Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	let_v	lord_n	see_v	4,698	5	3.6890	3	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A87798	Jurisdictions or, The lawful authority of courts leet, courts baron, court of marshallseys, court of pypowder, and ancient demesne : together with the most necessary learning of tenures, and all their incidents, of essoynes, imparlance, view; of all manner of pleadings, of contracts, of the nature of all sorts of actions, of maintenance; of diverse other things, very profitable for all students of innes of court and chancery : and a most perfect directory for all stewards of any the sayd courts. / Heretofore writ in French by the methodically learned, John Kitchin of Grays-Inne, Esq; and now most exactly rendred to more ample advantage in the English tongue; with a demonstrative table, pointing out all matter of consequence, throughout the whole work. Whereunto is added the authentick formes of all manner of writs, with their severall returnes in English, very usefull for all men in this Common-wealth, as they be now used.; Court leete et court baron. English	Kitchin, John.	1651 (1651)	Wing K656; Thomason E1225_1; ESTC R211060	481,896	637

been attaint of salse Oath or were seen in the Pillory or Tumbrill or against whom there was Judgement of life and member shall be outed by challenge and these are principal challenges Britton fol. 134. Those which pretend to have some right in the thing demanded shall be outed by challenge and this is a principal challenge the same Law that the juror is a Villaine 9 Ed. 4. fol. 17. Villaine is principal challenge 26 Book of Ass 28. That a juror was outlawed is a principal challenge if he shew the Record 11 H. 4. fol. 40. Abridg. Book of Ass 6. and 21 H. 6. fol. 30. The same Law that a juror was attaint of conspiracy 33 H. 6. fol. 55. 18. H. 8. f. 2. Writ of entry they are at issue and the Plaintif saith that the Sherif and two of the Coroners are his cozens and the other two cozens of the Defendant and praies a Venire facias to others and shall not unlesse all were his cozens for if it were made by the cozen of the Plaintif the array shal be quasht but the Defendant cannot quash the array by that that it is made by his cozens 15 H. 7. fol. 9. Plaintif cannot quash the array for that that it is made by his cozen but may shew that and pray a Venire facias to the Coroners but because it doth not lye in his knowledge the Plaintif may quash the array though the Sherif is of consanguinity or affinity of the Defendant but otherwise it is of his own part 19 H. 8. fol. 7. Defendant challenge the array for that it was made by J.S. cozen of the Plaintif and this found and the Array quasht 10 H. 7. fol. 7. The Array was quasht for that that the Plaintif was Gossip to the Son of the Sherif or for any other cause of the Plaintif 15 Edw. 4. fol. 23. Trespasse by the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and they were at Issue and the Plaintiff saith that the Sheriffe is his Steward and some of the Coroners are of his Robes and the rest within his distresse and the Defendant confest it and for that Processe issued out to choosers and the array by choosers shall not be quasht but the heads 18 Edw. 4. fol. 8. Where the Array is made by choosers this shall not be challenged but the heads shall be challenged 8 H. 6. fol. 60. The Array in Assise was quasht for that it was made by the Sheriffe himselfe being Plaintiffe and it was also quasht for that it was made by the Coroners at the denomination of the Plaintiffe for that the Court of Office awarded Venire facias to Electors The challenge is principall Cozen of one party Servant of one Master of one Party At other times Brings trespasse against one Eats at the costs of one Is Lord to one Challenges Is within the distresse of one Arbitrater of one Convict of horrible crime Hath right in the thing demanded Now let us see what is challenge for favour WHere one challenges for diverse causes and concludes for favour it is not double otherwise it is of principall challenge 7 H. 6. fol. 44. That the Defendant is Steward of a Mannor of the Juror or that he is within the distresse of the Juror it is a challenge for favour and not a principall challenge but that the Juror is within the distresse of the Defendant is a principall challenge but that the Juror hath marryed the Mother of the Defendant if she be dead and he had no Issue by her it is no principall challenge 14 H. 7. Tit. Brook 71. The same Law where a Juror hath marryed a Cozen of the Defendant which might be heire to him during their lives it is a principall but contrary if the Wife be dead without Issue 14 H. 7. fol. 1. 15 H. 7. fol. 9. It is no principall challenge that a Son of a Juror hath marryed a Daughter of the Plaintiffe 3 Edw. 4. fol. 12. Juror is a Keeper of the Forrest by the Kings Grant and the Plaintiffe is Master of the Game is no principall challenge 16 Ed. 4. fol. 1. It seemes it is no principall challenge if the Juror say he will passe with the Plaintiffe before he be sworne or that hee was laboured 21 H. 7. fol. 32. 7 H. 6. fol. 25. the same That the Defendant hath Trespasse against the Juror depending if it were after the action brought it was suspicious and is no principall challenge 20 Booke of Assise 11. If a Juror be challenged for that that one party hath an action hanging against him if he doe not shew Record of that it is no principall Statham 25 Ed. 3. That the Wife of the Sheriffe or of him which makes the Pannell is Sister of the Plaintiffe ought to conclude of favour 20 Ass 21.26 Ass 21. 22. Where a Juror is returned by name Chamberlaine and Chambers appears it is a challenge for favour and shall be inquired if he be knowne by both names or not 32 H. 6. fol. 23. It is no challenge that the Juror is Parishoner with the Defendant 22 Ass 25. Attaint It is no principall challenge that one of the Grand Jury and one of the Petty Jury have marryed two Sisters 43 Ass 46. In Attaint It is no principall challenge that one of the Grand Jury and one of the Petty Jury are at debate 50 Book of Ass 4. Juror was challenged for malice which he had to the Plaintiffe and tryed and found indifferent 27 H. 8. fol. 25. It is no challenge that a Iuror appeared where he was not summoned if he were impannelled 8 Ed. 3. 