Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n wit_n world_n write_v 85 3 4.9990 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A17385 A commentary upon the three first chapters of the first Epistle generall of St. Peter VVherin are most judiciously and profitably handled such points of doctrine as naturally flow from the text. Together with a very usefull application thereof: and many good rules for a godly life. By Nicholas Byfield preacher of Gods Word at Isleworth in Middlesex. To which is now newly added an alphabeticall table, not formerly published. Byfield, Nicholas, 1579-1622.; Gouge, William, 1578-1653.; Byfield, Nicholas, 1579-1622. Commentary: or, sermons upon the second chapter of the first epistle of Saint Peter. aut; Byfield, Nicholas, 1579-1622. Sermons upon the ten first verses of the third chapter of the first Epistle of S. Peter. aut; Byfield, Nicholas, 1579-1622. Sermons upon the first chapter of the first Epistle generall of Peter. aut 1637 (1637) STC 4212; ESTC S107139 978,571 754

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

that he was never guilty of any offence against God or man Thus of the sense of the words Divers Doctrines may be gathered out of these words but because one is principall I will but touch the rest Doct. 1. Mens sinnes are of mens making man made sinne God made none Doct. 2. It is a hatefull thing to be a maker of sinne As it was most glorious for God to make a world of creatures so it is most ignominious for man to make a world of sinnes Doct. 3. Christ made no sinne This is the chiefe Doctrine and plaine in the Text He was not only free from the first and worst kinds of making of sinne mentioned before but he was free from all sinne in all estates of his life he knew no sinne he did none iniquity he was that just One by an excellency Quest. But how came it to passe that the man Jesus had no sinne seeing all other men bring sinne with them into the world and daily sinne Answ. He was sanctified from the wombe being conceived by the holy Ghost which no other are so as both originall sinne was stopped from flowing in upon him in his conception and besides hee was qualified with perfect holinesse from the wombe and therefore is called that holy thing borne of the Virgin Luke 1.35 And it was necessary his humane nature should bee so holy and that hee should doe no sin because his humane nature was to be a tabernacle for the Deity to dwel in Col. 2.9 and besides from his very humane nature as well as from his Deity must flow unto us life and all good things and therefore he must needs be undefiled The man-hood of Christ is as the conduit and the God-head as the spring of grace unto us Besides his sufferings could not be availeable if he were not innocent himselfe The Uses follow and so Uses First we see the difference between the two Adams the first made sinne and infected all the world with it the other made no sinne but redeemed all the world from it The first Adam as he had power not to sinne so he had power to sinne but the second Adam had not only a power not to sinne but also no power to sinne not only as they say in Schooles Posse non peccare but also Non posse peccare Secondly we may hence see in what a wofull damnity against goodnesse the world stands when this most innocent Man that never did any sinne that never offended God or man in all his life when he I say comes into the world how is he despised and rejected of men Who looked after him unlesse it were for his miracles few honoured him for his holinesse How is the world set on wickednesse that it should account him without forme or handsomenesse that shone before God and Angels in such a spotlesse innocency Oh what wit had the rulers of this world that condemned him as a malefactor that had no spot in him from the crowne of the head to the soale of the foot that never did man wrong or sinned against God Isa. 49.7 and 53.2 3 4. Thirdly we may hence see cause to wonder at the love of Christ to us Oh how is it 〈…〉 of such a world of sinnes that yet himselfe never knew sinne What heart of man can sufficiently admire his love unto us that can abase himselfe to be made sinne for us that never did sinne himselfe Fourthly is it not hence also most manifest that impenitent sinners shall not be spared or pitied of God Did not God spare his owne Son that never offended in all his life and shall he spare them that never left offending of him Oh what madnesse hath besotted men so as with stubborne wilfulnesse still to trust upon an unknowne mercy in God yea such a mercy as God could never conceive in the case of his Sonne that was not to him as they are in any respect Were these men but throughly beaten from this sinfull plea of mercy in God they would repent of their sins in time and