from the obligation of the law That which is bound to the lawe is properly the subiect of the breach of the law now men and angels are only bound to Gods law therefore men and angels may only be tearmed the subiect their actions therefore onely as belonging vnto them are sinfull that is flowing from sinners and so are their workes so that mans nature worketh and sinne and God mans nature worketh and hath God working in it and so the action is good againe God beside his general influence concourse with his creature hath a speciall worke in the action which concernes himselfe and that is likewise good yea and verie good for it is the last end of the creature but the other cause which is sinne cleauing so fast vnto our nature qualifies our nature to doe sinfully The sunne-beames comming thorough a red glasse shines on the opposite wall with the tincture of the colour of the glasse now the question is whether the red colour be onely in the glasse or likewise in the shining surely it seemes that the whole colour remaines still in the glasse and rather dimmes the shining then infects it so the beames of Gods wisedome shining through our corrupt soules seemes to be an action tainted with sinne but surely the corruption stickes in our soules and onely hindred the bright beames of Gods glorie from appearing in our actions Reason 3. from the sole nature of an effect That which is onely an effect can neuer be a subiect nowe the motion is onely an effect and can no otherwise be considered and therefore is alwaies ioyned with his cause as a sinfull action is in sense and reason the action of a sinneful man that is whereof sinnefull man is the cause Hence beeing an effect it must needes exist or stand out by many causes and therefore according to euery cause hath his speciall affection so a sinfull action hath one reference vnto man an other vnto God and yet may stand out of both Christs death had many causes and all subordinate causes were according to Gods determinate counsell the action was sinfull yet the sinne did inhere in Pilate Herod and the accursed Iewes Reason 4. from the nature of goodnes That which is simply good cannot bee the subiect of sinne now actions are of this nature the reason is because causes giue beeing vnto things and therefore are absolute as causes now motion hauing no other being but that which it receiues from causes Causa cuius vi res est This vis must needs be Gods and causes producing that by a motiue force in themselues which force is from God cannot any wayes leaue in the effect an euill inherent but onely in themselues which wanted true force whereof the effect should haue existed hence we call sinne rather a deficient cause then an efficient cause Rom 6.12 Rom. 7.5 Indeede sinne in vs is said to raigne and haue force in our members and so sinne with his subiect is exceeding powerful but it is by turning Gods created force the wrong way euen as a wheele set a running wrong way is carried with as great force as when it runne the cleane contrarie so mans nature set a rebelling against God turnes Gods created forces against himselfe that the force is put into the action it is Gods but that it was put in by the hand of a rebell it became sinfull yet God will acknowledge his owne force in the action and turne the fault and crime to the proper owners That the Iewes and Pilate laid hands on Christ it was Gods created force in them but the abuse of it is their owne and takes vp a proper habitation in their miserable soules then causation beeing a created force and motion onely acknowledging the same well may the motion be Gods and yet no cause at all of sinne Reason 5. from priuation Sinnes are properly the priuation or want of action and therfore though they may bee both in one subiect yet neuer can the one be the subiect of the other for so should deadly enemies become louing freinds and the worst kind of opposites be reconciled for I am sure that priuation though he be no being yet he denies a beeing in the selfe same subiect which is capable of it Blindnes is a worse not being then not seeing for not seeing may be in a stone which is neuer the worse for it but blindnes can be no where but where sight may be and therefore the eye is much worse for it if then sinne bee the priuation of an action it can neuer bee in an action but alwaies against an action Reason 6. from action and passion which seeme to differ but in respect of the agent and patient and therefore the patient should sin more then the agent seeing the action wherein lies the sinne is most properly in the patient but frō the agent The action from the worker is a passion in the receiuer and therefore if sinne were in the action it should goe along with it to the patient yea rather should it be in the patient then the agent seeing the action rests most in the patient Hence murther should rather be the sinne of the patient then the agent seeing the action of murther as it is from the agent so most properly is in the party slaine and therefore the murtherer should be the murthered which is against reason It is plaine then that sinne abides in the murtherer the action is good let this therefore be obserued that God may be iustified euen in sinnefull actions yet no cause of sinne because sinne alone rests in the bosome of fooles and will not stirre one iotte out of that subiect it is therefore dangerous to defend that an action is the materiall cause of sinne for so should sinne not onely be said to be in the action but of the action and then I know not how God should worke the action and bee freed from sinne for causa causae est causa causati The words then are thus to be expounded Things are here put for actions by a metanomie of the cause for the effect for actions proceed frō things then actions for the sinnes which are committed by sinnefull things and so the action is an effect of the sinnefull man and is put for his cause which be sinnes in the things Neither is this any newe opinion Motus modus actionis for all agree that the motion is good onely the manner of doing is euill Now examine the point well and we shall alwaies find the manner in the doer and not in the thing done and therefore the euill is properly in the doer and not in the thing done onely it is said to be in it in that regard that an euill cause wrought it and so the motion is both Gods and mans yet not both of one manner of working Mans fall was an action therefore Gods and mans but man wrought it one manner of way and
