following it But God suffereth them for a while to haue their swinge and to florish that by the scandal of the crosse the faith and patience of the godly may be more exercised and tried vnto the wicked there may be left a time of repentance and when they abuse the long-suffering of God that then at length so much the iuster and heauier plague may light on them And therefore the holy Scripture in so many places as in the Psalmes 37.52.57.58 often elsewhere comforteth the godly against this kind of tentation foretelling vnto them defence and deliuery but destructiō Obiection 2 vnto their enemies Not all Neither is thereby the force of this proofe weakned because that all the persecutours of the Church are not in Tragicall manner taken out of this life For whiles God doth take vengeance on most of them in this life he doth sufficiently shew what he would haue to be thought of the rest verily that they are his enemies whom without they repent he will plūge into aeternal plagues the beginning and feeling of the which is desperation in which all the enemies of Christian Religion end their daies yea they who are not oppressed with any other calamities of this life To conclude that it may be manifest Not for this cause Answere Yea for this cause that they are Obiection 3 not onely for other transgressions so punished of God God doth so often denounce in his worde that such shal bee the ends of his enemies and that for this very cause because they go about to extinguish the people and true worship of God Yea furthermore they are not a few frō whom while they lie in torments their cōscience wresteth out this confession that they haue drawen these miseries vpon themselues by persecuting the godly as from Antiochus Epiphanes Iulian the Apostata And since that al the aduersaries of the Church in their calamites and death are destitute of comfort it is manifest that they suffer as the enemies of God and therefore are far from true Religion Now that which the wicked alone doe there is no doubt but that is in the number of their Sinnes for which they suffer punishment Wherefore the ouerthrowes of the enemies of the Church are no obscure Testimony of the wrath of God against them euen as God himself saith of Pharao To this same purpose haue I stirred thee vp Exod. 9. Rom. 9. that I might shew my power in thee and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth 10 The consent of true doctrine 10 The consent of the parts of doctrine 11 The confession and constancy of Martyrs and the iarring of others euen about the chiefe pointes 11 The testimonies and confessions of Martyrs who sealing with their blood this Doctrine doe shewe euen in the middest of death that they indeede doe so thinke as they taught and that they drawe that comfort out of it which they did preach vnto others And hence also it appeareth Obiection 1 that the certainty of this holy doctrine dependeth not on mens record Doth the certaintie of doctrine depēd of men though the constancy of Martyrs and other godly men giue comfort vnto vs. For albeit the Testimony of the Saintes too doth concur as a lesse principal proofe vnto our confirmation yet in their examples is seene a far other euē the testimony of God himself who strengthneth and comforteth them so that they are ready to sustaine any thing for his name sake Neither ought that to mooue vs a whit if other sectes also tel vs of their Martyrs For first Obiection 2 they are far behind that number of Martyrs Others are Martyrs also which the Church hath Answere They differ Againe there is not that alacritie and cheerfulnes found in them in suffering punishmentes which is in most of the martyrs of Christ so that it may easily appeare that they neuer feele that security of conscience and ioie of hart in God which the Godly feele And thirdly which is chiefely to bee considered the defenders of wicked doctrine suffer as being cōuicted of their errors But the godly no falshood being shewed in their confession are Tyrannically by their persecutors drawen vnto punishment whereas the persecutors themselues are conuicted of their impiety and iniurie euen as the Lord promiseth I wil giue you a mouth and wisedome where-against al your aduersaries shal not bee able to speak or resist Wherefore albeit sometimes some men suffer for their doctrine the certainty whereof they are not able to confirme neither to themselues nor to others yet doe they it not fenced by any diuine strength and comfort but being blinded by their owne stubburnes or pride and the illusions of the Diuel they run headlong to destruction contrariwise it is saied of the godlies Martyrdome Philip. 1. It is giuē vnto you for Christ not onely to beleeue in him but to suffer for his sake 12 The godlines and holines of those of whom the sacred Scriptures haue been written and who truely embrace this doctrine 13 Their plaine dealing in detecting of vices 14 The Testimonie of the holy Ghost 13 Their ingenuitie and plaine dealing in opening faults committed either by them or theirs whom the holy ghost hath vsed in committing this doctrine to writing 14 The testimonie of the holy Ghost which crieth in the hartes of the godly Abba father This testimonie doth not onely prooue which all the former also do but it perswadeth too For faith is nothing els then a firme assent by which wee agree vnto all the woord of God deliuered vnto vs and a confidence by which euery one of vs do know resolue that God according vnto the tenor of this Scripture is mercifull good vnto vs. Which confidence there followeth ioyfulnes resting in God and calling on him with an assured hope of obtaining those good things which according to the prescript of his woord wee begge of him Nowe that both of these that is both this assent or assurance of our doctrine and the liuely consolation which thence springeth neither do rest vpon the testimony of mē nor of any creature but is inflamed and strengthned by no other doctrine then of the Prophets and Apostles read heard and meditated of by them this euery one of the godly through a liuely and certain feeling of their hearts haue experience of This spirit therefore God adioyneth as a witnes vnto his woord Esai 19. This is my couenant with them saith the Lord my spirite that is vpon thee and my woordes which I haue put in thy mouth shall not depart out of thy mouth nor out out of the mouth of thy seed saith the Lord from hencefoorth euen for euer This spirite also Christ promiseth as the chiefe witnesse of his doctrine vnto his Disciples Iohn cap. 15. When the comforter shall come hee shall beare witnes of mee And cap. 16. When he is come which is the spirit of truth hee will lead
order of his minde declared in the nature of thinges and in his woorde and what agreeth therewith and disagreeth and all his woorkes and the works of all creatures past present and to come all the causes and circumstances of all things And moreouer That al Angels and men haue no more knowlege of diuine and humane matters than God doth woork maintaine in their minds For among other thinges the most beutiful and sightlie order which is in the nature of thinges the endes and vses of all things the signification of future euents arts and sciences the euerting and ouerturning of those deuises which the Diuell and wicked men haue most craftily contriued against God and all the godly doe enforce all men to confesse that these things could not proceed but from a most wise artificer and author Wherefore also the scripture it selfe willeth vs to consider the wisedome of God shining in these his woorks Eccle. 3.11 God hath made euerie thing beutiful in his time Isai 44.7 Who is like me that shal cal shal declare it set it in order before me since I appointed the ancient people Ioh. 5.13 He taketh the wise in their craftinesse And of these hee concludeth that the wisedome of God is immense vnconceiueable As Ps 145 7. His wisdom is infinit Rom. 11.32 O the deepenesse of the riches both of the wisedome and knowledge of God! But here again is to be obserued a difference betweene Philosophie and the word of God First that euen in the creation the knowen or legall wisedome was darkned and maimed in men through sinne and therefore needeth a renewing by the woorde deliuered to the Church And then that men without this heauenlie doctrine are altogether ignorant of that especial wisedome of God reuealed in the gospell whereby he saueth the Church gathered from amongst mankind by the son As it is said Mat. 11. I giue thee thanks O father bicause thou hast hid these things from the wise men of vnderstanding and hast opened them vnto babes The Goodnes of God diuerslie taken in scriptures The goodnesse of God signifieth sometimes his bountifulnes as Psa 106.1 Praise the Lord because he is good sometimes all the vertues and whatsoeuer is spoken of the nature of God As Psalm 14. Let thy spirite leade mee thorough the right waie That which also is meant by the name of holines or sanctity and light 1. Iohn 1. So in this place first by the name of goodnesse are vnderstoode al those thinges which are attributed to god in his woorde and are represented and resembled in his image as those thinges which are termed good in Angels and men as life power wisedome ioy righteousnesse c. For such is the nature of God as it hath manifested it selfe in the Lawe and Gospel and the goodnesse of the reasonable creature is an image of the diuine goodnesse And therefore here also differ philosophy and the Scripture in that Philosophy attributeth onely to God that his goodnesse which was opened in the Lawe and yet neither that wholie but of his goodnesse reuealed in the Gospell it is altogether ignoraunt Secondly by reason of the great and huge difference betweene the creatour and the creature we vnderstand those good thinges to bee in GOD which are agreeing to his diuine nature and maiestie For those which are proper vnto created natures woulde not bee good in GOD but rather a diminishing of his goodnesse Thirdly By reason of the immensitie of his diuine nature those things which are finite in creatures are in GOD infinite And therefore against sundry and diuerse disputes of Philosophers concerning the chiefest good we learne in the Church that GOD is the chiefest good Fourthly because nothing is vnperfect or not subsisting by it selfe in GOD whatsoeuer is attributed vnto him is not in him as formes or accidentes in creatures but such is his essence and nature in a manner not able to bee comprehended by our knoweledge and vnderstanding Fiftly His nature and will is a rule of that goodnesse and vprightnesse which is in creatures For so farre foorth thinges are and are called good as they agree with the wil of God Sixtly GOD is the onelie fountaine of goodnesse and the first cause of all good thinges So that all thinges haue so much goodnesse as God dooth create and maintaine in them And in this sense is it said Luke 18. There is none good but God onelie euen so as hee is most perfectly good and the fountaine of goodnesse The righteousnesse of God sometimes in Scripture signifieth that which is accounted righteousnesse before him The righteousnes of God both generall and particular and whereby he maketh vs righteous that elsewhere legall which is holines of life or conformity with the law of God which God worketh in vs by his spirit begun in this life to be perfected in the life to come as Iam. 1.20 The wrath of man dooth not accomplish the righteousnesse of God Or sometimes Euangelicall which is the righteousnesse of Christ imputed to beleeuers of the free mercy of God As Roman 3.21 But now is the righteousnes of God made manifest without the Law hauing witnesse of the Lawe and of the Prophetes to witte the righteousnesse of God by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vppon all that beleeue Sometimes is meant that righteousnesse whereby himselfe is righteous and then also in many places it signifieth the faithfulnesse or mercie and benignitie of GOD who according to his promises preserueth defendeth and deliuereth the faithfull as Psalm 31.1 Deliuer mee in thy righteousnesse But when it is properly spoken of the righteousnesse of GOD whereby himselfe is righteous as in this place First hee is called iust in respect of his generall iustice and righteousnesse which is the order or nature of this diuine vnderstanding and will whereby GOD will and approoueth doth himselfe and woorketh in others vnchaungeablie and vnspeakeablie such thinges as hee hath commaunded in his Lawe and neither will nor approoueth nor woorketh nor causeth nor furdereth any thing whatsoeuer disagreeth from this order but horribly hateth and detesteth them as it is said Psalm 11.17 The righteous Lord loueth righteousnesse Secondly In respect of his particular iustice and rightiousnesse which is the vnchaungeable will of God whereby God giueth to himselfe and will haue giuen him by others that glory which is due vnto the chiefe good as he saith I wil not giue my glory to another punisheth al sin with such punishment as is equall to the offence that is with eternal as in them who perish or with equiualent as in his Sonne Christ susteining the punishment for al those who are saued by him according as it is saide Thou shalt not depart thence vntill thou host paied the vtmost farding and cannot iniury anie creature whatsoeuer he determineth of him or doth vnto him because he oweth no man any thing as it is said Psa 45. God is iust in
work so cannot withall not worke or work otherwise because two contradictories cannot bee both at one time true FORTVNE and CHANCE are sometimes taken for the euents themselues or effects which follow causes that are causes but by an accident by reason of such causes Fortune and chaunce as are causes by and in themselues but not knowen to vs as when wee say good or euil fortune happy or vnhappy chance sometimes they signify the causes of such euents either the manifest causes which are causes but by an accident as when any thing is said to be don by fortune or by chance or the hidden and vnknowen causes which are causes by and in themselues As it is said in the Poet Omnipotent fortune and fate ineuitable And they are wont to cal that fortune which is a cause by an accident in voluntary agents whose actions haue some euent that seldom happeneth besides their appointment As he that digging with purpose to builde findeth treasure Chaunce they call an accidentall cause in naturall agentes whose motions haue effects neither proper to them neither alwaies hapning that without any manifest cause directing it as if a tile falling from a house kill one that passeth by By the name of FATE or destiny Fate or destinie The difference between the stoickes and th◠churches doctrine concerning Gods prouidence somtimes is vnderstoode the decree prouidence of God As that of the Poet Leaue off to hope that the fates of the gods are moued with entreaty But the Stoickes by this woorde vnderstoode the immutable connexion and knitting of all causes effectes depending of the nature of the causes themselues so that neither the second causes are able to woorke otherwise than they woorke neither the first cause can woorke otherwise than doe the second and therefore all effectes of all causes are absolutelie necessarie This opinion of the Stoickes because it spoileth God of his libertie and omnipotency and abolisheth the order and manner of woorking in second causes disposed by Gods diuine wisedome not onely founder Philosophy but the Church also reiecteth and contemneth and doth openly professe her dissenting from the Stoickes First because the Stoicks tie god to second causes as if it should be necessary for him so to woorke by them as their nature dooth beare and suffer But the Church teacheth that God worketh not according to the rule or lore of second causes but second causes according to the prescript of GOD as beeing the chiefe and most free gouerner and lord and therefore are subiect and tied to his wil pleasure Secondly the Stoikes were of opinion that neither God nor second causes can doe any thing of their owne nature otherwise than they do The church affirmeth that not only second causes are made ordained by god some to bring forth certaine definit effects some variable and contrary but God himselfe also coulde from euerlasting either not haue decreed or haue decreed wrought otherwise either by second causes or without them and by them either changeable in their own nature or vnchangeable al things whose contrary are not repugnant to his nature that hee hath so decreed them and doth so work them not bicause he could not otherwise but because it so pleased him as it is said Ps 115.3 Our god is in heauen he doth whatsoeuer he wil. And Luk. 1.37 With god shal nothing be impossible that is which is not against his nature or whereby his nature is not ouerthrowen as it is saide 2. Tim. 2. Out of this then which hath beene spoken we answere vnto the argument which was That which is done by the vnchaungeable decree of God is not done contingently but necessarily All thinges are doone by the vnchangeable decree of God nothing therefore is doone contingently neither by fortune or chaunce but all necessarily First wee say there is more in the conclusion than in the premisses when the opinion of the Stoicks is obiected to the Church For albeit the church confesseth al euents in respect of gods prouidence to be necessary yet this necessity is not a Stoical fate destiny because the church defendeth against the Stoikes both liberty in god gouerning things at his pleasure a chāgeablenes in second causes sheweth out of gods word that god could both nowe doe and from euerlasting haue decreed many things which neither hee doth nor hath decreed And therefore the church also hath absteined from the name of fate Necessitie of consequence or supposition doth not take away contingency least any should suspect her to maintaine with the Stoicks an absolute necessity of al things Secōdly if remouing stoicisme yet notwithstāding the necessity of al things the abolishing of cōtingency fortune chance be obiected we make aunswere to the Maior by distinguishing the words For those things that are done by the prouidence decree of god are done indeed necessarily but by that necessity which is by supposition or of consequence not by simple necessity or absolute Wherefore it followeth that all things come to passe not by simple absolute necessity but by that of supposition or consequence And necessitie of consequence doth not at al take away contingency The reason hereof is this Because the same effect may haue causes whereof some may produce it by an order changeable some by vnchangeable order therefore in respect of some it is contingent in respect of some necessary For as the originals or causes of contingency in things are that liberty which is in the will of god and Angels and men and the mutable nature of the matter of the elementes together with the readinesse or inclination thereof to diuers motions and formes so the cause of absolute necessitie in God is the very vnchangeable nature of god but the cause of that necessitie which is onely by consequent is the diuine prouidence or decree comming between those things which are in their own nature mutable also the nature of things created which is framed and ordained of god to certaine effects and yet subiect to the most free wil gouernment of god either according or besides or contrary to this order which himselfe hath made In respect therefore of second causes some things are necessary which are done by causes woorking alwaies after one sort as the motion of the son the burning of any matter put vnto the fier if it be capeable of burning some thinges are contingent which haue causes working contingently that is apt and fit to produce or to forbeare producing diuerse contrary effects as the blasts of windes the locall motions of liuing creatures the actions of mens wils But in respect of the first cause that is of the wil of god all thinges which are or are doone in Gods externall and outward woorks are partly necessary partly cōtingent necessary as euē those things which haue second causes most chaungeable as that the bones of Christ on the crosse were not broken
one sacrifice for sinnes sitteth for euer at the right hand of God Now the Papists contrarie to these manifest places of scripture will haue Christ to be often offered in the Masse 6 The Masse is repugnant to the doctrine of grace and iustification which teacheth that in this life onelie is the time of obteining fauour by faith alone for the onelie merite of christ The papists neglecting faith which they haue no knowledge of reiecting Christs merit substitute in place thereof this idolatrous inuention For through and for this sacrifice of the Masse and so for this worke as they speake wrought they maintaine that the dead also obtaine remission of sinnes 7 The Masse is repugnant vnto the articles of our faith concerning the true humanitie of christ concerning his true ascension into heauen and his returning from thence at the day of iudgement For they make a corporal presence of christ in the Masse saying that christ is inuisible present vnder the forme of breade and wine the substance of the bread and wine beeing abolished as often as the Masse is celebrated and this presence of Christ is corporal when the accidents onely of the signe remaine Jt is contrarie also to the nature of sacraments which permitteth not the substance of the signs to be abolished neither requireth any naturall connexion of the signes and things and therefore neither is it required in the Supper which leadeth vs to christ crucified and raigning in heauen and from thence communicating himselfe vnto vs. 8 The Masse is contrarie to the communion of Saintes with Christ. For it imagineth an execrable inuention which is that Christes bodie doth descend into our bodies and remaineth as long within our bodies as the formes remaine of bread and wine But the supper reacheth that wee are made members of Christ by the holy gh st and ingraffed into him 9 The Masse is repugnaunt to the true worship of God because it maketh Christ to be there corporally present so by consequent there to bee worshipped Euen as of ould before his ascension it was not onely lawful but in duty required that Christ should be worshipped in whatsoeuer place hee was and so also did his Disciples alwaies worship him when he was present as also when he ascended from them but after his ascension they did not from that time adore worship him turning vnto any one particular place more than other Wherfore seing the Papists in their Masse tie the worship and adoration of christ vnto a thing whereunto christ himselfe by expresse word hath not tied it they professe them selues to be idolaters and doe no lesse absurdly and impiously in this than if they should worship Christ at a wal or if they should worship a piller falling downe before it Which we prooue 1. Because no creature hath power to ty the woorshippe of God to anie thing or place wherein God hath not commaunded by expresse word himselfe to be worshipped and wherein God hath not promised to hear vs. And hereby is the cause of that difference plainly scene why the Iewes directing their praier to the propitiatorie or mercy seat did notwithstanding withall in spirite worship the true God and were by promise from him assured to bee head but worshipping in Dan and in Bethel and in the high places and in the temple of Samaria were idolaters not knowing what they worshipped Ioh. 4 22. Yee worship that which yee knowe not we worship that which we know for saluation is of the Iewes and the cause of this thing is more at large declared in the second of Kinges cap. 17. 2. Because in the newe testament all worshippe which is tied to anie certaine place on earth is vtterlie taken awaie and spiritual worship onlie required stirred and kindled by the holy ghost and doone with a true faith and knowledge of God Ioh. 4.21 The houre commeth when ye shal neither in this mountaine nor at Jerusalem worship the Father In these words Christ doth plainely take away worship tied and restrained to any certaine place on earth Wherefore wee must also take away and haue in detestation this impious inuention of christs corporal presence in the Masse or in the breade and wine For this being but that christ is in bodie present in the bread whether it be said to be done by transubstantiation or by consubstantiation the popish adoration standeth fast and of the contrarie side the presence of Christs body in the breade is taken away if wee take away this foule and shamefull Popish adoration of Christs bodie lying couertly by their iudgement vnder the formes of bread and wine Now withall wee are here to obserue What it is to worship christ in the bread namelie to direct our worshippe in soule minde cogitation and as much as may be in the motion of our bodies to the place in which the bread is and turning thereto to yeelde reuerence vnto christ as if hee were present there m re than else-where So of olde they worshipped God at the Arke turning thereto with their mindes and as much as might be with their external grace and inclination of bodie 1 OBiection The Masse is an application of Christes sacrifice Therefore it is not to be taken away Aunsw I denie the Antecedent because wee applie Christs merit by faith onely Obiect 2. There must bee a perpetuall sacrifice in the Church because Jsai foretoldâ— that it should bee from sabbath to sabbath Aunswere There must indeed be a perpetuall sacrifice in the church which is the sacrifice of thankes-giuing 1. Because it is a remembraunce of Christes sacrifice 2. Because almes were giuen in the primitiue church after the supper was ended which were a sacrifice 3. The supper also is an Eucharistical or thankesgiuing sacrifice For a propitiatory sacrifice the Fathers neuer dreamt of 6 What is the right and lawful vse of the supper THE right and lawfull vse of the supper consisteth in three thinges 1. When the rites and ceremonies instituted of CHRIST are reteined and obserued yet so that they bee not obserued of one or two priuatelie but that in a conuenient and lawfull assemblie of the church the breade be broken distributed and receiued and the wine giuen to all that communicate in remembrance of Christes death that is for confirmation of their faith and to shew their thankefulnesse 2. When the rites are obserued of those persons for whome Christ did institute them that is when the bread and wine is distributed and receiued of others of whom the Lorde woulde haue it receiued namely not of his enemies but of his Disciples which are the faithful For the obseruing of the rite without faith and repentance is not the vse but the abuse of it 3. When the supper is receiued for the right end which is in commemoration and remembraunce of the Lordes death 7 What the wicked receiue in the Lords supper THE wicked receiue 1. The bare signes onely namely bread and wine 2. They receiue those signes
word and sacraments 3 The Scripture attributing the partes of mans bodie vnto God doth signifie thereby his nature and propertie Therefore it is lawfull also to signifie the nature and propertie of God by Jmages Aunswere 1 There is a dissimilitude betweene metaphors or translations of wordes and Images because vnto them is annexed an exposition of them in the worde which hindereth and stoppeth al error 2. When by an anthropopathy that is when the Scripture applieng it selfe to speake vnto men after the manner of men doth attribute the partes of mans bodie vnto God the worshippe of God is not at all woont to bee tied vnto them 3 Lastly God spake these thinges after the manner of men to help our infirmity but he for-bad Images 4 God of oulde presented himselfe to be seene in mans shape Therefore we may also follow the like signes and semblances Auns God indeed mooued by certaine reasons thereunto did so but he hath forbidde vs to followe it For it is lawfull for God to manifest himselfe what way soeuer he will but it is not lawfull for any creature to represent god by any such signe as himselfe hath not commaunded And those visible shapes had god present with them to commaund promise and heare them vnto whom he manifested himselfe which cannot bee saide of such Images as imitate those shapes without flat Idolatry and therefore the saints did well in adoring god at them or in them as beeing after a speciall manner there present which to doe in these is impious and Idolatrous because it is done through the boldnesse and vanity of man without any commaundement or promise from god Lastly those visible shapes continued so long as it pleased the Lord to vse them for to manifest and shew himselfe and therefore could they not bee drawen to Idolatry But Images and pictures which men make to represent the manifestations of god were neither ordained to manifest god nor to represent or resemble those auncient manifestations of god and therefore are they an obiect and an occasion of Idolatry 5 It was lawfull for the Israelites to haue resemblances figures Cherubin Seraphin Palm-trees and diuerse pictures in Salomons Temple Therefore it is lawful also for Christians to haue Images in their Temples Aunswere The figures resemblances of diuerse thinges and liuing creatures as Oxen Lions Palm-trees Cherubins and such like painted in the temple of Salomon were warranted by the word of god But the word of god is flat against those Images which the Papistes haue in their Churches 2 The Images which were painted in Salomons temple were such as could not easilie be drawen by anie man into abuse 3. God had this cause for which he would haue those Images to bee painted in the temple that namelie they should be types of spiritual thinges but this cause is now taken away by Christ THE SECOND PART OF THE SECOND COMMANDEMENT THIS part forbiddeth any worshippe to be giuen vnto Images not only that which is giuen thereby or referred to creatures but that also which is referred vnto god himselfe Obiection 1. The honour which is giuen vnto the sign is the honour of the thing signified Images are a signe of God Therfore the honor which is giuen vnto Images is also giuen vnto God Ans The honour of the signe is also the honour of the thing signified namely when the sign is a true sign that is ordained by him who hath autority to ordain it whē also that honour is giuen vnto the sign which the right and lawfull author of it willeth to be doone vnto the signe For not the will of him that honoureth but of him that is honoured is the rule which must prescribe the due honour Now God hath forbidden any Images to be erected vnto him and therefore Images are no true signes of god 2 Obiection Whatsoeuer contumelie is done vnto the signe that redoundeth on God although the signe bee not instituted by his commaundement Therefore the honor also that is giuen to the signe redoundeth on God although that honour bee not commaunded to be giuen vnto the signe Aunswere This reason doth not folowe because then are contrary thinges rightly attributed vnto contraries when the contrariety of the attributes dependeth of that according to which the subiect is opposed not of some other thing So we grant that contumely against God followeth indeede the contumely against the signe albeit the signe were not instituted by God but not simply in respect of the signe it selfe vnto which that contumely was done but in respect of his corrupt and bad wil who by shewing contumely against the signe which is thought to represent God purposeth himselfe and is minded to despite with contumely and reproch God himselfe For to the shewing of despite and contumely against god it sufficeth if there bee any intent or purpose of departing from his commaundement But if through a desire that we haue to auoide Idolatry we detest Images and other false reputed signes of god by this contumely doone vnto the signes we rather promote further aduaunce gods glory But the honor of god doth not folow the honor of the sign except both the honor and the signe be ordained by God 3 Obiection Jf it bee lawfull to haue the Jmages of noble and renowmed men much more is it lawful to haue the Jmages of Angels and Saintes Aunswere 1. The lawfull hauing of the Images of noble and worthie men and the giuing of honour vnto them must bee warily and rightly vnderstood 2. The Images or monuments of notable men must bee such as may not bee drawen into Idolatrie 3. Where the antecedent proposition is taken in this sense in which it may be grounded the consequent also may be graunted of the like monuments or the like honour But if in the sequel or consequent that bee transferred to Images and superstitious honour which might haue beene granted in the antecedēt being rightly vnderstood the consequence is to be denied in respect of that ambiguity and diuersitie of meanings and in respect of the dissimilitude vnlikenesse of the honour and monuments That honour of monuments is lawfull which is a gratefull and honorable memorie of those whose monuments they are and also that which is applied to that vse which themselues would haue it and not to the worship of them or to the woorshippe of God by their monuments And such lawfull monuments which cānot be drawen into Idolatry we must not deface through a desire of despiting or reproching them whose monuments they are The obedience of this second commaundement consisteth as we haue seene in the true woorship of God The vices which are repugnant vnto this second commandement are 1 Jdolatrie which is a false or superstitious worship of God Idolatry is of two sorts 1 When a false God is worshipped that is when in place of the true god or besides him that honor or worship is giuen to some either imaginary or existent thing which
conuicted by the force of the trueth to haue stubbornely sought after error and blindnes The difference of this true doctrine from others 1 This doctrine was deliuered from God other Sectes are sprung from men and haue beene inuented by Diuels 2 True Religion hath firme testimonies diuine such as quiet consciences The Law by nature known yet darckened and conuince al other Sects of error 3 In the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles is deliuered the whole Lawe of God rightly vnderstood and vncorrupt and both the Tables of the Law are perfectly kept As for other Sects they cast away the principal parts of Gods Law that is to say the doctrine concerning the true knowledge and worshippe of God which is contained in the former Table of the Decalog as also they do reiect the inward and spirituall obedience of the second Table That little good and true which they haue is a part of the commandement concerning the discipline conteined in the second Table or concerning the outwarde and ciuile duties towardes men The Gospel by nature not knowen 4 The whole Gospel of Christ that rightly vnderstood is in the true church alone taught and in this true doctrine alone is it contained Other sects either are clean ignorant of it as the Ethnickes Philosophers Iewes Turkes who also are as very enemies of the Church or they doe patch some litle part of it out of the doctrine of the Apostles vnto their owne errors of which part yet they neither know nor perceiue the vse as the Arrians Papists Anabaptists and al other Heretikes of whom some concerning the person others concerning the office of our mediator maintaine errors Al these though they arrogate vnto themselues the title of the Church and professe the name of Christ yet since that they depart from that onely foundation of the Church which is Christ that is since they do not acknowledge Christ either to be true God or true man neither do seek for righteousnes and saluation wholy in him they are not the members of the true Church not so much as in outward profession as it is said 1. Iohn 4. Euery spirit which confesseth not that Iesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God and this is the spirit of Antichrist The difference of this true Doctrine from Philosophie It is true that wee studie Philosophie and not the Doctrine of other sectes but yet there is a very great differēce between these twoo Doctrines 1. Philosophie is whollie naturall but the principall part of this doctrine that is the Gospel is reuealed from aboue euen from God 2. Only this doctrine declareth the Gospel Philosophie is quite ignorant of it 3. The Doctrine of the Church sheweth the originals of our miseries Philosophie doth not so 4 This doctrine whereas it doth assure vs of eternal life it doth minister comfort vnto our consciences and sheweth vs the way how to wade out of dangers Philosophie teacheth vs not so much as this 5. Of this we are taught the whole Law Philosophie letteth passe the chiefest partes Indeede Philosophie conteineth two partes profitable for mans life as Logick Mathematikes others which God would not deliuer in this doctrine But as concerning this doctrine Philosophie hath but a little part of the Law that obscurely and that taken out but of a few preceptes of the Law It hath certain common comforts those that are not common it hath not as being proper vnto the Church Commō comfortes are these 1 The prouidence of God or the necessitie of obaying him 2. A good conscience 3. The woorthines of vertue 4. The final causes or the endes which vertue proposeth 5. The examples of others 6. Hope of reward 7. A comparing of euentes because a lesse euil is compared vnto a greater Those comforts which are not common but proper vnto the Church are 1. Remission of sinnes 2. The presence of God in miseries themselues 3. Our finall deliuerie Certaine notes or markes by which the Church is distinguished from others The marks which distinguish the Church or the professors of true doctrine from others are these 1. Puritie of doctrine 2. The right vse of the Sacramentes 3. Obedience towards God and his doctrine both in life and maners Many times truly great vices do grow in the Church but they are not maintained as falleth out in other Sectes For the true Church is the first her selfe that doth comprehend and condemne them before any other As long as this remaineth so long remaineth the Church OF THE THIRD QVESTION Whence it may appeare that this Religion alone was deliuered of God which is conteined in the Scripture GOD in the very creation of the woorld put this bridle in the mouth of all reasonable creatures that no man without extreme and manifest impudencie such as was the Diuels in paradise durst saie that anie thing if it were once apparantly knowen to haue beene spoken or commaunded by God might be called into question or that any man might refuse to obey it Here-hence are those things so often inculcated in the Prophets Hearken O heauens hearken O earth For the Lord hath spoken Thus saith the Lord. The woorde of the Lord came to Esaias Ieremias c. Since therefore it appeareth that the bookes of the olde and new Testament are the wordes of God there is no place left of doubting whether that bee the true Religion and doctrine which is conteined in them But whether these bookes were written by diuine instinct and by what proofes and Testimonies we are certaine of so great a matter this is a question not to be let passe of vs. Wherefore this question is necassary For except this aboue all other things remain stedfast and immoueable that whatsoeuer we read in the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles doth as truely declare the wil of God vnto vs as if wee did heare God openly speaking to vs from heauen it cannot chuse but that the very foundation and whole certainty of Christian Religion must bee weakned Wherefore it is a consideration worthy those who are desirous of the Glory of God and do seeke for sure comfort to enquire whence it may appeare vnto vs that the holy Scripture is the word of God To this question now long since answere hath bin made by the Papists that forsooth it is not otherwise certain The first part The autority of the Scripture doth not depēd of the Church then because the Church doth confirme it by her Testimonie But we as we neither reiect nor contemne the Testimony of the true Church so we doubt not but their opinion is pestilent and detestable who often saie that the holie Scriptures haue not their authoritie else-where then from the woorde of the Church For first wicked is it and blasphemous to say 1. Reason The reproch of God that the autority of Gods woord dependeth of the testimonie of man And if it be so that the chiefest cause why
