceedinges and that the king might although not lawfully in respect of the lawe of God of men or of nature yet safely and freely in respect of his subiectes doe whatsoeuer pleased him according as Iacob foretelleth Gen. 49.9 that Iuda the king of his brethren should be as the great Lion who when he laieth himselfe downe who shall raise him vppe or disquiet him The trueth heereof appeareth in the whole course of the story of the kings who praesuming vpon this whole and vndeuided authority did neuer feare or doubt to doe whatsoeuer they listed without asking leaue eyther at nobles elders or people Hence came that foolish and tyrannicall answer which RehoboaÌ„ made to the people threatning them 1. King 12.12 in this manner My least part shal be heauier then my fathers loynes whereby he meant that he would encrease those heauie burdens of tributes which his father had laide vpon them For but that he knewe verie well the state of his kingdome to be such as that he might both say and doe what he listed without controlement he had beene more then mad to make such an answere And hence it came that the idolatrous kinges did neuer sticke by their sole authoritie to set vp open idolatrie not once minding who would be offended therewith and likewise the continuall practise of the people doth declare that they did not violeÌ„tly oppose theÌ„selues to the doings eyther of the good or of the wicked kinges but suffered religion to stand and fall according to their pleasure Yea the dealing of God himselfe doth prooue the same who when he purposed to preserue Dauid against the fury of Saule would neuer suffer him to oppose Ceila or any other of Saules citâ—es against him but made him fly first into the mountains and deserts and afterwardes out of the land to the Philistines Yea Dauid although he were appointed by the expresse worde of God to sâ—cceede Saule in the kingdome yet he was so farre from laying violent handes vpon him that as we reade 1. Sam. 24.6 his heart smote him that is his conscience did accuse him that he had behaued himselfe disloyally against the king in that he had offered violence to the kings garment because that was as a threatning of death vnto him and a greate disgrace Yea further we doe not reade that God did euer by any of his prophets stirre vp the people to maintaine his true woâ—shippe by violence against the kinges or euer reproue them because they had suffered them to set vppe idolatrie which is an euident proofe of this point For if it had beene lawfull to resist in any case then surely in the maintenance of the true worshippe of God and of his glorie But heereof there is a great question made for although this king had power in ciuill matters to doe not onely right iustice without the helpe of any other power but also wrong without resistance shall we therefore giue vnto him this power in the cause of religion that he may deface the worshippe of God at his pleasure It may seeme much better that not onely kings should be throwen downe from their thrones but also that heauen and earth shoulde goe togither then that God should be dishonoured and detestable idolatrie erected We confesse that it is a most fearefull thing that the king of Israell who hath his authority from God should vse the same to dishonor God and thrust not only men out of their houses landes but also the great God of heauen earth out of his teÌ„ple and Church yea in trueth in some sort out of the world for God had tyed his visible Church to this land And therefore we answere that as it is vsually saide Si ius violandum regni causÃ¢ violandum so Si ius regni sit violandum religionis causa est violandum that if it be lawfull for the people of Israell for any cause to resist their lawfull king it is lawfull in the defence of the true religion and Gods glory But as hath beene said it seemeth that the state of this kingdome would not beare any resistance no not in this case much lesse in any other No man yea no company of men could for any offence committed by the king eyther against God or man the first or second table call him to account summon him to appeare in iudgement or vse any manner of violence eyther in word or deede against him Now we are to answere those thinges which may be obiected against this assertion Sect. VI. FIrst it may seeme agreeable to reason that

Selected quad for the lemma: child_n

Text snippets containing the quad