Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	punishment_n	sin_n	sin_v	1,923	5	9.5821	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A56405	A revindication set forth by William Parker, in the behalfe of Dr. Drayton deceased, and himself of the possibility of a total mortification of sin in this life: and, of the saints perfect obedience to the law of God: to be the orthodox Protestant doctrine, and no innovations (as they are falsly charged to be) of Dr. Drayton and W. Parker; in an illogicall vindication, wherein the necessity of sins remaining in the best saints as long as they live, and the impossibility of perfect obedience to the law of God, is ignorantly and perversly avouched to to [sic] be the orthodox Protestant doctrine; by one who subscribeth his name John Tendring. ...	Parker, William, fl. 1651-1658.	1658 (1658)	Wing P486A; ESTC R200724	221,023	288

righteous and then judgeth them so the elect being in themselves liable to the accusation and condemnation of the law to be just and righteous by faith in Jesus Christ through the imputation of his own justice to the praise of his power and the eternal salvation of their souls Which description of justification is utterly false and shews how farre he and those from whom he borrowed it are out of the way and how ignorant they are in fundamentals even one of the main grounds of their salvation which description he notwithstanding goes about to explicate by the causes as follows saying Now for the causes of justification first they are especially the efficient secondly material thirdly the formal fourthly final Why would he have any more then four causes of an effect I fear in this business he must content himself with fewer for the effecting and producing of the justification at which he aims But each of these aforesaid saith he must be considered two wayes first actively in respect of him that justifies us and secondly passively in respect of the man who is justified first the principal cause of our justification actively considered is God freely purposing to send his Son to be made man to work righteousness for men But God justified men in the Old Testament by the Spirit of his Son Isa 50.8 and 5.3 11. where he cites 1 Pet. 1.10 Gal. 4.4 Then to wit in the fulness of time God sending his Son made of a woman made under the law then revealing his Son unto us by the preaching of the Gospel and perswading us to believe the same and lay hold on the Son of God by the operation of the blessed Spirit and then accounting unto us the obedience of his Son for our righteousness In all which he is gone out of Gods road or way of justification and from the truth of the Gospel for though God so sent his Son made of a woman and made under the law yet it was not to justifie us by active obedience unto the law as we have said And this he did saith he to shew that he is the beginning the middle and the end of our justification and to prove this the Lord himself saith Isa 43.25 I even I am he that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine own sake and will not remember thy sins and the Apostle plainly saith Rom. 8.33 as he hath it page 77. It is God that justifies and the very Pharisees that rejected Christ most impiously professed this most truly that none can forgive sins but God onely And so saith Gregorie It is meet that he should be the giver of grace that was the author of nature Greg. in Psal paeniten pithily saith It is his office to absolve the guilty by whose justice he is made guilty But who questions any of all this Again the impulsive cause that moved God to do all this for man we find saith he to be two-fold first internal secondly external the first is the meer grace and free mercy of God towards men and this because he would be merciful to man Because we can ascribe no other cause of Gods will which is the cause of all things to wit in their first creation but onely this quia voluit because he would But in acts of providence especially in the punishment of sin there may be an external cause found in the creature And therefore Saint Paul saith he attributeth our redemption to the riches of his grace Ephes 6.7 Rom. 3.24 Titus 3.4 5. where he saith that after the kindness and love of God our Saviour towards men appeared not by works of righteousness which we have done but according to his mercy he saved us by the washing of regeneration and renewing of the holy Ghost which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour Whereby you see the Apostle maketh the kindness love and mercy of God to be the efficient principal cause or motive that moved God to send Christ to be the means of our salvation Nor is this denied at any hand but if the Vindicator had taken in one verse more of Titus 3. he might have easily seen that regeneration before described and justification is all one work and thing for it follows there that being justified by his grace in the work aforesaid we might be made heirs according so the hope of eternal life But he goes on thus And Augustine Homil. de Nat. Gratia saith that it is the ineffable grace of God that a man guilty of sin yea and say we polluted with sin should be justified from fin And especially against the Pelagian heresie who magnified nature to villifie and almost nullifie grace he saith that the grace of God whereby infants and men of years are saved is not procured by deserts but tendred freely without merits and so Anselm in Rom. 