Depart out of thy Mouth Nor out of the Mouth of thy Seed Nor out of the Mouth of thy Seeds Seed saith the Lord from henceforth and for ever And Such Like Answer to this Third Objection 1. TO what Purpose doth this Objection serve the Popish Writers Or what Argument may the Perpetuity Of Christs Universal Church afford Them against our former Assertion 2. We Believe and Confesse to the Comfort of our Souls That Christs Church hath continued And shall never fail so long as the world endureth 3. And we account it a prophane Heresie to teach that Christs Universal Church hath Perished from the Earth at any Time For this Assertion shaketh the Foundation of all Faith and Religion 4. But the Popish Writers who makes this Objection Should prove by invincible evidence of Scripture That the Catholick Universal Church of Christ is nothing Else But the Outward Succession of the Roman See If They can Prove This They should Prove their Objection Soundly And should confute our Opinion Truely 5. But it is a Thing which They cannot Doe They cannot bring us Either Texts of Scriptures or Reasons To shew that Christs Church Either is the Popes Succession Or Else dependeth upon the same See 6. For as Touching External Shew And Succession of Churches The Scriptures have foretold Apoc. 12. and 13.16 That Antichrist shall Seduce Great and Small Rich and Poor Free and Bond And that the Church shall flie into the Wildernesse And there Remain Of all which no word could be true If the Catholick Church were tied To the Popes Chaire And the Popes Chaire were the Rock That cannot be removed 7. And yet notwithstanding this General Dispersion And the Flight of the Church under Antichrist The Catholick Church shall for all That Continue 8. Although not in that outward strength And Glory In which sometimes it hath appeared And Flourished 4. Objection Of the Popish Writers Against the above Exercitations That the Now Church of Rome is Changed And is not Now what it was in the Beginning What Impudence is This say the said Writers There was never Heresie that Assaulted the Church of Rome Of which it carried not the Victory As Over the Donatists Over Jovinian Over Pelagius the Britain And over Others Answer to this Fourth Objection 1. THe Triumphs of which the Popish Writers do boast of Are no more proper to the Now or Latter Church of Rome Then the Triumphs of old Rome Over Pyrrhus Over Annibal Over Perses Over Antiochus are to be esteemed the Triumphs of Rome Now Being 2. And for the pretended Victory over Pelagius the Britain we say that he Triumphed over the Popish Kingdome For did he not Teach That Grace was imbred in Nature And the Popish Crew of Jesuites Defendeth the same Who seeth not then Pelagius sitting in the Popish Triumphant Chariot Popery is not of the first and Primary Antiquity That is many of the present Doctrines of the Church of Rome And in what Time Errors were received in it 1. PApists are not able to produce any Record Expresse and direct testimony Canon of Council or Ecclesiastical constitution For their burning Lights in the Church at noon day before the Decree of Pope Sabinianus in the year of our Lord 605. 2. Nor for Rome to be the Head of all Churches before Pope Boniface the Third in the year 606. 3. Nor for the Invocation of Saints in their Publick Lithurgy before Boniface the Fifth in the year 618. 4. Nor for their Latine Service thrust upon all Churches before Pope Vitalian in the year 666 which is the very number of the name of the Beast 5. Nor for the Cutting of the Host into three parts and offering one part for the Souls in Purgatory before Pope Sergius in the year 688. 6. Nor for setting up Images in Churches Generally and worshipping them before Pope Adrian the First and the Second Council of Nice in the year 787. 7. Nor for Canonization of Saints departed before Leo the Third about the year 800. 8. Nor for the Orall Manducation of Christs Body in the Sacrament before Pope Nicholas the Second in the year 1053. 9. Nor for the entire number of seven Sacraments before Peter Lombard in the year 1140. 10. Nor for Indulgences before Engenius the third in the year 1145. 11. Nor for Transubstantiation of the Bread into Christs body before the Fourth Council of Lateran in the year 1215. 12. Nor for the Elevation of the Host that the People might adore it before Honorius the Third in the year 1216. 13. Nor for any Jubilee before Pope Boniface the Eighth in the yeer 1300. 14. Nor for the Carrying the Sacrament in Procession under a Canopy before Pope Vrban the Fifth In the year 1262. 15. Nor for the Day and half Communion before the Council at Constance in the year 1416. 16. Nor for the suspending the Efficacy of Sacramental Consecration upon the Priests Intention before the Council at Florence in the year 1439. 17. Nor for the Popes Superiority to General Councils before the Sixt Council at Lateran under Leo the Tenth in the year 1517. 