creation of mankind and the first beginnings of the Church in paradice yea the woord is that immortall seede of which the Church was borne The Scripture is first in nature as the cause The Church therefore could not bee except the woord were first deliuered Now when wee name the holy Scripture wee meane not so much the characters of the letters and the volumes but rather the sentences which are conteined in them which they shal neuer be able to prooue to be of lesse antiquitie then the Church For albeit they were repeated and declared often after the beginning of the gathering of the Church 2. Answere The Maior is false A yonger workmā may be more skilful than an elder yet the summe of the Law Gospell was the same for euer To conclude neither is that which they assume alwaies true That the autority of the ancienter witnes is greater thā of th◠yōger For such may be the conditiō quality of the yonger witnes that he may deserue greater credit then the ancienter Christ being man bare witnes of himselfe Moses also and the Prophets had long time before borne witnes of him neither yet is the autoritie therefore greater no not of all the other witnesses then of Christ alone In like sort the Church witnesseth that the holy Scripture which wee haue is the woord of God The Scripture it selfe also doth witnes of it selfe the same but with that kinde of witnes that is more certaine and sure than all the othes of Angels and men There is alleadged also to this purpose a place 1. The pillar of truth to Timot Obiection 4 3. Where the Church is called the pillar and ground of the truth But since the Scripture doth teach otherwhere and that not once that the foundation of the Church is Christ and his word it is manifest inough that the Church is the pillar of the truth not a foundamentall or vpholding piller but a ministeriall that is a keeper and spreader of it abroad and as it were a mansion place or sure seat which might carrie the truth left with her and committed vnto her in the open face of all mankinde Acts. 9. Gal. 2. 1 Thes 2. 2 Thes 1. Tit. 1. euen as the holy Apostle Paul was called an elect vessell to beare the name of God before the gentiles and kinges neither yet did Paul get credit vnto the Gospell but the Gospell vnto Paul So likewise are the Apostles termed pillars Galat. 2. not that the Church rested on their persons but that they were the chiefe teachers of the gospell and as it were the chieftaines and maisters of doctrine For a man is not bound to beleeue those that teach on their bare woord but for the proofes which they bring of their doctrine Furthermore they alleage a sentence of Austin out of Obiection 5 his booke entituled against the Epistle of the foundation A place of Augustine 1 Answere An example maketh no rule chap. 5. I saith Augustine would not beleeue the Gospell except the authoritie of the catholicke Church did mooue mee thereunto But first if it were true that either Austin or some others did giue credence vnto the Gospell onely for the Churches autoritie yet might there not bee fashioned a rule hence of that which all men either did or ought to doe But that this is not the meaning of Austine 2 Aunswere He speaketh of himselfe as yet not cōuerted or not sufficientlie confirmed which these mē wold haue they do easily perceaue who weigh both the whole course of this place the phrase of speech which is vsual vnto Austen For Austen going about to shew that the Manichees were destitute of al proof of their doctrine first he opposeth one who as yet beleeueth not the gospel and denieth that such a one is able any way to be conuicted by the Manichaeans for he were to be conuicted either by argumentes drawen out of the doctrine it selfe of which the Manichaeans haue none or by the consent of the catholike Church from which themselues were departed for example sake he proposeth himselfe who should not haue had beleeued the Gospel except the authoritie of the catholik Church had moued him thereunto Austen therefore speaketh this not of himselfe as hee was then when hee writ these things against the Manichaeans but of himselfe before hee was yet conuerted or not sufficiently confirmed And that hee speaketh not of the present but of the time past the words that follow do manifestly declare whom then I beleeued when they said Beleeue the Gospel why should I not beleeue them when they say Beleeue not a Manichean For hence it appeareth that when he saith he was mooued especially by the authority of the Church he meaneth it of that time at which he obeied the Churches voice that is departed from the Manichaeans vnto the true Church But after that once he was conuerted and had perceaued the truth of doctrine that his faith was not now any more builded on the authoritie of the Church but on a far other foundation himselfe is a most sufficient witnes for vs whereas in the selfesame book Therefore he did beleeue the Church especially before he was able to perceiue it cap. 14. he saith on this wise Thou hast purposed nothing els but to commend that thy selfe beleeuest and to laugh at that which I beleeue And when as I of the other side shal commend that which myselfe beleeue laugh at that which thou beleeuest what dost thou thinke we must determine or do but euen to shake handes with them who bid vs to know certaine things and afterward will vs to beleeue things that are vncertain and let vs follow them who bid vs first to beleeue that which as yet we are not able to perceaue that being more enhabled by faith it self we may discerne to vnderstand that which we do beleeue not men now but God himselfe inwardly strengthning and illightning our mind Wherefore they do manifest iniury vnto Austen who draw that which himselfe confesseth of himselfe when hee was not yet conuerted or was but weake vnto that time when he affirmeth far otherwise not of himselfe onely but of al the godly For so reuerent a regard ought we to haue of the worde of God and such also is the force and efficacy of the holie spirit in confirming the harts of beleeuers that we beleeue God yea without any creatures Testimony euen as Elias forsooke not god 1. Reg. 19. The application of the answere no not when he thought that himselfe only was left aliue of the true worshippers of God If therefore either Austen or whosoeuer els being not as yet conuerted vnto religiō nor as yet hauing experiēce of the certainty of it in his hart That followeth not which they would 1 Because there is more in the Consequent than in the Antecedent 2 Because thereis a fallacy of the Accident A declaration of the like example 1 The
it is manifest that the decrees of the Church are of no lesse authoritie then the expresse sentence of the Scripture But we as we willingly grant that the controuersies of the Church must bee at length determined Aun Not the Church but the holie ghost is iudge in the word and that according to the Sentence of that iudge of whom wee may bee certainlie assured that we can not be deceaued So wee acknowledge this iudge to be not the Church but the holy Ghost himself speaking vnto vs in the Scripture and declaring his owne woords For he is the supreme iudge whose iudgement the Church onely demandeth declareth and signifieth he can not bee deceaued whereas all men are subiect vnto the daunger of error in a word he being the author of the Scripture is the best and surest interpreter of his owne words And therefore the Scripture it selfe in al doubtes recalleth vs and bindeth vs vnto it selfe as 2. Pet. 1. We haue a most sure word of the Prophets to the which yee doe wel that yee take heede as vnto a light that shineth in a dark place Iohn 5. Search the Scriptures Esay 8 To the Lawe and to the Testimonie if they speake not according to this word The Church doth not alwaies speake the words of the holie Ghost it is because there is no light in them For although the holie Ghost speaketh also by the Church yet because shee doth not alwaies speak the words of the holy Ghost she can not be the supreme chiefe iudge of controuersies in Religion For this iudge must be such a one whose sentence may by no means bee called in question But wee haue none such besides the word of God registred in the Scriptures Deciding of controuersies is not taken away Neither doe we at all take away the deciding of controuersies when wee make Scripture iudge of the meaning of the scripture For although contentious persons alwaies seeke sophismes by which they may delude and shift off the testimonies of Scripture yet doe they this against their conscience and the louers of the truth require no other interpreter of the Scripture but the Scripture and doe acknowledge and confesse themselues to be plentifully satisfied by it For whereas vnto men also it is graunted to bee themselues the best interpreters of their own wordes how much more ought this honor to bee yeelded vnto the holy Scripture The way how to decide doubtful places 1 The Analogy of faith Wherefore if controuersie be mooued concerning the meaning of some place in the Scripture we ought much more to doe that here which we would doe in other writinges First of all to consider and respect the anologie of faith that is to receiue no exposition which is against the ground of doctrine that is against any article of faith or commaundement of the Decalog or against any plaine testimonie of Scripture 1 Cor. 3. 2 Examining of Antecedents Consequents euen as Paul admonisheth forbidding to build wood hey stubble vpon the foundation Secondly to weigh the thinges that goe before and follow after that place which is in question that so not onely nothing contrary to these may be faigned on it but also that that may bee set for the meaning of it which these require For these either not beeing obserued or beeing dissembled the meaning of the Scripture is not seldome depraued Psalm 91. So those words of the Psalme Hee shall giue his Angels charge ouer thee that they shall beare thee in their handes that thou hurte not thy foote against a stone The Diuell tempting Christ interpreteth them as if they serued to maintaine ouer-rash and curious attempts when yet that which is added In all thy waies doth shew that they are to bee vnderstood of men doing those thinges that are proper vnto their calling Thirdly 3 Resorting to places which teach the same more clearly wee ought to search euery where in the Scripture whether there bee extant any place where it stands for confessed or is manifest or may bee shewed that the same doctrine in other woordes is deliuered touching the same matter which is conteined in that place which is in controuersie For if the meaning of the clearer and vndoubted place be manifest vnto vs wee shall also be assured of the place which is doubted of because in both places the same is taught as when Rom. 3. it is said We conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the Lawe That in this place to be iustified by faith is not to please God for the worthines of faith but for the merit of Christ apprehended by faith and that the woorkes of the Law signifie not the ceremonies onely but the whole obedience of the Law chiefly the morall other places doe teach vs which in moe and clearer woordes deliuer the same doctrine concerning the iustification of man before God as in the same chapter By the woorkes of the Law shall no flesh bee iustified in his sight for by the Law commeth the knowledge of sinne But now is the righteousnes of God made manifest without the Law hauing witnes of the Law and of the Prophets The righteousnes of God by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vpon al that beleeue for there is no difference For all haue sinned and are depriued of the glorie of God and are iustified freelie by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Iesus 4 Conferring like places togither Fourthly wee must conferre places of Scripture where though the same woords bee not spoken of the same thing yet the like woordes and formes of speaking are vsed of the like thinges For if the interpretation of the like place bee certaine and there bee the same causes for the like interpretation to bee giuen in the place that is in controuersie which are in the other then of like places wee must giue one and the same iudgement The Lord willeth Mat. 5. to put out our eie to cut off our hand if it be a cause of offence vnto vs. Now whereas the Law forbiddeth vs to maime our bodie Thou shalt not kill that therefore by this figure of speech the Lord would haue vs that wee should rather forsake thinges most deere vnto vs then that by the lust and motion of thē wee should suffer our selues to be withdrawen from God the like forme of speech otherwhere vsed to signifie things most deer and precious doth shew as Ierem. 22. If Iechoniah were the signet of my right hand yet would I plucke thee thence And Deut. 32. Hee kept him as the apple of his eie 5 The catholike Church When once according to these rules the controuersie concerning the text meaning thereof is iudged we may lawfully also descend to the consent of the Church yet putting great space betwixt not without great aduisement For least by the name of the Church we be beguiled first of all no sentence or
whosoeuer abideth not in perfect loue that is as Christ expoundeth it hee that loueth not God with al his hart with al his soule with al his cogitation and with al his strength With al his hart by which are vnderstood al the affections inclinations appetits or desires For God wil haue himselfe alone to bee acknowledged the chiefest and himselfe to be loued aboue al things and that men may relie on him hee wil haue the whole hart to be yeelded vp to himselfe not part to him and part to another and to this is opposed not to walke before God with a perfect hart Obiection If we ought to loue God with al our hart then ought we not to loue our Parentes Aunswere It is lawful for to loue other things also besides God but nothing aboue God We ought to loue our Parents but not chieflie For we ought to loue al other things for God It followeth with al thy soule by which he comprehendeth that part which is willing to anie thing or the motions of the will then therefore hee meaneth with thy whole will and purpose Thirdly with al thy cogitations by which he vnderstādeth the vnderstanding and mind so much as we know of God 1 Cor. 13.10 so much also doe we loue him therefore when we shal know him perfectlie that which is in part shal be abolished And therefore our loue of God which now is but in part shall then bee perfect Lastlie with al thy strength in which al inward actions agreeable to the Lawe of God are contained Secondlie it is said In the Loue of God 2 Why In the loue of God and what that is as vnto whom being once manifested and doing good vnto him man is bound whereupon the Lord calleth himselfe our God Now to loue God is to acknowledge him to bee the chiefest good and to bee the chiefest good to vs and so to loue him that thou wilt rather forgoe all things then thou wilt depart from him or not bee ioined with him for that which is best that thou dost most desire and dost couet most of al to be ioined with it Thirdly it is said In the loue of thy neighbour 3 What is In the loue of thy neighbor To loue thy neighbour is for the loue that thou owest vnto God to wish well and doe well vnto thy neighbour and to doe all things to him which thou wouldest in aequitie and according to the Law to be done to thee The Loue of God is the summe of the Law Why the loue of God is the summe of the Law Why it is called the first commandement because it is taken for our whole obedience as beeing the cause of our obedience The loue of God is called the first Commaundement because it is the spring and fountaine of the rest It is the fountaine of the rest 1. because it is the efficient and impulsiue cause 2. because it is the final cause or ende which the rest propose which is for to declare our loue towardes God In like maner it is called the greatest commaundement 1. because it is the end of al the rest of the cōmaundements of our whole obedience for therfore thou oughtest to do well vnto thy neighbour because thou louest God again that thou maist shew thy obedience to him 2. because that is the principall woorshippe for which the ceremoniall lawes were ordained and so is opposed vnto the ceremoniall woorship which was appointed for this morall lawe Obiection The second commaundement is like vnto the first therefore the first is not the greatest Answere The loue of our neighbour is like vnto the loue of God 1. Because that commandement of louing our neighbour is opposed vnto the ceremonies 2. Because the obedience of the first table is the cause of the second Thirdlie because the breach of the second table doth as well deserue eternall punishmentes as the breach of the first 4. Because it appertaineth to the morall woorship which is described in the first and second table 5. It is like because of the coherence of both for that neither can be obserued without the other 6. Because one is autor of both 7. Because both of thē contain our whole obedience Hēce now appeareth the answer to this obiectiō Therefore our neighbour is to bee set aequall with God and to bee aequally worshipped For ir hath beene said before Thou shalt loue God alone with al thy hart Now the loue of our neighbour is like vnto the loue which wee owe vnto God in respect of the kind of worship but vnlike in respect of the degree And it is also vnlike first in respect of the obiectes or things loued For God and man who are to be loued are diuers obiectes 2. For that the loue of our neighbour riseth from the loue of God but it falleth not so out of the contrarie 3. As it was said it is vnlike in respect of the degree of our loue to God Obiection If the loue of God bee the chiefest commaundement then the loue of God is greater then faith Answere Loue is heere taken for our whole obedience which wee owe vnto God vnder which faith is comprehended which is the cause of all the rest of our actions For in that wee are commaunded to loue God wee are also forbidden to offend him for no man offendeth him whom he loueth Why the loue of our neighbour is called the second commandement The loue of our neighbour is called the second commaundement 1. because it containeth the summe of the second table for if thou loue thy neighbor as thy self thou wilt not murther him thou wilt not hurt him 2. because the loue of our neighbour must rise out of the first table euen from the loue of God and so is that also explicated which is added of Christ That on these two commaundements hangeth the whole Law the Prophets that is that al the other legall obedience which is cōtained in Moses the Prophets doth spring from our loue of God and our neighbour Obiection In the Prophets also is the promise or doctrine of the Gospell therefore Christ seemeth not to speake aright in this place Answere He speaketh of the doctrine of the Law not of the promises of the Gospel which appeareth by the question of the Pharisie demanding which was the chiefe commaundement not which was the chiefe promise and therefore Christ answereth him vnto the purpose Hitherto reacheth the declaration of the Maior or first proposition concerning the abyding in the perfect loue of God and our neighbour Now remaineth the Minor Proposition which is But I haue not abidden in al that is I haue neither loued god nor my neighbour as I ought whence the conclusion ariseth Therefore I am accursed and so it appeareth that indeed the knowledge of our miserie and of our punishment which is contained vnder the name of miserie is drawen out of the Law That which also is proued by another
argument The Lawe sheweth our punishment because it bindeth vs either to yeeld obedience or to suffer punishment But no man performeth that obedience Therefore it bindeth vs to suffer punishment Furthermore the Law sheweth that al euils happen vnto vs because of our sins Againe it sheweth the iustice of God the greatnes and heauines of the wrath of God against sinne Hence ariseth a question whence sinne commeth especiallie since that the Lord made man good and to his owne image To this question apperteineth the common place concerning sinne the creation of man and free wil which three places we wil discourse of in order THE COMMON PLACE OF SINNE THE questions here to bee obserued are these 1 Whether sin be or whence it appeareth to bee in vs. 2 What sinne is 3 How manie kindes of sinne there are 4 What bee the causes of sin 5 What hee the effectes of sinne That sinne is not onely in the world but in vs also We know that sinne is in vs. 1 Out of the Law of God wee know 1. Out of the Law of God that is by comparing our selues and the Law together in considering what the Law requireth and what we haue performed The Law requireth whole and perfect obedience both inward outward But this we find not in our selues Obiect That which teacheth vs to seeke for righteousnes elsewhere then in our selues doth shew vs to be guilty of sin by that we haue knowledge of our sin But the Gospel willeth vnto to despair of ourselues Ob. We know it by the Gospel also Ans Not principally to seeke for righteousnesse elsewhere Therefore by the Gospel we haue knowledge of our sinne Answere I grant that we haue after some sort knowledge of our sinne by the Gospel but not principally For this is the principal vse of the Law But the Gospel presupposeth that which the Law hath proued that is that we are sinners before it sendeth vs to Christ So also sciences which are in order directlie one vnder another take their principles o◠chiefe groundes from the sciences next aboue them and proceed according to them not prouing them but taking them as graunted Againe the Gospel doth onelie in generall accuse vs of sinne but doth not in speciall declare what and which be our sinnes But this is the principall and proper function of the Lawe therefore doe wee not put the Law as excluding the Gospel 2 By the Law of nature 3 By testimonies of Scripture 4 By punishments ensuing 5 By sermons which treat of repentance as if by the Law alone we had knowledge of our sin but chiefly and properly 2. We knowe that wee haue sinne in vs by the Lawe of nature or by that iudgement of conscience which is in al men 3. By the testimonies of the holy Scripture as Psalme 14 and 53. Esaie 59.4 By the punishments and miseries which follow sinne 5. By the sermons which treat of repentance Now this question is sette downe 1. against the Libertines 2. for the exercise of repentance And here the question is not whether sinne be in some thing or in some men but whether it bee in all men And because that without the knowledge of those things neither dew honour can bee giuen to God nor saluation befall to vs God wil haue the nature and causes of sinne and the punishmentes thereof to be knowen and searched out of vs. But euen as of the beginning of mankinde so also of his corruption and restoring none know the certaintie besides the Church which is instructed by the voice of God concerning these so weightie matters And therefore the Philosophers doe erre about the verie definition and declaring the nature of sinne while they iudge either outward actions onely or purposes and desires which agree not with honest discipline to bee sinnes but not corrupt inclinations and affections ignorance errors and doubtings of God and his will and in a woord whereas they doe not vnderstand wholly the law of God it cannot be but they must make account of manie most hainous sinnes as of no sinnes They erre also about the cause of sinne for because whereas they are ignorant of the falling away of the diuels from God of the seducement and corruption of mens natures in our first parentes they imagin that sinne was not borne together with vs but that all as they grow in yeares so by their owne will they doe fall into it Last of all they erre about the effect of sinne because both they are ignorant of the euerlasting punishments neither are they able sufficientlie to conceaue of the horrible wrath of God against sinnes no not though they were taught it out of the word of God The Apostle Rom. 7. I had not knowen lust except the Law had said Thou shalt not lust Iohn 16. The holie Ghost shall reprooue the world of sinne because they beleeue not in mee Psal 90. Who knoweth the power of thy wrath For according to thy feare is thine anger WHAT SINNE IS IT is agreed on of all men The nature of sinne that sinne is a thing displeasing God contrarie to righteousnes deseruing punishment as it is said Psalm 5. Thou art not a God that loueth wickednes As therefore the rule of righteousnes is the wil of god so of the cōtrary we are not otherwhere to know what sinne is then by the same rule of mans life actions Therefore the definition of sin in the 1. Epist of Iohn cap. 3. is the truest and plainest Sinne is a transgression of the Law or what soeuer is repugnant to the Law But because here mens mindes seeke further what those euils are which are forbidden and condemned by the law of God we must adde an explication of this definition out of the Sermons and declarations of the Law scattered throughout the whole Scripture to wit That sinne is a defect or an inclination or action repugnant to the law of God offending God making him that sinneth togither with al his posterity guiltie of temporal eternall punishments except remission bee graunted for the Sonne of God our Mediatour The * The Logicians cal it Genus which is the more common nature of a thing or the matter of it general nature of sinne is a defect Likewise an inclination or action Now there are called defectes in the minde ignorance and doubtfulnes of God and his will in the hart a priuation of the loue of God and our neighbour of ioy in god and of an earnest desire and endeuor to obay God according to al his commandementes and an omitting of inward and outward actions which are commanded by the Law of God Or This defect is an absence 1 Of good inclinations in our minde 2. Of the knowledge of God 3. Of motions to obay the Law of God 4. Of inward actions which are required in the Law 5. Of outward actions which follow the inward Now corrupt inclinations are said to bee
honesty But the good worke in the godly is freely adorned not only with temporall but also with eternall benefites that also because it pleaseth him in our mediator Math. 5.16 not only thereby to inuite others to honestie according to that of Christs So let your light shine before meÌ„ that they may see your good works glorifie your father which is in heauen Wherefore the good works of the godly are ofteÌ„times in the old testameÌ„t shadowed by an acceptable incense wherewith God is honored pleased And godlines as the Apostle saith hath the promise of this life the life to come 7. Good works in the vnregenerat make only to the mitigatioÌ„ of their punishments that they may not suffer more grieuous pains as other wicked persons doe but the good workes of the godly doe not only serue for this that they may suffer lighter and easier punishments but also that they may be quite freed from all euill Thinges indifferent in themselues may bee also sinnes by an accident that is How things in themselves indifferent by an accident become sinne if they be done with offence or without faith For whatsoeuer is done without faith is sinne Vnto the pure all thinges indeede are pure but it is euill for the man which eateth with offence Out of these and the like places is this diuision taken For when the Apostle saith that all thinges are vncleane to the vncleane and wicked he intimateth also that those thinges which of themselues are good are notwithstanding vncleane or sinnes vnto the wicked In all these diuisions it is affirmed that also in the â—aintes of God is sinne Wherefore we must hold the difference betweene the sinnes of the regenerat and the vnregenerat There are diuers sinnes truely in the Saintes as 1. Originall sinne 2. Many actuall sinnes as of ignoraunce omission infirmitie 3. Some also fall into errors which fight with the foundation it selfe or into sinnes against their conscience for which they leese a good conscience comfort many giftes of the holy Ghost and should be condemned except they did repent But neuertheles very much doe the regenerate in sinning differ from the wicked 1. Because the purpose of God is to keepe the godly for euer 2. In the godly there is assured certain repentance in the ende 3. In the very sins themselues is the true beginning of faith sometimes more sometimes lesse and the godly so resist and striue against sinne that they fall not without repentance into errors against their conscience and repugnant to the foundation 4. What are the causes of sinne 1 SOme deriue the original of sin from the destinie of the start Men seeke the cause of sinne any where rather than where it is saying I sin because I was borne vnder an vnlucky Planet 2 Others when they sinne and are rebuked for their sinne they make answere Not I but the Deuill was in fault that I committed this deede 3 Others leauing excuses directly cast the fault vpon God saying God would haue it so for if he would not I should not haue sinned 4 Others when God say they might haue hindered me and yet did not himselfe is the author of my sinne It is no newe thing for men to sharpen their blasphemous tongue against God For our first Parentes when they had sinned and were accused of their sinne by God they translate and passe ouer the fault committed from themselues to others neither ingenuously confesse the truth Adam returneth the fault not so much vpon his wife as vpon God himselfe The woman saith he which thou gauest to be with me she gaue me of the tree and I did eate as if hee shoulde say except thou hadst ioined her to me I had not sinned But the Lord gaue him not his wife that shee shoulde be an occasion of euill vnto him but that it might be the better and more comfortable for him The woman simply imputeth the fault to the Deuill saying The Serpent beguiled me and I did eate These are the most false and corrupt iudgements concerning the originall of sinne impious and detestable whereby the maiestie truth and iustice of God is grieuously offended Destinie no cause of sinne 1. They who make destinie a cloake for sinne 1. define destinie to bee a linked order thorough all aeternitie and a certaine perpetuall necessitie of intents and workes according to the counsailes of God or according to the euill planets Now if you aske them who made the planets they haue not ought to aunswere but God Therefore these men lay their euill to Gods charge But such a destinie did not all the founder Philosophers maintain much lesse ChristiaÌ„s 2. S. Austine against two epistles of the Pelagians vnto Boniface lib. 2. cap. 6. They saith he who hold destinie maintain that not only actions euents but also our willes themselues depend of the position of the planets at the time of euery ones conception or natiuitie which they call constellations But the grace of God surpasseth not onely all the starres and all the heauens but also all the Angels Let vs conclude these things with the word of the Lord by his Prophet Ieremy pronouncing to this sense Thus saith the Lorde Learne not the way of the heathen bee not afraid for the signs of heauen though the heathen be afraid of such for the customes of the people are vaine Wherefore that the Astrologers call the planet of Saturne vnmercifull sharpe and cruell and the planet of Venus fauourable and gentle it is the vanity of vanities For the starres haue no force of dooing good or ill And therefore the fault of sinners ought not to be imputed vnto them 2. That the Deuill is not the onely author of sinne who when as we commit sinne shoulde beare alone the blame of the sinne and our selues be free from fault The Deuill not the onely autor of sinne it is most of all declared in this that he is able to induce and entice a man to euill but not to compell him For God keepeth vnder the Deuill by his power that he cannot doe what he will but onely what and so much as God permitteth him Nay he hath not so much as power ouer filthie swine much lesse ouer the most noble soules of men He hath indeede a subtilty and great force in perswading but God is stronger who also neuer ceaseth himself to put good motions into mans minde Neither permitteth he more to Satan than he maketh profitable for man Which we may see in that most holy man Iob in the example of Paul and in his wordes God is faithfull which will not suffer you to be tempted aboue that you be able Wherefore they are vain men who vnloade the blame of their wickednes on the Deuils shoulders It remaineth that we shew God no cause of sinne that also God is not the author of sin Gen. 1. 2. God saw those things which he had made and they
he thought not that God could would inflict on man transgressing his commandement that punishment which he had threatned Wherefore he tempted God and charged him with a lie For God had saide Thou shalt die the death The Diuell denied it saying Ye shall not die and Adam beleeued the Diuell Now not to beleeue God and of the contrarie to beleeue the Diuell is to account god for no true god 3 In stubbornes and disobedience 4 In vnthankefulnes 5 In vnnaturalnes 3. Stubbornes and disobedience For he is become disobedient vnto God 4. Vnthankefulnes for benefites receiued at his creation as for these that he was created to the image of god and to eternal life 5. Vnnaturalnes iniustice and crueltie For there was a neglect of loue in him towardes his posteritie because those good thinges were not giuen vnto him onely but also to his whole posterity Therefore he had them that he should keep them for himselfe and his 6. In Apostasie or should make losse of them from both But al this he neglected 6. Apostasie or manifest defection from God to the Diuel whom he obeyed whom he beleeued whom he set in the place of God withdrawing and sundring himselfe from God He did not aske of God those good things which he was to receiue but reiecting the wisedome and direction God by the aduise of the Diuel wil aspire to be equal with god Whereof it is apparent that Adams first sinne was no light fault but horrible sin and woorthy of so great punishment as it was punished withall 2 What were the causes of the first sinne THe first cause of the first sin was the Instigation of the diuell The second The cause of sinne The diuels instigation mans will freely yeelding vnto it God no willer or causer of it but permitter onely Mans wil freely consenting to the Diuel against Gods commandement Now although God would that man should be tempted by the diuel did withdraw that his grace frō him whereby he should resist the temptations of the Diuell yet he was not the cause of that sinne which Adam destitute of diuine grace did committe For he was not at all obliged or bound vnto man to keepe and mantaine that grace in him which he had giuen him And further he withdrewe it from man willing and also himselfe reiecting it neither yet therefore withdrew he it as that he would or did purpose or intend sin or were delighted therewith but to proue and to trie man to shew how vnable the creature is to doe or reteine ought that is good God not preseruing and directing him by his spirite Wherefore hee suffered together with his triall of Adam the sinne of Adam to concurre but he was no cause or efficient of it 3 What are the effects of the first sinne THe first next effect is Originall sin or the corruption of mans whole nature the destruction of Gods image as well in our first parents as also in all their posterity 2. A further later effect are all actual sins for that which is the cause of the cause is also the cause of the effect If original sin be an effect of the first sin thē are also actual sins which are the effects of originall effects of the first sin 3. Whatsoeue euils of paine or punistment because it is the cause of sins therefore is it also the cause of punishments Now although that first sin was committed many ages past yet notwithstanding the effect thereof which is a priuation or want of the true wisedome and direction of god of rightnesse in our inclinations and desires remaineth euer since that sinne was committed in the whole posteritie by gods iust iudgement Wherefore those things also which necessarilie ensue this priuation continu except by the singular benefit and mercy of God the prauity of our nature be corrected our sin being pardoned and remitted 4 Why God permitted the first sinne GOD permitted it that is gaue not his grace of resistance to our first parēts as to the blessed Angels 1. because as the Apostle saith The causes of gods permission of the first sinne 1 To shew his owne iustice and power Rom. 9. he would shew his iustice anger and power in punishing eternally the sinnes of the wicked but his mercie loue towardes mankinde in sauing his Chosen not imputing sinne vnto them for his Sonnes sake And Rom. 11 32. Gal. 3.22 God hath concluded all vnder sinne that hee might haue mercy on all 2 To shew mans weakenesse and infirmitie that euerie mouth may bee stopped 2 That it might stand for an example of the weaknes infirmitie of al creatures euen the most excellent if they enioy not the special blessing of their creatour and be preserued in that rightnes wherein they were created The necessitie vse of this doctrine of mans creation This doctrine concerning the creation of man is necessary for the Church for many causes and vses which it hath Wee must knowe that man was created of God without sinne least God bee imagined the authour or cause of sinne Whereas mans bodie was fashioned of cley let vs thinke of our frailtie that wee be not lifted vp with pride Seeing that the workemanship of God is so admirable in the framing of mans bodie and seeing it was created for the ministerie of Gods worship for god to dwell in and for euerlasting life let vs neither abuse it to dishonesty neither willingly destroy it nether make it a fly of diuels but keeping it chast cleane endeuour that it be a temple and instrument of the holie ghost to worship god Seing that god would haue mankind to consist of two sexes each is to haue his due place and honor neither is the weaker to be contemned or oppressed by tyrannie or lust or to bee entertained with iniuries contumelies but iustly to bee gouerned and protected But especially seeing man was created to the image and likenes of God this great glory is to be acknowledged and celebrated with a thankeful mind neither through our leudnes and malice is the image and likenesse of god to bee transfourmed into the image and likenesse of Satan neither to be destroied either in our selues or others And seeing it is destroied by sinne thorough our owne fault we must acknowledge and bewaile the greatnesse of this vnthankefulnesse and the euils which followed by comparing therewith those good things which we haue lost We must earnestly desire the restoring of this felicity and glorie And because the glory and blessednesse which is restored vnto vs by the sonne of god is greater than that which we lost in Adam so much the more must the desire of thankefulnesse and of profiting and encreasing in godlinesse be kindled in vs. And seeing we hear that all things were created for the vse of man and that the dominion ouer the creatures lost in Adam is restored vnto vs in Christ we must
