man SVBDIV. 5. Protestant doctrine of Predestination makes God alyer and dissembler FOVRTLY That God is by this doctrine of these Doctours a great lyer and a deepe dissembler and deluder that is that either God or these Doctours must be lyers or dissemblers is proued Because the words of God in holy scripture of these Protestant doctours in this point are contradictory therfore if Gods word be true theirs must be false or if theirs be true then must Gods be false and so God must be either a lier in speaking vntruly in scripture or a dissembler in speaking one thing intending another or they strang lyers in belying him That Gods word theirs are contradictory is apparent by these instances First God saies that he wils not inquity that he hateth iniquity that he hateth sinnes that both the wicked and his wickednesse is hatefull to him that Salomon did that which was not liked before our Lord that Dauid did displease him the one for his idolatry the other for numbring the people but these Protestant Doctours say the contrary Caluin sayes that God wils and is authour of sinne willed the sinne of Adam and fall of man that Pharao's cruelty pleased God Beza sayes that God wils and decrees euill and the damnation of man that God wils and is pleased with that which he doth reuenge and punish Peter Martyr sayes that God wils sinne as a meane to his end hates not sinne which he workes Perkins sayes that God willed the sinne and fall of Adam wils that sinne be committed Bucanā sayes that God wills sinne by his secret and well-pleasing will All which if they be true then the former sayings of God are false and so God lyes or dissembles of if Gods be true theirs are false Secondly God sayth that he hath not done iniquity that he will not do iniquity that they erre that worke euill that he who commits sinne is of the Diuell that he commaunds none to do wickedly that he did not command the building of the high place of Balaam that he doth not tempt any man to euill Suffers none to be tempted aboue that which he is able But contrary to all this Caluin sayes that God not only permits but commaunds euill commands and compells the Diuell to be a lying spirit in the mouth of Prophets workes the execration of the faithlesse Is the cause of obduration of Pharao's obduration and cruelty that wickednesse committed by man proceeds from God Luther sayes that God workes in vs good and euill and works euill by vs. Melancthon sayes that the treason of Iudas was as proper a worke of God as the conuersion of S. Paul Beza sayth that God doth worke in vs obduration and is the cause of it Sāctius sayes that God is the chiefe authour of obduration doth worke good and euill in vs doth reward his owne good punish his owne ill workes in vs that sinne as sinne and malum culpae is preordained of God that God ordained men to damnation and their sinnes to damne them forsooke them and denyed them grace that they might sinne compelleth to wickednesse mediatly by himself and by his speciall action Peter Martyr sayes that God doth solicite to deceaue doth compell to great sinnes to lye to seduce All which if they be true then the former sayings of God in Scripture are false and so God is a lyer a deluder or a dissembler or they foule lyers Thirdly God sayth in Scripture that he wils not the death of the wicked that he will not haue any to perish that it is not his will that one of these litle ones perish but will haue all to be saued and come to the knowledge of the truth He commaunds that none shall worship strang Gods that none commit murder adultery and theft he persuades the wicked to repent to be conuerted and repent from their iniquity and to sinne no more he inuiteth calleth and stretcheth out his hands and y would gather sinners vnder his winges as a Henne doth her chickins he would haue all to come to him But Caluin sayes that God did ordaine and predestinate many yea the most to damnation and created them for that end for no desert or sinne in them but only for that his will was so to haue it did create them as organs of his anger to destruction of death and that they might come to that end did either depriue them of power to heare the word of God or did blind and dull them in hearing it doth direct his voice to them not to that end that they may heare but to that end that they may be made more stupid that he calls them only by word and after a humane manner not because he would haue them come Beza sayes he will not haue the reprobate conuerted and saued who are not able to haue any will to be conuerted Piscator sayes he maks shew in words to will that which he wils not and not to will that which he wil so doth he vse holy dissembling Beza sayes he commandes that which he will not haue done and promiseth that which he will not performe that he doth not loue all neuer did nor euer will haue mercy on all that he would not haue the death of Christ to profit the