18. Nor the vulgar Latine Translation to be held for Authentical And upon no pretended Cause whatsoever to be reiected before the fourth Session of the Council of Trent in the year 1546. 19. Nor for the Second book of the Macchabees and the Apocryphal Additions to Hester and Daniel with the History of Bell and the Dragon which S. Jerome termeth a Fable to bereceived for Canonical Scripture before the said Session in the year above named 1. Frande 1. These be the Principles and Grounds of Faith and Worship that the Church of Rome doth Produce 1. Scriptures 2. Traditions of the Apostles 3. The Catholick Church 4. General Councils 5. The Ancient Fathers 6. The Pope which she calls the Supream Pastour of the Church 2. These be the Fraudes of the Church of Rome Concerning all the Principles and Rules above Produced The 1. of those Fraudes is That the Church of Rome careth indeed for none of Them but for the last which is The Determination of her Pope 1. THe Scripture must not be Scripture in any other Sense then as the Pope will Expound So that the Scripture being the Meaning of the Scripture And the Meaing of the Scripture being the Popes Exposition Hereof it followeth That the Scripture is nothing else but the Popes Interpretation 2. So Likewise In Traditions In Doctors In Councils In Churches If any Thing Dissent from the Popes understanding and Determination It is Rejected Abolished Condemned 3. And Finally all Faith all Religion all Divinity of the Church of Rome is only the Popes Sacred will and pleasure Papists give the Churches Authority to the Pope And take all Authority quoad nos from the Scripture So that by the Church they understand the Pope 1. THe Papists 1. take all Authority from the Scripture 2. They give it to the Church And 3. They give the Churches Authority to
Omnipotencie of God 5. And notwithstanding that God having so permitted it those false Miracles did serve to Introduce and settle many Errors 1. By this Means the Popes and their Clergie did endeavour to establish the Doctrine of Transubstantiation Sometimes saying that Beasts did leave their Food to worship the Host Sometimes That the Host being pricked some blood came out of it That a part thereof being fallen in the water when the Priest washed his hands all the water had been changed into blood 2. By this Means also the Pope and his Clergy did establish The Intercession Adoration and Invocation of the departed Saints And upon that How many Miracles have been boasted of Namely That many blind do recover their sight Many lame do go That many sick do recover health If any Mineral Waters be found in a Country that have some virtue there a Chappel of some Saint is builded unto whom the virtue of these waters is attributed which is called by the Name of Miracle 3. By this Means likewise hath been established the Adoration of Images being said that in certain places the Crucifix being ill used by the Jewes did render Bloud Also that in another place a Child without Feet having vowed himself to the Virgin Mary whose Image was worshipped in the place where he was Born did see in sleeping his two Feet be given unto him That in some other Places some Images did render Oyle like unto Sweat which did serve for the Cure of many Diseases 4. By this Means besides hath been established the veneration of Relicks 5. And for the Admiration of the Dignity of Popes this Means hath been also used 4. I have said That the Fourth of the Means used by the Popes and the Church of Rome to seduce People Consisteth in Persecution and Cruelty 1. IT is that which is represented in the Apocalypse chap. 17.6 In these words And I saw the woman drunken with the bloud of the Saints and with the Bloud of the Martyrs of Jesus And in the 12. Chapter all along Particularly and Expressely in the verses 13 15 and 17. of that Chapter 2. In that the Church of Rome is gone farre above the Cruelty of the Pagan Emperours and that of the most wild and Barbarous of them 3. This Cruelty and Persecution hath been exercised and tried by the Popes the Church of Rome in all the places where the Reformed Religion was Imbraced 4. And if at this Time it doth not appear so violent as in time past It is because the strength of Antichrist weakenth and not his will The Popes do hold That no other waies are to be used towards the Reformed then that of Punishments and of warre 1. BEcause say they there is but small hope of their Conversion Hereticks being very obstinate and whatsoever is done to exhort them to Repentance being by them attributed to the want of strength to force them 2. That there was not any Remembrance that ever Moderation had done any good 3. But that Experience had shewed that the sooner it is proceeded against them by the Justice and the Executions thereof it fareth the better 4. And where this way doth not suffice to proceed against them by warre Again Of the Cruelty of the Popes and of the Church of Rome and of the Popish Inquisition 1. THe Reformed call to witnesse all the people of the Christian World who have yet any sense