11. that because all men are shut up under sin the salvation of men cometh not in or by the merits of men but in the morcy of God The second impulsive cause is Christ saith he God and man who purchased by his merits that we should be justified in the sight of God Which thing hath been justly questioned for God might out of his free mercy and grace justisie us without any such merits and though the death of Christ wants not its inestimable price and merits yet we are not justified in Pauls sense thereby and much lesse by his active obedience but only by his Spirit But he gives us a reason for what he had said out of Isai 53.5 because the chastisement of our offences was laid upon him and that by his stripes we might be healed But here we would aske the Vindicator and his friends these questions first whether Isaiah speaks of a chastisement that was past or yet to come for certain it is that Christ was a Lamb slain from the beginning of the world Rev. 17.8 Secondly if it was a preterit suffering whether it was not Christs inward and voluntary death for us and in us when vve first became actual sinners according to Rom. 5.6 For when we were yet without strength according to the time Christ died for the ungodly and Gal. 3.1 Oh foolish Galatians who hath bewitched you that you should not obey the truth before whose eyes Christ hath been evidently set forth crucified in you Jam. 5.6 Ye have condemned and killed the just one and he doth not resist you See Rev. 1.7 and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him even so Amen And if so what peace was that which was procured for us by that his suffering and death was it not a time and space of repentance for otherwise we as also our first parents had immediately been sent to hell Fourthly what those stripes of Christ are by which we are healed are they his personal sufferings alone inward or outward upon the cross or are they his like sufferings when we suffer with him or for him dying unto all sin

See Rom. 6.8 For if we be dead with him we believe that we shall live with him and chap. 8.13 and if children then heirs heirs of God and joynt-heirs with Christ if so be that we suffer with him that we may be also glorified with him See 2 Cor. 1.4 5 6. 2 Tim. 2.11 12. 1 Pet. 4.1 2 3. This condition of conformity to Christs sufferings whether inward of which the Vindicator and his party say nothing or outward upon the crosse is not once thought of though there is no other way left us in Christ to obtain salvation Mat. 16.24 25. Pag. 68. he tels us but falsly that the material cause of our justification actually considered is Jesus Christ No it is the person to be justified and the benefits which we have by Christ saith he are two especially First redemption Secondly propitiation But those two say we will prove but one in the end First for redemption saith he it is a word borrowed from the use of war and why not from other civil and judicial acts and it signifies freedom from captivity And thus Christ is our deliverance but how First from the wrath of God see his method he sets that in the first place which should come last because saith he he is our reconciliation And is not that a propitiation through faith in his blood Rom. 3.25 which blood say we is the promised spirit for and signified by blood in the old Testament and not the blood of his crosse as he and others dream see Heb. 9.14 and 10.39 and 13.20 21. 1 Pet. 1.18 19. 1 Joh. 1.7 9. Rev. 7.14 and 12.11 Secondly saith he we are freed from the tyranny and dominion of sin because that obeying from the heart the form of doctrine unto which we are delivered that is the Gospel of Christ we are made free from sin and are become the servants of Christ which is our righteousnesse Rom. 6.18 Is this obedience then our righteousnesse sure he means nothing lesse though he speaks truer herein then he is aware of But he will have Christs external obedience to be our righteousnesse and none other Thirdly we are freed saith he from the punishment of our sins because it s against justice the punishment should be inflicted when the sin is pardoned for sin being the cause of punishment it must needs follow that sublatâ causâ which he elsewhere saith cannot be taken away in this life the cause being defaced or rather removed the effect should be absolved But against this he saith it may be objected That the sins of the elect are pardoned and yet they are afflicted continually and as the Prophet saith Psalm 73.13 they are chastised every morning and therefore how can it be that he should for give the guilt of their sins and yet as the Prophet speaks Psalm 99.8 he should punish their inventions But there are no sins pardoned say we till they be wholly left Unto which said objection he answers That the miseries of men before the pardon of sin are the punishments of sin but the affliction of the Saints after the remission of their sin are not to be reputed penalties of Gods anger but exercises of his servants and arguments of his love for as many as I love I rebuke and chasten saith Christ Rev. 3.19 so also Heb. 12.5 and that for a double end First for our salvation that we should not be condemned with the world 1 Cor. 11.30 Secondly and subordinately for our sanctification that we may be made partakers of his holinesse But what difference is there between Gods holinesse and our positive salvation is not eternal life a participation in full of Gods holinesse Psalm 17 