couplings contrarie vnto them in euery prohibition filthinesse and abhomination before God And certainly that generall proposition in the sixth verse Let no man go vnto her that is neare of kindred a Leuit. 18.6 agreeth with the lawe of nature And Christians are bound by the iudgement of Paule vnto the obseruation of the Leuiticall lawe touching degrees 2. Cor. 5.1 How then is that to be vnderstood Deuteronom 25.5 where the wife of the brother dying without issue is to be marâ—ied vnto the other brother and that example of Iudah who gaue his first sonnes wife after his death vnto his second sonne and after he was dead promised her to his third sonne also Gen. 38.8 whereas the Lord in Leuit. expressely forbiddeth the brother to marrie his brothers wife b Leuit. 18.9.16.18 I answer that the law Leuit. 18.9 is simply common vnto all nations as the lawe is of not stealing But that law Deuteronom 25.5 is either not to be vnderstood of a naturall brother but of the next of consanguinitie in another degree for they are all called brethren amongst the Hebrewes or else that it was a peculiar priuiledge granted after a sort vnto the Israelites that the familie should be conserued in the name of the first born and that the first birth of Christ which should neuer die should be signified Aug. quaest 61. in Leuit. What then shall we thinke of Abraham who married his brother Arans daughter c Gen. 11.29 of Iacob who married two sisters both aliue together d 29.16 and of Moses who was borne of a mariage betweene the nephew and the aunt e Exod. 2.1 6.20 as the Hebrew word is taken Numb 26.59 Either that those mariages were made both while there were but a few of the holy seede and also in the publike confusion God dispensing with and tolerating it or that those Patriarchs sinned and are not to be excused in all things and we are not to iudge by examples but by lawes But may a faithfull man marrie an vnbeleeuing woman No except the vnbeleeuing person promise consent to the true religion And thus Moses married a wife of Aethiopia and Iacob Labans daughter For God forbad his people to ioyne in matrimonie with the other nations f Deut. 7.3.4 And although that precept be iudicial yet it appertaineth vnto all if the reason be considered for he giueth a plaine moral reason which is at this day in force For she will seduce thy son that he shall not follow me but rather serue strange Gods the same is repeated in the Kings g 1. Reg. 11.1 2.4 also coÌ„firmed by Salom. example And besides the vnequall matches of the sons of God with Caines posteritie k Gen. 6.2 brought a pernitious corruption into all the world But the commandement of Paul is expresse Be not vnequally yoaked with infidels l 2 Cor. 6.14 and againe Let them marrie in the Lord m Cor. 7.39 that is religiously and in the feare of God What are the constitutions of Princes concerning this That a guardian shall not marrie his ward an adopting father his adopted daughter or an adopting mother her adopted sonne As also that brethren and sisters children shall not marrie Yet must the Magistrate abolish that law which teacheth that witnesses at the font may not marrie nor that he may marry her for whom he witnesseth at baptisme Do these lawes bind Christians They do so farre foorth as they agree with Gods word For each one must obey his gouernor when he can do it without breach of pietie and the libertie of conscience that is if it be not a sinne to conscience if it be done otherwise so as mariages contracted against these constitutions be not disanulled How is the coupling in mariage called in the Scriptures 1. Coniugium wedlocke of that common yoake wherewith the man and wife are ioyned into one flesh and as it were into one man 2. Matrimonium mariage of the end for a woman is married vnto a man to this end that she may be a mother of children and mariage is as it were Matriage of a mother 3. Connubium couering and in the plurall number nuptiae à nubendo that is of couering for as the heauen is sometimes couered ouer with clouds so were virgins in old time couered n 1. Co. 11.5.10 with a veile when they were brought vnto their husbands and that both to testifie their bashfulnesse and modestie and also their subiection and obedience or anothers power ouer them As the example of Rebecca testifieth who when she saw her husband Isaac she couered her selfe with a veile o Gen. 24.64 Like vnto which is that spreading abroad of the garment in Ruth 3.9 and Isa 4.1 What is against this 1. Mariages euery where graÌ„ted by that impure Antichrist between Vnkles and sisters daughters against all law both of God and man 2. The imagination of the Papists who say that indeed by the law of nature it is forbidden the father to marry the daughter or the mother the son but the forbidding of all other persons in Leuit. is a meere positiue law concerneth the Israelites only That Christians are not tied to those laws therfore the Pope may dispense 3 The Iewes error that those persons whosoeuer are not expressed in Leuiticus are also not forbidden to marie for then it would follow that the nephew might marie the grandmother because it is not forbidden by name wheras nature sheweth it to be wicked VVhat is Mariage An inseparable coniunction excepting the causes expressed in the written word of God of one man and one woman a Mat 19.9 Rom. 7.2 1. Cor. 7.27 being fit of yeares lawfully consenting into one flesh instituted by God for mutual help as wel in diuine as humane things for procreation if God will giue them of children and bringing them vp in the feare of God for God his Church and common wealth How manifold is mariage Twofold begun or promised consuÌ„mated ratified perfected VVhat is betrothing or contracting It is mention and promise of a future mariage called Sponsalia sponsals a spondendo of promising for that they were wont in old time to assure their daughters vnto them to whom they had promised to marie them to couenant that they in like sort should marie them and hence proceeded the names of Sponsus Sponsa the man-spouse and the woman-spouse How many kindes of Sponsals or contracts are there Two one conceiued by words de futuro for to come as they speake in schooles either plainely as I will take the to be my wife as if I should say I promise that I will sell thee my house for there is difference betweene promising and doing Or else vpon condition as If my parents consent if I may haue her dowrie Likewise if the contracters be vnder age or one of them in sense of the Law such contracts are de futuro