necessarily must needes be a cause The answer is it is a necessarie conclusion by way of ratiocination or discourse but not from the argument it selfe the disposition makes it necessarie but the third reason is no necessarie cause seeing that the action of Gods decree as out of himselfe and in the creature is externally and materially to be considered and so is not necessarie but contingent temporarie and mutable and therefore if it had pleased God it might haue fallen out otherwise for euery necessarie truth is an eternall truth And therefore that which is in time and not eternall is contingent mutable and alterable That which is said to the interceding cause betwixt Gods decree and the fall Of the interceding cause to wit mans free will to exempt God from sinne is most true for God did not immediatly worke mans fall But you obiect that the remote cause is as well sinfull as the next because the deuill was the remote cause and yet guiltie of the same sinne Adam commited A speciall neuerprooues a generall The answer is when the causes are vniuocall homogeniall and of the same order of working but in causes heterogeniall and equiuocall which are of diuerse natures the remote cause is neuer tainted with the same fault that the next cause is As wine is a remote cause why a man is drunke yet no faultie-cause of his drunkennesse The Gospell and our Sauiour Christ came to send a sword into the world but yet were no true causes of sedition and quarrels among men The Sunne raiseth putrified creatures out of dead carkases it can harden as well the clay as melt the waxe A sonne desires the death of his father so doth God One thing effected of diuerse causes may bee faultie in one but not in another but the sonne breaks Gods commaundement God doth it according to the true rule of iustice a sonne would haue his father liue God would the contrarie yet a sinne in neither And therfore a remote cause is onely guilty of the same offence with the next when they worke all after one forme and manner otherwise the immediate cause is the onely author of the sinne al the rest by accident and by abuse The Gospel is the sauour of death vnto death as well as the free will of man but not eodem genere causandi after the same manner of working Pharaoh hardneth his owne heart so doth God but the one immediatly the other mediatly by the abuse of mans freewill Therfore the answer is from the distinction of remote causes in vniuocall causes the remote cause is as guiltie as the next and therefore the deuills will In causes vniuocall all are guiltie of the same crime but not in equivocall and mans will working vnivocally are both in the same offence but Gods will and mans worke equiuocally the one one way and the other another and therefore no neede of participation seeing they haue no next genus of a cause in which they should communicate Answer to Gods desertion To the third euasion betwixt infallibilitie and necessitie it is granted that man fell infallibly but not necessarily except we vnderstand it of Gods decree in himselfe and then the truth was an eternall truth And in this sense our Diuines hold it not of any necessitie in mans will therefore it was only necessarie in Gods wll but contingent in mans yet the truth it selfe in the thing is to God and man contingent to God most certen but to man vncertaine For desertion we hold that God did not forsake man in any necessarie requisite for his true obedience vnto the law onely he with-held his confirmation of man If a man were set in some office for triall of his gifts is it necessarie that he should be confirmed in it I trow not and therefore this desertion was of confirmation and not of necessarie helpes for execution And here our Orthodoxe writers when they answer to that argument that iustice and mercie presuppose misery Misâ—rie potentiall reall habituall make answer of a threefold miserie first actuall which is in sense and feeling secondly habitual which is in the bosome of a man but as yet puts not forth it selfe the third potentiall into which a man may fall and this they call a miserie in comparison Iob 4.18 Behold he found no steadfastnesse in his seruants and laid folly vpon his angels Iob 9.2 Howe should man compared vnto God be iustified Habituall and actuall miserie had no place in man by his creation but possible or potentiall miserie was laid in the freedome of his will which if God had inclined vnto good and man so determined then had he come into the estate of the blessed Angels and so miserie had been impossible and his estate should haue been confirmed vnto him with God for euer not from the freedom of his will but from his obedience and Gods promise thereunto Therefore that desertion and not collation of necessarie helpe to auoide sinne is to be vnderstood of this third grace which was not a grace of creation but a further liberallity which God might haue bestowed if it had pleased him But I dare not rest satisfied with this answer because I see this third grace was onely to be obtained by the obedience of the creature that is if he did the will of God then would God haue beene as good as his promise thou shalt liue therefore in my iudgement Confirmation of life by creation was to follow our obedience vnto the 〈◊〉 confirming grace was a subsequent grace to followe obedience and not an antecedent grace to goe before it and so the angels obtained it by their obedience and from their obedience are confirmed if then without their obedience they could not be confirmed then must confirming grace belong vnto the law of creation as well as any other for what grace should man haue receiued by creation but that which God would haue communicated vnto him by the rule of obedience doe this and thou shalt liue to confirme him in life was vpon his doing I answer therefore Desertion 1. in not rebuking Sathan 2. In diuiding of the lawe and his facultie 3. In that God suffered man to be distracted and did not hold him close vnto his law in despite of the deuill that desertion is no cause of mans sinne but that God was wel-pleased to suffer the deuill to worke more strongly in the temptation then mans will should be able to oppose not for power giuen but for present act and as in this temptation the law forsooke man so God may most iustly bee said to forsake him I haue before declared that two things are most necessary for euery good action rule and power which if both concurre not the action cannot bee produced Now the law concurred not and therefore man was forsaken of the lawe not actiuely but passiuely euen as a master should promise his seruant all aide and succour as long as hee would
therefore be our wisdome to follow Gods footsteps sobrietie to stay our selues where he hath left no impressioÌ„ else shall we loose the sweete inspiration that issueth out of the flowers of Gods wisedome neither must we breath vpon it any of our vnsauourie notions for then the sweet influence wil retire into the flower the smell that we haue breathed out of our selues will returne not to recreate the spirits of grace and goodnesse but to puffe vp in vs a spirit of pride and selfe-conceit which is nothing but like a blowne bladder euacuated with the least pricke of sound knowledge For as extreame windie stomacks do not onely hinder digestion by interposition with the wholesome meate and relaxation of the mouth of the stomacke which ought to shut it selfe so close about the meate that not so much as the least vacuitie may bee left but also either by ill digestion fils the bodies with crudities obstructions and consequently putrifactions or else because winde is so stirring makes eiaculation and a sudden regurgitation of all that is receiued so in like manner windie knowledge aboue wholesome sobrietie makes such an interposition and relaxation of the minde that it can digest no wholesome doctrine but fils it selfe with all manner of rawe humors and vnstable opinions which breed such obstructions in the minde that presently it falls into diuers sickenesses and can keep nothing that is good but presently beeing receiued by the pride and selfe-conceit it hath in it selfe casts it vp againe and so by a continuall casting breeds that weaknes that so much leauen of evill doctrine is soked into the verie filmes as I may say of the mind that it breeds that disease which is tearmed of Physitians corruptio ad aciditatem corcorruption