untimely death or sicknesse it seemeth not unpossible that such a number by ordinarie meanes in the circuite of 215. yeeres might be multiplied for seventie persons in thirtie yeeres if they beget every one but one in a yeere will have 2100. Cut off the odde hundred and admit that the third part onely of the other number was apt for generation that is sixe hundred which make 300. couples or mariages those will beget in thirtie yeeres more which is the 60. yeere from their comming into Egypt nine thousand the third part hereof three thousand maketh fifteene hundred couples which having but every yeere one will beget the next thirtie yeeres which makes 90. in all 45000. hereof the third part 15000. will make 7400. couples leaving the odde hundred which will beget by the 12. yeere 222000. the third part whereof 74000. maketh 37000. couples and will beget by the 150. yeere 1110000 the third part hereof 370000. maketh 185000. mariages which will beget the next thirtie yeeres by the 180. yeere 5550000. whereof the third part 185000. which maketh beside the five odde thousand 920000. mariages which will beget by the 210. yeere 27600000. that is 27. thousand sixe hundred thousand Simler Though herein no miracle be admitted yet could it not be done without the exceeding blessing of God especially that notwithstanding their cruell bondage and sore labour yet they multiplied without number Perer. Somewhat about this time the children of Ephraim being increased went against the men of Gath to take away their cattell but presuming before the time they were slaine and Ephraim mourned for them 1 Chron. 7.21 Osiander QUEST VII Who this new King was that knew not Ioseph Vers. 8. THere arose a new King in Egypt 1. This new King was neither an Assyrian borne as Cajetano conjectureth upon these words of Isay chap. 52.4 My people went downe into Egypt to sojourne there and Asshur oppressed them without cause but the Prophet in this place toucheth both the oppressions of the Israelites in Egypt and under Asshur neither in the Egyptian Chronicles was there any Assyrian King either before Moses or for a thousand yeeres after till the reigne of Cambises the Persian 2. Neither could this King be Mephres in whose ninth yeere Ioseph should die and the bondage of Israel begin as Vincentius For seeing all the Patriarkes were dead before their affliction began of which number Levi elder than Ioseph by foure yeeres lived 137. yeeres Exod. 6. and so survived Ioseph who died at 110. yeeres 23. yeeres then could not Mephres be this King that began to reigne before Ioseph died 3. Neither was this King Ramesses as some thinke because one of the cities which the Israelites built was called by that name for Ramesses was King of Egypt in the time of the Trojane warre Plin. lib. 36. cap. 8. which was three hundred yeeres after the death of Moses if he reigned in Egypt in the time of Deborah as thinketh Eusebius he was 140. yeeres after Moses 4. But it is more probable that this King was Amemphis in whose 18. yeere Eusebius thinketh Moses was borne so also Hierome in Chronicis some call him Memnon the speaking stone whose image did use to speake at the Sunnes rise and so continued untill Christ Perer. Simler QUEST VIII Why this Pharaoh is called a new King HE is called a new King because he came of another family Ioseph or for that he brought in a new kind of government altering and changing the lawes as the Chalde Paraphrast and ruling after his owne pleasure Simler He knew not Ioseph either being borne after his time or having forgotten his benefits as Darius had Mardoches faithfulnesse Esther 6. Iunius Wherein his great ingratitude appeared for two great benefits Ioseph had procured one in generall in saving the whole land in the time of the famine the other to the Crowne in annexing to it the fift part of the revenewes of Egypt Perer. As also herein Iosephs modestie appeared that did not in his long time of honour which continued 80. yeeres raise up an honourable and wealthie state to his posteritie seeing his house was so soone obscured but as is most like he and his sonnes joyned themselves unto their brethren not hunting after the wealth of Egypt where they knew they were but strangers Simlerus QUEST IX The causes of the affliction of the Israelites Vers. 10. COme let us worke wisely with them c. 1. There were three causes why the Egyptians consulted to oppresse the Israelites first they envied their happinesse and prosperitie for God every way blessed them then they hated them for their religion in which regard the Hebrewes were an abomination to the Egyptians for they sacrificed those beasts which the Egyptians worshipped see Gen. 46.34 and Exod. 8.26 Thirdly they were afraid of them lest they should joyne with their enemies and rebell against them Perer. 2. And three things they feared lest they might take part with their enemies or rebell by their owne strength or make an escape out of the land Iun. They feared all these joyntly and every one in particular therefore it is better read disjunctively see before in the divers readings 3. They worke wisely or cunningly câ—â—ftily for so the word Chacham is taken both in the good bad part not as the Hebrewes imagine because they would not destroy them with the sword or fire lest God might be revenged of them in the same kind but devised by the water to destroy them whereby the Lord promised never to destroy the world againe but their craft is seene in attempting divers wayes to keepe them under that if they prevailed not by one meanes they might by another and in respect of themselves they worke wisely providing both for their owne securitie and for their profit in the service of the Israelites Simler Likewise they opprest them cunningly that they might not be accused of open and manifest tyrannie Osiander 4. Iosephus alleageth another cause of this affliction that about that time one of the Egyptian Priests foretold unto the King of one that should be borne who when hee once came to yeeres should worke much harme to the Egyptians and greatly exalt the people of Israel lib. 2. antiquit cap. 5. But this being his conjecture no such thing here insinuated by Moses may be more safely rejected than credited QUEST X. Of the hard affliction of the Israelites 12. THerefore they did set taskmasters over them c. 1. Divers wayes were the Israelites most grievously oppressed in Egypt 1. Philo writeth that they were caused to carrie burthens above their strength that they were forced to worke night and day that the same were constrained to be both workmen and servers they were employed in making brick digging and building insomuch that many of them died under their burthens and were not suffered to be buried and beside the most cruell men were set to be their taskmasters Phil. lib. 1. de vita Mosis 2.
for that heathenish conceit of the Philosopher that vertue is not properly said to be in women it is contrary to that position of the Apostle that in Christ there is neither male nor female Galath 3.28 the spirit of God can plant grace and vertue in the hearts of women as well as of men nay often the Lord chuseth the weake things of this world to confound the mighty things 1. Cor. 1.27 And the examples of so many vertuous and good women in the Scriptures of Sara Rebecca Anna the Shunamite and the rest in the old of Marie Anna Martha Lydia Dorcas and many other in the new Testament doe evidently confute that prophane paradox of the Philosopher 4. And to deliver the regiment of women from the Cardinals vile and impure slaunder this country and nation of ours as is hath found the government of a woman the worst in the late Marian persecutions when more good men and women Saints of God were put to death than in any three Kings reigne beside so have we seene it in the next change the best of all other Princes reignes that went before famous Queene Elizabeths government as for flourishing peace honourable fame and name enriching of the Land subduing of forraine enemies enacting of good lawes may be compared with the reigne of any former Kings So for the advancing of true religion increasing of learning propagating the Gospell none of her predecessors came neere her That as the refining of coine being reduced from base money to pure silver and gold was her honour in the Civill State so the purging of religion according to the purity of the word of God in the Church shall bee her everlasting fame in the world and is her eternall reward with God 4. Confut. That Christ shall have no Iudges under him at the latter day but shall be the only Iudge himselfe Vers. 22. LEt them judge all small causes Origen upon these words hath this private conceit Hanc sâ—guram Iudicum non solum in hoc seculo sed etiam in futuro servandam c. 〈◊〉 this forme of Iudges shall be observed not only in this world but in the next And then he alleageth that text Matth. 18.28 That when the Sonne of man shall sit in the throne of Majesty yee which have followed me in the regeneration shall sit upon twelve seats and judge the twelve tribes of Israel Whereupon he inferreth that Christ at the day of judgement shall appoint other Judges beside himselfe Qui judicent populum de mineribus causiâ— c. Which shall judge the people in smaller causes referring the greater to him The Rhemisnis and Romanistes whose manner is to scrape all the refuse of the Fathers affirme likewise That the faithfull shall judge and give sentence with Christ at the latter day wresting the same text in Matthew to the same purpose Contra. 1. The Apostles and Saints are said indeed to judge the world but not in that sense as Christ is said to be the Judge of the world but as he saith his Word shall judge them at the latter day Ioh. 12.48 that is be a witnesse against them so the Word preached by the Saints in their life and their conversation following the same shall be a witnesse against the world and so their condemnation like as in the processe of judgement here in earth the evidence that is brought in and the witnesses produced are said to condemne the guilty partie and to judge them though the Judge only give sentence Thus Ambrose fitly expoundeth this phrase Iudicabunt Sancti hunc mundum quia exemplo fidei illorum perfidia mundi damnabitur The Saints shall judge the world because by example of their faith their perfidiousnesse shall be condemned 2. For otherwise if Christ should observe the same forme which Moses did to appoint coadjutors because he alone sufficed not this were to derogate from his all sufficient power who needeth not as man any assistants or fellow helpers Vers. 22. Every great matter let them bring to thee Upon this president the Romanistes would ground the papall reservation of cases from whom no appeale say they is to be made as there was not from Moses Tostat. quaest 11. in 18. cap. Exod. Contra. 1. There is great difference betweene the reservation of matters to Moses and of certaine cases to the Pope for Moses was set over but one nation which at this time encamped together within the compasse of not many miles and so they might with ease bring the weighty causes to him But the Pope challengeth to be the supreme Judge over all the world and so without infinite trouble the greater causes cannot be brought unto him 2. Moses judgement was sought for because hee could not erre having often conference with God to direct him as the Pope hath not and this Testatus confesseth Romanus pontifex c. The Roman Bishop though he have great power sometime is not a man very vertuous and though he be because he hath not God present to answer unto all his demands facilius errare potest he may more easily erre therefore that is but a foppish and fawning conclusion of the Canonists that the Pope hath Omnia jura in scrinio pectoris All lawes in his breast 3. Whereas Iethro intended in this device the peoples ease not to goe farre for their causes and Moses ability to performe his office neither of these inconveniences is helped in making appeales to Rome for neither is the Pope able to amend all such causes and the people would be infinitely molested to be hurried to Rome 4. And if it were not for the advantage of the Court and Consistory of Rome they would desire to bee eased rather of than cumbred with such appeales But Moses herein only sought the profit of Gods people not his owne Simler 6. Morall Observations 1. Obs. To take heed of idle and vaine talke Vers. 8. THen Moses told his father in law c. Moses did conferre with Iethro about the wondrous workes of God which the Lord had wrought for them Vnde arguuntur hi qui vanis colloquiis delectantur They then are reproved which are delighted with vaine talke Ferus Which may serve as a good motive in our dayes to cut off idle if not very prophane conference when wee meet remembring ever that of idle words we must give an account B. Babington 2. Observ. Workes must be joyned with faith Vers. 12. THen Iethro tooke burnt offerings c. Having beene thankfull in words now he addeth deeds for S. Iames calleth that a dead faith where workes want if we joyne both these together as Iethro did we shall fully give assurance both to others and to our selves of our true faith B. Babington 3. Obs. That we should doe all our workes as in Gods sight Vers. 12. THey came to eat bread with Moses father in law before God Hereupon Origen well noteth Sancti manducant bibunt in conspectu Dei c. The
their mouth against heaven making the creature faulty and culpable whereas God created all things good tract 4. in Matth. But if it shall be objected that many things fall out according to the predictions of Astrologers I briefly answer that it commeth so to passe sometimes not by the dexterity of their wit and knowledge but either by the subtilty of Sathan that foretelleth what he himselfe is permitted to worke or by the credulity of such as consult with them whereby their affections give way unto the effect or by the secret disposing of Gods providence that such things should fall out for the probation of the faithfull and further confusion of misbeleevers QVEST. XXI Great Whales how said to be created Vers. 21. GOd created great whales 1. We need not because God is said here to create the whales which were made out of the water to have recourse unto that indigested matter which was made the first day of nothing Calvin So not only that is said to be created which is made of nothing but that also which is made new out of some matter as man is said afterward to bee created yet made out of the earth 2. But we deride that Jewish fable that God when he had made two great whales lest the increase of so huge a creature might tend to the destruction of the rest he did geld the male and salted the female to be meat for the just in the next world As though God did not foresee every thing before it was made and approved it being made and beside the Lord gave a blessing to all fishes and so to the whales among the rest to increase and multiply Mercer QVEST. XXII Of the great Whales Vers. 21. GReat Whales the word turmin signifieth a serpent dragon or great fish And this epithete great is not added without cause for the whale or great fish is the greatest of all living creatures Iob 41.24 In the earth there is none like him It is almost incredible what some writers report of the hugenesse of these creatures the Hebrewes write that whales have beene found of 500. stadia or furlongs in length Mercer Some have appeared in the waters of the bignesse of Islands Muscul. Pliny writeth that in the Indian sea there are certaine fish called balaenae whirlpooles quatuor jugerum of three or foure akors or furlongs in length and certaine long fish called pristes of 200. cubits and eâ—les in the riuer Ganges of 300. feet in length lib. 9. cap. 30. The same Author citeth Iuba King of Mauritania who maketh mention writing to Caius Caesar sonne of Augustus of whales in the Arabick coasts of 600. foot in length and 300. in breadth lib. 16. c. 40. Aelianus also writeth lib. 15. c. 21. that Alexander found in a caue in India a dragon supposed to be 70. cubits long they saw only his head out of the caues mouth not daring with the whole â—oast to approach neerer whose eyes appeared to be of the bignesse of a Macedonian target or shield These strange reports are found in forraine histories the truth whereof I will leave to the credit of the authors and the judgement of the readers Ambrose saith aequalia montibus corpora habere praedicantur the Whales are reported to have bodies equall to Mountaines Hexemer li. 5. c. 10. Certainly it is evident out of Scripture that these creatures of the sea are of a wonderfull bignesse as it appeareth both by that description Iob 41. His jawes are likened to doores v. 5. his scales to shields v. 6. hee maketh the sea to boile like a pot v. 2 2. As also by the story of Ionas where we reade that the Prophet was swallowed whole of a great fish and cast up againe And not to search further our owne Chronicles make mention of great fishes that have been taken as of one that was in length 22. yards being 12. foot broad betweene the eyes some of his ribs were 16. foot long his tongue 15. foot long three men might stand upright one upon another in the opening of the jawes Stow ann Elizab. 16. QVEST. XXIII Whether the fowles were made out of the water or earth Vers. 21. WHich the waters brought forth c. and every feathered fowle c. By these words it seemeth that the fowles had their beginning out of the water but the contrary is affirmed c. 2. v. 19. So the Lord God formed of the earth every beast of the field and every fowle of heaven c. To reconcile these places we neither affirme that the fowles were made of the thinner part of the water extenuated into the aire as Augustine lib. 3. in Genes ad lit c. 3. and Rupertus nor yet that they were made of mud or slime and so partly of earth partly of water as the Hebrewes not yet that they were made of the element of the water as Eugubinus in Cosmopeia nor yet that the fowles were made part of the water and part of the earth as wee see there are two sorts of them some that live in the water and some that keepe the land as Vatablus But we thinke that the fowles were created onely out of the earth Gen. 2.19 neither is the contrary affirmed here that the waters brought them forth but the Lord saith let the fowle fâ—ye upon the earth v. 20. so Iun. Cajetan Catharin QVEST. XXIV How and wherefore God is said to blesse the fish Vers. 22. ANd God blessed them c. 1. God is not said before to have blessed the herbs and trees as here hee blesseth these living creatures because the generation of living things whether it be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in bringing forth young egges or wormes is a more admirable worke of nature than is seene in the increase of plants 1. In that the beasts of the earth are not blessed as here the fishes and fowles it is not because of the serpent that was to be accursed as the Hebrewes imagine but for that the abundance and number of the fishes exceedeth the other yet it must bee understood that God also blessed the rest though it bee not expressed 3. The Lord here first of all speaketh to the creatures because now he beginneth to create living things Iun. hee speaketh to them as he did to the whale to cast up Ionas not by any syllabicall voyce but by his omnipotent will and power which the creature forthwith obeyeth Mercer 4. The fishes are said to fill the waters the fowle to multiply because the fishes are more in number and they only live in the waters but the fowles live not only vpon the earth but other creatures beside 5. By the waters in the seas all other gatherings together of waters are understood but the Seas are named as the principall wherein there is greatest store of fish Iun. 6. Eugubinus here is deceived that thinketh that the fishes began to rise out of the water as soone as the Seas were gathered together and so every
Gen. 7.2 where mention is made of cleane and uncleane beasts which difference was observed before the floud and continued by tradition not in regard onâ—y of sacrifice but also for their eating as it may appeare in the reviving of this law afterward Levit. 11.47 That there may be difference betweene the uncleane and cleane and betweene the beast that may be eaten and the beast that may not be eaten that then is said by the definition of the law to bee a cleane beast that might be eaten that uncleane that might not be eaten So I conclude this question with the sentence of Ambrose Quicoâ—vivium adornat c. he that prepareth a feast doth kill his oxen and fat cattell before and then biddeth his guests so the Lord ante homini caeterorum animalium praeparavit epulas before prepared the meats of other beasts and then as his friend invitavit ad convivium bid him to the banket Epist. 37. His opinion is that the cattell were provided of God to bee meat for man Mercerus is of another judgement that the eating of flesh was generally forborne before the floud which is also the opinion of the Hebrewes 1. both because it was necessary for the preservation of the kinds of cattell 2. as also herbs being then of greater vertue and strength before the floud and after might suffice for mans sustenance Mercer in v. 29.1 ch Gen. But these reasons conclude not 1. Like as after the floud when liberty was granted to eat flesh as the greene herb yet they did forbeare for a time till the breed of Cattell was increased upon the like reason before the floud immediately after the creation they might abstaine for a time from the eating of flesh but not altogether 2. The great vertue and strength of herbs concludeth that the eating of flesh was not so generall or necessary then as afterward but the whole abstinence from all kind of eating of flesh it concludeth not I rather preferre Musculus opinion who upon the sacrificing of beasts and wearing of their skins inferreth that beasts were killed before the floud and consequently their flesh eaten in 1. Gen. v. 29. 4. The didactica that is places of doctrine observed out of this first chapter 1. Doct. Of the Trinity proved 1. AGainst the Jewes that deny the Trinity and the Sabellians which affirme but one person in the Deity we have evident proofe in this chapter vers 1. where the word God or in the hebrew elohim gods is joyned to a verbe of the singular number bara created noting the singularity of the Godhead and plurality of the persons But exception is taken against this argument by Cajetanus for the which he is reproved of Catharinus another Popish writer lib. 4. animad ver and by Bellarmine lib. 2. de Christ. c. 6. for that it is the use of the Hebrewes to joyne words of the plurall with a verbe of the singular number upon which reason this collection is misliked also by Calvin and Mercerus but it may be replied that it is not the use of the Hebrewes to put in the plurall number that which hath no plurality in nature as to say Gods if there were but one person in the godhead But yet this argument for the Trinity is more evident vers 26. Let us make man after our image c. where God neither speaketh to himselfe saying let us make not I will make neither yet to the earth as though that wrought together with God nor to the Angels for God only created man vers 27. nor yet doth God speake in the plurall number according to the fashion of great men for that use of speeâ—h was not yet knowne but in this forme of speech is set forth the consultation of the blessed Trinity the Father Sonne and holy Ghost 2. Doct. That the heavens and earth had a beginning 2. OUt of the first verse wee conclude that the world had a beginning and that it was created by God contrary to the opinion of Xenophanes who held the world to bee without beginning or end and of the Epicures who did impiously hold that the world was made by chance by the concurrence of bodies together and of Aristotle among the heathen and Eugubinus in Cosmopeia among Christians who affirme Coelum empyraeum the highest and supreme heaven to have beene eternall Likewise wee condemne the folly of the lying Aegyptians and Chaldees who extend the age of the world many thousand yeares before it was made The Aegyptians boasted that they had a continuall succession of Kings 70. thousand yeares Augustine maketh mention of a letter that Alexander writ to his mother Olympias wherein he reporteth that hee heard of an Aegyptian Priest that the Kingdome of the Assyrians exceeded 5000. yeares of the Persians 8000. yeares Pompeius Mela writeth that they have chronicles of 13000. yeares Diogenes Laertius from Vulcan to Alexander accounteth 48860. yeares August lib. 12. de civitate dei cap. 10. The Aegyptians also reckon 100. thousand yeares since they first learned Astrology de civitat dei 18. c. 40. All these are lying fables seeing by just computation of yeares it is found that the world hath not yet continued since the first beginning thereof 6000. yeares 3. Doct. The word from the beginning 3. Vers. 3. THen God said hence Servetus would confirme his wicked error that the word was not from the beginning because the heavens and earth are here said to bee made before God spake But wee have an evident testimony that the word was in the beginning with God and that nothing was made without it Ioh. 1 2 3. and seeing the light was made by this word the word must needs be before the light the cause goeth before the effect so that the heavens and earth were in the beginning made by the word of God but in this place first onely it is added And God said because now more manifestly the wisdome and power of God appeareth in the distinction and perfection of the creatures which before were confused together Calvin Mercer Further another heresie of Servetus is confuted who thinketh that this was a new quality in God to speake which spake not before for this speaking in God was no quality in God as in man but it signifieth only his will and decree though Ab. Ezra doe without cause finde fault with R. Saadian for so expounding this word of God was nothing but Gods decree and commandement whereby the heavens also and earth were first made Psal. 148.5 so that then God thus spake also Calvin Mercer 4. Doct. Of the different beginning of the soules of man and beasts 4. Vers. 24 LEt the earth bring forth every living thing animam viventem the living soule from hence it was gathered that not only the bodies of bruit beasts but their life also and as it were soule were derived out of the earth whereby a manifest difference appeareth betweene the originall of mans soule which was breathed of God
blesse them that blesse thee Iun. 3. Thus temporall blessings more abounded under the Law when as yet the rich blessings of heavenly things in Christ were not manifestly revealed 4. This returning of Abraham rich out of Egypt was a type and figure of the rich estate of the Israelites at their returne out of Egypt Mercer QVEST. II. The cause of contention betweene Abraham and Lots servants Vers. 7. THere was debate c. 1. This debate falleth out that it might be as a bridle to Abraham not to set his minde too much upon his wealth and prosperity Calvin 2. The cause of their falling out Philo thinketh to be the insolencie of Lots servants that were borne out by their master the Latine text readeth as though Abraham and Lots flockes were all one and kept together betweene the shepherd of the flocks of Abraham and Lot but in the Hebrew the word is repeated betweene the shepherds of Abraham and the shepherd of Lot Neither was the cause as the Hebrewes imagine for that Abrahams servants being more righteous reproved Lots servants for feeding the corne fields and invading other mens grounds It is like therefore they contended for want of pasture because the land was not sufficient for them both vers 6 Oecolamp Iunius as also for their watering places which in that drie Countrey were very scant so we reade that Isaacks servants and the Philistims contended about the Weâ—â— which they digged Genes 26. Perer. 3. It is added the Cananite was in the land not for that Abraham feared lest if their flocks kept together their wealth should appeare the more or for that Abraham should be forced to make them Umpires and Arbitrators of this contention but to shew that by reason that the Cananites possessed the better grounds Abraham and Lot were driven to a strait for their cattell as also it is a reason that moved Abraham to breake off strife lest it might have beene an offence to the heathen QUEST III. How Abraham giveth Lot his choice Vers. 9. IF thou wilt take the left hand c. 1. Abraham being the elder and more worthy person departeth from his right for peace sake and offereth the choice to Lot Muscul. from whence as Rupertus thinketh this custome did grow that in parting of inheritance major dividat minor eligat the elder should divide the younger chuse 2. For the left hand the Chalde readeth the North for it should seeme that Abraham having pitched his tents toward the East had the North on his left hand the South on the right 3. And the meaning also may be this that they would not goe farre asunder but be still helpfull one to another as the right hand to the left Perer. QVEST. IV. Of the situation of Sodome and Gomorrha Vers. 10. LOt lift up his eyes and saw all the Plaine c. 1. He could not see all the Plaine of Iordan at once but that part of it where the pentapolis i. those five Cities stood 2. Sodome and Gomorrha are named as the principall because they exceeded in all iniquity whereas there are five Cities in all their Country was pleasant before they were destroyed by reason of the overflowing of the sweet waters of Jordan at this time when Moses did write it was inhabitable by reason of the pestilent and stinking smell but at Lots first comming this her which was twenty yeares before the destruction it was a fruitfull Countrey 3. Like unto the Paradise wherein Adam was created which though never any mortall man saw but Adam and Eve yet it might appeare what it was by Moses description This pleasant Vallie then was watered with Jordan as Paradise with Euphrates and Egypt with Nilus though Egypt were watered with much more labour Deut. 11.10 4. The words are not so to be read as though it were like that part of Egypt as one goeth to Zoar for there were many more Townes and Cities situate betweene Egypt and Zoar at this time called Bela Gen. â—4 2 which is one of the five Cities as Vatablus readeth and Lyranus but rather this is the right construction to joyne the last clause as one goeth to Zoar to the first part of the sentence so that the sense is this that that part of the Plaine as one goeth to Zoar as more fruitfull than the rest was like to Paradise and Egypt sic Muscul. Iun. Mercer Per. QVEST. V. Of the River Iordan the beginning and end thereof IOrdan 1. This floud taking beginning from the Mountaine Libanus ariseth out of two fountaines called Dan and Jor which joyned together make the name Jordan 2. Plinie and Solinus derive Jordan from the fountaine Paneas but Ioseph fetcheth it further off from a round fountaine or spring head called Phiale from whence it runneth under the ground to the fountaine Paneas and that Philip Tetrach of Trachonitis found it by this experiment by casting into the spring Phiale certaine light stuffe which came out againe in the other spring head Paneas 3. This River Jordan after it hath runne some fifteene mile falleth into the Lake or Fenne Samechonitis which is the same that is called the waters of Meroâ— where Iosua encountred with King Iaban and his fellowes Iosu. 11.7 then passing along by Corazin and Capernaum it falleth into the Lake Genezereth and so having continued a current of an hundred miles in length it falleth into the dead or salt Sea 4. After Jordan is entred into this Lake it loseth the sweetnesse of the waters being mixed with the salt Sea and loseth also the name Jordan so that they seeme to be in a great errour that affirme Jordan to runne into the ground before it come at this dead Sea called the Lake Asphaltitis or of brimstone for the Scripture testifieth the contrary Iosu. 3.16 where the neither waters of Jordan are said to runne into the salt Sea 5. It may be that before Sodome and Gomorrha were destroyed when there was no salt Lake but a Plaine Jordan had some other current but now it is swallowed up of that Lake and hath no issue forth againe but passeth by a gulph into the earth 6. This Jordan is the noblest of all Rivers because of that miracle in the passing over of the Israelites the parting of the waters againe by the Prophets Elias and Elizeus the healing of Naâ—mans leprosie the baptisme of our blessed Saviour ex Perer. QVEST. VI. Of Lots departure from Abraham Vers. 11. THen Lot chose unto him all the Plaine c. 1. As Abrahams humility appeareth in offering Lot his choice so in Lot appeareth some want of duty in that he would choose first Calvin 2. He maketh an inconsiderate choice preferring the goodnesse of the ground before the badnesse of the people and afterward Lot did smart for his choice being carried away captive 3. Thus God turneth this division and separation of Abraham and Lot to good 1. That hereby Lot by his good example and admonitions might preach to the
