the procreant cause of it for the zeale of the Iewes did not make Paul loue them for in this zeale they crucified Christ persecuted the Gospell and Saint Paul cals this zeale in himselfe blasphemie and therefore Paul would neuer commend it Indeede if I see a Papist zealous in his way I pitie him and wish his zeale were wel directed but I commend not his zeale When I read the Story of Alexander Cicero c. I loue their remembrance for some moralities in them as Christ loued that Yâ—…ng man in the Gospell but this zeale of the Iewes was no moralitie being considered in the manner in which they were zealous And therefore though Paul grant it yet as Chrysostome obserues he reproues it vehemently and takes away all Apology from them Here then I take it the Apostle comes directly to point to shew that Iustification by Faith abolisheth not the Law though their zeale bee cast away because it was not according to knowledge Paul here notably in the first place beating downe as was fit the admiration and opinion they had of their zealous obseruations In this verse there are two things First a Concession Paul grants that they haue the zeale of God Secondly an Accusation or Reproofe of their zeale But not according to knowledge The zeale of God The earnest study of the Iewes about the worship of the true God and standing for Moses Law Paul calls zeale Heb. 10.27 which is a vehement affection as a very hote fire is called the zeale of fire and may thus be described that it is an exceeding vehement affection or loue to a thing with an indignation against whatsoeuer doth hurt the thing beloued and an endeuor to redeeme it from all iniuries and wrongs Zeale of God Not as approued of God but so called because God was the end or obiect of it though they failed in the right way so as this is to be vnderstood comparatiuely in respect of the Heathen who are zealous for false gods So if we compare the Turkes and Papists The Turkes are zealous for Mahomet The Papists in comparison for Christ Not according to knowledge It was according to their owne conceiued knowledge but not according to the knowledge they should haue had by the Gospel and for this doth Paul reproue it The more of such zeale the worse doctrine Zeale if it be not according to knowledge is not acceptable to God The Iewes are a plaine example hereof See also Eccles 7.18 Q. Can a man haue too much zeale A. Not of true but of selfe-conceited A little of this is too much For whatsoeuer is without Faith is sinne Faith presupposeth knowledge Errour in knowledge breeds errour in zeale Vse 1. A good meaning will not iustifie our actions if otherwise euill as appeares in the Iewes who many of them meant well in persecuting the Gospell but they are to this day plagued for such zealous meanings Let vs meane neuer so well if that which we doe be not according to Gods meaning hee regards it not who hath giuen his Law not our meanings to be a rule of our obedience If a Wife play the Harlot and say she meant no harme will this satisfie her Husband And shall wee thinke to worship Images pray to Saints stay at home on the Sabbath day when we may conueniently resort to the Church vnder the shadow of a good meaning No. God will not accept of such bald excuses And if good meaning will not excuse ill doing What shall we say to them which doe ill and meane ill too What shall become of Drunkards Blasphemers Vncleane persons c. What good meaning can be in them Vse 2. Here we haue a rule for the ordering of our zeale that it may be acceptable to God For it is such a thing which if it be well ordered is most beautifull in a Christian but if not a thing of exceeding danger as Fire in moderation is most comfortable in extremitie most fearefull This Rule is sound knowledge out of Gods Word This knowledge must be three-fold First of the thing of the which we are zealous that it be in the Right For if wee be in the wrong the more zeale the worse as in a wrong way the more haste the worse speed Exod. 40.36,37 Therefore Saint Paul tels the Galathians that it is good to be zealous alwaies in a good thing 2. Of the wrong which is done to the thing we are zealous of that in deed there be a wrong done not going vpon hearesay and aduenture but vpon certainty being able out of the Word soundly to conuince the same For here is the indignation and if there be not sound knowledge we may become slanderers of our brethren and as they say beat them with the sword who deserue not to be touched with the scabberd 3. That wee haue some competent knowledge and abilitie thereby to iudge of the proportion of the wrong for the which we haue indignation in our zeale that so our zeale may haue a good temper For all sinnes offences wrongs are not of the same quantitie and qualitie As there is a difference in offences so must there bee in our zeale in greater things to be more zealous in lesser things lesse zealous wee must remember it is of the Nature of fire There is not the like fire for the roasting of an Egge and for the roasting of an Oxe but it is moderated according to the necessities of the houshold By this three-fold knowledge must our zeale be directed where the Word begins there must our zeale beginne and where the Word ends there must our zeale end whatsoeuer our opinion be For as he that trauelleth ouer the Washes or in some dangerous passage without a guide many times perisheth So is the man that is zealous not according to knowledge As therefore in the wildernesse when the cloud ascended the children of Israel set forward in their iourneyes and when that stood still so did they And if the cloud ascended not then they iourneyed not till it ascended Exod. 40.36,37 So is our zeale alwaies to follow our knowledge and to be directed therby There are two forts of men hereby to be apprehended 1. They which haue a desect not of zeale but of knowledge for the ground of their zeale 2. They which haue a defect not of knowledge but of zeale answerable to their knowledge Of the 1. of these may be verified the Prouerbe They set the Cart before the Horse The second may bee likened to Pharaohs Chariots when the wheeles were off so slowly doe they expresse their knowledge in their liues The first are like a little ship without ballast fraught but with a great many sailes which is soone either dasht against the Rockes or toppled ouer The second are like a goodly great Ship well ballasted and richly fraughted but without any sayles which quickly falleth into the hands of Pyrats because it can make no speed sooner making
Horeb he goes for more safetie and to meet with the Lord. There passeth by him a mightie wind an earthquake and fire representations of Eliahs zeale But God was not in them Then comes a still voice to teach Eliah patience saying What doest thou here Eliah Eliah answered Lord I haue bene iealous for the Lord of hoasts complaining according to the words here vsed by Paul verse 3. In this storie it appeares that Eliah was a man subiect to infirmities as other men are being ouerheate in his passion his life being in danger by Iesabel yet his zeale in regard of the cause of it is exceeding commendable and for our imitation doctrine We are to be zealous for the Lord. So was Elias Moses Samuel Dauid as appeares in their stories Vse When thou seest God dishonored and religion troden vnder foote be not senslesse Would it not moue a man to see altars throwne downe prophets killed miracles take no effect as in Eliahs time Iames 5. â—7 Or now to see the Sabboth profaned the preaching of the Gospell contemned and many notwithstanding dayly admonitions to runne out some to drunkennesse some to whoredome some to pride c Surely we want an Eliah Whosoeuer hath but a dram of his spirit these things to him are as a dagger at his heart Meeknesse in our owne causes but in Gods zeale and earnestnesse become vs. Yet be not ouer zealous few I confesse are sicke of this disease â—et Elias was and we may be also for we are more sure we haue his passions then his grace Excesse of zeale is intollerable yea it hath bene found lesse dangerous to the Church when men haue come short of the due proportion of zeale then when they haue exceeded Auda Bishop in Persia in an