reprobate will not haue the reprobate conuerted and saued and that they cannot haue any will to be conuerted Zanctius sayes He calls all according to his outward will and preaching of the Ghospell but according to his secret will neither would nor will haue all to come and be saued Perkins sayes he will not nor hath so much as any will or velleity no not conditionally that all be saued And therefore it is not true to say that God will haue all saued And that when S. Paul sayth so he speaketh according to the charitable opinion of men not according to Gods will All which wordes of these Protestant Doctours as they contradict the wordes of God for that God doth not will command and worke euill and that he doth will worke and compell to euill that God hates is displeased with sinne iniquity and sinfull persons and that he wils decrees and ordaines the same that God inuites calles desires wils the saluation of all and that he detaines and withouldes men from coming to be saued are quite opposite and contradictory one to another so therefore must either this Protestāt doctrine be false if Gods be true or if theirs be true Gods must be false and God either a lyer or a dissembler He that desires to see more of these expresse contradictions betweene the expresse word of God in holy Scripture and the Protestant Doctours in their
God a Diuell LASTLY that this Protestant doctrine doth transforme God into a Diuell and so doth depriue him of his only and all goodnes and therby transpose him into the greatest and vilest euill that can be shall by these ensuing reasons appeare 1. It is the office or property of Satan to â—empt man to sinne yea as an aduersary to lay traps to ensnare man in sinne for which in greeke he is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a tempter or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an entrapper or calumniator and in hebrew Sathan an aduersary and so he is called tempter is said to tempt vs and to temp the hart to lye to the holy ghost But this is more proper to God according to this Protestant doctrine then to the Diuell 1. Because God doth not only tempt and moue a man to sinne but which is more doth will ordaine and predestinate a man to sinne and to al the sinnes which are committed 2. Because God is not only our aduersary to oppose vs but so potently doth oppose vs in so weighty a matter as our greatest good that he directly excludes most from all felicity depriues most of all benefit of it debarres most from all meanes to attaine it entraps most in all the snares which may hinder their progresse vnto it the Diuell is but only his instrument to worke that which he wils and execute that which he before had designed against vs therefore God is more our tempter and aduersary then is the Diuell Secondly The office and property of the Diuell is to sow tares or ill weeds of sinne in the field of our hearts to choake vp all the corne of grace and goodnes the enemy comes and sowes tares But God doth this according to this doctrine more then the Diuell 1. Because God doth worke inwardly in the hearts of sinners doth excecate and obdurate the minds of men doth strike them with a spirit of errour giddinesse and madnesse and that not by permission but operation as Caluin in particuler affirmes 2. Because God doth will command and worke in vs all the sinnes which are wrought as the principall cause and mouer the Diuell being only as the instrument and that not free but forced not mouing but moued and not able to do otherwise then by God he is both commanded and compelled as before therfore the chiefe and principall sower of ill seeds and weeds of sinne is God not the Diuell Thirdly The office and property of the Diuell is to be authour of all sinnes in generall sinne is of the Diuell and of lying in particuler who speakes lies of himselfe and is a lier the Father of lies But this is more proper to God then the Diuell according to this doctrine 1. Because the Diuell did only in Adam by tempting him to eat the forbidden fruit remoue an impediment which did hinder ill to wit originall iustice by which the inferiour part was kept in order without rebellion to the superiour but God did by his will saith Caluin ordaine and decree the fall of Adam the ruine of all his posterity the miserable condition into which we are all fallen Therfore God was more properly the authour of Adams fal then the Diuel 2. Because the Diuell doth only tempt to sinne indirectly medially that is either obiectiuè proposing sinfull obiects to the phantasy that the will may consent and delight in them or dispositiuè by altering tempering the organs of the senses that the appetites may with more facility incline vnto them leauing alwayes a freedome of the will to dissent or assent but God according to Caluin doth not only by his ineuitable immutable decree and ordinance will and commaÌ„d the same but also by his immediate effectual irresistable concourse operation to euery actioÌ„ of sin so works the act of sinne in man that he leaues in man neither any operation at all God working all nor any liberty or freedome God necessitating all who is thereby not only the permitter but the authour of all sinnes the authour as well of the adultery of Dauid the treachery of Iudas the hardnesse of Pharao the cruelty of Achab the incest of Absalom the reproach of Semei the idolatry of the ten Tribes of the Chaldean destruction of Iudea of the Iewes and Pilates condemning of Christ as he is of the conuersion of S. Paul Therefore God is more and truely the immediate worker of sinnes and lyes then the Diuell O diabolicall doctrine SVBDIV. 