of Humanitie and Equitie remaining in them Whether the Cruelty of the Church of Rome hath not been of all Cruelties the greatest 2. Thereupon let Italy speak also Germany Spain France the Low Countries besides our Kingdom of England 3. It were tedious to recite the Horrible Murders The Fearful Burnings and the Exquisite Punishments that the Papists have exercised in those States 4. The Sword The Rack The Gallows and the Fire have been the Instruments of their Cruelty 5. And had it not been for these the Church of Rome had been overthrown long ago For by these Weapons it was first Founded after increased and now maintained 6. If once these faile the Roman Church questionlesse cannot long continue § Of the Popish Inquisition 1. THe Horrors of this Popish Inquisition are above all that the Devil did ever invent 2. The Tortures thereof are so cruel and barbarous that that justifies all the Torments of Phalaris 3. It is to speak of it too softly to call it the Image of Hell 4. A man is laid in prison not knowing for what cause 5. After the Darknesse and Solitarinesse of a year he is questioned upon some certain deeds 6. If he declares himself to be a good Catholick and Abjures Heresie then he is put to death more mildly For there to be guilty of death it sufficeth to have been accused 7. If he persevere in the defence of the Truth which he did professe and resolves himself to martyrdom after infinite Torments he is produced in publick his head covered with a horrible cover which they call S. Benedict with a mouth and a tail of the Devil 8. And so he is burned with a slow fire at sundrie times that so he may feel himself dying 9. Which is an horror to the Turks and Mahometans although they be mortal Enemies to the Christian Name For they never did any thing to Christians which came near to this Crueltie Of the Perfidiousnesse and Cruelty Exercised by the Council of Constance upon John Husse and Hierome of Prague 1. 1. IOhn Husse of Bohemia and Hierome of Prague came to the Council of Constance trusting in the protection of a publick promise namely of Sigismund the Emperour who gave his publick warrant 2. And yet they were burned in that Council 3. Was it not fit that the Council should have given credit to the publick warrant of the Emperour Exception of the Jesuites BUt say the Jesuites John Husse was not called by the Council of Constance neither did he receive from it any publick promise Answer of the Reformed to that Exception 1. THe Emperour Sigismund gave him his publick Warrant which the Council most dishonorablie infringed 2. And after they had put Husse to Death contrary to publick promise they Enacted a Law That a promise made unto Hereticks by the Emperour or by any King or Secular Prince should not hinder any Ecclesiastical Judges from proceeding against them According to Law Concil Constant Sess 19. 2. HIerom of Prague likewise came to the Council of his own accord and making publick profession of his Faith was burned 3. SO that the Case of these Two than the which all Christendome at that time had not any more Holy or Learned 1. Shall remain as a perpetual Monument of the Papists Treachery and most horrible Cruelty 2. And also as a notable Caveat unto all the Godly to beware of them for the Time to come §. The Doctrine of the Church of Rome is false Concerning the Faith given to Hereticks 1. AFter that the Council of Constance had most
undoubted Demonstrations of the Forgerie of this Edict of Donation 2. For in the Charter are all these Not onely related as certain truths but they are made the very ground and occasion why Constantine made this Charter 3. Seeing then there is neither truth nor reality in the foundation Certainly there is no truth at all in the Charter it self 4. But leaving these we will propose a few other Considerations in this Cause 1. In this Edict is mentioned the See of Constantinople as one of the Patriarchal Sees Whereas neither it had Patriarchal Dignitie before the Second General Council that is more then fiftie years after the Donation is supposed to be made Nor was there at that time so much as the name of Constantinople For this City was then called Byzantium And divers years after when Constantine had much enlarged it and made it as Socrates saith Parem aequalem Romae equal to Rome choosing it for the Imperial Seat It was then first called by his Name Constantinople And this was done as Baronius himself acknowledgeth a little after the Nicene Council was ended But as Sigonius more truely teacheth five years after that Nicene Council when Gallicanus and Symachus were Consuls So very stupid was the forgerer that to gain to the Pope to the See of Rome principality over Constantinople he makes Constantine write of that City which was not no nor the name of it so much as extant in the World at that time 2. Had Constantine given principality to the Roman See above all Churches in the World as the Charter saith he did What folly was it in John Bishop of Constantinople