excesse of zeale throwing downe a Temple of the Pagans was the cause that the King thereby insensed threw downe all the Temples of the Christians Theod. lib. 5. There are two things whereby we may discerne whether our zeale exceed due limits and bounds or no 1 If thou make thy selfe a partie so much is it in the wrong Elias was the more hot because his owne life was in danger So if there be a disordered person who hath prouoked vs then wee crie its pitie but he should be presented indited punished But when vnder a colour of zeale against sinne we reuenge our owne wrongs it s more passion then zeale Secondly Zeale should consume the faults not the persons of offenders if thine feeds on the persons not on the faults it s naught Quench it against the person inflame it against the fault Iames and Iohn would haue had the wicked Samaritans by and by to be consumed with fier from heauen but they are reproued by our Sauiour Luc. 9.53 And here Elias was somewhat faultie comming short of Moses and Samuell who made intercession for not against their people Eliah makes intercession against his people Moses and Samuell for them These rather then Eliah are to be imitated of Ministers It s a lamentable thing to see a father wringing of his hands ouer his child and complaining of his stubbornesse wishing he had neuer bene borne So it is very greeuious to heare an Eliah complaine to God of the stubbornesse of his people We are your fathers so liue you that we may haue no cause to sue against you either in the court of heauen or earth but rather to reioyce oueryou which we shall doe with much cheerefullnes praying for you if you forsake your sinnes and turne vnto God obeying his word If we in our prayers haue cause to complaine of you it will be vnprofitable to you for what followed Eliah his complaint The Lord speakes to him as if hee should say Eliah I see thou art in a moode well goe annoynt Hazael King of Aram Iehu King of Israel and Elisha Prophet in thy roome him that scapeth the sword of Hazaell shall Iehu slay and him that escapeth Iehu shal Elisha slay Of such force are the complaints of the Prophets and Ministers of God against their stubborne people as also are their prayers effectuall on the behalfe of such as beleeue and obey Now I beseech you presently to reforme your liues that wee may mutually ioyne together to blesse God you for vs and we for you that we may be all crowned together at the comming of Christ VERSE 3. Lord they haue killed thy Prophets and digged downe thine Altars and I am left alone and they seeke my life IN these words is set downe the complaint of Eliah more particularly in which are two things First the person to whom he complaines Lord. Secondly the matter of the complaint which is twofold First The killing of the Prophets Secondly The digging downe of Altars Both these aggrauated from the miserable estate of Eliah which appeared two waies first He is left alone in his owne opinion secondly They seeke his life also They not onely bellua multorum capitum the vulgar but Ahab Iesabel Nobles Commons and all from the highest to the lowest Especially Iesabel a diuellish and wicked woman who added to the Idolatry of the Israelites the abomination of the Sydonians and whose hatred against true religion was so great that it came into a prouerb such being called Iesabels Apoc. 2. Thy Prophets Thy is added for more detestation of the fact The Embassadors of a meane Prince are not to be wronged but they haue killed Thy Prophets Thine Altars An Altar was a building or Instrument of earth stone or other stuffe reared vp for the offering of Sacrifices Quest But what Altars means he God coÌ„manded that there should be no Altar in ordinary after the building of the Temple but at Ierusalem where only Sacrifices were to bee offered which is the cause that now the Iewes offer no sacrifices because they want their Temple Ahab could not come by the Altar at Ierusalem being out of his Kingdome What Alter then meanes Ahab Answ Some say that the signe is put for the thing signified and by Altars meant Religion which was by Ahab and Iesabel abolished But as the killing of the Prophets was a matter of fact so also I take this to be rather then of signification only They threw downe material Altars built in Abrahams Isaaks Iacobs Iosuahs and Samuels time before the Temple was builded and the Altars which were by Elias himselfe and other Prophets by speciall commandement after the building of the Temple set vp which were called afterward high Places and the good Kings of Iudah commended for pulling them downe 1. Kin. 18.4.22 Obiect Why should Eliah complaine of the doing of that by Ahab which done by others is commended Answ Those Altars remained as monuments of Gods worship and Elias complaines not simply against their demolishing but because it was done in despite of true Religion that no foot-step thereof might remaine to put the people in minde of the true God which if it had bin done in
Session and Intercession to be ended by way of Amplification for the cause alledged The words are parts of the Catechisme The sense is thus to be conceiued Alas sayth the weake Christian mine owne conscience the Law the Diuell accuseth me Yea but God iustifies thee saith Paul What a sinner How can that be sauing his Iustice for sinners are to bee condemned by the Law True saith Paul but Christ is dead for vs and so hath made satisfaction for as it is well obserued by Caietane that these words For vs are to be referred to euery part of the Answere he dyed for vs rose for vs c. The Death of Christ is farther declared by the consequences of it which are 3. 1. Resurrection 2. Session at Gods right hand 3. Intercession for vs which Gradation is added to take away all scruple Hee is dead Nay hee is risen which sealeth the merit of his death Nay hee sitteth at the right hand of God hauing receiued all power for the safety of Beleeuers and confusion of vnbeleeuers and that nothing be wanting to our comfort he continually makes intercession for vs Heb. 9.24 Heb. 10.10 by appearing in heauen for vs and by willing that his merits should be effectuall vnto vs. doctrine Those whome Christ dyed for cannot be condemned Rom. 4.25 and 5.9 Heb. 2.14,15 Vse 1. The Death Resurrection Power Intercession of Christ are the wells of saluation from whence all comforts are to be drawne Art thou cast downe for feare of thy sinnes and the punishment due to them Christ hath suffered thy punishment he was condemned in thy roome and stead and therefore in the Iustice of God thou must not be condemned Belieue and repent and then it is as possible for thee to be damned as for God to be vniust Thou mayest securely rest in his death because he not onely dyed but rose againe which though it did adde nothing to the price which was payd in his death yet it is a demonstration of the sufficiency of it and thereby a confirmation of thy comfort for if he had not rose againe his death had done vs no good If death had ouercome him how should wee sinners haue escaped Hee as our Samson carried away the gates of death The foundation of our comfort is layd in Christs death we receiue it in his resurrection His death is compared to the sowing of Corne which comforts most when it commeth vp Ioh. 12.24 So our peace and ioy is sowne in his death we reape it and begin to possesse it in his Resurrection 1. Cor. 15.17,18,19 He is not onely dead and risen but hath receiued all power hauing it in his hand to saue and destroy by this power he sent the Holy Ghost Act. 2. He hath alwaies gouerned and preserued his Church and confounded his foes We haue many foes indeed but we need not feare for if he so bridled them being on earth in our weaknesse that he ouerthrew them backeward with a word Ioh. 18.6 how can and will he hamper them being in Heauen in the power and glory of his Father He was courteous on earth and he forgets vs not now he is in Heauen hee is not like Pharaohs Butler who forgat Ioseph Gen. 40.23 He is not in Heauen onely to liue happily himselfe but to procure our happinesse also He prayeth yet for thee and his Father heareth him alwayes Iohn 11. Heb. 7.25 Therefore thou mayest bee confident that thou