THe wickednesse of the Amorites is not yet full c. 1. The Amorites are named whereas there were other people of the Canaanites because they were the most mighty among the rest both in power and stature of body whose height was like the height of Cedars Amos 2.9 and they excelled in wickednesse and therefore the Prophet setting forth the wickednesse of Israel saith their father was an Amorite Ezech. 16.2 2. Neither did the punishment of this people depend upon any fatall necessity before the which they could not be punished but upon Gods will and purpose who would not cut them off at the first but in his just judgement permitted them till they came to the height of iniquity 3. Some by sinnes here understand the punishment of sinne which God suspended for a time but the other sense is better to take the word properly for the wickednesse of that people which was not yet ripe which God deferreth to punish both to make them excusable that despise so long a time of repentance and to justifie his owne judgements which he sendeth not without just cause 4. And there are foure arguments or marks of the ripenesse of sinne and the nearenesse of Gods judgements 1. the quality of the sinnes themselves when they are such as are directly against God as superstition Idolatry the offering up of their owne children in the fire against the law of nature as in unnatural uncleannesse such as reigned among the Sodomites against humane society as in cruelty and oppression as in the old world Gen. 6.11 2. The generality of sin when not a few but the whole multitude are corrupt so in Sodome were not to bee found ten righteous men 3. The impudency of sinners that are not ashamed openly to transgresse and to boast of their sinne as the Prophet complaineth of the Israelites they have declared their sinne as Sodome they hide them not Isa. 3.9 4. When they are incorrigible and past amendment as Pharaoh and the Aegyptians when they were not humbled with those ten grievous plagues the Lord overthrew them in the red sea Perer. QVEST. XVII Why Euphrates is called the great river Vers. 18. FRom the river of Aegypt to the great river of Euphrates 1. Euphrates is called the great river not as the Talmudists thinke because it confined the holy land but either for that it was the greatest river in Asia as Danubius is in Europe Nilus in Africa in India Ganges and Indus or for that it was one of the rivers that came through Paradise as for the same cause Tigris or Hiddekel is called the great river Dan. 10.4 2. The river of Aegypt is not Nilus as R. Salomon and Mercer for the bound of Palestina never extended so farre but it is a river which runneth out of Nilus betweene Pelusium and Palestina thorow a great desart and falleth into the Mediterranean sea this river is called Sithor as Aben Ezra of the troubled and blacke water Iosuah 13.3 which it borroweth of Nilus which for the same cause is called melas black it is termed also the river of the wildernesse Amos 6.14 the same which the Septuagint call Rinocolura Isa. 27.12 because it did run along by that city so called of the cutting or slitting of noses which punishment King Artisanes inflicted upon malefactors and sent them to inhabite that city Diodorus Siculus lib. 2. and of this opinion is Epiphanius that this river of Aegypt is the river Rinocolura to whom Lunius assenteth Iosu. 13.3 It seemeth to bee an arme of the river Nilus commonly called Carabus which is distant some five dayes journey from Gaza toward Aegypt Perer. ex Masio in Iosua 13. QVEST. XVIII How the land of Canaan is said to be given to Abraham Vers. 18. VNto thy seed c. But v. 7. the Lord said to give thee this land to inherit it and cap. 13.15 both are joyned together I will give it unto thee and thy seed for ever c. Now seeing Abraham had not so much as the breadth of a foot Act. 7.4 how was this land given to Abraham 1. Some thinke it was given to Abraham in right to his seed in possession or to him because it was given to his seed for as the sonne belongeth to the father so what is given or promised to the son concerneth the father 3. but therefore is this land said to be given to Abraham though hee never had possession thereof but his seed because for his sake and the love of God toward him it was given to his seed as Moses saith because he loved thy fathers therefore hath he chose their seed after them Deut. 4.37 QVEST. XIX Whether the Israelites ever enjoyed the whole countrey Euphrates FRom the river of Aegypt to the river Euphrates c. But whereas the land of Canaan is otherwise confined Numb 34.8 where it is not extended beyond Hamath which is a great way on this side Euphrates and the usuall limitation and border was from Dan to Beersheba 1 King 4.25 which as in length not above 160. miles and in breadth from Joppe to Bethlem not above 46. miles as Hierome witnesseth epist. 129. ad Dardan a great question is here moved how their borders could reach to Euphrates 1. Some thinke that there were two countries promised to Abrahams seede the lesse of Canaan which they possessed and a larger extending to Euphrates upon condition if they walked in obedience which condition because they performed not they never injoyed that countrey sic Hier. like as in the Gospell saith he the Kingdome of heaven is promised to the obedient but if they performe not obedience they shall misse of the reward nequaquam erit culpa in promittente sed in me qui proâ—issâ—â— acceperâ— non merui and yet the fault shall not be in him that promiseth but in mee that am not worthy to receive the promise Hieron ibid. to whom subscribeth Andreas Masius in c. 1. Iosue 2. Augustine is of another opinion that the promised land was of two sorts the lesse which comprehended the land of Canaan which the Israelites possessed under Iosua the other which reached to Euphrates which was not under their dominion till David and Salomons time who reigned over all Kingdomes from the river that is Euphrates and from Tipsack which was a City upon that river afterward called Amphipolis even unto Azzah or Gaza 1. King 4.21.24 August qu. 21. in Iosue to whom agree Cajetane and Oleaster and Iunius upon this place and this seemeth to bee the better opinion for wee are not to thinke but that this promise made so solemnely to Abraham accordingly tooke effect 3. Whereas it is objected that all the country to the river Euphrates was never given unto Israel no not in Salomons time because they did not expell thence the inhabitants and plant the Israelites there as they had done in Canaan First Augustine answereth that concerning the Cities which were a farre off they were commanded if they would
little inferiour as it is in the Psalme 8. Thou hast made him a little lower than the Angels 4. But if man be compared with the omnipotent and eternall God hee is but as dust and ashes before him and indeed as nothing as the Prophet saith Behold the nations are as a drop of a bucket and as the dust of the ballance all nations are before him as nothing and they are counted to him lesse than nothing and vanity Isa. 40.15.17 therefore Gregory saith well Sancti quanto magis interna divinitatis conspiciunt tanto magis se nihil esse cognoscunt c. the Saints the more they consider the divine nature of God so much the more they acknowledge themselves to be nothing 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Angels are not to be adored or worshipped Vers. 2. HEe bowed himselfe to the ground From hence it cannot bee concluded that Angels are to bee adored and worshipped as the vulgar latine readeth for Abraham supposed these to be men and not Angels and therefore it is but a civill kind of reverence which hee giveth unto them otherwise though Abraham should have forgotten himselfe in yeelding unto them adoration yet would not they have accepted it as the Angell forbiddeth Iohn to worship him Revel 22.8 Thomas Aquinas answer that Iohn would have given unto the Angell the divine and highest kinde of worship due unto God and therefore was forbidden is insufficient for this were to make so great an Apostle ignorant what duty was only to be yeelded to God and it is misliked by Pererius one of that side And whereas he findeth out an other shift that this adoration exhibited by Iohn was not unlawfull but inconvenient to bee done in respect of the great excellency to the which man was now advanced by Christ this is as slender an answer as the other for in that the Angell forbiddeth Iohn to worship him because hee was his fellow servant it sheweth that it was not only inconvenient but unlawfull also for one servant to worship another Iohn then adoreth the Angell not of ignorance but of forgetfulnesse being in an ecstasis of minde and ravished with the glory of the Angell for if the Apostle had not forgotten himselfe he would not twice have failed herein Apoc. 19.10.23.9 2. Confut. The foresight of our obedience not the cause of the increase of grace Vers. 19. I Know him that hee will command his sonnes c. Pererius here noteth that God foreseeing Abrahams godlinesse and obedience doth bestow upon him these great benefits among the which was this revealing of his councell concerning Sodome whereas the onely reason as Vatablus well noteth why the Lord doth accumulate and multiply his graces upon his servants is his owne fatherly love toward them who having once made choyce of them doth for ever love them for what else doth the Lord here make mention of but his owne graces vouchsafed to Abraham it was not then any merit in Abraham that procured this increase of graces but Gods favour who leaveth not his but addeth graces upon graces till he have accomplished their salvation Calvin 3. Confut. Chrysost. Errour of freewill HEre further may bee noted Chrysostomes errour who saith that Abraham ex seipso scientia sibi naeturaliter insita ad tantum virtutis fastigium pervenit of himselfe and his naturall knowledge did attaine to such an high degree of vertue Pererius would thus excuse Chrysostome that by saying of himselfe c. he excludeth all externall helps by the instruction of other and not the secret revelation of Gods spirit and supernaturall gift of faith If Chrysostome could be so handsomely expounded for mine owne part I would be glad but who seeth not that his words carry another sense for the scripture useth to set these two one against another by grace and of our selves Eph. 2.8 By grace are yee saved through faith not of your selves if Abraham then was made righteous of himselfe it was not by grace The Scripture also sheweth that God first called Abraham from his idolatrous countrey before he did yet any commendable worke Gen 12.1 Wherefore all Abrahams righteousnesse depended upon the calling of God as Chrysostome in another place hath this sound saying quamvis fidem adducas à vocatione eam accepisti what though thou hast faith thou hast received it from thy calling 4. Confut. There is no preparation in a mans nature to his calling Vers. 19. THat the Lord may bring upon Abraham c. Hence Chrysostome noteth that Abraham primum in omnibus virtutis suae dedit specimen sic divinum meruit praesidium did first shew every where an example of vertue and so merited the divine assistance Pererius two wayes would justifie Chrysostome 1. he saith he speaketh not of merit of condignity but of a sufficient and fit preparation only unto grace 2. or hee meaneth not that Abraham merited the first grace of justification but onely the amplification or increase of it Perer. in 18. Genes disput Contra. 1. It is Gods mercy and love which first calleth us before we can be any way prepared thereunto there is no fitnesse aptnesse or congruity in our nature but all is of grace so Moses saith because the Lord loved thy fathers therefore he chose their seed after them Deut. 4.37 Gods love was the first motive for the choyce and calling of Abraham And againe seeing Terah Abrahams father was an Idolater under whom Abraham was brought up and by all likelihood infected that way before the Lord called him what preparation could there be in Abraham or provocation to his calling 2. Neither was the beginning only of Gods favour toward Abraham of grace the increase thereof by merit for Iacob being of Abrahams faith confesseth that he was not worthy or lesse than the least of Gods mercy Gen. 32.10 he confesseth that none of Gods graces neither first or last were conferred upon him for his worthinesse therefore Calvin well noteth that this word that consequentiam magis notat quam causam doth note rather a consequence than a cause Where the Lord findeth his servants faithfull and obedient he will increase them with further graces not merited by their obedience but added in mercy according to the gracious promise of God that vouchsafeth of his fatherly goodnesse so to crowne the faithfull service of his children For otherwise if our service and obedience bee weighed in it selfe it deserveth nothing as our Saviour saith When we have done all things which are commanded we must say we are unprofitable servants wee have dine that which was our duty to doe Luke 17.10 Morall observations 1. Moral The commendation of hospitality Vers. 2. HE ran to meet them from the tent doore Ambrose here well noteth non otiosus sedit Abraham in ostio tabernaculi c. Abraham did not sit idlely in the doore of his tabernacle sed longe aspicit nec aspexisse contentus cōcurrit obviam festin◠vit
5. to 10. 3. The punishment of blindnesse upon the Sodomites vers 11. Secondly the overthrow and destruction of Sodome is described 1. the cause God rained from heavenâ— 2 The manner fire and brimstone 3. The lamentable effect the Cities were overthrowne 2. The divers readings v. 1. Lot sate in the gaâ—es of the City H. gates of Sodome caet worshipped with his face to the ground H. S. C. bowed himselfe with his face T.P.G.B. heb Shacah to bow or humble the body v. 6. that we may company with them S. know them caet v. 9. he came in as a stranger H. came in to dwell H. one came to sojourne C. P. he came alone as a stranger G. he came as one to sojourne B. this man but one came to sojourne T. heb eechad one v. 14. which married his daughters S.B.P. which were to marry his daughters H.T.G.C. v. 15. in the punishment of the City T.G. sinne of the City sic heb gnaven v. 16. and set them without the City Sept. have not this clause as the rest have v. 17. lest I be overtaken S. lest I perish caet v. 19. I cannot be saved in the mountaine S.C.H.B. I cannot escape to the mountaine P. T. G. heb malat to escape so it is taken v. 17. escape to the mountaine v 20. is it not a little one meaning City cater is not res perixigna a small matter I. which I aske T. it seemeth rather to be referred to the City segnai little whereof the City was called tsegnar or Zoar. my soule shall live because of thee S. my soule shall live caeter v. 21. I have admired thy face in this word S. I have received thy face in this thing caet nasah to receive T. interp I have respect of thee or unto thee v. 26. his wife looked backward S. looked behind her H. C. Lots wife behind him G. or following him looked backe B. his wife looked backe behind him P.T. sic heb for Lot went after his wife to set her forwards 28. flame arised S. sparkes H. smoke cae chitâ—r smoke v. 33. he knew not when he slept and when he rose S. when he lay downe and rose up câ—t 38. Called his name Ammon the sonne of my sonne in law S. Ammon 1. the sonne of my people H. called him the sonne of my people C. called him Ben Ammi câ—t sic heb The explanation of doubts QVEST. I. Why Lot sate in the gate of the City Vers. 1. LOt sate at the gate of the City c. 1. Neither as a Judge because hee sate in the gate which was the place of judgement 2. Neither to meet his shepherds with their flockes 3. But Lot there sate as Abraham in his tent doore to take occasion to entertaine strangers as also knowing the wicked use of the City to preserve them from their rage and violence Calvin QVEST. II. Of the 2. Angels that came in the evening Vers. 1. IN the evening came two Angels These two were not the sonne and the holy Ghost as some thinke and that God the father staid still with Abraham but they were as they are called Angels 2. They are two nor for that one had commission to destroy Sodome the other to deliver Lot or as though one Angell had not sufficed for this businesse but they were both joyned in commission as it pleased God 3. These were Angels and not Prophets which are also called men because they were Angels in nature and men in their habit 4. They stayed not 5. houres in the way as the Hebrewes thinke but Sodome was of such distance from Abrahams tent that the journey might well aske 5. or 6. houres 5. They came about eventide to Lot at noone and in the cleare day to Abraham they were to him messengers of joy but now Ministers of judgement 6. Lot bowed himselfe upon his face aphim his nose touched the ground which is not added here and not before concerning Abrahams obeysance as though Abraham being the more worthy person would not bow so low as Rabbi Carus but it is added ex abundanti Mercerus QVEST. III. Of Lots inviting of the Angels into his house Vers. 2. SEemy Lords 1. It is but a curious observation that adonai is here written with patach as being but a civill salutation and before c. 18.3 with camets as being then properly spoken of God for neither did Abraham know them at the first to bee Angels nor yet is the word in most copies there written with cametz 2. Neither doth Lot say turne aside into my house as by the posterne or privy gate for feare of the Sodomites as Rasi for their going in was well knowne unto them 3. It is also a curious note that Lot would have them first goe in and then wash that they might not bee seene washing in the streets 4. Neither doe the Angels at the first refuse that Lot might not come in danger for lodging of strangers which was publikely forbidden as some thinke in Sodome But they civilly refused to make triall of Lots humanity as for the same cause our Saviour did the like to make his two Disciples more earnest Luke 24. Mercer QVEST. IV. Whether the children and all the people of Sodome came together Vers. 4. FRom the young to the old all the people from all places 1. Not such children only as were of discretion came together Cajetane but even the youth of the City corrupt by the evill example of the rest flocked together with the rest Calvin as wee see that children where an unruly company is assembled doe run on heapes 2. Neither as Lyranus and Tostatus is it an hyperbolicall speech that all the people came together but it is most like that this was a generall concourse of the whole City all besetting Lots house some nearer some further off Pererius 3. Some thinke that the Sodomites would admit no strangers to come in among them and therefore they were so earnest against these young men for whereas there are 4. properties among men 1. mine is mine thine is thine 2. mine is thine and thine is mine 3. mine is mine and thine is mine 4. mine is thine and thine is thine the 1. of naturall men the 2. of populare the 3. of cruell men the 4. of godly the Sodomites were of the first and third ranke being unmercifull to others all having to themselves Mercer QVEST. V. Of the beastly and immoderate lust of the Sodomites Vers. 5. BRing them to us that we may know them c. 1. Their meaning is not that they would know what guests hee had received into his house 2. Neither did they by a mannerly tearme conceale their vile lust Calvin 3. But they were come to that impudency that they were not ashamed publikely to proclaime their wickednesse but the Scripture setteth downe an unhonest thing by an hohonest name 4. And this seemeth to have beene extraordinary and not usuall thus to beset Lots
seed and beleeved they should possesse it in time 2. Abraham had great store of cattell treasure and houshold and of other goods which he gave unto Isaack Gen. 25.5 bestowing onely gifts upon his other sonnes 3. She desired that Isaack might be heire of Abrahams name and bloud as the Lord faith afterward that his seed should be called in Isaack QUEST VII Whether Hagar carried Ismael upon her shoulder Vers. 14. PVtting it upon her shoulder and the childe also 1. It is not like that Ismael being now a youth of twenty yeares old was laid upon his mothers shoulders to beare as the Septuagint read or that Abraham was constrained to binde Ismael with cords and lay him upon his mother for v. 18. she is bid to take him by the hand not to lay him upon her shoulder and whereas shee is said to cast him from her this was done not out of her armes but animo in her mind and affection Augustine Iunius Or taking him into her lap being sicke she after despairing of his health put him from her Mercer whereas also hee is called jeled a childe this word is used not onely of infants but of young men Genes 4.23 and Hierome well noteth that all children are so called in respect of their parents 2. Neither is it here a metaphoricall speech as Cajetane saith that to lay Ismael upon his mothers shoulders was to commit him to her care 3. But the sentence is thus distinguished as the Latine readeth well that whereas there are two words he gave and imposed or layed on this is to be referred to the bottle of water and bread the other to the child 4. As for that conceit of the Hebrewes that Ismael was sicke and through griefe fell into a dropsie or some inflammation which was the cause the bottle of water was so soone spent it hath small ground QUEST VIII What the reason is that Abraham gave Agar and Ismael no better provision HE tooke bread and a bottle of water c. How commeth it to passe that Abraham being so rich a man and loving Ismael so well should send him out with no better provision seeing that they were not to send away their servants empty but to give them a liberall reward of sheepe come and wine Deut. 15.13 1. Cajetane thinketh that by bread and water all other victuals are expressed and that Abraham gave them both servants and cattell being both his father and very rich and so both willing and able neither would he deale worse with Ismael his first borne than with the rest of his sonnes to whom he gave gifâ—s Genes 25.5 sic Cajetan But the Scripture it selfe gain-sayeth Cajetan herein which omitteth not to make mention of the very bottle which Abraham gave to carry the water in then by all likelihood the other gifts or greater value should have beene spoken of 2. Neither need we with Rupertus to seeke out an allegory that by Hagars carrying of water and not wine is shadowed forth the old Synagogue labouring under the literall sense of Scripture 3. Wherefore Tostatus thinketh better that Abraham gave Hagar no more than these necessary helpes in her journey 1. Either because Sarah the dame of the house would have it so whom God commanded Abraham to heare in this case 2. Or for that the Lord had promised to provide and take care for Ismael 3. Or Abraham might afterward remember Ismael with a portion among the rest of his brethren sic Tostatus 4. Or Abraham did thinke to send them a supply afterwards they sojourning not faire off 5. Or Abraham being in griefe and heavinesse for their departure might forget to doe that which otherwise he would have done for it seemeth he did it in haste Calvin Among which reasons I take the first and the last to be most probable QUEST IX How Hagars eyes were opened Vers. 19. GOd opened her eyes c. 1. Not that her eyes were shut before 2. Neither as though this fountaine which the Angel shewed did suddenly breake out of the ground as some think ex Vatablâ— 3. But caused her to see the well which either by reason of her griefe she before regarded not Calvin or she saw it not by reason of the farre distance or for that it was in some hidden place Perer. Thus the two Disciples are said not to have knowne and discerned Christ till their eyes were opened Luke 24. 4. Rupâ—rtus gathereth from hence a further mystery that as Hagar wandring in the wildernesse was brought to see a fountaine of water so the Jewes in the end of the world shall be called and brought to the knowledge of the truth QUEST X. Abimelech rather of feare than love maketh a league with Abraham Vers. 22. ABimelech spake unto Abraham c. 1. Some thinke that Abimelech not of any suspition or jealousie toward Abraham but for love of his vertue and seeing him to be a man prosperous and beloved of God both by reason of the victory given him against foure Kings when he recovered Lot and the honourable congratulation of Melchisedech that met him and now the rate birth of his sonne Isaack for these causes he desired his friendship Pererius 2. But it is more like that Abimelech feared Abrahams greatnesse and therefore of feare rather than love desired to make a league with him Muscul. Calvin for it is no other like but that Abimelech was affected to Abraham as afterward to his sonne that sojourned in the same place and how Abimelechs affection stood toward Isaack the Scripture sheweth Wherefore came yee to me seeing you hate me c. Gen. 26.27 yet Abimelech desireth also to make a covenant of friendship with Isaack QVEST. XI Of the gifts given to Abimelech and the seven lambs Vers. 27. ABraham tooke sheepe and beeves c. Pererius thinketh that no other ceremony was used in making this covenant but only an oath betweene them but this giving of sheep to Abimelech sheweth that some other rite and solemnity was performed Muscul. 2. And hereby Abraham doth acknowledge his homage to the King of the place for though all this land was promised to Abraham yet the time of his actuall possessing it was not yet come 3. The seven lambs were not money stamped with that marke but so many in the kind which Abraham giveth as a price or redemption of his well that he might enjoy it quietly afterward Calvin 4. And these seven lambs did not belong unto the covenant as a rite and ceremony thereof for then Abimelech would not have asked what they did meane v. 29. But they were as an earnest given for the redeeming of the well Perer. 5. Augustine thinketh that Abraham bought with them that parcell of ground where he planted a groave and it is not unlike for before this time Abraham is not sound to have planted any QVEST. XII Of the name and City of Beersheba Vers. 31. WHerefore the place is called Beersheba 1. The word
