are appointed and therefore seeing the judicialls prescribe the equity of judgements which is a part of the Decalogue we must be bound to that as we are to the rest of the Decalogue viz. so farre as they containe a generall equity though we are not tied to the formes of the Mosaicall politie Now Christ saith Matth. 5. 17. he came not to destroy the Law but to fulfill it which words are comprehensive of the Judiciall Law as for the substance a part of the Moral Law the Iudicial being indeed an Appendix and a more particular explication of that part of the Morall Law concerning matters of Iustice and judgement and therefore must be understood by Christ to be established 2. Though there be many pregnant proofs in the New Testament for abolishing the Ceremoniall Law yet we nowhere read in the New Testament of making void the Iudiciall Law concerning the punishing of sinnes against the Morall Law in the number of which are Idolatry Heresie Blasphemy Now these Iudiciall Lawes being the Lawes of God and by his revealed will once settled they must needs so farre forth remaine as they appeare not by his will to be repealed They who hold the Magistrate under the Gospel is not bound to punish for such sinnes must prove from the Scripture those Lawes of God revoked and cancel'd which none of the Patrons of Toleration have ever yet done 3. The substance and equity of the Iudiciall Law remains in that Christ and his Apostles make use of transfer and prove by some Iudicial laws divers things under the New Testament Christ makes use of a Iudiciall Law concerning punishment Matth. 5. 38 39. An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth viz. that of poena talionis Exod. 21. 24. and frees it from the false glosse and interpretation of the Pharisees in which he teaches the Iudiciall Lawes of Moses understood in their right sense are to be observed in the New Testament For if Christ in that Sermon of which this is a part would teach the Decalogue belonged to Christians by his vindicating it from the false interpretations of the Scribes and Pharisees then it followes hee meant to teach the Iudiciall Lawes of Moses concerning the punishment of Morall transgressions belonged to them also because he vindicated also one of them of which particular with the proof of the consequence the Reader may finde more in Piscators Appendix to Exodus The Apostle Paul 1 Cor. 9. 9. 1 Tim. 5. 18. among other proofs brought by him from fimilitudes fetched from the common use of men that the Minister of the Gospel ought to be maintained of the Churches charge whereas they might object those were but humane reasons he alleadgeth as the eternall Law of God one of the Iudiciall Lawes of Moses which was that a man should not muzle the mouth of the Oxe which treadeth out the corne where 't is manifest he doubteth not to bind the conscience of the Churches unto the equity of that Law which was judiciall likewise from the 13. verse of those that minister about holy things and wait at the Altar living of the things of the Temple and being partakers of the Altar hee concludes that they which preach the Gospell should live of it Now this maintainance of the Priests albeit in the manner of provision it be held by many ceremoniall yet as it was a reward of their service due by men as the punishments also if they failed in their duties was meerly judiciall So the equity of that judiciall Law Exod. 22. 2. Of the smiting of a theife in the night that he dye is approved by Christ Matth. 24. 43. So Christ and Paul both transferre that judiciall Law of having two or three witnesses in judgement Deut. 19. verse 15. to bind Christians in their Ecclesiasticall censures and judgements Matthew 18. verse 16. 2 Cor. 13. verse 1. 1 Tim. 5. verse 19. By which instances and some other particulars that might bee given 't is evident that in those judicialls to all the circumstances whereof we are not bound wee are notwithstanding bound to the equity of which the Reader may read more in Cartwrights second Reply to Doctor Whitgifts second Answer pag. 98 99 100. 4. That God appointed under the Law Blasphemie Apostasie Idolatry Prophecying lies in thename of the Lord to bee punished by the Magistrate proceeded from Gods holinesse justice infinite hatred of such sinnes and from their nature being so contrary to his nature so derogatory to his honour and glory high treason against the Supreme Majesty so destructive to the precious soules of men so dangerous to Common-wealths and Kingdomes as the Scriptures in divers places where these Lawes of punishing are set down assignes these causes and reasons Now I would know of the Patrons of Toleration whether under the Gospel these finnes of Blasphemy Apostasie c. be not as much against Gods holinesse justice glory as pernicious and damnable as they were under the Law yea and in some respects more as being against the Declarations of the Sonne of God Hebr. 2. 2 3. and a treading under foot the Sonne of God and counting the bloud of the Covenant an unboly thing which being granted punishment by the Magistrate must needs continue The rule of just and unjust in God and in his Law is alwayes the same and immutable It is as equally just to punish evill things as to forbid evill things and therefore the right and Law of punishments is also immutable Where and of what things the causes are perpetuall there also the right is eternall and immutable but the grounds and causes why such offences were punished as Gods justice holinesse glory c. are perpetuall and eternal God is alwayes like to himselfe the morall transgressions of men doe alike at all times displease him no good reason can be given why the Majesty of God should be of lesse account with us then heretofore among the Iewes and therefore by the like reason to be punished now as well as then But the further proof of this the Reader may finde in some learned Divines Beza de Haereticis à Magistratu punieâ—â—â— 155. and in Tremellius and Juniâ—â— Preface before the Books of Moses 5. The Iudiciall Law concerning the punishments of â—iâ—kednesse for the substance viz. that it should be punished remains under the Gospel because it comes within the nature of the Morall Law and was prescribed to the Iewes not quae Iewes or a people peculiarly taken into Covenant but qua men subject to the Law of nature as other Nations were For the proof of which besides the judgement of divers learned Divines Philip Melanctoâ— Peter Martyr Zanchius Aâ—tingius the reason of common right from the proper peculiar right of the Iewes is known and distinguished by these following particulars 1. If the same things have beene also found to be concluded and by civill sanction established by other Law-givers from the light of nature 2. If
in matters of the first Table to be any otherwise meant by Musculus then in his sense of the abrogation of the Decalogue formerly expressed 2. The reasons of those commands expressed in the 13. and 17. chapters of Deut. concerning putting to death false Prophets Apostates c. whether taken from the nature of the things themselves to which drawn or the nature of the persons guilty Seducers or the common condition of the sons of men shall feare and do no more so c. or the end of punishments putting away evill to which of them soever we look they have been were and are stil the same always of a like nature and force both before the commands were given by Moses in Moses time and now under the Gospell and therefore the reasons of those lawes being perpetuall and universall not abrogated by Christ neither are the lawes themselves of which though I gave a touch of it in pag. 50. yet I shall here further cleare it T is a rule given by many Divines in such sentences as these Tale praceptum qualis ratio praecepti Ratio immutabilis facit praceptum immutabile Vbi ratio legis redditur moralis ibi â—ex ipsa est moralis Officia illa omnia sunt moralia et immutabilia quae rationes morales immutabiles habent sibi annexas Now though this rule is liable to Exceptions and holds not universally as in Levit. 11. 44. Some speciall determination may be confirmed by a generall reason and the immutable nature of the law-giver hath its place and vertue in appointing mutable commands Yet where the reasons of a law ex natura rei not meerly ex instituto are perpetual and universal and the duties following from those reasons founded thereon the special inward and proper reason of such a command being morall and perpetual there alwayes it followes that law is morall and perpetual of which the Reader may bee further satisfied in Ames Cases Consc lib. 5. cap. 1. Quaest 9. and his Medulla l. 2. c. 12. Now the speciall inward and proper reason of that command Deut. 13. so shalt thou put the evill away from the midst of thee is juris moralis naturalis and therefore so is the command itselfe For a conclusion of this that these lawes of punishing Idolaters false Prophets c. were not properly judiciall lawes nor abrogated by Christs comming le ts take notice that that distinction of the judiciall law from the morall viz. the morall law was given of God publikly declared by his voice twice writ in tables of stone but the judiciall was afterwards delivered to Moses and by Moses to the people without any such solemnity is no exact nor perfect one For many of the laws not expressed in the Decalogue but delivered afterwards among the judiciall as about restoring the pledge of weights and just measures of giving the hire to the laborour and many other such like are no more judiciall or lesse morall then thou shalt not steal Yea such commands are transferred to the times of the Gospell as that of Levit 19. 17. to Matth. 18. 15. and Luke 17. 