into sowernesse which sets such an eager and sharpe appetite in the mind that it hungers continually to be fed with newe opinions and so at the length rottennesse and putrifaction is bredde therein and then consequently death and destruction therefore if we meane to preuent these sicknesses we must looke to God our patterne But alas you will say how can that be done seeing hee dwells in a light vnapproachable 1. Tim. 1.16 and therefore is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 incomprehensible by our Logicke or reason and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vnnamable by our graÌ„mar speech but here let vs wonder that God beeing one most simple beeing and therefore to be apprehended as one which he himselfe alone is able to doe hath made himselfe many in his attributes that so by many attributes wee might come to apprehend this one God Now these attributes are according to our measure and manner the measure of our reason and manner of our speech a vessel can hold no more then his measure neither is there any wayes how it may be filled but by the mouth so our soules hold the wisdome of God according to their measure and are to be filled with it according to their manner Now the Lord is said to speake mouth to mouth both in himselfe and by his ministers so then the wisedome of God teacheth vs that the words of euerie text are to be explaned for the manner of our apprehension and then the arguments and reasons for the measure of our knowledge Therefore in the feare of his maiesty and the loue of his wisedome let vs eie his worke before vs and write vpon it nil vltra here is my stay I wil range no further if this flower doe inspire wisedome then God giue me the taste of it and keepe my appetite and desire from that imbecillitie and strange weakenes that nothing will content it but newe inventions and vnaccustomed deuises of men my desire is to handle nothing but that which hath logicall ground in it But first let vs cleere the words for they are the ingrauen characters of the mind and therefore must we know them that we receiue no false reports by them the one serues for communication the other for information therefore the rules of speech and reason beeing obserued we doubt not but to communicate our text to the information of the weakest II. Part. Of the clearing of Gods euidence These things hast thou done These This word points out their speciall sinnes and is to limit a more generall to his specialls which are these theeuery adultery euill speaking deceit false witnesse slaunder profanation Things This is an ambiguous word first it signifies the beeing of any thing secondly it signifies any qualitie in that being thirdly any action proceeding either from the beeing or qualitie of any creature fourthly it signifies any sinne either in the qualities as vitious habits or actions as transgressions in thought word or deed fiftly miserie it is here taken in the fourth signification for sinnes because as actions proceed froÌ„ the being and qualities of euery creature so the being or quality beeing infected the action prooues bad and sinfull But here ariseth a great difficultie whether the action be the subiect of sinne or the effect It seemes to bee the subiect for a sinfull action is expounded sinne in the action so the subiect an action which is a thing should bee put for sinne his adiunct which properly is nothing But vnder the correction of the learned I iudge no action to be the subiect of sinne properly â—â—tions no subiect of sinne my reasons are these which I bring most willingly because in my apprehension it notably cleares God in working in sinfull actions Reason 1. from punishment in … d. That which is properly the subiect of sinne may bee punished but actions cannot bee punished for sinfull actions a man is punished therefore it is the man that is the subiect and his sinful action is the meritorious cause therefore when God is said to punish sinne with sinne it is to bee vnderstood sinfull action with sinfull action therfore to conclude that God is the author of sinne is a fallacian of composition and diuision for it is one thing to bee the cause of sinne and an other the cause of a sinnefull action for the sinne is not in the action but in the agent and therefore in man alone but the action is common to both as for example I cast a glasse against the stone wall the stone wall breakes the glasse so doth the hand that sast it but the one is a blameable cause the other vnblameable so man sinning casts himselfe by his owne free will against the law of God which beeing stronger then man breaks him in peices Here the lawe and will of God wrought in this sinfull action God and his law most iustly man by his own free will most vniustly the action therefore from both but the sin onely did sticke in the nature of man and so made him for his part in the action culpable and guilty of Gods wrath therfore the action hauing no sinne inherent in it properly may be handled of God without sinne Reason 2.
third of such things as would bee if such and such things went before If Caine doe well he shall be accepted Gen. 4. if Dauid stay in Keilah the lords of the citie will deliuer him if I continue in beleeuing then I shall be saued if I continue in sinne I shall bee damned And on this knowledge for any thing that I can perceiue doe the Papists and Lutherans hang all predestination and so make Gods will the consequent in decreeing and mans will the antecedent in giuing God the occasion The deceit is this that from the connexion of things they iudge of Gods will about things which is most indirect and a knowledge that agrees not to God but at the second hand It is true that the first knowledge beeing iudged according to logicall inuention is of things possible for arguments or reasons afore they come to bee disposed are onely in potentia ad arguendum haue an affection to argue and so many things that might be haue this potentiall kind of reason and so we say they are knowne of God because we so conceiue of them The second knowledge which is more actuall is properly science the laying together of those things which before were onely in affection to argue The third is of these things which beeing laid together can no otherwise haue force of reason but vpon connexion and supposition and in this head would they tie Gods decree and knowledge when indeed God followes no such suppositions but absolutely knowes and wills what he pleaseth yet seeing his decree is as large as all reason it cannot otherwise be imagined but that in the manifestation of it all reason should appeare And so we grant a connexion supposition condition and occasion in all Gods works that is in the effects of his will but none of all these in the will it selfe Therefore they doe amisse to put that vpon his will which is the cause which ought to be in the effect of his will and thereupon no antecedent of Gods will but meere consequents That creation should go before the fall the fall before redemption redemption before saluation and sinne before damnation are all of them most necessarie suppositions connexions conditions and if you please occasions And thus much for that occasion which is to Arminius delphicus gladius but it cuts asunder such knots as God hath tied together whose will in all things drawes the first linke and cannot be drawne of any M. Per. 3. Principle in sense is this that God does all by counsell