13. I shall be satisfied when I shall awake with thy likenesse But God punisheth those sins with temporal plagues in his servants for their humiliation and amendment and for a warning unto others which he pardoneth as to the world to come 2 Sam. 12.13 14. and before the pardon of sin men are chastised in love to their souls as well as afterwards Psalm 94.12 Pro. 3.11 12. and Heb. 12.6 7. As for Propitiation he tels us page 68 69. that it is a reconciling us to God through the blood to wit the blood of his Spirit and it is saith he the accomplishment of that which was signified by the Mercy-seat Exod. 30. But the Mercy-seat or Propitiatorie did represent Christ in the Spirit and in his second or spiritual coming in the power of his resurrection when the two tables of the Law are written upon our hearts and the face and aspect of God and the soul looks towards each other like the two Cherubims through Christ the everlasting propitiation and Priest And that which the Vindicator speaks there confirms it for first as God gave his oracles unto the Prophets he should have said unto the Priests also out of the Mercy-seat so he did yea doth reveal his will unto us his Priests and Ministers by Jesus Christ not without us only but especially within us 1 Joh. 2.27 Joh. 1.17 Secondly as God was said to dwell between the Cherubims which covered the Mercy-seat so in Christ the fulnesse of the Godhead dwelleth bodily or really Coloss 2.9 And thereby as God was made propitious and favourable unto his people to assist and bless them by the blood which the High-Priest sprinkled before the Mercy-seat so saith he he is pacified and reconciled unto us and procured to inrich us with spiritual blessings through the blood of Jesus Christ Coloss 1.18 Which is true of both bloods that of his Spirit and that of his cross yea of the blood of sin also which we must shed in conformity to the death and bloodshed of Christ But this last parallel is not apt but forced Again he saith the grounds of those benefits or the meritorious cause thereof is the most absolute and perfect obedience which our Saviour Christ performed unto his Father for our sakes and is to be considered first actively then passively first the active obedience of Christ is a most perfect performance of Gods Law even to the utmost tittle thereof touching which we must consider-first that although Christ as man fulfilled the Law for himself that in both natures he might be an holy High Priest to offer sacrifice unto God yet as mediator as God and man he became subject to the Law and did fully and perfectly execute the same for us But how doth he prove that for Christ saith he is not only our redemption by that ransome which he paid for our sins but he is also the perfection of the Law unto salvation most true but not in his sense unto every one that believeth And there he three things saith he that prove the necessity thereof to be performed for us what are they first the justice of God that will not justifie the wicked to wit while they remain such in deed and will Prov. 17.15 but such as are just and righteous either by a proper

shall reward evill to mine enemies cut them off in thy truth and 59.13 Consume them in thy wrath consume them that they may not be and let them know that God ruleth in Iacob to the ends of the earth and 71.24 My toung shall talkof thy righteousnesse all the day long for they are confounded for they are brought to shame that seek my hurt and 101.8 I wil early destroy all the wicked of the Land that I may cut off all wicked doers from the City of the Lord which is every Saint Jerem. 4.14 Wash thine heart O Jerusalem that thou mayst be saved how long shall thy wicked thoughts lodg in thee Psal 112.8 His heart is established he shall not be afraid untill he see his desire upon his enemies and 139.23 24. Search me O my God and know my heart try me and know my thoughts and see if there be any wicked way in me and lead me in the way everlasting and 143.9 10. Deliver me O Lord from mine enemies for I fly to thee to hide me with thee teach me to do thy will for thou art my God thy Spirit it is good lead me unto the Land of uprightnesse and of thy mercy cut off all mine enemies and destroy all them that afflict my soul Eccles 9.10 Whatsoever thine hand findeth to do do it with all thy might for there is no work knowledg wisedome or device in the grave whether thou goest and Luk 1.74 75. That we being delivered out of the hands of our enemies might serve him without fear in holinesse and righteousnesse before him all the days of our life Tit. 2.12 Teaching us that denying ungodlinesse and worldly lusts we should live soberly righteously and godly in this present world 1 Pet. 2.24 Who his own self bare our sins in his body upon the tree that we being dead to sin might live unto righteousnesse and 4.1 2. Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh arm your selves likewise with the same mind that he which is dead hath ceased from sin that he should no longer live the rest of his time in the flesh after the lusts of men but after the will of God Fifthly that when we were first converted sin had his death-wound contrary to Rom. 7.14 24. and 8.13 Gal. 5.17 Heb. 3.13 14. Take heed brethren lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief in departing from the living God but exhort one another daily lest any of you be hardned through the deceitfulnesse of sin and 6.4 5 6. and 10.26 27 28 29 30. and 12.15 Looking diligently lest any fall from the grace of God lest any root of bitternesse springing up trouble you and thereby many be defiled 2 Pet. 2.1.20 21. Jude 4. c. for no sin hath its deadly wound till it be by the patience and Spirit of Christ wholly overcome and lest Rev. 2.16 and 3.10 Sixthly That all the guilt of sin and punishment is taken away though the pollution and corruption remains contrary to Prov. 28.13 Jer. 33.8 Acts. 26.18 this is to take away the effect and leave the cause in force and being hence it is that Hieronymus saith on 1 Cor. 6. Be not deceived thinking that faith alone sufficeth for every sin that remaineth excludeth men from the kingdome of Heaven as the Apostle speaks Gal. 5. how the works of the flesh are hurtfull which are these adultery fornication uncleannesse c. of which I tell you before as I have told you in times past that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of Heaven But also saith he they pray sinfully who persevere in sin and desire that those sins of theirs should be pardoned or put away by the Lord which they themselves have not put away from them Seventhly they say that there is not any other active obedience or righteousnesse of Christ to be attained by faith then that which Christ works in his Saints for its contrary to Isai 45.24 25. and 48.18 and 53.11 and 59.17 and 61.3 10 11. and 62.1 2. Jerem. 23.5 6. and 31.31 32 33. and Rom. 4.11 and 5.7 18 19. and 8.4 Phil. 3.9 10. Eighthly that we are perfect in this life and complete by justification though not by sanctification where 's they are both one thing as hath been proved at large and while the one is imperfect the other is also Ninthly that justification lies in remission of sins or taking away the guilt of the same yet leaving the sin or pollution behind whereas justification taken in a liberative way is a purging and washing away of the fault and corruption in the first place as hath been proved out of Acts 13.20 and 1 Cor. 6.11 Tit. 3.4 5 6 7. Thirdly consider that the kingdome of God which Christ and his Apostles preached is not onely an inward kingdome Luk. 17.21 as it is a kingdome both of grace Rom. 14.17 and of glory also Rom. 8.19 Ephes 1.18 but consequently that there is an internal heaven of holiness and glory to be had and obtained by the Saints in this life Heb. 10.34 knowing that ye have in your selves a better and more induring substance in the heavens for so the words are in the Greek Text. As Paul also speaks of himself and fellow-Apostles whom God hath raised up and set together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus Ephes 2.5 6. this is that kingdome which Christ taught his Disciple to pray for saying ' thy kingdome come and which he and John Baptist published 'to be at hand Matth. 3.2 and 4.17 and which ' John saw coming down from God out of heaven Rev. 21.23 before whose coming all sin must be purged away for ' no unclean thing can enter into it Rev. 21.27 yea all the spiriteal effects of sin as the second day sorrow crying and tears shall be removed Rev. 21.4 Fourthly that they which know not own not nor witness this kingdome of God with the way and means thereunto were never sent of God to preach the true Gospel of the kingdome but do publish their own imaginations and traditions of men as the Vindicator and many of far greater note then he both living and dead both do and have done Fithly that they who do not believe that he God will avenge his elect who cry unto him night and day for vengeance against their spiritual enemies for the rooting of all out Luk. 18.1 7. have not the faith of Gods elect as hath been said before Sixthly we shall leave it to your serious consideration whether it be not the voice of the unbelievers and not of the Saints of whom it is said concerning the beast of sin which came out of the sea with seven heads and ten horns saying Rev. 13.4 and they worshiped the dragon who gave power unto the beast and they worshipped the beast saying who is like unto the beast who is able to make war with him Which interpretation concerning the beast of sin is not ours but

said verb in the said place in the Hebrew text is in the future tense but who is there that knows any thing of that language who knows not that the Hebrews have no potential mood of a verb and that when they have occasion to make use of the same mood to declare the sense of Scripture according as it is intended they then render the future tense of the Indicative mood in the Potential mood as aforesaid which the English Translators should have done to have made the hypothetical axiom good sense in reference to the reason given immediately in the Parenthesis to illustrate the hypothetical axiom by Again its requisite to find out the sense and scope of a Scripture-axiom to observe whether the said axiom be laid down absolutely without any dependence on the context or whether it be laid down with some relative particle to be taken notice of evidencing its dependence upon the context antecedent or consequent As for instance it is thus translated Eccles 7.20 for there is no man which sinneth not hence it is more confidently affirmed then truly by most that Solomon doth acknowledge that there is no man upon earth which doth good and sinneth not But the mistake of these men who affirm as aforesaid is from the mistranslating of the Hebrew particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which indeed