And this is it which they say to do any thing vpon deliberation or aduisement going before which manner of dooing is proper vnto the will For this is the difference betweene a nature agent and a voluntarie The difference betweene a naturall agent and a voluntarie that the naturall cause is ordained or appointed or fit and apt to one certaine manner of woorking neither can it forbeare working if the obiect be present whereon it should woorke as fire cannot but burne a bodie put vnto it if it bee of such matter as wil take fire But the will is able and apt to choose or refuse contrarie or diuers obiects or to forbeare and differ the choise thereof as a man may haue a will to walke or not to walke or may differ his wil of walking To doe therefore anie thing with free arbiterment and will is to doe vpon a fore-deliberation according to the will of god sometimes simplie and sometimes in some respect onelie and against it also sometimes in some respect but neuer simplie against it For the libertie of woorking is not taken away in any creature if God be said so to rule bend their wills that they be not inclined any other way than whither god will haue them inclined either simply or in some sort But free arbiterment is a faculty or power of working vpon deliberation and without constraint or rather the very wil it selfe so woorking Wherefore if the name of free arbiterment be so taken expounded as hath beene said The name of free arbitermēt may be tolerated in the Church though it be not vsed in the scriptures albeit it be not vsed in the Scriptures yet maie it be tolerated borne-with because both the description thereof such as was euen nowe deliuered agreeeth with the Scripture and the auncient writers haue also vsed the same name But if it be taken for such a will of free working which excludeth all action and woorking of the first cause guiding inuiting and bending the creatures wils whither it selfe listeth such a free arbiterment cannot bee admitted For example sake Abimelecke abstaining from Rebecca and the Iewes crucifieng Christ both did it with free arbiterment because those forealeaged conditions which make free arbiterment did agree vnto both neither yet could they at that present doe otherwise than they did God so guiding directing the ir wils 3 What is like or common and what diuerse or different in the libertie of will which is in god in Angels and man Common to men and Angels with God to wil a thing without constraint THese two things are common to God and reasonable creatures that is Angels men that they doe things vpon deliberation and aduise and will without coaction those things which they haue considered and thought of that is Their wil being by nature fit to will the contrary or diuerse from that which it doth wil or also to differre forbear the action doth incline to the other part of it owne accord and by a proper force which is within it For it is said of God Psal 115. He hath done all things which hee would And of men Mat. 23. Hierusalem how often would I haue gathered thy children and ye would not The differences of our liberty of wil and Gods 1 God knoweth al things of himselfe perfectly perpetually But the differences also of this liberty in God and in the creatures are to be considered The first is in the vnderstanding God vnderstandeth and knoweth all thinges of himselfe perfectly and perpetually neither can any ignorance of any thing or any error of iudgemēt fal into God at any time But the creatures know neither of themselues neither all things neither the same at all times but at such time and so much as is reuealed vnto them Who hath knowen the mind of the Lord Of that daie and houre knoweth us man God giueth vnderstanding Neither is there any thing which is not manifest in his sight He illighteneth euery creature To behold all things which are infinite requireth infinite power and wisedome which is proper to God alone Mention is here made of the vnderstanding because a thing not vnderstood is not either desired or refused 2 His will dependeth of none but himselfe ours of him The second difference is in the will The wil of God is gouerned or moued or depending of no other cause but of it selfe The wils of Angels and men are so the causes of their actions that neuerthelesse they are carried by the secret counsell of God his power and efficacie which is euerie-where present to the choosing or refusing of any obiect and that either immediately by God or mediately by instrumentes some good some bad which it seemeth good vnto God to vse so that it is impossible for them to doe any thing beside the eternall decree and counsail of God And therefore the woorde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to be absolutely his owne at his owne will and in his owne power agreeth most properly vnto God who perfectly and simply is his owne and at his owne will But of the creatures more rightly is vsed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is voluntarie and free which worde the Apostle vseth to Philemon vers 14. Heb. 10.26 1. Pet. 5.2 That God is the first cause of his actions God the first cause both of his owne actions and ours Psal 115.3 Dan. 4.52 Gen. 29.7 Exod. 3.16 Act. 2.23 and 3 17. c. and 4.17 c. the Scripture doth declare He hath done whatsoeuer he would Who according to his wil worketh in the army of heauen and in the inhabitants of the earth But that the wils and counsailes of the creatures depend of God who is aboue them these and the like speeches doe proue The Lord shal send his Angell before thee Go and gather the Elders of Israel together Him being deliuered by the determinate counsel and fore-knowledge of God yee haue slaine I know that through ignorance ye did it and But God hath fulfilled these things and Herode and Pontius Pilate gathered thēselues together to do whatsoeuer thine hand and thy counsel had determined before to be done By these and the like places it is manifest that all second causes as they were created of God so are they ruled of him as their first supreme soueraign cause But the wil of God dependeth on no one of the creatures because then a second cause should be put before the first cause And as God hath not any efficient so neither hath he any mouing or inclining cause without him Moreouer God so ruleth and guideth the wil of his creature that he doth not draw or enforce it but bend and encline it that is by obiectes represented to the mind he effectually moueth affecteth and allureth the wil to wil that which then the mind iudgeth good and refuse that which seemeth euil so that the wil it selfe also vpon deliberatiō going before
that we cannot haue it without his singular mercy grace wherefore destruction commeth of those that perish as concerning the merit of punishment but this taketh not away the superiour cause that is Gods reprobation For the last cause taketh not away the first cause The same is aunswered to that of Isa Sinnes separate the chosen from God for a time the reprobate for euer but yet the diuine purpose and counsel of God going before by which God decreed to adioine those vnto him or to cast them from him whom it seemed good to him so to deale with Rom. 9.18 He hath mercie on whom he wil and whom he will he hardeneth 7 Obiection Hee that hath not libertie to doe good The woorde of god not without good cause declared to the vnregenerate and eschevve euil is in vaine pressed vvith precepts and doctrine but the vnregenerate haue not libertie to doe good vvoorkes and omit euill therefore obedience is in vaine commanded them Answere The Maior is to be denied for when god doth suffer his wil to bee denounced to the wicked either hee doth together lighten them and moue them within by his spirite to obay his voice or pricketh them with the prickes of conscience either to obserue externall order and discipline or not so much to persecute the knowen trueth or he doth discouer their hypocrisie madnes in oppugning it or hee maketh manifest their weakenesse and ignoraunce and at length maketh them inexcusable in this life and in the last iudgement Reply 1 Whose conuersion and obedience dependeth of the grace of god hee hath no neede of exhortations and precepts But in them also vvho are conuerted their conuersion dependeth of grace Therefore precepts are vaine and needelesse Wee make answere to the Maior by a distinction If conuersion depend of grace so that the spirite doth not adioine doctrine as an instrument whereby to teach their mindes and mooue their heartes let this verily bee graunted although as it hath beene before saide there remaine as yet other vses of Doctrine But when it hath pleased God by this instrument both to lighten and mooue or incline mens mindes to faith and obedience the Maior is false For it is written Romanes 1. The ghospell is the povver of God vnto saluation to euerie one that beleeueth 2 Reply It is not mercie but crueltie to propound precepts and Doctrine to those vvho are denied the grace of obeieng and vvho are by it more hardened and more grieuouslie condemned God therefore doeth not this vvho is exceeding mercifull Wee deny againe the Maior 1 Because Gods exceeding mercy doth not take awaie his iustice 2 Because he so will haue them to bee made inexcusable by the preaching of his heauenlie Doctrine as that in the meane season he reioyceth not at their destruction and punishment But for the manifestation of his iustice whereof that greater regard shoulde bee had than of all the creatures euen Gods iustice it selfe requireth hee will that which otherwise hee abhorreth in his mercy and goodnes towardes all creatures as Ezechiel saith 21. I wil not the death of him that dieth 4 Readines of minde to receiue grace is not before conuersion but after 8 Obiection He that prepareth himselfe to receiue grace by which he maie doe good works he now doth woorkes pleasing to God But men prepare themselues to receiue grace Therefore also before regeneration they doe works pleasing to god We deny the Maior which yet these places seeme to proue 1. Sam. 7. Prepare your hart vnto the Lord. Act. 10. The praiers and almes of Cornelius before he was taught and baptized of Peter come vp into remembrance before god But in these and the like places to prepare or to haue in readines or to confirme the hart is not to doe works before the conuersion by which god maie bee inuited to bestowe the grace of regeneration vpon men but it signifieth that a readie and firme will of obeying god and persisting in true godlinesse is shewed of those which are already regenerated and conuerted For the people of Israell had repented when Samuell said this vnto them For there goeth before in the same place al the house of Israel lamented and followed the Lord Likewise Cornelius before he was taught of Peter that Iesus was the Messias is said to haue beene then godly and seruing god and so calling and inuocating on him that his praiers pleased God and were heard Albeit good woorks are said to be ours yet it followeth not that we are authors of them but the instruments whereby the author worketh them 9 Obiection The workes which are not in our power to performe are not our workes neither are truly and properly said to be done by vs But good woorks are said to bee ours and to be done by vs Therefore it is in our wil to do them or not to do them We deny the Maior For they are not therefore said to be ours or to be done by vs bicause they are of our selues but because God worketh them in vs as in the subiect and by vs as instruments and that so as our wil doth them of her owne proper motion although not except it be renewed raised and guided by the holy ghost For beeing regenerated and moued by him we are not idle but he working in vs we our selues also woorke wel and that freely without constraint For by regeneration the wil is not taken away but corrected as which before would onely that which is euil will now that which is good Eph. 2.10 We are his workmanshippe created in Christ Iesus vnto good works which god hath ordained that we should walk in them 10 Obiection God helpeth vs in working and yet beginneth our working in vs. He that is holpen by another in conuersion and in beginning good workes doth somewhat of them himselfe before he is holpen For he that hath help beginneth the action God helpeth vs wherefore it is of our selues to begin good works The Minor is proued Marc. 9. I beleeue Lord but help my vnbeliefe Rom. 8. The spirit helpeth our infirmity Aunswere Nothing cā folow in conclusiō of mere particular propositions For the Maior here is not vniuersall seeing not onely he may help who beginneth a work but he also in whom it is begun and accomplished by another Now so doth god help vs that himselfe doth first breede and engender in vs true knowledge of him and an inclination to obey him and the beginninges of good motions doth encrease also and perfect the same begun by him But he is therefore said to help vs because he doth so work in vs that we are not idle but work while he worketh and yet we are able no more to persist or to bring it to an end without him than to begin it And therefore we being inclined moued and gouerned by him wil also our selues of our owne accord and are able to work wel and do work wel that is because
made against the distinction of the Maior proposition in appointing either our selues or another Where only one meanes of satisfieng is put downe there must not be sought for or set downe another But the Lawe acknowledgeth and putteth downe onely one means and way of satisfieng to witte by our selues Therefore wee must not set downe also another neither must wee say either by our selues or by another Aunswere We graunt the whole reason being vnderstoode of the Law or according to the declaration of the Law For in the Law in vaine is sought the way of satisfieng by another Againe the Law teacheth onely one way or meanes of satisfieng yet so that it no where excludeth or denieth the other meanes which is by another For no where doth the Lawe say ONELY by our selues satisfaction must be made to the Law And albeit God did not expresse that other meanes in the Law yet in his secret counsail hee vnderstood it and left it to bee reuealed by the Gospel The law requireth our selues to satisfie The gospel sheweth and Gods mercie admitteth another to satisfie In this therefore we must seeke it This double meanes of satisfieng is to be obserued the former meanes of satisfaction the Law and iustice of God requireth to wit that satisfaction be made by vs the other doth the Gospel declare and the mercy of god admit Reply The doctrine of the Gospel then is disagreeing from the Law Aunswere It is not disagreeing Because the Law putteth it not exclusiue as shutting out al other neither what the Law teacheth not dooth it therefore deny or take away Lastly that a Mediatour is necessarie to make satisfaction to the iustice of God for vs many other thinges declare 1. The tremblings and tormentes of conscience in euerie one 2. The paines of the wicked 3. The sacrifices ordained by God whereby was desciphered Christes onely perfect Sacrifice 4. The Sacrifices of the Heathen For when as they were pressed with the prickes of conscience they sought for a meanes without themselues whereby they might pacifie God 5. The Sacrifices of hypocrits 6. The sacrifices of Papistes 3 What is the office of a Mediatour THe office of a Mediatour is To deale with both parties What the mediator doth with God both the offended and the offender First with GOD who was offended our Mediatour had necessarily to do these things 1. To make intercession for vs vnto him and to craue pardon for our fault 2. To offer himselfe for to satisfie 3. To satisfie indeede the iustice of GOD by suffering for our sinnes punishment sufficient though temporall 4. To craue of God and also to obtaine that he would accept of this satisfaction as a price of sufficient woorthinesse for which hee woulde account vs for Children pardoning our offences 5. To bee our surety and to promise in our behalfe that at length we wil leaue off to offend him by our sinnes Without this suretiship or promise intercession findeth no place no not with men much lesse with God Secondly with the party offending that is with vs What he doth with man our Mediator must do these things 1. He must be the messenger or embassador of God the father vnto vs that is to shew and open this decree of the father that hee dooth present himselfe to make satisfaction for vs and that God wil for this satisfaction pardon vs and receiue vs into fauour This vnlesse he should perform we should bee euer ignoraunt of this will of God and so should not be desirous of so great a benefit nor euer attain vnto it For there is no desire after that which is vnknown 2. Hee must perfourme this satisfaction by the pouring out of his owne blood because otherwise the iustice of God shoulde be violated 3. He must impute and apply that satisfaction vnto vs. 4. Hee must cause vs by giuing his holy spirite vnto vs to agnise this so great a benefit and to embrace and not reiect it For neither can any reconcilement be or any amity be knit betweene parties who are at variaunce except both partes accorde 5. Hee must by the same spirite cause vs to leaue off to sinne and beginne to bee conformable to Gods Lawe that is he must regenerate vs and restore the lost Image of god in vs. 6. He must preserue maintaine shield vs in this reconcilement and obedience begunne in vs against the Diuels and all enimies yea against our owne selues least we reuolt againe 7. Hee must glorifie vs being raised againe from the dead that is perfect and finish our saluation which is begun or all the giftes both which we haue lost in Adam those which himselfe hath merited for vs. In merit and efficacie doeth the Mediatourship consist The office therefore of the Mediator consisteth in merite in efficacy or forcible operation For in these two are all those things which we haue mentioned comprehended absolued Ioh. 10. I laie downe my life for my sheep I giue vnto them eternall life God giueth vs eternall life and this life is in his Sonne Iohn 1. In him was life Iohn 5.26 As the Father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath hee giuen to the Sonne to haue life in him-selfe As the Father raiseth vppe the dead and quickeneth them euen so the Sonne quickeneth whome hee will The benefites of the Mediatour Nowe when question is made of the office of the Mediator question is made withall concerning his benefites For the office inioyned of God vnto the Mediatour is to bestowe benefits which Paul 1. Cor. 1.30 compriseth in fowre generall heades as it were when hee saith Christ is made of God vnto vs wisedome and righteousnesse and sanctification and redemption I. Wisedome 1 He is called wisedome first because he is the matter or subiect of our wisedome 1. Cor. 22. I esteemed not to know any thing among you but Iesus christ him crucified This is our chiefest wisedome to knowe and beleeue that Christ is appointed our sauiour by whom wee beeing reconciled to GOD haue giuen vnto vs the holy spirite righteousnesse and euerlasting life Secondly Because hee is the cause or author of our wisedome and that three waies 1 Because hee hath brought foorth out of the bosome of the eternall father wisedome that is the Doctrine of our redemption 2 Because he hath ordained and doth preserue the ministerie of his woord by which he informeth vs of the fathers will and his office 3 Because hee is forcible and effectuall in the hartes of the chosen and maketh them to yeeld their assent vnto the woorde or Doctrine and to bee refourmed by it according to his Image For these three causes hee is called the woorde and the image of GOD as it is saide No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne and hee to whom the Sonne will reueale him Shorter thus Christ is called our wisedome because hee is 1 The subiect 2 The author 3 The meanes of
all euill For these are the effectes to come of that present and perpetuall wil of God towards vs which wee apprehend by faith Rom. 8.24 Wee are saued by hope but hope that is seen is not hope But if we hope for that we see not we doo with patience abide for it 1 Obiection Life euerlasting is a thing to come We beleeue life euerlasting Wee beleeue therefore that which is to come that is faith is also of things to come and so faith is hope it selfe Ans The Maior must bee distinguished Life euerlasting is to come tru as concerning the consummation or accomplishment therof But it is present vnto vs as cōcerning the wil and vnchaungeable purpose of God who hath decreed from euerlasting that which he hath begun in vs and will also in due time accomplish it Againe it is present vnto vs as concerning the beginning therof For euerlasting life is begun here in the elect by the holy ghost Wherefore faith apprehendeth it as it is present both in respect of the purpose of God in respect of the beginning thereof in vs. For he that beleeueth feeleth and knoweth that he is quickened and resolueth this to bee the will of God that that quickening and reuiuing which is here begunne shall bee absolued in another life Iohn 5.24 He that beleeueth in the sonne hath passed from death to life Iohn 17.3 This is life eternall that they know thee to be the only verie God and whome thou hast sent Iesus Christ Gal. 4.6 God hath sent forth the spirit of his sonne into your harts which crieth Abba father Rom. 8.24 We are saued by hope 1. Ioh. 3.2 Now are we the sonnes of God but it doth not yet appear what we shal be By faith thē we are certein that those blessings also which as yet we haue not are notwithstanding ours for Gods promise for the vnchangeable will in God to giue them vs but in certain hope wee looke for them as concerning their accomplishment Faith apprehendeth the promises of thinges to come hope relieth on the thinges promised The summe is There is one and the same act and operation of faith and of hope but they differ in consideration It is called faith as it doth apprehend things to come as if they were present in regard of the vnchangeablenes of Gods will It is called hope as it doth certainlie look for the bestowing of those things Therfore Heb. 11 1. it is shewed that faith is the ground substance of things which are hoped for that is it is that which maketh things which are hoped for to be extant and present in that manner as hath bin shewed Shorter thus Faith apprehendeth the promises concerning things to come as they are to come Hope the things themselues which are promised 2 Obiection Faith is the euidence of thinges which are not seene therefore not of thinges present Aunswere It is the euidence of thinges which are not seene to wit by the outward senses but they are seene by the eies of the mind euen as if they did lie open to the eies of the bodie Againe they are not seene in respect of their accomplishment or consummation 5 What are the causes of Faith THE first and principall efficient cause of faith is the holie ghost illightening the minde that it may vnderstand the word and moouing the will that it may assent vnto the woord once vnderstoode Yee are freelie saued by faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of God Ephes 2.8 Obiection The Diuel hath faith It is wrought therefore in him by the holie ghost Aunswere What faith is in the Diuel is wrought by the spirit of God but that by a generall woorking onely whereby hee worketh in all euen in Diuels and hypocrites what-soeuer knowledge or vnderstanding is in them 1. Cor. 12. c. not by a speciall and proper action or working wherby to regenerat or sanctifie them that they might truely acknowledge him to bee the author of this gift and magnifie him therefore after which maner hee woorketh faith in the elect alone The Diuels therefore and hypocrits haue faith from the spirit of God but the elect from the spirit of God sanctifieng them The instrumentall cause of faith in generall is the whole worde of God the Lawe and the Gospell written spoken readde heard The chiefe instrumental causes of ingendering iustifieng faith are the preaching of the word and the vse of the sacramentes meditated likewise many works miracles of God in the world But the chiefe and proper instrument of iustifieng faith is the preaching of the Gospell the vse of the sacraments For these doth the holy ghost vse as instruments yet not necessarie but arbitrarie at his own good pleasure both to stir vp faith in vs and to nourish strengthen increase the same Rom. 10.17 Faith commeth by hearing Rom. 1.16 The gospell is the power of God vnto saluation to euerie one that beleeueth 1. Cor. 4.15 I haue begottē you through the gospel Mar. 16.16 He that shall beleeue and be Baptized shall be saued Act. 22.16 Wash away thy sins 1. Cor. 10.16 The bread which we break is the communion of the bodie of Christ Wherefore ordinarilie iustifieng faith is neuer engendred in those who are of yeares to receiue it without the preaching of the gospell The cause of that faith which worketh miracles is not simply the woorde of God but there must necessarily come thereto an especiall and immediate reuelation from God The formal causes of faith a sure and ful confidence in Christ The obiect of faith Christ and his benefites promised The final causes of faith Gods glorie our saluation The formall cause of iustifieng faith is a certaine knowledge confidence in Christ The obiect of it is Whole Christ and his benefits promised in the word Likewise God fauorable to vs through Christ The subiect wherein it remaineth is the vnderstanding will of man The end or finall cause 1 The glorie of God to wit the celebration of his trueth iustice bountie mercie which hee hath shewed in the sending of his Sonne and in the giuing of faith in him 2 Our Saluation that we may receiue the blessings which are promised in the worde 6 What are the effects of faith The effectes of faith iustification and regeneration THe effects of iustifieng faith are 1 The iustifieng of vs before God 2 Peace of conscience or ioy resting on God Rom. 5.1 Beeing iustified by faith we haue peace with god 3 Our whole conuersion which followeth faith and beginneth at the same time with faith For by faith are our hats purified 4 The fruits of conuersion repentance euen good woorkes For whatsouer is not of faith is sinne Hither may be referred also the consequences of faith that is encrease of spirituall corporal giftes The first then and immediate effect of iustifieng-faith is Iustification from this afterwardes flow al other benefites
God is WHen it is demanded who is the tru god Wee must acknowledge God to bee such as himselfe hath manifested himselfe to bee we are to hold most firmly and surely that he alone is the tru god who euen from the beginning of mankinde did not onely manifest himselfe in the nature of thinges by the steppes and prints of his diuinity shining therein but especially in the Church by his woord deliuered and other famous testimonies of miracles deliueries and consolations wherby he plainly teacheth whom what he will be acknowleged and published by vs to be and that he is not acknowleged or woorshiped of any but of them who thinke according to this word both of him and his will neither is the true knowledge of him founde else-where than in this worde The certaintie of this position is hereof most manifest for that all those who imagine GOD to bee other in essence or nature or will than hee hath testified himselfe to bee in his owne manifestations and reueilings doe not embrace and woorship at all the true GOD but an other thing of their owne framing in steede of the true GOD according to these sayings Iohn 4.22 Ye woorship that which ye knowe not we woorship that which wee knowe for saluation is of the Iewes And cap. 5. vers 23. He that honoreth not the sonne the same honoreth not the father which hath sent him Gal. 4.8 But then when ye knewe not GOD yee did seruice vnto them which by nature are not Gods Eph. 2.12 Ye were at that time without Christ were aliants from the common-wealth of Israell and were straungers from the Couenaunt of promise and had no hope and were without GOD in the world Act. 17.23 Whom yee then ignorantly worship him shew I vnto you 1. Iohn 2.23 Whosoeuer denieth the sonne the same hath not the father But against these thinges seemeth that to bee which Paul saith to the Rom. 1.19 That that which may bee knowen of GOD is manifest also in men estranged from christian Religion for that GOD hath shewed it vnto them For the inuisible thinges of him The glimse of nature not sufficient to shew who is the true God that is his eternall power and Godhead are seene by the creation of the world beeing considered in his woorkes to the intent that they shoulde be without excuse And Act. 17. That GOD in former ages did not leaue himselfe without witnesse and that out of the whole nature of thinges but chieflie by the minde of man and the difference of thinges honest and dishonest and by the punishments the of wicked it may in some measure bee gathered not onely that there is a GOD but also what hee is and therefore manie thinges are found to haue beene spoken truely by the heathen and others concerning the vnitie and nature of GOD. But to these obiections wee aunswere that there are indeede some true thinges concerning GOD manifested otherwise also than by the worde deliuered to the Church but by them notwithstanding who is the true GOD cannot bee shewed and that for two causes For first those thinges by themselues are not sufficient For to the knowing of the true God it is requisite that wee knowe and professe not some thinges onely but all thinges which hee openeth of himselfe and woulde haue knowen Moreouer these selfe same true testimonies of God also which remaine in mens minds and in nature all they by reason of a naturall blindnesse in them and prauitie doe manie waies corrupt who in weighing of them followe not the light and interpretation thereof drawen from the worde of God deliuered to the Church when as euen of these thinges which might bee knowen by the helpe of nature manie thinges they doe not knowe manie they faine of their owne which haue nothing agreeing with the nature and wil of God and those thinges which they do retaine in shewe of wordes professe they farre otherwise vnderstand than they are proposed of God and declared in his word and in the Church vnderstoode and so beholding and sounding in their mouth true sentences and sayinges concerning God conceiue neuerthelesse and foster false opinions of him in their mind This answere S. Paul himselfe expresseth Rom. 1. when he addeth That they are inexcusable because that when they knewe god they glorified him not as god Now albeit Philosophicall wisedome cannot therefore shew who is the true god for that concerning the essence nature wil and workes of god The voice of nature concerning god neither to bee reiected nor contemned either in respect of insufficiencie or of mens misconstring it so much as is necessary to bee knowen it doth not teach is diuersly depraued by men so that out of the Church remaineth no true knowledge of god yet neuertheles that voice of the nature of things concerning god ought not for these causes to bee reiected as false or contemned as fruitles For neither is that straight waies false in it selfe which is peruerslie constred of men neither fruitles for al things nor to al men which auaileth the reprobate nothing at all to euerlasting saluation For god will also out of the Church bridle the lewd dissolute by the testimonies which their conscience punishments giue of his will anger and iudgement and according to them will hee haue the life and manners of men ruled Hee will haue mans corruption and his iustice made more conspicuous and cleare in punishing them who stubburnely withstand the knowen truth He wil by natural testimonies mens conscience shewing the imperfection thereof haue men stirred vp to seeke the true God in the Church as it is said Act. 17. That men were therefore placed in the theater of the worlde that they should seeke the Lord if so be they might haue groaped after him and found him Hee will also haue them who are conuerted to him to be more confirmed by the consent of nature and the worde as the often alleadging of naturall testimonies in the Scriptures declareth Lastly he will the imperfection of naturall knowledge being considered haue mens ignorance concerning God acknowledged his mercy magnified who discouereth and openeth himselfe in his woorde God cannot bee defined 1. Because he is immense 2. Because his essence is vnknown vnto vs Yet some way hee may be described which description comprehendeth his attributes or properties the persons principal woorks and by these three is the true God discerned from all false Gods The description of God according to the rules of Diuinitie After this sort then is God Theologically described God is a spiritual essence intelligent eternall infinite other from all the creatures incomprehensible most perfect in it selfe vnmutable and of an immense power wisedome goodnesse true iust chast mercifull bountifull most free angry and wrath with sinne which essence is the eternal father who frō euerlasting begot the Sonne according to his Image and the Sonne who is the coeternall Image of the father
purposed from euerlasting And seeing god both foreseeth all things vnchangeable and his counsailes concerning the euent and end of thinges are certaine and vnchangeable it must needes be also that the second causes and meanes or Antecedents without which those euents were not to followe must bee certaine and vnchangeable And because in things created especially in humane affaires there is great vncertaintie and mutabilitie neither is there any cause of vnchangeablenesse but the will of god God could not haue appointed any thing certaine or vnchangeable concerning the euent and end except hee had also made all the meanes by which the end is attained vnto and which as concerning their owne nature are most vncertaine and chaungeable by his euerlasting counsaile and decree certaine and vnchangeable Wherefore it is saide Isay 14.27 The Lord of hostes hath determined it and who shall disanull it Thirdly the whole vse and force and declaration of the promises threatnings and examples of Gods goodnesse power iustice mercie and wrath both olde and newe to teach vs and to erect vs with comfort or by feare to holde and keepe vs in our duetie and the feare of God dependeth of Gods vnchaungeable nature For all those do then affect vs when wee thinke that the same nature and will of God which was in times past is nowe also and is and will bee such to vs repenting or persisting in our sinnes as wee see it was in times past and nowe is towardes others And then doe wee truelie relie vpon the promises of God when wee knowe that his counsell shall neuer bee chaunged Fourthlie This doctrine inclineth mens mindes to obedience and subiection which is necessarie in asking thinges at Gods handes that wee desire not GOD to doe those thinges for vs or others which hee hath before time assuredlie toulde vs that hee will not doe and further that wee submit and leaue with reuerence those thinges to his pleasure whereof hee would not as yet haue knowen vnto vs what hee hath decreede Fiftlie The vnchaungeablenesse of Gods will is the grounde and foundation of the hope and comfort of the godlie in this life For it is most absurd to conceiue of GOD that nowe hee loueth and nowe hee hateth vs nowe hee will assuredlie giue vnto vs euerlasting life and a little after againe hee will not And therefore when once true faith and conuersion vnto GOD is begunne in our heartes and the spirite of God hath begunne to witnesse to our spirite that wee are the sonnes of GOD and heires of euerlasting life God will haue vs certainlie to resolue that as hee had this his will towardes vs from euerlasting so to euerlasting hee will not change it but will assuredlie bring vs at his pleasure out of this wicked and miserable life through al tentations and daungers what-soeuer to eternall and euerlasting life according to that article of our Faith I beleeue life euerlasting When as Omnipotencie is attributed to GOD What is signified by gods omnipotencie thereby is first vnderstoode That whatsoeuer hee will or whatsoeuer not impairing his nature and maiestie hee is able to will he is also able to perfourme Secondie That he is able to performe all those thinges without anie difficulty labour euen with his only beck will Thirdly That all the force power of working and effecting anie thing is so in god only that there is not the least abilitie or efficacie of anie creature but what he continuallie imparteth preserueth at his pleasure And therefore the power of God is to bee considered of vs not as beeing idle but as creating sustaining mouing and ruling al thinges The reasons are 1 God is the first cause of all thinges Therefore he hath all thinges in his power and their abilitie is so much as he giueth vnto them 2 Hee dooth such thinges as can bee done by no created finit power as are the creation gouerning of all thinges the preseruation of common weales the deluge the deliuerie out of Aegypt all his miracles 3 He is vnchangeable Therefore in him to be able to do and to doe is the same which to will and so of the contrary But although al men affirme God to be omnipotent yet there is a double difference betweene the sacred Doctrine of the Church How the doctrin of the church and philosophie differ in conceiuing of Gods omnipotencie and Philosophie concerning gods omnipotency For first without the doctrine of the Church men only know the vniuersall and generall power of god whereby hee createth preserueth and gouerneth the whole world but they know not that power whereby he saueth men and restoreth the world by his sonne gathering and preseruing an euerlasting Church and deliuering it from sin and death and endowing it with life and glory euerlasting by which works God especially sheweth forth his power as it is said Hag. 2.7 Yet a litle while I wil shake the heauens the earth and the sea and the drie land Secondly neither doe they professe of the generall power of god so much as is sufficient For albeit they are enforced to confesse that God is the author and preseruer of the woorld yet are they not able to saie that al things were created of nothing by the woorde of God alone for as much as they are ignorant fo the cause of sin confusion they cannot affirme al things so to be administred and gouerned by gods omnipotency as that al which is good is done by the powerful working of Gods will but they attribute many things to chance fortune humane wisdome or vertue and so imagine the power of god to be idle in these and doing nothing Furthermore that god cannot either sinne or wil and allowe of sinne or be changed or diminished or suffer any thing or make things doone vndoone or wil thinges flat repugnant and contradictorie or create another god or some nature equal to himselfe or bee perceiued by bodilie senses or doe other thinges proper to a create or finite nature or admit the same into himselfe this doth not diminish or weaken but rather augment strengthen his power For that is the greatest and most perfect power which can neither be destroied nor weakned nor diminished and that none susteining it but only by it selfe But contrariwise to be able to be corrupted impaired is a token of imbecillity and imperfection of exceeding immense wisedome Gods exceeding wisedome whereby both hee knoweth all thinges perfectly and is the fountaine of all knoweledge and vnderstanding That we may rightly and with profit and commoditie know the power of God it is necessarie not to consider it but as it is ioyned with his immense wisedome and goodnesse which moderateth it Further of his diuine wisedome first we learne That God doth of himselfe in one act or view vnderstand and behold perpetually and most perfectlie in maruellous manner and that vnknowen to vs himselfe and the whole