69 Fitzh Challenge 4. It is no principall challenge to say that the Defendant is Tenant to the Sheriffe or Bailiffe which makes the Array unlesse it be for favour 26 Ed. 3. Statham Common is the seventh Article which is inquirable ANd for that I intend that when the Statutes ensuing were made for Improvements immediately the Lords have improved their Wafts as much as they could or otherwise they were so moved with charity and pitty to the Poore that more they would not improve for Charity I pray God that that may continue Because many great ones which infeoffed Freeholders of small Tenements in great Mannours of extent c. may improve when they that are infeoffed have sufficient Pasture belonging to their Tenements c. Merton chap. 4. Westmin 2. chap. 46. Recites Merton and gives rate between Neighbour and Neighbour and it is Where it is belonging to their Tenements But if one claime Common for a certaine number by Grant the Lord cannot improve 16 Ed. 3. tit 9. If the Lord improve not leaving sufficient Common the Commonner may break way to use his Common See 17 H. 7. fol. 11. for breaking way 22 H. 7. fol. ult Fitzherbart 179. L. Where one hath a Common belonging or appertaining and is distrained hee shall have an Assise of Common of pasture Seventh Book of Assise 16. 8 Book of Ass 18. Assise

nothing there but the passage and 8 H. 7. fol. 5. by Keble the Soile and Free-hold in the way is to those which have Land adjoyning 2. Ed. 4. fol. 9. Where there is a common way throughout a Feild the Free-hold of the Soile is to the Tenant of the Land adioyning and not to the King for he hath but passage for his People Incidents A Man cannot dispence with a Suite to a Leet unlesse by speciall words 8. Ed. 2. tit 28 2. H. 7. fol. 4. Partition is made of foure Mannors which descend to foure coparceners that every one shall have a Mannor except the Advowson and by that the Advowson is ingrosse and severed and if all dy but one it shall be appendant again 8 H. 7. fol. 1. By grant of a hundred Leet passeth as Incident for a Hundred cannot be without a Leet for a Leet is parcell of it and to a Mannor a Court Baron is Incident and to homage fealty and to a Faire a Court of Pipouders and it seemeth these cannot be severed Perk. fol. 22. Common appendant cannot be severed nor Estovers to be burned in a House but a Villian regardent may be severed and an Advowson appendant and made in grosse for an Incident inseperable cannot be severed by grant as in the case next before but Incidents seperable may be 40 Ed. 3. fol. 22. Beasonable aid to make his Son Knight or to marry his Daughter and releife for soccage after the death of his Tenant cannot be released by generall words therefore release of all actions and demands besides fealty and Rent by the Lord to the Tenant shall not extinct these Incidents the contrary is said if it be by speciall words 19. H. 8. tit Incidents 34. Court-Baron is so incident to a Mannor and Court of Pipowders to a Faire that they cannot be severed by grant for if they grant the Mannor or Fair they cannot reserve such Courts 7. Ed. 4. fol. 11. Lord and Tenant the Lord releaseth to the Tenant the distresse this is void for the distresse is Incident the same of release of Fealty to him which holds by Homage for Fealty is Incident to Homage and is inseperable 26. booke of Assises 66 Lord and Tenant by Fealty Escuage and Rent and the Lord grants the Rent this is Rent seek and severed for Fealty remaines with the Homage as Incident to it the same Law where a Rent is Incident to a Reversion and yet these may be severed by speciall grant 29. booke of Assises 20. the same Littl. fol. 40. Where the Tenant holds by Homage Fealty and Rent if the Lord grant the Rent saving to him the Homage this Rent is Rent Seck and severed the same Law if he grant the Homage saving the Rent and where he holds by Rent and Fealty and grants the Rent saving the Fealty or left for life rendring Rent and grants the Rent saving the Reverson the Rent is Seck Rescous and pound breach is another branch of the Charge HE which destraines Beasts may put them in a close House if he will give them meate for the putting into the open pound is that the owner may give them meate 33. H. 8. tit distresse 66. If a man destraine without cause the owner may make Rescous but if he put them into the pound he cannot breake it for they are in custody of the Law see 40. Ed. 3. fol. 33. and Fitzh fol. 102. E. It seemes if a Lord destrain where Rent is not behinde the Tenant shall not make Rescous 4 Ed. 6. tit distress 74. If a man destraine wrongfully the owner may make Rescous 5. Ed. 4. fol. 7. by Danby 39. Ed. 3. tit 20. If Beasts put into the pound dye it is at the losse of the owner though he have tendred sufficient mends for he might have a Replevin Doctor and Student fol. 8.113 I may impound a dead thing where I please but if that corrupt by my default I shall answer for it 9. Ed. 4. fol. 2. Fitzh 102. L If the Lord do destraine where is no Rent nor service behinde the Tenant cannot make Rescous 9. Ed. 3. fol. 35. If a man destraine wrongfully the owner of the Beasts may make Rescous but by 4. Ed. 6. it was agreed if he destraine and impound them the owner cannot take them out for they are in custody of the Law 5. Ed. 4. fol. by Danby the same 2. H. 4. fol. 18. If a man destraine my Beasts which escape into his Land out of the great waste I may rescue them but if I keep them or put them there or by Hankford if I have notice that they use to go there this is no escape and there I ought not to make Rescous see 7. H. 7. tit 1. 2. H. 4. fol. 24. In Rescous nothing behinde and also that he was never seised and are good Pleas Quere 5. Ed. 4. fol. 7. Seising is not Traversable in Rescous by opinion there 6. Ed. 4. fol. 12. The same 8 H. 4. fol. 1. 