Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	witness_v	word_n	writing_n	13	3	8.2964	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A28585	The continuation of An historicall discourse of the government of England, untill the end of the reigne of Queene Elizabeth with a preface, being a vindication of the ancient way of parliaments in England / by Nath. Bacon of Grais-Inne, Esquire.	Bacon, Nathaniel, 1593-1660.; Bacon, Nathaniel, 1593-1660. Historicall and political discourse of the laws & government of England.	1651 (1651)	Wing B348; ESTC R10585	244,447	342

occasion of the Death of Pope Julio is to be seen Lastly she was no good Queen not onely because she gave up the Peoples Liberties in Ecclesiasticall matters to the forrain Jurisdiction of Rome but undertook too much therein by far upon her own account and in Civil Affairs though De jure She was not inferior to any of her Progenitors yet She would have it declared by the Parliament as if the consideration of her Sex or birth had made som hesitation in her minde and when she had made all clear she commending her self thereby to the Prince of Spain with her self indangered likewise that trust of the Nation which she had received and cast such a shadow upon her own Supremacy as in many things it is hard to be discerned Lastly In her whole course uneven sometimes appearing like the eldest Daughter of Henry the Eighth at other times like a Fem covert led by the will of her Lord and Husband that wanting Supremacy himself rendred her thereby beneath her self For First She married by Act of Parliament as if She were not at her own disposing professing as much in her speech to the Londoners upon the Kentish rebellion so a difference was made between the two Sisters the marriage of the one being by advice of Parliament and the abstinence of the other against the same Nor is the same altogether irrationall for by the one the Government of the Nation is indangered and by the other otherwise Secondly By her marriage She became doubly married one way relating to her Person unto her King the other relatintog her trust unto her Councell For where a Forraine mighty King is so nigh the Helme its dangerous to trust the same to his Wife without the joynt concurrence of the Lords The matter in fact declared no less for many times She had steered quite wide had not the Lords been more stiff to their principles then She. The first yeare of her marriage was Hony-moon with her She thought nothing too dear for the King and that her self was but meanly married unless her Husband were as compleat a King in her Nation as any of her Predecessors although contrarily the higher he was advanced the meaner She became Thirdly By her marriage She adventured her Title of Supremacy of jurisdiction For Phillip as King had the Honour stile and Kingly name and so had the precedency he had to do also with the jurisdiction for by the Articles of the marriage he was to aid the Queen in her administration of the Kingdome and maintenance of the Lawes Writs and Commissions passed under his name He also sate in Parliament voted therein and joyned in the Royall Assent Lastly Joyned in the publication and execution of all Lawes To him also was Allegiance due and therefore the Crime of Treason was equally against his as the Queens Crown and Dignity saving that it was reserved to be as against him onely during the time of Coverture and yet had the Queen left issue by him it would have been a hard adventure for the Lawers to have given their opinion in that case seeing the King had been Guardian to his Children during their minority Lastly The whole power and jurisdiction resting in them both joyntly could not inable them to make or dissolve Courts at will nor conclude orders and directions in cases of Plea and conveyance nor process concerning the same I shall sum up all in this on econclusion if neither of these three had an absolute Legislative power either in matters concerning the Church or Common-Wealth if no absolute jurisdiction in case either of Life Member or Estate If they neither can create unite or alter any Court either concerning the Triall and determining the Estates of the People or their own Revenue If not alter or make any new process in Courts of Law If not order common assurances of Lands or Estates And Lastly If they have no power in determining the last appeal and definitive sentence in matters of controversy but all must rest upon the sentence by Parliament there must certainly be found out a further sense of that grand Title of Supremacy of jurisdiction power superiority pre-eminence and Authority then by the common vogue hath bin made The Title of supremacy was first formed in the behalf of Henry the eighths Claime in matters Ecclesiasticall which by the Statute is explained under these words of power To visit correct repress redress Offences and Enormities This Power and no other did Queen Elizabeth claime witness the words of the Statute in her own time But in the framing of the Oath of Supremacy in her time not only in causes Ecclesiastical but temporal which never came within the Statutes and publique Acts in Henry the sevenths