without any disadvantage to our Cause For suppose we grant that Faith is Dead which is not moved with a desire of doing good Works according to the saying of St. Iames yet it doth not therefore follow from hence that no Faith Iustifies without Works From which two things do follow worthy of consideration First That no Faith justifies that is not lively And next though it abounds in good Works and never is without them yet it only without Works Iustifies This will appear evident by the Example of St. Paul Who though he was not conscious to himself of any Wickedness yet he durst not affirm himself to be thereby Iustified I think nothing hinders but the whole Argument may be yielded unto if so be the terms are rightly placed The Adversaries gather out of the Apostle Iames that Faith is dead which is without Works and herein we do not much oppose them But what follows from hence Therefore as they say dead Faith without Works doth not justifie And I deny it not But what Conclusion flows from this manner of Arguing Therefore only Faith doth not justiste Why so If no Faith but that which is lively justifies and if it receives Life only from Works then this is the consequence that Faith justifies only upon the account of good Works I Answer First though we grant it is true that the Faith which justifies us in the sight of God is lively and always joyned with a Godly Life Yet that this Faith justifies and reconciles us no other ways but upon the account of good Works is most false For this is not a good consequence from the premises Because Faith is not alone in the Life of the Believer therefore Faith is not alone in the Office of justifying Or because the Faith that justifies is not a dead but a lively Faith therefore it doth not justifie alone without Works For herein is a fallacy of the Consequence But you may object Whence then is Faith said to be lively and not Dead but from Works Which if it be so of necessity it must draw all its Life and Vertue from Works Nay the matter is quite contrary For though in the sight of Men Faith is not discerned to be Lively and Vigorous but by Works yet Faith receives not Life from Works but rather Works from Faith As Fruits draw their Life and Sap from the Root of the Tree but not the Root from them Iust so external actions proceed from Faith as the Root which if they be good they evidence the Root to be sound and lively and this is all they do but they communicate no Life thereunto And this Life and Vertue of Faith is not one but Twofold And it acteth partly in Heaven and partly in Earth If you ask what it doth amongst Men upon Earth It does good to its Neighbour working by Love But before God in Heaven it justifies the Ungodly not by Love but by the Son of God whom it only lays hold of Therefore those Men seem not to have got a clear insight into the Vertue and Nature of the Grace of Faith that suppose the whole Life thereof to consist in Love as if Faith of it self could do nothing but as it receives Vertue and Efficacy from Charity Indeed both may seem to be true in the External Actions of Human Life in which Faith lyes like a dead thing unless it be enlivened by Charity to the exercise of good Works And hereunto belongs that saying of Paul whereby he so much commends Faith working by Love understanding such Works as Faith working by Love brings forth to the view of a Human Eye Yet with God Faith hath a far different operation for it only without any reliance upon Works or assistance of Charity but trusting to the naked promise of God and the dignity of the Mediatour climbs up to Heaven and gets access into the presence of God where it does great and wonderful things combating with the Iudgment to come fighting against the terrours of Death Satan and Hell pleads the cause of a Sinner obtains his pardon absolves and justifies him from the accusations of a guilty Conscience takes away all Iniquity reconciles God to the Sinner appeases his wrath subdues the power of Death and the Devil and procures Peace yea and Paradise it self with theThief that had led a wicked Life and yet at Death was justified by Faith in the Redeemer Who would desire more or greater things And now so many and great things being done by Faith let us enquire After what manner it does them Not as it lives and works by Love but as it lives only by Christ and relies on the promise for the Life of Faith which lives before God is not Charity but Christ not receiving Life from Charity but communicating life unto it and justifying Works that they may be acceptable to God which would otherways be abominable Unto the truth of this we have a sufficient Testimony given us by Paul When he says my Life is Christ and again the Life that I now live in the Flesh I live not by the Love but by the faith of the Son of God who loved me and gave himself for me And elsewhere speaking of himself he says That he was not conscious to himself of any VVickedness and yet he denies that he is thereby Iustified as the same Apostle discoursing about the works of Abraham though they were never so Eminent for Holiness yet he saw nothing in them which that Great Patriarch might make a matter of Glorying before God Hereunto may be added the Arguments of others that have been strangely wrested out of Scriptures There are six Reasons principally which they pretend the Evangelists furnish them with against the Righteousness of Faith First they draw an Argument from these words of Christ Come ye blessed of my Father to the Kingdom prepared for you For I was an hungred and ye gave me Meat Argument Da. That which is the cause of blessedness is also the cause of Iustification Whom he hath Iustified them he hath also Glorified c. Rom. 8. Ri. Works of Mercy are the cause of blessedness for I was an hungred and ye gave c. Mat. 25. I. Therefore Works of Mercy are the cause of Iustification Answer I deny the Minor For Works of Mercy as they are considered in themselves are not the cause of Iustification or blessedness but rather effects and furits of Iustification for they are no otherways pleasing to God but as they are performed by persons in a justified state and it is by the Faith of Christ that they become acceptable For unless Faith go before and justifie the person of him that worketh his works are not at all regarded by God because they do not satisfie the Law of God being tainted with the corruption of depraved Nature and come far short of that perfection which Divine Iustice requires Wherefore if we will Reason aright about
defilements of the mind and all the roots of filthiness and impurity I say where will that man be found who performs these and all other duties of true Piety and so performs them that nothing in his Life seems superfiuous nothing is unequal in his duties nor defective in his manners I think he may be found in the Books of Osorius but not in the Life in the daily Confessions or in the Holy Absolutions of Osorius There was of Old I confess the Image of this most perfect righteousness seen and known upon the Earth But that Phoenix hath long since left the Earth and departed hence to Heaven and now sits at the right hand of Majesty drawing all to himself and I wish that at length he may draw Osorius also to himself What if the Lord himself looking down from Heaven upon the Sons of Men is affirmed in the Prophetical Psalm to have found all their ways corrupted and depraved if the Mystical and Royal Holy Psalmist durst not in confidence of his own righteousness enter into judgment with his God or present himself to be tryed by him and condemns all other mortal men of unrighteousness without excepting so much as one If Paul writing to the Romans in a very serious debate confirms the same and stops the mouths of all men that he may bring men over having called them away from a vain trust in their own works and convinced them of the vanity thereof to the help of the Son of God only which is placed in the faith of him If Iohn the Apostle yea and if that powerful proclaimer and defender of humane righteousness could not himself deny but that in many things we offend all I pray you O Osorius Will you now rise up after them not the eighth but the ninth Proclaimer of Righteousness being a mortal and sinful man who dare affirm to others that which you cannot perform your self after this manner That it is either righteousness or nothing which obtains us the favour of God and makes us acceptable and like unto him Qu. What do I hear is there nothing else I beseech you What then Is Faith nothing Is Grace nothing Is the Mercy and Promise of God nothing Do the Merits of Christ profit nothing to Salvation So that now there is nothing which reconciles us to God but the righteousness of works What Do you so place all righteousness in works that you think there is no righteousness of Faith Then you think perhaps that the righteousness of faith and works is one and the same and you make no difference between the Law and the Gospel whereas Paul teaches you far otherwise who openly and with great fervency of Spirit deprecates that other