therefore he hath his scope which he knowes wills and disposeth vnto most prudently and therefore decrees euery thing therevnto I. Ar. The most wise God doth all things for some ende and purpose euen that which he doth not yet hee permits it for some ende and purpose therefore first it is a fault to say that God must either agere be doing or otiose spectare become an idle beholder which is no good distribution for agere and permittere to doe and permit are really distinguished and both these are for good purpose and therefore God must either be doing or an idle beholder are too scant for he may permit Secondly prudence is too short a word to inlarge it selfe to all Gods wisedome Thirdly adhibito certo fine the ende applied finis gratia and for the ende are not all one for no man workes for the ende applied but for the good therein implied Fourthly Deus non vult aut non decernit quod non potest God neither wills nor decrees that which he cannot here no sense except it be further added which he cannot do or permit and therefore the conclusion is most imperfect so God decreed to doe except this be added or permitted Collat. Agere prudenter to doe wisely will beare the sense of permission for permission comming from Gods wil is considered of vs as an effect this effect is produded by counsell therefore for a good ende and purpose so then that which God doth permittere he doth prudenter agere grant then that Gods permission comes from his counsell and aimes at his glorie and then it must bee more then a negatiue act But to speake the truth permission as it is expounded of Arminius maintaines nothing but absurdities First in regard of the cause for saies he permission is voluntatis remissae now such a will as this cannot be in God whose will is meere act and therefore cannot admit of degrees all remissiuenesse of Gods will is in regard of the subiect which is quantum and may be lesse and more but in regard of himselfe it is impossible Secondly a remisse will doth either will or not will or suspend to suspend is neither to hinder nor further the act and so the Lord should haue no stroke in sinne which is the deniall of his prouidence in the apostacie of man if his prouidence did not suspend nor his power then his wil was not to suspend in that action if he did more then suspend then it was either to will or not to will if not to will then sinne should not haue beene therefore God did will it per modum actionis That this may appeare Gods manner of working in sinne we are to consider what manner of efficient causes true reason laies downe vnto vs And the first manner of causes efficient are either to beget or preserue the second to worke alone or with others the third by himselfe or by accident and agere is giuen to euery one of these Let vs then see where Gods action in sinne comes in and because it is most apparent in the third I answer God is the cause of sin by accident And this will appeare if we consider how many causes wrought by an internal principle these were foure the deuill and Adam principally the serpent and the woman instrumentally and all these were blameable causes The externall cause was the lawe and will of God which in mans transgression did all they did by an externall facultie for the lawe is made the sauour of death vnto death not by his own facultie but by the deuills and mans free will and this work of the law was most holy and iust And this is a working cause iustified by the true rule of reason and not a bare permission If a man take a knife and thrust it into his bowels it is the cause of murder and no permission if man therfore was thrust thorow and wounded to the death by the law of God it was no bare permission but a working cause yet in all things vnblameable And therefore to denie Gods will all causation is impossible If a man would faine kill himselfe and could finde no instrument to effect it withall he would be kept from the fact for want thereof so if the Law had not bin man could not haue died Therefore it is most true when our Diuines speake of permission that they doe not in the generall latitude of action exclude it
three things Rather reconciled then â—pposed in the first first the genus or common nature in it secondly the subiect and thirdly the ende for the first Counsell cannot be the genus of predestination because it shewes the manner how Predestination is effected so that Predestination is not Counsell but that which is done by Counsell Eph. 1.11 where predestination is said to be wrought after the counsell of his owne will To this I answer that by Counsell M. Perkins vnderstands the decree it selfe by an vsual Trope of the cause for the effect to wit Counsell for a decree by counsell so then Predestination is a decree by counsell and thus both of them are rather reconciled then opposed For the second The subiect of Predestination is of man qua peccator as sinnefull and in this Arminius doth triumph as the only ground whereby he ouerturnes all other opinions of predestination so that if we be able to discouer an other subiect of Predestination the cause wil easily be euicted in all the rest Now for this purpose let vs first see how God wrought his decree and this must be done by resolution Analysis and genesis of Gods decree the only way to know it which alwaies begins with the most speciall and goes backward to the most generall secondly when we haue brought it to the most generall to carrie it along as God wrought it He that will view the bodie of a man by Anatomie must first of all lay open the outward parts and so by cutting enter into the secrets of the bodie vntill he come vnto those parts where sense life and motion haue their beginnings so wee that will looke into the secret decree of God as it is reuealed in his word must begin with the most specialls so ascend till we come to the highest which though it be last in our resolution yet will it be the first in Gods working Genesis Gods knowledge direct Αλφα God Ωμεγα Glorie Goodnesse His Vertues Intellectuall Morall Iustice Mercy Analysis Gods knowledge indirect Creation A world Man Made Holy Vnholy Redeemed A Church à latere Faihtfull Singular Analysis The most speciall subiect that can be imagined The first subiect in resolution which is last in composition is one indiuiduall and singular man and in this regard men are said either to be written or blotted out of Gods booke that is either chosen by name or put out by name as in a register wherein men are intitled vnto some honour he that brags of it and yet when the register is searched hath not his name therein is put to greater shame and this book is called in the Scriptures the booke of life wherein God is said to write and blot out mens names not that any is blotted out but that God manifests that he neuer had them in his election And this is made of Arminius his fourth and last decree wherein he inserts two most vncomfortable points First that the basis and foundation of this is nothing but Gods foreknowledge in the vse of sufficient meanes administred which beeing receiued and kept men should be saued Gratâ—â— praeueniens subsequent if otherwise damned Secondly though by preuenting grace men might beleeue and by subsequent grace perseuere yet he might loose both and of a beleeuer become no beleeuer which first of all breakes in peices the chaine Rom. 8.3 the consequent of iustification is glorification this is contradicted by Arminius a man