8. Obseruations vpon the former doctrine VPON good ground therefore did Castalio who as Caluins scholler best vnderstood his maisters mind not only by his writinges but from his owne mouth affirme that this doctrine of Caluin did transfer God into the Diuell and for the same forsooke both him and Geneua and writ against him and this his doctrine Truely did Peter Vermilius a Professour of Tigure affirme that this doctrine of Caluins is a libertine execrable sacrilegious abominable and altogeather diabolicall doctrine Iustly did the Tigurin Sacramentaries anno 1554 accuse Caluin for this doctrine of great impiety cause his bookes writ of this subiect to be rent in peeces by the Hangman and to be burnt publickly in the Market place by special Edict commanded that none should diuulge in their territories any so horrible and detestable opinions Vpon good reason do as yet the Lutherans in Germany so detest this doctrine that to cleare Luther of it they did expunge out of his works these words God doth worke euill in vs. And most worthily doe the same Lutherans generally disclaime both this doctrine and Caluin for it in so much as one of them Heshusius a great Superintendent affirmes that Caluin writ wickedly of the cause of sinne made God the authour of sinne and in his doctrine is horribly contumelious against God pernicious to man and makes not the Diuell but God to be the authoisr of lyes Another of them a Professour auouches that not God but the Diuell is authour of this predestination and the God of the Caluinists Out of which doctrine and sequels vpon it may be obserued 1. That neuer any doctrine of Atheist Pagan Iew or Heretike was so wickedly pernicious and abominable as this of Caluin and his followers is for though some made God idle as Epicurus others impotent as Lucianus others the authour of euill as the Cerdonists Marcionists and Manichees others miserable afflicting himselfe as the Thalmudists others no God at all as the Atheists Yet all these are more tollerable theÌ„ these Caluinists for it is not so ill to be idle as to be doing ill better to make God do nothing then to make him the worker of all wickednesse It is more tollerable to make God vnable to do good then to make him the authour and actour of doing ill to make him vnable to requit good then vniust to punish where
it be contained among the chief articles of the Creed or plainly expressed in scripture 9. So sufficient that it be able to explicate determine all articles and doubtes in religion 10. So complet that it containe virtually be able to resolue plainly all questions and conclusions of Faith which may at any time vpon any occasion arise All which are necessary for such a rule and foundation vpon which so important a matter as faith and religion is grounded And this is the first thing to be obserued for the properties and conditions both of the Iudge and his rule of faith The whole body of the Church cannot be this Iudge SECT II. SECONDLY We may note that this infallible authority to iudge of controuersies of faith is giuen neither to the whole body and congregation of the Church of God as the rigid Lutherans with Brentius do hould nor to the secular Princes and Parlamentes as all the Lutherans at first and the State-Protestants of England do yet defend nor to the lay-people and priuate persons as Caluin and the Caluinists do maintaine nor yet is it residing in the wordes and text or scripture as the ordinary preachers pretend but only is giuen to the Pastours and Prelates of the Church of Christ who are lawfully by authority from Apostolicall succession ordained and Catholickly continue without diuision of heresy or schisme in the same and among them principally to the chiefe head and Pastour the successor of Peter and Bishop of Rome All which concerning euery one shall be briefly proued First therefore although the whole body of the Church collected haue the infallible assistance of the holy Ghost that it cannot erre or be deceaued in faith yet hath it not the same assistance that it may ought to be iudge determiner of faith For as in a naturall body the soule doth informe and giue life to the whole body and euery member of it but doth not discourse and giue