is cast into the lap but the euent proceedes from the Lord. Ionas by casting of lots was found out to be the partie for whose sake God sent the storme vpon the Seas which could not be done by chance nor yet vndone because being thereby cast into the Sea swallowed of a Whale and remained in his bellie three daies three nights but afterward cast vpon the land again he was therein a figure of Christs lying in the earth and of the time it should containe him In the election of a new Apostle the Lot fell vnto Matthias but not as hauing a libertie of falling vpon the other for it was to shew that hee which knew al things as the text saith had chosen him Act. 1.24 Therefore if these things seeming meere contingent fall out necessarilie in respect of GOD though vnto vs to whom future euents are vnknowne farre otherwise how can wee denie the same necessitie in all other things to which the like libertie is not granted Further it is to be obserued that although causes in their own natures not definite may encline vnto either part as the will to chuse or refuse yet these by Gods decree encline to one part only According to that of Salomon Man 's heart is in the hand of the Lord as the riuers of waters and whither he pleaseth hee turneth the same yet so as that which we doe that wee thinke for that instant best to bee done But you must vnderstand me of things propounded to our choice whereof there is in vs a libertie of chusing or refusing either In which case euery of vs may say by experience that we are moued to incline rather to the one then to the other Otherwise wee cannot be said to make a choice of any Now this inclining of the will comes from God Psalm 105. Prou. 16.1 20.24 hee worketh in vs both the will and the deede according to his good pleasure Philipp 2.13 The Lord August de Gratia Arbitrio Tom. 7. cap. 21. saith Augustine doth incline the willes of men whither it pleaseth him but yet so as that he doth not disturbe their natures neither violently worke vpon them but doth it by a pleasing inclining and gentle mouing them forward According as Boaethius in his Topicks Vid. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vpon the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 taken by him for destinie or Prouidence indifferently very well noteth Thus wee see that men will freely yet necessarily freely because they are only inclined and moued neuer forced nor compelled necessarily because GOD doth moue them to one part only according to his act of decreeing which cannot be altered Obiect If such things as are of their own natures appointed to no certaine ends but may fall out this way or that way in regard of themselues are so gouerned by God as that they can fall out no otherwise and therefore are necessarie then we cannot call this cause definite that indefinite this effect necessarie that contingent but must needs agree with the Stoicks that there is no libertie of working granted vnto them Euery thing doth take his name from his owne nature Solution the matter whereof it consists and the manner of subsisting and not from the externall cause of the same Adam was not called God from the externall cause of his being from whom hee receiued the breath of life but hee was called Adam of the earth being the matter whereof hee was framed Wee doe not call such things as we doe against Gods law good works from the externall cause farthest remoued from their working but wee call them transgressions of Gods law sins and such like from a defect within our selues and from our own corrupted natures Euen so when wee consider the natures of causes within themselues we call some definite some indefinite some effects necessarie some contingent Yea in this sense we say that our willes haue some freedome But if wee looke vnto Gods certaine foreknowledge his immutable will and act of gouerning then hath his infallible knowledge taken away chance his heauenly will limited our willes and his act of gouerning imposed a necessitie that cannot be eschewed And thus much touching the immutability of Gods Prouidence and the necessitie it imposeth on all things THE FOVRTH PART wherein is especially contained That although God doth gouern all things and that so as his gouernment can neither be altered nor hindered yet that he cannot be the author of sin although he is the principall cause of euery action with the which the sinne concurreth SVndry are the opinions cōcerning this point Diuers opinions thouching the author of sinne The Libertines affirme that God so willeth sinne as that he is the cause thereof The opinion of the Libertines And therefore that sinnes should not be reprooued because they are the workes of God For say they it is not mā which sinneth but the Lord by man If you contradict them their answere is You are not regenerate by Gods Spirit and therefore cannot iudge aright of his workes But this opinion tendeth wholly to the libertie of the flesh and therefore is diuellish and damnable The Manichees haue thought The opinion of the Manichees that God cannot so suffer sinne as that he should any way wil it and therefore concluded that there are two onely Authors of all things the one the chiefest Good the principall Efficient of all goodnes the other the chiefest Euill the sole Effecter of all wickednes as well the sinne as the punishment for the same And so they will haue sinnes to be committed whether the Author of all goodnes will or not Others there are which neither consenting to these nor agreeing with the former would haue God to will sin and that he is the cause thereof yet that no fault can be imputed vnto him but vnto men who commit it Their reason is Gods will is a rule of equitie and therefore whatsoeuer hee willeth the same is iust and right Thus you see the diuersitie of iudgements whence ariseth the necessitie of handling this doctrine In the entreating whereof it is necessarie to touch these three points How farre foorth God doth will sinne That he can in no respect be Author of any thing as it is simplie sinne That the diuell is the setter and wee the effecters of it For the vnderdanding How God doth will sinne how far forth God doth will sinne we must obserue that there is a double euill The one the euil of the offēce 1. Malum culpae which is the sinne the other the euill of the punishment which is the reward of sin 2. Malum poenae called euill in respect it is hurtfull to him which suffers it The Euill of the offence Sinne is to be considered three waies which is the sinne is to be considered three waies The first as it is simplie contrarie to Gods law in which respect onely it is