may be iustified that neuer shall be glorified for I am sure he that beleeues is iustified yet he that beleeues may fall from grace and therefore a man may be iustified that neuer shall be glorified But the Apostle saies the contrarie Whome he hath iustified them also he hath glorified Againe it breakes the next linke for God calls all seeing he giues meanes sufficient to know and beleeue and therefore effectuall meanes are vsed whereby men are called yet neuer shall be iustified when the Apostle saies the contrarie whome he calls effectually and sufficiently they are iustified So then a man may be called but neuer iustified and iustified but neuer glorified Secondly it makes against our redemption Ioh. 10.27 My sheepe heare my voice and follow me c. Here he contradicts three maine things in v. 28. First eternall life he that beleeues hath it but he may loose it therefore eternall life may suffer death and so eternall should become temporall and immortall mortall Secondly they shall neuer perish a good consequent from eternall life yet Arminius contradicts it and saies Christs sheepe may perish Thirdly No man shall plucke them out of his hand but they may fall saies Arminius and therfore shall they be taken from him but he will say it is of themselues but that makes the coÌ„tradiction much the worse For then 1. Christs sheepe may not heare his voice 2. Christ may not know them 3. they may not follow him 4. they may extinguish that life for which they are content to loose their naturall life and their eternall life may be as subiect to casualtie as their mortall and miserable life 5. they that shall neuer perish may perish of themselues therefore Christ shall not be as good as his word that said neuer 6. Christ shall fuffer that of his owne which he would neuer permit vnto others and therefore should be weaker to oppose the violence of his owne then the tyrannie of others 7. his fathers gift and greatnesse shall be surprised his Gift committed to the trust of his Sonne shall not faithfully be restored and his Father that is greater then all though he shall preuaile against all others yet his owne shall ouercome him Thirdly it takes away all Christian confidence how durst Paul so triumph Rom. 8.31 challenge principalities and powers Paul saies If God be for vs who shall be against vs Why Paul thou may be against thy selfe God spared not his Son to giue vs à ll things yet Paul he gaue vs not perseuerance Who can charge Gods chosen who Paul there is an answer They can do it theselues God iustifieth who shall condemne The answer is easie they may condemn themselues Christ is dead yea rather risen makes intercession but Paul for all his dying we may die for all his resurrection we may rise to condemnation for all his intercession we may liue not onely in purgatorie but hell it selfe But to stoppe the mouthes of such disputers the Apostle in the 35.38 39. makes an ennumeration of all that can befall vs as tribulation anguish persecution famine nakednes perill sword death life angels principalities powers things present things to come height depth or any other thing and what more then these can be found If thy selfe be more then all these then thou art assuredly a most wretched person that when all is taken away that might draw thee from Christ then thou wilt draw away thy selfe what more desperate then this In all these things saies the Apostle we are
aduerse to a sinner and so the arguments differ Adam by creation was a iust man in habite but not in act and according to that which the Lord required and so death beeing taken away we are in the way to iustification but not actually iust vntill actually the law be performed in our selues or another And because the point is in controuersie thereasons to establish this truth may be these Arg. 1. Lex regale 〈◊〉 iustiâ—e That which is the perfect righteousnesse of the lawe is both actiue and passiue but that whereby we are iustified is of this nature For I demaund by what rule of righteousnesse is life and saluation conuaied vnto vs If they say by faith then I demaund what is that righteousnesse of faith is it the verie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 then assuredly it excludes both the righteousnesse of Christ and that of the law and yet faith is said to establish both If it be the righteousnesse of Christ then I demaund is not that morall if morall then either perfect or imperfect if perfect then actiue and passiue That we apprehend Christs righteousnesse that is of grace but that Christ hath it for vs that is of the law The second Argument against this opinion may be this Christ did all as a nâ—ediator for those that haue need of a mediator That which Christ did as a Mediator was not onely for himselfe but for vs and for vs more principally then himselfe but all that Christ did were the actions of a Mediatour his humane nature had no subsistence but by the diuine and euery action beeing in supposito was of him as a Mediatour and therfore for vs and so both actiue and passiue obedience were for vs. But they will say his actiue obedience did fit him for our Mediatorship To this I answer if his actiue obedience be the obedience of a Mediator then in his whole latitude it was for vs and as soon as he was born he was fit to redeeme so neuer an action but it was for vs. If then these actions of fitting bee properly the actions of a Mediator then they tautologise speak no sense for so that fitting was nothing but redeeming for I am sure euery action of our Mediatour is to redeeme and to redeeme is to seeke those that were lost and so his actiue obedience was for those which were lost and if that then had we neede of all Christs obedience Argum. He fulfilled the ceremoniall law both actiuely and passâ—â—ely for others ergn the moral 3. Christ fulfilled all righteousnes morall ceremoniall The ceremoniall was not fulfilled by passiue obedience but also by actiue if the ceremoniall required both then much more the morall Deut. 4.1 Sam. 22. Hos 6.6 mercie more then sacrifice and knowledge more then burnt offerings and this in both was done for others he was circumcised for others for he was without sinne and therefore in Christ to signifie any pollution circumcision had no vse so was he baptized but it was not for the washing away of his owne filthines but ours The reasons why he must keepe the law for others are these 1. because perfect obedience depended on him for the performer 2. both the law morall and ceremoniall acknowledge him for Mediator for seeing it was impossible to be fulfilled of vs it was possible vnto him 3. because he did establish and fulfill both 4. he alone is the bond of both seeing then he performed actiue obedience to the Ceremoniall law and that not for himselfe but for vs. the like must be confessed of the morall especially the ceremoniall law beeing but an appendix and addition to the morall Argum. Against reason that death should cause life 4. Christs death could not bring life because no death can be the cause of life seeing they are contraries Fire cannot cause cold neither water heat blindnes cannot cause sight neither sight blindnes Christs death to take away death is good reason but to cause life is against all reason This is very agreeable with the Scriptures reason that as Christs death doth free vs from death so Christs life doth bring vs vnto life He died for our sinnes and rose againe for our iustification Dan. 9.24 the slaying of the Messias brings in the expiation of sinne and his liuing againe brings euerlasting righteousnesse Sinne brought in death therefore righteousnes must bring in life for if death should bring in life then life should be the reward of sinne for I am sure that the Scriptures affirme that death is the reward of sinne and the reward of sinne can neuer be the cause of life What hath a schoole-boy deserued when his master hath whipped him so what haue we deserued in Christ when we are onely punished in him Sinne and the reward of sinne haue no agreement with life Therefore it is true that the expiation of sinne is wrought by Christs passiue obedience and life by his actiue Argum. 