is without workê And where he saieth that we be iustified by fayth and workes suerly he meaneth nat that we be renewed or regenerate by workes nor he meaneth nat that partly Christ is our redemer and partly that our workê be our redemption Nor he describeth nat here the maner of iustifycation but he describeth what manner of persones the iuste be after they be ones iustified and renewed And thys worde iustificari i. to be iustifyed signifyeth here nat to be made of the iniust iuste but after an outwarde fashion to be pronounced rightwyse â–ª as it is taken in thys sayeng Factores legis iustificabuntur .i. The doers of the lawe shal be iustifyed Lyke therfore as these wordes haue no incoÌ„uenience the doers of the lawe shal be iustified so thynke we of the wordes of Iames man is iustified nat only by fayth but also by workes for vndoubtedly men be pronounced iuste hauynge fayth and good workes For good workes in holy men and women as we sayde before be iusticies of the lawe whiche be accepted bycause of the faythe and nat bycause they satisfye the lawe Men then be iustified by faythe and workes nat bycause of the workes but by cause of the faythe whiche yet good workes muste nedes folowe For Iames speaketh of tho workes whiche folowe faythe as he wytnesseth when he sayeth fayth helpeth his workes so we muste take The doers of the lawe shall be iustified that is to saye they whiche beleue and haue good frutes be pronounced ryghtwyse For the lawe is satisfied if we beleue and it pleaseth bycause of the faythe and nat bycause the workes do satisfye the lawe Thus we se that in these sentencies is no inconuenience but the aduersaries depraue and corrupt them addyng theyr owne gloses For it is nat sayde that workes deserue remission or that men for theyr workes be accepted and reputed ryghtwyse before god nat for Christ and that the workes do pacify the hartes and ouercum they re of god and that workes nede nat mercie None of all these thynges sayeth saynt Iames whiche yet the aduersaryes asscribe to his wordes ☞ ⧠There be cyted also agaynst vs other sentencies of workes as Daniel 4. Redeme thy synnes with almes dedes And Esay 58. Breke thy bread to the hungrye then pray and god wyll heare the. Luke 6. Forgyue and ye shal be forgyuen Matth. 6. Blessyd be the mercifull for they shall obtayne mercye To these sentencies and semblable of workes fyrste we make thys answere whiche hathe be made before that the lawe is nat trulye wrought without fayth Neyther dothe it please but for faythes sake in Christe accordyng to that sayeng of Christe without me ye can do nothyng Also without faythe it is impossible to please god Also by Christe we haue coÌ„mynge or way to god through faythe Therfore as often tymes as workes be required and praysed the gospell of Christe is to be put vnto Secondarily these textes which I haue a lytle here tofore recited be well nere sermons or preachynges of penaunce for they be made of two partes They haue in the begynnynge preaching of the lawe whiche rebuketh synne and commaundeth good workes Afterwade there is added a promyse But this is moste certein and vndoubted that in preachynge of repentaunce it is nat sufficient to préache the lawe whiche dothe comonly trouble and condeÌ„pne the coscience But it is requysite that preaching of the gospell be added that synnes be frely forgyuen for Christe and that by faythe we obtayne remission of synnes These thynges be so certayne and so clere that if our aduersaries wolde vary from them and exclude Christe and faythe from the preachyng of repentaunce they were worthy to be reiected as persones blasphemous agaynst Christ. Wherfore the sermon of Daniel ought nat onely to be applyed to almose deades but faythe also is to be requyred in it The sermon of Daniel is farre vnlyke the speache of Aristotle who wryttyng vnto his kynge Alexander doth also exhorte hym to liberalite and counseilleth him to vse his power to the comen vtilite and to the welth of al the people and nat to pride For thus he wrytteth to Alexander wherfore assay and endeuour your selfe to vse apply your Empiere and dominion nat to any contumely or pryde but to munificence and liberalite For sothe thys was a very