called a sinne The second as it is a punishment of sins before committed for God doth vsually punish one sinne with another Rom. 1.21 Because when the Gentiles knew God they glorified him not as God neither were thankefull but became vaine in their thoughts and their foolish hearts were full of darknesse therefore the Lord gaue them vp vnto their hearts lusts and vnto vncleannesse Thirdly as it is a cause of sinnes afterward committed Such was the ignorance of the Gentiles Ephes 4.18 Such the blindnesse and hardnesse of hearts in the Iewes whereof Isai chap. 6. and Paul Rom. 12. For these sinnes of theirs were punishments of their former sins secondly sinnes of the mselues thirdly causes of their infinite other sinnes as Augustine in his Treatise against Iulian teacheth excellently well Lib. 5. cap. 3. Thus we see that God may will a sin as it is a punishment and yet not be the Author of sinne as it is simplie sinne Note further Three things concurring in sinne that three things concorre in sins The first the deed or action and that is either inward or outward inward are those which are either of the mind Actions inward or outward as euill thoughts or of the heart as wicked affections or of the will as an euill choice and an agreement to that which is wicked Outward are those which are actions of the senses wrought by the externall instrumēts of the bodie Secondly the breach of Gods law going with this action which is an absence of the purity commāded and a presence of a defect and corruption forbidden noted by the Heathen man Tull. in his Parad when he saith Peccare est transilire lineas praefixas à scopo aberrare to sin is to passe the boūds prescribed and to wander from the marke expressed by the Grecians when they call it What sinne is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and defined by the holy Ghost to be the Transgression of the law 1 Ioh. 3.4 Thirdly there is in euery sin a guilt and an obligatiō wherin we stand most firmely bound vnto God to vndergo the punishment which our breach of his law hath deserued This guilt hath his ground in sinne Rom. 6.23 Death is the reward of sinne this death is from Gods Iustice which willes that euery one shall haue his due this death is our due because the soule that sinnes by Gods law shall die the death this law is giuen in equitie for he hath the right of commanding we of obeying he our Creator we his creatures and therefore by the law of equitie and right of creation haue entred a statute both of soules and bodies to be obedient vnto him Now all are guiltie in as much s all haue sinned and this guilt is the bond whereby in iustice we are tied through the committing of our sinnes to vndergo the punishment they haue deserued And so is the third things considered in sinne Concerning the first of these three God is the Author of the first thing considered in sinne viz. the Actiō which is the Action It is true that God is the principall Efficient and Author thereof for in him we liue we mooue and haue our being Touching the third thing confidered in sinne namelie the guilt God is author of the third namely the Guilt whereby we stand bound to vndergoe the punishment our sinnes haue deserued there is no question but that God doth in like manner will the same But the second namelie the transgressing of Gods Law which expelles the puritie in the action and makes it wicked breedes a doubt whether God doth wil it or not For the satisfying whereof I will first shew what it is to wil. Secondlie how farre forth God doth will the same To will is taken two waies To will taken two waies 1. Properly properlie or improperly properly when wee will a thing in respect of it selfe because we iudge it good indeede or at least in appearance seemes to be so Improperly when we will a thing 2. improperly in respect of another thing that is because of some good that will ensue the same and not in respect the thing we desire is of the one nature good In which sense men doe often wish a naturall euill A man often desireth the cutting offan infected member Simile he doth not properly will the want of that member for euery creature aimes at his perfection but the good he hopes will follow the same namelie the health of his bodie So that there is an improper willling of the one because we whollie desire the other So that the cutting away of that member may rather be called a voluntarie permission then an effectuall willing because the will according to the owne nature willeth that which is good either in truth or at least in appearance and if at any time it is carried to the contrarie this commeth from a certaine disturbing of the mind whereunto none can say that God is subiect Further those things which we properlie will those we like loue and take pleasure in but a knowne euill is neuer thus affected and therefore at no time we properly desire the same Since this then is thus with men much