Christian And there are too many who say make me a Bishop and I will be a Protestant So did the Bishop of Spalato in late memory leave Italy while Paul the Fifth was Pope because his Ambition was not so high prefer'd as he desired and fled to England and profess'd himself as Protestant and Preached against the Pope but when the old Pope was dead and his Kinsman got into the Chair being not made a Bishop here he return'd back again to Rome and turn'd Catholick again in hope of great preferment there from his Kinsman but in stead of the same they took him and burnt him for an Apostate There want not likewise in the present time Examples of those who profess'd themselves Protestants till not finding there Ambitious expectations satisfied with Bishopricks and other great places have turned Papists in hope to find the same amongst Them 2. If Frame err not too many have been promoted to their Bishopricks by the Moyne and Recommendations of Great Catholicks whose Creatures they were and how unfit Judges of Marriage Filiation and Succession to Protestant Kingdoms such Bishops must be is left to all true Protestants to consider 10. They Judg by Fictions and not by Truth Grant a Judg but liberty to judg by Fictions he will make what Religion what Law what Equity what Justice he pleaseth he will be the only God to be adored and Judg to be feared He will be like the Pope the only Proprietor of the World and justifie his Title to the Sale of Heaven Earth and Hell The Fictions by which Bishops judg Marriage and the mischiefs which insue by them have been most touch'd before As that Intention of minds and not conjunction of Bodies makes Marriage P. 83. 2. That Sponsa before a Priest in a Temple is Vxor ib. 86. 3. That Verba de Praesenti are Facta de Praeterito Futuro P. 84. 4. That Children begot by Adulterers were begot by the Husband if he was within the Four Seas P. 72 73. 5. That two Persons are Transubstantiated into one by the words of the Priest pronouncing them Man and Wife P. 66 67. c. That a Child is not Sib or Kin or of Consanguinity nor a Child to the Father who begot him or the Mother who bare him P. 14 15. 6. There is another Fiction by which they judg not mention'd before which is Benediction of the Priest for it was an old Superstition nursed in the People by the old Pagan Priests That their Wives should be Barren unless they were bless'd by the Priest Hence the old Arabians were wont to Swear by God and the Bellies of their Wives and Mahomet himself Alchor Cap. 4. P. 47. teacheth the same as a most Sacred Oath and Sterility the greatest Curse to be feared And though Jacob teach That the blessing of Children ought only to be asked and expected from God and not from Man and certainly it were in truth the greatest Idolatry to desire or expect that Blessing from the Priest and were to make him God as appears Benediction of the Priest on Marriage a Fiction Gen. 30.1 And when Rachel saw she bare Jacob no Children Rachel envied her Sister and said unto Jacob give me Children or else I die And Jacob 's anger was kindled against Rachel and said Am I in Gods stead who hath withheld from thee the fruit of the Womb But to infuse the like Superstition into the Hearts of Christians for the increase of his gain Soter Pope of Rome decreed No Marriage should be lawful without the Parties receiving the Benediction of the Priest Plat. Func And by a Decree in France all Children born in Marriages not blessed by a Romish Priest are made incapable to succeed to any Goods of Father and Mother Everard 24. The multitude of Pilgrimages to Saints and Idols that is to say to the Priests who keep them and take the gifts of all they can delude to ask of them the Benediction of Children are known Mr. Stopford Paganopap 111. of this Superstition or Idolatry mentions a noted Example Henry the Third King of France sent a Princely Gift to the Virgin of Loretto viz. a worthy Cup to obtain Issue Male by her Intercession a Gift for substance and work most excellent for the Cup it self is of Hollowed Gem at this day called the Azure Stone 'T is also very big and intermingled with Golden Veins the Cover whereof is of turned Crystal set in Gold and adorned with many excellent Jewels in the top of the Cover an Angel of Gold doth hold in his hand a Lilly of Diamonds the Arms of the Kingdom of France which Lilly doth consist of three Diamonds joined together in Gold with admirable Art the Foot of the Cup being Emerald is bound about and supported with Gold and beautified with Pretious Stones and rich Orient Pearls in the bottom of the Foot the Giver and the Cause of the Gift is engraven in manner following O Queen who by thy worthy Son Didst joyful Blessing bring To all the World Bless with a Son The Kingdom and the King Henry III. King of France and Polonia in the Year of our Salvation MDLXXXIV Certificate of a Bishop false St. Germyn lib. 2.69 raises a Question Whether if the true Heir is certified by the Bishop a Bastard as Ten to One if there happen a Contest between two Heirs but he is whether he that is of Council with the Adverse Party may with good Conscience advise his Client to make Use of this false Certificate of the Bishop in which without any Conscience which he so much pretends he saith he may for these Reasons First because it is a Maxime in the Law That a private mischief shall be suffer'd before a publick Inconvenience and the publick inconvenience would be that if the Certificate of the Bishop should not be final then in this Case if another Writ should be after sent to another Bishop in another Action to certifie whether he were a Bastard or not peradventure that Bishop would certifie that he were a Mulier that is to say lawfully begot and then he should recover as Heir and so he should in one self-Court be taken for Mulier and Bastard for avoiding which contrariety the Law will suffer no more Writs to go forth in that Case and suffers all men to take advantage of the Certificate rather than suffer such a Contradiction which in Law is called an Inconvenience The Second Reason he gives is because the Certificate of the Bishop is the higest kind of Trial that is in the Law in this behalf But with due respect to so grave an Author whose failings are rather to be imputed to the time of Popery wherein he was born and writ than to his Person In answer to his Reasons alledged I say first to the Maxim That 't is better to suffer a private mischief than a publick Inconvenience or which is much like it is better one man perish than the