art perfectly saued A man retaining an eloquent learned gracious Counsellour is of good hope much more mayest thou which hast the Kings Sonne yea the power and wisedome of God to be thy Aduocate Hee is innocent against him lyes no exception he hath satisfied for thee of his owne not by the force of reason but really by the price of his bloud He knowes the weightinesse of thy cause is in especiall fauour with the Iudge knowes best the reason whereby he may perswade and it concernes him that the day should be on our side because we are his flesh therefore we may be comforted Vse 2. From this sitting and Intercession Ambrose notes the distinction of the persons in the Trinity and that the Father is the fountaine of all good Vse 3. Saints are not our Intercessours but Christ therefore goe to Christ alone Can they more loue and care for vs then Christ They not heare nor vnderstand vs neither haue wee in the Scripture precept or example to require their intercession and if any helpe or comfort were to bee had this way Paul doubtles in a place so fit would first or last haue mentioned it If any man sinne saith Iohn 1. Ioh. 2.2 we haue Christ an Aduocate He doth not say You haue me or the Virgin Marie an Aduocate but Christ Maluit se ponere in numero peccatorū vt haberet Aduocatū Christum quam ponere se pro Christo Aduocato inueniri inter damnandos superbos August The Apostle had rather put himselfe among sinners that he might haue Christ his Aduocate then put himselfe for an Aduocate and so be found among them who are to be damned for their prid Vse 4. These comforts require great obedience for Christ hath not purchased for vs a carnall security whereby the feare of God should be abandoned but a spirituall whereby the feare of condemnation should be ouercome If thou wouldst partake of Christs death dye thou to sinne If of his Resurrection rise thou to newnesse of life If of his glorious Session obey his power and authority If of his Intercession then auoyde thou all sinne For nothing can bee more contrary then Christ to pray for thee that thou mayest be pardoned and thou not cease from thy blasphemy drunkennesse c. Christ prayeth not for such beasts Wee haue an Aduocate saith Iohn 1. Ioh. 2.7 Iesus the iust A iust Aduocate will not plead vniust causes Thy cause is vniust because thou beleeuest not nor carest how thou liuest For it is most iust euen supposing Euangelicall grace and mercy that such should be damned and should want the benefit of that pardon which they by their vnrepenting heart renounce Repent therefore that thou mayest haue thy part in these comforts VERSE 35. Who shall separate vs from the loue of Christ shall tribulation or distresse or persecution or famine or nakednesse or perill or sword IN this verse and the two next the Apostle remooueth the second Tentation arising from the presence of euill namely of the euill without vs from the Creatures The coherence Pareus maketh to be thus A weake Christian thus obiects Though God loue vs and Christ pray for vs yet wee are subiect to famine nakednes pouertie a thousand troubles Paul answers What then This is the condition of the Church we are neuerthelesse beloued for this yea we are more then Conquerors The vvords wherein Paul deliuers this are admirable and so indeed is this whole
the accursing of them who should conuert it to their owne vse and so by a translated sense it signifieth a perpetuall separation from Christ As therefore such things were separated from men for honour sake so applyed to men it signifies to be separate from Christ for horror sake This is Chrysostomes exposition approued of the best Interpreters And as the Greeke word is thus vsed so Sacer properly signifying Holy is vsed amongst the Latines by good Authors g Auri sacra fames Virg. Sacer intestabilis esto Hor. in a contrary sense For my brethren not spirituall but kinsmen according to the flesh that is the Iewes as if he had said I would bee damned in their stead that they might be wonne to Christ and saued in mine As Dauid wished he might haue dyed for Absolon and Christ dyed for vs. The Argument to iustifie Pauls griefe is from an effect of his loue which is a contestation that for their sakes he would with all his heart be accursed from Christ Therefore he must needs be grieued for their separation This loue of Paul is here amplified by three circumstances 1. The Person wishing Paul 2. The matter of his wish to be accursed from Christ 3. For whose sake for the Iewes Who Paul who was so zealous for Christ To be accursed from Christ his onely Ioy and Desire and for the Iewes his enemies who layd continuall wayt for him about a fortie of them vowing neither to eate nor drinke till they had his bloud Euen thus it was Euen Paul wisheth to be accursed from Christ for these Chrysostome calls it a flame a sea of loue No sea so deepe no flame so bright as Pauls loue Q. But is it lawfull for Paul thus to wish For it is to bee holden as a truth in Diuinitie that euery man is first to haue a care of his owne soule yea the Papists affirme that though the soule of the Virgin Marie whom they too much adore were in perill yet for her saluation wee ought not to hazard our owne A. There are many farre-fetcht answeres For Interpreters haue exceedingly laboured herein Wee hardly vnderstand how this should be because we are farre from the measure of Pauls loue Among all the Answers there are 3. principall The first is that Paul vseth an Hyperbolicall speech or that hee spake hastily not well considering the matter but hee spake vpon his oath as we haue heard and therefore no Hyperbole or ouersight to be admitted The second that he did not indeed so wish but was ready so to doe if it were lawfull but the words and his oath take away this also he did actually so wish and without supposition The third is Chrysostomes which also Aquinas hath who make a double separation from Christ 1. To be separated from his loue which Paul by no meanes wisheth neither is it lawfull to desire either not to loue Christ or not to bee beloued of him 2. To be separated from him onely by punishment in regard of the fruition of heauenly ioyes and so Paul wishes here not so much hauing an eye to the destruction of the Iewes as to the glory of Christ The vnbeleeuing Iewes did daily by vile speeches blaspheme Christ the hearing hereof was so grieuous to Paul that out of a great zeale he wished verily to haue beene accursed from Christ rather then that he should be so reuiled yet so accursed as that he would still loue Christ and be beloued of him He will for no cause be depriued of Christs loue but he is content to lose his part in Heauen for Christs glory doctrine We ought to redeeme the saluation of our very enemies with the losse of heauenly Ioyes to our selues rather then Christ should lose his glorie So Moses wisheth Exod. 32.12.32 For Gods glory ought to be more deare to vs then any ioy or good of our owne Vse 1. If we consider Paul as a kinseman wee are taught what great loue we owe to our kinred We are to loue our Nature in all but where there are most bands there should our loue be most Nature teacheth this and Grace perfiteth Nature Christ beginning to preach first preached at Nazareth to recompence the place of his education Luk. 4.16 And Paul saith 1. Tim. 5.8 That hee that prouideth not for his owne is worse then an Infidell Husbands ought specially to take care for the saluation of wife and children brethren for brethren c. Vse 2. Consider Paul as an Apostle 2. Pet. 5.2 and then it teacheth Ministers specially to feed their owne flockes to pray for them to be affected with their stubbornenesse So Samnel Ieremie c. Must Ministers take paines grieue and burne out the Candles of their liues to doe their people good Then is it not fit that their people should despise and despite their Teachers vexing them with their vngodly stomackes and profane carriage This is to encrease their sorrow which is so great that it is compared to the sorrow of a woman in trauaile Gal. 4 19. Vse 3. Consider Paul as a Christian He feeketh the saluation of his enemies so doe thou Remember it was Cains speech Am I my Brothers keeper Thou must haue care of thy brothers