time are inserted and if any thing more was intended it must come under the word Things which also was inserted in the said Oath and yet if the words of the Statute of Queen Elizabeth formerly mentioned be credited the word Things ought to comprehend no more then the word Causes and then the Power of Queen Elizabeth in the Common-Wealth will be comprehended in these words of Supremacy to visit correct repress redress Offences and Enormities for the Supremacy in the Church and Common-Wealth is the same in Measure and what more then this I cannot understand out of any publique Act of this Nation Now in regard Offences and Enormities are properly against Lawes the power to visit and correct must also be regulated according to Laws either of War or Peace nor do these five words Jurisdiction Power Superiority Pre-eminence and Authority contain any more Supremacy or other sense for two of them speakes only the rank or degree of the Queen in government Viz. Superiority and Pre-eminence belongeth only to her and not to any other Forrain power And two other words do note her Right and Title thereto by Power and Authority committed to her And the other word denotates the thing wherein She hath Superiority and power Viz. In jurisdiction the nature of which word Vlpian speaking of the nature of a mixt government explaineth thus Quando servata dictione juris judiciorum fit animadversio so as this supreame Authority in jurisdiction is no other then supream power to visit correct redress Offences or determine matters in doubt by deputing fit persons to that end and purpose according to the Law and this is all the Supremacy that appeareth to me belonging to the Crown in these times CHAP. XXXVI Of the Power of the Parliament during these times WHen the Throne is full of a King and he as full of opinion of his own sufficiency and Power a Parliament is looked upon as an old fashion out of fashion and serve for little other then for present shift when Kings have run themselves over Head and Eares A condition that those of that high degree are extremly subject unto but where the Crown is too heavy for the wearer by reason of infirmity the

would pick and chuse and prohibite the Kings Bench as they pleased and to that end would order Originalls out of the Chancery as they thought most meet for it is observed by Fleta that the Kings Bench hath no Jurisdiction of it selfe but by speciall Warrant that is to say by Originall Writs returned thither Neverthelesse it may seeme that such Crimes as are contrary to common honesty or the publique profit or peace in a more exemplary way then ordinary and therefore may be called Crimina laesi Regni or against the State These I say might more properly belong to the subline Judicature of the Councell Table as knowing better how far the publique State was interested or indammaged in such Cases then the other Judges that were experienced onely in ordinary matters of a more private concernment To recite the particular Cases upon record concerning racing of Records Forgeries and other crimes of falshood conspiracies combinations to abate and levell the prices of Commodities Ryots and such like will be superfluous In all which and others of that Cognisance the Sentence exceeded not Fine and Imprisonment or ransome Neither yet were the Common Pleas so rural but the Councel Table could rellish them also and digest them well enough and therefore did not stick to prohibite the Courts of Common Law under colour of a strange maxime That it is neither just nor honest for a man to be sued at the Common Law for a matter depending before the King and his Councell No though the Court of Common Law had the precedency and therefore although the right of Tithes being depending at the Common Law the Arch-Bishop in opposition to the jurisdiction sueth before the Kings Councell and the proceedings at the Law are thereby stayed and no wonder for the Councell Table challenged to hold the ballance of all Courts of Law within their owne Order and so if any doubt concerning the Jurisdiction depended the Councell Table gave the word and all stooped thereto But enough of the Subject matter the manner followes a new form of Processe is taken up that the Common Law and ancient Custome never knew and which grew so noisome to the People that complaints are made thereof as of common greivance and remedies are thereto applyed by the Lawes of these times For whereas by the Grand Charter nothing could be done in Judgement but according to the Lawes of the Land and in affirmance thereof a Law was made in these times that no Accusation nor Attachment nor forejudging of Life or Member nor seisure of Lands Tenements Goods or Chattels should be against the form of the Grand Charter and Law of the Land the course of affaires grew so stale that amongst other innovations a trick of a new kind of triall is brought forth by suggestions upon Articles exhibited against any man before the Councell Table and thereupon issued forth Attachments against the party complained of by meanes whereof and other courses for they could also sequester much vexation arose unto the People Hereunto upon complaints multiplied