21. H. 4. fol 40. By the Court where the Lord comes to destraine and sees the Beasts and the Tenant perceiving that chaseth the distresse out of his Fee the Lord shall not have a Writ of Rescous for he hath no possession of the Beasts but he may follow them and destraine them but if they were chased out of his Fee before the Lord see them there he cannot destraine them 44. Ed. 3. f. 20. the same Fitzh N. B. 102. G. 33. H. 6. fol. 58 A man attacheth a Horse in a corporate Town and there he is rescued and chased into another County upon fresh Suite the Officer may take him againe 6. Ed. 4. fol. 12. By Yelverton in Rescous nothing behinde is no Plea for if the Lord destraine where no service is behinde the Tenant is at no mischeife for the Tenant may have a Replevin and in this Writ recover his damages Fitzh 101. Rescous lieth where a man destraines for Rent or for services or damage doing and those would impound and another Rescues them and if a Collector or under Collector distreine for a fifteenth or a Bailiff or a Sheriff or other Officer distraine for the King and Rescous is made they shall have a Rescous and not the King but if a Bailiff of a Liberty distraine for the King and Rescous is made the Lord of the Liberty shall have Rescous and if the Bailiff or Officer of a common person distraine Rescous is made he which causeth the distresse to be made shall have Rescous 39. H. 6. fol. 42. Redisseisin to Coroners and one alone maketh a precept Rescous upon that is Justificable Assaults and Fraies For that that Assaults and Fraies are inquirable let us see which are punishable in a Leet and what not AS Saults are not inquirable and punishable by presentment in Leet but blood-shed is 8. Ed. 4. fol. 5. By Fairefax Leet hath no power to inquire but of those which make common annoyance at the common Law as of

good 8 H. 6 fol. 34 Trespasse of Grasse cut the Defendant saith that the place where c. was the Free-hold of his Master by which by his commandement he entered and made the Trespasse the Plaintiff saith of his own wrong without such cause and is good but if the Master himself had been party and had pleaded his Free-hold of his own wrong c. had been no Plea 28 Ed. 3. fol. 58. Trespasse of goods taken the defendant justifies by the commandement of his Master for that that the Plaintiffe is his Villain the Plaintif saith of his own wrong and is no Plea without answering to the Villainage 10 H. 6. f. 3. Trespasse of two Horses taken the defendant saith that he let to the Plaintif Land rendring the Rent of twenty Shillings and for this Rent behind he entered and took the horses and the Plaintif saith of his own wrong without such cause and by Cotesmore it is no Plea but he ought to answer to the speciall matter as to say of his own wrong without that that any Rent was behind 21 Ed. 4. f. 64. 42 Ed. 3. f. 2. Trespasse for chasing in his free Chase the defendant pleads license of the Plaintif to hunt there the Plaintif saith of his own wrong without such cause Inquire of this Issue 16 H. 7. fol. 3. Trespasse of goods taken where the defendant conveys his title from the Plaintif there the Plaintif by replication may say of his own wrong without such cause 9 Ed. 4. fol. 41. the same 9 Ed. 4. fol. 43. Trespasse of a bag with money the defendant saith that the Plaintif was indebted to him in a certain summe and delivered that unto him to content him the Plaintif saith of his own wrong without such cause and it is no Plea for that that he conveys from the Plaintif himself 10 H. 6. fol. 9. Trespasse for entring into his Pigeon-house and taking of Pigeons the defendant pleads that the Plaintif gave him leave to take them the plaintif may say of his own wrong without that he gave him leave 20 Ed. 4. fol. 4. 21 Ed. 4. fol. 76. Where the defendant conveys from the Plaintiffe or his Ancestor or that it is his Freehold these shall be answered and there of his own wrong without such cause generall is no good replication 44 Ed. 3. f. 13. Trespasse the defendant justifies for Harriot the Plaintiffe saith of his own wrong without such cause the Issue was taken upon that 38 Ed. 3. fol. 7. the same 44 Ed. 3. fol. 18. Trespasse the defendant justifies for that that the Plaintiffe was in VVard to the Prince and he seised him and granted the VVard to him by which he entered and occupied the Plaintiffe saith of his own wrong without such cause and it is no Plea by the Court but he ought to answer to the speciall matter by which the Issue was taken that he held in Socage and not in Knights Service See 22 Book of Assises 56. 41. Book of Assises 21. and 12 Ed. 4. fol. 10. 14 H. 4. fol. 32. Trespasse of his Servant taken the defendant justifies for that the father of him which is said to be Servant held of J.S. in Knights Service and that he died and the Land discended to the Infant called Servant being within age and that the defendant by the commandement of the said J.S. seised him the plaintif saith of his own wrong without such cause and by Cheney and Hull for that that the defendant hath alledged speciall matter that is Tenure in Knights Service the plaintif ought to answer to the speciall matter and this is no plea See 22 Book of Assises 85. 33 H. 6. fol. 29 Trespasse where the defendant justifies by the Kings patent of of his own wrong c. is no plea. 9 Ed. 4. fol. 22. Trespasse where the defendant justifies by wreck by prescription the plaintif saith of his own wrong without that that it was a wreck and good 5 H. 7. fol. 9. Trespasse the defendant justifies by custome of foldage by prescription of all Sheep which pasture in such a Common the plaintif there saith of his own wrong without such cause Where a double Plea shall not be suffered and where it shall PRior brought a Quare impedit and counts that his predecessor was seised and presented and the King seised his temporalties because of VVarre and presented and now it is void and it belongeth to him to present and it is not double 40 Ed. 3. f. 10. But in Quare impedit and counts of divers presentments in his Ancestors this is double 1 H. 5. fol. 1. Quare Impedit by Tenant in Tail and alledgeth a Presentment in the Donor and another in the Donee this is not double for the Gift is traversable but if he alleadge Presentment in the Feoffor and another in the Feoffee this is double 4 Ed. 4. f. 3 Debt against Executors to plead fully administred and so nothing in their hands is not double for one Answer makes an end of all that is that they have Assets 3 H. 6. f. 3 Debt upon Obligation and pleads Payment and Delivery of the Obligation in place of an Acquittance it is not double for one Answer shall be for all 1 H. 7. fol. 15 and also it is no Plea Trespasse the Defendant pleads Gift in Tail and divers Discents and it is not double for the Gift is onely traversable 19 Ed. 4. f. 4 Bastardy is pleaded to ten Acres and Release of all Actions and that is double 10 H. 6. f. 20 Non-tenure is pleaded to part and Bastardy to the rest and this is double 43 E. 3. fol. 29 B. Inquire 33 H. 6. f. 20 40 E. 3. f. 21 Dower the Tenant may plead Joint-tenancy of part and that she detains Writings for the rest which goes to all and it is not double 33 H. 6. f. 57 40 E. 3. f. 31 Assise of a Mannour the Defendant pleads a Fine of one halfe to J. S. whose Estate he hath and to the other halfe pleads a Release of the Father of the Demandant with Warranty and demands Judgement if against Warranty Assise ought to have been of that Moity and it is not double for this goes but to the Moity and is not c. 37 H. 6. f. 24 Debt upon an Obligation that he was a Lay man unlearned and the Day of Payment was read to be at another Day and that it was delivered as an Escrow upon condition that if others sealed c. and the others did not seal and so not his Deed this Conclusion hath made that single 38 H. 6. f. 26 Intendments Pleas good by Intendment and how INformation for Liveries it is shewed that Cloth was given at D. but not how it was used and it shall be intended there and good and Trespasse he broke his Close at D. and made an Entry and shall be intended to be there 5 H. 7. f. 18 Appeal of Rape is Rapuit and though it