righteousness which is of works that he may be found in him not having the righteousness which is of the Law but that which is of the Faith of Christ which is of God righteousness by Faith Do you not perceive here a manifest opposition between these two To be justified by the Law and to be justified by Faith yea and those very things which Paul removed far away from him as Dung in respect of obtaining Salvation Will you pave that only way for us to Heaven And in the mean while disputing about works I discourse of these things with you as if there were any such strength of so great vertues in this life as could deserve not only the reward of righteousness but also the name thereof What will you say if the most holy performances and endeavours undertaken in whatsoever manner by the most perfect men in this corrupted nature are so unprofitable to the immortality of Life that they are rejected by Christ as things without profit yea that they are despised and utterly contemned in the sight of God like a menstruous cloth as the Prophet Isaiah witnesseth unless they be underproped with better Grace and the commendation of Faith What if in Isaiah we are all said and that truly to have gone astray like Sheep every one in his own way from whom so great a Prophet doth not separate himself What do you suppose should be judged of our virtues and righteousness But you will say this complaint of the Prophet belongs not to all in the general but only to the Iews who in those times wickedly forsook their duty but by the same reason you may affirm that all the diseases of all men and times were not healed by the Death of Christ but theirs only who in those times had gone astray out of the way as lost Sheep But how frivolous this cavilling is it appears evident by the context of this Prophetical Prediction Whereby you see Osorius being convinced by Sacred Testimonies that those merits of our greatest vertues if they be looked upon in themselves are far from the perfection of that righteousness which your Philology Cloaths with very beautiful Colours Which yet I would not have to be so said by me nor underslood by you as if those that live vertuosly did nothing aright and praise worthy in this life Or as if the Godly Works of the Saints were not acceptable to God which God himself hath commanded to be done for thus you reason concerning Works that they come not indeed without Faith and the Grace of God but yet so that when they come you affirm that the Kingdom of Eternal Salvation is due to them by the best right not only as a recompense and reward but also as a lawful Patrimony as if the promise of Salvation depended not on Evangelical Faith but on the Righteousness of the Law and not on Christs merits only unless a Covenant of Works be joined together with it or as if faith it self profited nothing for the obtaining of Life upon any other account but that it may procure Grace which may stir us up to the praise-worthy performances of works by which works we attain unto eternal Life Faith Iustifies no otherways but upon the account of good works according to the opinion of Osorius For so your words do manifestly signifie where treating of Faith and enquiring why we are said to be saved by it you presently add a cause because say you we obtain the Divine protection only by faith and so very easily observe the precepts of the law and obey Divine Institutions and again concluding to the same purpose No man that is in his right wits shall obtain Salvation except he keep the Law or which is equivalent thereunto except he be ready and prepared in his mind te keept it And again in the same place discoursing of the Salvation of Christians Do you ask how a man is Saved Is there another way prepared for Salvation but what is eontained in the Law of God none at all Therefore we miserable mortals have a way to the Immortal Kingdom laid out and shewed unto us and that a very easie one you Osorius being our guide and teacher which is
Church which they by a false Name boast to be Catholick which broaches amongst the common People these so great monsters of errours and tares of Opinions defends them in Schools Preaches them in Churches which sends forth into the midst of us such Dogmatists and Artificers of deceits who not only corrupt the small Veins and Rivulets of sincere Doctrine but also proceed to the Fountains themselves and Invalidate the Foundations of Apostolick Institution and cut and tear the very sinews of the simple verity For what greater injury can be done to the Scriptures of God What more cruel against the Grace of Christ what more Hostile against the mind of Paul and more gross against the soundness of the Christian Faith can be said or devised than what those Roman Potters have contributed by their commentitious deceits to the plague and ruine of the Christian Common-wealth For what may we judge should be hoped for concerning the common Religion the Sins of every one and the state of the Christian Common-wealth if the matter come to this that this largeness of Evangelical mercy being taken away or contracted we must be called back again to the account of good Works Concerning the Vertue and Efficacy of Divine Grace a more enlarged dispute against the Adversaries Answering their Objections BUT Those Men will deny that they detract any thing from the Grace of God yea they say that this is the common Sin of the Lutherans not theirs because all that they drive at is to maintain the mercy of God and to celebrate it with due praises Why so I pray for what say they Do not the Pious Works of the Saints please God Well and what next Should not the same Works having proceeded from God himself the Author be referred to his bounty and mercy Why not Now then Catholick Reader receive a conclusion Roman Catholick enough as I suppose Therefore he 〈◊〉 detracts from good works wrought by Christ 〈◊〉 from the Grace and Mercy of God Well said but pray who detracts from those Who denies good Works which Christ living and dwelling in us Works to be good Works Does any Man take away due praise and dignity from those Now Hosius talks Osorius pleads Andradius crys out that the Lutherans do it eagerly Why so I beseech you Because they do not attribute unto the performance of good Works the Salvation that is due to them but translate it to Faith only What then such as do not attribute Salvation to good Works should they be therefore supposed to attribute nothing to Works or to cast reproach upon the grace of God On the contrary they that detract the promise of Eternal Life from the Christian Faith Shall they be accounted Friends to Grace By the same reason we may turn Light into Darkness and Darkness into Light Let Christ remain in his Sepulcher let Moses rise again to be Iudge of the Living and the Dead But now what Arguments do they rely upon in disputing thus Because say they Works of Righteousness flow from the Fountain of Divine Grace But what Is not Faith in Christ the Mediatour as singular a gift of God and does it not proceed from the Election of Divine Grace But now let us hear an Argument more than Catholick Argument Ma. We are justified by the Grace of God only Mi. Our good Works have their rise from the Grace of God only Con. Therefore all our Iustification consists in good Works The deceit of this Paralogism must be drawn forth And again the word Grace must be explained Which is taken one way in the major and another way in the minor for there it is taken for mercy and the free good will of God whereby he hath redeemed us freely whereby he loves us in Christ Iesus and forgives us our Sins and whereby also he imparts his Spirit and Life Eternal to us And this is peculiarly called Grace of forgiveness of which the writings of the Apostles speak aloud in many places It is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth but of God that sheweth mercy And again Sin shall not have dominion over you for ye are not under the Law but under Grace And what the same Apostle cites out of a Psalm Blessed are they whose Iniquities are forgiven and whose Sins are covered c. And also that which elsewhere he testified very evidently They are justified freely by his Grace moreover that none should be uncertain what is understood by the word Grace presently subjoining and as it were explaining himself he infers next By the Redemption which is in Christ Iesus But what other thing does this adding of Redemption signifie but the Remission of all Sins That this may be the Argument We are justified by that Grace whereby we are redeemed But Grace by renewing us doth not redeem us Therefore we are not justified by Grace renewing us I come now to the minor in which the word grace is taken otherways than in the major For there it is put for remission or redemption here for renovation That is for the effectual energy of the Divine Inspiration in communicating Gifts and Endowments wherewith he afterwards adorns those whom first he hath justified Whence arises a twofold manner of distinguishing Grace according to the twofold diversity of effects on