a remediall Law is made whereby it is Enacted that all such suggests made shall be carried to the Chancellor Treasurer and the Kings Grand Councell and the Informer shall finde surety to prosecute with effect and to incurre the like penalty intended for the Defendant if the Plaintiffes proofes be not compleat and then the Processe of Law shall issue forth and the Defendant shall not be taken against the form of the great Charter that is he shall not be taken untill first the fault appear upon Record by Presentment or by due Processe or by originall Writ according to the Ancient Law of the Kingdome Either therefore the Privy Councell had no power to hold any Pleas at all or else no power of triall The first of these was concluded in open Parliament and the second as good as so for if the first then the second will come on undeniably But suppose all this be given up yet was this Liberty to hold Pleas so qualified that the person could not be touched till the thing did appear by Inquisition and then in a Legal way such proceedings was had upon suggestion made against the City of London in Henry the Thirds time for one of the Judges was first sent into the City to finde the suggestion by a Jury and then the Lord Maior appeared before the Lords and traversed the matter and in a manner appealed or rather demanded to be tryed according to the custome of the City And the like course doe we finde observed in our Law Reports of these times in a Case concerning the price of Wooll by a false Report The foote of the whole account will be this That the work of Judicature of the Privy Councell in these times in Cases of Crimes was to receive Articles and award Inquisitions and after return in nature of a Grand Inquest to recover Traverse and to order triall at the Common Law and upon Verdict returned to Fine and Ransome In other Cases either of right or equity in matters of private property they were determined either by Judges of the Bench or Chancery although possibly the suite was Coram Concilio for that all the said Judges were of the Kings Councell And yet as I dare not affirme so I cannot deny but it might also be possible that some matters especially these of a greater consequence either in their own nature or in regard of the persons whom they concerned were determined by the major Vote of the whole Councell in a prudentiall or rather Arbitrary way But this was Invita minerva and used so rarely as the Path is growne out of view saving some few footsteps here and there remaining which shew that the Grand Councell of Lords had been there CHAP. IV. Of the Chancerie IT is the birth of the Kings Power in Judicature and may deserve the name of the first born For though it had no better Title in these later times then Officium because amongst other of the Kings Escripts it formed Writs remediall for such as had received wrong yet even by that work it was in repute for so much skill in the Law of the Land that by the consent of all it was as well able to advise a remedy as to advise the Complainants where to have it and yet it had one adventage further that it was an Office of remembrance to the King who is a Person of great trust in the Law and gave such credit to all Acts done before him as being entred into the remembrance became of the highest nature of Record against which no Plea did lie Amongst these matters of debt and contract coming into the account this Office taking notice of the Record tooke Cognisance of the thing and for the executing thereof and thus in these and such like Cases granted Judiciall Writs and so found out a way of Judicature to as many Causes as

the State would trust it with and because it pretended Cognisance onely of matters of Record before them they found out a way of examining of witnesses by Commission and returning their Depositions in writing which being become a Record before them they gave their Sentence upon the whole matter without the ancient ordinary tryall Per pares It becomes a kinde of Peculiar exempting it selfe from the ordinary course in manner of triall and from the ordinary rules of Law in giving of Sentence and as a back doore for the Kings Arbitry in case of Judicature in matters of Common Pleas as the Councell Table was in Crowne Pleas they both are looked upon with a very pleasing eye of Majesty which loves not to be straite laced yet all is imbattelled under the colours of Equity Honor Conveniency and Conscience like a Monopoly that is bred under the wings of the Publique but feeds it selfe upon it That this had attained the Title of a Court so anciently as in K. Stevens time as the Honorable Reporter noteth I much question by the Title that Fleta gives it in later times nor under his favour will that Testimony cited out of the History of Ely warrant it but upon a mistaken ground of misplacing the note of distinction for I take the words to be thus translated King Etheldred determined and granted that the Church of Ely should for ever in the Kings Court hold the dignitie of the Chancery and not hold the dignitie of the Kings Court of Chancery Neverthelesse its clear that these times brought it to that condition that it might well