vse of reason to the whole or euery part but only to the head so the spirit of God assistes the whole Church with the priuiledge of freedome from errour in faith but doth not likewise giue to it the priuiledg◠of authority to teach and iudge of faith and direct others in the same for which cause God hath giuen a measure of donation diuisions of graces and ministrations and made some not al Apostles Doctours Prophets that some may rule others be ruled some teach and others be taught some be superiours to iudge and direct others be inferiours to be iudged and directed and so an order and subordination a peace and vnity may be obserued and kept in the whole body among the members of Christs Church Whereof see more in the next fourth Section Secular Princes cannot be this Iudge SECT III. THIRDLY That this infallible authority is not in secular Princes or their Assemblies and Parlaments either as particuler members of the Church against Melancthon or as Princes and Superiours among the rest against Brentius so that they can and may lawfully and infallibly iudge of Controuersies make ecclesiasticall lawes giue authority to preach and prescribe a forme of doctrine a manner of seruice and an order of Sacraments and sacrifice though it be largely by many proued against the supremacy of Princes in causes Ecclesiasticall and requires a treatise more large yet in briefe it shall by these reasons be proued First because Kinges and Princes are in the Church of God and spirituall affaires as sheep to be ruled and ordered not as sheepheardes to rule and gouerne they are Lambes to be fed by Peter Sheep of the fold of Christ Members of the Church of God and seruants of the family of Christ Thus did the ancient and holy Fathers freely tell and admonish them and the Christian and good Emperours themselues acknowledged it S. Gregory Nazianzen told Valentinian That the law of Christ did subiect them Emperours to his power and Tribunall and that they were holy sheep of his holy fold S. Ambrose told Theodosius the Great that he was a sonne of the Church and that a good Emperour is within not aboue the Church Theodoret sayes of Constantine the Great that as a louing sonne he did propose busines to the Bishops and Priests as Fathers Constantine himselfe cōfesses that God gaue Priests power to iudge of Emperours witnesse Ruffinus that they were bishops within the Church he without it witnes Eusebius Valentinian the elder confesses that he as a laye man might not interpose himselfe in Church affaires but the Bishops and Priestes had care of such affaires witnes Sozom. And that himselfe was to submit himselfe to them witnes Paulus Diaconus And Theodosius the Great obeyed S. Ambrose his excommunication departed out of the Chancell at his command and cōfessed that thereby he had learned to know what difference there was betweene an Emperour and a Bishop witnes Theodoret and Nicephorus Secondly because the offices of the Bishops and Emperours are diuers and distinct the one of bodyes and goods the other of soules and fayth the one of life and death for offences against the King and common-wealth the other of sinnes and sacraments belonging to Gods lawes mans conscience the one is temporall of the kingdome and common-wealth the other is spirituall of the Church flocke of Christ which the hereticall Emperours forgetting were stoutly and zealously admonished and reprehended by the holy Bishops vnder them for the same As for example Cōstantius the Arian 1. by Hosius of Corduba willing him not to medle with Ecclesiasticall affaires nor to commaund them but to learne of them because to him God had committed the Empire but to them the Church 2. By Leontius of Tripolis because being ruler of military and politicke affaires he should not rule in thinges that belong only to Bishops 3. By S. Hilary of Arles wishing him to writ to Iudges of Prouincies that they should not presume or vsurpe to intermedle with the causes of Clergy men 4. By S. Athanasius of Alexandria that he and such who will be Presidents in ecclesiasticall iudgments who will make the Tribunals of the Court the seales of deciding ecclesiasticall causes themselues Princes and Authours of Church affaires are the abomination of desolation yea euen Antichrist himselfe Valentinian the yonger seduced by his wife was told by S. Ambrose of Milane That he had no Imperiall right in thinges that are diuine for the Court doth belong to the Emperour but the Church to the Priest And being called by the Emperour to reason with Auxentius the Arian he answered That if a conference was to be made of fayth it was to be made by the Priestes as it was vnder Constantine who prescribed no lawes but gaue free iudgement to Priests That it was neuer heard that in a cause of fayth Lay