other Oyes And forthwith after the three Proclamations made the Steward shall cause the Bailiffe to say If any man will be Essoyned and in Court Baron If any will be Essoyned or enter any Plaint come you in and you shall be heard And then the Steward ought to say Essoynes and profer of Suit and Plea three times and in the end Essoyne for this day and then the Steward enter the Essoyne in the Court Roll as it followeth in the entry of the Court Roll. Then after this the Jury shall be impannelled and first one shall be sworne and after three or foure together and the Oath shall be as followeth You shall enquire and faithfully make presentment of all things which I shall give you in charge The Oath of the Jury your Companions counsell the King and your owne you shall keep and you ought to present the truth and nothing but the truth So helpe you God But in the Court Baron there shall be omitted in the Oath to keep the Kings counsell for that is no Court of the Kings as a Leet is Note in the 27. In Feloni tantum of the Book of Assises p. 65. a Juror was arraigned in the Kings Bench as a Felon for that he was one of the Indictors of certaine persons of felony and discovered the counsell of his Companions and in Leet it is counsell of the King Yet Seck if he were attaint what Judgement shall be given And when the Foreman of the Jury for Court Leet or Court Baron is sworne three or foure shall come to the Booke together and shall be sworne together as afore is said To which the Steward shall say The same Oath which J. S. your Foreman hath taken of his part you for your parts well and truely shall observe and keepe So helpe you God and so the rest shall be sworne by three or foure together as in a Leet at least there shall be twelve sworne For 6. H. 4. fol. 2. is Jurors Leet that a Presentment in Leet shall be by twelve and not by fewer otherwise every Presentment there is traversable And 3. H. 7.4 If any stranger be there if there be not sufficient residents there to be impannelled the Steward may impannell a stranger there for that it is to enquire for the King and for redressing matters which are annoyances to the Common-wealth and if more be sworne then twelve as they may be for the King yet if twelve of them agree and the residue not it is a good Verdict and it used very often to be fifteene sixteene or seventeene of the Jury in the Leet but a Jury to try an Issue betweene parties by twelve onely as it appeareth by 21. Edw. 3. fol. 31. and 29. Edw. 3. fol. 43. And that a Verdict of eleven shall not be taken 41. of the Book of Assises p. 11. Jury or Court Baron yet in a Court-Baron there may be impannelled and sworne there lesse then twelve to inquire of Articles for the Lord. The cause that the Jury shall be sworne is That the end of all controversie to confirmation is an Oath and this is the cause that the Juries are sworne and not otherwise credited And see Fortescue fol. 54. The tryall in this Realme by tryall by twelve is a good tryall and necessary as at large by him appeareth Exhortation to the Jury Feare God and keep his Commandements this concernes every man then I pray you How have you the feare of God How doe you keep his Commandement which is the whole truth if you doe not regard your Oath Remember also Jeremiah Chap. 4. which saith You shall sweare in truth in Judgement and in Justice and so remove love feare hate and hope that is to say that you doe nothing for love nor for feare nor for malice hatred hope of benefit and gaine but to present justly and you ought to remember who saith Be not overcome of evill but overcome in good evill Saint Paul you shall not receive gifts because gifts blind the eyes But you ought to present justly Deut. Chap. 16. Woe to them that call good evill and evill good Isai 15. Thou shalt not annoint thy fist nor beare false witnesse against thy neighbour Exodus Chap. 20. The lips of a Lyer are an abomination to the Lord Prov. 6. It is just Judgement where not the person but the workes are considered Plato And so from your hearts expell all affection and be yea mindfull how many threatnings God hath appointed for breaking of an Oath First the Prophet saith Thou hatest all that worke iniquity thou destroyest all which speak a lye Dan. 5. He that blasphemeth the name of the Lord shall dye with the death Levit. Chap. 14. Thou shall not live because thou hast spoken a lye Zechariah 13. Ananias and Saphira for a lye in selling a Feild forthwith were slaine Acts Chap. 5. And so you see what perill and indignation is from God for not regarding your Oath and to utter the truth you shall be sure to be the children of God which is truth and you shall obtaine quietnesse to your selves and to all your neighbours and your Common-wealth shall florish with vertue and offendors and sinners shall be punished and abolished for the Leete is appointed to that end And note that at the beginning there might be every yeare as many Leets as he would which had that in his Mannor And after that Leets were ordained to be held but twice in the yeare Rastal County c. 2. by the Statute of Magna Charta Chap 35. Scilicet betwixt the Moneth of Michaelmasse and Easter 6 H. 7. fol. 2. Presentment of Felony in the Turne of the Sheriffe held after the Moneth of Easter is void although it were for the King for the Statute is That the Sheriffe in this case shall loose his Turne which is as much to say all in that shall be voide 38. H. 6. fol. 7. the same But by Prescription Leets are held a day certaine in the yeare And after the authority of the Leet was enlarged by the Statute de 18. Edw. 2. called the Statute De visu Franchi plegii And after by diverse others Rastal Leet 1. for what things are inquirable in Leets as in the Charge more at large may appeare and all the Articles are but for the advancement and preservation of the Common-wealth as by the Articles of your charge more at large may also appeare And in so much now that you see for what cause Leets were ordained and how the authority of them is inlarged for Government of the Common-wealth Now you ought to consider that you which are of the Jury are chosen in such manner as the Angels of God are at the last day of Judgement of man for as it is written Then shall the Angels come out and shall seperate the Ill from the midst of the Just And so you ought to separate the Just from the Ill persons and you ought