by her assent the Emperor is endeavour'd to be stoned by the people in hatred of his Concubine Zoe pacifieth the people Ib. Impotency and Sterility is a cause of Divorce The Law of Solon allowed Impotency in the Man or Sterility in the Woman to be a good cause of Divorce Plutarch in Solon vid. Aust contra c. because then old Folks might not Marry Such was the modesty of ancient times in Rome that from the first foundation of the City for the space of Five Hundred and Twenty Years there happened no Divorce between a Husband and Wife Val. Max. l. 2. cap. 1. And the first who began it was Spurius Carbillus who put away his Wife for Sterility which though it seem'd a tolerable cause yet wanted not reprehension from divers who thought the Conjugal Faith ought to overweigh the desire of Children Anno 631. Dagobert the great King of France repudiated his first Wife for Barrenness and Marrieth Nantildis a Nun Amandus a Bishop reproves him and he banisheth the Bishop afterwards having a Son he revoketh the Bishop to baptize him Calais Anno Christ 1263. The Queen of Bohemia being old and Barren the King intendeth a Divorce she layeth the fault on him he maketh her this offer That she should appoint him a Maid and if he got her not with Child in a Year he would be reputed faulty the Queen accepteth it and in Ten Months he hath a Son and afterwards divers Daughters She is Divorced and Marrieth Kum Grand Daughter to the Duke of Muscovia Chron. Boh. Regner King of Denmark Anno 820. marrieth Langertha a Warlike Woman of Suevia and had by her Fridlanus and two Daughters Crom. After he Repudiateth Landgertha for the inequality of the Match and Marrieth the Daughter of Hezotus King of Suevia by whom he had many Sons Crom. Anno 1354. Peter King of Spain repudiateth Blanch Daughter to the Duke of Bourbon and Marrieth Jean de Castro Histor Hispan Anno 1373. The King of Portugal refused a Match in Castile and taketh a Nobleman's Wife and banisheth him his Subjects are discontented with him Hist Hisp Anno 696. Pepin King of France repudiated his Wife and married Alpaida his Concubine by whom he had Charles Martell and he kill'd Lambert Bishop of Thuring for reproving his Marriage Am. Fris. Anno 576. The Wife of Chilperic King of France was divorced and thrust into a Monastery for being Godmother to her own Child Truon Charles the Eighth of France was Espoused to Mary the Daughter of Maximilian Maximilian marrieth Ann the Daughter and Heir of the Duke of Britain by Deputy The King of France repudiates the Daughter of Maximilian and marries the Daughter of the Duke of Britain Luis the Twelfth of France repudiates his Wife and marries Ann his Predecessor's Widow Anno 1333. The Marquess of Misnia having married Judeth the Daughter of the King of Bohemia the Emperor causeth the Marquess to repudiateher and marry his Daughter The King of Bohemia taketh divers places in Misnia and giveth Judeth to John Son of the French King Dub. The Arch-Bishop of Gnesna in Polonia forced Married Priests to be Divorced from their Wives Alsted Anno 1218. Lewis the Seventh King of France having married Elianor Daughter and Heir of William Duke of Guyen and having two Daughters by her notwithstanding divorced himself from her on pretence they were Couzins in the fourth degree She was after married to Henry the Second of England who had by her Five Sons and Three Daughters and was she who revenged her self on Rosamond though not in so high a degree injurious to her as Adela the Daughter of the King of France affianced to her Son Richard who was after King was suspected to be of whom it was commonly reported That her Husband was so far inamor'd that he having Committed Elianor to Prison resolved to be divorced from her and marry Adela Bak Hist 55.59 King John having maâ—ried Avice Daughter and Heir of Robert Duke of Gloucâ—ster having no Issue by her divorced himself from her alledging that she was his Couzin in the third degree Juan Daughter of Edward the First for her Beauty called the fair Maid of Kent was married first to William Montacute Earl of Salisbury and from him divorced but it appears not for what cause and was after married to Sir Thomas Holland in her right Earl of Kent and Father of Thomas and John Holland Duke of Surrey and Earl of Huntingdon and lastly she was Wife of Edward of Woodstock the black Prince of Wales and by him Mother of the infortunate King Richard the Second Henry the Eight married first Katharine Daughter of Ferdinando King of Spain the relict of his older Brother Arthur and was after Twenty Years marriage and the Birth of his Daughter Mary after Queen of England by her divorced from her on the opinion of some Divines that it was not lawful for him to marry his Brother's Wife and having successively married two other Wives after their death he married his fourth Wife Ann Sister to the Duke of Cleave she lived his Wife six Months and then was likewise Divorced Civilians Canonists Divines Lawyers and one Pope against another Aliment of Children and all by the Ears about Divorce and unless as we ought we wholy consult the Moral Law of God there is not a word of sence in the Laws of men but they are all for gain As Desertions and Divorces of Mothers without cause have been too frequent both amongst Gentiles Jews and Christians so likewise is the Desertion and not giving Aliment to Children Aristotle stain'd his Philosophy with the bloody Doctrine of exposing Infants The Chinoys who are poor think it Charity to strangle their Infants and save their Aliment Fornicators make it their custom to deflour Virgins and get them with Child and then illegitimate and desert both Mother and Child to save the charge of Aliment And oh horrid amongst Christians who le Parishes rise with Swords and Staves against one poor Sucking Babe to exterminate both it and the Mother naked and to be Vagabonds to beg steal or starve only to save so small an Alms as Aliment to one poor Infant not able to speak or beg for it self It is related by Travellers that some Indians use when a Child is born if it take not to suck the Dug of the Mother well they carry it out of the House and hang it naked on a Tree and leave it there returning themselves into the House after a while they go out again and bring in the Child and offer it the Teat if it take it not they carry it the second time and let it hang twice as long and fetch and offer it the Teat again if it take it not then they hang it on the Tree the third time and leave it hanging till it dies God made man righteous and writ the Moral Law in his heart but since the Devil hath seduced him to the Ceremonial he is become