by his holinesse goodnesse c. doth pledge them that unlesse that be which he saith he will lose them and swearing by himselfe he bindeth his Godhead for the performance as though he should say in effect If this be not let me be no more God Calvin QVEST. XXI Why the Lord tooke an oath BUt further it will be asked what need God had to take an oath seeing the word of God is certaine of it selfe and need no confirmation and an oath is used in doubtfull cases but to God nothing is doubtfull or uncertaine an oath is used when the party cannot be credited without an oath but Abraham did beleeve God The answer then is this 1. The Lord sweareth not to any such end as though any more credit and certainty by his oath might bee wonne unto his promise 2. And yet wee take not this to bee a metaphoricall speech onely with Cajetan that God is said to sweare by himselfe 3. But the Lord taketh an oath ad ampliorem confirmationem fidei nostra for the better confirmation of our faith and hee doth it the Apostle saith ex abundanti more abundantly to shew the stablenesse of his counsell Heb. 6.17 Calvin 4. Where we may note the differences betweene this oath and other oathes 1. God taketh this oath willingly not forced thereto of any necessity 2. He sweareth by himselfe as having not a greater to sweare by and Philo sheweth the reason Solus de seipso asseverare potest quia solus ipse suam novit naturam He only can beare witnesse of himselfe because he only knoweth his owne nature 3. He also further saith Sententiae nostra ex juramento fides accedit ipsi juramento ex ipso Deo fides astruitur Our sentence is credited because of our oath but this oath is beleeved because of God that taketh it QUEST XXII Whether the promises here made are new or the old renewed Vers. 18. IN thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed 1. It is of all hands confessed that the other three promises were made unto Abraham before 1. That Abraham should be blessed Genes 12.2 2. That his seed should be multiplied as the starres and as the sand of the sea Genes 13.16 3. That his seed should possesse the gate of his enemies which is in effect the same with that Genes 13.12 all this land will I give thee c. God promised Abraham the land of the Canaanites which were his enemies 2. But Ambrose thinketh that this was a new blessing containing a promise of the Messiah lib. 1. de Abraham c. 8. Paulus Burgensis confirmeth the same by these reasons because Saint Paul rehearseth this as a speciall blessing concerning Christ urging these words in thy seed which are onely found here and the Lord confirmeth this by an oath as Zachary in his song maketh mention of this oath which hee sware to our father Abraham Luke 1.73 3. But these reasons are easily answered 1. Saint Paul citeth rather that promise made Genes 12.3 in thee shall all the Gentiles be blessed Galath 3.8 for hee speaketh of that promise which was made 430. yeares before the law which must needs be that former given to Abraham at the 75. yeare of his age but there will want 50. yeares of that summe if the account should begin at this time when Abraham was 125. yeares old And whereas Saint Paul also alludeth unto this place v. 16. and thy seed and so expoundeth one place by another he sheweth that in effect they are both but one promise 2. The adding of the oath maketh it not a new promise but confirmeth onely the former otherwise by this reason all these promises should be newly made seeing the oath goeth before them all and indeed not onely this promise of the Messiah but the other also concerning the possessing of the land of Canaan was ratified by an oath Exod. 13.5 Perer. 4. Wherefore here is no other promise made to Abraham but such as he had heard before but the same more amply and fully confirmed by an oath and againe renued both to Abraham and Isaack in which two respects this promise is more excellent than the former Calvin QUEST XXIII How Saint Paul applieth this word Seed only to Christ. 3 to the Galath HEre by the way it shall not be amisse to explane that place of Saint Paul Galath 3.16 where the Apostle presseth the word seed shewing that because he saith seed not seeds it must bee referred to one namely Christ. The Jewes doe make two principall objections against this place 1. They urge that this word metaphorically taken for the of-spring of men is a nowne collective never used in the plurall number but put in the singular only signifieth a multitude as likewise doth the word populus vulgus people commonalty c. Answer 1. True it is that the word Zeraugh in the singular number doth often signifie a multitude but sometime in Scripture it is restrained to one as Gen. 4.25 the name of seed is given to Seth the Lord hath appointed me another seed for Habel Genes 21.13 Ismael is called Abrahams seed Wherefore it is not enough to say that this word in the singular is sometime taken for a multitude unlesse they could shew it so to be used here Beza 2. The Apostle then being not ignorant of the phrase and usage of the Hebrew tongue doth not contend about the word but the sense that the word seed in this place is not taken for seeds that is many but for seed that is one specially Perer. 21. They object further that whereas it is said In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed this is but a forme of blessing by way of comparison like to that Gen. 48.20 God make thee as Ephraim c. Ans. 1. If this speech did onely shew a forme not the cause of blessing it need not have beene said in thy seed but in thee that is Abraham God make thee like Abraham 2. Where such formes of blessing are used they are restrained to Israel as in the place alleaged Gen. 48. In thee Israel shall blesse but here all nations shall bee blessed how should it come to passe that all nations should not blesse themselves but bee blessed but in being called to the knowledge of God which is by Christ wherefore these words shew the cause of blessing not the forme Calvin Now then their objections being thus answered I will shew the right meaning of the Apostle 1. I first reject Hieromes collection reproved by Erasmus Paulum hoc argumento abusum apud crassos Galataâ— that Paul abuseth this argument having to doe with the dull Galathians for it becommeth us not so to think of so grave an Apostle writing by the Spirit of God 2. Neither is it enough to say that Paul by the same Spirit whereby Moses did write did understand him to speake of Christ Cajetan in 3. ad Galat. for Paul having to
to Benjamin when hee should have stayed for Iosephs cup yet Ioseph keepeth the same proportion in giving to Benjamin five suits of raiment Gen. 45.22 3. Neither with Ambrose need we make this a type and figure of Pauls excellencie in gifts who was of the tribe of Benjamin before the rest of the Apostles 4. But Ioseph did this to shew his love to Benjamin being his onely brother by the mothers side as Elkanah gave unto Anna his best beloved wife a more worthy portion 1 Sam. 1.5 Iun. Mercer 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. God the disposer of mens hearts Vers. 14. GOd give you mercie in the sight of the man Iacob acknowledgeth that God is the disposer of mens hearts and affections as the Wise man saith The Kings heart is in the hand of the Lord c. he turneth it whethersoever it pleaseth him Prov. 21.1 2. Doct. We must rest in Gods providence and carefully use the meanes Vers. 11. TAke of the best fruits c. Iacob though his trust were in God that he would incline the rulers heart toward his sonnes yet he refuseth not to use all meanes whereby they might insinuate themselves as he adviseth them to take double money with them and to carry a present Wee are therefore so to depend upon Gods providence as that we use all meanes which God hath appointed Calvin Like as though the Lord gave to Paul all the soules in the ship yet by swimming and using the boords and broken peeces of the ship they came to land Act. 27.24 44. 3. Doct. Restitution is to be made where any errour or oversight is committed Vers. 12. LEst it were some oversight Iacob would have the money restored which they found in their sacks mouthes thinking that the seller might forget himselfe Iacobs justice herein sheweth that in buying and selling where any oversight is committed restitution and satisfaction should be made Muscul. Not like as now a dayes the buyer and seller thinke it well gained when they can one deceive another which abuse the Wise man reproveth It is naught it is naught saith the buyer but when he is gone apart he boasteth Prov. 20.4 4. Doct. The creatures of God may be used not onely for necessity but delight Vers. 34. THey were made merry or drunke their fill with him That is they did eat and drinke liberally and plentifully so that it is not onely lawfull to use the creatures of God for necessitie onely but we may goe further to receive them with delight and chearefullnesse so that we 〈◊〉 of surfetting and drunkennesse As we reade of Abraham that made a great feast when Isaack was weaned Gen. 21.8 that is a plentifull and liberall banket As God hath made bread to strengthen man so he hath given wine to cheare his heart Psal. 104.15 But men must take heed lest in exceeding they fall to riot and distemper themselves with supâ—rfluous abundance Philo well observeth that of ancient time they used after their sacrifices to make their feasts and in the Temples that the place and action might put them in minde of sobriety whereupon some derive the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to bee drunke of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 after sacrificing So wee reade that the Elders of Israel did eat bread with Moses father in law before God Exod. 18.12 in that place where they had sacrificed Wee should therefore thinke of God in the middest of our feasts and not be like to those of whom Saint Iude speaketh of Without all feare feeding themselves Iud. 12. 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Monkes despised of the Iewes Vers. 30. HIs afflictions were inflamed The word is camar whereof the Idoll Priests were called chemarim of their blacke garments as of a burnt colour The Jewes give that name to the blacke Monkes Mercer who by their superstitious apparell make themselves ridiculous to the blinde Jewes and by such foolish toyes hinder their conversion to the faith 2. Confut. Against the pride of superstitious Papists Vers. 32. THat was an abomination to the Egyptians The Egyptians being a superstitious people despised the true Church of God and counted them prophane in respect of themselves which the Prophet noteth to be the guise of hypocrites Stand apart come not neare me I am holier than thâ—â— Isay 65.5 Even so the Pseudocatholike Papists despise the professors of the Gospell of Christ counting them heretikes refusing to come into their holy assemblies Calvin 6. Places of morall use 1. Morall To commit our counsell to God Vers. 7. COuld we know certainly that he would say so Iacobs sons in making mention of their father and youngest brother thought to have excused themselves but thereby they came into greater danger whereby we see that God doth many times frustrate our counsels and maketh them to fall out farre otherwise than we imagined Mercer as Peter also intrapped Ananias by the words of his owne mouth Act. 5. therefore we must commit our counsels to God that he would both direct the thoughts of our heart and words of our mouth 2. Morall A bad conscience full of suspition Vers. 18. BEcause of the money in our sacks mouth are we brought Thus a guilty conscience is alwayes suspitious and disquieted upon every occasion as appeareth in these men that are fearfull without cause and interpret every thing against themselves Thus Moses describeth the fearfulnesse of men that are punished for their sinnes The sound of a leafe shaken shall chase them Levit. 27.36 3. Morall We must be carefull to instruct our families Vers. 23. YOur God and the God of your fathers This steward of Iosephs house would never have spoken so reverently of the God of the Hebrewes but that he was so taught of Ioseph who had a great care to instruct his family in the right faith in the middest of that idolatrous nation this was Abrahams commendation Gen. 18.18 and Iacobs practice Gen. 35.4 4. Morall Iustice to be tempered with mercy Vers. 29. GOd be mercifull to thee my sonne Ioseph which hitherto had shewed himselfe severe and rigorous towards his brethren beginneth now to use them kindly whose example teacheth that prudent governours should qualifie and temper justice with mercy and severity with clemencie Grâ—gor as Saint Paul did towards the incestuous young man 2 Corinth 2. CHAP. XLIV 1. The Method or Argument FIrst in this chapter is declared the practice of Ioseph in laying theft to Benjamins charge 1. The device by Ioseph vers 1 2. 2. The execution by his servant in accusing them vers 4. to 6. 3. Their defence and agreement for the punishment vers 9 10. 4. The deprehension of the pretended theft with Benjamin vers 11. to vers 14. Secondly the conventing of them before Ioseph with their submission and Iosephs mitigation of the punishment vers 15. to vers 18. Thirdly Iudah interposeth himselfe and maketh intercession for Benjamin where is set downe 1. The narration both of their first speech had with Ioseph vers
give◠to Ioseph we doe learne that the bodies of the Saints ought in comely and reverent sort to be brought to the grave as the brethren that feared God carried Steven to be buried with great lamention Act. 8.2 5. Doct. Of the lawfulnesse of an oath Vers. 31. ANd he sware unto him It was lawfull for Iacob in some serious and weighty matter to enquire an oath and for Ioseph to performe it for men are mutable and therefore may be bound with an oath and though Ioseph might otherwise have fulfilled his fathers will yet it was not amisse that he should be more straitly bound we see then the lawfull use of an oath against the errour of the Anabaptists which allow not Christians to take an oath for the Apostle saith An oath for confirmation among men is an end of strife Heb. 6.16 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against the corrupt Latine translation of this place Vers. 31. ISrael worshipped toward the beds head not as the vulgar Latine readeth he adored the top of his rod Heb. 11.21 which translation differeth both from the Latine in this place which thus interpreteth he worshipped turning toward the beds head and from the Septuagint which readeth he worshipped or bowed himselfe ùpi to ácron upon the top of his rod or staffe the Latine text corruptly leaveth out the preposition ùpi upon but it differeth most of all from the Hebrew which standeth thus he worshipped toward the beds head from which reading the Septuagint doe varie in these two points first in adding the word à ute his which is not in the Hebrew secondly in mistaking the word for mittah a bed reading mitteh a rod both which words are derived of natah which signifieth to extend or stretch forth because a man doth stretch himselfe upon his bed and on his staffe Wherefore we see what a simple ground the Rhemists have to prove by this corrupt Latine text that creatures may be adored annot Hebr. 10.21 there being no such thing in the Hebrew Greeke or Latine text in this place that Iacob adored his rod. Further the like ground had Hadrianus the Pope as hee is cited in that erronious Councell the second Nicene who by this text would prove the adoration of Images with relation to their protipa that is the presidents patterns or patrons of those Images because say they the adoration which Iacob gave to this rod he intended it to Ioseph whose rod and scepter it was for Iacob worshipped not either his owne staffe or Iosephs scepter but toward the beds head worshipped God 2. Confut. That the Latine text is not authenticall FUrther whereas the Apostle seemeth to follow the translation of the Septuagint rather than the Hebrew text the Rhemists doe infer thereupon that after the same manner the vulgar Latine text may be received as authenticall though it doe varie from the Hebrew ibid. Contra. 1. The Apostles indeed doe sometime follow the Septuagint because it was a common translation and of great authority but they therein neither approve their errors nor yet make it of equall authority to the originall citing only such testimonies wherein the Greeke translation keepeth the sense though not the words as in this place whether we say Iacob leaning upon his staffe or turning to the beds head worshipped the principall sense is kept that Iacob worshipped God especially seeing the same word with very little alteration in the points signifieth both a bed and a rod or staffe 2. Hieromes observation then is good though Pererius without cause misliketh it Diligentius observandum est c. It is to be diligently observed that where the Apostles and Evangelists doe cite testimonies out of the old testament they follow not the words but the sense and where the Septuagint differ from the Hebrew they expresse the Hebrew sense for the Apostle in this place keepeth the Hebrew sense that Iacob worshipped God leaning upon his bed and staffe for it is true that Iacob did both that he reared himselfe upon his staffe towards the beds head 3. The Apostle then rather expoundeth than alleageth that text for he nameth Iacob whereas Moses saith Israel he speaketh of Iacobs worshipping when he had blessed his children but here Iacob worshippeth before he blessed them 4. This then is no good argument the Apostles follow the Septuagint where they keepe the Hebrew sense though not the words Ergo the Latine text must be received where it differeth both in sense and words from the originall 6. Places of morall use 1 Mor. That none should live idly without some honest trade or vocation Vers. 3. WHat is your trade or what is your worke Pharaoh as a prudent Prince examineth Iosephs brethren of their manner of living and occupation by the which question it appeareth that he condemned all idle persons that lived without any trade and it is the part of good Magistrates straitly to fift and examine all such as spend their time unthriftily not in any profitable labour according to the Apostles doctrine that they which doe not worke should not eat 2 Thes. 3.10 Muscul. 2. Mor. A poore life in the Church of God is to be preferred before the pleasures of the world Vers. 3. THy servants are shepherds Ioseph taught his brethren thus to say that they might dwell apart by themselves and not be imployed in Pharaohs court or in the affaires of the kingdome they did choose rather to live as poore shepheards in the service of God than to be in the kings Palace as strangers from the Church and houshold of faith though Ioseph had a speciall grace given him of God not to be corrupted with that place of honour yet he saw it not to bee meet nor convenient for his brethren Calvin so the Prophet David saith A day in thy courts is better than a thousand elsewhere Psal. 84.10 Moses likewise did choose rather to suffer adversity with the people of God than to enjoy the pleasures of sinne for a season Heb. 11.25 3. Morall Men called to honour should not despise their parents Vers. 7. IOseph also brought Iacob and set him before Pharaoh Ioseph though of honourable place in Egypt yet was not ashamed of his poore aged father but presented him to the King to this Ioseph many are unlike in these dayes that thinke it a disgrace unto them to acknowledge their poore parents Muscul. So did not David who brought his father and mother to the King of Moab to keepe them and provide for them 1 Sam. 22.4 as Ioseph here setteth his father before Pharaoh 4. Morall Our life here is but a pilgrimage Vers. 9. THe dayes of the yeares of my pilgrimage Thus not only Iacob but the rest of the fathers counted themselves but as strangers and pilgrims in the earth and thereby declared that they sought a Countrey Heb. 12.13 14. So the Apostle againe saith We have not here a continuing Citie but seeke for one that is to come Heb. 13.14 and therefore we
Simeon 1. We neither say with Ambrose that they are rather to be called prophecies than blessings lib. de Benedic Patriarc c. 2. 2. Neither with Pererius that they were so called of the greatest part for it is said that he blessed every one 3. Neither by the word blessing is cursing understood by an antiphrasis that is a contrary kind of speech as some thinke but Iacob blessed them verily and indeed 4. But the opinion of R. Salomon is not farre from blasphemy that Iacob did indeed purpose to blesse his sonnes but falling into phrensie he cursed them in stead of blessing for this were to make the motions of Gods spirit mad fits 5. Neither is it like that Iacob gave his sonnes other blessings here not expressed 6. But hee indeed blessed them all though not alike for the temporall chastisement laid upon Ruben Simeon Levi was but a fatherly correction for their amendment Calvin they also are blessed because they are counted among the tribes had their inheritance among them Mercer whereupon afterward Moses in particular blessed both Ruben and Levi Deut. 33. Iacob also doth conclude these three within the number of his sonnes and so comprehendeth them within the covenant Iun. QUEST XXXI Of the double cave where Iacob desired to be buried Vers. 30. IN the cave that is beside Machpelah c. 1. Iacob maketh a particular and perfect description of the cave where he would be buried from whence he had beene absent 17. yeares Ioseph 39. yeares that they should not doubt of the place 2. But that is a fable devised by the Jewes that Tsepho the sonne of Eliphaz did strive with Iacobs sonnes about this burying place and that he fought a great battell with them but they overcame him and brought him downe to Aegypt and when Ioseph was dead he fled out of Aegypt into Italy 3. Iacob intreated his sonne Ioseph to bury him with his fathers but he chargeth and commandeth his sonnes because Ioseph was the principall who should obtaine leave of Pharaoh and at whose costs Iacobs funerall should bee solemnized the rest were but to accompany him Mercer beside his other sons did still depend upon him and were as a part of his family whereas Ioseph was a man of great command and authority in Aegypt Perer. 4. Iacob sheweth who were buried there and maketh speciall mention of Abraham that his sonnes should bee more carefull there to bury him also seeing Abraham had of purpose bought that ground to bee a place of buriall for him and his Luther and seeing that his mother was there buried and Leah his wife it might seeme more reasonable that he should be buried there also 5. These three couples here mentioned were buried together there Abraham Sara Isaack Rebeckah Iacob Leah the hebrewes thinke also that Adam and Eve had their sepulture there but that is not like as it is also uncertaine whether any other of the twelve Patriarkes were there interred Mercer QUEST XXXII Why Iacob maketh mention againe of the purchase of the cave Vers. 32. THe purchase of the field c. 1. This repetition is not inserted by Moses as Marlorat but they were the words of Iacob 2. This verse therefore without cause is wholly omitted and left out by the Latine Translatâ—r 3. Yet did not Iacob here shew unto his sonnes the very instrument of conveyance whereby Abraham did purchase the cave and field as the Hebrewes for that rite custome was not then in use But Iacob hereby sheweth the undoubted right which he had to that ground whereof his fathers had possession both alive and dead 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. How the Patriarkes and Prophets used imprecations Vers. 7. CVrsed be their wrath c. The righteous did many times use imprecations and denounce curses as David Psal. 35.4 Let them be confounded and put to shame that seeke after my soule and in other places and Iacob here but they did it not in wrath or in their heat but with these considerations and regards 1. They spake as Prophets and as Ministers and Pronouncers of Gods sentence and decree so that they were not so much maledictions as predictions Perer. 2. For the most part they accursed such only in temporall things for their amendment as Iacob here doth his sonnes as David also saith Fill their faces with shame that they may seeke thy name O Lord Psal. 83.18 Perer. 3. If they denounced any spirituall curse it was upon such as were incorrigible as Psal. 68.21 God will wound the hairy pate of him that goeth on in his sinnes 4. They did not hereby revenge their owne particular cause but did censure them as enemies to the whole Church as Psal. 35.20 They imagine deceitfull words against the quiet of the land But these examples are no warrant for us to use the like imprecations because we have not the like spirit of prophecie as our Saviour answered to Iames and Iohn who asked him if they should command fire to come downe from heaven upon the Samaritans as Elias did Ye know not of what spirit ye are of Luk. 9.55 2. Doct. Iacob prophesieth of his sonnes as the spirit of God directed him FUrther in that Iacob spareth not to pronounce the curse of God against his owne sonnes it is evident that hee spake not of any partiall affection or ambitiously seeking to make his posterity great as the prophane disciples of Lucian the Atheists use to object against the doctrine and history of Moses Calvin but that he spake as he was thereunto moved by the spirit of God both in that against his naturall and fatherly disposition hee pronounceth hard and heavy things against his sonnes as also because the event afterward answered to these his predictions 3. Doct. All our helpe and strength is from God Vers. 24. THe armes of his hands were strengthened by the hand of the mighty God c. Although in waging of battell weapons of warre and other meanes are carefully to be used yet the help power and strength must come from God as Ioseph was strengthened by the hand of God against his enemies as David prayeth Make haste to deliver me make haste to helpe me O God Psal. 70.1 Luther 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. That the punishment of sinne remaineth not after the remission of the fault Vers. 6. INto their secret let not my soule come This punishment which was inflicted upon Simeon and Levi was not a satisfaction for their sinne past which was already upon their repentance remitted unto them as the Popish doctrine is that the punishment of sinne often remaineth the fault being pardoned but the Lord thinketh good to chastise those which have offended though their sin be forgiven them for these causes 1. That they may thorowly be humbled and take heed that thy commit not the like againe as David therefore saith It is good for me that I have beene afflicted Calv. 2. For the example of other that they also may
lay hand on them which properly belongeth to women as Rachel saith when she gave Bilha her maid to Iacob She shall beare upon my knees Gen. 30.3 3. The children are said to be brought up upon the fathers knees because they with joy imbrace their babes and dandle them on their knees Mercer Iunius QUEST XV. Why Ioseph would not presently be buried in Canaan Vers. 25. IOseph tooke an oath of the children of Israel 1. The Latine readeth only he tooke an oath of them but the Hebrewes well note that it is said of the children of Israel because not only the Patriarkes in person but all their posterity afterwards did take themselves bound to this oath and afterwards performed it 2. Ioseph did not presently charge them to bury him in Canaan but at their departure for these reasons 1. Because he would not prevent the time which God appointed for hee knew that God would visit them and deliver them Mercer 2. He did it to shew his faith as the Apostle sheweth that this motion proceeded of faith Hebr. 11.22 and that seeing they were to indure great affliction which Ioseph did foresee and therefore he saith God would visit them hee by this meanes would have them confirmed in the hope and expectation of their deliverance 3. Hee knew that the Egyptians would not suffer his body to be removed Perer. 4. And this would bee an occasion that the Egyptians should have Ioseph in remembrance leaving his monument among them and deale the better with his nation Mercer QUEST XVI Why Ioseph was buried in Secheni Vers. 25. YE shall carry my bones hence 1. This was accordingly performed by Moses when the Israelites came out of Egypt Exod. 13.19 2. Besides it is evident also out of the Scripture that Ioseph was buried in Sechem not because Ioseph was there sold into Egypt as some Hebrewes thinke for that done in Dothan not in Sechem Genes 37.17 neither as Rab. Salomon thinketh because Iacob gave Sechem to Ioseph to that end to be a place of buriall or for that Ioseph gave charge to his brethren there to bury him Mercer for no such thing is mentioned in the story But I rather thinke that the Israelites in their discretion did there bury him because that place was given him in speciall words by Iacob and because it fell out to be in the inheritance of his sonnes for which cause also they buried Iosua in his inheritance in mount Ephraim Iosua 24.30 32. QUEST XVII Whether the rest of the Patriarkes were buried in Sechem NOw whereas a question may be moved whether the Israelites removed the bones of the rest of the Patriarkes when they came out of Egypt 1. It is not like that the Patriarkes as they died in Egypt were removed to Hebron where Iacob was buried as Iosephus thinketh libr. 2. antiquiâ—at cap. 4. for this had beene a great trouble to make so many severall journeyes and seeing Iosephs bones were kept in Egypt there was no reason to remove the rest 2. Much more unlike it is as some thinke that they were translated to Sechem as they died for Ioseph was the first that was there buried 3. And that they were translated from Sechem by the sonnes of Hemor as some expound that place Act. 7.16 it is not probable for the Israelites after their returne would not have suffered any other to meddle with their fathers bones and before they returned they would rather have buried them in Hebron than in Sechem 4. Wherefore it is most likely that the Patriarkes bones were carried out of Egypt together with Iosephs bones and there all buried together as Stephen sheweth Act. 7.16 Perer. Consent And seeing mention is made of that place Act. 7.16 where it is said That Iacob and the fathers were removed to Sichem and put in the sepulcher which Abraham bought of the sonnes of Hemor of Sichem which place hath moved much question I will adde somewhat here of this matter to that which is before handled qu. 13. in Gen. 23. QUEST XVIII How Abraham is said Act. 7.19 to have bought the sepulcher of the sonnes of Hemor whereas he indeed bought it of Ephron 1. THere I refused their opinion that thinke Stephen might faile in memory and name Abraham for Iacob 2. Theirs also I rejected which thinke that Zophar Ephraims father of whom Abraham bought the ground was also called Hemor whereunto Pererius subscribeth 3. Neither doe I consent to Cajetane which thinketh that the Patriarkes were removed from Sichem to the sepulcher which Abraham bought by the sonnes of Hemor and so referre the last words of the sonnes of Hemor not to the verbe òné sato bought but to the word ètethésan put but this is not likely that the Sichemites had any thing to doe with their bones 4. Nor yet can I altogether approve Beza his conjecture that thinketh by the negligence of the scribes Abraham to be put into the text for Iacob the reasons why I refused these foure conjectures I have set downe in that place whither I referre the Reader 5. The Syrian Translater readeth in the singular metetéthe he was translated and etéthe was put and so understandeth it only of Iacob that he was removed to Sichem and from thence by the Sichemites carried to Hebron But the Scripture overthroweth this conjecture which testifieth that his sonnes buried him in Abrahams place of sepulture which he bought of Ephron Gen. 50.13 beside the originall copy in the Greeke readeth in the plurall not in the singular 6. I resolved in that place upon the exposition of histor scholastic from the which Iunius seemeth not much to differ histor scholastic transporteth the words thus And were translated to Sichem bought of the sonnes of Hemor and from thence put in the sepulcher which Abraham bought for money but this transposing may seeme very hard therefore Iunius transposeth not the words but thinketh the article 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be supplied that where it is said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the sonnes he would have it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. beside that of the sonnes of Hemor that is bought of them and would have this to be the meaning that Iacob and the Patriarks were buried part of them in Abrahams sepulcher part in Sechem which Iacob bought To this interpretation that Stephen here abridgeth two histories of Abrahams and Iacobs purchase I gave liking before as the best of all the rest propounded 7. But since I have considered of another way to reconcile this place which doth satisfie my selfe best and this it is that by Abraham here is not understood the posterity of Abraham as Geâ—evens upon that place for that were an unproper kinde of speaking but I rather thinke according to the manner of the Hebrew tongue wherein Stephen then spake that there is here an eclipsis of a word of cognation as of sonne nephew or such like for it is usuall in the Scriptures to eclipse such termes and names of kindred as
