righteousnesse 13 Obiection Jf Christ hath satisfied for vs we shall not be iustified freelie but for merite and desert Aunswere Wee are iustified freely in respect of vs not freely in respect of Christ whom the sauing of vs cost full dearely 14 Obiection Reward presupposeth merite So that where reward is there is also merite For reward and merite are correlatiues whereof if one bee put the other is put also But euerlasting life is proposed as a reward for good workes therefore also the merite of good workes is euerlasting life Aunswere The Maior is sometimes true as concerning creatures as when men may merite or deserue of men But neither alwaies among men doth it folowe that there is merite where there is reward For men also oftentimes giue rewards not of merit or desert Now it is vnproperly saide of God that he proposeth eternal life vnto our workes as a reward for we can merite nothing at Gods hands by our workes But for this cause especially doth God say that he wil giue a reward to our workes thereby to shew that good workes are grateful and pleasing vnto him 15 Obiection That which is not required vnto iustification is not necessarie to be done Good woorkes are not required vnto iustification Therefore it is not necessarie to doe them Answere The Maior is false if it bee meant generallie because wee ought to doe good woorkes in token of thankefulnes But if the Maior be meant particularly then nothing can bee concluded the premisses beeing meere particular nowe good woorkes are as an effect without which the cause to wit faith cannot be Therefore good workes verily are necessarie but not as any cause or merite of iustice 16 Obiection He that is iustified by two things is not iustified by one only But we besides that we are iustified by faith are iustified also by the merite and obedience of Christ therefore not by faith onely Answere He that is iustified by two things is not iustified by one onely that is after one and the same manner But we are iustified by two thinges after a diuerse manner For we are iustified by faith as by an instrument apprehending iustice but by the merit of Christ as by the formal cause of our iustice 17 Obiect Doctrine which maketh men profane is not to be deliuered But this doctrine that we are iustified by works maketh men profane Therefore it is not to be deliuered Ans If it should so fal out with any man it were but an accident Reply Euen those thinges which fall out to bee euils by an accident are to be eschued But this doctrine maketh men by an accident euil Therefore it is to be eschued Aunswere Those thinges which fal out to be euils by an accident are to be eschued if ther remain no greater cause for which they are not to bee omitted which by an accident make men euil But we haue greater causes why this doctrine ought to be deliuered 1. The commaundement of God 2. Our owne saluation 18 Obiection Christ hath brought vs eternall iustice This applied iustice is not eternal Therefore this is not our iustice but God himselfe is our iustice Aunswere The Lorde is our iustice that is our iustifier But that our applied iustice is eternal hath been shewed before because the imputation thereof is continued to all eternity That iustice also of the Lawe which is begunne in vs in this life shall bee continued and perfected in the life to come But that iustice which is God himselfe is not in vs because so God should be an accident to his creature and become iustice in man For iustice and vertue are thinges created in vs not the essence of God Moreouer Osiander who obiecteth this doth not discerne the cause from the effect As we liue not or are wise by the essence of God for this is all one as to say that wee are as wise as God so also we are not iust by the essence of God Wherefore nothing is more impious than to say That the essentiall iustice of the creatour is the iustice of the creatures for thereof it would follow that wee haue the iustice of God yea the verie essence of God The cause must be discerned from the effect increate iustice from created iustice 19 Obiection Where sinne is not there is no place for remission or imputation Jn the life to come sinne shall not be Therefore no place there for remission or imputation Aunswere In the life to come shall not bee remission of any sin then present but the remission which was graunted in this life shall continue and endure for euer And that conformity also which we shal haue with God in the life to come shal be an effect of this imputation 20 Obiection Ten Crownes are part of a hundred Crownes in paiment of a debt Therefore good workes also may be some part of our iustice Aunswere There is a dissimilitude because ten Crownes are a whole part of an hundred Crownes But our workes are not a whole and perfect part 21 Obiection It is said that Phinees worke and deede was imputed vnto him for righteousnes Answere The meaning of the place is That God did approue his worke but not that he was iustified by that worke Why we are iustified by christs merit onely We are iustified by the merite of Christ onely 1. For his glorie that his sacrifice might not bee extenuated and made of lesse value 2. For our owne comfort that we may be assured that our iustice doth not depend vpon our owne woorkes but vpon the sacrifice of Christ onely otherwise we should leese it a thousand times Why we are not Iustified partly by faith and partly by works Gal. 3.10 We are iustified not partly by faith partly by works 1. Because works are vnperfect and therefore our iustice also should be then vnperfect Cursed is euerie man that continueth not in all thinges which are written in the booke of the lawe to doe them 2. Although they were perfect yet are they due and debt So that wee cannot satisfie for an offence past by them When ye haue done all that yee are commaunded say wee are vnprofitable seruants 3. They are Gods works who worketh them in vs. 4. They are temporarie neither haue anie proportion with eternall blessinges 5. They are effectes of iustification therefore no cause 6. They are excluded that wee might not haue whereof to glorie 7. If they were part of our iustification our conscience should be destitute of stable and certaine comfort 8. Christ should haue died in vain 9. We should not haue the same way to saluation 10. Christ should not be a perfect Sauiour Why our works are vnperfect therefore cannot merit Now our workes are vnperfect 1. Because we omit manie things which we should doe and doe manie things which we should not doe 2. Because we blend and mingle euil with that good which wee doe that is wee doe good but wee doe it ill The thinges
reuerence him and declare our loue and thankefulnes towardes him by our good workes and obedience Rom. 12.1 J beseech you brethren by the mercies of God that ye giue vp your bodies a liuing sacrifice holy acceptable vnto God which is your reasonable seruing of God 1. Pet. 2.5 Yee are made an holie Priesthoode to offer vp spiritual sacrifices acceptable to god by Jesus Christ We are to doe good workes also in respect of our selues 1. That by our good workes we maie be assured of our faith Mat. 7.17 Euerie good tree bringeth forth good fruite Iames 2.20 That faith which is without workes is dead Phil. 1.11 Filled with the fruites of righteousnesse which are by Iesus Christ vnto the glorie and praise of god Now by our workes we must needes know that wee haue faith because the effect is not without his cause and wee must knowe the cause by his proper effect when as therefore we find not in our selues good works or newe obedience we are hypocrites neither haue we faith but an euil conscieÌ„ce For true faith only which neuer waÌ„teth al her fruites bringeth foorth as a fruitful tree good woorkes obedience amendment of life and these fruites likewise discerne and distinguish true faith from historical and temporary faith and so also from hypocrisie 2. That we maie be assured that we haue obtained remission of sinnes through Christ and are for Christes sake iustified before God for iustification and sanctification are benefites linked together which so cleaue together and that necessarily as they neuer can be seuered or pulled asunder For Christ obtained both for vs at once namely both remission of sinnes and the holy Ghost who stirreth vp in vs by faith the study and desire of good works and new obedience 3. That we maie be assured of our election and saluation 2. Pet. 1.10 Giue diligence to make your calling and election sure These proceede from the cause next going before For god hath chosen from euerlasting of his free mercy those onely which are iustified for the merit of his sonne Roman 8.30 Whom he predestinat them also hee called and them also he iustified Nowe that wee haue receiued from Christ iustification which is neuer giuen vnto the Elect without sanctification we knowe by faith And that we haue faith wee perceiue by the woorkes of faith true obedience and true conuersion 4. That by good woorkes our faith maie bee exercised cherished strengthned and aduaunced For they who giue themselues ouer to corrupt lusts against their conscience in them faith cannot be and therefore neither a good conscience neither a confidence and trust in god as beeing appeased and fauourable vnto them For wee haue through faith onelie a feeling of gods fauor towards vs a good conscience Rom. 8.13 Jf yee liue after the flesh yee shal die 2. Tim. 1.6 J put thee in remembrance that thou stirre vp the gift of god which is in thee by the putting on of my hands 5. That by good works we may shew forth and honest our life and calling Ephes 4.1 I praie you that yee walke worthie of the vocation whereunto yee are called 6. That wee maie escape temporal and eternal punishmentes Matth. 7.19 Euerie tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is cut off and cast into the fire Rom. 8.3 If ye liue according to the flesh ye shal die 7. That we maie obtaine corporall and spirituall rewardes which according vnto the promise accompanie good workes 1. Timot. 4.8 Godlines is profitable vnto al things which hath the promise of the life present and of that that is to come Except God woulde haue the hope of rewards and the feare of punishments to be motiue causes vnto good works he would not vse them in admonitions We must doe good woorkes also in respect of our neighbour 1. That wee maie bee profitable vnto our neighbours by our good example and so edifie them 1. Cor 15. All things are for your sakes that most plenteous grace by the thankes-giuing of manie maie redound to the praise of god Phil. 1.24 That I abide in the flesh is more needefull for you 2. That offences maie bee auoided Matth. 18.7 Woe bee to that man by whome offences come Rom. 2.24 The name of god is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you 3. That wee maie winne vnbeleeuers and by our woordes and deedes and example conuert them vnto Christ Luk. 22.32 When thou art conuerted strengthen thy brethren We see now then what are the causes for which we must necessariely doe good workes as also how or in what sense our workes are said to be necessarie for vs vnto saluation to wit not as a cause of our saluation but as mean or way without which wee come not vnto it And after the same sort also it maie be said That good woorkes are necessarie vnto iustice and righteousnes or vnto iustification or in them that are to be iustified namely as a consequent following iustification wherewith regeneration is vnseparably ioined But yet I would not vse these kindes of speaking 1. Because they are ambiguous doubtful 2. Because they breed contentioÌ„s minister occasioÌ„ of cauilling vnto the aduersaries 3. Because the Scripture doth not vse them which must be followed of vs in speaking 6 Whether good woorkes merit any thing before God THIS sixt question ariseth out of the fift as the fourth did out of the thirde For when men heare that wee receiue rewardes by our woorkes they presently conclude that we merit somewhat by them Wherefore wee are to know that good workes indeede are necessarie and therefore are to bee doone also for the rewardes ensuing them but yet that they merit nothing no not the least of gods giftes either corporall or spirituall The reasons hereof are most true and most euident 1 Our woorkes are vnperfect wherefore we can merit nothing by them Gal. 5.17 The flesh lusteth against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh and these are contrarie one to the other so that yee do not the same thinges that yee would 2 The good workes what euer we are able to doe are all due Luk. 17.10 When ye haue doone all those thinges which are commanded you say we are vnprofitâ—ble seruants 3 Our woorkes are impure and vitious how-euer they seeme most good Isay 64.6 Wee haue all beene as an vncleane thing and all our righteousnesse is as filthy cloutes Phil 3.8 J thinke all things but losse for the excellent knowledge sake of Christ Jesus my Lord for whome I haue counted all thinges losse and doe iudge them to be dongue that J might winne Christ 4 If we doe any good woorkes they are not ours but are belonging to god onely Phil. 2.13 Jt is god which worketh in you both the will and the deede euen of his good pleasure 1. Corinth 4.7 What hast thou which thou hast not receiued We are euill trees if then we doe any good that must needes come from God onely Mat 20.15 Is it
GOD doth not inflict punishment but on those who sinne but to bee forsaken of the holie Ghost is a punishment of sinne and vnthankefulnesse Therefore no man is forsaken of the holie Ghost but who hath first deserued that forsaking through his owne stubbornes The aunswere hereto is double Fisst the Argument may be graunted as concerning the regenerate For in them as long as they are in this life there is alwaies so much remaining of sinne as they deserue not onely temporall but eternall desertion and forsaking and although because the sinne which remaineth in them is forgiuen them for Christ therefore they are freed from euerlasting punishment yet are they not free from chastisementes so long as the remnaunts of sinne abide in them There is therefore in respect of their sinnes also alwaies most iust cause why sometimes for a season God woulde bereaue them of the grace and guiding of his spirite As it is in the second of Samuel the twentie and fourth Chapter And the wrath of the Lord was again kindled against Israell and hee mooued Dauid against them in that hee saide Goe and number Israell and Iuda Euery forsaking or rather sleeping as it were of the holy ghost in the regenerat is not a punishment neither done to that end Secondly we answere to the Minor that euery forsaking is not a punishment or done to that end as to punish but sometimes also for tryall that is for to make knowen and open the weakenes euen of the best and holiest both to themselues and others that they may learne that they cannot for one instant or moment stand against the tentations assaults of Satan if they be not presently sustained and ruled by the conduct of the holy spirite and that so they may be made more watchful and more earnest to cal hereafter for the assistance of the holy spirite to beware of relapses fallinges Lastly that both in this life in the world to come they may the better know and set forth their own vnworthines and the mercie of God towardes them who hath reclaimed and recalled them out of so many grieuous sinnes vnto himselfe and hauing deserued a thousand times death and destruction hath not yet suffered them to perish For these causes it is saide 2. Cor. 12. Least I shoulde bee exalted out of measure through the abundance of reuelations there was giuen vnto me a pricke in the flesh And Rom. 11. God hath shut vp all in vnbeliefe that he might haue mercie of all Against this they say That God doth promise the assistance of his holy spirite to all that aske it But this is generall onely concerning finall perseueraunce but not so as touching continual perseuerance For God promiseth no where that he will so guide his saints by his spirite in this life that they shall neuer fall By this which hath beene said that obiection also vanisheth to nothing when they say That the conuerted seeing they haue in their owne power to depart from that which is right and to resist haue also perseueraunce in their owne power For although hee constraineth not or violently draweth their wils but maketh them of rebels and enimies willingly of their owne accorde to become the sonnes of God and as concerning mens wils in this life there is nothing more prone than they to euill yet as touching the counsel purpose and working of God euidence of truth constraineth euen the aduersaries themselues to confesse that it cannot be but that the wil of man must then obey when God according to his euerlasting counsels hath decreed forcibly to moue incline it either to conuersion or to perseuerance Neither doth this immutabilitie and efficacie of Gods purpose take away the libertie of will in the conuerted but rather increaseth preserueth it and how much the more effectually God moueth it with so much the greater propension and readines it both will and doth good which the example of the blessed Angels cōfirmeth This is also more friuolous that they say That the godly are made careles and slouthfull and the desire to perseuere is diminished in them if they heare that their perseueraunce dependeth of the grace of the holy spirite alone For we may very well inuert this and returne it vpon our aduersaries seeing nothing doth more giue an edge vnto the saints and those who are indeed godly to a desire and indeuour to beware of falling and to a daily and earnest calling vpon God than if they knowe that they cannot so much as one moment stand against the tentations of the Diuel and their fleshe except by the vertue and instinct of the holy spirite they bee withdrawen from euill and bee forceably moued to good but contrariwise that opinion as experience teacheth maketh men careles and lesse minding to beware of sin by which men imagine that it is in their owne power to depart from god listening a while and yeelding to their owne lusts and to returne againe to God as oft as themselues thinke good so to doe Now if so bee this sentence concerning true perseuerance depending of the grace of the holy spirite breed in the reprobate and prophane men a carelesnesse and contempt of God it is both foolish and iniurious to iudge of the elect and godly by their humour or for their frowardnes to hide and smoother the truth Lastly against the defectes of libertie in the second and third state or degree of man they obiect after this sort If whole conuersion and perseuerance doe so depend of Gods will and doe the worke of God in men that neither they can haue it in whom hee doth not worke it neither they cannot but haue it in whom he will worke it that then not onely the libertie but all the action and operation of the will is taken away and there remaineth onely that it bee constrained and suffer which is against the scripture experience the inward strife and combate of the godlie and our owne confession But we answere that the will is not therefore idle when as it doth not resist the spirit forciblie mouing it For to assent also obey is an actiō of the wil. The working of the instrumentall cause which is our will is not taken away when we put the working of the principal cause which is God But when they reply That we make that obediēce of the wil in conuersiō perseuerāce wholy the worke of god so leaue nothing to the wil what to doe they run into an other paralogism of consequēt wheras they remoue the working of the second or instrumental cause for that the first cause or principal agēt is put For that which is so wholy the work of god in mā that man is only as the subiect in which god worketh in that we grant that the wil is only passiue suffreth doth work nothing as in imprinting or working or maintaining in the will heart newe qualities or inclinations But that which is
all euill For these are the effectes to come of that present and perpetuall wil of God towards vs which wee apprehend by faith Rom. 8.24 Wee are saued by hope but hope that is seen is not hope But if we hope for that we see not we doo with patience abide for it 1 Obiection Life euerlasting is a thing to come We beleeue life euerlasting Wee beleeue therefore that which is to come that is faith is also of things to come and so faith is hope it selfe Ans The Maior must bee distinguished Life euerlasting is to come tru as concerning the consummation or accomplishment therof But it is present vnto vs as cōcerning the wil and vnchaungeable purpose of God who hath decreed from euerlasting that which he hath begun in vs and will also in due time accomplish it Againe it is present vnto vs as concerning the beginning therof For euerlasting life is begun here in the elect by the holy ghost Wherefore faith apprehendeth it as it is present both in respect of the purpose of God in respect of the beginning thereof in vs. For he that beleeueth feeleth and knoweth that he is quickened and resolueth this to bee the will of God that that quickening and reuiuing which is here begunne shall bee absolued in another life Iohn 5.24 He that beleeueth in the sonne hath passed from death to life Iohn 17.3 This is life eternall that they know thee to be the only verie God and whome thou hast sent Iesus Christ Gal. 4.6 God hath sent forth the spirit of his sonne into your harts which crieth Abba father Rom. 8.24 We are saued by hope 1. Ioh. 3.2 Now are we the sonnes of God but it doth not yet appear what we shal be By faith thē we are certein that those blessings also which as yet we haue not are notwithstanding ours for Gods promise for the vnchangeable will in God to giue them vs but in certain hope wee looke for them as concerning their accomplishment Faith apprehendeth the promises of thinges to come hope relieth on the thinges promised The summe is There is one and the same act and operation of faith and of hope but they differ in consideration It is called faith as it doth apprehend things to come as if they were present in regard of the vnchangeablenes of Gods will It is called hope as it doth certainlie look for the bestowing of those things Therfore Heb. 11 1. it is shewed that faith is the ground substance of things which are hoped for that is it is that which maketh things which are hoped for to be extant and present in that manner as hath bin shewed Shorter thus Faith apprehendeth the promises concerning things to come as they are to come Hope the things themselues which are promised 2 Obiection Faith is the euidence of thinges which are not seene therefore not of thinges present Aunswere It is the euidence of thinges which are not seene to wit by the outward senses but they are seene by the eies of the mind euen as if they did lie open to the eies of the bodie Againe they are not seene in respect of their accomplishment or consummation 5 What are the causes of Faith THE first and principall efficient cause of faith is the holie ghost illightening the minde that it may vnderstand the word and moouing the will that it may assent vnto the woord once vnderstoode Yee are freelie saued by faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of God Ephes 2.8 Obiection The Diuel hath faith It is wrought therefore in him by the holie ghost Aunswere What faith is in the Diuel is wrought by the spirit of God but that by a generall woorking onely whereby hee worketh in all euen in Diuels and hypocrites what-soeuer knowledge or vnderstanding is in them 1. Cor. 12. c. not by a speciall and proper action or working wherby to regenerat or sanctifie them that they might truely acknowledge him to bee the author of this gift and magnifie him therefore after which maner hee woorketh faith in the elect alone The Diuels therefore and hypocrits haue faith from the spirit of God but the elect from the spirit of God sanctifieng them The instrumentall cause of faith in generall is the whole worde of God the Lawe and the Gospell written spoken readde heard The chiefe instrumental causes of ingendering iustifieng faith are the preaching of the word and the vse of the sacramentes meditated likewise many works miracles of God in the world But the chiefe and proper instrument of iustifieng faith is the preaching of the Gospell the vse of the sacraments For these doth the holy ghost vse as instruments yet not necessarie but arbitrarie at his own good pleasure both to stir vp faith in vs and to nourish strengthen increase the same Rom. 10.17 Faith commeth by hearing Rom. 1.16 The gospell is the power of God vnto saluation to euerie one that beleeueth 1. Cor. 4.15 I haue begottē you through the gospel Mar. 16.16 He that shall beleeue and be Baptized shall be saued Act. 22.16 Wash away thy sins 1. Cor. 10.16 The bread which we break is the communion of the bodie of Christ Wherefore ordinarilie iustifieng faith is neuer engendred in those who are of yeares to receiue it without the preaching of the gospell The cause of that faith which worketh miracles is not simply the woorde of God but there must necessarily come thereto an especiall and immediate reuelation from God The formal causes of faith a sure and ful confidence in Christ The obiect of faith Christ and his benefites promised The final causes of faith Gods glorie our saluation The formall cause of iustifieng faith is a certaine knowledge confidence in Christ The obiect of it is Whole Christ and his benefits promised in the word Likewise God fauorable to vs through Christ The subiect wherein it remaineth is the vnderstanding will of man The end or finall cause 1 The glorie of God to wit the celebration of his trueth iustice bountie mercie which hee hath shewed in the sending of his Sonne and in the giuing of faith in him 2 Our Saluation that we may receiue the blessings which are promised in the worde 6 What are the effects of faith The effectes of faith iustification and regeneration THe effects of iustifieng faith are 1 The iustifieng of vs before God 2 Peace of conscience or ioy resting on God Rom. 5.1 Beeing iustified by faith we haue peace with god 3 Our whole conuersion which followeth faith and beginneth at the same time with faith For by faith are our hats purified 4 The fruits of conuersion repentance euen good woorkes For whatsouer is not of faith is sinne Hither may be referred also the consequences of faith that is encrease of spirituall corporal giftes The first then and immediate effect of iustifieng-faith is Iustification from this afterwardes flow al other benefites
effectually those actions which are sinnes hee doth indeed detest them as they are sinnes and when he commaundeth obedience he doth in earnest exact it of al. But this wil of signification or commaundement of God doth not testifie or declare what he wil woorke in all but what agreeth with his mind what he alloweth what he requireth what euery one oweth vnto him God therefore dissembleth not neither is contrary to himselfe because he doth not in al places nor at al times manifest his will vnto his creatures and his will of punishing is not disagreeing from his Law The fourth Sophisme of Contingency and liberty or freenesse Gods gouernment doeth not take away but establish the liberty of the creatures will THat which is doone by the vnchangeable decree of god is not done contingentlie and freely But al thinges are doone by the vnchaungeable decree or counsel or prouidence of god Therefore nothing is done contingently and freely Aunswere The Maior is either particular and so concludeth nothing or beeing generally vnderstoode is most false For an effect which is the some in subiect and matter is chaungeable and vnchaungeable necessary and contingent in respect not of the same cause but of diuerse of which togither it is produced doth depend and whereof some are chaungeable some vnchaungeable In respect therefore of second and neerest causes some effects are necessarie and certaine which are produced out of causes alwaies woorking after one sort some are changeable which haue a changeable cause that is such as is not alwaies woorking after one sort and producing the same effects In respect of the first cause namely the decree of god which is vnchangeable all effects are vnchangeable and most certaine euen those which in respect of second causes are most vncertaine As that the bones of Christ should not be broken it was a thing contingent in respect both of the bones which in their own nature might as well haue beene broken as not broken as also of the souldiers who as concerning the nature of their will might haue chosen to doe either but in respect of the decree of god it was necessary for by his decree were the wils of the souldiours so ruled that they could not then neither would choose the contrary Wherfore the vnchangeablenes of the decree of God which is a necessity by supposition or conditional dooth not take away either the contingency of euentes or the libertie and freenesse of a created will but rather maintaineth and confirmeth it For GOD accomplisheth his decrees by reasonable creatures according to the condition of their nature when as by obiectes represented and shewed to their vnderstanding hee enclineth and bendeth their will that it shoulde with free and inwarde motion choose or refuse that which seemed good from euerlasting to GOD and was decreed of him For if when God worketh well by euill creatures there is not taken away in them through the decree or prouidence of God and his good woorking that which is accidentall to them that is corruption how much lesse shall that bee taken away which is essentiall vnto them euen to woorke freely So the blessed Angels are chaungeably good as concerning their nature but they are vnchaungeably and necessarily onely good according to Gods decree and directing of them and yet freely so that howe much the more effectually they are mooued by the spirite of God so much the more freely and with greater alacritie and propension they will and doe onelie that which is good Iudas the Iewes Herode Pilate the souldiours deliuered and crucified Christ freely with great willingnes pleasure yet they did whatsoeuer the hande counsel of god had determined before to be doone Acts. 4 28. 2. Ob. That which is done by the vnchangeable decree of god is not don cōtingently but necessarily Al things are don by the vnchangeable decree of god nothing therefore is doone contingently neither by fortune or chance but al necessarily which is the Stoicks doctrin of fate or destiny Here before we answere to this obiectiō we must know the significatiō of the words the difference between the opinion of the Stoicks and Christians NECESSARY is that which cannot be otherwise than it is CONTINGENT is that The difference between necessarie and contingent thinges which is indeede or is done but might notwithstanding not haue bin or haue bin done otherwise Necessity therefore and contingency is the order which is between the cause and the effect vnchaungeable or changeable And because the effectes followe of their causes vnchaungeably either in respect of the nature it selfe of the causes or in respect of som external cause which designeth and appointeth another cause to a certaine effect and because also the effects themselues cannot be more vnchāgeable than are their causes therefore there is said to be a double necessity The difference betweene absolute necessitie and necessitie of consequence or supposition One absolute or simple which is of them whose opposites or contraries are simply vnpossible in respect of the nature of the cause or subiect whereof it is affirmed As are the essential personal properties of god to wit god is god liueth god is iust wise c. God is the eternal father son holy ghost The other is necessity of consequence or by supposition which is the immutability and vnchangeablenes of those effects which follow of causes which causes being supposed or put the effect must necessarily follow but the causes notwithstanding themselues might either not haue beene or might haue been changed So are those things necessary which god hath decreed that they shuld be don in respect of the vnchangeablenes of his decree which decree yet god most freely made that is he might from euerlasting either not haue decreed it at al or haue decreed it otherwise according to those words Mat. 26.53 Thinkest thou that I cānot now pray to my father he wil giue me mo thā twelue legions of Angels How then should the scriptures be fulfilled Likewse those things are said to be necessary which are done indeed by such second causes as are so made of god that by their owne nature they cannot doe otherwise than they doe but yet they maie bee by God himselfe either taken away or hindered or altered and chaunged As the Sunne and the shadow going forward in consequence or order of nature with the Sunne and yet consisting and standing still in that battaile of Iosua and returning backwards in the dayes of Ezechias the fire burning bodies within the reach thereof which are capeable of burning yet not burning the three children in the fornace of Babylō or those things which are indeed in their owne nature apt to produce a contrary or diuerse thing or to forbeare producing of their effect and yet notwithstanding cannot do otherwise because they are so moued by god or by other causes which although they be not changed yet might haue bin changed or when they
work so cannot withall not worke or work otherwise because two contradictories cannot bee both at one time true FORTVNE and CHANCE are sometimes taken for the euents themselues or effects which follow causes that are causes but by an accident by reason of such causes Fortune and chaunce as are causes by and in themselues but not knowen to vs as when wee say good or euil fortune happy or vnhappy chance sometimes they signify the causes of such euents either the manifest causes which are causes but by an accident as when any thing is said to be don by fortune or by chance or the hidden and vnknowen causes which are causes by and in themselues As it is said in the Poet Omnipotent fortune and fate ineuitable And they are wont to cal that fortune which is a cause by an accident in voluntary agents whose actions haue some euent that seldom happeneth besides their appointment As he that digging with purpose to builde findeth treasure Chaunce they call an accidentall cause in naturall agentes whose motions haue effects neither proper to them neither alwaies hapning that without any manifest cause directing it as if a tile falling from a house kill one that passeth by By the name of FATE or destiny Fate or destinie The difference between the stoickes and th◠churches doctrine concerning Gods prouidence somtimes is vnderstoode the decree prouidence of God As that of the Poet Leaue off to hope that the fates of the gods are moued with entreaty But the Stoickes by this woorde vnderstoode the immutable connexion and knitting of all causes effectes depending of the nature of the causes themselues so that neither the second causes are able to woorke otherwise than they woorke neither the first cause can woorke otherwise than doe the second and therefore all effectes of all causes are absolutelie necessarie This opinion of the Stoickes because it spoileth God of his libertie and omnipotency and abolisheth the order and manner of woorking in second causes disposed by Gods diuine wisedome not onely founder Philosophy but the Church also reiecteth and contemneth and doth openly professe her dissenting from the Stoickes First because the Stoicks tie god to second causes as if it should be necessary for him so to woorke by them as their nature dooth beare and suffer But the Church teacheth that God worketh not according to the rule or lore of second causes but second causes according to the prescript of GOD as beeing the chiefe and most free gouerner and lord and therefore are subiect and tied to his wil pleasure Secondly the Stoikes were of opinion that neither God nor second causes can doe any thing of their owne nature otherwise than they do The church affirmeth that not only second causes are made ordained by god some to bring forth certaine definit effects some variable and contrary but God himselfe also coulde from euerlasting either not haue decreed or haue decreed wrought otherwise either by second causes or without them and by them either changeable in their own nature or vnchangeable al things whose contrary are not repugnant to his nature that hee hath so decreed them and doth so work them not bicause he could not otherwise but because it so pleased him as it is said Ps 115.3 Our god is in heauen he doth whatsoeuer he wil. And Luk. 1.37 With god shal nothing be impossible that is which is not against his nature or whereby his nature is not ouerthrowen as it is saide 2. Tim. 2. Out of this then which hath beene spoken we answere vnto the argument which was That which is done by the vnchaungeable decree of God is not done contingently but necessarily All thinges are doone by the vnchangeable decree of God nothing therefore is doone contingently neither by fortune or chaunce but all necessarily First wee say there is more in the conclusion than in the premisses when the opinion of the Stoicks is obiected to the Church For albeit the church confesseth al euents in respect of gods prouidence to be necessary yet this necessity is not a Stoical fate destiny because the church defendeth against the Stoikes both liberty in god gouerning things at his pleasure a chāgeablenes in second causes sheweth out of gods word that god could both nowe doe and from euerlasting haue decreed many things which neither hee doth nor hath decreed And therefore the church also hath absteined from the name of fate Necessitie of consequence or supposition doth not take away contingency least any should suspect her to maintaine with the Stoicks an absolute necessity of al things Secōdly if remouing stoicisme yet notwithstāding the necessity of al things the abolishing of cōtingency fortune chance be obiected we make aunswere to the Maior by distinguishing the words For those things that are done by the prouidence decree of god are done indeed necessarily but by that necessity which is by supposition or of consequence not by simple necessity or absolute Wherefore it followeth that all things come to passe not by simple absolute necessity but by that of supposition or consequence And necessitie of consequence doth not at al take away contingency The reason hereof is this Because the same effect may haue causes whereof some may produce it by an order changeable some by vnchangeable order therefore in respect of some it is contingent in respect of some necessary For as the originals or causes of contingency in things are that liberty which is in the will of god and Angels and men and the mutable nature of the matter of the elementes together with the readinesse or inclination thereof to diuers motions and formes so the cause of absolute necessitie in God is the very vnchangeable nature of god but the cause of that necessitie which is onely by consequent is the diuine prouidence or decree comming between those things which are in their own nature mutable also the nature of things created which is framed and ordained of god to certaine effects and yet subiect to the most free wil gouernment of god either according or besides or contrary to this order which himselfe hath made In respect therefore of second causes some things are necessary which are done by causes woorking alwaies after one sort as the motion of the son the burning of any matter put vnto the fier if it be capeable of burning some thinges are contingent which haue causes working contingently that is apt and fit to produce or to forbeare producing diuerse contrary effects as the blasts of windes the locall motions of liuing creatures the actions of mens wils But in respect of the first cause that is of the wil of god all thinges which are or are doone in Gods externall and outward woorks are partly necessary partly cōtingent necessary as euē those things which haue second causes most chaungeable as that the bones of Christ on the crosse were not broken