yea of thine enemies It will not serue the turne to say Euery Fat shall stand on his owne bottome This is harsh to nature but Grace must ouereome corruption Vse 4. Reioyce not at the fall of thine enemy whether it bee by the immediate hand of GOD or by the hand of the Magistrate say not It is no matter If thou feelest thy heart to hammer such thoughts striue and pray against it Consider Pauls example here and Dauids in the Psalmes Psal 35.13 To reioyce at other mens harmes is the way to haue such things cast vpon our selues Prou. 24.17 Vse 5. The cause of Pauls wish is the glory of Christ which ought to be more deare vnto vs then our owne saluation Though we cannot attaine to the measure of Pauls zeale yet we must aime at it and endeuour our vttermost Though Parents are loth to part with their Children yet for their good they are content to put them to schoole and to binde them to Trades farre off So we can be contented to enioy life liberty c. yet if the parting from these be to Gods glory we must be ready so to doe How few then be there which loue Christ as they ought how few which would be content to part with Heauen for his honour for many will not for the glory of God and the obtaining of Heauen leaue their pride whoredome drunkennesse c. VERSE 4. Who are Israelites to whome pertaineth the Adoption and the Glorie and the b Or Testaments Couenants and the giuing of the Law and the seruice of God and the promises 5. Whose are the Fathers and of whome as concerning the Flesh Christ came who is ouer all God blessed for euer Amen
Rom script ad Gel. Succanum Therefore say I whosoeuer are elected are elected before they were borne Vse 3. Hence also is notably confuted the vanity of Astrologers who vpon the calculation of mens Natiuities foretell of their dispositions fortune as they call it and ends by the Constellation of the heauens at their Byrth Some of them haue said that there is a constellation for obtaining our prayers another also for saluation Albuâ—…azar Maternus sicut refert Pererius lib. 2. in Gen. cap. 1. num 59. But these are toyes and Impostures and confuted by this example For a man is appointed of GOD before hee is borne Therefore his estate depends not on his Natiuitie There could bee no greater diuersitie in any then betweene Iacob and Esau and yet Twinnes and borne at the same time and in the same place and therefore why not vnder the same Constellation For Iacob held Esau by the heele and both were but as a long child If they say that the Motion of the heauens is so swift that notwithstanding they might be born vnder diuers Ascendents I would aske If so swift How can they discerne it And with Gregory then euery one is borne vnder diuers Constellations as his head vnder one his shoulders vnder another his belly vnder a third his legges vnder a fourth Againe as Gellius asketh Noct. Att. l. 14. c. 1. if the same constellation portend the same things Why then were there many Alexanders many Aristotles and as we may say many Dauids many Salomons c Was there no one borne at the same time with these or before or since vnder the like Constellation Now followes the Cause of such difference betweene Esau and Iacob that one should be loued and the other hated The Cause is the stabilitie of the purpose of Gods Election That the purpose of God according to Election c. In the words is a Traiection of the Verbe which if it bee right placed maketh the sense plaine which otherwise is obscure For the sense they would bee thus placed That the purpose of God concerning Election which is not of works but of him that calleth might stand that is might bee firme This purpose here mentioned to bee vnderstood about Reprobation as well as about Election as included in the contrary The meaning then is that God manifested to Rebecca before her children were borne their different estates caused by the stable Decree of God which depends not vpon the workes of man but vpon the Will of God Here we haue three things First the cause of the different estates of Iacob and Esau viz. The purpose of God according to that is about or concerning Election Secondly the cause of this Election two wayes set downe First Negatiuely Not of workes Secondly Affirmatiuely but of him that calleth Thirdly the property of this Purpose of God That it is Firme doctrine The Doctrine out of the 1. part The purpose of Gods election specifieth and detenmineth the indefinite promises of the Word The promise is made to Isaac and his seede This promise is made good not to Esau but to Iacob because it was purposed to Iacob not to Esau Which appeareth also by the examination of Rom. 11.7 Tit. 1.1 Act. 13.48 Vse 1. Here parents are taught the meaning of the Promise I am thy God and the God of thy seede What That all thy children shall be saued No It stands if any if but One. God promiseth to Dauid and his seede the Kingdome Shall all his sonnes be Kings No. But hee to whom God purposeth it So among our many children those onely shall haue grace to beleeue the promises to whom they are purposed Parents are bound to giue good Education to their children but Parents cannot change their hearts which are corrupt from the beginning That which decayes in Nature is to be restored onely by the Author of Nature Let Parents arise in these things to acknowledge the counsell and purpose of God which is secret many times but neuer vniust and let them comfort themselues in those who haue the signes and markes of election shining in them Vse 2. Here also we are taught the Reason why all profit not by the preaching of the Gospell The promises are the same propounded totall but they are in the counsell of Gods good pleasure and purpose made effectuall only to the Elect. Thus our Sauiour teacheth saying Into what house soeuer you enter say Peace be to this house Luk. 10.5,6 If the sonne of peace be there it shall remaine vpon him but if not it shall returne Saint Augustine obserues that Christ sayes not vpon whom your peace shall rest he shall be the sonne of Peace But where there shall be a sonne of peace your peace shall rest vpon him The like reason is for Corrections and Education and other meanes of goodnes They are profitable onely to the Elect. Ob. If God offer mee the promise and meane not that I shall receiue it he mockes mee and why am I punished for not receiuing it A. Some thinke to ensnare God with their subtilties but it is to be vnderstood that preaching was ordained by God not for euery mans saluation but onely for the gathering and saluation of the Saints which are mingled here together with the Reprobates It is of vse also concerning the Reprobates to conuince them and to make them inexcusable Whereby the Elect are stirred vp the more to humility and thankefulnesse when they see their owne Nature condemned in the Reprobates doctrine The Doctrine out of the second The purpose of Gods Election and Reprobation is not of workes but of the will of God Ephes 1.4.11 Tit. 3.5 Vse 1. The Rule of Gods choise is not the goodnesse which hee seeth in the thing to be chosen though we choose things for their goodnesse The cause of Gods chusing is his will It is the gift of the Diuine will not the desert of humane fragilitie Diuinae voluntatis donum non humanae fragilitatis meritum Aug. Hyp. 6 Greg. de Valentia Disp tom 1. Disp 1. q. 23. de Praed p. 4. This confuteth the Iesuites among whom this is the most receiued opinion that the praescience of the co-operation of our Free-will with Grace and of our finall perseuerance is the cause of Election This co-operation they say is respected not by the way of simple vnderstanding as possible but by the way of vision as absolutely and actually to be Which vision or fore-sight of our actuall co-operation with grace is the cause of Election and in order of reason as they affirme goes before it which is nothing else but that the goodnes of our owne wils is the cause why God elects vs. This opinion comes neere to Pelagius but is farre from Paul who affirmeth the purpose of God concerning Election to bee of him that calleth This also confuteth those who hold that Faith foreseene is a condition prae-requisite or a motiue cause to Election