in Cyriacus and in others to strive for that Preheminence What meant Boniface the third that he would never shew this Charter and grant of principalitie made by Constantine Why did he use so much intreaty and means to Phocas a murtherer that the Church of Rome might be called the first of all Churches when the same was long almost 300. years before given by a fair Charter to the Roman See by Constantine so Worthy and Renowned an Emperour 3. In this Edict Constantine is made solemnly to give unto Pope Sylvester the Lateran Palace whereas not only Sigonius witnesseth that this was given long before to Pope Meltiades Augustale Palatium in Laterano impertiit Constantine gave to Meltiades the Lateran Palace but Baronius and Binnius avouch the same for a certainty and say that no wise body will doubt thereof Those Augustissimae Lateranenses Aedes say they That most princely Palace of the Lateran was given by the same Constantine to Pope Miltiades the Predecessor of Sylvester and to his Successors and that in the Seventh year of Constantine which was twelve years before he was either Baptized or made this Charter of Donation Is not this now a piece of great munificence in the Emperour to give that which it is not his own to give or to give that to Sylvester which many years before that gift was Sylvesters own and his Successours for ever 4. To the above said considerations let us add the Testimony of their great Cardinal Baronius to whom accords Gretser who hath written an Apologie for him in this very point He by many Reasons and at large proves the Edict to be Commentitium prorsusque falsum A meer Figment and Forgerie And as Gretser saith Commentis accensendum docuit He hath taught that it is a Counterfeit One Reason is That this Edict was not in the Ancient Acts of Sylvester but was by forgerie inserted into them The time when this was done he defines to have been after the 1000 year of Christ The Parties by whom this forged Edict was made and published he also declares It was fained by some Grecian under the name of Eusebius and set forth by Theodorus Balsamon whereas a nullo Graecorum hactenus in lucem editum until then no Grecian had published it And from the Grecians it came to the Latins and Western Church Leo the 9. being the first Pope who makes mention thereof Thus the Cardinal By whose acknowledgment it may be seen what truth there is in the Popes specially in Pope Leo who in his Decretal Epistle most solemnly commends this Edict for an Ancient and undoubted Evidence Such as he knew by sight and sense to be the true deed of Constantine Which yet their great Cardinal after long sifting of Monuments and Records testifieth to be a Forgerie and that of the Grecians First of all devised as he saith about 700. years and published 800. years after the Death of Constantine Fraud Of the Fraud and Imposture of the Popes and of the Church of Rome in regard of pretended Revelations both by Dreams and by Extraordinary Visions and Apparitions of the Dead 1. THe Pope and the Church of Rome make use of these pretended Revelations to lead the poor People by the Nose and to make him believe some Doctrines which the word of God doth condemn 2. So was it said that some were Appeared who had said That to come out of Purgatory such and such things were to be done so Sing Masses and by some certain kind of persons that by such forged Impostures the Fable of Purgatory should be established 3. Likewise was it said that some were Appeared who said That they had seen some Tormented in Hell Fire who told them That they were there for sundry Sinnes but particularly for having Stolne a Chalice from the Convent of the Benedictine Monks 4. Others who being Tormented did say That it was because they had Taken and Appropriated to themselves some Possessions belonging to the Church 5. Besides others said That some certain Priests godly persons singing Masse did see an Angel which did accompany them 6. In the Times of the deepest ignorance there was nothing more common then the speech of such Visions and Apparitions either Imaginaries and Phantastical or proceeding from the Devil to abuse the poor people and to establish his False Doctrine Fraud It is a Fraud and a meere Cavillation for the Refutation of the Falshood of a Religion and also for the Proofe of the Truth of a Religion to demand only Formal Places of Holy Scripture contained word by word in it Which Fraud and Cavillation is used by many Doctors of the Church of Rome disputing with the Reformed but wrongfully BEcause if all that which is not opposed by Formal Texts cannot be said to be grounded in the Word of God Then there are none so abominable Heresies nor any so monstrous opinion which may not boast although wrongfully to have the word of God for its Ground So for Example 1. The Heretick Arrians could say That they were grounded upon the Word of God because there is no passage which formally saith That the Son is consubstantial to the Father and that it is not a Created God 2. The Nestoreans also could say That they were grounded upon the Word of God because there is no formal place which saies That