this side and on that side of which one consists in the remission of evil Works the other in the operation of good Works And that is called pardoning Grace and this is called renewing Grace From the one whereof proceeds the Salvation and the Iustification of the Ungodly and from the other come the good Works of the Godly and yet those are not full nor perfect Therefore I answer the Argument proposed which hath more errours than one Moreover it is made up of mere particulars Also in the minor contrary to the manner of Disputants the case is changed whereas the same case should be kept that goes before in the major and the minor should follow thus But our good Works are by the grace of God only or at least in the major the same case of the minor should have been kept after this manner Our Iustification arises twice from the grace of God Therefore all our Iustification flows from good Works So that the true nature of this Pseudosyllogism belongs not to the first but the second figure simply concluding both affirmatively and also most absurdly just as if a Man should argue thus Our corporeal Nature was made of the slime of the Earth Earthen-Pots are made of the slime of the Earth therefore our corporeal Nature was made of Earthen-Pots What need is there of words Whatsoever way these Men form their Argument or reform it they shall never be able to prove that the works of the Law whether such as we our selves have wrought or such as the Divine Grace works in us do contain in themselves any cause of Salvation For
Works which ye intrude from having a share with Faith in justifying a Sinner what hurt is it to sound Doctrine if the Word only is not expressed when you read such Scriptures as these being justified freely by his Grace Rom. 3. By the Works of the Law no Flesh shall be justified The Righteousness of God is manifested without the Law Rom. 3. a Man is not justified by the Works of the Law but by the Faith of Christ Gal. 3. Not of Works Rom. 11. Without Works Rom. 4. Not of Works Tit. 3. Not of Works Eph. 2. Not according to Works 2 Tim. 1. Without Works Rom. 9. What is the Signification of such Expressions but that all Works being excluded it should be understood that Faith only is the procuring cause of Iustification for what else is Faith without Works and without the Law but Faith only Therefore by the necessary Law of Consequence we may argue thus we are justified by Faith and are not justified by any other thing inherent in us according to the Scriptures Therefore we are justified by Faith only Or we may Confute the Adversaries with this Argument Argument That from which all other things are excluded must of necessity remain alone The Scripture excludes all other things in Man from Faith Therefore of Necessity it is Faith only that justifies But whereas they deny that this exclusive Word is found in the Scripture let them read Mark 5. and Luke 8. where the Lord says Only believe and thou shalt be saved I come now to the Greek and Latin Doctors of the Primitive Church Basilins Nazianzen Hilarius Ambrose Augustin Hierom Chrysostom Theophylact Oecumenius Photius Bernard to whom if you please you may add Thomas Aquin. who all Commenting on the same Words of Christ and Paul do not only agree with us in the same Opinion but also in the same exclusive Word as hath been evidently proved in our former Answer to Osorius Thought it be manifest that we assert nothing here which the Orthodox Divines of the Primitive Church have not confirmed unanimously and in the same Words yet nevertheless these things so evident in themselves do not satisfie those perverse Sophisters who when they cannot deny the very Words of learned Men yet they take occasion to contend with us about the Sense of the Words in which they pretend that we do greatly err for they have found out a curiously contrived Distinction Saying That by Faith only is understood the first Iustification but not the second Thus these cunning Artificers of Words have turned one Iustification into two one that is obtained by the first Grace as they call it before all Works as in Infants when they are Beptized And another which is in Persons come to Years by the practice of good Works That I may Answer this frivolous Distinction First I object this saying of Augustin good Works that follow him that is justified do not go before him that is to be justified which if it be true what remains but that they should either Confess that there is no such thing as this second Iustification which they have devised or else that good Works go before him that is to be justified contrary to the Doctrine of Augustin Moreover if they think there is sufficient cause why Faith only should not be admitted because it is not expresly mentioned in the Holy Scriptures why should not also this Distinction of theirs about a second Iustification by the practice of good Works be rejected upon the same account which is no where expressed in the sacred Oracles But by a manifest Contradiction is opposice to Heavenly Truth It is an Ancient and Famous Rule of Lawyers That there is no occasion of distinguishing where the Law makes no Distinction In what place of Scripture can those Sophisters find this Distinction between a first and second Iustification whereby Infants Baptized are otherways justified than they that are come to years for both were alike dead in their Sins and they are both alike regenerated and live by Faith in Christ the Son of God That we may briefly Consute this Sophistry whereas neither the Holy Scriptures nor the Godly Doctors of the Primitive Church ackonwledge any manner of justifying but one only How comes it to pass that those men have devised a twofold Iustification making two of that which is but one So that the first Iustification consists of Faith only and the second is made up of Works But it is easie to withstand this absurd device by the Authority of sufficient witnesses amongst whom Ambrose comes first into Mind who hath expressed himself thus Because there is one God of all he hath justified all after the same manner and what that manner is he shews in these Words He justifies them no otherways but as they are Believers And presently after he excludes all Merit of Works For nothing saith he is the cause of Dignity and Merit but Faith only And again Seeing that a Man is not justified before God but by Faith only c. Therefore let us inferr from these Words of Ambrose if there is one manner of justifying as there is one God Then no Distinction can make two Iustifications of that which is one only As no Distinction can make the one only God that justifies to be two Again if Believers are no otherways justified before God but by Faith according to the Testimony of Ambrose and there is no other Dignity nor Merit that God regards but only Faith what place is there for a second Iustification made up of the Merits of Works Hereunto let us add the Testimony of Gregory which is very seasonable to confute the Forgery of those vain Sophisters concerning their second Iustification These are the Author's Words Grace begot me being naked in the first Faith and the same Grace will save me being naked at my Reception Thus Gregory spake of Nakedness And what Nakedness is that but the want of Vertue and good Works as he himself Interprets which is the Condition of every gracious Soul not only of Men come to Years but also of Infants when they are Baptized in their first Regeneration If we are found Naked in our Reception into Glory where then is that second Iustification made up of good Works but if it is not so where is that Nakedness whereof Gregory speaks How can these things so much disagreeing consist together that we should both be Naked and void of good Works and also cloathed with good Works and thereby Merit a second Iustification In the mean while this should not be omitted which the same Gregory mentions of Grace which he divides not into a first and second as the Papists do now adays but he shews that it is one and the same Grace which both first regenerates us and also afterwards receives us into the Kingdom of Glory By which it is evident that there is but one manner of justifying which
