Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	witness_v	word_n	yield_v	13	3	6.1937	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A28585	The continuation of An historicall discourse of the government of England, untill the end of the reigne of Queene Elizabeth with a preface, being a vindication of the ancient way of parliaments in England / by Nath. Bacon of Grais-Inne, Esquire.	Bacon, Nathaniel, 1593-1660.; Bacon, Nathaniel, 1593-1660. Historicall and political discourse of the laws & government of England.	1651 (1651)	Wing B348; ESTC R10585	244,447	342

occasion of the Death of Pope Julio is to be seen Lastly she was no good Queen not onely because she gave up the Peoples Liberties in Ecclesiasticall matters to the forrain Jurisdiction of Rome but undertook too much therein by far upon her own account and in Civil Affairs though De jure She was not inferior to any of her Progenitors yet She would have it declared by the Parliament as if the consideration of her Sex or birth had made som hesitation in her minde and when she had made all clear she commending her self thereby to the Prince of Spain with her self indangered likewise that trust of the Nation which she had received and cast such a shadow upon her own Supremacy as in many things it is hard to be discerned Lastly In her whole course uneven sometimes appearing like the eldest Daughter of Henry the Eighth at other times like a Fem covert led by the will of her Lord and Husband that wanting Supremacy himself rendred her thereby beneath her self For First She married by Act of Parliament as if She were not at her own disposing professing as much in her speech to the Londoners upon the Kentish rebellion so a difference was made between the two Sisters the marriage of the one being by advice of Parliament and the abstinence of the other against the same Nor is the same altogether irrationall for by the one the Government of the Nation is indangered and by the other otherwise Secondly By her marriage She became doubly married one way relating to her Person unto her King the other relatintog her trust unto her Councell For where a Forraine mighty King is so nigh the Helme its dangerous to trust the same to his Wife without the joynt concurrence of the Lords The matter in fact declared no less for many times She had steered quite wide had not the Lords been more stiff to their principles then She. The first yeare of her marriage was Hony-moon with her She thought nothing too dear for the King and that her self was but meanly married unless her Husband were as compleat a King in her Nation as any of her Predecessors although contrarily the higher he was advanced the meaner She became Thirdly By her marriage She adventured her Title of Supremacy of jurisdiction For Phillip as King had the Honour stile and Kingly name and so had the precedency he had to do also with the jurisdiction for by the Articles of the marriage he was to aid the Queen in her administration of the Kingdome and maintenance of the Lawes Writs and Commissions passed under his name He also sate in Parliament voted therein and joyned in the Royall Assent Lastly Joyned in the publication and execution of all Lawes To him also was Allegiance due and therefore the Crime of Treason was equally against his as the Queens Crown and Dignity saving that it was reserved to be as against him onely during the time of Coverture and yet had the Queen left issue by him it would have been a hard adventure for the Lawers to have given their opinion in that case seeing the King had been Guardian to his Children during their minority Lastly The whole power and jurisdiction resting in them both joyntly could not inable them to make or dissolve Courts at will nor conclude orders and directions in cases of Plea and conveyance nor process concerning the same I shall sum up all in this on econclusion if neither of these three had an absolute Legislative power either in matters concerning the Church or Common-Wealth if no absolute jurisdiction in case either of Life Member or Estate If they neither can create unite or alter any Court either concerning the Triall and determining the Estates of the People or their own Revenue If not alter or make any new process in Courts of Law If not order common assurances of Lands or Estates And Lastly If they have no power in determining the last appeal and definitive sentence in matters of controversy but all must rest upon the sentence by Parliament there must certainly be found out a further sense of that grand Title of Supremacy of jurisdiction power superiority pre-eminence and Authority then by the common vogue hath bin made The Title of supremacy was first formed in the behalf of Henry the eighths Claime in matters Ecclesiasticall which by the Statute is explained under these words of power To visit correct repress redress Offences and Enormities This Power and no other did Queen Elizabeth claime witness the words of the Statute in her own time But in the framing of the Oath of Supremacy in her time not only in causes Ecclesiastical but temporal which never came within the Statutes and publique Acts in Henry the sevenths time are inserted and if any thing more was intended it must come under the word Things which also was inserted in the said Oath and yet if the words of the Statute of Queen Elizabeth formerly mentioned be credited the word Things ought to comprehend no more then the word Causes and then the Power of Queen Elizabeth in the Common-Wealth will be comprehended in these words of Supremacy to visit correct repress redress Offences and Enormities for the Supremacy in the Church and Common-Wealth is the same in Measure and what more then this I cannot understand out of any publique Act of this Nation Now in regard Offences and Enormities are properly against Lawes the power to visit and correct must also be regulated according to Laws either of War or Peace nor do these five words Jurisdiction Power Superiority Pre-eminence and Authority contain any more Supremacy or other sense for two of them speakes only the rank or degree of the Queen in government Viz. Superiority and Pre-eminence belongeth only to her and not to any other Forrain power And two other words do note her Right and Title thereto by Power and Authority committed to her And the other word denotates the thing wherein She hath Superiority and power Viz. In jurisdiction the nature of which word Vlpian speaking of the nature of a mixt government explaineth thus Quando servata dictione juris judiciorum fit animadversio so as this supreame Authority in jurisdiction is no other then supream power to visit correct redress Offences or determine matters in doubt by deputing fit persons to that end and purpose according to the Law and this is all the Supremacy that appeareth to me belonging to the Crown in these times CHAP. XXXVI Of the Power of the Parliament during these times WHen the Throne is full of a King and he as full of opinion of his own sufficiency and Power a Parliament is looked upon as an old fashion out of fashion and serve for little other then for present shift when Kings have run themselves over Head and Eares A condition that those of that high degree are extremly subject unto but where the Crown is too heavy for the wearer by reason of infirmity the