accepted of the Protestants by toleration because at first they could obtain no more then by an absolute approbation 3. The same Service-book was changed and reformed and many things were left out of the said Liturgie by another Edition thereof established in the Fifth Year of Edward the Sixt. 4. And that latter Service-book of King Edward is in substance all one with the Service-book of Queen Elizabeth 5. And that since King Edwards Reigne there hath been no material Alteration of the English Service book 6. The Papists have no cause to inveigh against this alteration of the Service-book of the Church of England if they remember that themselves have changed their Breviaries Portesses and Missals more then once even of late years See Possevin Appar v. Missal Etver Breviarum Of the mention of Saints made in the Liturgie of the Church of England and of their Feasts keeping yearly 1. VVHen in the Church of England according to the Liturgie thereof the said Church doth adorn the Calendar with the Names of some Eminent Saints and do make honourable mention of them in her Religious publick worship as the Antient Church did of her Martyrs yet she doth not call upon them She doth not lift up the hands nor bow the knees nor present offerings nor direct her prayers nor intend any part of Religious worship to them But to their God and ours as S. Augustine answereth for the practice of the Church in his time 2. She doth remember the Saints of God but in no wise made Gods of Saints She doth blesse God for them and not worship them for God 3. Although her Devotion doth glance by their Names yet it doth pitch and is fixed upon the Angel of the Covenant the Holy of all Holy ones our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ On the blessed Virgins Anniversary she doth honour Christ in his Mother On S. John Baptists she doth honour him in his forerunner On S. Michaels she doth honour him in his Archangel On the Apostles she doth honour him in his Ambassadours On the Evangelists she doth honour him in his Chroniclers On S. Stephen she doth honour him in his Martyr On S. John the Divine his day she doth honour him in his beloved Disciple who also leaned on his breast at Supper It is a great Error in the Worship of God to be altogether for Prayer and to make no esteem of the Preaching of the Word of God both must not be severed one from the other 1. FOr if it be said of Christ that his House is an House of Prayer and not of Sermons We must observe where he spake this it was in the Temple where he spake it And were not these very words part of a Sermon which he Preached to the Buyers and Sellers there 2. He hath but little skill in the Language of Canaan who knoweth not that Prayer and Invocation of Gods Name is in the Scripture by a Synecdoche taken for the whole Worship of God Acts 2.21 Rom 10.13 3. Yet admit that our Saviour should in that place take Prayers strictly for that part of Gods Worship which consisteth in lifting up our hands to prefer our Petitions and Supplications unto him S. Paul furnisheth us with a direct answer to this Objection even by those Questions he propoundeth Rom. 10.14 How then shall they call on him on whom they have not believed How shall they believe on him of whom they have not heard And how shall they hear without a Preacher 4. As there is no powerful Preaching without Prayer to God for a blessing upon it so no good Prayer without Preaching to direct both in the matter and form and to enflame our hearts with zeal How the Magistrate is to carry himself toward Seducing and Seditious Hereticks that are not Tolerated in a State 1. LEt it be accounted Mercy not to execute the Rigour of Penal Statutes upon silly seduced Sheep But certainly it is cruelty to spare the Wolves which worry them 2. I mean those Wolves who plot Treason against their Natural Prince who scandalize the State and who stain with impure breath the Gold and Silver Vessels of the Sanctuary who turn Religion into Statism or rather into Atheism 3. Such Wolves are in England the Popish Priests and the Jesuites 4. Who not onely shew their Rage in not sparing our Sons and our Daughters and daily enticing them and by their Agents conveying them over beyond the Sea to sacrifice not their bodies but their souls their Faith their Religion to the Moloch of Rome 5. But besides who plot the ruine and overthrow of the State who say as the Children of Edom in the day of Jerusalem down with it down with it even to the ground or rather up with it up with it to the trembling Aire blow up King Queen Prince Parliament Clergy Laity Nobility Gentry Commons Lawes Statutes Charters Records all in a Cloud of fire that there remain not so much as any Cindars of them upon the Eearth lest parhaps the Phenix might revive out of her own Ashes We must not in England frequent Hereticks Seducers