respect of that morall kinde of Lawes which takes order that the disturbers of humane societie may be punished that honest and lawfull peace be maintained that the publike safetie and quiet be preserued and that iudgement and iustice preuaile What things are Disparata i. disagreeing or of other nature then the Law The Gospell is of another nature of which we will speake in next place What opinions do oppose this doctrine of the Law 1 The error of the Manichees who say the Law is euill because it worketh wrath Rom. 4.15 whereas it doth not worke this effect properly but through the transgression of him that breaketh it 2 Of the Pelagians who thought themselues to be so disposed and able by nature as to performe it 3 Of the Antinomi and Libertines who thinke that Christians haue no more need of the morall Law and that the ten commandemens are not to be preached in the Christian Church because the faithfull are borne againe of the spirit 4 Of the Pharisees who thought the fulfilling of the law to be easie possible c Mat. 19.20 and that some of the commaundements were great commaundements as those which concerned more grosse sinnes murder adultery periurie some they thought were the least commaundements the transgressing whereof God did not regard as the inward affections wandring from the law of God d Matt. 5.19 Also that error of the same Pharisees and of the Ebionites who taught that the obseruation of the ceremoniall law was to be ioyned with the Gospell 5 Of the Papists who affirme that perfect obedience to the law may be performed by a regenerate man pro statu viatoris as he is in the estate of a pilgrime that the scripture doth ascribe to the godly diuers seuerall works whereof some are good and such as satisfie the law some euill and resisting the law that the law doth not require of men any more perfect obedience then that which may be performed in this life yea moreouer that a man may doe more then he ought if he will which workes they call Workes of supererogation and that therefore men become iust before God through the obseruation of the law and doe deserue by it eternall life 6 The same Papists foolish and peruerse imitation who bring into the Church the Leuiticall ceremonies 7 Of those brainsicke heads who will haue Christian common weales to be gouerned onely by the politicke lawes of the Iewes 8 Of the Anabaptists who faine that the Patriarches beleeued nothing of the Gospell or promises of eternall life but that they were onely fed with the outward and corporall promises because they are said to haue beene in the law a Rom. 3.19 and vnder the law b Gal. 4.3.5 as also because it is written Math. 11.13 that the law was vntill Iohn came To conclude all errors concerning the true meaning of the law as also all sins which are against euerie of the ten commandements The twentieth common Place Of the Gospell What doth the word Euangelium signifie IT properly signifyeth a good ioyfull happie and glad tidings or message in which sense Aristophanes vseth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I told them good tidings So in Appians writing of the murder of Cicero 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 carrying the good newes to Anthonie 2 It signifieth a reward giuen to them who brought good tidings Hom. odyss 14. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is Let this be my reward for my good newes that when he shall returne to his house you cloath me with good apparell Ierkin and Coat 3 It signifieth a Sacrifice offered for good newes receiued Xenophon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he offered Sacrifice vpon receipt of his good newes But in what signification doth the Scripture vse this word Euangelium or Gospell 1 As the verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to report ioyfull things Isa 52.7 How beautifull vpon the mountaines are the feete of them who bring the glad tidings of peace and tidings of good for which word the Prophets vse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to report good newes so the Apostles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 haue termed Euangelium or Gospell a Marc. 1.15 that notable and ioyfull report of saluation procured by Christ to them that beleeue or a solemne preaching of the grace of God manifested and exhibited in Christ Luk. 2.10 I bring you tidings of great ioy that shall be to all people for this day is borne vnto you a Sauiour which is Christ the Lord. 2 By Metonymie it is taken for the historie concerning Christ concerning things which he taught and did b Act. 1.1 And in this sense we reckon foure Gospels Sometimes also it signifieth the publication of the doctrine of the Gospell the preaching and notifying of the same as 1. Cor. 9.14 Liue of the Gospell that is of the preaching of the Gospell and 2. Cor. 8.18 Whose praise is in the Gospell But what is the reason of this name Because as to malefactors condemned to a most grieuous and ignominious punishment for their offences nothing can happen more ioyfull and acceptable then that being freed from the sentence of condemnation they should enioy the libertie and glorie of kings so likewise to men cursed for their sins and condemned eternally nothing can happen better or more welcome then to heare that being free from the sentence of him that condemned them that they are reckoned and are indeed in the number of the sonnes of God What is the Gospell It is a heauenly doctrine brought out of the secret bosome of God the Father by the Sonne preached by the Apostles and comprehended in the bookes of the new Testament bringing a a good and ioyfull message to all the world namely that mankinde is redeemed by the death of Christ the onely begotten sonne of God so this remission of sinnes saluation and eternall life is prepared for all men if so be they repent and beleeue in Iesus Christ VVho is the author or efficient cause of the Gospell God who hath vouchsafed to reueale his hidden purpose and good pleasure concerning our redemption whereupon it is called the Gospell of God Rom. 1.1 A fellow cause or ioynt cause is the word that is the Sonne of God who comming out of the fathers bosome hath declared it to vs as he first pronounced the promise of the Gospell in Paradise Gen. 3.5 The seed of the woman shall breake the Serpents head By what instrumentall cause or by whose meanes was the Gospell made knowne to the world 1 By an Angell of God who soone after Christ was borne said Luke 2.10 I bring you tidings of great ioy c. For this day is borne vnto you a Sauiour c. 2 By Iohn who preached the summe of the Gospell shewing Christ and calling him the Lambe of God that is a Sacrifice appointed by God to make satisfaction for the sins of the world In which
at their pleasure and the Princes of darknesse because they are the authors of all ignorance of God of blindnesse mischiefes vnhappinesse malice of all disorder trecherie crueltie c Ephes 2.2 Ephes 6.12 Col. 2.15 As for the name Lucifer it came from a false and friuolous exposition of that place Isaiah 14.12 which as may well appeare was in derision ironically giuen to the King of Babylon Whence do euill Angels take their beginning In respect of their nature and substance they are of God who did create them good of nothing and who doth still vphold them But in regard of the qualities brought vpon them they are of themselues as Christ witnesseth Ioh. 8.44 The diuel when he speaketh a lie speaketh of his owne that is of himselfe and continued not in the truth wherin he was created at the beginning but fel by his owne free wil and was a murderer from the beginning not in respect of Satan himselfe but of man that was made that is to say then when he first set vpon man whereupon we may gather that the Angels sinned before that Adam and Eue sinned What was the first sinne of the Angels Some thinke that it was pride according to that Eccles 10.15 Pride is the beginning of all sinne Others thinke it was enuie whereby Satan enuied that man was made after the image of God according to that Wisdom 2.24 By the diuels enuie death entered into the world But Christ shewes Ioh. 8.44 it was lying or the hatred of the truth that is of the euerlasting Gospell touching Christ who should take our flesh vpon him and of his grace which is needfull for