is a relative particle and doth intimate that this verse doth relate unto the 19 verse which is the antecedent context thereunto where it is said that wisdome doth strengthen the wise more then ten mighty men which are in the city The meaning is that wisdome will fence and secure a wise man more from dangerous assaults and violence then ten mighty men which are in the city For the illustration of which and to shew the excellency of wisdome and the use thereof in a superlative degree Solomon doth subjoyn the 20 verse so as to make it with the 19 verse a discrete axiom by putting a discrete particle if rightly translated to the 20 verse but our Translators expresse that particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by a a causal particle for which indeed being so expressed maketh those said 19 20 verses relating together to contain in their relative respect little or no sense at all as will appear to every truth-searching man thus Wisedom doth strengthen the wise man more then ton mighty men which are in the City for or because there is not a just man upon earth which doth good and sinneth not Now is that a good reason or cause why wisedom doth strengthen a wise man more then ten mighty men even because there is not a just man upon earth who doth good and sinneth not surely it s not a better reason then his was who gave out of his shallow judgement that Tenderden steeple was the cause of Goodwin-Sandes because Goodwin Sandes was after Tenderden steeple That story Bishop Latimer made use of upon an occasion in a Sermon before King Edward concerning such who ignorantly put non causam pro causa that which is no cause for the cause So do the Translators by their translation put non causam pro causa for sinne is no cause why wisedome hath any excellent effect but the contrary rather if we believe what Solomon saith Eccles 10.1 Dead flies make the ointment of the Apothecarie to smel so doth a little folly him that is in reputation for wisedom But if the Translators had translated the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 discretely though although notwithstanding and rendred the verb which is in the future tense of the Indicative mood in the present tense of the Potential mood then had they given a good and profitable sense of the words thus Wisedom strengtheneth a wise man more then ten mighty men which are in a City although there be no man upon earth which doth good and sinneth not as it did strengthen Christ Luk. 20.20 21. and Stephen also Act. 6.10 By translating the said words in the manner aforesaid as they should have done they had not been guilty of seducing the people to believe by their translation that Solomon doth affirm contrary to Scriptures that there is no man upon earth which doth good and sinneth not If those who are Judges and assume power to scan and judge mens words do conclude the axiom or axioms to be positively and absolutely affirmed or denyed which are only intended relatively to the antecedent or consequent axioms we say if they do so quis pene innocens sit who can free himself from treason or blasphemy as often as their tryers and Judges please to declare their words absolutely and abstractly spoken when the author of them intended them as Solomon did in the place aforesaid onely to be relatively spoken By which kind of dividing axioms he did more wickedly then wittily who said Hang all the Law and the Prophets concealing and not mentioning Christs antecedent words Math. 22.40 On these commandements hang all the Law and the Prophets 10. Que. Whether if we doubt of the meaning of an axiom which is a divine testimony we are not to consider to the end we may see the meaning of it the artificial arguments contained in the said axiom for though testimonium be argumentum inartificiale yet the axiom consists of artificial arguments and these testata must be proved by artificial arguments or something equivalent or tantamount unto them which are qualifications requisite to be in every witnesse as scientia virtus prudentia First Knowledge in the testis else he will speak he knoweth not what like them 1 Tim. 1.7 Secondly Vertue or else talke they care not what as they did Math. 28.15 upon a sad account Thirdly Constancy else the testes will seem to contradict themselves as they did that cryed before Christ Hosanna to the highest and the next day cried Crucifie him crucifie him Therefore to find out the true meaning of the res testata the thing affirmed or denied we must see what arguments relating one to another are contained in the axiom which is a Scripture-testimony As for instance Christ saith to Nicodemus Joh. 3.5 Except a man be born again of water and of the Spirit c. Now what water Christ meaneth is the thing to be inquired into We instance in the said place because there was a learned respondent who did of late in a publique disputation affirm and the opponent did not deny it though he might that elementary baptismal water was meant by Christ in the said place His only reason was without any further demonstration because so many Fathers had for so many ages downward attested it without any artificial arguments but onely their bare words to be so which is the reason we professe to all men why we doubt that sense to be the meaning of water in that place unlesse the said respondent can assure us that those Fathers or some of them were by inspirement infallible in giving of the said sense if he can then