a sonne and a man and yet the manhoode or to be a man is one thing the fatherhoode or to bee a father another but there is not one subsistent which is the father and another subsistent which is a man but one and the same subsistent is both because both manhoode and fatherhoode is in him manhood absolutely fatherhood respectiuely as in regard of his Sonne Of the worde essence also it is furder to be noted that God or the Deitie or diuine essence is not in respect of the persons the same which the matter in respect of the effect because God is vnchaungeable neither is compounded of matter and forme Therefore we cannot say wel Three persons are or consist of one essence Neither is it as the whole in respect of the parts because God is indiuisible Wherefore it is not well saide that the person is a part of the essence or the essence consisteth of three persons for euery person is the whole diuine essence one and the same Neither is it as the general to the speciall because the persons are not specials but indiuiduals Neither is it simplie as the special to the indiuiduals because the diuine essence it selfe is indiuiduall or one in number and the persons are not another or a diuerse or a separated thing from the essence but euery person is that essence Therefore it is well said God or the Diuine essence is the father is the sonne is the holy ghost Likewise The three persons are one God or in one God Againe they are one and the same essence nature diuinity wisedome c. They are of one or the same essence nature diuinitie c. Yet it cannot bee saide well they are of one God Wherefore the diuine essence is in respect of the persons as a thing after a rare and singular maner communicated in respect of those things vnto which it is common For neither is there the like example of community in any created things For a generall is a certain thing common to manie specials a general and special to manie indiuiduals but yet so that they are affirmed of those manie plurallie not singularlie as that the father and the sonne or this father and sonne are two liuing creatures two men But wee maie not speake after this sort of God and the diuine persons as to saie the father and the sonne are two Gods two spirites two omnipotentes c. Because there is but one GOD one spirite one omnipotent c. Wherefore that affirmation the father is God the Son is God the holy Ghost is God is a true affirmation affirming that which is more common of a thing which is more restrict that is affirming the essence of the indiuidual which hath in some sort an analogy and proportion only with the speciall affirmed of his indiuiduall but is not at al the same nor of the same kind 6 Whether these names are to be vsed in the Church THese names are to be vsed and reteined in the church Obiection But these names namely Essence person and Trinitie are not in the Scripture therefore they ought not to be vsed and reteined in the Church Answere These names which are not in the Scripture neither the words themselues nor the sense of them are not to be vsed but both the names them selues of essence and person are found in the Scripture and the thing also or the doctrine it selfe concerning them The name Essence is expressed by the name of Iehoua which is frequent in the Scripture Likewise by the name of Beeing which often also offereth it selfe in the Scripture Exod. 3.14 I am that I am Reuel 1.8 Which is and which was and which is to come The woorde Person is expressed by the greeke woord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 13. which woord is there interpreted Person The ingraued forme of his person The name of Trinitie is signified 1. Iohn 5.7 There are three which beare recorde in heauen the father the woorde and the holie ghost and these three are one And this for the names themselues Now for the thing As often as is mentioned one Iehoua so often is mentioned one essence As often as the Father the Sonne and the holie ghost is called Iehoua so often the three persons of the Diuinitie are expressed that is three subsisting three vnderstanding c. And this aunswere yeeldeth the first cause why these woordes ought to bee reteined in the Church because namelie they are extant in the holie Scripture either in woordes or in sense and meaning The Second cause is because they are fit to expound the phrase and speech of the Scripture vnto the vnlearned And furder if no woordes were to bee vsed but such as are extant in the Scriptures all interpretation shoulde bee taken away For interpretation requireth that the words of Scripture bee expounded to the vnlearned by such words as being more vsual in other languages or matters doctrines are more easie for them to vnderstand paueth and maketh plaine away vnto them for the vnderstanding of the speech and phrase of Scripture The third cause is that the sleights and sophismes of heretiques which for the most part they goe about to cloake and couer with the woords of holie Scripture are more easily espied and taken heede of if the same things bee expounded in diuerse woordes and those especiallie short perspicuous and significant So the sectaries and followers of Seruetus do confesse that the Father the Sonne and the holy ghost are one God but not one in essence but by propagation that is that they are not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the same in substance but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like in substance Likewise they graunt the Sonne to be true God but they deny him to bee the same in substance with his father But therefore is it that heretiques will none of the Churches phrase speech because they dislike the thing it selfe For if there were a consent an according in the thinges we shoulde easily come to an agreement about the woordes 7 How many persons there be of the Diuinity or God-head IN one diuine essence are subsisting three persons Three persons are one God and one God is three persons and those truely distinct one from another by their properties namely the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost each of which three persons notwithstanding are one and the same God eternal infinit most perfect in himselfe And these persons are consubstantiall and coeternal without any confounding of their properties and respects as also without anie disparagement or inequalitie betweene them And that there are three persons each of which are that one true God creatour of all thinges is prooued first by testimonies of Scripture which are taken partly out of the olde Testament and partly out of the newe The old Testament yeeldeth vs many testimonies Gen. 1.2 The spirite of God mooued vpon the waters Then God said let there be light Exod. 3.2 The Lorde is
created by him to declare his iustice power and prouidence The creation of the worlde proued by reason not onely by testimonies of the sacred word Furdermore besides testimonies of Scripture almost innumerable it is confirmed also by firme and true reasons that the world was created of God First The autoritie of God himselfe auouching the same in his word Secondly The originals and beginnings of nations and peoples shew it which could not be faigned of Moses whenas some remēbrance and memoriall of them was then extant amongst manie which yet in processe of time perished Thirdly The noueltie and latenesse of all other histories compared with the antiquity ancientnesse of the sacred storie Fourthly The age of men decreasing which sheweth that there was greater strength in nature at the first and that not without some first cause it hath decreased hitherto Fiftly The certaine course race af times euē from the beginning of the world vnto the exhibiting of the Messias Vnto Testimonies of scripture come also argumentes drawen out of nature it selfe First The order of things instituted in nature which must needes haue beene produced and framed by some intelligent minde farre superiour to all thinges Secondly The excellencie of the mind of men and Angels These intelligent mindes haue a beginning therefore they haue it from some intelligent cause Thirdly The principles or generall rules and naturall notions ingenerated in our minds Fourthly The tremblings of conscience in the wicked Fifthly The constitution and founding of common weales Sixtly The endes of all thinges profitablie and wiselie ordeined Therefore by some cause vnderstanding ordaining them Seuenthly The verie order of causes and effectes which cannot bee carried backward or forward infinitly for then neuer should the end be come vnto or the effect produced Lastly those other arguments and reasons also which proue that there is a God prooue in like manner that the worlde was created of God And although out of Philosophie or those generall principles which are naturallie knowen it cannot bee knowen or shewed Whether the woorlde was created from euerlasting or in time and also Whether it was to haue beene created or no Likewise Whether it shal endure for euer or no and whether it shall remaine the same or is to bee chaunged for these thinges depend onely vpon the will of God which is onely declared to the Church in his worde yet notwithstanding it may bee knowen by the light of nature sithence the woorlde was that it was by God alone produced out of nothing For euen the sounder philosophers are enforced to acknowledge that GOD is the cause efficient or maker of all other thinges which are Therefore hee was the maker both of the first matter of all thinges and of those celestiall and heauenlie spirites and of the soule of man But these thinges are not produced by GOD out of any matter Therefore out of nothing Wherefore whatsoeuer argumentes are brought of Philosophers against the creation of the woorlde it is easie to perceiue that those were not framed out of true philosophie but by the imaginations of men if the order of the generation and mutation of things instituted in nature which was created of God bee discerned from creation God not idle before the world but contemplating from euerlasting his owne wisedom 1 Obiection God say the Philosophers could not bee from euerlasting idle But the world not beeing created he should haue beene idle Therefore the worlde is eternall Aunswere First the Maior is false If it be all one with them to bee idle and not to administer and rule the worlde For GOD created the worlde most freely which beeing not created hee should neuerthelesse haue beene no lesse perfect than he is now whē it is created as who for euer is most perfect of himselfe and in himselfe Secondly the Minor is also false If they meane by idle him who doth nothing at all For God before the creation of the woorlde did contemplate and beholde from euerlasting his own wisedome hee begot the Son from him flowed the holy Ghost he chose vs to euerlasting life hee decreed to produce create the worlde in time Thirdly It is impietie to rush and breake in into the secrets of god who hath prouided and prepared hel for curious seekers or searchers what God did before the creation of things Motion goeth before anie moueable thing which is generated but not before that which is created 2 Ob. They collect arguments also whereby to prooue that this motion or mutation of things which nowe is hath beene from euerlasting Whatsoeuer can any way be mooued or changed say they that either hauing bin such from euerlasting hath admitted no change or motion which were absurd is also denied of vs or hath beene made such by some generation motion But there is no motion or change except there bee some thing before which can be mooued and changed Wherefore no motion of anie thing can be brought which some other motion hath not gone before and so there shall bee no beginning of changes mutations But there is an vntrueth an vnsufficient enumeration in the Maior for that they imagining that thinges coulde neuer be produced out of other but by generation take away from god the power of creating what he wil euen out of no matter preexistent or being before Wherefore our aunswere is that Motion goeth before a mooueable thing which is generated but not which is created There went not any motion before the first beginning of motions in nature but onely the creating will of God 3 Obiect All motion before which was quietnesse or a ceasing of mutation hath another motion going before it whereby is remooued the cause of that quietnesse or let of mutation But they say that according to our assertion there is put a quietnes before the first motion that euer was in the nature of things Therefore there must bee some motion or mutation whereby the cause of that quietnes was taken away so there shall bee no mutation which may be said to be the first Auns The maior is true of the mutation entercourse of things now begunne after the creation but not of the first orignal of these mutations changes which we now see in the world For the let stay of them was then the will of God only which is not taken away but being the same standing immoueable from euerlasting to euerlasting beginneth effecteth the beginnings ends mutations or motions of things and also quietnesse or cessation a continuance in the same state most freely without any mutation or change of himself Seing then this his diuine wil alone beginneth the motion mutation of things without second causes as hee did in the creation of the worlde it was not onely not necessary but not so much as possible by reason of the eternitie and immutability of the diuine wil that there should be any other
effectually those actions which are sinnes hee doth indeed detest them as they are sinnes and when he commaundeth obedience he doth in earnest exact it of al. But this wil of signification or commaundement of God doth not testifie or declare what he wil woorke in all but what agreeth with his mind what he alloweth what he requireth what euery one oweth vnto him God therefore dissembleth not neither is contrary to himselfe because he doth not in al places nor at al times manifest his will vnto his creatures and his will of punishing is not disagreeing from his Law The fourth Sophisme of Contingency and liberty or freenesse Gods gouernment doeth not take away but establish the liberty of the creatures will THat which is doone by the vnchangeable decree of god is not done contingentlie and freely But al thinges are doone by the vnchaungeable decree or counsel or prouidence of god Therefore nothing is done contingently and freely Aunswere The Maior is either particular and so concludeth nothing or beeing generally vnderstoode is most false For an effect which is the some in subiect and matter is chaungeable and vnchaungeable necessary and contingent in respect not of the same cause but of diuerse of which togither it is produced doth depend and whereof some are chaungeable some vnchaungeable In respect therefore of second and neerest causes some effects are necessarie and certaine which are produced out of causes alwaies woorking after one sort some are changeable which haue a changeable cause that is such as is not alwaies woorking after one sort and producing the same effects In respect of the first cause namely the decree of god which is vnchangeable all effects are vnchangeable and most certaine euen those which in respect of second causes are most vncertaine As that the bones of Christ should not be broken it was a thing contingent in respect both of the bones which in their own nature might as well haue beene broken as not broken as also of the souldiers who as concerning the nature of their will might haue chosen to doe either but in respect of the decree of god it was necessary for by his decree were the wils of the souldiours so ruled that they could not then neither would choose the contrary Wherfore the vnchangeablenes of the decree of God which is a necessity by supposition or conditional dooth not take away either the contingency of euentes or the libertie and freenesse of a created will but rather maintaineth and confirmeth it For GOD accomplisheth his decrees by reasonable creatures according to the condition of their nature when as by obiectes represented and shewed to their vnderstanding hee enclineth and bendeth their will that it shoulde with free and inwarde motion choose or refuse that which seemed good from euerlasting to GOD and was decreed of him For if when God worketh well by euill creatures there is not taken away in them through the decree or prouidence of God and his good woorking that which is accidentall to them that is corruption how much lesse shall that bee taken away which is essentiall vnto them euen to woorke freely So the blessed Angels are chaungeably good as concerning their nature but they are vnchaungeably and necessarily onely good according to Gods decree and directing of them and yet freely so that howe much the more effectually they are mooued by the spirite of God so much the more freely and with greater alacritie and propension they will and doe onelie that which is good Iudas the Iewes Herode Pilate the souldiours deliuered and crucified Christ freely with great willingnes pleasure yet they did whatsoeuer the hande counsel of god had determined before to be doone Acts. 4 28. 2. Ob. That which is done by the vnchangeable decree of god is not don cōtingently but necessarily Al things are don by the vnchangeable decree of god nothing therefore is doone contingently neither by fortune or chance but al necessarily which is the Stoicks doctrin of fate or destiny Here before we answere to this obiectiō we must know the significatiō of the words the difference between the opinion of the Stoicks and Christians NECESSARY is that which cannot be otherwise than it is CONTINGENT is that The difference between necessarie and contingent thinges which is indeede or is done but might notwithstanding not haue bin or haue bin done otherwise Necessity therefore and contingency is the order which is between the cause and the effect vnchaungeable or changeable And because the effectes followe of their causes vnchaungeably either in respect of the nature it selfe of the causes or in respect of som external cause which designeth and appointeth another cause to a certaine effect and because also the effects themselues cannot be more vnchāgeable than are their causes therefore there is said to be a double necessity The difference betweene absolute necessitie and necessitie of consequence or supposition One absolute or simple which is of them whose opposites or contraries are simply vnpossible in respect of the nature of the cause or subiect whereof it is affirmed As are the essential personal properties of god to wit god is god liueth god is iust wise c. God is the eternal father son holy ghost The other is necessity of consequence or by supposition which is the immutability and vnchangeablenes of those effects which follow of causes which causes being supposed or put the effect must necessarily follow but the causes notwithstanding themselues might either not haue beene or might haue been changed So are those things necessary which god hath decreed that they shuld be don in respect of the vnchangeablenes of his decree which decree yet god most freely made that is he might from euerlasting either not haue decreed it at al or haue decreed it otherwise according to those words Mat. 26.53 Thinkest thou that I cānot now pray to my father he wil giue me mo thā twelue legions of Angels How then should the scriptures be fulfilled Likewse those things are said to be necessary which are done indeed by such second causes as are so made of god that by their owne nature they cannot doe otherwise than they doe but yet they maie bee by God himselfe either taken away or hindered or altered and chaunged As the Sunne and the shadow going forward in consequence or order of nature with the Sunne and yet consisting and standing still in that battaile of Iosua and returning backwards in the dayes of Ezechias the fire burning bodies within the reach thereof which are capeable of burning yet not burning the three children in the fornace of Babylō or those things which are indeed in their owne nature apt to produce a contrary or diuerse thing or to forbeare producing of their effect and yet notwithstanding cannot do otherwise because they are so moued by god or by other causes which although they be not changed yet might haue bin changed or when they
and of saluation and euerlasting life 4 At length also assuming taking vnto him humane nature to teach as by his voice the will of god concerning vs and towards vs and to confirm this doctrine by Miracles 5 Not only to giue oracles and prophecies to open the will of god by prophets and to teach expound it himselfe present in humane nature but also to ordaine institute the ministery of the woord and sacraments that is to call and send Prophets Apostles and other ministers of the Church and to furnish them with giftes necessarie to this ministerie Iohn 20.21 As the Father hath sent mee so send I you Ephes 4.11 He Christ hath giuen some Apostles and some Prophetes some Doctours Luk. 21.15 I will giue you a mouth and wisedome where-against all your aduersaries shall not be able to speake nor resist So 1. Pet. 1.10 The spirit of Christ is saied to haue spoken by the prophetes 6. To giue the holy Ghost Mat. 3.11 Hee will baptise you with the holy Ghost and with fire 7. To be through his owne and others ministerie effectuall in the hartes of the hearers that is by his spirit to lighten our mindes that wee may vnderstand those thinges which hee teacheth vs of God and his will either by his own voice or by the voice of others Luk. 24 45. Then opened hee their vnderstanding that they might vnderstand the scriptures 8. To effectuate also that which by the efficacie of his spirit he speaketh in our heartes that is to moue our will that wee may yeeld our assent and obedience to those thinges which by his teaching wee learne and knowe Eph. 5.25 Christ gaue himselfe for the Church that he might sanctifie it and clense it by the washing of water through the worde And these thinges Christ did doth performe euen from the beginning of the church to the end of the world and that by his own authority and power and for this very cause is hee called the Word Mat. 11.27 No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne and he to whom the sonne wil reueile him Ioh. 5 21. As the Father so the Sonne quickneth whom he will By these things which haue beene now spoken is also vnderstood what difference there is betweene Christ other Prophets both of the old and newe testament why he is the chiefe prophet doctor The difference eminency consisteth in his nature office 1 Christ is the verie sonne of God god and lord of all doth immediatly vtter the woord of the Father is the embassador and mediator sent of the father Other prophets are only men his seruants called sent by him 2 Christ is autor reueiler of the doctrine therefore the Prince of all Prophets Others are s gnifiers of that which they haue receiued from Christ For whatsoeuer knoweledge and Propheticall spirite is in them all that they haue from Christ reueiling and giuing it to them Therefore is the spirit of christ said to haue spoken in the prophets Neither hath he opened only to the prophets the doctrine which he teacheth but also to all the godly Ioh. 1.16 Of his fulnes haue we all receiued that is al the Elect euen froÌ„ the beginning of the world vnto the end Ioh. 1.18 No man hath seen god at any time the only begotten sonne which is in the bosome of the father he hath declared him 3 His Prophetical wisedome is infinit and perfect therefore in al gifts he excelleth others 4 This Prophet christ appointeth the ministery sendeth ordaineth Prophets and Apostles he giueth the holie Ghost gifts necessarie for the prophets Apostles al ministers of the word to the perfourming of their duty Ioh. 16.14 He shall receiue of mine shall shew it vnto you He will lead you into al trueth 5 Christ himselfe is not onlie autor of the doctrine erectour maintainer of the external Ministery but also by his own other Prophets voice outward ministerie he preacheth effectuallie to men inwardlie through the vertue and working of the holy ghost Others are onely the instrumentes of Christ and that arbitrarie and at his disposition and direction 6 The Doctrine of christ which beeing made man hee vttered by his owne and his Apostles mouthes is much more cleare ful than the doctrine of Moses the Prophets of the old Testament Christ therefore hath authoritie of himselfe others from him if Christ speake wee must beleeue him for himselfe others because Christ speaketh in them These things are expresly prooued by these places of holy writ Hebr. 1.1 At sundrie times and in diuerse manners god spake in the old time to our Fathers by the Prophets Jn these last daies he hath spoken vnto vs by his Sonne And cap. 3.3 This man is counted woorthie of more glorie than Moses in as much as hee which hath builded the house hath more honour than the house Ioh. 16.14 The spirit of truth which I will send you shall receiue of mine and shal shew it vnto you Mat. 17.5 This is my beloued sonne in whom I am well pleased Heare him Luc. 10.16 Hee that heareth you heareth mee and hee that despiseth you despiseth mee and him that sent mee 3 WHAT CHRISTS PRIESTHOOD IS A priest in general A Priest in generall is a person ordeined by god to offer for himselfe and others oblations sacrifices to pray for others and to instruct Vnder praier is comprehended blessing which is to wish them good from God A typical priest There is one Priest which is signifieng or typical another signified The typicall Priest was a person appointed by God 1. to offer typical Sacrifices 2. to make intercession for himselfe and others 3. to declare to the people the doctrine of the Law and the promise of the Messias and true Sacrifice which was to come Such were al the Priestes of the old Testament For these three properties which we haue reckned were common to the High-Priest with other inferiour Priestes The High priest But some thinges the High-Priest had proper peculiar to himselfe 1. That he alone entered into the Tabernacle called the Holiest of al or Sanctuarie that but once euerie â—eare not without blood which he offered for himselfe and the people burning incense there and making intercession for the people 2. That his rayment was more gorgious 3. That he was set ouer the rest 4. That he onlie was consulted of questions or matters doubtful waightie and obscure whether appertaining to religion or to the common-wealth and did returne the aunsweres of God for the Princes and the people 5. and therefore did gouerne and order some counsels and offices of the state and kingdom did see that al things were lawfully administred The inferiours were all the other priests of the old Testament whose office it was to sacrifice to praie to teach the doctrine of the Lawe and the promise of the Messias to come
beginning of the woorlde who knewe GOD aright Therefore in Iesus the Sonne of Marie is another nature besides his fleshe which is the Sonne of GOD and subsisted from the beginning of the woorlde reueiling GOD vnto men not onely to those of the godly who liued since hee tooke fleshe but to those also who liued before it Againe Iohn 3.13.17.19.31 Iohn 16.28 c. Hee is called the sonne who came from heauen who beeing in earth is in heauen who came into the woorlde not as other men from the earth but from aboue out of heauen from the Father So that then hee was before he came into the woorlde But the fleshe of CHRIST is not of heauen neither came it from heauen Therefore there must needes bee another nature in him in respect whereof hee is the onely begotten Sonne of GOD euen before he tooke fleshe of the Virgine Againe He that was manifested in the flesh is GOD 1. Timot. 3. and therefore another nature from the flesh For God is one thing who is manifested and the flesh another thing wherein hee is manifested The Sonne of God is hee that was manifested in the fleshe 1. Iohn 3.5 For this purpose appeared the Sonne of GOD that hee might take away our sinnes and that hee might loose the woorkes of the Diuell Therefore the Son is God and another nature from the flesh that is the man Iesus is the sonne of God in respect not only of his humanity but also of his diuinity which besides and before the fleshe existed in him and by the assumption of the flesh was made as it were visible and conspicuous Wherefore it followeth also and that necessarily that that was a subsistent and a person For that which is by nature a sonne is also a person But Christes diuinitie or nature which was also before his flesh is the Sonne of God by nature Therefore it is a subsistent and a person in the flesh taken or assumpted and before it To the fourth classe belong those places of Scripture The Word is a person before Iesus borne of the Virgin and he is the sonne which affirme Christ man to be the word incarnate The Argument is this The word is a person which both existed before Iesus was borne and now dwelleth personally in the fleshe taken of the Virgine But that word is the Sonne Therefore the sonne is a person The Maior is proued because those thinges are attributed vnto the Word Ioh. 1.1 Ioh. 1 5. Reu. 19. which only agreeth to a thing subsistent liuing intelligent woorking that is to a person For the Woord was before al creatures with the father God by him were al things made hee was autor of al life and light in men hee was in the world from the beginning and not knowen he hath his own country and nation he came vnto it in his name men beleeue he giueth power to be the sons of god to others by his own autority power he doth assume take flesh is therein manifested seen handled conuerseth and dwelleth amongst men The Minor is proued Because the Word is called the onelie begotten Sonne of GOD Iohn 1.14.18.34 Reuelat 2.18 c. And because the same properties are attributed to the Woorde and the Sonne For the Sonne is in the bosome of the Father reueiling GOD vnto men By him the woorlde was created In him is life hee was sent and came from Heauen into the woorlde Hee tooke the seede of Abraham Likewise the life which is the woorde was with the Father before the incarnation and manifestation of Christ Therefore god was euen then the father of the Word and the Word the sonne of god But seeing the newe Arrians doe maruailouslie depraue by their newe and craftie deuised Sophismes this notable place of Iohn concerning the Woorde subsisting before the fleshe borne of the virgine and creating and preseruing all thinges that thereby they might robbe and despoile the Sonne of GOD of his true and eternal deity it seemed good here to adioine those things which Zacharias Vrsinus some yeares since noted drue out as to be opposed against these corruptions and forgeries briefely indeede and barely after the manner of Logicians yet such as are learned and sound whereby also the like corruptions and wrestings of places of holy Scripture may easily be obserued discerned and refuted IOHN purposing to write the Gospell of Christ in the first entrance proposeth the summe of that Doctrine which he purposed to deliuer and confirme out of the storie and Sermons of Christ And seeing the knowledge of Christ consisteth in his person and office The argument of Iohns gospel hee describeth both and sheweth that Christ is the eternall Sonne and Woorde of God the Father who taking fleshe was made man that he might be made a sacrifice for our sinnes and might make vs through faith in him the Sonnes of God and heires of eternall life This Woorde then whom afterwards he calleth the onely begotten Sonne of the Father he saith nowe to haue beene in the beginning which sheweth his eternity These woords of the holie Euangelist they corrupt and depraue who raise againe Samosatenus blasphemies from the pit of hell expounding this beginning of the beginning of the gospels preaching doone by Christ In the beginning was But contrarie S. Iohn and the Church euen from the Apostles and their scholers time doe vnderstand that beginning of the world wherein all things to haue beene first created by GOD Moses in the first Chapter of Genesis recounteth For Iohn saith that the Worlde was made by him and further that euen then in that beginning hee was God and that the true God creator which is onelie one and was in the beginning of the worlde Replie 1. Beginning dooth not signifie eternitie Therefore wee depraue it who so expound it Aunswere Wee doe not so expound it but that euen then in the beginning of the worlde was the Word and therefore was before the creation of the world and whatsoeuer was before this was from euerlasting And so is the scripture wont to speake Eph. 1.4.1 Pet. 1.20 Pro. 8 22 23. c. where wee may see a large place concerning wisedome whose eternitie is there signified in this that it is saide to haue beene before the creation of the worlde Replie 2. Beginning often signifieth the beginning of the gospels preaching Yee were with me from the beginning I said not to you from the beginning Aunswere This sheweth that somtimes it so signifieth but not alwaies And we are stil to conster it of that beginning which the text sheweth As also in other places Reuel 1.8 I am α ω the beginning and the end the first and the last The woorde The corruptors say The man Iesus Christ is called the Woorde because hee speaketh and teacheth the will of the father Wee say that hee is called indeede the Woorde for this cause because hee declareth God his wil but yet in respect
is most absurd or hee was this from the beginning of the worlde Heb. 3. Hee is made the builder of the house whereof Moses also was a part Hebr. 13. Iesus Christ yesterdaie and to daie and the same for euer Our Second aunswere is by denying their interpretation For Saint Iohn there speaketh of the first creation Which we shewe First Because he speaketh of the second afterwardes As manie as receiued him to them hee gaue power to be the Sennes of God Likewise Of his fulnesse haue all wee receiued and againe Grace and trueth came by Iesus Christ Now he therefore setteth down the first creation before because both creations are the worke of the same That therefore he might shew that the second creation was wrought by the woorde it was necessarie for him to teach that the first also was wrought by it For the same is the Creatour and repairer of the worlde Secondly Because he saith the world was made by him Reply The woorlde heere is taken for the Church Aunswere No for hee addeth And the woorlde knewe him not The same woorlde which was made by him knewe him not Therefore hee meaneth the wicked whether elect or reprobate Thirdly other places demonstrate the same Iohn 5.17 My Father woorketh hitherto and I woorke Wherefore both of them from the beginning of the woorlde woorke the workes of both creations In the same place verse 19. Whatsoeuer thinges the Father dooth the same thinges dooth the Sonne also And vers 20. The Father sheweth him all thinges whatsoeuer hee himselfe dooth Therefore not onlie the workes of the second creation but also of the first creation preseruation and administration of the world In the same place it is said As the Father quickeneth so the Sonne quickeneth whom he wil. But the Father was from the very beginning the giuer of corporal spirituall life Col. 1.16.17 By him were all things created which are in heauen and which are on earth thinges visible and inuisible whether they be thrones or dominions or principalities or powers all thinges were created by him and for him And hee is before al thinges and in him al things consist Thus farre of the first creation that which followeth speaketh of the second creation Reply 1. All these speake of the instauration of the Church Answer No. Because that comprehendeth also the Angels Reply 2. The Angels also were restored by Christ and ioined to their head Auns But the new creation is called a restoring from sinne death to righteousnesse and life this agreeth not to the Angels Reply Heb. 1.2 By whom also he made the worldes The worlds that is the new Church Aunswere 1 God made the old also by him because it is one Church hauing one head and foundation 2 The Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is vsed in that place signifieth in Scripture the world not the Church And faâ—der when it is there added Bearing vp al thinges by his mighty worde those words speak of the preseruation not only of the Church but of al things And moreouer he rendereth a cause why he is the heire not only of the Church but of all Creatures namely because he is the creatour preseruer of all thinges Heb. 1.10 Thou Lord in the beginning hast established the earth the heauens are the works of thine hands Reply In these wordes he conuerteth his speach to the Father to prooue that he was able by his power to lift vp the Sonne to diuine maiestie Aunswere This is â—â—â—mpudent shift and elusion 1 Because it is saide before But vnto the Sonne which appertaineth to both places of the Psalme cited by the Apostle 2 Because the Psalme dooth entreat of Christes kingdome and therefore those words which there are spoken of the Lord are to be vnderstood next immediatly of his person secondarily and mediately of the father Reply 1. If he made all thinges then then father made them not by him Aunswere Both he made them and they were made by him Ioh. 5. Whatsoeuer things the Father dooth the same dooth the Sonne also And yet the father dooth them by him Reply 2. The creatour cannot be compared with the creatures But Christ is there compared with the Angels Therefore creation of thingeâ—â—s not attributed vnto Christ Aunswere He is not comparâ—d with the creatures in any proportion but without proportion This the place it selfe of the Psalme prooueth â—he heauens shall perish but thou doost remaine Reply 3 Iâ— hee were creatour and equall with the Father hee could not sittâ— at his right hand Aunswere Wee may inuert this and saâ— of the contrarie rather if he were not equal he could not sitte at his right hand Because none but the omnipotent and true God is able to administer the kingdome of heauen earth Phil. 2.6 who beeing in the forme of god thought it no robberie to be equal with God Isay 45.23 Thus saith the Lorde that created heauen Euerie knee shall bowe vnto me This is saide of Christ Rom. 14.11 Phil. 2 10. Againe Isay 48.12 I am I am the first and I am the last My hand hath laide the foundation of the earth and my right hand hath spanned the heauens when I call them they stand vppe together These wordes Christ applieth vnto himselfe Reuelat. 1.18 and 22.23 In it was life In the word was life and the life was the light of men Wee interpret That the sonne of God is by himselfe the life as is the Father and the fountaine giuer and maintainer of al life as wel corporall and temporall as spirituall and eternall in all from the verie beginning of the world Iohn 5. He hath giuen to the Sonne to haue life in himselfe as the father hath life in himselfe They conster it That the man Iesus is the quickener or giuer of life because in him is the life of all that no man without him and all by him are saued These are their words Vnto which we reply If hee giue eternall life to all so that no man hath is without him Therefore either no man was quickened before hee was borne of Mary which were absurd or hee was the quickner giuer of life from the beginning Euen as Ioh. affirmeth this of him as beeing verified in him also before hee was made fleshe Neither can this be vnderstood onely of his merit whereby hee deserued this life for men For that life is in him signifieth that hee is by his efficacie and effectuall woorking the quickner and reuiuer as himselfe expoundeth it Iohn 5. and 10. and the aduersaries themselues confesse So are wee also to vnderstand his illightening of men that is the knowledge of God the author whereof hee was in all euen from the beginning as himselfe saith No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne and hee to whome the Sonne will reueile him And Iohn Baptist saith No man hath seene God at ANY TIME the Sonne hath declared him And the light shineth in the darckenes