them houses Vers. 22. ANd because the Mid-wives feared God and he made them houses c. There are two generall expositions of this place Some doe interpret the word Lahem them of the Mid-wives some of the people of Israel Of the first 1. Some referre it to the Israelites that they provided for the Mid-wives and kept them from Pharaoh but that is not like seeing the Israelites could not at this time defend themselves from Pharaohs rage 2. Some understand it of Pharaoh that he made strong houses for them that all the Hebrew women should come to them to be delivered but that had beene a thing impossible 3. Some referre it to God that he made them houses which is diversly expounded the Hebrewes supposing these Mid-wives to be Iochebed and Miriam by houses understand the Kingdome and Priesthood which was setled afterward in their of-spring for Iochebed was the mother of Aaron and Miriam they say maried to Calâ—b but this is uncertaine Iosephus writeth lib. 3. antiquit that she was the wife of Hur and it is before shewed that Miriam for her age could be none of them David Chimhi understandeth it of their preserving from the rage of Pharaoh Tostatus of their incorporating and graffing into the nation and common-wealth of Israel as Rahab was but it is more like they were Hebrew women as is before also touched and needed no such ingraffing Hierome understandeth it of spirituall houses in heaven so also Rupertus Augustine and Theodoret of giving them riches Pererius of increasing their families for so is the phrase used Sarah saith when she gave Hagar to Abraham I may be builded by her Gen. 16. And this uncertaintie there is in the first exposition 4. Therefore the second is rather to be preferred to understand it of the people that God made them houses that is families and increased them for these reasons 1. Because in the Hebrew there is a masculine pronoune lahem which although some thinke is sometime taken for the feminine as Exod. 2.17 Piscator and elsewhere and Vatablus saith that mem is sometime taken for nun yet it is more properly taken in the native and originall use where there is no necessitie otherwise to enforce it Iun. 2. Because the house and famille is not builded by the woman but by the man Simler 3. This better agreeth to the words going before that the people multiplied vers 20. and the words following if we read them thus And so it was because the Mid-wives feared God and he made them house That Pharaoh charged all his people c. Pharaoh seeing that God by the meanes and occasion of the Mid-wives as the instruments God as the author and chiefe cause increased the people then he cast about another way how to effect this cruell purpose Iun. Simler QUEST XVIII Whether the Mid-wives onely were temporally rewarded NOw what manner of reward it was which the Lord here giveth it may thus be briefly resolved 1. Neither with Gregorie is it to be thought that because of their dissimulation they were onely temporally rewarded for the text saith they feared God and the feare of God is not onely in this life but more rewarded in the life to come 2. Hierome and Rupertus here understand the spirituall and everlasting houses in heaven but the words before v. 20. shew that hereby a temporall blessing is insinuated the Mid-wives prospered the people multiplied 3. Therefore the last resolution is that no doubt the charitie and mercie of these Mid-wives and the feare of God in them was eternally rewarded but the temporall blessing is here onely expressed both in respect of the times because as Hierome saith Aeterna vitae promissio est propria novi testamenti The promise of eternall life is peculiar to the new Testament and in regard of carnall and weake men who are by temporall promises more easily allured so the promises made to Abraham whose saith and obedience were eternally crowned were in shew temporall as in the length of life increase of his posteritie victorie over his enemies as appeareth Gen. 15. ex Perer. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. That God is not the author of evill Vers. 12. THey were grieved or fretted because of the children of Israel But Psal. 105.25 it is said he turned their heart to hate his people The hatred and griefe which the Egyptians conceived against Israel seemeth to be ascribed to God yet farre be it from us to thinke that God is the author of the least sinne much lesse of so great a sinne as to hate the people of God for as God is not tempted with evill so neither tempteth he any man Iam. 1.13 This manner of phrase therefore in Scripture may receive five severall expositions which may all together be received first God is said to turne their heart not effective but permissive not by way of working but permitting or suffering as Theodoret because he gave way to their wicked will corumque insidias â—inimè prohibuerit and hindered not their evill purpose 2. God is said to doe it as he hardened Pharaohs heart subtrahendo gratiam by withholding his grace and leaving them to themselves Cajetan 3. God doth it as an universall cause because in him we move we live and have our being Act. 17. not as a particular agent as Rupertus useth this comparison Quemadmodum sol molle lutum convertit in durum As the Sunne turneth the clay and mire from soft to hard of which changing the Sun is onely the generall cause the proper and next cause is the qualitie of the matter 4. God turneth their heart into hatred occasionaliter by ministring the occasion onely as Aug. Non cor illorum malum faciendo sed populo bene faciendo cor eorum sponte malum convertit in odium Their heart being evill of it selfe he turned to hatred not by making it evill but by doing well unto his people God is said to doe it because he was the author of the welfare of his people whereby the envious Egyptians were provoked to hate them 5. The Lord is said to harden mens hearts ordinative disposative because he knoweth how to rule and dispose of their evill and obdurate hearts and turne it to his glorie as Augustine proceedeth in the same place Quo illorum odio ad exercitationem populi filii ad gloriam nomâ—nâ— suâ— usus est Deus Which their hatred God used both for the exercise of his people and to the glorie of his owne name Ex Perer. 2. Doct. God must rather be obeyed than men Vers. 17. NOtwithstanding the Mid-wives feared God and did not as the King of Egypt commanded This their refusall to obey the Kings wicked charge was both lawfull and commendable The things which belong to Caesar as tribute custome honor feare Rom. 13.7 must willingly and of conscience be yeelded to Caesar Matth. 22.21 But the things which belong to God must not be given to Caesar as to
text is against his conjecture and Zipporah calleth him a bloudy husband because shee was forced to draw her owne childs bloud with that cutting which she was not put to before 2. Some therefore thinke that Moses had left one of his sonnes with his father in law as a pledge of his love and sincere affection so that he had one only child with him Hugo But the text also is against this conceit for Moses tooke both his sonnes with him vers 20. 3. Some thinke that Eleazar Moses youngest sonne was borne but a little before Moses tooke his journey and that for haste thereof he deferred his circumcision Lyranus Thostatus Pererius But if Moses had it in mind to circumcise his child he would not of purpose have transgressed the law of circumcision which exactly requireth every male to be circumcised the eight day 4. Wherefore the more probable conjecture is that Moses seeing the circumcision of his first child to have beene so offensively taken did in gratiam uxoris to content his wife forbeare this deferring then of circumcision proceeded rather of his humane infirmity and forgetfulnesse than of any set or deliberate councell And this the circumstance of the text will beare seeing Zipporah as not yet thorowly acquainted with this mystery doth cast away the foreskin with such indignation Iunius Pellican Piscator QUEST XXVIII At whose feete Zipporah and what she cast Vers. 25. CAst it at his feet c. 1. The Septuagint read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fell downe at his feete so also Cajetane whose meaning is that Zipporah fell downe at the Angels feete intreating to spare her husband but so soone as the child was circumcised Moses recovered and the Angell left him 2. Rupertus readeth after the same manner shee fell downe thinking that shee was prostrate at Moses feete intreating him to dismisse her But Moses rather sent her backe in his owne discretion unto his father with her children it had beene an unwomanly part and not commendable for the wife to desire to depart from such an husband Simler 3. But whereas the Hebrew word tagangh signifieth she caused it to touch that is cast some say she cast the circumcised foreskin at the feete of the Angell to appease him so the Chalde Paraphrast and Tharg Hierâ—solymitan but the words following in the next verse shew that she cast it at his feete whom she called bloudy husband Perer. 4. Some referre it to the child that shee cast it at his feete and Kimhi saith it was an use among the Hebrewes to call the infant circumcised the spouse or husband But to what end should Zipporah say thus to a young infant that understood her not Simler 5. Therefore she cast it at Moses feete whom in indignation she calleth bloudy husband Simler Iun. Perer. QUEST XXIX Why Zipporah calleth Moses husband of bloud Vers. 26. THou art indeed a bloudy husband unto mee 1. The Septuagint translate the bloud of my sonne stetit is stayed which translation having no ground at all or colour out of the originall but Augustine to great businesse quaest 11. in Exod. and maketh him flie unto allegories and mysteries for it seemeth to make a contrary sense unto the originall seeing she called Moses a bloudy husband because of shedding of her sonnes bloud it is like then it stayed not 2. Rabanus thinketh that shee called Moses so and accuseth him of cruelty for commanding her to circumcise her child so also Vatablus But seeing shee by this meanes redeemed her husbands life shee no doubt did not thinke much of her childs circumcision in that behalfe but thought it well done to save his life 3. Some thinke shee by bloud meaneth not only this present griefe but other troubles which she was like to endure as if shee should say if our journey began with such a hard hap what is the end like to be 4. Aben Ezra will have Zipporah thus to say unto the child whom they used to call chatan husband spouse because of the joy of circumcision whom she first calleth husband of bloud because she feared that her husband would dye but when she saw he was escaped then she correcteth her speech and calleth him husband of bloud because of the circumcision but this name of husband who seâ—th not better to agree to Moses than to her child Ex Perer. 5. Wherefore she thus saith unto Moses calling him husband of bloud both because shee was faine to redeeme him with the bloud of her child and in respect of circumcision it selfe which she held to be a bloudy law being not yet thorowly instructed in these rites sic Thostatus Iunius Ferus but shee calleth him not man of bloud which name in Scripture is given to cruell and bloudy men but husband of bloud QUEST XXX Whether those words rehearsed againe were uttered by Zipporah or by Moses the writer Vers. 26. BVt shee had said husband of bloud because of the circumcision 1. Piscator because the word is put in the plurall circumcisions thinketh that she so speaketh in respect of the circumcision of both her sonnes but seeing one of them only is here circumcised and because at this time only Zipporah was put to doe it her selfe which caused her thus to say shee so speaketh because of the circumcision of this child 2. Some thinke that these are the words of Zipporah and that shee either qualifieth her former speech turning her words which she had uttered of the bloud and death of her husband for so Aben Ezra taketh them to be spoken to the child that he was circumcised with the death and losse of her husband and after that by this circumcision she perceived her husband to bee recovered shee applied her speech to circumcision Iunius in his Analysis saving that hee holdeth these words to be uttered to Moses and not to the child expresseth the same meaning that Zipporah expoundeth and excuseth her former words that by bloud she understandeth circumcision whereby the young infant being upon the way and in an Inne might bee put in danger 3. But I rather approve Iunius judgement in his annotations that these are the words of Moses rather than of Zipporah shewing a reason of her speech for that shee repeated the same words being uttered with indignation twice it is not like especially after that the danger was over shee had small cause to expostulate with Moses for then she had shewed that shee had preferred the childes health before the life of her husband so also Zeiglerus QUEST XXXI How Zipporah knew that Moses was striken for the neglect of circumcision BUt another question will be here moved how Zipporah knew that Moses was in danger for neglect of circumcision 1. Some thinke that the Angel appeared in a visible shape and both by signes and words threatned Moses because his child was uncircumcised Cajetan But to devise words or speech to be said beside Scripture it is not safe 2. Some thinke that Moses was put in mind
Simler 2. Observ. Against emulation WHen he seeth thee he will be glad in his heart That is hee shall bee farre from emulation or envie though his younger brother were preferred before him as Cain envied Abel Ismael Isaac Esau Iacob Simler This teacheth us that wee should not envie the preferment of others before their equals and in some sort their elders and superiors preferment neither commeth from the East nor from the West or from the South but it is God who maketh high and low Psal. 75.6 3. Observ. Against negligence in receiving the Sacraments Vers. 24. HE sought to kill him We see by this what a great sinne it is before God to neglect the Sacraments if the Lord spared not Moses his faithfull servant for an oversight onely and negligence how much greater shall their punishment be that runne into open contempt of the holy mysteries Ferus Let men learne then by this example that they deferre not the baptisme of their children nor omit the receiving of the Sacraments for God holdeth this as a wrong done to himselfe when his ordinance is neglected contemned or prophaned for this cause saith the Apostle many are weake and sicke among you and many sleepe 1 Cor. 11.30 4. Observ. That masters of families especially pastors doe rule well their owne families FUrther in that it sufficed not though Moses himselfe were circumcised seeing his child which was of his familie and charge was uncircumcised this is gathered that it is the dutie of masters of families specially of Pastors and Ministers and such as have charge over others that they see that all their domesticals be well ordered and governed for otherwise God will require it of them as is evident in the punishment of Heli who being a good man himselfe yet bare too much with the lewdnesse of his sonnes Perer. as the Apostle saith Hee that cannot rule his owne house how should hee care for the Church of God 1 Tim. 3.5 5. Observ. The sword and word must concurre together Vers. 27. HE met him in the mount of God and kissed him Moses the Prince and chiefe Magistrate and Aaron appointed to be the chiefe Priest doe each kisse the other and joyne both the Politike and Ecclesiasticall power together then the people beleeved so the Church of God is edified when the sword and word doe concurre together as David and Sadok Ioas and Iehoiadah Iehosaphat and Amariah Iosias and Hilkiah the Kings and chiefe Priests did one assist the other Ferus CHAP. V. 1. The Argument and Method THis Chapter hath two parts The first containeth the message which Moses delivered to Pharaoh vers 1. with Pharaohs refusall vers 2. and their replie from the authoritie of God vers 3. The second sheweth three events of this message the first is the increasing of the peoples servitude commanded by Pharaoh to vers 10. and executed by his officers to vers 11. The second the beating of the officers and rulers of the children of Israel vers 14. with their complaint unto Pharaoh vers 15.16 with his unmercifull and ungentle answer to vers 19. The third is the expostulating of the officers with Moses and Aaron to vers 20. and of Moses with God to vers 22 23. 2. The divers readings Vers. 3. The God of the Hebrewes hath met with us I. P. better than is called over us B.A. or hath called us L.V.S. or we worship the God of the Hebrew G. The word nikra is so taken 2 Sam. 1.6 and it is here taken in the same sense as the other nikra with he chap. 3.18 as it may appeare by the like construction with the preposition ghal Lest he meet us or fall upon us with the pestilence I.A.P. better than lest the pestilence come upon us L.V.S. or bring upon us the pestilence G. for then the preposition should bee superfluous or lest hee smite us with B. but the word phagangh signifieth to run upon not to smite Vers. 5. And would ye make them leave their burthens I. It is better read with an interrogation and so it containeth a reason why he would not have the people called from their worke as the Septuagint following the sense and not the words let us not therefore cause them to cease better than to read affirmatively ye have caused them to cease A.P. or doe cause them to cease B.G. as being confident upon their multitude and so intending a rebellion or how much more if ye give them rest from their worke L. that is if they multiplied before being under sore labour how much more if they take their case but here these words how much more are not in the originall Vers. 9. Let them not regard lying words I.A.P.L. vaine words V. S. B. G. but shakar signifieth properly to lie to deale falsely as Gen. 21.23 Vers. 14. Finish your works every dayes taske in the day thereof I.A.P. better than finish your dayes worke every dayes taske G. for the words are transposed or your dayly taskes in their due time B. the sense but not the words or the works belonging to the day S. or fulfill your worke every day L. here is wanting of the day Vers. 16. The fault is in thy people I. or thy people offendeth P. better than there is wrong done to thy people L.S.B. or thy people is blamed G.V. It is better referred to the Egyptians that they were in fault because they gave them no straw than to the Israelites it is not like they would lay the fault upon their brethren Vers 19. After he had said that is the King I. better than after it was said L.G.B. for the word leâ—mar is in the active or they saying 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 S. it is referred to the King that so had said vers 8. 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Why the Lord so often sent Moses and Aaron Vers. 1. THen Moses and Aaron went and said unto Pharaoh c. Whereas the Lord might at once have destroyed Pharaoh and have delivered his people yet it seemed best unto him by divers and sundrie messages to deale with him 1. That Gods power might appeare in shewing his wonders 2. That the Israelites might see the wonderfull care which the Lord had of them 3. To exercise their patience being not delivered at the first 4. And to leave Pharaoh without all excuse Simler QUEST II. Whether Moses and Aaron went in alone to Pharaoh COncerning the number of them that went to Pharaoh 1. Neither is the conceit of the Hebrewes to be received that thinke the Elders who should have accompanied Moses and Aaron forbeared of feare and therefore they were not afterward suffered to goe up into Mount Sinah with Moses for neither did Aaron goe up and yet presented himselfe with Moses to Pharaoh 2. Neither is it to be thought with Thostatus and Pererius that the Elders went not in with Moses for this had beene directly against Gods commandement chap. 3.18
doth deere them and easeth the paine It seemeth this plague consisted most of the common sort of frogs because they came out of the waters yet there might be a mixture also of the other sorts especially of the Rubetae to make the plague more grievous 3. And in this plague this was strange and extraordinary that the frogs left the waters their proper element and scralled upon the land and entered their houses Simler QUEST II. Of the greatnesse of this plague frogs COncerning the greatnesse of this plague 1. Philo noteth that those frogs filled the high wayes and their houses yea crept into their Temples and did climbe up into their upper chambers so that they were at their wits end 2. Iosâ—phus sâ—ith that beside the annoyance which they brought upon the land leaping upon their meat and drinke that the waters were corrupted by them so that it stanke of them and was putrified and full of corruption Some Hebrewes write also that they crept into their mouthes when they were asleepe and entred â—nto their bowels 3. Thus the Egyptians by this plague were cumbred and punished in all their senses in their sight with the number and uglinesse of them in their hearing with their croaking in their taste by corrupting their victuals in their smell with the stinch of them in their feeling with their â—iting and venom Pererius 4. This plague was sutable to their sinne for as they regarded not the pitifull and mournfull cries of the infants which they cast into the water so now are they vexed with the crying and croaking of frogges Infants as Theodoret noteth are herein resembâ—ed to cralling frogs because they doe so creepe upon their hands and feete before they are strong to goe Perer. 5. We reade that in time past whole Cities have beene dispeopled by frogs that invaded them without any miraculous worke Plinie out of Varro reporteth of a City in France where the people were driven away by frogs Paulus Oroâ—â—us writeth that the Abderites were chased out of their Country by frogs and craved of Cassâ—nder King of Macedonia some other place of habitation Perer. So the Artoriitae of India and the people inhabiting about Paeonia and Dardania were invaded of frogs Egypt also out of the slime thereof is apt to engender frogs as Iosephus writeth and for this cause the bird Ibis is honoured among them because that kind destroyeth the frogs But there is a great difference betweene this miraculous worke and the other first in respect of the infinite number of them and their generall overspreading secondly those frogs were ingendred not all at once but by little and little here as soone as Aaron had stretched out his hand this great army of frogs was raised thirdly they all are suddenly destroyed and gathered in heapes the other as they came not all at once so neither doe they goe away all together Simler QUEST III. From whence this great aboundance of frogs came THis aboundance of frogs 1. Came neither out of the slime as Iosephus thinketh into the which hee saith they were resolved againe 2. Neither yet altogether out of the waters for though Egypt is full of pooles of water and lakes yet they sufficed not to fill all Egypt with frogges 3. Therefore they were brought forth by the power of God neither did the frogs of any naturall instinct leave the waters to creepe upon the land but like as God by the ministry of his Angels brought all the creatures to Adam to receive their names and afterward unto Noah in the Arke so were these frogs brought together and sent upon the land Perer. QUEST IV. In what place and how the Sorcerers brought forth frogs Vers. 7. THe Sorcerers did likewise 1. They brought not forth true frogs but counterfeit as before in the first plague but the frogs that Aaron caused were frogs indeed for afterward they were gathered into heapes and the land stanke of them that it might appeare to be a true miracle Pellican 2. These Sorcerers though in shew they could bring forth frogs yet they could not remove the plague of frogs which was sent upon the land Osiander 3. The place where the Sorcerers shewed their skill was in the land of Goshen which was exempted both from these and the other plagues for the Lord threatneth only to bring the frogs upon Pharaoh and his people vers 3. Iun. Simler QUEST V. Why Pharaoh calleth now for Moses and not before Vers. 8. THen Pharaoh called for Moses c. Pharaoh called not for Moses to pray for him to remove the first plague though both Philo and Iosephus so affirme there being no such thing expressed before it is hard for any man to imagine that which there is no warrant for 2. Therefore this may be the cause why Pharaoh is forced now to flee unto Moses and not before because this was a more grievous and intolerable plague which is extended upon Pharaoh and his house none are exempted from it in the other plague they might make some shift to helpe themselves as the richer sort with wine the poorer with the juyce of herbes and such like but against this plague there is no remedy Perer. 3. But it seemeth that Pharaoh had a double meaning he would have the frogs removed first that afterward hee might call backe his promise for dismissing of the people Simler QUEST VI. Why Moses saith to Pharaoh take this honour to thee Vers. 9. TAke this honour over me when I shall pray 1. Some refer these words to the event that when the frogs were removed Pharaoh should have good cause to boast of Moses and to rejoyce that he was so neere at hand to helpe him Vatab. 2. Some understand Moses to speake by way of comparison that he had now no cause to boast of his Sorcerers that could not helpe but in Moses Simler 3. But the meaning seemeth rather to be this that Moses doth yeeld unto Pharaoh this honour to appoint a time when the frogs should be taken away that God might receive greater honour thereby Iun. QUEST VII Whether Moses tempted God in prescribing the time of removing the plagues AT what time I shall pray for thee 1. Moses doth not tempt God in appointing a time for this worke as the Bethulians did Iudith chap. 7. that limited to themselves the space of five dayes to expect helpe from God for they speake doubtfully but Moses confidently Simler 2. Neither herein did Moses presume but he was assured of Gods assistance not being so much confirmed by the successe of the miracles hitherto as building upon Gods promise who had made him a God unto Pharaoh both to bind and loose to doe and undoe Simler Borrh. 3. And Moses leaveth it to Pharaohs choice to appoint a time least he might have bin thought to have wrought by constellation or other astrologicall meanes Pellican QUEST VIII Of the use and application of this plague of the frogs COncerning the application of this plague 1.