empty On the contrary the Publican who emptied himself and took care to bring an empty vessel received the more plentiful grace By these things I suppose it is sufficiently evident what this Righteousness is and of what sort which makes us righteous before God whether it is Christs or ours If it is Christs it is not ours How then of works of our righteousness If it is ours it is not Christs how is a man of wicked made righteous If of wicked he is made righteous that I may speak in the words of Augustine what are the works of wicked men Let the wicked man now boast of his works I give to the Poor I take nothing away from any man c. then thou art in this thy boast wicked and thy works are none These things said he therefore it is a false Opinion which men plead for to wit that a man cannot be called righteous by an external righteousness Neither is it less Ass-like which those Balqamites do bray who say that it is the same thing for a man to be thus Righteous as if a man should say an Ass with the form of an Ass is a Mon for by Faith we are called faithful and by righteousness weare called righteous c. Be it so indeed that no Man should rightly be called righteous but upon the account of Righteousness what then seeing Christ is our righteousness is there not sufficient cause upon that account why we should be called righteous should any man require a better righteousness than that which is Christs And what form of expressing though external can hinder but that the righteousness which is peculiar to Christ may also be called ours and may be common both to him and us especially seeing he is wholly ours with his merits vertues benefits and all his goods which qualities though they are not properly in our selves yet being received from him they pass likewise into our possession As the Bodies of the Stars and Planets though dark of themselves yet they shine and are made bright not with their own but anothers light to wit being inlightned with the light of the Sun just so it comes to pass to us that we are made Righteous Kings Priests Sons and Heirs of God not by any property of our nature or condition of works but because the Son and Heir himself is said to be made Sin and a Curse for us not for any sin inherent in him but imputed to him Argument But here again and again those impure Sophisters object that this was never heard from Aristotle and that it is not agreeable to reason that he should be called learned that hath no learning or righteous that is not endued with righteousness And perhaps that may seem true in moral vertue Now seeing there is a twofold righteousness as I have said one which they call Ethick another which is Theological that consists in manners this in faith we must judge far otherwise of this than of that For the righteousness of which Aristotle treats as it is a moral vertue distinguished from prudence courage and temperance thus it is referred to the habits of the mind and internal qualities according to which men are denominated of what sort they are by Philosophers And though we confess this to be true in some respect it doth not at all hurt our cause nor discourage our enterprize in clearing this point For all this Controversie undertaken by us drives at this that we should search for a righteousness which is no moral humane vertue but which is a Spiritual Grace and gift of God which is not ours but which is proper to Christ whence he only is called holy and just and we are called justified in him not upon the account of works but faith which God imputes for righteousness unto them that believe in his name And hence it is rightly called the righteousness of faith and therefore faith it self is righteousness whereby we are accounted righteous before God being endued not with that external righteousness about which those men Philosophize but being beautified and adorned with a peculiar and most internal righteousness which being so who sees not that it is false and sophistical which those men take out of Aristotle that we are justified by works or should upon no account be called just why so because no man can be called just but upon the account of the righteousness which every man possesses for his own in himself For thus do those sharp-witted Men argue who cannot endure the free justification of Faith To whom that I may make answer let us hear this first from them Whether faith whereby we believe in Christ seems to them a vertue or not If they judge so I ask whether it is a moral vertue or a theological And then whether it is internal and inherent being inwardly placed or whether it should be called external If faith is an internal thing and the same is our righteousness in the fight of God Why then should not this seem an allowable form of arguing against the Iesuites who deny that we are otherwise justified than by internal and inherent righteousness Argument Ma. Our Faith is Righteousness before God Mi. Our Faith is an internal and inherent vertue Concl. Therefore we are made righteous before God by an internal and inherent vertue But here again the Adversaries object that they do not at all deny but that Faith is an internal vertue in us which nevertheless makes us faithful but makes us not just Why so because we are said to be faithful from faith but we are said to be righteous only from righteousness O sweet and understanding men as if those who are faithful in Christ Iesus were not also just before our God or as if these things should only be looked upon in their names and needed not to be considered rather in their causes and effects And what will they then say to these words of Paul being justified by faith we have peace with God through our Lord Iesus Christ What if the cause being granted the effect also must necessarily be granted and faith is a justifying cause as the Apostle witnesseth how can it be that those who receive the name of faithful from faith should not also upon the same account receive the cause of righteousnes whence they are not only called righteous but made so also in reality And these things we have said by the by against the objections of the Iesuits who seeing they so strictly examine the Divine Theorems of our Religion according to the Logical forms of arguing it is reasonable that we also should keep them entangled and expedite our selves out of their nets as much as may be Here therefore seeing they require of us Arguments conformed unto the modes of Aristotle let them so receive them Argument Ma. Men from Righteousness are rightly and formally called Righteous Mi. The Faith of Christ is Righteousness imputed to us by God
which every man must endeavour according to his power to attain by industry and diligent labours and the merits of the greatest Vertues And when the former Pelagians affirmed that we could do that by the strength of Nature there were not wanting others at the same time who valiantly opposing the help of the Grace of God to Free-will successfully rejected and exploded this wicked Opinion by the Scriptures After this came another kind of Divines who having followed Augustine disputed thus against the Pelagians that we cannot so much as will good by Free-will without Grace or merit Eternal Life by any means without Grace And that is true indeed But that those same men joyning Grace again deny not that we can merit Life by Works and that ex condigno according to their worth I do not see what difference is between these and the Pelagians in that except that in the manner of working they somewhat differ for those work without grace these no otherways but by grace but both do equally err from the scope of true Iustification For as untrue as that is that it is in our power to perform any thing aright without the Grace of God It is again as false that this grace of working was not given by God for any other purpose but to produce meritorious works whereby we may be justified Though I deny not that by any means that the Divine grace of the Spirit is both fruitful and abounding with the greatest Vertues which can never be idle but it doth not therefore follow by sufficient strength of Reason that the reward of Eternal Salvation is due to the merits of these Vertues as the generality of Sophisters chatter with a great noise in Schools For thus Thomas the Prince of this Faction and the others that are partakers of his Discipline discourse of grace and in their Summularies do define this grace as if it were nothing else but a certain habitual infusion of the heavenly gift in the essence of the Soul because as they suppose it is a principle of meritorious works for so Thomas defines it And Guillermus not much differing from him calls this grace a form freely given to us by God without merits which makes him that hath it acceptable and makes his work good and meritorious Of these then is a vulgar definition made up and it thus defines grace unto us that it is a gift of good will freely given making its possessor acceptable and rendring his work good And Albert shews the manner how it makes a man good in as much as by infused Vertues as he says it perfects the will of man for act c. By these things I suppose it appears evident enough what Opinion hitherto hath been usual amongst those men in the Popish School In which neither their Divines themselves are well enough agreed with one another for some place this habitual gift of influencing grace in the essence of the Soul subjectively that I may speak in their own Dialect amongst whom is Thomas and Bonaventure Others chose rather to refer it not to the essence but the powers of the Soul as its proper subject of whom is Scotus and the Allies of that Order Again There are those who think grace is nothing else but a Vertue which is the thing that Osorius strongly defends in his Books But Thomas confutes this Heresie with much greater strength and bears it down with suitable Reasons But the summ of all their summs drives at this that Faith only may be excluded