3. and therefore though these commands of punishing Blasphemers Apostates false Prophets c. bee not expressed in the Decalogue but added after yet they may bee no more judiciall then the third and fourth Commandement And therefore the most accurate distinction that is given by Divines between judiciall lawes properly so called and those lawes numbred among the judiciall is this those were properly judiciall lawes which had a singular respect to the people of the Jewes so as the reason cause and foundation of them was placed in some peculiar condition of that people But those lawes which were wont to be reckoned among the judicials and yet in their reason had no singular respect or relation to the condition of the Jewes more then to other people all those are of morall naturall right common to all people of which distinction with some other particulars about the nature of the judiciall law and how farr it binds Christians under the Gospell I referre the Reader to Ames Cases of conscience the fifth Book chapt 1. De Jure and to Zepperus explanation of the mosaicall lawes chap. 5. who shewes two extreams of men in that point one in the excesse holding all the judiciall lawes promiscuously in force others in the defect holding them all and wholly abolished but holds the middle way between both viz. what ever in the mosaicall lawes hath an immutable and perpetuall reason and nature by common right immuâ—ably and alwayes as by an adamantine chaine binds all men in all times and places But whatsoever hath an implied reason and condition of change does no longer bind the consciences of Christians Zepperus also in his first Book chapt 12. of the mosaicall lawes answers at large the places brought by Minus Celsus Senens and others out of Musculus Luther Calvin Zanchius and others for the abrogation of these lawes showing they are understood only of those things that peculiarly belonged to the commonwealth of the Jewes and as given by Moses to the Israelites and not of such judicialls which either in the law of nature or Decalogue have their reason founded Now of this latter sort are all those commands for the substance of them for punishing the false Propheâ— Apostate c. as appears in the nature of those laws and the reasons of them for what singular respect or relation to the condition of the Jews hath taking the evill away fearing and doing no more so turning away from the Lord their God more then to the condition of Christians Thirdly As to Hagiomastixs affirmation page 43 that to prove by the law of God in the old Testament Deut. 13. c. that false Prophets Blasphemers c. may be bodily punished under the New Testament is all one as if a man should go about to prove that the man Moses is now alive by this argument viz. because hee was alive under the old Testament I answer 1. Moses is alive under the new Testament as God said in the bush to Moses I am the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob so God is the God of Moses as well as of Abraham c. Now God is not the God of the dead but of the living Matth. 22. 32. compared with Mark 12. 26 27. 2. Though Moses body be dead and buried by God in a Sepulcher that no man knowes of yet his Doctrine may be alive t is a grosse non sequitur that their Doctrine must be dead and buried whose bodyes are dead for then Davids Doctrine in the Psalmes the Prophets Doctrine yea the Evangelists and Apostles Doctrine should be dead they being now all dead as well as Moses and so all proofes brought for any Doctrine from Davids Psalmes the Prophets the new Testament may be thus evaded by saying we may go about to prove David the Prophets
Prophets does not only signifie Prophets as Arias Montanus observes upon that place but foolish speakers and vaine talkers such namely who are the cunning devisers of vaine discourses and by the subtil illusious of words doe catch the people such as Peter speaks of 2 Pet. 2. false Teachers among the people who with fained words deceive among others such especially who when they are confuted by learned men by plain places of Scripture being destitute of all abilitie and means by which to defend them errors that they may delude weak people insolently hoast they have the Spirit all their discourses being full of the boasting of the Spirit their prayers disputations speeches to the People all full of that for which they thinke they should be more beleeved then for all reason testimonies imitating therein Mahomet that Prince of Hereticks who when be could not prove the things he taught then he fled to the authoritie of the Spirit saying the Spirit revealed those things to him Now all sorts of Hereticks and false Teachers besides those Prophets who say let us goe after other Gods are vain talkers and deceivers as they of the circumcision and others Tit. 1. 10. 3 In this place is understood Hereticks and false Teachers as well as false Prophets who teach the following after other Gods from the effects that follow upon the thrusting thorow in the 4. 5. 6. verses so Gualther upon the place saith that it ought to be understood of false Teachers out of what followes it shall be manifest as from saying I am no Prophet I am an but bandman for man taught me to keep cattell from my youth c. That is they shall ingenuously confessé their ignorance that they ought to be sent to the Plaw-taile and to keep cattel rather then to continue any longer in the Ministrie of the Church And this is fulfilled in our age in many Papists who have left many fat Livings and preferments to embrace the pure Doctrine of the Gospel and â—â—bet in the Church of Christ by the labor of their hands to get their living then in the tents of Anti-Christ to enjoy the greatest means Now Papists and such others however they are false Teachers venâ— corrupt unsound Doctrine yet they are not of those who deny the true God and Christ and perswade to serve strange Gods So that by all these places of Scripture opened wee may see fully proved against Hagiomastixs assertion by warrant of Scripture many corruptions in matters of Religion besides false Prophets publickly teaching Apostasie to false Gods outwardly and bodily punished as private Seducers though they pretend not to be Prophets as persons seduced not seducing as those who would not hearken to but contemne the sentence of the supreme Ecclesiasticall Assembly as Hereticks and false Teachers and whoever would see more of these instances of Magistrates punishing for corruptions of religion in points of wil-worship Sabboth breaking c let them look back to page 27. 28 29 of this present Tractate Secondly Supposing there had been no other commands nor examples for Magistrates under the old Testament putting to death for matters of Religion then those named by Hagiomast of false Prophets Apostates Blasphemers which is not true as I have now shown in this first Answer and page 28. of this present Book yet these were sufficient grounds to justifie the Magistrates punishing in like cases and that upon these Reasons 1. In all Laws and commands for the better knowing their nature what they require and would have t is good looking into the causes and reasons of them why such Lawes were given by God from the cause of making the Law the mind of the Law-giver is to be understood T is a knowne maxime Ratio legis est mens legis the reason of the Law is the mind of the Law Now the reasons and causes of both those commands both against false Prophets as also private Seducers in Deut. 13. from 1. to the 12 are 1. the seeking to turne men away from the Lord their God and thrusting them out of the way which the Lord commanded them to walke in 2. The putting away the evill from the midst of them that others may hear and fear and do no more any such wickednes among them these are the Spirit and substance of these commands that those are to bee punished who when they fal from God themselves tempt others to the like defection and therefore are to bee made examples that others may not doe the like And therefore whoever seeks to turne men away from the Lord God and thrust them out of the way which the Lord hath commanded them to walke in they come within the compasse of these commandements although they doe not tempt to goe after the false Gods of that time and those Countries which the false Prophets then enticed them to for the reason of the Law is expressed in a universall forme against those who seek to turne men away from the Lord their God and to thrust them out of the way which the Lord commanded them to walke in as Beza observes and therefore to be in force against those in generall who doe fal from the true Religion and enticers also which is done other wayes then by falling to the strange Gods in those times that Moses writ in yea the command it selfe verse 5. in the letter mentions as speaking to turne men away from the Lord their God so to thrust out of the way which the Lord their God commanded them to walke in which certainly in the Scripture sense and acception includes other Apostafie and Idolatrie then of other Gods and I aske whether Israels worshipping the golden calfe and the ten Tribes worshipping the golden calfe at Dan and Bethel though they worshipped Iehovah in and by them were not a going out of their way which the Lord their God commanded them to walke in Secondly It is common and usual that in the commands concerning the worship of God and in other places of Scripture where the worship of God is spoken of there are Synecdochicall speeches intending and containing many other things of like kind and nature although not formally and literally expressed Eliah whe he complained of the whole Covenant of God violated by the Israelites expresses it by a part thrown down thine Altars and slaine thy Prophets The Prophet Isaiah prophecying of Egypts embracing the true religion saith Egypt shall sweare to the Lord of hosts under that expressing the whole worship of God The commands of God are exceeding large and broad comprehending many things under one Rivet in his explication of the Decalogue among other Rules hee gives for understanding of the commandements hath this that in all the Precepts of the Decalogue we must acknowledge a Synecdecâ—e in which one kind being propounded all under the same genus are understood But that that Synecdoche may be rightly explained before all things the Scope of the Law-giver in
grâ—sse then the Papists I referre the Reader to the Theses of learned Voetius De necessitate utilitate Dogmatis de saâ—stâ— Trinitate who fully and excellently proves all these particulars In the ancient Constitutions of Gratian Valentinian Theodosius Martian Iustinian Antitrinitarians are said Iewishly and Apostatically to contradict the Trinitie and the name of Christians is denied them Are not Anti-trinitatians as Paul Best that hath belched out so many reproachfull speeches against Christ and the Holy-Ghost Blasphemers in a high measure Are not they who doe not only speak evill of the Trinitie but teach others so to doe greater Blasphemers then those spoken of in Levit. 24. 16 Are not divers Anabaptists who have broached false Doctrines and foretold divers things to come as the day of judgement to be on such a day such a City or Country to be destroyed on such a day such a Citie or Kingdome to be given them of God and that by affirming they spake by Revelation and immediate inspiration of God false Prophets as well as those in Deut. 13. 2. Deut. 18. 