more is it so with God Whence it necessarily followes that hee doth willinglie suffer sinne and that he doth will that which followes the same namelie his owne glorie but is no cause of sinne as it is simplie a transgression of his law as shal be more at large declared But care is to be had lest in going about to set downe the meane we fall into the extreame or labouring to eschew some danger wee slip into a greater He that shall say God doth will sinne as it is a transgression of his law shall not goe vnpunished neither may he which affirmeth that sinne is committed against his will or without his knowledge goe vnreprooued the former is to rob God of his goodnes the latter of his infinite power and knowledge In shewing how far forth God doth will sinne seuen things to be obserued Therefore that we may escape the danger keepe the meane and obtaine our desires these things are to be obserued That God doth will his owne glorie principally as the sole end wherefore all other things are effected Secondly that he willeth the euill of the punishment and that so as he is the sole effecter and inflicter thereof Thirdly that hee willeth sinne as it is a punishment of sinnes before committed Fourthly that he doth will sinne as it is an action either inward or outward Fiftlie that he doth will sinne as it is a guilt or obligation wherein we stand bound vnto God to vndergoe the punishments which our sinnes haue deserued Sixtly that God doth not will sinne as it is a transgression of his Law but doth onelie willinglie permit it Lastly that there is a difference between his willing of that which is good and that which is euill
knoweth euil as it is euil doth no way conceiue of it to be good that mā doth not at any time will that euill for the wil is naturallie caried to that which is good and when it wils the contrarie it is from the corruption of the naturall instinct of willing and because man is deceiued through his corrupted nature and by the false shew set thereon by Satan to take that for good which indeede is euill Yea to those whose consciences tell them they refuse the good and chuse the euil euen to them doth the good for that instant seeme lesse beneficiall and the euill more cōmodious pleasing But God being an absolute pure goodnesse can will nothing corruptlie he knoweth euill in al respects it cannot deceiue him he is not deluded with a false shew to whom all things are apparent the outward painting hides not the inward corruption from him to whom all things are naked the nature of his owne effects cannot deceiue him to whom the verie secrets of all mens hearts are euident Satan may leade the blind awrie but hee cannot seduce the Al-seeing though his first assault ouercame Adam and Eue yet many attempts could not preuaile against Christ Therefore if good be the proper obiect of the will in the corrupted creature how much more doth the pure Creator the Al-seeing God will only that which is good Reas 6 Sixtlie those things which God willeth those he both liketh and loueth for it is the propertie of the will to bee caried with a certaine affection vnto that which it doth will But God doth no way affect sinne but both hateth and condemneth it Psal 44. Thou Lord hast hated iniquitie and loued righteousnesse And Zacharie after he had perswaded the people to eschue sin addes the reason wherfore they should obey namely For these are the things which the Lord of Armies hath hated And therefore the will being carried with a certen affectiō to the thing willed how can God hating sinne and iniquitie meerely will the same Reas 7 Seuenthly if God was the effecter of sinne in his owne person or did worke it by others then hee would not vse meanes for the preuenting thereof for therein he should crosse his own works But hitherto tend all his works of creation the whole Law and the Gospell namely vnto obedience vnto God and auoiding of sinne and for this purpose as Iohn saith that he might take away the sinnes of the world and destroy the workes of the diuell Ioh. 1.30 1. Ioh. 3.6 he gaue the greatest price euen his only begotten Son that which was most neere and deare vnto him Now what wisdome can we hold it to labour continually to preuent that which wee purpose continually to effect and why should wee doe that for which wee would giue the greatest price to haue it abolished Since wee hold this to bee follie in our selues how dare wee impute it to God being wisedome it selfe Reas 8 Eighty euery sinne is committed either by leauing that vndone which ought to bee done or by doing that which ought not to be done Sinnes are either of omnissiō or commission But God is tied to neither of these and therfore can faile in neither If hee should bee bound to any thing how should hee be ruler of all things for to be bound to a thing and yet to haue authoritie ouer that thing agrees not with reason Now since all of vs acknowledge God to bee Almightie which is to rule al and haue authoritie ouer all we must needs confesse he is not tied to any law and therfore cannot offend against the law Reas 9 Ninthly euery sinne is properly a sin from the next cause of the same and not from another cause further remoued A tree blowne down by the winde is called a windfall as attributing the cause of the fall vnto the winds and not vnto the heauens which drew vp the vapors whereby the winds were caused When a man is scald with hot water it is called a scalding as attributing the cause to the water and not a burning as hauing relation to the fire by whose vertue the water was heated As these effects are properlie imputed to their next causes so is sinne vnto vs and not vnto God being the cause farthest remooued in our actions whereunto our sinnes are ioyned Though the diuell was the setter deciuer and