and no Certificate of Bishops hath power to take that right from them 7. Here the wantonness of Widows is forbidden who are for new Husbands as soon as the old is put in his Grave whereby who are Fathers of their Children is made uncertain 8. Here is no false Fathering of Children on those who are within four Seas 9. Here is no punishing Men twice for one offence once by the Temporal Court and then by the Spiritual Court or contrary punishments by contrary Courts one by the Contentious Court and another by the Penitential Court 10. Here is no Auricular Confession of their Wives or Daughters by Priests in Temples or Chambers and defiling thereby of their Families 11. Here is no punishing of Women for bringing forth Children nor the Murders of so many Infants caused thereby as by the Papist Laws is continually done Yet I conclude though the Law of the Turk is far better than that of the Pope and shall rise in Judgment against such as plant his Canons in their Courts in defiance of the Law of God and Nature I think neither a fit Rule to judge Marriage Legitimation or Succession by CHAP. V. Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession not to be judged by Ecclesiastical Laws THE Question is Whether Marriage Legitimation and Succession ought to be judged by Ecclesiastical Laws No English Lawyer can mention my Lord Coke without great honour but how he came so biass'd as to endeavour to set up Papal and Episcopal Laws under the name of Regal appears not Object 1 It is objected by Coke lib. 5.1 part 40. in Cawdryes Case That the Kingdom of England is an absolute Monarchy and if the King cannot Authorize by his Commission or Writ Ecclesiastical Judges to determin and judg those great and important Causes of Matrimony Divorce and general Bastardy by Certificate of the Bishop who is the Ecclesiastical Witness and Judg both of Fact and Law and by the Canon Laws which by use and custom are now our Ecclesiastical Laws Then he is disabled to be supreme Governour of this Realm in all Spiritual things or Causes as well as Temporal according to the Oath of Supremacy due to him And that he could not then cause Justice to be administred to his Subjects in these so great and important causes of Matrimony Divorce and general Bastardy on which depends the strength of mens Descents and Inheritances This I conceive though not in the same words yet in sence and substance to be the weight of my Lord Coke's Argument whereby he would make use of Marriage as one means amongst his many other to set up an Ecclesiastical Law and Judg over the Temporal Freeholds and Inheritances and other Birth-rights of the Subjects To which is answer'd First As to the words Absolute and Supream I suppose he intended no such absolute Monarchy or Supremacy as is not under the Law of God though it be not so express'd in the form of the Oath of Supremacy For though Regum timendorum in proprios greges Ecclesiastical Laws not needful to the King's Supremacy but hurtful Reges in ipsos imperium est Jovis then I think he doth not intend it to be above the Law of the Land seeing the King himself by his Oath is pleased to oblige himself to his People to govern according to that Law where it is not contrary to the Law of God Then as to the pretended want of Power of doing Justice concerning causes of Free-hold and Inheritance depending on marriage except by Ecclesiastical Laws and Judges that is very strange for how was Justice done in the times of Primitive Christianity for many Hundred Years after Christ when neither Bishops or any other Ecclesiastical Judges ever pretended Jurisdiction todetermin Temporal Right or Propriety but left the same to be judged by the Imperial Laws How was Justice done in the time of Henry the Second when the Jurisdiction of all Matrimonial causes remained in the Temporal Courts Richard the First his Son being the first as Matthew Paris writes whom the Clergy got by his publick Edict to give the Jurisdiction of Power and Gifts by reason of Marriage and of all Matrimonial causes to the Bishops Courts and the same Richard likewise gave them Jurisdiction of all breach of Faith Promises and Oaths whereby if much of the Power so rashly granted had not been by him so speedily resumed they had hookt to themselves the whole Jurisdiction from the King's Courts of all Contracts and Conveyances Bonds and Obligations as well as Marriages concerning Temporal Goods and Inheritances And why cannot general as well as special Bastardy be tryed at Common Law And how likewise are all Rights depending on all Marriages made during the late Civil Wars by pretence of any Ordinance of Parliament made by 12. Car. 2. cap. 33. to be tryed by a Jury and the Common Law and not by Certificate of the Bishop or any Ecclesiastical Judg to the advancement and not prejudice of Justice and a far greater expedition and advantage to the same would it be if by the like Act the Jurisdiction of all Marriages and Legitimations as it was in the time of Henry the Second were again restored to the Common-Law-Courts So likewise anciently Bastardy alledged in an Action of Trespass was triable by Jury but now usurped by Bishops as well in personal as real Actions 4. Edw. 4.35 Object 2 Coke lib. 5.1 part in the same case of Cawdry it is further alledged Circumspectè agatis gives no Jurisdiction of Marriage to Bishops That the Statutes of Circumspectè agatis made 13. Eliz. 1. of Articuli Cleri made 9. E. 2. Anno Domini 1315. of 15. E. 3. Cap. 6. of 31. E. 3. Cap. 11. give Jurisdiction of marriage to Bishops To which is answer'd That in the Statute of Circumspectè agatis there is not a word mention'd of marriage but only by it Jurisdiction is given to the Bishops of Fornication and Adultery which is not Marriage but rather Anti-marriage for Marriage is an Ordinance of God Fornication and Adultery are Ordinances of the Devil and whereas before the Jurisdiction of Fornication and Adultery as acknowledged by Coke lib. 5.1 part 488. was in Leets under the name of Letherwit or more properly Lecherwit yet had Leets never Jurisdiction of Marriage or Divorce neither consequently could Bishops have it from them As for Articuli Cleri and the other Statutes there is not a word in them concerning Marriage nor so much as of Fornication and Adultery the Jurisdiction therefore pretended was never given by any Statute Linwood likewise expounds the words of the Statute of Circumspectè agatis which gives Bishops Jurisdiction of all deadly Sins as Fornication and Adultery and the like Non intelligas de omni peccato mortali sed de tali cujus punitio spectat merè ad forum Ecclesiasticum nam si de ratione cujuslibet peccati mortalis cognosceret Ecclesia sic periret temporalis gladii Jurisdictio