attributed vnto the sonne differ so from the diuine properties which are attributed vnto him as the effectes from their causes so that then his properties woorke them 5 The equalitie of honour and woorshippe Hee hath equal honour giuen him dependeth of the equalitie of Essence properties and woorkes Isai 42.8 I will not giue my glorie to anie other But the Scripture giueth equall honour and woorshippe to the Father and the Sonne therefore they are truelie equall in God-head and in all the perfections thereof The Minor is confirmed first by Testimonies Psalm 97. Heb. 16. Let all the Angels of god woorshippe him Iohn 5.23 That all shoulde honour the sonne as they honour the father Reue. 5.13 c. Secondly Hee is called God absolutelie and simplie as is the Father Psalm 45.7 and Hebrews 1.8 Acts. 20.28 1. Timothy 3.16 Thirdly the Epithets or titles of Diuine honour which are euerie where in the scriptures attributed vnto the sonne As God blessed for euer The great god and Sauiour The Lord himselfe from heauen The Lord of glorie The Lord of Lords and King of Kings Power and eternall kingdome Sitting at the right hand of the Father The Bride-groome husband head of the Church god of the temple which are all the elect Trust and Beliefe in him Inuocation for hee is woorshipped of the Church as GOD and Bride groome of the Church at all times and in all places Thankesgiuing for his Diuine benefites Furthermore albeit the name of GOD especially beeing put absolutely and without restraint dooth euidently prooue the sonnes equalitie with the Father as it hath beene saide yet seeing that signifieth moe thinges and is also applied to others who are not by nature God wee are diligently to collect and haue in a readines those Testimonies in which thinges proper to the true God only are attributed to the sonne which agree to none else who are called Gods and whereby God himselfe discerneth himselfe and will haue him selfe discerned from other creatures and forged Gods For vnto whom the essential properties of any nature or essēce doe truely and reallie agree vnto him the essence it selfe must needes bee giuen The sonne hath all thinges from the Father not by grace but by nature 1. Obiection He that hath all things of another is inferiour to him of whom hee hath them The sonne hath all thinges of the Father Therefore hee is inferiour vnto the Father Aunswere The Maior holdeth and is true of such a one as hath any thing by the grace and fauour of the giuer for hee might not haue it and therefore is by nature inferiour but it is false of him who hath al those thinges by his owne nature which hee himselfe hath of whom hee receiueth them For seeing he can not not haue them it can not be that he should bee inferiour or should haue lesse than hee of whom hee receiueth them But the sonne hath all thinges of the Father which the Father hath and that by nature and absolute necessitie that is in such sort as that the Father can not but communicate vnto him all thinges which him selfe hath belonging to his diuine nature and maiestie Therefore hee is equall vnto the Father in all thinges The sonne doth all thinges with the consent of the Father in like manner as the Father doth 1. Obiection Hee that doth whatsoeuer he doth by the will of another interposed and going before is inferiour vnto him The sonne will and doth all thinges by the will of his Father going before Therefore he is not equal vnto the Father in vertue dignitie and essence Aunswere The sonne doth all thinges his Fathers will going before not in time and nature but in order of persons so that hee will or doth nothing which the Father also will not and doth and whatsoeuer the Father will and doth the same also the sonne will and dooth likewise that is with equall aucthoritie and power Wherefore the societie order of the diuine operations doth not take away but doth most of al settle establish the equalitie of the Father and the sonne as also of the holy Ghost THE FOVRTH CONCLVSION The word is con-substantial with the Father THE woordes con-substantiall and like-substantiall differ For * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like-substantiall signifieth mo persons and like essences as three men are like-substantial For they are both three persons and three essences of like nature that is agree in humane nature But * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 con-substantial signifieth one essence mo persons In the god-head is not like-substantial because there are not three gods but con-substantial because there are three persons of one and the same diuine essence For there is but one Iehoua that is one diuine essence which is the same is wholy in euery of the three persons therefore euery of thē are that one God besides which essence whatsoeuer is it is a creature not God The Latine church turneth the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 con-substantial taking substance for essence It is therefore the same that coessentiall that is of one and the same essence Furthermore these three thinges beeing declared and set downe namely that the Sonne is subsisting or a person that he is distinct frō the Father that he is equall with the Father the fourth is easilie gotten and obtained against the newe Arrians to wit that he is con-substantial with the Father which is also in like manner to be vnderstood concerning the holy Ghost For either this must be granted or of necessity there are made three gods which they though in words they deny it yet in very deede affirme when they frame and faine three essences and spirits The Arguments which shew The Father the Son to be of one the same essence are these 1. Iehoua is but one essence The English translations reteine not the worde it selfe IEHOVA but vse the Lord in steed thereof which is the signification of IEHOVA and therfore in effectuall one or one god Deut. 6.4 But the eternal Father and the Sonne coeternal with the father are that Iehoua Therfore these two are one essence and one God The Minor is proued first by those places of Scripture which cal the sonne Iehoua Ier. 23.6 This is the name whereby they shal cal him Iehoua or the Lord our righteousnes Isai 25.6 The expected God and Sauiour is called Iehoua But Messias is the expected god Sauior Therefore Messias is that Iehoua whereof the Prophet speaketh Za. 2.8 The deliuerer of the Church sent from Iehoua which is the Messias onely is called Iehoua Mal. 3.1 He is called Jehoua whose fore-runner was Iohn Baptist. But Iohn Baptist was the fore-runner of the Messias or the Sonne of God Christ Hee therefore is called Iehoua Hither belong al the places in which are giuen to the Angell or messenger of Iehoua both the name of Iehoua the diuine properties and honours But that Angell was the Sonne of
or moe substaunces of the same nature and essence So two men are vnited in naturall properties and perfections because they haue the same in kinde or the like and therefore are of the same humane nature The Aire in the Chimney which getteth the perfections or qualities of the fier as beeing nowe become a flame and the fier of the burning coales which fiereth and inflameth the Aire next vnto it are two substaunces of the same properties and fierie nature and therefore are saide to bee vnited in nature and essentiall properties that is they are two fiers in number but in kinde and nature they are one Likewise the three diuine persons are vnited in essential properties that is haue the same essentiall properties which is nothing else but that they are one essence one and the same God 2 WHAT IS TO BE VNITED IN PERSON THOSE things are said to bee vnited in person which are one person that is which although they differ in naturall properties yet exist in one and the same indiuiduall subsistence or haue altogether the same subsistence So the soule and bodie of man are vnited and concurre vnto one person because they beeing vnited doe make one person or one subsistent incommunicable not susteined in another or of another The Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost are not vnited in person or personall properties because they haue these not the same but distinct By this which hath beene saide it is manifest That the Vnion in nature and naturall perfections is an equalitie of properties and nature but the personall Vnion is when two vnlike natures are coupled so that each reteineth his naturall properties and operations whole and distinct but yet haue both one and the same subsistence wholie or it is the ioining of two natures different in properties to constitute the substaunce of one indiuiduall or person that is such a connexion and knitting of them together as that they are one indiuiduall subsisting by it selfe or the substaunce of one indiuiduall But that in Christ the Vnion of the flesh with the Woorde is not essentiall made in the nature or anie essentiall propertie of the God-head is shewed by these reasons First Of the God-head and the fleshe assumpted there ariseth not anie third Essence but eache is and abideth an Essence so perfect and whole as neither especiallie the Diuine as beeing in it selfe a person and simplie voide of all change commeth into the composition or compounding as wee properlie take this Word of the other Secondly Jf the Vnion of the fleshe with the Word were essentiall it would follow that the humanitie once assumpted and taken was equalled with the Godhead in essentiall properties and so by a consequent to bee made of the same nature essence with the Word So Vigilius in his fourth booke sheweth that the Eutychians held two substances to be in Christ of the same nature Wherefore they who will haue the essential properties of the Godhead to be reallie communicated and common with the fleshe so that the fleshe shoulde truely and reallie bee and bee called omnipotent omniscient and whatsoeuer else the God-head is they indeede howsoeuer in woordes they mightily stand against it holde this Vnion to bee made in essentiall properties and in nature and both with Eutyches and Schwenckfield they confounde both natures and take away the difference betweene the creature and the Creatour and also with Nestorius they frame and make two persons and so bring in a quaternitie For albeit they say that they in that their confusion or as themselues call it with their Master Schwenkfield Deifiyng and Maiesticall exaltation of the fleshe doe retaine the substance of the fleshe yet two substaunces hauing reallie the same and like perfections are two Subsistents or persons of one nature as are two men and whatsoeuer other indiuiduals of the same kind or nature Lastly with Sabellius and the Patripassians they incarnate the whole Trinitie For there is one and the same Essence in number of the diuine persons and the same essential properties Wherefore that which is vnited and equalled with one of these three according to essence must needes be also vnited and equalled with the rest Wherefore the Vnion of both natures in Christ is personall or according to the subsistence proper vnto the Word both natures keeping and retaining in that vnion their properties whole and vnconfounded For the Word did not by vniting humane nature vnto it make the same the Godhead or GOD and omnipotent immense and infinite but it tooke the manhood which reteineth still the properties belonging vnto it and so did ioine and knitte it vnto it selfe as to bee one person with it and the substaunce of one Christ Neither is it absurd that a thing which neither is made or is one with another in kinde neither any Homogeneal part thereof shoulde yet exist in the same subsistence with it or shoulde subsist in it selfe where-with it is vnited For a graffe hath his subsisting in a tree of another nature or kinde The same is the subsistence both of the sprig engraffed and of the tree susteining the sprig that is they are one and the same indiuiduall tree yet haue they and so doe retaine natures in properties most diuers The like reason is there in the two natures of Christ both subsisting in or of the same person of the sonne Obiection The humane nature is vnited with the Word in person but not in nature Therefore the person is diuorced and sundered from the nature Againe The person onelie of the sonne is vnited with the humane nature therefore not the diuine nature it selfe of the Word Aunswere In both these Arguments is a fallacie from that which is no cause as if it were a cause and both offend in this for that they who so reason against the maintainers of true doctrine and men sounde in faith either knowe not or are not willing to distinguish betweene these two Phrases of speech To bee vnited in nature and to be vnited too or with a nature when notwithstanding the difference is very great and most familiar and knowne vnto the schoolemen For to bee vnited in nature is to bee equalled that is to bee made one essence or nature with another To bee vnited too or with a nature is to bee coupled and ioined therewith to one subsistence or personalitie Wherefore the fleshe is vnited to or with the the Woorde not in nature or in Essentiall propertie that is it is not made with the Woorde one essence neither made equall vnto it in omnipotency wisedome and nature for so shoulde the whole Trinitie bee incarnate Yet is it vnited to the omnipotencie wisedome nature and essence of God not simplie but of god the Worde Now this is nothing else than the flesh to be vnited to the person of the sonne or to the Worde in person which person is the verie diuine nature or essence omnipotent wise and whatsoeuer else is proper to the Godhead But albeit
the verie essence it selfe of the God-head c. Therefore if Gods omnipotencie bee really communicated to Christs humanitie so that this also is by reason of the omnipotency communicated vnto it reallie omnipotent of necessity then by reason of the same omnipotency really communicated Christes humanitie shall bee indeed an essence subsisting of it selfe and by it selfe incorporeall eternall immense creatres of all thinges that is God himselfe blessed for euer and so by consequent the diuine person For an essence intelligent subsisting by it selfe which also is God must needs be the person And these are the fruits of reall communicating of properties in natures The participation of the God-head exaltation and maiestie of the flesh and such like is not a real communicating of the essentiall properties of the God-heade made into the humane nature or an omnipresence omniscience omnipotency that is a God-head of the man-hood For such a communicating should not perfect but destroy the man-hoode and conuert it into the God-head and dissolue the personal vnion of distinct natures but it is First the verie vnion of the humanitie with the Word in such sort as it being created finite doth together with al the essential properties therof subsist not in a created person of the same humane nature but in the increate and eternal person of God the Word by reason of which vnion God the Word but not the God-head is is called trulie man and contrarie man but not the manhood is and is called truly eternall God No dignitie eminence can be imagined greater than this neither doth it agree to anie but to the flesh of Christ onely Secondly Jt is the excellencie of gifts For these christs humanitie receiued without measure that is all whatsoeuer and most great and most perfect that maie fall into a created and finite nature Thirdly The office of the mediator to the perfourming whereof the vnited but yet distinct properties and operations of both natures doe necessarily concur Fourthly The honor and worship which by reason of the Mediatorship agreeth is giueÌ„ to whole christ according to bâ—th natures keeping still as was before saide the difference of properties and operations in natures Now whatsoeuer testimonies some bring either out of the Scriptures or out of the Fathers which were sound in faith thereby to proue that their Eutychian transmutation and a third kind of communicating forged by themselues that is exequation or equalling of natures all those testimonies indeed belong either to the grace of vnion of the natures which is signified by the communicating of properties or to the grace of Christes Headship which compriseth the office and honour of the Mediatour which are affirmed of whole Christ by waie of communicating or to the habituall grace that is the created giftes which Christ receiued without measure which are properly affirmed of the flesh or humanitie These giftes which are also called graces are not properlie effectes of the personal vnion as are the attributes or properties of the natures and office First because they are communicated to the manhoode as well of the Father and the Holie Ghost as of the Word or Sonne For he is said to haue receiued of the Father the spirite without measure that is aboundauntlie likewise to be annointed with the Holy Ghost And if the giftes were effects of the vnion it would follow of necessity that the flesh was vnited not to the Son only but to the Father also and the holy Ghost Secondlie The vnion of the flesh with the Woord was from the verie moment of the conception alwaies most perfect But the consummation and perfection of giftes was not vntil the accomplished time of his resurrection ascension For hee was indeede humble weake and contemned he was indeede ignorant of some things he did indeede encrease in wisedome stature and in fauour not with men onely but also with God himselfe Thirdly The flesh when it was in the state of humility had not immortality or a nature not subiect to sufferings or the like and yet remained it alwaies vnited with the Woorde Wherefore the habitual giftes or graces of the humanitie for which it is also in it selfe reallie wise mighty iust holie follow not the personal vnion in respect of dependency as the effect followeth and dependeth of this cause but onely in respect of order Because namely the humane nature was first to subsist and bee before it were enriched with giftes and it subsisteth vnited to the Woord in the very first moment of the conception But after what maner the humanitie is vnited vnto the Sonne of God hath beene said before For by the special and miraculous working of the holy Ghost in the womb of the virgine of her blood was the flesh of christ formed sanctified and vnited according to subsistence or personally vnto the Wâ—ord 4 Why it was necessarie that the two natures should bee vnited in the person or subsistence of the sonne of God FOR what cause Christ our Mediatour was to bee together both a true and perfect iust man and true that is by nature GOD hath beene declared of vs before in the common place of the Mediatour in the 4 question pag. 237. For the woorke of our redemption could not haue bin compassed and finished by the Mediator without the concurrence of diuers natures operations in the same person For albeit he suffred died in the flesh yet his passion and suffering would not haue that force and efficacy to redeeme iustifie sanctifie vs neither could christ haue applied those benefites vnto vs except he had bin withal true and natural God Of the Incarnation of the Word the confession made by the Fathers of Antioch against Paulus Samosatenus TAKEN OVT OF THE ACTES OF THE FIRST EPHESINE COVNCEL VVEE confesse our Lord Iesus Christ begotten before all worlds of his Father but in the last times borne according to the flesh of the Virgine by the holy Ghost subsisting in one person onely made of the celestiall God-head and humane flesh Whole God and whole man Whole God also with his bodie but not according to his body god Whole man also with his God head but not according to his God head man Againe whole adorable also with his bodie but not according to his bodie adorable Whole adoring also with his Godhead but not according to his godhead adoring Whole increat also with his body but not according to his body increated Whole formed also with his Godhead but not according to his godhead formed Whole consubstantial with god also with his body but not according to his body consubstantiall as neither also according to his Godhead he is coessentiall with men but hee is according to the flesh consubstantiall vnto vs existing also in his Godhead For when wee say hee is according to the spirit consubstantiall with God wee doe not say hee is according to the spirit coessentiall with men And contrarily when wee affirme him to bee according to the
All other proofes and arguments may be referred vnto these 2 What is the last iudgement IN euerie iudgement are the Accused the Accuser the iudge the cause examination hearing of the cause the Law according to which iudgement is giuen the sentence of absolution and condemnation and the execution thereof according to the Lawes Judgement then in generall is an inquisition or examination of a cause by an ordinarie and lawfull iudge according to iust Lawes and a pronouncing of sentence and the exequution thereof according to iust Lawes Nowe is it easie to define this iudgement of God This iudge hath no neede of inquisition or examination of the cause or of witnesses and accusers seeing he is himselfe the searcher of harts Therefore there shal be only the iudge men of whom sentence shall be giuen the law according to which sentence shal be giuen execution The definition of it is this 1 The last iudgement is a iudgement which God shal exercise in the end of the world by christ who should then visiblie descend froÌ„ heauen in a cloud in the glorie maiesty of his Father Angels by whom also then shall be raised from the dead all men which haue died since the beginning of the world vnto the end thereof but the rest who are then liuing shal be sodainly chaunged and all presented before the tribunall seate of Christ who shall giue sentence of al and shal cast the wicked with the diuels into euerlasting tormentes but shall receiue vp the godlie vnto himselfe that they maie with him and blessed Angels enioie eternal happinesse and glorie in heauen It may be defined more brieflie on this wise The last iudgement shall bee a manifestation or declaration and separation of the iust and vniust who euer haue liued or shall liue from the beginning of the woâ—ld vnto the end proceeding from God by christ and a pronouncing of sentence on these men and an execution thereof according to the doctrine of the Law and Gospel The partes of this definition wee wil now in few wordes confirme 1. That iudgement shall be a manifestation of the iust and vniust For Reuel 20.12 The books shall be opened that the secrets of hartes may bee laied open 2. There shall bee a separation of the iust and vniust For Mat. 25.32 Christ shall place the sheep on his right hand but the goats on his left hand 3. This manifestation and separation shal be wrought of God by Christ If of God then shal it bee a most diuine and iust iudgement Rom. 3.6 Jf God bee vnrighteous how shall hee iudge the world Jt shall bee made and wrought by christ because Iohn 5.22 The Father hath committed all iudgement vnto the Son And Act. 17.31 God hath appointed to iudge the worlde by a man 4. Jâ— shall bee a pronouncing of sentence Mat. 25.34 Come yee Blessed of my Father We are Blessed of God not in Adam but in his seed and therefore the sentence shall bee giuen according to the gospel For by nature wee are subiect vnto the wrath of God Therefore also shall the godly say When saw wee thee hungering or thirsting They shall confesse that the retribution of rewardes commeth not by their merit but by his grace Furder after this manner the wicked and the godly shall bee iudged according to the Lawe and Gospell Absolution shall bee principally according to the Gospel but shal be confirmed by the Law Condemnation shal bee principally by the Lawe but shall be confirmed of the Gospel Sentence shal bee giuen on the wicked according to their owne merite Sentence shall be giuen on the godlie according to Christes merite applyed vnto them by faith a testimonie and witnesse of which faith shal be their workes Now to be iudged is to bee declared iust before the tribunal of Christ and to enter into euerlasting life and that with a respect and condition of faith which is required in the Gospell Obiection But vnto euerie man shall be giuen according to his workes Therefore iudgement shall be giuen on al according to the doctrine of the Law Aunswere In this sense shal be giuen also vnto the elect according to their works not that their works are merites but in that they are the effects of faith Wherefore vnto the elect shal be giuen according to their woorkes that is they shal be iudged according to faith to be iudged according to faith is to be iudged according to the Gospel But the iudge maketh mention of our woorks and not of faith First because he wil haue it knowen to others why he so iudgeth least the vngodly condemned persons might obiect that hee giueth vs eternal life vniustly Wherefore he wil shew them our workes and will bring them forth as testimonies to refute them that we haue in this life applyed vnto vs Christes merit Secondly That wee maie haue comfort in this life that we shall hereafter according to our works stand at his right hand 3 Who shall be iudge CHrist shall bee the iudge Iohn 5.22 Hee hath committed all iudgement vnto the Son Neither yet are the Father the holie Ghost remoued from this iudgement But Christ immediatly shal speake and giue sentence and that in his humane nature And when he speaketh God shal speake not onely because he himselfe is God but because the Father shal speake by him The iudgement then shall belong vnto all three persons of the God-head as concerning their consent and authority but vnto Christ as touching the publishing and exequuting of the iudgement For Christ shall visibly giue sentence of all which sentence he shal also together execute The church also shal iudge as touching the approbation and allowing of this iudgement as Christ saith Luk. 22.30 That the Apostles shal sit on twelue seates and shall iudge the twelue tribes of Israel that is they shall subscribe vnto Christes iudgement and approoue his sentence The causes why Christ man shall bee iudge are these 1. Because the church is to bee glorified by the same Mediatour by whom and for whom it was iustified Act. 17.31 God wil iudge the woorld in righteousnesse by that man whome hee hath appointed Matth. 24.30 They shal see the sonne of man come in the cloudes of heauen with power and great glorie Ioh. 5.27 The Father hath giuen power to the Sonne to execute iudgement in that hee is the Sonne of man 2. That we maie haue comfort knowing him to bee our iudge who hath purchased vs with his bloode and who maketh vs his brethren yea his parts and members For he is 1 Our brother and our flesh 2 He hath promised and saide Ioh. 3.36 He that beleeueth in the Sonne hath eternall life cap. 6.24 Verilie verily I say vnto you hee that heareth my word beleeueth in him that sent me hath euerlasting life and shall not come into condemnation but hath passed from death vnto life The third cause why he commeth is to deliuer his Church
shall deliuer me from the bodie of this death Reu. 22.17 The spirit the Bride say Come Lord Jesu which they say not who are not ready to receiue the Lorde For the wicked tremble and shake at the mention of that iudgement THE THIRD PART OF THE CREED Of the holy Ghost the sanctifier IN this last part of the Apostolike confession are cōteined six articles whereof the first speaketh of the person of the holie Ghost the next of the Church which is gathered confirmed and preserued by the holy Ghost the foure articles following are of the benefites bestowed by the Holy Ghost on the Church and first of the communion of Saints Secondly of remission of sinnes Thirdly of the resurrection of the flesh Lastly of euerlasting life The chiefe Questions of the holy Ghost or holy spirite 1 What the name spirit signifieth 2 Who and what the Holie Ghost or spirite is 3 What is the holy Ghosts office 4 Of whom the holy Ghost is giuen and wherefore 5 To whom he is giuen 6 How he is giuen and receiued 7 How he is reteined and kept 8 Whether he maie be lost and how 9 Wherefore he is necessarie 10 How we may know that he dwelleth in vs. 1 * It is here to be noted that this Questiō serueth more properlie for the latine which vseth this name Spiritus only when as we in English vse as much or more rather the word Ghost than Spirit when wee speake of the third Person WHAT THE NAME SPIRIT SIGNIFIETH THE name spirite is taken sometimes for the cause sometimes for the effect When it is taken for the cause it signifieth a nature incorporeall and liuing of a spirituall essence wielding moouing and stirring some thing So first God essentiallie and personallie is a spirit that is incorporeal without any bodilie dimensions or quantitie inuisible Secondly The Angels also whether good or bad are in this sense spirites Thirdly after the same manner the soules of men are called spirits Gen. 2.7 Hee breathed in his face breath of life that is he sent in a spirit or soule into him When the woorde spirit is taken for an effect it signifieth 1. The aire moued 2. The mouing it selfe and motion of the aire 3. The wind and moouing vapours 4. Spirituall effects or motions good or bad So is it said The spirit of fear And contrary The spirit of Princes that is courage likewise The spirit of fornication 5. New spirit signifieth the giftes of the holy spirit In this doctrine which we haue in hand Spirit signifieth the cause stirring and moouing namely the third person of the God-head which is forcible in the mindes and wils of men And this third person of the God-heade is called a spirit 1. Because he is a spiritual essence or substaunce incorporeall and inuisible 2. Because he is inspired of the Father and the son that is because is the immediate stirrer and moouer of diuine works The Father and the Sonne mooue but by this spirit 3. Because himselfe inspireth and immediatly worketh motions in the harts of the Elect whence he is called Luk. 1.35 The power of the most high 4. Because hee is God equall and the same with the Father and the Son And god is a spirite This third person of the God-head is called Holie 1. Because he in himselfe by himselfe and of his owne nature is Holie 1. Because he is the hallower or sanctifier that is he immediatly halloweth or sanctifieth and maketh holie others The father and the sonne sanctifie by him and therefore mediatelie 2 Who and what the holy ghost is THE holie ghost is the third person of the true and onelie god-head proceeding from the Father and the Sonne and coeternall coequal and consubstantial with the Father and the Son and is sent from both into the harts of the Elect to sanctifie them vnto eternal life Here are we to say the same thinges of the Godhead of the holy Ghost which haue bin spoken before of the Godhead of the son For this definition is also to be prooued and confirmed by the proofes of the same foure partes 1 That the holy Ghost is a person 2 That he is the third person or that he is other distinct from the father and the Sonne 3 That he is true God with the Father and the Sonne or that he is equall to the Father and the Sonne 4 That he is of the same God-head with the Father the Sonne or that he is consubstantiall vnto both FIrst therefore that the holy ghost is a person is prooued 1 By his apparitions Because he hath appeared visible Luk. 3.22 The holy ghost came downe in a bodilie shape like a Doue Act. 2.3 And there appeared vnto them clouen toungs like fire and it that is the fire or the holie ghost sate vpon each of them Seeing then the holy Ghost descended in bodilie shape vpon Christ and sate vpon the Apostles it followeth that he is subsisting For no qualitie or created motion of minds or hearts is able to doe in like manner For an accident doth not only not take vpō it any shape but standeth in neede of some thing else in which it selfe should consist and bee Neither is the aire the place or subiect of holinesse godlinesse loue of God and other spiritual motions but the mindes of men 2. He is proued to be a person because he is called god 1. Cor. 3.16 Know yee not that yee are the temple of god and that the spirite of god dwelleth in you Acts 5.3 Why hath satan filled thine hart that thou shouldest lie vnto the holie Ghost And in the next verse he saith Thou hast not lied vnto men but vnto god See also Isai 40.7.13 Actes 28.25 Ephes 4.4.30 Howesoeuer then the aduersaries of this doctrine gtaunt the holy Ghost to be God yet this cannot bee but he must be a subsistent or person seing God is a being but our godlinesse goodnesse Godly motions and other diuine affections cannot be called God 3. He is a person because he is the author of our Baptisme and we are baptized in his name that is by his commaundement and wil. But wee are not baptized by the commaundement and wil of a deade thing or of a thing not existing neither are wee baptized in the name of the graces or giftes of God 4. Because the properties of a person are attributed vnto him as that hee teacheth that he distributeth giftes euen as he wil that he comforteth confirmeth ruleth raigneth likewise that hee sendeth Apostles that hee speaketh in the Apostles Luke 12.12 The holie Ghost shall teach you in the same houre what yee ought to saie So also he declareth the thinges to come Ioh. 16.13 The spirite of truth wil shewe you the thinges to come Hee giueth prophecies he commaundeth and willeth that the Apostles be separated and lastlie he appointeth teachers in the church All these are thinges proper vnto a person existing intelligent endued with a wil working