honest sayeng and there coulde nothiÌ„g be sayde better touchiÌ„g the duetie of a greate prynce But Daniell instructeth and teacheth his kyng nat only of his office or calling but also of repentaunce of loue and deuotion towardes god of remission of synnes and of those greate thynges whiche be clene aboue philosophy Nat only therfore almouse deadê be to be requyred here but also faythe And that the texte dothe declare where it sayeth that the kyng was conuerted nat only to gyuing of almouse but muche rather to faythe For there remayneth yet the excellent confession of that kynge and prayse of the god of Israel There is none other god whiche can saue in this wyse So then there be two partes of the sermon of Daniel The one parte is the preachyng of repentauÌ„ce whiche rebuketh synnes and gyueth monition of a newe lyfe sayeng Redeame thy synnes with ritghtuousnes thy wyckednes with benefites towardes yâ— pore For so speaketh Daniell in his owne tongue where it appereth sufficieÌ„tly that he gyueth nat only instruction of almes dedes but of all iustice .i. of the knowlege of god fayth For he sayth Redeme thy sines by rightuousnes Nowe iustice toward god is fayth by whiche we beleue yâ— god forgyueth vs. Afterward Daniel giueth iÌ„struction of benifites towardê pore men whiche is that he shuld nat gouerne proudly nor cruelly but prouide diligeÌ„ly se for the profetê of his subiectê the other parte of his sermoÌ„ promyseth remission of siÌ„nes Lo thy sines shal be healed Hierome here besydes yâ— purpose puttith to a dubitatiue particle forsitaÌ„ muche more vnwysely he disputeth in hys coÌ„mentaries that remission of synnes is vncertayne But let vs remembre that the gospell vndoubtedly promyseth remissioÌ„ of siÌ„nes And he is to be iudged to disannull abrogate the gospell whosoeuer thynketh that remissioÌ„ of siÌ„nes is vncertayn Let vs therfore nat regard Hierome in thys place Nowe for asmuche as here is a promyse euidently put doubtles faythe is required for a ê“myse can nat be receyued but by fayth Howbeit eueÌ„ there also he sheweth yâ— remissioÌ„ might chauÌ„ce wheÌ„ he sayth Redeme thy siÌ„nes And thys promyse of remissioÌ„ of synnes is a verie prophetical and an euangelical sentence which doutles Daniel wold to be receyued by fayth For Daniel knewe that remissioÌ„ of siÌ„nes was promised for the sede that was to come that is to wyt Christ and that nat only to the Israelites but also to al nations For els he coulde nat haue promysed to the kynge remissyon of synnes For it belongeth nat to man namely in the affrayes of
determine vpon a perpetuall lyfe Another Canon grauntynge yet more libertie to the weakenes of man addeth mo yeres inhybityng a vowe to be made before the age of .xviii. yeres But whether of them so euer we folowe certes the moste parte hathe a very lawfull and iuste excuse why they shulde forsake theyr monasteries because they vowed before those ages Finally yea although the violacion and breakyng of the vowe coulde be reproued yet it shall nat forthwith folowe that the mariagê of suche persones as haue agaynst theyr vowe maried ought to be dissolued and broken For saint Augustine denyeth that they ought to be broken .27.9.1 capt Nuptiarum Whose auctorite is nat lyght I although other men afterwarde thought other wayes But though goddes commaundemente of mariage may be thought to delyuer many from theyr vowes yet our men bryng also another reason concernyng vowes that they be frustrate and vayne for euery honouryng of god ordeyned chosen of men without the coÌ„maundemente of god to deserue remission of synne and iustification is wycked as Christe sayth They honour me in vayne with coÌ„maundementes of men And Paule teacheth euery where that ryghtuousnes is nat to be sought of thobseruations and honours deuised by men but that it coÌ„mith by faythe to them that beleue that they haue god pacified and mercyfull through Christe nat for any our merites But clere hit is that monkes and freers haue taught that these fayned and made religious deserue remission of synnes and iustification and that they make amendes for synnes I pray you what thynge elles is this but to detracte and plucke awaye from the glorie of Christe