carry that name if formerly it had not For it grew very fast both in honour and power and this not by usurpation though it did exceed but by expresse donation from the Parliament Yet is this power much darkned in the limits and extent thereof chiefly in regard that the Chancellor is betrusted with many things whereof there is no evidence for the Chancery to claim any Cognisance For he was in these times a person of many interests and relations being one of the Quorum in the Star-Chamber of the Kings Councell chief in the Chancery most commonly a Clergy man and therewith Legate è latere and in these severall Relations might act directly and yet in severall Courts And therefore though he had power with others to punish neglects of Execution of the Statutes of Wines by Act of Parliament and also of the Statute concerning Victuall and to determine matters of controversie between parties in Cases depending before the Parliament and in some matters that concern the Kings Revenue yet cannot these be said to be the proper worke belonging to the Cognisance of the Chancery but to the Chancellor by speciall Commission in another relation Allbeit I cannot deny but the Court it selfe had Cognisance in matters of as strange a nature Viz. To punish disturbances of Merchants in their trade to see to the executing of the Statutes of Purveiors and to remedy greivances contrary to other Statutes which generall words let in a wilde liberty to that Court to intermeddle in Lawes which were never intended for their touch to punish Nusances according to discretion to give remedy to Merchants upon the Statute of Staple so that its clear enough the Parliament intended it should be a Court and gave their Seale to their power of Judicature Nor as it seemeth was this any regret to the Courts of Common Law but as a thing taken for granted For the Reports tell us that if the King grants Tythes arising from without the bounds of any Parish the Patentee shall sue in the Chancery by Scire Facias and shall there proceed to issue or demurrer and then to the common Law where upon triall if the Defendant make default the Plaintiffe shall have Judgement and Execution And if the Heire be in Ward to the King the Mother shall sue and recover her Dower in the Chancery And they tell us that it had power to prohibite Spirituall Courts and Courts of common Law yea to over-rule or reverse judgements and yet the common Law held its ground when it was concerned for neither were all suites there by Bill as in cases of Equity nor determined according to such rules nor did the power of Judicature rest in the breast of one Chancellor but in him joyntly with other Councell of the King which were also learned Judges of the Law For the Report informeth that Edward the Second had granted a Rent in Taile to the Earle of Kent who dying his Sonne under age and Ward to the King Edward the Third seised amongst other Lands the rent and granted it to Sir John Molins Upon Petition the King refers the matter to the Arch Bishop and others of the Councell calling to them the Chancellor A Scire Facias goes forth to Sir John Molins he upon appearance pleaded to the jurisdiction as a case belonging to the common Law but it would not be allowed because it was to repeale the Kings Charter And whereas it was objected that the reference was to the Arch Bishop and others and therefore the cause ought not to be determined in the Chancery it was resolved that it did properly belong to the Chancery by the Law And in the Argument of the case it appeares clearely that the Kings Councell there were learned in the Law And the same is yet more evident by the Title of Bills in those dayes exhibited in the Chancery which was directed to the Chancellor and the Kings Councell and the rule given Per tout les Justices which I rather note for the shortnesse of the forme of Bills in those dayes farre different from these times wherein the substance of the complaint however small in it selfe is oftentimes blowne out into so great a bubble that it breakes to nothing And the Statutes formerly mentioned do assert the same thing as touching the Kings Councell For though they speake of the Councell or Chancery in the English Tongue yet in the Originall the words are Conceill en Chancery Having thus touched upon the matters under the Judicatory of the Chancery and Judges in the same in the next place the manner of proceedings comes to consideration For it seems they had been formerly very irregular and that contrary to the Grand Charter upon a bare suggestion in the Chancery the party complained of was imprisoned and no proceedings made thereupon for remedy whereof it was ordained that upon suggestions so made the complainant was to finde Sureties to pursue the suggestions and that the processe of Law should issue forth against the party without imprisoning him and that if the suggestions were not proved true the complainant should incur the like penalty that the Defendant should have done in case be had beene found guilty but afterwards this later clause was altered by another Statute because it was full of uncertainty and it was ordained that in such case the Complainant