20 22 In a word I shall conclude this with a passage out of * Beza De Haereticis a Magistratu puniendis brought by way of Answer to a like objection against Deut. 13. c Those Lawes are not now in force because there is no man now a false Prophet according to Moses definition that is who foretels any thing to come and teaches to worship other gods I answer that the mind of the Law-giver is to be understood from the cause of making the Law Because he hath spoken to turne away from the Lord your God Now there are divers publick Declarations of this defection of which although the Principall only and those which most commonly fall out be named in the Laws yet the very reason of the Law is expressed in a universall forme and therefore in the general oúght to be in force against those who doe fall from the true religion and sollicite others to defection whom in a generall word we call now Hereticks not false Prophets or dreamers of dreams or Sacrificers to other gods because that those out ward ceremonies and those gifts of Prophecie are ceased But though they be ceased notwithstanding neither defection nor the punishment of it is ceased Moreover I say those who interpret the holy Scripture wrongfully withdraw men from the true worship of God and so perswade them to the worship of other gods For t is necessary that all Doctrine which speaks of the worship of God if it be not of God it proceeds from the Devil Therefore he that receives it intertains the Devil and he that perswades the receiving it drawes away from God For Paul cals the Doctrines of forbidding meats and marriage the Doctrines of Devils Fourthly In the commands given by God either against such and such sins or for punishing in such and such sins without any stretching of the commands at all or interpretations at large many things not named must necessarily be contained as under generals the particulars as under one kind other kinds of a higher nature or of the like nature as under the male the female also and other such or else many common received Rules given by Divines for interpretation of the Decalogue and Scripture are to be rejected Yea many things that are evill and abominable are not forbidden in the Law of God There are many things may be instanâ—ed in out of the new Testament of which God showes his dislike which yet in the letter and particularly by name are not forbidden in any of the commands of the old Testament as Rom. 1. 26. with divers others that might be named and there are many abominations that have been are and may be committed even of things against the light of nature that are neither in the old Testament nor new forbidden particularly and yet certainly these things are forbidden directly and properly in the commandements and the commandements are not stretcht nor wyre-drawn by those who alledge such commands against such Practises If the Scriptures must set down particularly by name all the kinds and degrees of evils with the particular manner and way of doing them which the corrupt nature of man is capable of committing and al particulars of all kinds and manner of duties with all particular cases about punishments and all kinds and degrees of punishment belonging to all kind of offences that may fall out and that both in Civil and Ecclesiastical censures with the particular way and manner of proceeding in them all I suppose some hundreds of great volumes would not containe them all but that it might be said in this case as t is Iohn 21. the last verse of the things which Iesus did that if they should be written every one the world it selfe could not containe the Books that should be written And if there must not be an extension and interpretation of commands so as to hold such commands and places of Scripture forbid or enjoyne some things not particularly named how will Hagiom prove many things practised by Papists and Prelaticall men to be against the second command or against any command as the making Crosses for Religion Holy-Water Saints Reliques bowing at the name of Jesus Holy-Dayes Surplices Altar-Clothes with a hundred other Ceremouies and Inventions of men in the worship of God are these literally and by name forbidden in the second command or any other and may not the Papists and Prelates in all the texts of Scripture brought against their Wil-worship and Inventions of men say the very same to Hagiomastix and his fellowes that Crosses Holy-Dayes bowing at the name of Iesus c are not mentioned nor touched in any one word of those Laws under the old Testament given against Idolatrie But if any one will goe about to draw these words unto their Crosses c that cannot bee done by the proper force of the words but as Lawâ—ers speake per extensionem latamque interpretationem And it would be first well considered of whether every Law does admit of such extensions and if not every one which of them then does admit and wherefore and whether in the second commandement there are those things for which an extension is to be made Again I desire Hagiomastix and his compeers to resolve me these questions seeing there must be no extension of that command in Deut. 13. 1 5. nothing else commanded but what is in the letter of the Law Whether a false Prophetesse that should arise and endeavour to perswade to the worship of a false God and that by affirming she spake by the inspiration of some deitie and that her saying's were to be esteemed Oracles were not to be put to death by virtue of this command as well as the false Prophet and yet a Propheâ—esse is not in the text Whether that command Exod. 21. 33 34. of the owner of the pit into which his neighbours Oxe or Asse fell making good the
be remembred T is a frequent thing in the Prophets when they prophecie of Christs Kingdome to proclaime War to Idols and Images as in Micah 2 I will cause the Prophets to passe out of the Land he denounces destruction to the Prophets which is to be understood of false Teachers 3. I wil cause the uncleane Spirit to passe out of the Land that is all the workes of the Devil the uncleane Spirit often so called by which he withdrawes men from the true worship of God Upon which words Gualther writes The Prophet having spoken in the 1. v. of a full and absolute washing by Christs bloud both from original sin and the corruption of our nature under the name of uncleannesse and all actuall sins thoughts words and deeds under the name of sinne least any from hence should conceive a hope of carnall liberty and impunity he showeth this effect of the grace of Christ is yet to proceed further that by him also shall be taken out of the way from the midst of the Church whatsoever is against the true Religion and Word of God Zach. 14 20 21. In that day shall there be upon the bridles of the horses Holinesse unto the Lord and the pots in the Lords house shall be like the bowles before the Altar c. On which verses Gualter writes the summary meaning of all to be this That in those days of the Gospel all things shall be turned to the worship of God even those things which before have beene imployed to prophane uses and against him Now then there shall not be Holinesse unto the Lord written only on the forehead of the Priests but it shall appear eminently on the bridles of the horses And Horses are particularly instanced in Horses being in a special manner serviceable for War the horse is prepared for the battel saith Solomon to show that the Warrs under the Gospell should not be prophane and wicked such as are made by ambitious and covetous persons but such by which the worship and Church of God may be defended against wicked enemies by those whom God hath appointed nursing Fathers of his Church And such Warrs in times past Constantine made against Maxentius and Licinius and Theodosius against Eugenius and Arbogastus And for those words in that day there shall be no more the Canaanite in the House of the Lord of Hosts he showâ—s Canaanite signifies Merchant and that the Prophet speaks of those who sell and make merchandise of holy things as the false Teachers in Peter who made merchandise of the people These are to be driven away far from the Church because they both corrupt the worship of God subvert the faith of the simple and make void the merit of Christ these Christ sets not upon only with words or with denouncing woes but with a whip made of small cords as impudent greedy dogs he câ—sts out of the Temple with publick disgrace By the Canaanite or Merchant in this place the Prophet seems to have a special relation to the abuse of merchandizing and selling which was used in the Temple Matth. 21. 12. 2. John 15. Malach. 3. 2 3 4 5 the Prophet in this chapter prophecying of Christs comming into the world least men in his comming should pâ—â—â—â—ise to themselves an earthly Kingdome and a lawlesse Libertie of doing any thing without punishment he tels them what a one Christ is and for what end he comes and what kind of persons they ought to be who desire to be be saved by him Who may abide the day of his comming for he is like a refiners fire and like fullers sope and he shall fit as a refiner and purifier of silver and he shall purifie the sons of Levi and purge them as gold and silver c that is as those who deal in mettals doe not cease to melt and purge their mettals til they see all the drosse taken away nor fullers leave to wash and rub the garments till all the spots and dirt be washed out So Christ doth not cease using his fire and fullers sope till we be sanctified and cleansed throughout The use of this Doctrine to us ought to be least we abuse our pretence of beleeving in Christ to a Libertie of sinning but rather we should give our selves to him to be purged that we may be made such as he would have us to be But of the scope of the Prophet in these verses and how severe Christ under the Gospell will be against transgressors of the first Table as Sorcerers false Swearers under the last of which are contained all those who abuse the name of God that they may deceive others not only those who in Civill matters and bargains falsly pretend the name of God but also such who in teaching abuse it and vent the fictions of their owne brains for divine Oracleâ— the Reader may find more in Gualther upon the place So 2. The new Testament speaks of Christs comming to destroy the workes of the Devil 1 John 38. among which false Doctrins Antichristianisme and seducing are spoken of by the Apostle in that Epistle and the foregoing chapter as cheife and Christ is brought in Revel 2. 18 20. described in a most terrible manner speaking against Toleration of Heresies Thâ—se things faith the Son of God who hath his eyes like unto a flame of fire and his feet like fine brasse I have a few things against thee because thou suffirest that woman Iesabel which calleth her selfe a Prophetesse to teach and to seduce my servants as also Christ and his Apostles in the new Testament in severall respects speak more against false Doctrines Herefies false Teachers Seducerâ— then against corrupt manners Neither can it be put off by saying that under the new Testament Christ hath brought Libertie a part whereof is the Toleration of Heresies c for the Apostle in Gal. 5. 1. where he exhorts Christians to stand fast in the Libertie wherewith Christ hath made them free expresly declares verse 13. this Libertie is not to be used for an occasion to the flesh which it must needs be if this Libertie were a Libertie of Heresies heresies being named in the same chapter a worke of the flesh verse 19. 20. Master Cartwright writing of certaine judiciall Lawes that cannot be changed as of putting to death a contemptuous Blasphemer and stubborne Idolater speaks thus of this pretended Ground of Christs comming As for that they alledge the cause of this Libertie now they are not to be put to death by reason of the comming of our Saviour Christ and his passion t is a weak one and injurious unto the comming and death of Christ for he appeared that he might destroy the workes of the Devil this makes our Saviour Christ to build againe that Kingdome of sin which he hath destroyed For when in common reason and by the manifest word of God the Lord giveth this blessing unto the punishment of such greivous offenders by death that