instigator in the sinne of eating the forbidden fruit yet the transgression was properlie Adams else how could Gods iustice haue taken hold vpon him and his whole posteritie for the same Reas 10 Tenthly what God punisheth in all that he cannot in iustice effect in any Either in the person of Christ or on these which commit it But God punisheth sinne in all And therefore being Iustice cannot effect it in any Reas 11 The eleuenth reason If God bee the author of sinne it must needs be as hee doth either foreknow it decree it or will it But God cannot be the author of sin any of these waies And therefore not at all The former part of the Argument is euident It remaines to proceed to the proofe of the latter part Touching the first namely that Gods foreknowledge cannot be the cause of sinne God is said either to know things or to foreknow them we must note that God is said either to know things or to foreknow them betweene his knowledge foreknowledge there is this difference The difference betweene Gods knowledge and foreknowledge Knowledge is general of all things both done and to be done but his foreknowledge is restrained to things that are to be done hereafter Secondly Gods knowledge extends to that within himselfe as well as to that without himselfe but his foreknowledge is onely of outward things and cannot be said to be of any thing within himselfe because whatsoeuer is in God is his essence which being from euerlasting in reason he cannot be said to foreknow the same We must further obserue Knowledge is either contemplatiue or actiue that this his knowledge is to be considered two waies The one absolutely and simplie as it is only in himselfe the other secundùm quid respectiuely as whē an Artificer maketh that whose maner forme he doth foreknow The former is a contemplatiue knowledge that is a knowledge without practise or effecting the thing foreknowne The latter is an actiue knowledge that is a knowledge ioyned with practise or a working the thing foreknowne Contemplatiue knovvledge no cause of sinne Out of which diuision this Argument ariseth If Gods knowledge is the cause of sinne it is either as it is contemplatiue or actiue But it is not a cause of sinne either of these waies And therefore not at all That Gods bare foreknowing a thing will come to passe Gods foreknowledge cannot be a cause of sin cannot be the cause of the thing foreknowne it appeares first by the naturall signification of Theorica contemplatiue which is a meere conceiuing and
Thus a good Iudge giues his charge to preuent stealing at one Sessions Simile and punisheth those which haue broke it at the next Sessions Secondly if you respect Gods reuealed will that is the meanes he vseth for our cōuersion keeping of his lawes in this sense he willeth the death of none but if you respect his secret will that is his decree of reprobation Esay 1.24 Matth. 11. Luke 10. then God may be said to will the death of infinite many and that therein he reioyceth and taketh pleasure in as much as his power and iustice is thereby exalted His iustice in that hee punisheth sinne his mercie in that of his grace through his sonne hee saueth some his power in that he can ordaine for his owne seruice both vessels of wrath and vessels of glorie Thirdlie 1. Tim. 4.2 whereas God is said to will the saluation of all we must vnderstand by All some of euerie nation and degree whatsoeuer Thus Paul noteth when he saith Pray for kings and all in Authoritie because it pleaseth God that some of euerie countrie nation and degree should be saued Thus the generall vsed by Esay 43.9 is expounded in the sixt verse to be ment of the sons and daughters of God But some replie Replie 1. Tim. 4.10 that this cannot bee thus because it is said that although God is especially a Sauiour of the faithfull yet that he is a Sauiour of all as wel as of them Ans Sauiour hath relation to this life not to the life to come so that the meaning is that although God especiallie preserueth and deliuereth the godly yet that he giueth food raiment and other things necessarie for this life euen vnto the wicked also In this sense speaketh Dauid Psalm 33.6 Thou Lord sauest both man and beast Where saue must needs be vnderstood for preserue and maintaine and so in the place before alleaged Obiection The will of man agreeing with Gods will is good But whensoeuer one man doth kill another False conclusions inserred there is mans will agreeing with Gods will because it was his pleasure that such a thing should fall out In regard of the right of punishing And therefore man for killing man is not to be punished though it lies in God to punish him for it Where mans will agreeth with Gods will in all respects Solution the argument doth hold but in this and all other there is infinit contrarietie God wils a voluntarie permission man a wilfull effecting God often willes the death of a man if hee bee holie as a blessing to giue him the life of the soule for the death of the bodie and for momentarie troubles eternall ioies if he be wicked as a punishment for his sinne and to cut him off from infecting his Church but the murtherer in killing of a man respects none of these ends but the satissying of his malitious mind the occasion being as often vniustly taken as of weaknesse giuen So that in this and al other such like God willes his owne glorie in the execution of iustice and in shewing mercie to his children Rom. 12.9 but the manslaier regards neither but whollie the satisfying of his bloudie desire whereby he multiplies his sinnes in approching to the seate of iudgement 1. Thes 4.6 for vengeance is the Lords and to him only it belongs to repay Obiection Our vnrighteousnes commends the righteousnesse of God therfore though God hath the right of punishing yet he cannot in iustice punish vs because our sinne sets forth his glorie Our vnrighteousnesse doth not commend Gods righteousnesse Solution as it is simplie sinne but by accident namely because when we doe sinne God doth punish vs for the same which punishment being the execution of iustice his righteousnesse is thereby commended therfore let vs not sinne nor sinning without repentance thinke to goe vnpunished for it is for the honor of the Iudge of the world to execute iudgement Gen. 25. Obiections alleaged to prooue God the Author of sinne with the Answers vnto them Obiect IF God created the wicked man against the euill day or day of wrath Thus taught the Seleutians Aug. de haeres Thus taught Floring and Blastus at Rome Euscb lib. 5. cap 13. 