seeke true mercy from God which never is with-held from penitent sinners Lastly Did our Saviour Christ suffer so patiently such extreme things that never deserved any evill in himselfe What a shame is it for us to be so unquiet and dejected or so froward or so unsettled when any crosses or afflictions fall upon us who yet have deserved at Gods hands to suffer a thousand times more and worse things than those that doe befall us In his mouth was found no guile We reade in the Scripture of guile in the spirit when we have false hearts and guile in the hands by false weights and ballances and guile in the mouth in deceitfull words Guile in words is committed many wayes First by lying when men speake what they thinke not Secondly by flattering when men praise others after a corrupt maner or for corrupt ends Thirdly by backbiting when men censure others behind their backs of malice or whisper evill against others Psal. 41.7 Fourthly by wresting the words of others to their hurt Psal. 56.11 and 52.1 2. Fiftly by with-holding the just praises of others or Apologie Sixtly by fearefulnesse in evill times when men will not stand for the truth or speake against their Consciences Seventhly by disgracefull jests Ephes. 5.4 Eighthly by telling the truth of malice 1 Sam. 22.9 10. Ninthly by boasting of a false gift Pro. 27.1 Tenthly by hypocrisie and dissimulation and that divers wayes as 1. When men speake faire to mens faces but reproach them behinde their backs or flatter them meerely to catch them and intangle them in their talke as the Pharisees often tempted Christ. 2. That reproveth sinne in others and yet commits it himselfe Rom. 2.19 3. That colours sin under pretence of Religion Marke 12.40 4. That professeth Religion in words and yet denieth it in his heart 5. That hideth his sin by deniall or excuses to avoyd shame and punishment 6. That gives good words to men in affliction but relieves them not 1 Iohn 3.17 18. None of these nor any other wayes of guile were found in Christ though they called him a deceiver and sought all occasions against him Thus of the sense the doctrines follow Doct. 1. Guile in words is a vice that wonderfully dishonours a man it was a fault would give great advantage to the enemies of the truth As it is a sinne which is in a speciall manner hatefull to God Psal. 5.7 so it is shamefull amongst men and therefore as any man would enjoy good dayes let him refraine his tongue from evill and his lips that they speake no guile Psal. 34.13 Doct. 2. When he saith that they found no guile in his mouth it imports that they sought it And so we learne that the godly are so hated of the wicked that they seeke occasion against them when they see not or heare not of any faults in them they search and inquire and lie in waite
Christians as in the manner shew no scruple nor feare nor trouble of minde for breaking Gods expresse Law in requiring obedience to Magistrates while they are ignorant whether it be a sinne or no to obey and yet on the other side are extremely fearefull and troubled in themselves to vary from the advice or example of such men as they account godly or fathers to them or others in Religion and so are more fearefull to breake mens traditions than Gods Commandements Tradition is ill as well when it comes from good men as when it comes from bad men 3. The Jesuites that maintaine that horrid doctrine of deposing or murthering of Princes so farre are they from obeying them Persons rather to be confuted by strokes than by arguments as men that offend not onely against the Lawes of God but the Lawes of Nations and the Law of Nature Hitherto of the things to which they must submit themselves viz. to every ordinance of man The motive or manner followes For the Lords sake These words doe import both the cause and the manner of submission they must submit for the Lords sake and so First there are divers things in God which should move Christians to all possible care of pleasing and obeying their Magistrates as First Gods and mens Magistrates were ordained of God and therefore for his sake that set them up we should obey them Secondly Gods Commandements God hath required our submission and therefore for the respect of the dutie wee owe to God we should obey them Thirdly Gods Image Magistrates are little Gods in the world they resemble Gods soveraignty or Majesty and therefore because they are like God we should obey them even for so much of the similitude of God as wee may behold in them or their authority Fourthly Gods mercies we are infinitely bound unto God and therefore for his sake even for the love we beare to him wee should doe this which hee requireth Fifthly Gods glory God shall get much honour and his religion will be well spoken of if Christians live obediently and contrariwise