before Moses from this command of God used this sword And this law therefore God inserted in the Israelitical laws which is not now taken away by Christs coming as a mosaicall coaction because Christ abrogated not the policie and law of nature Musculuâ— in his common places De Magistratibus shewing the Magistrates coercive power in matters of religion to be so manifest a truth as that the heathen could nor be ignoraÌ„t of it concluds t is to be much more acknowledged by Christians neither is it that any man should say it s not for us Christians to harken in points of religion what the light of our nature dictates unto us but what the Scripture speaks to us of which are given for that end that we may be instructed to every good work For although in those things which concerne the mysteries of our Faith the Law of nature is not to bee consulted with but rather the Scriptures yet also-those things ought not to be contemned which by God are written in our â—earts by nature as is that law of nature whose direction both the Prophets Christ and his Apostles commend to us Is not that power which fathers have over their children of the law of nature which the Scripture also confirms And who wiâ—l deny that it specially belongs to Parents to bring up their children in true religion and the feare of God In Abraham this was praised Gen. 18. Now if wee consider the Magistrate what is hee otherwise to be accounted of then the supreme Father of all his subjects whose power is much greater then of a Father over children and therefore it belongs more to him then to a Father that be should take upon him the care of Religion and among â—is subjects set it up As for Musculus Authority which is so much urged by Minus Celsus Senenfis Sect tertia page 183. that all the judiciall lawes are by the Gospell wholly antiquated and therefore those of Deut. 13. Deut. 17. c. concerning the killing of false Prophetâ— Blasphemers I answer t is evident that is not Musculus meaning that under the Gospell Magistrates may not make lawes or punish for points of Religion for in many of his writings he pleads for this coercive power as in the second Psal verse 11. Serve the Lord with feare Let them note this place who deny kingly and saecular power that the Magistrate bâ—th to doe in the cause of religion The spirit of God admonishes Kings and Judges of the earth to serve the Lord. But hee understands it of that service which is due to the Sonne of God Let them answer here in what thing Princes ought to serve Christ if in religion there be nothing at all which ought to be done by them When therefore Princes by their power doe care that the Doctrine of Gods word be kept in the Church Idolatry and false worships taken away Ministers conveniently provided for and adversaries suppressed forbidding also that the name of God be blasphemed and â—aring that those who live godly may be safe but the wicked and turbulent may be punished do they not serve Christ then So in his commentaries on the fifth of the Gal. 12. verse he is for cutting off false Teachers by the Christian Magistrate which Mr. Goodwiâ—â— page 74. of his Hâ—giomastix confesses of him So in his Common Places De Magistratibus and De Haeresi hee pleads for at large the coercive power of the Magistrates in matters of Religion and particularly of restraining and imprisoning Hereticks yea in case they be blasphemous against God of cutting them off by death For saith hee the law of God doth not suffer a Blasphemer to live By which testimonies of Musoulus and divers others that might be taken out of his writings t is apparent whatever his meaning was of the Abrogation of the whole judiciall law it could not bee that all the commands concerning the Magistrates coercive power against Hereticks false Prophets Blasphemers were by the comming of Christ wholly taken away For whereas Musoulus his expresse judgement is though against the Magistrates cutting off by death a simple Heretick for putting to death blasphemous Hereticks his proof is the law of God doth not suffer a blasphemer to live which law was given by Moses as well as those in the 13. and 17. chapter of Deut. and I find no law spoken of or example recorded in the new Testament for putting Blasphemers to death but what hath immediate reference to that law in Lâ—vit 24. 16. or was founded on the law of nature common to all Nations Now for that abrogation of the mosaicall law in Musâ—ulus common places de legibus spoken of by Minus Celsus Senensis t is not of the abrogation of the judiciall law only but of the morall also which is equally pleaded by Musculus in that chapter and yet t is well known that Musculus was no Antinomian So that however he differed in the way of his expressions from other great Divines about the manner how the morall law in the ten commandements binds us Christians viz. not as delivered by Moses legally to the Israelites but as agreeing with the law of nature justice and equity commanding good just and holy things so far tying all men to observance Musculus explains his own meaning that the observation of the Decalogue did not belong simply to the Israelites alone but secundum quid in some respects as given by Moses upon Mount Sinai and as it contained the Tables of a Covenant made by God with Israel So farre it binds not Heathens nor Christiens but only Israelites But the things containeâ— in the Decalogue the matter of it concernes all The Decalogue so farr as to be under Moses and his Paedagogie doth not binde Christians but as it contains things agreeable or contrary to righteousnesse and the law of Christ t is in force to and therfore coÌ„mands the one and forbids the other Musculus saith he is so farre from condemning the use of the ten Commandements in the Church of God that he greatly praises their study and diligence who first brought that in for a part of the Catechisme of the Church So that notwithstanding any thing Musculus hath of the abrogation of the mosaical law Moses Laws for punishing Idolaters false Prophets Blasphemers are in force now for the generall equity and reason of them as containing matter agreeable to the rules of reason and justice as well as the Decalogue and indeed confidering what Musculus in his Tractate de legibus writes of the judiciall lawes that they are Appendixes of the morall commands inserted here and there in Moses writings and added for exposition of the Decalogue as also what he saith De Magistratibus that the Magistrates power in matters of Religion is of the light of nature nature dictates it and that the law is still in force against Blasphemers then wee cannot understand the abrogation of these lawes of Moses of punishing
the campe and let all that heard him lay their hands on his head and let all the Congregation stone him Thirdly the declaration of the mind of the Lord in these two examples was no Answer by Vrim for besides that there is no mention in the text of the high Priest being spoken to put on the Ephod to enquire by Vrim neither doe any Interpreters understand it so both the texts are against it in those words And the Lord spake unto Moses saying bring forth him that hath cursed And the Lord said unto Moses The man shall surely bee put to death the declaration of Gods mind being to Moses immediately whereas in the judgement of Vrim it was to the Priest immediately so that these Answers of God were the Answers of a Law-giver giving Lawes and Penalties by the hand of Moses but not any new Interpretations and declarations of the meaning of the Law upon controversies and doubts arising and besides Gods way of answering Moses and answering by Vrim were different things as the Rabbins and other learned men who write of those things show Gods answering Moses and giving him Lawes and Commandements being by voice but answering by Vrim being in an other way by beholding the Breast-Plate and seeing therein by the Vision or Inspiration as these Scriptures Exod. 25. 22. Numb 7. 89. Exod. 28. 30. with Ainsworths Annotations expresse As for the immediatenesse of these Answers from God to Moses though not by the judgement of Vrim there were speciall reasons thereof God in an immediate way communicating to Moses all his Laws morall and judiciall Exod. 25. 22. and Moses being such a Prophet whom the Lord knew face to face and such an extraordinary man in severall respects as there was none like unto him Numb 12. 6 7 8. Exod. 33. 11. Deut. 34. 10 11. But for the Magistrates and Iudges that came after Moses to whom the morall Law and the Appendix of it the judiciall Law was given and delivered they were to proceed according to the written Law and there were in hard matters higher Courts consisting of a greater number more able to go to to determine what the lower could not then the highest of all the Synedrion at Jerusalem who were in all their judgements aboue morall transgressions to goe according to the Law of Moses as many Scriptures testifie Deut. 17. 11. c But no such Grounds after the whole Law morall ceremoniall and judiciall was published of immediatenesse of Answers from God to any of their Courts no not to the high Synedrion as to Moses who was to receive all for the first constituting of their policie according unto which all Courts and Iudicatures higher and lower were bound to goe Fourthly In these great and weighty cases of the Blasphemer and Sabbath-Breaker Moses did not presently passe sentence but made delayes put them in Prison till he knew the mind of the Lord and as for other reasons before alledged so for these following 1 to teach Iudges in matters of great weight of life and death not to be too sudden and hastie 2 in causes that are very hard to aske councell and to use all means to be well satisfied before they doe any thing In Ainsworths Annotations upon Numb 15. 