and to darken yea to denye the ryghtuousnes of feythe Ergo yt folowith of necessâ—â—e that these accustomed and vsuall vowes be wycked honourynges of god wherfore they be vayne of none effecte For yâ— vowe which is wycked agaynst the coÌ„maundement of god is nothyng worthe for no vowe ought to be a bonde of wyckednes as the Canon it selue saieth Paule saieth ye be auoyded from Christe ye be fallen from grace whiche be iustified in the lawe that is to wytte they that thynke to deserue remission of synnes with theyr owne warkes and to please god for their owne fulfillyng of the lawe and whiche do nat fele that for Christe they frely take by feythe remission of synnes gyuen them by the mercy of god and that for Christe they please god these lose Christe for the truste due to Christe and to the promyse of god they remoue away applie to warkes Also they plede agaynst the wrathe of god nat Christe the mercy stocke but theyr owne warkes so that the honour due to Christ they apply to their warkes But it is clere that monkes and religious persons teache this I meane that they deserue remission of synnes with theyr obseruacions and that they haue god mercyfull vnto them for this cause Wherfore they teache men to trust in theyr warkes nat in the ê“piciacion mercyfulnes of Christe This truste is vngodly wycked and contrary to the gospell and in the iudgemente of god it shal be founde voyde for our workes may nat be pleded agaynste the wrathe and the iudgement of god The wrathe of god is mitigated and swaged only whan we conceyue and take by feythe the fre mercy promysed through Christ. Therfore they lose Christe whiche put theyr truste nat in Christ but in theyr owne warkes Furthermore the Monkes freers religious men dyd teache theyr kynde of lyuynge to be a state of ê‘fection because they kepte nat alouly the preceptes but also the counselles This errour is most repugnaunt to the gospell because they haue fayned them selues so to haue fulfylled the commaundementes that they no more also then they be bounden to And out of this hathe spronge an horrible errour in that they fayned themselues to haue merites of supererogation that is to say more then they were bounden to haue These merites they haue applied for other to be satisfactions for other mennes synnes These thynges if any man were disposed odiously to handle howe many thynges myght he reherse of whiche euen the religious ê‘sons â—hemselues be nowe asshamed Yt is no lyght sclaunder in the churche to purpose set forthe to the people any honourynge of god deuysed by men without the coÌ„maundemente of god and to teache that suche an honour dothe iustifie men make them ryghtuous For the ryghtuousnes of feythe iÌ„ Christ whiche chiefly ought to be taughte iÌ„ the church is thus obscured and darkened whyles these wonderfull angelicall religions as this fayned pouertie this cloked humilitie this hypocriticall chastite be caste before the eyes of men Furthermore the preceptes of god and the true honour of god be darkened obscured defaced whan men do heare that only Monkes freers chauoÌ„s and nunnes be in the state of ê‘fection For the very perfection of a christen man is an other thyng It is earnestly to dreade god and agayne to conceyue faythe and to truste that we haue god pacified contented for Christes sake to aske of god and surely to loke for helpe in all thynges that we haue to do accordyng to out callyng And iÌ„ the meane season to do good workes outwardly and to serue our vocacion In these thynges is the true perfection true honour of god and nat in the vnmaried lyfe or in beggynge or in vile fylthy cotes Also the people conceyue many noysome and perilous opinioÌ„s of those false praysinges of the Monkishe lyfe They heare chastite for so these religious persons â—al it praysed without measure therfore the people do leade theyr lyfe in mariage with offence and grefe of conscience They heare that only beggars be perfecte therfore they kepe possessions and occupy the worlde with an inwarde remorse of conscience They heare that it is a counsell of the gospell nat to auenge therfore priuate persones hearing this be nat affrayed to auenge for they heare that it is but a counsell and naâ— a