5. All types whereof Christ is the truth Types prooue both actine and passiue obedience to bee found in Christ point at this assertion first in the couenant of grace there was the Arke and the Table Exod. 24.7 in the Arke was the booke of the law and so the booke of the lawe went with the couenant and was to be found in Christ for vs. Exod. 25.22 the Mercie-seat was betweene the two Cherubims and these were vpon the Arke of the Testament Mal. 3.1 therefore no seat of mercie without the Arke of the Testament The pascall lambe must be without spot eaten with sweete bread and sowre hearbs both must be in Christ therefore not onely the soure hearbs of his death and passion but the sweet bread of his righteousnesse Vrim and Thummim must be on the Priests breast when he carries the peoples iudgement before God and this must be had beside blood therefore righteousnes beside passion Ar. 6. From similitudes familiarly applied in the Scriptures whose end purpose are to prooue this First the wiues debt is made the husbands and we beeing married vnto Christ the debt that we owe God by our creation must be payed before he will admit of vs now that debt was Do and liue and this Christ hath done and so we shall liue Secondly Christ is the head of his Church and therefore must he giue vnto his members life motion and all things needfull Thirdly the suretie must pay and discharge the whole debt of him for whome he is bound all of vs are bankerupts and stand in neede to haue a great debt discharged for vs and likewise a new stocke purchased To conclude it is foolish to make such a distinction as this seeing all the actions of our Mediator are as wel actiue as passiue his life is not taken from him but he laies it downe willingly and euen from his conception his humanitie being assisted by his deity which could not suffer turned all Christs sufferings into actions I haue bin drawne to inlarge
place First it brings sinne to Gods goodnesse then along to Gods law and thirdly to Gods plagues They that tame vnruely creatures first bring them to the thing and place where they haue done the iniurie then labours to let them see the fault by beating of them So the Lord first brings vs to our selues and his silence le ts vs see what we haue done against our selues and his silence and then doth he let vs feele the power of his wrath that hereafter he may be our feare either filiall or slauish for he will haue euerie knee to bowe vnto him either a knee of power or of reuerence of loue or constraint from heart or from bodie Vse 1. reprehension First confutation of all those that denie Gods prouidence because they see not present execution of iudgement for sinne and present reward for weldoing the Lords times are in his owne hands and he is verie wise in them all therefore it is my wisdome to rest content with patience and expect Gods leasure Secondly correction of the godly that are too importunate with the Lord to destroy the wicked Wilt thou not breake the heauens and come downe but hee that beleeues will not make hast Vse 2. instruction First admonition to the wicked that they agree with their aduersarie while he is in the way least he deliuer them to the iudge and they be cast into prison and there lie vntil they haue paid the vttermost farthing Secondly direction to the godly neuer to be at rest vntill they know themselues reconciled vnto God in Christ Iesus for that is Gods heartie loue no bare silence for one may hold his tongue and yet be extreamely angrie Vse 3. From Gods direct knowledge consolation First in weldoing surely if God can agree with a sinner for a time how shall hee reioyce to doe his child good that labours to serue him Secondly in miserie this may affoard comfort that God will not bee worse vnto me then he is vnto the wicked nay he will spare me as a father spareth his child that hee sees endeauour to do well CHAP. IIII. Of the simple inuention First of Gods knowledge NOW I come to the simple inuention and consider euery reason by himselfe the sentence hath two parts Gods truth Gods holinesse Gods truth in these words these things hast thou done wherein we haue knowledge without all error secondly integritie without all partialitie thirdly equity without all contradiction Obser 1. Gods knowledge is a most exact and particular knowledge of all things these things are knowne vnto the Lord to wit the verie consent vnto adultery and theeuery the very running of the heart though the world could neuer coÌ„demne them of any such crimes this knowledge therefore is most particular of sinnes persons things causes ends effects and all circumstances that accompany them Reas 1. Because all things are in God long before they exist in the world Hence is God called the most perfect idaea of all things a skilfull workeman hath the plot of his building in his head long before he begin his worke out of himselfe Psal 139.2 thou vnderstandest my thought afarre off and v. 16. thine eies did see me when I was without forme for in thy booke were all things written which in continuance were fashioned when there was none of them before 2. Reason As all things were in God From creation so all things were from God and that which was from him must needes be knowne of him Psal 94.9 He that planted the eare shall he not heare he that formed the eye shall he not see Psal 139.13 Thou hast couered me in my mothers wombe therefore thou hast possessed my reynes v. 15. My bones are not hid from thee though I was made in a secret place and fashioned beneath in the earth And it is a most cleare knowledge for Heb. 4.13 Neither is there any creature which is not manifest in his sight but all things are naked and open vnto his eyes with whome wee haue to doe The word in the originall is taken from a beast that hath the skinne fleaed off his necke so that all the nerues and arteries that runne that way may plainly be seene or els from a man cast on his backe with his face toward heauen which may be seene of all Neither is this a bare knowledge but with care and counsell Eph 1.11 Which worketh all things after the counsell of his will and most particular Matth. 