is no desert of ill It is lesse blasphemy to make two Gods the one authour of good and the other the authour of euill then to make one God and yet to make him the authour and worker of euill and of all euill to call him iust and yet to make him the punisher of that in others which he wills commandes and workes by himselfe to account him mercifull and yet vpon his meere will and pleasure without any cause or desert to ordaine create millions of men to eternall torments and damnation It was not so great impiety in the Iewes to make God mourn sorrowfull for the punishment he wrought on Hierusalem as it is in the Caluinists to make him well pleased with the vnreasonable tormenting of soules in hell to make it one of the chiefest attributes of Gods iustice to appoint men to sinne and then for that sinne to punish and damne them It is not so foolish to say with the foole there is no God at all as it is to say God is the Authour and worker of all wickednesse and yet the punisher and reuenger of the same for they by the light of reason will condemne and auoid thefts murders periuries iniustice as lying in their power to auoid but these will may by their owne principles practise and exercise them al as being by God forced and necessitated to them as wanting freedome to auoid them and as fearing no punishment for them Though therefore most wicked yet lesse wicked were the former opinions of Iewes Heretikes and Atheists then these of the Caluinists Secondly it may be obserued that no Caluinist can be certaine and assured either of any verity of Scripture or of any article of his Faith or of any assurance of his saluation by his priuate spirit for though he may imagine himselfe to be certaine of the sense of Scripture of the articles of his fayth and of the infallibility of his saluation that they are reuealed from God yet he may with all according to his principles of fayth imagine that God who reueales these may reueale tell him which is false for as God according to them is he who effectually procures the sinner to sin who as the principall cause vses the sinner as an instrument to commit sinne who incites compels and necessitates the sinner to sinne who phisically and effectually workes and causes the act of sinne so the same God according to them may procure and incite the Apostles and Prophets as his instruments compel and necessitate them as the chiefe authour and worker and produce in them as the principall agent lyes and vntruthes and so may by them in Scripture reueale an vntruth either of the beliefe of the mysteries of their fayth or of the certainty of their saluation What certainty therefore can they haue from God of reuelations they receaue from him or of any thing suggested by their supposed spirit as from him Againe God according to Caluin hath one will exteriour another interiour doth call exteriourly whome he withouldes interiourly speakes to them but to make them more deafe giues them light but the more to blind them doth teach them but to make them more dull doth apply to them a remedy but not to cure them for so are Caluins wordes If so then how can any be sure that the calling the speaking the light the doctrine and the motion of their spirit as they suppose of God is not rather to detaine then draw them rather to darken then lighten them rather to dull them then teach them rather to increase then cure their diseases Surely if the spirit of God may worke and doth more ordinarily worke the bad then the good doth more vsually make shew to call when he intends they shall not come doth more generally make blind then enlighten make obdurate then mollify make dull then teach and wound then cure And if God do more often intend bad thē good obduration then illumination damnation then saluation of most whome he cals inuites and makes shew of intending their good And if the greatest part of the world be thus by God deluded and deceaued then why may not or rather should not euery Protestant iustly suspect the same of himselfe Why may he not rightly feare that God intends one thing by his inward will and pretends another by his outward will that God doth worke errour and deceit in him rather then truth and verity That he is a lying spirit rather then a true in him Surely if God hath deceaued more then he hath taught truth darkened more thē he hath lightned obdurated more then he hath mollifyed woūded more then he hath cured and damned more then he hath saued iustly may euery one both suspect and feare that God may do the like to him sith no ground reason or motiue he hath of the one rather then of the other and no more assurance of his saluation among the lesser number then of his damnation with the greate◠Thirdly it may be obserued that the God of these Caluinists and precise Protestants is not the same with the ancient Christians and present Catholikes but the one doth so farre differ from the other that the one of the Caluinists doth will decree and predestinate all sinnes which are committed by men and so makes man sinne by the will decree and predestination of