verse 15 16 17. Therefore as that before is to be vnderstood so is this And as large a sense as Hauing mercy hath so large must hardening haue Then not onely of Actuall hauing but of the purpose it must bee vnderstood He should haue said He stirres vp to destruction whom he will but he saith he hardneth that he may shew how he stirreth vp namely by hardening Hardnesse is an estate of a corrupt heart whereby it is disposed to all euill yeelding no obedience to God and it is threefold First Naturall which is the estate of all men Secondly that which is contracted by a custome of sinning as a path is hardened by continuall trampling of passengers Thirdly Iudiciarie which GOD inflicteth vpon men as a Iudgement This is here meant for finding all in their naturall hardnesse hee hardeneth that is reprobates whom hee pleaseth Q. But all hardnesse is finne How then can God be said to harden A. There is a difference betweene hardnes and hardning Hardnes is sinne but to harden is not alwayes so and this is from God not as sinne but as his iust Iudgement For it is not possible that by him we should sinne by whom wee repent and rise from sinne euen as bitter water and sweet issue not from the same fountaine It is from God that we stand from our selues that we fall God is said to harden properly not by making soft hearts to become hard for Pharaohs heart was neuer but hard nor by putting hardnes into the heart as the Papists vniustly charge vs to affirme nor by only suffering vs to be hardened which is the opinion of the Papists dreaming idlely of an idle permission in God making him like the Poets Iupitor who was feasting in Aethiopia while things went out of order but three wayes 1. By forsaking not making it hard but not taking the hardnes away He hardneth that is he softneth not He hardneth not by putting in hardnes but by not putting in the softning oyle of his mercy as the Sunne causes darknes by with-drawing his light 2. By punishing for finding the heart hard if hee please not to pardon it and to soften the heart hee inflicteth a new hardnes as a punishment of the former And this he instilleth not but effecteth three wayes 1. Either by Satan to whose power hee deliuereth such a heart for him to worke vpon 2. Or by themselues giuing them ouer to their owne hearts â—usts 3. Or by the preaching of the Word For as the middle region of the Ayre is more cold by the Anteperistasis so the heart of a Reprobate more hard by the Word not properly but accidentally as a resty horse the more hee is spurred forward the more goes backward By actuating and exciting the present euill inclination of the Creatures by propounding an occasion to manifest it as the Sunne being in it selfe most cleane by the force of his beames draweth out of a dunghill stinking and vnpleasant vapours Hardnes then is caused by the Commandement Occasionally by our owne malice Meritoriously By Satan Efficiently By God Iudicially So Satan is the Tormentor a sinfull man the guilty person God the Iudge and that a Iust one who knowes how to vse euill meanes well being no wayes the cause of sinne as sinne but alwayes ordering it for his glory and the good of his Elect. For sinne is like a Ship Man the Mariner Satan the spirit or winde God the Pilot at the sterne directing all things to his glory doctrine The will of God is the cause of Election and Reprobation as hath beene shewed before Vse 1. Our goodnesse or ilnesse is not the cause of Predestination In election is excluded the merit of man and the debt of God and yet it is to bee confessed that some way the goodnesse of man is the cause of election Praedestinatio quantum ad principium sine nobis non sine nobis quantum ad finem Paulus de Pala. Gran. in ca. 25. Math. Aliud est principium Actionis abud Cognitionis that is not of the Action of God Electing but of our Cognition and knowledge that we are elected Consider election Compositiuely there is no cause but Gods will Consider it resolutely and our Vocation is the cause whereby we know it In Reprobation our ilnesse is excluded as a speciall personall discretiue cause but not as a necessary condition or generall meritorious cause without the which God will not reprobate any Vse 2. Here also appeareth that man falne is the subiect of Predestination Of election it is because it is called mercy which presupposeth misery and faultinesse It is of Reprobation because it is called hardning Now this is a Rule that God hardens none but such as are hard before Neither can it be auoided by an interpretation of Actuall Hardnes For here is to be remembred that Paul speakes of Gods purpose as hath beene obserued before out of Martyr And if hee actually harden none but them which are hard neither did hee euer purpose to harden but such Also if it bee not here to be vnderstood of the Decree of Reprobation there is more in the Antecedent then in the Consequent This verse being the determination of the point according to the meaning of that which is before deliuered and thus doe most Interpreters vnderstand this secret Augustine often calleth the subiect of Gods Decree The Damned Masse Lege doctissimam Aug. Epist quae est ad Sixt. presb num 105. That Masse saith Anselme Ibi gratuita est indulgentia vbi iusta poterit esse vindicta Ansel to which death is due Hereby is perspicuous both the Mercy and Iustice of God Because there is a free Indulgence where there might haue beene a iust reuenge He loued Iacob by a free Mercy he hated Esau by a due and deserued Iudgement They that against this pretend the absolute right of God obserue not how this way that Absolute right is more excellently manifested when Authoritie is attributed to him among all mankinde being guilty to saue or to damne all or none or some at his owne pleasure An absolute Monarch who hath power of life and death if his subiects should rebell hath by his absolute power iust right to pardon them all if hee will or some and not others whereof hee needeth giue no other reason then his pleasure But sure he could not be counted a iust Lord and Gouernour if out of a plea of absolute command hee should deuoid from his protection and cast off any his subiects without relation to any Rebellion or other crime If you aske whether God can annihilate all things I answere Yes If whether hee can reprobate good Angels or Men for Angels and men to bee neither good nor bad is an idle fiction I say hee cannot by the perfection of his nature which can not but loue goodnesse as Augustine excellently He rendreth good for good because hee is good Euill for euill because he is iust God
wants but few the want of faith Vse 5. The Lawe is a heauenly thing and many wonders are contained in it of which wee shall comfortably vnderstand if we studie it aright Study it not as the Iewes or Papists doe to be iustified by it but to bring thee to Christ and then to walk in all obedience with thankfulnesse If thou doest thus thou hittest the nayle on the head If the Lawe driue vs not to Christ as the storme the birds to the Row and the ship to the hauen all other intents and studies are of no value Euery precept must teach vs our weaknesse euery promise must set our teeth on edge and euery curse as the lash of a whip make vs cry peccaui and bring vs down vpon our knees with Iesu thou sonne of Dauid haue mercy as the blind man cried in the Gospell And when thou art come to Christ thou must not cast away the Lawe but vse it still to make thee more to cling vnto Christ and as a rule of righteous liuing Christ is the end of the Lawe not the killing but fulfilling end Finis non interficiens sed persiciens Aug. not to end but to vrge thy obedience When the Marchant is come aboord his ship by boat he drownes not his boat but hoyses it vp into his ship he may haue vse of it another time or as a Noble-man neglects not his Schoolemaster when he is come to his lands but preferres him So certainly if the Lawe though sharpe hath brought thee to Christ thou canst not but loue it for this office if thou doest not thou hast not Christ Yea it will be the delight of a man to be then doing when Christ is with him as Peter then willingly and with successe cast out his net Without Christ the Lawe is an vncomfortable study but with him nothing more delightfull VERSE 5. For Moses describeth the righteousnesse which is of the Lawe that * Leuit. 