could punish them by so small a creature they might thinke that if God armed the greater creatures against them they should not endure it Simler QUEST XIV Why the Lord by the stretching out of Aarons rod brought forth lice Vers. 17. AAron stretched out his hand with his rod. It was not Aarons rod or hand that of it selfe could doe any such thing God needed not any of these meanes but thus it pleased him that this plague should bee wrought 1. To shew his great power that is able to doe great things by weake and small meanes 2. And that not only he hath power in himselfe to doe whatsoever it pleaseth him but that hee can give power unto his creatures to execute his vengeance so the Lord is able by himselfe and by others to bring forth his judgements 3. This hee did also to shew how much hee setteth by his elect to whom hee giveth such great power and to countenance the ministry and calling of these his servants Ferus QUEST XV. Why the Sorcerers could not bring forth lice Vers. 17. NOw the Enchanters assayed likewise with their enchantments to bring forth lice c. 1. The Sorcerers could not bring forth lice not as the Hebrewes imagine as Lyranus and Thostatus report of them because they cannot bring forth any creature lesse than a barly corne for if they could produce to the sight greater creatures they might more easily have compassed the lesse whose generation is not so perfect but commeth out of corruption Indeed in artificiall workes it is harder to worke upon a small substance and therefore Pliniâ— commendeth the curious devices of certaine workemen for their smalnesse as Cicero telleth of the Iliades of Homer written so small that they might bee put into a small nutshell Callicrates made antes of Ivory so little that the partes thereof could not be perceived Mirâ—ecides made a ship that a Bee might cover it with her wings But in naturall workes the reason is contrary the lesse workes are more easily perfected for the force of nature worketh from within but the artifices applieth his instruments without and cannot therefore worke upon every small substance 2. Rupertus hath this conceit that the Sorcerers did indeed bring forth lice as they did frogs before but because they did not sting and bite as the true lice which Aaron caused their fraude was discovered but this is contrarie to the text which saith they endevoured or wrought to bring forth lice but could not 3. Cajetanus thinketh that the Sorcerers did erre in their worke and did not applie their enchantments aright and so failed But it proceeded not from any vertue of their enchantments that they did counterfeit the three signes before but of the will and power of Satan who is not tied to these enchantments which are but a signe and ceremonie of their covenant and league with the devill therefore though they had failed in some circumstance the devill would not have forsaken them seeing they wrought under him and for him if it had been in their power 4. Augustine maketh this the reason why the Magicians were confounded in this third plague but it was the fourth signe counting the turning of the rods into serpents for the first to signifie that the heathen Philosophers some of them had knowledge of the Father and Sonne but erred concerning the holy Ghost But beside that some of the philosophers did see as in a cloud the mysterie of the Trinitie as both Cyrillus Eusebius Theodoret witnesse Plato in his writings maketh mention of God the Father the Word and the Minde this is rather a mysticall than historicall reason And if to seeke the cause thereof we neede flie unto mysteries it rather signifieth thus much that many of the philosophers did know divers things concerning God and his creatures but they were ignorant altogether of the Trinitie Perer. 5. The sorcerers then were hindred by the power of God who suffered them hitherto to deceive by their Satanicall illusions but now by a superiour commaunding power he controlleth the power of darkenes Simler Pererius Pellican Cajetan Ferus And Satan is hindred in his working two waâ—es either altogether that he cannot do what he would as in this place or when he is permitted to doe any thing yet the Lord so disposeth as that he cannot atchieve that end which he intendeth as appeareth in the temptation of Iob Borrh. And the Lord confoundeth them in this small and base creature for their greater confusion when their mysticall working by the operation of Satan is there restrained where they thought most easily to have prevailed Ferus QUEST XVI What the sorcerers understand by the finger of God Vers. 19. THis is the finger of God 1. Some by finger understand the plague it selfe as the Chalde Paraphrast as though in effect the sorcerers should confesse thus much that this plague was of God and they could not resist it so Iob saith the hand of God hath touched me cap 19.21 2. Augustine by the finger of God understandeth the spirit of God whereras Saint Luke saith that Christ cast out devils by the finger of God cap. 11. Saint Matthew saith by the spirit of God and fitly is the spirit compared to the fingers that as the fingers proceed from the hand and arme the arme from the bodie so the spirit proceedeth from the Father and the Sonne and as there are ten fingers upon both the hands so there are divers gifts of the spirit and here are tenne plagues answering to the number of the fingers So also Ierom saith that the arme and strength of God is the Sonne and the Spirit is the fingers and with this finger did the Lord write the tenne Commandements in the Tables of stone But this collection seemeth to be somewhat curious neither is it like that the Sorcerers had any such knowledge of the mysterie of the Trinitie 3. Therefore Rupertus thinketh that the sorcerers did onely meane by this phrase the power of God but that unwittingly also by a divine instinct they doe give an evident testimony of the holy spirit the third person of the Trinitie as Caiphas did ignorantly prophesie of Christ. But it seemeth that these sorcerers being professed servants of Satan and possessed with his spirit were not fit vessels to receive any such divine instinct 4. Pererius thinketh that by the finger of God they understand a great invincible power as the Scripture saith the Cedars of God a man of God for the tall cedars and for an excellent man But in this sense they could not denie but that the other works were also excellent more admirable than this 5. Liranus will have them by the finger of God to understand the power of some superiour devill that staied the working of the inferiors But this is an insolent speech by the name of God to understand the devill and by this meanes Satan should strive against Satan and the kingdome of
owne glorie Augustine saith Aliud Deus fecit ordinavit aliud non fecit sed ordinavit Some things God both doth ordaineth some things he doth not yet ordaineth that is disposeth of them to some good end 3. God is to be considered in the action of the hardning of the heart as a just judge that punisheth sinne by sinne so is he also an agent and not a patient or sufferer onely Their owne master of the sentences doubteth not to say that concupiscentia in quantum poena est peccati Deum habet aâ—thorem that concupiscence as it is the punishment of sinne hath God the author thereof lib. 2. distinct 23. So likewise may it be said that the hardning of the heart as it is a punishment of sinne proceedeth from God and his reason is because all punishments are just Therefore as God is a Creator giving power and life to all as hee disposeth and ordereth evill actions unto good as he is a just Judge and punisher of sinne so is he an agent in hardning of the heart therein shewing his power wisedom and justice but the sinne and evill therein committed is only of man who properly hardneth his owne heart 2. Conf. Against the toleration of any contrarie religion Vers. 29. AS soone as I am out of the Ciâ—ie Moses will not pray in the Citie which was given to superstition and Idolatrie he will separate himself from the companie and presence of the superstitious and unbeleevers that he may give himselfe to fervent and zealous praier And for this cause he said before that the people could not sacrifice unto God in Egypt Simler By this then we see that God cannot be purely served in the middest of Idolaters They which will worship God aright must sequester themselves from among such It is therefore a dangerous thing that any toleration of a contrarie religion should be admitted God will have as the whole heart in man so the whole worship in his Church where Gods arke is there Dagon shall be thrust out of his place for there is no fellowship betweene light and darkenes Christ Belial 2. Cor 6.14.15 As Iacob would suffer no superstition in his familie but removed all the images out of his house Gen. 35. so will a religious prince in his kingdom 3. Conf. Of assurance and confidence in prayer I Will spread mine hands unto the Lord and the thunder shall cease Moses here prayeth with confidence and is assured that God will heare his prayer So ought we to aske in faith pray with assurance that God will heare us S. Iames saith let him aske in faith and waver not neither let that man thinke that is he which wavereth that hee shall receive any thing of the Lord cap. 1.6.7 How then are not the Romanists ashamed thus to affirme non requiri in oratione sidem qua certo credamus Deum absolute facturum quod petimus that faith is not requisite in prayer to beleeve certainly that God will absolutely do that for us which we aske Bellarmin de bon operib in parâ—icul cap. 9. Indeed there is a double kind of such assurance one is extraordinarie which proceedeth of some speciall revelation as here Moses building upon Gods particular promises made unto him was sure his prayer should take effect the other is an ordinarie assurance which is also of two sorts either when we pray for things spirituall concerning eternall life where the faithfull have an absolute assurance to bee heard or for things â—emporall where our assurance is but conditionall that God will grant us such thing so faire forth as they are expedient And even in praying for things temporall there is also an assurance 〈…〉 and determinaâ—e which is somewhat rare yet often found in the children of God when they haâ—e 〈…〉 and constant perswasion that God will heare them for their temporall blessing which they pray for and God therein never faileth them as Iacob was assured that God would keepe him in his journey and give him bread to eat and clothes to put on Gen. 28. And of this assurance S. Iames speaketh thâ—t 〈…〉 of faith shall save the sicke Iam. 5. they which pray with confidence and assurance for the health of the bodie even shall be heard therein they which are not heard have not that fâ—iâ—h and God giveth them not that faith and assurance because he seeth such health not to be good for them There is beside this a generall assurance which every one of Gods children feeleth in their prayer as to be fully perswaded that either God will give them that particular temporall blessing which they pray for or some other gift which God seeth to be more necessary for them As Paul was not in particular assured that the pricke of the flesh should be taken from him yet he knew that his prayer should obtaine either that or a more pretious gift as the Lord said my grace is sufficient for thee he received the grace and strength of God to resist and overcome that temptation though it were not altogether taken from him Augustine concerning this difference of assurance betweene prayer for things temporall and for things spirituall hath this excellent sentence Sanitatem quis petit cum agrotat forte ei adhuc aegrotare utile est potest fieri ut hic non exandiaris at vero cum illud petis ut det tibi Deus vitam aeternam securus esto accipies A man asketh health when he is sicke and yet it may bee good for him to be sicke it may bee then thou shalt not be heard here but when thou asketh of God to give thee eternall life be out of doubt thou shalt receive it 6. Places of morall use 1. Observ. Sinne the cause of extraordinary sicknesse Vers. 10. THere came boiles breaking out into blisters As Pharaoh here and his people were smitten with boiles and ulcers for their sins which they had committed against God and his people so when the Lord sendeth strange diseases and sicknesses into the world wee must take them as signes of the wrath and indignation of God Simler As the Apostle sheweth that the Corinthians for certaine abuses which they were guiltie of in receiving the Lords Supper were chastised some with sicknesse some with death 1 Cor. 11.30 2. Observ. Gods judgements tempered with mercy Vers. 19 SEnd therefore now and gather thy cattell c. The Lord remembreth mercie in the middest of his judgements though the Lord had certainly determined to bring this plague of haile upon Egypt yet together Moses giveth advice how both they and their cattell should be preserved from it thus saith the Psalmist Mercy and truth are met righteousnesse and peace shall kâ—ssâ— one another Psal. 85.10 Gods truth and justice is accompanied with mercy truth and favour Pellican 3. Observ. Confession of sins which proceedeth onely from the feare of Gods judgements is no true or right confession Vers. 27. PHaraoh said unto them I
hard hearted and incorrigible as is evident in the example of Pharaoh 3. God also teacheth men by his example to be patient and long suffering one toward another 4. This patience of God though some abuse it yet other profit by it and their hard hearts are mollified as though Pharaoh by Gods sparing of him became more obstinate yet Nebuchadnezzar at the length by the Lords lenity and goodnesse and fatherly correction was brought to know himselfe and to confesse the true God 5. And though the evill and wicked should reape no profit by the Lords wonderfull patience yet the elect and such as are ordained to salvation are thereby called and brought unto grace as S. Paul sheweth of himselfe For this cause was I received to mercy that Iesus Christ should first shew on me all long suffering unto the ensample of them which in time to come should beleeve on him 1. Tim. 1.16 QUEST XX. How God is said to harden by the subtraction of his grace BEside there is another way whereby the ancient fathers understood God to be said to harden mens heart namely by the subtraction and withdrawing of his grace as Chrysostome God is said to give over unto a reprobate sense to harden to blind and such like Non quòd hac a Deo fiunt quippe cùm à propria hominis malitia proveniant sed quia Deo justè homines deserente hac illis contingunt Not because these things are done by God which proceed of mans malice but because while God doth justly forsake men these things doe happen unto them So also Augustine ludurare dicitur Deus quem mollire noluerit God is said to harden whom he will not nullifie excacare dicitur quem illuminare nolverit And he is said to blind him whom he will not iluminate Gregorie also upon these words of the Lord to Moses I will harden Pharaohs heart thus writeth Obdurare Deus per posâ—â—iam dicitur quando cor reprobum per gratiam non 〈◊〉 God is said by his justice to harden the heart when he doth not by his grace mollifie a reprobate heart So Thomas Aquinas Excacatio obduratio duo important c. The blinding and hardning of the heart implieth two things one is the internall act of the minde adhering unto evill and being adverse from God and so God is not the cause of the hardnesse of the heart The other is the subtraction of grace whereby it commeth to passe that the â—ind is not illuminate to see God c. and in this respect God is the cause of induration This exposition also is true but it expresseth not all that seemeth to be contained in this phrase that God is said to harden Pharaohs heart QUEST XXI How God is said occasionaliter by ministring the occasion which the wicked abuseth to harden the heart THere is then a sixt way of interpreting these words God is said to harden mans heart occasionaliter by way of occasion when the wicked take occasion by such things as fall out and are done by Gods providence to be more hardned and confirmed in their sinne 1. For as all things as prosperity adversity life death fulnesse want and whatsoever else doe worke together unto good to those that feare God as the Apostle saith Rom. 8. So on the contrary all things fall out for the worst unto the wicked and impenitent so the wonders which God wrought in Egypt served to confirme the Hebrewes in their faith but Pharaoh through his owne malice was thereby hardned 2. The things which the Lord doth whereby the wicked take occasion to be hardned are of three sorts either inwardly in the mind as by stirring their affections as of anger feare hope desire which they by their corruption turne unto evill or else such things as are done about them as admonitions corrections mercies benefits which they also ungratiously abuse or they are things externall or without them as the objects of pleasure honour and such like whereby their hard heart is puffed up and swelleth And all these things being good of themselves they through the hardnesse of their heart pervert unto their destruction as S. Peter speaketh of some which through ignorance and unbeleefe doe pervert the Scriptures 2. Pet. 3.16 And S. Paul sheweth that sinne tooke occasion by the commandement and wrought in him all manner of concupiscence Rom. 7.8.3 Thus Pharaoh was hardned by occasion of Gods workes the plagues and wonders which were shewed in Egypt by the wonders because he saw his Magitians could doe the like by the plagues because they touched not him but happened without they came not all at once but with some respite betweene and because he saw that they continued not long but were soone removed 4. To this purpose Augustine Vt tale cor haberet Pharaoh quòd patientia Dâ—o non mâ—veraâ—ur ad pietatem propriâ— sunt vitii quòd vero facta sunt ea quibus cor suo â—itio jam malâ—gnum divinis jussionibus resisteret c. dispensationis fuit divina In that Pharaoh had such an heart which could not be moved by the patience of God unto piety it was his owne fault but that such things were done whereby his heart being evill of it selfe did resist the commandement of God it was of the divine dispensation quaest 18. iâ— Exod. This exposition also of Augustine may bee received but yet there is somewhat further to be considered in Gods concurring in the hardning of Pharaohs heart QUEST XXII God 〈◊〉 sâ—â—d to harden the heart as the event is taken for the cause THere is further a seventh exposition for in the Scripture that is often taken for the cause of a thing which is but the event of it a Chrysostome noteth upon these words Ioh. 17. None of them perished but the child of perdition that the Scriptures might be fulfilled here the Scripture Quae eventus sunâ— pro causa ponit putteth that for the cause which was the event for Iudas did not perish to that end that the Scripture should be fulfilled but it so fell out that the Scripture in Iudas perishing was fulfilled Damascen giveth the like instance in the 51. Psalme Against thee only have I sinned and done evill in thy sight that thou maist be justified in thy sayings and cleere when thou art judged But David did not sinne to that end that God might be justified God had no need of his sinne to set forth his glory So it fell out that God spared David and by his mercy overcame his sinne yet hee sinned not to that end like as when a man is at his worke and one commeth and so he breaketh off he should say my friend came to day to hinder my worke whereas his friend had no such end in his comming So Iacob said to his sonnes Wherefore dealt yee so evill with me as to tell the man whether yee had yet a brother or no Gen. 43.6 Iacobs sonnes in so telling intended no evill or
evening by the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 morning it cannot be avoided but that S. Matthew meaneth the morning and till the morning of the third day Christ was not risen therefore Pererius without cause findeth fault here with Thostatus yet notwithstanding in this place the eventide or twilight is not taken any of these three waies but properly for the shutting in of the day QUEST X. Of the time when the Passeover should be killed betweene the two evenings BUt what should be here meant by the two evenings there are divers opinions 1 Some take these two evenings for the two twilights of the evening and morning Lippoman But that cannot be for so he alloweth the whole night for the killing of the paschall lambe which was to bee counted with the fifteenth day following whereas they are commanded to kill the Passeover on the 14. day at even 2. Masâ—uâ— in 5. Iosua reporteth this to be the opinion of most of the Hebrewes that the evening is to be taken from the first declining of the sunne in the afternoone untill it set and they are the two evenings the first when the sunne beginneth to turne in the afternoone the other when it is in the setting so also Rabbi Salomon But this seemeth to be somewhat hard to take halfe the day for the evening for after the sunne beginneth to decline there is much day behind as it is called Gen. 29.7 haioâ— gadol which cannot be said to be any part of the evening 3. Some doe take these two evenings the one to begin at the sunne set the other when it beginneth to be night and the space betweene which we call the twilight to be those two evenings Aben Ezra Oleaster Bâ—rrh Which space they define to containe about an houre and a third part Pellican But this interpretation cannot hold for after the sunne set began the 15. day to be counted when they were first to eat unleavened bread Levit. 29.9 which was upon the eve of the fourteenth day chap. 12.18 that is presently following the 14. day but they were to kill the paschall lambe upon the 14. day before the 15. day came so the times must be distinguished betweene the killing of the lambe which was betweene the two eventides upon the 14. day and the eating thereof with unleavened bread which was in the evening following after the sunne set Perer. 4. Wherefore there remaineth a fourth exposition which is this They divided the naturall day from sun to sun into foure parts which each of them containeth three houres and the first part was from the breake of day for the three first houres and was called of the last houre tertia the third houre the second part sexta the sixth houre the third nona the ninth houre and the fourth from thence unto night and was called vespera the evening the first evening was toward the sunne set some two houres before Cajetanus or three and the other at the sun set in this space they were to kill the paschall lambe of this opinion is Iosephus a most expert and skilfull man in the Jewish rites and observations who writeth that the Priests used to kill the paschall sacrifice from the ninth houre to the eleventh lib. 7. de bel Iud. c. 17. and it seemeth that in the twelfth houre which was the last they did rost and dresse the lambe and after sun set eat it And this interpretation may be thus further confirmed 1. Because they were to kill the paschall lambe on the 14. day but after the sunne was set the fifteenth day began Perer. 2. If they should not have killed the lambe till the sunne set they should not seeme to have sufficient time the night then comming upon them to kill the lambe dresse and prepare it 3. The example of our Saviour doth warrant it who sent his Disciples before the evening to prepare the Passeover and when even was come he sate downe with the twelve to eat it Matth. 26.14 The Passeover was killed and made readie before the evening came Masius 4. Beside the phrase of Scripture doth also approve and justifie this interpretation for when as our Saviour fed the five thousand before they sat downe it is said the even was come Matth. 14.11 when the sun was not yet set for the time would not then have served to have placed them all upon the ground and given them all bread there being so few servitors none but Christs Disciples and beside S. Marke saith this was done when the day was farre spent 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chap. 6.35 This then was one evening when the sunne began to draw low then afterward it is said When the evening was come Christ was in the mountaine alone Matth. 14.23 this was the other evening when the sunne was set Perer. Iun. Simler QUEST XI Whether the Passeover was killed in the first evening when the foureteenth day began or the latter BUt whereas the Hebrewes counted the dayes and so observed their Feasts from evening to evening so that every day civill had two evenings the one where it began the other where it ended the question is whether the paschall lambe were to be killed on the evening when the 14. day began or when it ended But it doth evidently appeare that was to be killed in the end of the 14. day and so in the latter evening and not in the first 1. Because they were commanded to eat unleavened bread in the end of the 14. day at even chap. 12.18 when the fifteenth day began for they were not to eat unleavened bread till the fifteenth day Levit. 13.6 But if they were to take the first evening when the fourteenth day began then they were to eat unleavened bread all the 14. day 2. Againe it is said that they should eat the flesh the same night with unleavened bread that is the same night after they killed the Passeover but if they killed it the evening before when the 14. day began then they did eat unleavened bread upon the 14. day and so eight dayes in all for from the evening before the 14. day till the evening after the 21. day are eight dayes but they were commanded onely to eat unleavened bread seven dayes from the 14. at even till the 21. day at even chap. 12.18 3. Beside the practice of our Saviour Christ sheweth how the Passeover was to bee kept according to the law hee did eat the Passeover the same night wherein he was betraied 1 Cor. 11.23 and the next day he suffered which was the 15. day of the moneth for it is the generall received opinion that Christ suffered upon the 15. day of the first moneth insomuch that Beda saith Nulli licet dubitare Christiano No Christian ought to doubt thereof it must be then of all confessed that Christ in all respects observed the law if he suffered upon the 15. day and the eve before eat the Passeover being immediatly before prepared and made readie for him then
not here signifie the sex but the kind as many times we say a man hath oves and vaccas sheepe and kine both which words are of the Feminine Gender and yet our meaning is that he hath of both sexes Thostatus 3. But all this question is moved without cause for the originall word sheb signifieth not agnus a lambe either male or female but pecus a small beast noting not the sex but the kind and so Vatab. and Iun. translate QUEST XIV The generall signification of the rites of the Passeover Vers. 8. THey shall eat the flesh the same night The rites and ceremonies of the paschall lambe did betoken these things in generall 1. The great haste and speed that they were to make which was signified both by the meat which they did eat it must be rost with fire which was sooner done than to be boyled or sodden in water they must eat their bread unleavened because they had no time to leaven it neither were they to breake a bone of it they should have no time to picke the bones and sucke the marrow As also by their manner of eating with their staves in their hand and shoes on their feet as readie for their journie neither were they to carrie any thing forth of the doores vers 46. the time would not serve them one to visit another and to send part thereof to their neighbours 2. The other thing generally signified was that hard servitude which they had endured in Egypt which is insinuated by the sower herbs and unsavory leavened bread and the rosting of the lambe 3. So then the celebrating of the Passeover did put them in minde of two great benefits which they had received of their deliverance from the plague when the first borne of Egypt were smitten and of their freedome from the bondage in Egypt which later as being the more principall is oftner spoken of in Scripture and as some have observed it is mentioned 50. severall times Perer. QUEST XV. The particular application of the rites and ceremonies of the paschall lambe FOr the particular application of these rites 1. They were to eat the flesh the same night not the flesh without the sinewes as some Hebrewes have strictly taken the word but whatsoever was apt and fit to be eaten those parts excepted which because of their uncleanenesse and unaptnesse for nourishment use to be cast away as the guts and entrals and they were to eat it the same night after the sunne was set which was the the beginning of the 15. day 2. It must not be eaten rawe 1. That is not throughly dressed or prepared as Rab. Salomon for they needed not to be admonished not to eat raw flesh 2. Oleaster hath here a conceit by himselfe that â—a which is here translated of all raw should signifie rather broken or cut of the word nava and the meaning to be that they should not cut it in peeces to be boyled But beside that both the Chalde and Septuagint doe interpret rawe and all other interpreters and Oleaster hath this conceit alone by himselfe this is expressed afterward that it should bee dressed whole with the head feet and purtenance vers 9. neither were they divided into peeces but as they did eat it after it was rosted for they were forbidden to carrie any of the flesh out of the house vers 46. Iun. 3. And for two reasons were they commanded to rost it rather than to boile it both because of more haste and rosted meat is held to bee stronger food for in the boyling much of the moisture and substance of the meat goeth out into the water and they were not to eat it not thorowly dressed lest they might in the eating cast it forth againe Perer. 3. They must eat it also with unleavened bread 1. Because it was sooner prepared as Abraham in haste caused unleavened cakes to be made Gen. 18. and so did Lot likewise Gen. 19. to entertaine the Angels 2. By this was signified that they should leave and forsake all the Egyptian superstitions and corruptions which are understood by leaven as in the same sense our Saviour biddeth his Disciples to take heed of the leaven of the Pharisies 3. It is to be considered that in this first Passeover they were not commanded to eat unleavened bread seven dayes neither did they intend so much but they carried their dow forth unleavened not for any religion in abstaining from leavened bread but for their haste as it is expressed vers 19. Therefore that prescription to abstaine from leavened bread seven dayes vers 14. belonged to the perpetuall observation of the pasch but all the other rites prescribed unto vers 14. appertained to the first Passeover Iosephus thinketh that they did eat unleavened bread 30. dayes for want of other and that they had all that time no more sustenance than they brought out of Egypt and eat thereof very sparingly onely for necessitie and in remembrance of their penurie and want they keepe the Feast of unleavened bread eight dayes lib. 2. antiquit cap. 5. In the which speech of Iosephus some things are very probable as that they lived of the provision which they brought out of Egypt thirtie dayes untill Manna fell which was upon the sixteenth day of the second moneth for in the fifteenth day they came to the wildernesse of Sin where they murmured for meat and the next day in the morning the Manna was sent chap. 16.1 and 8. It is also very like that their bread was unleavened all this while because they made it of that unleavened masse which they brought out of Egypt vers 39. But it is not like that they kept the Feast of unleavened bread in remembrance of that penurie and want for then they should have kept it thirtie dayes but rather it was kept for a commemoration of a benefit which they received in their deliverance out of Egypt upon the fifteenth day and the overthrow of the Egyptians in the red Sea the one and twentieth day seven dayes after which was the reason of that observation of the Feast of unleavened bread seven dayes and beside they are not commanded to keepe it eight dayes but onely seven Vers. 8. With sower herbs shall they eat it 1. The Latine translator readeth lactuâ— is agreâ—â—ibuâ— with wild lâ—â—â—ice so also Rab. Salomon 2. The Septuagint 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which are a certaine kind of bitter herbe whereof Theophrastus writeth histor plane lib. 7. cap. 11. and Pliniâ— lib. 19. cap. 8. Theodorus Gaza doth sometime interpret it endive sometime wild lettice 3. But it seemeth rather generally to be understood of sower herbs not of any speciall kind Lyranus as the Chalde also readeth so also Vutab â—un in remembrance of their bitter affliction in Egypt 4. The Hebrew word is merorâ—m bitternesse which sometime is taken for the bitter sorrow of the mind as 〈◊〉 3.15 and so Oleaster taketh it to be meanâ— here But