34. the Reader may find the Chaldee paraphrazing thus This judgement was one of the foure judgements that came before Moses the Prophet which he judged according to the word of God Some of them were judgements of lesser moment and some of them judgements of life and death In the judgements of lesser moment of pecuniary matters Moses was readie but in judgements of life and death bee made delayes And both in the one and in the other Moses said I have not heard viz what God would have done For to teach the Heads or cheife of the Synâ—drions or Assises that should rise up after him that they should bee ready to dispatch inferior causes or money matters but not hasty in matters of life and death And that they should not be ashamed to inquire in causes that are too hard for them seeing Moses who was the Master of Israel had need to say I have not heard Therefore hee imprisoned him because as yet it was not declared what sentence should passe upon him Babington in his comfort Notes on Levit. 24. writes Moses although such a man yet will doe nothing hastily in judgement and especially touching life but he will be advised by God who then spake from betwixt the Cherubims Exod. 25. and Numb 7. But it followes not because Iudges and Courts of Iustice were to learne to be cautious and carefull in matters of religion for what they punish especially with death that therefore they may punish no violations in religion though expresly and directly against the word of God unlesse God doe immediately from heaven declare them Blasphemies c and such kind of Blasphemies which the Law intends death to And for a conclusion of my Answer to this Evasion of Master Goodwin of the judgement by Vrim in the cases of Blasphemie Idolatry Prophecying falsly the cleare reason why then they were punished with death but may not be so now that being ceased under the new Testament I shall say no more but this I challeng him among al the examples recorded in Scripture of punishing men with death imprisonment or banishment c for Blasphemie Idolatrie Prophecying falsly prophaning of the Sabbath marrying Idolatrous wives and other transgressions of Gods worship to produce any one Instance that by the Iudges or by the high Sanhedrin God was enquired by Vrim whether such and such facts were Blasphemie Idolatrie c and of that kind and nature intended by the Law as punishable with death or among all Classicall Authors Rabbins and others who have written of the customes of the Iewes of Vrim and Thummim of the Sanhedrin at Ierusalem to cite me out of them any passages that affirme the Iudges or the high Councel of Seventie at Ierusalem or the high Priest for them were wont in cases of Apostasie Blasphemie c. to enquire by Vrim and to passe sentence upon persons according to that Answer and not according to the law which if he cannot doe as I am confident upon serious search he cannot then the Reader may easily see what poor shifts this great Champion of the Sectaries is put unto to uphold his damned cursed cause of Toleration of all Religions and to elude the commands of God fore-named for punishing Blasphemers Apostates Idolaters and false Prophets Now among all who have written of the high Priest and of Deut. 17. 11 12. I find only some Papists going Hagiomastixs way as Tostatus Lorinus who from all places of Scripture of the high Priest drawing matter to the Pope for establishing his Authoritie doe from this place also that they may establish his Authoritie above the Scriptures and appeals to him in cases of Controversie as the sole infallible Judge speake of the
high Priest in matters of morall transgressions giving Answers by Vrim and not by the sentence of the Law So Lorinus upon the 11. verse according to the sentence of the Law which they shall teach thee saith that by the name of the Law in this place is neither necessarily understood the Mosaicall Law nor the holy Scripture but the sentence it selfe of the Judge as the pronounâ— infinuates the Hereticks would have it to bee a conditionall command of hearâ—â—ning to the Priests according to the Law that they might take away the Authoritie of Traditions and appeale to the Scripture alone Luther long since writing upon this place observed as much of the Papists And the Papists with a great deale of endeavour have drawn this place to their Idol that they might set up the Papacie So that by this it seems the Papists and Sectaries are agreed upon the same Mediums to set up the Pope and his Infallibilitie and a Toleration and Dispensation to beleeve and professe whatsoever men please Thirdly this cleere reason of Master Goodwin in his 36. Section of Hagiomastix against the old Testament Law being now in force for putting of false Prophets Blasphemers and Seducers to Idolatris to death upon which hee vapours and triumphs so exceedingly over the Anti Quaerists certaine striplings of the Assembly as hee by way of scorne terms them is so farre from fighting against the Magistrates punishing even by virtue of that old law for matters of Religion where hee is sure and certaine the things hee punishes for are Apostasies Idolatries Heresies Blasphemies and that hee is not mistaken as that in all such cases of certaintie and infallibility it establishes the Magistrates coercive power in matters of the first Table and is indeed a strong reason for it For if that were the formall cause and reason why Magistrates might then punish Idolatrie false Prophecying c. because they might infallibly know such a thing was Idolatrie c. and so bee out of danger of fighting against God then what things may bee as certainly known under the Gospel to bee Idolatrie false Prophecying Apostasie c the Magistrate may as well restraine I shall not need to prove the consequence because besides its own evidence that it necessarily follows Master Goodwin in expresse terms grant and confesses page 130. that for his part hee shall thinke it equall nd meet hee that shall doe presumptuously and not hearken unto what is by infallible Revelation from God should be put to death and the only ground brought by him in this 36. Section of denying this power to Magistrates now is their uncertaintie in matters of Religion the best Oracles that Magistrates and Iudges have to direct them in doubtfull cases about matters of Religion being men of very fallible judgements and every way obnoxious unto error and mistake and therefore to goe about to prove that the old Law is now in force because it was once given to the Iewes is as if one should prove that a man may safely and without danger walke among bogges and praecipices at midnight because he may well do it at noone day So that by Hagiomastixs owne confession what 's certainly and infallibly known to be Error Idolatrie Blasphemie Heresie may and ought to be punished by the Magistrate under the new Testament which is indeed a yeelding the question that Magistrates may punish under the Gospell in matters of Religion for that 's not the question what is truth and what is Error what is Heresie and what is Idolatrie and whether any thing can bee known certainly under the Gospell to be truth or no and how the Magistrates come to know it and who shall tell them which is truth that is quite another question but the question in hand about Toleration and the Magistrates coercive Power in points of Religion is supposing and granting there are many things certaine in Religion which he certainly knows and beleeves whether then the Magistrate may punish which upon this very question whether Princes have full Power to command for truth was well observed by Bishop Bilson long since in his answer to a Jesuite making this objection Yea But who shall tell Magistrates which is truth That is not this question When wee reason whether Princes may command for truth and punish error you must not cavill about the meanes to know truth from error but suppose that truth were confessed and agreed on and in that case what may Princes doe for truth If I should aske you whether Princes may revenge Murthers and punish thefts were this an Answer to say but how shall they know what Murther is and who be theeves No more when we demand what duty Princes owe to God and his truth should you stand quarrelling what truth is or how truth may be known The Princes dutie to God is one question which wee now handle the way to discerne truth from error is another which anon shall ensue when once this is ended But first let us have your direct Answer whether Princes may command for truth or no And then the Iesuite answering for truth they may but if they take quid pro quo they both hazard themselves and their whole realms Bilson replies you slide to the second question again before the first be finished stay for that till this be tried Now then to bring this point to ahead and issue Hagiomastixs clear reason grants that in cases about matters of Religion sure and certaine the Magistrate may punish in the times of the Gospel which directly overthrowes that universall Toleration so much pleaded for in divers of his Books so that Master Goodwin by his own cleer reason is forced upon this Dilemma either to hold no points in matters of Religion and Doctrine of faith can be certainly and infallibly known under the Gospel or if they can then the violations of such may by the Magistrate be lawfully censured And here in this matter I doe appeale from Master Goodwins wanton wit great applause among his Seduced Members and from all others his ingagements to the Sectarian partie to his conscience if so bee in this point of pretended libertie of conscience he hath any conscience at all left to resolve me this question whether Christian Magistrates under the Gospell may not by the Scriptures and other meanes that God hath given and appointed in his Church infallibly and certainly know that there is a God that this God is but one that the Scriptures are the word and mind of this God that this God is holy just good wise eternall omniscient omnipotent mercifull perfect that this one God though but one in essence is three in persons the Father the Sonne and the Holy Ghost that the Son was manifested in the flesh became man that he died for our sinnes according to the Scriptures that hee rose again from the dead ascended into heaven sitteth at the right hand of God shall come to judge the world that