the Doctrine of Christ for ab initio non fuit sic that a verbal Contract of words should pretend above the real Contract of carnal knowledg And the Lady Grey though it doth not appear but that she was otherwise a very vertuous Lady yet if she knew the truth of what is before mention'd concerning the Lady Lucy she cannot be excused in taking that Husband to her self who had already given the first pledg and made the cheif and real Contract of Marriage with another Woman and far happier might she have been if she had ascended a meaner but more lawful Bed for the Earl of Warwick at his return home from France finding by this Marriage his Embâ—ssage frustrated the Lady Bona deluded the French King abused and himself made a stale and the disgraceful Instrument of all this deeply resented and waiting his time raised an Army and by surprize took the King Prisoner and presently conveyed him to Middleton-Castle in York-shire to remain there in safe custody with the Bishop of York where if he had not by fair words and Money gotten his Keepers to permit him the recreation of Hunting and thereby means to escape he had lain at Mercy And after he was escaped and had gather'd sufficient Forces whereby he made the Earl of Warwick fly to the French King where he was honourably received yet the Earl returned again so Potent with the French joined with the great party he had in England that the King was fain to fly to Burgundy and the new advanced Queen to take Sanctuary at Westminster And though her Husband again returned and by a hazardous Battel wherein Warwick himself and many other Lords were slain he recover'd again his Kingdom yet he had so little quiet and less security that what injoyment she obtained of him was always in fear and danger of the Field and other Competitors of the Bed after a man guilty so more unhappy then her self and when she lost him by death she lived to see those Remains of him he had left her two hopeful Sons most cruelly Murther'd and for the conclusion of all her self confined to the Monastery of Bermondsie in Southwark and all her Goods confiscate by her own Son in Law Henry the Seventh yet no just cause appearing against her In which Monastery in great pensiveness within few Years she died There is a Case reported by Sir Jo. Davies and likewise mention'd by the learned Dr. Godolphin in his Repertorium Canonicum 488. to have happened in Ireland which was this G. B. Esq had Issue C. B. on the Body of J.D. whom he had never carried to Priest or Temple but his Son C. B. Desertion of a Woman after a Child for a richer in Ireland was begot by natural marriage without any Pontifical Ceremony About Sixteen Years after G. B. having found a Lady who was richer and of a greater Estate and Reputation then his first Woman by whom he had his eldest Son C. B. Marries her with assent of her Friends by whom he had Issue E. B. and died after the death of G. B. the said C. B. his reputed Son and his Mother being both left alive continued silent by the space of nine Years 'till they happened to have one of their Kindred Bishop of K. by whom they then were encouraged by new hope to obtain their Right who it seems not experienced in the Forms of Judicial Proceedings without any Libel exhibited and not Convocatis Convocandis proceeded to take the Depositions of many Witnesses to prove that the said G. B. Twenty-nine Years before had lawfully married and took to Wife the said J. D. Mother of the said C. B. And the said C. B. was the Legitimate and lawful Son and Heir of the said G. B. And these Depositions so taken the said Bishop caused to be ingrossed and reduced into the Form of a solemn Act and having put his Signiture and Seal to that Instrument delivered the same to C. B. who publish'd it and thereupon alledged himself Son and Heir to the said G. B. Hereupon an information is put into the Castle-Chamber in Ireland against the Bishop suggesting a Conspiracy to Legitimate C. B. Son and illegitimate E. B. the Daughter of the said G. B. And for this Practice the said Bishop and others were Censured This Case and the foremention'd Case of Kenne are both contrary one to another and both contrary to the Law of God In Kennes Case the wrong Heir is Legitimated by the nullifying of a lawful Marriage consummate by carnal knowledg and birth of the right Heir by Sentence of the Spiritual Jurisdiction and there the Common-Law will not releive the right Such Faith they say they are bound to give to the Spiritual Sentence whether right or wrong whether with cause or without cause until the Spiritual Judg revoke his own Sentence himself but here where a right Heir is made Legitimate by Sentence Declaratory of a lawful Marriage between the Father and Mother of the right Heir in the Castle-Chamber the Common-Law will Legitimate the wrong Heir and will give no faith to the Sentence of the Spiritual Judg if that they think it wrong so it seems the Common-Law in Westminster-Hall and the Common-Law in the Castle-Chamber are very contrary one to another as to the point of giving faith concerning Marriage and Legitimation to Spiritual Jurisdiction yet both contrary to right and destructive to the lawful Heir according to the Law of God and both give faith to Common and Canon-Law above the Supreme Law and Legislator Amongst the Greeks the manner of the Contract of Marriage was The Parties going to the Temple before the Priest the Man swore in the presence of Witnesses Se sponsam post concubitum invitum non deserturum That he would not after he should have lain with the Woman forsake her without her consent Arch. Att. 156. The like form of words in the Marriage-Contracts was used by the ancient Romans who shall rise up in Judgment against the Popes who unless Parties mumble the aforemention'd Nonsense of Verba de praesenti give Licence for Money to deceive and desert a Thousand though they have never so many Children by them and to make all Women common and to their own Priests to give example being interdicted all verbal Marriage that they may have the more liberty to abuse the real and to take and leave all they please and as oft as they please The like do the Guiny Priests who converse with the Devil and their form of Contract of Marriage is no doubt according as he will have it For the Woman is there sworn to the Man that she will not desert but the man swears not to her nor will oblige himself by any verbal Contract but is to be left as free as any Popish Priest whatsoever Desertion after deflouring hath caused Seditions and Civil Wars This deflouring and desertion was a while in fashion amongst the Roman Nobles and Patricians who