saith That God gave them favour in the sight of the Egyptians neither did the Israelites borrow these things but they simply asked them and the other frankly gave them Pererius thinketh that the Israelites asked these things betweene the ninth and the tenth plague because when there was one plague yet behinde the Lord bad Moses to speake to the people to aske of the Egyptians chap. 11.2 But in that place only it is shewed what the Lord commanded Moses to doe hee spake to the people then to doe it but it was not acted then as likewise in the same place mention is made how the Lord would goe forth at midnight and smite all the first borne which was not done then but afterward 2. Wherefore I rather thinke with Calvin and Iunius that the Israelites asked these things of the Egyptians after the last plague immediatly before their departure the reasons are these 1. The Egyptians seeing their first borne slaine were afraid of their owne lives and therefore in respect thereof they regarded not their substance Tanquam si hoc pretio animas redemissent As if they had redeemed their lives with this price Iun. And as Calvin Hinc clamor ille desperationis index omnes mortui sumus hinc facilitas illa in dando supellectile Hence came that desperate cry wee are all dead men hence that facility in giving their house-hold stuffe 2. That this asking of the Egyptians came after all the plagues it is shewed chap. 3.20 I will smite Egypt with all my wonders c. after that shall he let them goe then it followeth in the next verse I will make this people to be favoured of the Egyptians c. for every man shall aske of his neighbour c. 3. The text saith that they shall put the jewels and raiment upon their sonnes and their daughters that is shall load them with them and lay them upon their shoulders it is like then they were upon going when they made their burthens 4. If they had asked them before it had beene only to borrow them not to have them of gift but it is shewed already that they did not borrow them quest 42. 5. They had no colour to borrow their jewels and costly rayment before for they asked them to set forth the service of God which was upon their going for Pharaoh said Goe serve the Lord as yee have said vers 31. QUEST XLV What kind of favour it was which the Lord gave the Israelites in the sight of the Egyptians Vers. 36. ANd the Lord gave the people favour c. 1. Some thinke that this favour was by reason of some supernaturall grace and amiable quality which was given unto the Israelites whereby the Egyptians were allured unto their love as the booke of Iudith saith was given unto Iudith an extraordinary comelinesse whereby she was commended to all that saw her Iudith chap. 10. 2. Another opinion is that this favour was wrought rather in the hearts of the Egyptians toward the Israelites that the Lord who overruleth mens hearts did incline the affections of the Egyptians toward his people and this is the truer opinion as both may appeare by the use of the same phrase elsewhere as it is said that Ioseph found favour in his masters sight Gen. 39.3 which was not caused so much by Iosephs amiable person as by the working of his masters affection for the reason is there shewed of this favour his master saw that the Lord was with Ioseph so that the cause of this favour was not the externall object of Iosephs person but the internall effect of his masters affection likewise this is evident by the contrary for as it is said He turned their hearts to hate his people Psalm 105.25 so their hearts were turned againe to love and favour his people 3. Yet was it not such favour as Cajetane supposeth that the Egyptians prevented the peoples asking and forced them to aske as he would inferre upon the signification of the word Vajashilum which in hiphil he saith signifieth to cause or compell to aske But neither is the word so taken in hiphil but rather signifieth to lend or give one his asking as Anna using the same word 1. Sam. 1.28 saith shee had given or lent her sonne unto the Lord where hishilti in hiphil cannot be translated Shee had caused the Lord to aske And beside what needed that circumstance for the Egyptians to have forced the Israelites to aske and then to have given them their asking they might at once have given them unasked 4. Neither was this a worke of regeneration of the Egyptians whereby they suddenly of wolves became lambes as Master Calvin very well noteth but it was a speciall worke of Gods power onely at this time thus to sway their affections for they were soone changed againe when they pursued the Israelites with all hostility 5. And although this inclining of the Egyptians hearts and bending of their affections was Gods speciall worke yet it pleased the Lord to use some subordinate meanes to procure it and give occasion thereof as namely these two the one was the great reputation and estimation which Moses was in both with Pharaoh and with his people which reason is yeelded of this favour chap. 11.3 Calvin The other because the Egyptians by the death of their first borne were in such perplexity and feare that they were glad to give them any thing to redeeme their lives Thostatus So it is said in the Psalm 105.38 Egypt was glad at their departure QUEST XLVI Why the Lord enriched his people with the Egyptians substance NOW the reasons wherefore the Lord gave the Israelites such favour and thereby enriched them were these 1. To accomplish the promise made to Abraham Gen. 15.14 That the people should come out with great substance Osiander 2. For the comfort of the Israelites whom the Egyptians before had stripped of that they had and divers wayes oppressed now some amends is made them by possessing the precious jewels of the Egyptians Ferus 3. As also by this meanes the Egyptians were animated to pursue and follow after the Israelites to their owne confusion and destruction Ferus 4. And hereby the Israelites were furnished with many rich ornaments which afterwards served for the adorning and beautifying of the Tabernacle Ferus QUEST XLVII Of which Egyptians they asked and who of the Israelites and what Vers. 35. THey asked of the Egyptians 1. These were not the Egyptians inhabiting out of the land of Goshen as some thinke because it is like if any had inhabited among the Israelites they should have beene exempted from the plagues of Egypt which is not to be thought But this followeth not for such plagues as befell either the persons of the Egyptians or their proper substance might as well be laid upon the Egyptians dwelling among the Israelites as upon others as is shewed before quest 33. in 7 chap. And that these Egyptians of whom the Israelites asked these things
enjoyned to bee a principall feast day unto the Lord 〈◊〉 chap. 12.16 Vers. 8. For this cause did the Lord this unto me when he brought me I.V.C. or that he brought me c. S. This is that which the Lord did unto me where c. L. but here the word baghabur for or because is omitted this is done because of that which the Lord did A.P.B.G. This last seemeth to be the best reading See the 6. question following Vers. 12. Thou shalt sâ—t over unto the Lord. I.V. cause to passe A.P.C.H. separate L.S. set apart G. appoint B. The first rather best agreeth that is he shall deliver it out of his hand unto the Lord as having now no more power over it Vers. 15. Therefore I doe sacrifice unto Iehovah B.G. cum caeter macte I doe kill I. but the other word is more fit because things holy unto God are rather said to be sacrificed than killed Zabach more usually is taken to sacrifice Vers. 13. Thou shalt cut off his necke I.A. better than kill it C. L. or breake his neck B. G.P.V. gharaph signifieth to strike off the necke as Deut. 21.4.6 Vers. 18. The children of Israel went up well appointed or girded P. not armed A.B.G.C.L.V. for whence should they have so much armour nor in battell order I. that is five in a ranke I. for the word signifieth fived they would so have taken up a great length of ground nor in the fifth generation S. for that is contrary to the Lords promise Gen. 15.16 that they should come forth in the fourth generation the word chamushim is derived of chomesh taken for the fift ribbe 2. Sam. 2.18 The meaning then iâ— that their loynes were girded up as they were commanded to eat the Passeover chap. 12.11 and so they went forth as appointed for their journey 3. The explanation of difficult questions QUEST I. How the first borne were accounted that were consecrate unto God Vers. 2. SAnctifie unto the Lord all the first borne 1. What the Lord meaneth by the first borne is expressed in the next words that which openeth the wombe so that here the first borne are so accounted in respect of the mother but in the right of the first borne there was respect had unto the father as Iacob calleth Ruben the beginning of his strength for Ioseph though he were Rachels first borne yet was he not Iacobs but here that is called the first borne which openeth the wombe of his mother as Christ according to this law was the first borne of Mary Simler Though Ioseph her espoused husband had as some thinke other children by a former wife so that if a man had divers wives the first borne of every one was holy unto God 2. It is added among the children of Israel as well of man as of beast because those beasts are excluded which were wilde and not serviceable among them Calvin QUEST II. In what sense the first borne are said to be the Lords Vers. 2. FOr it is mine 1. The first borne are said to be the Lords not onely by a common right as all things are said to be the Lords the earth and the fulnesse thereof 2. Nor yet only because the encrease of every thing is thankfully to bee acknowledged to proceed and come of God Pelliâ—â—n 3. But the first borne of Israel both of man and beast were the Lords by a peculiar right because he preserved them in Egypt when all the first borne of Egypt were destroyed Iun. in Analys 4. God might have commanded all to be offered unto him but he would not challenge or expect of them his full right and due lest it might have seemed grievous unto them but only hee requireth that which hee had more specially preserved Ferus QUEST III. Why the law of the Passeover is repeated Vers. 3. THerefore no leavened bread shall be eaten This institution of the passeover is now againe repeated and the caveat concerning leavened bread is often inculcate and urged 1. Both because mans corrupt and crooked nature had need to be often admonished being ready to forget the precepts of God and to wrest and deprave them Ferus 2. As also to put them in minde of that which was signified hereby to take heed both of the leaven of corrupt doctrine and of corrupt manners Pellican 3. The Hebrewes give this reason of this double institution because of the double sense of the Law one the plaine and open sense the other the hid and secret sense which reason we also approve but not in their meaning which wrest the Scripture with fabulous glosses and ridiculous collections but this wee affirme that in the passeover was a double sense the one concerning that outward ceremony which belonged to the paschall lambe the other hath relation unto Christ the true paschall lambe by whose bloud we are redeemed Simler QUEST IV. Whether Abib were the proper name of a moneth Vers. 4. THis day came ye out in the moneth Abib 1. Some take this to be no proper name of the moneth but a description of it by the fruit that began to ripe then and so they translate Mense novarum fruguâ— the moneth of new fruit so the Chalde Septuagint Latine Pagni Simler Pelican and M. Calvin giveth this reason because the Hebrewes had no proper names of their moneths but such as 2000. yeere after they borrowed of the Chaldes Contra. 1. It was not 2000. yeeres untill the Captivity of Babylon when the Hebrewes borrowed those Chalde names nor full out 1000. as is shewed before quest 46. in chap. 12.2 And further that other names of the moneths are found in Scripture beside the Chalde names as Zif the second moneth Ethanim the seventh Bul the eight is likewise declared afore quest 4. in chap. 12.3 And if Abib were here no proper name it would bee uncertaine which moneth hee meaneth the first or the second for in both there were ripe eares of barley in the first and of wheate in the next for they were to offer of their first fruits also in the feast of weekes Levit. 23.20 Numb 28.26 2. Yet they are deceived that tooke this moneth Abib for the same with the moneth Ab which answereth to our July as Pagnine for it is evident by the keeping of the passeover on the 14. day of the first moneth that the Israelites came out in the first moneth 3. Therefore it is more probable that Abib is here the proper name of the first moneth so called because then the corne was spindled and began to be eared for Abib signifieth the spindle with the eare as Exod. 1.9.3.1 Iun. Vatab. Not that the fruit was ripe this moneth but it began to flower and shew Calvin And thus the Hebrewes in all their feasts had relation unto the fruits of the ground the passeover was kept when the corne eared Pentecost when it was ripe and the feast of the Tabernacles in the end of the yeere when they had
gathered in the fruits of the yeere Simler And this moneth when all things began to revive and spring was answerable unto the state of the Israelites who now were revived by their joyfull deliverance from the winter and boistrous stormes of Egypt Borrh. QUEST V. Why the Israelites are charged to keepe the Passeover in the land of Canaan and not before Vers. 5. NOw when the Lord hath brought thee into the land of the Cananites 1. Hence it is evident that the Israelites were not bound to keepe the passeover in the wildernesse neither do we reade that they kept it more than once there in the second yeere Numb 9. and the next passeover was kept under Iosuah Ios. 5. eight and thirty yeeres after Simler The reason whereof might be this because they were not circumcised after they came out of Egypt for the space of 40. yeeres and the law was that no uncircumcised person should eat of the passeover this also signifieth that we shall not keepe our full and perfect passeover till we come into our heavenly Canaan Pellican 2. The reasons why they are charged to keepe the passeover in that plentifull land that abounded with milke and hony was partly to stirre them up to be thankfull unto God for his benefits and abundant liberality Calvin As also to admonish them that they should remember God in their prosperity and take heed that their full estate did not make them forget him 3. But now in that so fruitfull and pleasant a country as Palestina was is become barren and desolate this judgement hath befallen the Jewes and their country for their sinnes Pellican 4. Five nations only are here named that inhabited Canaan the Cananites Hittites Amorites Hivites Jebusites but the rest also are understood Iun. QUEST VI. Whether the keeping of the passeover was the cause of their deliverance or that the cause of the other Vers. 8. BEcause of that which the Lord did unto me 1. Some doe make this the sense of the place and read thus For this did the Lord doe so unto mee Septuagint Chalde Iun. Vatab. and would have this to be the meaning that God did shew all these wonders in Egypt and deliver them from thence to the end that they should keepe a memoriall of them 2. Others doe reade thus as is set downe supplying the word which and make this the reason of keeping the passeover because the Lord delivered them out of Egypt Simler Calvin Latine Genevens Pagine Montan. And this seemeth to be the more agreeable exposition both for that the cause of a thing goeth before the use thereof the wonders which the Lord did were first done and then the passeover commanded in remembrance thereof this was because of the other rather than the other because of this And againe the children aske not a reason of those things which the Lord did for them but they demand the cause of their service which they performe unto God as is shewed chap. 12.26 and chap. 13.14 Piscator QUEST VII How these things should be as signets upon their hands Vers. 9. IT shall be for a signe upon thine hand c. 1. This phrase is not only used as a similitude that they should alway have the benefits of the Lord in remembrance as a thing alwayes in their sight and that the passeover should as a signet on their head and as a frontlet betweene their eyes call to their remembrance their deliverance out of Egypt Sic Simler Pellic. though in the Proverbs this phrase is used in that sense by way of similitude as Prov. 1.9 They shall be as ornaments to thy head and as chaines to thy necke and chap. 6.21 Bind them to thy heart and tye them to thy necke And by these three to put it on the hands and forehead and to have it in the mouth are signified the faith in the heart the confession in the mouth and the operation of the hands whereby we expresse our thankfulnesse unto God Borrh. 2. Yet this is not all the meaning of this place but it is like also that they used some externall signe as in wearing signets upon their hands and frontlets upon their browes to put them in minde of the Law of God as for the same cause they were commanded to make fringes upon their garments Numb 15.38 And as they were commanded to write the Law upon the postes of their doores so also to binde them 〈◊〉 signets to their hands Deut. 6.6 for like as the Idolatrous nations did weare earings and frontlets in honour of their Idols as the Romane Gentrie were knowne by their rings and their Priests and their wives by their tutuli their foretops so the Lord would have the Israelites to use these ornaments as ensignes of their profession Simler Thus M. Calvin approving the first exposition yet assenteth also unto this if any man thinke that Moses alludeth unto those Qui tarditatis suae conscii subsidia memoriae sibi conficiunt non repugno Which because of their dulnesse doe use these things as helpes to their memory I will not gainsay Iunius also giveth this note Deut. 6.8 upon these words Thou shalt bind them as a signe to thine hand Typus accurata observationis atque perpetuae This was a type of the exact and continuall keeping of the Law Therefore there is no inconvenience to thinke that as they used fringes upon their garments so also frontlets and signets that should be alwayes in their eyes to put them in minde of the Law of God as reverend Beza very well noteth also Erat hic ritus quem postea Iudaei suis superstitionibus contaminarunt a Domino constitutus ut esset veluti 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 legis beneficiorum This rite which afterward the Iewes corrupted with their superstitions was appointed of God that it should be as a remembrance and monument of the Law and of the benefits which the Lord had bestowed upon them Annot. in Matth. 23.5 3. Yet this being admitted I cannot see how the Jewes out of this place can prove that use and custome of writing some part of the law in scroules of parchment and so binding them to their foreheads and to the wrests of their hands as they doe at this day Simler For whereas they write in those parchments certaine sacred lections which they call parashoth Beza which are the foure places where mention is made of these signes upon their hands and frontlets betweene their eyes two out of this Chapter vers 9. and 16. two out of Deut. chap. 6.8 and chap. 11.18 what warrant can they shew for the excerpting of these foure texts rather than any other this seemeth then to be a tradition of their owne without any ground in Scripture 4. But that superstitious use of the Jewes who doe place the greatest part of their religion in carrying about with them their tephillim and zizim their frontlets and fringes as they call them thinking that thereby they are preserved from evill
my song I.V.C. praise B.G.A.P.I. the first rather Ziâ—arah commeth of Zamar to sing Vers. 2. And I will build him a tabernacle I.G.C.A.P. rather than I will praise him B.L.S.V. navah signifieth to dwell as Habak 2.5 he shall not dwell or continue and in hiphil to cause to dwell Vers. 4. In the reedie sea I.V. the sea suph A.P. rather than the red sea B.G. cum cater suph signifieth a reed or bulrush Vers. 6. Thy right hand is glorious to me in power I better than thy right hand is glorious in power B.G. cum cater the word is nedari with an affix pronoune Vers. 6. Thy right hand hath bruised them A.B. cum caeter better than with thy right hand thou hast brused them I. for a preposition should be supplied here which is wanting in the Hebrew and the word jeminca is used before in the beginning of the verse in the nominative case Vers. 9. Mine hand shall take them for an inheritance I. shall rule over them S. bâ—tter than shall destroy them A.P.V.C.L. cum cater the word torish of jarash to inherite signifieth properly to cause to inherite sometime it signifieth to expell but that sense is not fit here and beside it was their intendment to bring them againe into their subjection and service cap. 14.5 Vers. 11. Who is like unto thee among the mightie I.L. rather than among the gods A.P.V.B.G.C. for beside that â—elim is so taken for the strong and mightie 2. King 24.15 this sense is more generall and exalteth God above all that are called mightie Angels or men Vers. 17. Plant them in the mountaine of thine inheritance B.G.C.A.P. cum cater of thy possession I. but nachalah rather signifie than inheritance as the Septuagint translate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vers. 19. Pharaohs horses went with his chariots I.C.P.G. not Pharaohs horsemen L. V. for that is expressed afterward nor Pharaohs hâ—rse S. or Pharaoh on horseback went B. for though it be sus in the singular in the originall yet it is taken for the plurall as cap. 14.23 it includeth a signification also of Pharaohs personall going into the sea Vers. 20. With timbrels and daunces B. G. C. cum cater rather than timbrels and flutes I. the word mecholoth is taken for dauncers Iud. 21.20 and so waâ— the use for the women to come forth with daunces to meete those that returned with victorie as Iud. 11.34 1. Sam. 18.5 and heere as Miriam is said to take a timbrell only so it is like the other women did neither had it been so fit for them to play upon flutes because of their singing and answering Moses Vers. 22. And they went forth toward the desert of Shur or that they might go forth to the wildernesse of Shur I. better then they went out into the desert of Shur B.G. cum cater for they did not immediately enter into the desert of Shur after they left the red sea but they travelled first three dayes thorow the wildernesse of Ethan Num. 33.8 Iun. Vers. 23. He or everie one called the name of the place Maraâ— I.V.A.P.C. not the name of the place was called B.G.S.L. for the word â—ara is in the 〈◊〉 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QVEST. I. Of the antiquitie and excellencie of Moses song Vers. 1. THen sang Moses 1. This song of Moses as it is the first that we reade of in Scripture so it is the most auncient song that is extant in the world for the songs of Linus Musaeus Orpheus are found to be 300. yeares after this song of Moses 2. Iosephus saith that Moses composed this song in hexameter verse and lest any should thinke this strange Hierome in his preface to the booke of Iob witnesseth that all that booke from those words in the beginning of the third chapter Let the day perish wherein I was borne unto those words cap. 42. therefore I abhorre my selfe and repent in dust and ashes iâ— written in hexameter verse for the most part consisting of Dactilus and Spondaeus the two usuall feete of an hexameter verse Perer. 3. But whereas Iosephus in the same place saith that the Israelites did passe all that night in mirth and rejoycing for their deliverance that seemeth not to be so for it was morning before the Egeptians were drowned cap. 14.24 The Lord looked toward the Egyptians in the morning watch and the Israelites saw their dead bodies upon the sea banke which they could not so well discerne by night therefore this rejoycing was solemnized the next day not the same night QUEST II. In what order Moses the children of Israel and Miriam sang this song COncerning the order and manner how this song was sung 1. Some are of opinion that Moses sang it alone and that he taught the people afterward this song who did often sing it as they had occasion Thostatus and Iosephus thinketh that the people first rejoyced and gave thankes unto God and that afterward Moses framed this song in hexameter verse but the text favoureth not this opinion which saith that then even at that time Moses and the children of Israel sang wherefore I subscribe rather unto Philo who saith that Moses began first every verse and then the people followed this is agreeable to the text where Moses boginneth in his owne person saying I will sing unto the Lord and seeing that Moses and the children of Israel sang this song who were not all Prophets to endite a propheticall song neither in so short a time could they have learned this song before it is like that the one followed the other and that Mosesâ—egan â—egan and then the people repeated either the whole verse or the ground of the song only which was this Sing unto the Lord for he hath triumphed gloriously the horse and his Rider hath hee overthrowne in the sea which verse is after repeated by Miriam and her companie for so was it the use in solemne songs to have one verse repeated as Psalme 136. that clause For his mercie endureth for ever is often repeated Now in what order of consort and consent Miriam sang and answered the men is not agreed upon 1. Some think that Miriam with the women answered the men and sang the ground of the song by tuâ—nes Oleaster Iun. and Philo sometime is of the same opinion that there was a mixt harmonie of the great and base voyces of the men and of the sharpe tunes of the women 2. But I thinke rather that there were two companies of fingers of the men apart and of the women apart and that as Moses began and the people followed so did Miriam sing and the women answered her Sic Pellican Simler Calvin And this may seeme more probable 1. Because it was the use for the women only by themselves not mingled with men to celebrate such solemnities as appeareth Iud. 11. when Iepthahs daughter met him and 1. Sam. 18.5 when the daughters of Israel
Therefore the Lords day must be warranted by the word before it can be sanctified and set apart to holy uses 5. And seeing the Jewes Sabbath is warranted by the word it must also be changed by the word there must bee the same authority in the alteration of it which was in the first institution The Lords day then was not appointed by the ordinary authority of the Church for then the Church by the same authority might constitute another day if there were cause which cannot be admitted but as Vrsinus saith Apostolica Ecclesiae pro libertate sibi à Christo donata c. The Apostolike Church according to the liberty given them of Christ did make choice of the first day for the seventh The Church then by the extraordinary power of the Apostles directed specially thereunto by the Spirit of God did alter the day and Tostatus saith well Tota Ecclesia Spiritu sancto ducta hunc deem instituit The whole Church being led by the holy Ghost did institute this day quaest 11. 7. Conf. Of the preeminence of the Lords day beyond other festivals ANother errour of the Romanists is that they require sanctification and necessary keeping of all holy dayes as making a necessity of keeping all alike Rhemist annot Galath 4. sect 5. Contra. 1. The same difference that was betweene the legall Sabbath and other their festivals remaineth still betweene the Lords day observed among Christians and other holy dayes but the Sabbath day was more strictly observed than the greatest festivals besides for on their Sabbath it was not lawfull to kindle a fire Exod. 35.3 nor to dresse their meat Exod. 16.23 but on other festivals they were not forbidden to doe such works as were to bee done about their meat Exod. 12.16 they were onely restrained from doing servile works Levit. 23.7 but the works about their meat and drinke were not servile 2. The observation of the Lords day doth simply binde every Christian in conscience though there were no positive Law of the Church for it that wheresoever a Christian liveth in any part of the world it is his dutie in remembrance of the resurrection of our blessed Saviour to sanctifie the Lords day but other festivals of Saints a man is not bound in conscience simply to keepe but as hee is bound in generall to yeeld obedience to the superiour authoritie in lawfull things for onely Gods immediate Commandements doe simply bind in conscience in respect of the thing commanded as the Apostle saith There is one lawgiver that is able to save and destroy Iam. 4.12 and no more but he alone therefore by this reason the Lords day hath a preeminence before other festivals 3. Hereunto I will adde Tostatus reason Sabbatum vel una quaecunque esset dies in hebdomada observanda videbatur dependere à ratione naturali The Sabbath or what other day is to be kept in the weeke seemeth to depend upon naturall reason as is shewed before quest 5. Caetera observationes sunt magis ex voluntate legislatoris Other observations depend rather of the will of the lawmaker Tostat. qu. 13. So our Lords day succeeding the Jewish Sabbath is grounded in part even upon the law of nature but other festivities depend ab arbitrio Ecclesiae of the determination of the Church So then to conclude this point as Augustine saith Quomodo Maria virgo mater Domini inter omnes mulieres principatum tenet sic inter caeteros dies haec omnium dierum mater est As the Virgin Marie the mother of our Lord is the principall among women so among other dayes this day is as the mother of the rest Sermon de temper 36. 8. Controv. To commit any sinne upon the Lords day is a double transgression THe Romanists here have another erroneous assertion that the internall act of religion pertaineth not to the keeping of the Sabbath but the externall and so consequently they denie that any sinne committed upon the Sabbath is thereby the greater Bellar. de cult sanctor lib. 3. cap. 10. prop. 4. Contra. 1. But the contrarie is evident out of Scripture that it belongeth to the rest of the Sabbath to abstaine from the works of sinne ut vacantes à pravis actionibus c. that being vacant or ceasing from evill actions they might suffer God to worke in them by his Spirit therefore the Lord saith speaking of his Sabbath It is a signe betweene me and you in your generations that I the Lord doe sanctifie you Exod. 31.13 And to the same purpose Ezechiel chap. 20.12 I have given them also my Sabbath to be a signe betweene me and them that they might know that I am the Lord that doe sanctifie them These places are urged to this purpose by Pelargus Bastingius 2. So the Fathers expound that precept of doing no servile worke upon the Sabbath Ne nos voluptas corporis libido succendant That the pleasure and lust of the bodie should not inflame us upon this day qui enim facit peccatum est servus peccati for he that committeth sinne is the servant of sinne So Hierome in Esaiam cap. 59. Likewise Augustine thus writeth Spiritualiter observat sabbatum Christianus abstinens se ab opere servili c. A Christian man doth spiritually observe the Sabbath in abstaining from servile worke what is this from servile worke from sinne Tractat. 4. in Ioann So also Thomas Est triplex servitus una qua homo servit peccato c. There is a threefold service one when a man serveth sinne altera qua homo servit homini c. another when man serveth man and this service is according to the bodie not in the minde tertia est servetus Dei the third is the service of God If we understand servile worke this last way it is not forbidden upon the Sabbath day sed alia opera servilia primo vel secundo modo c. but other servile works the first or second way are contrary to the keeping of the Sabbath Sic Thomas 2.2 quaest 122. art 4. addit 3. 3. Hereunto I will adde Tostatus reason Hence it followeth that hee which committeth adulterie killeth or is drunken upon the Lords day magis peccat quà m si aliis diebus idem ageret sinneth more than if he should doe the same thing upon other dayes quia sic est transgressor duplicis praecepti because he so transgresseth two Commandements that precept Thou shalt not commit adulterie thou shalt not kill or any other and this of sanctifying the Sabbath Tostat. qu. 12. See more of this question elsewhere Synops. Centur. 2. err 70. 4. Morall observations 1. Observ. Against hypocrisie and vaine glorie Vers. 8. REmember the Sabbath day to sanctifie it c. Rupertus applieth this text against the doing of any thing for vaine glorie or to bee seene of men but wee should referre all to the praise of God In omnibus operibus tuis Deiretributionem attende c. In all thy works wait for