men of very fallible judgements and every way obnoxious unto error and mistake Yea the wisest and most learned of them are not able cleerly or demonstratively to informe now what the Government of the Church was in the Apostles dayes what the duties of a Minister are to the People as how oft he must preach so that upon Hagiomastixs cleere reason in his 36. Section against the old Testament Law for Magistrates punishing Blasphemers Idolaters c whatsoever can be brought out of the old or new Testament in matters of dutie may be evaded and it may be said this or that was commanded or forbidden because then they had the high Preists Prophets and Apostles who were infallible and could determine all difficulties In a word if some dissimilitude that may be shown either under the old Testament or the new in the times or state of things there when those Commands and Rules were given from the times and state of things now may be a sufficient reason of the Rules and Commands themselves being now not in force then it will follow that all morall duties laid down both in the Law and the Gospel bind not us because the same dissimilitude or as great may be shown in whatsoever dutie upon any Ordinance of Christ or relation among men is propounded Upon this ground the Sacrament of Baptisme shall not be perpetuall not universall in the Church because of some differences between that time when Christ instituted it and the times now as Socinus thereupon held Baptisme an indifferent thing belonging only to the infancie of the Church in which out of a rude people and accustomed to ceremonies a Church was gathered to Christ So neither an outward calling and Ordination of Ministers shall be perpetuall because then there were Apostles and other extraordinary men who in ordaining them could conferr the gifts of the Holy Ghost and had the gift of discerning of spirits So all the commands given by Paul and Peter of servants obeying their Masters and being subject to their Masters with all feare may be evaded and they may say they concerne not us because the servants in those times were their slaves bought with their money at their dispose but wee are borne free as well as our Masters and then those servants in any commands doubtfull had Apostles or other infallible men to go to to be resolved which wee have not they being long since ceased and so I might goe over all examples and commands both in the old or new Testament Fifthly This cleere reason of Hagiomastix in his 36. Section and 130. page why Magistrates under the old Law might exercise coercive Power upon false Prophets Blasphemers c because in all difficult cases of Religion the Iewes to whom this Law was given had the opportunitie of enquiring by Vrim and Thummim of immediate consultation with the mouth of God himselfe by the high Priest seems not to be any reason upon these grounds First that reason is never expressed in those commands or examples for putting to death false Prophets Blasphemers Idolaters c. but other reasons are alledged viz. from the nature of the sinnes drawing away from God the putting away of the evill and that others may feare and do no more so with other such like all reasons of a common nature to the times now as well as then Secondly before there was a high Priest and holy garments made for him particularly the brest plate of judgement the Vrim and Thummim Exod. 28. 15. 30. the Law was given for putting to death Idolaters Exod. 22. 20. and in Jobs time long before the high Priest and in a Land where the high Priest was not enquired by Idolatry was an iniquity worthy to be punished by the Iudges 3. Those who were Heathens strangers in the Land of Judea that beleeved not in the God of Israel nor understood not what the judgement of Vrim was and the sentence thereof yet the Iewish Magistrates would not suffer such whilst staid among them to blaspheme God to worship strange Gods or to offer their children to Molech as appears in Levit 20. 2. and in page 49. 50. of this Treatise Fourthly the Magistrates exercised their coercive Power in matters of Religion as freely after Vrim and Thummim were lost and that judgement ceased as they did before which cleerly showes the enquiring by Vrim under the old Law was not the cause of those Lawes concerning punishing Idolaters and false Prophets being in force It is the judgement of most of the learned writers both Robbins and others that the oraculous consultation with the Breast-plate continued no longer then to the captivitie of Babylon Vrim and Thummim being lost at the captivitie of Babylon and wanting at the Peoples returne as these Scriptures show Ezra 2 63. Nehem. 7. 65 neither do we find that ever God gave Answer by them any more divers learned men who write of the Iewish Church and State and of the first and second Temple of Hag gai 1. 8. Haggai 2. 9. The glory of this latter House shall be greater then of the former show the want of five things in the second Temple which had been in the first 1. The Aâ—ke with the mercy seat and Cherubims Secondly the fire from Heaven Thirdly the Majesty or divine presence Fourthly the holy Ghost Fifthly And the Vrim and Thummim of which the Reader may see fully in Ainsworths Annot. on Exod. 28. 30. Now that after the Captivitie of Babylon Princes and Magistrates used a coercive Power for offences against the first Table is plaine by those instances Ezra 10. 7 8. of making Proclamation that all who had taken strange wives of the People of the Land should come unto Jerusalem for the putting them away and such as were borne of them and that whosoever would not come within three dayes according to the Councell of the Princes and the Elders all his substance should be forfeited c Nehem. 9. 38. Nehem. 10. and 13. chapters Nehemiab and other Rulers entring into Covenant for Reformation in the matter of the Sabbath strange wives maintenance for the service of the House of God and Nehemiah commanding and contending to have matters reformed in the worship and house of God yea restraining and hindring the Prophanation of the Sabbaâ—h and smiting some for marrying wives of Ashdod of Ammon and of Moah Yea the want of a Priest standing up with Vrim and Thummim by whom the Magistrates might enquire was so far from hindring Magistrates in punishing about matters of Religion that the quite contrary is expressed both in Ezra and Nehemiah Ezra 2. 63. Nehem. 7. 65. some Priests being put from the Priesthood and forbidden by the Governor to eat of the most holy things till their stood up a Priest with Vrim and with Thummim that is for want of Vrim and Thummim by which God might be consulted with and his mind known herein Zerubbabel the Tirshatha is commonly said to be
verses about false Prophets neither doe they give out signs or wonders to confirme their calling the parties instanced in the text being of daughters to Fathers Wifes to Husbands c were not likely so much as to pretend to them the name of Prophets speaking by inspiration of some deitie but rather drawing by their neernesse of relation intimatenesse of affection opportunities of private and constant converse which many phrases in those verses the wife of the bosome thy friend which is as thy owne soule entise thee secretly thou shalt not censent unto him neither shall thine eye pity and such like imply and yet these are commanded to be put to death as well as those Prophets who openly and bodily gave out signs and wonders to confirme their being Prophets of which the Reader may be further satisfied by reading Junius his Analytical explication on Deut. 13. And as Moses in that former part of the chapter showes plainly contrary to the affirmation of Hagiomastix and other Libertines that others who perswade men to the worship of a false god besides those who pretend themselves Prophets are to be killed so in the latter part of this chapter from v. 13. he layes downe how they are to be put to death also that are guilty of Apostasie that have suffered themselves to be drawn away from the true worship of God to other gods who are so far from comming under the notion of false Prophets endeavouring to perswade men to the worship of a false God and that by affirming they spake by the inspiration of some deitie as that they fal not under the Title of Seducers at all but the seduced and therefore Iunius writing upon this Deut. 13. analyzes the whole chap. concerning Apostasies into two First the Authors entising to Apostasie in the first 11. verses Secondly those who are guilty of Apostasie who suffer themselves to be withdrawn from the worship of God in the latter part of the chapter and he showes this is another part of the chap. in which Moses speaks not of those seducing false Prophets nor the clandestine Seducers but of those who yielded to their Seducements particularly of those who publickly to the view of all are Seduced and being in publick Order as a City rest in that Apostasie by the publick authoritie of men falling from God and openly defending that impietie So Deut. 17. from verse 2. to verse 8. sets downe a Law for putting to death those who are Idolaters and Apostates simply though they never went about to entice others Iunius upon this 17. c. observes that this Law differs from that in the 13 chapt the eleven first verses because there Moses speaks of Apostates who are Dogmatists and enticers to Apostasie but here of Idolaters simply In Deut. 17. from verse 8. to verse 13. there is a Law that in ecclesiastical cases in matters of Religion as well as Civil upon going from the lower Iudicatories to the supreme to the high Priest with the Colledge of Priests the man that would doe presumptuously and would not hearken unto the Priest even that man should die which was in other cases then Blasphemie Apostasie Prophecying falsly for it appears by the scope of that place and the stream of all interpreters that in too hard matters for inferior Courts they should goe to the High Ecclesiastical Synedrion and whoever presumptuously disobeyed their sentence according to the Law though in other things then the forenamed Blasphemie c as appears by this place verse 11. 12. speaking of the Law indefinitely with that 2 Chr. 19. 8 9 10 11. compared together mentioning what cause soever shal come to you of your brethren that dwell in their Cities between Law and commandement statutes and judgements should be put to death the ground of which putting to death here commanded was not only from the nature of these sins against the first Table of the highest forme as Apostasie Blasphemie and such like but for other sinnes in points of Religion though lesser when the sentence and resolution of the high Priest with his Colledges was presumptuously disobeyed so that the punishing of wilful scorneful contempt of supreme Ecclesiasticall Government determining doubts and Controversies according to the word of God though in other cases then Apostasie Blasphemie Prophecying falsly is here commanded But having spoken so much of this Deut. 17. already in p. 101. 102 103 104 105 135 159 160. I shal not enlarge further only I shal take my leave of this Scripture by adding a passage out of Master Cottons late Book against Mr. Williams in way of answer to an evasion of his that the capital punishment prescribed against the presumptuous rejection of the sentence of the highest Court in Israel was a figure of excommunication in the Church of Christ Unto which Master Cotton replyes That Law is of moral equity in all Nations and in all Ages Hee that shall presumptuously appeale from or rise up against the cheifest or highest Court in a free state is guilty laesae Majestatis publicae and therefore as a capital offender to be censured in any free common-wealth And certainly if that part of the Law in Deut. 17. of presumptuously appealing from or rising against the sentence of the cheifest and highest Court in a free State being punished with death be of universal and perpetual equitie then punishing so far at least as to restraine those who presumptuously rise up and contemn the sentence of the highest Ecclesiastical Iudicature in a Church going according to the word of God is of universall and perpetual equitie too and the command of God in that text for punishing is against the man that will not hearken unto the Priest as well as he that will not hearken unto the Judge Deut. 18. 20. sets downe a Law that the * Prophet which shal presume to speake a word in Gods name which he commanded him not to speak shal die as well as hee that shall speake in the name of other gods which place of Scripture proves expresly against Hagiomastix that other Prophets besides those that came in the name of false gods and with other false Doctrine then that let us goe after other gods which thou hast not known and let us serve them were to be put to death The command is indefinite concerning speaking any word in Gods name which he commanded not to speak which must needs extend further then a Prophet prophecying only of turning to another God for there were many false Doctrines and false worships against the Jewish Religion besides that of Apostasie to other gods Again the scope of the words and several phrases as if the thing follow not nor come to passe thou shalt not be afraid of him show t is meant of other Doctrine then saying let us goe after other gods namely of Doctrine foretelling of some things to come whereas enticing to goe and serve other gods is de praesenti Learned * Iunius writing