worketh also in them to be warie and to take heed thereof Rom. 8.3 Whom hee predestinate them hee iustified They therfore doe amisse who thinke to receiue comfort without any desire of a good conscience Replie But if they must take heed and beware they are vncertaine Aunswere No because they haue this as a spur to goe forwarde and perseuere But To bee certaine and not to haue a desire of repentance amendment of life implieth a contradiction as if thou shouldest say I am certaine of my reward therefore I will not runne for a rewarde is not giuen but to him that runneth These propositions doe mutuallie one follow another To bee certaine of saluation and to haue a desire of conuersion and amendement of life 2 What Predestination is PRedestination differeth from prouidence The difference bâ—tweene predestination and prouidence as a speciall from the generall For prouidence is the eternall counsell of God concerning al creatures but Predestination is the eternall counsel of GOD concerning the sauing of men and Angels Wherefore Predestination is the eternal most iust and vnchangeable counsel of God of creating men of permitting their fal into sinne and eternal death of sending his Sonne into flesh that hee might bee a sacrifice and of conuerting some by the woorde and the holie ghost for the Mediatours sake and sauing them in true faith and conuersion and of leauing the rest in sinne and eternall death raising them vp to iudgement casting them into eternal paines Here is spoken of men which shall bee saued and not saued therefore to them onely and not to Angels doth this definition of Predestination agree Election The partes of Predestination are Election and Reprobation Election is the eternal vnchaungeable free and most iust decree of god whereby hee hath decreed to conuert some to Christ to preserue and keepe them in faith and repentaunce and by him to giue them eternall life Reprobation Reprobation is such a decree of god as whereby hee hath decreed to leaue some according to his most iust iudgement in their sinnes to punish them with blindnesse and damnation and to condemne them beeing not made partakers of Christ euerlastingly That Election likewise as also Reprobation are both the decree of god these and the like sayinges doe prooue John 13.18 I know whom I haue chosen 2. Tim. 1.9 His grace was giuen to vs before the worlde was Rom. 9.18 He hath mercy on whom he wil. Both therefore election and reprobation were made by counsell and therefore both are a decree and that eternal because there is no new thing in God but all from euerlasting and the Scripture doth manifestlie saie Ephes 1.4 That God hath chosen vs before the foundation of the worlde Seeing then hee hath chosen vs hee hath therefore reiected the rest That which the verie word of choosing doth shew For whatsoeuer is chosen the same is chosen other thinges beeing reiected This Election is of grace and free that is not in respect of anie good foreseene in vs. He hath mercie on whom he will that is He giueth freely what he giueth Joh. 15.16 You haue not chosen me 3 What the causes of Predestination or Election and Reprobation The efficient cause of our election Gods good pleasure not any thing in vs. THE efficient and motiue cause is the good pleasure of God Matth. 11.26 Jt is so O Father because thy good pleasure was such God hath not foreseene any thing in vs for which he should choose vs for there can be no good in vs as of our selues For if anie good bee found in vs that hee dooth worke wholy in vs and hee woorketh nothing in vs which hee hath not decreed to woorke from euerlasting Wherefore the alone gracious and most free good pleasure of God or the alone free mercy of God is the efficient and motiue cause of our Election Ephes â— 5. God hath predestinate vs to be adopted through Jesus Christ vnto himselfe according to the good pleasure of his wil. See further Roman 9.11 Coloss 1.12 2. Timot. 1.9.10 The cause of reprobatioÌ„ in God In like manner also the efficient cause of Reprobation is the most free good pleasure of God For wee beeing all by nature the children of wrath had al perished if sin were the cause of reprobation Wherefore the cause of reprobation is not in men themselues but that is in God his will of shewing foorth his iustice Therefore of particular men why this man is elected and he reprobated there can bee no other reason giuen but the good pleasure of God onely But the cause of damnation is altogether in men The cause of Damnation in men which is sinne The supreme final cause of Predestination is gods glorie and the last and proper final cause of Election is the manifestation of Gods goodnesse and mercie in freelie sauing the Elect. The next neerest finall cause of our Election is our Iustification when God dooth in his Sonne freely account vs for righteous Both which finall causes the Apostle compriseth in these wordes Ephes 1 6. He hath predestinate vs to the praise of the glorie of his grace wherewith he hath made vs freely accepted in his beloued Likewise of the contrarie The first final cause of Reprobation is the declaration of gods iustice seueritie and hatred against sinne in the reprobate 1 Obiection God did foreknowe our workes Therefore he choose vs for our woorks Aunswere He did foreknowe those good thinges which he purposed to woorke in vs as also he foreknewe the persons otherwise he could not haue foreknowen any good workes So could he not haue foreseene any euill except he had purposed to permit the same 2 Obiection Christs merite applied vnto vs by faith is the cause of our Election Therefore not the good pleasure of God Answere Christes merit is not the cause of election but is reckoned among the effects thereof 3 Obiection Euil workes are the cause of reprobation therefore good workes are the cause of election Aunswere Euil workes are not the cause of reprobation but of that which followeth reprobation that is of damnation Good workes go not before in him that is to be iustified muchlesse are they the cause of election but they followe in a man beeing iustified and draw their original and their perpetual efficacy and vertue from gods meâ—e grace 4 Whaâ— are the effects of Predestination THE effect of election is the whole woork of our saluation and al the degrees of our redemption 1. The creation and gathering of the church 2 The sending and giuing of Christ the Mediatour and his Sacrifice 3. Effectuall calling of men to his knowledge which is the conuersion of the Elect by the holie Ghost and the woorde 4. Faith iustifâ—cation regeneration 5. Good woorkes 6. Finall perseueraunce 7 Raising vnto glorie 8. The effects of Reprobation Glorification and eternal life The effects of Reprobation are the creation of the reprobate priuation
of gods grace blinding hardening perseueraunce in sinne raising to iudgement and casting into eternal torments Obiection Diuers or contrarie causes haue contrarie effectes The effectes of election are good woorkes Therefore euil works are the effectes of reprobation Aunswere The Maior is not alwaies true in voluntarie causes For there is a dissimilitude Because God purposed onely to permit euil woorks but to worke good in vs. But the proper cause of euill works is the Diuel and euil men Replie But god hardeneth and blindeth men Blindnes is an effect of reprobation and a sinne Therefore sinne is an effect of reprobation Aunswere Blindnesse is a sinne in respect of men who admit it and as it is receiued of them and purchased by their owne demerite but as it is inflicted of God it is a iust punishment And that God doth deliuer some from that blindnesse is of his mercie Obiection Hardenesse or induration is an effect of reprobation and is a sinne God is autor of reprobation therefore of hardnes also and so of sinne Aunswere Hardnesse is an effect of reprobation but so that it is done according to reprobation but commeth not from it Hardnesse and blindnesse or exâ—ecation are according to reprobation or according to predestination as they are sins But they are effects of reprobation or predestination as they are most iust punishmentes 5 Whether Predestinatiâ—n â—e vnchaungeable PRedestination is firme sure and vnchaungeable which maie appeare euen by thâ— generall reason Predestination vnchangeable Because God is vnchaungeable and doth not depend on the interchangeable course of thinges but the same rather dependeth on his decree What therefore hee hath from euerlasting decreed of sauing the elect and condemning the reprobate that hath he vnchaungeablie decreed And therefore both election and reprobation is firme and vnchaungeable For whom he woâ—ld and hath decreed from euerlasting should be sauâ—d them also hee now will and so hereafter perpetually The same alâ—o wee are to think concerning reprobation Neither are there wanting testimonies of Scripture whereby the same is confirmed Iohn 6.39 This is the Fathers wil that of al which hee hath giuen mee I shoulde loose nothing Isai 46.10 My councel shal stand and J wil doe whatsoeuer I wil. Mal 3 6. I am the Lord I chaunge not Ioh. 10.28 None shal pluck my sheepe 〈◊〉 of my hand Ioh. 1. â—6 Yee beleeue not for yee are not of my shâ—epe â— Tim. 2.19 The foundation of god remaineth sure and hath this seale the Lord knoweth who are his The foundation which Paul so calleth is the decree of sauing the Elâ—ct 1. Because it is the beginning and welspring of our saluation and the end thereof and of al the meanes tending to saluation 2. It is called the foundation for the surenesse and firmenesse thereof because the same is neuer shaken These things are needefull for vs to knowe that wee maie haue firme comfort and consolation that wee may beleeue eternall life and so al other Articles of christian faith The reason is often repeated and therefore often to bee meditated of because he that denieth himself to be certain of the gracâ— to come is vncertaine also of the present grace of God For God is vnchangeable 6 How far forth Predestination or Election and Reprobation is knowen vnto vs. IT is knowen vnto vs in general as That some are Elect and some Reprobate but not in speciall whether this or that man be But of our own Election euery of vs not only may but also ought to bee in speciall certaine and assured And verily thereof we shall be certaine by the effectes Euerie man ought to bee assured of his owne Election in speciall namelie by conuersion that is by true faith repentance For that we may beleeue and know that we are certainly chosen to eternal life wee are bound to beleeue in Christ and to beleeue also eternal life But this wee cannot beleeue except wee haue true faith and repentaunce And as euerie one ought to haue both these So also euery one ought certainly to hold that he is of the number of the Elect. Otherwise they shal accuse God of lying Rom. 5.2 Wee reioice vnder the hope of the glory of God Christ is our intercessour woorking our euerlasting saluation I beleeue euerlasting life that is not spiritual life onely but euerlasting also which being heere begunne I carrie hence with mee out of this life Neither onely in speciall dooth euerie one know his owne Election by faith and conuersion but it is in generall also knowen that some are Elect. The Election of others is to bee beleued in generall And in general thou oughtst not only to hope but also certainely to beleeue that there are other besides thee elected For thou art bound to beleeue the Article of the Church because that hath bin at al times nowe is But thou alone by thy selfe art not the Church and therefore thou must not saie with Elias I am left alone But to discerne of particulars and of euerie single man is not thine to do Thou art notwithstanding wel to hope of the Election of others eueÌ„ as concerning euery particular man In generall is the whole Election of all in speciall there is a diuerse consideration of himselfe and of others No certainetie of reprobation eitheâ— concerniâ—g our selues or others Of Reprobation no man ought to iudge or determine any thing certainely either as touching his owne or as touching an â—thers reprobation before the end of his life For he that is â—or yet conuerted may be here after conuerted before he dâ—â— No maÌ„ therefore ought to iudge of others that they are reprobates but to hope wel of them of himselfe euerie man ought certainely to beleeue that he is an elect For wee haue a generall commandement 7 Whether the Elect be alwaies members of the Church and the Reprobate neuer The elect are then first member of the Church when they are regenerated THE Elect are not alwaies members of the church but then first when they are conuerted and regenerated by the holy Ghost For it is said Rom. 8.9 Jf any man hath not the spirite of Christ the same is not his Likewise the church is called holy But then first are the Elect holy when they are conuerted For Saint Paul expressely saith 1. Corint 6.11 And such were some of you but yee are washed Againe Coloss 1.13 He hath translated vs into the kingdome of his deare Sonne Now some are borne liue and die in the church others are not born in it but are called either soone or late vnto the visible church some both to the visible inuisible church as the theefe on the crosse As also those of the Gentiles of whome Christ spâ—ke Joh. 10.16 J haue other Sheepe Some either are borne in the visible church or come vnto it who neuerthelesse are not members of the inuisible and who sometimes depart from the visible Such are the reprobate who
of Christ imputed vnto vs. Christ is in respect of our iustification 1. As the subiect matter wherein our iustice is 2. As the impellent cause because he obtaineth it 3. As the chief efficient because he together with his Father dooth iustifie vs and 4. Because he giueth vs faith whereby we beleeue and apprehend it The mercy of god is as the impellent cause thereof in GOD. Christes satisfaction is the formal cause of our iustification giuing the very life and being vnto it 7 Why Christes satisfaction is made ours by faith onelie Faith the apprehensiue instrument of Christs satisfaction CHRISTES satisfaction is made ours by faith alone 1. Because faith is the onely instrument which apprehendeth Christs satisfaction 2. Because the proper act operation of faith and not any other act of vertue is the application or apprehension of Christes merite yea faith is nothing else than the acceptation it selfe or apprehension of anothers iustice and of the merit of Christ 3. It is done by faith onely because we are iustified by the obiect of faith onely to wit by the merite of Christ alone besides which there is no iustice of ours nor any part thereof For wee are iustified freely for Christes sake without woorkes There is nothing which is our iustice and righteousnes before God neither in whole nor in part besides Christes merite onely by receiuing and beleeuing anothers iustice and not by working wee are iustified Not by working nor by meriting but by apprehension and acceptation only we are iust and righteous Wherefore we are iustified by faith onely by faith as Saint Paul speaketh as by a mean and instrument but not for faith as the Papistes say who wil admit both these maners of speaking as if faith were indeede the application whereby we apply vnto our selues Christes iustice but were also besides a certaine work or merite whereby we merite to bee iust Nowe the exclusiue particle onely is added that whatsoeuer merit of ours may bee excluded and faith vnderstoode with relation and respect to Christes merit which is our iustice That so the sense may be Christes merite iustifieth vs and not faith it selfe that which is apprehended dooth iustifie vs and not the instrument which doth apprehend Neuerthelesse this proposition Wee are iustified by faith may bee vnderstoode also without relation to wit wee are iustified by faith as by a meane But this proposition of the Apostle Faith was imputed to him for righteousnesse and other the like are necessarilie to bee vnderstoode with a relation vnto Christes merite and iustice Faith was imputed vnto him for righteousnes as faith is the apprehending instrument of righteousnes apprehended faith beeing as it were the hande wherewith the Iustice of Christ is receiued and by this means faith is wholy excluded frō that which is receiued by faith vnto which nature notwithstanding of faith it were repugnaunt That For faith we should be iust and righteous For if for faith then faith were nowe no longer an acceptation of anothers righteousnesse but were a merit and cause of our owne iustice neither should receiue anothers satisfaction which now it should haue no neede of Obiections against this Doctrine of Iustification 1 OBiection Wee are iustified by faith Faith is a woorke Therefore we are iustified by the woorkes thereof that is by the merite of faith Aunswere First the consequence of this reason is denied because more is in the conclusion than in the premisses of which premisses this onely followeth That by that worke wee are iustified as by an instrument or meane not as an impellent cause Nowe it is one thing to be iustified by faith that is to be iustified faith only being the meane to receiue it by the bloode of Christ and it is another thing to be iustified for faith that is for the merite of faith 2. The kinde of affirmation is diuerse for in the Maior faith is vnderstoode with relation to Christes merite in the Minor it is taken absolutelie and properlie 2 Obiection Justice is that whereby wee are formallie or essentiallie iust Faith is iustice Therefore we are by faith formallie and essentiallie iust Aunswere The consequence of this reason is to bee denied because the kinde of affirmation is diuers For the Maior is meant properly but the Minor * Per Metalepsin figuratiuely one thing being taken for another faith for the obiect of faith which is Christs merite and iustice 3 Obiection Faith is imputed for righteousnes as Paul saith Therefore for faith we are righteous Aunswere This is also figuratiuely vnderstood because by faith which is imputed for righteousnes is correlatiuely vnderstood the obiect of faith vnto which faith hath relation For Christs merite which is apprehended by faith is properly our iustice and this merite of Christ is the formall cause of our iustice The efficient of our iustice is God applying that merite of Christ vnto vs. The instrumental cause of our iustice is faith And therefore this proposition We are iustified by faith being legallie vnderstoode with the Papists is not true but blasphemous but being taken correlatiuely that is Euangelically with relation to Christs merit it is true For the correlatiue of faith is the merit of Christ which faith also as a ioint-relatiue or correlatiue respecteth and as an instrument apprehendeth 4 Obiection That which is not alone dooth not iustifie alone Faith is not alone Therefore faith dooth not iustifie alone Aunswere Here is a fallacie of composition the reason beeing deceitfully composed For the woorde alone is composed and ioined in the conclusion with the predicate which is the woorde iustifie but in the premisses or antecedent it is ioined with the verbe is The Argument is true if in the conclusion alone bee not sundred from the verbe is or from being which is the participle of is but bee ioined with it on this wise Faith therefore doth not iustifie alone that is being alone For if it be so vnderstood the argument is of force for faith is neuer without workes as her effects Faith iustifieth alone but is not alone when it iustifieth hauing workes accompanying it as effects of it but not as ioint-causes with it of iustification 5 Obiect That which is required in those who are to be iustified without the same faith doth not iustifie Good works are required in those who are to be iustified Therefore without good workes faith doth not iustifie Auns The particle without is ambiguously doubtfully taken for in the Maior it is taken thus Faith without it that is being without it doth not iustifie So that the same fallacie is in this obiection which was in the former The Minor also of this obiection is more at large to be explaned In them who are to be iustified moe things are required but not after the same maner Faith is required in them who are to be iustified as an instrumēt apprehending anothers iustice Good works are required in them not as a cause of
excluded that coined deuise of good intentions when as namely men doe euill things that good things may come thereof likewise when they deuise and imagine woorkes which they thrust vpon God insteed of worship Neither doth it suffice if a woorke be not forbidden but it must also be commaunded if it shall serue for Gods worship 2 That the worke haue his original from a true faith which faith must be grounded and depending on the merite and intercession of the Mediatour and by which he may know both the person and the worke to be accepted of god for the mediatours sake For without faith it is vnpossible for anie man to please God Neither is such a faith â—â—ere sufficient which assureth thee that God will this â—r that this worke is commaunded of God For then the wicked also should doe that which God will but not with a true faith A true or iustifieng faith therefore stretcheth surder as both coÌ„prehending historicall faith and also which is the chiefest thing applieng the promise of the gospell vnto vs. Of this true faith are these things spoken Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Without faith it is vnpossible to please God And the reasons of both these sayings are not obscure because without faith there is no loue of God and so consequently no loue of our neighbour And whatsoeuer woorke ariseth not from the loue of God is hypocrisie 3 It is required that this woorke be referred principally iâ— the glorie of God onely Otherwise it shal proceed froÌ„ the loue of thy selfe not from the loue of God Whenas thou doest any thing thou must not heede or care what men speake whether they praise thee or no so that thou knowe that it pleaseth God But yet true glorie we may lawfully desire seeke for according to that Mat. 5.16 Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good woorkes By these former conditions all these woorkes are excluded 1 Which are sins in themselues and repugnant vnto Gods Lawe and his will reuelled in the word 2 Which are not repugnant vnto the Law neither in themselues good or euill but which may yet by an accident be made good or euil Workes not repugnant vnto the Lawe are made euill or sinnes by an accident when as they beeing not commaunded of God but imposed by men are done with an opinion of worshipping God therein 3 Which are good in themselues and commanded by God but yet are made sinnes by an accident in that they are vnlawfully doone as not arising from those lawfull causes by which the doers of them should be moued to do them and which in doing them they should respect that is they are not done by faith neither to this end chiefly that God might therein be honored 2 The woorkes of the regenerate and vnregenerate differ because the workes of the vnregenerate First Proceed not of faith Secondly Are not ioined with an inward obedience and therefore are doone dissemblingly and are meere hypocrisie Thirdly As they proceed not of the right cause so are they not referred to the chiefe end which is Gods glory 3 This difference which appeareth in the workes of the godly the wicked coÌ„firmeth also that the very morall works of the wicked are sins though yet not such sins as those are which in their owne nature are repugnant vnto Gods Lawe For these are sinnes by themselues and in their own kind but those either are sins onely by an accident namely by reason of defect because neither they come of faith neither are doone for Gods glorie Wherefore this consequence is not of force Al the workes of the wicked and of Paynims are sins Therefore they are al to be eschued For the defects only are to be eschued not the worke 2 How good workes may bee doone GOod workes may be done through the grace or assistance of the Holy Ghost onely and that by the regenerate onely whose heart is regenerated of the holy ghost by the gospel and that not onely in their first conuersion and regeneration but also by the perpetual and continual gouernment of the holy ghost who both worketh in them an acknoweledgement of sinne faith new obedience and also doth daily more and more encrease and confirme the same gifts in them Vnto this doctrine Saint Ierome also consenteth Let him be accursed saith hee who affirmeth the Lawe to be possible without the grace of the holy Ghost Wherefore out of this doctrine wee learne that men not as yet regenerated are able to doe no good and that euen the holiâ—st men sinne also except the benefite and blessing of regeneration bee continued This wee maie see in Peter and Dauid Without regeneration no one part of a good work can bee so much as begunne because All our righteousnesse is as the cloth of a menstruous womaÌ„ In which saying also the Prophet comprehendeth himselfe and euen the holiest among men If in the Saintes themselues nought else is found before God what then in the vnregenerate What these are able to perfourme wee see in the Epistle to the Romanes in the two first Chapters Now as by our selues we are not able to beginne good workes So neither are we our selues able to accomplish anie good worke For it is God which worketh in you both the will and the deede euen of his good pleasure Without imputed righteousnes we are all in the sight God abomination filth and dung But the righteousnes of christ is not imputed vnto vs before our conuersion Therefore it is vnpossible before our conuersion that either our selues or our worke should please God Faith is the cause of good woorkes Faith commeth from God Therefore the effect also shall come from God neither shall it goe before the cause therfore good works caÌ„not be before conuersion 3 Whether the workes of the Saintes be perfectly good THE woorks of the Saintes are not perfectly good or pure 1. Because the Saints which doe good workes doe many things which are sinnes in themselues for which they deserue to be cast out into euerlasting paines Cursed be he that abideth not in al. Deut. 27.26 Yea the holiest men doe many euil works commit many sins and acts which are euill in themselues Such was the sinne of Peter thrise denying Christ and of Dauid murthering Vrias committing adulterie willing to couer it and numbering the people 2. Because there is not that degree of goodnesse in those good woorkes that proceede from the Saintes which ought to be For their good workes are not so pure and good as God requireth Yea when the Saintes perfourme most holy workes yet are they not perfect but haue alwaies in this life defectes and are stained with sins For faith and the loue of God and our neighbour whence good workes flow are imperfect in vs in this life The effect then shall not bee perfect because the cause is not perfect For we do not perfectly know and loue God and our neighbour and
not lawfull for me to doe as I wil with mine own He must needs be very impudent who hauing receiued of gift an hundred florens of a rich mā thinketh that he deserueth a thousand mo by receiuing those hundred whereas rather he is by this gift receiued bound to the rich man not the rich mā to him 5 No creature which doth euen the most perfect woorkes can thereby merit ought at Gods handes or bind God vnto him to giue him any thing according to order of iustice The reason hereof doth the Apostle yeeld Who hath giuen him first We deserue no more our preseruation than we deserued our creation He did owe nothing vnto vs when hee created vs so neither now doth he owe vs our preseruation neither is he bound to giue vs any thing We can bestow no benefit vpon our Creatour nay although we should neuer sinne yet can we not sufficiently declare and shew forth our thankefulnesse 6 There is no proportion betweene our woorkes which are vtterly vnperfect and the excellency of those great blessings and benefites which the Father giueth vs freelie in his Son 7 1. Cor. 1.31 He that reioiceth let him reioice in the Lorde But if we merit by our work remission of our sins man should haue in himselfe whereof to reioice neither should the glorie be giuen to God Rom. 4.2 If Abraham were iustified by his woorkes hee hath wherein to reioice but not with God 8 Wee are iust before we doe good woorkes Rom. 9.11.12.13 For yer Esau and Iacob were borne when they had neither done good nor euil that the purpose of God might remain according to election not by works but by him that calleth it was said vnto her The elder shall serue the yonger As it is written I haue loued Jacob and haue hated Esau 9 They who will be iustified by woorkes haue no sure and steadefast conscience Rom. 4.16 The inheritance is by faith that it might come by grace and the promise might be sure to all the seede 10 If wee should obtain righteousnesse by our own worke the promises should be made voide For in Abraham shall all the nations bee blessed And Christ also should haue died in vaine 11 There should not be one and the same reason and cause of our saluation if this Doctrine of the merit of woorkes should be admitted Abraham and the Theefe on the Crosse should haue bin otherwise iustified than we are iustified But there is but one way leading vs to saluation I am the way the truth and the life 1. Tim. 2.5 There is one Medatour betweene God and Men. Eph. 4 5. There is one Lorde one Faith one Baptisme Heb. 13.8 Jesus Christ yesterday and to day the same is also for euer Acts. 4.12 There is giuen no other name vnder Heauen whereby wee must bee saued Therefore we shall not be saued by good workes or for our good woorkes 12 Christ shoulde not giue vs full and perfect saluation and so neither should hee bee a perfect Sauiour if some thing were as yet required of vs whereby we should bee made iust But Christ is our perfect Sauiour For as Paul witnesseth God with his glorious grace hath made vs accepted in his beloued By whom we haue redemption through his bloud euen the forgiuenes of sinnes according to his rich grace And Ephes 2.8 By grace are yee saued through faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of God 1 Obiection They which haue not good woorkes cannot be saued Therefore good woorkes are necessarie vnto saluation Ans That without which we cannot be saued is necessary vnto saluation that is as a part of saluation or as an accident of saluation not as a cause of saluation 2 Obiection God calleth those blessings which hee promiseth to them that doe good workes rewardes and meed Now meede presupposeth merit Therefore good workes doe merit Aunswere Amongest creatures sometimes it doth but neuer with god But they are called the rewardes or meede of our woorkes in respect of God forasmuch as hee recompenseth most fully those thinges which wee doe neither yet is that recompence due For there can come no commoditie vnto God by vs therefore God is not bound no not to make the least recompence For he that stādeth no waies in need of our works and vnto whom they can ad or bring nothing at al of him doubtles wee are not able to merite or deserue any thing But there commeth good rather vnto our selues by good workes For the good works which we doe are a conformity with God therefore are Gods gift by which gift and benefit we are bound vnto god but not god vnto vs. Wherfore it is no lesse absurde to say that we merite saluation at gods hāds by good works than if one should say Thou hast giuen me an hundred florns Therefore thou oughtest also to giue me a thousand florens Obiection 3. But whereby may we be assured that we haue good works Aunswere 1. By the peace of conscience 2. By our conuersion 3. By the fruites of conuersion OF THE LAW OF GOD OR OF THE DECALOG AND TEN COMMANDEMENTES THE chiefe Questions 1 What the Law is in general 2 What are the parts of the Law 3 What is the vse of the Law 4 Jn what the Lawe differeth from the gospell 5 How far the Law is abrogated 6 How the Decalog is diuided 7 What is the meaning of the Decalog and of euerie commandement thereof 1 What the Law is in general THE Lawe in generall is a sentence or decree commaunding things that are honest binding creatures endued with reason vnto obedience with a promise of rewarde and a commination or threatning of punishment It is a sentence commaunding thinges that are honest otherwise it is no Law It bindeth creatures endued with reason for the Lawe was not made for them who are not bound to obedience With a promise of reward The Law freely promiseth blessings vnto those who perfourme obedience because no obedience can be meritorious before God Obiection But the gospell also promiseth freelie good things blessings Therefore the Law differeth not from the gospell Answ The Law promiseth freely after one maner and the Gospel after another The law promiseth freely with a condition of our obedience But the gospel promiseth freely without the works of the Law with a condition of faith not with a condition of our obedience Wherefore the gospell dooth not promise blessings freely without al condition but without such a condition as wherewith the Lawe promiseth blessinges vnto vs. And with a commination or threatning of punishment Otherwise the Lawe were a vaine and empty sound and shoulde effect nothing Moreouer the Latine woorde Lex which signifieth the Law is deriued from Lego which signifieth to reade and publish or from Lego which signifieth to choose With the former deriuation agreeth the Hebrue woorde with the latter the greeke woord For in Greeke the Lawe is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
also the whole seuen yeares were called sabbothes Leuit. 25.8 Thou shalt number seuen sabbothes of yeares vnto thee euen seuen times seuen yeares The Mediate externall Sabboth is that which God dooth mediatelie constitute by his church such as is in the New Testament the first day of the weeke to wit sundaie or rather The Lords daie which was instituted for the seuenth day or sabboth day in respect of Christs resurrection 2 The causes for which the sabboth daie was instituted THE final causes or endes for which the sabboth daie was instituted are these 1. The publique seruice and worship of god in the church exercise of praiers confession obedience in which consisteth the study of the knowledge of GOD of good woorkes and thankfulnes God will and therefore doth hee especially ordaine the sabboth that hee bee worshipped and inuocated of vs in this life not only priuately but also by the publique voice of the Church 2. The mainteinance and preseruation of the ministerie of the church which is an office and function instituted by God to teach and instruct the Church concerning God and his will out of the word of God deliuered by the Prophets and Apostles and to administer the sacramentes according to Gods holy institution This is not the least end for which the sabboth was ordained For this ordinaunce and publique preaching of the doctrine being ioined with praier and thankes-giuing and with the vse of holy rites is a publique exercise stirring and cherishing faith and repentaunce 3. It was instituted that it might be in the old testament a type signifieng the spirituall and euerlasting sabboth Ezech. 20.12 Moreouer J gaue them also my sabbothes to bee a signe betweene mee and them that they might know that J am the Lord that sanctifie them 4. It was instituted for a circumstaunce of the seuenth daie that namely the seuenth day might aduertise mē of the creatiō of the world of the ordering and menaging of things to be done and of that meditation which they are to vse in considering gods workes which hee in sixe daies created and accomplished 5. That on that daie the works of charitie bountifulnesse and liberalitie should be exercised 6. For the bodilie rest both of men and beastes but of beastes in respect of man 7. That men should prouoke one another by their example to godlinesse and to the praising and honouring of god Ps 22.22 J wil declare thy Name vnto my brethren in the middest of the congregation wil I praise thee 8. That the church maie be seen and heard among men and be discerned frō the other blasphemous idolatrous multitude of men and that they maie ioine themselues thereto who are as yet separated from it So was in the old Testament also the sabboth a marke distinguishing the people of Israel from all other nations 3 How the sabboth is sanctified or kept holy THE works which are to be done on the sabboth daie or the partes of the sanctifieng of the sabboth day are comprehended in the word Sanctifieng which parts we will briefly expound The partes then of the sanctifieng of the sabboth are 1. Rightly and truly to teach and instruct the church concerning god and his wil. The teaching which is here commanded is of another kinde from that which was mentioned in the third commaundement For there it belongeth to euery priuate person to teach heere the function of teaching is enioined as proper vnto certaine persons and that vnto such persons as beeing furnished from aboue with necessary giftes are lawfully called by the church vnto this function and vnto them is it enioined in this commandement that they propound and deliuer found doctrin to al men both in publick assemblies and in priuate instruction 2 Rightlie to administer the sacraments according to Gods diuine institution This likewise must bee perfourmed by the ministers of the Church lawfullie called to discharge this function And as the doctrine so also this administration of the sacraments is not tied to certaine daies but it sufficeth if the administration be publique and be done by the ministers who beare a publique person and represent in the ministery the person of god himself talking with men and if also in the assemblies of the Church those thinges be done by thē which god hath tied annexed vnto the ministers So circūcision was administred on any day which fel out to be the eighth frō the Infants natiuity So Baptism also may be administred at anie time Act. 8. 10. But the administration of the sacraments ought chieflie to be exercised on the Sabboth daie Therefore Num. 28. 29. besides daylie sacrifices there are certain sacrifices appointed which were to be perfourmed on the Sabboth on festiual daies Furdermore this administratiō must be in publike assemblies For so Christ also instituted his supper as which amongst other ends must be also a bōd of church assemblies to be administred in the assembly of the church bee it great or be it small Mat. 26. Drinke ye all of this Vnto the right administration also of the sacraments belongeth the excluding and debarring of those whom God hath commaunded to be excluded from them Like as it was not lawful for those that were aliens from the Country and religion of the Iewes neither for any of the vncircumcised to eate of the Paschal Lamb Exo. 12. So neither ought the church to admit vnto the Lords supper those that are not baptised or those that are baptised but yet are aliens in their Doctrine and manners from Christianity 1. Cor. 10 11. 3 Diligentlie and dailie to frequent the publique assemblies of the Church and there attentiuelie to giue eare vnto the Heauenlie Doctrine plainlie opened and deliuered and diligentlie to meditate after thereon and examine it but especially to spend those daies which are deputed vnto the ministery seruice of God in reading meditation and in discoursing of diuine matters These things are made manifest by the nature and necessary dependancie of Correlatiues For if god will haue some to be teachers hee will also haue some to be hearers and learners of this Doctrine And the study of learning is not without priuate Meditation Therefore haue the men of Beraea their commendation Acts. 17.11 Thus they receiued the word with all readinesse and searched the Scriptures dailie whether those things were so But vnto them especially is the study of knowing the Doctrine of god enioyned who either serue or hereafter are to serue and minister vnto the Church 1. Tim. 4.13 Giue attendance to reading to exhortation and to doctrine And 1. Tim. 3. and 2. Tim. 2. Paul will haue the minister of the Church to be fit and able to instruct and to refute the aduersaries 4 To vse the sacraments according to gods Jnstitution So god commaunded the Passeouer to be celebrated in a solemne assemblie of the people and vnto other holy daies and sabbothes he assigned certaine sacrifices And in like manner god will that