from Iustification and that they may not acknowledge any other Iustification but what consists in exercising of Works Neither do they think this grace to be given to us upon any other account but for this end to fulfil as they say the Commands of God according to the due manner without which the fulfilling of them cannot otherways be meritorious The Errour of the Tridentines in defining Grace is examined I Have explained the sayings of some Divines which differ several ways from one another yet they are all wonderfully agreed in this one thing as it were by a common Conspiracy that they may take away from sinners that saving Grace which only justifies us Let us joyn also unto these if you please the Sophisters of later times and especially the Nobles of Trent and the Hereticks of that Council whose Writings Opinions and Decrees when they are read what do they declare I will say in a word and truly nothing that is sound nothing that is not full of Errour nothing that does not disagree with the genuine verity of the Word But what that Errour is lest we should seem to accuse them without cause let us explain in a few words but true to wit seeing there is a twofold Testimony of the Grace of the Father towards us in the Scriptures the one whereby in a free gift he bestowed his Son upon us 〈◊〉 the other whereby he bestowed his Spirit The Son to die for us the Spirit to 〈◊〉 our Life there is not any man but should confess that they are both great gifts He gave his Son than whom nothing was dearer to him he bestows his Spirit than which nothing is higher in Heaven But for what purpose doth he bestow both how does he give them for our advantage for what end with what fruit what did he design in so doing by what Reason was he persuaded by what necessity by what mercy was the most gracious Father and maker of the World moved I would very willingly ask this first either of Thomas Aquinas or rather of those Tridentine fellow-Priests for if Free-will being helped by the grace of the Sprit of God as they say could do so much by meriting through the infused Vertues even as much as was sufficient for obtaining Salvation what cause then was there why all this charge should be put upon Christ the Son of God What need was there of his blood Why did not the most gracious Father spare his Life But if so be that all other helps of grace could afford no help to expedite the business of our Redemption Then it remains to be asked of those men what they affirm of Christ whether they acknowledge him the only Saviour or not And indeed I know that they will not deny that Christ is the only Saviour But in the mean while it remains that they should answer me this after what manner this only Saviour saves his own whether only by his Innocency and Death or by adding other helps besides Now if they judge that other securities are necessarily required it must be known what sort of Securities these are Aquinas with his Associates answers that those are gifts procured by the Holy Spirit and habitual Infusions of Charity and the like faculties of exercising Righteousness which helps unless they are added the Death of Christ according to his Opinion is not of such efficacy that it should be able
perfect to day whilest he always endeavours after better things the morrow he finds it imperfect These things said Hierom. Therefore if Paul being in perpetual motion could find no ftate of Righteousness in which he could rest It follows by consequence from hence that either there is no Iustification of a Christian in this Life or that surely it is not defined by its right terms by Thomas or the Thomists whence a just connexion is framed on this manner Argument Ma. Where there is a perpetual Race there is no station nor term of motion Mi. There is a perpetual Race in this Life towards obtaining Life Con. Therefore there is no station of attaining to Righteousness in this Life and end of notion which Thomas sets down By these things I think it is sufficiently evidenced what is the Iustification of a Wicked Man in the Scriptures and in what thing it chiefly consists not in a transmutation of inherent qualities by a voluntary receiving of Grace as they of Trent would have it but in the judiciary absolution of the Iudge whereby he that is guilty is sent away free and indemnity is given to him Whence Iustification seems to be defined not amiss by some That it is an action of God whereby he absolves the condemned Sinner from the Law in his free mercy for the sake of Christ justifies him from his Sins and glorifies him being justified Though in the mean while it is not denied that it is a matter of great concernment how every Man leads his Life and amends it But yet it is one thing to speak of Righteousness and another thing to speak of Iustification And again it is one thing to be exercised in the common use of Life and another thing to be exercised in judicatories There the amendment of Life hath praise but in judicatories no regard uses to be of what you are to do but of what you have done not what new qualities better Grace hath brought but by what remedy former Sins may be done away And now I pray you what then must be said and looked for in that most strict Iudgment of the most high God where the scene and sink of the wholeLife comes to be brought forth from its lurking places to the light where impurity of Life Deceits Injuries Filthiness of Lusts the Defilement of Conscience and Concupiscence the Wickedness of Words Works Counsels and Thoughts the Ambition of a pust up Mind the stubborness of Hatred Love Envy and the other Affections Rebelling against Reason the Love of the World Earthly Desires the Contempt and Ignorance of God The neglect of Duty Moreover the whole sink of things formerly done will be all at once laid open What will the miserable Sinner say here What will he bring To what will he fly Will he fly to his secret Confessions and Expiatory Penances and Satisfactions that will not be sufficient These things may declare thee to be a Sinner and a Penitent but not at all Righteous What then you will say hath not God promised to the Penitent the pardon of their Sins Be it so but where then is the Tridentine Iustification which is denied to consist of Remission only whereas you bring nothing into Iudgement but Confessions Penances and Deprecatory Tears For what need is there of any Satisfaction or Repentance when you have committed no Sin But if otherways Where then is your Righteousness whereof you boast To wit say you Remission of Sins being once received by Repentance together with Remission it self flows in Sanctification and the Renovation of the inner Man and the other gifts of Grace by the Holy Spirit whence Man of Unjust becomes Iust and of an Enemy a Friend c. What and dare you trusting in this Righteousness of yours enter the lists with the Majesty of so great a Iudgment And think you that your Vertues are such that they will overcome at this Iudgment Seat when they are Iudged Not by the Righteousness say you of my Vertues but by those works which the efficacious Grace of God works in me Which Righteousness is not mine but God's Not of my own Free will but of Grace acting in me Now then wherein will this Righteousness of yours differ from that Pharisee in the Parable of the Gospel Whose Life if you look into you see it is honest enough and unblamable if you look upon Grace he seems no less to acknowledge it and to attribute all his Vertues to it Otherways why did he with so much reverence and so carefully give thanks to God that he was not like other Men unless he had thought that whatsoever good Works he had were received of his gift and bounty For his Prayer doth sufficiently declare that wherein he seems not so much to Glory in his own good deeds as in the grace of God which he had received to which he ascribes all these things which he had done Therefore if it be true that these Roman Catholicks define That true Iustification consists in no other thing but in Works of Righteousness done by the grace of God what then doth hinder but this Catholick Pharisee according to their Catholick Opinion should be sent away to his House justified Which not being so it remains therefore that another manner of Iustification should be sought for by us than in VVorks of Righteousness which inheres and is planted in us by the grace of God But here the Roman Legions fight with all vehemency for their Catholick Righteousness as for their Camp First by Natural Reason that it is contrary to Nature for any Man to receive the Name or Essence of Righteousness from the Righteousness of another Moreover that it is much less reasonable for God who is the highest perfection of Righteousness and the Eternal Verity to will or be able to pronounce Men Iust that are impure and defiled with wickedness and Evil deeds and who are not truly righteous That I may answer these men two things offer themselves to be considered one which belongs to the cause of Iustification and another which belongs to the explication of the word In both of which the Adversaries are greatly mistaken First in this that treating of the cause of Iustification they seem to place it in no other thing next and immediately but in every man 's own Righteousness not which is imputed being received from another but which every one hath within himself trusting to this foundation That because every thing receives its name and essence only from the form that is inherent hence they gather that none should be accounted just but those only whom their own life and not another's makes righteous If they understand it of Formal Righteousness only and not Iudicial it hath no absurdity and may without any inconvenience be granted to them But what then what is this so much to the purpose for this is not the matter of debate what we are or are not formally in our selves