all men to life eternall and of the nature of man which should be exalted aboue all Angels And therefore indeede it was the hatred they bore of Christs glorie and mans felicitie Also it was their apostacie and rebellion whereby Satan fell from God his maker and that very sinne which Christ calleth The sinne against the holy Ghost a Math. 12.31 1. Iohn 5.16 because he fell wittingly and willingly and of purpose from the truth and that also with hatred of that euerlasting truth whereof Christ speaketh I am the truth Ioh. 14.6 And to Pilate I am come into this world that I might beare witnesse to the truth Ioh. 18.31 The same is proved by the continuall practise of Satan euen from the beginning of the world to the end sowing lies and heresies either against the Deitie of Christ or against his humanitie or against his office And raising vp most cruell persecution against that truth of Christ Is there a great number of those Angels which fell from the truth Yes sure a great number and almost innumerable yet vncertaine to vs and not know howne many For 2. Pet. 2.4 and Iude 6. we reade that very many Angels fell at one time from the truth and therefore are cast into hell or the bottomlesse pit And Luk. 8.30 mention is made of a legion of diuels which possessed one man And Mat. 12.45 the vncleane spirit returning taketh with him seuen other spirits that is many other spirits worse then himselfe and more vncleane And Reu. 12.7 we reade that the dragon with his Angels fought against the woman and therefore there is no cause why we should sleepe secure and carelesse What punishment is inflicted vpon euill Angels Manifold 1. In that they are cast out of the heauens wherein the blessed be and wherein they were created into hell that is not only into that place vnder the earth ordained for the euerlâ—â—ting torments of the reprobate which Luk. 16.23 calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hell and chap. 8.31 the bottomlesse pit that is a gulph of a wonderfull depth but also into this ayre which compasseth the earth and into the region vnder the Moone as testifieth the Apostle Eph. 2.2 6.12 to exercise the patience of the godly and also to punish and to vexe the wicked for their impietie where also they being tyed with the chaines of darknesse are kept to the generall iudgement a 2. Pet. 2.4 Jud. 6. 2. In that their whole nature how great soeuer is wholy corrupted and defiled so as there is in it nothing at all sound and pure 3. Their will is so obstinate in sinne as they are not able no not to desire to repent of euill nor to be saued Which is by the iust iudgement of God who hath decreed that they which sinne against the holy Ghost that is they which wittingly and willingly and of set purpose sinne and renounce the knowne truth should neuer repent b Heb. 6 4. 10.26 1. Ioh. 3.8 1. Ioh. 3.8 The diuell sinneth euen from the beginning namely continually and obstinately 4. Their mind was darkened to wit being depriued both of the knowledge of all that truth as well of themselues as of God and of Christ which might stand them in any stead to life eternall As also of that created knowledge of those things wherin at the beginning they were created for which cause they are tearmed the princes of darknesse c Eph. 6.12 And yet not wholly because they excell yet in great knowledge of things concerning both God and men namely such as was naturall vnto them or they haue by nature partly by that naturall light which is left in them partly by obseruation partly by the effects of Gods power which come to passe in time By which means they knew Christ both to be the Sonne of God and also should be the Iudge of the world a Mat. 8.21 Act. 16.17 19. but yet without any affection towards him without any loue or affiance in him and to their greater terror and condemnation b Jam. 2.19 For which cause they are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Skilfull but more truly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because they do alwaies abuse that their knowledge to euill and neuer to good Can euill Angels foresee things to come and certainely foretell them To foresee and to foretell things to come so farre foorth as they are things to come and to know them before hand of themselues and by themselues and of their owne proper spirit they cannot for it is the peculiar worke of God alone for so it is said Esa 41.23 Tell vs what things shall come to passe and then we shall know that ye are gods But by the instinct of another or by reuelation from another and by the present causes by the experience and obseruation of things and by probable coniectures to foresee things to come it is granted vnto creatures So then by these meanes the wicked spirits may foretel things to come as namely such things as they haue learned to haue bene foretold in some place by some holy Prophet or such things whose natural causes they see to be present before their eyes or such things which they see now are disposed and like to come to passe or such things as themselues are purposed
dying What then should haue become of man in the conclusion if he had not sinned should he haue euer liued vpon earth No but he should in the end haue remoued into heauen indeed without death which is the dissolution of the soule from the body but yet not without some change such as the Apostle speaketh of 1. Cor. 15.51 shall be in the bodies of the elect who shall be then liuing in the comming of the Lord they shall remoue hence into heauen What things be contrary to this doctrine The errour of the Pelagians who affirmed that man should haue died although he had neuer sinned against those speeches Gen. 2.17 and 3.3 Rom. 5.12 and 1. Cor. 15.21 The twelfth common Place of Mariage What thinke you of Mariage is it a diuine humane or politike constitution IT is diuine 1. because it was instituted by God in Paradise a Gen. 1.27 2.15 betwixt Adam and Eue in their innocencie they then bearing the true image of God 2. Because it was a type of that truly diuine and spirituall mariage which was to be betwixt Christ and his Church b Ephes 5.23 3. Because it was ordained for the propagation of the Church and for the further helping forwards the saluation of man It is also humane or politike or as I may say of humane constitution 1. because it was instituted for the propagation of mankind and ciuill societie vpon earth for in heauen they marry not but are like the Angels of God Mat. 22.30 2. Because for the most part it dependeth vpon the honest constitutions made by man for that purpose How proue you that mariage was instituted by God Gen. 2.18 God said that is in his most wise counsel decreed and ordained it is not good for man to be alone let vs make an helper or companion of his life like vnto him and when he could finde none for Adam before him God brought vpon him a dead sleepe and whilest he was asleepe and so being brought as it were into an extasie voide of griefe and was naturally ignorant what was done took one of his ribs and thereof made woman whom he brought vnto Adam who being led by the spirit of God did prophesie saying This is bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh she shall be called Ischa that is Vira Mannesse because she was taken out of man being as it were alter-ipse a second self For this cause shall man leaue his father and mother and cleaue vnto his wife and they shall be one flesh And after the deluge God