the couenant that the bookes of the Prophets and apostles are called the old and new Testament For it is wel known that here by the name of Testament is meant the couenant If then the couenant which is between God and the faithfull bee described in these bookes it must needes bee that in them is declared what God promiseth and what hee doth vnto vs to wit his fauour remission of sinnes his holy spirit righteousnes and life euerlasting and preseruation of his Church in this life by and for his sonne our mediatour as also what he requireth of vs that is to say faith by the which we receaue his benefits and a life framed according to his commandementes by which wee declare our thankfulnes And these are the thinges which are taught in the Law and Gospell 5 Neither is the meaning of the holy Ghost otherwise From the Subiect correlatiue of the couenaÌ„t when in a woorde he sayeth that Christ is taught in the whole Scripture and that hee alone is to be sought there For Paul truely as also the rest of the Apostles did not propose a maimed but a whole doctrine vnto the churches euen as himselfe witnesseth Act. 20. That hee kept nothing backe but shewed all the counsell of God concerning the Ephesians And yet the selfe-same Apostle 1 Cor. 2. saith That hee knew nothing but Iesus Christ and him crucifyed And Cap. 3. That the foundation of the doctrine of the Church is Christ alone And that this foundation is common to the Prophets together with the Apostles Wherefore the Doctrine concerning Christ is the summe and scope of the Scripture and the foundation laid by the Prophets and Apostles on which whosoeuer rely not they are not stones of the Temple of God that is members of Christes Church OF THE SECOND QVESTION SINCE that we do vnderstand what is the Doctrine of the Church Wherefore true religion is to be discerned from others coÌ„teined in the books of the Prophets and Apostles to wit the sound and vncorrupt voice of the Law of God and the Gospell concerning Christ easie it is necessarie for vs to discerne it from al other religions 1 Because of the commandement of God 1 Cause The commandement of God 1. Iohn 5.39 1. Cor. 10. 1 Cor 6.17 Apoc 18.4 Eâ—aâ— 52.11 â— Iohn 10. 2. â—â—me The glory of God 2. Cor. 6.15 which ought to suffice vs whether we know the cause or no. Flie Idols Depart from her my people Be not yoked with Infidels Be yee holy Touch no vncleane thing yee that beare the vessels of the Lord. Hee that bringeth not this doctrine bid him not God speede 2 For the glorie of God who as hee will not haue him-self coupled with idols and diuels So also hee will haue his truth seuered from lies and his houshold to bee separated from the enemies of the Church that is from the children of Satan It were contumelious so to thinke of God as that he would haue such Children as persecute him There is no agreement betweene Christ and Belial â— Our saluation 3 For our owne saluation and that in two respects 1. That the Church may be known that is may be beheld vnto the which the faithful may ioyne them-selues Whereas if thou canst not discern the true Church from the false thou shalt â—ot know vnto which to ioyne thy selfe and what maner of woorship thou oughtest to follow For God will that all which are to he saued be gathered vnto the Church according as it is said Out of the Church there is no saluation 2. In regard of our comfort that euery one may know of what kingdome they are and whether they be of those vnto whom God promiseth saluation This canst thou not know except thou canst discerne the true Church from false churches 4 The doctrine of other sectes 4. The confirmation and the difference is necessarie to be knowen that our faith and comfort may bee the surer when as we see that to be in our Church which â—is wanting in others likewise when as wee perceiue what is the cause why they who make profession of our doctrine he saued but all other sectes together with their sectaries be damned 5 Least wee being deceaued should embrace the doctrine of some other sect for true Religion 5. The eschuing of danger Act. 4 Iohn 10. For there is no saluation in any other neither among men is there giuen any other name vnâ—der heauen whereby wee must bee saued Therefore is it said He that is the sheepheard of the sheepe him doe the sheep follow because they know his voice and they wil not follow a stranger but they flee from him for they know not the voice of strangers It is necessarie therefore that the sheep know how to discerne the voice of the sheepherd from the voice of wolues according vnto the rule 1. Iohn 4 Beleeue not euerie spirit For Sathan is wont to transforme himselfe into an Angel of light and the most part of Heretikes doe imitate the woords of true teachers whereas their opinions are most different And wee oftentimes see that the ruder sort when as they perceaue some similitude in some either rites or opinions are easily lead to beleeue that the aduersaries of the Church do professe either the same religion with vs or not so bad as wee make it or since that they haue some thing common with vs that it is not much material whether they let passe some thinges or ad some others Wherefore least some shewe of likenes may beguile any man it is profitable that the manifest and vniuersal differences of the true and false religions may be laid open to the sight 6 Least we be partakers of the punishments which are to 6. Punishment come on such men Apoc. 18.4 Goe out of her that ye be not partakers in her sinnes and that ye receaue not of her plagues 7 That the wicked may bee left vnexcuseable 7 That the wicked may bee left vnexcuseable For albeit an acknowledging of God is neither sufficient to saluation nor true without the doctrine of the Church yet so much of God is manifested vnto al men as is sufficient to take away al excuse from them for their impiety For neither vnto these very things which may truely bee gathered concerning God by the light of nature and frame of the world do they giue their assent neither go they forward to seeke a more full knowledge of God vnto the which those thinges are as it were spurs to pricke them forward but either they doe quite and clean reiect them or they draw them vnto an other meaning and stitch their own inuentions vnto them besides and against the testimonie of the whole nature of things and their owne consciences So that they are ignorant indeed of God but that of stubbornes and of purpose And this is the very cause why at length they are oppressed with desperation because they are
honesty But the good worke in the godly is freely adorned not only with temporall but also with eternall benefites that also because it pleaseth him in our mediator Math. 5.16 not only thereby to inuite others to honestie according to that of Christs So let your light shine before meÌ„ that they may see your good works glorifie your father which is in heauen Wherefore the good works of the godly are ofteÌ„times in the old testameÌ„t shadowed by an acceptable incense wherewith God is honored pleased And godlines as the Apostle saith hath the promise of this life the life to come 7. Good works in the vnregenerat make only to the mitigatioÌ„ of their punishments that they may not suffer more grieuous pains as other wicked persons doe but the good workes of the godly doe not only serue for this that they may suffer lighter and easier punishments but also that they may be quite freed from all euill Thinges indifferent in themselues may bee also sinnes by an accident that is How things in themselves indifferent by an accident become sinne if they be done with offence or without faith For whatsoeuer is done without faith is sinne Vnto the pure all thinges indeede are pure but it is euill for the man which eateth with offence Out of these and the like places is this diuision taken For when the Apostle saith that all thinges are vncleane to the vncleane and wicked he intimateth also that those thinges which of themselues are good are notwithstanding vncleane or sinnes vnto the wicked In all these diuisions it is affirmed that also in the â—aintes of God is sinne Wherefore we must hold the difference betweene the sinnes of the regenerat and the vnregenerat There are diuers sinnes truely in the Saintes as 1. Originall sinne 2. Many actuall sinnes as of ignoraunce omission infirmitie 3. Some also fall into errors which fight with the foundation it selfe or into sinnes against their conscience for which they leese a good conscience comfort many giftes of the holy Ghost and should be condemned except they did repent But neuertheles very much doe the regenerate in sinning differ from the wicked 1. Because the purpose of God is to keepe the godly for euer 2. In the godly there is assured certain repentance in the ende 3. In the very sins themselues is the true beginning of faith sometimes more sometimes lesse and the godly so resist and striue against sinne that they fall not without repentance into errors against their conscience and repugnant to the foundation 4. What are the causes of sinne 1 SOme deriue the original of sin from the destinie of the start Men seeke the cause of sinne any where rather than where it is saying I sin because I was borne vnder an vnlucky Planet 2 Others when they sinne and are rebuked for their sinne they make answere Not I but the Deuill was in fault that I committed this deede 3 Others leauing excuses directly cast the fault vpon God saying God would haue it so for if he would not I should not haue sinned 4 Others when God say they might haue hindered me and yet did not himselfe is the author of my sinne It is no newe thing for men to sharpen their blasphemous tongue against God For our first Parentes when they had sinned and were accused of their sinne by God they translate and passe ouer the fault committed from themselues to others neither ingenuously confesse the truth Adam returneth the fault not so much vpon his wife as vpon God himselfe The woman saith he which thou gauest to be with me she gaue me of the tree and I did eate as if hee shoulde say except thou hadst ioined her to me I had not sinned But the Lord gaue him not his wife that shee shoulde be an occasion of euill vnto him but that it might be the better and more comfortable for him The woman simply imputeth the fault to the Deuill saying The Serpent beguiled me and I did eate These are the most false and corrupt iudgements concerning the originall of sinne impious and detestable whereby the maiestie truth and iustice of God is grieuously offended Destinie no cause of sinne 1. They who make destinie a cloake for sinne 1. define destinie to bee a linked order thorough all aeternitie and a certaine perpetuall necessitie of intents and workes according to the counsailes of God or according to the euill planets Now if you aske them who made the planets they haue not ought to aunswere but God Therefore these men lay their euill to Gods charge But such a destinie did not all the founder Philosophers maintain much lesse ChristiaÌ„s 2. S. Austine against two epistles of the Pelagians vnto Boniface lib. 2. cap. 6. They saith he who hold destinie maintain that not only actions euents but also our willes themselues depend of the position of the planets at the time of euery ones conception or natiuitie which they call constellations But the grace of God surpasseth not onely all the starres and all the heauens but also all the Angels Let vs conclude these things with the word of the Lord by his Prophet Ieremy pronouncing to this sense Thus saith the Lorde Learne not the way of the heathen bee not afraid for the signs of heauen though the heathen be afraid of such for the customes of the people are vaine Wherefore that the Astrologers call the planet of Saturne vnmercifull sharpe and cruell and the planet of Venus fauourable and gentle it is the vanity of vanities For the starres haue no force of dooing good or ill And therefore the fault of sinners ought not to be imputed vnto them 2. That the Deuill is not the onely author of sinne who when as we commit sinne shoulde beare alone the blame of the sinne and our selues be free from fault The Deuill not the onely autor of sinne it is most of all declared in this that he is able to induce and entice a man to euill but not to compell him For God keepeth vnder the Deuill by his power that he cannot doe what he will but onely what and so much as God permitteth him Nay he hath not so much as power ouer filthie swine much lesse ouer the most noble soules of men He hath indeede a subtilty and great force in perswading but God is stronger who also neuer ceaseth himself to put good motions into mans minde Neither permitteth he more to Satan than he maketh profitable for man Which we may see in that most holy man Iob in the example of Paul and in his wordes God is faithfull which will not suffer you to be tempted aboue that you be able Wherefore they are vain men who vnloade the blame of their wickednes on the Deuils shoulders It remaineth that we shew God no cause of sinne that also God is not the author of sin Gen. 1. 2. God saw those things which he had made and they
either doth not moue the next cause of the effect or doth not intend and mind the effect neither is appointed thereunto it cannot be said to be a cause of that effect but by an accident as when of a good father is borne an euil and euil-liuing sonne or of a good father a good and wel-liuing son when a godly Magistrate by his commandement moueth the will of a wicked executioner to execute a guilty person and he being impelled either by desire of reuenge or by hatred or by cruelty reioiceth at his euil whom he executeth and so committeth murther before God and lastly when one maketh a sword and another vseth it either wel or il Now as often as the next cause is either before the bringing foorth of the effect depraued or in the verie bringing of it foorth either by it selfe or by another cause then bringeth it forth a bad effect which the cause remoued or a farre off that either bringeth forth or moueth this next cause neither intendeth neither as by any ordination or appointment vnto it produceth As when the wil hand of the cleauer purpose to cut a thing and the iron being too dul causeth that to break which is taken in hand to be cut So also God maketh and moueth the wil but because the wil of men is depraued by the diuel and it selfe it bringeth forth sin which God neither when he maketh nor when he moueth the wil intendeth or mindeth to bring forth Wherefore it followeth not at al that God is the cause of those sins which are committed by his creatures depraued and corrupted of themselues Likewise it is obiected Second causes are able to do nothing without the first cause which is God Wherefore neither is sinne brought forth neither doe they depraue themselues but that also the first cause worketh it with them God the first cause doth not concur with secondarie causes to the bringing forth of sinne We aunswere to the antecedent The second causes do nothing without the first cause that is without the first cause preserue them and mooue them to doe so far forth as it is good which they doe but they doe without the first cause concurring with them to the bringing forth of euil as it is a fault or of sin Isa 30. We to the rebellious children saith the Lord that take counsel but not of me and couer with a couering but not by my spirit that they maie laie sin vpon sin How the good will of man corrupted it selfe Likewise they obiect That which is good cannot by sinning corrupt it selfe except it be some other waie corrupted as it is said A good tree cannot bring forth euil fruit The wil of the diuel and Adam before the fal of both was good Therefore it could not corrupt it selfe by sinning except it were by some other means corrupted We deny the Maior For although the creature be good yet God not preseruing his goodnes that is mouing or willing that his wil should be moued by outward obiects neither in the meane season lightning and gouerning the wil with the knowledge of his own diuine will it is not only possible but it must necessarily folow that he must sinne become an euil tree and thorough his owne wil and fault auert himselfe from God run to worse and worse and purchase blindnesse the iust punishment of sin both vnto him and his as it is said Without me ye can doe nothing Againe it is obiected He that withdraweth grace from the sinner without which sin cannot be auoided he is the the cause of sinne God did withdraw his grace frō man without which hee could not persist in righteousnes Wherefore God was the cause of mans sinne Wee deny the Maior First because God was not bound to man to preserue that grace in him which he gaue him Secondly because he withdrew his grace for man beeing willing thereunto and reiecting it of his owne accord Thirdly because he withdrewe his grace not that he did enuie man righteousnes and eternal life or that he is delighted with sin but to trie him that is to shew how the creature is able to doe or keepe no goodnes without the singular goodnes and mercy of his creator and so god is not at al the cause of sin although sin doth necessarily follow this withdrawing in him from whom the grace is withdrawn So then when God did withdraw his grace frō man not God withdrawing it but man reiecting it is the cause of his owne sin destruction Againe they say God wil the temptation of man yet not the sinne of man He that wil haue him to be tempted whom he knoweth certainly wil fal if he be tempted he will the sinne of him who falleth But God would that man should bee tempted of the diuel whō he knew certainly would fall for otherwise mā could not haue bin tempted Wherefore God is the cause of his fal Here also we deny the Maior For he is not the cause of sin who wil haue him that will fall tempted for to try or to make manifest the weaknes of his creature but the diuell tempting man to this end that he may sinne and be separated from God and man obeying the tempter against the commandement of God are the causes of sin For the antecedent which being put must necessarily haue another thing consequent thereof is not the cause of the consequent except it worketh somewhat in producing the consequent But God neither in withdrawing his grace neither in that he doth wil the temptation of man worketh in producing of sin as it is sin because he neuer intended it Againe they obiect That is not of God but of man and the Diuel which maketh sinne He that is the cause of those thinges which make sin is the cause of sin God is the cause of those things which make sin that is of the action which is the matter and of the priuation of rightnes in man which is the form of sin Wherefore he is the autor of sin To these the aunswere hath beene made before For the Minor is to be denied Because the action priuation of the diuine light direction do make sinne as they are contrarie to the Law And they are contrary to the law of God and make sin as they are committed by man are in him but as they are guided by God inflicted they are not sin but a trial of him that would sin or a punishment of him that had sinned Wherefore that is not of God but of man and the Diuell which maketh sin Whether God would the fall of Adam and how Last of al they vrge Seeing that God would the fa◠of Adam either as it was sin or as a punishment and coulde not will it as a punishment because no sin had gone before which should be therewith punished it seemeth to follow that God would that worke as it was sin But this consequence also is deceitful
Li. 3. de libero arbitrio cap 4. And Augustine God is a iust reuenger of those thinges of which yet he is not an euill autor Wherefore those sinnes which ensue and followe are in respect of god considered as most iust punishments which as they are punishments haue their beeing from him as their author and causer but as they are sinnes in respect of men they come God neither willing nor causing them but permitting onely seeing he doth not cause men to do that which he would haue done for a punishment to this end as for to obay therein his will For one and the same work is good and holy in respect of God and sin in respect of men by reason of the diuersitie both of the efficiences of the ends For first man by reason of his great both ignorance and corruption will and worketh euill only But God because hee is exceeding good and the verie rule of goodnesse and righteousnesse doing in all things what he wil will and worketh alwaies only that which is good Secondly men haue such an end of their actions as is disagreeing frō the Law of God that is what they doe they do not to that end to obay God but to fulfill their bad and corrupt desires But God hath the end of all his woorkes agreeing with his nature and Law euen that he may declare and execute his iustice goodnesse and mercie By these two thinges it commeth to passe that the reasonable creature woorking together with God God woorking vprightly and holily doth neuerthelesse it selfe woorke vnholylie and corruptly 5 What are the effects of sinne NOw that it is defined what sinne is and from whence it came we are to consider also what be the euils which follow sinne For except this also be knowen we know not yet how great euil there is in sinne and with how great hatred God pursueth it It hath been said before that euil was of two sorts one of crime or offence which is sinne the other of paine or punishment The euil of punishment is the effect of the euil of offence That this maie be the better vnderstoode we must here againe remember that of punishments Some are onlie punishments as are the destruction of nature or tormentes others both punishments and sins as al sins which haue followed since the first fal 1 The sinnes which follow are effects of those which go before Sinnes ensuing effects of sinnes which go before So original sinne is the effect of the sinne or fal of our first parents By one mans disobedience manie were made sinners And secondly All actual sinnes are effects of original sinne Sinne took occasion by the commandement and deceiued me And thirdlie The effect of actual sins is the increase of them that is greater guiltines by reason of the most iust iudgement of God because God punisheth sins with sins Wherefore God also gaue them vp to their hearts lustes Rom. 1.24 2 Thes 2.11 Mat. 25.29 Other mens sins oftentimes effectes of actual sinne And therefore God shal send them strong delusiō that they should beleeue lies Frō him that hath not shal be takē away also that which he hath And fourthly The effects of actual sins are also oftentimes other mens sins by reason of scandale or example wherby some are made worse of others are entised or moued to sin So the persuasion of the diuel caused man to decline from God and now it worketh in stubburn-minded men The diuel put it into the heart of Iudas to betraie Christ Ioh. 13. Euil speeches corrupt good maners So euill teachers doe withdrawe men from god to errours idolatry and other sins So a vse of liberty out of season offendeth and draweth men to sinne An euil conscience an effect of sinne 2 There followeth sin in the immoueable and perpetual order of Gods iudgement an euil conscience which is the knowledge and dislike which we haue in our mind of our own sinne and the knowledge of the iudgement of God against sin and that proceeding out of the knowledge of Gods Law vpon which ensueth the fear of the wrath of God and punishment according to the order of gods iustice and a flieng and hatred of God who destroieth sinne which is the beginning of desperation and eternall torments except it bee cured by the comfort of the gospel Rom. 2. The gentiles shewe the effect of the Law written in their harts their conscience also bearing witnes and their thoughts accusing one another or excusing And Isaiah There is no peace to the wicked Temporall and spiritual euils effects of sin 3 Temporall and spirituall euils as temporall death and in a worde all the calamities of this life These euils are onely punishments that is torments and dissolution of nature If any man obiect that they also are subiect to temporall death and other calamities who haue all their sinnes remitted them and therefore al temporall euils are not the punishmentes or effects of sinne Temporal euils in the regenerate are effectes of sinne not as punishmentes but as chastisements but some haue other causes we answere that the consequence holdeth not from the denial of one particular to the denial of the general For albeit the calamities of the regenerate are not effectes of sin as a punishment which is inflicted on men sinning that so the iustice of God might be satisfied yet are they effects of sinne as chastisementes and exercises whereby sinne is repressed and more and more purged out vntill at length by corporall death the whole be abolished Now that of the blind man Ioh. 9. Neither this man hath sinned nor his parents Christ meaneth not simply that they had not sinned or that their sins were not a cause of this calamity but that their sinnes were not the principal cause why he was borne blind but that the woorkes of God should be shewed on him Christ by a miracle opening his eies 4 Eternall death which is the effect of al sinnes Eternall death the effect of sin as they are sinnes For al of what quality soeuer they bee are punished either with eternal paine as in the reprobate or with equiualent paine to eternal as in the sonne This death doth begin in the reprobate euen in this world that is anxiety and torment of conscience which we also should feele except we were deliuered by the grace of God Now by the name of eternal death is not vnderstoode the destruction of the soule or body or the separation of them but the abandoning and banishing of the soule and bodie liuing from the face of God a continuall horror and torment and a feeling and flying of Gods wrath and iudgement and a horrible murmuring against God taking vengeance of their sinnes If they obiect that the sinnes of those who beleeue in Christ The regenerate though they sin are not punished with this death because Christ hath suffered an equiualent punishment for them are not punished with eternall
death we answere that those were punished in Christ with a punishment which both for the grieuousnes of the punishment for the dignitie of the person who suffered it is equiualent to those eternall punishments which were to bee inflicted vpon vs for our sinnes As it is said Esa 53. He hath laid vpon him the iniquities of vs all Against that which we affirme that eternall death is the effect of al sinnes yea euen of the least The 1. Obiection is Why the during of punishment ought to be alike to al sinnes but not the degree of punishment Like is not to be giuen vnto things vnlike But sinnes are not alike Therefore al ought not to be punished with eternall death Aunswere There is more in the conclusion of this reason than was in the premisses For only this followeth to be concluded Therefore all sinnes ought not to bee punished with like punishment For all sinnes euen the least deserue eternall punishment because all sinnes offend against the eternall and infinite good Wherefore as concerning the lasting of the punishment all sinnes are punished with like punishment but not as concerning the degrees of punishments All sins are punished with eternall torments yet so as not with equal torments The seruaunt who knoweth the wil of his master and doth it not shall be beaten with manie stripes It shal be easier for them of the land of Sodom in the daie of iudgement than for thee Al sinnes are not equal Here the Stoicks obiect That al sinnes or vices are ioined with anie one vice and therefore all are alike and equall But neither is this consequence of force whereas also things vnlike and vnequal maie bee ioined together neither is the antecedent graunted That seemeth to be proued by the saying of Iames cap. 2. He that faileth in one is guilty of al. But Iames saith not that all sins or vices concur and are ioyned with one but first that in the breach of one point the whole law is violated as the whole bodie is said to be hurt when one part is harmed Then that there concurreth with euery sin the fountaine or cause of al other sins that is the contempt of God And this euil beeing seated in the hart doth violate the loue of God and so al other parts of our obedience towards God For no woork which proceedeth not from the perfect loue dread and reuerence of God can agree with the Law of God or please God And yet haue we experience that this hindereth not but that he which is infected with one vice may bee propense and prone to some sins more and to some lesse especially since vices themselues also are one opposite to another by the one of which contraries and not by both at one time euery man violateth vertue Neither are those principles also of the stoicall philosophers to be graunted That how farre soeuer thou goe in sinning after thou hast once past the line or middle which is vertue it is not material for the encreasing or augmenting the fault of passing beyond the line And that al vertues are alike and equall one to another so that no man is stronger than a strong man For whereas sin is a swaruing frō the middle it is manifest that how much greater the swaruing is so much is the sin more grieuous And that vertues are both in the same in diuers men otherwhile greater otherwhiles lesser euen as much as the qualities of the body are different in degrees experience doth witnes Wherfore in the iudgemēt of god also there are degrees put aswel of punishmēts as of sins 2 Obiect Gods great mercy his iustice neither impeached by other in punishing sin with eternal punishment Hee that is exceeding merciful doth not punish all sinne with exceeding and extreme punishment neither is to al eternitie angrie with sinne or looketh vpon the torments of his owne woorke For extreme iustice which doth strictly follow right and lawe in punishing admitteth no fauourable equity which yet mercie especially exceeding mercy doth vse and shewe But God is exceeding mercifull Therefore hee doth not punish all sinne with exceeding that is euerlasting punishment Or God punisheth all sinne with extreme punishment Therefore hee is not mercifull Auns First wee are to distinguish the ambiguitie of the Maior Hee that is exceeding mercifull doth not inflict exceeding and extreme punishment that is except his iustice require it But that God should punish all sinne with euerlasting punishment his exceeding iustice requireth which is Psal 5.5 earnestly and exceedingly to hate and punish all whatsoeuer is not agreeable to his Lawe So that except hee did punish it with sufficient punishment hee should not bee mercifull but light and cruell Secondly wee deny the consequence of the reason because it is a sophisme reasoning from that which is not the cause as beeing the cause For the iudge is not therefore vnmercifull for that hee executeth a robber on the wheel because he doth it according to iustice neither is delighted with the torment and death of a wretched man but had rather he were saued if so the Lawes permitted Right so God according to his infinit wisedome euen in inflicting extreme punishment on all sinne doth notwithstanding shewe immeasurable and manifould mercy and contrariwise in shewing exceeding mercy doth most straitly and exactly execute his iustice For 1. He punisheth our sinnes sufficiently and fullie not in vs but in his onely begotten sonne our guilt being translated on him 2. He offereth remission of sinnes and grace to al men who receiue his Son the Mediator with true faith and conuersion 3. Hee woorketh also that faith and conuersion by his spirit in the Elect. 4. Hee preserueth his elect in afflictions 5. At length he fully deliuereth them And all these things hee doth of his free mercy not bound or obliged thereto by any merite of ours 6. He is not delighted with the destruction of the reprobate who refuse that grace offered but by differring their punishment and by other great and diuers benefits he inuiteth them to repentaunce Wherefore the execution of Gods iustice is not repugnaunt to his mercy neither doth his mercie take away or make breach of his iustice but they are both coupled with a marueilous temperature in preseruing and sauing vs. How God is said remit nothing of his iustice and yet to be mercifull 3 Obiection is against this That god doth so exercise his mercy as he doth not thereby make breach of his iustice He that remitteth nothing of extreme iustice is not at all merciful but onely iust God remitteth nothing of extreme iustice because hee punisheth all with a sufficient punishment Therefore God is onely iust and not mercifull Aunswere We deny the Minor For god giueth vs his Sonne and punisheth him for vs of his meere mercie not of any right not bound thereunto by anie merites of ours Besides the Maior of the second Obiection is to be distinguished
And this is it which they say to do any thing vpon deliberation or aduisement going before which manner of dooing is proper vnto the will For this is the difference betweene a nature agent and a voluntarie The difference betweene a naturall agent and a voluntarie that the naturall cause is ordained or appointed or fit and apt to one certaine manner of woorking neither can it forbeare working if the obiect be present whereon it should woorke as fire cannot but burne a bodie put vnto it if it bee of such matter as wil take fire But the will is able and apt to choose or refuse contrarie or diuers obiects or to forbeare and differ the choise thereof as a man may haue a will to walke or not to walke or may differ his wil of walking To doe therefore anie thing with free arbiterment and will is to doe vpon a fore-deliberation according to the will of god sometimes simplie and sometimes in some respect onelie and against it also sometimes in some respect but neuer simplie against it For the libertie of woorking is not taken away in any creature if God be said so to rule bend their wills that they be not inclined any other way than whither god will haue them inclined either simply or in some sort But free arbiterment is a faculty or power of working vpon deliberation and without constraint or rather the very wil it selfe so woorking Wherefore if the name of free arbiterment be so taken expounded as hath beene said The name of free arbitermēt may be tolerated in the Church though it be not vsed in the scriptures albeit it be not vsed in the Scriptures yet maie it be tolerated borne-with because both the description thereof such as was euen nowe deliuered agreeeth with the Scripture and the auncient writers haue also vsed the same name But if it be taken for such a will of free working which excludeth all action and woorking of the first cause guiding inuiting and bending the creatures wils whither it selfe listeth such a free arbiterment cannot bee admitted For example sake Abimelecke abstaining from Rebecca and the Iewes crucifieng Christ both did it with free arbiterment because those forealeaged conditions which make free arbiterment did agree vnto both neither yet could they at that present doe otherwise than they did God so guiding directing the ir wils 3 What is like or common and what diuerse or different in the libertie of will which is in god in Angels and man Common to men and Angels with God to wil a thing without constraint THese two things are common to God and reasonable creatures that is Angels men that they doe things vpon deliberation and aduise and will without coaction those things which they haue considered and thought of that is Their wil being by nature fit to will the contrary or diuerse from that which it doth wil or also to differre forbear the action doth incline to the other part of it owne accord and by a proper force which is within it For it is said of God Psal 115. He hath done all things which hee would And of men Mat. 23. Hierusalem how often would I haue gathered thy children and ye would not The differences of our liberty of wil and Gods 1 God knoweth al things of himselfe perfectly perpetually But the differences also of this liberty in God and in the creatures are to be considered The first is in the vnderstanding God vnderstandeth and knoweth all thinges of himselfe perfectly and perpetually neither can any ignorance of any thing or any error of iudgemēt fal into God at any time But the creatures know neither of themselues neither all things neither the same at all times but at such time and so much as is reuealed vnto them Who hath knowen the mind of the Lord Of that daie and houre knoweth us man God giueth vnderstanding Neither is there any thing which is not manifest in his sight He illighteneth euery creature To behold all things which are infinite requireth infinite power and wisedome which is proper to God alone Mention is here made of the vnderstanding because a thing not vnderstood is not either desired or refused 2 His will dependeth of none but himselfe ours of him The second difference is in the will The wil of God is gouerned or moued or depending of no other cause but of it selfe The wils of Angels and men are so the causes of their actions that neuerthelesse they are carried by the secret counsell of God his power and efficacie which is euerie-where present to the choosing or refusing of any obiect and that either immediately by God or mediately by instrumentes some good some bad which it seemeth good vnto God to vse so that it is impossible for them to doe any thing beside the eternall decree and counsail of God And therefore the woorde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to be absolutely his owne at his owne will and in his owne power agreeth most properly vnto God who perfectly and simply is his owne and at his owne will But of the creatures more rightly is vsed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is voluntarie and free which worde the Apostle vseth to Philemon vers 14. Heb. 10.26 1. Pet. 5.2 That God is the first cause of his actions God the first cause both of his owne actions and ours Psal 115.3 Dan. 4.52 Gen. 29.7 Exod. 3.16 Act. 2.23 and 3 17. c. and 4.17 c. the Scripture doth declare He hath done whatsoeuer he would Who according to his wil worketh in the army of heauen and in the inhabitants of the earth But that the wils and counsailes of the creatures depend of God who is aboue them these and the like speeches doe proue The Lord shal send his Angell before thee Go and gather the Elders of Israel together Him being deliuered by the determinate counsel and fore-knowledge of God yee haue slaine I know that through ignorance ye did it and But God hath fulfilled these things and Herode and Pontius Pilate gathered thēselues together to do whatsoeuer thine hand and thy counsel had determined before to be done By these and the like places it is manifest that all second causes as they were created of God so are they ruled of him as their first supreme soueraign cause But the wil of God dependeth on no one of the creatures because then a second cause should be put before the first cause And as God hath not any efficient so neither hath he any mouing or inclining cause without him Moreouer God so ruleth and guideth the wil of his creature that he doth not draw or enforce it but bend and encline it that is by obiectes represented to the mind he effectually moueth affecteth and allureth the wil to wil that which then the mind iudgeth good and refuse that which seemeth euil so that the wil it selfe also vpon deliberatiō going before