Martyrs more particularly set forth and no Act of Parliament positive in the point But the time is now come when nighest reformation that the thing is settled more to the prejudice of reformation then all the endeavoures foregoing like to the darknesse of the night that is at the Superlative degree when nighest break of Day A Statute is now made that indeed quite blotted out the very name of the Statute of Henry the fourth De haeretico comburendo but made compleat that Statute of 5 Rich. 2. and the other of 2 Hen. 5. both which were formerly neither good in Law nor effectuall otherwise then by Power and gave more settlement to the Ordinaries proceedings in such Cases For the Delinquent might be convict before the Ordinary by Witnesses or might be indicted at the Common Law and the indictment certified to the Ordinary as Evidence yet did the Parliament carve them out their work and in expresse words declared That opinions against the Authority and Laws of the Bishop of Rome were not Heresie and by the same reason might have done more of that kind but that was enough to tell all the World that the Parliament could define what was not Heresie although they did not then determine what was Heresie And thus the judgment of the Romane Church is called into question in one of their fundamentals and the Clergy left in a Muse concerning the rule upon which they were to proceed against this Crime The Parliament within six yeares after undertakes though somewhat unhappily to determine and define certain points of Controversie which had some relation to the Worship of God and the publique Peace and declared the contrary to these determinations to be Heresie and the punishment to be Death and Forfeiture and the triall to be before Commissioners by Jury or testimony of two Witnesses or by examination in the Ecclesiasticall Court or inquisition in the Leete or Sessions of the Peace Upon the whole matter therefore the Ordinary had a particular Power to determine Heresie but the Parliament determined such Heresies as were punishable with Death and Forfeiture by enumeration in the six Articles This was the Clergies Primmer wherin they imployed their study as making most for their designe and laid aside thoughts of all other Heresies as drie Notions or old fashions laid aside and not worthy the setting forth to common sale Secondly the Lesson concerning Marriage was no lesse difficult for the Clergy to take out They were put by their former Authority derived from abroad and their ancient rule of the Canon Law with the Kings leave they do what they do and where they doubt they take his Commission so did the Arch-Bishop of Durham in the Case betweene John and Jane Fisher in the Kings Case the determining part is put to the Parliaments Conclusion and for a rule in other Cases some persons are enabled to Marry which formerly were not Viz Masters of the Chancery and Doctors of the Civill Law and some forbidden Marriage as all Preists by the Statute of the six Articles And unto the rest concerning degrees of Consanguinity or Affinity a particular enumeration is appointed to be observed within which Marriage is declared unlawfull all other further off are made lawfull In all which regards the Cognisance of Matrimoniall Causes is theirs onely by leave Thirdly Residency and Nonresidency was a Theame formerly learned from the Canon Law in which as also in the thing it self the Clergy were the onely skilfull men The rule of the Canon Law was strict enough considering the times but it was not steel to the back The Parliament now undertakes the cause and though it gave in some respects more liberty then the Canon yet stood it better to its tackling and kept a stricter hand upon the reines then was formerly used and by giving a generall rule for Dispensation took away all arbitrary Dispensations and Licences which were formerly granted beyond all rule but that of Silver or Gold and made all practises contrary to the rule damageable to the party Thus far concerning the matters in Cognisance now touching the Power of the Keyes English Prelacy having laid aside the pretentions of Rome they put the World to a gaze to see which way they would go In the inocent infancy of Prelacy it was led by the hand by the Presbytery and would doe nothing without them afterwards having gained some degree of heighth and strength they entred themselves to be Chariot Horses to the Roman Sun till they had set all on fire now unharnest it is expected they should returne to their former wits neverthelesse forgetting their ancient yokefellowes the rurall Presbyters they stable with the King use his name sometimes but more often their owne serving him with Supremacy as he them with Authority beyond their Spheare they raise him above Parliament he them above Councills so as they do what they list let the Plebeian Presbyter wil or nill they are the onely numerall Figures and the other but Ciphers to make them Omnibus numeris absoluti Neverthelesse the Canon still remaines the same Episcopi se debent scire Presbyteros non Dominos nec debent in clerum dominari Episcopus se sedente non permittat Presbyterum stare Episcopi noverint se magis consuetudine quam dispensatione Presbyteris majores Kings may make them Lords but as Bishops they hold their former rank assigned by the Canon as Lords the King never gave them the keyes and as Bishops the Canon did not yet as under the joynt Title of Lord Bishops they hold themselves priviledged to get what power they can two things they reach at Viz. The absolute power of Imprisonment and of Excommunication in all causes Ecclesiasticall The common Law would never yeeld this some Statutes in some cases did pretend First as touching Imprisonment the Statute of Henry the fourth concerning Heresie doth lispe some such Power of what force the same Statute is hath been already observed in case of incontinency of Church-men it is more directly given them by a Statute in Henry the sevenths time before which time the Statute it self doth initimate that an Action did lye against them for such imprisonment which Law also was made uselesse by another in Henry the eighths time who gave away to Statutes for the punishing them at the common Law First with Death which continued for some Months and that being found too heavy it was punished by another Law with Forfeiture and Imprisonment And the same King likewise gave way to a law for the like punishment in case of Heresie By that Law that revoked the Statute of Henry the fourth formerly mentioned although till triall the same was bailable And thus continued till the time of Edward the sixth But as touching Excommunication it was to no purpose for them to struggle the common Law would never permit them to hold possession quietly but did examine their Authority