whole Wherefore there can be no surer demonstration that Faith only justifies than is held forth in these very words of the Sacrament whereby the flesh and blood of Christ is represented in that holy Banquet under the similitude of Bread and Wine Another Argument Unless your Righteousness exceed the Righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees ye cannot enter into the Kingdom of Heaven Therefore not Faith only but also Works of Righteousness exalt us to the Kingdom of Heaven I answer By these words the Lord gives us serious Instruction what manner of lives they ought to live that are justified But he doth not thereby signifie what is the proper cause of Iustification one Iudgment should be made of the causes of things and another of their effects If you enquire for the cause of Iustification the Lord hath resolved that doubt Thy Faith hath saved thee This is Life eternal that they should know thee the only true God and Iesus Christ whom thou hast sent In like manner Paul expressed himself If thou confess the Lord Iesus with thy mouth and believe with thy heart that God raised him from the dead thou shalt be saved But if you enquire what manner of lives they ought to live that make sincere profession of the Faith of Christ we are taught in this place and many other sayings of Scripture that they ought to differ much from the lives of the Scribes and Pharisees to wit that they who are created in Christ Iesus should behave themselves without a Pharisaical Vizard of external Holiness or a proud conceitedness of their own Righteousness but that they should be adorned and beautified with sincerity and uprightness of mind and persevere in the practice of good Works which God hath prepared that we should walk in them he said not that we should be justified by them but that being justified by his Grace we should walk in them bringing forth fruits worthy of our Vocation Another Argument Every Tree that bears not good fruit shall be cut down and cast into the fire Luke 3. Therefore Faith only is not sufficient to Salvation without Repentance I acknowledge the Divine Authority of that Prophecy which is true as it is generally known to all that have heard of the Gospel For who would endure an Unfruitful Tree that cumbers the ground and beares either no Fruit at all or such as is hurtful to the Husbandman But suppose it brings forth good Fruit and beautiful to look upon I would ask them whether the abundance of Fruit be the cause or whether it is not rather the demonstration of the Tree's Fruitfulness and whether the Fruits do not rather receive their growth from the Root whence they come Therefore if Repentance is reckoned amongst Fruits it doth not make the Man in whom it receives its first beginning perfect and good but only evidences what manner of Man he is now and hath formerly been For unless a wicked Life had gone before no Repentance had followed after Moreover Repentance could do no good unless Faith be joyned therewith by which a broken hearted Sinner may get access to the Throne of Grace But you may say Are not grief and remorse for Evil deeds and resolutions to the contrary things very acceptable to God and are not only conducible to the amendment of former miscarriages but also a great cause of future Reformation I Answer The sorrow of an afflicted Conscience which we call Repentance is a lovely effect but it proceeds from an Evil cause yet I deny not that it is a very excellent thing and never too late but always acceptable to God if so be it is accompanied with Faith in Christ. Neither do I deny that by means thereof Men are deterred from their customary Evil courses and stirred up to the exercise of Vertue Which though we grant to be true what doth all this avail towards the justifying of a sinner from those Sins that he hath formerly committed If a Man hath transgressed the Laws of the Commonwealth and being arraigned before a Iudge is forced to give account of all the actions of his Life will it be enough for him to say I was in an errour or I repent of my fault Will fear of judgment or shame set a Man free from the condemnation due to sin unless the Righteousness of a bleeding Saviour apprehended by faith do interpose and ward off the stroke of Divine vengeance from the guilty Sinner Without shedding of Blood saith the Apostle there is no remission Now then if neither Holiness of Life nor Prayers nor Tears nor the Blood of all the Saints can avail any thing towards the mitigation of the bitterness of this Iudgment and the only remedy be the death of the only begotten Son of God what will your Repentance do in this case Indeed I acknowledge that the Scripture attributes much to Repentance and there are glorious promises annexed thereunto but two things must be considered here First Of how large an extent the Promises are and next to whom they do belong for there are some rewards given in this Life and others that are reserved for Life Eternal Verily Eternal Life which is the benefit of Redemption as it could not be purchased by any works of ours so likewise it is not promised as the reward of Repentance or if in any Scripture it seems to be so promised it is not simply upon the account of Repentance but for another cause To wit the faith of the worker and not the work it self Therefore these things should be put each of them in their own places and comprehended within their own bounds That it may be understood aright what Faith does and what Repentance and what efficacy is in both and how they are distinguished from one another and also how they being joyned together do contribute mutual assistance to one another in the Iustification of the Ungodly For though we deny not that both are very pleasing to God yet the one is acceptable to him one way and the other another way For faith is acceptable through Christ but Repentance only upon the account of Faith And it is also a certain truth that though by faith only as the procuring cause we obtain Iustification in the sight of God Yet this very faith doth not put forth its power of Iustifying upon any but penitent and broken-hearted Sinners and therefore in the Gospel we are so often invited to Repentance Not that it is not true faith only which justifies without Repentance but because faith if it be true justifies no others but them that have turned from their Sins in sincerity and are converted unto God by Repentance For such as have no trouble of Conscience nor sorrow for Sin but run on obstinately against their Conscience and continue in their Evil courses it is a vain thing for them to hope for Iustification by Faith whereof they falsely boast for all such stout-hearted Sinners
are far from Righteousness None need the Physician but they that are Sick neither doth Christ invite any to come unto him but such as are heavy laden Come unto me saith he all ye that labour and are heavy laden and I will give you rest But what is coming to Christ but believing in him according to the saying of Augustin Therefore as Christ rejects none that come unto him that is such as return to him by believing but revives and justifies them so faith in Christ in which only our Salvation consists is no where of a saving efficacy but only in those whom it finds burdened and afflicted Another Objection If Faith only were sufficient to Iustification it would follow that good Works are not necessary But the Consequent is false And Therefore the Antecedent also is false That Faith ony is sufficient Vega confirms the Minor with this Argument Unless good Works had been necessary in all respects Paul had not so carefully given Instructions about Vertue and rebuked Vice and so mightily commended good Manners and Integrity of Life but we shall afterwards enquire into the Minor I come now to the Argument And First I deny the Major for this is not a necessary Consequence Salvation is obtained by Faith in Christ only Therefore good Works are not necessary The necessity of Vertue and honest discipline is and always hath been very great in all respects both private and publick yet this necessity doth not at all detract from the peculiar dignity of Faith that it should not be the only cause of Iustification as on the other side the Iustification of Faith doth not take away the necessity nor