coÌ„maundemente Other there be which iudge that al rule and ciuiâ—e offices be vnmete for christen men as though they coulde nat stande with good christian .ii. There be redde examples of men whiche forsakynge mariage and forsakyng the administration and rule of he comâ—n wealthe haue hydde themselues in abbeyes or monasteries and this called they to fle out of the worlde and â—o seke a kynde of lyuyng that shulde more please god Nether dyd they see that god ought to be serued in those precep es whiche he hym selfe dyd gyue and teache nat in coÌ„maundemeÌ„tes deuised by men It is a good and a ê‘fecte kynde of lyuyng whiche hathe the precepte of god for it It is necessary to admonishe warne men of these thing And before this tyme also Gerson rebuketh the errour of religious persons as touchynge perfeâ—â—ion and witnesseth that to say the monkisshe or religious lyfe to be a state of perfecâ—ion was
satisfy the laâ—e of god And besydes ther may be done â—orkes of superogation Therfore men maye nat only satisfy and fulfyll the lawe of god but also do more theÌ„ fulfyl it And because Monkes and Freers do more than fulfyl the lawe therfore they haue merites more then they nede them selues And because it is liberalalite to gyue vnto other of that whiche thou haste aboue thyne owne necessitie therfore they may gyue those merites to other men They deuise also a sacrament that is to say a wytnes and a marke of this gyuyng for wheÌ„ men be deade they put about them the habites of theyr relegious men to witnesse that other mens merites be applyed vnto them With suche coaceruatioÌ„s our aduersaries do deface the benefite of Christe and the iustice of faythe ⧠We do nat here rayse vp vayne pratyng about the worde But we stryue about a greate thiÌ„g that is to weâ—e wherof godly myndes ought to conceyue sure and vndoubted hope of saluation whether good workes maye set consciences at peace and quyetnes Whether they ought to thynke that eternall lyfe is so gotteÌ„ if they do set theyr good workes agaynste the iudgement of god orels they ought to thynke that through mercy for Christes sake they be reputed ryghtous do obtayne eternall lyfe These thyngê do come into controuersie whiche onleâ— the coÌ„science do discusse and iudge it can nat haue any stronge and sure consolation But we haue declared euideÌ„tly ynough that good workes do nat satisfie the lawe of god but that they haue nede of mercye that by faythe we be accepted with god for Christê sake also that good workes do nat set the coÌ„science at reste and peace Of all these thyngê it foloweth that we ought to thynke that for Christes sake through mercy and nat for the lawe they that be iustified do obtayne eternal lyfe What shall we say then as touchyng the name of rewarde Fyrste if we shulde say that eternall lyfe is called a rewarde because it is due to them that be iustified by reason of the promyse we shulde nat speake any thynge amysse For these gyftes be ordered among theÌ„ selues as AugustiÌ„ne sayeth Dona sua coronat deus in nobis .i. God crowneth rewardeth hys owne gyftes in vs. But the scripture calleth eternal lyfe a rewarde nat because it is due for our workes but because it dothe recompense the affections and workes albeit yet it is gyuen for another cause Lykewyse as the inheritaunce commeth to the good mans sonne of the howse nat for his owne workes or seruice and yet neuertheles it is a rewarde and recoÌ„pense of the warkes and seruice of the son It is sufficieÌ„t therfore that the name of rewarde dothe for thys cause agre to eternall lyfe be cause eternall lyfe dothe recompence good workes and afflictions Eternall lyfe therfore is nat a rewarde because our workes be sufficient or because it is due for workes but consecutiuely because although it be due for another cause yet neuertheles it dothe recompense good workes and afflictions ⧠Besydes thys we do graunte that workes be in very dede meritorious nat of remission of synnes or of iustificatioÌ„ for workes do nat please but in theÌ„ that be iustified and that because of faythe Neyther be they worthy of eternall lyfe For as iustification commeth by faythe for Christes sake so dothe viuificatioÌ„ but they be meritorious of other