a voluntary assent folowing chooseth that which God wil sheweth to be chosen 3 It appertaineth as well to the vnderstanding as vnto the will that God as he vnchangeably knoweth all things 3 God determined all things which he will from euerlasting and wil them vnchangeablie we determine what we wiâ—l in time many times change from that which we fiâ—st determine so also hath determined from euerlasting and will vnchangeablie al thinges which are done as they are good permitteth them as they are sins Now as the creatures notions and iudgements of thinges so also their willes are chaungeable so that they will that which before they would not and will not that which before they woulde For seeing that al the counsels of God are most good most iust and most wise he neuer disliketh correcteth or changeth them as often-times men doe when as they doe perceiue themselues to haue determined anie thing vnaduisedly before Neither doth God depend on their second causes either motions actions or mutations or doth aduise according to them as doth the creature but himselfe beeing the first cause al the actions of al creatures depend on him For he doth not as men take aduise concerning the end by viewe of meanes or things antecedent leading thereunto but according vnto his decree concerning the end consequent he doth decree ordaine the means antecedents that is God woorketh not thereafter as hee seeth the second causes to woorke but he causeth or permitteth the second causes so to worke as he himselfe hath decreed and purposed to woorke Hither appertaine those sayings Num. 23. God is not as man that he shoulde lie Mal. 3. I am the Lord and change not The vnchangeablenes of Gods purpose taketh not away the libertie of his will Obiection Hee that can not change his counsaile and purpose hath not free-will But God cannot change his counsail and purpose which he hath once appointed Therefore his will is not free First we deny the Maior For not he which doth not change his purpose which hee hath once appointed hath not liberty of wil but he which could not purpose any other thing beeing let by some external cause But the liberty of god consisteth not in the change of his wil or purpose but in this that God will all thinges whatsoeuer hee will altogether with his will and of himselfe and could haue hadde otherwise decreed or not decreed all thinges which hee decreed from euerlasting of the creation preseruation and gouernment of things according to these sayings Matthew 19. Luk. 18. With men this is impossible but with God al thinges are possible These and the like sayings shew that God hath so appointed from euerlasting with himselfe the creation of things and the gathering sauing of his church not as if he could not haue not don this or not haue appointed it otherwise but because so it seemed good to him neither must men seeke anie superior cause thaÌ„ his wil of al his diuine works which he exerciseth in his creatures neither is there any other necessitie to be found in them than which dependeth of the most free appointment of god himselfe For as to resolue of such a purpose as is to be changed so also to change it either to better or to worse is rather seruitude or bondage than freedoome and libertie For it proceedeth of ignorance or impotencie For they change their counsels and purposes who either or in taking them or are not able to perfourme the counsaile which they haue taken But to resolue of such a purpose as might alike either haue beene decreed or not decreed and which after it is decreed is neither changed nor to be changed at any time this is perfect and diuine libertie Nowe God whatsoeuer he hath decreed could either not haue decreed it at al or haue decreed it otherwise And that he changeth not that which he hath once decreed the perfectnes of his nature euen his infinit wisedome and goodnesse is cause thereof For most wisely and rightlie doth he decree all thinges constantlie persisteth in that which is good right Wherfore the immutability in god doth aswell not diminish his libertie as his immortalitie other things which are proper vnto his diuinitie Secondly if any man vrge that it is a point of liberty not onlie to resolue of anie aduise what he will but after he hath resolued to bee able either to followe it or to change it we vnderstand by those things which haue beene alreadie spoken that this doth agree to the creatures which may or in their purposes and therefore stand in need of changes alterations but not to god who can neuer er and therefore requireth no change of his purpose Lastly if they reply That not to be able to alter a purpose once vndertaken is a defect of abilitie or power therefore against the libertie of God we answere that the antecedent of this reply is true if the change of it be impossible by reason of some impediment comming from some external cause or by reason of defect of nature or ability but the antecedent is most false if the impossibilitie of change proceed from a perfection of that nature which is not changed from a wisedome and rightnesse of that purpose which is vnchangeable and from a perseuerance and constancy of the will in that which is good and right after which sort it is apparant to be in God Gods directing of out wil taketh not away the lâ—bertie thereof But against that where it was said that the wils of all creatures are so guided by God that neither they are able to will what hee from euerlasting hath not decreed neither not to will what hee hath decreed for them to will more question is vsed to bee made 1 That which is ruled by the vnchangeable will of God doth not woorcke freelie The will of Angels and men is ruled by the vnchangeable will of God Therefore either it hath no libertie or the choise which it maketh is not tied to the will of God Answere wee make to the maior by a distinction It is not a free agent which is so ruled by God as it hath no deliberation and election of his owne But that which GOD so ruleth as hee sheweth the obiect vnto the vnderstanding and by it effectuallie mooueth and affecteth the will to choose it that dooth notwithstanding freelie woorke albeit it bee inclined at the becke and will of GOD whither hee will haue it For to woorcke freely in the creatures is not to woorcke without anie ones gouernment but with deliberation and with a proper and selfe-motion of the will although this motion be elsewhence raised ruled Wherefore it is not the immutabilitie and operation of the diuine will and prouidence which is against this libertie but a priuation and constrainte of iudgement which is an impulsion or a motion proceeding not from an inwarde cause or facultie but
onely from an outwarde cause beside or against the nature of that which is mooued Nowe such an impulsion falleth not into the will but God moueth it leading and bringing it on as it were by obiects to choose that which he will For the facultie or abilitie and power of the will cannot be brought into act that is to shewe and expresse it selfe without an obiect and We are liue and mooue in God Acts. 17. But to bee mooued of no other cause but of himselfe onelie Necessity taketh not away liberty of will in vs. this is exceeding and infinite perfection and libertie agreeing to God alone which the creature cannot desire much-lesse arrogate and challenge vnto it selfe without notorious blasphemie Further it maie easilie be shewed that the necessitie or immutabilitie which ariseth not from constraint but from the nature of the will or from the commotion of it stirred by other causes to choose or refuse an obiect thought of by the mind doth not at al withstand or hinder the libertie of will First because this necessitie doth not take awaie This necessitie proceedeth froÌ„ Gods woorking in vs which rather preserueth thiâ— libertie Absolute necessity doth not take awaie in God greater libertie muchlesse can a lesse absolute necessity take away a lesse liberty in vs. but effectuateth and preserueth the iudgement of the minde free or voluntarie assent of the will in asmuch as god doth cause woorke in men both the notions and election of obiects Secondly Because God albeit hee is by nature that is by exceeding and absolute necessitie good and hath begotten his sonne and had his holie spirite from all eternitie yet will he not by a constrained but most free-will be liue be blessed and good haue his sonne and holie spirite and will all his purposes and works to be good and iust although it be impossible that hee shoulde will anie thing contrarie to these which hee hath already determined If then this absolute necessitie of willing things in God doth not take awaie euen the greatest libertie there is no doubt but that necessitie which is but onelie conditionall that is according to the decree and gouernment of god doth not take awaie that libertie which agreeth vnto the creatures that is iudgement and election free and voluntarie Thirdly Angels saints in heauen haue greater liberty of will and yet greater necessity The holie Angels and blessed men in the celestiall life euen by our aduersaries owne confession are endued with greater libertie of will than we are in this life But they necessarily wil those things onelie which are right and iust and hate and abhorre all thinges whatsoeuer are euill and vniust because they are made such of god and so established by him and are so illuminated and guided by the holy ghost that they cannot otherwise will or work neither by this necessitie of willing those thinges which are good and pleasing to god is the liberty of will taken away or diminished in them but rather is encreased and confirmed as who with al willingnesse choose and doe those thinges onely which are iust Fourthly It is shewed by many testimonies of scripture Many paces of Scripture coÌ„firm the necessity of those actions the liberty of which yet both we and our adueâ—â—ries acknowledge that the wils voluntary actions of good and wicked men which our aduersaries mantaine to be and to haue beene free and we also according to the right meaning of this worde Libertie do willinglie confesse are so guided by the secret and vnchangeable purpose of god that they neither can nor could either doe or be otherwise Wherefore either so many manifest places of scripture must be denied or openly corrupted or it must be graunted that one and the same action of the will is free contingent in respect of the will and necessary in respect of Gods gouernment Contingent effects leese not their contingencie by reason of any necessitie imported by Gods decree The same is to be saide of the effectes of the will which are in respect therof contingent that is free and might as well not bee doone as be done Fiftly it is declared by manie places of scripture that all contigent effectes doe retaine their contingencie which they haue from the nature of their causes although they bee done by the vnchaungeable determination of the purpose or prouidence of God But all voluntarie effectes or motions are contingent in respect of the will which by nature was like able to haue doone the plaine contrarie vnto them They therefore retaine their contingencie that is their libertie for this is the contingencie of the actions of the will although they be so determined of by gods wil that there can be no other The reason of the Maior in this argument is for that GOD so mooueth the second causes and by them bringeth to passe what hee will that in the meane season by his prouidence hee dooth not destroy or abolish their nature which hee gaue them at their creation but rather preserueth and nourisheth it so that as concerning their nature some woorcke contingently some necessarily although in respect of the libertie of Gods purpose all woorke contingently and in respect of the vnchaungeablenesse of his decreee all woork necessarily so as they doe For when GOD by the rising of the Sunne lighteneth the woorlde he maketh not the Sunne so as if beeing risen it did not necessarily lighten or were apt by nature not to lighten and yet is it in the power of God either to chaunge the nature of the Sunne or that remaining as it is not to lighten the woorlde as hee shewed in Aegypt and at the passion of Christ In like manner when the Quailes light at the Tentes of the Israelites and the Rauens carrie meate to Elias and one Sparrowe falleth on the ground GOD doth not make the nature of these liuing creatures such as coulde not bee carried else-where and yet that they can haue no other motion than that which they haue by reason of the will of God interposed and comming betweene the Scripture plainly affirmeth Whereof it is manifest that as in other thinges which work contingently their contingency so in the wil the liberty which is giuen it of God is not taken away but rather preserued by gods gouernment Nowe then if our aduersaries in their argument vnderstand that Liberty which consisteth in the deliberation of the minde and free assent of the wil wee doe not onely graunt but also better mainetaine than they the liberty of will in all actions thereof and so the Maior of their argument shall bee false to witte that those things which are done by the vnchaungeable decree of God are not done by the free will of men and Angels For this libertie the prouidence of God doth so not hinder but rather establish and confirme that without this that liberty cannot so much as be for God both keepeth his order which he appointed
from that obedience by her owne proper and free motion if hope or shewe of any good to come by defecting were offered vnto it Or shorter thus Before the fall it was such a power in man as that he was able to will and yeeld perfect obedience to be coÌ„formable to god to make choice of that coÌ„formity And further was able if he listed to forsake that conformity Or to be yet shorter Man before his fall had perfect libertie either to continue good or to fall Before the fall there was a fitnes and aptitude in man to choose good or euill and man was perfectly conformed to god because hee was made to the Image of God Again All things which God made were very good Now that there was in our first Parentes some weakenes ioined with perfect knowledge and obedience of God which might bee ouercome by the greatnes and force of some temptation Man though most free yet not so strong but he might fall God not assisting him the euent it selfe doth euidently inough declare And that by the especial purpose of god there was not so much grace bestowed vpon our first Parentes as thereby they were not able to be seduced by the tentation of Satan and bee moued to sinne the Apostle witnesseth Rom. 11. when he saith God hath shut vp al in vnbeleefe that he might haue mercie on all Likewise Rom. 9. sayâ—â—g That the vessels of wrath are prepared of god to destruction â—e sheweth that god therefore suffered mankind to fall because it seemed good to him not onelie to declare his mercy towards his chosen but his anger also and power and iustice in punishing the reprobate Furthermore whereas nothing is done without the euerlasting most good purpose counsel of god the fall also of our first Parents may be so much the lesse exempted from it by how much the more god had precisely exactly determined from euerlasting concerning his chiefe work euen mankind what he would haue done Lastly the creature can by no meanes retaine that righteousnes and conformitie with God except God who gaue it keep it neither can he leese it if god will haue it kept according to these sayings Iames. 1. Euerie good giuing and euerie perfect gift is from aboue and commeth downe from the father of lights Iohn 1. In it was life and the life was the light of men which lighteth euery man that commeth into the world Psalm 51. Take not away thy holy spirite from me Psalm 104. If thou hide thy face they are troubled 2. Tim. 2. The foundation of god remaineth sure and hath this seale The Lord knoweth who are his And of our confirmation and establishment in the life to come Math. 22. In the resurrection they are as the Angels of god in heauen As then man could not haue fallen except god had withdrawen his hand and not so forceably and effectually affected his will ruled it in temptation so neither could he persist in integrity when hee was tempted except god had sustained and confirmed him euen as hee confirmed the blessed Angels that they shoulde not defect and fall away together with the other Apostataes Seeing therefore such was the first mans estate from which he wittingly and willingly fell the crime and fault of sinne neither can nor ought to be laid on God but on man only albeit notwithstanding he fell by the eternal counsell and will of God Humane reason fansiyng her owne wit in deriuing the blame of sinne from herselfe The causes of humane reason refuted which lay the fault of the first sinne on God when shee heareth these thinges is troubled and keepeth a stirre and faineth many absurdities to folow except such a libertie of doing well or euil be giuen to man that his perseuerance or falling depend of his own will alone First that God was the cause of that first sinne and by consequent of all other sinnes as which came all of the first fall Likewise that he was the cause of the sinne of the Diuel seducing man especiallie seeing the first sinne is not to bee accounted a punishment as other sinnes for no sin had gone before How the first sinne might be a punishment vnto t selfe to that end permitted of God which should be punished with that sinne and therefore seeing God coulde not will that as a punishment he may seem to haue willed it as a sinne But although there be nothing to the contrarie why sinne may not be the punishment euen of it selfe whereas in the same action both the creature depriuing himselfe of that conformitie which he had with God might sinne and god depriuing him of that good which hee of his owne accorde casteth away might punish as it is said of couetousnes Syrach 14. There is nothing worse than when one enuieth himselfe and this is a rewarde of his wickednes Yet notwithstanding there are other ends besides punishment for which it was conuenient for God to will the action both of the Diuell of man God woulde the temptation of man which was done by the Diuell as a tryal of man by which it might be made manifest Other endes and causes why God would the action though not the sinne both of Satan and Adam whether hee woulde perseuere in true pietie towardes God Euen as God himselfe doth tempt Abraham immediatly when hee commaundeth him to doe that which yet hee woulde not haue done God would that assent of man by which he did yeelde vnto the Diuell against the will of God as a manifestation of the weakenesse and feeblenesse of the creature which cannot keepe the giftes wherewith hee was adorned by God without Gods especiall instinct and aide Likewise He woulde haue this done as an occasion or a waie to manifest his iustice and seueritie in punishing and his mercie in sauing sinners As Exod. 9. Rom. 9. Nowe God respecting and willing these thinges in that perswasion and enticement of Satan and in mans assenting and yeelding thereunto did notwithstanding all this while hate the sinne of both and therefore did not wil it neither cause it but iustly permitted and suffered it to be done For first whatsoeuer things God doth they are alwaies iust 2. He was not bounde vnto man to preserue and confirme him in goodnes 3. He would haue man to be tempted and to fall that he might trie mans perseuerance in true pietie towards God 4. That he might manifest the weakenes of the creature 5. That this fall might be an occasion and way to manifest Gods iustice and mercie These things very well agree with the nature and law of God Now that they say That man did not fall of his owne free will except he had equall power as well to persist in obedience as to fal the consequence is not of force because they reason from an ill definition of mans libertie which they imagine cannot stand if it be determined and ruled by God But the whole scripture
that we cannot haue it without his singular mercy grace wherefore destruction commeth of those that perish as concerning the merit of punishment but this taketh not away the superiour cause that is Gods reprobation For the last cause taketh not away the first cause The same is aunswered to that of Isa Sinnes separate the chosen from God for a time the reprobate for euer but yet the diuine purpose and counsel of God going before by which God decreed to adioine those vnto him or to cast them from him whom it seemed good to him so to deale with Rom. 9.18 He hath mercie on whom he wil and whom he will he hardeneth 7 Obiection Hee that hath not libertie to doe good The woorde of god not without good cause declared to the vnregenerate and eschevve euil is in vaine pressed vvith precepts and doctrine but the vnregenerate haue not libertie to doe good vvoorkes and omit euill therefore obedience is in vaine commanded them Answere The Maior is to be denied for when god doth suffer his wil to bee denounced to the wicked either hee doth together lighten them and moue them within by his spirite to obay his voice or pricketh them with the prickes of conscience either to obserue externall order and discipline or not so much to persecute the knowen trueth or he doth discouer their hypocrisie madnes in oppugning it or hee maketh manifest their weakenesse and ignoraunce and at length maketh them inexcusable in this life and in the last iudgement Reply 1 Whose conuersion and obedience dependeth of the grace of god hee hath no neede of exhortations and precepts But in them also vvho are conuerted their conuersion dependeth of grace Therefore precepts are vaine and needelesse Wee make answere to the Maior by a distinction If conuersion depend of grace so that the spirite doth not adioine doctrine as an instrument whereby to teach their mindes and mooue their heartes let this verily bee graunted although as it hath beene before saide there remaine as yet other vses of Doctrine But when it hath pleased God by this instrument both to lighten and mooue or incline mens mindes to faith and obedience the Maior is false For it is written Romanes 1. The ghospell is the povver of God vnto saluation to euerie one that beleeueth 2 Reply It is not mercie but crueltie to propound precepts and Doctrine to those vvho are denied the grace of obeieng and vvho are by it more hardened and more grieuouslie condemned God therefore doeth not this vvho is exceeding mercifull Wee deny againe the Maior 1 Because Gods exceeding mercy doth not take awaie his iustice 2 Because he so will haue them to bee made inexcusable by the preaching of his heauenlie Doctrine as that in the meane season he reioyceth not at their destruction and punishment But for the manifestation of his iustice whereof that greater regard shoulde bee had than of all the creatures euen Gods iustice it selfe requireth hee will that which otherwise hee abhorreth in his mercy and goodnes towardes all creatures as Ezechiel saith 21. I wil not the death of him that dieth 4 Readines of minde to receiue grace is not before conuersion but after 8 Obiection He that prepareth himselfe to receiue grace by which he maie doe good works he now doth woorkes pleasing to God But men prepare themselues to receiue grace Therefore also before regeneration they doe works pleasing to god We deny the Maior which yet these places seeme to proue 1. Sam. 7. Prepare your hart vnto the Lord. Act. 10. The praiers and almes of Cornelius before he was taught and baptized of Peter come vp into remembrance before god But in these and the like places to prepare or to haue in readines or to confirme the hart is not to doe works before the conuersion by which god maie bee inuited to bestowe the grace of regeneration vpon men but it signifieth that a readie and firme will of obeying god and persisting in true godlinesse is shewed of those which are already regenerated and conuerted For the people of Israell had repented when Samuell said this vnto them For there goeth before in the same place al the house of Israel lamented and followed the Lord Likewise Cornelius before he was taught of Peter that Iesus was the Messias is said to haue beene then godly and seruing god and so calling and inuocating on him that his praiers pleased God and were heard Albeit good woorks are said to be ours yet it followeth not that we are authors of them but the instruments whereby the author worketh them 9 Obiection The workes which are not in our power to performe are not our workes neither are truly and properly said to be done by vs But good woorks are said to bee ours and to be done by vs Therefore it is in our wil to do them or not to do them We deny the Maior For they are not therefore said to be ours or to be done by vs bicause they are of our selues but because God worketh them in vs as in the subiect and by vs as instruments and that so as our wil doth them of her owne proper motion although not except it be renewed raised and guided by the holy ghost For beeing regenerated and moued by him we are not idle but he working in vs we our selues also woorke wel and that freely without constraint For by regeneration the wil is not taken away but corrected as which before would onely that which is euil will now that which is good Eph. 2.10 We are his workmanshippe created in Christ Iesus vnto good works which god hath ordained that we should walk in them 10 Obiection God helpeth vs in working and yet beginneth our working in vs. He that is holpen by another in conuersion and in beginning good workes doth somewhat of them himselfe before he is holpen For he that hath help beginneth the action God helpeth vs wherefore it is of our selues to begin good works The Minor is proued Marc. 9. I beleeue Lord but help my vnbeliefe Rom. 8. The spirit helpeth our infirmity Aunswere Nothing cā folow in conclusiō of mere particular propositions For the Maior here is not vniuersall seeing not onely he may help who beginneth a work but he also in whom it is begun and accomplished by another Now so doth god help vs that himselfe doth first breede and engender in vs true knowledge of him and an inclination to obey him and the beginninges of good motions doth encrease also and perfect the same begun by him But he is therefore said to help vs because he doth so work in vs that we are not idle but work while he worketh and yet we are able no more to persist or to bring it to an end without him than to begin it And therefore we being inclined moued and gouerned by him wil also our selues of our owne accord and are able to work wel and do work wel that is because
God worketh good things not onlie IN vs but also BY vs as ioint workers with him Phil. 1.6 he that hath begun this good work in you vvil perfourme it vntil the daie of Iesus Christ 2. 13. It is god who worketh in you both the wil the deed euen of his good pleasure Reply The beginning proceeding accomplishment of conuersion is the free work gift of god Therefore mans wil when he is conuerted doth nothing but is meere passiue There should bee no vse also as hath bin said before of lawes discipline doctrine exhortations and such like Answere We deny the consequence of this reason because the reason proceedeth from the putting of the first cause to the remouing of the second or instrumētal cause Again it is a mere fallacy cōcluding that to be simply so which is but in some respect so For first the wil as also the whole man renued is both the subiect and instrument cooperating and iointly woorking of his conuersion that is is conuerted of god and doth conuert himselfe For the action of god conuerting inclining the wil goeth before the assent of the will not in time but in nature only Secondly the holy ghost regenerating cōuerting vs woorketh in vs both new qualities in receiuing wherof we are mere passiue work not our selues For we cānot make to ourselues a fleshy hart of a stony No generall preuenting grace in vs which wee haue in our owne power to vse o◠refuse but the special grace of the spirite onelie worketh in vs conuersion the want whereof causeth our continuance in sinne God worketh in vs euen to wil also new actions in working which we are both passiue and actiue For we being regenerated by gods spirit are not stocks but ioint workers with him because we are made of vnwilling vnfit to good willing fit able to do good Thirdly the holy ghost worketh this regeneration not without precepts doctrin other means but by thē because it so pleased him Wherfore they cānot be neglected without shewing an impious wicked contēpt of god himself But here especially our aduersaries wil reply again that indeed we cannot be cōuerted to god except his grace preuent vs moue vs to cōuersion but this grace preuēting those who are to be conuerted is so far giuē to al as it is in thēselues or in their own power to vse it or refuse it that is to be turned from or to persist in sin And then at length they who haue vsed rightly that first vniuersal grace preuēting al men that is haue by their libertie applied thēselues to chuse that good vnto the chusing whereof they are sollicited but yet not effectually moued of god Vnto these is giuen also the subsequent ioint-working grace so that what they could not haue performed without this this now cōming between they may do that is may truly turn vnto god perseuere This they proue by sentēces of scripture which seem to hang the grace of god vpon the condition of mans vvil Zac. 1. Turn to me I wil turn to you Isa 1.19 If ye cōsent ye shal eat the good things of the earth Ier. 7. I called you ye answered not But it is certainly manifest out of the Scripture that neither anie man can be cōuerted except the holy ghost be giuen him neither is he giuen to al men of god but to those only whō he of his free mercy vouchsafeth this benefite so that the cause is not to be sought in mē but in god alone why these rather thā they beleeue gods voice ar turned vnto him therfore al truly might be cōuerted as cōcerning the liberty power of god the chāgeable nature of mans wil but not both in respect of the auerting of their nature frō god of that in-bred corruption in al which may indeed betakē away by god but cānot without his working be laid aside or put off by vs also in respect of the vnchangeable decree of god wherby god hath determined to leaue some in sin destructiō into which he hath permitted them to fal therefore either not to lighten their minds with his knowlege or not to renu their harts wils with new inclinations or powers nor effectually to moue thē to yeeld obedience to the known truth Neither do the testimonies teach otherwise which the aduersaries ale age God willeth vs to turne to him that he may turn to vs that is may turne away mitigate our punishments bestowe his benefits vpon vs not as if our cōuersion were in our own power but because he wil effectuat confirm these precepts commandements in the harts of his chosen Hee promiseth good things to those who wil obey him not as if it were in our power to wil obedience but because he wil stir vp by his promises that wil in vs. He chargeth the stubburn with their wickednesse not as if it were in their owne power to put it off but because he wil by accusing their wilful stubburnnes take away al excuse from them when he iudgeth them Again they vrge The will of receiuing Gods grace goeth not before faith conuersion but is part and the beginning thereof Although no man can bee conuerted to doe wel without grace yet not only the consequent gifts benefits of god but the first grace also of his holy spirit whereby we are conuerted al who are willing may haue seeing god promiseth that he wil giue to al that wil. As Isay 1. Apoc. 3. Isay 31. Al ye that thirst come to the waters But al may wil. Therfore al may be conuerted We deny the Minor Reply The wil of receiuing goeth before the receiuing it selfe Therfore they who as yet haue not grace may haue wil to receiue it We deny the Antecedent as cōcerning the grace of conuersiō For no man can desire this except he haue the beginning of it in him For it is god who worketh in vs both to wil and to doe Wherefore the wil of beleeuing and repenting is the very beginning of faith and conuersion the which whosoeuer haue true and vnfeigned it is encreased and perfected in them as it is saide Gods promises not vnprofitable though made with an vnpossible condition to the vnregenerate which yet is made possible to the regenerat by Christ Hee that hath begunne this good vvoorke in you vvill perfourme it 11 Obiection They gather also and collect these sayinges which promise Gods bounty with a condition of our obedience As If thou vvilt enter into life keep the commandements Likewise Do this thou shalt liue Out of these thus they reason A promise which hath adioined an vnpossible condition is vnprofitable and mocketh him vnto whom it is made But Gods promises haue an impossible condition Therefore they are all vncertaine yea neuer to be perfourmed and nothing but a mockerie Aunswere First wee deny the
Maior For the promise euen in those who receiue it not hath this vse that it may bee made manifest that God doth not reioice at the destruction of any and that hee is iust in punishing when as he doth so inuite thē vnto him who through their ingratitude contemne and refuse gods promises Secondly we distinguish that vnto them indeed the promise is vnprofitable to whom the condition adioined is neuer made possible through faith and grace of iustification by Christ and of regeneration by the holy Ghost But so it is made possible vnto the elect Wherefore God deludeth nether but earnestly declareth to both of them what they ought to be vnto whom he giueth euerlasting life and how vnwoorthy they are of Gods benefites and shall neuer bee partakers of them vnlesse by the free mercy of God they be exempted from destructiō further also he allureth more and more and confirmeth the faithful to yeeld obedience Lastly they cite also other sayings which seeme to place conuersion and good-woorks in the will of men Psal 119. I haue applied my heart to fulfil thy statutes 1. Ioh. 5. verse 18. He that is begotten of god keepeth himselfe These the like sayings attribute the woorke of god vnto men first because they are not only the obiect but the instrumēt also of gods woorking which the holy spirite exerciseth in them Then because they are such an instrument which being renewed and moued by the holy spirit doth also it selfe woorke together and mooue it selfe For there is not one effect ascribed vnto the holie ghost and another to mans will but the same to both vnto the holie ghost as the principal cause vnto mans will as a secondarie and instrumentall cause The third degree of libertie in man regenerated The third degree of libertie belongeth to man in this life as he is regenerated but not yet glorified or in whom regeneration is begun but not accomplished or perfected In this state the will vseth her libertie not onely to worke euill as in the second degree but partly to doe ill and partly to do well And this is to be vnderstood two waies First that some works of the regenerate are good and pleasing to God which are done of them according to Gods commandement but some euil displeasing to god which they do contrary to the commaundement of God which is manifest by the infinit fallings of holy men Secondly that euen those good works which the conuerted doe in this life albeit they please God by reason of Christes satisfaction imputed vnto them yet are they not perfectly good that is agreeable to Gods law but vnperfect stained with many sins therefore they cannot if they be beheld without Christ stand in iudgement escape damnation The cause of the renewing and beginning of this liberty in man to good is the spirit working by the wil. The cause for which the wil beginneth to work well is this because by the singular grace or benefite of the holy spirit mans nature is renewed by the word of God there is kindled in the mind a new light knowlege of god in the hart new affections in the wil new inclinations agreeing with the Lawe of God and the will is forcibly and effectually mooued to doe according to these notions and inclinations and so it recouereth both the power of willing that which God approueth and the vse of that power and beginneth to bee conformed and agreeable to God and to obey him Deut. 30.6 The Lord thy God wil circumcise thy hart the hart of thy seed that thou maiest loue the lord thy god with al thine heart Ezec. 36.26 A new hart wil I giue you and a newe spirit wil I put within you and I wil take away the stony hart out of your body and I wil giue you an heart of flesh and I wil put my spirit within you and cause you to walke in my statutes Act. 16. The Lord opened the hart of Lidia that she should attend to those things which were spoke of Paul 2. Cor. 3. Where the spirit of the Lord is there is libertie Why the will in the regenerate vseth liberty not onely to good but to euil also The causes for which the will vseth her libertie not onely to the choosing of good but of euill also are in number two The first for that in this life the renewing of our nature is not perfect neither as concerning the knowledge of GOD neither as concerning our inclinations to obey GOD and therefore in the best men while they liue here remaine stil many and great sinnes both originall and others The Second for that the regenerate bee not alwaies ruled by the holy spirite but are sometimes for a time forsaken of GOD eyther for to try or to chastise or humble them but yet are recalled to repentaunce that they perish not Of the first cause it is said Rom. 7. I knowe that in me that is in my flesh dwelleth no good thing for to wil is present with mee but I finde no meanes to performe that which is good Marc. 9. I beeleue Lord but help thou my vnbeliefe Of the second cause it is said Psa 51. Take not away thy holy spirit from mee Isaiah 63.17 O Lord why hast thou made vs to erre from thy wayes and hardned our heart from thy fear Returne for thy seruaunts sake 1. Kings 8.57 The Lorde our God bee with vs that hee forsake vs not neither leaue vs. Therefore the regenerate man in this life doth alwaies goe either forwarde or backewarde neuer continueth in the same state Hence are deduced these 2. conclusions first as man corrupted before he be regenerated can not begin new obedience pleasing acceptable vnto God So he that is regenerated in this life although he beginne to obey God that is hath some inclination and purpose to obey God according to all his commaundementes and that vnfained though yet weak and strugling with euil inclinationes affectiones and desires and therefore there shine in his life and manners a desire of pietie towardes God and his neighbour yet can hee not yeeld whole and perfect obedience to God because neither his knowledge nor his loue of God is so great and so syncere as the law of God requireth and therefore is not such righteousnes as may stande before God according to that saying Psal 143.2 Enter not into iudgement with thy seruaunt for in thy sight shall none that liueth be iustified The second They who are ōcuerted can no farder retein good inclinations neither thoughts and affections and a good purpose to perseuere and go forwarde therein than as the holy spirit worketh and preserueth these in them for if he guide and rule them they iudge and doe aright but if he forsake them they are blinde they wander slip and fall away yet so that they perish not but repent and are saued if so bee they were euer truely conuerted 1. Cor. 4. What hast