Eliz Stowell quatenus de factor fuerunt ad invicem matrimonio ut predicitur copulat ' ab invicem Separand ' divorciand ' fore debere pronunciamus decernimus declaramus Eosque Separamus Divorciamus eisdemque Christopher ' Eliz. licentiam Libertatem ad alia vota convolanda concedimus tribuimus impertimur per hanc Sententiam nostram definitivam sive hoc finale nostrum decretum quam sive quod ferimus promulgamus in hiis Scriptis c. And after the Divorce the said Christopher Kenne Espous'd and took to Wife Elizabeth Beckwith And after Anno 5th Eliz. before certain Commissioners Ecclesiastical the said Elizabeth Beckwith Libelled against the said Christopher Kenne That before the Marriage between them contracted he had Married with Elizabeth Stowell on which process was awarded against Elizabeth Stowell pro interesse And upon due examination of the Cause it was Sentenced That the Marriage between the said Christopher Kenne and Elizabeth Beckwith was lawful and Sentenced them ad Exequenda Conjugalta obsequia c. And that the said Christopher Kenne was never lawfully Espoused unto the said Elizabeth Stowell and after the said Elizabeth Beckwith died after whose death the said Christopher took to Wife the said Florence by whom he had Issue one Daughter and called Elizabeth and died And Anno 36th Eliz. it was found by Office in the County of Sommerset by Force of a Mandamus after the death of the said Christopher Kenne that the said Elizabeth Kenne was his Daughter and Heir who was within Age Viz. of the Age of Ten Months The Queen granted her Wardship to Sir Nicholas Stallenge and the said Florence then his Wife on which the said Martha alledged her self to be Daughter and Heir to the said Christopher Kenne and with her Husband Silvester Williams Exhibited their Bill in the Court of Wards against the said Sir Nicholas and Florence alledging That the said Martha was Daughter and Heir of the Body of the said Elizabeth Stowell his lawful Wife and that they the said Christopher and Elizabeth Stowell at the time of their Marriage in Anno 37. H. 8. were both of them above the Age of Consent and that they Cohabited together Nine or Ten Years before the said supposed Divorce during which Cohabitation the said Martha was procreate between them and therefore pray they may have License to Traverse the said Office To which Bill the said Nicholas and Florence put in their answer and the Plaintiff examined divers Witnesses and before Publication Sir Nicholas dies and thereupon the said Silvester and Martha exhibited a Bill of Reviver against the said Florence and after Martha having Issue Elizabeth the Wife of the now Pl. died after whose death the said Thomas Robertson and Elizabeth his Wife bring a new Bill of Reviver to revive the first Sute in which the Witnesses were examined and this Case was refer'd to Fleming and Coke Chief Justices and Tanfeild Chief Baron and Selverton and Williams Justices and Sing and Altham Barons of the Exchequer If it be asked for what reason was such a Sentence given my Lord Coke nor the rest will neither tie the Bishop nor themselves to shew any for he saith The lawfulness of Marriage belonging originally to be tried in the Ecclesiastical Court if the Ecclesiastical Judg that is the Bishop Sentence a Marriage Null We that is the Judges of the King's Courts ought to give Faith that is implicit Faith to their Sentence as they do to our Judgment whether true or false right or wrong reason or no reason and so he saith Where the original cause of Sute concerning Marriage belongs to the Common Law Courts the Ecclesiastical Judg is to give like Faith to them as 22. E. 4. in Corbets Case which was this Sir Robert Corbet had by Elizabeth his Wife two Sons Robert the Elder and Roger the Younger and dies Robert the Elder being under the Age of Fourteen takes to Wife one Matilda and they dwell together tâ—ll full Age Et habuerunt carnalem copulam cogniti reputati pro viro uxore palam And after the said Robert put off the said Matilda having no Issue by her and Married one Lettice in the life of the said Matilda and hath Issue by her Robert and dies Lettice Preached openly that she was the lawful Wife of Robert and her Son a mulier Roger the Son of Sir Robert Corbet sues in the Spiritual Court to Reverse these Espousals between Robert his Brother and Lettice for which Lettice sues a Prohibition In which Case it was Resolved 1. That if Robert and Matilda had had Issue and had been unjustly Divorced and after Robert had Married Lettice and had Issue and died that as long as the unjust Divorce had continued the Issue of Matilda could have had no remedy at Common Law the same gives so great Faith to the Sentence of the Bishop 2. That here Roger might sue at Common Law notwithstanding the second Marriage in regard the same was void being made while the first Wife lived On which may be noted the injustice of the Bishops being above Appeal in Judgment in these particulars 1. Here is a lawful Matirmony Consummate by the Birth of a Child and two Persons thereby indissolubly joined together by the Act and Law of God put asunder by the Bishop and his Papal Law Here is a Dispute from Generation to Generation concerning the Validity of a Marriage and Succession to an Inheritance Against the Marriage is alledged That the same was declared void by a Sentence of Divorce or rather of Nullity given by the Bishop Against it is answered by Elizabeth a Descendent of the said Marriage and the right Heir to the Inheritance that the cause of the said Sentence was false And she offer'd to prove that the said Christopher Kenne and Elizabeth Stowell were both above the Age of Consent to Marriage in Anno 37. H. 8. and were then lawfully Married and Cohabited together Nine or Ten Years and the said Martha was lawfully Procreate between them before the pretended Divorce was made Was there ever Probation more Relevant tender'd was there ever better Reason alledged by a poor Lady to defend her Inheritance On this Hoskins Bacon Dodridge and other Council Argued so long from Term to Term as was enough to spend a good Portion before it was got But alas to no purpose for had this Elizabeth been Queen Elizabeth her self these Judges will give no Relief or Hearing against a Bishops Sentence unless his Lordship will please to Revoke it himself And notwithstanding all Arguments to the contrary it was accordingly resolved by all the Justices and Barons That she must go without her Inheritance and her Mother Martha remain a Bastard till the Bishop who made her so should again unmake her which was in plain English to adjudg there should be no Appeal in any case of Marriage Filiation Aliment or Succession from the Bishops to