Law is of Fat 's fixed in a Brew-house or Dy-house and at this day is the like of Glasse though there it was held the contrary but it seemeth where the Termor fixeth such things he may take it within the Terme but after the Terme not and the Heir shall have Table-dormants and those things which cannot be attached in Assise Stamford 45. Chattels are as well Chattels moveables as not moveables and Leases and Chattels are the Corn growing and right of Action and an Obligation made to a Felon and Money out of a Bag and Corn out of a Sack are Chattels 10 Ed. 4. fol. 1. It seemeth where one gives all his Goods and Chattels the Charters of the Giver doth not passe See 4 H. 7. fol. 10. 38 Ed. 3. Tit. Charters 24. It seemeth that Charters are but Chattels 8 Ed. 4. fol. 4. If one give to me a Deed of Feofment whereof I have not the Land this is but a Chattell in me 21. Ed. 4. fol. 80. Writings may be laid to pawn for Money borrowed by which it seems that Writings are Chattels in divers Cases 37. Assise 11. A Woman hath Execution by Statute-Marchant of Land and takes a Husband this is a Chattell and for that the Husband may give it 24. Fd. 3. Tit. Charters 5. by Thorp The Escheator may seise the Ward though there be no Office found for it is a Chattell and vested in the King without an Office 4. H. 7. fol. 10. Where Tenant in Tail discontinues and dies the Deed in Tail belongs to the Heir before he hath re-continued his Estate in the Land and it is no Chattell but an Inheritance for if one give all his Goods and Chattels he shall not have such Deeds Now let us see that the not using of Priviledge and Liberty is the cause of ceasing of that and where not I intend not using of Liberty which is for the benefit of the party this is no cause of ceasing but where it is for the Common-wealth not using is a cause of ceasing and mis-using is a cause of ceasing for ever IF one have Liberties and do not use them within memory all is gone 14. H. 7. fol. 1. Not using of the Office of Clerk of the Market is cause of ceasing for that is for the Common-wealth 2. H. 7. fol. 11. By Billing by mis-using and not using also of Market shall cease 2. H. 7. fol. 11. 15. Ed. 4. fol. 7. Where the Abbot of S. Albans had a Gaol by Franchise and would not be at costs with the Justices of the Gaol-delivery to make Delivery of Prisoners and kept them long in Prison for that it was seised into the Kings hands 8. H. 4. fol. 17. If the Lord of the Franchise refuse to do a thing commanded by the Court as to bring in his Prisoners it is a forfeiture of his Liberty contrary where it is commanded by proceffe by Hussey If a Lord refuse to do right or misuse his Franchise by himself or by his Bailiff or Deputy or do not use his Franchise that shall be reseised and all Lords which have franchises shal attend upon the Justices of Assise in person or by their Bailiffs or otherwise they shall forfeit their Franchises 20. Ed. 4. fol. 5. Confirmation NOte that there need be no Confirmation of a Charter of grant of Liberties after the death of every King as it is used 1. R. 3 fol. 4. But otherwise it is of Officers judiciall 33. H. 8. tit 203. If the King grant the Chattells of Felons to one and dies there need no confirmation of that otherwise if there were a Faire or a Market granted or a judiciall thing or a ministeriall Office granted Suit Then the next branch of Charge is Suitors and for that let us see who are resident which ought to make Suit at the Leet and who not SUite reall is at a Leet Residents and this is by reason of their residence 12. H. 7. fol. 17. Eitzh 160. B. A man which is not resident but hath Lands within the Leet shall not be destreined but where he is dwelling to make sute to the Leet Marlebridge chap. 10 Who have Tenements in diverse Hundreds have no necessity to come to these Turnes unlesse in the Bailywicks where they are dwelling where the Master is resident and also his Servant in some Leet as well the Master as the Servant 2 H. 4. fol. 17. Men of Religion Clerkes Knights nor Women shall not be Deciners Fitzh fol. 160. C. Register fol. 181. Britton fol. 19. It is provided that they have no need to come Rast County 2. Arch-Bishops Bishops Abbots Priors Earles Barons nor any religious Men or Women Marlebridg chap. 10. A man shall not make Suite twice to two Leets of severall men for his residency but one time to one and another day to another he may but one may come twice to the Leet of one person and yet may be charged to come to the Turne of the Sheriffe 18 H. 6. fol. 13. Every man ought to be attendant to a view of frankpledge 21 Ed. 3. fol. 12. For that the not scowring of Ditches adjoyning to High waies and Bridges and also other annoyances in waies are presentable in Leets and is another branch of the Charge let us see how they shall be done and what by the Common Law and what now by the Statutes Waies IF a man have Land adjoyning to the Kings High way he is charged of common right to cleanse the Ditches without any prescription 8 H. 7 fol. 6. but if he be not next adjoyning it is otherwise for there he is not chargable without prescription but it is said that he whose land is next adjoyning to a Bridge Purprestures is not held of common right to repaire the Bridge though the Bridge have been there time out of minde unlesse he have that made by prescription Magna Charta Rastall Bankes 2. Bridges Rastall Bridges 1. chap. 15. No Town nor Free-man shall be distreined to make Bridges unlesse that of old they use to make them in the time of King H. our Grand-Father the Statute of 22 H. 8. chap. 5. Gives power to the Justices of Assise to determine the making of Bridges where it cannot be held and proved what person certaine ought of right to make such decaied Bridges and what shall be made by the Inhabitants or riding where such decayed Bridges are by which it appeares that he which hath Land adjoyning to a Bridge is not chargeable to make the Bridge unlesse it be by prescription 2 Ed. 4. fol. 9. By Moyle if any incroachings be made over the Kings Way as by a Ditch House or Wall it shall be punished by presentment in the Leet and I collect upon the opinion of this book and upon 8. Ed. 4. fol. 9. And upon 27. H. 6. fol. 9. and upon 6. Ed. 3. way 2. Where a Lord of a Mannor hath Land upon both parts of a High way that he