nor keep familiar society with them rather we must fly from them and detect them to the Magistrate when they be banished from the Countrey 1. WE must beware in England of the Agents of Rome Priests and Jesuites who go about to withdraw us from the love of our Countrey from our Allegiance to our Prince and which is worst of all from the true and pure Worship of God 2. If stealing away the bodies of our Sons and Daughters be so hainous a crime that many conceive it better to deserve the Gallows then the stealing of a Horse or of a Sheep what punishment do we suppose they do deserve who steal away their souls from God and their hearts from their Parents 3. If we account them as capital Enemies who seek the ruine of our Estate can we esteem otherwise of them who seek the utter ruine and overthrow of our Souls 4. And let us not be deceived in regard of them because their outward behaviour is fair and their company delightful For as they are Panther like which hideth her ugly visage which she knoweth will terrifie the Beasts from coming near her and allures them with the sweet smell of her body but as soon as they come within her reach she maketh a prey of them 5. Therefore as we tender the Salvation of our Body and Soul our Estate in this Life and in the Life to come let us take heed how we play at the hole of the Cockatrice And do familiarly converse with the great Whore or with any of her Minions lest they draw us to naughtiness and spiritual lewdness 6. Let us have no part with them that have no part in God or who have part with abominable Idols 7. Nay furthermore let us detect such Persons to publick Authority that they may learn not to blaspheme the truth of our Religion nor seduce his Majesties Subjects from
us learne by this what the Gods of the Pagans and Gentiles were 1. 1. IT is written of Ewhemere of Tegea That the cause why he was called an Atheist was for that he wrote the true History and Genealogie of the heathen Gods 2. Shewing that they were Kings Princes and great Personages 3. Whose Images being kept for a Remembrance of them were turned into Idols 4. Their High and worthy Doings into yearly Gaming 's 5. And their Honourings into Worshippings 2. 1. ANd Seneca writes in his Book of Superstition that the Gods as he saith which were called inviolable and immortall were dumb and senceless Images disguised in the shapes of Men of Beasts and of Fishes and some in ugly and ill favoured Monsters 2. That the Daemones which were the Devils which possessed those Images did require worse things for their service then the horriblest Tyrants that ever were 3. As that men should Gash themselves Maime and Lame themselves Geld themselves and offer to them in Sacrifice Men Women and Children Seeing the Romans brought into Rome the Gods of all the Nations whom they had conquered It is demanded how it happened that the God of the Ancient Jewes which was the true and the onely God and none other did find no place there 1. CIcero in his Oration for Flaccus answereth That that beseemed not the Majestie of the Empire 2. But in his conscience did Bacchus Anubis Pryapus and their shameful Nightwakes and Mysteries celebrated in the Dark yeild Renown to the State of the Empire 3. Nay if he will say the Truth they knew that the God of Israel and none other was the true God 4. And that for the harbouring of him it behoved them to drive away all the rest 5. And they had for so long a time fed the people in Idolatrie that they were afraid as many Princes also to be cast and driven away by their Subjects in receiving their rightful Lord. They were Devils who were worshipped by the Pagans under the Name of their false Gods 1. THe Gods of the Pagans were men 2. Under the Names of those men the Devils made themselves to be worshipped 3. The Devils to get credit and to authorize themselves did borrow the Name of men and very often the Names of most wicked men 4. And in their Oracles when they were asked what they were they said that they were those men 5. As for Example he that was worshipped at Delphos said he was the Son of Latona Esculapius said he was the Son of Apollo and Mercury said he was the Son of Jupiter and of Maja as we read in their Oracles rehearsed by Porphyrius 6. Now what honest man doth not make difficultie for never so great gain to make use of the Name of a wicked man Nay who doth not abhor the Name and the very remembrance of such an one 7. And who then will not conclude that those Devils were worse then those wicked men who would win credit clothed of the skins of such wicked men 1. The Sybils speak but of one onely God 2. And do cry also against the false Gods 1. IT is disputed among the Learned by what Spirit the Sybils did speak because it is not unconvenient that God should compel the very Devils to set forth his Praises 2. Howsoever it be they speak but of one onely God saying There is but onely one true God right great and everlasting Almighty and Invincible which seeth every thing but cannot be seen himself of any fleshly man Lactantius lib. 1. cap. 6. 