so the worke of god that the will of man is not only the obiect but the instrument also of gods working an agent by it own force giuen it of god in producing an effect in that the wil is not only passiue but both actiue passiue for as much as it is to this end moued of the spirite to worke that it self might do that which God wil worke by it which also so commeth to passe in all the good actions of the will euen as in ill actions also when it is incited either by the Diuel or other causes it self is not in the mean season idle Wherefore in Ezechiel it is added 36. I wil cause you to walke in my Statutes and yee shall keepe my Iudgements and doe them The fourth degree of libertie is in man perfectlie regenerated after his glorification The fourth degree of libertie is in man perfectlie regenerated after his glorification or after this life In this libertie the will shal be only free to choose good and not to choose euill this shal be the perfect libertie of our wil by which we shall not only not sin but shall abhorre nothing more than sin also shal not be able to sin anie more The reasons hereof are these Because in the mind shal shine the perfect knowledge of god his will in the wil heart a most perfect exceeding inclination to obeie god an exceeding loue of god a ioy resting in god an agreeablenes or conformitie with god Wherefore no place shal be for ignorance for errour or any doubting of God yea or for the least stubbornes against God Lastly That conformitie in the elect of all their inward powers and faculties with God and the effectuall guiding of the holie Ghost shal bee continued to all eternitie For the blessed Saints are neuer forsaken but continuallie ruled by the holie Ghost in all their actions in the celestiall life For which cause it cannot possiblie bee that any motions or actions of man there shoulde once swarue from rightnesse And therefore it is said Math. 22. They are as the Angels of god in heauen This last degree of libertie after mans glorification greater than the first before his fall because this excludeth all possibility of falling the other did not Neither by this meanes is the libertie of will taken away or diminished but is truely confirmed and perfected in the blessed Angels men for as much as both the vnderstanding is free from al error ignorance and doubtfulnes and lightened with the perfect knowledge of god and the heart and wil free from all stubbornes and without all soliciting or suggestiō to withstand god is carried with an exceeding loue of god and an alacrity to obey the knowen will of god And hence it appeareth also how much more excellent our state shal be than was Adams before his fall Adam truely before his fall was perfectly conformed to god but he could wil both good euil and therefore had some infirmity ioined with his excellent gifts euē a power to depart from god leese his gifts that is he was changeablie good But we shall not be able but to will good onely And as the wicked are onely carried to euill because they are wicked so shal we also only loue chuse good because we shal be good It shal be then impossible for vs to will any euill Because wee shal bee preserued by gods grace in that perfect liberty of wil that is we shal be vnchangeably good It is necessary that this doctrine Of the similitude and difference of free-will which is in god and his creatures The vse of this doctrine concerning the diuersities of libertie which is in God and in man and of the diuerse degrees of mans libertie and in diuers states and degrees of mans nature deliuered hitherto out of the scripture should be manifest knowen in the Church for many waighty causes 1. That this glorie may be giuen to god that he alone is the most free agent whose libertie and wisedome dependeth of no other and that all the creatures are subiect to his gouernement 2. That we may remember that they who wittinglie and willinglie sin or haue cast themselues into a necessitie of sinning are not at al excused and so not god but their own wils declining of their own accord from gods commandements to be the cause of their sins 3. That we may know god alone to be of himself vnchangeably good the fountain of goodnes but no creature to be able neither to haue nor to keep more goodnes than god of his free goodnes wil work keep in him therefore we must desire it of him ascribe it receiued to him 4. That we knowing god to be a most free gouernor of al things may confesse that he is able for his glory our safety to change those things which seeme most vnchangeable 5. That wee knowing from what excellencie of our nature wee haue fallen by our owne fault may the more deplore and bewaile our vnthankefulnes and magnifie Gods mercie who aduaunceth and lifteth vs vp euen to a greater excellencie 6. That knowing the miserie and naughtines of our nature and disposition if once god forsake vs we may be humbled in his sight and ardentlie desire to wade and come out of these euils 7. That hauing knowledge of that libertie into the which the sonne of god restoreth vs wee may the more desire his benefites and be thankefull vnto him for them 8. That knowing we are by the mercie of god alone seuered from them that perish that we rather than they might bee conuerted wee bee not lifted vp with an opinion of our owne goodnes or wisedome but ascribe the whole benefite of our iustification and saluation not to anie cause appearing in vs but to the mercie of god alone 9. That acknowledging the vveakenes and corruption vvhich remaineth euen in vs regenerated vve may seeke for iustification in Christ alone and may vvithstand those euils 10. That knovving our selues not to be able to stand against tentations vvithout the singular assistance of the holie spirite vve may ardently and dailie desire to bee preserued and guided by god 11. That vnderstanding that vve are not preserued against our vvils but with our wils we may wrastle with tentations indeuour to make our calling and election sure 12. That vnderstanding the counsaile of god concerning the conuerting of men by the doctrine of the gospel and ministerie of the Church vve may imbrace earnestlie and desirouslie the vse thereof OF EVILS OF PVNISHMENT IN this question also we are to speake of the effects of sinne that is of the other part of mans miserie euen of the euill of paine and punishment It is saide that God doth most grieuouslie most iustlie and most certainelie punish sinne Most grieuouslie for the greatnes of sin because the infinite good is offēded thereby Most iustlie because euery sin violateth
of Gods presence which knoweledge the Scripture calleth knowledge by the spirite and face to face 16 Faith which is onely historicall breedeth though by an accident despair and the grieuousnes of Gods iudgement 17 Temporary faith breedeth a certaine ioy but not a quiet conscience because it ariseth not from the true cause as also it maketh shew of confession and some shew of good woorkes but that only for a season 18 Faith of miracles doth obtain of God those miracles whereof it is conceiued 19 By faith only applying to euery one the promise of grace we obtaine and receiue righteousnes before God and the participation or communion of Christ with al his benefits 20 As before this faith cannot goe true conuersion and the beginning of true obedience according to all the commaundementes of God so can they not but needes accompanie the same OF THE CREEDE OR SYMBOLE OF THE APOSTLES AFter we haue intreated of FAITH Why the creede is called a symbole it directly followeth now that we speake of the sum of those things which are to bee beleeued which we cal the Symbole of the Apostles or the Apostolick Symbole The especial Questions here are 1 What a Symbole is 2 What are the parts of the Apostolique Symbole 1 WHAT A SYMBOLE IS THis woorde Symbole is deriued from a greeke woorde which signifieth either a common collation of diuerse men to the making of a banquet or a signe token and marcke whereby a man is discerned froÌ„ others Such as is the militarie signe whereby fellowes are desciphered from enimies The Symbole so termed in the Church is a breefe and summarie forme of christian doctrine or a briefe summe or confession of the points of Christian religion or Euangelical doctrine Nowe it is called by the name of Symbole because it is as a token or profession whereby the Church with her members is discerned from all her enimies and from al other sects Some say that this briefe summe of Euangelical doctrine was called a Symbole for that this doctrine was collated as it were and imparted by the Apostles and euery one of them did bestow some part thereof but that cannot be proued But if you wil deriue it thence this reason also nothing absurde may be rendered thereof for that the Articles of faith are the squire and rule whereunto the faith and doctrine of al Orthodox or right beleeuing Christians ought to agree and be conferred This Symbole is called Apostolique 1. Because it conteineth the summe of the Apostolique doctrine which the Catechumens were enforced to hold and professe 2. Because the Apostles deliuered that summe of doctrine to their Scholers and Disciples which the Church afterwardes held as receiued from them This selfesame Symbole is called also Catholick because there is but one faith of al Christians Question Were there not new Symboles made as Athanasius Symbole the Symbole of Nice of Ephesus of Chalcedon Aunswere These are not other from this Apostolique Symbole but certaine words are added as an explication of this by reason of heretiques by whom because of the shortnes thereof this was depraued There is no change either of the matter or of the Doctrine but onely of the forme of declaring it as easily appeareth by comparing them together 2 What are the parts of the Apostolicke Symbole or Creed THe principall parts thereof are three 1 Of the Father and our creation 2 Of the Sonne and our redemption 3 Of the holy ghost and our sanctification that is of the workes of our Creation Redemption and Sanctification How our Creâ—tioÌ„ RedemptioÌ„ Sanctification are ech appropriated to some one person of the Trinitie and yet all three persons haue their ioint working in them Obiection Vnto the father is ascribed the creation of heauen and earth vnto the Sonne the redemption of mankind vnto the holy ghost sanctification Therefore the Sonne and the holy ghost did not create heauen and earth neither did the Father and the holy ghost redeeme mankinde neither do the Father the Sonne sanctifie the faithfull Answere It is a fallacie grounding vpon that which is affirmed but in respect as if it were simply affirmed For the creation is giuen to the Father redemption to the Sonne sanctification to the holy ghost not as they are simply an operation or woork for so should other persons be excluded from it but in respect for the order and manner of woorking which is peculiar and proper to euerie of them in producing and bringing forth the same externall woorke A more open declaration hereof may be this The woorkes of our creation redemption sanctification are the operations of the Godhead outwardly that is externall operations which God worketh on his creatures and they are vndiuided that is common to the three persons which they by common wil and power woork in the creatures by reason of that one and the same essence and nature of the Godhead which they haue For the Scripture attributeth the Creation not onely to the father but to the Sonne also and the holy ghost Ioh. 1.3 Al things were made by it Gen. 1. The spirit of the Lord moued vpon the waters Mat. 1.20 That which is conceaued in her is of the holy Ghost Likewise our redemption is attributed to the father and the holy Ghost Iohn 3. God sent his Sonne into the woorlde that the world might be saued by him Tit. 3. Hee saued vs by the renewing of the holie ghost which he shed on vs abundantly And sanctification both to the father and to the sonne Gal. 4.6 God hath sent the spirit of his sonne into your harts crying Abba Father 1. Thess 5.23 The very god of peace sanctifie you throughout 1. Cor. 1.30 Christ is made sanctification vnto vs. Eph. 5.26 Christ sanctifieth the Church Al the persons therefore create redeem sanctifie Neuerthelesse yet in respect of that order of woorking which is betweene them Creation is ascribed vnto the father Because hee is the fountaine as of the Diuinitie of the Sonne and the holie Ghost so also of those diuine operations which hee woorketh and perfourmeth by the Sonne and the holie Ghost Redemption is ascribed vnto the Sonne because hee is that person which executeth the fathers will concerning the redeeming of mankinde and dooth immediatly perfourme the woorke of our redemption For the Sonne onely was sent into flesh and hath paied the ransome or price for our sinnes not the father nor the spirit To the holy ghost is ascribed sanctification because he doth immediatly sanctifie vs. For the father createth but mediatly by the Sonne and the holy Ghost The Son from the father and the holy Ghost from the father and the sonne The father and the holy ghost redeeme vs but mediatly by the sonne But the son immediatly from the father by the holy ghost The father and the son sanctifie vs but mediatly by the holy ghost but the holy Ghost immediatly from the father and the sonne The workes of the trinitie external
order of his minde declared in the nature of thinges and in his woorde and what agreeth therewith and disagreeth and all his woorkes and the works of all creatures past present and to come all the causes and circumstances of all things And moreouer That al Angels and men haue no more knowlege of diuine and humane matters than God doth woork maintaine in their minds For among other thinges the most beutiful and sightlie order which is in the nature of thinges the endes and vses of all things the signification of future euents arts and sciences the euerting and ouerturning of those deuises which the Diuell and wicked men haue most craftily contriued against God and all the godly doe enforce all men to confesse that these things could not proceed but from a most wise artificer and author Wherefore also the scripture it selfe willeth vs to consider the wisedome of God shining in these his woorks Eccle. 3.11 God hath made euerie thing beutiful in his time Isai 44.7 Who is like me that shal cal shal declare it set it in order before me since I appointed the ancient people Ioh. 5.13 He taketh the wise in their craftinesse And of these hee concludeth that the wisedome of God is immense vnconceiueable As Ps 145 7. His wisdom is infinit Rom. 11.32 O the deepenesse of the riches both of the wisedome and knowledge of God! But here again is to be obserued a difference betweene Philosophie and the word of God First that euen in the creation the knowen or legall wisedome was darkned and maimed in men through sinne and therefore needeth a renewing by the woorde deliuered to the Church And then that men without this heauenlie doctrine are altogether ignorant of that especial wisedome of God reuealed in the gospell whereby he saueth the Church gathered from amongst mankind by the son As it is said Mat. 11. I giue thee thanks O father bicause thou hast hid these things from the wise men of vnderstanding and hast opened them vnto babes The Goodnes of God diuerslie taken in scriptures The goodnesse of God signifieth sometimes his bountifulnes as Psa 106.1 Praise the Lord because he is good sometimes all the vertues and whatsoeuer is spoken of the nature of God As Psalm 14. Let thy spirite leade mee thorough the right waie That which also is meant by the name of holines or sanctity and light 1. Iohn 1. So in this place first by the name of goodnesse are vnderstoode al those thinges which are attributed to god in his woorde and are represented and resembled in his image as those thinges which are termed good in Angels and men as life power wisedome ioy righteousnesse c. For such is the nature of God as it hath manifested it selfe in the Lawe and Gospel and the goodnesse of the reasonable creature is an image of the diuine goodnesse And therefore here also differ philosophy and the Scripture in that Philosophy attributeth onely to God that his goodnesse which was opened in the Lawe and yet neither that wholie but of his goodnesse reuealed in the Gospell it is altogether ignoraunt Secondly by reason of the great and huge difference betweene the creatour and the creature we vnderstand those good thinges to bee in GOD which are agreeing to his diuine nature and maiestie For those which are proper vnto created natures woulde not bee good in GOD but rather a diminishing of his goodnesse Thirdly By reason of the immensitie of his diuine nature those things which are finite in creatures are in GOD infinite And therefore against sundry and diuerse disputes of Philosophers concerning the chiefest good we learne in the Church that GOD is the chiefest good Fourthly because nothing is vnperfect or not subsisting by it selfe in GOD whatsoeuer is attributed vnto him is not in him as formes or accidentes in creatures but such is his essence and nature in a manner not able to bee comprehended by our knoweledge and vnderstanding Fiftly His nature and will is a rule of that goodnesse and vprightnesse which is in creatures For so farre foorth thinges are and are called good as they agree with the wil of God Sixtly GOD is the onelie fountaine of goodnesse and the first cause of all good thinges So that all thinges haue so much goodnesse as God dooth create and maintaine in them And in this sense is it said Luke 18. There is none good but God onelie euen so as hee is most perfectly good and the fountaine of goodnesse The righteousnesse of God sometimes in Scripture signifieth that which is accounted righteousnesse before him The righteousnes of God both generall and particular and whereby he maketh vs righteous that elsewhere legall which is holines of life or conformity with the law of God which God worketh in vs by his spirit begun in this life to be perfected in the life to come as Iam. 1.20 The wrath of man dooth not accomplish the righteousnesse of God Or sometimes Euangelicall which is the righteousnesse of Christ imputed to beleeuers of the free mercy of God As Roman 3.21 But now is the righteousnes of God made manifest without the Law hauing witnesse of the Lawe and of the Prophetes to witte the righteousnesse of God by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vppon all that beleeue Sometimes is meant that righteousnesse whereby himselfe is righteous and then also in many places it signifieth the faithfulnesse or mercie and benignitie of GOD who according to his promises preserueth defendeth and deliuereth the faithfull as Psalm 31.1 Deliuer mee in thy righteousnesse But when it is properly spoken of the righteousnesse of GOD whereby himselfe is righteous as in this place First hee is called iust in respect of his generall iustice and righteousnesse which is the order or nature of this diuine vnderstanding and will whereby GOD will and approoueth doth himselfe and woorketh in others vnchaungeablie and vnspeakeablie such thinges as hee hath commaunded in his Lawe and neither will nor approoueth nor woorketh nor causeth nor furdereth any thing whatsoeuer disagreeth from this order but horribly hateth and detesteth them as it is said Psalm 11.17 The righteous Lord loueth righteousnesse Secondly In respect of his particular iustice and rightiousnesse which is the vnchaungeable will of God whereby God giueth to himselfe and will haue giuen him by others that glory which is due vnto the chiefe good as he saith I wil not giue my glory to another punisheth al sin with such punishment as is equall to the offence that is with eternal as in them who perish or with equiualent as in his Sonne Christ susteining the punishment for al those who are saued by him according as it is saide Thou shalt not depart thence vntill thou host paied the vtmost farding and cannot iniury anie creature whatsoeuer he determineth of him or doth vnto him because he oweth no man any thing as it is said Psa 45. God is iust in
and will haue compassion on whome I will haue compassion Isay 43.25 I euen I am hee that putteth awaie thine iniquities for mine owne sake and will not remember thy sinnes Seuenthly That hee dooth these thinges towardes sinners who not onelie were vnwoorthie of them but also who were his deadlie enimies Romanes 5.10 When wee were enimies wee were reconciled to GOD by the death of his sonne They also of the wiser sort which are out of the Church are all compelled to attribute mercie vnto God beecause they see him so mercifullie to spare sinners whereupon Ieremie Lamentations chap. 3.22 saith It is the Lordes mercies that wee are not consumed because his compassions faile not But beecause the perfectnesse of Gods iustice and the priuitie of their owne sinnes doth not permit them to conceiue any firme persuasion of Gods mercie towardes them neither knowe they ought concerning the saluation of men by the death of his sonne therefore are they not able either constantly or wholy to agnise Gods mercie 1 Obiection Mercie is a kinde of griefe or sorrow therefore there is sorrow and griefe in God Aunswere The names of affections when they are attributed vnto God by an Anthropopathie they doe not signifie anie passion or change in God but an inspeakeable either dislike or liking of the obiects God therefore is said to be mercifull 1. Because he is against the destruction of his creature 2. Because hee doth those thinges which mercifull men are wont to doe 2 Obiection God seemeth sometimes to reioice in reuengement Isai 1. Prouerb 1. Aunswere He reioiceth not in reuengement or punishment but in the executing of his owne iustice 3 Obiection It seemeth in some places of scripture that Gods mercie doth not extend it selfe vnto the wicked Isai 27. Aunswere This is to be vnderstood of that degree of mercie wherewith he imbraceth his chosen And yet hee spareth also the wicked neither reioiceth at their destruction 4 Obiection But yet he saueth not all whereas he is able to do it Therefore hee is not exceeding mercifull neither mercifull towardes all Aunswere He doth not saue all for most iust cause For his mercie is so to bee exercised that it hinder not the execution of his iustice 5 Obiection He doth not take mercie on anie or receiue anie into fauour without the satisfaction of his sonne Therefore he doth it not freelie Aunswere That which is concluded doth not followe because God of his free grace giueth this satisfaction it selfe and applieth it vnto vs. Nowe hee giueth a thing freely who giueth the price of a thing for which the thing it selfe is giuen God is also called Bountifull 1. In what the bountifulnes of God is seene Because hee createth and gouerneth all things 2. He is the onely fountain of al good things 3. Which befall to all creatures 4. Yea to the wicked 5. Of his goodnes loue and free mercie towardes all creatures 6. But especiallie towardes mankinde which he hath made according to his image and for whose sake hee hath created all other things 7. But in them also chieflie toward his Church to whom hee hath opened himselfe and his will 8. And in this his Church toward his chosen Angels and men to whom by his sonne he giueth life and glorie euerlasting And further whom he is angry with and on whom he inflicteth punishment hee is not angrie with their substaunce or nature which himselfe created but with that corruption which came by other meanes to his diuine worke Rom. 1.18 The wrath of god is reueiled from heauen against all vngodlines Obiection No creature visible is subiect to so manie euils as man Therefore he is not bountifull towards men Aunswere Hee is subiect to these euils by an accident that is because of sinne but withall he is enriced abooue other creatures with great blessings euen when hee is out of the Church but is most happie and blessed if he repent God also alone is most free For what causes God is saied to bee most free because hee alone by nature is such that no fault or miserie can fall vpon him 2. Neither can hee bee constrained of anie 3. Neither is hee bounde to anie 4. Neither is hee subiect or tied to the rule or lore of an other Wherefore whatsoeuer he will and doth that hee will and doth of himselfe most freely when as much and in what maner he wil what he will that is most good iust But here chieflie is considered the freedome of will or libertie frō constraint which is the power abilitie whereby god without any necessitie hath from euerlasting decreed the whole order of the creatiō preseruatiō rule of al things and doth accomplish the same not beeing constrained or tied to other causes yet so that hee neuer swarueth from his rightnes To this beare witnes his miracles and many examples of deliueries and punishments and many places of scripture as Psalm 135.6 Whatsoeuer pleased the Lord that did hee in heauen and in earth in the sea and in all the depths 1. Sam. 14.6 It is not hard to the Lord to saue with manie or with fewe 1 Obiection That without which second causes which worke necessarilie can not worke doth it selfe also worke necessarilie Without the first cause which is God Second causes which necessarilie worke cannot worke therefore the first cause also which is God worketh together with them necessarilie Aunswere The Maior is true of such causes as woorke with absolute necessitie but it is false of such as worke onely of a conditionall necessitie that is because it so pleaseth God who notwithstanding could moue them otherwise or else at all not moue them or not so much as make them that they should worke and shoulde worke after that maner which they doe woorke Therefore all second causes depend on the first but not the first any way on the second 2 Obiection God is vnchangeablie good therefore not freelie good Aunswere This vnchangeablenes dooth not diminish but establish the libertie of Gods will For it is not the vnchangeablenes of a nature but constraint and coaction which is contrarie to libertie and so much the more freely the will chooseth with howe much the greater and surer force and motion it is carried vnto her obiect 3 Obiection It is said also of particular euents that God can onelie wil those thinges which are best but onelie those things which hee hath decreed are best therefore hee cannot will other things But aunswere is made to the Minor What things God hath decreed those are best not before but after his decree For Gods will being the rule and squire of rightnes therefore are thinges good because hee will them wherefore if hee woulde haue from euerlasting had anie other thing that then shoulde haue beene best As that Ioseph should be solde and made Lord of Aegypt and giue sustenance to his fathers familie was best because God would so Now if God would haue any other way
easily imagine in him the gouernment of al things in the woorlde as being partly hard or impossible and partly as vnwoorthie of God and lastly by reason of confusions sins al which euils would seeme to haue God their author if it should be granted that God gouerned all thinges we find experience euerie one both in our selues and others how hardly the true Doctrine concerning Gods prouidence getteth place in the minde and that naturall light sufficeth not to the right vnderstanding thereof so great varietie of opinions and errors concerning this point of doctrine dooth sufficiently declare Now there are of these three sorts especially 1 The Epicures will haue either no prouidence at all Errors concerning Gods prouidence or onely of those thinges which are and are doone in the lower partes of the world 2 The Stoickes haue deuised in steede of prouidence an absolute necessitie and order of all thinges being in the verie nature of things whereunto not onlie al other things but god himselfe also is subiect 3 The Peripatetiques did imagine that God indeede dooth beholde and vnderstand all thinges but yet dooth not order and rule all thinges but mooueth the celestiall motions and dooth by them send downe by waie of influence some power and vertue vnto the lower partes of nature but the operations themselues or motions depend of the matter and of the wils of men that is they will haue the prouidence of GOD to bee a prescience or foreknowlege in god of al things but not a will decreeing causing and ruling al things Contrarily The Church teacheth out of the worde of God that nothing is extant and commeth to passe in the whole world but by the certaine and definite though yet most free and most good counsail and purpose of God Which that it may the better bee vnderstoode these three questions are to bee considered 1 Whether there be any prouidence of God 2 What the prouidence of God is 3 Why the knowledge thereof is necessarie 1 WHETHER THERE BE ANY PROVIDENCE OF GOD. The prouidence of God certaine and not to bee doubted of It is manifest that they who deny Prouidence take away religion and the whole woorshippe of God For if God dooth not respect and rule humane affaires then neither were good things to be desired of him neither were hee to be praised for them receiued who doth not giue them neither his anger to be feared who doth not punish neither were we to liue according to his will who requireth not obedience nor maketh or keepeth anie difference betweene the good and bad These therefore are the first and most knowen and most certaine grounds and principles of al religion That there is a God and that there is prouidence that is that God knoweth and ruleth those thinges which are and are done in the world and especially mankinde as beeing the chiefe and principall part of the world Neither yet doth the whole Scripture therefore so many waies inculcate Gods gouernment of all thinges as if their own conscience did not conuince euerie man of it but that it might the more confirme in vs the beleefe perswasion of a thing most certaine and most necessary to be knowen teach vs that which men know not of it and correct that which they vnderstand amisse Testimonies of scripture for Gods prouidence There are two sorts of arguments proofs whereby is confirmed that there is a prouidence of God First it is proued by testimonies of Scripture Act. 17.21 He giueth to al life breath and all thinges and a little after In him wee liue and mooue and haue our being Matth. 10.29 Are not two Sparrowes sold for a farthing and one of them shal not fall on the ground without your father Yea and all the haires of your head are numbered Like to these are found infinite testimonies in the Scripture not onely as concerning the generall rule but also as concerning particular examples For there is almost no point of heauenly Doctrine which is more diligently inculcated vrged in the old Testament than the Doctrine of Gods prouidence So in Ier. 27. God reasoneth from the generall to the particular that is from the rule it selfe to the exāple The general is I haue made the earth the man and the beast that are vpon the ground and haue giuen it vnto whom it pleased me And presently he adioyneth the particular Now haue I giuen all these landes into the handes of Nabuchadnezzar the king of Babel my seruant Moreouer the prouidence is confirmed by reasons Reasons of philosophie for proofe of the same which are in such sort Philosophicall as that also the Scripture often vseth the same Of these there are two sorts whereof one demonstrateth the thing that is in question from the woorkes or effectes of GOD the other from the attributes or properties or nature of God whereon as their proper cause those effects depend Yet more knowen proofes and more common and obiect are those which are drawen from the woorkes or effectes of god For by these as being more knowen vnto vs we learne and knowe the cause it selfe euen the nature and properties of God then after wee knowe the cause we returne backe againe from it to the effectes and demonstrate them by this and haue distinct and perfect knowledge thereof And both these proofes and reasons are demonstratiue necessarily and irrefragably proouing that which is in question and common to Philosophy with Diuinity But the properties and workes of God are better knowen of them which are in the Church than of them which are without And furder the prouidence of God is proued almost by the same arguments whereby it is shewed that there is a God The reasons drawen from the workes or effects of God for proofe of his prouidence 1 THE order which is in the nature of things that is 1 Order the most apt disposing of all the parts the succession of motions and actions continuing by certaine and perpetual Laws and courses and seruing for the preseruation of the whole and for those ends whereunto thinges were ordained This order proceedeth not from a mere sensible nature neither commeth it by chance or fortune but contrarie hee must needes be most wise who appointed and setled this order in the nature of things and so he also who by his prouidence gouerneth and ruleth nature Psal 8 19.135.147.148 2 Th◠minde 2 The minde and vnderstanding which is in Angels and men Man which is as it were a litle worlde is ruled by a minde and vnderstanding much more then is the great woorlde gouerned by diuine prouidence as in the administring whereof more wisedome is required Whence it is saide Psalm 94.9 Hee that planted the eare shall hee not heare Or hee that formed the eie shall he not see 3 The natural knowledge of the law 3 The naturall notions of principles engraffed in our minds o the Lawe of nature or the difference betweene
goodnesse dooth he preserue administer and rule the woorlde created 6 Euerie positiue thing and all good is from God 6 Autor of all good as the first cause and chiefe good But not only substaunces but all their motions and actions are a certaine positiue thing good Therefore all motions also haue God their first cause and are done by his wil. 7 Hee that will the ende or consequent of anie euent 7 God maker and disposer of the meanes which bring to euerie end will also the meane or euent which goeth before But GOD will the ends of all things which are doone Therefore he will also all precedent euentes either simply and absolutely or in some sort and respect 8 God is the first cause of al things 8 He the first cause Therefore all thinges depend on him 9 An vnchangeable prescience or foreknowledge dependeth of an vnchaungeable cause 9 His vnchangeable foreknowledge of all thinges God foreknoweth all thinges vnchangeablie from euerlasting Therefore this his foreknowledge must depend of an vnchaungeable cause But there is no vnchangeable cause beside the wil of God Therefore al things depend and are gouerned of the wil of God 2 WHAT THE PROVIDENCE OF GOD IS THe prouidence of god is the eternal most free vnchaungeable The definition of Gods prouidence most iust wise and good counsail of god whereby he worketh al good thinges and permitteth also euil thinges to bee doone and directeth al things both euill and good to his glorie and the safety of his chosen The explication of the parts of the definition seuerally 1 Counsel 1 By the name of counsell is comprehended An vnderstanding or prescience and foreknowledge of things to come or to be done of the causes for which they are or are not to be doone Likewise a will effecting or woorking a thing for certaine causes and that in due time and order Prouidence therefore is the prescience and forcible wil of God Psal 33.11 The counsel of the Lord standeth for euer Isaie 46.10 My counsel shall stand Prescience is a knowledge whereby God knew from euerlasting not so much what himselfe was or is to doe as what not himselfe but others would and wil doe as sinnes And this prescience belongeth to vnderstanding Prouidence Predestination though they agree in this that both are of those things only which god himselfe purposed to do yet they differ because prouidence extendeth to al things and to al the works of god but predestination is extended properly to those creatures only which are endued with reason Predestination is the most wise eternall vnchangeable decree of God whereby he deputed destined euery man before he was created to his certaine vse and end God predestinated no man to commit sinne though he foreknew sinne before 2 Eternal 2 That this counsel is eternal cannot bee denied because seeing neither the ignorance of any thing nor encrease of knowledge nor change of wil falleth into God it is certain that he knew and decreed al things from euerlasting Pro. 8.22 The Lord hath possessed me in the beginning of his way Isa 46.10 Which declare the last things from the beginning from old the things that were not done Ephes 1.4 Hee hath chosen vs in Christ before the foundation of the woorlde 1. Corint 2.7 Wee speake the wisedome of God which hee had determined before the world 3 Most free 3 Most free that is a decree which was made from euerlasting of all thinges and euentes as it pleased him of his greate wisedome and goodnesse when hee had perfect power otherwise to haue directed his counsell or else to haue omitted it or to haue done thinges otherwise than hee decreed to doe them by his counsel Psal 115.3 Hee doth whatsoeuer he wil. Ier. 18.6 As the clay is in the potters hand so are you in mine hand 4 Vnchangeable Because neither error of counsell 4 Vnchangeable nor any change or mutation falleth into god but what he hath once decreed from euerlasting that as beeing most good and right doth he bring to passe 1. Sam. 15.29 The strength of Israel wil not lie nor repent Mal. 3.6 I am the Lorde I chaunge not 5 Most wise This is shewed both by the woonderfull course of things and euents in the world 5 Most wise and by the scripture it self Iob. 12.13 With him is wisedom and strength he hath counsel and vnderstanding 6 Most Iust Because the wil of God is the onely fountaine and the chiefe rule of all iustice manifested and declared in the Lawe Whatsoeuer therefore GOD will 6 Most Iust or hath decreed or doth woork it is simply and in it selfe iust whether we know or not knowe the manner how it is iust 2. Chro. 19.7 There is no iniquitie with the Lord our God neither respect of persons Dan. 9.14 7 Whereby god worketh This is added that wee maie knowe the counsel of God not to be idle 7 Effectual in working but effectual and forcible in working For god not only once created things bestowed on them a vertue and force whereby to work but also doth preserue and moue by his presence and continual working al things at his pleasure No creature whether great or smal can either be or moue or do or suffer anie thing except God effectually preserue moue and gouern it Act. 17. In him we liue and moue haue our being And God worketh al things by his sole and eternal wil without any labour or motion For to wil in him is both to be able and to do and contrary his power and action is his very eternal and vnchangeable wil. For in god the wil is not disioined from his efficacy and woorking as it commeth to passe in creatures The working or operation of God is two-fold General The general and special working of God whereby hee susteineth and gouerneth al things especially mankind special wherby he beginneth the saluatiō of his chosē in this life and perfecteth it in the life to come 1. Tim. 4.14 God is the sauior of al men specially of those that beleeue Ro. 8.14 As many as are led by the spirit of god they are the sons of god An other diuisiō there is of gods working wherby it is diuided into immediate The Immediate working of God and mediate working Immediate working is when beside or contrarie to the meanes and order setled by him in nature he woorketh what he will as in all miracles which are described and declared to this end that we might learne that God dooth woorke most freely either by meanes or without them For that all those miracles are not wrought without diuine power both experience teacheth vs in asmuch as they cannot bee wrought by the power of any creature and the Scripture witnesseth as Psalm 136.4 Which onely dooth great woonders Exod. 8.19 This is the finger of God Gods Mediate working Mediate woorking is when God by creatures