faith sighes and ardent praiers a sincere professing of Christianitie 1. Corint 12.3 No man can saie that Iesus is the Lord but by the holy ghost In a woorde by faith and repentaunce we know that the holie Ghost dwelleth in vs. OF THE CHVRCH THE questions to be obserued 1 What the Church is 2 How many waies it is taken 3 What are the markes thereof 4 Wherefore it is called holy and Catholique 5 What is the difference betweene the Church the common-weale or ciuil state 6 Whence it is that the Church differeth from the rest of mankinde 7 Whether any may be saued out of the church 1 WHAT THE CHVRCH IS VVHen the question is what the Church is it is presupposed that there is a Church so that it is not necessarie to make a question Whether there be a church Now as concerning the name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ecclesia which we cal the church it is natiuely a Greeke woord and commeth from a word which signifieth to cal forth For the custome was in Athens that a companie of the citizens were called foorth by the voice of the crier from the rest of the multitude as it were namelie and by their Hundreds to an assembly wherein some publique speech was had or to heare relation made of some sentence or iudgement of the Senate And thus differeth the word Ecclesia from Synagoga or Synagog For Synagoga signifieth any manner of congregation be it neuer so common and inordinate But Ecclesia betokeneth an ordained congregation and such as is called together for some cause From hence the Apostles translated the name Ecclesia to their purpose terming the Church by it for resemblaunce and likenesse sake For the church is gods congregation neither comming together by chance without cause nor beeing inordinate but called foorth by the voice of the Lorde and the crie of the word that is by the ministers of the gospel from the kingdome of Satan to hear or embrace Gods word This congregation or companie of those which are called of God to the knowledge of the gospell the Latines keeping still the Greeke woorde call Ecclesia But it shall bee requisite that we a little more fully define what the Church is The church of God is a congregation or companie of men The definition of the Church chosen from euerlasting of god to eternal life which from the beginning of the woorld vnto the ende thereof is gathered of the sonne of god out of all mankinde by the holie ghost and the Woorde consenting in true faith and which the Sonne of God defendeth preserueth and at length glorifieth with glorie and life euerlasting Thus is the true Church of God defined whereof the Creede dooth properly speake Obiection 1. They which are in the church perish not as the definition affirmeth Manie hypocrites are in the Church Therefore either hypocrites shall not perish or it is false that they which are in the Church perish not Aunswere They which are in the inuisible Church perish not and of this was our definition But the Minor proposâ—â—ion speaketh of the visible Church in which are manie hypocrires Obiection 2. Where the inuisible church is not neither is the visible Jn the time of popery was not the inuisible church therefore there was not the visible Aunswere I denie the Minor For there also were remnantes that is there were alwaies some mingled with those dregs who held the foundation some more purely some lesse In summe the Church was oppressed but not extinguished 2 How manie waies the church is taken THE church is taken either for the true church The false Church or for the false The false church is vnproperly called the church and is a companie arrogating vnto themselues the title of Christes church but which do not folow the same but rather persequute it The true church is either visible The true church 〈◊〉 either vâ—â—ible or inuisible or inuisible The visible church is a companie among men embracing and professing the true and vncorrupt doctrine of the Lawe and the Gospel and vsing the Sacramentes aright according to Christes institution and professing obedience vnto the doctrine in which company are many vnregenerated or hypocrites In the 〈…〉 perish consenting notwithstanding agreeing to the doctrine in which also the Son of God is forcible to regenerate some by the vertue of his spirite vnto euerlasting life Hither appertaine the parables of the seede and the tares The inuisible church is a companie of those which are elected to eternall life in whom a newe life is begun here by the holie Ghost is perfected in the woorlde to come They which are in this inuisible church They which are in the inuisible Church neuer perish neuer perish neither are any hypocrites therein but the Elect only of whom it is said Ioh. 10.28 No man shal plucke my sheep out of mine hands Moreouer both these partes of the true Church both visible and inuisible are either vniuersall or particular The Vniuersall visible Church The Vniuersall visible Church is the companie of all those which professe the doctrine wheresoeuer in the worlde they be The particular Visible Church The particular visible is also a companie of those which professe the doctrine but in some certaine place The Visible Church is Vniuersall in respect of the profession of one Faith in Christ and of one Doctrine and worshippe But it is particular in respect of place and habitation The Vniuersall Inuisible and of diuersitie of rites and customes So also the Inuisible Church is Vniuersall as all the Elect in whatsoeuer place they bee and at whatsoeuer time they liued haue one faith The particular Inuisible againe it is particular as either in this or that place they haue the same faith Now all particular Churches are partes of the Vniuersall and the Visible are partes of the Vniuersall church Inuisible And of this Vniuersall Jnuisible Church doth the Article of our Creed speake properlie I beleeue the Holie Catholique Church For besides that the vniuersall inuisible church is catholique it is also nobilitated with this title that it is Holie Furder in this is the true communion of Saints between Christ and al his members It is called inuisible not that the men are inuisible but because their faith and godlinesse is inuisible neither is knowen of anie but of themseleus in whom it is neither can wee indeede discerne certainly the godly from the hypocrites in the church The TriumphaÌ„t and Militant parts of the Vniuersall Inuisible The partes of this vniuersal inuisible church may these two not vnfitly be accounted The church Militant and Triumphant The Militant is in this world fighting warring vnder the banner of Christ against the Diuel the woorlde and our flesh The Triumphant which both now triumpheth with the blessed Angels in heauen and shall after the resurrection enioie a full triumph Nowe although the Militant church is
writing by S. Paul himselfe So Paul saith of the Lordes supper 1. Cor. 11.23 I haue receiued of the Lord that which also J haue deliuered vnto you But this tradition after the Euangelistes himselfe also hath set downe in writing The Iesuites cite the saying of Paul 2. Thes 3.6 Withdraw your selues frō euery brother that walketh inordinately and not after the tradition which hee receiued of vs. But a little after in the same chapter hee describeth what tradition he meaneth as it is manifest to him that looketh on the place And yet will they thence prooue that many thinges are to bee beleeued which can not bee proued by anie testimonie of Scripture The like impudencies they shewe in another testimony taken out of Luke Act. 16.14 They deliuered them the decrees to keep ordained of the Apostles Elders which were at Jerusalem When a little before Cap. 15.23 he witnesseth that those decrees were set downe in letters written by the Apostles But wee are to keepe and hold the notes and marcks before set downe First in respect of Gods glorie that enimies may be discerned from Sonnes Secondly In respect of our own saluation that we may ioine our selues to the true Church For there are three sorts of men 1 They who openly professe and declare themselues to be enimies 2 Hypocrits 3 The company of the Elect chosen 4 Why the Church is called holy and Catholicke THE Church is called Holy The church holy in respect of Christs holinesse imputed and their own begun Catholique in respect of place and time 1 Because Christes sanctification is imputed vnto it 2 Because al his members haue begunne al the parts of obedience It is called Catholicke 1 In respect of places because it is spread through the whole world For there is one Vniuersall Church of all places degrees of life neither is it tied to a certaine place kingdome or to certain succession 2 In respect of times Because there is but one true Church of all times which also is at all times so Catholicke as that it is dispersed through the whol world nether is at any time tied to any certain place Jt is not called Catholicke because it possesseth many kingdomes For Catholicke is a title giuen vnto the Church in the Apostles time for before time the Church was limited within narrowe bondes Nowe that there is but one Church of al times and ages from the beginning of the world vnto the end it is out of doubt For 1 It is manifested that the Church hath euer been Neither can Abrahams daies be obiected as if before he was called there had beene no worship of the true God in his familie and himselfe had beene after his calling alone without anie others For before his calling he held the foundations and grounds of Doctrine of the true God though it were darkned with superstitions mingled therewith Againe Melchisedec liued at the same time who was the Priest of the most high God and therefore neither was Abraham after his calling alone but there were others besides him worshippers of the true God whose priest was Melchisedec 2 That the Church as it hath beene euer so shall also continue euer appeareth by these testimonies Isay 59.21 My woordes shall not depart out of thy mouth nor out of the mouth of thy seed Ier. 33.20 If the night and day may bee chaunged then shall my couenant also be changed Mat. 28.20 I am with you alway vntill the end of the world Moreouer Christ was euer and euer shal be King Head and Priest of the Church Wherefore the Church was euer and euer shall be And hence also it is manifest That the Church of both testaments is one and the same that which is confirmed also by the article folowing For Christ is the sanctifier of his Church who is common to men of both testaments Hither appertaineth the Question of the authoritie of the Church Which I omit In this we wil consider here onely that opinion or saying The church doth not erre How the church may bee saide not to erre Which is true after this sort First the whole doth not erre though some members thereof doe er Secondly it doth not erre Vniuersally although in some pointes of Doctrine it may Thirdly It erreth not in the foundation 5 In what the Church differeth from the common-weal 7 Differences betweene the Church and common-weale THE Church differeth from the common-weal 1. Because common-weales are distinct and kingdomes of the world in diuerse places and times The Church is alwaies one and the same at all times and with all men 2. The kingdomes and states of the world haue many Heads or one chiefe Heade and many other inferiour Heades besides and that on earth The Church hath but one and that in heauen 3. The common-wealth is gouerned by certaine lawes made for the maintenance of outwarde peace and tranquillity The Church is ruled by the Holy Ghost the worde of God 4. The common-wealth or ciuill state requireth outward obedience onely The Church requireth both as well inwarde obedience as outwarde 5. In ciuill states and common-weales there is power and libertie to make new lawes positiue by the authoritie of the magistrate the violating of which lawes bindeth mens consciences and deserueth corporal punishmentes The Church is tied to the woorde of God vnto which it is not lawfull to adde ought or to detract ought from it 6. The ciuill state hath corporall power where-with it is armed against the obstinate disobedient For he may and ought by force to curb these and to punish them by the sword The Church punisheth by denouncing of Gods wrath out of the worde of God 7. Jn the Church are alwaies some Elect Holie but not alwaies in the common-wealth 6 Whence ariseth the difference of the Church from the rest of mankinde THE cause of the difference is the Election of God Election putteth the difference betweene the Church and others Act. 14.16 Jn times past god suffered all the Gentiles to walke in their owne waies Rom. 9.18 God hath mercie on whom he will and whom he will he hardeneth Ioh. 6.37 Al that the Father giueth me shal come to me Rom. 8.29.30 Those which hee knew before he also predestinate to be made like to the Image of his Sonne and whom he predestinate them also he called By these wordes we are also taught that the promise of grace is generall in respect of the Elect or beleeuers God verilie would haue all to be saued and that Rom. 11.7 1 Jn respect that he loueth the saluation of all But the Elect only haue attained to that saluation 2 In respect that he inuiteth al to saluation But the rest haue beene hardened The Efficient cause then of this difference is the Election of God willing to gather vnto himselfe a Church in earth Secondly the Sonne is a mediate executour of this will and purpose The holy ghost immediate Thirdly The
woord of God is the instrumental cause Now the cause of the difference beeing known let vs in a woorde see what that difference is Three sorts of men Wee are to obserue therefore that there are three sortes of men verie much different one from another For some men are euen in profession estraunged and aliants from the church as who deny faith or repentance and therefore are openly enemies of the Church others are called but not effectuallie which are al hypocrits Others lastly are called effectually which are the Elect who are but a little portion according to that of Christ Matt. 20.16 Many are called but few are chosen 7 Whether anie one maie bee saued out of the Church None saued out of the church NO man can bee saued out of the Church For whomsoeuer God hath chosen and elected to the ende which is eternal life them he hath chosen to the means which is the inward and outwarde calling Obiection Therefore Election is not free Aunswere It is free because God chose freely both to the end and to the meanes But after he hath once destined and ordeined men to meanes hee neuer changeth Wee are here also to holde against the Anabaptistes That infantes which are borne in the church are also of the church OF PREDESTINATION THIS common place of Predestination or election and reprobation ariseth out of the former place Of the Church is ioyned with it The special questions are 1 Whether there be Predestination 2 What it is 3 What is the cause thereof 4 What are the effectes thereof 5 Whether it be vnchangeable 6 How far it is knowen vnto vs. 7 Whether the Elect bee alwaies members of the church and the reprobate neuer 8 Whether the Elect fal from the church and the reprobate remaine euer in the church 9 What vse there is of this Doctrine 1 WHETHER THERE BE PREDESTINATION Predestination proued by Testimony of scripture THAT there is predestination testimonies of scripture do confirme Mat. 20.16 Many are called but few are chosen Ioh. 15.16 Yee haue not chosen mee but I haue chosen you Iohn 10.16 Other sheep haue I also which are not of this foulde Eph. 1.5 Predestinate according to the good pleasure of his will Acts. 18.10 J haue much people in this citie Eph. 1.4 Hee hath chosen vs in him Rom. 8.30 Whom he predestinate them also hee called By these and the like places wee learne that some are elected some not and therefore there is predestination When the Question is whether there be predestination theÌ„ this is in Question Whether there bee any such counsell of God which hath seuered some to bee saued and others to bee reprobate Some say that Election when mention is made thereof in scripture is taken for some excellencie for which a man is worthy to bee elected or chosen as wee may say a Choise and gallant horse So also they interpret reprobation but falsely for it is the eternall counsell and purpose of God That there is Reporbation is apparent by diuerse places Reprobation proued by scripture S. Paul saieth Rom. 9.22 That god doth shew his iustice on the vessels of wrath Mat. 13.11 It is giueÌ„ vnto you to know the secrets of the kingdome of heauen but to them it is not giuen Iud. vers 4. who were before of old ordeyned to this condemnation Mat. 14.25 â—hou hast had these thinges from the wise Iohn 10.26 Ye are not of my sheepe Pro. 16.4 He hath made al things for his own sake euen the wicked for the day of euill 1 Obiection But the promise of grace is vniuersall Aunswere It is vniuersall in respect of the faithfull that is it belongeth to all those who beleeue But it is particular in respect of al men Our aduersaries say that those which are conuerted maie fal awaie Which is to weaken and diminish the general promise Reply But it is said 1. Tim. 2.4 That God will that al men be saued But contrarie Matth. 20.16 Places of scripture reconciled concerning gods wil to saue and not to saue men Manie are called but fewe chosen Matth. 13.15 This peoples heart is waxed fat saith the Lorde least they shoulde returne that J might heale them And heere it is saide that God will that some bee not saued Therefore these testimonies are contrarie one to another Aunswere 1. God wil that al be saued as he is delited with the saluation of all Albeit elsewhere it is saide That hee reioiceth at the destruction of the wicked Prou. 1.26 yet hee reioiceth not thereat as it is a vexation or destruction of his creature but as it is an execution of his iustice 2. Hee wil that all bee saued in as much as he inuiteth al to repentance But he wil not haue all saued in respect of the force and efficacie of calling Actes 17.27 He dooth good vnto al if so be they might haue groped after him and found him Rom. 11.7 The Elect obtaine it the rest are hardened He saith verily vnto all Honesty of life pleaseth me yee owe it vnto me But he saith not to al I wil worke it in you but to the elect onely because from euerlasting it hath so pleased him 2 Obiection He that giueth vnequallie to those that are equal is an accepter of persons Aunswere It is true First if hee giueth to those which are equall vnequallie for anie outward causes or respectes that is for such causes as are not that condition in respect of which equall rewardes or punishmentes were to be giuen or not to be giuen that is when the cause which is common to both is neglected and other thinges regarded which are not the cause as riches honours and the like But here God respecteth the receiuing of this benefite and conuersion and giueth eternall life to them which haue these Secondly he that giueth vnto those which are equall vnequallie beeing bound to anie were an acceptour of persons But God giueth most freely of his meere mercy and grace Hee is bound to no man because we were his enemies therefore he might most iustly haue excluded all And if vniustice shoulde any waie fal into God which God forbid that we should think he should be vniust an acceptour of persons in that he giueth any thing at all But if thou beeing moued with pittie and compassion shouldst giue a farthing to one begger and a pennie to another thou art not therefore an acceptour of persons Matth. 20.15 Js it not lawfull for mee saith Christ to doe as I will with mine own Js thine eie euil because J am good Rom. 11.35 Who hath giuen first vnto the Lord To knowe this is behoouefull for the glory of God 3 Obiection Jt is meete and iust that he who hath taken a sufficient ransome for all sins should receiue al men into fauor God hath receiued a sufficient ransome for the sins of the whole worlde Therefore he should receiue al into fauor Christs ransome though
worketh also in them to be warie and to take heed thereof Rom. 8.3 Whom hee predestinate them hee iustified They therfore doe amisse who thinke to receiue comfort without any desire of a good conscience Replie But if they must take heed and beware they are vncertaine Aunswere No because they haue this as a spur to goe forwarde and perseuere But To bee certaine and not to haue a desire of repentance amendment of life implieth a contradiction as if thou shouldest say I am certaine of my reward therefore I will not runne for a rewarde is not giuen but to him that runneth These propositions doe mutuallie one follow another To bee certaine of saluation and to haue a desire of conuersion and amendement of life 2 What Predestination is PRedestination differeth from prouidence The difference bâ—tweene predestination and prouidence as a speciall from the generall For prouidence is the eternall counsell of God concerning al creatures but Predestination is the eternall counsel of GOD concerning the sauing of men and Angels Wherefore Predestination is the eternal most iust and vnchangeable counsel of God of creating men of permitting their fal into sinne and eternal death of sending his Sonne into flesh that hee might bee a sacrifice and of conuerting some by the woorde and the holie ghost for the Mediatours sake and sauing them in true faith and conuersion and of leauing the rest in sinne and eternall death raising them vp to iudgement casting them into eternal paines Here is spoken of men which shall bee saued and not saued therefore to them onely and not to Angels doth this definition of Predestination agree Election The partes of Predestination are Election and Reprobation Election is the eternal vnchaungeable free and most iust decree of god whereby hee hath decreed to conuert some to Christ to preserue and keepe them in faith and repentaunce and by him to giue them eternall life Reprobation Reprobation is such a decree of god as whereby hee hath decreed to leaue some according to his most iust iudgement in their sinnes to punish them with blindnesse and damnation and to condemne them beeing not made partakers of Christ euerlastingly That Election likewise as also Reprobation are both the decree of god these and the like sayinges doe prooue John 13.18 I know whom I haue chosen 2. Tim. 1.9 His grace was giuen to vs before the worlde was Rom. 9.18 He hath mercy on whom he wil. Both therefore election and reprobation were made by counsell and therefore both are a decree and that eternal because there is no new thing in God but all from euerlasting and the Scripture doth manifestlie saie Ephes 1.4 That God hath chosen vs before the foundation of the worlde Seeing then hee hath chosen vs hee hath therefore reiected the rest That which the verie word of choosing doth shew For whatsoeuer is chosen the same is chosen other thinges beeing reiected This Election is of grace and free that is not in respect of anie good foreseene in vs. He hath mercie on whom he will that is He giueth freely what he giueth Joh. 15.16 You haue not chosen me 3 What the causes of Predestination or Election and Reprobation The efficient cause of our election Gods good pleasure not any thing in vs. THE efficient and motiue cause is the good pleasure of God Matth. 11.26 Jt is so O Father because thy good pleasure was such God hath not foreseene any thing in vs for which he should choose vs for there can be no good in vs as of our selues For if anie good bee found in vs that hee dooth worke wholy in vs and hee woorketh nothing in vs which hee hath not decreed to woorke from euerlasting Wherefore the alone gracious and most free good pleasure of God or the alone free mercy of God is the efficient and motiue cause of our Election Ephes â— 5. God hath predestinate vs to be adopted through Jesus Christ vnto himselfe according to the good pleasure of his wil. See further Roman 9.11 Coloss 1.12 2. Timot. 1.9.10 The cause of reprobatioÌ„ in God In like manner also the efficient cause of Reprobation is the most free good pleasure of God For wee beeing all by nature the children of wrath had al perished if sin were the cause of reprobation Wherefore the cause of reprobation is not in men themselues but that is in God his will of shewing foorth his iustice Therefore of particular men why this man is elected and he reprobated there can bee no other reason giuen but the good pleasure of God onely But the cause of damnation is altogether in men The cause of Damnation in men which is sinne The supreme final cause of Predestination is gods glorie and the last and proper final cause of Election is the manifestation of Gods goodnesse and mercie in freelie sauing the Elect. The next neerest finall cause of our Election is our Iustification when God dooth in his Sonne freely account vs for righteous Both which finall causes the Apostle compriseth in these wordes Ephes 1 6. He hath predestinate vs to the praise of the glorie of his grace wherewith he hath made vs freely accepted in his beloued Likewise of the contrarie The first final cause of Reprobation is the declaration of gods iustice seueritie and hatred against sinne in the reprobate 1 Obiection God did foreknowe our workes Therefore he choose vs for our woorks Aunswere He did foreknowe those good thinges which he purposed to woorke in vs as also he foreknewe the persons otherwise he could not haue foreknowen any good workes So could he not haue foreseene any euill except he had purposed to permit the same 2 Obiection Christs merite applied vnto vs by faith is the cause of our Election Therefore not the good pleasure of God Answere Christes merit is not the cause of election but is reckoned among the effects thereof 3 Obiection Euil workes are the cause of reprobation therefore good workes are the cause of election Aunswere Euil workes are not the cause of reprobation but of that which followeth reprobation that is of damnation Good workes go not before in him that is to be iustified muchlesse are they the cause of election but they followe in a man beeing iustified and draw their original and their perpetual efficacy and vertue from gods meâ—e grace 4 Whaâ— are the effects of Predestination THE effect of election is the whole woork of our saluation and al the degrees of our redemption 1. The creation and gathering of the church 2 The sending and giuing of Christ the Mediatour and his Sacrifice 3. Effectuall calling of men to his knowledge which is the conuersion of the Elect by the holie Ghost and the woorde 4. Faith iustifâ—cation regeneration 5. Good woorkes 6. Finall perseueraunce 7 Raising vnto glorie 8. The effects of Reprobation Glorification and eternal life The effects of Reprobation are the creation of the reprobate priuation
of gods grace blinding hardening perseueraunce in sinne raising to iudgement and casting into eternal torments Obiection Diuers or contrarie causes haue contrarie effectes The effectes of election are good woorkes Therefore euil works are the effectes of reprobation Aunswere The Maior is not alwaies true in voluntarie causes For there is a dissimilitude Because God purposed onely to permit euil woorks but to worke good in vs. But the proper cause of euill works is the Diuel and euil men Replie But god hardeneth and blindeth men Blindnes is an effect of reprobation and a sinne Therefore sinne is an effect of reprobation Aunswere Blindnesse is a sinne in respect of men who admit it and as it is receiued of them and purchased by their owne demerite but as it is inflicted of God it is a iust punishment And that God doth deliuer some from that blindnesse is of his mercie Obiection Hardenesse or induration is an effect of reprobation and is a sinne God is autor of reprobation therefore of hardnes also and so of sinne Aunswere Hardnesse is an effect of reprobation but so that it is done according to reprobation but commeth not from it Hardnesse and blindnesse or exâ—ecation are according to reprobation or according to predestination as they are sins But they are effects of reprobation or predestination as they are most iust punishmentes 5 Whether Predestinatiâ—n â—e vnchaungeable PRedestination is firme sure and vnchaungeable which maie appeare euen by thâ— generall reason Predestination vnchangeable Because God is vnchaungeable and doth not depend on the interchangeable course of thinges but the same rather dependeth on his decree What therefore hee hath from euerlasting decreed of sauing the elect and condemning the reprobate that hath he vnchaungeablie decreed And therefore both election and reprobation is firme and vnchaungeable For whom he woâ—ld and hath decreed from euerlasting should be sauâ—d them also hee now will and so hereafter perpetually The same alâ—o wee are to think concerning reprobation Neither are there wanting testimonies of Scripture whereby the same is confirmed Iohn 6.39 This is the Fathers wil that of al which hee hath giuen mee I shoulde loose nothing Isai 46.10 My councel shal stand and J wil doe whatsoeuer I wil. Mal 3 6. I am the Lord I chaunge not Ioh. 10.28 None shal pluck my sheepe 〈◊〉 of my hand Ioh. 1. â—6 Yee beleeue not for yee are not of my shâ—epe â— Tim. 2.19 The foundation of god remaineth sure and hath this seale the Lord knoweth who are his The foundation which Paul so calleth is the decree of sauing the Elâ—ct 1. Because it is the beginning and welspring of our saluation and the end thereof and of al the meanes tending to saluation 2. It is called the foundation for the surenesse and firmenesse thereof because the same is neuer shaken These things are needefull for vs to knowe that wee maie haue firme comfort and consolation that wee may beleeue eternall life and so al other Articles of christian faith The reason is often repeated and therefore often to bee meditated of because he that denieth himself to be certain of the gracâ— to come is vncertaine also of the present grace of God For God is vnchangeable 6 How far forth Predestination or Election and Reprobation is knowen vnto vs. IT is knowen vnto vs in general as That some are Elect and some Reprobate but not in speciall whether this or that man be But of our own Election euery of vs not only may but also ought to bee in speciall certaine and assured And verily thereof we shall be certaine by the effectes Euerie man ought to bee assured of his owne Election in speciall namelie by conuersion that is by true faith repentance For that we may beleeue and know that we are certainly chosen to eternal life wee are bound to beleeue in Christ and to beleeue also eternal life But this wee cannot beleeue except wee haue true faith and repentaunce And as euerie one ought to haue both these So also euery one ought certainly to hold that he is of the number of the Elect. Otherwise they shal accuse God of lying Rom. 5.2 Wee reioice vnder the hope of the glory of God Christ is our intercessour woorking our euerlasting saluation I beleeue euerlasting life that is not spiritual life onely but euerlasting also which being heere begunne I carrie hence with mee out of this life Neither onely in speciall dooth euerie one know his owne Election by faith and conuersion but it is in generall also knowen that some are Elect. The Election of others is to bee beleued in generall And in general thou oughtst not only to hope but also certainely to beleeue that there are other besides thee elected For thou art bound to beleeue the Article of the Church because that hath bin at al times nowe is But thou alone by thy selfe art not the Church and therefore thou must not saie with Elias I am left alone But to discerne of particulars and of euerie single man is not thine to do Thou art notwithstanding wel to hope of the Election of others eueÌ„ as concerning euery particular man In generall is the whole Election of all in speciall there is a diuerse consideration of himselfe and of others No certainetie of reprobation eitheâ— concerniâ—g our selues or others Of Reprobation no man ought to iudge or determine any thing certainely either as touching his owne or as touching an â—thers reprobation before the end of his life For he that is â—or yet conuerted may be here after conuerted before he dâ—â— No maÌ„ therefore ought to iudge of others that they are reprobates but to hope wel of them of himselfe euerie man ought certainely to beleeue that he is an elect For wee haue a generall commandement 7 Whether the Elect be alwaies members of the Church and the Reprobate neuer The elect are then first member of the Church when they are regenerated THE Elect are not alwaies members of the church but then first when they are conuerted and regenerated by the holy Ghost For it is said Rom. 8.9 Jf any man hath not the spirite of Christ the same is not his Likewise the church is called holy But then first are the Elect holy when they are conuerted For Saint Paul expressely saith 1. Corint 6.11 And such were some of you but yee are washed Againe Coloss 1.13 He hath translated vs into the kingdome of his deare Sonne Now some are borne liue and die in the church others are not born in it but are called either soone or late vnto the visible church some both to the visible inuisible church as the theefe on the crosse As also those of the Gentiles of whome Christ spâ—ke Joh. 10.16 J haue other Sheepe Some either are borne in the visible church or come vnto it who neuerthelesse are not members of the inuisible and who sometimes depart from the visible Such are the reprobate who
according to the measure of the gift of Christ Eph. 4.7 4. It signifieth an obliging or binding of al the members to imploy refer al their gifts to the glory of christ their head to the saluation of the whole body of euery member mutually Why the faithfull are called Saintes The faithfull are called Saints in three respects 1. Jmputatiuelie that is in respect that Christs sanctitie and nolines is imputed vnto them 2. Inchoatiuely that is in respect that conformitie and agreeablenes with the law is incliâ—ated or begun in them 3. In respect of their separation because they are selected and separated for all other men By this then which hath beene spoken it appeareth what is to beleeue the communion of Saints namely to beleeue that the Saints of which number I must needes certainly be assured my selfe to bee one are vnited by the spirite vnto Christ their head and that from the head gifts are poured downe vnto them both those which are the same in all necessarie to saluation as also those which being diuers and diuersly bestowed vpon euerie one are requisite for the edification and building of the Church Now must we a litle more at large expound the fiâ—st and chiefe part of the communion of Saintes That is the vnion or coherence of al the Saintes that is of the whole bodie of the church with Christ the heade and of his members among themselues which is wrought by the Holy Ghost euen by the same spirite who dwelleth in christ the heade and in all his members And by this vnion christ conformeth his Saints maketh them like vnto himselfe by the same spirit which is common to both worketh the like in both reseruing stil a difference in working for in the heade he worketh al gifts graces those most perfectly in the members he worketh those gifts which are conuenient for euerie one so much as is for euery one requisite and necessarie This vnion of Christ with his members and of his members mutually among themselues is confirmed and declared by these places of Scripture John 15.5 J am the vine yee are the braunches He that abideth in me and I in him the same bringeth forth much fruite 1. Cor. 12.13 By one spirite are wee all baptised into one bodie 1. Cor. 6.17 Hee that is ioined vnto the Lord is one spirit 1. Iohn 4.13 Hereby know we that we dwel in him and he in vs because he hath giuen vs of his spirite Hence it is cleare how absurde their fancy is who contend that this communion is a subsistence or personal beeing of Christes body among our bodies or of our bodies blended and mingled with his The same is refuted by that often alleadged comparison of the head and members For those are coherent and grow together but are not in a mixture nor mingled one with another Whence also wee maie easily iudge of that communion which is in the Sacramentes For the Sacramentes seale nothing else but that which the word promiseth But to let this passe the same is also hereby refuted that this communion must be continued for euer For to this ende dooth Christ communicate himselfe to vs that he may dwel in vs Wherefore such as is his abiding and dwelling such is his communion But christs abiding and dwelling is perpetual Therefore his communion also is perpetuall This argument is most strong and firme and therefore for the assoyling it they haue beene faine to deuise their Vbiquite For to obtaine that other communion which they woulde haue they must needes affirme that Christ dwelleth alwaies bodily in al his Saints OF REMISSION OF SINNES THE chiefe Questions 1 What remission of sinnes is 2 Who giueth it 3 For What. 4 Whether it agreeth with Gods iustice 5 Whether it be freely giuen 6 To whom it is giuen 7 How it is giuen 1 WHAT REMISSION OF SINNES IS REmission of sinnes is the purpose of God not to punish the sins of the faithful euen as if they had neuer sinned Remission of sinne is Gods will not imputing vnto vs our sinne and imputing Christs righteousnesse which purpose of not punishing their sinnes God dooth withall declare vnto vs. Roman 5.5 For the loue of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the holie Ghost which is giuen vnto vs. It may be also defined thus Remission of sinnes is the pardoning of deserued punishment and the giuing or imputing of anotherâ— righteousnes to wit the righâ—eousnes of Christ But more fullie it is defined on this wise Remission of sinnes is the will of God which to the faithfull and Elect imputeth not anie sinne and therefore doth in like sort loue them as if they had neuer sinned and deliuereth them from al punishment of sin and giueth them eternal life freely for the intercession and merit of Iesus Christ the sonne of God our Mediator Now albeit God â—or the merit of his son remitteth our sins to vs yet he afflicteth vs as yet in this life not therby to punish vs but fatherly to chastise vs. Neither yet because god doth not punish vs for our sins must we therfore think that he is not displeased with them For he is highly displeased offended with the sins also of his Saints chosen 2 Who giueth remission of sinnes REmission of sinnes is giuen of God onelie who as the Prophet Isaiah saith cap 43. 25. putteth away our iniquities And this is done both of the Father the Son and the Holy Ghost For we are baptized in the name of all three Now Baptisme Remission of sinnes is the worke of all three persons as also it is saide of Iohns Baptisme is wrought for remission of sinnes and of the Sonne the Scripture affirmeth plainly That the sonne of man hath power to remit sinnes Likewise it is saide of the holy Ghost that hee was tempted that he is offended and grieued Wherefore he also hath power to remit sins For none can remit sins but hee against whom sinne is committed and who is offended by sinne And Christ also in plaine woordes in the Euangelists speaketh of the sinne against the holy Ghost Now the cause that God onelie that is the father the son the holy ghost only remit sins is this because none but the partie offended can remit sins but only god the father the son the holy ghost is offended by our sins Therfore god only can remit them and consequently no creature is able to graunt ought of this right of god Whereupon also Dauid saith Psal 51.4 Against thee onelie haue I sinned and done euil in thy sight How the ministers and the Church are saide to remit sinnes Obiection But the Apostles also and the Church remit sins because it is saide Matth 18.18 Whatsoeuer yee binde on earth shall bee bound in heauen and whatsoeuer yee loose on earth shall be loosed in heauen and Ioh. 20.23 Whose soeuer sins yee remit they are remitted vnto them and whose