they pleased the Protestant Admiral Coligni was the first whom the King with a Counterfeit Countenance and Promises and great Donatives drew to Court the Queen of Navarrâ— was next drawn thither but soon after died as was generally believed of Poison that was given her in some perfumed Gloves to conceal which the Chirugions that open'd her would not touch her head pretending that she died of an Imposthume in her side the Cardinal Castilion was also at that time poison'd which though after confess'd by him that had done it yet was not then so much as suspected the King of Navarre and Prince of Conde were then drawn to Court and received with all the signs of Friendship could be invented a Dispensation was obtained from the Pope for the Marriage and the chief Heads of the Protestants were all drawn to Paris on pretence to assist at the Solemnities of the Marriage on the Seventeenth of August the King of Navarre was Married and four Days were spent in all the Bravery of Diversions that are usual on such occasions but were now performed with more than ordinary Magnificence and Joy there was but one part of the Kings deportment which could give any ground of Jealousie which were the horrid and Blasphemous Oaths and Imprecations which he made Use of on all occasions to persuade them of the Reality of his Professions which always raise suspitions in sober and wary Persons these the King used so frequently that the Writers of that time say he seldome spoke three words without some Terrible Oath or Blasphemous Expression but it was now high time to Execute his Design not valuing his Oaths the Duke of Guise was therefore put upon it to get the Protestant Admiral Assassinated who imployed therein one Maurenell who had formerly Assassinated another Person for him this Rogue he placed in the House of one who had been his Tutor near St. German of Auxerre where the Admiral used to pass as he went or came from the Louvre therefore on the Twenty Second of August about Noon as the Admiral was going home from the Court reading a Paper that he had in his hand the Assassinate that was laid for him shot him from the House where the Duke of Guise had placed him his Fury was charged with three Bullets that were believ'd to be poison'd one of these carried away part of the Fore-finger the other struck in his left Arm the third missed The King was in the Tennis-Court when the news was brought him and Personated a deep Resentment and said in a Tone seeming full of Affliction and with a Terrible Oath Shall I never have quiet and so threw away his Racquet and went out in a Rage The Duke of Guise did also counterfeit some Surprize The King of Navarre and the Prince of Conde came to the King to complain and desired his leave to go out of Town seeing men were not safe so near the Court the King seemed more to Resent it than they and with the most horrible Oaths that he could think of Swore he would Execute such Revenge on all that were found guilty as should never be forgotten and desired them to stay and be witnesses of it and visited the Admiral who lay sick of his Wounds with great shew of condoleing his misfortune but in short after all these and many other counterfeit Shews a Council is called by The Most Christian most Perjured King wherein it was Resolved That not only the Persons of Quality of the Religion should be killed but every one of what condition soever of that Profession should be Massacred and amongst them violently was moved that the King of Navarre and Prince of Conde should run the common Fate of the rest till with much ado moderated by another Party that they should be only enforced to change their Religion and the Conduct of the whole Business was committed to the Duke of Guise to destroy all the Protestant Hereticks through the Kingdom who first ordered a strong Guard to be set about the places where the Admiral and his Friends Lodged that none might escape and to have a multitude of Torches and Flambeaux ready only to light out of their Windows and a multitude of Soldiers whose Sign should be a White Linnen Sleeve on the left Arm and a White Cross in their Caps and the pretence was that these should shew the King a Divertisement in the Night in the Counterfeit Assaulting of a Fort and the time appointed for the Execution was at Tolling of the Great Bell of the Palace which should be done near the break of Day and then they were to light their Torches and March the Signal was given the Morning of the 24th of August St. Bartholomew's Day being Sunday part of the Soldiers are sent to the Lodgings of the Wounded Admiral to go through with the Murder begun and Seven breaking into his Chamber all Armed there killed him and the Duke of Guise being below the Court bid them to throw him out of the Window which was done and either the Duke or the Count of Angoulesme for it is differently reported wiped his face for it was disfigured with Blood to know if it was be indeed and perceiving it was trampled on his Belly and went away an Italian cut off his head and carried it to the Queen Mother and then embalmed it and sent it to the Pope then all the Ignominy and Barbarity possible was exercised on the Dead Carcass his Fingers and Hands were cut off his Body dragged about the Streets thrown into the Seine and hanged up in Chains his Feet uppermost and a Fire was set under to burn which only Roasted and consumed it not here the horrible Massacre began and ended not till it had run through the whole City and Countrey with all the most Hellish Butcheries could be devised one would cut off the Nose another the Ear a third the Hands a fourth the Arms of the same Party before they would be so merciful as to kill him No Degrees Age or Sex spared Young or Old Infant or Suckling and a single Death satisfied not till they made them die many Deaths and till as is Estimated there were destroyed an Hundred Thousand Innocent Protestants The Cruelty of which was so abhor'd by the Soldiers themselves that many of them endeavour'd to save many of the Protestants for sure of all Men the most Valiant are the most Merciful but the more than Feminine Cruelty of the Babylonish Bishops which they derived from the Woman who sate on the Beast so set on the Multitude as made them worse than all the wild Beasts in the World which justly gives cause of Abhorrence against Episcopal Compulsion to Marry by a Priest in a Temple the same being the means without which this Perfidious and Bloody Massacre could not have been Effected Why the Ottoman Emperors Marry not by a Priest or in a Temple and of the Bloody Murders ensued of the Sons of Solyman the Magnificent