the absence of another for commonly then many tales are devised Lyran. Or that the Judge should not give care to the accuser before he have heard the partie accused also Borrh. Or this some make to be the meaning Non suscipias vocem testium quos scis mentiri Receive not the voice of witnesses whom thou knowest to lie Tostat. quaest 1. But it is better generally understood of all as well private men as Judges Vetat falsum rumorem de ullo homine vel spargi vel admitti It forbiddeth any false rumour to be spread of any or admitted Gallas Praecipue tamen lex haec ad judicia pertinet And yet principally this law belongeth to judgements Simler because false reports may there doe most harme yet because it is also a fault in private men to raise false reports and to be too credulous to beleeve them it is better here to retaine a generall sense QUEST II. What it is to put to the hand to be a false witnesse NEither shalt put thy hand with the wicked to be a false witnesse 1. Calvins joyneth this to the former clause and saith they are here understood to be false witnesses qui proximos traducunt which joyne their hand with the wicked in traducing of their neighbours So also Oleaster But the manner of the phrase here used of putting to the hand that is of binding and combining themselves importeth a greater matter than onely in carying or spreading of a false report 2. Some referring this law unto publike testimonie in judgement understand it of the person of the Judge that he should not be a meane to procure false witnesses as the Elders of the Citie to whom Iezâ—bel sent did against Naboth R. Salomon Marbach But the words In being a false witnesse which is more than procuring will not beare that sense 3. Some by putting to the hand understand thou shalt not sweare to be a false witnesse because they used to lift up their hand when they did sweare Lyran. Tostat. But this doth make the sense too particular for what if he doe not sweare but onely promise or give his hand to be a false witnesse it is directly against this law therefore by putting the hand is signified hee shall not aid or assist him he shall not consociate himselfe vel conferre operam or promise his helpe or consent unto evill Iun. 4. And withall here is forbidden that wicked confederacie and mutuall ayding one of another in bearing false witnesse as it is a common practice Da mihi mutuum testimonium Witnesse for me and I will bee witnesse for thee Gallas 5. And two things are forbidden Non adjuvabis causam improbi falso testimonio c. Thou shalt not helpe the cause of the wicked by a false testimonie not make a covenant with him to doe it for him Lippomaâ— QUEST III. How great a sinne it is to be a false witnesse Vers. 2. TO be a false witnesse 1. Falsum testimonium habet tripliceus deformitatem A false testimonie hath a threefold deformitie ex perjurie first by perjurie because witnesses are not admitted but upon their oath ali◠〈…〉 justitiae another way by violating of justice tertio ex ipsa falâ—tate thirdly by the falsenesse of his testimonie Thomas These three evils and mischiefes then do accompanie a false witnesse perjurie injustice falsenesse and lying 2. And in three other respects is this sinne of false witnesse bearing odious and abominable 1. In respect of the author thereof who is the divell for when he telleth a lie he speaketh of his owne 2. The inconveniences are great which ensue the perverting of justice and the condemning of the innocent 3. There is also nominis divini contaminatio the polluting and prophaning of the name of God Borrh. QUEST IV. Whether in this law we are to understand the mightie or the many Vers. 2. THou shalt not follow the mightie 1. The most doe read many or the multitude as before is shewed in the divers readings and they make two parts of this law the first to concerne all in â—enerall that they shall not follow a multitude to doe evill the second Judges in particular not to folâ—ow a multitude in judgement Cajetan Oleaster Whether it be to respect the multitude of the parties â—riends that sentence is to be given upon Marbach or the multitude of Judges that consent in a wrong judgement Simler And then the meaning is that in neither case a multitude is to be followed si â—it manifestè iniquum vel falsum if it be manifestly false or unjust which the multitude holdeth for if it be manifeste verum either manifestly true vel dubium or doubtfull which many doe affirme one must not of singularitie depart from their judgement Tostat. quaest 2. 2. Some in the former clause interpret rabbim many Thou shalt not follow many to doe evill but in the other branch of the law they understand it not of the quantitie and number but of the qualitie neither decline after the mightie c. that is where there are many Judges to give sentence the inferiour should not be overruled by the opinion of the Superiour Judges and mightie and therefore among the Jewes this wise course was used in giving of sentence in the assemblie of Judges that the punies and inferiour Judges should deliver their opinion first lest if the greatest began the other might bee swayed by them this is also the use among the Divines in the Vniversitie of Paris the Juniours and Inferiours begin first Lyran. This also is the honourable use of the Star-chamber with us 3. But seeing the same word rabbim is used in both sentences it is taken in the same sense in both places and is better interpreted the mightie than the many for these reasons 1. Because of the opposition of the poore man in the next verse the mightie and the poore are better compared and set together than the many and the poore 2. So Levit. 19.15 gadhol the great and dal the poore are set one against the other that neither the one nor the other should be respected in judgement 3. This interpretation of the mightie comprehendeth also the other whether they be mightie in number or in power Iun. 4. And as respect is not to bee had of the multitude so neither of the paucitie and fewnesse as the Donatists in times past and the Anabaptists in these dayes doe brag of their small number as therefore the best Gallas QUEST V. How the poore is not to be esteemed in judgement Vers. 3. THou shalt not esteeme a poore man c. 1. The word hadar signifieth honour beautie comelinesse Prohibet blandis sermonibus ornari causam pauperis He forbiddeth that the poore mans cause should be set forth with glosing words and so be made better than it is Cajetan Oleaster Therefore Aristotle giveth a good rule that in matters of judgement causa simplicibus sermonibus propeneuda erat that the cause should be laid
be free then Pilate who condemned Christ being by false witnesse and the malice of the Jewes accused whom he knew to be an innocent man giving this testimonie of him I find no fault in him at all Ioh. 19.4 should notwithstanding herein have beene without fault Therefore upon these reasons the former conclusion of Lyranus standeth sound and good that a Judge sinneth in giving sentence against the innocent condemned and cast by false evidence if hee in his conscience knew him to be innocent And that he ought rather in this case to give over his office and dignitie if there be no other way to deliver the innocent rather than to be guiltie of his bloud QUEST XIV A Iudge is not bound of his knowledge to condemne a man not found guiltie in publike judgement BUt as the Judge is bound in conscience to deliver the innocent whom he knoweth so to be that yet is found guiltie through malice and envie notwithstanding it dâ—th not follow that hee should likewise condemne him that is cleared in publike judgement whom he knoweth in his private knowledge to be guiltie of the crime as of murther adulterie whereof he was accused but by favour and partialitie acquited and the reasons of this difference are these 1. The law is more readie to spare than to punish to extend favour than to shew rigour according to that rule in the law Odia restringi decet favores convenit ampliari Hatred is fit to be restrained and fafour to be enlarged Tostat. 2. In condemning a man of his owne knowledge he doth more than in dismissing the innocent for here he doth not absolve him by any sentence but onely suspendeth the sentence of condemnation and giveth over his place rather than he will give sentence against him but here he giveth sentence against the other 3. If he should condemne any upon his private knowledge onely he should doe it as a private man but so he hath no power to condemne Lyran. 4. Yet the Judge knowing the partie accused to be guiltie may by some meanes so worke and give such direction that his wickednesse may be found out but of his owne knowledge without further processe or evidence in judgement he cannot condemne him whom he knoweth to be guiltie QUEST XV. What a dangerous thing it is for a Iudge to take gifts Vers. 8. THou shalt take no gift 1. That is the Judge when any cause of his is in hand who bestoweth the gift upon him otherwise for the Prince or Magistrate to take a present or gift of acknowledgement which the subjects and inferiours doe offer to shew their dutie and thankfulnesse it is not here forbidden nay those wicked and unthankfull men that brought Saul no presents are reproved 1 Sam. 10.27 Osiander 2. And a difference is to be made betweene Judges and Advocates for these may safely take their fee so they exact not more than is due unto them because both they have not their set stipends as Judges have and beside they are but pleaders not givers of sentence and so the danger is the lesse whereas Judges have their certaine solarie appointed them and in their sentence definitive the cause standeth or falleth Tostat. 3. This also must bee understood of extraordinarie and unusuall gifts for inferiour Judges have by order certaine fees allowed them in every cause which they may safely take in some places they have publike allowance maintenance and revenues wherewith they ought to be contented as Nehemiah was allowed the bread of the Governour though he tooke it not chap. 5.15 4. And not he only which receiveth silver and gold sed etiam qui propter landom judicat male munus acciple c. but he also which for praise doth judge unjustly receiveth a reward August And there are three kindes of taking of gifts munus à corde est captata gratia à cogitatione c. there is a gift from the heart when a man thinketh to winne favour munus ab ore a gift from the mouth in praise and commendation munus ex manu a gift out of the hand by receiving of a reward Gregor QUEST XVI Whether all kinde of gifts are unlawfull 1. SOme thinke that all gifts are not unlawfull which are given to Judges and they make this difference some gifts are for gaine and lucre as silver gold and such like some are for meat and drinke and these were by some Lawes allowed to be taken especially after sentence given And these circumstances further they would have considered in gifts 1. Who giveth if the rich to him that is poore it is so much the more suspicious 2. The quantity of the gift if it be but small it is not like to corrupt the minde and therefore Tostatus saith Ecclesia Romana non consuevit in his interpretari accipientem delinquere vel donantem The Church of Rome useth not to interpret that the giver or taker offend in these small gifts But it is no marvell that their Church which loveth gifts so well according to the saying Omniae venalia Romae All things are saleable at Rome doth give such a favourable interpretation of bribery 3. The time of giving must be considered if one give unto him in his necessity it is not presumed that he did it to corrupt his mind as to releeve his want Tostat. As though it be not so much more like to corrupt the Judge when he receiveth a gift in his great necessity 2. Therefore this text seemeth to condemne all gifts great or small given to whomsoever rich or poore and whensoever being given to obtaine favour in their cause for a generall reason is given because all such gifts doe blind the eyes and judgement of the wise which are here called the seeing and as the word ghiver in piel signifieth doe not only blind but pull out their eyes as in the same mood it is said Ierem. 52.11 That the King of Babel put or pulled out the eyes of Zedekiah Oleaster And in another sense the word ghur signifieth evigilare to awake so gifts cause the eyes of the prudent to awake and attend upon the unrighteous cause Oleaster But the other sense is more fit here they are said to blind their eyes either that their judgement being corrupted they see not what is just or right as lovers are blinded in that which they love or though they see what is just yet they are turned by gifts to give wrong judgement against their owne conscience Simler These gifts also pervert the words of the just their heart also is first perverted but mention is made of words because principalis subversio c. est in verbis Iudicis the principall subversion and overthrow of the righteous cause is in the words of the Judge Tostat. qu. 8. They are called still righteous though now corrupted because they were so indeed before and seeme to be so still to themselves and others Simler 3. Wherefore if all gifts doe blind the eyes of
Judges and pervert their words then it is not safe to receive any gift in that kinde which is given for the furtherance of ones cause No it is not lawfull for a Judge to take a gift to give right judgement Nam de vendâ—tione justi judicii veniretur ad venditionem nequissimi Lest from selling of just judgement they should fall to sell unjust judgement Tostat. And as it is unlawfull to sell justice so it is also to buy as S. Paul might have beene delivered for a reward Act. 24.25 but he chose rather to answer at Rome And in the ancient Church they were noted which did give money for their liberty that they might not be compelled to be present at the Gentiles idolatrous sacrifices Simler 4. So then howsoever the Canon law and the practice of the Church of Rome doth tolerate small gifts yet it is the safest way not to accept of any at all And herein the ancient Romane lawes are to be preferred which as is extant in their 12. Tabulae capite puniendum Iudicem c. did decree that Judge to be punished with death which tooke money to give sentence in a cause Dioclesian also made a Law that a sentence pronounced by a corrupt Judge ipso jure infirmam esse by the Law should be void and to be suspended by appeale Lystat being asked why he received not gifts of the Messerians answered Quia in lege justitiae peccatur Hee should have offended against the Lawes of justice Innocentius also hath a good saying speaking of corrupt Judges Vos non attenditis merita causarum sed personarum non jura sed munera non quod ratio dictet sed quod voluntas affectet non quod licâ—at sed quod lubeat c. pauperum causam cum mora negligitis divitum causam cum instantia promovetis c. You doe not consider the merit of the cause but of the persons not right but gifts not what reason enditeth but what will affecteth not what is lawfull but what you list c. the cause of the poore you neglect by delaying the cause of the rich you are diligent in promoting therefore Tostatus here resolveth and concludeth well that howsoever the Canons doe tolerate the receiving of small gifts yet it is better Si volunt effugere conscientiae scrupulum ut nihil omnino accipiant If they will avoid the scruple of conscience that they take nothing at all 5. A gift then is of great force it prevaileth much as the Wise-man saith in the Proverbs chap. 17.8 A reward is as a stone pleasant in the eyes of them that have it it prospereth whither soever it turneth As a precious stone shineth every way so a gift is available to any purpose Gifts doe much hurt in private matters as Amphiarans wife being corrupted with a precious jewell betrayed him and Procris chastity was overcome with a gift but in publike affaires gifts doe much more hurt as well in civill as Philip King of Macedonia non tam armis quam auro expugnavit libertatem Graecia did not so much by force and armour as by gifts and treasure overthrow the liberty of Greece As also in Ecclesiasticall matters where simonie doth as much hurt as bribery in the Common-wealth for they which by corrupt meanes attaine to the great preferments of the Church must needs also corruptly administer the same Aâ— the Prophet Ezechiel noteth the false Prophets which for handfuls of barley and peeces of bread did prophesie false things chap. 13.18 Simler Therefore seeing the Spirit of God hath set it downe that gifts and bribery doe corrupt and blinde Nimia eorum est impudentia c. They are very impudent and shamelesse that will make their boast notwithstanding that though they receive gifts they can give right judgement Gallas QUEST XVII Why strangers are not to be oppressed in judgement Vers. 9. THou shalt not oppresse a stranger 1. Some thinke that this is a repetition of the former Law chap. 22.21 Thou shalt not doe injury to a stranger that it may appeare quanta cura domino sint peregrini c. how carefull God is of strangers Lippom. And because the Israelites were given to be inhumane and hard toward strangers as the Jewes are to this day that contemne all people beside themselves the Lord saw it necessary often to inculcate this precept Simler But rather I thinke with Cajetane and Gallasius that this is a new Law Illud communiter hoc specialitèr datur judicibus testibus accusatoribus That was given in generall this in particular to Judges witnesses accusers 2. And to this end God so provided in his wisdome that the Israelites and their fathers should be strangers and sojourners in other countries as in Canaan and Egypt ut captivitatis peregrinationis miseriam discerent to learne by experience what the misery of captives and strangers was that they might the better know how to have pity on the like Nemo libentius hospitem sine tecto suo introducit hospitio c. No man more willingly receiveth him into his house that wanteth lodging than he that was sometime without lodging himselfe no man sooner feedeth the hungry and giveth the thirsty drinke than he that felt hunger and thirst himselfe c. August 3. And whereas it is added You know the heart of a stranger the meaning is how full of care and griefe they are that you need not afflict them more Simler that they are destitute of friends and had need to be so much the more pitied Tostat. and seeing strangers are no inhabitants but such as passe thorow the country they should not be stayed nor hindred ut iter suum posset exequi that they may finish their journey Lyran. You know also by your selves their hearts how ready they are to call unto God for helpe against their oppressors as you did in Egypt Simler QUEST XVIII Of the divers festivals of the Hebrewes Vers. 10. SIx yeeres thou shalt sow thy land c. The Hebrewes had divers kindes of festivall dayes which all tended to the honour of God Now impendimus honorem Deo c. wee doe give honour unto God either for an eternall benefit and so they had juge sacrificium every dayes sacrifice or for some temporall which is either generall as of our creation in remembrance whereof they kept the seventh day holy or of our preservation ideo erat festum Neomemae therefore they kept the feast of the new Moone every moneth or speciall as of some speciall benefit and deliverance in remembrance whereof they had their festivals of weekes as Pentecost of moneths as the seventh moneth of yeeres as the seventh yeere and the seventh seventh yeere which was the Jubile Thomas QUEST XIX Why the land was to rest the seventh yeere Vers. 11. BVt the seventh yeere thou shalt let it rest c. 1. The land is said to rest in two respects First in a metaphoricall sense as we are
were Eldad and Medad Gloss. interlinear But this cannot be for those seventy Elders were appointed after the campe was removed from Sinai and pitched in Kibrath Hattavah which was the next station beyond Sinai Numb 33.16 But now the Israelites remained at mount Sinai 2. Some are of opinion that these seventy Elders were appointed when Iethro gave counsell to Moses that is six out of every tribe which make 72. but the even number is set downe Simler But those Captaines over the people which were chosen according to Iethro his direction were heads over thousands hundreds and fifties chap. 18.25 they were then more than seventy 3. Neither were these seventy such as before time the people had chosen out for their Rulers answerable unto the number of soules that went downe with Iacob into Egypt as Calviâ— seemeth to thinke for it seemeth that before Iethro gave that advice to Moses there were no such Governours and Rulers over the tribes because Moses then needed not to have wearied himselfe in hearing their causes himselfe alone 4. Wherefore these were no speciall Elders that before were elected and chosen out but such as Moses did single out upon this occasion out of the more honourable sort of the people and therefore they are called vers 11. eetzilee separated or selected And Tostatus holdeth this as a reason because the word Elders ziene in the Hebrew hath no article set before it as is usuall in that language when any speciall persons of note are named But though his reason doe not alwayes hold yet his opinion seemeth of the rest to be most probable Tostat. qu. 3. QUEST III. Why Moses went up into the mount alone Vers. 2. ANd Moses himselfe alone shall come neere to the Lord c. 1. Here are three degrees or orders appointed to be observed in their comming neere unto God the people stand farre off and come not neere at all Aaron and his two sonnes and the seventy Elders ascend with Moses to some part of the mountaine but Moses himselfe only goeth up unto God vers 12. Calvin Lippoman 2. Rabanus maketh this morall application of it that as the seventy Elders went not up with Moses so unusquisque perpendat discrete vires suaâ— ut ultra non praesumat that every one doe discreetly examine his strength and not presume beyond his knowledge 3. For the mysticall sense Procopius maketh Aaron here a type of Christ who stood aloofe off and contemned not our humane nature sed descendens ad nos inter nos moratur but descending dwelt among us c. But this application can in no wise be fit that Aaron should be here a type of Christ who went not up unto God but Moses did for who should have freer accesse unto God than our Mediatour and intercessor therefore Moses here rather signifieth the Law which is perfect and pure in it selfe yet is not able to bring us to God as these ascended not with Moses but were left behind Simler QUEST IV. Whether all the people in generall were assembled Vers. 3. ANd all the people answered c. 1. Sometime the whole congregation is understood to be the Elders only and principall men that stand for the rest of the people as chap. 12.3 the Lord biddeth Moses to speake to all the congregation and yet he onely spake unto the Elders vers 21. But here we rather understand that all the multitude was called together for as we reade that when the Law was confirmed and ratified the whole assembly came together not only the Elders and Officers but even their children and wives yea the strangers unto the hewer of wood and drawer of water Deut. 29.10 11. so was it requisite that at the first receiving of the Law all the whole multitude should come together to give their generall consent 2. If it be objected that it was not possible that so many hundred thousand as there were in Israel could assemble in such sort to heare the voice of one man we may either say that God might give an extraordinary strength unto Moses voice that it might be heard round about Tostatus Or though all the people were not within hearing themselves at once yet one might receive it from another and so give their consent or one company might succeed another to heare Oleaster QUEST V. Why the Lord requireth the peoples consent to his Lawes Vers. 3. ALL that the Lord hath said will we doe 1. Though God might by his soveraigne right impose what Lawes he thought good without the peoples consent because they were bound to obey whatsoever the Lord commanded yet the Lord thought good to require their consent because otherwise they might be lesse culpable if they had not obeyed those Lawes which were thrust upon them against their will 2. And although they had twice before chap. 19.8 and 20.19 promised their obedience yet that was but in generall before the Lawes were published and therefore it was necessarie that a particular consent should be had now unto the severall Lawes which were propounded 3. God knew before they would consent but that was not sufficient unlesse they also expressed it themselves that they might afterward be left without excuse Tostat. 4. The people are to be commended for their readinesse but yet they knew not how impossible it was to keepe the Law and therefore cannot be excused of rashnesse Iun. Of this sudden promise of obedience which the Israelites had soone forgot Hierome thus writeth Melius est non promittere quam promissa non facere c. It had beene better for them not to have promised at all than not to performe their promise And Gregorie herein compareth the Jewes unto Locusts Subiâ—o saltuâ— daâ—tes protiâ—â—s ad 〈◊〉 codemes c. Which doe of a sudden give a spring and forthwith fall upon the ground againe QUEST VI. What Lawes they were which Moses wrote in a booke Vers. 4. ANd Moses wrote all the words of the Lord. 1. R. Salomon thinketh that Moses first rehearsed and afterward wrote the whole booke of Genesis and all Exodus unto this place But this cannot be 1. The Rabbin himselfe thinketh that Moses rose the next day and built the Altar how could he then write these two bookes without a great miracle in one day which we are not without great necessity to bring in to make or devise miracles where no cause is were great presumption Lyran. 2. It is said he wrote all the words of God and so consequently only the words of God but the history of Genesis and Exodus containe many things beside the words of God therefore there was no cause either to rehearse or write all the contents of these two bookes Tostatus 2. Cajetanes opinion is with whom consenteth Osiander that Moses did write all the former Lawes contained in the 21 22 23. chapters and the ten Commandements beside with all those Lawes set forth in the 12. and 13. chapters and his reason is
Altar upon the burnt offering I.A.S. better than for a burnt offering P.L.B. or in the Altar of burnt offering S. for here the preposition is omitted or beside the burnt offering G.V. the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ghal above upon Vers. 35. Thou shalt fill their hands B.G.V.A. consecrate their hands P.S.L. consecrate their ministerie I. offer their oblations C. the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 temalle shalt fill Vers. 36. Thou shalt cleanse the Altar G.B. cum caeter not sprinkle the Altar with the sinne offering I. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chata in piel signifieth to cleanse and so Iunius translateth Levit. 14.52 3. The questions explained QUEST I. Why it pleased God to have the Priests thus consecrated Vers. 1. THis is that thou shalt doe unto them in consecrating them c. 1. First it was requisite that there should be some singled out and appointed to minister in the Priests office to avoid confusion lest every one at his pleasure might have presumed upon the Priests office as among the Gentiles he that was the more mightie and honourable tooke upon him to be a sacrificer Lippom. Pellican 2. The Lord as before hee beautified the Priests with glorious apparell so here he by certaine publike and solemne rites doth cause them to be consecrated in the sight and view of all the people for the greater reverence and authoritie of their calling 3. And hereby the Priests themselves were assured also of their calling which was sealed and confirmed unto them by these signes 4. And these ceremonies were figures and types of the high Priest Christ Jesus whom the Lord hath anointed and of all the faithfull and beleevers whom Christ hath made Kings and Priests to God his Father Simler QUEST II. Why the calfe is said to be the sonne of a bullocke Vers. 29. TAke a young bullocke yet under the dam. 1. Some take this to bee according to the Hebrew phrase A calfe or steare the sonne of a bullocke that no more is thereby signified but that he should take a bullocke as so they say the sonne of a goat the sonne of a dove and such like Oleaster But this were in that sense a needlesse repetition for a bullocke must needs come of a bullocke and a goat of a goat 2. Some make this to be the meaning that he should take a young bullocke out of the heard de armento so Latin Septuag Chalde Vatab. But more is signified thereby than so for Genes 18.7 it is said that Abraham ran to the heard and fetched filium bovis the sonne of a bullocke not out of the heard for that is said before 3. Rab. Salomon thinketh this is added by way of distinction because the word phar signifieth not onely a young bullocke but an old calfe and therefore by this addition it is signified that it should be a young bullocke But this addition needed not for that cause for the word phar of it selfe signifieth a young bullocke as the Septuagint translate it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a calfe 4. Wherefore I preferre here Iunius reading who interpreteth it juvencum filium bovis a young bullocke the sonne of an oxe or bullocke juvencum subrumum a calfe or bullocke yet sucking under the dam not weaned and therefore sometime ben bakar the sonne of a bullocke is put alone without the other word phar QUEST III. Why a bullocke two rams and other things were offered at Aarons consecration A Young bullocke 1. Lyranus thinketh that they are bid to take a calfe or young bullocke for Aarons consecration to make atonement for that sinne which hee had committed in making the golden calfe and the two rams were prescribed one in remembrance of the ramme which was sacrificed in the stead of Isaack and the other for a commemoration of the paschal Lambe which they offered at their departure out of Egypt But these are light conjectures for Aaron had not yet committed that sinne in making the golden calfe neither was it a ramme but a lambe which they celebrated the passeover withall 2. Therefore this is the reason why all these things and of this sort and kinde are taken According to the dignitie of the persons here consecrated such are the sacrifices and gifts of their consecration as Levit. 4. a calfe or young bullocke is prescribed to be offered for the sin of the Priest whereas but a goat was sacrificed for the sinne of the Prince because the sins of the Priests who professed knowledge were more dangerous and scandalous So then because here the high Priest with his sons are to be consecrated a bullocke must be taken 3. And because the Priests were to offer unto God all the gifts and sacrifices of the people of all sorts it was fit and requisite that they should be consecrated with sacrifices of all sorts which were three either sinne offerings burnt sacrifices or peace offerings of the first kinde was the bullocke here of the second the first ramme and of the third the second 4. And for that there were divers kinds of meat offerings some of things that had life as beasts and birds some without life as cakes unleavened bread and such like and the meat offerings of things without life were of divers sorts some out of the oven some of the frying pan some out of the cauldron Levit. 2.4.5 here all these varieties are presented unleavened bread out of the oven cakes tempered with oyle in the frying pan and wafers boyled in water as R. Salomon thinketh like unto our fimnels Tostat. qu. 1. 5. And because the Priests were duces ante signani aliâ—rum the Captaines and ring-leaders of others to signifie that there was a greater holinesse required in them they are consecrated all kinde of wayes 1. They are washed 2. They are clad with the Priestly robes 3. They are anointed 4. The sacrifices both for sin the burnt offerings and peace offerings are offered for them 5. They are purified with bloud both their eares hands and feet are touched therewith and they themselves and their garments are besprinkled also with bloud And this was not to be done one day or two but their consecration did continue for seven dayes together vers 36. Gallas QUEST IV. Why Aaron and the Priests were called to the doore of the Tabernacle Vers. 4. THou shalt bring Aaron and his sons to the dâ—â—re of the Tabernacle The reasons hereof may bee these why Aaron was brought to the Tabernacle there to put on his Priestly garments 1. Because he was to serve with the rest of the Priests in the Sanctuarie within into the which Aaron was not to enter without his Priestly attire for his sound must be heard when he goeth in and out lest he die chap. 28.35 2. Because at the doore of the Tabernacle was placed the brasen Altar where the Priests were daily to offer sacrifice and therefore it was meet they should be there consecrated where the chiefe of their service
with a reservation of their punishment vers 34. 2. The divers readings Vers. 1. Gathered themselves together against Aaron B.G.L.P. upon Aaron A.H. to Aaron I.V.C.S. ghal upon or against Vers. 12. For a mischiefe B.V. rather than maliciously G.B. craftily L. with a mischievous intent I. with maliciousnes S. C. in maliciousnes A. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 beraghah to a mischiefe Vers. 15. So Moses turned him B.G.I.L.V. Moses looked backe P.C. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 phanah signifieth both to turne and looke but the first rather here because of the word following he went downe Vers. 18. It is not the noise which the strong make nor the noise which the weake make I. the voice of them which crie out strength or the voice of them which crie out weaknes S.A.H. better than the voice of them which answer strongly or of them which answer weakely V. or the noise of them which have the victorie or of them which are overcome G.B. or the crie of them which exhort to fight or of them which compell to flie L. Vers. 28. Three thousand men B. G. cum caeter three and twentie thousand L. very corruptly See 72. qu◠following Vers. 29. When every one shall be upon his sonne I.A.H. better than every one upon his sonne B.G. cum caeter for here the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when is omitted Vers. 32. And now whether wilt thou forgive them their sinne I. if thou wilt c. A.H. better than and now forgive them their sinne B.G. cum caeter for here the conjunction 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 im is omitted in the translation Vers. 35. Because they procured the calfe which Aaron made or made the calfe which Aaron made B.G. cum caeter for that which they did to the calfe which Aaron made I. But the preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 eth is seldome a signe of the Dative but of the Accusative case because they worshipped the calfe which Aaron made C. the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gashah to make 3. The questions discussed QUEST I. Whether Moses had signified unto the people when hee would returne Vers. 1. WHen the people saw that Moses tarried long c. 1. R. Salomon here is of opinion that Moses when he went away told the people that he would returne after 40. daies but they were deceived in the account and reckoned that day wherein Moses ascended so that in the end of 39. daies they then consulted to make them gods 2. Contra. But this assertion can stand by no meanes 1. It was not knowne unto Moses himselfe how long he should stay when he went from them for he himselfe staied six daies in the mount before he was called up to the top chap. 14.16 If he had set them a certaine time he would not have spoken ambiguously but plainly that they might have knowne certainly when to expect his returne 3. At the least though they had mistaken a day they would have waited for him so long after the appointed time 4. Neither could all this be done in the space of one day the people to gather their earings and Aaron thereof to make a golden Calfe and beside Aaron putteth off the solemnitie to the next day all this could not be done upon the 40. day therefore it is like that they began this wicked enterprise upon the 35. day or thereabout and that Moses had not given them any direction for his returne Tostat. qu. 2. Liran QUEST 2. Whether the Egyptians were the first beginners and motioners of this idolatrie Vers. 2. WHen the people saw 1. R. Salomon againe some what to excuse here this fact of the Israelites saith that the Egyptians which went out with the Israelites did egge and intice them and set them a worke to make this golden image as they likewise provoked the people to fall a lusting for flesh by their example Numb 11.4 2. Contra. 1. But howsoever at other times the strangers that were mingled among them might set them a murmuring it is like here that the Israelites themselves were most forward in this wicked enterprise for the name of people is given unto them whereas the other are not simplie called the people but with some other addition as chap. 12.38 A great multitude of sundrie sorts of people and Numb 11.4 A number of people that was among them fell a lusting c. 2. They themselves speake of their bringing out of Egypt by Moses but Moses brought the Israelites out the rest were not so much brought ou◠as voluntarily came forth being mingled among the people 3. The people also themselves were subject and prone to idolatrie as S. Stephen sheweth out of the Prophet Act. 7.43 yea he saith directly vers 39. that they were their fathers that said unto Moses Make us gods c. Tostat. qu. 1. 4. S. Paul also so expoundeth it of the Israelites 1 Cor. 10.7 Neither be ye Idolaters as were some of them So not all the people but onely some of them were guiltie of this sinne of idolatrie for it is like that they whom Moses armed afterward to slay their brethren were not consenting thereunto Iun. 5. The Levits vers 29. did consecrate their hands every one upon his son and brother they were then their owne brethren and consequently Israelites who were ringleaders of this mischievous exploit QUEST III. The occasions of idolatrie in generall and particularly of the idolatrie of the Israelites here Vers. 1. THat Moses tarried long c. Here we are to consider of the occasions and causes of idolatrie which are either generall or particular in this place which moved the Israelites to fall into this follie 1. The generall are these 1. Feare in extremitie and distresse maketh men run to wicked devices and to erect unto themselves gods as the mariners in Ionas ship being in danger called every one upon his god 2. Another cause is ignorant imitation of things not rightly understood as because Abraham at Gods commandement would have offered his son Isaac unto God the heathen idolaters likewise did sacrifice their owne children with bloudie hands unto their idols 3. A third cause is foolish doting love and affection as Salomon doting upon his wives was by them enticed and seduced to idolatrie It is written that Alexander so loved Ephestio that he decreed divine honour to be given him 4. A fourth cause is good hap and prosperitie as the Atheniens having obtained a victorie against the Persians at Marethe onely with the helpe of ten thousand men seeing at that time in the aire a spirit in the likenesse of Pan which terrified their enemies they afterward worshipped him and built him a Temple B. Babington 2. The particular causes and occasions of this idolatrie which deceived the Israelites were these 1. The first was absentia ducis the absence of their Captaine 2. Curiositas their curiositie that not being contented with those things which Moses had taught them must