28. Solution then it seemes he is the cause of sinne But God hath done so Prou. 16. And therefore seemes to be cause of sinne God created not the euill man to sin and therefore cannot be a cause of it but sinning to punish him for the same In which case none can complaine Psalm 6. because God will giue to euery one according to his worke Obiect If there be no euill in the citie which the Lord hath not done then it seemes he is the cause of sinne But God is the cause of all euill in the citie Amos 3.6 Esay 4. and therefore of sinne There is a double cuill Solution the morall and the naturall the morall euill is the sinne the naturall euill is the punishment for the sinne God is the Author of this but not of the other And therfore the Prophet Amos theacheth in this place that afflictions come from God and not by chance and fortune as some were perswaded Obiect God commanded Abraham to kill his innocent son Shemeus to curse Dauid Gen. 32.2 Sam. 15. But these are sinnes Therefore God seemes to be a cause of sinnes God commanded not Abraham to sacrifice his sonne of superstition Solution as they that offered their sons and daughters to the idoll Moloch nor yet to satisfie any malice or wicked thought in Abraham toward his sonne for this was farre from so holie a father but onlie as it was a point of Gods deuine seruice to trie the faith of Abraham who therby was to be made a father of al beleeuers And therefore God did well in commanding and Abraham well in obeying Secondly though the commandement was giuen to trie Abraham yet the secret purpose of God was to deliuer Isaac as the sequeale did manifest But on the contrarie Shemeus his railing on Dauid was from a malitious minde and to satisfie his furie against him the which was not commanded by God but only willingly permitted and in the permission so ordered as that it turned vnto Dauid to be a correction for his sinne in which sense Dauid saith the Lord bad him doe it And therefore by neither of these can God seeme to be the author of sinne Obiection God caused the Israelites to spoyle the Aegyptians of their iewels Exod. 12.25 chap. 3.22 contrarie to his owne Law Exod. 20. and therefore seemes a cause of sinne What God commaunds to be done Solution the performance of that can be no sin because sinne is a transgression of Gods lawe Secondly the Israelites being Gods people and hauing liued in great seruitude in Egypt and by their labours encreased the treasures of Pharaoh very exceedingly there was good reason why they
is proued by the testimonies of many Heathen writers as of Orphaeus Homer Plutarch Euripides Sophocles Menander Diphilus Virgil Phocilides Hipocrates Pythagoras Plato Plotin Atticus Platonicus Auicen Algazilus Aristotle and many others all which I passe ouer and come vnto the fourth and last way of proouing this trueth vnto vs. Gods Prouidence prooued by meere reason IN this latter age wherein iniquitie hath almost gotten the vpper hand and wickednes approched verie neere the seate of iudgement some I feare me there are The replie of Atheists I would to God not many which dare affirme that the word of God is but a rule of policie and that wee yeeld vnto it rather because it prescribes a goodly order then sets downe a certaine trueth though these are self-made Idols hauing eies but wil not see eares but wil not heare harts but wil not vnderstād euicting consciences but will not subscribe vnto them For the confuting of whom let me deale with them and others by meere reason after this maner Reasons to prooue Gods Prouidence And first with such as acknowledge the Godhead but cannot see his Prouidence in all things Reas 1 Since it is granted that all things are made by God it must needs follow that euery thing is gouerned by him For if we confesse him God we together withall inferre that hee is most wise yea wisedome it selfe most mightie yea power strength it selfe most good yea goodnes it self for to be God to be almightie wisedome and goodnes it selfe are all one How then can God bee wisdom if ignorāt how to gouerne how Almightie if not able to rule euery thing How goodnes it self if being both wisdom and Almightie hee should not after his creation of the world gouerne and preserue the same Beasts though without reason care for that which proceeds from them Sillie birds looke to their nests they haue framed and carefullie hatch vp their young that nature sent forth And wilt thou graunt thus much in creatures vnreasonable and denie the same in God the Creator of them Reas 2 Secondly if God doth not gouerne the world I would demaund of thee what should bee the reason Whether because he would but cannot or can but will not If thou shalt say he would but cannot thine eies can tell thee thou art deceiued because it is harder to make all things of nothing then being made to guide and gouerne them Again how should God be almightie if there were any thing which he could not doe and how infinite if thou didest know the ends of his power Therefore the Lord can guide all