rewardê corporall and spiritual whiche are gyuen partly in this lyfe and partly after thê lyfe For god differreth the most parte of hys rewardes vntyll he dothe glorifie sayntes after thys lyfe because he wyl that they be excercised in this lyfe to mortifye the olde man The gospell dothe frely set forth and exhibete the promise of iustification and viuification for Christes sake But in the lawe rewarde is offered and is due nat frely but for workes For asmuche therfore as workê be a certayne fulfyllyng of the lawe they be well called meritorious and it is well sayde that rewarde is due vnto them And this rewarde engendereth degrees of rewardes accordyng to that sayeng of Paule Euery man shall receyue rewarde accordynge to hys owne labour These degrees be rewarde of warkes and of afflictions But our aduersaries do contende and styffly affyrme that eternall lyfe is only due for workes because Paule sayeth He shall rendre to euery man accordynge to hys work In the fyfthe of Iohan. who so euer haue wrought well shall ryse agayne to the resurrection of lâ—fe In the .xxv. of Mathewe I was hungry and ye gaue me meate In all these places in whiche workes be commeÌ„ded and praysed it is necessary to haue recourse to the rule a boâ—â—remembred that is to saye that workes please nat without Christe nor that Christe the mediatour is nat to be excluded Wherfore when the texte sayeth that eternal lyfe is gyuen to warkes It meaneth that it is gyuen to them that be iustified For good workê do nat please god but in them that be iustified that is to say in them whiche thynke them selues accepted to god for Christes sake And they that be iustified do necessarily bryng forthe good workes or good frutes as I was hungry and ye gaue me meate Here when it is sayde that eternall lyfe is giuen to these workes the meanyng is that it is gyuen to ryghtuousnes Therfore he coÌ„prehendeth fayth when he nameth the frutes And the scripture nameth the frutes to shewe that god requyreth nat hypochrisy but iustice whiche is full of efficacitie and workyng and a certayne newe lyfe bryngynge forthe good frutê Neyther do we couet here any vayne or vnfrutful subtilite For they be very wayghty causes for whiche we do dispute these thyngê For if we do graunt to our aduersaries that workes do deserue eternall â–ª lyfe anone they adde these false and inconueniente thynges that workes satisfie the lawe of god that they haue no nede of mercy that we be ryghtuous that is to saye acceptable in the syght of god for our owne workes and nat for Christê sake â–ª that men maye do more then fulfyll the lawe So all the doctrine of the iustice of faythe is quyte ouerthrowne And vndoubtedly it is necessary that the pure doctrine of the iustice of fayth be reserued in the churche Wherfore we be compelled to rebuke the phariseicall opinions of our aduersaries bothe to the entent that we may set forth the glory of Christ and also that we maye set forthe vnto consciences ferme and sure comfortes For howe shall the conscience conceyue certayne hope of saluation whan it shal perceyue that in the iudgement of good workes be vnworthy Onles it knoweth that men be reputed ryghtuous and saued throughe mercy for Christê sake nat for our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe Dyd S. Laurence lyeng on the grydyron thinke that through the worke he satisfyed the laweof god and that he was voyde of syn and neded nat Christ the Mediatour nor the mercy of god No verely he
whiche walke nat after theyr fleshe but after the spirite Also we be dettours nat to the fleshe that we shulde lyue after the fleshe For if ye lyue after the fleshe ye shall dye But if in spirite ye mortifye the actes of the bodye ye shall lyue Wherfore this fayth whiche receyueth remission of synnes in the troubled and affrayed herte and fleyng synne dwelleth nat in them whiche folowe theyr lustes nor staÌ„deth nat with deadly synne Out of these effectes or operacions of fayth the aduersaries pycke out one and that is loue â–ª and teache that it iustifyeth Thus it manifestly appereth that they only teache the lawe They reache nat fyrste that we receyue remissioÌ„ of synnes by fayth They teache nat of the mediatour Christe