3. Also they cry out against the false Gods and exhort men to beat down their Altars accounting them happy who shall dedicate themselves to the glorifying of onely one God Among the divers Religions of Pagans there were some manifestly impious and wicked 1. SOme worshipping the Creatures in Heaven yea and on Earth as the Aegyptians did in old time and as the Tartarians do at this day 2. Some offering up Men in Sacrifices as the Carthaginians did in old time and as the Western Isles do yet at this day 3. And other-some permitting things not onely contrary to all Laws but also even horrible and lothsome to nature 4. If all this was good I pray you what good doth remain or what evil is there in the World Of the False Worship of the Idolatrous Heathen 1. THe Idolatrous Heathen did render a Religious Worship 2. And were not content onely to offer Beasts to their Gods as the Jewes did to the true God but also they did offer men 3. For in some places they Sacrifice their Children as among the Moabites In others their Fathers as among the Triballi Elsewhere their Princes or Priests as among the Indians And in some Countries Themselves as among the Americans 4. Yet for all this their throwing themselves into or causing others to passe through the fire to their Moloch or Saturn or Abaddon they are not to be accounted true worshippers and such worship is not true but false 5. Because what they doe in this kind is not done by Gods Commandement nor intended to the honour of the true God but it is in obedience and to the honour of an Idol or Devil whom they worship instead of the true God Of the Falshood of the Modern Jews Religion in particular 1. THey serve and honour onely one God but they soyle with many Fables the Doctrine of the nature of God and of the Providence which they acknowledge as it clearly appears by the Fables which are related by Buxtorfius 2. The Modern Jewes seek the means of their reconciliation in some outward Ceremonies in Washings and Purifications and such other like things whose Conscience being awaked they are forced to acknowledge that by such things the Remorse of the Conscience and the Sting of Sin cannot be plucked out from the sinful Man 3. 1. The Modorn Jews although it seems that they keep the Bark of the Law yet they denie the Truth thereof 3. Besides they give false Interpretations to the said Law as it is to be seen in divers places of the New Testament 4. Moreover they forge and invent many absurd things concerning the Messias and the Kingdom thereof As also concerning Eternal Life all contrarie to the Doctrine of the Old Testament Of the Religion of the Modern Jews In what respects now the Judaical Religion is opposite to Christ 1. THe Jews Religion is opposite to Christ in two respects principally First In retaining the old Ceremonies of Moses Law which were shadows of things to come Rom. 10.4 Heb. 10.1 and had their accomplishment in Christ For that which S. Paul saith concerning Circumcision is to be understood of all other Ceremonies Gal. 4.9 5.2 They which entangle themselves with that Yoke of Bondage under those impotent and beggarly rudiments are abolished from Christ and Christ doth profit them nothing Secondly In devising a multitude of strange and new Superstitions coined in the Mint of their Rabinish conceits contrary not
different Religion and to marry with another Person which shall not differ in Religion The Spirit is not without the Word and must be examined by the Word of God against Anabaptistical Enthusiasts TRy the Spirits whether they be of God or no by the Word of God 1 Joh. 4.1 To the Law and to the Testimony saith the Prophet Esaiah if they speak not according to this Word it is because there is no light in them Esa 8.20 And if we saith the Apostle or an Angel from Heaven preach unto you any other Gospel than what ye have received let him be accursed Gal. 1.8 That is saith S. Augustine than what is contained in the Prophetical and Apostolical writings August contr tit Petil. lib. 3. c. 6. Of Schism and Schismaticks 1. SChisme is a Dissention or Separation when one or more separate and rent themselves from the outward fellowship of the Faithful cutting asunder the Peace and Unity of the Church upon some dislike of some Rites and Orders therein lawfully received and observed or else upon different Opinions about their Teachers 2. As Heresie is a departing from the Communion of the Church in respect of Doctrine so Schism is a cutting off ones self for External things An example hereof we have 1 Cor. 1.10 c. In these words every one of you says I am Pauls I am Appollos I am Cephas and I am Christs 3. There are two kinds of Schism one is Simple and without any conjunction of Error in Doctrine The other is Mixt that is to say that it is conjoined with some Error in Doctrine 4. It is not the Separation that makes the Schism but the Cause of the said Separation as the Doctors of the Cannon