18.5 Ezech. 20.11 Gal. 3.12 the man which doth those things shall liue by them 6. But the righteousnesse which is of faith speaketh on this wise * Deut. 30.12 Say not in thy heart Who shall ascend into Heauen That is to bring Christ downe from aboue 7. Or Who shall descend into the Deepe that is to bring vp Christ againe from the dead 8. But what sayth it * Deut. 30.14 The Word is nigh thee euen in thy mouth and in thy heart that is the Word of faith which we preach HEre Paul brings an Argument to euince that faith abolisheth not but stablisheth true righteousnesse thus The righteousnesse of faith is that which Moses teacheth vnto Iustification Therefore Iustification by faith abolisheth not righteousnes but establisheth it Paul compares in these verses the righteousnesse of the Lawe and of faith together shewing that the righteousnesse of the Lawe to be performed by vs is vncertaine and impossible and that the righteousnesse of faith is certaine and possible and both these by the testimony of Moses The Iewes thought that faith had been contrary to Moses but Paul shewes that Moses taught faith as Christ himselfe witnesseth Ioh. 5.46 The impossibility of the righteousnesse of the Law vnto Iustification Paul shewes in the 5. verse out of Leuiticus The man that doth these things shall liue thereby that is shall be iust for life flowes from Iustice The Gospell teacheth not a diuers righteousnesse from that of the Law but a diuers way vnto it namely Faith in Christ who fulfilled the Law The Argument from hence against Iustification by the Law is drawne from the Cause To performe the Law is impossible But righteousnesse of the Law is to performe it Therefore This impossibility of our performing the Law is not from the Law but from our selues who are corrupt That the righteousnesse of Faith is certaine and possible Paul shewes verse 6 7 8. that it is certaine verse 6 7. that it is possible verse 8. The Righteousnesse of Faith that is which the Gospell offereth and Faith receiues is certaine This Paul declares by a Negation of contrary doubtfulnesse elegantly compounded by a figure out of Deuteronomie The doubting which presseth sinners is two-fold 1. how they may enter into Heauen and 2. how they may auoid Hel. These two Moses shewes to be taken away by Faith The first because we beleeue the Ascension of Christ for vs. The second because we beleeue his Resurrection whereby hee demonstrated his victory ouer Hell and Death as if Moses had said He that seekes Iustification by the Law must needs be in continuall feare of Hell and despaire of Heauen but he that beleeueth that Christ is risen and ascended is freed from both Christ rose for vs and ascended for vs and before which must be implied liued and dyed for vs he which beleeueth not and seeketh for Iustification from himselfe in effect denies the Resurrection and Ascension of Christ That the righteousnesse of Faith is possible Paul shewes by the facility of it out of Moses vers 8. Faith is easie because it is giuen otherwise the hardest thing in the world for a sinner to beleeue the Gospell In the 8. verse we haue two things 1. Moses Testimonie The Word is nigh thee c. 2. Pauls exposition That is the Word of Faith which we preach The Word is nigh thee The Word of Promise so was the Word of the Law but nigh thee in thy mouth and heart not in Tables of Stone as the Law As if hee should haue said by a Prouerbiall manner of speaking This is righteousnesse before God to beleeue with the heart and with the mouth to confesse the Resurrection and Ascension of our Sauiour Christ for vs. The Generall summe That Righteousnesse is the safest and sufficientest to saluation which maketh vs assured before GOD and succoureth vs in tentation but so doth not the righteousnesse of the Law but that of the Gospell Therefore In this passage many things might be spoken of as of the Law our insufficiencie and impossibilitie to performe it Of the Ascension and Resurrection of Christ But I will onely consider of doctrine The Doctrine Faith not the Law makes vs certaine of our saluation before God Luke 8.12 Rom. 9.33 Ephes 2.8 1. Pet. 1.9 Vse 1. The Law is too weake to iustifie vs but strong enough to condemne vs which thou shalt finde which repentest not of thy sinnes Seeke not that which the Law cannot doe but feare that which the Law can doe Vse 2. Faith takes away but the Law breeds doubting both because we doe but little of that which the Law commands and in that little there is much defect deseruing the curse As then the doctrine of the Iewes so of the Papists who teach men to bee iustified by inherent righteousnesse must needs leaue men in suspence and doubt which doubts Faith ouercomes If our bodies were as hard as an Adamant wee should not feele the sting of Serpents so if the soule
of Faith The greatest Philosophers as the Epicures and Stoiks most resisted Paul Acts 17.18 as our greatest Politicians most scoffe at Religion and at preaching of the Word Vse 2. All are bound to heare and nothing so worthy to be heard as the Gospel Let vs say of hearing as Paul speaks of knowing it 1. Cor. 2.2 viz. that he esteemed to know nothing besides The Nurses song doth not so quiet the babe as the preaching of the Gospell the Conscience It s the hand of GOD offering vs forgiuenes of sinnes Hee therefore who hath eares to heare let him heare He hath wel imployed his eares who hath reuernntly heard the Gospell which the diuell keepes many from hearing lest by hearing they should be conuerted and liue If thou wilt not Now beare that which may profit thee thou shalt heare one day that which will make thy heart to ake euen this Goe you cursed c. For if any receiue you not nor heare your words shake the dust off your feet truely it shall be easier for Sodom in the day of Iudgement then for them Mat. 10.14,15 Vse 3. Ministers must be affected and grieue when they see the company of reuerent hearers so thinne and their labours so fruitlesse The Prophet here complaines of this so Christ grones for the hardnes of the peoples hearts and weepes ouer the stubbornnesse of Ierusalem The shrewdest turne to be done to a Minister is to depriue him of the ioy of his labours and the way to reioyce them is to embrace the Gospel they preach It will be vnprofitable and heauy for the hearers to haue their Minister to complain of them with griefe vnto God Vse 4. Esay and Paul gaue not ouer though they had cause to cōplaine As the Physician omits no point of his Art though the recouery of his Patient be desperate So though vvee preach to many desperate and scoffing hearers we must not giue ouer but rather vse the more diligence For whether they profit by vs or no we shall haue our fee. Not as the husbandman loseth by an ill crop shall I lose If I preach and thou repent not it shall neuer repent me of my paines I will preach still for though my preaching be not a sweet sauour to thee yet euen in thee I am a sweet sauour to God Thou also shalt smart for it for if we be offended when our words are despised much more will God bee at the contempt of his Gospell Vse 5. Although faith cannot be without preaching going before it yet preaching may be without faith following it as that which is to be knowne may be without the knowledge of it The word that sounds without is not sufficient faith if God speake not within in the heart There are two things required to faith the determination of that which is to be beleeued and the inclination and perswasion of the heart to beleeue Aquinas Preaching determines but its God who perswades by preaching God can doe it without preaching but preaching cannot doe it without God Our voyce can say Repent but its God only that giues Repentance Paul preacheth to Lidiaes eare but God hath the key of her heart Pray that God would open our mouthes to speake pray also that he will vnlocke thy heart to beleeue for as Rebecca cookt the Venison but Isaac gaue the blessing so wee may plant and water but its God that giues the increase 1. Cor. 3.7 VERSE 18. But I say Haue they not heard Yes verily c Psal 19.4 