Moral Law of God of Truth and Equity neither if these Writs were Formed according to the Truth and Equity of the Moral Law of God is it possible a sufficient number should be Formed for Writs are finite and Cases of Equity infinite and not to be put in Writs or written except by God in the Fleshly Tables of the Heart and in the Spiritual Tables of the Soul it self and Conscience It will be asked How could they subsist before H. 6. without a Sub paena and Equity from a Chancellour seeing the Common Law Writs could not supply it and what expedient is there now how Equity may be supplied To which I answer That Equity was then supplied by the Writ of Right and Justicies the Titles of both which Writs signifie Equity and likewise other Writs and the General Issues Formed on them of the Meer Right Not Guilty Null Tort Null dissersint Nihil debet guided the Jury to find according to Right and Equity by the Moral Law of God and not the Ceremonial Law of Man till the Judges to wrest the Power belonging to Jurors into their own hands brought in the Tender of the Demy mark to turn the Issue of meer Right into a Possessary Issue and instead of Truth brought in the Pictions of Colours destroyed the Justicies by Writs of Remover gave way to false Laying of Counties in Transitory Actions changed Venues granted new Trials abated Declarations for Variance from the Bond and not Sueing for what was paid as well as for what was not granting Arrests of Judgment after Verdict and not permitting to demur first to the Law and after to plead to the Fact before Verdict prohibited on the Issue Not Guilty matters of Justification to be given in Evidence admitted Demurs to Evidence admitted special Verdicts caused Juries to be of an even and not of an odd number and the Verdict not to be according to the Plurality of Votes and many other ways they had to weary Juries from giving a Verdict according to Conscience and Equity or when they had so given it to same I conclude therefore to compell men to Commence Suites by Writs in the present Age is to condemn them without Hearing of the Equity and Merits of their Cause and to compell them to revive again those Ancient Writs and trie Equity by Juries hath many great inconveniences before mention'd to be incident to all Writs especially such as are Antiquated and not understood but all these mischiefs are salved by Commencing Suites by a Copy of the Declaration Sworn in stead of a Writ which cannot be Sworn and a Judg Commissionated with Jurisdiction of Fact Law and Equity under Appeal which single Judg in a Court by himself sitting without Vacation as a Chancellour hath Power to do will no doubt be able to dispatch more Causes without troubling any Writs Juries or Councel at the Bar and more justly and under Account in one Year then 't is possible for any Chancellour with Plurality of Offices or Court with Plurality of Judges Juries and Councel at the Bar to do in Seven 6. Men are condemned before Hearing on the Capias Vtlagatum and Excommunicato Capiendo A Satyr on a Papist and a Protestant Imprison'd one on an Outlawry the other on an Excommunicato Capiendo against Imprisonment before Hearing A Papist and a Protestant Who used when they met to Rant About the Altar and the Rail Were both together Clapt in Gaol The first was catch'd by an Outlawry The last whose Conscience did vary From Bishops and their Common Prayer As Felon or a false Betrayer Was therefore Excommunicate And put to beg within a Grate Pap. Brother then quoth the Papist sad Are Protestants too grown so mad To have an Inquisition here Who thus can though no cause appear Forfeit our Goods and Selves at will In Prisons cold to starve and kill Before they Hear us doest not know Amongst our selves it is not so Who by Experience wiser grown Will Inquisition now have none Witness the Rich Venetian And wary Dutch who late began For Liberty against such Lords And Swisse with their two handed Swords For this Proud Aragon Rebell d And Naples Silk-men hardly quell'd And many more abhor'd such Tricks Yet are they all good Catholicks So Holland justly now prevents Imprisonment of Innocents And makes to help the Poor opprest Before a Judgment no Arrest Is this the Charta and of Right Petition for which you fight That every ' Torney and his Clerk Who use to live upon the shark Forge all the Outlawries they please Remedies worse than the Disease And that Poor men may be betray'd First Forge the County where 't is laid They Forge and Antedate the Writs Of Parchment cut in little Bits Then next they Forge the Sheriffs name And Forge Returns upon the same They Proclamations Forge and Feign And Exigends next without pain And all this Knavery you may spie Page Sixth of the Academy Which is their Mother and their Nurse Teachers to Forge and Steal of course Such Clerks deserve hanged to be As Nicholas Clerks upon a Tree And thus though made them to prevent They fool all Acts of Parliament For no Averment must deny The Shrieve or Clerk although they lie Is this the Liberty so proud You use to cry it up aloud And Property you so much Vant That every Papist it doth want What Purgatory can you tell Is worse than this on Earth your Hell Or what Hell is there more worth fearing Than Your Damnation without Hearing He neither shews me Time or Place Nor Witnesses brought Face to Face My Goods are all Confiscated My very Wives and Children's Bed The Bailies Seised without account Of Price to what they did amount Or Witness Writings Boxes Chest And Money too on a Suggest And Lies and Fictions in worse case I am than Felons in this Place Their Goods although the Law is strict Not Forfeit are until Convict But left to feed them Oh the blest Justice is shewn to men distrest By Protestants who only you Say have the Religion true But Christ says Know them by their Works Which shews you worse than Jews or Turks I have not left a Bit of Bread Witness these unfeign'd Tears I shed The Plaintiff asks of me a Sum As at the Dreadful Day of Doom I answer shall and God doth know I do not him a Farthing ow Yet can I not although I try Be brought to answer or deny His Forged Stuff or see the Face Of Judg or Jury on the Place But here to perish am designed And to this Dungeon confined Unless I give what e're he 'l ask This is my miserable Task I think you now turn Witches too The Rogues the mischief who did do To bring me here sure had a Spell What Language 't was I cannot tell 'T was written in a little scrow Half-words and dash't that none might know Or ratâ—er scratch'd it was in Soot With Devils Claw or Cloven Foot Prot.