10.39 A sparrow falls not to the ground without Gods will yea and all the haires of your head are numbred and most certen Numb 23.19 God is not as man that he should lie neither shall it be resisted Exod. 4.11 he will giue a mouth to man make the dumme speake it and the deafe heare it before it shall be silenced by man the very stones shall speake out of the wall and the timber before man shall burie Gods truth or obscure that which he would haue reuealed 3. Reason As all in God and from God From proâ—dence so for his prouidence and preseruation of them they liue mooue and haue their beeing continued from him Act. 17.25 And therfore seeing the Lord hath gone with vs all our daies he must needes be priuie to all our doings There is not a motion in the heart a stirring of the hand a turning vp of the eye or a foote of ground troden but the Lord knoweth it because he was in that motion Againe for our liuing whether generall or speciall the Lord taketh notice of it generall with what conscience good or euill with what faith or infidelitie whether we haue had our conuersation in heauen or vpon earth particular first to himselfe what pietie in his worship thankfulnes for his blessings praier in our needes prouidence in the vse of meanes and without meanes Secondly towards man first all in generall what charitie iustice peace loue in speciall towards superiours what reuerence equalls humilitie inferiours kindnes lastly to thy selfe what modestie temperance sobrietie 4. From the ende Reason God must dispose of all things for himselfe therfore must he know them Rom. 11.36 For in him and through him and for him are all things c. 5. From circumstances of time place and person Reason In that the Lord knoweth not all things as in himselfe from himselfe and working by himselfe and for himselfe but also in that he knoweth euery circumstance of time place person Of place Psal 139. first for the positions of it v. 3. Thou compassest my pathes and my lying downe and art accustomed to all my waies thou holdest me straight behind and before and laiest thy hand vpon me Againe for the place it selfe v. 7. Whether shall I goe from thy spirit or whether shall I flee from thy presence if I ascend into heauen thou art there if I lie down in hell thou art there let me take the wings of the morning and dwell in the vttermost parts of the
pure life and he that is not this puritan shal neuer see God and let them know that the seruants of God are of the blood royal to wit Christ Iesus and therefore haue Dauids heroicall spirit durst meet them on the field and shew as good courage for a good cause as the best of them But the seruants of the Lord his faithfull ministers haue told it to the Church that her faithfull friends haue beene abused by many a Churle vnto whom they haue stood as walls of defence and therefore their affections are vp in armes against them But the Church will find cakes bottles of wine sheepe readie dressed measures of corne clusters of raisins and abundance of figs to meet all that loue her to giue them kind intertainement Bid them not regard these Nabals for as their names are so are their natures Nabals they are and folly is with them and so shall they perish for the Lord will not suffer one of them to liue that pisseth against the wall But your soules shall be bound in the bundle of life with the Lord and the soules of these your enemies shall God cast out as out of the middle of asling Thus shall euerie faithfull soule praise God that hee is preserued by the Church and therefore when they shall see that the Lord hath dealt well with them they shall be mooued to remember the Church as Dauid remembred Abigail with the best bond of loue Secondly correction of the godly that learne not to thinke basely of the thoughts of wicked men they dishonour God by them and therefore into their secrets let our soules neuer enter Vse 2. Instruction First an admonition of the wicked to shewe them that they haue alwayes false reasons for their thoughts Indeed it is true that we can no sooner haue sinne in our heads but the deuill will find a reason for it but alas when we bring it to our question it makes vs presently make a fallacian against our soules Silence beats vpon the minds of these hypocrites but alas the image in the glasse shall not looke to him from whom it was reflected Moses face shines but he sees it not so these men haue Gods sunne to shine vpon them his raine to fall vpon them but they perceiue neither Thus they become like wine vessels that sends out all the wine againe but keepes in the dregs God doth much good vnto them but they neuer thinke rightly of it for as infants new borne are kept from fire and water laid to sleepe shifted in their scapes but they knowe not who doth all this for them so God brightnesse it selfe shuts in heauen and earth yet our eye cannot looke against it no more then the batâ—e or owle at the bright beames in the firmament and therfore no maruell if wicked men after all Gods silence looke amisse therefore as the fountaine and all the water that springs out of it haue the same qualities so the heart and the thoughts words and deeds are all of the same nature if one filthy all filthie and purge one and purge all Now the fountaine in a wicked man beeing corrupt no maruell that these thoughts issue out of it Eccles. 8.11 Because sentence against an euil worke is not executed speedily therefore the heart of the children of men is fully set in them to doe euill here is the verie selfe-same conclusion God defers therefore they are fully purposed to sinne against God Let them therefore be admonished to looke better to their thoughts for they are in a miserable estate that makes euerie thing turne vnto their hurt Secondly a direction to Gods children that they learne not to thinke their owne thoughts speake their owne words or doe their owne actions but onely that which shall be approoued by God and his word and then shall their praise not be of men but of God Vse 3. Consolation First in all good wayes when I can say I haue serued God with a good conscience for that shall be the miserie of the wicked when the Lord shall say who required these things at your hands Secondly in their trouble to say with Hezekias Remember Lord how I haue walked before thee this is better then all the riches in the world or the vanities wherein he hath placed all his thoughts this shall stand by him in this world to iustifie him because God speakes for him in the ende of this world to free him from hel death and damnation because he hath built vpon the rocke and hath in his thoughts highly valued the blood of Christ to purge him from all sinne when all the rest of the world shall be accursed for that they haue put their trust in the arme of flesh 2. Tim. 4.6 7. Pauls ground of comfort when he is readie to be offered is this I haue fought the good fight of faith finished my course I haue kept the faith therefore he expects a crowne of righteousnesse this is no phansie but a grounded perswasion from his practise Sect. 4. Of awicked mans conceit of God Like thee The fourth thing is in the forme and manner of their thoughts and that is by drawing a paterne of God out of themselues to limit him by their owne limits and measure him by their own measure First for qualitie and condition the only patrone and fauourer of their courses one that did esteeme and approue most highly of all their waies Where we may see that hypocrits as proud Pharisies thinke themselues not like other men and therefore needes must they be like God himselfe not knowing that a third may be giuen to wit that they are so like themselues that a man cannot paralell them with any other They haue looked into the fountaine of Gods silence and surely like Narcissus they are fallen in loue with their owne shadow or like children they are so delighted with their image that they must needs kisse the glasse and thinke no babie like to that which they haue seene of themselues and thus like apes are gotten so farre in loue with their owne brood that with ouermuch embracing of themselues they kill all they touch and thus while they wil set as Queenes and ladies bragging they shall neuer be widowes presently the Lord brings vpon them both pouertie and widow-hood because they themselues haue pressed euerie thing they were in loue of vnto death so that being wise in their owne conceit we may be assured that there is more hope of fooles then of them and that drunkards and vile persons shall sooner inherite the kingdome of heauen then any proud person of them all the Publicans and grosse sinners shall sooner go into heauen then these Scribes and Pharisies Secondly this must yet be strained higher euen to the verie being and essence of God God must be altogether as they are extraordinary neere fellowship It was one of the greatest prerogatiues that was euer giuen to Abraham to be called the freind of God but what shall these be called