confirmed mariage and blessed it saying Increase and multiply b Gen 9.1 At length the Sonne of God himselfe restored it being somewhat decaid c Math. 19.4.5.6 honoring the same both with his presence and miraculous gift d Ioh. 2.11 c. To conclude God not onely instituted mariage but also stirreth vp mutuall loue betweene the bride and the bridegroome and furdereth mariage e Genes 24.14 50 51. Whence it followeth first that mariages are not by chance or depending on mans arbiterment onely but are fatall and gouerned by Gods prouidence Secondly that mariage is a good and a holy thing Thirdly that it is to be vndertaken in the feare of God and inuocation for his direction But are not Moses and Paul contrary one to another where it is said Gen. 2.18 It is not good for man to be alone and 1. Cor. 7.1 g Gen. 2.18 It is good for man not to touch a woman h 1. Cor. 7.1 No for that Paul speaketh first of good which is profitable and not of honestie and he doth not oppose good vnto vice or sinne but vnto inconuenient Secondly because that in Genesis is vnderstood of the species or greatest part of mankind which wold decay if it were not continued and increased by mariage neither can a man liue chastly without mariage but Paul speaketh of certaine indiuidua or persons hauing the gift so as they can liue chastly without mariage for of others he saith It is better to marrie then to burne i 1. Cor. 7.9 But tell me whether Paul speaking of a virgin 1. Cor. 7.38 k 1. Cor. 7.38 and saying He that bestoweth her not in mariage doth better do meane that virginitie deserueth more the fauour of God then mariage He speaketh onely of some outward commodities of the single life for the present necessitie that is imminent persecutions l verse 26. and for that the vnmaried is more expedite and fit to teach to serue the Church to vndergo the dangers of his profession and the duties of piety with a better and freer mind m verse 32.34 and insinuateth more difficulty to be in mariage then in the single life as he speaketh concerning the maried Such shall haue trouble in the flesh n verse 28 and more distraction of thoughts and care for the things of this world o vers 33.34 and therfore that the single life is more profitable vnto him that hath the gift of continencie and lesse subiect to distractions and troubles and in this respect more blessed then mariage p verse 40. Notwithstanding the godly maried may also care for those things which belong vnto the Lord as Abraham Isaac Iacob Zacharias Iohn Baptists father and the like What is contrary to this doctrine concerning the efficient cause of Matrimonie The heresie of Montanus the Tatians Saturnians Manichees Marcionites Priscillianists Encratites who condemned mariage as the doctrine and worke of the diuell Pope Syricius differed not much from this heresie who called matrimonie vncleannesse of the flesh in which no man might please God Vnto all whom that saying of S. Paul is to be opposed 1. Tim. 4. 1. Tim. 4.1.2.3.4 Of the matter of Mariage Of how many and of what manner of persons ought Mariage to consist Of two onely one man and one woman for so saith the Lord Two shal be one flesh a Gen. 1.27 2.24 Mat. 19.5 and so many suffice for procreation of offspring But whenas the maried couples giue themselues mutually one to another they are both the second causes efficient and they also the matter of mariage What is contrary to this Polygamie not of hauing many wiues successiuely when one succeedeth another but of enioying more then one at one and the same time Gen. 4.19 which corruptiō of lawful mariage begun in Lamech of Cains race and was afterwards permitted vnto the Fathers not for wantonnesse but for increase of an holy seed both for that politick customes were at that time as also that God might thereby manifest his promise of an innumerable seede to spring of a few But Christ condemned it afterwards Mat. 19.8 5.32 saying It was not so from the beginning and declaring that who so putteth away his wife and taketh another committeth adulterie For that God being about to giue Adam a wife tooke not two or more but one ribbe out of
The other is by words de praesenti for the present as I do betroth thee to be my wife which present and actual promise is called simple absolute consent although the mariage be not yet celebrated Thus she is accounted betrothed named a wife VVho so defileth anothers mans betrothed wife or spouse let him be stoned to death for he hath huÌ„bled his neighbours wife b Deut. 22.23 And Iacob speaking of Rachel who was only betrothed vnto him Giue me my wife c Gen. 29.21 The Angel saith vnto Ioseph Fear not to take Mary thy wife d Mat. 1.20 when she was but betrothed vnto him but she that was betrothed was now by determination accounted a wife vnlesse some thing fell out which might frustrate the contract Is the bond alike in both contracts No for in the contracts de futuro indeed touching the promise and to free the faith plighted they may be admonished but they can not be coÌ„pelled especially if they bring probable reasons why they wil change But the coÌ„tracts de praesenti induce an effectual obligation which ought not to be dissolued by mutuall conseÌ„t for it is a truly ratified mariage e Math. 19.6 although not wholy consuÌ„mated without adding the duties of mariage Also contracts de futuro if they be confirmed with copulation following ought to be ratified VVhy are contracts instituted and why is there a certaine time obserued betweene it and the celebration of mariage There are diuers causes first that the bridegroome and bride may first consent in minde before they coÌ„ioyne in body or as Austine saith lest the husband easily obtaining make light account of that which he longed for being deferred SecoÌ„dly that in the mean time the coÌ„tracts may be published in the Church to the end that if any iust cause ly hid for which the mariage beguÌ„ may not be coÌ„summated it may be manifested in due time Thirdly naturall honestie that meÌ„ might not presently after the contract be caried violently like beasts with the sway of their sensuall desires Which three causes appeare in the contract of Ioseph and Marie a Mat. 1.18 Deut. 21.12 Which is the other degree of mariage The consummation which is done by consecrating or blessing and by celebration of the mariage What is consecration of mariage It is a holy actioÌ„ wherein the bride groome bride being brought into the church before the congregation are taught by the minister touching the institutioÌ„ ends of mariage there expresly witnes their conseÌ„t either by signes if they be duÌ„b or deaf or by words if they can speake For the Canons say that mariage is of no force except consent be declared by words so iâ— their mariage publikly confirmed and they themselues consecrated vnto God by prayer From whence is this custome taken From the example of God himselfe who as soone as he had giueÌ„ Adam a wise blessed them like a Minister in these words Increase and multiplyb Also from a general rule which commandeth That all things be done in the Church decently and in good order c 1. Cor. 14 40. Further it maketh for the dignitie of mariage and freeth the new maried of all ill suspition least they should be thought to liue together like harlots Lastly it cannot but be approued by God who will both be called vpon and is alwayes at hand to them that call vpon his name What is the celebration of mariage All the other whole politicke action by which the couenants of mariage are confirmed and the bride is honestly and modestly brought into the bridegromes house Ought a Christian to obserue this festiuitie and celebration Yea and that according to the custome of the country where he dwelleth and that rule which Paul commandeth Whatsoeuer things are true honest iust holy of good report c. do them d Philip. 