God the other of the Catholickes doth will decree and predestinate only good works and all good workes and so doth make man to doe good workes according to the will of God and doth suffer him to do euill according to the man his owne will The one doth command vrge and compell Sathan to deuise sinnes and to sollicite men vnto it The other doth bind hould and hinder Sathan that he do not tempt man and doth ayde help and assist man that he be not by Sathan tempted aboue his power The one doth himselfe secretly incite moue necessitate man to sinne the other doth disswade deterre and enable man against sinne The one is the principall authour worker and effectour of all sinnes as sinnes and men only his instruments to do that sinne which he workes by them The other is no authour nor instrument nor worker at all of sinne as sinne but only the efficient cause of that which is good leauing man to be the deficient cause of that which is malice and sinne The one vpon his meere will because it is his pleasure without any demerit or sinne in man did ordaine predestinate and create most men to damnation and ordained and predestinated only some few to saluation The other created all men to saluation and had a will and desire that all should attaine to it and be saued and ordained none to damnation but vpon his foresight of their sinne by which they would deserue damnation The one did will appoint and decree the sinne of Adam and of all mankind for that end only that in
all the Commandements or any of them is impossible 10. That no humane lawes do oblige in conscience to their performance 11. That the Sacraments chiefly Baptisme are seales and signes of predestination to glory of remission of sinnes and perseuerance in Gods fauour and that in Baptisme are forgiuen sinnes past and to come 12. That man by reason of Gods decree and originall sinne hath no liberty or freedome of will to do or auoid bad workes 13. That God hath ordained and predestinated vpon his meere will and pleasure without any cause giuen or so much as forseene all who are damned both to damnation and to sinne All which positions as they are auerred by the learned Protestants and preached to the people so they do ouerthrow all the articles of the Creed all the petitions of the Pater noster and all the precepts of the Ten Commandments and leade to all loosenesse and dissolution of life as shal be shewed SVBDIV. 1. In generall dectroying all fayth AND first that these Positions do quite ouerthrow take away all diuine and supernaturall fayth which is the first foundation and corner-stone of our spirituall building the first preparation to life and iustification the first root of all true vertue and good workes the first gate by which God enters into our soule the first light which shines in our vnderstanding the first true seruice which we offer to God and the first step by which we beginne to walke our iourney to heauen that this doctrine doth quite ouerthrow this fayth and all the articles of the Creed proposed in it is proued 1. Because they distinguish three sortes of fayth 1. Historicall of thinges reuealed and related in scripture and proposed by the Apostles in the Creed such as are the Trinity Incarnation Passion Resurrection and Ascension of Christ with all other articles which all Christians vsually belieue 2. Generall of promises in generall and all graces promised by Christ to all as the sending of the Holy Ghost the coming to iudgment the raysing of the dead and the like which are generall for all 3. Speciall of the promise made to euery man in particuler of his predestination iustification and saluation by which euery one is made infallibly certaine that his sinnes are forgiuen him and that he shal be saued Whereas I say they make these three sortes of Fayth the first and second of these Faithes to wit Historicall and Generall by which they belieue the articles of the Creed promises of God in general they affirme to be faigned not true fayth a shadow of Fayth not a real iustifying faith a Fayth which is common to the reprobate and damned euen to the Diuels themselues and only the third or Special fayth they assigne to be the true diuine and supernaturall iustifying fayth which hath for his obiect the speciall mercy of God to them in particuler applyed the certainty of remission of their sinnes assuredly past and security of their saluation infallibly to come by which they doe as much or more assuredly belieue their iustification and saluation then they do the B. Trinity Incarnation or the rest of the articles of Fayth Now if this speciall fayth be the only true diuine supernaturall and sauing fayth by it is belieued only one article of the Creed that not truly as shall appeare to wit Remission of sinnes and the Historicall and Generall fayth by which the rest of the articles are belieued be only a shadow of Fayth a fayth of the damned and Diuells then we haue no