Gratian Theodosius and others who by publick Edicts did prohibit false Doctrines and did command all throughout the whole Empire to embrace the true Faith t is confessed by Master Burroughs himselfe The protection of their Civil peace is not sufficient to give them such a denomination of nursing Fathers and Mothers Upon which place Bâ—lson writes thus with this endeavour of Christian Princes God comforteth his Church by the mouth of Esay Kings shall be thy nursing Fathers c what Esay saith Princes shal do that I conclude Princes must doe because God would not promise they should usurpe another mans office but discharge their owne If you take the milke of Princes for temporall honours Lands and goods the â—ery Children will laugh you to scorne The Church of Christ is no wanton Church She lusteth for no worldly wealth which is rather harmful poison then wholesome food Gods provision for her is spiritual not carnall her delights are not outward in flesh but inward in grace The Prophet good man had no leasure to thinke on yoâ— farms demeans and Revenues no remedy you must needs yeeld us that Christian Princes in respect of their office not of their riches have received an expresse commandement from God to show themselves Nurses to his Church Now Nurses by nature must provide for their infants and defend them from danger ergo Kings and Queens in the new Testament are bound to tender the Church of Christ and by their princely power and publick Laws to defend the same from infection of Heresies invasions of Scismes and all other apparent corruptions of faith and good manners Zach. 13. 2 3. is a prophecie of the times and dayes of the Gospel as the context is cleare and is confessed by some Patrons of Toleration though put off and evaded that t is allegorical and figurative and meant of some one particular time only under the Gospel with other such like as the Posteript to Hagiomastix writes page 21. 22. all which evasions I had thought at this time to have fully taken of and to have cleared this text by many passages and Phrases in the context besides severall reasons that it must needs be understood literally and of all times under the Gospel but the troubles of the times call me of from my intended thoughts and preparations in this kind and shall reserve them if God will for a second part only I shall adde that divers learned Interpreters ancient and moderne as Theodoret Calvin and others hold the Prophet here alludes to Deut. 13. where God required such strictnesse in maintaining pure Doctrine that the Father should rise up against the Sonne whom he begat God would have all the godly to burne with such a zeal of defending the true worship of God and Pietie that no affinitie nor consanguinitie nor any other carnall respect should prevail to hinder the requiring of punishment upon their neerest friends in cases of violating the worship of God and corrupting sound Doctrine This was the Prescript of the Law But whereas for a time Religion had beene neglected yea troden under foot Zacharie saith that when the faithfull should repent they should bee endowed with such a desire of true Pietie as neither Father nor Mother should suffer wicked errors in their Sons And here t is to be observed that this zeale is approved of under the Kingdome of Christ for Zacharie does not here restraine this Doctrine to the time of the Law but showes what shall be when Christ is come namely that then again that zeale shall burne in the hearts of all the godly which was almost extinct It followes therefore this Law was not given only to the Jewes as many fanatical men imagine who would have a leave of disturbing the world but that this Law extends to us also Musculus speaking of things appertaining to the Classis of morall commands shows that many things in the Prophets writings belong thereunto and he gives this reason That in most things they were Interpreters of the Mosaicall Law And therefore Zacharie does here inter â—â—t that Law in Deut. 13. concerning false Prophets and Seducers to be in force under the Gospel The Prophets in their writings doe interpret and explaine Moses writings as the Books of Moses doe the Decalogue written by God in two Tables of stone and delivered unto Moses Deut. 5. 22. That in Deut. 13. is to be compared with this Zach. 13. 3. where we find the same things almost the same words used in a Prophecie of the times of the Gospel the meaning of which is not that his Father or Mother should presently run a Knife into him but that though they begat him yet they should be the means to bring him unto condigne punishment even the taking away of his life and so Master Cartwright speaking of this prophecie writes thus No power is given to one private man to kill another nor for the Private man to kill his children but this manner of speech is grounded on Deut 17. 7. where t is proved the Witnesse who accused should throw the first stone against the convicted persons ergo they ascribe the killing of the guilty person as belonging to the duty of the Accuser THESIS 20. In the Scriptures of the new Test there are clear grounds full proofes that Hereticks and false Teachers corrupters of Religion deserve to be punished corporally as well as spiritualy by excommunication and that Magistrates ought to punish in cases of Idolatry Heresie and such like as well as for transgressions against the second Table Now among many I shall lay down these following 1. That Christ and his Apostles being accused before Magistrates about matters of Religion as blasphemy being against the Law of Moses and such like they never pleaded for themselves that it was not lawfull to punish any man for matters of Religion but they defended their causes that they had not taught any thing against the word of God and the Law of Moses were not guilty of Blasphemy or Heresie so that they granted the major proposition namely that is was lawful for the Magistrate to punish Hereticks who taught against the Word of God but they denied the minor that they were Hereticks For out of the word of God they showed they were not Hereticks in that they taught nothing against the Word of God yea nothing but what had a proof in the Word of God But of this the Reader may see more in Zanchits Miscellanies De Magistratu page 173. 2. Christ in John 2. 14 15 16. made a scourge and drove out of the Temple those that made his Fathers house a house of merchandise which now false Teachers are said to doe 2 Pet. 2. 3. and t is the more observable that Christ who let the woman taken in adultery go away and did not punish her that would not divide an inheritance because his Kingdome was not of this world yet in the matter of his Fathers house did exercise
Apostles and Prophets in those Primitive times were infallible and immediately inspired of whose immediate infallibilitie how farre and in what way whether only in penning the holy Scriptures or how else whether ex hubituali asseâ—â—entia Spiritus or only de particulere assistantia Spiritus I shall speake at large in the second part of my Anti-Toleration in answering that Objection we have now no externall infallible Iudge yet all those they wâ—â—t unto in their Epistles every particular beleever man and woman were not neither are infallible not the Elect Lady and her children not all the beleeving Romans nor all those Christians to whom the Epistle generall of Iohn and Iude were written nor those Angels of the Churches of Pergamus and Thyatira nor Christians in our times to whom those commands and Rules are written and given by the Apostles as well as those who then lived for the Epistles did not concerne the times and the particular Churches and persons only to whom they were written as some wickedly affirme and yet these are commanded to stand fast in the Faith to avoid those who cause divisions contrary to the Doctrine which they have learned to prove al things are reproved found fault with by the Spirit of God for not censuring of Heresie false Doctrine c. which fully proves true Doctrine may be known from false false Teachers may be discovered and censured by persons not infallible and so the judging of what is Heresie Scism and who is a Heretick or a Scismatick and the punishing or not punishing of them depends not upon infallibilitie or fallibilitie of Spirit infallibilitie is not the ground of censure nor fallibilitie of non censure Thirdly The Apostles who were infallibly and immediately inspired yet in cases of Controversie arising in the Church and in censures and determinations thereupon did not act from infallibility and immediatenes of Answers from God but from Scripture grounds by way of reasoning and disputation deduced and in a Synodical way by the joint common resolution of Elders as well as themselves as is evident by Acts 15. Acts 21. 18 19 20 21. In that dissention that Paul and Barnabas had with certainemen that came downe from Judea about circumcision Paul and Barnabas were able to have determined it without their and others going up to Jerusalem to the Apostles and Elders Paul by his Apostolicall infallible Spirit could have determined as in Gal. 5. 