4.8.9 Thinke you the mariage feast lawfull Yea it is vsed almost amongst all nations and also confirmed by many examples of Scripture as we reade that Laban made a great feast at the mariage of Iacob and Rachel e Gen. 29.22 and Christ both with his presence and present of 6. galons of excellent good wine confirmed this custom f Ioh. 2.1.2.7.8 But yet in such bankets we must remember that which is recorded concerning Tobias his mariage that they feasted in the feare of the Lord g Tob. 7.17 8.20 As also that at King Ashuerus his great and solemne feast such modestie and honestâ—e was obserued as that no man was compelled to drink more then himself pleased h Hest 1.8 Wherfore mariages celebrated with riot pride gluttonie drunkennes vnchast playes al kind of wantonnes are solemnized to the diuel and not vnto God these are not the least cause of euils which make mariage troblesome vnpleasant vnto many withall rob many parents of their children What is the forme of mariage A iust coniunction of one man and of one woman into one flesh for they which were two before mariage are after marrying made one flesh that is one man by the coniunction and vnion both of soule and bodie What positions do you gather out of this formall cause of mariage First that the bond of mariage is most straight far exceeding that which is betweene the parents and the children as God saith a man shall leaue his father and his mother and shall cleaue vnto his wife i Gen. 2.24 2. That it is not only most strait but indissoluble because that two are made one flesh therefore Christ saith Whom God hath ioyned together let no man separate a Math. 19.6 Thirdly that it is mutuall and reciprocall in one ouer anothers bodie for the Apostle gathereth hereout in that they are one flesh that neither of both hath power ouer their owne bodie b 1. Corin. 4.7 Fourthly an argument of mutuall loue betweene them The husband must loue his wife as his own flesh and as Christ loueth hâ—s Church c Ephes 5.28 Fiftly that there ought to be a communion of all things both spirituall and corporall betweene maried couples What and how many are the ends of mariage Three if thou respect the persons themselues first that they mutually helpe one another both in heauenly and humane things This God expressed Let vs make Adam a helper like vnto himselfe d Genes 2.20 that humane societie may be familiar and friendly yet so as that the husband may appeare to be the wiues head e 1. Corin. 11.3 The second is procreation of children which may succeed their parents both in name and goods which end the Lord hath likewise expressed Increase and multiply f Gen. 1.28 Thirdly that it may be a remedie against all wandring lusts as Paul noteth For auoiding fornication let euery one haue his owne wife and euery woman her owne husband g 1. Cor. 7.2.3 But if you respect either the church or common wealth
happen to returne againe which was thought dead The later mariage contracted by meere ignorance shal be dissolued the fault being thus fouÌ„d to haue bin eithers shal not be imputed vnto either of them Doth barrennesse breake off Matrimonie No for that defect is commonly hidden vnknowne God hath often holpen it when as it hath bin couÌ„ted desperate a. 2. Seeing that God giueth children who shutteth openeth the womb according to his own good pleasure he seemeth after a sorr to lay violent hands vpon God who reiecteth the wife giuen him by God because she beareth him no children Is diuorcement to be permitted for offences or for ciuil death as to be condemned to the Gallies or mines or banishment or els perpetuall imprisonmeÌ„t or els by reason of some disease fallen into after the consummation of mariage or for any other the like causes Herein the iudgements of Doctors do differ for some denie DiuorcemeÌ„t for any such cause because god hath said Whom god hath conioyned let no man separate b Mat. 6. but man separateth when he doth it without Gods word But God hath not granted Diuâ—rcement in his word for such causes But this question were superfluous if the magistrate did his dutie for he should cut off such offendors and so should the innocent party be prouided for Now as concerning ciuill death the Canons teach that the wife is to follow the husband either in banishment or imprisonment As touching diseases caught after lawfull mariage the rule is to be obserued Ill accidents are patiently to bee borne in mariage where there is no fault committed But yet Leprosie is wont to be reckoned amongst the causes of Diuorce for seeing there is a law concerning the Leprous that they dwel apart by themselues that it is incurable that the clean person ought not to be infected with that disease yea the law hath also a caution for the children that contagious children be not procreated of infected parents to the certaine destruction of the whole common weale it is very conuenient that the sound person be not compelled to coÌ„pany with the infected yoak-fellow Hitherto belongeth madnesse which breaketh out into manifest and incurable rage which is to be restrained with bonds least they hurt their owne children or wise or else whomsoeuer they can come by Concerning crueltie ill vsage of one toward the other Theodosius his law the Canon law also the iudgement of the best Diuines do permit in such cases after reconciliation hath bin often tryed in vaine and domesticall separation for a time diuorcement to be made least the innocent party being too much broken with griefe attempt some vnlawful thing For patience being too much hurt turneth into furie But let the innocent party c 1 Cor. 10.13 Mat. 19.8 in the meane time make account that he is called to single life in faith craue victorie of him who suffereth not his to be tempted aboue their strength Therefore as Christ accused not but excused Moses for granting Diuorcement for the hardnesse of their hearts so many at this day thinke that the Christian Magistrate is to be excused in helping by diuorcemeÌ„t those who are miserably vniustly tyrannously and cruelly oppressed for they thinke it better for them to liue apart angelically than together diuelishly but yet if both of them doe one rage against another with words or stripes they thinke separation ought so to be made so as that all hope of new mariage againe be taken from them that yet by this meanes whatsoeuer before this be admitted they may bee reconciled Cod. l. 8. de repud But our consistorie laws do very wel appoint to try al means whatsoeuer before this be admitted Wherein they agree with Iustinian who saith Euen as wee forbid the dissolution of mariage without iust cause so we desire to haue those that are oppressed with aduerse necessitie to bee freed with a necessarie though an vnhappie helpe What is to be done thinke you if either of them being become an vngodly Apostate or obstinate heretike endeuour to draw and compell the other into the same Apostacie and impietie or into any other crime Heere the Magistrate is to make diuorcement with the sword according to Gods commaundement