do a Miracle in my Name that can lightly speak Evil of me For he that is not against us is on our part The Bishops Canon appears therefore clean contrary to the Example and Precept of Christ It is before mention'd how the Bodies of Dead Persons in their Graves are by some believed to be Revived and Tormented by the Devil and how Locusts Flies and Fishes have been struck with this Thunderbolt of Excommunication There is no Good man dare Torment or Destroy by the help of any Invisible Spirit nor will nor ought any good Magistrate suffer them without a Sign of Mission from God above the Power of his Temporal Sword for all Magicians and Witches would then Act their Mischiefs under pretence that they do it by the Spirit of God and that their Excommunication is the Curse of God If therefore any Malefice follow without a Sign of Mission whereby they had a Warrant to Curse the Magistrate Sign of Mission whereby they had a Warrant to Curse the Magistrate ought to punish them for Witchcraft or all Laws against Witchcraft must be Repealed and the Devil let loose by his Instruments the Witches to do what mischief he pleases and no Judg presume to punish a Witch if he only say What he did was done by the Spirit of God It is impossible to distinguish invisible Spirits or to trie the Spirit whether God or the Devil but by visible Sign if the hurt be done therefore by any Person by assistance of a Spirit unless he shew a Sign he ought by the standing Laws and Acts of Parliament to be punished for Witchcraft and if he pretend to have a Mission from the Spirit of God and hath none he ought to be punished for a Cheat. And under the same Dilemma fall the Authors and Executors of the before mention'd Canon prohibiting Ministers to cast out the Devil by Fasting and must be guilty either of Withcraft or a Cheat if they cannot shew a Sign of Mission to make such a prohibition and to give such a Licence as their Canon imports though they impute the same to the Ministers who Fast and Pray when they do not Excommunication makes all Sins equal Excommunication as it came from Pagans so it sets up again that old Pagan Doctrine of the Stoicks Omnia Peccata esse Equalia Excommunication for Two Pence There was a Poor man who used to go to Labor for Six-pence a Day he lived in a Parish where the Custom was The Clerk was to have a Penny every Year of every House-holder and being very Poor rather needing to receive Alms than to pay Rates he thought he might have been on that Cause excused whereby this Penny was neglected to be paid for two Years following which amounted to the Sum of Two Pence for which he was Sued in the Bishops Court and Excommunicated and he would often complain that he could not recover his Estate till he had given the Court Eighteen-pence See the Piety of an Excommunicator he would if he had had Power have sold the Poor mans Soul to the Devil for Two Pence if he could not get some Money to redeem it Excommunication Pardons all Sin for Money Excommunication is done to no other end than to drive them to buy Absolution which enticeth and encourageth all kind of Uncleanness and other Wickedness Excommunication sets up Idolatry Pope Gregory the Second Idolatry Excommunicated and Deposed the Greek Emperor Leo Isaurus because he made a Law against Images and Nick-named him Iconomachus or the Fighter with Images Excommunication and Power to Judg of Heresie returns all to Popery and Priest-riding Thus Excommunicators follow the Precedent of the old Pagan Priests of Mars whom they called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the Fire-bearers who having Solemnly performed their Rites and Ceremonies of Cursing Execration or Excommunication as Balak would have had Balaam to have done used before the Battel joined to cast Fire-brands between the two Enemy-Armies standing in Battel Array one against another and so stirred them up to fight but they themselves yet retired out of the medly and danger 1. This gives the Popish Priest that main Pillar of the Popish Empire the Jurisdiction of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession and the Arbitrary disposing of the same both in Kingdoms and Private Patrimonies 2. This gives him the Power of setting up Images as appears in the fore-cited Example of the Emperor Leo Isaurus Excommunicated and Deposed because he forbad Images 3. This gives him Power to Asassinate Kings of which are a multitude of Examples 4. This gives him a Power of Confiscating Kingdoms and Selling them to others 5. This gives him Power to Confiscate and Imprison Arbitrarily the Subjects by Excommunicato Capiendo's as is before declared 6. This gives him Power of taking from the People the free Election of their Parochial Ministers and imposing on them the Popish Sacrament of Orders and Ordination contrary to the Law of God 7. This gives him Power to compell Confession of Sins to be made to the Priest which ought only to be made to God the Magistrate and the Brother injured 8. This gives him Power to impose Penance and Corporal punishment which ought only to be done by the Magistrate 1. Because the Magistrate should else bear the Sword in vain 2. Because it is unjust the Magistrate should penance or punish once and the Priest punish again for the same Sin for Nemo debet bis puniri pro eodem delicio 9. This gives him Power of imposing what Commutation-Money and Arbitrary Fine he pleaseth which is a Subversion of all Propriety in Goods 10. This gives him Power to sell Absolutions and Pardons of Sins and compell the same to be taken from the Priest which ought only to be taken from God the Magistrate and the Brother injured for unumquod que dissolvitur eodem modo quo conflatum est none can pardon an Offence against a Law but a Legislator none can release a Trespas but the Party against whom the Trespass is committed 11. This not only gives him Power by Pardon to Null the Laws of God and Men and the Penalties of the same but to Enact Arbitrarily new Laws and Penalties contrary and Superior to the Law of God viz. Ceremonial Laws made by the Priest contrary and Superior to the Moral Law made by God 12. This Impowers him to Usurp the Throne of God himself in the Soul and Conscience of man wherein none ought to be Judg but God himself Excommunication without a Sign of Mission not Instituted by Christ but invented by Pagan Priests and Daemons That Christ never Judged nor Condemned any though he heard him Preach in Person and believed not appears by the Scripture Faith and Infidelity being rather unavoidable Passions than free Actions of the Soul it being not in humane Power to believe what the Conscience is not convinced of or not to believe that whereof it is convinced and that Christ never appointed so