their sound went into all the earth and their words vnto the ends of the world THis is spoken of the Gentiles not of the Iewes as appeares by the manner of the next verse In this Paul preuents another obiection occasioned by the words before concerning the sending of the Gospell to the Gentiles as if some Iew should haue sayd If you be sent to the Gentiles why do you preach to them all but only to some choyce Cities and Nations Paul answeres that they doe and shall preach to them all which he vtters by an interrogation and proues by a testimony out of the Psalmes as if he should say Dauid tells you that all haue or might heare for Their sound is gone out into all the earth Question is whether Paul alleadge this testimony or allude vnto it In the Psalme he speaks of works here of the Word Some say that Paul argues from the lesse If God teach all by the great volume of the heauens much more will he teach all by the heauenly doctrine of the Gospell I thinke that vnder the historicall narration of the heauens and of their sound is hid a prophecy of the preaching of the Gospell because the latter part of the Psalme speakes much in the commendation of it and Paul here so applies it And indeed there is a most sweet Analogie betweene the heauens sound and the Gospell There are diuers particulars obserued I thinke these are good The heauens are the worke of Gods hand so is the Gospell reuealed by God The heauens shew the worke of God so the Gospell that wee are Iustified by the worke of God which is faith not by the works of man The doctrine of the Gospell is pure and lightsome as are the heauens The influence of the heauens comforteth cherisheth inferior things so doth the Gospell the Conscience The diuersity of Nations and Languages is manifold which vnderstand not one another yet all vnderstand the excellency of the heauens and the wonderfull worke of God in them So God enabled the Apostles to teach all Nations in their owne tongues the wonderfull works of God Into all the earth and vnto the ends of the world The summe is that the Gospell was preached to all the world Ob. But many Nations were long after the Apostles dayes conuerted as England in the time of Gregory the great the Iaponians and Americans but the other day heard of Christ A. All the earth is either taken for the most part the ends for Countries very farre off or it is spoken of that which should be or it is meant of the 4. quarters of the world or of the Romane Empire And for that of England it is false Indeed in Gregories dayes England by Austen the Monke was first brought in subiection to Rome they before agreeing with the Greeke Church for at the comming of that Austen there were many holy Monks in this Land and some haue written of the conuersion of it in the daies of Eleutherius yea Dorotheus seemeth to affirme that Simon Zelotes was in Brittany if the place be not misprinted And for the New discouered places may be answered that either they were not then inhabited or the Gospell there preached but not receiued or that the fame of the Gospell at the least came thither as the fame of the Israelites came into Canaan doctrine The Gospell was preached to all the world in the time of the Apostles
Eliah there were seuen thousand reserued so also now The like times of the Church are wisely to be compared But the present estate of the Iewes is the same with that of the Israelites therefore as then so now a reseruation is made and by consequence their reiection not totall Heere we haue two things 1. A Proposition 2. An Amplification The Proposition that in the time of Paul though the Iewes were generally cast off yet there was and is a reseruation Obseruation When thou hearest of persecution and of killing vp the Prophets and professors be of good-comfort God will saue seuen thousand He will reserue one Eliah as in the dayes of Ahab one Athanasius as in the time of the Arrian Heresie one Wicliffe one Husse one Luther in the most darksome and hideous times of Antichrist The Amplification is from the cause of this Reseruation which is Election set foorth also by the eause of it which is Grace Through the Election of Grace not actiuely to be vnderstood on mans part as Chrysostome but actiuely on Gods part and passiuely on ours nor is Election to be heere expounded faith the seale of it as some but the decree called election of Grace that is gratious or free election doctrine The cause why some are reserued in dangerous times is their Election For as saith so perseuerance is proper to the Elect Act. 13.48 and 20.21 Vse 1. As to be preserued from Idolatry when true Religion is abolished and persecuted so in these dayes to be kept from sin and to stand when a thousand fall on one hand and ten thousand on another is a comfortable note of Election Iniquitie abounds Neglect not so faire an occasion of making thy Election sure If God bestow his grace on thee stoppe thee in the way of sinne make thy heart bleed for the transgressions of the time and preserue thee in his feare thou art elected for if thou wert a reprobate he would not haue such care of thee but giue thee quite ouer to follow the swinge of thine owne lusts vnto perdition Therefore by thy life thou mayest know for God hath not elected vs to serue the Diuell but himselfe Vse 2. If persecution come seare not many suffered constantly in the dayes of Iesabel and seuen thousand could not be found being hidden as a treasure by God So in Queene Maries daies many were taken and burned and many were sought after and could not be found for God couered them with his hand and smote the eyes of them which sought their liues as he smote the Sodomites sometimes when they sought the dore of Lots house Resolue thus If such fiery times should come and God should call thee out and suffer thee to bee found he will also so strengthen thee that thou shalt glorifie him in thy sufferings If God giue thee not such strength he will so hide thee from thy persecutors that though Iesabel her selfe search all the corners of the Land for thee as narrowly as Laban searched Iacobs stuffe yet shee shall not finde thee VERSE 6. And if by Grace then is it no more of workes otherwise Grace were no more Grace But if it be of workes then is it no more grace otherwise worke is no more worke THese words as was before said are an amplificatiō of the summe of the 5. vers namely that the Reseruation is according to election of Grace from whence this Consectary takes place If by election of grace then not by workes Though this doe not much pertaine to Pauls Argument in hand yet by the direction of the Spirit he takes that little occasion offered to speake something in commendation of Grace because he had to deale with the Iewes which stood greatly vpon their owne Righteousnesse which indeed was one of their maine diseases and therefore he neglects not by the way to touch this sort and to giue them a iog for remembrance that we are saued by grace not by workes Pauls example must teach Ministers a point of wisedome which is to take notice of the speciall sinnes of their Auditors and in the course of their teaching if any occasion offer though it lie not so plaine in their way to giue them a memento Paul breakes out here into a new question that he might meete with the Iewes in euery corner When Ministers speake against the sinnes of their Auditors O say they he findes not that in his text but we know by the direction of Gods Spirit and by the warrant of Pauls example if we find such in you how to find it in our text to reproue you for it and yet not to be guiltie of rouing or digressing But to the Consectary If election and preseruation be of grace it is not of workes This is proued by the nature of grace and workes which are contrary and destroy one another And it is set downe with inuersion of the termes That which is of grace is not of workes else grace were not grace that is free That which is of workes is not of grace else works were not workes that is did not make indebted The mysterie in this verse plainly appeares if we vnderstand what is meant by grace and what by workes The Schoolemen and Iesuites distinguish grace into grace making gracious and grace freely giuen