That whosoeuer teacheth Apostasie or turning away from the Lord God he should be slaine and so euill might be taken from the midst of the people a Deut. 13 6 VVhat if the Magistrate neglect his dutie Let the Apostles precept bee of force Auoid an Hereticke after once or twice admonition b Tit. 3.16 Luke 14.26 And so also the Atheist Apostate and Blasphemer Also that of our Sauiour If any come vnto me and hateth not his father mother wife c. is not worthy of me And againe If thine eye offend thee plucke it out c Math. 5.29 And againe whosoeuer forsaketh house field or wife c. shall receiue an hundred fold d 19.29 Hath the wife the like right against her husband that he hath against her in suing for diuorcement If you respect the right which the one hath in the others bodie the bond is equall Wherefore e Cor 7 4 in an equall Obligation it is meet that the same right be granted vnto the one as to the other prouided that modestie be obserued which becommeth the woman towards her husband being agent By whome ought the diuorcement to be made By no priuate person or by the innocent partie or of their owne priuate authority for no man may bee iudge in his owne cause but by lawfull Iudges as well Ecclesiasticall as ciuill if they may be had because mariage consisteth of the Diuine f Mat. 18.15 16 17. humane law mixt not rashly but after reconcilement hath beene sought and the cause lawfully knowne and iudged by alleaging and prouing on both sides For Abrahaam did not put away Hugar vpon his owne priuate iudgement but by the manifest commandement of God g Gen. 21.12 What contrarieth this Doctrine The errour of the Romanists who affirme that there may bee a lawfull separation of mariages for the attaining of Euangelicall perfection as they call it expounding that place of Mathew amisse e Mat 19.12 For they are said to castrate themselues for the Kingdome of Heauen which abstaine from mariage and by the gift of God liue continently that they may serue God more freely as if they wanted their virill parts such as is the cutting off the foote hand and the pulling out of the eye Secondly that it may be broken for the profession of a monasticall life yea though one of the maried couple be against it and that only by the Popes authoritie 3. Lastly this is against the peruerse opinion of such which thinke that that law of Moses concerning Diuorce which is Deu. 24.2 ought now to be of force in the Church of Christ The fourteenth common place of the gouernment of the world or Gods
might manifest his iustice and mercie 2. The primitiue or outward cause mouing vnto it the calamitie of mankinde and the tyranny of the Diuell ouer mankinde 3. The antecedent or inward cause mouing here vnto was the vnspeakeable loue of God the father towards his creature as it is said Ioh. 3.16 So God loued the world that hee gaue his onely begotten sonne c. 4. A fellow cause working voluntarily and with election and obeying the father was the sonne of God himselfe who as Paule saith Phil. 2.7 Made himselfe base taking on him the forme of a seruant became obedient to the father euen vnto the death of the crosse For hee deliuered himselfe into the hands of his enemies voluntarily and readily according to the prophecie Esai 53.7 He was offered because he would and Heb. 10.4 out of the Psalm 40.7.8.9 Because it was impossible by the bloud of Buls and Goats to take away sins therefore Christ entring namely into the world said Sacrifice and oblation thou wouldest not haue burnt sacrifices for sins thou wast not pleased with then I said Lord I come in the beginning of the book it is written of me that I may doe thy will O my Lord. Sathan also is a chiefe cause of Christs death because with an ancient hatred he persecuted the seed of the woman and when hee could do no more hee bit his heele as it was foretold Gen. 3.15 All men are causes of Christs death and to them it must be imputed because of the guilt and the sinne wherein euery one is entangled The helping or instrumentall causes of Christs death were Iudas and the high Priests who counted to Iudas the 30. siluer pieces a Mat. 26.15 Annas also Caiphas Pilate and the people which cryed Away with him away with him b Ioh 18.15 And the Roman souldiers who were his executioners which instruments notwithstanding God so vsed as he finished by them a worke most holy to wit the redemption of mankind but the cursed instruments for none but the most vile and wicked could endure to betray condemne and murder an innocent he did punish with most iust punishments seing they sinned not by constraint but of their owne accord and most of them against their owne conscience What is the subiect oft this passion The Lord himselfe the verie sonne of God being made man But whether was the passion a suffering of his whole person or of one of his natures onely The passion was of the person because that person which suffered was God and man but he suffered not in his diuine nature for it cannot be that an immutable thing should suffer an immortall thing die but in mans nature which hee tooke vpon him and which was subiect to suffering Therefore Paule in respect of the person saith Act. 20.28 That God purchased to himselfe the Church by his bloud And in respect of the humane nature 1. Pet. 4.1 the Apostle affirmeth that Christ suffered in the flesh And in the Epistle to the Hebrewes 2.14 the author saith That the sonne of God was made partaker of flesh and bloud that by death hee might destroy him who had the power of death Therefore although the passion and death of Christ be properly of the flesh according to nature yet according to the person it belongeth to the word because it is one and the same person both of the flesh and the word What was the formall cause The suffering both of the bodie soule both which sufferings are described by the Euangelists in certaine degrees and parts What was the suffering of his soule The inward torment of the soule which Christ felt especially after the administration of the Supper and that ariseth by certaine degrees 1. For first in the garden hee feeling the anger of God kindled against our sins out of his great trouble of minde cryeth Mat. 26.38 My soule is verie heauie euen vnto the death and Father if it be possible remoue from mee this cup by which cup according to the Hebrew phrase he vnderstandeth the anger of God and the punishment for our sinnes yet notwithstanding he addeth a condition Not as I will but as thou vvilt Mark 14.26 Whereby he signifieth not an opposition but a diuersitie of wils which is not of it selfe faultie especially where the wil of mā is subiected to Gods will so a man is ought to be sorie at his friends death yet doth he willingly yeeld to the purpose of God 2. This torment was so increased that hee sweateth drops of bloud through the grieuousnesse thereof Luk. 22.44 At last vpon the Crosse as though he were oppressed by these griefes and forsaken of god he cryeth out My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Ma. 27.46 not as though God were separated frō the humane nature but because it is as Bernard saith a kinde of forsaking when there is no performance or exhibiting of power in so great necessitie neither any shewing of Maiestie which complaint was the complaint of one not despairing or distrusting for he calleth God his God but of one wrestling with a most grieuous temptation Caluin calleth this sanctam desperationē an