Law do teach 5. This cause of Separation must not be the corrupt Life and Manners of some Members of a particular Church but onely Errors Heresies and Idolatry 6. In this regard the Reformed Churches are not Schismatical Because for such a cause they have separated themselves from the Roman Church 6. It is rather the Roman Church which is Heretical and the Pope Head of the same because they have given the cause of the Separation by their Heresies their Idolatry their Persecutions and their Tyrannie 8. Before this Separation of the Reformed from the Roman Church there hath been great Schismes in her by the plurality of Popes which she had at the same times 9. There hath been also many Schisms in the said Roman Church by the Division of her Doctors 10. The Reformed Church do wish the Convocation of a lawful Council to reform the Errors and Abuses of the Roman Church 11. Besides the Roman Church other Churches have been Schismatical as that of the Donatists and of the Novatians who for some Faults of some Members of the Church did separate themselves from the Communion of the Church 13. There is a great danger in Schisme although it be not as great an evil as Heresie and therefore the remedy must be applied unto it as soon as it doth appear Of the False Religions in general and conjointly 1. Of Pagans and Gentiles 2. Of the Modern Jewes 3. Of Turks and Mahumetans which are all Enemies of the Church of God 1. Of Pagans and Gentiles 1. THe Pagans and Gentiles are ignorant of the true God of the truth of his Word 2. And among them some are found who not by consequence and as if they did not mind and mean it but by expresse profession do worship the Devil builds Temples unto him and render unto him Religious Worship 2. Of the Modern Jewes THe Modern Jewes which are now scattered among the Nations of the Earth are virulent enemies of Christ and of his Church for having persecuted the Saviour during his Life they injure him and blaspheme against him after his Death 3. Of the Turks and Mahumetans THe Turks and Mahumetans do preferre their Mahumet to Christ and do follow the pernitious Doctrine which the Alcoran doth propound unto them Of the False Religion of the Ancient Pagans in particular 1. THe Principle and the Rule of the true Religion is the Word of God 2. The Marks of the true Religion are 1. The true knowledge of the true God 2. The true Worship of the true God 3. The true Mean of Mans Reconciliation with God 3. Let now every one consider well whether all that is to be found elsewhere than in the Ancient Judaical Religion and in the true Christian 4. Truely not among the ancient Pagans 1. For instead of a Word of God which enlightneth us to Salvation there were but Ambiguous Vain Frivolous Oracles which did not speak neither of the Glory of God nor of Mans Salvation 2. Instead of the true God among them onely were found Devils Men and Idols 3. Instead of a sufficient Mediatour they only had Washings which pass not further then the skin Slaughters of Men Sacrifices of poor wretched condemned for their Crimes 5. How could there have been a true Religion among the said Pagans since they did not know nor had the true God how could there have been among them an assured and certain Religion since the true God did not speak unto them and how could there have been a saving Religion among them since the true God did not intervene in it What differences there are between the true God and the false Gods of ancient Pagans and Gentiles THe true God is stiled the Living God in opposition to the Heathen Idols which were without Life Sense or Motion 1. They had eyes and saw not ears and heard not hands and handled not whereas the true God hath no eyes yet seeth no ears yet heareth no hands yet worketh all things 2. The Heathen Idols were carried upon mens shoulders or Camels backs as the Prophet Esay excellently describeth the manner of their Procession Esa 46.1 2 3. But contrariwise the true God beareth his Children and supporteth them from the womb even to their old age and gray hairs 3. The Heathen Gods as S. Augustine observeth in the Siege of Troy saved not them that worshipped them but were saved by them from Fire and Spoile whereupon he inferreth what folly was it to worship such Gods for the preservation of the City and Countrey which were not able to keep their own keepers but the true God preserveth them that serve him and hideth them under the shadow of his wings Of the great multitude and diversity of the Gods acknowledged and worshipped by the Pagans 1. THe Assyrians worshipped as many Gods as they had Towns 2. The Persians had as many Gods as there be Stars in the Heaven and Fires on Earth 3. The Greeks had as many Gods as they had Fancies 4. The Aegyptians had as many Gods as they Sowed or planted Fruites or as the Earth brought forth Fruites of it self 5. To be short the Romans in conquering the World did conquer all those Vanities and they wanted not wit to devise others of their own brain Let