things If thou shalt say he can but will not then thou deniest his mercie and wisedome for mercie euer extends aid vnto others and wisedome directs al things to a certaine end And therefore God being almightie goodnes and wisedome it selfe it must needes follow that al things are gouerned by him Reas 3 Thirdly we count Prouidence in man an excellent thing for the more prouident the more in that respect commended Now whatsoeuer is good in our selues which yet notwithstanding is in vs but by measure and in part the same is originally and infinitely in God Therefore since experience doth teach vs that he hath giuen euerie thing a naturall instinct of caring and prouiding for things vnder them how can we bereaue God of this honour due vnto his name Reas 4 Obserue the goodly order and harmony of euery thing one ruling another ruled one in authoritie another subiect vnto it they not so excellēt to those that are more excellent those which haue no life to those that haue life the vnreasonable to the reasonable the earthly to the heauenly the heauenly host to the glorious Creator euer in subiection First the day then the night the Sunne continually running his race like a giant in the one the Moone enlightning the other neuer continuing in the full but alwaies increasing or decreasing After darknes comes light after a shower the sunshine after heate cold weather after a storme a calme The daies doe make the weekes the weekes the moneths the moneths the yeere In the yeere the spring followes the winter the sommer the spring the Autumne the sommer the winter the Autumne and then comes the spring againe These wee see keepe their perpetuall sucession and order And therefore it must needs follow that God by his Prouidence is maintainer of the same Reas 5 Fifthly we know that the Globe of the earth and the sea being compared with the heauens are but as a pricke with a pen or as the appearance of one of the least starres and yet the earth not to bee measured nor the sea to bee compassed the Sun causing the seasons of the one and the Moone ruling the tides of the other Now both these are guided by the course of the heauens and the heauens as wee all acknowledge by God alone and therefore by good consequence the sea earth with al things therein contained are gouerned by him Reas 6 Sixtly we see that Townes standing by the sea are not swallowed manie Islands compassed with the same are not ouerflowed yea Townes Islands and the whole world with the swellings of the Seas are cōtinually threatned and whence is it that they are not ouerflowed surely from Gods Prouidence who commands it that it shall not passe his bounds but running thorow the chanels of the Earth to comfort the bowels thereof afterward to returne to his place againe Reas 7 Seuently wee see that such beasts as might hurt man doe notwithstanding their rebellion caused by the sin of man goe single by themselues and haunt the couerts and caues of the earth making but small increase But such beasts as might benefit man how huge how strong soeuer come home vnto him submitting themselues by whole flocks and heards euen to little children and so encrease abundantlie And therefore since such things as might hurt vs flie from vs and such as bring profit and by whose liues our liues are maintained come home vnto vs it must needes bee that Gods Prouidence directing all things to our good doth cause the same Reas 8 Eightly suppose as it often fals out two sons to be begotten by one man borne of one woman brought forth at one time vnder one and the same motion of the heauens Esau and Iacob commonlie called Twins The one of these liues in a ciuil and honest maner and brings his hoary head in peace vnto the graue The other set on fire with the vehement heate of enuie thirsteth after blood murdereth his neighbour and and so receiues death the iust reward of his wicked fact What is the cause both being by nature the children of wrath Ephes 2.4 that both of them fell not into the like transgression Not diuersitie of seede for both were begotten by one man and both borne of one woman not diuersitie of the planets for they were both borne vnder one and the same motion of the heauens
end therfore is the Sonne of man made manifest that hee might dissolue the workes of the diuell Secondly man is the cause of sinne for after that it was conucied from Satan into Adam Maxey in his golden chaine in him it ariseth as out of a spring from this spring it is reserued in nature as in a conduit Rom. 5.12 from nature conueied to concupiscence as by a pipe which working in our corrupted natures causeth sinne and iniquitie to bee effected so that now because euery action hath his qualitie from the roote of the affection and from the intention of the next author therefore is sinne properly attributed vnto our selues as the causes thereof And therefore the Lord for the disobedience of his people Israel in not hearkening vnto him saith that hee gaue them vp vnto their owne hearts lusts Psalm 81. Genes 6.5 and they walked in their own waies And what are these waies of men Surely to haue all the thoughts of their hearts set vpon wickednes at all times Genes 8.21 To be inclined to cuil from our youth Iob 15.16 To drink in iniquitie as it were water To loue darknesse more then light Tit. 3.3 To bee vnwise disobedient deceiued seruing the lusts and diuers pleasures 1. Cor. 6.11 liuing in malitiousnesse and enuie hatefull and hating one another Rom. 3.4 Rom. 8.7 So that the wisedome of our flesh is emnitie to God for it is not subiect to the law of God neither indeede can be Hence it is that euerie man is tempted to euill of his own concupiscence Iam. 1.14 that Pharaoh hardens his owne heart Genes 8.16 that Israel and not the Lord Ierem. 