that for Christe we haue God our good lorde but for our owne loue And yet what maner of loue that is they tell nat nor can nat tell They bragge glory that they fulfyll the lawe where as this glory is properly due to Christ and they lay the affiaâ—Ì„ce of theyr owne workes to the iudgemeÌ„t of god for tâ—ey say that they deserue grace eternall lyfe de condigno .i. of theyr owne worthynes This is vtterly a wycked and a vayne affiaunce For in this lyfe we can nat satisfye the lawe because the carnall nature ceaseth nat to bryng forth euyll affections al though the spirite in vs resysteth theÌ„ But a man may demaunde of vs a question sythe that we also confesse that loue is the worke of the holy ghost and syth it is ryghtwysnes for it is the fulfyllyng of the law why do nat we teache that it iustifieth â–ª To this we answere Fyrst it is certayne that we receiue nat remission of synnes neyther by loue nor for or loue but for Christ by only fayth Only faythe whiche loketh to the promyse and is assured that god forgiueth because Christ dyed nat in vaine ouercometh the feares of synne of death If a man doubteth whether hys synnes be forgyuen hym he disworshyppeth Christe sythe he iudgeth hys synne greater or stronger then the death and promyse of Christe where Paule sayeth that grace surmounteth synne that is to say that mercye is aboue synne who thynketh that he attayneth remission of synnes because he loueth dishonoreth Christ and he shal fynde in the daye of gods iudgement this affyaunce of his owne propre iustice to be wycked voyde Ergo fayth must recoÌ„cile make of the iniust iust And as we receiue nat remissioÌ„ of synnes by the other vertues or for the other vertues of the lawe as for pacience chastitie obedieÌ„ce towarde the superiours cÌ„ and yet these vertues must ensue so we neyther receyue remissyon of synnes because of the dilectioÌ„ of god Howbeit it is a commune fourme of speakyng otherwhyles to comprise in one worde bothe the cause and the effect by a figure called Synecdoche as in the seuenth of Luke Christ sayeth Many synnes be forgyueÌ„ her because she loued muche For Christ expouneth him selfe wheÌ„ he addeth Thy fayth hathe saued the. Christ then meant nat that the woman by that worke of loue shulde deserue remissioÌ„ of synnes and therfore he clearly sayeth Thy faythe hathe saued the. But fayth is the thyng which conceiueth mercy for the worde of god freely If ye deny that thê is fayth ye vtterly knowe nat what faythe meaneth The very historye of it selfe sheweth sufficiently what he calleth loue in this place The woman cam brynging with her this opinion of Christe that in hym â–ª she shulde fynde remission of synnes This worshyp is the most hyghe worshyp of Christ she coulde gyue no greater worshyp vnto hym This is the trewe fashyon of acknowledgyng Messias to seke at hym remission of synnes And to conceiue this opinion of Christ thus to worship him is rightly and truly to beleue But this worde loue Christe vsed nat to the womaÌ„ but to the Pharisee for he coÌ„pared the hole worshyppyng of the Pharisee with the hole worshyppyng of the woman He chydeth the Pharisee because he acknoweledged hym nat to be Messias although he dyd vnto hym these externe officies as vnto a straunger and an holy greate man he poynteth to the woman and commendeth her worshyppyng her oyntment â—eares cÌ„ whiche all were sygnes of fayth a certayne coÌ„fession that at Christ she sought remission of synnes Undoutedly this was a greate example which nat without cause moued Christe to chyde the Pharisee whiche was a wyse and an honest man but one that beleued nat This impietie he vpbraideth him and instructeth him by the example of the woman signifieng that it was a shame yâ— where as an vnlerned woman beleued god he a doctour of the lawe beleued nat and acknowleged nat Messias nor sought nat at hym remission of synnes saluacion So theÌ„ he prayseth the hole worshyppyng as it is ofte done in scripture that in one worde we shuld coÌ„prise many as here after we shall shewe more at large in lyke places as in this saying Gyue almes and all shal be clene he requyreth nat only almesdedê but also the iustice of faythe so also here wheÌ„ he sayeth Many