knowledge of God by their names As though Moses in this cleare sight of Gods glorie did see the names of Gods elect Burgensis confuteth this exposition as being both against the text for the Lord speaketh of proclaiming his owne name not of the names of the elect and beside Moses asked no such thing nor yet doth God reveale unto his servants the number of the elect Matthias Thoring taketh upon him in defence of Lyranus to confute Burgensis but his reply is verse unsufficient the two first reasons of Burgensis are verie evident to the third he answereth that seeing Moses saw a representation of the Divine Essence he saw also relucentia in ipsa those things which did appeare and shine in that brightnesse and yet it followeth not that hee should see all hee might see in that glorious representation the election of some though not of all for this hee saith was one of the errours condemned at Paris Quod omnis videns verbum relucentia in verbo videt omnia quae verbum That he which seeth the Word and all things shining in the Word doth see all which the Word seeth Contra. 1. But if as they imagine Moses then saw in Gods glorie and now the Saints in heaven see in Christ as in a glasse the names of the elect then must they see all their names as in a glasse one cannot but see whatsoever is represented therein 2. And yet it followeth not that he which so seeth should see all which the Word seeth for the Word seeth more than is represented as they imagine in the reflexion of the brightnesse thereof 6. The meaning then is this Deus promulgabit nomen suum God will publish his name It was a great benefit that God yeeldeth himselfe in part to be seene but it is a greater that he revealeth himselfe by his voice Multa enim visiones frigida sunt sisermo non accesserit For many visions are but cold if there be no word added thereunto Calvin Per strepet in auribus nomen Domini c. The name of God shall sound in his eares Borrh. And God will manifest himselfe in that name in quojam Mosi innotuit wherein he was made knowne to Moses already namely Iehovah Gallas And beside in the hearing of Moses recitabit omnia epitheta cognomina he will rehearse all his epithetes and other names as it followeth chap. 34.6 Ferus Osiander And all this was both for Moses better understanding that those things which were represented per gloriosam illam by that glorious resemblance should more fully bee declared to Moses Burgens As also Vocabo coram te ut videaâ— manifeste c. I will call before thee that thou mayest see manifestly that which yet thou seest but darkly Rupertus The Lord by calling stirred up Moses attention And further it was a watch-word to Moses when he should see God the Lord when his glorie was passed by should then crie trâ—â—sit aut adest Dominus now the Lord passeth by or is present Oleaster Dominus est coram te the Lord is now before thee Vatab. And then and not before Moses should looke out upon God as he passed by QUEST XL. Why these words are added I will shew mercie c. Vers. 19. FOr I will shew mercie c. 1. Oleaster giveth this reason of these words that in this speech the Lord performeth that which he said before that he would shew him all his good Quod maximè in misericordia consistit which chiefly consisteth in mercie So also Ferus But if all the Lordâ— good had consisted herein in shewing mercie then superfluous mention should have beene made afterward of his justice chap. 34.7 not holding the wicked innocent c. 2. Osiander taketh it to be an exposition of the former words I will proclaime my name that is declare what my will is toward men in shewing mercie to those on whom I will have mercie But this is not the whole will of God for he doth visit the iniquitie of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generation as well as he reserveth mercie to thousands 3. Tostatus thinketh that hereby Moses is admonished not to thinke that this grace was shewed him for his owne merits But Moses ascribeth all to the favour and grace which hee found with God vers 12. 3. Therefore it is rather yeelded as a reason of the Lords grace and favour extended here unto Moses 1. Which some apply thus that the Lord hereby gave Moses like privilege as to the Fathers Abraham Isaak and Iacob that as he shewed mercie to them so likewise he would unto Moses that he should not need to alleage the merits of the Fathers as he had done before Lyranus But Moses urged not the merits of the Fathers before he onely insisted upon Gods promise made unto them 2. Some thinketh that the Lord here maketh a reservation and exception of the people that though hee shewed this favour to Moses yet he would doe with the rest as he thought good Gallas 3. But Calvin commeth neerer the sense making this a reason why the Lord shewed this glorious vision more unto Moses than to any other because it was his good pleasure So also Simler Likewise Iunius Non omnino omnibus sed quibus quando quantum decretum est c. God doth not thus reveale himselfe to all and at all times but to whom when and how much he hath decreed from all eternitie 4. Out of this place brought in upon this particular occasion the Apostle à singulari causa ad universalem accommodat doth of a singular matter make a generall doctrine Rom. 9.15 Iun. That God cannot be thought to be unjust si aliis prateritis alios eligat if he chuse some pretermitting others Calvin 5. And here Moses minde is elevated and lifted up to consider who it is in whom the Lord saith I will have mercie in Messia meâ— in my Messiah Borrh. QUEST XLI Why the word is here doubled BUt why the same word is repeated I will shew mercie on whom I will shew mercie 1. Augustine giveth this reason Deus suae misericordiae firmitatem ista repetitione mâ—nstravit God would by this repetition shew the stablenesse and surenesse of his mercie as when Amen Amen is doubled and as Pharaoh had two dreames of the same thing 2. But here is more than a bare repetition if the Lord had said I will have mercie I will have mercie then there had beene nothing but a bare iteration therefore Calvin better observeth that this kinde of doubling and repeating the same words is used in all languages abi causa investigatiâ—nem excladere volumus when we will have no other cause sought out as Pilate said What I have written I have written 3. Though there is no great difference in the signification of these words I will shew mercie c. and have compassion c. yet in the originall they are distinguished for the first
also is in the same minde Faciem Dei juxta naturae sua proprietatem nulla videt creatura No creature can see the face of God in the propertie of his owne nature 6. But whereas Iacob saith I have seene God face to face Gen. 32.30 which is here denied unto Moses Thomas Aquinas well interpreteth that place that whereas it is said that Iacob saw God face to face Referendum est non ad ipsam essentiam sed ad figuram in quo representabatur Deus It must be referred not unto the essence of God but unto that figure wherein God was represented c. Otherwise it is not to be doubted but that Moses saw more than Iacob did and there is no question but that this was the most cleere sensible vision of Gods glorie that is to be found in all the old Testament for none of the Fathers saw the Lords back-parts but only Moses Oleast yet neither Iacob there nor Moses here saw the divine essence Nunc majus aliquid prastantius obtinet non tamen ut Deum perfecte videat c. Moses obtained a more excellent thing than Iacob yet not to see God perfectly as he is in himselfe but as the capacitie of humane nature was able to beare Calvin 7. Alcuinus giveth this reason why Moses when it is said the Lord spake with Moses face to face saw not the divine essence for then hee would not have said afterward Ostende mihi teipsum Shew me thy selfe or thy glorie Apparuit ergo ei Deus in ea specie qua voluerat non ipse autem apparuit illi natura propria God therefore appeared unto him in that manner hee would not in his owne nature c. 8. Simlerus addeth further hee saw onely the back-parts of God Non vidit igitur naturam substantiam Therefore he saw not his nature and substance And whereas notwithstanding the Lord is said to have talked with Moses face to face that is only to shew a difference betweene that cleere vision which Moses had and other visions shewed to other Prophets not so cleere Simler 9. Lyranus then here is deceived who affirmeth that though the vision or sight of the divine essence was not now granted to Moses Tamen alias fuit concessa in vita praesenti Yet it was granted at another time in this life present But the reason here used by the Lord that no man can see God and live is generall excluding all men while they live here from the vision of Gods nature and essence And as Tostatus reasoneth Non videtur esse aliud tempus inconvenientius c. There seemeth no time to be more convenient for Moses to see Gods essence in than this when Moses made that request unto God qu. 17. yet Tostatus likewise is deceived who thinketh that Moses at this time did see the divine essence QUEST XLIX Of the meaning of these words No man shall see me and live Vers. 20. THere shall no man see me and live 1. Gregorie Nyssenus giveth this sense of this place not that the sight of that glorious face should be the cause of death Nam quomodo vitae facies causa mortis esse poterit For how should the face of life be the cause of death to those that approach or come neere unto it But to shew because the divine nature exceedeth all knowledge that he which thinketh God to be any of those things which are seene and knowne vitam non habet hath no life Non est ergo vita quod cognoscitur That then is not life which is seene or knowne and so cannot give life c. Hee maketh then in effect this to be the meaning of these words No man shall see me and live thinke not that which thou seest of one to be God able to give life But the Lord speaketh here not of any inward opinion but of the present sight and contemplation of God which Moses decreed and by face he meaneth not any thing beside himselfe that is seene of him but his essence and nature that which himselfe is no man can see that and live 2. Procopius seemeth to approve this sense that they which live here according to the flesh cannot see God but they may see him Non secundum carnem ambulantes Which walke not according to the flesh But Procopius may answer himselfe by a distinction that there is prima Dei facies the first face of God which is his divine essence which is indeed invisible neâ—ini mortalium visa and never seene of any mortall creature there is secunda Dei facies as second face of God which is his grace and favour which is seene by faith of this sight of God our blessed Saviour speaketh Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God c. But the Lord speaketh here of the sight of his first face which is invisible for Moses lived not according to the flesh and yet he is denied this sight and afterward he is granted to see the back-parts which he could not have seene if he had beene carnall not spirituall 3. Rupertus thinketh that as before the Lord spake unto Moses in the person of the people Pro parte electorum In respect of the elect among them I will cause all my good to goe before thee so he speaketh this pro parte reproborum in regard of the reprobate and wicked among them that they should not see Gods glorie and live because they were appointed to die So Rupertus maketh the force of this speech to consist in the word Then thou canst not see my face that is the wicked and unbeleevers among the people But this exposition cannot stand 1. Because the reason is generall No man shall see me and live no man whatsoeveâ— 2. The emphasis lyeth in the word face for his back-parts it is granted Moses to see 3. And the Lord meaneth here Moses person not in him the person of the people as the whole narration following sheweth how the Lord would put Moses in a cleft of a rocke and cover him with his hand while he passed by c. 4. Another exposition is this Qui ex opposito Deum aspicit non vivet He which doth see Gods face as opposite and comming against him shall not live Discat homo Deum sequi Let a man seeke to follow God c. not as it were to meet God in the face or to oppose himselfe against him for vice is opposite to vertue So also Gregor Nyssen 5. Augustine thus interpreteth No man can see God and live Nemo potest eum in hac vita videre vivens sicuti est No man can see him while he liveth in this life as he is So also Lyranus Vatab. Iun. annot But thâ—n this should onely be a repetition of the same thing Thou canst not see my face for no man living can see my face It better containeth a reason of the Lords former answer why Moses could not see
here gave his people 44. qu. Why the Lord at this time gave his people a law 45. qu. Who is said here to tempt 46. qu. Of the divers kinds of temptations 47. qu. Of the difference betweene good and bad temptations 48. qu. Wherein the Lord at this time proved his people 49. qu. What diseases of Egypt he meaneth 50. qu. Whether Job being a righteous man felt not of the diseases of Egypt 51. qu. In what sense the Lord saith I am thy healer 52. qu. Of the fountaines and Palme trees in Elim 53. qu. Of the mysticall signification of the twelve fountaines and seventie Palme trees 54. qu. Of divers errors and oversights of Josephus Questions upon the sixteenth Chapter 1. QUest Of the desart of sin 2. qu. Of the time when the Israelites came into the desart of sin 3. qu. Whether all the children of Israel murmured 4. qu. How they are said to have murmured against Moses and Aaron here and afterward against the Lord. 5. qu. Of the grievous murmuring of the Israelites 6. qu. How the Israelites are said to have sit by the fleshpots of Egypt 7. qu. In what sense the Lord saith he will raine bread from heaven 8. qu. Why they are commanded every day to gather this bread 9. qu. How the Lord is said by this to have proved his people and to what end 10. qu. Why the flesh was given in the evening the bread in the morning 11. qu. Whether the rocke were first stricken to bring out water or the flesh and bread first sent 12. qu. Why Moses biddeth Aaron to speake to the people and doth it not himselfe 13. qu. How the people are bid to draw neere before the Lord. 14. qu. What cloud it was wherein the Lord appeared 15. qu. When the Lord thus spake to Moses 16. qu. What manner of fowles were sent whether they were Quailes 17. qu. Whether the comming of Quailes were a naturall worke 18. qu. VVhether this storie of the sending of the Quailes and that Numb 11. be all one 19. qu. Whether the Manna were a kinde of dew 20. qu. Whether the Manna were a naturall meteor 21. qu. Whether the Manna lay about the campe onely and not within it 22. qu. Whence it was called Manna 23. qu. VVhy the Manna is said to be the bread of Angels 24. qu. Of the measure Gomer how much it contained 25. qu. How one measure of Manna sufficed for every ones eating 26. qu. Why a Gomer was appointed for every head 27. qu. Whether the people transgressed in gathering some more some lesse 28. qu. How it came to passe that none had over that gathered more nor none had any lacke that gathered lesse 29. qu. How the Manna grew to bee corrupt with wormes 30. qu. How the Sun is said to wax hot and of the melting of Manna 31. qu. How they gathered twice so much upon the sixt day 32. qu. What moved the Rulers to come and tell Moses that the people had gathered double 33. qu. Of the meaning of the 23. verse and whether they dressed upon the sixth day that which was reserved for the seventh 34. qu. Whether the observation of the Sabbath were now first instituted 35. qu. Of the rest of the Sabbath 36. qu. The description of Manna the quantitie fashion colour and taste thereof 37. qu. Whether the Manna had a divers relish according to every ones taste 38. qu. When Moses spake to Aaron concerning the pot of Manna to be set before the Lord. 39. qu. By whom this clause was added of the Israelites eating of Manna fortie yeares Questions upon the seventeenth Chapter 1. QUest Why some mansion places are omitted here 2. qu. Of penurie and want of water which the Israelites here indured 3. qu. Why it pleased God to prove his people with thirst 4. qu. How the people are said to tempt God 5. qu. Of Moses feare lest he should be stoned 6. qu. Why Moses is bid to take the Elders with him 7. qu. Why Moses is bid to take his rod. 8. qu. Whether it be all one storie of smiting the rocke Exod. 17. and Numb 20. or divers 9. qu. Of the mount Choreb 10. qu. Whether the water out of the rocke did still follow the Israelites 11. qu. What nation the Amalekites were and how they set upon Israel 12. qu. The reasons which moved the Amalekites to set upon the Israelites 13. qu. Why Moses goeth not himselfe to battell but appointeth Joshua 14. qu. Whether this Hur were the sonne of Caleb 15. qu. Whether Moses lifted up his hands in prayer 16. qu. How Moses hands were heavie 17. qu. Of the supporting and bearing up of Moses hands 18. qu. What this Amalek was and of whom descended 19. qu. What booke this was wherein Moses is commanded to write this storie 20. qu. Why Moses is commanded to rehearse it to Joshua 21. qu. Whether Amalek were wholly destroyed by Saul 22. qu. Of the building of the Altar and the name thereof 23. qu. Of the meaning of these words Thy hand is upon the throne of Jah Questions upon the eighteenth Chapter 1. QUest Whether Jethro and Rehuel or Reghuel were the same man 2. qu. How Jethro heard what the Lord had done for Moses and Israel 3. qu. The causes which moved Jethro to come unto Moses 4. qu. When Moses had sent Zipporah away 5. qu. Of Moses two sonnes 6. qu. How Moses was delivered from the sword of Pharaoh 7. qu. At what time Jethro came to Moses before the Law given in mount Sinai or after 8. qu. Wherefore Jethro sent before to Moses 9. qu. Of the manner of Moses entertainment 10. qu. Why Moses declareth all these things unto Jethro 11. qu. Of Jethro his joy and rejoycing 12. qu. Whether Jethro had before this the knowledge of the true God 13. qu. Of the meaning and true reading of the 11. verse 14. qu. Whether Jethro offered himselfe burnt offerings 15. qu. In what sense they are said to eat bread before the Lord. 16. qu. How the people came to Moses to aske of God 17. qu. Why the Lord would have Moses to take his dirrction from Jethro 18. qu. What causes Jethro would have reserved to Moses 19. qu. Of the qualities and properties required in good Magistrates 20. qu. How the Rulers over thousands hundreds c. are to be counted 21. qu. Of the number of these Officers and of their continuance and succession 22. qu. The difference betweene Moses office and the rest 23. qu. Of the meaning of these words And God command thee 24. qu. In what sense the people are said to goe quietly to their place 25. qu. Whether these Officers were chosen by Moses 26. qu. Whether these Officers were of equall authoritie or one subordinarie to another 27. qu. Of the difference betweene these Officers and the seventie Elders Numb 10. 28. qu. At what time Jethro tooke his leave of Moses Questions upon the ninteenth Chapter 1. QUest Of what
vestra quam privatim expertus sum ut liberiùs animi mei sensa palam expromerem vestrae enim humanitati sat sciâ— probatur Augustini consilium si quisquam est qui se non audet ingerere ad amicitiam faciendam cum aliquo nostro temporali honore aut dignitate revocetur offerendum est illi quadam commitate submissione animi quod petere per se ipse non audet desino jam plurib molestus esse excessi mensuram epistolae sed non excessi doloris modum ut ait Hieronym precor jam ut qua ipsi fratres conservos miseratione dignemini in terris ipsi abundè cumulatam apud misericordem patrem in coelis inveniatis Vestrae Reverentiae observantiss ANDREAS WILLETTVS THE FIRST BOOKE OF MOSES CALLED GENESIS CHAP. I. The Analysis or Logicall resolution IN this Chapter Moses treateth of the creation of the world first in generall how God created heaven and earth vers 1. then in particular in the rest of the Chapter where wee have the severall workes of God and their severall approbations that they seemed good unto the Makeâ— The severall workes are distinguished into six dayes and in every dayes worke there are foure things to bee observed the authority whereby they are made as v. 3. The Lord said Let there be light c. the obedience of the creature in being made and there was light thirdly the approbation of the Creator v. 4. God saw that the light was good fourthly the distinction of the worke vers 5. The evening and the morning were the first day and so of the rest of the dayes workes Againe the order of the particular creation is this God createth the workes and câ—eatures without sense afterward the sensitive and living creatures the first are either the superiour and celestiall as the light made the first day the firmament the second the contents of the firmament the Sunne Moone and Starres the fourth day or the inferiour creatures as the earth with the trees plants and herbs the third day The sensitive creatures are either unreasonable as the fishes and fowles made the fifth day v. 20. the beasts and cattell made the sixth day or the reasonable creatures man and woman made the sixth day In the framing and bringing forth of man there is set forth first the consultation of the Trinity v. 26. Let us make man c. then the creation wherein is to be considered the substance and forme of mans creation according to Gods owne image v. 27. the endowment of man created in his preheminence and domination over all other creatures vers 28. his increase and procreation bâ—ing forth fruit and multiply his maintenance and preservation vers 29. I have given unto you every herb c. that shall be to you for meat The Genesis or Grammaticall construction where the translations differ v. 1. God created b.g. T.H.p. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 made s bara created heb v. 2. was without forme b.g. T. empty H. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 invisible s solitudo vast solitary p. tohu heb 3. moved upon the waters b.g. incubabat did sit upon T. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was carried upon c. s. motabat did flutter upon H. p. rachaph 6. the firmament 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 b.g. H.p.s. expansum the broad or spread heaven T. heb rachang to spread 11. bud and herb b. bud of the herb g. herbam virentem greene herb H. herbam teneram tender herb or grasse T. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the herb of grasse s. bud herb p. heb seeding seed g.s. T.p. heb making seed H. apt to seed b. 12. after his kinde and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to his likenesse This is added by the septuagint 18. to rule in the day g. to rule the day b. T.H.p. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to rule the day s.p. heb 20. let the waters bring forth b. H. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 s. bring forth in abundance g. T. bring forth as wormes that is in abundance p. heb sharats 29. every tree b.g. T.p. heb gnets 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lignum every kinde of wood bearing fruit s. H. 3. The Exegesis or Theologicall explication of doubtfull questions and obscure places QVEST. I. What the heaven and earth was created in the beginning vers 1. Vers. 1. IN the beginning God made heaven and earth c. 1. Moses here doth not onely generally or summarily set downe the creation of the world which afterward is described in particular which was the opinion of Chrysostome remembred by Augustine lib. 2. cont Manich. c. 3. 2. Nor yet doe we understand a certaine first matter whereof the heaven and earth were afterward made as Augustine seemeth to thinke lib. 1. Genes cont Manich. c. 7. and one Philastrius Bishop of Brixia doth affirme it to be heresie to say that this was the element of the earth afterward created but another earth as the matter whereof other things were made catalog haeres 3. Neither yet do we approve the opinion of the Schoolemen which by the heaven understand only Coelum empyreum the highest heaven above the starrie skie the seat of the Angels and blessed Spirits and by the earth a confused substance whereout other things were formed afterward of which opinion were Alcuinus Rabanus Lyranus Tostatus Catharinus with others for Moses specially intendeth to set downe the creation of things visible and David expounding Moses speaketh of these heavens here created which should perish Psal. 102.25 which are not those highest heavens subject to no change 4. Neither yet doe wee here exclude the creation of those invisible heavens with Mercerus but in this word comprehend as well the invisible as visible heavens Colos. 1.16 Iun. 5. This heaven and earth then here mentioned to bee created in the beginning are the same heaven and earth which are now comprehending the generall matter and seed whereout all other things in heaven and earth were made first created in the matter afterward perfected in forme and lastly beautified with their ornaments this then was the order of the creation First the same heaven and earth were created in a confused substance and unformed matter then the forme was added in the first and second dayes workes Lastly the ornaments produced as trees and plants and beasts in the earth starres in the skie fishes in the sea fowles in the aire Thus S. Paul expoundeth Moses that God made the heaven and earth Act. 14.15 God made the world Acts 17.24 so that this heaven and earth first made was no other than the world though not yet set in perfect order Of this opinion are Basil Ambrose Theodoret and most of the ancient Writers QVEST. II. What beginning Moses speaketh of Vers. 1. IN the beginning c. 1. This is neither to be understood as Iohn saith in the beginning was the word for there hee speaketh of a beginning without a beginning that is from everlasting but this was the
beginning of the creation or being of things 2. Neither is it to be understood causally in the beginning that is for the beginning as for Israels cause or for the law as the Hebrewes for God created all things for himselfe Prov. 16.4 It is also a forced exposition by this beginning to understand Christ although the doctrine bee most sound that all things were created by him 4. Nor yet as Abeâ— Ezra is this clause in the beginning used here syntactice in construction with the next word as though this should be the sense in the beginning of creating or when God created and so the sense should bee suspended till the second or third verse for then hee would have said barâ— in the infinite not bara in the praeâ—ertence as it is vsed Chap. 5.1 5. Wherefore Moses saith in the beginning in respect of the things created that in that beginning when God purposed to create the world hee made first heaven and earth of nothing Mercer Iunius QVEST. III. Hebrewes curious observations Vers. 1. GOd created heaven and earth c. 1. The Hebrewes have here many curious observations which I will not stand upon as 1. by the letters of the two first words bereshith bara they note the time from the beginning of the world untill the Messiah Aleph and beth signifie 3000. râ—sh shin tau 900. jod 10. that is â—910 which doth not much differ from the just time according to the computation of some from the creation to the Messiah 2. They note the duration or continuance of the world for 6000. yeeres because aleph is six times found in the first verse 3. By the 7. words of the first verse they would have signified the 7. dayes of the weeke and the 7. planets These observations are more curious than profitable 2. So is that question which is controversed among the Rabbins whether the heaven or earth were made first they thinke that heaven being first named was first made but that reason is not firme for the earth is named before the heavens Gen. 2.4 and the manner of the Scripture is to mention that last which is treated of first as in the second verse Moses beginneth againe to speake of the earth Paguin Wherefore it is most like that God made the heavens and earth together in their first matter as the cup and the cover as in an egge the yolke and the white as in a circle the center and circumference Mercer And this first creating of the heaven and earth was a part of the first dayes worke Luther For otherwise the Lord had not made all things in six dayes contrary to the Scripture Exod. 20.11 QVETS IIII. How the earth is said to be without forme and void Vers. 2. THe earth was without forme 1. The earth is here so called by way of preoccupation for it was not yet so called till the third dayes worke vers 10. Vatab. 2. The heaven was also without his forme though not altogether so confused as the earth for there being no light yet created both the heaven and earth were unformed and imperfect 3. The earth is said as yet to be tohu and bohu emptinesse and vacuity this tohu was not that materia prima which the Philosophers dreamed of and bohu to be the forme of things not yet applied to the matter as though the heavens and earth had beene made of some precedent matter whereas indeed God made the heaven and earth of nothing which long continued not in this imperfect estate the light being the same day created 4. The darknesse here spoken of was neither the element of fire as some Hebrewes imagine which if it bee is bright and transparent neither is it the same with tohu before mentioned as R. Levi neither was it any thing created and a farre greater darknesse than that which afterward was called the night wherein there is some light of the starres but it was a meere privation of light afterward created 5. The waters here mentioned which covered the deepe as a garment in the beginning Psal. 104. 6. were before comprehended vnder the name of earth as all the inferiour elements beside as the superiour parts of the world are insinuate by the heaven Mercer QVEST. V. What is meant by the Spirit moved upon the waters THe Spirit of God moved c. By the Spirit here 1. wee neither understand an Angell which is the dreame of Cajetanus for God needed not the ministery of Angels in making the world 2. Nor yet the wind as Tertullian lib. cont Hermog 3. Nor the aire as Theodoret. qu. 8. in Genes If God had no use of the Angels to make the world much lesse of inferiour creatures 4. But this was the Spirit of God whereby the creatures were fostered and formed Iob. 26.13 His Spirit hath garnished the heavens QVEST. VI. What was the light created the first day Vers. 2. GOd said let there be light c. Some doe thinke that this was a spirituall no naturall or corporall light August lib. 1. in Genes ad lit c. 3. Rupert 1. lib. de Trinitat c. 10. but that cannot be seeing this light made a visible and apparent difference betweene the day and night 2. Some thinke it was the perfect light of the Sunne which was created the first day but afterward rehearsed to bee made in the fourth Catharinus but this is contrarie to the text for the Sunne was made the fourth day 3. Others thinke that it was a bright and lightsome cloud which was carried about and gave light to the world as Beda Lyranus Magister Sentent c. 4. Others that it was a light without a subject afterward fastened to the body of the Sunne as Basil. homil in Genes 6.5 Others that it was an exceeding bright shining light such as no mortall nature could behold being whole and altogether and therefore it was afterward dispersed into divers bodies of the Sunne Moone and Starres so Nazianzene Theodoret qu. 14. in Genes 6. Some thinke it was the light of the Sunne yet imperfect afterward perfected inlarged and beautified Aquinas part 1. qu. 67. art 4. Thus we see how variable and inconstant mens opinions are when they search into curious matters and enquire after hid things but it sufficeth us to know that God made the light before the Sunne that we should not attribute that to the creature which was the worke only of the Creator what manner of light it was where placed how it moved how long it continued because in Scripture there is no certainty busily to search it were curiosity it is most like that it was a certaine light which was not extinguished when the Sunne was created but rather increased Vatab. Mercer And it is not unlike but that this light proceeded from the element of fire as thinketh Damascene lib. 2. de sid c. 7. and Iunius as an effect thereof and whereas it may be objected that this light was moveable from one hemispheare to another as causing