Aqin Sum. p. 2. q. 111. art 1. The first they say is charitie a grace whereby we are conioyned to God the second is faith and the rest of Christian vertues But first both these are coincident for charitie also is a grace freely giuen Secondly they make this grace to be in man they know no other and therefore Bellarmine and the rest when they write of this subiect they write de gratia hominis of the grace of man but the Scripture onely speaketh of the grace of God and of the grace of our Lord Iesus Christ Grace is taken three wayes First for the free fauour of God the alone cause of our election which is subiectiuely in God one of the imminent vertues of the Deitie being his essence This is meant here Secondly for the energie operation and working of this grace which Austen calleth the mouing of mercie Motum miseric Aust lib. 3. Hyp. the lesuites call it an helpe or grace preuenting or following of grace preuenting is that place Eph. 2.8 of following 1. Cor. 15.10 of both together 2. Cor. 12.9 Thirdly for the gifts of grace which haue a different appellation ordinarily in Pauls Epistles as faith hope loue patience and this is distributed into habituall grace and actuall This in no wise is here to be vnderstood nor either of the parts before spoken of from the Schoole For charitie and faith are workes but we must haue a grace opposite to workes Workes are either good or bad bad workes not here vnderstood but good Ob. But grace and good workes are agreeing as the cause and the effect Ans To speake properly the anger of God is contrary to his grace
doubt not of his mercie who will graciously receiue a Iew. Vse 2. Redemption is a taking away of sinne by iustification and sanctification Such as are in their sinnes are vnredeemed and remaine vnder the power of the diuell who holds thē though not by a visible possession which is fearfull yet by an inuisible operation which is worse Many say they defie the diuell who by consenting to his suggestions worship him in their liues for as true obedience is a worshipping of God so sinne and disobedience is the worship of the diuell as Paul sheweth saying Rom. 6.16 His seruants ye are to whom ye obey God saith sweare not the diuell saith sweare and ease thy stomack God saith be sober the diuell saith be drunken To whom doest thou yeeld If thou refusest to doe Gods will and obeyest the fiend thou art Gods enemie and the diuels slaue VERSE 28. As concerning the Gospell they are enemies for your sake but as touching the election they are beloued for the fathers sakes HEre Paul proues by reason that the Iewes shall be pardoned and so called The reason is taken from the loue of God and followes thus Those whom Gods loues he will pardon and call But God loues the Iewes Ergo. The argument is brought in by a prolepsis What the Iewes might some say pardoned and called Gods enemie whom God hates Yes saith Paul euen the Iewes for though in some respect they are hated yet in other they are beloued of God Here are two things auouched of the Iewes first that they are enemies secondly that they are beloued They are enemies whose Pauls but not so here but Gods enemies hated of God This is amplified two wayes first from the meritorious cause for the Gospel namely because they refuse and persecute it secondly from the end for your sake for your benefite that is the Gentiles The hatred of the Iewes to the Gospell is deadly as appeared in the crucifying of Christ in their persecuting the Apostles and their extreme malice to Christians of all times being a chiefe cause and principall agents in the tormenting of poore Christians as Tertullian reports of his times and their dealings with Polycarpus doe testifie mentioned by Eusebius Iudaeorum Synagogae sontes perse eutionum Pertul scorp adnersus Gent. Hierome reports that in his time the Iewes vsed to curse Christ and Christians vnder the name of Nazarens In the dayes of Philip the long a King of France they hired certaine leapers to poison all the fountaines in that kingdome In this our land they committed many outrages by crucifying children to death on Good friday for which as they deseruedly many of them suffered so they were at length wholy banished out of this kingdome Robert Gagnanus lib. 7. hist Franco They were also for such like things expelled Spaine circa an 1290. giuing occasion of the beginning of the bloudy Inquisition circa an 1493. which afterwards was turned against the Protestants In two Councels it was prouided that at Easter two dayes before and two after they should not be permitted to come abroad because of their insolencies offered to Christians at that time which is yet obserued in all Christian cities where they are suffered Aurelianeuse 3. et Matisconense 1. circa an 537 et 575. For this hatred of the Gospell they are hated of God and that for our good as ver 11. It is in the power of wicked men to sinne but by their sinne to effect this or that good is not in their power but in his who deuides the darknesse and orders it August lib. 1. de praedest cap. 16. 2. They are beloued loco Aug. modo citat They are hated and yet beloued which may well be because they are not in the same respect time or particular subiect These to be vnderstood of the nation as Austin saith of whom some belong to Iacobs halting some to the blessing he receiued Beloued of God in two respects first of election secondly of the fathers Election signifies the grace whereby they were chosen to be the people of God by which it comes to passe that many of them belong to Gods secret election For where God hath his Church there is the treasury of his Election Fathers sake Abraham Isaac and Iacob not because of their merits but of the couenant made with them doctrine The Iewes are beloued of God Esay 1.1 c. They were beloued and Gods loue is to the end Vse The certaintie of the calling of the Iewes hereby is manifest yet some haue gone about absurdely to take away the subiect of the question denying there are any Iewes in the world because there are none in England or because they liue not in a countrey by themselues which are filly shifts to alledge against so manifest a truth Haue all learned men agreed to befoole the world Doe Christian Magistrates make lawes against shadowes Doe all Trauellers consent together to bely themselues who say they haue seene and talked with Iewes What Country-men are they which in Italy Venice and diuers free Cities are vpon penalties distinguished by their habite from other Christian themselues say they are Iewes Are they not Is the profession of a Iew in such account and esteeme that men should counterfeit themselues Iewes which are not Surely this is not worth the answering There is a place to the Thessalonians 1. Thes 2.14 which these accute disputers haue not obserued which hath more validity against the calling of the Iewes then all which they haue alledged Paul saith That the wrath of God is come on the Iewes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which some haue translated for euer but it is better translated to the vttermost noting the extremity of punishmēt not of time or if of time then to be applied to Pauls persecutors and those of that time which wrath they endured at the destruction of Ierusalem Vse 2. Many speake and account loosely of the Gospell but for such doing God hated the Iewes Vse 3. Thou knowest a Papist or prophane person though thou beest an enemie to him for his sinne yet thou must loue him for the Election because for ought thou knowest hee may be the elect childe of God Vse 4. Good fathers are a great blessing to their children Salomon continues Prince all his dayes and one Tribe is reserued for his sonne for Dauids sake let vs feare God euen for our childrens sake that the blessing of God doe not determine in vs. 2. King 11.34.35.36 Vse 5. Thou louest the remembrance of Abraham then loue a Iew as many times we shew fauour to one that is lewd for his good fathers sake nay though wee bee glad for our owne sakes yet wee must loue them for Gods sake wee must loue them whom God loues woe vnto them who haue no other cause of hating their neighbour but because hee is religious and beloued of God such are of the line of