execution of his iustice or the deliuerie of his Church or a chastisement or triall or Martyrdome or ransome Isay 1.24 Psalm 2.4 Prouerb 1.26 4 Obiection Hee will that all men shall bee saued 1. Tim. 2.4 2. Pet. 3.9 Answere All men that is all sorts of men For out of all sorts of men he chooseth his chosen Now of euil of crime or offence Euil of crime as it is such God doth only permit and not wil. there is another consideration For these as they are sinnes or euils of crime are not considered as good S. Iames saith of them let no man when he is tēpted that is when he is sollicited to euil say that he is tēpted of God Therefore God neither intendeth them in his counsel purpose neither alloweth nor worketh nor furdereth them but only suffereth or permitteth them to bee doone of diuels men that is doth not hinder thē from not being doone when yet he could hinder them partly to shew in punishing them his iustice partly to shew in pardoning them his mercy Gal. 3.22 The scripture hath concluded all vnder sin c. And Rom. 9.17 For the same purpose haue I stirred thee vp c. But in the mean season the forsaking of his creature or depriuing him of diuine light rightnesse the action it selfe which diuels mē sinning do against the Law wil of God he notwithstanding by his generall prouidence efficacy wil moueth but to such an end as doth best agree with his nature law iustice goodnesse whether it be knowen or vnknowen to vs. Therefore sinnes are truely said to be doone not by the wil or working but by the permission of God The word permission in this place is to bee reteined because both it and others of the same force are sometimes found in the Scripture As Gen. 26. and 31.7 Psal 105.14 But yet we must expound it aright out of the scriptures For God neither will nor will not sinnes simplie but in some respect he wil and in some respect hee will not but onely permitteth them Which that it may the better be vnderstood we must knowe that in euery sin or euil of crime are two things namely the material or subiect and the formal Sinne is alwaies both in a good subiect and to a good end directed by God that is the corruption it selfe or defect of rightnes sticking inherēt in the subiect The subiect is a thing positiue or a thing of nature as an inclination motion action therefore dooth it partake of the nature of good is wrought and moued by god but corruption is not wrought by God but came vnto the subiect by the wil of diuels and men forsaking God Wherefore no sinne can bee or bee imagined which is not in some good thing and hath adioined vnto it some consideration and respect of good Otherwise God for his infinit goodnesse would not suffer it to bee doone neither shoulde it bee desired of any neither should at al be so that it is truly saide that there cannot bee put anie thing which is the chiefe and extreme euill that is such as dooth take away good wholy for it should not bee desired vnder some shewe and apparancie that it hadde of good neither shoulde it haue a subiect wherein in to bee Sinne alwaies is to bee discerned from good and so shoulde destroie it selfe But albeit euill is alwaies ioyned with good and dooth concurre with it in the same actions or inclinations yet these two thinges are diligently to bee seuered and discerned neither is the woorke of the Creatour to be confounded with the worke of the creature sinning least either God thereby bee made the cause of sinne or the greatest part of the gouernement of the woorlde and humane affaires bee taken from him Heereby wee may vnderstand howe farre foorth god will sinne In sinne God effectuallie will 1 The subiect or matter how he wil not but permitteth it He wil therefore sinnes 1 As concerning their matter that is the actions themselues of men sinning motions and inclinations to obiectes as they are onely such God wil woorketh and directeth For both they partake of the nature of good and if God simplie would them not they shoulde not at all bee done 2. ◠The endes As concerning the endes whereunto God destineth those actions which are sinnes that is hee wil the actions of sinners as they are the punishmentes of the wicked or chastisementes or trials or martyrdomes of the godlie or the Sacrifice of the Sonne of GOD for the sinnes of men But these endes are most good and most agreeing with the nature iustice and goodnesse of GOD. Therefore GOD the first cause of al good will intendeth and woorketh these in the sinnes or actions of the wicked and by a consequent also the actions them-selues which the wicked doe in sinning and by which as meanes GOD attaineth to those endes 3. 3 The forsaking of his creatures As concerning the withdrawing of his grace that is his diuine light and rightnesse This withdrawing is an action proper to god namely his eternall and forcible woorking will destining whom it will to bee forsaken It is also iust and holie because GOD is bound to none and because it is either the exploration and triall of the creature or the punishment of sin And this withdrawing once beeing put the inclinations motions actions of the creature cannot but erre and swarue from the Lawe of GOD and bee sinnes Nowe as the inclinations motions and actions of sinners The corruption of the action or inclination God will not but permitteth are sinnes that is are repugnant to order and nature and swarue from the Lawe of GOD because they are doone without the knowledge of Gods will and purpose of obeying him So God neither will nor ordaineth nor alloweth nor commaundeth nor woorketh nor furthereth them but forbiddeth condemneth punisheth and suffereth them to be committed of his creatures and to concurre with his most iust decrees iudgementes and woorkes thereby to shewe howe necessary and needefull for the creature is the grace of the holie ghost to flie sinne and to manifest his iustice and power in punishing sinne Wherefore the permission of sinne is no idle permission or a cessation and ceasing of Gods prouidence and woorking in the actions of the wicked as if they did depend onely vpon the will of the creature but this permission is of efficacie and woorketh Jt is permission as concerning the formall cause of sinne that is corruption it selfe which the creature hath of it selfe not by anie effection or woorking of GOD but it is of efficacie and woorketh as concerning the motions and actions of the creature sinning which god effectuallie will and moueth as also concerning the withdrawing of his grace the ends whereunto he destineth directeth and bringeth the actions of them that sinne GOD then is saide to permitte sinne 1. Because his will
see the scripture it selfe not onelie to attribute the particular euents of all both specials and generals vnto gods prouidence but further to transferre applie the same to al the specials generals which it speaketh of singular and particular examples Wherefore the scripture will haue the same also to be vnderstood of all indiuiduals singulars For as god brought the wind vpō the earth Gen. 8. so doth he bring the wind out of his treasures Psal 135. As he would that he of whom it is spoken Ioh. 9. should bee borne blinde so doth he make the deafe and the dumbe him that seeth and the blind Exod 4. As he destroieth the counsel of Achitophel 2. Sam. 17. so he frustrateth the counsels of the gentiles Psalm 53. As he commaunded the Rauens to feede Elias 1. Kings 17. so one sparrow falleth not to the ground without him As Christ could not be taken before the time appointed by God so can no euil happen to any of vs but at such time and place and in such maner as pleaseth God For therefore doth the scripture to teache vs how to collect and gather recount so many examples of Gods prouidence Thirdly there are also places of Scripture wherein the generall referring of all thinges to the prouidence of God is plainlie expressed or is signified by a Synecdoche which figure of speeche wee vse when we signifie the whole by a part or a part by the whole or by the comparing of lesser things with greater or greater with lesser Ezec. 12.25 The thing that I shal speake shall come to passe And God speaketh not onely those things which he reueileth vnto vs but whatsoeuer also from euerlasting hee hath decreed and purposed with himselfe Infinit almost are the testimonies which demonstrate that the prouidence of God extendeth it selfe to all thinges but these now shall easilie suffice For by these verilie it is apparent that euen euerie the least and smallest thing both good and bad is ruled by the prouidence of God yet in such wise as that those things which partake of the nature of good are not onelie done according to the prouidēce of god that is god not willing neither commaunding nor working them but permitting by his prouidence and directing them vnto the ends by him appointed but also by the prouidence of God as the cause but those thinges which are euil are done according to the prouidence but not by the prouidence of God that is God willing commaunding and woorking them For all good thinges are done God willing them euill God permitting them And God wil those things by his wil which he liketh worketh and commandeth He permitteth those thinges which he neither liketh nor commandeth nor worketh nor furthereth but which he condemneth forbiddeth punisheth That appeareth especially out of those testimonies which were alleaged concerning reasonable creatures For they shewe that all reasonable creatures both Angels and men and those both good and bad are ruled and gouerned by Gods prouidence but so that whatsoeuer good is in them that is from god himselfe who worketh this in reasonable creatures but whatsoeuer ill is in thē is of themselues being by nature euil not of God who is most good Al good thinges god woorketh himselfe in reasonable creatures but euill things hee permitteth in respect of other things that are good The reasons whereby is demonstrated The reasons and argumentes to proue all thinges to bee done by the prouidence of God 1 Gods omnipotencie 2 His wisedome that the prouidence of God extendeth it selfe to all things are almost the same with those which proue that there is a prouidence of god 1 That which is not done if God no way will it must needs be done god some way willing it This is true by the rule of contradiction where one of the two contradictory propositions must alwaies bee true But nothing can bee done god no way willing it that is god simplie not willing it because he is omnipotent And it is proper to omnipotencie for one to be able to doe what he will and to forbid what he wil not haue done Therefore all things are done god some way willing them to wit either simplie as good things or after a sort as euil things For if he would could not he should not be omnipotent Now concerning those which after a sort he wil after a sort he wil not he decreeeth of that part whereof he hath waightier better reasons whether knowen or vnknowen vnto vs. 2 It is proper to him that is most wise not to suffer any thing which is in his power to be done without his will and counsell And how much the wiser he is so much the more largely doth his gouernement extend it selfe But god is a gouernour infinitely wise and hath in his power al things Therefore he suffereth nothing to come to passe without his certain and determined counsel And further if the number of things were infinit yet were god sufficiēt for the administring of them seeing he is of an exceeding and infinite wisedome And therefore he easilie taketh care of all thinges that are created which although they be many yet in them-selues and most of all in respect of Gods infinite wisedome they are finite and limited 3 God will the ende◠of all thinges 3 He that will the end or consequent of any thing or euent he wil also the meanes or antecedent or that euent whereby the end is come vnto But God wil the ends of all things and euents whether good or bad Therefore he wil vniuersally all thinges which are and are done if not simplie yet in some sort and respect For whatsoeuer thinges are or are doone in the woorlde either they are the ende and consequent or the antecedent and meane whereby to attaine vnto the end The Maior is manifest The Minor is thus prooued God will all that is good But of all thinges there are some endes most good otherwise god by reason of his immense goodnes would not permit them to be done Prou. 16 4. The Lord hath made althings for his owne sake yea euen the wicked for the daie of euil Therefore the endes of al euents are wrought by the will of God 4 God is the first cause 4 The first cause is that which doth not depend of anie other but whereof all second causes and their actions and motions depend and are gouerned But God is the first cause of al things Therefore God and his counsels and woorkes doe not depend or are gouerned of any other but all other thinges of him neither according to others actions dooth hee determine of his but himselfe decreeth all things so to be doone that is God hath not therefore determined or decreed any thing for that hee foresawe that second causes woulde so doe but therefore all thinges shall bee so for that they are so determined or decreed by him Nowe to depend of another is vpon consideration first had of
anothers action whether present or past or to come to bee moued thereby to determine and doe a thing 5 The vnchangeablenes of Gods foreknowledge 5 What God vnchangeablie foreknoweth he also vnchangeablie will from euerlasting But God from euerlasting foreknoweth vnchangeablie all things euen those which are most mutable Therefore hee woulde from euerlasting vnchangeablie all thinges either simplie or in some sort and respect The Minor is manifest The Maior is thus prooued All certain and vnchangeable prescience or foreknowledge dependeth on an vnchangeable cause But there is no vnchangeable cause besides the will of God For all second causes are in themselues changeable and might haue not beene Therefore Gods will alone is the cause of his vnchangeable prescience that is GOD therefore foreknoweth that a thing shall be so because he will and decreeth it to bee done so either simplie or in some respect For if he simplie woulde it not it coulde neuer haue beene done and foreknowen of him The summe is Gods will and decree is the cause both of the euent and of the foreseeing or foreknowing of it but the foreseeing is not the cause of the effect Moreouer prescience in GOD is not seuered from his will and woorking as in creatures but they are both but one thing differing in consideration onely Num. 23.19 Hath hee saide it and shall hee not doe it And hath he spoken and shall hee not accomplish it 6 All naturall good thinges are from GOD as the first cause But all the faculties motions actions of all things 6 God the cause of all good as it is good as they are meerely such are naturall good thinges that is thinges made and ordeined of GOD in nature Therefore all are from GOD their authour and effectour and are wrought by GODS prouidence Acts. 17.28 In him wee liue and mooue and haue our being A Confutation of certaine Sophismes or cauils which are wont to be obiected against the prouidence of god mouing and gouerning al and euerie particular whether good or bad great or small most iustlie The first of confusions and things disordered in nature No confused or disordered thinges haue their being Confusions as they are such are not from God as efficient of them but directing them or are gouerned by the prouidence of god 1. Cor. 14.33 But whatsoeuer thinges are vnder the son are confused because all are vanity Eccles 1.14 Therefore they are not ruled and gouerned by diuine prouidence Answere The Maior proposition consisting of doubtfull termes is to be distinguished No confuse thinges true if they be simply confuse are gouerned by the prouidence of god that is the prouidence of god working them as they are confuse All thinges that are vnder the Sonne that is humane thinges are confuse and vaine true but not simplie so that no order and good at all lieth hid and is found in that confusion For if they were such god for his great goodnes and iustice would not permit them to be done Wherefore if by the confusions of the would they collect and conclude that there is no prouidence there is more auouched in the conclusion than was conteined in the premisses or they proceed from that which is in some respect so to conclude the same to be simply and absolutely so For whereas many thinges in the world are well ordered as the celestiall motions the preseruation of the kindes of al thinges commonweals the punishments of wicked men many more it may not by this argument be concluded of al things but of those onely which are done against the order by god appointed that they are not gouerned by his prouidence but those things in which a most manifest order doth appeare shal be an euident testimony of gods wisedome effectual working But if then they conclude that those disordered thinges are not ruled and gouerned of god so also shall there bee more said in the conclusion than was in the premisses For it foloweth thereof not that the things confuse troubled but that the confusion or troubling of order which is in theÌ„ is not of god As the wicked were created of god albeit their wickednes proceeded not froÌ„ god but from theÌ„selues For euery thing is not necessarily auouched of the concrete or subiect so qualified which is affirmed of the abstract or quality it self Wherefore if it be again replied putting this Maior That disordered things are not or are not ruled of god and therfore many things in the world not done by his prouidence eueÌ„ thus too is the Maior diuersly faulty For first that it be graÌ„ted that things disordered if they be simply such are not or are not ruled of god yet caÌ„not this be granted of them if both confusioÌ„ order in diuers respects be found in theÌ„ There is order euen in disordered â—hinges Nowe neither diuels nor men commit any thing so repugnant to the order setled by god wherein albeit in respect of their corrupt wil it be most disordered there is not yet the most wise order of diuine iustice power and goodnesse lieng hidde vnder that confusion which themselues haue caused and for the most part also the same doth manifestly appear the euent or god himselfe by his word declaring it Great confusion was there in the Iewes detestable murder when they crucified the sonne of god and yet notwithstanding the hand and counsel of god hath defined determined nothing with more woonderful order and wisedome than the death of the sonne for our sinnes Al humane thinges therefore are vaine not in respect of the will and decree or prouidence of god for if we respect it they are most wel ordered euen such as in mens iudgementes seeme most disordered but in respect of men as concerning both the fault and the punishment For first all our thinges GOD not illightening correcting and directing vs by his spirite are euil and displeasing GOD. Secondly they obtaine not their expected and hoped euentes or those at least-wise not firme and stable neither such wherein sound and solid felicitie and blessednesse doth consist Thirdly That wisedome also which is the knoweledge of Gods will and a true desire to bee obedient thereunto in this life is ioyned with manifolde errors sinnes and calamities Therefore humane matters are not ruled of GOD that is woorking them as they are confuse and sinnes but are ruled of GOD permitting sinnes euen as they are sinnes and directing them to most good endes but woorcking all that is good euen those thinges which lie did in thinges disordered and confuse Moreouer the euils which iust men suffer and the good which the vniust enioie seeme disordered to mens iudgements but according to the iudgement of GOD there is a most iust order in them for those causes which are vttered in the woord of GOD. And those things are to bee remooued from the will and woorking of GOD not which in our iudgement but which in the iudgement of God are disordered
by the souldiers by reason of the vnchangeablenes of the decree prouidence of God contingent by reason of the liberty of his eternal and vnchangeable decree and the execution thereof euen those thinges which as concerning their owne nature haue second causes most vnchangeable as the motion of the sunne shadowes What contingencie is denied If therefore by contingency they meane the changeablenesse of effects which they haue by the nature of second causes or by the power and libertie of God it doth not follow that things are not contingent because of that necessity which they haue by the prouidence of God For this dooth not take away but preserueth rather the nature order maner of woorking in second causes ordeined by God But if by contingency they mean the changeablenes of second causes and effects so floting and wauering that they are not ruled and gouerned by Gods prouidence any such contingency the Scripture dooth not admit or approue Whether the motions of a creature are contingent or necessarie Hereby we also vnderstand when it is demanded concerning the motions effects of creatures whether they are to be termed necessarie or contingent that some verily are more rightly properly called contingent than necessarie though both contingent necessary are wrought by diuine prouideÌ„ce For they are rather to bee called such as they are of their own nature by the nature of their neerest causes than as they are in respect of Gods prouidence which is a cause more remoued farther off And nothing is more either certaine or manifest than that according to the nature of second causes some thinges should bee changeable some vnchangeable yet by the power of God though al things in the creatures may bee changed they are made notwithstanding vnchangeable because of the certaintie of his decree and diuine prouidence So likewise we answere concerning fortune chance What fortune and chaunce is denied For if by these names be vnderstood such causes or euents by accident as haue no cause which is proper and by it selfe a cause they ought to be far abandoned from the church of Christ But if wee vnderstand thereby a cause which is by it selfe a cause proper though vnknowen to our senses and reason or such causes by accident which haue notwithstanding some secret proper cause adioined nothing hindereth in respect of second causes which are causes by accideÌ„t in respect of our iudgemeÌ„t whereby we attain not to the proper that which is by it selfe the cause of these euents that to be or to be a thing fortuning or don by chance which in respect of gods prouideÌ„ce commeth to passe by his most accurate and vnchangeable counsel decree according to those sayings Matth. 10.29 One sparowe shal not fal on the ground without your father And Pro. 16 33. The lot is cast into the lap c. The fifth Sophisme of the mutility or vnprofitablenesse of meanes THat which shal be vnchaungeably and necessarily God is effectual in working by meanes which himselfe hath freely ordained by the wil prouidence of god in vain to the furdering or hindering of that are means applied as the vse of the ministery the magistrate lawes exhortations promises threatnings punishmeÌ„ts praier our study endeuors But al things are done by the decree of god vnchangeably neither can they which woorke by the prouidence of God worke otherwise than they doe Therefore al those means are vaine fruitlesse Ans It is not necessary that the first principal cause being put the second instrumeÌ„tal cause should be remoued and taken away In vain are second causes means applied if god had determined to execute his decrees without meanes neither had commaunded vs to vse them But seeing god hath decreed by those means in some to worke faith conuersion some to bridle keep vnder some to leaue excuselesse hath for that cause commanded vs in his word to vse theÌ„ they are not in vain vsed and applied Yea when there commeth no profit by these meanes yet they profit to this that they leaue the wicked without excuse As therefore the sunne doth not in vaine daily rise and set neither are the fieldes in vaine sowed or watered with the raine neither bodies in vaine with foode refreshed though God createth light and darcknesse bringeth forth the corne out of the earth and is the life length of our daies so neither are men in vaine taught or study to conform their life vnto doctrine though all auaileable actions and euentes proceede not from any but from God For God from euerlasting decreeed as the endes so the meanes also and prescribed them vnto vs whereby it seemed good to him to bring vs vnto them Wherefore we vsing those meanes doe well and obtaine profitable and frutefull euentes but if wee neglect them either by our fault we depriue our selues or others of those blessings offered by God or if God euen in this contempt of his woorde haue mercie of vs or others yet our conscience accuseth vs of open and grieuous sinne Wherefore wee must vse meanes Why wee must vse meanes first that we may obay God therein who both hath decreed endes and ordained meanes to those ends and prescribed them vnto vs neither tempt him by contemning these to our owne peril and danger Secondly that we may obtaine those blessings decreed for vs according to his promise and that to our saluation Thirdly that we may retaine a good conscience in vsing the meanes although the expected euent doe not alwaies followe either in our selues or others The sixth Sophisme of the merit of good euill WHatsoeuer is necessarie doth not merit rewardes or punishmentes But all morall good and euill is doone necessarilie Therefore neither the good meriteth reward nor the euill punishment Aunswere This argument is handled by Aristotle in his Ethicks Lib. 3. Cap. 5. But the aunswere thereto is easie No good worke of the creature meriteth reward First the maior is either particular and so there is no consequence or sequele or beeing generally taken is false and that euen in morall or ciuil consideration to wit in respect of those thinges which are necessarie by supposition and yet are done freely as the actions of men Secondly we grant the reason in respect of the iudgement of god concerning good works For the creature cannot merit any thing no not by his best workes of God Because both they are due and are the effects of God in vs. And therefore the more good things God woorketh in vs so much the more he bindeth and endebteth vs to him Wherefore in the godly Euâ—â— workes merit punishment iustly God crowneth and rewardeth of his free bountifulnesse not their merites but his owne giftes But as touching euill woorkes we deny the reason for they merit punishment and that most iustly For although men forsaken of God cannot but sinne yet the necessity of sinning both
attributed vnto the sonne differ so from the diuine properties which are attributed vnto him as the effectes from their causes so that then his properties woorke them 5 The equalitie of honour and woorshippe Hee hath equal honour giuen him dependeth of the equalitie of Essence properties and woorkes Isai 42.8 I will not giue my glorie to anie other But the Scripture giueth equall honour and woorshippe to the Father and the Sonne therefore they are truelie equall in God-head and in all the perfections thereof The Minor is confirmed first by Testimonies Psalm 97. Heb. 16. Let all the Angels of god woorshippe him Iohn 5.23 That all shoulde honour the sonne as they honour the father Reue. 5.13 c. Secondly Hee is called God absolutelie and simplie as is the Father Psalm 45.7 and Hebrews 1.8 Acts. 20.28 1. Timothy 3.16 Thirdly the Epithets or titles of Diuine honour which are euerie where in the scriptures attributed vnto the sonne As God blessed for euer The great god and Sauiour The Lord himselfe from heauen The Lord of glorie The Lord of Lords and King of Kings Power and eternall kingdome Sitting at the right hand of the Father The Bride-groome husband head of the Church god of the temple which are all the elect Trust and Beliefe in him Inuocation for hee is woorshipped of the Church as GOD and Bride groome of the Church at all times and in all places Thankesgiuing for his Diuine benefites Furthermore albeit the name of GOD especially beeing put absolutely and without restraint dooth euidently prooue the sonnes equalitie with the Father as it hath beene saide yet seeing that signifieth moe thinges and is also applied to others who are not by nature God wee are diligently to collect and haue in a readines those Testimonies in which thinges proper to the true God only are attributed to the sonne which agree to none else who are called Gods and whereby God himselfe discerneth himselfe and will haue him selfe discerned from other creatures and forged Gods For vnto whom the essential properties of any nature or essēce doe truely and reallie agree vnto him the essence it selfe must needes bee giuen The sonne hath all thinges from the Father not by grace but by nature 1. Obiection He that hath all things of another is inferiour to him of whom hee hath them The sonne hath all thinges of the Father Therefore hee is inferiour vnto the Father Aunswere The Maior holdeth and is true of such a one as hath any thing by the grace and fauour of the giuer for hee might not haue it and therefore is by nature inferiour but it is false of him who hath al those thinges by his owne nature which hee himselfe hath of whom hee receiueth them For seeing he can not not haue them it can not be that he should bee inferiour or should haue lesse than hee of whom hee receiueth them But the sonne hath all thinges of the Father which the Father hath and that by nature and absolute necessitie that is in such sort as that the Father can not but communicate vnto him all thinges which him selfe hath belonging to his diuine nature and maiestie Therefore hee is equall vnto the Father in all thinges The sonne doth all thinges with the consent of the Father in like manner as the Father doth 1. Obiection Hee that doth whatsoeuer he doth by the will of another interposed and going before is inferiour vnto him The sonne will and doth all thinges by the will of his Father going before Therefore he is not equal vnto the Father in vertue dignitie and essence Aunswere The sonne doth all thinges his Fathers will going before not in time and nature but in order of persons so that hee will or doth nothing which the Father also will not and doth and whatsoeuer the Father will and doth the same also the sonne will and dooth likewise that is with equall aucthoritie and power Wherefore the societie order of the diuine operations doth not take away but doth most of al settle establish the equalitie of the Father and the sonne as also of the holy Ghost THE FOVRTH CONCLVSION The word is con-substantial with the Father THE woordes con-substantiall and like-substantiall differ For * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like-substantiall signifieth mo persons and like essences as three men are like-substantial For they are both three persons and three essences of like nature that is agree in humane nature But * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 con-substantial signifieth one essence mo persons In the god-head is not like-substantial because there are not three gods but con-substantial because there are three persons of one and the same diuine essence For there is but one Iehoua that is one diuine essence which is the same is wholy in euery of the three persons therefore euery of thē are that one God besides which essence whatsoeuer is it is a creature not God The Latine church turneth the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 con-substantial taking substance for essence It is therefore the same that coessentiall that is of one and the same essence Furthermore these three thinges beeing declared and set downe namely that the Sonne is subsisting or a person that he is distinct frō the Father that he is equall with the Father the fourth is easilie gotten and obtained against the newe Arrians to wit that he is con-substantial with the Father which is also in like manner to be vnderstood concerning the holy Ghost For either this must be granted or of necessity there are made three gods which they though in words they deny it yet in very deede affirme when they frame and faine three essences and spirits The Arguments which shew The Father the Son to be of one the same essence are these 1. Iehoua is but one essence The English translations reteine not the worde it selfe IEHOVA but vse the Lord in steed thereof which is the signification of IEHOVA and therfore in effectuall one or one god Deut. 6.4 But the eternal Father and the Sonne coeternal with the father are that Iehoua Therfore these two are one essence and one God The Minor is proued first by those places of Scripture which cal the sonne Iehoua Ier. 23.6 This is the name whereby they shal cal him Iehoua or the Lord our righteousnes Isai 25.6 The expected God and Sauiour is called Iehoua But Messias is the expected god Sauior Therefore Messias is that Iehoua whereof the Prophet speaketh Za. 2.8 The deliuerer of the Church sent from Iehoua which is the Messias onely is called Iehoua Mal. 3.1 He is called Jehoua whose fore-runner was Iohn Baptist. But Iohn Baptist was the fore-runner of the Messias or the Sonne of God Christ Hee therefore is called Iehoua Hither belong al the places in which are giuen to the Angell or messenger of Iehoua both the name of Iehoua the diuine properties and honours But that Angell was the Sonne of
is communicatings or such as make thinges common the properties and operations of natures are to be distinguished from the office of the person froÌ„ the honor which in respect of the office is due vnto the person Likewise one effect or act theandricall that is both of god and man or woorke or benefite from one operation or action as the whole from a part The office is common to both natures but the natures proper faculties of woorking and actions in exequuting that office are not common to both natures For that the same shoulde bee both proper and common doth implie a manifest contradiction So the worke and benefite of whole Christ is a certaine whole thing and is as it were compound and common to both natures but there are two partes heereof and diuerse operations proper to each nature which are wrought yet iointlie and belong to the same person which is Christ God and man that is both are wrought of one person according to diuerse causes and originals of woorking or according to diuerse natures but not by one and the same nature By these groundes it is easie to dissolue assoile most of the Sophismes and cauils with which at this time both the Schwenkefildians and Vbiquetaries are woont to glose and blanch that their real communicating of essential properties in natures and their Eutychian deifieng of Christs flesh to thrust the same vpon the simple for the true glory maiestie of Christ himselfe For thus they reason The offices benefits of the Mediatour his redemption intercession purging froÌ„ sins quickning sitting at the right hand of the Father his dominion and Lordlie power ouer al creatures his presence with the church beholding ruling al things raising the dead iudging both quicke and dead al these agree to Christ according to both natures Therefore the humanitie as wel as the diuinitie is also it selfe reallie omniscient searcher of harts omnipotent present in the substance of his bodie at the same moment in al places doth of it selfe know al things hear our coÌ„plaintes praiers giue the holie ghost work by him in the hearts of the chosen faith and conuersion to conclude in respect of these things the humanitie it selfe also is for it selfe adorable to be adored as wel as the godhead To these and the like there is one and a readie aunswere namelie That it is ill going from the person and from the office honor of the person to the properties operations of the natures Or The societie and coniunction of the office and honor dooth not cause or inferre the same properties or operations of both natures Or In the affirmation of the office honor are not signified the same properties of both natures nor the working of the same operations but the coniunction or concurrence of distinct operatioÌ„s proceeding froÌ„ distinct properties to the same effect or action theandrical that is of god and man The reason is because of redemption quickning adoration the like which are the functions benefits worship of the whole person there are moe and diuerse manners and parts which all agree reallie to one the same person but not to one the same nature but some to the god-head onlie some onlie to the manhood Wherefore this Maior of the reason is false Whatsoeuer thinges agree vnto Christ god and man according to both natures the same also doe agree after the same manner and as touching all parts to both natures For it doth not followe because the godhead is redemptresse therefore also it suffered and was dead Now that those things which in the person office of the Mediatour are and abide proper vnto one nature neither are made nor are by reason of the vnion common to both natures maâ—â— be shewed at large but now let these few suffice First Such as is the vnion of the natures such is the communicating of the properties But the vnion of the natures was not made in the natures or into one nature but in the person or vnto one person Therefore the communicating of the properties was made in the person not in the natures that is the vnion maketh the properties of both natures common not to one nature but to one person For not one nature but one person hath truly as two natures so also double properties and operations and those infinitely differing created and increate finite and infinite Wherefore as by vnion the man-hoode was not made the God-head or God so neither is it immense infinit and omnipotent But contrariwise man neuerthelesse is trulie and reallie as God eternal so omnipotent also and eueriewhere and giuer of the Holy Ghost The reason is Because not the manhood but the Man Christ hath indeed in his substance the eternall and immense God-head Secondly That which is proper to one can not bee common to moe that is can not exist or be found together in other subiects also of diuers nature For to be proper and to be common are contradictory therfore in fardest repugnancie Thirdlie There can not be made one omnipotencie and one omnipotent operation to be of both natures whereby as well the manhood as the Godhead should be reallie omnipotent and worke diuine thinges but there must needes be also one essence of both whereby the manhood also must bee reallie God For the omnipotency which they wil haue one and the same to be communicated vnto the flesh is the Godhead it selfe Fourthly If Christs humanitie in the office of the Mediator doth it selfe reallie effectuallie perfourme not onely that which belongeth vnto the flesh but also those thinges which are proper vnto the Godhead then either his Godhead shall bee idle and doe nothing in the woorke of our redemption or surelie the fleshe assumpted shall doe more and more shall be due and yeelded vnto it than to the Word which assumed and tooke it Fiftly Jf the flesh because it is saide to bee quickning is also omnipotent and doth by proper vertue regenerate mens hartes after the same sort also may it bee saide that the God-head also because it is redemptresse is subiect to suffering and did suffer For both quickning and redeeming are properties of the office common to both natures but not after one and the same manner Sixtly The whole maiesty of the God-head is that it is an essence existing not of another but of it selfe and subsisting by it selfe spirituall or incorporeal eternall immense vnchaungeable of infinite power wisedom goodnes c. That is the whole Maiesty compriseth all the perfections and operations proper vnto the Godhead But omnipotencie is the whole maiestie of the God-head according to the supposition of the Vbiquetaries For so Schmideline writeth in the 142. conclusion of his disputation of the Lords Supper of the communicating of the properties had at Tubinge in the yeare M.D.LXXXII In the word omnipotencie I comprise the whole maiestie of the godhead And in his 143. conclusion Omnipotencie is