2. Behold I Paul say unto you that if you be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing but the whole businesse is debated decreed and the decrees sent forth by Synodicall Authoritie determined according to the word of God and not by extraordinary immediate infallible inspiration of the Spirit the proofe of which seing the Reader may find so fully and largely in many learned Authors I shall spare to write anything of it So upon Pauls comming to Hierusalem Acts 21. and the offence that many thousands of the Iewes which beleeved and were zealous of the Law took at him Paul went not upon his own infallibilitie of Spirit or immediate Revelation but upon the joint councell and direction of Iames and all the Elders verse 18. 20 21 23 24 25 26. Now if the Apostles in judging of false Doctrine and Scisme censuring the Authors of these and imposing upon the Churches their Decrees to be kept all which are spoken of in Aâ—ts 15. proceeded not in the way of infallible immediate Revelation from God laid it aside as it were but in an ordinary way by Scripture reason experience upon and after much debate as is apparent from verse 6. to verse 30. then t is evident that immediatnesse of Revelation with infallibilitie of Spirit is not the sole judge of Heresies and Errors and the only just reason of inflicting punishments upon Hereticks and Scismaticks Seventhly besides the other false Suppositions laid down by Hagiomastix in his 36. Sect. as the enquiring by Vrim and Thummim in cases of Idolatrie Blasphemie as that Inallibilitie is the ground of coercive power c this also is false that he supposeth under the new Testament there is no Infallibilitie nor certaintie to be had in difficult doubtfull matters of Religion but that in those things we walk at midnight in comparison of those under the old Law who walked at noon day which assertion of the uncertaintie and darkenesse of the Church in points of Religion under the new Testament compared with the old is contrary to these grounds First to many prophecies of the state of the Church after Christs comming which speak that then the earth shall be filled with the knowledge of the glory of the Lord as the waters cover the Sea and the light of the Moon shall bee as the light of the Sunne and the light of the Sun shall be seven sold as the light of seven dayes and unto the manner of the Administration of the Covenant of Grace under the new Testament which however for substance was but one and the same under the Law and the Gospel yet for manner of Dispensation and Application differed and is various as many Divines show and one of the main differences between them in manner of Administration stands in this that the Covenant of Grace under the new differs from the old in Cleernesse and Evidence in that the Doctrine of grace and salvation by Christ and of faith in him together with the Appendixes is more distinct and expresse then before it was not being now under a vaile but beheld with open face 2 Cor. 3. 12 13 17 18. Secondly then the Church of Christ under the new Testament should be in a far worse condition then the Iewes were under the old for whereas they were sure and certaine in their Religion and had an infallible way of being resolved in all doubts Christians now should be in continuall doubts and uncertainties in matters of faith not knowing what to doe or whether to turne themselves which must needs be a most miserable condition and the Iewes case in the time before Christs comming in the flesh was to be much preferred before ours for the burden of being under the Pedagogy of the Law with a certaintie and infallibilitie of knowing what to hold and beleeve is a light burden in comparison of being freed from the Ceremoniall Law and in the meane time to be without all certaintie and assurance in points of faith and worship Who would not chuse rather to undergoe some burden with an infallibilitie and certaintie of Religion then to enjoy a Libertie from a Yoake with an uncertaintie and continuall feares Is not the bondage of feare worse then a bondage of ceremonies and many outward Legal observations If the deliverance of us from the Pedagogie of the Law hath brought us into this condition out burden is greater in this thing then any that the Law laid upon the Iewes Hath Christ delivered us from one burden to lay a greater upon us Have wee
not cause to say Lord let any burthen of the Ceremoniall Law be laid upon our necks rather then this Thirdly unto the end of Christian Religion and the knowledge of it as it is written in the Scriptures particularly of the new Testament which is that Christians may have consolation and hope in life and death Rom. 15. 4. 1 Epist John 1. 4. Now there can be no solid comfort without certaintie and assurance of the truth of the thing in it felse at least which wee professe but in doubts fears uncertainties the soule must needs be in perplexities anxieties as upon the rack Feare hath torment 1 Iohn 4. 18. But Secondly the infallibilitie and certaintie under the old Testament by Vrim and Thummim of the Priest so much spoken of and magnified by Hagiomastix above that under the new was as much liable to questioning and doubts by cavilling and contentious Spirits as the way under the new and many exceptions might be made and Controversies to arise whether those who were to give sentence in cases of Religion upon the Answer by Vrim did according as they received it from God or according to their own corrupt affection and interest which considering what many of the Priests were under the old Testament corrupt and partiall and the silent manner of Gods Answer by Vrim might give occasion of questioning yea Hagiomastix himselfe supposes and implies in some cases a possibilitie of a wrong Answer and doing injustice after consultation with the glorious Ordinance of the Oracle of God as these words show So that except those that were to give sentence in cases of Religion had been desperately wicked end set upon bloud and had despised the glorious Ordinance of the Oracle of God amongst them they could not doe injustice Now t is evident there were high Priests among them and such who had power of sentence in cases of Religion that were desperately wicked who either might passe sentence without enquiring by Vrim or else not goe according to Gods Answer by Vrim but according to the lusts of their owne hearts Whosoever does but consider these examples following recorded in Scripture both of the Priests and other men going flat contrary to the mind of God and immediate Answers from him will not wonder but be satisfied The Priests in Ieremiahs time were desperately wicked and set upon bloud even upon having Ieremiahs bloud pronouncing sentence upon him This man is worthy to die and Thou shalt surely die Jerem. 26. 8 11. and there were many complaints by Ieremiah Ezekiel and other Prophets of the Priests and cheife Priests being out of the way through strong drink erring in vision and stumbling in judgement saying to a stock Thou art my Father and to a stone Thou hast brought me forth c offering violence to the Law and Prophaning of holy things putting no difference between the holy and prophane hiding there eyes from the Sabbaths the chiefe of the Priests transgressing very much and polluting the house of the Lord which he had hallowed in Ierusalem Esay 28. 7. Ierem. 2. 27. Ezek. 22. 26. 2 Chron. 36. 14. Now if the Priests would doe all this when they degenerated offer violence to the Law say to a stock thou art my Father pollute the house of the Lord and much more that is recorded in the Scripture of them then there is no question to be made but they might pervert the sentence by Vrim and give an Answer quite contrary to what they received immediately and infallibly from God therby condemning the innocent and clearing the guiltie making that prophecying falsly as in Ieremiahs case which was Prophecying truly making that Blasphemie which was none Yea they are particularly taxed for erring in vision and stumbling in judgement which words probably may be meant of their judgement by Vrim the Priests Answers in that way being cald the judgement of Vrim and judgement in divers places of Scripture as Numb 27. 21. Exod. 28. 15 29 30. So that for all Hagiomastixs cleer reason if the Priests were corrupt and partiall under the Law as some good Priests in some particular cases might be and were as Aaron in the golden calse Eli in the matter of his sonnes Hophni Phinehas and wicked ones would certainly be the Iews might be in danger in matters of Religion to be punished unjustly then in those dayes notwithstanding their Priests had immediate and infallible Answers from God as well as Christians now under the new Testament besides if we consider what the way of Answering by Vrim was and that as distinguished by Rabbins and other Divines from some other wayes of Gods Answers not by a loud voice that all who came to enquire might heare the Answer as well as the Priest but in a silent way and manner revealed only to the Priest either by inspiration or by looking into his breast-Plate upon the darknesse or brightnesse of his Iewels by which he knew or by some letters in the breast-Plate in which he read the will of God and so by the Priest communicated to the Iudges and standers by but if the Priests would pretend other Answers from God then he gave how should the Iewes disprove them and what more certaintie had those who in difficult doubtfull cases came to the high Priest to enquire by Vrim seing they received the Answers not from God immediately but from the high Priest and the Priest might possibly deceive them in cases falling out about their own children or neer bloud showing partialitie and affection then may be had by us now in these times nay going according to Master Goodwins Principles that the sentence of the high Priest was by Vrim and not by the Law the judgement of Vrim from the Priest was the supreme and last Iudge in case the Priests would be false as in some particular cases they might the Iewes were in a more uncertaine and worse condition then if to be judged by the Law or wee in these dayes who if our Magistrates and Iudges should degenerate might appeale to the Scriptures and urge them to them whereby to convince them but so could not the Iewes according to Hagiomastixs Doctrine the Priest by Vrim being appealed to in cases where they suppose the Law could not helpe and lastly if wee consider how Prophets under the old Testament who were as immediately and infallibly inspired as the high Priest by Vrim yet in all their Answers and Dictates were not without all possibilitie of mistake as is evident by Nathans Answer to David 2 Sam. 7. 4 5. c nor without all danger of deceiving those they spake to as is to be seen in that example of the old Prophet in Bethel 1 Kings 13. 11 17 18 21. and divers other places of Scripture speaking of Prophets wee may easily conceive how Magistrates and Iudges then might be liable to error as well as now especially if they tooke all the Priests and Prophets said without comparing and examining