Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n marry_v put_v wife_n 2,872 5 8.0395 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A89345 Psychosophia or, Natural & divine contemplations of the passions & faculties of the soul of man. In three books. By Nicholas Mosley, Esq; Mosley, Nicholas, 1611-1672. 1653 (1653) Wing M2857; Thomason E1431_2; ESTC R39091 119,585 307

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

given to us little children humbly ignorant here an equality of knowledge with the Angells which alwaies behold the face of their heavenly Father therefore sing thou with the Psalmist Lord I am not high minded I exercise not my self in things too high for me Psalm 131. But I refrain my soul and keep it low like as a child that is weaned from his mother Yea my soul is even as a weaned child CHAP. II. Of the Attributes of the soul Chap. 2. Book 1. AFter the Original of the soul it will not be amiss before we come to its Definition to treat of the Attributes of the soul viz. the Immortality and Eternity the Indivisibility impatibility Separability and Impermixture of the soul not but that these are more properly touched in the second Book the Metaphysicall science of the soul as it is abstracted from bodily Organs only here to shew as I have already done the Divine principle of the soul how far these properties of the soul have been or may be evidenced by the light of Reason by the truth of naturall Philosophie and first with the last of the soules Separability and impermixture from the body and so in order upwards The Separability and immixture of the soul The soul of man is inorganical and hath its operations out of the body and therefore it is separable from the body separable I mean not as it doth subsist after death without the body as some of the antient Plilosophers onely held but even in this life also whilst it is in the body it is separated from it so the Modern and most of the antients maintain Lib. 3. de anima cap. 5. 6. Aristotle every where affirms it to be a property of the whole Intellect as well the patient as the agent and from this property of the soul is gathered arguments of the souls Immortality by Scotus Piccolomineus Alexander Aphrodiensis Vicomeratus Julius Pacius and others Art thou maried to this weak and frail body O my soul seek not a divorce in any unwarrantable unnatural way for though it be better to be dissolved and to be with Christ yet but for the cause of Christ thou maist not put her away not kill her or hate her but love her as a Wife cherish her as a weaker Vessell yet if she command obey not if she intice consent not let not thy Affections overcome thy Reason to cap ivate thy love to her lust in this case separate thy self from her not in affection but action let thy Diviner faculties Reason and understanding be thy Counsellors and rule thou in her yet above her and without her The Impatibility of the Soul The soul of man is Impatible it suffereth not for the rule is quicquid patitur corrumpitur as the wood suffers by the fire till it be consumed of the fire the soul of man not so it receives Objects and Species yet no way suffers or is hurt by what it receives Object But this property you will say the Sensitive soul hath as well as the Rational for even as the Intellectuall faculty receives intelligible forms yet doth not thereby suffer viz passione corruptiva so doth the Sensitive also receive its forms and Objects and is not hurt by them and therefore saith Aristotle sensus est impa●ibilis To this I answer that though this property agree with the Sensitive as well as the Rationall faculty yet with the Rational in a higher and much more eminent manner the Sense is not hurt by any Objects nor suffers any detriment so long as the Objects are presented in an orderly manner and due proportion there the Sense in no sense is patible viz. passione corruptiva but if a due proportion of the Objects be not observed for quicquid recipitur recipitur ad modum recipientis the Sense is destroyed of its more vehement Object for he that saith sensus est impatibilis meaning in the former sense saith also vehemens sensibile destruit sensum and this v●hemens Objectum corrumpit sensum as too great a sound makes a man deaf too great a light will make a man blind But this cannot be said of Humane intellect since there is no such vehement Object which can corrupt it yea rather perfects it for after we have understood the highest and difficultest matters we are not made incapable of understanding easier as with gazing upon the Sun our sight will be so dazled with the light thereof that we cannot presently see lesser lights but much more capable to understand them than before and herein is an argument of the Divinity and immortality of the soul For were it mortall it would certainly be destroyed or wounded by its more forcible Object but vehemens in elligibile perficit intellectum ergo intellellectus non debilitatur in operando so incorruptible so immortall 'T is Scotus his argument for the souls immortality Behold how sin overthroweth as it were the whole Fabrick of Heaven God hath created the Humane soul of an impatible nature not subject to pain or punishment sin enters the soul and makes it liable to greater grief and torment than is imaginable evill of sin begets evill of pain pain privative and pain positive paenam sensus and paenam damni pain of loss the privation of eternal felicity banishment from the heavenly Country loss of the inheritance of the Kingdom of Heaven absence of God and want of the vision of him and an utter exclusion from all good things for ever this is the privative pain which is more bitter to me saith Saint Chrysostom than the positive torments of Hell nor is it any wonder if this loss cannot be expressed for we have not yet known the beatitude of those things that are reserved for us how then shall we apprehend our misery in the loss of them but besides this pain of loss there is a pain of sense a worm that never dieth a fire that never goeth out nor can any tongue express or heart conceive this pain but such as know them experimentally but a general torture it is in all the parts of the body in all the faculties of the soul the soul as well as the body is passive a passion worst of all passions a passion voyd of corruption voyd of consumption the wood suffers in the fire till it be totally consumed by the fire and well were it with the damned had they such pains which might at last consume them but as the widdows barrel of meal should not waste nor her cruse of oyl be spent so though in a different sense hers in mercy these in judgement the worm shall continually gnaw and eat but they not wast the bush shall burn in the fire and the fire not consume the bush for ever These things are writ for thee O soul that thou come not into this place of torment that if thou canst not patiently abide the eternall fire of hell hereafter thou maist not so patiently suffer sin here but