together not as Samsons foxes by the tayles euery one to drawe sundrie waies they sustaine no double persons single will they be in all their waies they are troubled with no contrary laws they can make all agree well enough and therefore when cry they in the very desperation of their soules who shall deliuer vs they giue thankes to God not for Christ but for themselues that they are not like other men Therefore the spirit hauing not pulled downe the old building how shall it be possible to set vp the newe which is plainly to be seene in the chap. following Rom. 8. First where is their freedome from the law of sinne and of death neither Christ nor the spirit hath purchased it for them and I doubt that their owne paiment will not stand good in Gods court Secondly if things may be known by their sauours surely euerie man may see they sauour of the things of the flesh Thirdly if the wisedome of the spirit and the wisedome of the flesh be enemies I admire what peace and life can be in hypocrites when they will not denie their owne wisedome for as yet the bodie is not dead and quickned again by the spirit still are they debters to the flesh and will liue after him How will they prooue themselues to bee the sonnes of God if the spirit of bondage be gone and the spirit of adoption be entred into their hearts let vs heare the cry of Abba father let them prooue the witnesse of the spirit if they bee heires of God euen annexed with Christ let vs see how they can suffer with him how they esteeme of afflictions in comparison of their glorie doth the creature groane for them nay alas I feare against them because they subiect him vnto vanitie Let vs heare how they with patience looke for their redemption Is their hope for things not seene nay alas all for the present How doth the spirit assist them in their infirmities how is he with them in their prayers what requests doth he bring out of their soules where be their deepe sighes that cannot be expressed can they search the meaning of the spirit according to the will of God surely nothing lesse for all is but lip labour Againe haue they assurance that all works together for their good can they tell it from their predestination vocation iustification and glorification can they from hence conclude that God is for them and no man can be against them that there is no charges for them to pay that there is no condemnation no separation from the loue of God in Christ all afflictions cannot doe it no death no angels no principalities nor powers nor things present nor things to come no place not heauen aboue is too high for them nor hell below is able to make them sinke into his depth yea in breife not any creature is able to doe it therefore no hypocrite is in Christ and therefore impossible that he should bee washed from his filthinesse beeing not washed hee must remaine in it And that will appeare if we mark his life and death life prosperitie aduersitie In prosperitie for his profession he is all courage and verie full of brags like the coward that before he come in the field is fire and towe but when he comes to the tryall is the first that flees the field when the couragious champion is very silent but when there is neede of him will shew that hee hath more tried sortitude in him then a thousand cowards So hypocrites make all the world ring with their Master though all the world forsake thee yet will I not forsake thee I will lay downe my life for thee yet when Christ shall come with a this night shall yee be put vnto it then will they flee with the first and if Christ haue no better champions then they he shall be left all alone Secondly come to the hearing of the word all promises they will make their owne all iudgements threatened they will put vpon others and for application of both it shall be as in this place God is like them he fauours them aboue all with his mercies and his iudgements passe ouer their houses Thirdly for his life no reformation For aduersitie if God be gone he is gone no more stout words no comming to Church no more outward reformation but labour to make the best of all Gal. 6.12 they will seeke to please to the face and labour to constraine to their profession that they may suffer no persecution for the crosse of Christ In speciall for their sinnes when they are in miserie it may be they will let a word come out against some knowne actuall sinne but with Dauid Psal 51. they neuer strike at the roote to wit their originall sinne for the punishment Mic. 6.6 they will part with any thing they haue to be freed from the stroaks of Gods rod but the thing required shall not once come neere them And for the thoughts of death many a Balaams wish but that is all for their life is nothing And lastly for death it selfe they either die like stocks and stones or else like bulls and bears roaring and bellowing out their shame and confusion Secondly this may be a direction to Gods children to approoue their sinceritie vnto God by alwaies setting themselues in the presence of the Lord. 3. Vse consolation First in trouble to reioyce when it shall please God to try vs in the fornace of affliction that so we may come forth as tryed gold refined and made the more fit for Gods kindome Secondly in our welfare to trust more in God then in our selues and to count the lifting vp of Gods countenance vpon vs in the face of his anointed more ioy of heart then when the corne wine oyle and all the pleasures and profits of this world are increased And thus much of the first part of Gods iustice to wit the power of it from the efficient in the forme and execution of it vpon the sinne and person of an hypocrite Now followes the orderly proceeding of this iustice Of the order of Gods iustice First in the cause Order In the handling of the methode vsed by the Lord in this place wee are to consider of the arguments Order is described first from the cause I thee Lord secondly from the effect which is to set or place things thirdly from the obiect in that word them that is thy sinnes 4. from a testimony drawn from the notice of the conscience which shall sufficiently witnesse of the worth of Gods methode For the cause of this order it is the Lord. Surely Gods wisedome is to be seene in nothing more then in methode and order for order is not from any brutish nature but the best and wisest so that the changes and multitude of alterations in this world are no casuall matters left in the hands of blind fortune If indeed we looke into Gods Church and see the varietie of colours and the instabilitie