diuine and supernaturall fayth of the rest of the articles but belieue them only by a Faith which is a fained faith a shadow and no more a guift of God then the fayth of the damned and the Diuells in hell Therefore all true â—nd diuine beliefe of the articles of the Creed is by this special doctrine of speciall Fayth quite abolished and taken away from all Christians and nothing but a shadow of Fayth a fained and diabolicall faith left to them and so by one position of theirs is cut off all diuine fayth or beliefe of all the articles of the Creed Secondly whiles they deny all authority of Tradition Church Councels and Fathers and will belieue nothing but what they themselues find in Scripture and that as their priuate spirit interprets it While they make their spirit the iudge of all fayth all controuersies of fayth what is to be receaued or reiected belieued or condemned While I say they doe thus they may by the vertue of this spirit call in question the authority and credit of the Creed it selfe with the authours of it as not to be found in Scripture and the particuler articles they may either reiect as counterfeit intruded or els expound and interpret them as their spirit shal lead them Thus Luther and Caluin following Erasmus for Erasmus is sayd to haue layd the egge which Luther hatched to haue insinuated that which Luther assured to haue doubted of that which Luther downe right denyed made doubt of the authority of the Creed whether it was made by the Apostles or not And the Seruetians in Transiluania witnesse Canisius admit it but so farre as it agrees with the word of God interpreted no doubt by their spirit Thus did Beza by his spirit affirme that part of the sixt article he descended into hell to haue been thrust into the Creed Thus Caluin and Zuinglius following likewise Erasmus by their spirit affirmed that part of the tenth article the Communion of Saints to haue beene intruded into this Creed out of some other Creed and not to haue beene found in the ancient Creeds Thus Luther by his spirit changed in his Germane Creed the word Catholike Church into Christian Church And Beza reiected the same word Catholike as most vaine and wicked And thus by their Glosses and expositions vpon many articles as not pleasing their tast they wrest diuers as shall appeare from their natiue proper sense for example he descended into hell that is he descended into the graue so make a new Creed in sense and meaning agreable to their spirit and the doctrine of it Of which who will haue a full view let him read Andr. Iur. his Nullus and Nemo and Fitzsimons vpon the Masse where their many absurd glosses and expositions are at large discouered and confuted SVBDIV. 2. In particuler against all the twelue Articles of the Creed THIRDL Y because by this doctrine and these Doctours are oppugned in particuler all the mysteries of fayth in euery article of the Creed which by this briefe enumeration of euery one shal be made manifest And first in the first article attributed to S. Peter I follow the diuision of S. S. Augustine and Doctour Kellison is oppugned 1. The faith and beliefe of all the articles in generall in the word Credo by all who hould that it is
draw forward to the practise of vice and so remoue al encouragement to vertue and propose all enticements to vice by which they do open a wide gap to all liberty and loosenesse of life and giue a free passage to all concupiscence and sensuality of sinne to what any mans imagination or affection shall lead him That this their doctrine I say doth this shall by these and the former positions and illations vpon them be conuinced For first they take away from the Christian-common-wealth all superiority by affirming that among Christians is no superiour that a Christian is subiect to none but only to Christ who only is his immediate superiour as Luther 2. They take away from Superiours all spirituall and temporall power to make any lawes affirming as Luther Caluin do that to make lawes and to rule by lawes is proper only to God that no man can forbid that which is not forbid by Christ 3. That they take from lawes all obligation to bind in conscience affirming all as Luther Caluin Zuinglius Beza Martyr Danaeus VVhitaker Perkins others do that no Magistrate or Lawes are to be obeyed for conscience that all lawes of men are to be abolished that the laws of the Apostles oblige not but for scandall that there is no sinne or obligation in conscience to any law but of God 4. They derogate from Gods lawes holding that it is impossible for any man though iust to performe and satisfy the law or to keep the Commandements or any one of them that therefore the law commands thinges impossible which is a fundamentall point of Christian religion to be belieued and that the contrary which affirmes the keeping of the law to be possible and the gayning of heauen to be proposed cōditionally if we keep the law is a