and shall bee adiudged to eternall paines Not as if the wicked were not alreadie condemned For as we said the Diuels were alreadie iudged so also are the wicked alreadie iudged and condemned namely 1. Jn the decree of God 2 Jâ— his word 3. In their owne consciences 4. As concerning the beginning of their iudgement But then the wicked together 〈◊〉 the Diuels shall bee iudged by proclaiming and publiâ—hiâ—g of that iudgement For then shal be 1 a manifestation of Goâ—s iudgement that they perish iustlie who perish 2. The wicked shall further suffer also punishment and tormentes of bodie which now is buried 3. The wicked and the Diuels shal be so sharply lookt vnto and kept vnder that they shall not bee able any more to hurt the godly or to despite God and his church A great gulfe placed betweene vs and them shall shut vp all passage from them so that they shall cease to harme vs. 8 For what causes that iudgement shal be THE chiefe and principall cause is the decree of God For therefore shal the last iudgement be because god hath said decreed that it shal be Wherefore it must needs be so that so God maie haue his end that is that he may shew and declare perfectlie and wholy his goodnesse and loue towardes vs that hee maie bee worshipped in his Temple which is in his chosen that the Sonne of God maie haue his kingdome and his citizens glorious and such as beseeme him 2. A lesse principal and subordinate cause is both the saluation of the Elect who are here vexed and the damnation of the wicked who here doe florish For therefore also shal the last iudgement bee that it maie goe well with the good and ill with the bad And of this shall the Godly take matter to magnifie and praise God 3. The last iudgement shal be because of Gods iustice Heere is not a full and perfect execution of Gods iustice For the wicked must bee in perfect and full ill state both in bodie and soule 9 When this iudgement shal be THIS iudgement shal be in the end of the world in the end of daies For there are three parts of the during and continuance of the world 1 Before the Law 2 Vnder the Law 3 Vnder Christ That part of the during of the world which is vnder christ is called the ende of the worlde the end of daies the last time Wherefore there shal not be so long space between christs first comming and his second as was from the beginning of the world vnto his first comming But the yeare the day the moneth of this iudgement is not knowen of Christ himselfe 1 As touching his humane nature 2 As touching his office and Mediatorship Mar. 13.32 Of that day and houre knoweth no maÌ„ no not the Angels which are in heauen neither the Son himselfe saue the Father 10 Wherefore God would haue vs certaine of the last iudgement THE time of the iudgement to come is vnknowen to vs but as it is most certaine that that iudgement shal come so God also would haue vs knowe the same First in respect of his glorie That wee might bee able to refute Epicures who account this heauenly doctrine of the diuine iudgement to come for a fable Jt should goe well saie they with the righteous But it dooth not so Therefore God either can not performe it or standeth not to his promises or there is no prouidence Vnto which their cauill we aunswere That because in this life it goeth not well with the Godly it shall go well with them at length after this life Secondly God will haue vs knowe it for our comfort That we may comfort our selues amidst our euils miseries with this that at length shall come a time when we shal be deliuered from this corruption and rottennesse Thirdly that we maie retaine keepe our selues in the feare of God and our dutie and that others also may be reclaimed from euill This iudgement shal be let vs endeuour therefore that wee may be able to stand in this iudgement The scripture vseth this argument both waies both to comfort vs and to hold and keepe vs in our duty Christ shall at length iudge the wicked and our enimies suffer we therefore patiently persecutions Rom. 14.10 Wee shal al appear before the iudgement seat of Christ therefore liue wee Godly Fourthly That the wicked may be left excuselesse For they are warned sufficiently that they shoulde bee ready at euerie season least they should say they were oppressed vnawares 11 For what cause God would not haue vs certaine of the time of iudgement ALbeit it be most certaine that the last iudgement shal at length be yet the day of that iudgement is altogether vncertaine Mar. 13.32 Of that day and houre no man knoweth no not the Angels which are in heauen nor the Sonne himselfe saue the Father Wherefore the yeare moneth day houre of the last iudgement Christ himselfe also knoweth not not onely as concerning his humane nature but also in respect of his present office The present office of Christ to wit in that he is our Mediatour doth not require that he should declare that vnto vs. Now the causes why God would haue it hid from vs are these 1 That he might exercise our faith and patience and so we should shew that we would beleeue God albeit wee knowe not the time of our deliuerie 2 That he might bridle our curiositie 3 That he might keepe vs in his feare in godlinesse and in executing of our dutie and so we should bee readie euery moment Mat. 24.43 Jf the good-man of the house knew Luk. 12.40 Occupie til I come 12 For what cause God differreth that iudgement HEE differreth it 1 To exercise faith patience hope and praier in the Godlie 2 That all the elect may bee gathered vnto the Church For in respect of them and not in respect of the wicked doth the world continue For the creatures were made for the children of the house The wicked vse them as theeues and robbers Nowe God will haue the elect gathered by ordinary meanes he will haue them in this life to heare the word and by it to be renewed conuerted vnto which is required some tract of time 3 He differeth it that hee might grant vnto all a time and space of repentaunce as at this time and that his differring might leaue the wicked obstinate without excuse Rom. 2.4 Despisest thou the riches of his bountifulnesse and patience and long sufferance not knowing that the bountifulnesse of God leadeth thee to repentance 13 Whether the last iudgement bee to be wished for WE are doubtlesse to wish for the day of iudgement because it is an vndoubted signe and token of that difference whereby the Elect are discerned from the reprobate which declaration the Godly doe earnestly desire Moreouer it shall bee a deliuerie out of those miseries in which we are Rom. 7.24 O wretched man that I am who
sufficient for all yet not applied to all doth not saue all Answere It must not onely be a sufficient ransome for al but must be also applyed vnto al receiuing it by faith but it is not applied vnto al because it is saide John 17.9 I pray not for the world but for them which thou hast giuen mee Replie A sufficient ransome ought to bee applied vnto all Christs ransome is sufficient Therefore it ought to bee applied vnto all That a sufficient ransome ought to bee applied vnto all is proued because this is a propertie of infinite mercy to doe good vnto all Aunswere We denie that infinite mercie consisteth herein It consisteth not in the number of those that are saued but in the manner howe they are saued Moreouer he will not giue this benefite vnto all because hee is withall most wise and iust Hee may together exercise both his mercie and his iustie Iohn 3.16 God so loued the world that he hath giuen his only begotten Sonne that whosoeuer beleeueth in him should not perish but haue eternal life He that beleeueth not is condemned already 4 Obiection He that taketh a sufficient ransome for all yet doth not saue all is vniust because he taketh more than in equitie he should God taketh a sufficient ransome for all and yet doth not saue all Therefore he is vniust Answere He is vniust except himselfe giue the ransome But God gaue it Therefore he taketh of his own not of ours Secondly The sufficiencie of the ransome doth not bind god to the receiuing of al but the applying of it But he hath not entered into any bond that he will apply that ransome to all 5 Obiect He that afflicteth some for his own glories sake God not vniust though hee afflict some for his glories sake is an vniust God Answ This proposition is false being generally taken For though it be true in creatures yet is it false in god Because god is the chiefe good and greatest regard ought to be had of the chiefe good Nowe the chiefe good that is gods glorie did require that not only his mercy but his iustice also should be manifested Secondly We aunswere that he is vniust who afflicteth some and that without any trespasse or fault of their owne For God for his glories sake doth suffer some to perish while themselues willingly perish and fall away Thirdly God is bound to none to saue them as neither he was to create them He suffereth men to fall into sin but 1 Themselues willinglie falling 2 Himselfe not being bound to saue them 3 Being bound to haue more regard of his owne glorie than of mens saluation 6 Obiection He that destineth to the ende destineth also to the meanes whereby we come to the end God destineth some to the end that is damnation Therefore hee destineth them to the meanes also which are sinnes For that sinnes are the meanes to come to damnation is prooued because that is a meane without which we cannot come to the end as none can come to damnation without sinne Answere Means are of two sorts Some which goe howsoeuer before the end that is which he vseth who tendeth to the end and by the help whereof he obtaineth and accomplisheth the ende which hee intendeth Other meanes there are which come indeede vnto the ende but are not doone by him which intended the end Those hee maie suffer or admit but it followeth not that he wil them Wherefore I answere vnto the Maior He that wil the end will also the means which himselfe worketh and by which hee worketh to obtaine that end which he entendeth but not all meanes otherwise there shall bee more in the conclusion than in the premisses Neither will hee also those thinges which he permitteth that is hee hindereth them not from being done if they hinder not his end God in calling all yet sauing but some doth not dissemble 7 Obiection Hee that calleth all and yet will saue but some only dissembleth God doth so Therefore he dissembleth Answere Of meere particulars nought followeth Or there is a fallacy in putting that which is no cause for a cause Wherefore to the Maior we answere He doth not doe it to illude men but either to leaue all without excuse or to inuite them to repentance And furder if you vnderstand the Maior generallie it is to be denied because there may be another cause if it be so taken it is thus to be distinguished Hee that calleth all and yet will saue but some onely to illude men or to deceiue them hee dissembleth if hee call them indefinitely or with a mind not willing to woorke in them to obey But God neuer promised that hee woulde woorke this in all Wherefore there is no contradiction in these propositions All ought to doe it and I wil woorke in some to doe it because the same thing is not denied in the one which is affirmed in the other but a diuerse thing The secret counsell of God as touching our saluation is reueiled vnto vs. 8 Obiection They whose saluation dependeth on the secret counsel of god cannot haue comfort Our saluatioÌ„ dependeth on the secret counsel of God Therefore we cannot haue comfort Answer Wee can not haue comfort before it is reueiled vnto vs. But that secret counsell of God is opened vnto vs by the sonne and the Holy Ghost Likewise by the effects Rom. 5.1 1. Being iustified by faith wee haue peace towards God 2. Cor. 1. 22. and 5.5 Hee hath sealed vs and hath giuen the earnest of the spirit in our hartes Hee that hath created vs for this things is God â—ho also hath giuen vnto vs the earnest of the spirit Rom. 8.16 The same spirit beareth witnesse with our spirit that wee are the children of God 1. Iohn 3.24 Hereby wee know that hee dwelleth in vs and wee in him euen by the spirit which he hath giuen vs. 9 Obiection That which is done in vaine no man should endeuour But the reprobate doe in vaine repent because it is â—posible that they should bee saued Aunswere This is true if any knew that they were reprobate But God will haue no man so to determine of him-selfe 2. It is a contradiction to bee a reprobate and to shew repentaunce for if they did repent then were they not now reprobates Therefore there commeth no danger by this absurdity 10 Obiection That dâ—nger which is not The Elect 〈…〉 wary circumspect neede not to bee taken heede of But vnto the Eleâ—t there is no dâ—nger of câ—ndâ—â—nation Therefore they neede not take heede thereof Aunswere The Maior is true if there should be no danger whether heede bee taken or not taken But there is no danger vnto the elect that is being heedefull and bewaring of any danger that may come But all the elect are heedeful circumspect and warie and those who are not heedful are not elected For from whom God auerteth and turneth away this danger he
death is The euerlasting death of the wicked and is so called not because the reprobate by once dyeng shall fulfill it but because they shall die perpetuallie and shall feele perpetuall tormentes 2 Who giueth euerlasting life Euerlasting life the worke of all three Persons GOD alone giueth eternall life the Father giueth it by the son the holy ghost Of the Father it is said Ioh. 5.21 As the Father raiseth vp the dead and quickneth them so the son quickneth whom he will In which place the same is affirmed of the son also as in like maner in these folowing Ioh. 14. In him was life Isai 9.6 The Father of eternitie Iohn 10.28 I giue vnto them eternall life that is not by merit onely but also by power and working Of the Holy Ghost likewise it is saide Iohn 3.5 Except a man bee borne of water and the spirit hee can not enter into the kingdome of God Rom. 8.11 Hee that raised vp Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortall bodies by his spirit dwelling in you And this testimonie is to bee obserued for the confirmation of the Godhead of both Obiection But the ministers also giue life according to that of Paul 1. Cor. 4.15 In Christ Iesus J haue begotten you through the Gospel Aunswere Christ and the holy Ghost giue life by their owne power the ministers are onely instruments by whom Christ worketh through thâ— vertue of his spirite Replie But Christ giueth life by a communicated power Therefore not by his proper power Answere He giueth it by a power communicated but communicated from euerlasting as he was begotten from euerlasting Ioh. 5.26 As the Father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath he giuen to the Sonne to haue life in himselfe 3 To whom euerlasting life is giuen EVerlasting life is giuen to all the Elect All the Elect they alone are partakers of euerlasting life and to them onely Joh. 10.28 I giue vnto them eternal life that is to my sheepe who are his elect and chosen Iohn 17.9 I pray for them I pray not for the world but for them which thou hast giuen me for they are thine and verse 12. Those that thou gauest me haue I kept and none of them is lost but the childe of perdition Againe faith and repentaunce are proper vnto the Elect only but these are part of eternal life Therefore eternal life belongeth to the Elect onely Rom. 11.7 The Elect haue obtained it and the rest haue beene hardened Wee must obserue in this place whereas the question is To whom euerlasting life is giuen that it is better to answere That eternal life is giuen to the Elect than to say it is giuen vnto the conuerted * As they are elected so theâ— are but chosen to eternall life as they are conuerted so they are in part admitted vnto it and begin to bâ— put in possession of it For conuersion and faith are the beginning of eternal life And to say Eternal life is giuen to the conuerted were all one as if you woulde say life is giuen to the liuing 4 For what cause euerlasting life is giuen THE impellent or motiue cause of euerlasting life giuen vnto vs is the alone free mercy of God For a good thing doth communicate it selfe and make others partakers of it and his loue towardes mankinde God of his â—ree mercy giueth vs for Christs sake euerlasting life that wee might praise and magnifie the same his mercy for euer And he will that euerlasting life bee giuen vs and himselfe giueth the same vnto vs for the alone intercession and merit of Christ imputed vnto vs by the comming and interposing whereof gods mercy is more illustrated and manifested than without it But no work of man either foreseene in vs or present is the cause of this eternall life whereunto notwithstanding wee are brought by many meanes Before the beginning of eternal life our woorkes merit eternall death after the beginning thereof all our woorkes are effectes thereof and nothing is cause of it selfe The final cause or end for which eternal life is giuen vs is that the mercy of God might be acknowledged and magnified of vs. Eph. 1.6 To the praise of the glorie of his grace wherewith hee hath made vs accepted in his beloued For the same cause God giueth vs eternall life for which hee chose vs. 5 When euerlasting life is giuen Euerlasting life is beguâ— here by conuersion IN this life is giuen the beginning of eternal life and that necessarily For vnto whom life euerlasting is not begunne to be giuen here that is who beginneth not here to feele a part of eternal life to wit faith and conuersion vnto him life euerlasting shal neuer be giuen after this life 2. Corinth 5.2 Therefore we sigh desiring to be clothed with our house which is from heauen Because that if we be clothed we shal not bee found naked It is consuÌ„mated in the worlde to come by glorification The consummation of euerlasting life is after this life for vnto whom euerlasting life is begunne to bee giuen here to them shal it be giuen finished compleate and consummated And of this consuÌ„mation ther are two degrees one when the soule is presently carried into heauen because by the death of the bodie we are freed from all infirmitie the other degree is greater higher and more glorious when in the resurrection of the bodies the soules shall againe be vnited to their bodies because after the resurrection we shal be made glorious and shall see God euen as hee is Iohn 5.24 He that heareth my word and beleeueth in him that sent mee hath euerlasting life and shall not come into condemnation but hath passed from death to life 1. Iohn 3.2 Nowe are wee the Sonnes of GOD but yet it dooth not appeare what wee shall bee and wee knowe that when hee shal appeare we shal bee like him for we shal see him as he is 6 How euerlasting life is giuen vnto vs. EVerlasting life is giuen vnto vs by the holy Ghost God giueth vâ— euerlasting â—iâ—â— by the outwâ— ministerie 〈◊〉 thâ—â—warde miâ— of the spirit and the holy Ghost giueth it vs in this life by the ministerie of the word by the worde he worketh in vs the knowledge of God and his wil This knowledge hath following it a study and desire more and more to know God and to liue according to the prescript of his will It is giuen heere vnto infants so that they haue an inclination to repentaunce and faith But the consummation and accomplishment of euerlasting life shal be giuen vs after this life immediately Now that it is heere giuen vs mediately by the woorde is prooued by plaine testimonies of Scripture John 6.68 Whither shall wee goe say the Disciples Thou hast the words of life 1. Corint 4.15 Jn Christ Jesus J haue begotten you through the gospel Rom. 116. The gospell is the power of
are good which wee doe but the manner after which wee doe them is not good OF SACRAMENTS THE Sacraments are a part of Ecclesiastical ministerie And as touching Ecclesiastical ministerie the questions are 1. What is the vse of the ministerie 2. What are the partes thereof 3. In what those partes agree and accord 1. The chiefe and last vse of the ministerie of the Church is that we beeing brought to Christ may be confirmed and assured of Gods will that is that it teach vs the will of God exhort vs to embrace Gods blessinges and benefites and ascertaine vs of the continuance of the same 2. The parts of the ministerie are the Sacraments and the word 3. The Sacraments so accord and agree with the word that whatsoâ—uer is promised vs in the word of the obteining of our saluation by Christ the same the sacraments as signes and seales annexed to the word as it were vnto a Charter or letters patent confirme vnto vs more and more thereby to help and relieue our infirmitie Whereby also it is apparent that the chiefe vse of the sacramentes to is in respect of God the confirmation of our faith like as also the ministers themselues whatsoeuer they doe in respect of their ministerie that they especiallie doe to declare and confirme gods will vnto vs. Obiection Jt is saide That the spirit and the Word worke faith in vs and the sacraments nourish it being wrought These three therefore differ nothing one from an other Aunswere First The Holy Ghost worketh and confirmeth faith in vs as the efficient cause thereof the Word sacraments as Instrumental causes 2. The Holy Ghost also can work faith in vs without them But the Word Sacraments without the holie Ghost can woorke nothing 3. The holy ghost wheresoeuer he dwelleth is effectuall in woorking The word Sacraments are not so These things brieflie were first to be spoken in general concerning the ministerie It remaineth that we now in fewe woordes entreat Of the Sacraments which are the other part of the ministerie of the Church The right and direct methode of interpreting this doctrine of the Sacraments requireth that first wee speake of the Sacramentes in generall And this way may wee not vnfitly entreat in speciall of the Supper and Baptisme to wit if wee take in declaring each Sacrament in special the same questions and that course and order of the same questions which wee must obserue and follow concerning the Sacramentes in generall and lastly if wee applie those testimonies which speake of the Sacraments in generall to the handling and declaring of the Sacraments in special The chiefe Questions concerning the Sacraments 1 What Sacraments are 2 What are the ends of Sacraments 3 Jn what Sacraments differ from Sacrifices 4 Jn what they agree with the Word in what they differ from it 5 How the SacrameÌ„ts of the old new TestameÌ„t agree 6 What Sacramental vnion is 7 What the things differ from their signes 8 What forms of speaking of the Sacraments are vsual to the Church and Scripture 9 What is the lawful vse of the Sacraments 10 What the wicked receiue in the vse thereof 11 Howe manie Sacramentes there are of the newe Testament 1 WHAT SACRAMENTS ARE. The originall of the word Sacrament THAT we may know what Sacramentes properly are the name it selfe of Sacrament is first to be considered Among the auncient Romanes this word Sacrament signified a solemne forme of an oath taken in warre which they called a militarie Sacrament so called of Sacrando that is of sacring or consecrating them because by that oath euerie one was consecrated or destined to this captaine and not to any other to serue him Heereof it is that some will haue these ceremonies instituted by God therefore to be so called for that as souldiours did oblige and binde themselues by that military Sacrament vnto their captaine so wee bind our selues vnto our captaine Christ by a solemne oath in the presence of god Angels and men This truely is not vnapt or vnmeete metaphor but yet I thinke rather that the original of this name came from the olde Latine Translations in which wheresoeuer the worde mysterie is vsed in the new Testament for the same they commonly in Latine put the woorde Sacramentum Now mysterie commeth from a Greeke verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to institute instruct or initiate one in holy matters or matters of religion But that Greeke verb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is deriued from another which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to shut because as Eustathius saith they who were initiated or entred in holy rites were to shut their mouth not to vtter those thinges which were secret Nowe a mystery is said to be either a secret thing it selfe or the signe of a secret thing or that which hath a secret signification which none vnderstand but they who are initiated in holy rites By a signe wee vnderstand an externall and corporall thing and action or a ceremony instituted and ordained by God which betokeneth a certaine internall thing and spirituall Which the Grecians call a mysterie and is otherwise called of Diuines a Sacrament And some such signes god alwaies would haue to bee extant in his Church whereby the good will of God towardes men might be recorded and made knowen that men of the other side might declare and shewe their faith towardes God and other duties of piety and godlinesse Sacramentes therefore are so called mysteries because they haue a secret signification which none vnderstand but they who are initiated and instructed concerning the substaunce of sacred matters or the pointes of Christian Religion HAuing seene now what the name of Sacrament signifieth it resteth that wee consider the thing it selfe and define what Sacramentes are The definition whereof is this Sacramentes are sacred signes and seals obiect to our eies The Definition of sacramentes ordained and instituted by God that by them he might the more declare and seal the promise of his gospel vnto vs. The partes of this definition are in number three The first part apperteineth to the kinde of Sacramentes the latter two to their difference To the kind whereof they are it apperteineth that they are sacred signes seals that is diuine The sacraments are sacred seals signifieng or betokening sacred things such as belong to gods worship and the saluation of men A signe and a seale differ one froÌ„ the other as a general thing froÌ„ a thing more special For euerie seale is a signe but not euery signe a seal A seale certifieth and confirmeth a thing A signe onely sheweth it A sign is a thing signifieng somewhat else than that which it sheweth to the senses or a signe is that whereby the vnderstanding vnderstandeth some thinges else besides the signe it selfe So wordes are the signes of thinges Moreouer signes are of two sortes some are onely signifieng others are confirming also that is such signes
is confirmed not onely by Christ in the Euangelistes but also by Paul who expresly saith The cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the communion of the bloud of Christ The Signes and thinges signified in the Lordes Supper Moreouer the signes in this sacrament are bread and wine bread broke and eat wine distributed and taken The things signified are 1. The breaking of the body and the shedding of the bloud of Christ 2. Our vnion and coniunction with christ by faith so that wee drawe life euerlasting from him and are made partakers as of Christ himselfe so also of all his benefites as the branches are made partakers of the life of the vine Wee are aduertised of this our communion with christ First by the proportion which the signes haue with the thinges and Secondly by the promise which is adioyned And the proportion dooth chiefâ—â— propose and shewe two things vnto vs 1. The sacrifice of Christ. 2. Our communion with christ because the bread is not only broken but is also giuen vs to eate Now the breaking of the bread is a part of the ceremony whereunto a part of the thing signified dooth aunswere This difference doth Paul testifie when he saith This my body which is broken for you Heere recâ—iuing and eating is a part of the ceremony whereunto dooâ—h aunswere the thing signified â—o wit the eating of christes body Now this diuine and spirituall thing namely the breaking and communicating of christes body is signed and confirmed by this ceremony which is the breaking and receiuing of bread for two causes 1. Because Christ commandeth these rites vnto which we ought to giue no lesse credite than if Christ himselfe did speake with vs. 2. Because hee annexeth a promise that they who obserue these rites with a true faith must be assured and certaine that they haue communion with Christ Wine is added that wee should know the perfection and accomplishment of our saluation to be in his sacrifice that there was nothing which could be further desired The wine is seuered from the breade to signifie the violence of his death because his bloud was sundered from his body 2 What are the ends of the Lords supper THE ends for which the Lords supper was instituted are 1. That it might bee a câ—nfirmation of our faith that is a most certaine testification of our communion and vnion with christ because Christ testifieth vnto vs by these signs that hee doth as verily feede vs with his bodie and bloud vnto euerlasting life 〈◊〉 wee receiue at the hand of the minister these the Lords signes And this testification is directed to euerie one who receiueth the signes with a true faith and furder also wee so receiue the signes at the ministers hand as that rather the Lord himselfe giueth them vs by his m nisters Wherefore christ is saide to haue baptised moe disciples than Iohn when yet hee did it by his Apostles and other disciples 2. That it might bee a publique distinction or marke discerning the church from all other nations and secteâ— For the Lord instituted and appointed his supper for his disciples and not for others 3. That it might be our testification to christ and the whole church Which is a publique confession of our faith and a solemne binding of our selues to thankefulnes and the celebration of this benefite Both which are prooued by these wordes of christ Doe this in remembrance of me This remembrance is taken first for faith in the heart then for thankesgiuing and our publique confession 4. That it might be a bond of the churches assemblies and meetings because the Supper was instituted that it should be done and celebrated in a congregation and that either great or small Therefore the Supper as was said before is called a * Synaxis conuent and Christ expresly commaundeth Drinke yee all of this Likewise Paul When yee come together to eate staie one for another 5. That it might bee a bond of mutual loue and dilection because the Supper testifieth that all are made the members of christ vnder one heade as also Paul saith For we that are manie are one bread and one bodie because we are all partakers of one bread The Lordes supper may not bee celebrated by one alone Of this which hath beene spoken wee gather that the Lordes Supper ought not to bee celebrated by one onely 1. Because it is a communion and the signe of our communion 2. Because it is a thankesgiuing and all ought to giue thankes vnto God and by consequent hee that thinketh himselfe vnworthy to communicate with others in the Lordes Supper doth withall confesse himselfe not to bee fitte to giue thankes vnto God 3. Because christ together with his benefits is not proper to anie but common to all 4. Christ called all his housholde vnto it euen Iudas himselfe 5 That some abstaine from comming to the supper it commeth of a certaine euil and corrupt motion because they thinke them selues not woorthie inough to approche vnto this table All are worthy who beleeue themselues to bee deliuered by Christ from eternall damnation and desire to profite and goe forward in godlinesse In summe if the Supper bee receiued by one onely th t is done against the vse appellation institution and nature of the sacrament Obiection Christ in the word of the Institution of his supper putteth as the principal end of his supper his remembrance therefore the confirmation of faith must not be made the principal end of his supper Aunswere The reason foloweth not to the denial of a part by putting the whole For the remembrance of Christ is the whole wherein is comprised both our confession and our solemne bond to thankefulnesse and also the confirmation of our faith Wherefore rather by inuerting the reason I thus inferre and conclude because the remembrance is the supper therefore it is the confirmation of our faith and because also Christ proposeth vnto vs that ceremonie or rite which must bee vnto vs a remembrance of him he doth verily propose also a confirmation of our faith which is nothing else but a remembraunce of Christ and his benefites Obiection The holie ghost confirmeth our faith Therefore the supper doth not Aunswere The reason foloweth not to the remouing of an instrumental cause by the putting of a principal cause 3 What the supper differeth from Baptisme THE supper differeth from baptisme 1. Jn ceremonies or rites 2. In the circumstances of the institution and vse or in the significations of the ceremonies Baptisme is a signe of the couenant entered and made betweene God the faithfull The supper is a signe of the continuing of that couenant Or baptisme is a signe of regeneration and of our entrance into the church The supper is a signe of their fostering abiding and preseruation who are once entered into the church The new man must first be borne by the spirite of Christ as is a natural man by natural conception and
1. A griefe both for sin past and present which is called Sorrowe and also for sinne to come which is called Feare 2. An hatred of sinne committed both of present sinne and of sinne to come 3. An auerting from sinne committed both present and future sinne 4. A flying of sinne to come The griefe is in the heart The flieng is in the will in that we wil not here after commit sinne The auerting is in the hart and wil and it is an auerting vnto somewhat to wit an auerting from euil vnto good This former part of conuersion is called mortification 1. Because as dead men can not shew foorth the actions of one that is liuing so our nature the corruption thereof beeing abolished doth no more shew forth or exercise her actions that is doth no longer bring forth actuall sinne originall sinne beeing repressed For the dead bite not 2. Because mortification is not wrought without griefe and lamenting The flesh rebelleth against the spirite and for this cause mortification is also called a crucifieng Quiâ—â—ening Quickâ—â—â—â—g comprehendeth those thinges which are contrarie vnto mortification 1. The knowledge of Gods mercie and the applieng thereof in christ 2. A ioifulnesse thence arising which is for that God is pleased and for that newe obedience is begun and shal bee perfected 3. An ardent or earnest endeâ—â—ur and purpoâ—â— to sinne no more arising from thankefulnes and because we reioâ—â—e that we haue God appeased and pacified towardes vs a desire also of righteousnesse and of reteining gods loue and fauour That ardent desire both of not sinning and also of righteousnesse and of reteining Gods loue and fauour is newe obediencâ— it selfe This latter part of conuersion is called quickening for a cleane contrarie respect vnto that for which the former part was called mortification 1. Because as a liuing man doth the actions of one that liueth so quickening is a kindling of newâ— faculties and qualities of working in vs. For the loue of God is kindled in vs and the holy Ghost is giuen vs by whom we doe good woorkes By nature the vnregenerate are dead astouching good works The regenerate begin to doe good woorkes 2. In respect of that ioie which the conuerted haue in God which is a most pleasaunt thing This ioie in God which is the other part of quickening ariseth from hence to wit in that we know God now to be pacified towardes vs and that we are able to performe the Law and bee conformed and correspondent vnto the Law and God 4 What are the causes of conuersion THE principal efficient cause of conuersion is the holie Ghost Conuert vs and we shal be conuerted The instrumentall causes or meanes are first the Lawe then the Gospell and after the doctrine of the Gospel hath beene preached Lamen 5 2â— againe the doctrine of the Law For the preaching of the Law goeth before preparing vs to the preaching of the Gospel because without the Lawe there is no knowledge of sinne and therefore no griefe or sorrowe for sinne Afterwardes followeth the preaching of the Gospell because without the Gospel there is no faith after the preaching of the Gospel againe followeth in the church the preaching of the Law that it maie be the squire of our actions So doe the Prophets first accuse threaten and exhort and then promise and lastlie exhort againe Such was also Iohn Baptistes preaching And such is the preaching doctrine of repentance which comprehendeth the Law the gospel The next instrumentall cause is faith because without faith there is no loue of God and except wee knowe what the wil of God is as namely that hee wil remit vnto vs our sinnes by and for Christ conuersion will neuer be begunne in vs neither in respect of the first part thereof which is Mortification neither in respect of the second part which is Quickening For by faith are the harts of men purified without faith there is no true ioying iâ— God neither can wee without faith loue god And whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne All good works flow from faith as from their fountain We being iustified by faith haue peace with god The furthering causes of conuersion are The crosse chastisementes as also punishmentes benefites and examples of others The subiect or matter of conuersion which belongeth to the mind will and hart is 1. Jn the minde and vnderstanding a right iudgement concerning god his wil and workes 2. In the wil an earnest and ready desire and purpose to obey god according to al his commaundementes 3. In the hart a good reformed affection The obiect of conuersion is 1. Sin or disobedieÌ„ce which is the thing from which we are conuerted 2. Righteousnes or new obedience which is the thing whereunto we are conuerted The formal cause of conuersion is the conuersion it selfe and the properties thereof The chiefe finall cause of conuersion is gods glorie The next and subordinate ende is our good euen our blessednes and fruition of euerlasting life There is another end also of conuersion which is lesse principall to wit the conuersion of others When thou art conuerted confirme thy brethren Let your light so shine before men that they may glorifie your heauenly father which is in heauen 5 What are the effectes of conuersion THE effectes of conuersion are all good woorkes and an earnest desire both to obey God according to all his commandements without exception also to conuert and recall others into the way The conuerted or beleeuers sinne indeede oftentimes but they defend not their sinnes but endeuour more and more to shun and auoide them OF GOOD-WORKES THE chiefe Questions 1 What good-workes are 2 How they may be doone 3 Whether the works of Saints be perfectly good 4 How our woorkes though not perfectlie good please God 5 Why we are to doe good-workes 6 Whether good-woorkes merit any thing in the sight of God 1 WHAT GOOD-WORKES ARE. GOOD workes are such as are done according to the prescript rule of Gods Lawe with a true faith to the glorie of God onlie Three things are heere to be considered 1 The conditions cirumstances required for the making a woorke good 2 The difference betweene the woorkes of the regenerate and the vnregenerate 3 Jn what sort the morall woorkes of the wicked are sinnes 1 That a work which we do may be good these conditions are required necessarily vnto it 1 That it be commaÌ„ded of God Matt. 15 9. Jn vaine they woorshippe mee teaching for doctrines mens precepts No creature hath the right or wisedome and vnderstanding to institute and ordaine the worship of God But good woorkes wee speake of morall good and the worship of God are all one Nowe Morall good is farre differing from naturall good in as much as al actions as they are actions euen those of the wicked are good that is naturallie but all actions are not good morally that is agreeing with the iustice of God And thus is