synnes be remytted vnto her because she loued muche that is to saye because she hath worshypped me truly by fayth and excercises and signes of fayth he coÌ„pryseth the hole worshyppyng but in the meane seasoÌ„ yet he teacheth thys that properly remission of synnes is receyued by fayth althoughe loue confession and other good workes do necessaryly ensue wherfore he meaneth nat this that those frutê be a recoÌ„pense or raunsum for whiche remission of synnes is gyuen whiche may reconcile vs to god we dispute of a greate thing euen of the honour of Christe and from whens the godly myndes may fetche a sure ferme consolacion whether our truste is to be put in Christe or in our workes If so be that we owe to set our trust in our workes then we must plucke from Christe the honour and title of a mediatour and redemer And yet we shall fynde in the iudgement of god that this confidence is vayne and that the conscience from thens shall ruÌ„ne into despayre That if remission of synnes and reconciliacyon chaunseth nat frely for Christ but for our loue and merites no man shal haue remission of synnes but where he fulfylleth the hole lawe for the lawe iustifieth vs nat so longe as it can accuse vs. It is euident then syth iustificacion is reconciliacion for Christ that by fayth we be iustified for it is most certayne that by only fayth is receyued remission of synnes Nowe therfore let vs answere to the question afore proposed why loue iustifyeth nat The aduersaries thynke ryghtly that loue is the fulfilling of the lawe And doubtles the obedience towarde the lawe were ryghwisnes if we coulde do the lawe But we haue here tofore shewed that the promisses were therfore gyuen because we coulde nat do the lawe And for this selfe cause denyeth Paule
For Christ rebuketh the pharises whiche thought theÌ„ selues to be made cleane in the syght of god that is to saye to be iustifyed by theyr oft washinges euen as a certayne byshope of Rome sheweth of holy water that it sanctifyeth and clenseth the people And the glose sayth that it cleneth from venial synnes Suche were also the opinions of the Pharisies whiche Christ reprehendeth and he setteth against this fayned purgatyon two maner of clennes the one inwarde the other outwarde he byddeth that they shulde be made cleane inwardly and addeth concernynge outwarde clennes Gyue in almose of your superfluitie and aboundance and so all thynges shal be cleane vnto you Our aduersaryes do not ryghtly applye thys partycle or sygne vnyuersall omnia for Christe addeth thys conclusyon to bothe members Then all thynge shal be cleane to you that is to witte yf ye shall be clane inwardly and shall gyue almose outwardly For he sygnifyeth that outwarde clennes is to be sette in the warkes commaunded by god and not iÌ„ the traditions of men as then were tho ofte wasshinges and nowe a dayes is the dayly sprinclyng of holy water the habites of religious persons as they be called the deuersite choyse of metes and lyke pompes But our aduersaryes do corrupte the sentence with sophistrie translatynge the vniuersall perticle to the one parte alone All thynges shal be cleane to you yf ye gyue almose as yf a man shulde make thê reason S Andrewe is present g o ergo al the Aposteles be present Wherfore in the antecedente both members ought to be ioyned together in thys wyse Beleue and gyue almose so all thynges shall be cleane to you For the scripture sayth in another place that the hartes be purifyed by faythe That if the hartes be clensed and afterwarde almose dedes be put to outwardly that is to saye almanner workes of charite so shall they be cleane al together that is for to saye not onely within but also without And that hole sermone of Christe ought to be ioyned together of which there be many partes wherof certayne do teache of faythe and certayne of warkê And it is no ê“perty of a good reader to pycke out the preceptes of warkes leuynge out the places of faythe There be some also which do interprete it to be an Ironicall locution Gyue ye almose and all thynges be cleaue vnto you For Christe semeth dryly to checke the vayne persuasion of the phariseis whiche whan they had theyr myndes laden with moste lewde affections yet in