lessen the care of a Godly Life Therefore both Faith in Christ and the practice of Holiness are necessary the one to justifie Sinners in the sight of God and the other to exercise them that are justified in this World Therefore There is need of a distinction in this case for according to Philosophy a thing is said to be necessary two manner of ways First Absolutely and simply when one thing is so necessary to another that it cannot be done or consist without it Secondly In respect of Consequence when a thing is of such a Nature that as soon as it begins to be other things also are joyned with it or at least soon follow after and thus good works in persons justified are necessary to Salvation not simply but in regard of Consequence By what I have said any Reader that is not void of Sense may easily discern that we seek not to banish good Works out of the World that they should not be necessary but we only remove them from being a cause of Iustifying That so both Faith and Works may be put each of them in their own place and contained within their own bounds For Paul did not in vain nor without great necessity exhort with much vehemency to the Godly practice of a Christian Life For what is more glorious in it self or more worthy of the profession of Christianity or fitter to adorn the Doctrine of the Gospel than that those who are called by the Name of Christ should resemble him exactly in their manners and the practice of their lives And as they profess themselves to be Citizens of the Heavenly Kingdom they should according to their power endeavour to lead a Life like Heaven upon Earth On the contrary what is more abominable or odius than if those who have been engaged by so many benefits exalted to so great dignity and are joyned to him into so near an union by so many Covenants and Obligations if yet they do not follow his Foot-steps nor imitate him in the practice of their lives Therefore in this we and they agree that Works of Piety are very necessary but we must consider wherein this necessity lies For they are effects which of necessity depend upon their cause from whence they proceed but the cause hath no dependance upon them by any necessity By the like Consequence we call many things necessary in common Offices of Civility and Humanity as when Kindnesses are received what is more necessary and according to Iustice than a thankful remembrance of a Favour received and a readiness of Mind to give evidence of thankfulness not only in Words but also by repaying Kindness with Kindness if there be Opportunity Which thankfulness was nevertheless no cause of the Kindness that was done Let us here compare other kinds of Offices Who knows not that a Son and Heir ought of necessity to be dutiful to his Father But again who can be ignorant that this is no cause in him why he should receive the Inheritance The same also may be observed in Marriage where the Wife being tyed to her own Husband of necessity owes Subjection to him which nevertheless she shews to him not so much for any Law of necessity that extorts it as of her own accord and willingly being provoked by a Principle of Love moreover when she shews him the greatest Subjection this necessity is no cause of the Marriage bond Iust so it is in the performance of Godly Works which Paul commands us to maintain for necessary uses not that necessity of Works is any cause of Iustification but because it cannot otherways be but that where true Faith is there of necessity good Works are required and yet they are not so much required as they are a necessary Consequence for who was ever endued with the true Knowledge of Christ the Son of God or had the secret breathings of his Spirit or had a lively sense of his unsearchable Power and the unspeakable Glory of his Majesty but is drawn after him with the Cords of Love and cleaves unto him with all his Heart setting light by all the Vanities of this World Moreover who hath a true savour of Christ but he dispises the World and all the things of the World as the dirt under his Feet So that now there is no need of any Law to exact Works of Righteousness of him who is truly planted in Christ because he is a Law to himself and does more of his own accord than can be commanded by any Compulsion An Argument of the Iesuites The Word only is not found in the Holy Scripture therefore Faith only doth not justifie Though it is not true that this exclusive Word is no where found in the Holy Scriptures yet suppose we should grant it to be true what would be the Consequence Verily those things that follow from a necessary Consequence though they are not expressed yet they are implied And therefore ye also your selves admit many Words into your Confession of Faith of which the Scripture makes no mention But let us proceed you say this Exclusive Word is not found in Canonical Scripture I confess it is not in so many Letters and Syllables But seeing we meet with so many other things in sacred Writings that exclude all these Accessory
of the Works of Christ were not they Works of the Law For he himself hath said that he came not to destroy the Law but to fulfil it were not the things which he performed in fulfilling the Law VVorks of Grace VVhat difference then is there between those VVorks that are called VVorks of the Law and those other that are called VVorks of Grace So that it appears that he who excludes the VVorks of the Law excludes also the VVorks of Grace from Iustification Though I acknowledge there is great difference between the Law and Grace in respect of the manner of Doing and the ends of their Offices For what the Law exacts that Grace performs but in respect of the things themselves and the Actions unto which they are directed seeing both the Law and the Grace of God are exercised in the same subject Matter there is no difference between them The Law commands us to Love our Neighbour and lays a Punishment on him that disobeys But Grace communicates Strength and Ability to perform what the Law commands VVhich when we perform we are said to do not only a VVork of Grace but also a VVork of the Law by Grace so that it is a matter of small concernment whether it be called a VVork of the Law or a VVork of Grace a VVork of our own or a VVork of Faith Therefore if the Scripture denies That a man is justified and attributes his Iustification to another cause that is Faith what should be inferr'd from hence but that Man's Iustification comes neither by the VVorks of the Law nor the VVorks of Grace Iust as if a Man writing to his Friend should say thus This Benefit was procured for him by no Money or charge of his own VVhat matter is it whether it was his own Money or borrowed of some other Man when the meaning of the VVriter was to signifie that this Benefit whatsoever it was was not bought by any Price of the Receiver but obtained by the free Bounty of the Giver So Paul desiring to set before the Eyes of all Men the boundless Immensity of Divine Grace toward Mankind that they might behold and embrace it expresly denies that Man is justified by the VVorks of the Law But here the Distinction of Hosius as I have said presents it self It is true saith he in respect of the Works that are of the Law and belong to our own Free-will which being attended with Imperfection can avail nothing to Iustification To which I Answer in a Word Give then that Grace which may furnish frail Nature with Strength to yield perfect Obedience to the Law and may restore us to perfect innocency in this Life and you have won the cause But in the mean while let those Disputants consider how many gross and pernicious Absurdities proceed from this kind of Doctrine for hereby the infinite greatness of the free Grace and Mercy of God towards us is taken away and abolished this also destroys our thankfulness to him for his goodness and withholds Consolation from afflicted Consciences so that very great injury is done to him that hath freely communicated so many and so great Benefits and much greater injury is done to those on whom they are bestowed Hereby also it comes to pass that there remains no Assurance in the Promise of God no firmness in our Faith no soundness in the Doctrine of Religion nor Comfort or Refreshment in the Suffering of the Saints A second Argument out of St. Paul Being justified freely by his Grace through the Redemption which is in Christ Iesus whom he hath set forth to be a Propitiation by Faith in his Blood to declare his Righteousness at this time that he may be Iust and the Iustifier of him that is of the Faith of Iesus Christ and again we reckon that a Man is justified by Faith without Works Unless the Hearts of these our Adversaries were fully set in them to pervert the ways of the Lord it could not otherways be but these clear and evident sayings of the Apostle must be sufficient to satisfie them and prevail upon them to beware lest they kick against the Doctrine of the Apostles and exalt themselves in their proud Imaginations and vain Conceit of their own Righteousness against such clear Manifestation of Divine Grace But