wicked perswasion So the Confession of Auspurge and England so Luther Melancthou Caluin Beza Danaeus VVhitaker Perkins Scharpius Adaemus Francisci and others 5. They abolish the morall law of the Decalogue or ten Commandements affirming that it is free and nothing belongs to any iust regenerate and pious person that the breach of it to any faythfull shall not be imputed as a sinne nor punished as a sinne thus Luther Melancthon Zuinglius Martyr Caluin Beza VVhitak Tindaell Bucan Bullinger and others whereupon they inferre that the obseruation of the law is not necessary to saluation thus Luther Caluin Perkins Piscator Paraeus and Martyr That no Saint as yet euer did fullfill the law and obey it nor loue God with his whole hart as the law requires thus the Confessions of Auspurge Scotland and Bohemia Luther Caluin Brentius Paraeus Danaeus others And that we should not vse any prayer for that end that we may fulfill the law but only that we may endeauour to fullfill it thus Caluin Perkins and others doe affirme To which assertions if we adde their other positions before mentioned 1. About good works that they are not pleasing to God as any worship to him but are all sinnes that mortall and neither free nor meritorious nor necessary nor profitable nor possible nor any cause of saluation therfore can haue no dignity no merit no reward no crowne of iustice 2. About sin that God wils works and is pleased with sinne doth predestinate command tempt necessitate to sinne that no sinne is imputed to the elect that no sinne can be auoided that no sinne is any cause of damnation 3. About iustification that only faith doth iustify that by assuring a man of his iustification which once had can neuer be lost that no iustice is inherent but all imputed that none doth take away any sinne but only couer it that none doth make a man iust before God but only before man If I say we adde these their positions and doctrine which are their common Tenents and before proued to the former it will euidently appeare that their doctrine of it selfe without any wresting or forcing it is a spurre to vice and a bridle to vertue is a retractiue from good life and an attractiue to bad doth stope the way to a mind enclined to morall honesty open the gat to one disposed to loosnesse and liberty SVBDIV. 2. In particular how many wayes the Protestant Doctrine incourageth to the breach of all lawes and to all lewdnes of life AND first if a man should belieue not only the articles and points reuealed in Scripture but also the consequences deduced from them as most Protestants hould thē may euery Protestant out of these their former principles by euident consequence deduced belieue and practise these such like positions and practises which draw from all piety to impurity and which do euidently follow out of the former principles First therfore he may reason and accordingly practise thus The obseruation of the ten commandments yea of any one is impossible and by the liberty of the ghospell I am freed from all obligation to any as well morall as ceremoniall precepts Ergo in vaine do I labour to keepe them in vaine do I ēdeauour to abstaine from idolatry periury prophaning the Sabboth disobedience to Superiours murder adultery theft false witnesse concupiscence or the like because it is as impossible for me to keepe thē as for me to leap ouer the sea Because by the liberty of the Gospel I am freed from the obligation as well of them as of the ceremonial precepts and therfore may as well breake the Sunday as the Saturday as well commit fornication as eat porke or bacon as well omit duty to parents or princes as circumcision or the paschall lambe sith all are equally abrogated and neither sinne nor punishment of either is imputed Ergo Why shall not I as well commit as auoid swearing drinking murder adultery or the rest Why not as well yield to as resist concupiscence Why not as well consent as dissent as well follow as forbeare my pleasures as well feed as bridle my appetites and passions because both are against the commāmandement which is impossible to be kept and neither imputed to me for sinne which by faith is fully remitted Secondly He may reason and accordingly practise thus No prince or Prelate hath any power to make lawes which shall oblige the subiect in conscience Ergo I am not bound in conscience and vnder any sinne to obey them but may so as publicke scandall or punishmēt can be auoided breake them at my pleasure so it be priuate and vnknowne therfore may I vnderhand breake the Canons iniunctions of the Church and vse simony bribery and the rest Therfore need I not obserue the lawes of the commō wealth but may bring in or trasport forbidden goods deny tolles taxes or imposts breake any statute either as a magistrate or as a subiect so I can auoid scandall and punishment because vnder sinne and in conscience I am obliged to none of these lawes and statutes Thirdly