iustification but as effectes of faith and as it were a testimony of their faith and thankefulnes For faith is not without her fruit Now to applie the merit of Christ is the proper act of faith but other good workes are not so though they also proceede from faith Wherefore also the apprehension of Christs merite is after another manner required in them that are to bee iustified than are other good woorkes For faith with this her proper act without which faith cannot bee considered is required as a necessarie instrument whereby we applie Christs merite vnto vs. But good woorkes are not required that by them we may apprehend Christs merite and much lesse that for them wee should be iustified but that by them we may shew our faith which without good woorkes is dead and is not knowen but by them Whatsoeuer is necessarily coherent with the cause that is not therefore necessarily required to the proper effect of that cause but good workes although they are necessarily coherent and ioined with faith yet are they not necessarie for the apprehension of Christs merit that we should ouer and besides faith by them also apply the same vnto vs. 6 Obiection The Messias bringeth euerlasting iustice and righteousnes Jmputed righteousnes is not eternall Therefore wee are not thereby iustified Aunswere It is said that Christes righteousnesse shall bee an euerlasting righteousnesse but after a diuerse manner For in the life to come wee shal bee iust after another manner than in this life For although we shall then be iust by the same righteousnes euen by the righteousnes of Christ imputed vnto vs yet with this shall also the legal iustice and righteousnesse be continued so that then also by the legall righteousnesse we shall be perfectly iust because now onely we are as concerning that but in part and beginning iust Each iustice both the iustice of the Law and the iustice of the Gospel is eternall by continuation And the iustice and righteousnesse of the Gospell that is the iustice of Christ imputed vnto vs is eternal by continuation of the imputation The iustice of the Law is eternal by continuation of good woorkes euen as it is continued by good woorkes first and beginning in this life vntill at length after this life it bee perfected and become perfect and so continue to al eternity 7 Obiection Knowledge dooth not iustifie Faith is a knowledge Therefore faith doth not iustifie Aunswere Knowledge alone dooth not iustifie But iustifieng faith is not a knoweledge onely but also a confidence and sure persuasion whereby as a meane we apply Christes merit vnto vs. And furthermore Knowledge and this sure persuasion are much different Knowledge is in the vnderstanding but this is in the will Therefore a sure persuasion or confidence is not only a knoweledge of a thing but also a will and purpose of doing or applieng that which wee knowe or of resting in it so that wee are thereby secure and take ioie of heart therein 8 Obiection Saint Iames saith cap. 2.24 Yee see then how that of workes a man is iustified and not of faith onelie Answere 1. Hee speaketh of that iustice whereby wee are iustified through our workes before men that is are approued iust or are found to be iustified but he speaketh not of that iustice whereby we are iustified before God that is whereby wee are reputed of God iust for vniust For hee saith in the same chapter Shew me thy faith by thy works and J will shewe thee my faith by my woorkes 2. He speaketh not of a true or liuely faith but of a dead faith which is without works 9 Obiection Euil workes condemne Therefore good workes iustifie Ans 1. These contraries are not matches for our euil works are perfectly euil our good workes are imperfectly good 2. Although our good woorkes were perfectly good yet should they not deserue eternal life because they are debts Vnto euil workes a reward is giuen by order of iustice vnto good works not so because we are obliged and bound to doe them For the creature is obliged vnto his creator neither may he of the contrary bind god vnto him by any works or means to benefit him 10 Obiect Saint Iohn saith 1. Ioh. 3.7 He that doth righteousnes is righteous Therefore not he that beleeueth Ans 1. He is righteous before mē that is by doing righteousnes he declareth himself righteous to others but before god we are righteous not by dooing righteousnes but by beleeuing 2. He sheweth there not how we are righteous but what the righteous are when he saith that hee that is regenerated is also iustified 11 Obiection Christ saith Luk. 7.47 Many sinnes are forgiuen her because she loued much Therfore good works are the cause of iustification Ans 1. Christ here reasoneth from the latter to the former from the effect which commeth after to the cause which goeth before Manie sins are forgiuen her Therefore shee loued much and because there is a great feeling in that woman of the benefite it must needes therefore bee that the benefite is great and many sins are forgiuen her That this is the meaning of Christes woordes appeareth by the parable which hee there vseth 2. Not euerie thing that is the cause of consequence in reason is also the cause of the thing it selfe which followeth in that consequence of reason Wherefore it is a fallacie of the consequent if it bee concluded Therefore for her loue manie sins are forgiuen her For the particle because which Christ vseth doth not alwaies signifie the cause of the thing folowing It foloweth not The Sunne is risen because it is day Therefore the day is cause of the rising of the Sun the contrarie rather is true 12 Obiection That which is not in the Scripture is not to be taught or reteined That wee are iustified by faith onelie is not in the Scripture neither the wordes themselues nor the sense of the woords Therefore it is not to be reteined Aunswere To the Maior we say That which is not in Scripture neither in words nor in sense is not to be reteined But that we are iustified by faith onely is conteined in Scripture as touching the sense thereof For we are said to be iustified freely Rom. 3.27 Gal. 2.16 Eph. 2.8 9. Tit. 3.5 1. Iohn 1.7 without the workes of the Law by faith without merite Not of anie righteousnesse which we haue doone The blood of Jesus Christ cleanseth vs from al sinne Therefore no woork shall be meritorious If no worke Therefore are we iustified by faith onely apprehending Christes merit Wherefore wee are necessarily to retaine the particle onelie 1. That all merite either of faith or our workes maie be remooued from this woork of our iustification 2. That it maie be shewed that faith not the merite of faith is necessarily required to iustice because the iustice or merite of Christ is giuen by faith onely and by this meane alone we receiue that iustice and
are good which wee doe but the manner after which wee doe them is not good OF SACRAMENTS THE Sacraments are a part of Ecclesiastical ministerie And as touching Ecclesiastical ministerie the questions are 1. What is the vse of the ministerie 2. What are the partes thereof 3. In what those partes agree and accord 1. The chiefe and last vse of the ministerie of the Church is that we beeing brought to Christ may be confirmed and assured of Gods will that is that it teach vs the will of God exhort vs to embrace Gods blessinges and benefites and ascertaine vs of the continuance of the same 2. The parts of the ministerie are the Sacraments and the word 3. The Sacraments so accord and agree with the word that whatsoâ—uer is promised vs in the word of the obteining of our saluation by Christ the same the sacraments as signes and seales annexed to the word as it were vnto a Charter or letters patent confirme vnto vs more and more thereby to help and relieue our infirmitie Whereby also it is apparent that the chiefe vse of the sacramentes to is in respect of God the confirmation of our faith like as also the ministers themselues whatsoeuer they doe in respect of their ministerie that they especiallie doe to declare and confirme gods will vnto vs. Obiection Jt is saide That the spirit and the Word worke faith in vs and the sacraments nourish it being wrought These three therefore differ nothing one from an other Aunswere First The Holy Ghost worketh and confirmeth faith in vs as the efficient cause thereof the Word sacraments as Instrumental causes 2. The Holy Ghost also can work faith in vs without them But the Word Sacraments without the holie Ghost can woorke nothing 3. The holy ghost wheresoeuer he dwelleth is effectuall in woorking The word Sacraments are not so These things brieflie were first to be spoken in general concerning the ministerie It remaineth that we now in fewe woordes entreat Of the Sacraments which are the other part of the ministerie of the Church The right and direct methode of interpreting this doctrine of the Sacraments requireth that first wee speake of the Sacramentes in generall And this way may wee not vnfitly entreat in speciall of the Supper and Baptisme to wit if wee take in declaring each Sacrament in special the same questions and that course and order of the same questions which wee must obserue and follow concerning the Sacramentes in generall and lastly if wee applie those testimonies which speake of the Sacraments in generall to the handling and declaring of the Sacraments in special The chiefe Questions concerning the Sacraments 1 What Sacraments are 2 What are the ends of Sacraments 3 Jn what Sacraments differ from Sacrifices 4 Jn what they agree with the Word in what they differ from it 5 How the SacrameÌ„ts of the old new TestameÌ„t agree 6 What Sacramental vnion is 7 What the things differ from their signes 8 What forms of speaking of the Sacraments are vsual to the Church and Scripture 9 What is the lawful vse of the Sacraments 10 What the wicked receiue in the vse thereof 11 Howe manie Sacramentes there are of the newe Testament 1 WHAT SACRAMENTS ARE. The originall of the word Sacrament THAT we may know what Sacramentes properly are the name it selfe of Sacrament is first to be considered Among the auncient Romanes this word Sacrament signified a solemne forme of an oath taken in warre which they called a militarie Sacrament so called of Sacrando that is of sacring or consecrating them because by that oath euerie one was consecrated or destined to this captaine and not to any other to serue him Heereof it is that some will haue these ceremonies instituted by God therefore to be so called for that as souldiours did oblige and binde themselues by that military Sacrament vnto their captaine so wee bind our selues vnto our captaine Christ by a solemne oath in the presence of god Angels and men This truely is not vnapt or vnmeete metaphor but yet I thinke rather that the original of this name came from the olde Latine Translations in which wheresoeuer the worde mysterie is vsed in the new Testament for the same they commonly in Latine put the woorde Sacramentum Now mysterie commeth from a Greeke verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to institute instruct or initiate one in holy matters or matters of religion But that Greeke verb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is deriued from another which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to shut because as Eustathius saith they who were initiated or entred in holy rites were to shut their mouth not to vtter those thinges which were secret Nowe a mystery is said to be either a secret thing it selfe or the signe of a secret thing or that which hath a secret signification which none vnderstand but they who are initiated in holy rites By a signe wee vnderstand an externall and corporall thing and action or a ceremony instituted and ordained by God which betokeneth a certaine internall thing and spirituall Which the Grecians call a mysterie and is otherwise called of Diuines a Sacrament And some such signes god alwaies would haue to bee extant in his Church whereby the good will of God towardes men might be recorded and made knowen that men of the other side might declare and shewe their faith towardes God and other duties of piety and godlinesse Sacramentes therefore are so called mysteries because they haue a secret signification which none vnderstand but they who are initiated and instructed concerning the substaunce of sacred matters or the pointes of Christian Religion HAuing seene now what the name of Sacrament signifieth it resteth that wee consider the thing it selfe and define what Sacramentes are The definition whereof is this Sacramentes are sacred signes and seals obiect to our eies The Definition of sacramentes ordained and instituted by God that by them he might the more declare and seal the promise of his gospel vnto vs. The partes of this definition are in number three The first part apperteineth to the kinde of Sacramentes the latter two to their difference To the kind whereof they are it apperteineth that they are sacred signes seals that is diuine The sacraments are sacred seals signifieng or betokening sacred things such as belong to gods worship and the saluation of men A signe and a seale differ one froÌ„ the other as a general thing froÌ„ a thing more special For euerie seale is a signe but not euery signe a seal A seale certifieth and confirmeth a thing A signe onely sheweth it A sign is a thing signifieng somewhat else than that which it sheweth to the senses or a signe is that whereby the vnderstanding vnderstandeth some thinges else besides the signe it selfe So wordes are the signes of thinges Moreouer signes are of two sortes some are onely signifieng others are confirming also that is such signes
his couenant despited reproched 9. That froÌ„ the sinners theÌ„selues punishment may be auerted because the wicked approching vnto the Lords table eate their own damnation Wherefore that this may not come to passe the church is bound to prouide that such approch not hither 10 They who denie the faith and doctrine of christ are to be excluded froÌ„ the church from the vse of the sacraments For the faithful or christians are not to be confounded or mingled with those who are not members of the Church as with those which are professed vngodly persons blasphemours reuolters to Arrianism Mahumetisme the like But they that deny refuse to repeÌ„t deny the faith doctrine Tit. 1.6 They professe that they know god but by works they deny him And he that denieth the faith is worse then Infidels Therfore they who persist in their wickednes deny to repent are to be shut out of the church neither are they to be admitted to the vse of the sacraments And heere hath place that saying of Christ Matth. 7.6 Giue not that which is holy to dogs Wherfore nether to the sacraments are dogs to be admitted namely those which persist in their wickednes and make a mocke of Gods word For if Christ speaketh this of his audible word to wit the word preached which yet was instituted for the coÌ„uerted vnconuerted or such as were yet to be conuerted much more shal this bee spoken of his visible word namely of the sacraments which were ordained and instituted for the conuerted onely 11 Open blasphemers ought not to be baptized For they ought not to bee baptized who beleeue not with their whole hart Wherefore Philip saith to the Eunuch If thou beleeuest with al thine hart thou maiest be baptized So Iohn also Baptized none but such as confessed their sinnes Now if blasphemers and vnbeleeuers are not to be baptized it followeth that they are to bee shut out of the church not to be admitted to the receiuing of the sacraments They who ought not to be baptized neither ought they to be admitted vnto he Supper For there is one and the same reason in â—oth 12 They who are not as yet baptized are not to be â—â—mitted vnto the supper but to them who forsake their Baptism Bapâ—â—â—m is no Baptisme according to that of the Apostle 〈◊〉 2.25 If thou be a transgressor of the Law thy circuÌ„cision is made vncircumcision Therfore they who forsake their Baptism are not to be admitted vnto the Supper Obiection Then they who forsake their Baptism are also to be baptized after their receiuing into the church Answer Their receiuing into the church by Baptisme is firm and in force to them that repent without any iteration of the signe But seing Baptism is an entrance into the church they who forake it are not in the church and therefore as long as they continue such they are not to be admitted either into the Church or vnto the supper 13 Vnto whom the promise of grace doth not belong vnto theÌ„ the sign of grace ought to be extended otherwise the church should deale corruptly admitting them whom God excludeth should be diuerse disagreeing froÌ„ her selfe for she should absolue them by the visible woord whom she condemned by the audible word Wherefore whom God hath reiected depriued of his grace they are not to be admitted vnto the sacraments which are the signes of Gods grace 14 The institution of the sacrameÌ„ts or the condition which must be obserued in comming to the sacraments requireth repentaunce Therefore they who shew not repentance ought not to be admitted This argument foloweth by a counterpositioÌ„ They which haue repentance faith are to be admitted Therfore they which haue not repentance faith are not to be admitted 4 How the power of the keies differeth from the ciuil power 1 THE power of the keies coÌ„mitted vnto the church depeÌ„deth on Gods words the ciuill power is armed with the sword 2 Jn the church iudgemeÌ„t proceedeth according to Gods lawes in the ciuill state iudgement is exercised according to ciuil Lawes 3 The church punisheth the obstinate with the word of God onlie yet so as that this punishment pierceth euen vnto their consciences The ciuil state punisheth the obstinate only with corporal punishment The church punisheth with the word when it denounceth the anger and wrath of God against infidels and vnrepentant persons 4 Oftentimes the Discipline of the church hath place where there is no place for ciuil iudgement as when the church casteth out of her congregation the impenitent and accounteth them no more for her members And contrariwise the ciuil gouernment oft times hath place where there is no place left for church Discipline as when the Magistrate punisheth adulterers robbers theeues with death and dooth no more reckon them for members of the commoÌ„ wealth whether they repent or continue obstinate whom yet the church assoone as they repent and shee receiue them is bound to hold for her members 5 The iudgement of the church hath degrees of admonitions For first repentance must be sought for before they come to punishment But the ciuil iudgement proceedeth to punishment whether he which sinned promise repentance or continue vnrepentant 6 The end and purpose of the church is that hee which hath offended should repent and be saued for euer the end and purpose of the Magistrate is that the offender bee punished and so peace and externall order and Discipline be maintained in the common-wealth 7 The church is bound to reuerse and retract her iudgement and punishment if there come repentance But the Magistrate is not bound to recal his iudgement and punishment neither is he able sometimes to recall it Wherefore the difference is apparent and manifest of the ciuil and Ecclesiasticall power or the power of the keies deliuered by christ vnto the church And this power may easily stand and consist without that For the church acknowlegeth him for her member whom the Magistrate dooth not acknowledge nor suffer 5 What order is to bee obserued in exercising the power of the keies WHen a man hath coÌ„mitted some priuate trespasse he must first bee curteously admonished by one according to the commandement of Christ Mat. 18.15 Jf thy brother trespasse against thee go and tel him his fault betweene thee and him alone Jf he heare thee thou hast wonne thy brother Moreouer Jf being admonished by one he dooth not yet repent he must bee againe priuately admonished by thee taking one or two with thee And such admonitions must be doone according to gods word and with signification of good-will towardes the offender and that not but for causes iust weighty necessarie And if neither so admonished by one or two he repent hee is to be corrected by the whole Church Which also Christ hath commaunded Jf hee will not vouchsafe to heare them tell it vnto the Church Nowe if a man transgresse publikely by offending of the whole
reuerence him and declare our loue and thankefulnes towardes him by our good workes and obedience Rom. 12.1 J beseech you brethren by the mercies of God that ye giue vp your bodies a liuing sacrifice holy acceptable vnto God which is your reasonable seruing of God 1. Pet. 2.5 Yee are made an holie Priesthoode to offer vp spiritual sacrifices acceptable to god by Jesus Christ We are to doe good workes also in respect of our selues 1. That by our good workes we maie be assured of our faith Mat. 7.17 Euerie good tree bringeth forth good fruite Iames 2.20 That faith which is without workes is dead Phil. 1.11 Filled with the fruites of righteousnesse which are by Iesus Christ vnto the glorie and praise of god Now by our workes we must needes know that wee haue faith because the effect is not without his cause and wee must knowe the cause by his proper effect when as therefore we find not in our selues good works or newe obedience we are hypocrites neither haue we faith but an euil conscieÌ„ce For true faith only which neuer waÌ„teth al her fruites bringeth foorth as a fruitful tree good woorkes obedience amendment of life and these fruites likewise discerne and distinguish true faith from historical and temporary faith and so also from hypocrisie 2. That we maie be assured that we haue obtained remission of sinnes through Christ and are for Christes sake iustified before God for iustification and sanctification are benefites linked together which so cleaue together and that necessarily as they neuer can be seuered or pulled asunder For Christ obtained both for vs at once namely both remission of sinnes and the holy Ghost who stirreth vp in vs by faith the study and desire of good works and new obedience 3. That we maie be assured of our election and saluation 2. Pet. 1.10 Giue diligence to make your calling and election sure These proceede from the cause next going before For god hath chosen from euerlasting of his free mercy those onely which are iustified for the merit of his sonne Roman 8.30 Whom he predestinat them also hee called and them also he iustified Nowe that wee haue receiued from Christ iustification which is neuer giuen vnto the Elect without sanctification we knowe by faith And that we haue faith wee perceiue by the woorkes of faith true obedience and true conuersion 4. That by good woorkes our faith maie bee exercised cherished strengthned and aduaunced For they who giue themselues ouer to corrupt lusts against their conscience in them faith cannot be and therefore neither a good conscience neither a confidence and trust in god as beeing appeased and fauourable vnto them For wee haue through faith onelie a feeling of gods fauor towards vs a good conscience Rom. 8.13 Jf yee liue after the flesh yee shal die 2. Tim. 1.6 J put thee in remembrance that thou stirre vp the gift of god which is in thee by the putting on of my hands 5. That by good works we may shew forth and honest our life and calling Ephes 4.1 I praie you that yee walke worthie of the vocation whereunto yee are called 6. That wee maie escape temporal and eternal punishmentes Matth. 7.19 Euerie tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is cut off and cast into the fire Rom. 8.3 If ye liue according to the flesh ye shal die 7. That we maie obtaine corporall and spirituall rewardes which according vnto the promise accompanie good workes 1. Timot. 4.8 Godlines is profitable vnto al things which hath the promise of the life present and of that that is to come Except God woulde haue the hope of rewards and the feare of punishments to be motiue causes vnto good works he would not vse them in admonitions We must doe good woorkes also in respect of our neighbour 1. That wee maie bee profitable vnto our neighbours by our good example and so edifie them 1. Cor 15. All things are for your sakes that most plenteous grace by the thankes-giuing of manie maie redound to the praise of god Phil. 1.24 That I abide in the flesh is more needefull for you 2. That offences maie bee auoided Matth. 18.7 Woe bee to that man by whome offences come Rom. 2.24 The name of god is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you 3. That wee maie winne vnbeleeuers and by our woordes and deedes and example conuert them vnto Christ Luk. 22.32 When thou art conuerted strengthen thy brethren We see now then what are the causes for which we must necessariely doe good workes as also how or in what sense our workes are said to be necessarie for vs vnto saluation to wit not as a cause of our saluation but as mean or way without which wee come not vnto it And after the same sort also it maie be said That good woorkes are necessarie vnto iustice and righteousnes or vnto iustification or in them that are to be iustified namely as a consequent following iustification wherewith regeneration is vnseparably ioined But yet I would not vse these kindes of speaking 1. Because they are ambiguous doubtful 2. Because they breed contentioÌ„s minister occasioÌ„ of cauilling vnto the aduersaries 3. Because the Scripture doth not vse them which must be followed of vs in speaking 6 Whether good woorkes merit any thing before God THIS sixt question ariseth out of the fift as the fourth did out of the thirde For when men heare that wee receiue rewardes by our woorkes they presently conclude that we merit somewhat by them Wherefore wee are to know that good workes indeede are necessarie and therefore are to bee doone also for the rewardes ensuing them but yet that they merit nothing no not the least of gods giftes either corporall or spirituall The reasons hereof are most true and most euident 1 Our woorkes are vnperfect wherefore we can merit nothing by them Gal. 5.17 The flesh lusteth against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh and these are contrarie one to the other so that yee do not the same thinges that yee would 2 The good workes what euer we are able to doe are all due Luk. 17.10 When ye haue doone all those thinges which are commanded you say we are vnprofitâ—ble seruants 3 Our woorkes are impure and vitious how-euer they seeme most good Isay 64.6 Wee haue all beene as an vncleane thing and all our righteousnesse is as filthy cloutes Phil 3.8 J thinke all things but losse for the excellent knowledge sake of Christ Jesus my Lord for whome I haue counted all thinges losse and doe iudge them to be dongue that J might winne Christ 4 If we doe any good woorkes they are not ours but are belonging to god onely Phil. 2.13 Jt is god which worketh in you both the will and the deede euen of his good pleasure 1. Corinth 4.7 What hast thou which thou hast not receiued We are euill trees if then we doe any good that must needes come from God onely Mat 20.15 Is it
which are written in the booke of the Law to doe them Now that the Law dooth not take away the intercession of Christ is apparant out of the gospell which teacheth that it is correspondent and agreeable vnto the iustice and Lawe of God that sinners should be receiued into fauour a sufficient satisfaction and their conuersion being interposed and comming between For god is not at variance with himselfe in the doctrine of the Law and the gospel The Ceremonial or lawes deliuered of god by Moses concerning Ceremonies binding the Iewes vntill the comming of the Messias that they should distinguish this people the church from others and should be signes symboles types or shadowes of spirituall thinges to be fulfilled in the New Testament by Christ That this definition may be vnderstood we must know what ceremonies are to wit solemne externall actions that is often to bee after the same maner with the same circumstances reiterated ordained of God or of men also to be vsed in the seruice and woorshippe of God for order or signification sake But the Ceremonies which are ordained of God are simple absolutely diuine worship The ceremonies which are ordained and instituted of men if they be good are a woorship onely seruing for diuiuine worship The Judicial or Lawes concerning the ciuill order or ciuil gouernement that is of the offices of Magistrates iudgementes punishments contractes and of the distinguishing and bounding of dominions deliuered of God by Moses for the settling and preseruing of the Jewes common wealth binding al Abrahams posteritie vntil the comming of the Messias and furder that they should be the bond of the preseruation and gouernment of this Mosaicall common wealth vntill the Messias was manifested and certaine markes whereby this people which was bound vnto them should be discerned from al others and should withall bee kept in honest discipline and good order lastlie that they might be types of that order which should be in Christs kingdome that is of the spiritual regiment of the Messias Ceremoniall and ciuill Lawes whether they be diuine or humane so that they be good are verily agreeable vnto the Decalogue But yet are they deduced thence onely by a necessary consequence and serue thereto as certaine prescriptions of circumstances Hereby plainly appeareth the difference of these Lawes which yet is diuerse because there is not one and the same gouernement of the common-wealth and of the church neither is there the same end of al these Lawes neither are al these Lawes after the same maner abrogated But the chiefe and especiall difference of these lawes is drawen frō the binding time knowledge or manifestation 1. The Moral ordinances are knowen by nature The ceremonial and ciuil are not knowen by nature but are instituted according to the diuersity of causes and circumstaunces 2. The Moral bind al men and euen the Angels also The ceremonial and ciuill were onely prescribed vnto the people of Israel And therefore Iob Iethro Naaman the Cyrian and others who are recounted for religious men that is such as were borne of Paynims and liued amongest them but yet worshipped the God which was manifested among the people of Israell they did not obserue the Leuiticall ceremonies and yet did neuerthelesse please God And the verie ordinaunces themselues concerning the ceremonies and the forme of ciuill gouernement shewe that they bind Abrahams posteritie onelie whom God woulde by this fourme of gouernment and worshippe distinguish from other nations 3. The Lawes of the Decalogue are perpetual in this life and after this life The ceremonial and ciuill were deliuered of God at a certaine time and againe abolished 4. The Moral Lawes speak of both internall and external obedience The ceremoniall and ciuil speak of externall obedience only albeit neither doth this please God without the internall and morall obedience 5. The moral Lawes are not limited by certain circumstances but are general as that there is a time to bee granted for the ministery and seruice of God and that the ministery is to be preserued that adulterers and theeues are to be punished But the ceremonial and ciuil Lawes are special or a limitation of circumstances which are to be obserued in external rites or actions both ecclesiastical and ciuil as that the seuenth daie is to be alotted for the ministery and seruice of God that the Tenths and first-fruits are to bee giuen to the Priestes that adulterers are to be stoned that theeues are to be amerced with a four-fold restitution 6. The ceremonial and the ciuil Lawes also are types or figures of other things for whose cause they were ordained The moral signifie or prefigure nothing but are signified by the rites and ceremonies 7. The morall are the end for which other causes are to bee made or they are the principal seruice and worshippe of god The ceremonial and ciuil serue for the moral ordinances that to them obedience might be rightly and duely perfourmed that a certain time and certain rites may be obserued in the publique ministery of the church that the ministery it selfe maie bee maintained and preserued 8. The ceremoniall giue place vnto the Morall The Morall giue not place vnto the Ceremoniall The Morall Lawe the Naturall and the Decalogue differ The Decalogue is the summe of the morall Lawes which are scattered throughout the whole Scripture of the olde and new Testament The Naturall lawe dooth not differ from the Morall in nature not corrupted but in nature corrupted a good part of the natural law is darkened by sins and but a little part only concerning the obedience due to god was left remaining after the fall For which cause also God hath in his church repeated againe and declared the whole sentence and doctrine of his Lawe The distinctions of these Lawes are to bee knowen both in respect of the differences of the same and also in respect of their aborgating and lastly for the knowing and vnderstanding of their vse 3 What the vse of the Lawe is THE first and principall vse of the ceremoniall and iudiciall Lawes of Moses was to serue as a schoolemaster vnto Christ and his kingdome that is to bee a signification of spirituall and Heauenly things in Christs kingdome namely the benefites of Christ towardes his Church and the duty of the Church towardes God and christ Gal. 3.24 The Law was our Schoolmaster to bring vs vnto Christ This S. Paul prouounceth of the whole Lawe of Moses But that it is true concerning the forme of ceremoniall worshippe and ciuill gouernment for a type and signification of christs kingdome the Epistle to the Hebrues doth purposely teach from the beginning of the fourth chapter to the end of the tenth all places of Scripture which referre the ceremonies and kingdome of the old people vnto Christ as Coloss 2.11 Wee are circumcised with circumcision made without hands 1. Cor. 5.7 Christ our passeouer is sacrificed for vs. Psal 110. Thou art a Priest for euer Dan. 9. The
or Decalogue is to bee vnderstoode according to the interpretation of the Scripture that is according to the exposition and declaration of the Prophets Christ his Apostles and not according to the sense and iudgement of man only or Philosophy We must ioine together the explication scattered euery where thoroughout the Scriptures and not stick onely vpon those short commandementes Neither doth Morall Philosophie suffice for interpretation thereof because it conteineth but a little part of the Lawe and this is one difference betweene Philosophie and the doctrine of the gospel which is deliuered in the church 2 The Decalog requireth in al the commaundementes obedience both external internal perfect not in parts onlie but also in degrees that is that we obey God not onely in al the duties prescribed but in the degrees also of those duties Cursed be he that abideth not in al. 3 The first commandement must be included and vnderstoode in al the rest that is the obedience of the first commandement must be the motiue and final cause of our obedience towardes the rest of the commaundementes otherwise it is not the worship of God but hypocrisie whatsoeuer we doe For we must doe al thinges which are deliuered and prescribed in the other commaundementes euen for the loue we beare to God and for the desire we haue to woorship him For except wee so doe them we doe them not according to the sentence and prescript of the Law neither doe we please God therein Wherefore the first commaundement of the Decalogue must sinne before and giue light as it were vnto all the other commaundementes both of the second and the first table bee included in them This rule is deliuered by the Apostle 1. Corinth 10.31 Whether therefore yee eate or drink or whatsoeuer yee doe doe al to the glorie of God By these two former rules many things are made more cleare and manifest namely That no man in this life perfourmeth entire and perfect obedience vnto the Lawe that the vertues of the vnregenerate are sins in the sight of God because they are neither ioined with inward obedience nor come from the obedience of the first commaundement neither are referred vnto it seeing they do not know the true God and therefore they are but a shadow of obedience and are hypocrisie which God most seuerely condemneth Isai 29.13 Because this people come neere vnto me with their mouth and honour me with their lips but haue remoued their heart far from me J wil again doe a marueilous work in this people Roman 14. Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Moreouer by the these rules it is manifest that true obedience cannot be begunne but by faith through the knowledge of the Mediatour and the gift of the holie Ghost Acts. 15. Purifieng their harts by faith Galat 2. In that that I nowe liue in the flesh I liue by faith in the Sonne of God For God is not truely knowen or loued without faith in Christ Joh. 5. He that honoureth not the Sonne honoureth not the Father which hath sent him Againe by these rules it is declared that our obedience in this life seeing it is but begunne onelie cannot please God but through for the satisfaction of Christ imputed vnto vs. Eph. 1. He hath freelie made vs accepted in his beloued Lastly by them it is manifest that in true conuersion obedience is begunne according to al the commaundementes For who truly loueth god he submitteth himselfe without exception to al his commandements 1. Joh. 3.9 He that is born of God sinneth not 4 That wee maie iudge aright of the meaning of euerie commaundement or Law we must aboue al thinges consider the drift or end thereof For the end of the Law sheweth the meaning thereof and by the end we shall iudge aright and easilie of the meanes This rule also is of force in humane Lawes But we are to vnderstand it of the next and neerest end of the Law For not those thinges which are necessarie to the attaining of such endes as are remoued and a far off but those which are necessary to the attaining of the neerest and subordinate ends are to be comprised in the sentence and prescript of one Law which except it be obserued the sentence and substance of al or many Laws wil be brought al into one The furthest end and therefore the end of the whole Law is the worshippe of god It requireth therefore the whole obedience of the Law The end of the second table is the preseruation of the society of mankinde this requireth al the duties of the second table The end of the fift commaundement is the preseruation of ciuill order it compriseth therefore the duties of superiors towards inferiors and of inferiors towards superiours because without these ciuil order cannot be preserued 5 The same vertue is often in a diuerse respect commaunded in diuerse commandementes that is the same vertue is required for the performing of obedience vnto many commandementes This wee are to know least we in vaine trouble and vex our selues in distinguishing and placing the vertues As fortitude is a vertue both of the sixt and fift commaundement because it is required in a Magistrate who is to take vpon him the defence of others 6 The Lawe-giuer dooth in an affirmative commaundement comprehend the negatiue and contrariwise in a negatiue hee comprehendeth the affirmatiue that is in the commanding of vertues the forbidding of the contrary vices is conteined and so contrariwise 7 We must take heede that we restraine not the commandementes too much and take them too streitlie For they are so to be taken and vnderstoode as that in the generall all the specials be conteined and in the chiefe special the next allied specials and in the effect the causes and in one of the correlatiues the other also So when chastity is commaunded temperancy is also commaunded without which this effect is not When subiection which is the one relatiue is commaunded Magistracie also which is his correlatiue is commanded 8 The obedience or commaundementes of the second table yeeld vnto the obedience or commandements of the first table Obiection But the second commandement is like vnto the first Ans Jt is like 1. as concerning the kind of Moral worship 2. As concerning the kinde of punishment to wit euerlasting punishment whereunto they are subiect who breake the second as well as they who break the first 1. Ioh. 3. Lastly they are like as concerning their coherence and connexion because neither can bee kept without other For God is not loued except our neighbour be loued neither is our neighbour trulie loued except God be loued 1. Joh. 4. Hence also aunswere may be made to this obiection The second table must yeelde vnto the first Therefore ceremonies which are duties of the first table must be preferred before the duties of loue and charitie towardes our neighbour For the second table yeeldeth vnto the first in moral duties not in ceremonial