here the Roman Legions make a fresh incursion again and the Ring-leader of them is Andraeas Vega who fights against the Righteousness of Faith Whom there is no need of answering in this World For he hath been removed out of this Life a great while since that he might answer to God his Iudge And because he denied that he was justified by the Faith of Christ only let him look to it what he must answer his Iudge in that Iudgment wherein he must give account of his whole Life where of necessity he must either overcome or fall If he overcome where is the Truth of Scripture in which it is said God only overcomes when he is judged But if he fall where then is the Righteousness of Works What if David so great a King and Prophet could not endure that God should enter with him into Iudgment If Iob a Man of so Holy a Life yet durst not answer to one of a thousand What will our Vega say what will he bring his Cowls his Fastings his lyings on the Ground his Night Watches his Vows his Liturgick-Prayers his Propitiatory-Masses his Mumbled over Confessions his Penances and Satisfactions But who hath required these things at your Hands Nay but he will defend himself and take Sanctuary in the Law which he hath fulfilled not by the Strength of his own Free-will but by the help of Divine Grace Say you so David being guarded with as much Grace as any Man was yet sunk down under the weight of the Law of God I suppose Iob wanted not Divine Grace and yet he dares not appear before God in Iudgment And will Vega nevertheless hope to bring such an account of his Life before the Tribunal of God that if God strictly Mark it and weigh it in the balance of his Iustice he will not find more Sins than Merits therein But I need not ask him what he will answer to God his Iudge To whom I know he can make no satisfaction with all his inherent Righteousness But this is that which I ask him and not him only but all the other Tridentines also what they will answer the Apostle Paul who openly pronounces a Curse both on Men and Angels if any of them should dare to preach any other Gospel than he had preached And what Gospel is it that we have received by the preaching of Paul Is it not the same that he taught so often in all his Epistles with frequent Repetitions and great Care and Diligence and also confirmed it with Miracles Now the summ of the Gospel which he preached is this That Man is justified freely without Works by the Grace of
what manner of consequence is this Because habitual influences of Works which make us acceptable to God proceed no otherways but from cooperating Grace Therefore Faith without inherent Righteousness doth not justifie neither doth Salvation consist of any other thing but good Works But because there is a twofold sort of Works one of those which go before Faith another of those which follow Faith I would know of which of those rwo parts they understand it If of the preoedent they will not deny those to be Sins For that which is not of Faith is of Sin But if they understand it of Works subsequent to Faith they will say that those are either perfect or imperfect If perfect and of such a sort that they answer the things commanded in the Law not only according to the substance but also according to the manner of doing To what purpose then is that daily saying of the Church made mention of Forgive us our debts Or what will they answer to Augustine who evidently confutes what they maintain On the contrary if they are Imperfect Languid and Lame upon what account will they make us acceptable to God the Iudge which are of themselves defective and besprinkled with faults and spots and need another Grace by the commendation whereof they may be pleasing to God What if that infinite and Eternal purity for the most part in the Levitical Sacrifices did not endure whatever seemed any way defective or deformed or defiled with the least pollu on and which was not exquisitely entire and blameless in all respects if so great integrity of all parts was required in the Levites and Priests that it was not lawful to suffer any one to enter into the holy place of the Sanctuary who was wounded in any member of his body or deformed in any part or had a Wen Do you think that you can endure the presence of the most holy God with that half-torn and ragged Imperfection Wherefore seeing it must needs be perfect and unblameable upon all accounts which by Iustification indemnifies and frees us from all sin before the dreadful Tribunal of most perfect Righteousness surely no man can believe that it consists in our works but only in the works of the Son of God not those which his habitual grace works in us but those which he himself hath both graciously undertaken to do for us and also having undertaken them hath performed them to the full What Benesits come to us from Christ and what should be chiefly regarded in these Benefits NOW this is it in which chiefly the unspeakable amplitude of Divine Grace towards us doth evidently shine forth that God the Almighty Governour and Creatour of the World according to his fingular Mercy wherewith he hath loved the World having given his Son sent him to us and so sent him that he for us hath fulfilled all Righteousness for there was no need that he should fulfil it for himself and if he hath fulfilled it for us what hinders now but that may be ours which was done for us or to what purpose should he do that for us which he knew was necessary to be done by our selves for our Salvation But what if according to the saying of Thomas Whatsoever things we can do by Friends we our selves are said to be able to do it in some respect How much better then may we our selves be supposed both to be able to do and also to have done those things which a Friend is not only able to do for us but hath also done for us and this is that grace chiefly which every where the Evangelical Writings sound sorth unto us unto which all our both consolation salvation should be referred which Paul the Apostle having received from Christ did propagate it with so continued labour among the Gentiles and taught it with so great fervour of spirit and made it evident with so many Signs and Miracles and also confirmed it with so many Scriptures and most sure Testimonies Wherefore those Papists are the more worthy to be abhorred as being Enemies to Antiquity and Enemies to Paul who seem to be busied about nothing else but to abolish the Gospel of Christ and to overturn the Foundations of the Doctrine of the Apostles that have been long since very well laid by our first Fathers and to sow another Gospel in the minds of Christians For what else doth all their Doctrine drive at who disputing about Grace Faith and Righteousness do so handle the matter by their Philosophical Principles that he who observes their Collections Distinctions Corollaries and Opinions will perceive that they do not teach as Christians out of the Gospel out of Christ out of Paul but that the Antient Philosophers of the old Academy or the Thalmudists of the Law of Moses are again risen up and alive except that this only difference is between them and the Antient Philosophers that these do palliate with the name of Grace and Faith in words at least in some manner but in reality as touching the signification of the word Grace or the force of the word Faith they seem to be so very blind as if they had read Paul little or at least had not at all understood him I do not rail at the men themselves whom I rather account worthy of pity but it is not at all convenient to endure the Errours of men because they cast no small blot upon Religion and are injurious to Christ and do violence to Paul overthrow the simplicity of the Christian Faith moreover they adulterate all the sincerity of Evangelical Doctrine with their Niceties and after a certain manner subdue it unto humane Philosophy Which that it may appear the more evidently to the Minds and Eyes of beholders let it not be tedious to you to hearken a while first what Divine Truth and then what Humane Opinions teach us But because there are two things chiefly in which the whole sum both of our Salvation and Religion is contained Grace and Faith of which the one belongs to God towards men the other agrees to men towards God It very much concerns Christians that their Minds be very well instructed in both And Grace indeed is discerned in those good things that are given to us and promised by God Faith is exercised in those Offices which are chiefly due from us to God and are greatly requisite Therefore that we may rightly apprehend the nature of Grace we must see what and how great those gifts are which the bounty of God hath partly bestowed upon us and partly promised Concerning which thing it remains that we should examine what the Scriblers of Popish Divinity do hold Now what they teach about this matter is for the most part to this purpose They place the end of humane Life in blessedness and the School-Divines dispute about this very blessedness just after such a manner as the Philosophers of old did of their chiefest good unto