six English men otherwise the Jury shall not be taken and so shall be Tales of that 4 Mar. b. Tit. Jurors 8. Jury tooke a Writing of the Plaintiff which was not delivered to them in Court and passed for the Plaintiff and for that that this matter appeared to the Court by examination therefore the Plaintiff shall have no Judgment 35 H. 8. B. Tit. Replead 54. It was in use in the Kings bench though that the Jury was ready to passe there if there be a Jeofaile apparent in the Record the Jury shall be discharged 26 H. 8. f. 6. Jurors after they are in the House return to heare evidence again upon matter which they were in doubt of and may 14 H. 7. f. 1. The Jury eate and drink before the Evidence finished or after they are agreed depart and drink before Verdict they shall be Fined and the Verdict is good but if he eat and drink after evidence given and before they agree the Verdict is void And it seems that this matter shall be shewed when the Jury comes in to give their Verdict and shall be examined and not after And it seems that the Jurors may depart asunder by cause of great tempest of a House falling or fire where they are Execution For that that execution is used in many Court-Barons by Levari facias let us see what Goods upon that may be taken in Execution and what not and the order of execution GOods pawned shall not be taken in execution for the Debt of him which pawned them during the time they are pawned 34 H. 8 Pledge 28. and 4 Ed. 6. Distresse 75. Where A. lets Oxen for time and after A. is condemned these Oxen during the tearme shall not be taken in execution 22 Ed. 4. f. 10. Debt in Court-Baron the Plaintiff recovers by Judgment and shall have execution and the Beasts of the Defendant were taken and delivered to him in Execution 33 Ed. 3. Tit. Execution 133. In Debt where three are bonnd joyntly and severally and hath of those three severall Judgments and if Execution be against one the other shall have a supersedeas but in trespasse against three Execution against one doth not suffice and the same Law is in a ioynt Debt 4 Ed. 4. fol. 39. By Fieri facias or Levari facias the Officer cannot break the Doore nor Chest to take Goods in Execution for if he do trespasse lies against him for the breaking only 18 Ed. 4. f. 4. 13 Ed. 4. fol. 9. by Choke notwitstanding 8 Ed. 2. Tit. Executors 152. contrary If one recovers in Court-Baron he shall not have execution by Eierifacias nor otherwise but may distrain the Defendant after Judgement and detaine the distresse in their hands in safegard till the Defendant hath satisfied the Plaintiff of the condemnation 22 Ass 72 Statham 11 Ed. fol. 93. Nat. Bre. fol. 165 and 4 H. 6. fol. 17 action Bailiff in Court Baron cannot sell the Goods in execution but shall restraine them as distresse notwithstanding where it is used to make Levari facias it is a good custome and note that it is used in many Mannors that the goods are praised and execution made of them by Levari facias 22 Book of Ass 72. A Writ of Execution Judicii lieth where Judgement is given in a Court-Baron upon a Writ of right patent or in debt or trespasse and the Bailiff will not make execution this Writ lieth as well as it lieth where Judgement is given in a Court of Record and the Sheriff will not make execution and if he will not levy the execution upon the Goods it was in vaine to award this Writ Fitzh f. 20. A. Capias doth not lye in Court-Baron and for that the Capias to satisfie doth not lye to have execution and Elegit doth not lye there c. for this is given by the Statute of Westm 2. chap. 18. 29 H. 8. Tit. Execution B. 132. Two are bound in an obligation joyntly and severally if he sue one and takes his Body by a Capias to satisfie yet he may take the other but if one satisfie him the other may plead that 37 H. 8. Tit. condition B. 16. One taken by a Capias to satisfie is in execution though that be not returned 13. H. 4. Tit. Avowris 237. One avowes for that that J. S. was seised of a place where c. And let that to the Plaintiff for life rendring Rent and after J.S. grants the reversion to B. who was bound in a recognsance to the Avowant and that the Avowant hath that Rent delivered in execution and good 15 Ed. 3. Tit. Execution 93. Rent was delivered in execution upon a Recognisance time of Ed. 1. Title Audita querela 402. If the Father be bound in a Recognisance and dies and his Issue within age the Execution shall not be against him for if it be he shall have an Assise Time of Ed. 1 Tit. 417. If a man takes a Wife and after be bound and dyes the VVife is indowed if she be outed by extent she shall have Assise 29 H. 8. Tit. Stat. Merchant 40. If one sue Execution upon a Statute and he accept part of the Land in name of all he shall not have extent of the residue but it seems upon a Nihil returned upon the Testatum he may have processe into another County 2 R. 3. f. 8. Statute Staple was certified by the Maior of the Staple and the Conisee upon that sues a VVrit to take the Body and to extend his Land in Suff. and Middlesex only and this VVrit was not returned and by Certiorare he caused the Maior to certifie the Statute again and upon that he hath a VVrit of extent in ten Counties but not in Suff. and Middlesex and this VVrit is not returned and he hath the third Certificate and the third VVrit of Extent into six Counties but not in Suff. and Middle and now hath his Extent and hath Land that the Cognifor hath in right of his VVife which died and for threats durst not take the profits of the residue and by all the Justices the Cognisee shall have a Capias into the County where he took his first Writ and not otherwise that is into the County of Suff. and Middlesex only upon the fourth Certificate and upon that the Conisor found suerties to the King and party according to the Statute 11 H. 6. chap. 10. He shall have a Scire facias against the Conisee to prove the matter in his VVrit and to be at the Judgment in the Court and if he faile of any he shall forfeit his Recognisance 2 R. 3. fol. 9. If the Conisee of a Statute dies his Executors or Administrators if he dye Intestate shall have execution upon it without suing Scire facias or that the Conisor cannot have any Plea although he have a deed of Release but if he have a Release he shall have an Audita querela or a Scire facias and so it is where one