enchanters request 4 Superstition which is to attribute such effectes to certaine things or obseruations of gestures or woordes as depend not ether on natural or moral reason or on the word of God and either doe not at all follow and fall out or are wrought by the Diuels and other causes than those wherby they were thought to haue bin done Vnder this vice of superstition are comprehended South-saieng Leuit. 19.26 Isay 44.25 47 13. obseruations of dreames diuinations signes and predictions or foretellings of Wyzardes all which are by expresse wordes condemned in the Scriptures 5 Al trust and confidence which is reposed in creatures For this is manifestly repugnant to the true knowledge of one god to faith hope For trust and confidence is an honour due vnto god alone which who so translateth vnto creatures dooth in very deede imagine moe gods Wherefore god in his word doth vtterly condemne those Psal 46.2 Ier 17 5. Mat. 6.24 Eph. 5 5. who repose trust and confidence in things created as in men And also hee condemneth those which put their trust in their owne workes and in riches which al couetous men do and so vnder the name of this vice is couetousnes also comprehended 6 Jdolatrie which is most of all repugnaunt vnto the true knowledge of god and to faith Now there are two kinds of Jdolatrie 1. When another is woorshipped than that one true God This kinde of Idolatrie doth properly belong vnto the first commandement 2. When albeit the true God is worshipped yet neuerthelesse he is worshipped after another manner than God himselfe hath in the second commaundement and also commonlie in his word prescribed either by internal worship or by external worship or external rites and ceremonies This other kind of Idolatrie is forbidden in the second commaundement 7 The contempt of God which is to know those thinges of God which are true but not to bee moued thereby to loue him Vnto faith are repugnaunt of one side which offendeth in the defect of faith 1. Vnbeliefe which assenteth to such doctrine as is heard known concerning God 2. Doutfulnes which neither assenteth stedfastly to the doctrine of God neither dooth altogether gainsay it but beeing floting and wauering hath a weake inclination nowe to one part and now to another 3. Distrust which applieth not vnto it selfe the knowledge which it hath of God and his promises and doth through feare of Gods forsaking vs surcease the dooing of that it should doe 4. A dissembling or hypocritical faith 5. Temporarie faith or a reuolting from faith which is to yeeld an assent to the doctrine of the Church and to reioice in the knowledge thereof and to embrace it for a season but without any applying or full persuasion of the promise of Gods grace and without regeneration and therefore to be ouercome through temptations or other causes and so to cast away againe that assent and profession of godlines Mat. 13.20 He that receiued seed in the stonie ground is he which heareth the woorde and incontinentlie with ioy receiueth it Yet hath he no roote in himselfe and dureth but a season for as soone as tribulation or persecution commeth because of the word by and by hee is offended Acts. 8. Simon also beleeued and was baptized Heb. 6.4 Jt is impossible that they which were once lightened and haue tasted of the heauenlie gift c. Nowe amongest those which are repugnaunt vnto faith of the other side which offendeth in the excesse are 1. Tempting of God which is through an vnbeliefe or distrust or contempt of God and a trust or loue of our owne wisedome iustice or power and glorie to depart from gods woord or order and so to make trial of gods truth or power and stubbornly and proudly to prouoke god vnto anger Deut. 6 Mat 4. Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy god Exod. 17.2 Moses saide vnto them why contend yee with me Wherefore doe ye tempt the Lord 1. Cor. 10.22 Do we prouoke the Lord to anger 2. Carnal securitie which is to liue without thinking of god and his will or of our owne infirmitie and daungers and without acknowledging or bewailing of our sinnes and without the feare of god and yet to promise vnto our selues an indemnitie from the anger of god and from punishment without faith or repentance This is often and most grieuously accused in the scripture Mat. 24. Christ speaketh of that securitie and carelesnes which shal bee at his second comming Psalm 36. Wickednes saith vnto the wicked man euen in mine heart that there is no feare of god before his eies For hee flattereth himselfe in his owne eies Psal 94.7 They saie the Lord shall not see neither wil the god of Jacob regarde it But this carnal securitie differeth from spiritual securitie because the carnal persisteth in sinnes and feareth not the anger of god and punishment because either it knoweth not mans weakenes and sinne and gods wrath or contemneth it But the spiritual securitie is a faith and hope which being ioined with true repentance without sinne and in feare of gods chastisements doth not yet fear gods forsaking because it is assured of gods vnchāgeable fauour towardes it Whereof it is spoken Rom. 8.31 Jf god be on our side who can be against vs Vnto Humilitie is opposed in the extremitie of excesse Pride or arrogancie which is to ascribe his giftes not to god but to his owne worthines or abilitie and therefore to stand in admiration of himselfe and his gifts not truely to feare god neither to acknowledge and bewaile his defects and so further to be aspiring to higher place and calling standing not vpon god but vpon his owne giftes to attribute also to himselfe those thinges which hee hath not to attempt thinges aboue his power and not belonging vnto his calling to contemne and debase others in respect of himselfe to beleeue none but to couet to excel and be eminent aboue others to referre his gifts and counsels principallie to his owne glorie to be angrie with god and men to fret and sume against god when his desires and counsels are hindered and also to accuse God of errour and vniustice if Gods counsels agree not with the iudgements and affections of men Vnto humility is opposed in the extremity of defect A faigned modestie or humility which is a double pride and it is to hunt after the praise and commendation of humility by denying of those thinges outwardly which yet a man dooth in his minde attribute vnto himselfe either truely or falsly and by refusing of those thinges which he most of all desireth and couertly laboreth to compasse Vnto patience in the extremity of defect impatience is contrary which is through the not knowing and distrust of Gods wisedome prouidence iustice and goodnes not to bee willing to obey God in suffering such aduersitie as he willeth vs to suffer and through griefe to fret against God or to do somewhat against
of their ancestours 5. He saith that he is a god which sheweth mercie vnto thousandes in them that loue him and keepe his commaundementes And heere hee extendeth his punishment vnto the fourth generation but his mercy vnto thousandes thereby to signifie that he had rather shewe mercy than anger and so by this meanes to allure vs the more to loue him But vnto this promise are opposed manie examples of the godlie whose children and posteritie haue perished Whereunto god himself answereth Eze. 18. That he wil blesse the posterity of the godly if they continue in the good cōuersation godlines of their auncestours but wil punish them if they depart from it If here it be demaunded why hee dooth not conuert their posteritie seeing without his mercy they are not able to follow the godlines of their parentes We answere first Because this promise is not vniuersal but indefinite and therefore God doth not therein bind his mercie vnto euerie particular one of the godlies posteritie but reserueth his Election free vnto himselfe So that as of the posteritie of the wicked he conuerteth and saueth some in like manner also he leaueth of the posterity of the godly some in their naturall corruption and in destruction which all by nature deserue and this he doth to shew that his mercy is free as wel in chusing the posterity of the godly as of the wicked Secondly because he bindeth not himselfe to perfourme the same benefites or all the benefites vnto all the posteritie of the godlie Wherefore he satisfieth this promise when he dooth euen vouchsafe of corporall benefites the wicked and reprobate posterity of the godly Thirdly because he promiseth this felicitie of the posteritie vnto them that loue him and keepe his commandmentes that is to those which are indeede godly and of good conuersation But because the loue of God obedience is euen in the holiest Saintes in this life vnperfect therefore the reward also promised vnto them is vnperfect and ioined with the crosse chastisements among which the wickednesse and vnhappinesse of their posteritie is not the last as maie appear in Dauid Salomon and Iosias Obiection They who keepe Gods commaundementes obtaine mercie Therefore we merit somewhat of God Aunswere God saith J wil shew the mercie Therefore it is not of merit or desert Therefore the obiection is a fallacy putting that for a cause which is no cause For when God addeth this promise that he will shewe mercie vnto the thousand generation of them that loue him and keepe his commaundements he sheweth that he had rather shew mercy than anger thereby to allure vs to loue him This promise and commination is belonging verily to the obedience of the whole Decalogue but is therefore especially annexed vnto this commaundement both that we might know the first and second commandement to be the foundation of al the rest also that God might shew that he is especially angry with the deprauers and corrupters of his worship and punisheth this kinde of sin both in them and in their posterity and contrarily doth blesse also the posterity of them which diligently regard and keepe pure religion or the true seruice and worship of God By this declaration and exposition of the woords of this commandement it appeareth that by the naming of one kind al false worships of God are condemned and contrariwise is commaunded the obseruation of the true and vncorrupt worshippe which is euery internal or external work commaunded of God doone in faith which is persuaded that both the person and the woork please God for the Mediatours sake the chiefe end where of is that due honour may be giuen vnto god whereby we may shew that we acknowledge him alone for the tru god who hath willed this worship to be thus done to him And then is this worship done vnto him when he is so worshipped as himselfe hath manifested in his word that he will be worshipped And these may suffice as touching the exhortation which is adioined to the commaundement nowe wil wee declare those things which belong vnto the commandement it selfe In this second commaundement is forbidden all false worship and the true worship of God is commaunded And this is the end or scope of this commaundement that the true god alone who commaundeth himselfe to bee worshipped in the first commaundement bee rightlie worshipped of vs namely with such worship wherewith it is right and meete he should be worshipped of intelligent or vnderstanding creatures and such as pleaseth him God therefore in this commaundement prescribeth the rule of true diuine worships He forbiddeth not only that creatures or Images be not reputed or woorshipped for God but also that himselfe be worshipped by Images and at Images and when he condemneth the chiefe and grossest and most euident kinde of false woorshippes namely the woorshipping of God at or by Images it is manifest that hee forbideth also the other kindes of false woorshippes seeing this is the heade and fountaine of all the rest Wherefore all woorshippes whatsoeuer are instituted by men not by God in which the same cause of prohibiting or forbidding appeareth are forbidden by the forbidding of this the grossest kinde of the rest and withall a rule is giuen that wee holily and religiously conteine and holde our selues within the lists and tarriers prescribed by God neither ad ought to that woorshippe which God himselfe hath instituted Ios 1.7 Prouer. 30.6 Reuel 32.1 nor maime the same so much as in the least point which also we are in other places expresselie enioyned by the Lorde This commaundement is different from others for that in others the parts of themselues or specialties of diuine woorship are rehearsed but in this al adding maiming and altering of them is forbidden and a rule prescribed that wee keepe our selues within the bonds by god appointed And this studie endeuour and care to worship God after that manner which himselfe hath commanded is the poper peculiar obedience of this commaundement Which is also required in these sayings Deut. 4 Ye shal put nothing to the word which I command you neither shal ye take ought therefrom that yee may keepe the commaundementes of the Lorde your God which I command you Deutr. 12. Whatsoeuer J command you take heed you do it thou shalt put nothing thereto nor take ought therefrom Now as concerning the wordes of the commandement wee are to obserue that there are two parts of this Second commandement The former part forbiddeth Jmages to bee made The second part forbideth to woorshippe them with diuine honour Of the first part we will first speake The first part of the second commandement where is intreated of Images The chiefe Questions concerning Images 1 How far Images may be allowed to be made 2 Why they are to be abolished in Christian Churches 3 How they are to be abolished 1 HOW FARRE IMAGES MAYBE ALLOWED TO BE MADE IMAGES or Pictures are not here simply forbidden because the
science of casting caruing and painting is reckoned among those artes and craftes which are profitable for mans life Exod. 31.3 35.30 c. Syrac 38.28 and are the gifts of god Neither is the reason hereof hard or obscure because writing and painting are profitable for the memoriall of thinges doone for ornaments and for an ingenuous and liberall delight of mans life Wherefore the Law forbiddeth not the vse of Images but the abuse namely it forbiddeth that Images be made as by them to represent or woorship god For we ought not neither can we any way paint or graue or represent god much lesse must we tie gods woorshippe vnto carued or grauen Images This Doctrine doth the end scope of the commandement declare which is the obseruation of the vncorrupt worship of god And because god is incorporeall and infinite vnpossible is it that he should bee expressed or represented by any corporeall or finite image without an impairing of his diuine maiesty Esay 40.18 Rom 1 23. Deut. 4.15 To whome will ye liken God Or what similitude will ye set vp vnto him Moreouer as god will not haue himselfe to be engrauen or painted or anie Image or semblance of him to bee câ—â—ued and framed so also doth it not at all profit or auaile vs as being a cause an occasion of Idolatry 2 Why Images are to be abolished in the Churches of Christians Exod 23.24 34.13 Numb 33 25. Deut 7.5 1. Reg. 15.13 2. Reg 10.30 2. Reg. 18.4 Deut. 17 23. c. 1. Cor. 10.20 1 THey are to be abolished because of the commaundement of god who will haue Idoles to be abolished and all the corruptions of the true worshippe of god of true doctrine as his wrath anger against Idolatrie dooth testifie And hereof is it that for the taking away abolishing of Idols Iehu Ezechias and Iosias are praised in Scripture Jn respect of our confession of the syncere worship of god and of our hatred against Idolatrie 1. Iohn 5.21 This confession whereby we professe our selues not to be Idolaters consisteth not only in words but also in actions and in outward shew and signes 3 They are to be abolished for auoiding of offence superstition least by retaining of ancient Images or by substituting adding new the same daÌ„ger come to the church to the ignoraÌ„t people therby which in times past we see to haue issued hence and so the enimies of the Church be by this spectacle hauing so great a shew of Idolatry the more alienated from the Church so that they despite and reproch therefore the trueth of god So the Iewes because they see Images in the Churches of those which professe Christianity are greatly offended And wee see that Images neuer brought any good to them which had them but euen gods own people was seduced thereby as we may see often in the sacred storie especially in the booke of Iudges the Kings in the Prophets So prone and readie is our nature vnto this euill which hath after ensuing it most grieuous punishments as are those which the Lord reciteth by Moses besides many others I wil destroy saith he your high places and cut awaie your Jmages and cast your carkasses vpon the bodies of your Idoles and my soule shal abhor you In like manner also the Angel of the Lord vpbraiding the Israelites that they had made a league with the Idolatrous Cananites saith Wherefore I will not cast them out before you but they shall bee as thornes vnto your sides and their gods shall be your destruction It is no ceremony therefore to abolish Images seeing they are the instruments signes causes and occasions of Idolatry Neither are the causes of this commandement any way chaunged or diminished as namelie that the glory of god be maintained against Idolaters and the enemies of the church and that god bee not tempted through offering an occasion of superstition and of conceiuing false and corrupt opinions of gods worship vnto men which are of their owne accord inclining and prone vnto idolatry Wherefore this commaundement of taking away and abolishing images made for the representing of god or for diuine worshippe is Moral and dureth perpetuallie 3 Howe images are to be abolished IN abolishing and banishing Images two things are to be obserued 1. That the doctrine concerning the true woorship of God bee preached before the abolishing of Idols So wee read that Iosias did Let the woord therefore go before the idoles wil fal to the grouÌ„d 2. The images their altars the like instruments of idolatrie must be taken away not by priuat men but by publick autoritie For so hath god commanded the Israelites so likewise hath godly Kings put it in practise so also Paul disliking the Idoles of the Athenians Ephesians did not yet pul them downe or abolish them Certaine obiections of the Papists 1 VVE worship not the Jmages but God of whom those are signs and tokens Wherefore there is no cause why images shoulde bee abolished and taken out of churches Answere It is impiety to place and ordaine such signes as whereby God neither can bee truly signified neither at all ought to be signified And albeit they were such signes as whereby God might bee truely signified yet is it not in the power of any creature to ordain or establish them but only in the wil and pleasure of God 2 The bookes of Lai-men or the vnlearned are profitable Jmages are the bookes of the vnlearned Therefore they are profitable Aunswere 1. Such bookes of Lay-men are profitable as are deliuered vnto them by God 2. The Minor is false For the Prophetes teach far otherwise as Haba 2.18 An image is a teacher of lies Zacha. 10.2 The Jdoles haue spoken vanitie Whence we maie thus reason We ought not to speak vain things or to lie of God either in words or in gestures But wood or grauen Jmages are lies of God because they cannot represent God yea because they swarue so farre and carrie vs with them from God at their figure and shape is vnlike god so consequently they cause vs also to lie of God If then we wil not lie of god we must needs neither make nor haue anie Images or grauen semblances For as Ieremie saith 10.8 The stock is a doctrine of vanitie Nowe in this sense we graunt Images to be the books of the vnlearned to witte because partly they teach and signifie false things of God and partly because through the reuerence of the thing signified and the place when as they stand to the open view in churches and elsewhere they easily draw away others vnto superstition and teach the people Idolatry as experience sufficiently beareth witnes 3. It followeth not if it were so that Images did teach the vnlearned that therefore they should be reteined in the church as profitable books For God wil not haue his church to be taught by these but by his
is that some certaine time be alotted to the ministery of the Church or to the publick seruice of God The other part is Ceremoniall and Temporarie namely that that time be the seuenth day that therin be kept the Leuitical ceremonies That this part bee temporarie and the other perpetual is vnderstoode by the end of the commaundement and by the causes of both parts whereof more shal be spoken afterwardes Now we wil in few words expound the wordes both of the commaundement and of the reason adioined vnto the commandement Which being once knowen so much the easier shal bee vnderstoode those things which are afterwardes to bee spoken concerning the sabboth Remember thou keep holy the sabboth daie that is with great care and religion keepe holy the sabboth day Not without cause doth God so seuerely commaund the keeping of the sabboth 1. Because the breach and violating of the sabboth is the breach and violating of the whole worship of God For the neglect of the ministery doth easily corrupt the doctrine and worship of God 2. Because by the exacting of the ceremoniall or typical sabboth God would signifie the greatnesse and necessitie of the spiritual sabboth 3. Because god wil haue the external sabboth to serue for the beginning and perfecting of the spiritual sabboth in vs. 4. Because he willeth the sabboth to bee kept holy and to be sanctified that is that sinnes should be eschued and auoided therein good works done and that it should not be spent in slothful idlenesse Now god is otherwise said to sanctifie the sabboth than are men God is saide to sanctifie the sabboth because he appointeth it for diuine worship men are saide to sanctifie it when they referre it to that vse vnto which god hath appointed it Thou and thy sonne and thy daughter c. He will haue also our children and familie to cease from their labours for two causes 1. Principallie that these also may be brought vp by their parents and masters in the seruice of God and may be admitted vnto the ministerie of the Church For God will haue these also to be members of his Church 2. Because hee will haue especiallie on the Sabboth day loue and bountifulnesse towards our neighbour to be shewed and seene in the Church The strainger c. Hee willeth also straingers to intermit their labours and that if they were conuerted vnto true religion because they were of the houshold of the Churche if they were infidels he commandeth it thē not in respect of themselues but in respect of the Israelites 1. Least by their example they should giue offence vnto the Church 2. Least their libertie might bee an occasion vnto the Jewes to accomplishe by them those labours which it was not lawfull for them to woorke by them selues and so the lawe of God should bee deluded Hereby is aunswere made vnto three questions 1. Whether other nations were also bound to the Mosaical ceremonies if any of them liued among the Iewes 2. Whether they which are aliens from the church may or ought to be forced to religiō 3. Whether the sacraments among which was also the Sabboth ought to be cōmon vnto Infidels with the Church Vnto these questiōs we thus answer As concerning binding constraint the strangers which conuersed among the Iewes were not forced either to al ceremonies or to religion but to external discipline which was necessary for the auoiding of breeding offences in the Church wherein they liued For a Magistrat ought to be a maintainer of discipline order according to both tables of the Decalogue amongest his subiectes and to forbid manifest idolatry and blasphemies Moreouer as cōcerning the binding there was a peculiar consideration and respect of the sabboth which was not then first by Moses prescribed vnto the Israelits but commanded by God from the beginning of the world vnto all men and so did bind all men vntill the comming of the Messias Although indeed this commaundement and ordinance was so growen out of vse among other nations that they accounted it among the number of the chiefe reproches wherewith they derided and scoffed at the Iewes Furdermore the sabboth was no sacrament vnto Jnfidels because neither did the promises belong vnto them that God would be their sanctifier neither were they therefore constrained to cease from their daily labours as for a testification or confession of this promise but onely for auoiding of offence and for preuenting of such occasion of breaking the sabboth as might bee giuen by them vnto gods people These thinges are also the better vnderstood by this that their cattle also are commaunded to rest whose rest had no respect or consideration either of Gods woorshippe or of a Sacrament but was commaunded only in respect of men 1 That all occasion of labouring might be cut off by forbidding the labour or vse of their beasts 2 That also they sparing brute beasts might learne how greatly God wil haue regard to be had of mercie and fauourablenesse towards men For in sixe daies This reason which is annexed vnto the commaundement is drawne from Gods rest appertaineth to the ceremonial commaundement concerning the Seuenth day And rested on the seuenth day That is hee ceased to create anie newe partes of the world as being nowe perfect and such as god would haue it to be This seuenth day he consecrated to diuine seruice 1. That by the example of his owne rest as a most forcible and effectuall argument hee might exhort men to the imitation thereof And so the imitation of this rest is double Ceremoniall or signifieng and Morall or spirituall or signified 2. That this rest of the seuenth day might bee a monument of the creation then finished and absolued by God and of his perpetuall preseruation and gouerning of his worke euer since that day vnto his owne glorie and the safetie of his chosen and that so it might be a pricke to stir vs vp to the consideration magnifieng of Gods workes towardes mankind Furdermore God did not therefore grant six daies vnto labour and the seuenth to diuine woorship that on other daies the worshippe of God shoulde bee omitted but hee requireth these two thinges 1 That on the sabboth day there bee not onely a priuate seruing of God as on other daies but also a publike seruing of him in the Church 2 That on that day all other labours should giue place both to the priuate and publicke seruice of God which on other daies euerie one doth exercise according to his vocation We are furder to beware of a Jewish superstition which Christ also doth once again refute in the Gospel namely to thinke it vnlawfull to performe on the sabboth day whatsoeuer woorkes belonging to the necessitie either of his owne life or of anothers For by the end of the commaundement it appeareth that only seruile woorkes or such as hinder the exercise of the ministerie are forbidden of God but not those which hinder not the
also the whole seuen yeares were called sabbothes Leuit. 25.8 Thou shalt number seuen sabbothes of yeares vnto thee euen seuen times seuen yeares The Mediate externall Sabboth is that which God dooth mediatelie constitute by his church such as is in the New Testament the first day of the weeke to wit sundaie or rather The Lords daie which was instituted for the seuenth day or sabboth day in respect of Christs resurrection 2 The causes for which the sabboth daie was instituted THE final causes or endes for which the sabboth daie was instituted are these 1. The publique seruice and worship of god in the church exercise of praiers confession obedience in which consisteth the study of the knowledge of GOD of good woorkes and thankfulnes God will and therefore doth hee especially ordaine the sabboth that hee bee worshipped and inuocated of vs in this life not only priuately but also by the publique voice of the Church 2. The mainteinance and preseruation of the ministerie of the church which is an office and function instituted by God to teach and instruct the Church concerning God and his will out of the word of God deliuered by the Prophets and Apostles and to administer the sacramentes according to Gods holy institution This is not the least end for which the sabboth was ordained For this ordinaunce and publique preaching of the doctrine being ioined with praier and thankes-giuing and with the vse of holy rites is a publique exercise stirring and cherishing faith and repentaunce 3. It was instituted that it might be in the old testament a type signifieng the spirituall and euerlasting sabboth Ezech. 20.12 Moreouer J gaue them also my sabbothes to bee a signe betweene mee and them that they might know that J am the Lord that sanctifie them 4. It was instituted for a circumstaunce of the seuenth daie that namely the seuenth day might aduertise mē of the creatiō of the world of the ordering and menaging of things to be done and of that meditation which they are to vse in considering gods workes which hee in sixe daies created and accomplished 5. That on that daie the works of charitie bountifulnesse and liberalitie should be exercised 6. For the bodilie rest both of men and beastes but of beastes in respect of man 7. That men should prouoke one another by their example to godlinesse and to the praising and honouring of god Ps 22.22 J wil declare thy Name vnto my brethren in the middest of the congregation wil I praise thee 8. That the church maie be seen and heard among men and be discerned frō the other blasphemous idolatrous multitude of men and that they maie ioine themselues thereto who are as yet separated from it So was in the old Testament also the sabboth a marke distinguishing the people of Israel from all other nations 3 How the sabboth is sanctified or kept holy THE works which are to be done on the sabboth daie or the partes of the sanctifieng of the sabboth day are comprehended in the word Sanctifieng which parts we will briefly expound The partes then of the sanctifieng of the sabboth are 1. Rightly and truly to teach and instruct the church concerning god and his wil. The teaching which is here commanded is of another kinde from that which was mentioned in the third commaundement For there it belongeth to euery priuate person to teach heere the function of teaching is enioined as proper vnto certaine persons and that vnto such persons as beeing furnished from aboue with necessary giftes are lawfully called by the church vnto this function and vnto them is it enioined in this commandement that they propound and deliuer found doctrin to al men both in publick assemblies and in priuate instruction 2 Rightlie to administer the sacraments according to Gods diuine institution This likewise must bee perfourmed by the ministers of the Church lawfullie called to discharge this function And as the doctrine so also this administration of the sacraments is not tied to certaine daies but it sufficeth if the administration be publique and be done by the ministers who beare a publique person and represent in the ministery the person of god himself talking with men and if also in the assemblies of the Church those thinges be done by thē which god hath tied annexed vnto the ministers So circūcision was administred on any day which fel out to be the eighth frō the Infants natiuity So Baptism also may be administred at anie time Act. 8. 10. But the administration of the sacraments ought chieflie to be exercised on the Sabboth daie Therefore Num. 28. 29. besides daylie sacrifices there are certain sacrifices appointed which were to be perfourmed on the Sabboth on festiual daies Furdermore this administratiō must be in publike assemblies For so Christ also instituted his supper as which amongst other ends must be also a bōd of church assemblies to be administred in the assembly of the church bee it great or be it small Mat. 26. Drinke ye all of this Vnto the right administration also of the sacraments belongeth the excluding and debarring of those whom God hath commaunded to be excluded from them Like as it was not lawful for those that were aliens from the Country and religion of the Iewes neither for any of the vncircumcised to eate of the Paschal Lamb Exo. 12. So neither ought the church to admit vnto the Lords supper those that are not baptised or those that are baptised but yet are aliens in their Doctrine and manners from Christianity 1. Cor. 10 11. 3 Diligentlie and dailie to frequent the publique assemblies of the Church and there attentiuelie to giue eare vnto the Heauenlie Doctrine plainlie opened and deliuered and diligentlie to meditate after thereon and examine it but especially to spend those daies which are deputed vnto the ministery seruice of God in reading meditation and in discoursing of diuine matters These things are made manifest by the nature and necessary dependancie of Correlatiues For if god will haue some to be teachers hee will also haue some to be hearers and learners of this Doctrine And the study of learning is not without priuate Meditation Therefore haue the men of Beraea their commendation Acts. 17.11 Thus they receiued the word with all readinesse and searched the Scriptures dailie whether those things were so But vnto them especially is the study of knowing the Doctrine of god enioyned who either serue or hereafter are to serue and minister vnto the Church 1. Tim. 4.13 Giue attendance to reading to exhortation and to doctrine And 1. Tim. 3. and 2. Tim. 2. Paul will haue the minister of the Church to be fit and able to instruct and to refute the aduersaries 4 To vse the sacraments according to gods Jnstitution So god commaunded the Passeouer to be celebrated in a solemne assemblie of the people and vnto other holy daies and sabbothes he assigned certaine sacrifices And in like manner god will that
conscience is not troubled because God is inuocated and called vpon and the grace of resistance is desired and there is remaining in their hearts a testimonie of the remission of their sinnes And for a remedie for these sinnes after the fall was mariage appointed Therefore against these inclinations is it to be said It is better to marrie than to burne But yet S. Paul neuerthelesse by those wordes doth not allowe such mariages as are vntimely hurtfull to the cōmon wealth entred into before a lawfull age or vnhonest that is against good orders and manners The special Questions of Marriage 1 What Marriage is 2 What are the causes of the institution of Marriage 3 Whether it be a thing indifferent 4 What are the duties of married persons 5 What things are contrarie to Marriage 1 WHAT MARRIAGE IS MArriage is a lawfull indissoluble coniunction of one man and one woman instituted by God that we might know him to be chast and to detest all lust that also we might therein chastly serue the Lord and that especially it might be a meanes whereby mankind might be multiplied and God gather thence afterwardes vnto himselfe a Church Lastlie that it might bee a societie and fellowship of labours cares and praier That marriage may bee a lawfull coniunction these thinges are thereto required 1 That matrimonie bee contracted by the consent of both parties 2 That there be adioined also the consent of others whose consent is required as namelie Parents or those who are in the place of Parents 3 That honest conditions be obserued 4 That there be no errour committed in the persons 5 That Matrimonie be contracted betweene such persons as are not forbidden by Gods Lawe as betweene them vnto whome the degrees of consanguinitie may be no hinderance The degree of consanguinity is the distance of kinsfolke in discent Concerning those degrees this rule is to be obserued How manie persons there are from the stock so manie degrees there are Now the stocke is the person from whome the rest are deriued The Line is either of ascendents or descendents or collaterals The Ascendents are all the ancestors and progenitors The Descendents are all the posterity or progenie The Line of Collaterals is either equall or vnequall It is Equall when there is equall distance from the common stocke Vnequal when the distance is vnequall Those prohibitions of degrees of consanguinitie from marriage which are expressed and set downe Leuit. 18. are Morall 1 Because the Gentiles are saide to be cast out for these abominations But the Gentiles had no ceremoniall Lawe 2 Paul doth most sharplie reprooue him who married his fathers wife 1. Cor. 5. Iohn Baptist saith vnto Herod Mar. 6.18 It is not lawfull for thee to haue thy brothers wife From the end because the end that is the prohibition of incest in reuerence of Bloud was made vniuersall perpetuall and morall 4 Jt is the Law of nature 5 The coniunction shal be lawfull or the marriage lawfull if such persons be ioined in matrimonie as are fit to be ioined 6 If this coniunction be in the Lord that is that a beleeuer marrie not with an vnbeleeuer but with a beleeuer and that religiouslie in the feare of God 7 If Matrimonie be contracted between two persons For they shall be two in one fleshe Obiection The Fathers had moe wiues Aunswere We must iudge not according to examples but according to Lawes 2 What are the causes of marriage THE author of marriage is God himselfe For marriage is no inuention of Man but instituted by God in Paradise Now the causes for which mariage was instituted are as we may learne out of the definition of marriage 1 The meanes of multiplieng mankind 2 The gathering of the Church 3 The image and resemblance of the coniunction between God the Church 4 That loose and wandering lusts might be auoided 5 That there might bee a societie and fellowshippe of labours and praier That fellowship is more neere and strait and therefore sendeth out more ardent and earnest praiers because we doe more ardently and earnestly helpe them by our praiers vnto whom wee are ioined in labour and affection As the Parents pray more earnestly for the children than the children for their Parents because loue doth descend not ascend 3 Whether marriage be a thing indifferent MArriage is a thing indifferent vnto them who haue the gift of continencie But whosoeuer are not endewed with this gift of continencie vnto all them marriage is not a thing indifferent but commanded vnto them as necessary from God himselfe And as marriage is a thing indifferent to all those that are endued with the gift of continencie so the same is graunted vnto all persons that are fitte and meete for it But when a iust and lawfull time of contracting marriage is not obserued then is that thing a cause of many euils and troubles in ciuill and Ecclesiasticall affaires But notwithstanding whosoeuer haue once lawfully and in the Lord contracted Matrimony it is neuer permitted or lawfull for them to dissolue or loose the bond of Matrimony once contracted except it be for adulterie 4 What are the duties of married persons THE duties of married persons are 1 Mutuall Loue 2 Spousall faith troth as each to loue the other only continually and constantly 3 Communitie of goods and a Sympathie or fellow-feeling in euils and calamities 4 The bringing foorth and bringing vp of children 5 Bearing with infirmities with a desire to cure them The proper duety of the husband is 1 To nourish his wise and children 2 To gouerne them 3 To defend them The proper duety of the wife is 1 To be a helper vnto her husband in maintaining and preseruing their houshold substance 2 To obey and reuerence her husband When these thinges are neglected they grieuouslie trespasse against the lawful vse of marriage 5 What thinges are contrarie to matrimonie VNTO matrimonie are contrarie fornications adulteries incests vnlawful copulation abuses of marriage diuorces not in case of adulterie But the person that is forsaken or is solicited to admit a forsaking doth not cause the diuorce but the other THE EIGHT COMMAVNDEMENT THOV shalt not steale By this commaundement is enacted and decreed a distinction of possessions For the end of this commandement is The preseruation of goods or possessions which God giueth to euery one for the maintenance of their life Thou shalt not steale that is Thou shalt not couer or attempt by guile to conueigh thy neighbours goods vnto thee Therefore defend preserue encrease them and giue thy neighbour his owne Nowe theft is onely named as being the grossest kinde of defrauding that by it the rest of the like qualitie might be vnderstood and that for the same as the scope or end other vices or sinnes of like nature and their antecedents and consequentes might bee prohibited and forbidden The vertues of this eight commaundement together with their extremes or contrarie vices 1 COmmutatiue