holy desperation For this cause Dauid prophecying of Christ Ps 18.5.6 saith thus The sorrowes of the graue haue cōpassed me about that is I haue suffered horrible griefes such if as these griefes should haue bene indured by an angel yea al the Angels they would haue bin brought to nothing altogether oppressed of thē And He. 5.7 it is thus said of him Who in the daies of his flesh did offer vp praiers supplycations with strōg crying tears vnto him that was able to saue him frō death and was also heard in that which he feared or was deliuered from his feare that is from that terrour astonishmēt which possessed him when he thought vpon the most seuere iudgement and anger of God But what was the cause of such torments in Christs soule Not one but many 1. The thinking vpon the tyranny of sinne death and Sathan which made hauock of mankind 2. The meditation of that horrible infamous and cursed punishment a Gal. 3.13 which he foresawe he should suffer in his most holie bodie as also those contumelies which should be cast vpon him 3. His thinking vpon the ingratitude of the greatest part of the world 4 Especially the sense of Gods horrible wrath which hee sustained for our sins for which he tooke vpon him to make satisfaction Whereupon Iohn 1.29 Hee is called the Lamb of God which taketh away or which beareth the sins of the world What was the suffering of the bodie His outward suffering which befell to him besides those griefes which in his soule hee sustained which may bee diuided according to the subiectes or places in which he was diuersly afflicted as the garden Caiphas his house or the Cōuocation of the Priests the Pretorie or towne Hall the place without the citie where theeues were punished
eternall as Christ saith Iohn 3.3 vnlesse a man be borne againe c. 3 Because faith without which it is impossible for any man to be saued cannot be without good workes and faith hath charitie euer ioyned with her though not in action yet in possibility a Gal. 5.6 4 Because Bernard saith good workes are the way to the kingdome not the cause of raigning Neither can any man attaine to life eternall but by the way of good workes which God hath prepared that wee should walke in them Ephes 1.4 2.10 What is to be obserued in the sayings of the Scriptures vvherein iustification saluation and life eternall is ascribed to workes 1 Legal sentences are to be vnderstoode of perfect good workes such as none can be found in no creature But euangelicall sentences doe alwaies include faith in our workes And we must vnderstand that by faith in the first place iustification is receiued and acceptation to life eternall afterwarde in the second place and by consequence workes are accepted as the fruites of fairh and life eternall is promised to these for Christes sake 2 In such sayings there are not brought forth arguments from the cause why the person is made partaker of eternall life but it is shewed from the effects or the adiuncts what person is partaker of remission of sinnes life eternall So Luk. 7.47 Christ plainely proueth in way of resolution by this argument that the womans sinnes were pardoned because shee loued much But twoe diuerse questions are at no hand to be confounded The one to whom life eternall is giuen the other for what cause it is giuen To them that doe well and meditate in the law of God is happines and life eternall promised a Psal 1.13 119.1.2 Math. 25.3 but yet it is giuen freely for Christes sake b psal 32 1 3 In this question we must remember to obserue a rule of the Rabbines concerning the holy Scriptures In euery place wherein thou lightest on an obiection for an hereticks thou findest a medicine in the side thereof So the scripture wheresoeuer it ascribeth eternall life to workes as a reward calleth it an inheritance c math 25 35. Colloss 3.24 4 When as diuers effects doe depend alike of one and the selfe same cause the consequence from one effect auaileth to another because of their common dependance as Luk. 7.47 the consequence from loue auailes to proue the remission of sinnes because ech of them dependeth on faith 5 Where there is a subiect there is his proprietie and on the contrarie where there is a propriety there is his subiect So where there is faith there be workes and where there be good works there is faith 6 Seeing good workes doe spring from faith whatsoeuer is attributed to them must needs be ascribed to the roote i. faith whence they spring VVhat is the end and vse of good workes It is three fold 1. The glory of God namely that by them wee should glorifie God before men a Mat. 5.16 2 The testification of our true faith that we may make our calling and election sure to our selues in our owne consciences 2. Pet. 1.10 And also that we may liue sutable to the gospell our calling Ephes 4.1 I beseech you walk worthy of the calling wherwith you are called 3 The edification of our neighbour 2 Cor 9 which is done whilest that we further him by our workes or prouoke him to doe the like b 11. 12. 13 Act. 3.14 VVhat is contrarie to this doctrine 1 Euill workes 2 The error of the papists who teach that good workes may be done without faith as also of them that thinke they are perfect which boast of the perfection and purity of workes and securely rest in them Also their error who bragge of their merits of congruity and condignity and boast of the workes of supererogation which teach that their wilworships Numb 15.39 Ezek 20.18 19 Mat. 15.19 that is worships of there owne deuising are acceptable to god Which accompt these for good workes which are done with good intent and leane only on the will and tradition of men which imagine that the violating of these is more hainous then of the commandements of God As for that which is saide that we must heare the guides euen as Christ himselfe d. Luk. 10.16 Heb. 13.17 it must be vnderstood only of the true pastours of the Church which watch for the saluation of the soules committed to their charge And the error of them who affirme that man is iustified before God by workes as causes sclander vs that we contemne good workes as though this were in controuersy betweene vs and them whether good works are to be done wheras we doe more carefully vrge this then they doe 3 Of the Epicures or libertines which neglect good workes as vnprofitable The three and thirtieth common place Of Christian libertie What doe you vnderstand by this name Christian libertie NOT loosenesse or in generall simply euery libertie but in some respect restrained to some certaine kinde and certaine degrees For this Epithite or title Christian or spirituall puts a difference wherby this speciall kind of libertie is discerned from ciuill and bodily libertie and from the counterfeit liberty of other sects Neyther yet is it contrarie to bodily and ciuil libertie a Eph 6.5 1 Cor. 7 22 or to that seruice that we owe to God and to iustice b 1 pet 2.16 Rom. 6.18 1. Cor. 7.22 Hee that is called being free is the seruant of Christ that is he ought to serue Christ Againe whereas we speake of Christian libertie we must put difference betweene the libertie of the will whereof we haue spoken in the common place of freewill and the libertie of the person wherof here we are to intreat In Greeke it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. Cor. 3.17 for where the spirit of the Lord is there is libertie .. In Latine it is called libertas libertie or setting free not that it it is done by force as in old time when the Lord deliuered the people from Pharaoh vnlesse it be in respect of Sathan whose power and kingdome Christ hath destroyed neither is it obtained with the leaue of our enemies as when the people returned out of Babilon but by the full price paid not to Sathan but to God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Apostle calleth the price of our redemption whereby vve are made free How manifold is personall libertie Paul sets it downe to be twofold not in the kinds but in respect of the degrees one whereby Christ hauing paide that endlesse price namely his bloud wee are redeemed that wee might be set free from the slauerie of sinne death and the Law c Ephe. 1.7 Rom. 7.6 which for instruction sake we may call the Redemption of libertie Whereof the Apostle maketh mention Rom. 6.22 Now are wee made free from sinne but are the