If Sommons in Precipe be not served fifteen days before the first day of the return of the Writ the Tenant may wage his Law of not sommoned 42 Ed. 3. fol. 7. Precipe at the great Cape returned the Tenant tenders his Law of not sommoned and at the day comes to wage his Law And the Demandant offers to waive the default and prays that the Tenant may plead in cheif But cannot if the Tenant will not assent by which he made his Law and the Demandant takes nothing by his Writ But at the first day that the Tenant offered his Law the Demandant might have released the default 27 H. 8. fol. 17. the same 2 H. 5. fol 1. Formedon at the great Cape returned the Demandant is essoined and for that the Tenant need not wage his Law for the default is saved 18 H. 6. fol 6.3 H. 6. fol. 50. the same 8 Ed 4. fol 2 Precipe If the Demandant be essoined the day that the Tenant tenders his Law the default is saved he need not wage his Law of not summoned But if it be at the day that he hath waged his Law it is otherwise for he cannot release the default 33 H. 6. fol. 49. the same 7 Ed. 3. tit 51. Saving default Fitzh at the Petty Cape returned the Demandant was essoined and had day over at which day he took him to the default and the Tenant was put to answer at the default notwithstanding the said Essoine 5 Book of Ass 11. the same 4 Ed. 3. tit 62. F. At the great Cape returned the Demandant was essoined and day given over at which day the Demandant took him at default by which it was awarded that he take nothing by his Writ 3 H. 6. fol. 48. Precipe at the great Cape returned the Defendant saith that he was imprisoned by J. S. upon a Statute Merchant by vertue of a Statute acknowledged to him that he could not come and notwithstanding that this was his own act that is to say the acknowledging the Statute and not paying it yet the Imprisonment was by the act of the Law and his default and by that Plea his default was saved The same Law of encrease of water 12 Ed. 4. fol. 44. Saving default F. 42 Ed 3. fol 7. Precipe at the Petty Cape ret●●●ed the Tenant saith that he was in Prison at the time of the default made ready c. And the Demandant to the contrary that he was at large and the Enquest taken sound that he was in prison by which the Demandant took nothing by his Writ 13 Ed. 3. Tit. 49. F. 18 Ed. 3. tit 35. F. At the great Cape returned the Tenant saith that he was in prison c. The demandant saith that he was in prison by his own consent and by fraud to save his default And the Tenant was driven to aver that he was in prison against his will and upon this Issue taken 14 Ed 3 tit 39. F. 13 Ed 3. tit 49. At the petty Cape returned the Tenant saith that he was in prison upon a Statute c. and the demandant saith that that was by covin and so Issue taken that he was in prison against his will taken and others to the contrary 39 H. 6. fol 17. The Attorney may save the default where his Master came and for that both may save the default by encrease of water and by Imprisonment and not by weakness neither of the one nor of the other for that cannot be tryed if he may come without unavoidable perill of death or not 38 H 6. fol 12. Weaknesse of an Attorney is not sufficient to save a default but encrease of water and Imprisonment is a cause See 50 Ed. 3. fol. 9. And the Tenant plead in abatement matter for mischeif of war and death which proves the Writ abated without saving his default 40 Ed 3. fol. 2. Precipe against H. son of W. Osmond the Tenant at the great Cape comes without saving his default and saith that his Father is named Edmond and not Osmond and for mischeif of the war he shall have that plea before default saved by waging of Law 40 Ed. 3. fol. 42. Formedon at the day of the Petty Cape the Tenant cometh and saith that the Demandant hath entred hanging the Writ and cannot have that Plea in abatement before the default saved 40 Ed. 3. fol. 18. Precipe against the Husband and Isabel his wife they come before the default saved that the wife is named Elizabeth and had for the mischeif of the war 14 H 4. tit 15. Precipe the Tenant saith that the Demandant is out-lawed and shall not have this before default saved 38 Ed. 3. tit 17. At the great Cape against three they alledge severall Te●ancie and the Writ abate if he do not maintain And they shall not wage the Law of not summoned for then they admit the Writ and that they are Tenants as the Writ supposeth 12 Ed. 4. fol. 1. 14 H. 6. f. 4. Precipe at the great Cape the Tenant would plead Joyntenancy and could not before his default saved for this comes upon the view 42 Ed. 3. fol. 11. the same 21 Ed. 4. fol. 19. Precipe against two at the great Cape one Tenant pleads that the other is dead after the day of the default and for that this Plea proves the Writ abated he shall have this Plea before his default saved 20 H. 6. fol. 2. the same 42 Ed 3. fol 3. Precipe against two one Tenant may plead that in the conclusion of the Writ the one is left out and the Writ for that is abated before the default saved Pleas after Continuance and Imparlance and what not ASsise where they are adjourned upon Plea in Bar it seems that he shall not have but one Plea after the last continuance for otherwise he may delay the party Infinitely 28 H. 6. fol 1.9 H. 7. fol 9.9 H. 6. fol 22. Quare impedit cleerly agreed that a man shall have but one Plea after the last continuance upon matter in Deed And by some the same Law is where it is by matter of Record 1 Ed 4. fol 3. Ass It seems that one cannot have divers Pleas after the last Continuance 2 H. 6. fol 13. Entrie in the Post If the Demandant enter and after there is a Continuance yet he may plead that for that that it is abated And it is folly of the Demandant to abate his own Writ 7 H. 6. fol 15. The same 7 H. 6. f 16. Quare Impedit It was pleaded in abatement Plaintiffe was made knight after the last continuance Judgment of the Writ and he had it 20 H. 6. fol 17. Trespasse after Imparlance the Defendant saith that the Plaintiffe was made knight day of the Writ not named knight Judgement of the Writ and had that Plea 35 H. 6. fol 5. Where a man is sued by the name of J. Prior of the Church of St. Peter of D. and imparles by an Attorney he shall not