the meane season because they gaue almose thought theÌ„ selues to be halfe goddes Thys interpretatyon is nat vnmete neyther hath it any thing in it selfe dissonante or contrary to the other scriptures We wolde put to also other places but that we thinke that by these places which we haue rehersed and declared all other lyke may easely be iudged But we shall yet adde this scolastical argumeÌ„t Ryghtuousnes must nedes be in the wyll g o ergo faythe whiche is in the vnderstandyng doth nat iustifye This argument we do therfore reherse that the hole matter myght be made more playne howe fayth doth iustifye and what Paule dothe call iustifycatyon And fyrst because of certayne wayward persons we shall answere artificiously Thê is playne in morall philosophie that iustyce is called obedyence towarde the superiour such as he accepteth and alloweth But faythe is an obedyence towardes the gospell Wherfore faythe is ryghtly called iustyce for obedience towardes the gospell is imputed and rekened for ryghtuousnes in somuche that obedyence towardes the lawe only doth therfore please because we beleue that god is frely gracious and louinge to vs for Christes sake for we do neuer satisfye the lawe Nowe althoughe this faythe be in the wyl for it is to wyl and to receyue the promyse yet neuer theles this obedyence towarde the gospel is not for our clennes imputed for ryghtuousnes but because it receyueth the mercy that is offered and thynketh that we be reputed ryghtuous for Christes sake by mercy and nat for our owne fulfylling of the lawe nor for our owne clennes So the mynde is to be called awaye from gasynge on the lawe vnto the gospell and vnto Christe and we must assure our selues that we be reputed ryghtuous when we do thynke our owne selues to be accepted for Christes sake and nat for our owne loue or for our owne fulfyllynge of the lawe And faythe differeth froÌ„ hope for faythe receyueth at thê present tyme remissyon of synnes recoÌ„ciliation or acceptatyon of our owne selues for Christes sake But hope is busye aboute the good thynges that be to come and aboute delyueraunce to come Secondarely Iustifycation here in thê place signifieth to be reputed rightuous Now god dothe nat repute a man ryghtuous after the maner that a man is reputed ryghtuous in the corte of causes or in philosophi for the iustyce of hys owne warkes whiche maye wele be put in the wyl But he reputeth a maÌ„ ryghtuous by mercy for Christes sake so that a maÌ„ do receyue hym by fayth Wherfore fayth may be called Iustyce for it is that thynge which is imputed to rightuousnes as paule is wont to speake in what so euer parte of man it be put For that dothe nothynge at all let goddes imputatyon howe be it we do put thys faythe in the wyll of man for it is to wyll and to receyue the promyse of Chryste And thys scolasticall argument thus debated because it dryueth the matter to an art the hole cause semeth moche the better to be perceyued By 〈◊〉 these thynges it maye be also perceyued what is to be iudged de merito condigni that is to wyt of the meryte of worthynes of whiche our aduersaryes do fayne that men be ryghtuous in the syght of god for theyr owne loue and fulfyllynge of the lawe Here is no mencion at al made of the iustyce of fayth and in the stede of Christe the mediator is put that we be accepted for our fulfyllynge of the lawe These thynges are in no wyse sufferable but as we sayd before though loue foloweth renouatioÌ„ yet maye nat the glorie of Christ be taken froÌ„ hym and geuen to our fulfyllynge of the lawe but it is to be thought that euen after the renouation also we be accompted iust for Christes sake and that Christ remayneth styl a mediator and mercy stocke and that by the meanes of Christ and for him we haue commynge and entre to the father and that we do nat satysfie the lawe but that we haue alwayes nede of mercy and that we be alwayes compted iust for mercye And thys thynge dothe the hole churche confesse that we be made ryghtwyse and saued throughe mercie as we haue heretofore recyted forthe of Saynt Ierome Our ryghtuousnes is not for our owne meryte but commeth of the mercie of god But so it is that thys mercy is receiued by faith g o ergo cÌ„ But se