meanes they might be brought back to a more high thought and vnderstanding neither doe we read that the Apostles obserued that washing of feete but that these parts of washing of feet in those hot countries wherein they goe not so well shod as wee appertained to women rather then to men 1. Tim. 5.9.10 VVho are the fellow helpers or administers or seruice able causes of the Supper of the Lord Only the ministers of the word lawfully called to whom the keyes of the Church are giuen whiles that they do rightly execute their office in the administration dispensation of the word of the holy Supper for no man taketh this honour vnto himsef 1 Cor. 3.9 â—â— 1 Math. 28.19 but he that is called of God as was Aaron Heb. 5.4 But the son of God who is present at hand with his Church not with a bodily presence but yet with a spiritual wholsom preseÌ„ce for vs as being the master of the feast doth so celebrate the same by the meanes of his ministers that he alone doth as truly exhibite vnto vs bread and drink of life that is to say himselfe to be enioyed by faith as he doth euidently exhibit vnto vs by the hand of his seruants the signes therof that is to say bread to be chewed in the mouth and wine to be drunk Ioh 6.51 the bread that I will giue is my flesh which I will giue for the life of the world For whom is the the Supper of the Lord instituted Ioh 16.7 Not for all confusedly mixt one with another without exception for Mat. 7.6 he forbiddeth that which is holy to be giuen to the profane to dogs and to strangers from Christ but to theÌ„ which are borne again of water of the spirit that is to the disciples of Christ a Math. 26 26. Luke 22.14 1 Cor. 11.23 because he promised to these only as also he doth giue the sustenance of his quickning flesh and of his bloud And the Sacrament doth belong vnto them to whom the promise doth belong from whence in time past they which were comming on and learned the Catechisme which were not yet baptized they which were accursed out of the Church and the penitentiaries the Sermon being ended were commanded to goe out the Deacon crying let the Catechumeni that is such as learned the Chatechisme and the excommunicated goe out from thence was said the Masse that is the dimission of the Catechumeni And the Grecians did say 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say holy things for holy men like as Apulcius in his second booke doth report that the Priest was wont when he was about to begin the Sacrifices to say thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is who is here to whom answere was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as if it should be said honest good men when as the polluted and vnworthy went away Of how many parts doth the institution of the Lords Supper consist Of three 1. Of the institution of Christ whereby he ordained the outward matter of this Sacrament 2. Of his words both preceptiue and also determinatiue annexed to the institution wherby he doth declare the inward matter and forme moreouer the end 3. Both of a lawful administration also of the receiuing of the Lords Supper it selfe What did Christ when he instituted his Supper He sat downe at the table with the disciples but stoode not at the Altar because he instituted a holy banquet not a sacrifice b Mat. 26 20 Mark 14 18 Luk. 22.14 wherupon againe it ought not to be tearmed the Sacrament of the Altar but the Lords Supper or the Lords Table euen as it is named by Paule 1. Cor. 11. Moreouer hee tooke and instituted the matter namely outward signes two only no more nor fewer that is to say bread the cup or wine in the cup. In like manner he added thereunto holy ceremoniall actions For as he was about both signes 1. He gaue thanks to the Father 2 Hauing taken the bread he brake it 3. He gaue it to the Disciples so also he gaue the cup or wine Iâ— not the holy Supper a double Sacrament seing that the signe thereof is double No. 1. Because euery signe seuerally by it selfe is not a SacrameÌ„t but both of them ioyned together 2 Because amongest vs it is one banquet alone not diuers where notwithstanding many meats and drinkes are set on For those two signes doe declare one action of Christ that is to say our whole spirituall nourishment For that is said to be one not onely which is simple and indiuisible or continuall but that which is perfect that is one in perfection to whose integritie all things doe concurre which are required to the end of the same as one man consisting of the essentiall parts Therefore this Sacrament is many things materially but one thing formally and perfectly in as much as in them one refection is perfected saith Thomas Part. 3. qu. 73. Artic. 20. But why would Christ haue vs vse a twofold Signe That by distinct symboles or signes he might as it were set before our eyes and imprint in our mindes his cruell and bloudie death and truly note out both the giuing of his bodie seuerally and the shedding of his bloud out of his bodie for our sinnes For as Bellarmine doth confesse in his booke of the Sacrament of the Eucharist 4. booke chap. 22. The forme alone of bread doth not exactly represent Christ as dead vnlesse the bloud also be seene on the other part as shed and the forme of wine alone doth not sufficieÌ„tly represeÌ„t Christ as offered in sacrifice for bloud alone is not a sacrifice 2 Like as in this life as Augustine saith in the 26. Tractate vpon Iohn the whole refreshing or nourishing of bodies doth consist of meate which is a due nourishment and of drinke which is a moist nourishment so let vs know that Christ is set forth vnto vs in the Eucharist distinctly as meate and drinke neyther let vs thinke any thing to be wanting vnto vs which may appertaine to our whole spirituall sustenance or nourishment and so let vs by faith apply vnto our selues the bodie and bloud of Christ and the benefit obtained by the deliuerie of his bodie and shedding of his bloud and so as it were by faith let vs eate and drinke Christ himselfe whole Iohn 6.55 My flesh is meat indeed and my bloud is drinke indeed Therefote they doe scarce leaue vnto vs halfe full satisfaction for our sinnes but a lame or halfed matter of nourishment in Christ and do take away the integritie or perfection of this Sacrament whosoeuer doe sunder the cup from the Eucharisticall bread against the precept Math. 19.6 That which God hath coupled together let no man put asunder Whether therefore doe they sinne which take away the cup from the Eucharisticall bread Yea greatly because they goe from the ordinance of Christ and do