against Executor which pleads that J. S. recovered against them an hundred pounds and had Execution and they have nothing come to their hands besides that the Plaintiff saith the Testator did owe nothing to J. S. and so the Recovery false and feigned 21 Ed. 4. f. 71 Dower the Tenant saith that the Husband was not seised that she could have Dower c. The Plaintif saith that T. the Father of her Husband died seised and that descended to her Husband which died before Entry and so he died seised and in Formedon of Lands recovered in value he ought to conclude and so gave 19 H. 8. fol. 6 Right of Ward and counts that the Ancestor of the Infant died in his Homage the Defendant saith that he held of him in Socage without that that he died in his Homage the Plaintiff saith that J. S. and D. were seised to the use of the Ancestor of the Infant and so the Ancestor died in his Homage 12 H. 7. f. 7 Where the matter before the So is sufficient Barr there the So shall not be entered as in Trespasse or Assise the Tenant justifies and so not guilty 32 H. 6. fol. 16 Where the matter before the So is matter of Barr and sufficient there the matter after the So is not traversable and contrary if not sufficient 5 Ed. 4. fol. 5 Debt upon an Obligation for Bail and is named Sheriff the Defendant ought to plead that and conclude and so not his Deed but not generally it is not his Deed. 19 H. 8. fol. 7 Juris utrum the Tenant saith that his Father was seised and died seised and the aforesaid Plaintiff abated and he recovered and so his Lay Fee and not the frank Gift of the Plaintiff 38 H. 8. fol. 26 Debt upon an Obligation Defendant pleads divers matters and concludes and so not his Deed and this Conclusion hath made this single 3 H. 6. f. 3 Of his own Wrong Where of his own Wrong is good and where not REplegeare the Defendant avowes as Bailiff for that a Prior held of his Mannour by Fealty and Rent the Plaintiff saith of his own wrong without such cause it is no Plea for here he ought to answer the substance which is material that is to say the Lordship 2 H. 5. f. 1 Where one iustifies by a Lease made to him by the Plaintiff of his own wrong is no Plea otherwise it is where heiustifies a Servant of a Lessee 10 H. 4. f. 3. If the Defendant justifie by licence or commandement of the Plaintiff the Plaintiff shall not say of his own wrong without such cause not if parcell be of Record for these ought to be answered specially 12 Ed. 4. fol. 10 Trespasse of Imprisonment the Defendant justifies for that he is Constable and was assaulted by him and broke the Peace the Plaintiff may here say of his own wrong without such cause for that that no Record was alleadged 5 H. 7. f. 6 Trespasse of Battery the Defendant saith of his own Assault the Plaintiff saith of his own wrong without such cause and this is good 5 H. 7. f. 1 Trespasse where one justifies as Servant by command that he arrested the Plaintif or that he came at the request of the Sergeant c. of his own wrong without such cause is no Plea 2 Ed. 4. f. 6 See 9 Ed. 4. f. 31 If the Defendant plead licence or a Lease of the Plaintiff of his own wrong is no plea 20 Ed. 4. f. 4 21 E. 4. f. 76 10 H. 6. f. 3 f 9 the same Where a Sheriff justifies to make Execution of his own wrong is no plea otherwise it is where he justifies as Bailiff by command of the Sheriff 19 H. 6. Trespasse of Battery Defendant saith that the plaintiff beat one W. to death and the Constable came to arrest him and he stood at defiance by which the Defendant came in aid and the hurt which he had was of his own Assault the plaintiff saith of his own wrong without any such cause and good 38 E. 3. f. 9 Trespasse of Grasse out the Defendant justifies as Parson of the Parish and that he took them as Tithes separated from the ninth part the Plaintiff saith of his own wrong without such cause and it seems it is no Plea and then the Plaintiff replied as above without that that they were severed from the ninth part and good 16 E. 4. fol. 4 9 E. 4. f. 27 Trespasse the Defendant justifies the Imprisonment for that that the Plaintiff assaulted J. N. to have robbed him for which he put him in the Stocks of his own wrong c. is good 41 E. 3. f. 29 Trespasse the Defendant justifies for that Attachment was awarded out of the Court Baron to the Bailiff to attach a Horse upon a Plaint entered there by him and that he came in aid of the Bailiff the Plaintiff saith of his own wrong without such cause and this is good 38 E. 3. f. 3 Replegeare of Beasts taken the defendant justifies for Execution of a Recovery in Court Baron of twenty shillings the Plaintiff saith of his own wrong without such cause and held that he shall not have this general Averment against a speciall matter by which he said that the Beasts were not delivered in Execution 14 H. 8. f. 18 False Imprisonment the Defendant iustifies the Arrest of the Plaintiff by a Warrant of a Justice of the Peace where the truth was that when he was arrested he had no Warrant but after had a Warrant directed to him the Plaintiff may say of his own wrong without that that he hath any such Warrant and gives the matter in Evidence 2 E. 4. f. 9 False Imprisonment the Defendant iustifies that he took the Plaintiff wandring in the night for suspition c. The Plaintiff may say of his own wrong without such cause but he cannot say of his own wrong without that that he was wandring for he cannot traverse the speciall matter but where it is a matter of Record or of writing and not where it is a matter in deed 13 R. 2. Tit. 28. Rescous the Defendant iustifies to make Replevin by Warrant of the Sheriff the Plaintiff saith of his own wrong without such cause and it is not allowed against this special matter but of his own wrong without that that he had a Warrant of the Sheriff at the time of the delivering of the Distresse c. 33 H 6. f. 47 Trespasse of Goods taken in the County of Darby the Defendant saith that the Plaintiff fold them to J. S. in the County of Middlesex and he by his commandement took them the Plaintif saith of his own wrong without that that J. S. commanded him in manner and form and is good 22 Book of Ass 57 The Defendant iustifies as under the Eschea●or for that Tenant of the King aliened without licence and shews a Commission and the Plaintiff saith of his own wrong without such cause and is