if Christians be not obedient God may be much dishonoured thereby and great stormes of affliction may be brought upon the Church by the wrath of Princes Sixthly the judgements of God because they must give account to God for their behaviour toward Magistrates as well as for their behaviour towards God himselfe Secondly these words may note the manner of obedience we must obey Princes for Gods sake not onely for conscience sake but even as if wee did obey God himselfe and with a due respect unto God and so it may make also a limitation We must so obey man as we still have respect unto God so as nothing be done against the Word or pleasure of God Use. The use should be therefore for instruction to teach us to looke carefully to our selves in our submission and so to obey First from the heart because God is intituled to this service Secondly with feare because God will be an avenger of disobedience and resisting of the powers Thi●dly though our subjection should be to our losse or discredit or danger or hurt any way yet for the Lords sake we should doe it There is motive enough in God though there were not worthinesse in the Magistrate or recompence to us Againe it serves to shew the hatefulnesse of those transgressors that resist the power and will not make conscience of it to submit themselves to the ordinances of Magistrates For this is to resist God himselfe this is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and God will certainly be a revenger of this disobedience it being his owne cause as well as the Magistrates Besides it serves to informe us concerning the admirable power and wisdome of God in effecting the subjection of man to authority of Magistrates All men naturally affect to excell and like not superiority in other men And besides it is needfull that one man should governe and keepe in order millions of men disposed as before Now this well points at the cause of this order and su●jection which is the respect of God God naturally hath planted in the hearts of men a feare to rebell or disobey even for feare of God himselfe more than Princes and besides God hath made man to see by experience that he doth defend the persons and rights of Kings by revenging the disobedience of men this naturall conscience keepes under naturall men Now though the Apostle would have godly men to obey for the same reason yer it i● upon an higher ground for godly men are instructed by the Word of God to obey Princes yea herein differ● the obedience of the godly from the wicked that the godly man obeyes for the meere love hee beares to God and the wicked only for feare of vengeance from God so both obey for an higher reason than the respect of Princes themselves even for the Lords sake the one for the love of God and the care of his glory the other for feare of his punishments and judgements Lastly it shewes men must so acknowledge the glory of Princes as that especially we have respect unto the glory of God who is King of Kings we must obey Kings in the land so as God be not disobeyed Thus of the Proposition the Exposition followe● The Apostle labours to cleare this doctrine from divers scruples might be conceived by Christians whether they arise from the diversitie of the sorts of Magistrates or from their soveraigntie For the sorts hee shewes they must obey Magistrates of all sorts both superiour and inferiour the highest and those which are subordinate to them both Kings and Governours also for their soveraigntie Hee teacheth them to observe the supremacie of Kings and Monarchs In generall we may learne from the Apostles care to prevent mistaking herein that he accounts it a pernicious thing to erre about the authoritie of Princes and their Gover●ours And experience shewes it to be pernicious sometimes to the persons of Kings who are often by treason murthered upon wicked and erroneous grounds and sometimes to the subjects who draw upon themselves not onely fearefull sinnes but miserable punishment also by erring herein sometimes it is pernicious to religion it selfe and religious causes giving not onely scandall but procuring desolation in the Churches through errours sometimes on the left hand and sometimes on the right hand Whether to the King It may be questioned whom the Apostle meanes by the word King Such as understand the Epistle to be written to the Jewes may perhaps conceive that the Kings that ruled by deputation in Judea should bee meant such as were Herod and Agrippa But in as much as the Jewes were scattered thorow the Provinces and those provinciall Jewes were most in quiet and in as much as for the reasons afore given it is likely that the Epistle was written to all Christians both Jewes and Gentiles therefore by the King hee meant Caesar. And then a more scruple ariseth for the Romans