5.3 Hos 13.9 make their faces harder theÌ„ brasse that what helpe they haue is from the Lord but their destruction from themselues for Deus est prior in amore God first offers grace Matth. 23.37 Luk. 13.34 he would gather them vnder the wings of his mercie but in that they are not gathered it is because themselues would not Therfore I conclude this truth with Paul In that men are the children of wrath it is from their corrupted natures for in that they transgresse Gods lawes they are moued and ruled therein by the Prince of the aire Ephes 2.2.3.4 yet so as that they follow the course of the world and are led by the lusts of their owne flesh which carrie them as directly in the paths of sinne as it is naturall to the birds to flie in the aire and to the fishes to swimme in the seas And thus it is manifest that sinne is iustly attributed wholly to Satan our selues to him as the originall and mouer to vs as naturally and desirously effecting what we are moued vnto for hee propounds a deceiueable price posteáque currentibus velocitatem addit and afterward helpes vs forward in the race of sinne wherein we are running as fast as we may The second point followeth That although in euery of our actions there are three causes and that euerie of these worke that which is good yet that it is from our selues that our actions are euill THat it may appeare how farre forth God worketh in euery of our actions and wherein the committing of sin doth consist I hold the handling of this point very needfull Touching the first part Three causes of euery Action which may bee propounded by way of obiection against the truth of the former position we acknowledge it a certaine truth that of euery of our actions there are three causes the first God the second common nature the third our will The first cause is of himselfe the second and the third proceed from the first God working by them â—nd they by a certain vertue strength â—eceiued from him The first being an â—bsolute good cause must needs worke only the which is good both in heaueÌ„ and earth The second considered as it proceeds froÌ„ the first namely God working by it it by a vertue receiued froÌ„ God is also good and so worketh naturallie in it selfe and in the parties vnder the same contained The third cause namelie our will considered as the second workes of the one nature as I haue alreadie prooued that which is good for Paul saith Rom. 2.14 The Gentiles which haue not the Law doe by nature the things contained in the Law So that it is truth that these are the causes of euery action Obiect and that these causes worke that which is good Ephes 2.3 Rom. 3.4 and yet notwithstanding that we are by nature the children of wrath the wisdome of the flesh being enmitie to God Solution Mans estate to be considered tvvo vvaies Natural is twofold For the vnderstanding of this we must know that mans estate is to be considered two waies First as it was in Paradise pure and holie Secondlie as it is since our fall wicked and sinfull so that naturall is now twofold vel innatum vel agnatum either borne in vs as naturally proceeding from common nature Common nature good or else borne with vs ouer and aboue nature the first is good being that which God created The second euill because it is a corruption and wicked inclination added vnto nature by the fall of Adam The corruption of nature euill How corruption is become naturall Hovv our actions are good Hovv euill which by reason of the generall infection of euery part and impossibilitie to haue it remooued is now become in vs as naturall as the former Yet those things which are naturally in vs as proceeding from common nature are good but as our actions are considered to come from this corrupted nature they are euill Common nature considered in it selfe as it proceeds from God doth only cause that from a man should proceede a man from a sheepe a sheepe from a Lion a Lion and so in particular But if you shall consider nature according to the next meanes it worketh by and as it is by that meanes stained and corrupted then doth it cause that from a leaper should proceede a leaper from one troubled with the palsie one subiect to the palsie from a nature corrupted with sinne a creature defiled with iniquitie Genes 2.3 Adam at first was free from this corruption of sinne and had he not tasted on the forbidden fruit no doubt his posteritie had remained in the same condition but after his disobedience he was infected with this corruption and so in that respect that he was the next meanes of him which succeeded him and his son the next meanes of him which came from his loines and so all considered as they come from their next parents euen from Adam vnto themselues by an ordinarie succession as Adam begat Sheth Sheth begat Enoch Enoch begat Kenan Kenan begat Mahalaleel and so in particular til thou commest to the next cause of thy selfe namely thine owne parents hence it is thou art corrupted for in that respect thou wast