therefore neither doe we so cheerfullie and perfectlie as we ought perfourme these workes vnto God and our neighbour J see another Law in my members rebelling against the Lawe of my minde And this is the cause why the works of the godly cannot stand in iudgement 4 How our workes though not perfectlie good please God ALbeit our works be not done according vnto the Law but are contrariwise manie waies defiled they please God notwithstanding through faith and for the merit and intercession of Christ our Mediatour remaining now also intercessour for vs with his Father Whence Christ is called our High-Priest by whom our woorks are offered hee is called also the Altar wheron our works being put are pleasing to God whereas otherwise they would stincke in the sight of God The works of the person which pleaseth god so please God as the person himselfe doth Nowe the person pleaseth God by the imputation of the righteousnesse and sanctification or satisfaction of Christ beeing clad namelie with the righteousnes puritie and sanctification of Christ that is the person pleaseth God for the Mediatours sake and therefore the woorks also of the person are for the Mediatours sake pleasing and acceptable vnto god God doth not examine our vnperfect iustice our works as they are in themselues according to the rigour of the Law according to which he should rather condemn them but he regardeth and considereth them in his son Whereof it foloweth that we do as it were supplie and repaire our want defect with the perfection of Christs satisfaction 5 Why we are to doe good works OVT of the doctrine of free satisfaction humane reason reasoneth on this wise He is not bound himselfe to satisfie for whom another hath alreadie satisfied Christ hath satisfied for vs. Therefore there is no neede for vs to doe good woorks Aunswere There is more in the conclusion of this reason than in the premisses For this onely should follow be concluded Therefore we our selues are not bound to satisfie and this wee grant 1 In respect of Gods iustice which doth not exact a double paiment 2 In respect of our own saluation which otherwise should be none at all Reply Satisfaction is perfect obedience we are not bound to satisfaction Therefore neither are we bound to perfect obedience no not in the life to come For whō another hath satisfied for he himselfe is not enforced to satisfie But the obedience of Christ is not a ful satisfaction for our sinnes Therefore the fomer consequence is true Aunswere There is yet more concluded than the premisses would afford For this should followe that obedience is neuer at any time to bee performed of vs as thereby to satisfie for our sins already cōmitted or which shall be committed vntill the end of our life But it followeth not hereof that wee must not bee perfect in the life to come For then also wee shall bee bound to perfect obedience we shall be like vnto the Angels and our worke shall be perfectly good although that perfect obedience then due neither shall nor can be a satisfaction or ransome for our sinnes to wit for that obedience which we omitted in this life and yet was due to be performed of vs. For he that oweth twenty florens doth not pay his debt if he repay ten florens Wherefore the Maior proposition hath a double meaning and is true if it be taken in this sense whom an other hath satisfied for hee himselfe is not bound to satisfie to wit for those thinges for which satisfaction was made before So we are not bound to satisfie for our sinnes which we now commit For Christ hath fully perfectly satisfied his Father for all our sinnes and hath performed perfect obedience vnto the Lawe in our behalfe which otherwise wee shoulde haue performed in this life vnto the lawe and which we in this life omit and are no way able to perfourme Now for this end hath Christ satisfied for vs and redeemed vs by his bloud that at length we might in the life to come cease from sinne and performe that obedience vnto him which then we are to performe Neither dooth it for all this hereof followe that God requireth a double obedience or satisfaction of vs. For God excteth obedience hence-forward of vs as thereby to shewe our thankefulnesse and not to satisfie for those sins which we commit in this life For wee are neuer able to satisfie by that obedience which we owe for that obedience which we doe not performe neither is there any other besides Christs satisfaction required for that obedience which is not performed by vs in this life this satisfaction of christ is sufficient to expiate and doe away all our sinnes God notwithstanding doth in this life also require of vs this our obedience though yet it be but begun and vnperfect For seeing God so greatly hated sinne that satisfaction could not be made vnto him for sinne but by the death of his only begotten Sonne wee verily must also hate it euen as himselfe also cōmandeth vs to fly abhor it from our hart and soule And Christ hath not therefore freely redeemed vs that it might hence forwarde be lawful for vs to giue our selues ouer vnto sinne but that being freed from sinne wee should hereafter begin to liue to him onely This end of our redemption which Christ himselfe respected is cause sufficient for which al of vs should necessarily doe good workes because namelie they are testimonies and effectes of that new life which is at length after this life to be accōplished Besides this cause there are manie others also in like sort most weightie which we wil in few words declare We are to doe good woorkes in respect of God our selues and our neighbour In respect of God 1. Because of the commandement of God Let your light so shine before men that they maie see your good workes and glorifie your Father which is in heauen God requireth the beginning of obedience in this life and the perfection thereof in the life to come Wherefore we are necessarilie to giue our selues to good workes that wee maie perfourme due obedience vnto God who requireth it of vs. Joh. 15·12 This is my commaundement that yee loue one another Rom. 6.18 Beeing made free from sinne yee are made the seruantes of righteousnes 1. Thess 4.3 This is the wil of God euen your sanctification 2. For the glorie of God The setting foorth of Gods glorie is the chiefe end why God commaundeth and wil haue good works to be don of vs that both by them we maie worship and magnifie god and others seeing the same maie glorifie our heauenly father like as that saying of christ before alleadged out of S. Matthew doth teach vs. 3 Because of that thankefulnes which the regenerat ow. It is right and iust that by whom we are redeemed and from whom we receiue exceeding great benefites and those of al sorts we should also loue magnifie worship
the couenaunt which is the Moral Law must bee reteined and written in our harts Now if they vrge those words which the prophet addeth They shall teach no more euerie man his neighbour for they shal al know me That hereby they may conclude That men are not in the newe Testament to bee willed to knowe God for that they shal of themselues know him and obey him they er too grossely going aboue to remooue the instrumentall cause by reason that the effect in the new Testament is greater and more plentifull For that men may know God and of their own accord obey him the holy Ghost worketh by the doctrine of the Lawe and the Gospell Neither doth it follow that they are not bound neither are to bee vrged by incitements of exhortation because they doe their dutie of themselues For binding and exhorting is a far other thing than constraining Wherfore in two respectes hath the law place in instructing the regenerate namely that they maie learne of the Lawe the will of God and may also by the Lawe bee more and more incited willinglie to obey God 4 The Moral Law is a testimonie of God that there is a god and likewise who and what he is This is a lesse principall vse of the Lawe as also those that followe but the former are principal vses of the Lawe 5. Jt is a testimonie of the church For seeing in the Church onely the doctrine of the Lawe hath beene preserued pure and vncorrupt which all other sects haue by assenting to manifest errours and impieties diuerslie corrupted the voice of the Lawe which soundeth in the church is an euident testimonie disciphring and declaring which is the people of God and which is true religion in the world 6. Jt is a testimonie of the excellencie of mans nature which was before the fall and which shall bee in the life to come that is it remembreth vs of the Image of god in man which was created in him and which is restored in him by Christ 7. Jt is a testimonie of eternal life For the Law must be obserued by vs because it was not in vaine giuen vs. And seeing in this life the Lawe hath not his ende in vs there must needs be therefore remaining yet another life wherin we are to liue according to the prescript of the law that so at length the Lawe may be fulfilled of vs. Wherefore in respect of al these causes and vses let vs conclude and resolue that the Law of god is to be inculcated in the church of Christ both after and before the doctrine of the gospel and is continually and diligently to be meditated on by all men according to the doctrin deliuered in the first Psalm His delight is in the Lawe of God and in his Lawe doth he meditate both day and night 4 Jn what the Law differeth from the Gospel THIS question hath been already handled in the second part Of mans deliuerie Pag. 264. and therefore needeth here no long discourse The Lawe differeth from the Gospell 1. Jn the manner of their manifestation The Lawe is knowen by nature the gospel was manifested from aboue 2. Jn their matter or doctrine The Lawe teacheth what wee ought to bee and what to perfourme The gospell teacheth how we may be such namely in Christ 3. In their promises The Law promiseth eternal life and al good things with a condition of our owne proper and perfect righteousnesse and obedience remaining in vs The gospel promiseth the same with a condition of faith and beliefe in christ whereby we embrace an others obediēce performed for vs to wit the obedience of Christ Now with this condition of faith is ioined by an indissoluble knot and bond the condition of new obedience 5 How far the Law is abrogated THE whole Law is abrogated vnto beleeuers 1. As touching iustification because iudgement is not giuen according to the Law for that iudgement would condemne and cast vs away but according to the gospel 2. As touching constraint We are vnder grace and therefore are we stirred vp by the spirite of Christ to yeelde voluntary obedience vnto the Law For seeing the whole Law is abrogated vnto beleeuers then verily the Moral Law is also abrogated vnto them in the same respect namely as touching iustification or condemnation and as touching violent constraint For now the Law doth not any more expresse and wrest obedience frō vs as a tyrant or as a master enforcing constraining a lewd seruant vnto obedience The reason is because Christ beginneth voluntarie and free obedience in vs by his spirit Obiection The Law and the Prophetes continue vntil John the Baptist came If therefore then first the Moral Law was abrogated as touching condemnation when Christ was manifested in the flesh it followeth that those were vnder condemnation who liued before the comming of Christ Answer The Law was abrogated as touching condemnation as wel vnto the beleeuers in the old Testament as to them who are beleeuers in the new To them who liued in the old as touching the power and efficacy of Christ to these in the new as touching his fulfilling and exhibiting The Ceremonial ciuil or Judicial Lawes are wholie abrogated as touching obedience so that there is no necessitie anie more of obseruing them 1. Because they were to continue onlie vnto the cōming of the Messias Gen. 49.10 The scepter shal not depart from Iuda nor a Law-giuer from betweene his feete vntill Siloh come And Dan. 9.26 After threescore and two weekes shall Messias be slain and shal haue nothing the people of the prince that shal come shal destroie the cittie and the Sanctuarie and the end thereof shall bee with a floode and vnto the ende of the battell it shall bee destroied by desolations Ephes 2.14 Hee is our peace which hath made of both one and hath broken the stop of the partition wal Jn abrogating through his flesh the hatred that is the Law of commaundementes which standeth in ordinances The Ceremonial Lawes then are taken awaie by Christ a type of whome they were that which also Stephen declareth in his Sermon Actes 7.7 Likewise the author of the Epistle to the Hebrues 2. Because the Messias beeing exhibited the types cease such as were the ceremonial Lawes Coloss 2.17 which are but a shadow of things to come but the body is in Christ But the Ceremoniall are said neuerthelesse to be perpetual because they were to last vntill the comming of the Messias As also because the things signified by them are eternall Against the abrogating of the ciuill or iudiciall lawes this is obiected The best and most iust forme of gouernment is to be followed But there can bee none better or iuster than that which God himselfe settled among his people Therefore that is to be followed and reteined Aunswere Either the Maior of this reason may bee distinguished or the Minor denied with an exposition For that which in positiue lawes that is
persons places times and other circumstances require vnto the glory of God the safety of our neighbor This end maketh that the Diuel cānot be said to be true although he somtimes speak that which is true For his is true who speaketh and loueth the truth doth affection it for the glory of God and the safety of his neighbour Truth may also be defined on this wise Truth is a firme election in the wil whereby we constantly embrace true sentences opinions speak that which is true keepe couenants promises auoide al deceitful dissemblings both in speech and outward gesture True confession is commaunded both in this and in the third commaundement as often times the same vertu is required to the obedience of diuers commandements But in the third commandemēt true confession is required as it is the honour and worship of God immediately respecting God and here it is commanded as there is a will in vs not to deceiue our neighbour but to wishe his safety welfare Vnder the name of truth we comprise liberty of speech which is a vertu wherby as much as the time place necessity requireth we professe the truth freely boldly are not withdrawne through the fear of dangers Vnto truth in the defect are repugnant 1. Al lies vnto which appertain al guiles dissemblings negligence in vnderstanding the truth of thinges lies of courtesy likewise slanders backbitings euil speakinges which kindes of lying are repugnaunt also vnto Fairnesse of maners conditions Lying is to speak otherwise or to signify otherwise by outward gestures than thou thinkest than the thing it selfe is So then in this commaundement principally is lying forbidden Vnto lying is referred also wilful ignoraunce which is a lying in the mind Officious lyes or lyes of courtesie are to be auoided because euil is not to be doone that good may come of it And al lying that doth expressely dissemble the truth is condemned But a truth which is vttered by a figure is no ly whether he vnderstand it or no with whom we deale This is to be obserued that we bee not too rigorous in examining the actiōs of the Saints also that we excuse not those things which haue no neede to be excused 1. Obiect That which profiteth another and hurteth no man is not sinne A dutiful lie is of such qualitie Therefore it is no sinne Answere The Minor is false Reply But yet the truth is often not to bee spoken Answere We must not put a difference between the hiding of the truth and lying Obiect God blesseth the midwiues because thy told a lie Therefore God alloweth and liketh of lies Aunswere God therefore blesseth the mid-wiues because they feared God slue not the infantes of the Israelites 2. Vnto truth in the defect is repugnaunt vanitie or leuitie which is a readines to lieng He is vain who lieth much often easilie and that without anie shame A lier is he who hath a desire to lie Vnto truth in the excesse is repugnant 1. Vntimely professing of the truth which is to cast pearles to swine and to giue that which is holy vnto dogges as Christ saith who by these words doth wholy forbid vnnecessarie and vntimely professing of the truth For as the verse hath it in the Poet He that warneth out of time doth harme 2. Curiositie which is to search after thinges vnnecessary or vnpossible These things may suffice for this chiefe and principall vertue of this ninth commandement The vertues which folow wait vpon trueth and they all are as it were of truthes retinue 2 Fairenesse of minde is a vertu which taketh wel things well or doubtfully spoken or done and interpreteth them in the better part to wit as farre as there are any reasonable causes to induce thereto doth not easily conceiue suspicions neither sticketh vpon suspicions though they be such as are iust haue reasonable causes hee doth not ground thereon neither directeth his actions accordingly neither decreeth or determineth ought by them It is defined after this manner Faiernesse of minde is a neighbour-vertue vnto truth allowing of others wils vpō probable reason hating all euil-mindednesse drawing also some things that are doubtfull to the better part hopeing in deede that which is good but yet as touching mutable thinges thinking that the wils of men may change and that a man may erre concerning anothers will seeing the infoldings and secret places of mans mind are not beheld The Extremes of this vertue in the defect are Slaundering and Suspiciousnesse Slaundering is not onelie falsly to criminate attach the innocent but also to interprete things indifferently spoken in the worser part or also to interlace coine some falshoode Suspiciousnes is to take things well or ambiguously spoken in the worser part to suspect euill thinges of those that are good or to suspect without cause or also to make to much of tru suspicions It is lawful for vs somtimes to suspect except we wil be fools Mat. 10.16.17 Beware of men be ye wise as serpentes innocent as doues In the excesse foolish Credulitie foolish flatterie Credulitie is hastily or vnaduisedly to interprete any thing or to assent to one without iust probable cause Or to beleeue a thing of another when there are manifest or probable reasons to the contrary Flatterie or assentation is to praise or like things not to be praised thereby to get either the goods or fauour of another man Fairenesse of mind is an assistant or special kind of truth Therfore it is also here together with trueth commanded 3 Simplicitie which is open trueth without wrinkles or fetches and compassings or it is a vertue which doth properly and plainly speake and doe such thinges as are true right and declared in artes common life Trueth is tempered with simplicity fairenesse of mind or conditions The extremes of simplicitie are Fained simplicitie and Doublenesse in manners and conuersation 4 Constancie which is a vertue not departing from the knowen trueth neither altering his purpose without good and necessary causes but constantly speaking dooing such thinges as are true iust necessarie Or it is a vertue persisting in the trueth once found knowen approued in the like maner professing defending the same Constancy is necessarie for the preseruation maintenance of the trueth Therefore it is here also commanded The extremes hereof in the defect are Vnconstancie or Lightnesse which is to alter true purposes opinions without reason In the excesse the extremes are Pertinacie or stoicall stifnesse and rigour which is a vice arising from a confidence in his owne wit or from pride ostentation refusing to yeeld or depart from his opinion albeit it bee such as hee seeth by strong reasons to be false but persisting in false opinions or vniust vnprofitable actions 5 Docilitie or a readinesse to learne which is a vertue searching after the reasons of true opinions easily
wil vs to desire it But God willeth vs to craue in this life and to desire the perfect fulfilling of the Law 1. Because he wil at length effectuate it in those that desire it therefore hee will giue it vs after this life if wee desire the same here truly and from our heart 2. That we may now goe forward in godlinesse and that the studie of liuing according to the prescript of Gods law may bee daiely more and more kindled and confirmed in vs. 3. That by this desire of fulfilling the Lawe God maie exercise vs in repentance and obedience OF PRAIER THE chiefe Questions hereof are 1 What praier is and howe many sortes there are of praier 2 Why praier is necessary 3 What is required to true praier 4 What is the forme of praier by Christ prescribed 1 WHAT PRAIER IS AND HOW MANY SORTS OF PRAIER THERE ARE. PRaier is a petition ioyned with an ardent and earnest desire whether vttered in woords or not vttered whereby wee aske of the true god reueiled in the word those things which he hath commanded to be asked of him proceeding from an acknowledgement of our necessity and neede with humilitie and repentaunce and confession of our owne vnworthinesse made in true conuersion vnto God in a confidence and sure trust in gods promises for christs sake our Mediatour Saint Paul maketh mention of three sortes of praier 1. Petitions for good thinges 2. Deprecations against euill things 3. Jntercessions and requestes for others The General of these specials is Praier Likewise Jnuocation and Adoration But praier differeth notwithstanding from Inuocation Adoration For Adoration is often times taken for the whole worship of god because whō we woorship him we account for the true God But praier is a part of Inuocation for Jnuocation compriseth these two as a general his specials namely Petition or praier and thankes-giuing For Inuocation or to Inuocate on God is to craue of the true God any thing that is necessary both for the soule and body and to giue thanks for benefits receiued of him Thankefulnes or Thankesgiuing is an acknowledgement of a benefit receiued and a voluntary binding to the performaunce of duties mutuall possible and lawful Thankefulnes conteineth two things to wit truth and iustice 2 Why Praier is necessarie THE causes for which praier is necessary are these 1 The commandement of God because God hath commanded that wee call vpon him and will this way chiefely and principally be worshiped and magnified by vs. Psa 50.16 Call vpon me in the daie of trouble Luk. 11.2 When ye praie say Our Father c. By these wordes of Christ it furder appeareth that the tongue also is required to praier which we may proue also by other reasons 1 God wil haue himselfe magnified with the tongue which hee created chieflie to this end 2. Out of the aboundance of the heart the mouth speaketh 3 Wee are to doe it that others may follow our example 2 Our Necessitie and Want For wee receiue not of God those blessings which are necessarie for our safety and saluation except we aske them of him For God hath promised them to such only as aske them Nowe what wee speake of the necessitie of praier the same is also to bee saide of the necessitie of Thankesgiuing For without giuing of thanks we leese those thinges that are giuen receiue not such thinges as are to be giuen and are necessarie The necessitie of both will easily appeare whether we consider the effects of faith or the cause of faith and so also faith it selfe Faith is kindled or encreased in no man who doth not aske it no man hath faith who giueth not thankes for it and they which are endued with true faith aske the grace of God and they who haue tasted of gods grace shew themselues thankfull vnto God for it and doe more and more craue and desire it Rom. 5.5 The loue of God is shed abroade in our hearts by the holy Ghost which is giuen vnto vs. And the holy ghost himselfe also is obtained by petition or praiers For the holie Ghost is giuen to none but to him that desireth him 1 Obiection But we see the wicked also to receiue the gifts of the holie Ghost Therefore not onlie they that desire him receiue him Aunswere The wicked verily receiue manie gifts but not those principall giftes neither those that are proper to the Elect such as are faith repentance remission of sins regeneration and furder what giftes the wicked receiue those are not auaileable vnto them neither doe they receiue them to saluation Reply Jnfants craue not the holie ghost and yet they receiue him Aunswere The holy ghost is not giuen but to those that aske him that is to those of yeares and vnderstanding who are able to aske him But euen Infants also aske and craue the holy ghost after their manner hauing to wit in possibilitie an inclination to faith and therefore potentially they aske the holy Ghost or haue an inclination to aske him 2 Obiection The Effect is not before his cause But praiers are the effects of the holie Ghost in asmuch as no man can aske the Holie Ghost who hath not the holie Ghost and hee alone woorketh praier in vs Therefore the Holie Ghost is not receiued by praier but is in vs before praier and so by consequent he is not giuen to them onlie that aske him 1 Aunswere Whosoeuer hath not the holie ghost cannot aske him that is as concerning the encrease of him 2 The Effect is not before his cause that is in order and nature but in time they are both together For the holy Ghost is in vs according to nature before praier because we then first begin to desire him to aske him of God when he is giuen vnto vs. But albeit the Holie Ghost is according to nature or order first in vs yet he is not first in vs according to time For as soone as the holy Ghost is giuen we begin to desire his presence When God giueth his spirit at the same time they aske him vnto whome hee is giuen And the Holie Ghost is giuen to none but to him that desireth him for no man desireth him but he who hath in himselfe the beginning of him Whereas then it is said of Christ Luk. 11.13 How much more shall your Heauenlie Father giue the holie Ghost to them that desire him this must not be vnderstood of the encrease onely but also of the beginning of his giftes and graces 3 What is required to true praier THE conditions and circumstaunces of true praier are 1 A direction of it vnto the true God that wee make our praier vnto the true God manifested in the Church by his Prophetical and Apostolique word by his workes of creation preseruation and redemption of the Church As wee haue receiued so are we baptized and as we are baptized so we beleeue and as we beleeue so wee adore and worship the
at the creation by his perpetuall efficacy and operation and doth inspire into all by his vertue true notions and right election But if they challenge a libertie vnto the creatures depending of no other cause whereby it is guided wee denie their whole argument as knowing such a liberty of creatures to stand against the whole Scripture and that it only agreeth vnto God For him alone doe al things serue In him we liue and moue and haue our being he giueth vnto al not only life or power of mouing themselues but euen breathing too that is very mouing it selfe To the same tendeth this Obiection also If the will The will worketh togither with God is not mere passiue when it is conuerted of GOD or turned and inclined to other Obiectes cannot with-stand it is euen meere passiue and so woorcketh not at all But this consequence deceiueth them because there is not a sufficient enumeration in the Antecedent of those actions which the will may haue when it is mooued of GOD. For it is able not only to withstand God mouing it but also of it owne proper motion to assent and obey him And when it doth this it is not idle neither doth it onely suffer or is mooued but it selfe exerciseth and mooueth her owne actions And yet this is to bee vnderstoode of the actions of the wil not of the new qualities or inclinations which it hath to obey God For these the wil receiueth not by her owne operation but by the working of the holy Ghost The will of man withstanding the reueiled will of God is yet guided by his secret wil therefore resisting doth not resist Thirdly they say That which withstandeth the will of God is not guided by it But the will of men in manie actions withstandeth the will of God It is not therefore alwaies guided by the will of God But the consequence heere faileth because there are foure termes For the Maior is true if both the reuealed and the secret will of God bee vnderstood so that simplie and in all respects it bee withstood and that bee doone which simply and by no meanes it would haue done that which is impossible to come to passe because of the omnipotency and liberty of God But in the Minor the will of God must bee vnderstoode as it is reuealed For the secret decrees of Gods will and prouidence are euer ratified and are perfourmed in all euen in those who most of all withstand Gods commandements Neither yet are there contrarie wils in god For nothing is found in his secret purposes which disagreeth with his nature reuealed in his woord And God openeth vnto vs in his Law what he approueth and liketh and what agreeth with his nature and the order of his mind but he doth not promise or reueal how much grace he wil or purposeth to giue to euery one to obey his commandements God though the mouer of wicked wils yet not the mouer of the wickednes of the wil◠Fourthly as touching this Obiection If all motions euen of wicked willes are raised and ruled by the will of God and manie of these disagree from the Lawe of God and are sinnes god seemeth to be made the causer of sinnes The aunswere is that it is a paralogisme of the accident For they disagree from the law not as they are ordained by or proceed from the wil of god for thus far they agree very wel with the iustice and Law of God but as they are done by men or Diuels and that by reason of this defect because either they doe not know the will of god when they doe it or are not moued by the sight knowledge therof to do it that is they doe it not to that end that they maie obey God who will so haue it For whatsoeuer is doone to this ende it disagreeth not from the Lawe seeing the Law doth not but with this condition either commaund or forbid any thing if God hath not commanded a man to doe otherwise So doth the Lawe of God forbidde to kill anie man except whome God hath commaunded anie to kil Who then killeth a man God not commaunding it hee out of doubt doth and offendeth against the Lawe Neither doth God dissent from himselfe or his law when he wil haue some thing done either by his reueiled or secret will otherwise than according to the generall rule prescribed by himselfe in his Law For hee hath such endes and causes of all his purposes as that they cannot but most exactlie agree with his nature and iustice Fifthly they obiect Libertie which is guided of another can not be an image of that liberty which dependeth of no other which is in god But the liberty of mans will is the image of the liberty which is in god Therefore the liberty of mans will dependeth not or is not guided by the will of god We denie the Maior For seeing that euerie thing which is like is not the same with that vnto which it is like to conceiue in some sort the libertie of God it is enough that reasonable creatures doe woorke vpon deliberation and free election of will albeit this election in the creatures is both guided by themselues and another in God by no other than by his owne diuine wisedome The image of a thing is not the thing it selfe and the inequality of degrees taketh not awaie the image as neither the likenesse and similitude of some partes taketh awaie the dissimilitude of others Wherefore the libertie of reasonable creatures both is gouerned of God and is notwithstanding a certaine image of the libertie which is in God because it chooseth thinges once knowen vnto it by her own and free or voluntary motion For as of other faculties or properties so also of libertie it is impossible that the degrees should bee equall in God and his creatures whereas all thinges are infinite in God and finite in his creatures Seeing therefore wisedome righteousnesse strēgth in the creatures is the image of the vnmeasurable wisedom righteousnes power which is in god a portion also of liberty agreeable and competent for the creatures may be the image of the liberty which is in God The will is not idle or mere passiue when God worketh by it no more than the sun raine and such like instrumentes of Gods operation Sixtly they say If the creature cannot but doe that which God wil haue done and cannot do what god will not haue done the wil hath no actiue force but is wholy passiue especially in our conuersion which is the work of god Likewise there is no vse of laws doctrine discipline exhortation threatnings punishments examples promises and lastly of our study and endeuour Wee denie the consequence Because the first or principal cause beeing put the second or instrumentall cause is not thereby taken away For as god lightneth the world doth quicken the earth bringeth foorth corne nourisheth liuing creatures yet are not the
instruments of gods working idle as the sun the raine the earth husbandmen food So god conuerteth men ruleth their purposes wils actions that is teacheth moueth them to approue chuse what he wil by laws by magistrats by doctrine by rewards by punishments and lastly by their owne wil which al he vseth as instruments not as if he could not without these illighten the mind with notions and incline the wil but because it so seemeeh good to him to exercise his power by these Albeit God was able to haue wrought what he would without the will yet because he will worke by the wil the working of the will is not in vaine If they reply That that wold necessarily come to passe so which is don euen without them therefore they are in vain vsed we deny the antecedent For although god were able to moue mens wils without these and if he had so decreed to doe men doubtles should doe without these what now they do beeing mooued by these yet whereas god hath once so decreed the effects as he hath also appointed their secōd instrumentall and impulsiue causes that verily shal be doone which god wil haue done but yet not without middle and second causes by whose means and working comming betweene and interposed god wil bring his purposes and decrees to passe Luk. 11. Hee wil giue his holy spirite to those who aske him Rom. 8.10 Whom he hath predestinated them hath he also called If they reply again Although it be grāted that these are not in vaine in those in whom god wil shew his force and be effectual by them yet in others who are not moued by them ther is no vse of them we answere 1. Although there were no vse yet because that is not knowen vnto vs whom god wil mooue or not moue we are to labour in teaching and vrging all and to commit the euent and fruit of our labour to God 2. Tim. 4. Preach the word bee instant in season c. Ezech. 3. If thou warn the wicked he turne not from his wickednes he shall die in his iniquitie but thou hast deliuered thy soule Secondly we aunswere the consequence followeth not from the denial of one particular to the denial of the generall or from a not sufficient enumeration For although many obey not teaching admonitions neither are moued with rewards and punishments yet this vse is great that by this meanes their naughtines and stubbornnes is opened and so the iustice of God made more manifest in their punishment Ioh. 15. If I had not done workes among them which none other man did they had not had sinne Rom. 1. God hath shewed it vnto them to the intent that they might be without excuse 2. Cor. 2. We are to God the sweete sauour of Christ in them that are saued and them who perish Seauenthly Heb. 9. Externall Discipline is called the righteousnes of the flesh Therefore it dependeth on mans will The consequence of this reason is to bee denied which doth not holde from the position or putting of the second cause to the remouing of the first cause For as it foloweth not the Sun causeth day therefore God doth not so neither doth this folow the vnregenerate performe outwarde Discipline therefore they doe it god not causing it in them nor ruling and directing them 8 Obiection They alleage testimonies also How the scriptures admit libertie of will which confirme that men doe euill or good with freewill As Exod. 35. The children of Israell offered free gifts vnto the Lord. Deut. 30. I haue set before thee life death good euil blessing cursing therefore choose life that both thou and thy seed may liue But in these al the like places only that liberty of mans will is affirmed which hath beene spoken of before that is that the will obeieth or withstandeth the precedent iudgemēt of the vnderstanding with free and voluntarie motion without any constraint but the gouernement of god is not at all remoued from voluntarie actions For it was shewed before that this liberty of will doth not stand against that necessitie which by the prouidence of God doth accompanie it 9 Obiect What necessitie the scripture remoueth from voluntarie actions They bring forth testimonies also in which necessitie is remoued taken away from voluntarie actions Leuit. 22. Of these ye shal offer willingly Act. 5. Whils it remained appertained it not to thee And after it was solde was it not in thine owne power 1. Cor. 7. vers 37. Hee that standeth firme in his hart that hee hath no necessitie but hath power ouer his owne will c. 2. Cor. 9. As euery man wisheth in his heart so let him giue 1. Pet. 5. Feede the flocke of God caring for it not by constraint but willingly But these sayinges speake of obligation or binding which somtimes is signified by the name of necessity as the freeing from any bond by the name of libertie as Leuit. 22. Act. 5. partly of coaction or constraint as 2. Cor. 9. and 1. Pet. 5. or also of neede as 1. Cor. 7. which yet may be referred to obligation or bonde by which the Parentes are bounde to haue regard of the infirmitie of their children So also the power of will in the same place signifieth the right or power of determining any thing no obligation or bond hindering it But the remouing of any obligation or coaction doth not at all take away the vnchaungeablenes of voluntary actions which vnchangeablenes hangeth on the decree of God For as well his will who is not bound neither by any neede or want constrained is guided and moued by the purpose and counsell of Gods prouidence as his whom either bond or neede constraineth to resolue of any purpose Wherefore the scripture denieth not that the will is moued and ruled by God when it is not driuen by bonde or want or feare to doe any thing for there are besides these many other reasons and causes by which God can moue it either to will or not to will How in scriptures God is said not to will that which yet he will 10 Obiection They bring places of scripture which testifie that men will or doe somewhat God bidding and willing otherwise Ierem 7. Because I haue called you and ye haue not answered I will doe vnto this house as I haue done to Sylo Mat. 23. Hierusalem Hierusalem how often would I haue gathered thy children euen as the hen gathereth her chickens vnder her winges and ye would not If then they did that which God would not their actions did depend onely of their owne will and not of Gods Anwere It is a fallacie concluding that which is in some sort so to be in all respects and simply so For God will not the actions of sinners as they are sinnes But hee wil them as they are punishmentes of sinnes and the execution of his iust iudgement Wherefore this