gall his face polluted with spitting his cheekes bruised with buffeting his knees shiuering his shoulders shaking his heart grieued his bodie and soule tormented his ioints racked his hands and seete nailed his sides pearced Lord will not the seruant suffer willinglie for his master when his master hath patiently endured all this for him Nihil adeò graue est quod non aequanimiter toleretur si Christi passio ad memoriam reducatur Gregor hath not the righteous suffered for the vnrighteous and shall not the vniust for the iust hath hee willinglie endured all for thee and wilt not thou patientlie endure a little for him was he content to suffer wholly for thy good and walt not thou in patience suffer for thy owne but howsoeuer afflictions are hard to flesh and bloud yet nothing is so grieuous which will not patiently be borne if these torments of Christ be called to remembrance these were non tantum mira dura sed otiamindigna Gessit mira pertulit dura nec tantum dura sed etiam indigna August not onely wonderfull and grieuous but considering Christs person vnworthie to be suffered but that thou being a sinner shouldest be chastised for thy sinne and corrected that thou mightest amend it is no indignitie at all Exod. 15. Therefore if the water of affliction seeme bitter cast in that sweet tree the crosse of Christ and it will bee pleasant vnto thee The serpent lift vp in the wildernesse Numb 21.9 cured those which loockt vpō it so though men are stong with the fierie persecutions of tyrants yet if they behold Christ Iesus lift vp vpon the Crosse for our sinnes we shall not die but liue possesse our soules in patience 2. Consideratiö of our selues Non sine flagello exist qutisine peccato venit tamen patiens erat He which came into the world without sin went not out of the world without the whip and yet he patiently endured the same shewing that we which came into the world full of sinne and euer since liued vilely should deseruedlie looke for correction and when it comes endure it patiently And this is the second consideration namely of our selues A man faults not the sharpnesse of the Chirurgions knife when he considers the corruption of his sore and that it must needs bee launced the sicke patient willingly takes in the bitter potion when he findes his disease grieuous so if wee consider the corruption of our soules we desire to be launced with the knife of correction if we consider how sicke we are of sinne wee will willing lie take in the bitter potions of affliction that as a preparatiue they may make way for that pretious balme of the blood of Christ to cure vs. These things considered if the Lord should kill vs yet let vs trust in him if thy house shall be a place of correction and that from the day of birth to the day of death if the yoke shall not be taken from thy necke nor the staffe from thy shoulders yet endure patiently willingly and gladly Sola suga victoriam perdis moriendo non perdis This priuiledge hath Patience that although it is alwaies in the combat yet it euer returnes victor And therefore Vincentius said to Datianus that hee could preuaile more by being persecuted then this other by persecuting Nor doth it only triumph in euerie thing but also gaine by all things The barrennesse of the field doth fill his barnes when there are fewest grapes Manifested in Job his cellers are most full when these takes from him hee addes vnto him when the fire burnes his cottage it builds him a castle And thus doth Patience conquer and gaine in all things and in and through him Gods children shall gaine here and triumph euer in the life to come Vse 11 Further whereas all aduersities and crosses both in vs and in ours come from God as the sole inflicter of them wee are hereby also taught when the hand of God is vpon vs either of these waies to haue recourse wholly vnto him for helpe and remedie This is his owne commandement Psalm 50.15 Numb 11.1 Ios 7.7 1. Sam. 7.6 2. Sam. 24.10 Call vpon me in the time of thy trouble and I will beare thee and thou shalt glorifie mee This is the practise of the Church Moses for himselfe and the Israelites Ioshua for himselfe and the people Samuel Dauid Ezechias Asa Esras Nehemiah leremias Daniel 2. King 19.15 2. Chro. 14.11 Esdr 8.21 Nehem. 1.11 Dan. 9.3 Mark 1.4 Matth. 8 5. Act. 9.40 Lament 5.1 Matth. 26.39 Prou. 18.10 the Leper the Centurion Peter the whole Church and Christ himself whē any afflictions befell them euermore had recourse vnto God that inflicted them This is grounded vpon reason He maketh the wound and bindeth it vp he smiteth and his hands make whole therefore seeke vnto him his name is a strong tower and therefore he can helpe hee respects vs as the father his sonne as the mother her infant and therfore when the righteous runne vnto him whose mercie and power meete together they shall be sure to be exalted He is that wise Physitiō which knowes our diseases which hath a world full of potions if he please to vse them which can help vs without them if it seeme good vnto him which is as readie to come Seekers vnto witches condemned as we are to send which is neuer so detained by others but that he can attend vs nor comes to vs for his own gaine but for our profit and therfore in all our afflictions let vs seeke vnto him Hence is condemned that vile and damnable practise of many who for the curing of themselues sauing of their cattell or finding of that which is lost will presently forsake God haue recourse vnto the diuell by his seruants the Witches which how foolish and wicked it is may appeare by that which hath been said alreadie as also by these reasons following Reas 1 First because it is directly forbidden by the Lord Isai 8.19 Aske no question of the dead but turne vnto the law and the testimontes Nor doth God onely forbid it but also seuerely punish it Leuit. 20.6 Manifested on Theodotus Euseb lib. 5. cap. 14 and on Buddas Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 17.2 If any turne after such as worke with Spirits and after Southsayers to goe a whoring after them then will I set my face against that person and cut him off from among his people Secondly man hath in his diuine reason found it abominable and censured it very strictly as it appeares by the decrees of Constantius Can. 26. Quest 5. of the Extrauagants and the most commendable and worthy lawes of this Common-wealth Thirdly from a cause simply cuill can proceed no good and therfore witchcraft proceeding from the diuell as it may it may appeare in that it will endure neither light nor triall must needs bee wicked and by consequence those also